FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Would Scotland....
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Richer Now would an independent England be richer or poorer ? I can honestly see the amount of people outside Scotland bricking it at the thought of Scotland waving cheerio to the UK lol And dont give me we are subsiding you for Scotlands benefit birthday caird pish lol Why is it people in England that believe that subsidy pish do not wanna see that money spent on Englands local services and the NHS ? Are you really saying you wana help Scotland but dont wanna help your fellow Englishmen ? Away and dont talk pish lol " Why would it be richer? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Richer Now would an independent England be richer or poorer ? I can honestly see the amount of people outside Scotland bricking it at the thought of Scotland waving cheerio to the UK lol And dont give me we are subsiding you for Scotlands benefit birthday caird pish lol Why is it people in England that believe that subsidy pish do not wanna see that money spent on Englands local services and the NHS ? Are you really saying you wana help Scotland but dont wanna help your fellow Englishmen ? Away and dont talk pish lol Why would it be richer? " No i answered it your question now you answer mine | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Richer Now would an independent England be richer or poorer ? I can honestly see the amount of people outside Scotland bricking it at the thought of Scotland waving cheerio to the UK lol And dont give me we are subsiding you for Scotlands benefit birthday caird pish lol Why is it people in England that believe that subsidy pish do not wanna see that money spent on Englands local services and the NHS ? Are you really saying you wana help Scotland but dont wanna help your fellow Englishmen ? Away and dont talk pish lol Why would it be richer? No i answered it your question now you answer mine " Why do we believe England subsidised Scotland? Because the data tells us so. I believe in the UK, so I am happy that wealth is distributed from richer regions to poorer regions. This is normal. It happens in EVERY single country in the world. That's how the nation state works. So HOW would Scotland be richer if independent? Please provide your evidence to support your position. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Nah nae thanks i will wait fir you answering mine thanks " See the post above yours, I've answered your questions. I see you are too scared to answer mine though! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Nah nae thanks i will wait fir you answering mine thanks See the post above yours, I've answered your questions. I see you are too scared to answer mine though! " Nah you didnt Where is the answer to this question - Now would an independent England be richer or poorer ?.................. Or this Why is it people in England that believe that subsidy pish do not wanna see that money spent on Englands local services and the NHS ? Or this Are you really saying you wana help Scotland but dont wanna help your fellow Englishmen? Get answering then i shall answer yours | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Btw i know this was in the other thread but this shows the amount of pish and anti Scottish- ness there is in here "MPs across the UK decide what's best for the people of Scotland on some issues at least" So you saying English mps think they know whats best for Scotland fuck that bullshit!!! The people of Scotland decide what is best for Scotland Shove your Tory cuts up your arse Scotland dont want them Oh wait this is the point where people outside Scotland will say well mitigate them then too fucking feart to devolve real power to Scotland incase it shows the UK up lol " It's not anti Scottishness at all. It's just the constitutional arrangements of the UK. Interesting to see that you ignored the rest of my post though! Too mentally challenging for you? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Nah nae thanks i will wait fir you answering mine thanks See the post above yours, I've answered your questions. I see you are too scared to answer mine though! Nah you didnt Where is the answer to this question - Now would an independent England be richer or poorer ?.................. Or this Why is it people in England that believe that subsidy pish do not wanna see that money spent on Englands local services and the NHS ? Or this Are you really saying you wana help Scotland but dont wanna help your fellow Englishmen? Get answering then i shall answer yours " Sorry, my mistake, I missed that one. It would be poorer. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The problem in here is there is people outside of Scotland think you actually know whats better for Scotland than people actually living in Scotland Then trying to dictate terms when Scotland can have a referendum on independence Here is a nice juicy fact for you none of you outside Scotland get to decide Scotlands future And i know whats coming but but but but the Pm gets to dictate terms to when Scotland can have one sick as fuck that you actually believe the British empire is still alive and that we i Scotland are a colony fuck off with that shite Hell you had one dickhead on social media actually thinks Scotland is part of England lmao " Is it up to the people of Glasgow to decide what's best for Glasgow? I think that you will say "no" it's best for politicians all over Scotland to decide what's best for Glasgow (again, in some issues at least). So you want exactly the same set up as Westminster, just on a more parochial scale. But please correct me if I'm wrong. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So English mps you believe know whats best for Scotland ? And just to answer your question Yes it is upto the people of Glasgow to decide what is best for them And funny enough the people of Glasgow booted Labour oot of Glasgow City council as thats what was best for Glasgow hahahahahahaha " So Glasgow won't be part of an independent Scotland then? How about Stirling? Aberdeen? Edinburgh? Skye? None of the these will have decisions made for them by politicians from the rest of Scotland? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Nah nae thanks i will wait fir you answering mine thanks " He's provided an answer | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Btw i know this was in the other thread but this shows the amount of pish and anti Scottish- ness there is in here "MPs across the UK decide what's best for the people of Scotland on some issues at least" So you saying English mps think they know whats best for Scotland fuck that bullshit!!! The people of Scotland decide what is best for Scotland Shove your Tory cuts up your arse Scotland dont want them Oh wait this is the point where people outside Scotland will say well mitigate them then too fucking feart to devolve real power to Scotland incase it shows the UK up lol " Xenophobia alert | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So English mps you believe know whats best for Scotland ? And just to answer your question Yes it is upto the people of Glasgow to decide what is best for them And funny enough the people of Glasgow booted Labour oot of Glasgow City council as thats what was best for Glasgow hahahahahahaha So Glasgow won't be part of an independent Scotland then? How about Stirling? Aberdeen? Edinburgh? Skye? None of the these will have decisions made for them by politicians from the rest of Scotland? " Where did i say that ? You asked " Is it up to the people of Glasgow to decide what's best for Glasgow?" I replied yes its upto the people of Glasgow to decide whats best for Glasgow and i explained the people Glasgow booted Labour oot of Glasgow city council and elected the SNP into Glasgow city council Whats wrong in what i said there correct me if you dare lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So English mps you believe know whats best for Scotland ? And just to answer your question Yes it is upto the people of Glasgow to decide what is best for them And funny enough the people of Glasgow booted Labour oot of Glasgow City council as thats what was best for Glasgow hahahahahahaha So Glasgow won't be part of an independent Scotland then? How about Stirling? Aberdeen? Edinburgh? Skye? None of the these will have decisions made for them by politicians from the rest of Scotland? Where did i say that ? You asked " Is it up to the people of Glasgow to decide what's best for Glasgow?" I replied yes its upto the people of Glasgow to decide whats best for Glasgow and i explained the people Glasgow booted Labour oot of Glasgow city council and elected the SNP into Glasgow city council Whats wrong in what i said there correct me if you dare lol " But in an independent Scotland, politicians from all over Scotland will decide what happens in Glasgow, not the people of Glasgow, right? By the way, you still haven't answered why Scotland would be richer, despite saying you would. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So English mps you believe know whats best for Scotland ? And just to answer your question Yes it is upto the people of Glasgow to decide what is best for them And funny enough the people of Glasgow booted Labour oot of Glasgow City council as thats what was best for Glasgow hahahahahahaha So Glasgow won't be part of an independent Scotland then? How about Stirling? Aberdeen? Edinburgh? Skye? None of the these will have decisions made for them by politicians from the rest of Scotland? Where did i say that ? You asked " Is it up to the people of Glasgow to decide what's best for Glasgow?" I replied yes its upto the people of Glasgow to decide whats best for Glasgow and i explained the people Glasgow booted Labour oot of Glasgow city council and elected the SNP into Glasgow city council Whats wrong in what i said there correct me if you dare lol But in an independent Scotland, politicians from all over Scotland will decide what happens in Glasgow, not the people of Glasgow, right? By the way, you still haven't answered why Scotland would be richer, despite saying you would. " Yet another question kinky can't answer! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lmao And in an independent Scotland the people will decide whats best for Scotland Sorry but we dont need English mps deciding whats best for Scotland you go worry about the state England is in eh lol The people of Scotland will 100% decide whats best for Scotland " In the UK, the people of the UK decide what's best for the UK | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No no no CLCC you said this "MPs from across the UK decide what's best for the people of Scotland" So are you saying English mps decide whats best for Scotland ? " This is rhetorical question and I don't expect you to answer, didn't you know that Westminster MPs come from across the UK? You haven't answered my other 2 questions yet, despite saying that you would. Just like the time you said you were going to answer my question after you had finished your soup. You say that other people should answer your questions before you will answer theirs, so I don't understand why you think you should avoid questions, but still keep asking them. In the UK, MPs from across the UK decide what's best for the people of the UK. In an independent Scotland, politicians from across Scotland will decide what's best for the people of Scotland. Mainlanders will decide what's best for islanders, despite not living there. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"see... the problem with asking someone like kinky this question is the same problem that you have with asking centaur a question about brexit.... the plain issue is they only see what they perceive is good, and never acknowledge any of the bad or the consequences..... its rosy eyed opinion.... until you ever get them to acknowledge that there are minuses to a decision they want to make, the conversion is never going to be rational... and you will forever be going round in circles because kinky won't ever answer questions that give a negative answer... even though it maybe the most truthful thing that could be said! so they turn to "whataboutisms" to deflect the questions.... the cost of leaving the eu as about to leaving the uk..... the numbers of ships built against the types of ships built..... and so on and so on.... all classic semantic questions use to deflect for an answer.... not to derail the subject... May finally said one truthful think in her speech on friday.... she said that not all sides are going to get everything they want! jacob rees mogg as the arch finally acknowledged this was the case... you never get leavers acknowledging anything bad about brexit.... so until you can get kinky to finally acknowledge ANYTHING NEGATIVE about getting independence.... it will all be in one ear and out the other.... so... actually this time, rather than being combative with kinky, i am going to take a different approach, because if he is not prepared to look at the whole picture, its not worth having the conversation.... kinky...... simple question..... "if you were to get your independence, would there be any negatives that you would acknowledge would happen? are you prepared to acknowledge there would be downsides to that decision..... and what would they be?"" This is why they are jihadis. It's a cult, they brook no diversion from the one true faith, unbelievers are heretics, if you are not for them, you are against them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"CLCC is really does sound like your saying English mps know whats best for Scotland So what do English mps think is best for Scotland then ?" What you are saying, is mainlanders know what's best for islanders. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So what do English mps think is best for Scotland then ?" What do mainlanders think is best for the islanders then? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"... be richer, or poorer as an independent country? " As has been proven on several previous threads, poorer. But it would continue as a functioning nation. But as the standard of living would be so much lower and the youth would emigrate for work, independence is just not worth the price. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"... be richer, or poorer as an independent country? As has been proven on several previous threads, poorer. But it would continue as a functioning nation. But as the standard of living would be so much lower and the youth would emigrate for work, independence is just not worth the price. " Sorry not for you to decide afraid lol did you know the youth are on the side on independence look at the age in 2014 and how they voted the youth voted for independence and the older generation voted to save the UK sooner or later the older generation will keep dying off best get use to it Scotland will wave cheerio to the UK but you would be more than welcome in an independent Scotland where we couldnt give a flying fuck where you are born | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Kinky, you do know that Scottish, Welsh and NI MPs vote on what's best for the people of Cambridge, right? " I guess not! How ignorant can you be! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"... be richer, or poorer as an independent country? As has been proven on several previous threads, poorer. But it would continue as a functioning nation. But as the standard of living would be so much lower and the youth would emigrate for work, independence is just not worth the price. Sorry not for you to decide afraid lol did you know the youth are on the side on independence look at the age in 2014 and how they voted the youth voted for independence and the older generation voted to save the UK sooner or later the older generation will keep dying off best get use to it Scotland will wave cheerio to the UK but you would be more than welcome in an independent Scotland where we couldnt give a flying fuck where you are born " Ha ha ha!!! Utter rubbish! Quality of Life beats dogma and rhetoric every time. Nobody rational, what ever their age, would cut of their nose to spite their face. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ever heard of EVEL ? English votes for English laws " Yes, but we've evolved past all that small minded tribal nonsense. Have you? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"... be richer, or poorer as an independent country? As has been proven on several previous threads, poorer. But it would continue as a functioning nation. But as the standard of living would be so much lower and the youth would emigrate for work, independence is just not worth the price. Sorry not for you to decide afraid lol did you know the youth are on the side on independence look at the age in 2014 and how they voted the youth voted for independence and the older generation voted to save the UK sooner or later the older generation will keep dying off best get use to it Scotland will wave cheerio to the UK but you would be more than welcome in an independent Scotland where we couldnt give a flying fuck where you are born Ha ha ha!!! Utter rubbish! Quality of Life beats dogma and rhetoric every time. Nobody rational, what ever their age, would cut of their nose to spite their face. " Utter rubbish eh then prove me wrong how did the young vote in 2014 eh ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ever heard of EVEL ? English votes for English laws Yes, but we've evolved past all that small minded tribal nonsense. Have you? " Yes i have so are you saying English votes for English laws is no longer in use ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"... Ha ha ha!!! Utter rubbish! Quality of Life beats dogma and rhetoric every time. Nobody rational, what ever their age, would cut of their nose to spite their face. Utter rubbish eh then prove me wrong how did the young vote in 2014 eh ? " Firstly, there is no point in providing you with, stats, studies or reports as you always reject them out of hand. Secondly, democracy isn't a single item but changes over time. (your own words) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ever heard of EVEL ? English votes for English laws Yes, but we've evolved past all that small minded tribal nonsense. Have you? Yes i have so are you saying English votes for English laws is no longer in use ? " You have moved on from all that tribal nonsense? Excellent Good for you I can't believe how long it's taken you to dump all that self harming regional based nationalistic shit You've genuinely impressed me Welcome to the 21St century. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"... Ha ha ha!!! Utter rubbish! Quality of Life beats dogma and rhetoric every time. Nobody rational, what ever their age, would cut of their nose to spite their face. Utter rubbish eh then prove me wrong how did the young vote in 2014 eh ? Firstly, there is no point in providing you with, stats, studies or reports as you always reject them out of hand. Secondly, democracy isn't a single item but changes over time. (your own words) " Thats cause you know i am right lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"... Ha ha ha!!! Utter rubbish! Quality of Life beats dogma and rhetoric every time. Nobody rational, what ever their age, would cut of their nose to spite their face. Utter rubbish eh then prove me wrong how did the young vote in 2014 eh ? Firstly, there is no point in providing you with, stats, studies or reports as you always reject them out of hand. Secondly, democracy isn't a single item but changes over time. (your own words) Thats cause you know i am right lol " Kinky, if we asked you what colour the sky Is, I doubt you could even get that right! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"... Ha ha ha!!! Utter rubbish! Quality of Life beats dogma and rhetoric every time. Nobody rational, what ever their age, would cut of their nose to spite their face. Utter rubbish eh then prove me wrong how did the young vote in 2014 eh ? Firstly, there is no point in providing you with, stats, studies or reports as you always reject them out of hand. Secondly, democracy isn't a single item but changes over time. (your own words) Thats cause you know i am right lol " Actually I've taken to dis-believing pretty much everything you say as I can never corroborate it from reputable sources | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Then here is your chance to prove me wrong I am telling you that in 2014 the youth voted for independence your welcome to try and prove me wrong the floor is yours......." Just Googled it. YouGov Poll - voters aged 16-24 49% Ok so I've proved you wrong. This is where you flatly deny all the evidence. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Then here is your chance to prove me wrong I am telling you that in 2014 the youth voted for independence your welcome to try and prove me wrong the floor is yours....... Just Googled it. YouGov Poll - voters aged 16-24 49% Ok so I've proved you wrong. This is where you flatly deny all the evidence." Lmao seriously!!!!! you went with a damn poll well read and sweep this is actually how 16/17 years voted lol 71% of 16 to 17-year-olds voted for Scotland to be independent Did i not tell you the youth is on the side on independence hahahahahahhaah | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Then here is your chance to prove me wrong I am telling you that in 2014 the youth voted for independence your welcome to try and prove me wrong the floor is yours....... Just Googled it. YouGov Poll - voters aged 16-24 49% Ok so I've proved you wrong. This is where you flatly deny all the evidence. Lmao seriously!!!!! you went with a damn poll well read and sweep this is actually how 16/17 years voted lol 71% of 16 to 17-year-olds voted for Scotland to be independent Did i not tell you the youth is on the side on independence hahahahahahhaah" You do realise those figures are from a survey? That's a rhetorical question as it's obvious you don't | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Then here is your chance to prove me wrong I am telling you that in 2014 the youth voted for independence your welcome to try and prove me wrong the floor is yours....... Just Googled it. YouGov Poll - voters aged 16-24 49% Ok so I've proved you wrong. This is where you flatly deny all the evidence. Lmao seriously!!!!! you went with a damn poll well read and sweep this is actually how 16/17 years voted lol 71% of 16 to 17-year-olds voted for Scotland to be independent Did i not tell you the youth is on the side on independence hahahahahahhaah" 16 & 17 year old??? Ha ha ha ha You nonsense knows no bounds! As soon as they get a job, the realities of life will soon educate them. Scottish Independence is drain pipe to the dole queue, decreased medical services and massive inflation. Basic economic life lessons are a bitch aren't they | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"71% of 16 to 17-year-olds voted for Scotland to be independent and 29% voted against " Where are you getting this information from? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do you and all the other English people on here care if Scotland goes for independence? I don't understand why it really matters to you " They love thinking they own Scotland. Truth is it should matter to them they should really be more worried at the state England is in because of Westminster governments over the years but hey its only Labour and Tory in England cant think outside the box that those two parties have fucked the UK | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Google it " You do realise it was based on a survey of........14 people. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"71% of 16 to 17-year-olds voted for Scotland to be independent and 29% voted against Where are you getting this information from?" Jesus christ now you dont even know how 16 and 17 year olds actually voted in 2014 wow just wow lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ever heard of EVEL ? English votes for English laws " if you are going to talk about a topic then please at least have a little understand.... if you knew anything about EVEL... then you would know that it is parliamentry convention and not actual law... the convention being that if a bill is earmarked for only relating to england and wales, that scottish and northern ireland MPs in parliament dont vote on it, because those matters are devolved to their own parliament/assemblies..... however because it is only convention that is why the SNP can threaten as they did to vote on things like Foxhunting and NHS england issues..... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"71% of 16 to 17-year-olds voted for Scotland to be independent and 29% voted against Where are you getting this information from? Jesus christ now you dont even know how 16 and 17 year olds actually voted in 2014 wow just wow lol " A detailed breakdown of votes are never given, not surprised you know nothing about this (like most things) The figures you quote are from the Lord Ashcroft poll that was carried out at the time. They surveyed a grand total of 14 people within that age group, 10 voted Yes, 4 voted No. This is where the 71% figure comes from. Most people will realise you can't extrapolate any further from such a miniscule sample. Here's the original source of the data. https://i.gyazo.com/3dffa2605d0491b5e7f8b714b4729991.png A whole 14 peple questioned | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ever heard of EVEL ? English votes for English laws if you are going to talk about a topic then please at least have a little understand.... if you knew anything about EVEL... then you would know that it is parliamentry convention and not actual law... the convention being that if a bill is earmarked for only relating to england and wales, that scottish and northern ireland MPs in parliament dont vote on it, because those matters are devolved to their own parliament/assemblies..... however because it is only convention that is why the SNP can threaten as they did to vote on things like Foxhunting and NHS england issues....." Fuck me Fabio you are piss poor on things involving Scotland stick to worrying about England eh lol If their is cuts to the English NHS then if effects the Scottish NHS duh!!! So why shouldnt Scottish mps not be allowed to vote on something that effects Scotland ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lol that's not true think you need to check it out more" It is true, I've given the details below. This is where all the articles that use the figures sourced their data from. You say it's on google and it is. So where is the source of your information if not the Ashcroft survey? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ever heard of EVEL ? English votes for English laws if you are going to talk about a topic then please at least have a little understand.... if you knew anything about EVEL... then you would know that it is parliamentry convention and not actual law... the convention being that if a bill is earmarked for only relating to england and wales, that scottish and northern ireland MPs in parliament dont vote on it, because those matters are devolved to their own parliament/assemblies..... however because it is only convention that is why the SNP can threaten as they did to vote on things like Foxhunting and NHS england issues..... Fuck me Fabio you are piss poor on things involving Scotland stick to worrying about England eh lol If their is cuts to the English NHS then if effects the Scottish NHS duh!!! So why shouldnt Scottish mps not be allowed to vote on something that effects Scotland ? " if you knew the debate it was actually NHS England internal procedures that was being discussed and debated... not any sort of financial stuff (because that would have to be part of the Budget bill that goes thru every year)..... but thanks for playing!!!!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Btw i love how no yoon brings up the fact is Ruth Davidson said on live tv that she had already looked at the sample postal votes before 10pm on the 18th Sept 2014 thats against the rules but no no no yoon gives a flying fuck aboot breaking rules to get what they want lol " Ha ha ha ha! Standard Kinky. Deflect and evade. Change the subject. Anything but admit he's wrong. Highly entertaining | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Btw i love how no yoon brings up the fact is Ruth Davidson said on live tv that she had already looked at the sample postal votes before 10pm on the 18th Sept 2014 thats against the rules but no no no yoon gives a flying fuck aboot breaking rules to get what they want lol " Is this a poor attempt to deflect from the fact your claim about 16-17 year olds was based on a survey of 14 people? And also that you don't understand how voting works in the UK? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Ha ha ha ha! Standard Kinky. Deflect and evade. Change the subject. Anything but admit he's wrong. Highly entertaining " It's a constant theme with nationalists on here (and online in general). On the oil thread when I pointed out I'd read the report and it showed oil production would continue declining I was accused of reading the BBC spin instead. I showed a link to a chart from the full report and suddenly it all went quiet. On this thread we yet again have a couple of nationalists trying to claim the information isn't true, despite them having no idea where it came from, and then when presented with evidence it all goes quiet again or straight into deflection mode. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ayrshireman is correct though see the amount of people outside of Scotland love to poke their noses into Scottish matters unreal lol you would honestly think you would be more worried that the state England and Wales is in to be all raged up going all Hulk telling Scotland you all set the terms on whats best for Scotland yeah fucking right lol" More nationalist racism. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ayrshireman is correct though see the amount of people outside of Scotland love to poke their noses into Scottish matters unreal lol you would honestly think you would be more worried that the state England and Wales is in to be all raged up going all Hulk telling Scotland you all set the terms on whats best for Scotland yeah fucking right lol More nationalist racism." Lol yeah ok If all else fails pull the racist card out I am stating fact at the end of the day the people living in Scotland will decide whats best for Scotland not for people outside Scotland thinking they know whats best for us thanks but no thanks England and Wales are in some state fix that first lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Fabio you really should know if their is cuts to the NHS in England it has a knock on effect to the Scottish NHS So why do you believe Scottish mps should be banned for voting on something that effects Scotland eh ? " That's nonsense, how the block grant to Scotland is spent is entirely the responsibility of the Scottish executive. English NHS spending has zero influence on the funding of the Scottish NHS. Scottish Ministers decide spending plans that have to be approved by Holyrood. If Holyrood decide to cut the budget to the Scottish NHS then that is their responsibility. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Fabio you really should know if their is cuts to the NHS in England it has a knock on effect to the Scottish NHS So why do you believe Scottish mps should be banned for voting on something that effects Scotland eh ? That's nonsense, how the block grant to Scotland is spent is entirely the responsibility of the Scottish executive. English NHS spending has zero influence on the funding of the Scottish NHS. Scottish Ministers decide spending plans that have to be approved by Holyrood. If Holyrood decide to cut the budget to the Scottish NHS then that is their responsibility. " Lmao Fucking hell this is really piss poor how unedcuatede you all are either that or outright lying Ok money is NOT DEVOLVED!!!!!!!! Yes the budget the Scottish government get then yes they are incharge f where the money gets spend on the Scottish government have no and i repeat no control over the set amount they get from the UK treasury fucking duh!!!!!!! So any Tory cuts on the English NHS will have a knock on effect on Scottish NHS but no no your keep defending Tories and trying to pass it off as SNP cuts but i am here to expose that lie the UK treasury is in charge of the money and how much each devolved parilament get Then the devolved parliaments decide where the money gets spend Yoons be crazy and the lack of understanding what happens in their own fucked up UK lmao I suppose you believe it was all fine for the Tories to speak about devolved powers in a UK election yes a UK elections and useless fannies talk about devolved powers lmao | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""Yes the budget the Scottish government get then yes they are incharge f where the money gets spend on" You are talking "shite" then. You accept how the money is spent is entirely the responsibility of the Scottish executive. How the English NHS is funded does not have any direct effect of the funding of the Scottish NHS. The Scottish executive decides that! The block grant the Scottish executive receives is for them to decide where it is spent. " Oh for fuck sake lol Yes the Scottish government is in charge of where the money gets spent But the Scottish government are not in charge of how much money they get fron the UK treasury duh!!! So any cuts to the NHS in England will have a knock on effect to Scottish NHS duh!!! Which part of miney is not devolved do yiu not get ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ever heard of EVEL ? English votes for English laws if you are going to talk about a topic then please at least have a little understand.... if you knew anything about EVEL... then you would know that it is parliamentry convention and not actual law... the convention being that if a bill is earmarked for only relating to england and wales, that scottish and northern ireland MPs in parliament dont vote on it, because those matters are devolved to their own parliament/assemblies..... however because it is only convention that is why the SNP can threaten as they did to vote on things like Foxhunting and NHS england issues..... Fuck me Fabio you are piss poor on things involving Scotland stick to worrying about England eh lol If their is cuts to the English NHS then if effects the Scottish NHS duh!!! So why shouldnt Scottish mps not be allowed to vote on something that effects Scotland ? " But it will have an impact on people from Cambridge. And so will other votes about other laws that are not only about English laws. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ok lets deal with this Is the UK treasury in charge of the money ?" *Cough* Scottish taxation *Cough* | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"... be richer, or poorer as an independent country? " Hang on, you're not allowed to start threads like this. What the hell will Kinky do today now? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It would depend on what you meant by richer or poorer. Scotland is a country that is a subjugated (not equal) partner of the United Kingdom and therefore gaining its freedom and independence could be seen as becoming richer as the populace would no longer be subjugated. Financially, they may, or may not have the same amount of income to play with, but what they will have is the means to cut their own cloth accordingly. There are plenty of small countries around the world like Scotland (Ireland and Norway for example) that may be “richer” if they were subjugated to another country but in fact they are richer in other ways because they make their own decisions about what is important to them and at the same time join larger political unions as equal partners to increase their economic standing in the world." not often I agree with "_oo hot", but a good post | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It would depend on what you meant by richer or poorer. Scotland is a country that is a subjugated (not equal) partner of the United Kingdom and therefore gaining its freedom and independence could be seen as becoming richer as the populace would no longer be subjugated. Financially, they may, or may not have the same amount of income to play with, but what they will have is the means to cut their own cloth accordingly. There are plenty of small countries around the world like Scotland (Ireland and Norway for example) that may be “richer” if they were subjugated to another country but in fact they are richer in other ways because they make their own decisions about what is important to them and at the same time join larger political unions as equal partners to increase their economic standing in the world. not often I agree with "_oo hot", but a good post " Nice to see a Scottish nationalists finally admitting that the country would be financially poorer after independence. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Where in the fuck am i saying the NHS is not devolved to the Scottish government Money is not devolved correct ? That lies with the Uk treasury " It's amazing that one person can be so uneducated on a matter they constantly argue about. You're wrong on just about every single thing you post on here. I'm pretty sure you don't even understand what the word 'devolved' means. Again to help you out, here's the Scottish Government website page that discusses Scotland's finances https://beta.gov.scot/publications/scotlands-finances-key-facts-figures/ To quote from it: "Scotland's Finances: Key facts and figures Competent, financially prudent Scottish Government This part of the guide sets out key information about how the system stands in 2016-17. The next part sets out how it will change in 2017-18 and beyond. Devolved Finances * The Scottish Government is accountable to the Scottish Parliament and the people of Scotland for its use of public money. * Scottish Ministers decide spending plans that have to be approved by Holyrood. * Since 2009-10, the Scottish Government has produced its accounts on the basis of international accounting standards." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Where in the fuck am i saying the NHS is not devolved to the Scottish government Money is not devolved correct ? That lies with the Uk treasury It's amazing that one person can be so uneducated on a matter they constantly argue about. You're wrong on just about every single thing you post on here. I'm pretty sure you don't even understand what the word 'devolved' means. Again to help you out, here's the Scottish Government website page that discusses Scotland's finances https://beta.gov.scot/publications/scotlands-finances-key-facts-figures/ To quote from it: "Scotland's Finances: Key facts and figures Competent, financially prudent Scottish Government This part of the guide sets out key information about how the system stands in 2016-17. The next part sets out how it will change in 2017-18 and beyond. Devolved Finances * The Scottish Government is accountable to the Scottish Parliament and the people of Scotland for its use of public money. * Scottish Ministers decide spending plans that have to be approved by Holyrood. * Since 2009-10, the Scottish Government has produced its accounts on the basis of international accounting standards." " I have never known anyone as passionate about a subject, be so ignorant of it, as kinky is about politics. Like you say, they are wrong about virtually everything they post. I don't mean difference of opinion wrong, I mean clearly, demonstrable FACTS, kind of wrong. Like kinky thinks that Scottish politicians are unelected kind of wrong. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It would depend on what you meant by richer or poorer. Scotland is a country that is a subjugated (not equal) partner of the United Kingdom and therefore gaining its freedom and independence could be seen as becoming richer as the populace would no longer be subjugated. Financially, they may, or may not have the same amount of income to play with, but what they will have is the means to cut their own cloth accordingly. There are plenty of small countries around the world like Scotland (Ireland and Norway for example) that may be “richer” if they were subjugated to another country but in fact they are richer in other ways because they make their own decisions about what is important to them and at the same time join larger political unions as equal partners to increase their economic standing in the world." 100% agree Some clearly dont get it Scottish independence is about the right to self govern to make our own decisions about what is important to us not to be ruled over and told what is best for Scotland and if we dont like it then mitigate it sorry but that is not good enough | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It would depend on what you meant by richer or poorer. Scotland is a country that is a subjugated (not equal) partner of the United Kingdom and therefore gaining its freedom and independence could be seen as becoming richer as the populace would no longer be subjugated. Financially, they may, or may not have the same amount of income to play with, but what they will have is the means to cut their own cloth accordingly. There are plenty of small countries around the world like Scotland (Ireland and Norway for example) that may be “richer” if they were subjugated to another country but in fact they are richer in other ways because they make their own decisions about what is important to them and at the same time join larger political unions as equal partners to increase their economic standing in the world. 100% agree Some clearly dont get it Scottish independence is about the right to self govern to make our own decisions about what is important to us not to be ruled over and told what is best for Scotland and if we dont like it then mitigate it sorry but that is not good enough " Yet another nationalist admitting Scotland would be financially poorer after independence | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It would depend on what you meant by richer or poorer. Scotland is a country that is a subjugated (not equal) partner of the United Kingdom and therefore gaining its freedom and independence could be seen as becoming richer as the populace would no longer be subjugated. Financially, they may, or may not have the same amount of income to play with, but what they will have is the means to cut their own cloth accordingly. There are plenty of small countries around the world like Scotland (Ireland and Norway for example) that may be “richer” if they were subjugated to another country but in fact they are richer in other ways because they make their own decisions about what is important to them and at the same time join larger political unions as equal partners to increase their economic standing in the world. 100% agree Some clearly dont get it Scottish independence is about the right to self govern to make our own decisions about what is important to us not to be ruled over and told what is best for Scotland and if we dont like it then mitigate it sorry but that is not good enough Yet another nationalist admitting Scotland would be financially poorer after independence " Offt putting words in my mouth where did i say that ? I said Scottish independence is about the right to self govern to make our own decisions about what is important to us not to be ruled over and told what is best for Scotland Reaching much eh CLCC lmao | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Richer or poorer? It is reflection of modern life to limit this solely to monetary values. There's so many more ways to be richer or poorer. For many I spoke with, Scotland becoming independent again was worth so much more than money. I think that's why there will always be a movement for seperation." Yup to self govern and do things different to the UK government instead of being told if we dont like it then mitigate it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It would depend on what you meant by richer or poorer. Scotland is a country that is a subjugated (not equal) partner of the United Kingdom and therefore gaining its freedom and independence could be seen as becoming richer as the populace would no longer be subjugated. Financially, they may, or may not have the same amount of income to play with, but what they will have is the means to cut their own cloth accordingly. There are plenty of small countries around the world like Scotland (Ireland and Norway for example) that may be “richer” if they were subjugated to another country but in fact they are richer in other ways because they make their own decisions about what is important to them and at the same time join larger political unions as equal partners to increase their economic standing in the world. not often I agree with "_oo hot", but a good post Nice to see a Scottish nationalists finally admitting that the country would be financially poorer after independence. " Not at all, I suspect there could be a possibility for the initial few years after independence as well as many negotiations. That is not to say our finances wouldn't grow, I suspect they would in years to come after Independence. . And then there would be EU negotiations, good possibility of re-joining EU my god if that happened, how many business's would re-locate to Scotland CLCC you are indeed a vindictive lady why loves to twist words we Scots could live with initial less finance for all the benefits that is indeed if we would be poorer, there are no facts or indeed proof on this, it would only be known once it happens. and regardless of being richer or poorer I would jump at the chance of independence | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Richer or poorer? It is reflection of modern life to limit this solely to monetary values. There's so many more ways to be richer or poorer. For many I spoke with, Scotland becoming independent again was worth so much more than money. I think that's why there will always be a movement for seperation." A third nationalist admitting that Scotland would be financially poorer after independence No, it's not all about monetary values, but money certainly helps. Worried about language? There'll be less money for teaching languages in schools. Worried about the arts? There'll be less money for that too. Worried about jobs? Well with trade barriers between Scotland and the UK, there will be fewer jobs. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Richer or poorer? It is reflection of modern life to limit this solely to monetary values. There's so many more ways to be richer or poorer. For many I spoke with, Scotland becoming independent again was worth so much more than money. I think that's why there will always be a movement for seperation. A third nationalist admitting that Scotland would be financially poorer after independence No, it's not all about monetary values, but money certainly helps. Worried about language? There'll be less money for teaching languages in schools. Worried about the arts? There'll be less money for that too. Worried about jobs? Well with trade barriers between Scotland and the UK, there will be fewer jobs. " CLCC you simply do not know what the outcome would be richer or poorer . or indeed stay the same . You can guess, and guessing is indeed what you are doing . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lets see now how many countries that gained their independence from the UK is begging to rejoin the UK ? Must be a reason for this after all the people defending the UK think its all sunshine and rainbows to be in the UK I do honestly wonder why no country has ever rejoined the UK lmao " exactly Sadly, Scotland has many gutless people | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Richer or poorer? It is reflection of modern life to limit this solely to monetary values. There's so many more ways to be richer or poorer. For many I spoke with, Scotland becoming independent again was worth so much more than money. I think that's why there will always be a movement for seperation. A third nationalist admitting that Scotland would be financially poorer after independence No, it's not all about monetary values, but money certainly helps. Worried about language? There'll be less money for teaching languages in schools. Worried about the arts? There'll be less money for that too. Worried about jobs? Well with trade barriers between Scotland and the UK, there will be fewer jobs. CLCC you simply do not know what the outcome would be richer or poorer . or indeed stay the same . You can guess, and guessing is indeed what you are doing . " Yes, I do. It's fucking obvious. Scotland now shares services with the rest of the UK. Scotland doesn't have a single embassy anywhere in the world, it will have to build those. Government departments would have to be recreated. No phase 1 military training is run in Scotland, you'll have to build those facilities. There are no border posts or monitoring of the border, that will have to be set up. You will need to create a central bank, you will need to create a new currency. Unless you intend to remain unicamral, you'll need to create a second chamber. You'll need a supreme court. You'll need to create a military, huge numbers of civil servants, a vast array of quangos etc etc etc. That will all cost a HUGE amount of money. Add on to that the reduced trade between Scotland and the UK, and the fall in tac receipts, as well as the loss of the Barnett Formula, and the bills keep on piling up. And all for What? If you woke up tomorrow, and Scotland was independent, what would be different? Would you be in the same house? Would you eat the same breakfast? Drive the same car? Shop in the same shop? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Richer or poorer? It is reflection of modern life to limit this solely to monetary values. There's so many more ways to be richer or poorer. For many I spoke with, Scotland becoming independent again was worth so much more than money. I think that's why there will always be a movement for seperation. A third nationalist admitting that Scotland would be financially poorer after independence No, it's not all about monetary values, but money certainly helps. Worried about language? There'll be less money for teaching languages in schools. Worried about the arts? There'll be less money for that too. Worried about jobs? Well with trade barriers between Scotland and the UK, there will be fewer jobs. " Scotland has a greater GDP than Ireland. Scotland’s population is greater than Norway’s - it is not a viable argument to suggest that an independent Scotland would be worse off outside the United Kingdom. An independent Scotland may choose to abandon, or completely reevaluate defence commitments for example. It may choose to become a high tax socially inclusive country (Like Norway). An independent Scotland that hopefully could become an EU Member would attract colossal inward investment at the expense of the angry little bulldog next door. I am not Scottish, but I absolutely think that the Scots have the right for another referendum if Brexit Britain actually happens. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Richer or poorer? It is reflection of modern life to limit this solely to monetary values. There's so many more ways to be richer or poorer. For many I spoke with, Scotland becoming independent again was worth so much more than money. I think that's why there will always be a movement for seperation. A third nationalist admitting that Scotland would be financially poorer after independence No, it's not all about monetary values, but money certainly helps. Worried about language? There'll be less money for teaching languages in schools. Worried about the arts? There'll be less money for that too. Worried about jobs? Well with trade barriers between Scotland and the UK, there will be fewer jobs. Scotland has a greater GDP than Ireland. Scotland’s population is greater than Norway’s - it is not a viable argument to suggest that an independent Scotland would be worse off outside the United Kingdom. An independent Scotland may choose to abandon, or completely reevaluate defence commitments for example. It may choose to become a high tax socially inclusive country (Like Norway). An independent Scotland that hopefully could become an EU Member would attract colossal inward investment at the expense of the angry little bulldog next door. I am not Scottish, but I absolutely think that the Scots have the right for another referendum if Brexit Britain actually happens." good to see someone outside of Scotland that believes we have ever right to decide our own future and not to be told that we have to suffer brexit what cause we are part of the UK well people in a democracy can at any point change their minds I know their will be people that would vote no to independence not a problem with that as thats their right but to deny others a right to change their minds and for Scotland to decide its own future is very very very wrong We in Scotland are NOT a colony tgat can be bossed about | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Oh there is that anti Scottish behaviour from Ticklybit again Did anyone notice that he only said "Scotland was a leading player in the empire" He left oot England " Did anyone notice you have left "oot" Ireland and Wales. They also played their part in the empire. You only mentioned England! By using your logic, can I now accuse you of being anti English? As we are having a discussion about Scotland only you can seek grievance about not bringing England into it. Of course you are not anti English, where could I get that idea from? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Kinkster threads go like this He makes a statement. He gets challenged. He refuses to address the challenges and throws in a diversion. The diversion gets challenged. He refuses to answer the challenges. He then throws in something like "Yoon gangs" or "hate Scotland. People challenge this. He turns it to 11. Someone says something that he thinks substantiates a point he's made, he declares he's won the internet. Someone challenges that and he tells them he's not answering as he's already won the internet and they hate Scotland. Repeat. Outcome People think he's got issues People think that SNP supporters are all like kinky and bonkers. The net cause of Scot's independence takes a bit. Kinkster, end the cycle, go and talk to someone in the real world and get some help. It is genuinely painful to witness." Ooooffft raging much lol Am i getting to you ? Am i getting to you ? Am getting to you ? Lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Oh there is that anti Scottish behaviour from Ticklybit again Did anyone notice that he only said "Scotland was a leading player in the empire" He left oot England Did anyone notice you have left "oot" Ireland and Wales. They also played their part in the empire. You only mentioned England! By using your logic, can I now accuse you of being anti English? As we are having a discussion about Scotland only you can seek grievance about not bringing England into it. Of course you are not anti English, where could I get that idea from? " Not at all I was refering to the UK as in England and Scotland act of the union 1707 Nice try though | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I was refering to the UK as in England and Scotland act of the union 1707 Nice try though " At no point did you refer to the Act of Union in your previous post. That's an obvious lie. You just got exposed by your own words, now you weasel your way out of it by lying. What a dishonest little man you are? Where in your previous post is any reference or implication of the Act of Union? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Kinkster threads go like this He makes a statement. He gets challenged. He refuses to address the challenges and throws in a diversion. The diversion gets challenged. He refuses to answer the challenges. He then throws in something like "Yoon gangs" or "hate Scotland. People challenge this. He turns it to 11. Someone says something that he thinks substantiates a point he's made, he declares he's won the internet. Someone challenges that and he tells them he's not answering as he's already won the internet and they hate Scotland. Repeat. Outcome People think he's got issues People think that SNP supporters are all like kinky and bonkers. The net cause of Scot's independence takes a bit. Kinkster, end the cycle, go and talk to someone in the real world and get some help. It is genuinely painful to witness. Ooooffft raging much lol Am i getting to you ? Am i getting to you ? Am getting to you ? Lol " Not really, but I think your post is a good indication of your mental health issues. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ticklybit you ready to answer yet ? Hehe " . Hehe you say, when you answer this. But we all know you are "shite feart" to do so. You haven't even attempted to do so, you did have a rant the other night but failed to address the question. Hehe indeed. . Leaving the EU via Brexit will have consequences, job losses for instance. Scotland goes independent,the consequences of that is that it too leaves the EU in the hardest terms. No deal,therefore the same if not worse job losses than Brexit. By going independent and leaving the UK, there will be further job losses. As Scotlands trade with the rest of the UK is four times higher than with the EU, it would be safe to assume that it would be even more damaging than that caused by leaving the EU itself. The question which you have not attempted to answer is, which of those two options is the least damaging to Scotland? Brexit in UK or independence out of both the UK and EU? What would you chose kinky? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Richer Now would an independent England be richer or poorer ? I can honestly see the amount of people outside Scotland bricking it at the thought of Scotland waving cheerio to the UK lol And dont give me we are subsiding you for Scotlands benefit birthday caird pish lol Why is it people in England that believe that subsidy pish do not wanna see that money spent on Englands local services and the NHS ? Are you really saying you wana help Scotland but dont wanna help your fellow Englishmen ? Away and dont talk pish lol Why would it be richer? No i answered it your question now you answer mine Why do we believe England subsidised Scotland? Because the data tells us so. I believe in the UK, so I am happy that wealth is distributed from richer regions to poorer regions. This is normal. It happens in EVERY single country in the world. That's how the nation state works. So HOW would Scotland be richer if independent? Please provide your evidence to support your position." So kinky still hasn't answered This, despite saying they would. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I was refering to the UK as in England and Scotland act of the union 1707 Nice try though At no point did you refer to the Act of Union in your previous post. That's an obvious lie. You just got exposed by your own words, now you weasel your way out of it by lying. What a dishonest little man you are? Where in your previous post is any reference or implication of the Act of Union? " I did say Scotland and England big clue there lol It was Scotland and England only that signed the act of the union 1707 lol Your just mad cause i caught you out in your anti Scottish shite Claim doon son lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Richer or poorer? It is reflection of modern life to limit this solely to monetary values. There's so many more ways to be richer or poorer. For many I spoke with, Scotland becoming independent again was worth so much more than money. I think that's why there will always be a movement for seperation." That being the case though, why do so many have difficulty accepting the fact that the country would be worse off financially? There are very few, if any nationalists who accept this and instead claim financial figures are rigged or can't be trusted etc. Also, why do the SNP not come out and be honest about this as well? Instead they came out with a White Paper that was laughably bad in terms of finances and they made the claim everyone would be better off. I've actually got a bit of respect for those who admit they don't care about being worse off financially as it's all about self-determinism (although I think it's rather selfish as those at the bottom always suffer the most when finances are tight) but I do have a big issue with the constant need by many to lie that it wouldn't be the case. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I was refering to the UK as in England and Scotland act of the union 1707 Nice try though At no point did you refer to the Act of Union in your previous post. That's an obvious lie. You just got exposed by your own words, now you weasel your way out of it by lying. What a dishonest little man you are? Where in your previous post is any reference or implication of the Act of Union? I did say Scotland and England big clue there lol It was Scotland and England only that signed the act of the union 1707 lol Your just mad cause i caught you out in your anti Scottish shite Claim doon son lol " And you forgot the Laws of Wales Acts 1535 and 1542 when Wales was also now represented in Parliament at Westminster. When Scotland joined in union with England, it was also a union with Wales. Did you really forget that, or were you just ignorant of it? Read up on history son. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I was refering to the UK as in England and Scotland act of the union 1707 Nice try though At no point did you refer to the Act of Union in your previous post. That's an obvious lie. You just got exposed by your own words, now you weasel your way out of it by lying. What a dishonest little man you are? Where in your previous post is any reference or implication of the Act of Union? I did say Scotland and England big clue there lol It was Scotland and England only that signed the act of the union 1707 lol Your just mad cause i caught you out in your anti Scottish shite Claim doon son lol " I think this is covered in his SOP as the "xenophobia defence plan" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Richer or poorer? It is reflection of modern life to limit this solely to monetary values. There's so many more ways to be richer or poorer. For many I spoke with, Scotland becoming independent again was worth so much more than money. I think that's why there will always be a movement for seperation. That being the case though, why do so many have difficulty accepting the fact that the country would be worse off financially? There are very few, if any nationalists who accept this and instead claim financial figures are rigged or can't be trusted etc. Also, why do the SNP not come out and be honest about this as well? Instead they came out with a White Paper that was laughably bad in terms of finances and they made the claim everyone would be better off. I've actually got a bit of respect for those who admit they don't care about being worse off financially as it's all about self-determinism (although I think it's rather selfish as those at the bottom always suffer the most when finances are tight) but I do have a big issue with the constant need by many to lie that it wouldn't be the case." I could not agree more. My mate has always said Scotland would be poorer after Indy but he accepts that. His belief is that Scotland would eventually get back up financially but it would take time. That is the kind of honesty I respect and we have really good debates on Indy. We agree on some stuff but not on others but at least he is a realist. As he calls them " The flag waving believers in unicorns " are infor an eye opening come Indy. At least he is finantialy educated but willing to take the hit !@! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Kinkster threads go like this He makes a statement. He gets challenged. He refuses to address the challenges and throws in a diversion. The diversion gets challenged. He refuses to answer the challenges. He then throws in something like "Yoon gangs" or "hate Scotland. People challenge this. He turns it to 11. Someone says something that he thinks substantiates a point he's made, he declares he's won the internet. Someone challenges that and he tells them he's not answering as he's already won the internet and they hate Scotland. Repeat. Outcome People think he's got issues People think that SNP supporters are all like kinky and bonkers. The net cause of Scot's independence takes a bit. Kinkster, end the cycle, go and talk to someone in the real world and get some help. It is genuinely painful to witness. Ooooffft raging much lol Am i getting to you ? Am i getting to you ? Am getting to you ? Lol Not really, but I think your post is a good indication of your mental health issues." Your post shows you are actually willing to joke about with mental health its fuck all to joke about with | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Outside the EU single market there will be fuck all to stop the UK government trading away protected status for Scottish whisky so they can get a trade deal with Trump Oh what do we have here US lobbyists are calling for Scotch Whisky protected status to be dropped The Scottish Whisky Industry exports over £4bn annually, and accounts for c25% of UK food & drink exports. Let that fucking sink in eh lol " Nothing to do with topic at hand. This isn't your thread, so how about you answer the questions at hand, such as how would Scotland be richer after independence. You said you would answer that question. Are you going to keep your word? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Outside the EU single market there will be fuck all to stop the UK government trading away protected status for Scottish whisky so they can get a trade deal with Trump Oh what do we have here US lobbyists are calling for Scotch Whisky protected status to be dropped The Scottish Whisky Industry exports over £4bn annually, and accounts for c25% of UK food & drink exports. Let that fucking sink in eh lol " And the vast majority of it is owned outside of Scotland, have you heard of Pernod Ricard or Diageo? One headquartered in London the other in Paris. Let that sink in! . Where will receipts from corporation tax and profits go if Scotland is independent? It wont be Edinburgh, let that sink in. The only tax an independent Scotland would receive would be from companies registered there and from the duty raised on domestic sales only. Let that sink in! . As for protected status, it is protected by UK, EU and WTO rules. The usual unfounded and ill prepared argument and ignorant "shite" from kinky. As someone else asked earlier, why are you always wrong? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Outside the EU single market there will be fuck all to stop the UK government trading away protected status for Scottish whisky so they can get a trade deal with Trump Oh what do we have here US lobbyists are calling for Scotch Whisky protected status to be dropped The Scottish Whisky Industry exports over £4bn annually, and accounts for c25% of UK food & drink exports. Let that fucking sink in eh lol Nothing to do with topic at hand. This isn't your thread, so how about you answer the questions at hand, such as how would Scotland be richer after independence. You said you would answer that question. Are you going to keep your word?" Sorry but no thanks you dont tell others to stick to what the thread is aboot so nae thanks Plus you dont stick to what my threads is aboot so yeah nae thanks | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I an wilking to take a punt on why the Leave side want a no deal/ hard brexit soo bad is to buying shares in UK companies as they start playing with other people's money. They then sell them quickly and buy them back at a much lower price making a nice profit for themselves And of course to make the UK a tax haven " Kinky, this has nothing to do with the thread whatsoever, and is not a natural progression from other posts. Please remember the forum rules state: "Deliberate or malicious disruption of the forum: If you deliberately or maliciously try to interrupt everyone else's enjoyment of the forums, for example by trying to fill up the forum with your own content (just one example), it's not fair and we'll take action." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Outside the EU single market there will be fuck all to stop the UK government trading away protected status for Scottish whisky so they can get a trade deal with Trump Oh what do we have here US lobbyists are calling for Scotch Whisky protected status to be dropped The Scottish Whisky Industry exports over £4bn annually, and accounts for c25% of UK food & drink exports. Let that fucking sink in eh lol " Food and Drink only make up a tiny amount of UK exports. Roughly around 2%. Let that sink in. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Outside the EU single market there will be fuck all to stop the UK government trading away protected status for Scottish whisky so they can get a trade deal with Trump Oh what do we have here US lobbyists are calling for Scotch Whisky protected status to be dropped The Scottish Whisky Industry exports over £4bn annually, and accounts for c25% of UK food & drink exports. Let that fucking sink in eh lol Nothing to do with topic at hand. This isn't your thread, so how about you answer the questions at hand, such as how would Scotland be richer after independence. You said you would answer that question. Are you going to keep your word? Sorry but no thanks you dont tell others to stick to what the thread is aboot so nae thanks Plus you dont stick to what my threads is aboot so yeah nae thanks " Did you see my reply? Do you want to talk about the whisky industry further? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Outside the EU single market there will be fuck all to stop the UK government trading away protected status for Scottish whisky so they can get a trade deal with Trump Oh what do we have here US lobbyists are calling for Scotch Whisky protected status to be dropped The Scottish Whisky Industry exports over £4bn annually, and accounts for c25% of UK food & drink exports. Let that fucking sink in eh lol Nothing to do with topic at hand. This isn't your thread, so how about you answer the questions at hand, such as how would Scotland be richer after independence. You said you would answer that question. Are you going to keep your word? Sorry but no thanks you dont tell others to stick to what the thread is aboot so nae thanks Plus you dont stick to what my threads is aboot so yeah nae thanks Did you see my reply? Do you want to talk about the whisky industry further?" He's on Divert and deflect mode now. Apparently we are all sat gnashing our teeth as his superior rhetorical skills ties us up in knots. Anyone fancy a hobnob? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""Say something good aboot the SNP ?" They lost 21 seats and 476867 votes at the last General Election, that was good. " I knew it couldnt do it lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Btw its really interesting to watch yoons always play Scotland doom and gloom lol Again watch this say something good about Scotland? Wont accept the usual crap " its a beautiful country Say something good aboot the SNP ? I know am getting to yous all take a look at this forum Scotland is getting talked aboot more and more must piss you right off that we wont get back in the box eh lmao " Two good things !!!! Here they are First good thing.....Kinky lives in Scotland. Second good thing about the snp....Kinky supports the snp | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Want more lol That i know you want buried I know yoons love the deficit game lol So UK assets are approx £8.8 trillion we own 8.3% boom!!!! Deficit gone lol Scotland contributes to London projects total cost running up ro about £110 million plus have to now add in Buckingham palace and Westminster that will add to that Deficit gone see ya cheerio lol No doubt that will be buried any dirty trick to keep Scotland tied doon to the UK Scottish people must not be allowed to decide their own future eh we must be told what are future is " Full speed ahead Captain Kinky and launch the last of the diversion bombs. Cap'n the engines cannae take it (Kinkster does Star Trek) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""So UK assets are approx £8.8 trillion we own 8.3% boom!!!! Deficit gone lol" And a share of UK debt at 8.3% would be £165,153,283,800. BOOM !!!! I see kinky thinks he can get a share of private assets in the UK, thats your house, car and savings he thinks he gets a cut of. Hes quoting private and public assets how stupid is that? " Exactly why I'm not wasting any more of my time on his ridiculous and factually bereft posts. I urge others to follow suit. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""Say something good aboot the SNP ?" They lost 21 seats and 476867 votes at the last General Election, that was good. I knew it couldnt do it lol " most of these were protest votes many slipping over to Tory due to brexit, these votes will not remain Tory votes, they will slip back to SNP Labour has lost out long term due to the damage of Jim Murphy & Kezia Dugdale Danny Alexander has ensured no one will vote Lib Dems along with the buffoon Willie Rennie The only Party that considers any good and well being for Scotland is in fact the SNP I have my grief with SNP due to various policies they have, but all in all they have Scotland's interests at heart Unlike any other Scottish Party. That is one thing, no one can deny | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Want more lol That i know you want buried I know yoons love the deficit game lol So UK assets are approx £8.8 trillion we own 8.3% boom!!!! Deficit gone lol Scotland contributes to London projects total cost running up ro about £110 million plus have to now add in Buckingham palace and Westminster that will add to that Deficit gone see ya cheerio lol No doubt that will be buried any dirty trick to keep Scotland tied doon to the UK Scottish people must not be allowed to decide their own future eh we must be told what are future is " That is great peace of thinking but you are talking about deficit and debt they are two completely different things !!! I was watching one of your fellow travellers saying with Scotland's share of what is in the treasury then Scotland can set up a currency. ... your simplistic remedy seems to blow that out of the water !!!!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ok watch this hehehehehehe So which party / branch office to people believe is standing up for Scotlands best interests ? " LABOUR !!!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Want more lol That i know you want buried I know yoons love the deficit game lol So UK assets are approx £8.8 trillion we own 8.3% boom!!!! Deficit gone lol Scotland contributes to London projects total cost running up ro about £110 million plus have to now add in Buckingham palace and Westminster that will add to that Deficit gone see ya cheerio lol No doubt that will be buried any dirty trick to keep Scotland tied doon to the UK Scottish people must not be allowed to decide their own future eh we must be told what are future is That is great peace of thinking but you are talking about deficit and debt they are two completely different things !!! I was watching one of your fellow travellers saying with Scotland's share of what is in the treasury then Scotland can set up a currency. ... your simplistic remedy seems to blow that out of the water !!!!!" Agreed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ok watch this hehehehehehe So which party / branch office to people believe is standing up for Scotlands best interests ? LABOUR !!!!" Lmao is that why they have never been in government since 2007 ? So what evidence is there that they are standing up for Scotland ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I see this is still going on. It's asmusing seeing someone accusing people of ranting or anger when it's clear where all the anger, bad language, childish comments about 'shitting pants' and numerous spelling mistakes as they bash away at the keyboard are all coming from. It's pretty much restricted to one person. Maybe getting a job would help them with their issues. Sitting in the house day after day ranting on a swingers site can't be healthy, mentally of physically." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I see this is still going on. It's asmusing seeing someone accusing people of ranting or anger when it's clear where all the anger, bad language, childish comments about 'shitting pants' and numerous spelling mistakes as they bash away at the keyboard are all coming from. It's pretty much restricted to one person. Maybe getting a job would help them with their issues. Sitting in the house day after day ranting on a swingers site can't be healthy, mentally of physically. " And I managed two spelling mistakes of my own . Not from angrily hammering away at the keyboard though. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Decribing most people on this thread lol Getting a job would help them with their issues. Sitting in the house day after day lol " Have you ever held a job? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""Some were a collection of states, self-governing eg 'India'" I suggest that you look up the Mughals occupation of India prior to the British being there. A more bloodthirsty period in history is harder to find. India was never a unitary state until after its independence from Britain. And even then, partition was a period of recent history that the people of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh still bear the scars of. Lets look empires of the past, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Belgian, Dutch, German, Russian, Turks and the Italians. Im not saying they were right to do what they did, but that was what was happening at the time. Britain had to compete for these lands with all those other countries, if we did not, I shudder to think how the world would look like today. We have to put it in the context of the times, to judge them by the standards of today is wrong and revisionist. Why do we single out the British empire whilst ignoring all the others? " That's why India was in inverted commas. I'm well aware of its history. Talking about brutal regimes, of which UK were no less willing to join in, especially in that area, takes the discussion on another road we were not on. Still, at no point did any of these states/countries wish to be governed again by their recent 'rulers'. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ok watch this hehehehehehe So which party / branch office to people believe is standing up for Scotlands best interests ? LABOUR !!!! Lmao is that why they have never been in government since 2007 ? So what evidence is there that they are standing up for Scotland ?" I do not think the snp stand up for Scotland's people because no matter what they do IT is geared towards one thing Indyref 2. As the snp have not convinced me it is the best way forward for Scotland I prefer to give my vote to Labour. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Decribing most people on this thread lol Getting a job would help them with their issues. Sitting in the house day after day lol " Not having a job can't apply to me since I have worked since I left school at age 17. Not only that I have not had a sick day in over 23 years !! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ok watch this hehehehehehe So which party / branch office to people believe is standing up for Scotlands best interests ? LABOUR !!!! Lmao is that why they have never been in government since 2007 ? So what evidence is there that they are standing up for Scotland ? I do not think the snp stand up for Scotland's people because no matter what they do IT is geared towards one thing Indyref 2. As the snp have not convinced me it is the best way forward for Scotland I prefer to give my vote to Labour." So are you saying Kinky is wrong then and the SNP do nothing for Scotland or its people Or is it just their stance on independance you dont agree with. See kinky thinks everyone north of the border hates Scotland and the Scots but we all know that isnt true. Just because we would like it if Scotland remained does not mean they cant have a referendum on it Also why does he keep asking predominantly English people what we would do then when we answer tells us to fuck off we are shite feart to lose Scotland Sorry if I went off tangent there | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ok watch this hehehehehehe So which party / branch office to people believe is standing up for Scotlands best interests ? LABOUR !!!! Lmao is that why they have never been in government since 2007 ? So what evidence is there that they are standing up for Scotland ? I do not think the snp stand up for Scotland's people because no matter what they do IT is geared towards one thing Indyref 2. As the snp have not convinced me it is the best way forward for Scotland I prefer to give my vote to Labour." Went into SNP bad mode lol Nothing on what Scottish Labour branch is doing in Scotlands best interest lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |