FBI investigation into Russian interference has resulted in indictments.
His cronies and sidekick's are starting to tumble.
Now only a matter of time before he takes a direct hit.
The Orange One is in the judicial cross hairs. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Na, its all just not true..
the Russians were spending up to and in excess of $1.5 million per month during the 2016 election purely out of coincidence..
they were organising and disrupting alongside Trumps supporters who never knew anything and hey why would you ask who those guys are? 
bit like an away match on the continent and not asking the guys next to you in your teams colours 'where you from?'..
yeah right..
and of course none of it was ever discussed at all ever in the meetings with the Russians and trumps family members and people in his campaign team and even if it was it was nothing to do with the ginger one..
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
The ex FBI director Comey knew an awful lot of information about Trump campaign before the election, but kept quiet as it may influence the result. He then brings up Clinton's aides emails 11days before the election - conveniently supplied by the Russians to wikileaks. Which was all a red herring and then 3 days before the election said nothing illegal found! There's a lot more to come. Some senior republicans in the house also knew. So what's the best for the USA? Russia the old enemy being allowed to influence the election? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Na, its all just not true..
the Russians were spending up to and in excess of $1.5 million per month during the 2016 election purely out of coincidence..
they were organising and disrupting alongside Trumps supporters who never knew anything and hey why would you ask who those guys are?
bit like an away match on the continent and not asking the guys next to you in your teams colours 'where you from?'..
yeah right..
and of course none of it was ever discussed at all ever in the meetings with the Russians and trumps family members and people in his campaign team and even if it was it was nothing to do with the ginger one..
"
I think the meetings focused on adoption of little children from Russia. They should have mentioned puppies too, for extra credibility.
Trump announced that the criminal charges against the Russians have left him in the clear - it's not him, it's them |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *asyukMan
over a year ago
West London |
It rather depends on how collusion is defined.
Did Trump's campaign want to get any dirt that they could on Clinton under any circumstances? Probably yes.
Did they care who it came from or how it was obtained? Probably no.
Were they conspiring against the USA. Probably not.
Is it possible to find evidence to confirm that Trump was directly involved? Probably not.
Is it possible to find evidence that his closest advisors did? Probably yes.
Will Trump be impeached as a result? Unlikely.
Will Trump look even less believable than he does now? Probably.
Will any of this make any difference to his supporters? Unlikely.
At the very least Trump is now acknowledging that Russia did influence the election result so there is some chance that more resources will go into combating it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Na, its all just not true..
the Russians were spending up to and in excess of $1.5 million per month during the 2016 election purely out of coincidence..
they were organising and disrupting alongside Trumps supporters who never knew anything and hey why would you ask who those guys are?
bit like an away match on the continent and not asking the guys next to you in your teams colours 'where you from?'..
yeah right..
and of course none of it was ever discussed at all ever in the meetings with the Russians and trumps family members and people in his campaign team and even if it was it was nothing to do with the ginger one..
I think the meetings focused on adoption of little children from Russia. They should have mentioned puppies too, for extra credibility.
Trump announced that the criminal charges against the Russians have left him in the clear - it's not him, it's them "
said before that the puppet masters in the Kremlin have played it well, they must be pissing themselves in how they have played some of the citizens of the USA.. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It rather depends on how collusion is defined.
Did Trump's campaign want to get any dirt that they could on Clinton under any circumstances? Probably yes.
Did they care who it came from or how it was obtained? Probably no.
Were they conspiring against the USA. Probably not.
Is it possible to find evidence to confirm that Trump was directly involved? Probably not.
Is it possible to find evidence that his closest advisors did? Probably yes.
Will Trump be impeached as a result? Unlikely.
Will Trump look even less believable than he does now? Probably.
Will any of this make any difference to his supporters? Unlikely.
At the very least Trump is now acknowledging that Russia did influence the election result so there is some chance that more resources will go into combating it."
pretty much agree, no matter how close it gets to him he will be ok with some of his base who can't see or don't care what has been done to their democratic process..
cos they won, more than a bit like some aspects of the brexit referendum..
given some of their history in other countries democratic process's at least no one has 'disappeared' or dropped out of a helicopter into a swamp.. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
