FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Why did we vote?
Why did we vote?
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
 | |||
"Let me attempt this: the election was called so that we would be sure that people overwhelmingly supported us. Now we know they don't. What do we do now?" We vote because we are conditioned to do so. If we all stood strong and said enough of this s**t and no one voted then perhaps we could get a more modern up to date system that might give us better results. | |||
"Let me attempt this: the election was called so that we would be sure that people overwhelmingly supported us. Now we know they don't. What do we do now?" hang your heads in shame for being a bunch of smug gits and slink off to the side lines to lick your wounds | |||
| |||
"Does anybody know what happened to to the last prime minister? The fresh faced one who went to Eaton." The one who called an optional vote and came out of it badly? | |||
"Does anybody know what happened to to the last prime minister? The fresh faced one who went to Eaton. The one who called an optional vote and came out of it badly? " The one who had a blow job from a pig? | |||
"Does anybody know what happened to to the last prime minister? The fresh faced one who went to Eaton. The one who called an optional vote and came out of it badly? The one who had a blow job from a pig?" No abbott was with corbyn not cameron | |||
"Does anybody know what happened to to the last prime minister? The fresh faced one who went to Eaton. The one who called an optional vote and came out of it badly? The one who had a blow job from a pig? No abbott was with corbyn not cameron" Very uncool. -Matt | |||
"Let me attempt this: the election was called so that we would be sure that people overwhelmingly supported us. Now we know they don't. What do we do now?" We have to accept that we the people do support Theresa May and that the election was rigged by a Russian conspiracy. | |||
"Does anybody know what happened to to the last prime minister? The fresh faced one who went to Eaton. The one who called an optional vote and came out of it badly? The one who had a blow job from a pig? No abbott was with corbyn not cameron Very uncool. -Matt" Its been a bitter morning of sucking lemons for some.Free hugs from the left and liberals are needed.  | |||
"Let me attempt this: the election was called so that we would be sure that people overwhelmingly supported us. Now we know they don't. What do we do now?" Blame the russians!  | |||
"Does anybody know what happened to to the last prime minister? The fresh faced one who went to Eaton. The one who called an optional vote and came out of it badly? The one who had a blow job from a pig? No abbott was with corbyn not cameron Very uncool. -Matt Its been a bitter morning of sucking lemons for some.Free hugs from the left and liberals are needed. "The only thing I'm pissed off about this morning is the value of the pound | |||
"Does anybody know what happened to to the last prime minister? The fresh faced one who went to Eaton. The one who called an optional vote and came out of it badly? The one who had a blow job from a pig? No abbott was with corbyn not cameron Very uncool. -Matt Its been a bitter morning of sucking lemons for some.Free hugs from the left and liberals are needed.
The only thing I'm pissed off about this morning is the value of the pound"Good for exports..theres always a silver lining..  | |||
"Does anybody know what happened to to the last prime minister? The fresh faced one who went to Eaton. The one who called an optional vote and came out of it badly? The one who had a blow job from a pig? No abbott was with corbyn not cameron Very uncool. -Matt Its been a bitter morning of sucking lemons for some.Free hugs from the left and liberals are needed.
The only thing I'm pissed off about this morning is the value of the pound Good for exports..theres always a silver lining.. "Bless you, we don't have anything to export!! Isn't that why the north hates Thatcher? | |||
| |||
"Because someone waved a placard and shouted lots and lots and lots and lots. Then everybody believed him. But if you understood you had to pay for all his talk; that banks, uni education, NHS, schools, rail, water, gas, electric, eco credentials, child care, school meals, higher wages. Alongside the normal expenses of running of the country, it's departments, infrastructure and international commitments were enormous. Then you'd realise each and every person would be bearing the weight of his proposals for the distributions of 'means' (finance), for an extremely long time. " So you're blaming a politician for doing what's needed to win an election? Interesting. As has been said before, albeit not on this thread, the only point of an election campaign is to win. | |||
"Because someone waved a placard and shouted lots and lots and lots and lots. Then everybody believed him. But if you understood you had to pay for all his talk; that banks, uni education, NHS, schools, rail, water, gas, electric, eco credentials, child care, school meals, higher wages. Alongside the normal expenses of running of the country, it's departments, infrastructure and international commitments were enormous. Then you'd realise each and every person would be bearing the weight of his proposals for the distributions of 'means' (finance), for an extremely long time. " I know, funny isn't it. It's almost like being honest and a likeable person is actually a good thing! -Matt | |||
"Because someone waved a placard and shouted lots and lots and lots and lots. Then everybody believed him. But if you understood you had to pay for all his talk; that banks, uni education, NHS, schools, rail, water, gas, electric, eco credentials, child care, school meals, higher wages. Alongside the normal expenses of running of the country, it's departments, infrastructure and international commitments were enormous. Then you'd realise each and every person would be bearing the weight of his proposals for the distributions of 'means' (finance), for an extremely long time. I know, funny isn't it. It's almost like being honest and a likeable person is actually a good thing! -Matt" Would you honestly say, "It's because he's nice and she's not nice." If you disclosed your voting behaviour to your peers? I nearly voted Labour but he flipped on long standing ethics (trident and shoot to kill), that aside, I really wonder what reasons there are (other than great meet), to justify them taxing those they planned to help most. Honestly looking for an answer as I think there seems a lack of thought and a lot of self interest (nationally). | |||
"Because someone waved a placard and shouted lots and lots and lots and lots. Then everybody believed him. But if you understood you had to pay for all his talk; that banks, uni education, NHS, schools, rail, water, gas, electric, eco credentials, child care, school meals, higher wages. Alongside the normal expenses of running of the country, it's departments, infrastructure and international commitments were enormous. Then you'd realise each and every person would be bearing the weight of his proposals for the distributions of 'means' (finance), for an extremely long time. I know, funny isn't it. It's almost like being honest and a likeable person is actually a good thing! -Matt" My dads a harden tory. He said by the end of the campaign he saw Corbyn a favourite uncle type of guy..and May as a miserable auntie.. | |||
"Because someone waved a placard and shouted lots and lots and lots and lots. Then everybody believed him. But if you understood you had to pay for all his talk; that banks, uni education, NHS, schools, rail, water, gas, electric, eco credentials, child care, school meals, higher wages. Alongside the normal expenses of running of the country, it's departments, infrastructure and international commitments were enormous. Then you'd realise each and every person would be bearing the weight of his proposals for the distributions of 'means' (finance), for an extremely long time. So you're blaming a politician for doing what's needed to win an election? Interesting. As has been said before, albeit not on this thread, the only point of an election campaign is to win. " Hmmmm. To win! Did we win? Did they win? Did anybody win anything? I'm confused. | |||
"Because someone waved a placard and shouted lots and lots and lots and lots. Then everybody believed him. But if you understood you had to pay for all his talk; that banks, uni education, NHS, schools, rail, water, gas, electric, eco credentials, child care, school meals, higher wages. Alongside the normal expenses of running of the country, it's departments, infrastructure and international commitments were enormous. Then you'd realise each and every person would be bearing the weight of his proposals for the distributions of 'means' (finance), for an extremely long time. So you're blaming a politician for doing what's needed to win an election? Interesting. As has been said before, albeit not on this thread, the only point of an election campaign is to win. " Hmmmm. To win! Did we win? Did they win? Did anybody win anything? I'm confused. | |||
"Because someone waved a placard and shouted lots and lots and lots and lots. Then everybody believed him. But if you understood you had to pay for all his talk; that banks, uni education, NHS, schools, rail, water, gas, electric, eco credentials, child care, school meals, higher wages. Alongside the normal expenses of running of the country, it's departments, infrastructure and international commitments were enormous. Then you'd realise each and every person would be bearing the weight of his proposals for the distributions of 'means' (finance), for an extremely long time. So you're blaming a politician for doing what's needed to win an election? Interesting. As has been said before, albeit not on this thread, the only point of an election campaign is to win. Hmmmm. To win! Did we win? Did they win? Did anybody win anything? I'm confused. " I'm afraid we the people didn't win at all, we never will, no matter what your political persuasion. Career politician are the only winners, as usual. Fucking shit pissing wank arse bollocking fucking fuckshit........I'm off to cut the grass, the sun's out. Might have beer. | |||
"Because someone waved a placard and shouted lots and lots and lots and lots. Then everybody believed him. But if you understood you had to pay for all his talk; that banks, uni education, NHS, schools, rail, water, gas, electric, eco credentials, child care, school meals, higher wages. Alongside the normal expenses of running of the country, it's departments, infrastructure and international commitments were enormous. Then you'd realise each and every person would be bearing the weight of his proposals for the distributions of 'means' (finance), for an extremely long time. So you're blaming a politician for doing what's needed to win an election? Interesting. As has been said before, albeit not on this thread, the only point of an election campaign is to win. Hmmmm. To win! Did we win? Did they win? Did anybody win anything? I'm confused. I'm afraid we the people didn't win at all, we never will, no matter what your political persuasion. Career politician are the only winners, as usual. Fucking shit pissing wank arse bollocking fucking fuckshit........I'm off to cut the grass, the sun's out. Might have beer. "Speak for yourself  | |||
"Because someone waved a placard and shouted lots and lots and lots and lots. Then everybody believed him. But if you understood you had to pay for all his talk; that banks, uni education, NHS, schools, rail, water, gas, electric, eco credentials, child care, school meals, higher wages. Alongside the normal expenses of running of the country, it's departments, infrastructure and international commitments were enormous. Then you'd realise each and every person would be bearing the weight of his proposals for the distributions of 'means' (finance), for an extremely long time. " It's funny how so many other countries seem to manage most of that list, and are doing quite well for themselves and yet, somehow, it's just impossible here because...... | |||
| |||
"Because someone waved a placard and shouted lots and lots and lots and lots. Then everybody believed him. But if you understood you had to pay for all his talk; that banks, uni education, NHS, schools, rail, water, gas, electric, eco credentials, child care, school meals, higher wages. Alongside the normal expenses of running of the country, it's departments, infrastructure and international commitments were enormous. Then you'd realise each and every person would be bearing the weight of his proposals for the distributions of 'means' (finance), for an extremely long time. It's funny how so many other countries seem to manage most of that list, and are doing quite well for themselves and yet, somehow, it's just impossible here because......" Did they do bank bailouts and middle east wars as well? | |||
"Because someone waved a placard and shouted lots and lots and lots and lots. Then everybody believed him. But if you understood you had to pay for all his talk; that banks, uni education, NHS, schools, rail, water, gas, electric, eco credentials, child care, school meals, higher wages. Alongside the normal expenses of running of the country, it's departments, infrastructure and international commitments were enormous. Then you'd realise each and every person would be bearing the weight of his proposals for the distributions of 'means' (finance), for an extremely long time. I know, funny isn't it. It's almost like being honest and a likeable person is actually a good thing! -Matt Would you honestly say, "It's because he's nice and she's not nice." If you disclosed your voting behaviour to your peers? I nearly voted Labour but he flipped on long standing ethics (trident and shoot to kill), that aside, I really wonder what reasons there are (other than great meet), to justify them taxing those they planned to help most. Honestly looking for an answer as I think there seems a lack of thought and a lot of self interest (nationally). " I can see what you mean about flipping on those two long standing issues. But as he explained with Trident, it was a party decision and he has (reluctantly) gone along with it as that is what they want. With shoot-to-kill he has said he would back the Police to use whatever force them deemed appropriate. Quite clearly in both cases you can see he is still very much against the idea of killing, but has had to make compromises. Unfortunately I think that is something that every politician is going to have to do to some degree or other. Put another way, what would you call a PM who did exactly what they wanted without any input from anyone else at all? Probably a 'dictator'. So I guess whilst, I agree with you to a point (hey, I'd love Trident to be dropped. Not because having a nuclear deterrent in itself is bad, but because of what more effective things in this day and age that money could be put towards). But I would still say he is the one who has compromised the least on his principles. As to nice vs not nice. Yes, I would. I am a firm believer that there is more to be gained in life by not being a complete pain in the arse the whole time. And that is what May's approach seems to be. If she is hated by her constituents, and can't even bring herself to meet any of them.... how is she going to have any empathy for them and the issues they face? -Matt | |||
"Because someone waved a placard and shouted lots and lots and lots and lots. Then everybody believed him. But if you understood you had to pay for all his talk; that banks, uni education, NHS, schools, rail, water, gas, electric, eco credentials, child care, school meals, higher wages. Alongside the normal expenses of running of the country, it's departments, infrastructure and international commitments were enormous. Then you'd realise each and every person would be bearing the weight of his proposals for the distributions of 'means' (finance), for an extremely long time. I know, funny isn't it. It's almost like being honest and a likeable person is actually a good thing! -Matt Would you honestly say, "It's because he's nice and she's not nice." If you disclosed your voting behaviour to your peers? I nearly voted Labour but he flipped on long standing ethics (trident and shoot to kill), that aside, I really wonder what reasons there are (other than great meet), to justify them taxing those they planned to help most. Honestly looking for an answer as I think there seems a lack of thought and a lot of self interest (nationally). I can see what you mean about flipping on those two long standing issues. But as he explained with Trident, it was a party decision and he has (reluctantly) gone along with it as that is what they want. With shoot-to-kill he has said he would back the Police to use whatever force them deemed appropriate. Quite clearly in both cases you can see he is still very much against the idea of killing, but has had to make compromises. Unfortunately I think that is something that every politician is going to have to do to some degree or other. Put another way, what would you call a PM who did exactly what they wanted without any input from anyone else at all? Probably a 'dictator'. So I guess whilst, I agree with you to a point (hey, I'd love Trident to be dropped. Not because having a nuclear deterrent in itself is bad, but because of what more effective things in this day and age that money could be put towards). But I would still say he is the one who has compromised the least on his principles. As to nice vs not nice. Yes, I would. I am a firm believer that there is more to be gained in life by not being a complete pain in the arse the whole time. And that is what May's approach seems to be. If she is hated by her constituents, and can't even bring herself to meet any of them.... how is she going to have any empathy for them and the issues they face? -Matt" The problem with branding yourself a 'man of principle' is that you look ultra stupid when the trade unions force you to back down over the economic reality of trying to shut down our greatest export products, which happen to be killing machines. | |||
| |||
"Are we talking of weapons to Saudi Arabia?" Yes, the greatest exports deals we've ever done. | |||
"Does anybody know what happened to to the last prime minister? The fresh faced one who went to Eaton. The one who called an optional vote and came out of it badly? The one who had a blow job from a pig? No abbott was with corbyn not cameron"
Stop it the thought of dirty old man Steptoe Corbyn with Abbott is putting me off my dinner. | |||
| |||
"Are we talking of weapons to Saudi Arabia? Yes, the greatest exports deals we've ever done. " Really thats the best we've done.So we are now relying on a brutal authoritarian regime which has a dwindling resource to buy our weapons..Awesome | |||
"Are we talking of weapons to Saudi Arabia? Yes, the greatest exports deals we've ever done. Really thats the best we've done.So we are now relying on a brutal authoritarian regime which has a dwindling resource to buy our weapons..Awesome "Yes we equip our greatest ally in the middle east, they pay good prices and the oil delays the economic crash our economy is heading for. | |||
"Are we talking of weapons to Saudi Arabia? Yes, the greatest exports deals we've ever done. Really thats the best we've done.So we are now relying on a brutal authoritarian regime which has a dwindling resource to buy our weapons..Awesome
Yes we equip our greatest ally in the middle east, they pay good prices and the oil delays the economic crash our economy is heading for. "War economic s require more war.Luckily our "friends" will give us all the bogey men we require for war and at the same time pollute the planet to extinction .Such a progressive and forward thinking approach .This is why aliens wont make contact with this dieing species god damitt! | |||
| |||
 | |||
