FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Corbyn COULD be worse for Britain than BREXIT
Jump to: Newest in thread
" “The nationalisation of key industries, higher taxes and a shift in spending priorities towards low-income households under Corbyn’s leadership COULD damage valuations of UK companies”. “The UK is in the midst of a double whammy of uncertainty in the shape of BREXIT a fragile domestic political situation. Taken together, these two factors – which are interrelated to some degree – cast a long shadow over the policy backdrop and economic outlook of the UK,” “For the UK market, domestic politics MAY BE perceived as a bigger risk than Brexit,” “From a UK investor perspective, we believe that the domestic political situation is AT LEAST AS significant as BREXIT, given the fragile state of the current government and the perceived risks of an incoming Labour administration that COULD potentially embark on a radical change in policy direction” " I know I’m not going to get agreement on this with many on here who normally agree with me on BREXIT but I firmly believe that that a Corbyn led Labour government would be an absolute financial disaster for the UK but here’s the thing:- One of the biggest supporters, both politically and financially, of the Conservative party is saying that a Corbyn led Labour government MAY BE worse for Britain than what has become the main economic policy of the Conservative party, namely BREXIT. By implication, if it only MAY BE worse for Britain than BREXIT, then it MAY also BE not as bad for Britain as BREXIT. If that’s what one of the Conservative’s biggest backers is saying, how many other former Conservative baggers, supporters and voters might be thinking the same thing? Thanks a lot UKIPTories, you’ve not only engineered a totally unnecessary economic crises in the UK, possible breakup of the UK, a disastrous exit from the EU but also created the possibility of Corbyn led Labour government to see over the mess you’ve made, that will squeeze us all till ‘the pips squeak’ for every and any last drop of wealth that might remain after BREXIT. I didn’t see that written on the BREXIT red bus anywhere either. | |||
| |||
"Because Morgan Stanley are totally going to be neutral and objective on the issue... " Exactly my point. One would expect Morgan Stanley, as a bug financial bagger of the Conservative Party, to put this in the most favourable, pro Conservative terms possible and yet they only say Corbyn MAY BE worse for Britain than BREXIT not WILL BE!! That should be setting major alarm bells ringing for every Conservative supporter. | |||
| |||
"Many papers have quoted a recent Morgan Stanley report on the possible prospects of a future Labour government under Jeremy potentially doing more harm to the British economy than BREXIT but that’s not what the report actually says. This may be a bit pedantic but that’s not actually what the report says. What it actually says is that a Corbyn led Labour government MAYBE worse for Britain than BREXIT “The nationalisation of key industries, higher taxes and a shift in spending priorities towards low-income households under Corbyn’s leadership COULD damage valuations of UK companies”. “The UK is in the midst of a double whammy of uncertainty in the shape of BREXIT a fragile domestic political situation. Taken together, these two factors – which are interrelated to some degree – cast a long shadow over the policy backdrop and economic outlook of the UK,” “For the UK market, domestic politics MAY BE perceived as a bigger risk than Brexit,” “From a UK investor perspective, we believe that the domestic political situation is AT LEAST AS significant as BREXIT, given the fragile state of the current government and the perceived risks of an incoming Labour administration that COULD potentially embark on a radical change in policy direction” I know I’m not going to get agreement on this with many on here who normally agree with me on BREXIT but I firmly believe that that a Corbyn led Labour government would be an absolute financial disaster for the UK but here’s the thing:- One of the biggest supporters, both politically and financially, of the Conservative party is saying that a Corbyn led Labour government MAY BE worse for Britain than what has become the main economic policy of the Conservative party, namely BREXIT. By implication, if it only MAY BE worse for Britain than BREXIT, then it MAY also BE not as bad for Britain as BREXIT. If that’s what one of the Conservative’s biggest backers is saying, how many other former Conservative baggers, supporters and voters might be thinking the same thing? Thanks a lot UKIPTories, you’ve not only engineered a totally unnecessary economic crises in the UK, possible breakup of the UK, a disastrous exit from the EU but also created the possibility of Corbyn led Labour government to see over the mess you’ve made, that will squeeze us all till ‘the pips squeak’ for every and any last drop of wealth that might remain after BREXIT. I didn’t see that written on the BREXIT red bus anywhere either. " It's not just the bank Morgan Stanley warning against the effects of a Corbyn Labour government though is it OP. Warnings are coming from within the Labour party itself. First of all we had Corbyn and his Shadow Chancellor John McDonnel saying publicly they were making contingency plans for a run on the pound £ should they be elected into power. Then just 2 or 3 days ago a top Corbynista and Labour party activist called Mika Minio-Paluello admitted that Labours nationalisation plans could leave the country "fucked". Leftie activist Mika Minio-Paluello, who sits on the high level Labour energy forum, warned the cost of taking over rail, mail and energy firm's risks wrecking people's pensions. Ms Minio-Paluello told a political event it would see pensions "Fucked". She said, "On specifics, we nationalise shit, but those companies have lots of debt. Now if we don't keep paying the debt the UK's credit rating is fucked and we can't borrow money". Ms Minio-Paluello told the meeting, "I'm chair of my local branch and I've also been doing various advice for Corbyn's team and central office". So there you have it even Labours own high level activists know Corbyn's spending plans would be disastrous for the country. | |||
"And yet, by simply having taken the time to think through the ramifications of their policies, they're already showing that they're better equipped to lead than May et al. " I don't know that they're better equipped but, whilst BREXIT remains the Conservative's only economic policy for the future of Britain, more and more people are starting to ask if Labour could really be any worse. | |||
"Many papers have quoted a recent Morgan Stanley report on the possible prospects of a future Labour government under Jeremy potentially doing more harm to the British economy than BREXIT but that’s not what the report actually says. This may be a bit pedantic but that’s not actually what the report says. What it actually says is that a Corbyn led Labour government MAYBE worse for Britain than BREXIT “The nationalisation of key industries, higher taxes and a shift in spending priorities towards low-income households under Corbyn’s leadership COULD damage valuations of UK companies”. “The UK is in the midst of a double whammy of uncertainty in the shape of BREXIT a fragile domestic political situation. Taken together, these two factors – which are interrelated to some degree – cast a long shadow over the policy backdrop and economic outlook of the UK,” “For the UK market, domestic politics MAY BE perceived as a bigger risk than Brexit,” “From a UK investor perspective, we believe that the domestic political situation is AT LEAST AS significant as BREXIT, given the fragile state of the current government and the perceived risks of an incoming Labour administration that COULD potentially embark on a radical change in policy direction” I know I’m not going to get agreement on this with many on here who normally agree with me on BREXIT but I firmly believe that that a Corbyn led Labour government would be an absolute financial disaster for the UK but here’s the thing:- One of the biggest supporters, both politically and financially, of the Conservative party is saying that a Corbyn led Labour government MAY BE worse for Britain than what has become the main economic policy of the Conservative party, namely BREXIT. By implication, if it only MAY BE worse for Britain than BREXIT, then it MAY also BE not as bad for Britain as BREXIT. If that’s what one of the Conservative’s biggest backers is saying, how many other former Conservative baggers, supporters and voters might be thinking the same thing? Thanks a lot UKIPTories, you’ve not only engineered a totally unnecessary economic crises in the UK, possible breakup of the UK, a disastrous exit from the EU but also created the possibility of Corbyn led Labour government to see over the mess you’ve made, that will squeeze us all till ‘the pips squeak’ for every and any last drop of wealth that might remain after BREXIT. I didn’t see that written on the BREXIT red bus anywhere either. " Where does that quote come from and if its a paper what paper ? | |||
"And yet, by simply having taken the time to think through the ramifications of their policies, they're already showing that they're better equipped to lead than May et al. " And yet, by simply having Diane Abbott in your team - any chance of credibility is sadly lost ...... Unless you are a comedy team of course | |||
"Many papers have quoted a recent Morgan Stanley report on the possible prospects of a future Labour government under Jeremy potentially doing more harm to the British economy than BREXIT but that’s not what the report actually says. This may be a bit pedantic but that’s not actually what the report says. What it actually says is that a Corbyn led Labour government MAYBE worse for Britain than BREXIT “The nationalisation of key industries, higher taxes and a shift in spending priorities towards low-income households under Corbyn’s leadership COULD damage valuations of UK companies”. “The UK is in the midst of a double whammy of uncertainty in the shape of BREXIT a fragile domestic political situation. Taken together, these two factors – which are interrelated to some degree – cast a long shadow over the policy backdrop and economic outlook of the UK,” “For the UK market, domestic politics MAY BE perceived as a bigger risk than Brexit,” “From a UK investor perspective, we believe that the domestic political situation is AT LEAST AS significant as BREXIT, given the fragile state of the current government and the perceived risks of an incoming Labour administration that COULD potentially embark on a radical change in policy direction” I know I’m not going to get agreement on this with many on here who normally agree with me on BREXIT but I firmly believe that that a Corbyn led Labour government would be an absolute financial disaster for the UK but here’s the thing:- One of the biggest supporters, both politically and financially, of the Conservative party is saying that a Corbyn led Labour government MAY BE worse for Britain than what has become the main economic policy of the Conservative party, namely BREXIT. By implication, if it only MAY BE worse for Britain than BREXIT, then it MAY also BE not as bad for Britain as BREXIT. If that’s what one of the Conservative’s biggest backers is saying, how many other former Conservative baggers, supporters and voters might be thinking the same thing? Thanks a lot UKIPTories, you’ve not only engineered a totally unnecessary economic crises in the UK, possible breakup of the UK, a disastrous exit from the EU but also created the possibility of Corbyn led Labour government to see over the mess you’ve made, that will squeeze us all till ‘the pips squeak’ for every and any last drop of wealth that might remain after BREXIT. I didn’t see that written on the BREXIT red bus anywhere either. Where does that quote come from and if its a paper what paper ? " I would probably think andrex bog paper but not the soft stuff that hard tracing paper we used to have at school | |||
"Many papers have quoted a recent Morgan Stanley report on the possible prospects of a future Labour government under Jeremy potentially doing more harm to the British economy than BREXIT but that’s not what the report actually says. This may be a bit pedantic but that’s not actually what the report says. What it actually says is that a Corbyn led Labour government MAYBE worse for Britain than BREXIT “The nationalisation of key industries, higher taxes and a shift in spending priorities towards low-income households under Corbyn’s leadership COULD damage valuations of UK companies”. “The UK is in the midst of a double whammy of uncertainty in the shape of BREXIT a fragile domestic political situation. Taken together, these two factors – which are interrelated to some degree – cast a long shadow over the policy backdrop and economic outlook of the UK,” “For the UK market, domestic politics MAY BE perceived as a bigger risk than Brexit,” “From a UK investor perspective, we believe that the domestic political situation is AT LEAST AS significant as BREXIT, given the fragile state of the current government and the perceived risks of an incoming Labour administration that COULD potentially embark on a radical change in policy direction” I know I’m not going to get agreement on this with many on here who normally agree with me on BREXIT but I firmly believe that that a Corbyn led Labour government would be an absolute financial disaster for the UK but here’s the thing:- One of the biggest supporters, both politically and financially, of the Conservative party is saying that a Corbyn led Labour government MAY BE worse for Britain than what has become the main economic policy of the Conservative party, namely BREXIT. By implication, if it only MAY BE worse for Britain than BREXIT, then it MAY also BE not as bad for Britain as BREXIT. If that’s what one of the Conservative’s biggest backers is saying, how many other former Conservative baggers, supporters and voters might be thinking the same thing? Thanks a lot UKIPTories, you’ve not only engineered a totally unnecessary economic crises in the UK, possible breakup of the UK, a disastrous exit from the EU but also created the possibility of Corbyn led Labour government to see over the mess you’ve made, that will squeeze us all till ‘the pips squeak’ for every and any last drop of wealth that might remain after BREXIT. I didn’t see that written on the BREXIT red bus anywhere either. Where does that quote come from and if its a paper what paper ? " My quotes of the report come from the Guardian and the report itself is from Morgan Stanley. IF you want to know about the report you can google 'Corbyn may be worse than BREXIT' and find out more yourself. The intent of my post is neither to agree or disagree with the findings of the report or the Guardian's article on it. The point of the post is is that even one the Conservative's biggest supporters is now starting to question whether a Corbyn led Labour government would actually be worse for this county's future than the current BREXIT (aka economically suicidal) policy of this Conservative government. Forget for a moment whether you agree or disagree with BREXIT or whether you think Corbyn is Britain's savour or a 70's through back and just think about the significance of one of the Conservative's biggest backers questioning whether any Labour government, never mind a Corbyn led Labour government, would actually be worse for the UK than the current government. Read this paragraph again and make sure you've actually read what I've just written before you dismiss this out of hand. This is very significant. | |||
"Many papers have quoted a recent Morgan Stanley report on the possible prospects of a future Labour government under Jeremy potentially doing more harm to the British economy than BREXIT but that’s not what the report actually says. This may be a bit pedantic but that’s not actually what the report says. What it actually says is that a Corbyn led Labour government MAYBE worse for Britain than BREXIT “The nationalisation of key industries, higher taxes and a shift in spending priorities towards low-income households under Corbyn’s leadership COULD damage valuations of UK companies”. “The UK is in the midst of a double whammy of uncertainty in the shape of BREXIT a fragile domestic political situation. Taken together, these two factors – which are interrelated to some degree – cast a long shadow over the policy backdrop and economic outlook of the UK,” “For the UK market, domestic politics MAY BE perceived as a bigger risk than Brexit,” “From a UK investor perspective, we believe that the domestic political situation is AT LEAST AS significant as BREXIT, given the fragile state of the current government and the perceived risks of an incoming Labour administration that COULD potentially embark on a radical change in policy direction” I know I’m not going to get agreement on this with many on here who normally agree with me on BREXIT but I firmly believe that that a Corbyn led Labour government would be an absolute financial disaster for the UK but here’s the thing:- One of the biggest supporters, both politically and financially, of the Conservative party is saying that a Corbyn led Labour government MAY BE worse for Britain than what has become the main economic policy of the Conservative party, namely BREXIT. By implication, if it only MAY BE worse for Britain than BREXIT, then it MAY also BE not as bad for Britain as BREXIT. If that’s what one of the Conservative’s biggest backers is saying, how many other former Conservative baggers, supporters and voters might be thinking the same thing? Thanks a lot UKIPTories, you’ve not only engineered a totally unnecessary economic crises in the UK, possible breakup of the UK, a disastrous exit from the EU but also created the possibility of Corbyn led Labour government to see over the mess you’ve made, that will squeeze us all till ‘the pips squeak’ for every and any last drop of wealth that might remain after BREXIT. I didn’t see that written on the BREXIT red bus anywhere either. Where does that quote come from and if its a paper what paper ? My quotes of the report come from the Guardian and the report itself is from Morgan Stanley. IF you want to know about the report you can google 'Corbyn may be worse than BREXIT' and find out more yourself. The intent of my post is neither to agree or disagree with the findings of the report or the Guardian's article on it. The point of the post is is that even one the Conservative's biggest supporters is now starting to question whether a Corbyn led Labour government would actually be worse for this county's future than the current BREXIT (aka economically suicidal) policy of this Conservative government. Forget for a moment whether you agree or disagree with BREXIT or whether you think Corbyn is Britain's savour or a 70's through back and just think about the significance of one of the Conservative's biggest backers questioning whether any Labour government, never mind a Corbyn led Labour government, would actually be worse for the UK than the current government. Read this paragraph again and make sure you've actually read what I've just written before you dismiss this out of hand. This is very significant. " Well its none news then if its from the Tory supporting Morgan Stanley really...it loses all credibility to be unbiased...mays well had quoted and asked Centuar to write it | |||
"And yet, by simply having taken the time to think through the ramifications of their policies, they're already showing that they're better equipped to lead than May et al. And yet, by simply having Diane Abbott in your team - any chance of credibility is sadly lost ...... Unless you are a comedy team of course " May and her cabinet aren't exactly top shelf material, with Johnson actively harming the very citizens he's meant to be helping, and of course former disgraced minister who resigned in disgrace, Liam Fox, so I'd be less quick to single out that black woman you don't like. | |||
"Many papers have quoted a recent Morgan Stanley report on the possible prospects of a future Labour government under Jeremy potentially doing more harm to the British economy than BREXIT but that’s not what the report actually says. This may be a bit pedantic but that’s not actually what the report says. What it actually says is that a Corbyn led Labour government MAYBE worse for Britain than BREXIT “The nationalisation of key industries, higher taxes and a shift in spending priorities towards low-income households under Corbyn’s leadership COULD damage valuations of UK companies”. “The UK is in the midst of a double whammy of uncertainty in the shape of BREXIT a fragile domestic political situation. Taken together, these two factors – which are interrelated to some degree – cast a long shadow over the policy backdrop and economic outlook of the UK,” “For the UK market, domestic politics MAY BE perceived as a bigger risk than Brexit,” “From a UK investor perspective, we believe that the domestic political situation is AT LEAST AS significant as BREXIT, given the fragile state of the current government and the perceived risks of an incoming Labour administration that COULD potentially embark on a radical change in policy direction” I know I’m not going to get agreement on this with many on here who normally agree with me on BREXIT but I firmly believe that that a Corbyn led Labour government would be an absolute financial disaster for the UK but here’s the thing:- One of the biggest supporters, both politically and financially, of the Conservative party is saying that a Corbyn led Labour government MAY BE worse for Britain than what has become the main economic policy of the Conservative party, namely BREXIT. By implication, if it only MAY BE worse for Britain than BREXIT, then it MAY also BE not as bad for Britain as BREXIT. If that’s what one of the Conservative’s biggest backers is saying, how many other former Conservative baggers, supporters and voters might be thinking the same thing? Thanks a lot UKIPTories, you’ve not only engineered a totally unnecessary economic crises in the UK, possible breakup of the UK, a disastrous exit from the EU but also created the possibility of Corbyn led Labour government to see over the mess you’ve made, that will squeeze us all till ‘the pips squeak’ for every and any last drop of wealth that might remain after BREXIT. I didn’t see that written on the BREXIT red bus anywhere either. It's not just the bank Morgan Stanley warning against the effects of a Corbyn Labour government though is it OP. Warnings are coming from within the Labour party itself. First of all we had Corbyn and his Shadow Chancellor John McDonnel saying publicly they were making contingency plans for a run on the pound £ should they be elected into power. Then just 2 or 3 days ago a top Corbynista and Labour party activist called Mika Minio-Paluello admitted that Labours nationalisation plans could leave the country "fucked". Leftie activist Mika Minio-Paluello, who sits on the high level Labour energy forum, warned the cost of taking over rail, mail and energy firm's risks wrecking people's pensions. Ms Minio-Paluello told a political event it would see pensions "Fucked". She said, "On specifics, we nationalise shit, but those companies have lots of debt. Now if we don't keep paying the debt the UK's credit rating is fucked and we can't borrow money". Ms Minio-Paluello told the meeting, "I'm chair of my local branch and I've also been doing various advice for Corbyn's team and central office". So there you have it even Labours own high level activists know Corbyn's spending plans would be disastrous for the country. " Tbh planning for a the run on the pound in this day is probably an important issue, whichever party we are on about. Effectively planning for a run on the pound is simulating and stress testing for capital flight, and funnily enough I'd like it if all parties were to plan for potential capital flight as brexit approaches, plus they should do it in regards to their economic manifestos. It's a good idea for a 'radical left' labour opposition to stress test for a run on the pound in a time when they might be planning heavy national investment coupled with the potential effects of brexit. | |||
"Many papers have quoted a recent Morgan Stanley report on the possible prospects of a future Labour government under Jeremy potentially doing more harm to the British economy than BREXIT but that’s not what the report actually says. This may be a bit pedantic but that’s not actually what the report says. What it actually says is that a Corbyn led Labour government MAYBE worse for Britain than BREXIT “The nationalisation of key industries, higher taxes and a shift in spending priorities towards low-income households under Corbyn’s leadership COULD damage valuations of UK companies”. “The UK is in the midst of a double whammy of uncertainty in the shape of BREXIT a fragile domestic political situation. Taken together, these two factors – which are interrelated to some degree – cast a long shadow over the policy backdrop and economic outlook of the UK,” “For the UK market, domestic politics MAY BE perceived as a bigger risk than Brexit,” “From a UK investor perspective, we believe that the domestic political situation is AT LEAST AS significant as BREXIT, given the fragile state of the current government and the perceived risks of an incoming Labour administration that COULD potentially embark on a radical change in policy direction” I know I’m not going to get agreement on this with many on here who normally agree with me on BREXIT but I firmly believe that that a Corbyn led Labour government would be an absolute financial disaster for the UK but here’s the thing:- One of the biggest supporters, both politically and financially, of the Conservative party is saying that a Corbyn led Labour government MAY BE worse for Britain than what has become the main economic policy of the Conservative party, namely BREXIT. By implication, if it only MAY BE worse for Britain than BREXIT, then it MAY also BE not as bad for Britain as BREXIT. If that’s what one of the Conservative’s biggest backers is saying, how many other former Conservative baggers, supporters and voters might be thinking the same thing? Thanks a lot UKIPTories, you’ve not only engineered a totally unnecessary economic crises in the UK, possible breakup of the UK, a disastrous exit from the EU but also created the possibility of Corbyn led Labour government to see over the mess you’ve made, that will squeeze us all till ‘the pips squeak’ for every and any last drop of wealth that might remain after BREXIT. I didn’t see that written on the BREXIT red bus anywhere either. Where does that quote come from and if its a paper what paper ? My quotes of the report come from the Guardian and the report itself is from Morgan Stanley. IF you want to know about the report you can google 'Corbyn may be worse than BREXIT' and find out more yourself. The intent of my post is neither to agree or disagree with the findings of the report or the Guardian's article on it. The point of the post is is that even one the Conservative's biggest supporters is now starting to question whether a Corbyn led Labour government would actually be worse for this county's future than the current BREXIT (aka economically suicidal) policy of this Conservative government. Forget for a moment whether you agree or disagree with BREXIT or whether you think Corbyn is Britain's savour or a 70's through back and just think about the significance of one of the Conservative's biggest backers questioning whether any Labour government, never mind a Corbyn led Labour government, would actually be worse for the UK than the current government. Read this paragraph again and make sure you've actually read what I've just written before you dismiss this out of hand. This is very significant. " Agreed, when your trumpet blowers are putting in 25% effort for their job then you know their not confident with the orders given. | |||
"Many papers have quoted a recent Morgan Stanley report on the possible prospects of a future Labour government under Jeremy potentially doing more harm to the British economy than BREXIT but that’s not what the report actually says. This may be a bit pedantic but that’s not actually what the report says. What it actually says is that a Corbyn led Labour government MAYBE worse for Britain than BREXIT “The nationalisation of key industries, higher taxes and a shift in spending priorities towards low-income households under Corbyn’s leadership COULD damage valuations of UK companies”. “The UK is in the midst of a double whammy of uncertainty in the shape of BREXIT a fragile domestic political situation. Taken together, these two factors – which are interrelated to some degree – cast a long shadow over the policy backdrop and economic outlook of the UK,” “For the UK market, domestic politics MAY BE perceived as a bigger risk than Brexit,” “From a UK investor perspective, we believe that the domestic political situation is AT LEAST AS significant as BREXIT, given the fragile state of the current government and the perceived risks of an incoming Labour administration that COULD potentially embark on a radical change in policy direction” I know I’m not going to get agreement on this with many on here who normally agree with me on BREXIT but I firmly believe that that a Corbyn led Labour government would be an absolute financial disaster for the UK but here’s the thing:- One of the biggest supporters, both politically and financially, of the Conservative party is saying that a Corbyn led Labour government MAY BE worse for Britain than what has become the main economic policy of the Conservative party, namely BREXIT. By implication, if it only MAY BE worse for Britain than BREXIT, then it MAY also BE not as bad for Britain as BREXIT. If that’s what one of the Conservative’s biggest backers is saying, how many other former Conservative baggers, supporters and voters might be thinking the same thing? Thanks a lot UKIPTories, you’ve not only engineered a totally unnecessary economic crises in the UK, possible breakup of the UK, a disastrous exit from the EU but also created the possibility of Corbyn led Labour government to see over the mess you’ve made, that will squeeze us all till ‘the pips squeak’ for every and any last drop of wealth that might remain after BREXIT. I didn’t see that written on the BREXIT red bus anywhere either. Where does that quote come from and if its a paper what paper ? My quotes of the report come from the Guardian and the report itself is from Morgan Stanley. IF you want to know about the report you can google 'Corbyn may be worse than BREXIT' and find out more yourself. The intent of my post is neither to agree or disagree with the findings of the report or the Guardian's article on it. The point of the post is is that even one the Conservative's biggest supporters is now starting to question whether a Corbyn led Labour government would actually be worse for this county's future than the current BREXIT (aka economically suicidal) policy of this Conservative government. Forget for a moment whether you agree or disagree with BREXIT or whether you think Corbyn is Britain's savour or a 70's through back and just think about the significance of one of the Conservative's biggest backers questioning whether any Labour government, never mind a Corbyn led Labour government, would actually be worse for the UK than the current government. Read this paragraph again and make sure you've actually read what I've just written before you dismiss this out of hand. This is very significant. Well its none news then if its from the Tory supporting Morgan Stanley really...it loses all credibility to be unbiased...mays well had quoted and asked Centuar to write it " You've really failed to grasp the concept of this thread totally #facepalm | |||
| |||
"And yet, by simply having taken the time to think through the ramifications of their policies, they're already showing that they're better equipped to lead than May et al. And yet, by simply having Diane Abbott in your team - any chance of credibility is sadly lost ...... Unless you are a comedy team of course May and her cabinet aren't exactly top shelf material, with Johnson actively harming the very citizens he's meant to be helping, and of course former disgraced minister who resigned in disgrace, Liam Fox, so I'd be less quick to single out that black woman you don't like." I don't dislike her, we love her in this part of the World and think all your comedians are great | |||
"Many papers have quoted a recent Morgan Stanley report on the possible prospects of a future Labour government under Jeremy potentially doing more harm to the British economy than BREXIT but that’s not what the report actually says. This may be a bit pedantic but that’s not actually what the report says. What it actually says is that a Corbyn led Labour government MAYBE worse for Britain than BREXIT “The nationalisation of key industries, higher taxes and a shift in spending priorities towards low-income households under Corbyn’s leadership COULD damage valuations of UK companies”. “The UK is in the midst of a double whammy of uncertainty in the shape of BREXIT a fragile domestic political situation. Taken together, these two factors – which are interrelated to some degree – cast a long shadow over the policy backdrop and economic outlook of the UK,” “For the UK market, domestic politics MAY BE perceived as a bigger risk than Brexit,” “From a UK investor perspective, we believe that the domestic political situation is AT LEAST AS significant as BREXIT, given the fragile state of the current government and the perceived risks of an incoming Labour administration that COULD potentially embark on a radical change in policy direction” I know I’m not going to get agreement on this with many on here who normally agree with me on BREXIT but I firmly believe that that a Corbyn led Labour government would be an absolute financial disaster for the UK but here’s the thing:- One of the biggest supporters, both politically and financially, of the Conservative party is saying that a Corbyn led Labour government MAY BE worse for Britain than what has become the main economic policy of the Conservative party, namely BREXIT. By implication, if it only MAY BE worse for Britain than BREXIT, then it MAY also BE not as bad for Britain as BREXIT. If that’s what one of the Conservative’s biggest backers is saying, how many other former Conservative baggers, supporters and voters might be thinking the same thing? Thanks a lot UKIPTories, you’ve not only engineered a totally unnecessary economic crises in the UK, possible breakup of the UK, a disastrous exit from the EU but also created the possibility of Corbyn led Labour government to see over the mess you’ve made, that will squeeze us all till ‘the pips squeak’ for every and any last drop of wealth that might remain after BREXIT. I didn’t see that written on the BREXIT red bus anywhere either. Where does that quote come from and if its a paper what paper ? I would probably think andrex bog paper but not the soft stuff that hard tracing paper we used to have at school " So now the OP has revealed his quotes came from the Guardian, you think the Guardian is andrex bog paper. | |||
"Many papers have quoted a recent Morgan Stanley report on the possible prospects of a future Labour government under Jeremy potentially doing more harm to the British economy than BREXIT but that’s not what the report actually says. This may be a bit pedantic but that’s not actually what the report says. What it actually says is that a Corbyn led Labour government MAYBE worse for Britain than BREXIT “The nationalisation of key industries, higher taxes and a shift in spending priorities towards low-income households under Corbyn’s leadership COULD damage valuations of UK companies”. “The UK is in the midst of a double whammy of uncertainty in the shape of BREXIT a fragile domestic political situation. Taken together, these two factors – which are interrelated to some degree – cast a long shadow over the policy backdrop and economic outlook of the UK,” “For the UK market, domestic politics MAY BE perceived as a bigger risk than Brexit,” “From a UK investor perspective, we believe that the domestic political situation is AT LEAST AS significant as BREXIT, given the fragile state of the current government and the perceived risks of an incoming Labour administration that COULD potentially embark on a radical change in policy direction” I know I’m not going to get agreement on this with many on here who normally agree with me on BREXIT but I firmly believe that that a Corbyn led Labour government would be an absolute financial disaster for the UK but here’s the thing:- One of the biggest supporters, both politically and financially, of the Conservative party is saying that a Corbyn led Labour government MAY BE worse for Britain than what has become the main economic policy of the Conservative party, namely BREXIT. By implication, if it only MAY BE worse for Britain than BREXIT, then it MAY also BE not as bad for Britain as BREXIT. If that’s what one of the Conservative’s biggest backers is saying, how many other former Conservative baggers, supporters and voters might be thinking the same thing? Thanks a lot UKIPTories, you’ve not only engineered a totally unnecessary economic crises in the UK, possible breakup of the UK, a disastrous exit from the EU but also created the possibility of Corbyn led Labour government to see over the mess you’ve made, that will squeeze us all till ‘the pips squeak’ for every and any last drop of wealth that might remain after BREXIT. I didn’t see that written on the BREXIT red bus anywhere either. " thought you brexiters disnt like getting told what to do by people from the outside ...isnt that what was said about obama? | |||
| |||
"If Brexit or remaining were handled successfully by Labour, they would still say the same thing. He's not loved by them, for what may happen to their business practices. That's the only story. " No that's not the story at all. The real story is that one of the Conservative's leading supporters and financial backers is NOT saying a Corbyn led government would be worse than the current Consecutive government only that it MAY be worse. Don't any of you actually get how fundamentally important and significant that actually is? | |||
"If Brexit or remaining were handled successfully by Labour, they would still say the same thing. He's not loved by them, for what may happen to their business practices. That's the only story. No that's not the story at all. The real story is that one of the Conservative's leading supporters and financial backers is NOT saying a Corbyn led government would be worse than the current Consecutive government only that it MAY be worse. Don't any of you actually get how fundamentally important and significant that actually is?" Yeah I see what you mean. The Torys are doing so badly that even their own backers are considering the option of Labour instead. But Morgan Stanley on its own isnt going to make a huge difference, if this is part of a wider change of opinion it could be significant considering the government may fall. | |||
"Many papers have quoted a recent Morgan Stanley report on the possible prospects of a future Labour government under Jeremy potentially doing more harm to the British economy than BREXIT but that’s not what the report actually says. This may be a bit pedantic but that’s not actually what the report says. What it actually says is that a Corbyn led Labour government MAYBE worse for Britain than BREXIT “The nationalisation of key industries, higher taxes and a shift in spending priorities towards low-income households under Corbyn’s leadership COULD damage valuations of UK companies”. “The UK is in the midst of a double whammy of uncertainty in the shape of BREXIT a fragile domestic political situation. Taken together, these two factors – which are interrelated to some degree – cast a long shadow over the policy backdrop and economic outlook of the UK,” “For the UK market, domestic politics MAY BE perceived as a bigger risk than Brexit,” “From a UK investor perspective, we believe that the domestic political situation is AT LEAST AS significant as BREXIT, given the fragile state of the current government and the perceived risks of an incoming Labour administration that COULD potentially embark on a radical change in policy direction” I know I’m not going to get agreement on this with many on here who normally agree with me on BREXIT but I firmly believe that that a Corbyn led Labour government would be an absolute financial disaster for the UK but here’s the thing:- One of the biggest supporters, both politically and financially, of the Conservative party is saying that a Corbyn led Labour government MAY BE worse for Britain than what has become the main economic policy of the Conservative party, namely BREXIT. By implication, if it only MAY BE worse for Britain than BREXIT, then it MAY also BE not as bad for Britain as BREXIT. If that’s what one of the Conservative’s biggest backers is saying, how many other former Conservative baggers, supporters and voters might be thinking the same thing? Thanks a lot UKIPTories, you’ve not only engineered a totally unnecessary economic crises in the UK, possible breakup of the UK, a disastrous exit from the EU but also created the possibility of Corbyn led Labour government to see over the mess you’ve made, that will squeeze us all till ‘the pips squeak’ for every and any last drop of wealth that might remain after BREXIT. I didn’t see that written on the BREXIT red bus anywhere either. " Yes Corbyn will destroy this country with or without brexit,if he gets in we are finished | |||
"Many papers have quoted a recent Morgan Stanley report on the possible prospects of a future Labour government under Jeremy potentially doing more harm to the British economy than BREXIT but that’s not what the report actually says. This may be a bit pedantic but that’s not actually what the report says. What it actually says is that a Corbyn led Labour government MAYBE worse for Britain than BREXIT “The nationalisation of key industries, higher taxes and a shift in spending priorities towards low-income households under Corbyn’s leadership COULD damage valuations of UK companies”. “The UK is in the midst of a double whammy of uncertainty in the shape of BREXIT a fragile domestic political situation. Taken together, these two factors – which are interrelated to some degree – cast a long shadow over the policy backdrop and economic outlook of the UK,” “For the UK market, domestic politics MAY BE perceived as a bigger risk than Brexit,” “From a UK investor perspective, we believe that the domestic political situation is AT LEAST AS significant as BREXIT, given the fragile state of the current government and the perceived risks of an incoming Labour administration that COULD potentially embark on a radical change in policy direction” I know I’m not going to get agreement on this with many on here who normally agree with me on BREXIT but I firmly believe that that a Corbyn led Labour government would be an absolute financial disaster for the UK but here’s the thing:- One of the biggest supporters, both politically and financially, of the Conservative party is saying that a Corbyn led Labour government MAY BE worse for Britain than what has become the main economic policy of the Conservative party, namely BREXIT. By implication, if it only MAY BE worse for Britain than BREXIT, then it MAY also BE not as bad for Britain as BREXIT. If that’s what one of the Conservative’s biggest backers is saying, how many other former Conservative baggers, supporters and voters might be thinking the same thing? Thanks a lot UKIPTories, you’ve not only engineered a totally unnecessary economic crises in the UK, possible breakup of the UK, a disastrous exit from the EU but also created the possibility of Corbyn led Labour government to see over the mess you’ve made, that will squeeze us all till ‘the pips squeak’ for every and any last drop of wealth that might remain after BREXIT. I didn’t see that written on the BREXIT red bus anywhere either. Yes Corbyn will destroy this country with or without brexit,if he gets in we are finished" What do you mean destroy.....the tories are doing a great job of it without his help | |||
"Many papers have quoted a recent Morgan Stanley report on the possible prospects of a future Labour government under Jeremy potentially doing more harm to the British economy than BREXIT but that’s not what the report actually says. This may be a bit pedantic but that’s not actually what the report says. What it actually says is that a Corbyn led Labour government MAYBE worse for Britain than BREXIT “The nationalisation of key industries, higher taxes and a shift in spending priorities towards low-income households under Corbyn’s leadership COULD damage valuations of UK companies”. “The UK is in the midst of a double whammy of uncertainty in the shape of BREXIT a fragile domestic political situation. Taken together, these two factors – which are interrelated to some degree – cast a long shadow over the policy backdrop and economic outlook of the UK,” “For the UK market, domestic politics MAY BE perceived as a bigger risk than Brexit,” “From a UK investor perspective, we believe that the domestic political situation is AT LEAST AS significant as BREXIT, given the fragile state of the current government and the perceived risks of an incoming Labour administration that COULD potentially embark on a radical change in policy direction” I know I’m not going to get agreement on this with many on here who normally agree with me on BREXIT but I firmly believe that that a Corbyn led Labour government would be an absolute financial disaster for the UK but here’s the thing:- One of the biggest supporters, both politically and financially, of the Conservative party is saying that a Corbyn led Labour government MAY BE worse for Britain than what has become the main economic policy of the Conservative party, namely BREXIT. By implication, if it only MAY BE worse for Britain than BREXIT, then it MAY also BE not as bad for Britain as BREXIT. If that’s what one of the Conservative’s biggest backers is saying, how many other former Conservative baggers, supporters and voters might be thinking the same thing? Thanks a lot UKIPTories, you’ve not only engineered a totally unnecessary economic crises in the UK, possible breakup of the UK, a disastrous exit from the EU but also created the possibility of Corbyn led Labour government to see over the mess you’ve made, that will squeeze us all till ‘the pips squeak’ for every and any last drop of wealth that might remain after BREXIT. I didn’t see that written on the BREXIT red bus anywhere either. Yes Corbyn will destroy this country with or without brexit,if he gets in we are finished What do you mean destroy.....the tories are doing a great job of it without his help " I mean DESTROY, we could end up like Zimbabwe we could have hyper inflation,there economic policies would be suicide.He would also force the banks to leave and nobody prepared to lend us money,it is very simple and it is only idealists that do not want to see this.There is no socialist/communist utopia and there never has been a fact | |||
"Many papers have quoted a recent Morgan Stanley report on the possible prospects of a future Labour government under Jeremy potentially doing more harm to the British economy than BREXIT but that’s not what the report actually says. This may be a bit pedantic but that’s not actually what the report says. What it actually says is that a Corbyn led Labour government MAYBE worse for Britain than BREXIT “The nationalisation of key industries, higher taxes and a shift in spending priorities towards low-income households under Corbyn’s leadership COULD damage valuations of UK companies”. “The UK is in the midst of a double whammy of uncertainty in the shape of BREXIT a fragile domestic political situation. Taken together, these two factors – which are interrelated to some degree – cast a long shadow over the policy backdrop and economic outlook of the UK,” “For the UK market, domestic politics MAY BE perceived as a bigger risk than Brexit,” “From a UK investor perspective, we believe that the domestic political situation is AT LEAST AS significant as BREXIT, given the fragile state of the current government and the perceived risks of an incoming Labour administration that COULD potentially embark on a radical change in policy direction” I know I’m not going to get agreement on this with many on here who normally agree with me on BREXIT but I firmly believe that that a Corbyn led Labour government would be an absolute financial disaster for the UK but here’s the thing:- One of the biggest supporters, both politically and financially, of the Conservative party is saying that a Corbyn led Labour government MAY BE worse for Britain than what has become the main economic policy of the Conservative party, namely BREXIT. By implication, if it only MAY BE worse for Britain than BREXIT, then it MAY also BE not as bad for Britain as BREXIT. If that’s what one of the Conservative’s biggest backers is saying, how many other former Conservative baggers, supporters and voters might be thinking the same thing? Thanks a lot UKIPTories, you’ve not only engineered a totally unnecessary economic crises in the UK, possible breakup of the UK, a disastrous exit from the EU but also created the possibility of Corbyn led Labour government to see over the mess you’ve made, that will squeeze us all till ‘the pips squeak’ for every and any last drop of wealth that might remain after BREXIT. I didn’t see that written on the BREXIT red bus anywhere either. Yes Corbyn will destroy this country with or without brexit,if he gets in we are finished What do you mean destroy.....the tories are doing a great job of it without his help " Last time I checked the stock exchange was close to an all time high as were car sales. In addition unemployment is extremely low and productivity ( when adjusted to account for the rise in technology based businesses is also high.) . We have very few house repossessions the boom in the number of coffee shops would indicate that people are not short of money to spend. The borrowing proposed by John McDonnell would destroy the country . He even had the cheek to suggest that his expenditure would pay for itself which is economic nonsense. | |||
"Many papers have quoted a recent Morgan Stanley report on the possible prospects of a future Labour government under Jeremy potentially doing more harm to the British economy than BREXIT but that’s not what the report actually says. This may be a bit pedantic but that’s not actually what the report says. What it actually says is that a Corbyn led Labour government MAYBE worse for Britain than BREXIT “The nationalisation of key industries, higher taxes and a shift in spending priorities towards low-income households under Corbyn’s leadership COULD damage valuations of UK companies”. “The UK is in the midst of a double whammy of uncertainty in the shape of BREXIT a fragile domestic political situation. Taken together, these two factors – which are interrelated to some degree – cast a long shadow over the policy backdrop and economic outlook of the UK,” “For the UK market, domestic politics MAY BE perceived as a bigger risk than Brexit,” “From a UK investor perspective, we believe that the domestic political situation is AT LEAST AS significant as BREXIT, given the fragile state of the current government and the perceived risks of an incoming Labour administration that COULD potentially embark on a radical change in policy direction” I know I’m not going to get agreement on this with many on here who normally agree with me on BREXIT but I firmly believe that that a Corbyn led Labour government would be an absolute financial disaster for the UK but here’s the thing:- One of the biggest supporters, both politically and financially, of the Conservative party is saying that a Corbyn led Labour government MAY BE worse for Britain than what has become the main economic policy of the Conservative party, namely BREXIT. By implication, if it only MAY BE worse for Britain than BREXIT, then it MAY also BE not as bad for Britain as BREXIT. If that’s what one of the Conservative’s biggest backers is saying, how many other former Conservative baggers, supporters and voters might be thinking the same thing? Thanks a lot UKIPTories, you’ve not only engineered a totally unnecessary economic crises in the UK, possible breakup of the UK, a disastrous exit from the EU but also created the possibility of Corbyn led Labour government to see over the mess you’ve made, that will squeeze us all till ‘the pips squeak’ for every and any last drop of wealth that might remain after BREXIT. I didn’t see that written on the BREXIT red bus anywhere either. Yes Corbyn will destroy this country with or without brexit,if he gets in we are finished What do you mean destroy.....the tories are doing a great job of it without his help Last time I checked the stock exchange was close to an all time high as were car sales. In addition unemployment is extremely low and productivity ( when adjusted to account for the rise in technology based businesses is also high.) . We have very few house repossessions the boom in the number of coffee shops would indicate that people are not short of money to spend. The borrowing proposed by John McDonnell would destroy the country . He even had the cheek to suggest that his expenditure would pay for itself which is economic nonsense. " The stock exchange is high because the pound has plummeted...everything to do with this government fucking up and on there way out...the tories have borrowed far far more money than labour ever has in there history....you need to do wsome research and stop reading those red tops | |||
| |||
"Many papers have quoted a recent Morgan Stanley report on the possible prospects of a future Labour government under Jeremy potentially doing more harm to the British economy than BREXIT but that’s not what the report actually says. This may be a bit pedantic but that’s not actually what the report says. What it actually says is that a Corbyn led Labour government MAYBE worse for Britain than BREXIT “The nationalisation of key industries, higher taxes and a shift in spending priorities towards low-income households under Corbyn’s leadership COULD damage valuations of UK companies”. “The UK is in the midst of a double whammy of uncertainty in the shape of BREXIT a fragile domestic political situation. Taken together, these two factors – which are interrelated to some degree – cast a long shadow over the policy backdrop and economic outlook of the UK,” “For the UK market, domestic politics MAY BE perceived as a bigger risk than Brexit,” “From a UK investor perspective, we believe that the domestic political situation is AT LEAST AS significant as BREXIT, given the fragile state of the current government and the perceived risks of an incoming Labour administration that COULD potentially embark on a radical change in policy direction” I know I’m not going to get agreement on this with many on here who normally agree with me on BREXIT but I firmly believe that that a Corbyn led Labour government would be an absolute financial disaster for the UK but here’s the thing:- One of the biggest supporters, both politically and financially, of the Conservative party is saying that a Corbyn led Labour government MAY BE worse for Britain than what has become the main economic policy of the Conservative party, namely BREXIT. By implication, if it only MAY BE worse for Britain than BREXIT, then it MAY also BE not as bad for Britain as BREXIT. If that’s what one of the Conservative’s biggest backers is saying, how many other former Conservative baggers, supporters and voters might be thinking the same thing? Thanks a lot UKIPTories, you’ve not only engineered a totally unnecessary economic crises in the UK, possible breakup of the UK, a disastrous exit from the EU but also created the possibility of Corbyn led Labour government to see over the mess you’ve made, that will squeeze us all till ‘the pips squeak’ for every and any last drop of wealth that might remain after BREXIT. I didn’t see that written on the BREXIT red bus anywhere either. Yes Corbyn will destroy this country with or without brexit,if he gets in we are finished What do you mean destroy.....the tories are doing a great job of it without his help Last time I checked the stock exchange was close to an all time high as were car sales. In addition unemployment is extremely low and productivity ( when adjusted to account for the rise in technology based businesses is also high.) . We have very few house repossessions the boom in the number of coffee shops would indicate that people are not short of money to spend. The borrowing proposed by John McDonnell would destroy the country . He even had the cheek to suggest that his expenditure would pay for itself which is economic nonsense. The stock exchange is high because the pound has plummeted...everything to do with this government fucking up and on there way out...the tories have borrowed far far more money than labour ever has in there history....you need to do wsome research and stop reading those red tops " I thought that the Stock Exchange is high because investors have long term confidence in the future of the British economy. All the currency movement does is make imports more expensive and exports more competitive . There may be some benefits if earnings are abroad and remitted to the UK but this may need to be offset against currency movements on loans. It is probably best to take the simplistic approach and accept that the Stock Market is a barometer of the performance of the UK economy and has performed exceptionally well in the last two years . This is of course great news for workers who are members of share save schemes or pensioners who rely on dividend income to fund their retirement . I do not think many of the South Wales steel workers who has cashed in final salary pension schemes will have many complaints about a strongly performing stock market . | |||
"Many papers have quoted a recent Morgan Stanley report on the possible prospects of a future Labour government under Jeremy potentially doing more harm to the British economy than BREXIT but that’s not what the report actually says. This may be a bit pedantic but that’s not actually what the report says. What it actually says is that a Corbyn led Labour government MAYBE worse for Britain than BREXIT “The nationalisation of key industries, higher taxes and a shift in spending priorities towards low-income households under Corbyn’s leadership COULD damage valuations of UK companies”. “The UK is in the midst of a double whammy of uncertainty in the shape of BREXIT a fragile domestic political situation. Taken together, these two factors – which are interrelated to some degree – cast a long shadow over the policy backdrop and economic outlook of the UK,” “For the UK market, domestic politics MAY BE perceived as a bigger risk than Brexit,” “From a UK investor perspective, we believe that the domestic political situation is AT LEAST AS significant as BREXIT, given the fragile state of the current government and the perceived risks of an incoming Labour administration that COULD potentially embark on a radical change in policy direction” I know I’m not going to get agreement on this with many on here who normally agree with me on BREXIT but I firmly believe that that a Corbyn led Labour government would be an absolute financial disaster for the UK but here’s the thing:- One of the biggest supporters, both politically and financially, of the Conservative party is saying that a Corbyn led Labour government MAY BE worse for Britain than what has become the main economic policy of the Conservative party, namely BREXIT. By implication, if it only MAY BE worse for Britain than BREXIT, then it MAY also BE not as bad for Britain as BREXIT. If that’s what one of the Conservative’s biggest backers is saying, how many other former Conservative baggers, supporters and voters might be thinking the same thing? Thanks a lot UKIPTories, you’ve not only engineered a totally unnecessary economic crises in the UK, possible breakup of the UK, a disastrous exit from the EU but also created the possibility of Corbyn led Labour government to see over the mess you’ve made, that will squeeze us all till ‘the pips squeak’ for every and any last drop of wealth that might remain after BREXIT. I didn’t see that written on the BREXIT red bus anywhere either. Yes Corbyn will destroy this country with or without brexit,if he gets in we are finished What do you mean destroy.....the tories are doing a great job of it without his help Last time I checked the stock exchange was close to an all time high as were car sales. In addition unemployment is extremely low and productivity ( when adjusted to account for the rise in technology based businesses is also high.) . We have very few house repossessions the boom in the number of coffee shops would indicate that people are not short of money to spend. The borrowing proposed by John McDonnell would destroy the country . He even had the cheek to suggest that his expenditure would pay for itself which is economic nonsense. The stock exchange is high because the pound has plummeted...everything to do with this government fucking up and on there way out...the tories have borrowed far far more money than labour ever has in there history....you need to do wsome research and stop reading those red tops I thought that the Stock Exchange is high because investors have long term confidence in the future of the British economy. All the currency movement does is make imports more expensive and exports more competitive . There may be some benefits if earnings are abroad and remitted to the UK but this may need to be offset against currency movements on loans. It is probably best to take the simplistic approach and accept that the Stock Market is a barometer of the performance of the UK economy and has performed exceptionally well in the last two years . This is of course great news for workers who are members of share save schemes or pensioners who rely on dividend income to fund their retirement . I do not think many of the South Wales steel workers who has cashed in final salary pension schemes will have many complaints about a strongly performing stock market . " The stock exchange is high because the pounds low....you must really do some research on these things...instead of posting bollocks | |||
"Many papers have quoted a recent Morgan Stanley report on the possible prospects of a future Labour government under Jeremy potentially doing more harm to the British economy than BREXIT but that’s not what the report actually says. This may be a bit pedantic but that’s not actually what the report says. What it actually says is that a Corbyn led Labour government MAYBE worse for Britain than BREXIT “The nationalisation of key industries, higher taxes and a shift in spending priorities towards low-income households under Corbyn’s leadership COULD damage valuations of UK companies”. “The UK is in the midst of a double whammy of uncertainty in the shape of BREXIT a fragile domestic political situation. Taken together, these two factors – which are interrelated to some degree – cast a long shadow over the policy backdrop and economic outlook of the UK,” “For the UK market, domestic politics MAY BE perceived as a bigger risk than Brexit,” “From a UK investor perspective, we believe that the domestic political situation is AT LEAST AS significant as BREXIT, given the fragile state of the current government and the perceived risks of an incoming Labour administration that COULD potentially embark on a radical change in policy direction” I know I’m not going to get agreement on this with many on here who normally agree with me on BREXIT but I firmly believe that that a Corbyn led Labour government would be an absolute financial disaster for the UK but here’s the thing:- One of the biggest supporters, both politically and financially, of the Conservative party is saying that a Corbyn led Labour government MAY BE worse for Britain than what has become the main economic policy of the Conservative party, namely BREXIT. By implication, if it only MAY BE worse for Britain than BREXIT, then it MAY also BE not as bad for Britain as BREXIT. If that’s what one of the Conservative’s biggest backers is saying, how many other former Conservative baggers, supporters and voters might be thinking the same thing? Thanks a lot UKIPTories, you’ve not only engineered a totally unnecessary economic crises in the UK, possible breakup of the UK, a disastrous exit from the EU but also created the possibility of Corbyn led Labour government to see over the mess you’ve made, that will squeeze us all till ‘the pips squeak’ for every and any last drop of wealth that might remain after BREXIT. I didn’t see that written on the BREXIT red bus anywhere either. Yes Corbyn will destroy this country with or without brexit,if he gets in we are finished What do you mean destroy.....the tories are doing a great job of it without his help Last time I checked the stock exchange was close to an all time high as were car sales. In addition unemployment is extremely low and productivity ( when adjusted to account for the rise in technology based businesses is also high.) . We have very few house repossessions the boom in the number of coffee shops would indicate that people are not short of money to spend. The borrowing proposed by John McDonnell would destroy the country . He even had the cheek to suggest that his expenditure would pay for itself which is economic nonsense. The stock exchange is high because the pound has plummeted...everything to do with this government fucking up and on there way out...the tories have borrowed far far more money than labour ever has in there history....you need to do wsome research and stop reading those red tops I thought that the Stock Exchange is high because investors have long term confidence in the future of the British economy. All the currency movement does is make imports more expensive and exports more competitive . There may be some benefits if earnings are abroad and remitted to the UK but this may need to be offset against currency movements on loans. It is probably best to take the simplistic approach and accept that the Stock Market is a barometer of the performance of the UK economy and has performed exceptionally well in the last two years . This is of course great news for workers who are members of share save schemes or pensioners who rely on dividend income to fund their retirement . I do not think many of the South Wales steel workers who has cashed in final salary pension schemes will have many complaints about a strongly performing stock market . " Here you go Einstein i did some research for you London's leading stock market index pushed back through the 7,000 mark as it took a shot at its record high today, but the pound tumbled to levels not seen since 1985. The FTSE 100 leapt 1.3 per cent to close up 90.8 points at 7,074.3 this session. It fell back in the last fifteen minutes to below its record close of 7,103.9, having at one point traded as high as 7,121.9 - just short if its record intraday high of 7,122.7. At the same time its smaller cousin, the FTSE 250, climbed 0.9 per cent to 18,342.1 points. Both indices were bolstered by the sell-off in the pound, as the weak currency boosts the earnings of London-listed companies with international profits that are now worth more in pounds and pence thanks to sterling's decline http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/markets/article-3821269/FTSE-100-passes-7-000-nears-time-high-pound-slides.html | |||
"Many papers have quoted a recent Morgan Stanley report on the possible prospects of a future Labour government under Jeremy potentially doing more harm to the British economy than BREXIT but that’s not what the report actually says. This may be a bit pedantic but that’s not actually what the report says. What it actually says is that a Corbyn led Labour government MAYBE worse for Britain than BREXIT “The nationalisation of key industries, higher taxes and a shift in spending priorities towards low-income households under Corbyn’s leadership COULD damage valuations of UK companies”. “The UK is in the midst of a double whammy of uncertainty in the shape of BREXIT a fragile domestic political situation. Taken together, these two factors – which are interrelated to some degree – cast a long shadow over the policy backdrop and economic outlook of the UK,” “For the UK market, domestic politics MAY BE perceived as a bigger risk than Brexit,” “From a UK investor perspective, we believe that the domestic political situation is AT LEAST AS significant as BREXIT, given the fragile state of the current government and the perceived risks of an incoming Labour administration that COULD potentially embark on a radical change in policy direction” I know I’m not going to get agreement on this with many on here who normally agree with me on BREXIT but I firmly believe that that a Corbyn led Labour government would be an absolute financial disaster for the UK but here’s the thing:- One of the biggest supporters, both politically and financially, of the Conservative party is saying that a Corbyn led Labour government MAY BE worse for Britain than what has become the main economic policy of the Conservative party, namely BREXIT. By implication, if it only MAY BE worse for Britain than BREXIT, then it MAY also BE not as bad for Britain as BREXIT. If that’s what one of the Conservative’s biggest backers is saying, how many other former Conservative baggers, supporters and voters might be thinking the same thing? Thanks a lot UKIPTories, you’ve not only engineered a totally unnecessary economic crises in the UK, possible breakup of the UK, a disastrous exit from the EU but also created the possibility of Corbyn led Labour government to see over the mess you’ve made, that will squeeze us all till ‘the pips squeak’ for every and any last drop of wealth that might remain after BREXIT. I didn’t see that written on the BREXIT red bus anywhere either. Yes Corbyn will destroy this country with or without brexit,if he gets in we are finished What do you mean destroy.....the tories are doing a great job of it without his help I mean DESTROY, we could end up like Zimbabwe we could have hyper inflation,there economic policies would be suicide.He would also force the banks to leave and nobody prepared to lend us money,it is very simple and it is only idealists that do not want to see this.There is no socialist/communist utopia and there never has been a fact" Or Venezuela as that seems to be more along the lines of Corbyn's utopia. Corbyn thought that President Maduro would be a beacon of light for socialism/communism in the world and Corbyn said when Maduro was elected there "This is a cause for celebration". Now look how things have turned out there, you could say Venezuela has been a test run for how things would turn out in Britain under a Corbyn Labour government. | |||
" Here you go Einstein i did some research for you London's leading stock market index pushed back through the 7,000 mark as it took a shot at its record high today, but the pound tumbled to levels not seen since 1985. The FTSE 100 leapt 1.3 per cent to close up 90.8 points at 7,074.3 this session. It fell back in the last fifteen minutes to below its record close of 7,103.9, having at one point traded as high as 7,121.9 - just short if its record intraday high of 7,122.7. At the same time its smaller cousin, the FTSE 250, climbed 0.9 per cent to 18,342.1 points. Both indices were bolstered by the sell-off in the pound, as the weak currency boosts the earnings of London-listed companies with international profits that are now worth more in pounds and pence thanks to sterling's decline http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/markets/article-3821269/FTSE-100-passes-7-000-nears-time-high-pound-slides.html " Youre wasting your time here. He doesnt understand the link between currency value changing and prices. It doesnt matter how many times or how much you simplify it its simply beyond him. I tried explaining it to him like I would a 5 year old (literally exactly as if he was 5) and it was still not enough. | |||
"Many papers have quoted a recent Morgan Stanley report on the possible prospects of a future Labour government under Jeremy potentially doing more harm to the British economy than BREXIT but that’s not what the report actually says. This may be a bit pedantic but that’s not actually what the report says. What it actually says is that a Corbyn led Labour government MAYBE worse for Britain than BREXIT “The nationalisation of key industries, higher taxes and a shift in spending priorities towards low-income households under Corbyn’s leadership COULD damage valuations of UK companies”. “The UK is in the midst of a double whammy of uncertainty in the shape of BREXIT a fragile domestic political situation. Taken together, these two factors – which are interrelated to some degree – cast a long shadow over the policy backdrop and economic outlook of the UK,” “For the UK market, domestic politics MAY BE perceived as a bigger risk than Brexit,” “From a UK investor perspective, we believe that the domestic political situation is AT LEAST AS significant as BREXIT, given the fragile state of the current government and the perceived risks of an incoming Labour administration that COULD potentially embark on a radical change in policy direction” I know I’m not going to get agreement on this with many on here who normally agree with me on BREXIT but I firmly believe that that a Corbyn led Labour government would be an absolute financial disaster for the UK but here’s the thing:- One of the biggest supporters, both politically and financially, of the Conservative party is saying that a Corbyn led Labour government MAY BE worse for Britain than what has become the main economic policy of the Conservative party, namely BREXIT. By implication, if it only MAY BE worse for Britain than BREXIT, then it MAY also BE not as bad for Britain as BREXIT. If that’s what one of the Conservative’s biggest backers is saying, how many other former Conservative baggers, supporters and voters might be thinking the same thing? Thanks a lot UKIPTories, you’ve not only engineered a totally unnecessary economic crises in the UK, possible breakup of the UK, a disastrous exit from the EU but also created the possibility of Corbyn led Labour government to see over the mess you’ve made, that will squeeze us all till ‘the pips squeak’ for every and any last drop of wealth that might remain after BREXIT. I didn’t see that written on the BREXIT red bus anywhere either. Yes Corbyn will destroy this country with or without brexit,if he gets in we are finished What do you mean destroy.....the tories are doing a great job of it without his help I mean DESTROY, we could end up like Zimbabwe we could have hyper inflation,there economic policies would be suicide.He would also force the banks to leave and nobody prepared to lend us money,it is very simple and it is only idealists that do not want to see this.There is no socialist/communist utopia and there never has been a fact Or Venezuela as that seems to be more along the lines of Corbyn's utopia. Corbyn thought that President Maduro would be a beacon of light for socialism/communism in the world and Corbyn said when Maduro was elected there "This is a cause for celebration". Now look how things have turned out there, you could say Venezuela has been a test run for how things would turn out in Britain under a Corbyn Labour government. " This guy should be on stage hes comedy gold | |||
| |||