FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > FBI

FBI

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

Has the sacking of the Director of the FBI just opened a can of worms for Trump?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

It definitely looks like he's hiding something

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple  over a year ago

in Lancashire

it looks iffy especially given Trump saying Comey was doing a good job..

oops that was when Trump thought Comey had fucked Clinton's bid for the White House up..

so whats changed Donald.. ?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *abioMan  over a year ago

Newcastle and Gateshead

timing.... timing..... timing...

i think it was specifically done yesterday to divert the agenda away from the sally yates testimony to congress with regards to michael flynn.... and were not expecting the blowback from the announcement....

even though the dems didn't like comey for the way the clinton investigation was made public, while the trump investigation at the some time remained silent....

dislike him... sure....

dismiss him... no!

then there are the reasons that were "reason"... said it was all about clinton, but the 2nd paragraph was all about trump himself ( and claiming the fbi told him he wasn't under any investigation, when by law the FBI director wouldn't be able to tell him that)

the AG, jeff sessions, is suppose the recuse himself in anything, even inadvertly dealing with russia...yet he is the one along side the new deputy AG, that made the recommendation to fire him....

it just all "smells" funny......

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

He's just put himself under one big fuck off flash light with this stunt. I guess will find out soon enough if it was a good or bad move for his presidency.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

President or not you don't want to go rubbing a FBI director up the wrong way ex or not, if this guys worth half his salt he'll have a contingency plan for such a scenario, let's see what he leeks into the public domain in vengeance.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *xplicitlyricsMan  over a year ago

south dublin


"President or not you don't want to go rubbing a FBI director up the wrong way ex or not, if this guys worth half his salt he'll have a contingency plan for such a scenario, let's see what he leeks into the public domain in vengeance."

He's already leaked that Trump demanded he do an oath of loyalty to Trump but he refused. Comeys also going to testify in front of the senate.

Trump just keeps on confirming hes not capable as president. He allowed hours to pass before getting his people out to the media with the story to put to the media. And theyve fucked it up by blaming it on the Hillary stuff and then completely changing their story by saying actually it was nothing to do with that when it was obvious that wasnt true.

Trumps put himself under the spotlight again just at a point when he might have been able to turn the corner if he could pass healthcare in the senate.

Hes a tactical and strategic buffoon unwilling to let people advise him properly. Even his messaging which was his strength on the campaign is failing.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"it looks iffy especially given Trump saying Comey was doing a good job..

oops that was when Trump thought Comey had fucked Clinton's bid for the White House up..

so whats changed Donald.. ?

"

mmmm.... Donald is starting to act like a politician.... that's what's changed !

And why not !

Why cant he do and say things that all politicians do !

In that sense Donald seems to be learning his lesson !

But he did underestimate the political scene... its dirtier then he ever thought ....and there are some nasty creatures in the swamp....

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple  over a year ago

in Lancashire


"it looks iffy especially given Trump saying Comey was doing a good job..

oops that was when Trump thought Comey had fucked Clinton's bid for the White House up..

so whats changed Donald.. ?

mmmm.... Donald is starting to act like a politician.... that's what's changed !

And why not !

Why cant he do and say things that all politicians do !

In that sense Donald seems to be learning his lesson !

But he did underestimate the political scene... its dirtier then he ever thought ....and there are some nasty creatures in the swamp.... "

There's even nastier ones as far as the US constitution sits in Trumps wider circle and the circle keeps coming back to links to Russia..

He's inept in his acting like a politician thus far, add in his ego and instability and this will get him in time..

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ercuryMan  over a year ago

Grantham

Us old ones can remember Nixon pulling the same stunt with a Special Advisor.

And look how it turned out for him!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple  over a year ago

in Lancashire


"Us old ones can remember Nixon pulling the same stunt with a Special Advisor.

And look how it turned out for him!"

Yes..

All this has done is to make some people more determined..

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

Is Trump pulling a Nixon so tae speak?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

tricky dicky meet tricky trumpy

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *xplicitlyricsMan  over a year ago

south dublin


"Us old ones can remember Nixon pulling the same stunt with a Special Advisor.

And look how it turned out for him!"

Special prosecuter and that was slightly worse because that special prosecuters only job was to investigate Nixon. Comey had other elements to his job as lead administrator.

But the timing is ridiculous. The White House leaks say that Trumps been looking to fire him since he testified last week and Trump didnt like his testimony. That Trump then met with the Russians right after only makes it worse.

Trump wont be going anywhere. Republicans are spineless. Nixon was going to survive until the recess and the politicians returned home to find their constituents wanted Nixon gone. And with how polarised the electorate is I cant see that overwhelming pressue coming. Some people will let Trump do whatever because he's on their side.

And Pence can take over with less than 2 years left in the term and run twice more. So theres almost no way that Trump will be gone before February 2018 unless he dies or falls ill.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"Us old ones can remember Nixon pulling the same stunt with a Special Advisor.

And look how it turned out for him!

Special prosecuter and that was slightly worse because that special prosecuters only job was to investigate Nixon. Comey had other elements to his job as lead administrator.

But the timing is ridiculous. The White House leaks say that Trumps been looking to fire him since he testified last week and Trump didnt like his testimony. That Trump then met with the Russians right after only makes it worse.

Trump wont be going anywhere. Republicans are spineless. Nixon was going to survive until the recess and the politicians returned home to find their constituents wanted Nixon gone. And with how polarised the electorate is I cant see that overwhelming pressue coming. Some people will let Trump do whatever because he's on their side.

And Pence can take over with less than 2 years left in the term and run twice more. So theres almost no way that Trump will be gone before February 2018 unless he dies or falls ill."

Or gets JFK'd

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *oo hotCouple  over a year ago

North West


".........

So theres almost no way that Trump will be gone before February 2018 unless he dies or falls ill....,,,

..........Or gets JFK'd"

Not a nice thing to think of anyone. That said, any person of the mindset to do this would likely come from the type of people who voted for Trump.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


".........

So theres almost no way that Trump will be gone before February 2018 unless he dies or falls ill....,,,

..........Or gets JFK'd

Not a nice thing to think of anyone. That said, any person of the mindset to do this would likely come from the type of people who voted for Trump. "

If he gets the bullet it'll be ordered from within.Its never a lone crazy.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

Fucking with the director of the FBI is not his cleverest moment.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

Suppose he's got Russian back up he might get away with it.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


".........

So theres almost no way that Trump will be gone before February 2018 unless he dies or falls ill....,,,

..........Or gets JFK'd

Not a nice thing to think of anyone. That said, any person of the mindset to do this would likely come from the type of people who voted for Trump. If he gets the bullet it'll be ordered from within.Its never a lone crazy."

His daughter

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


".........

So theres almost no way that Trump will be gone before February 2018 unless he dies or falls ill....,,,

..........Or gets JFK'd

Not a nice thing to think of anyone. That said, any person of the mindset to do this would likely come from the type of people who voted for Trump. If he gets the bullet it'll be ordered from within.Its never a lone crazy.

His daughter "

How typical !

You , and other lefty fanatical anti Trumpers are openly discussing the possibility political assassination of him or family members!

You are careful to call it JFK´d but still its a sick disturbing discussion !

People have been timed out by the mods from the forums for a lot less !

But in a typical lefty double standard, you discuss it, but say it is more likely that someone on the right would do it!

If memory serves me right , and if we are to believe the official story , it was Oswald .....

And Oswald was a communist....

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


".........

So theres almost no way that Trump will be gone before February 2018 unless he dies or falls ill....,,,

..........Or gets JFK'd

Not a nice thing to think of anyone. That said, any person of the mindset to do this would likely come from the type of people who voted for Trump. If he gets the bullet it'll be ordered from within.Its never a lone crazy.

His daughter

How typical !

You , and other lefty fanatical anti Trumpers are openly discussing the possibility political assassination of him or family members!

You are careful to call it JFK´d but still its a sick disturbing discussion !

People have been timed out by the mods from the forums for a lot less !

But in a typical lefty double standard, you discuss it, but say it is more likely that someone on the right would do it!

If memory serves me right , and if we are to believe the official story , it was Oswald .....

And Oswald was a communist.... "

Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

the awesome Big Stick write songs about stuff like that ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=20nPkeBuCXw

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


".........

So theres almost no way that Trump will be gone before February 2018 unless he dies or falls ill....,,,

..........Or gets JFK'd

Not a nice thing to think of anyone. That said, any person of the mindset to do this would likely come from the type of people who voted for Trump. If he gets the bullet it'll be ordered from within.Its never a lone crazy.

His daughter

How typical !

You , and other lefty fanatical anti Trumpers are openly discussing the possibility political assassination of him or family members!

You are careful to call it JFK´d but still its a sick disturbing discussion !

People have been timed out by the mods from the forums for a lot less !

But in a typical lefty double standard, you discuss it, but say it is more likely that someone on the right would do it!

If memory serves me right , and if we are to believe the official story , it was Oswald .....

And Oswald was a communist....

Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed? "

Yes.... most of them !

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

i think he's more likely to get lincolned

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"i think he's more likely to get lincolned"

Are you Expressing your Fantasies ?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"i think he's more likely to get lincolned

Are you Expressing your Fantasies ? "

are you mental

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"i think he's more likely to get lincolned

Are you Expressing your Fantasies ?

are you mental "

Lol....I love that ! I am mental ?

But its you speculating about assassination..... or in your own words being "Lincolned" of a president !

So....if I am "mental" for criticizing that, what do you call yourself ?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

you didn't criticise my post, you asked a puerile question

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"you didn't criticise my post, you asked a puerile question "

Really? Did I ?

Was it puerile or ironic ?

You use terms like Lincolned, and you post links to a band singing " I want to kill the president" !

mmmm.... so assuming my question is puerile, how should You be classified ?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"you didn't criticise my post, you asked a puerile question

Really? Did I ?

Was it puerile or ironic ?

You use terms like Lincolned, and you post links to a band singing " I want to kill the president" !

mmmm.... so assuming my question is puerile, how should You be classified ?"

i find you boring ... goodbye

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"you didn't criticise my post, you asked a puerile question

Really? Did I ?

Was it puerile or ironic ?

You use terms like Lincolned, and you post links to a band singing " I want to kill the president" !

mmmm.... so assuming my question is puerile, how should You be classified ?

i find you boring ... goodbye "

Run boy, Run .... lol

Boring ! Thanks ! its a compliment coming from you..... or not !

What or how does one classify someone posting about killing a public figure because you don't like his politics ?

So .... boring sounds good compared to that.....

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *imiUKMan  over a year ago

Hereford

Dance, monkey, dance.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *xplicitlyricsMan  over a year ago

south dublin

When two trolls start trolling each other and get stuck in an infinite loop.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"When two trolls start trolling each other and get stuck in an infinite loop."

Do you have anyone in mind.... or are you referring to yourself ?

If you are going to be derogative, then at least have the decency and/or balls to be clear , or risk actually acting like a provocative disruptive element .... some would call a troll

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


".........

So theres almost no way that Trump will be gone before February 2018 unless he dies or falls ill....,,,

..........Or gets JFK'd

Not a nice thing to think of anyone. That said, any person of the mindset to do this would likely come from the type of people who voted for Trump. If he gets the bullet it'll be ordered from within.Its never a lone crazy.

His daughter

How typical !

You , and other lefty fanatical anti Trumpers are openly discussing the possibility political assassination of him or family members!

You are careful to call it JFK´d but still its a sick disturbing discussion !

People have been timed out by the mods from the forums for a lot less !

But in a typical lefty double standard, you discuss it, but say it is more likely that someone on the right would do it!

If memory serves me right , and if we are to believe the official story , it was Oswald .....

And Oswald was a communist....

Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?

Yes.... most of them ! "

so why does the US spend such a ridiculous amount on the secret service? Air Force 1, Marine 1, multiple back ups and decoys etc?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

....or McKinley'd

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


".........

So theres almost no way that Trump will be gone before February 2018 unless he dies or falls ill....,,,

..........Or gets JFK'd

Not a nice thing to think of anyone. That said, any person of the mindset to do this would likely come from the type of people who voted for Trump. If he gets the bullet it'll be ordered from within.Its never a lone crazy.

His daughter

How typical !

You , and other lefty fanatical anti Trumpers are openly discussing the possibility political assassination of him or family members!

You are careful to call it JFK´d but still its a sick disturbing discussion !

People have been timed out by the mods from the forums for a lot less !

But in a typical lefty double standard, you discuss it, but say it is more likely that someone on the right would do it!

If memory serves me right , and if we are to believe the official story , it was Oswald .....

And Oswald was a communist....

Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?

Yes.... most of them !

so why does the US spend such a ridiculous amount on the secret service? Air Force 1, Marine 1, multiple back ups and decoys etc? "

Duhhh

The question is so ridiculous it defies belief !

But as usual I will help you, with a question !

Why does any head of state , president , or prime minister of any country have security personnel/details ?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


".........

So theres almost no way that Trump will be gone before February 2018 unless he dies or falls ill....,,,

..........Or gets JFK'd

Not a nice thing to think of anyone. That said, any person of the mindset to do this would likely come from the type of people who voted for Trump. If he gets the bullet it'll be ordered from within.Its never a lone crazy.

His daughter

How typical !

You , and other lefty fanatical anti Trumpers are openly discussing the possibility political assassination of him or family members!

You are careful to call it JFK´d but still its a sick disturbing discussion !

People have been timed out by the mods from the forums for a lot less !

But in a typical lefty double standard, you discuss it, but say it is more likely that someone on the right would do it!

If memory serves me right , and if we are to believe the official story , it was Oswald .....

And Oswald was a communist....

Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?

Yes.... most of them !

so why does the US spend such a ridiculous amount on the secret service? Air Force 1, Marine 1, multiple back ups and decoys etc?

Duhhh

The question is so ridiculous it defies belief !

But as usual I will help you, with a question !

Why does any head of state , president , or prime minister of any country have security personnel/details ? "

So they don't get assassinated

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


".........

So theres almost no way that Trump will be gone before February 2018 unless he dies or falls ill....,,,

..........Or gets JFK'd

Not a nice thing to think of anyone. That said, any person of the mindset to do this would likely come from the type of people who voted for Trump. If he gets the bullet it'll be ordered from within.Its never a lone crazy.

His daughter

How typical !

You , and other lefty fanatical anti Trumpers are openly discussing the possibility political assassination of him or family members!

You are careful to call it JFK´d but still its a sick disturbing discussion !

People have been timed out by the mods from the forums for a lot less !

But in a typical lefty double standard, you discuss it, but say it is more likely that someone on the right would do it!

If memory serves me right , and if we are to believe the official story , it was Oswald .....

And Oswald was a communist....

Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?

Yes.... most of them !

so why does the US spend such a ridiculous amount on the secret service? Air Force 1, Marine 1, multiple back ups and decoys etc?

Duhhh

The question is so ridiculous it defies belief !

But as usual I will help you, with a question !

Why does any head of state , president , or prime minister of any country have security personnel/details ?

So they don't get assassinated "

Are you asking or stating ?

Either way its still ridiculous !

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


".........

So theres almost no way that Trump will be gone before February 2018 unless he dies or falls ill....,,,

..........Or gets JFK'd

Not a nice thing to think of anyone. That said, any person of the mindset to do this would likely come from the type of people who voted for Trump. If he gets the bullet it'll be ordered from within.Its never a lone crazy.

His daughter

How typical !

You , and other lefty fanatical anti Trumpers are openly discussing the possibility political assassination of him or family members!

You are careful to call it JFK´d but still its a sick disturbing discussion !

People have been timed out by the mods from the forums for a lot less !

But in a typical lefty double standard, you discuss it, but say it is more likely that someone on the right would do it!

If memory serves me right , and if we are to believe the official story , it was Oswald .....

And Oswald was a communist....

Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?

Yes.... most of them !

so why does the US spend such a ridiculous amount on the secret service? Air Force 1, Marine 1, multiple back ups and decoys etc?

Duhhh

The question is so ridiculous it defies belief !

But as usual I will help you, with a question !

Why does any head of state , president , or prime minister of any country have security personnel/details ?

So they don't get assassinated

Are you asking or stating ?

Either way its still ridiculous ! "

It's ridiculous that you think trump is the first president to get death threats.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *illwill69uMan  over a year ago

moston


" so why does the US spend such a ridiculous amount on the secret service? Air Force 1, Marine 1, multiple back ups and decoys etc? "

They don't...

Airforce 1 (and it's backups) are converted US Air Force troop transport planes, same goes for Marine 1. If they were not being used to ferry the president around they would be used for other duties or just on crew training flights, so any cost is minimal (except the cost to those military assigned presidential duties who have to spend time and money making sure their No1 uniforms are perfect at all times[and they don't count as that bullshit is what they signed up for]).

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


" so why does the US spend such a ridiculous amount on the secret service? Air Force 1, Marine 1, multiple back ups and decoys etc?

They don't...

Airforce 1 (and it's backups) are converted US Air Force troop transport planes, same goes for Marine 1. If they were not being used to ferry the president around they would be used for other duties or just on crew training flights, so any cost is minimal (except the cost to those military assigned presidential duties who have to spend time and money making sure their No1 uniforms are perfect at all times[and they don't count as that bullshit is what they signed up for])."

"On 28 January 2015, the Air Force announced that the Boeing 747-8 will serve as the next presidential aircraft.[39][40] On 6 December 2016, then-President-elect Donald Trump tweeted his opposition to the Air Force One replacement due to its high cost of "more than $4 billion". The U.S. Government Accountability Office estimated the total cost at $3.2 billion, and U.S. Air Force's projected budget is nearly $4 billion. In December 2016, Boeing was on contract for preliminary development worth $170 million."

Not cheap.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


".........

So theres almost no way that Trump will be gone before February 2018 unless he dies or falls ill....,,,

..........Or gets JFK'd

Not a nice thing to think of anyone. That said, any person of the mindset to do this would likely come from the type of people who voted for Trump. If he gets the bullet it'll be ordered from within.Its never a lone crazy.

His daughter

How typical !

You , and other lefty fanatical anti Trumpers are openly discussing the possibility political assassination of him or family members!

You are careful to call it JFK´d but still its a sick disturbing discussion !

People have been timed out by the mods from the forums for a lot less !

But in a typical lefty double standard, you discuss it, but say it is more likely that someone on the right would do it!

If memory serves me right , and if we are to believe the official story , it was Oswald .....

And Oswald was a communist....

Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?

Yes.... most of them !

so why does the US spend such a ridiculous amount on the secret service? Air Force 1, Marine 1, multiple back ups and decoys etc?

Duhhh

The question is so ridiculous it defies belief !

But as usual I will help you, with a question !

Why does any head of state , president , or prime minister of any country have security personnel/details ?

So they don't get assassinated

Are you asking or stating ?

Either way its still ridiculous !

It's ridiculous that you think trump is the first president to get death threats."

Lol....no, you don't get it !

Please, stop trying to attribute to me things I didn't say!

The unbelievable BS you post is ridiculous !

But.... quite normal ...in your case!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


".........

So theres almost no way that Trump will be gone before February 2018 unless he dies or falls ill....,,,

..........Or gets JFK'd

Not a nice thing to think of anyone. That said, any person of the mindset to do this would likely come from the type of people who voted for Trump. If he gets the bullet it'll be ordered from within.Its never a lone crazy.

His daughter

How typical !

You , and other lefty fanatical anti Trumpers are openly discussing the possibility political assassination of him or family members!

You are careful to call it JFK´d but still its a sick disturbing discussion !

People have been timed out by the mods from the forums for a lot less !

But in a typical lefty double standard, you discuss it, but say it is more likely that someone on the right would do it!

If memory serves me right , and if we are to believe the official story , it was Oswald .....

And Oswald was a communist....

Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?

Yes.... most of them !

so why does the US spend such a ridiculous amount on the secret service? Air Force 1, Marine 1, multiple back ups and decoys etc?

Duhhh

The question is so ridiculous it defies belief !

But as usual I will help you, with a question !

Why does any head of state , president , or prime minister of any country have security personnel/details ?

So they don't get assassinated

Are you asking or stating ?

Either way its still ridiculous !

It's ridiculous that you think trump is the first president to get death threats.

Lol....no, you don't get it !

Please, stop trying to attribute to me things I didn't say!

The unbelievable BS you post is ridiculous !

But.... quite normal ...in your case!"

That's what you said Tony

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


".........

So theres almost no way that Trump will be gone before February 2018 unless he dies or falls ill....,,,

..........Or gets JFK'd

Not a nice thing to think of anyone. That said, any person of the mindset to do this would likely come from the type of people who voted for Trump. If he gets the bullet it'll be ordered from within.Its never a lone crazy.

His daughter

How typical !

You , and other lefty fanatical anti Trumpers are openly discussing the possibility political assassination of him or family members!

You are careful to call it JFK´d but still its a sick disturbing discussion !

People have been timed out by the mods from the forums for a lot less !

But in a typical lefty double standard, you discuss it, but say it is more likely that someone on the right would do it!

If memory serves me right , and if we are to believe the official story , it was Oswald .....

And Oswald was a communist....

Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?

Yes.... most of them !

so why does the US spend such a ridiculous amount on the secret service? Air Force 1, Marine 1, multiple back ups and decoys etc?

Duhhh

The question is so ridiculous it defies belief !

But as usual I will help you, with a question !

Why does any head of state , president , or prime minister of any country have security personnel/details ?

So they don't get assassinated

Are you asking or stating ?

Either way its still ridiculous !

It's ridiculous that you think trump is the first president to get death threats.

Lol....no, you don't get it !

Please, stop trying to attribute to me things I didn't say!

The unbelievable BS you post is ridiculous !

But.... quite normal ...in your case!

That's what you said Tony "

NO its NOT !

Its not the first time you do something like that !

Its not my fault you cant read or understand English ! I can only conclude that by your own non sense posts !

So QUOTE ME where I say that president Trump was the first to get threats!

Or.... Apologise for your mistake !

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


".........

So theres almost no way that Trump will be gone before February 2018 unless he dies or falls ill....,,,

..........Or gets JFK'd

Not a nice thing to think of anyone. That said, any person of the mindset to do this would likely come from the type of people who voted for Trump. If he gets the bullet it'll be ordered from within.Its never a lone crazy.

His daughter

How typical !

You , and other lefty fanatical anti Trumpers are openly discussing the possibility political assassination of him or family members!

You are careful to call it JFK´d but still its a sick disturbing discussion !

People have been timed out by the mods from the forums for a lot less !

But in a typical lefty double standard, you discuss it, but say it is more likely that someone on the right would do it!

If memory serves me right , and if we are to believe the official story , it was Oswald .....

And Oswald was a communist....

Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?

Yes.... most of them !

so why does the US spend such a ridiculous amount on the secret service? Air Force 1, Marine 1, multiple back ups and decoys etc?

Duhhh

The question is so ridiculous it defies belief !

But as usual I will help you, with a question !

Why does any head of state , president , or prime minister of any country have security personnel/details ?

So they don't get assassinated

Are you asking or stating ?

Either way its still ridiculous !

It's ridiculous that you think trump is the first president to get death threats.

Lol....no, you don't get it !

Please, stop trying to attribute to me things I didn't say!

The unbelievable BS you post is ridiculous !

But.... quite normal ...in your case!

That's what you said Tony

NO its NOT !

Its not the first time you do something like that !

Its not my fault you cant read or understand English ! I can only conclude that by your own non sense posts !

So QUOTE ME where I say that president Trump was the first to get threats!

Or.... Apologise for your mistake ! "

Right, let's try it again, Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 19/05/17 20:45:19]

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *illwill69uMan  over a year ago

moston


""On 28 January 2015, the Air Force announced that the Boeing 747-8 will serve as the next presidential aircraft.[39][40] On 6 December 2016, then-President-elect Donald Trump tweeted his opposition to the Air Force One replacement due to its high cost of "more than $4 billion". The U.S. Government Accountability Office estimated the total cost at $3.2 billion, and U.S. Air Force's projected budget is nearly $4 billion. In December 2016, Boeing was on contract for preliminary development worth $170 million."

Not cheap. "

You missed the part where the Donald objected because he wanted to have the US government pay him to use his own plane as air force 1, to upgrade it and take over the maintenance then return it to him at the end of his presidency.

You really should know to look beyond the Trumps farts on twitter.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


""On 28 January 2015, the Air Force announced that the Boeing 747-8 will serve as the next presidential aircraft.[39][40] On 6 December 2016, then-President-elect Donald Trump tweeted his opposition to the Air Force One replacement due to its high cost of "more than $4 billion". The U.S. Government Accountability Office estimated the total cost at $3.2 billion, and U.S. Air Force's projected budget is nearly $4 billion. In December 2016, Boeing was on contract for preliminary development worth $170 million."

Not cheap.

You missed the part where the Donald objected because he wanted to have the US government pay him to use his own plane as air force 1, to upgrade it and take over the maintenance then return it to him at the end of his presidency.

You really should know to look beyond the Trumps farts on twitter."

He has already racked up millions of dollars for charging the Secret service agents for seats on his plane when protecting himself and his family. He is out to enrich himself.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *illwill69uMan  over a year ago

moston


"He has already racked up millions of dollars for charging the Secret service agents for seats on his plane when protecting himself and his family. He is out to enrich himself."

forget that, it really is nothing.

He had the state department put up an add on the official website saying that Mara Laga (or whatever it is called) was for sale, and he bills the government for its use every time he goes there!

Not only is the man a crook, he is a total disgrace to the office he holds. Every American who voted for him should be outraged at his antic.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


".........

So theres almost no way that Trump will be gone before February 2018 unless he dies or falls ill....,,,

..........Or gets JFK'd

Not a nice thing to think of anyone. That said, any person of the mindset to do this would likely come from the type of people who voted for Trump. If he gets the bullet it'll be ordered from within.Its never a lone crazy.

His daughter

How typical !

You , and other lefty fanatical anti Trumpers are openly discussing the possibility political assassination of him or family members!

You are careful to call it JFK´d but still its a sick disturbing discussion !

People have been timed out by the mods from the forums for a lot less !

But in a typical lefty double standard, you discuss it, but say it is more likely that someone on the right would do it!

If memory serves me right , and if we are to believe the official story , it was Oswald .....

And Oswald was a communist....

Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?

Yes.... most of them !

so why does the US spend such a ridiculous amount on the secret service? Air Force 1, Marine 1, multiple back ups and decoys etc?

Duhhh

The question is so ridiculous it defies belief !

But as usual I will help you, with a question !

Why does any head of state , president , or prime minister of any country have security personnel/details ?

So they don't get assassinated

Are you asking or stating ?

Either way its still ridiculous !

It's ridiculous that you think trump is the first president to get death threats.

Lol....no, you don't get it !

Please, stop trying to attribute to me things I didn't say!

The unbelievable BS you post is ridiculous !

But.... quite normal ...in your case!

That's what you said Tony

NO its NOT !

Its not the first time you do something like that !

Its not my fault you cant read or understand English ! I can only conclude that by your own non sense posts !

So QUOTE ME where I say that president Trump was the first to get threats!

Or.... Apologise for your mistake !

Right, let's try it again, Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?"

Not doing that dance again with you !

I have tired of you BS !

You continuously post nonsense, and then use it to provoke other posters, implying they said something they didn't say !

You don't have the right to provoke people by saying they said something they did not say ! Fortunately its all written , so its easy to see what was , and was not said !

So its simple ! I repeat !

QUOTE ME ! Show me where I say that president Trump was the first to get threats!

Or.... Apologise for your mistake !

If you fail to do so , this time will formally report you to admin for Trolling and acting as agitators on multiple threads !

Never thought I would have to do that , but patience has its limits !

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


".........

So theres almost no way that Trump will be gone before February 2018 unless he dies or falls ill....,,,

..........Or gets JFK'd

Not a nice thing to think of anyone. That said, any person of the mindset to do this would likely come from the type of people who voted for Trump. If he gets the bullet it'll be ordered from within.Its never a lone crazy.

His daughter

How typical !

You , and other lefty fanatical anti Trumpers are openly discussing the possibility political assassination of him or family members!

You are careful to call it JFK´d but still its a sick disturbing discussion !

People have been timed out by the mods from the forums for a lot less !

But in a typical lefty double standard, you discuss it, but say it is more likely that someone on the right would do it!

If memory serves me right , and if we are to believe the official story , it was Oswald .....

And Oswald was a communist....

Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?

Yes.... most of them !

so why does the US spend such a ridiculous amount on the secret service? Air Force 1, Marine 1, multiple back ups and decoys etc?

Duhhh

The question is so ridiculous it defies belief !

But as usual I will help you, with a question !

Why does any head of state , president , or prime minister of any country have security personnel/details ?

So they don't get assassinated

Are you asking or stating ?

Either way its still ridiculous !

It's ridiculous that you think trump is the first president to get death threats.

Lol....no, you don't get it !

Please, stop trying to attribute to me things I didn't say!

The unbelievable BS you post is ridiculous !

But.... quite normal ...in your case!

That's what you said Tony

NO its NOT !

Its not the first time you do something like that !

Its not my fault you cant read or understand English ! I can only conclude that by your own non sense posts !

So QUOTE ME where I say that president Trump was the first to get threats!

Or.... Apologise for your mistake !

Right, let's try it again, Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?

Not doing that dance again with you !

I have tired of you BS !

You continuously post nonsense, and then use it to provoke other posters, implying they said something they didn't say !

You don't have the right to provoke people by saying they said something they did not say ! Fortunately its all written , so its easy to see what was , and was not said !

So its simple ! I repeat !

QUOTE ME ! Show me where I say that president Trump was the first to get threats!

Or.... Apologise for your mistake !

If you fail to do so , this time will formally report you to admin for Trolling and acting as agitators on multiple threads !

Never thought I would have to do that , but patience has its limits ! "

All presidents get death threats, that's why they have the secret service as well as the air force and marines etc etc etc.

Maybe you cant remember other presidents getting threats, or maybe you can't remember other presidents having the same protection, but they did. Trump isn't the first.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


".........

So theres almost no way that Trump will be gone before February 2018 unless he dies or falls ill....,,,

..........Or gets JFK'd

Not a nice thing to think of anyone. That said, any person of the mindset to do this would likely come from the type of people who voted for Trump. If he gets the bullet it'll be ordered from within.Its never a lone crazy.

His daughter

How typical !

You , and other lefty fanatical anti Trumpers are openly discussing the possibility political assassination of him or family members!

You are careful to call it JFK´d but still its a sick disturbing discussion !

People have been timed out by the mods from the forums for a lot less !

But in a typical lefty double standard, you discuss it, but say it is more likely that someone on the right would do it!

If memory serves me right , and if we are to believe the official story , it was Oswald .....

And Oswald was a communist....

Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?

Yes.... most of them !

so why does the US spend such a ridiculous amount on the secret service? Air Force 1, Marine 1, multiple back ups and decoys etc?

Duhhh

The question is so ridiculous it defies belief !

But as usual I will help you, with a question !

Why does any head of state , president , or prime minister of any country have security personnel/details ?

So they don't get assassinated

Are you asking or stating ?

Either way its still ridiculous !

It's ridiculous that you think trump is the first president to get death threats.

Lol....no, you don't get it !

Please, stop trying to attribute to me things I didn't say!

The unbelievable BS you post is ridiculous !

But.... quite normal ...in your case!

That's what you said Tony

NO its NOT !

Its not the first time you do something like that !

Its not my fault you cant read or understand English ! I can only conclude that by your own non sense posts !

So QUOTE ME where I say that president Trump was the first to get threats!

Or.... Apologise for your mistake !

Right, let's try it again, Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?

Not doing that dance again with you !

I have tired of you BS !

You continuously post nonsense, and then use it to provoke other posters, implying they said something they didn't say !

You don't have the right to provoke people by saying they said something they did not say ! Fortunately its all written , so its easy to see what was , and was not said !

So its simple ! I repeat !

QUOTE ME ! Show me where I say that president Trump was the first to get threats!

Or.... Apologise for your mistake !

If you fail to do so , this time will formally report you to admin for Trolling and acting as agitators on multiple threads !

Never thought I would have to do that , but patience has its limits !

All presidents get death threats, that's why they have the secret service as well as the air force and marines etc etc etc.

Maybe you cant remember other presidents getting threats, or maybe you can't remember other presidents having the same protection, but they did. Trump isn't the first.

"

Who said he was?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple  over a year ago

in Lancashire

Before this degenerates into some running off to teacher crying they've been made to look stupid..

Trump's conversation with the Russians re Comey do not look good at all and this time the leak can't be blamed on the guy sacked ..

Either the Russians themselves or trumps own team?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


".........

So theres almost no way that Trump will be gone before February 2018 unless he dies or falls ill....,,,

..........Or gets JFK'd

Not a nice thing to think of anyone. That said, any person of the mindset to do this would likely come from the type of people who voted for Trump. If he gets the bullet it'll be ordered from within.Its never a lone crazy.

His daughter

How typical !

You , and other lefty fanatical anti Trumpers are openly discussing the possibility political assassination of him or family members!

You are careful to call it JFK´d but still its a sick disturbing discussion !

People have been timed out by the mods from the forums for a lot less !

But in a typical lefty double standard, you discuss it, but say it is more likely that someone on the right would do it!

If memory serves me right , and if we are to believe the official story , it was Oswald .....

And Oswald was a communist....

Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?

Yes.... most of them !

so why does the US spend such a ridiculous amount on the secret service? Air Force 1, Marine 1, multiple back ups and decoys etc?

Duhhh

The question is so ridiculous it defies belief !

But as usual I will help you, with a question !

Why does any head of state , president , or prime minister of any country have security personnel/details ?

So they don't get assassinated

Are you asking or stating ?

Either way its still ridiculous !

It's ridiculous that you think trump is the first president to get death threats.

Lol....no, you don't get it !

Please, stop trying to attribute to me things I didn't say!

The unbelievable BS you post is ridiculous !

But.... quite normal ...in your case!

That's what you said Tony

NO its NOT !

Its not the first time you do something like that !

Its not my fault you cant read or understand English ! I can only conclude that by your own non sense posts !

So QUOTE ME where I say that president Trump was the first to get threats!

Or.... Apologise for your mistake !

Right, let's try it again, Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?

Not doing that dance again with you !

I have tired of you BS !

You continuously post nonsense, and then use it to provoke other posters, implying they said something they didn't say !

You don't have the right to provoke people by saying they said something they did not say ! Fortunately its all written , so its easy to see what was , and was not said !

So its simple ! I repeat !

QUOTE ME ! Show me where I say that president Trump was the first to get threats!

Or.... Apologise for your mistake !

If you fail to do so , this time will formally report you to admin for Trolling and acting as agitators on multiple threads !

Never thought I would have to do that , but patience has its limits !

All presidents get death threats, that's why they have the secret service as well as the air force and marines etc etc etc.

Maybe you cant remember other presidents getting threats, or maybe you can't remember other presidents having the same protection, but they did. Trump isn't the first.

"

The historical odds of an assassination attempt is 1 in 4.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


".........

So theres almost no way that Trump will be gone before February 2018 unless he dies or falls ill....,,,

..........Or gets JFK'd

Not a nice thing to think of anyone. That said, any person of the mindset to do this would likely come from the type of people who voted for Trump. If he gets the bullet it'll be ordered from within.Its never a lone crazy.

His daughter

How typical !

You , and other lefty fanatical anti Trumpers are openly discussing the possibility political assassination of him or family members!

You are careful to call it JFK´d but still its a sick disturbing discussion !

People have been timed out by the mods from the forums for a lot less !

But in a typical lefty double standard, you discuss it, but say it is more likely that someone on the right would do it!

If memory serves me right , and if we are to believe the official story , it was Oswald .....

And Oswald was a communist....

Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?

Yes.... most of them !

so why does the US spend such a ridiculous amount on the secret service? Air Force 1, Marine 1, multiple back ups and decoys etc?

Duhhh

The question is so ridiculous it defies belief !

But as usual I will help you, with a question !

Why does any head of state , president , or prime minister of any country have security personnel/details ?

So they don't get assassinated

Are you asking or stating ?

Either way its still ridiculous !

It's ridiculous that you think trump is the first president to get death threats.

Lol....no, you don't get it !

Please, stop trying to attribute to me things I didn't say!

The unbelievable BS you post is ridiculous !

But.... quite normal ...in your case!

That's what you said Tony

NO its NOT !

Its not the first time you do something like that !

Its not my fault you cant read or understand English ! I can only conclude that by your own non sense posts !

So QUOTE ME where I say that president Trump was the first to get threats!

Or.... Apologise for your mistake !

Right, let's try it again, Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?

Not doing that dance again with you !

I have tired of you BS !

You continuously post nonsense, and then use it to provoke other posters, implying they said something they didn't say !

You don't have the right to provoke people by saying they said something they did not say ! Fortunately its all written , so its easy to see what was , and was not said !

So its simple ! I repeat !

QUOTE ME ! Show me where I say that president Trump was the first to get threats!

Or.... Apologise for your mistake !

If you fail to do so , this time will formally report you to admin for Trolling and acting as agitators on multiple threads !

Never thought I would have to do that , but patience has its limits !

All presidents get death threats, that's why they have the secret service as well as the air force and marines etc etc etc.

Maybe you cant remember other presidents getting threats, or maybe you can't remember other presidents having the same protection, but they did. Trump isn't the first.

"

STOP trying to divert from the BS you posted !

Man up !

Have the balls to admit you are wrong and I said no such thing !

So I repeat :

QUOTE ME ! Show me where I say that president Trump was the first to get threats!

Or.... Apologise for your mistake !

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"Before this degenerates into some running off to teacher crying they've been made to look stupid..

Trump's conversation with the Russians re Comey do not look good at all and this time the leak can't be blamed on the guy sacked ..

Either the Russians themselves or trumps own team?"

The problem is... some posters on here act stupid , or at least have no respect for other posters !

One thing is robust debate that can at times get a bit heated ! Another is inferring to others statements or ideas they did not make or defend ! That is a form of provocation used often by those who either are not intellectually capable of a proper response, or simply want to troll threads provoking others !

Now on your other statement.....

"Either the Russians themselves or trumps own team?"

I don't get where you could get any reasonable explanation for either of these two to leak confidential content of a meeting !

What would be gained by that ?

Care to elaborate ?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"Before this degenerates into some running off to teacher crying they've been made to look stupid..

Trump's conversation with the Russians re Comey do not look good at all and this time the leak can't be blamed on the guy sacked ..

Either the Russians themselves or trumps own team?

I don't get where you could get any reasonable explanation for either of these two to leak confidential content of a meeting !

"

Yet they leaked it, and trump confirmed it.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"Before this degenerates into some running off to teacher crying they've been made to look stupid..

Trump's conversation with the Russians re Comey do not look good at all and this time the leak can't be blamed on the guy sacked ..

Either the Russians themselves or trumps own team?

I don't get where you could get any reasonable explanation for either of these two to leak confidential content of a meeting !

Yet they leaked it, and trump confirmed it. "

There you are Again muding it up !

Who leaked ?

What did Trump confirm ?

Still waiting for your apology !

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"Before this degenerates into some running off to teacher crying they've been made to look stupid..

Trump's conversation with the Russians re Comey do not look good at all and this time the leak can't be blamed on the guy sacked ..

Either the Russians themselves or trumps own team?

I don't get where you could get any reasonable explanation for either of these two to leak confidential content of a meeting !

Yet they leaked it, and trump confirmed it.

There you are Again muding it up !

Who leaked ?

What did Trump confirm ?

Still waiting for your apology ! "

If you don't know what was leaked, or what was confirmed then you should need to be more up to date with current affairs.

I'm sorry that you cant remember other presidents getting death threats or receiving protection, however all of the ones in my living memory have. Trump is not the first. You can either agree with me, or disagree. Which is it going to be?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"Before this degenerates into some running off to teacher crying they've been made to look stupid..

Trump's conversation with the Russians re Comey do not look good at all and this time the leak can't be blamed on the guy sacked ..

Either the Russians themselves or trumps own team?

I don't get where you could get any reasonable explanation for either of these two to leak confidential content of a meeting !

Yet they leaked it, and trump confirmed it.

There you are Again muding it up !

Who leaked ?

What did Trump confirm ?

Still waiting for your apology !

If you don't know what was leaked, or what was confirmed then you should need to be more up to date with current affairs.

I'm sorry that you cant remember other presidents getting death threats or receiving protection, however all of the ones in my living memory have. Trump is not the first. You can either agree with me, or disagree. Which is it going to be? "

Dont run and hide from the facts !

If you cant back the statements in you posts ... then don't post !

You post BS then expect people to take it serious ! As usual you have no notion of what you are talking about , then turn it around , to attribute your shite to others! Have you no shame ?

Grow up !

You don't have the personality or decency to admit you screwed up !

So stop running and deflecting and either admit you were wrong , or prove you were not by quoting me !

You should be ashamed of yourself for trolling on here

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"Before this degenerates into some running off to teacher crying they've been made to look stupid..

Trump's conversation with the Russians re Comey do not look good at all and this time the leak can't be blamed on the guy sacked ..

Either the Russians themselves or trumps own team?

I don't get where you could get any reasonable explanation for either of these two to leak confidential content of a meeting !

Yet they leaked it, and trump confirmed it.

There you are Again muding it up !

Who leaked ?

What did Trump confirm ?

Still waiting for your apology !

If you don't know what was leaked, or what was confirmed then you should need to be more up to date with current affairs.

I'm sorry that you cant remember other presidents getting death threats or receiving protection, however all of the ones in my living memory have. Trump is not the first. You can either agree with me, or disagree. Which is it going to be?

If you cant back the statements in you posts ... then don't post !

"

Come on then tony, which presidents do you remember that didn’t received death threats or receive protection?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"Before this degenerates into some running off to teacher crying they've been made to look stupid..

Trump's conversation with the Russians re Comey do not look good at all and this time the leak can't be blamed on the guy sacked ..

Either the Russians themselves or trumps own team?

I don't get where you could get any reasonable explanation for either of these two to leak confidential content of a meeting !

Yet they leaked it, and trump confirmed it.

There you are Again muding it up !

Who leaked ?

What did Trump confirm ?

Still waiting for your apology !

If you don't know what was leaked, or what was confirmed then you should need to be more up to date with current affairs.

I'm sorry that you cant remember other presidents getting death threats or receiving protection, however all of the ones in my living memory have. Trump is not the first. You can either agree with me, or disagree. Which is it going to be?

If you cant back the statements in you posts ... then don't post !

Come on then tony, which presidents do you remember that didn’t received death threats or receive protection? "

ONCE again !

Stop running ! have the balls to own up to your blunder!

Stop trying being childish trying to deflect and asking questions that AGAIN have nothing to do with my posts !

You even cropped the post, but I will insist and repeat what you cropped out!

QUOTE ME ! Show me where I say that president Trump was the first to get threats!

Or.... Apologise for your mistake !

Once again.... man up !

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Infinite regress.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple  over a year ago

in Lancashire


"Before this degenerates into some running off to teacher crying they've been made to look stupid..

Trump's conversation with the Russians re Comey do not look good at all and this time the leak can't be blamed on the guy sacked ..

Either the Russians themselves or trumps own team?

The problem is... some posters on here act stupid , or at least have no respect for other posters !

One thing is robust debate that can at times get a bit heated ! Another is inferring to others statements or ideas they did not make or defend ! That is a form of provocation used often by those who either are not intellectually capable of a proper response, or simply want to troll threads provoking others !

Now on your other statement.....

"Either the Russians themselves or trumps own team?"

I don't get where you could get any reasonable explanation for either of these two to leak confidential content of a meeting !

What would be gained by that ?

Care to elaborate ? "

Seems some want to cry wolf and run to teacher too when it's baseless however..

So after a closed meeting in the white house between trump and the Russians the gist of conversation is leaked?

Work it out unless your saying the media did it or do you think that this was also down to Obama?

Note it has not been denied by the white house..

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"Infinite regress. "

Indeed Bob !

Care to help !

What do you do when someone infers something you didn't say thus putting words in your mouth and distorting your posts ?

specially as it results from their inability to post coherent statements !

What would you do ?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"Before this degenerates into some running off to teacher crying they've been made to look stupid..

Trump's conversation with the Russians re Comey do not look good at all and this time the leak can't be blamed on the guy sacked ..

Either the Russians themselves or trumps own team?

The problem is... some posters on here act stupid , or at least have no respect for other posters !

One thing is robust debate that can at times get a bit heated ! Another is inferring to others statements or ideas they did not make or defend ! That is a form of provocation used often by those who either are not intellectually capable of a proper response, or simply want to troll threads provoking others !

Now on your other statement.....

"Either the Russians themselves or trumps own team?"

I don't get where you could get any reasonable explanation for either of these two to leak confidential content of a meeting !

What would be gained by that ?

Care to elaborate ?

Seems some want to cry wolf and run to teacher too when it's baseless however..

So after a closed meeting in the white house between trump and the Russians the gist of conversation is leaked?

Work it out unless your saying the media did it or do you think that this was also down to Obama?

Note it has not been denied by the white house.."

But are are still missing the point !

"I don't get where you could get any reasonable explanation for either of these two to leak confidential content of a meeting !

What would be gained by that ? "

The issue is the leak ! Not the content of what was discussed !

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"Before this degenerates into some running off to teacher crying they've been made to look stupid..

Trump's conversation with the Russians re Comey do not look good at all and this time the leak can't be blamed on the guy sacked ..

Either the Russians themselves or trumps own team?

The problem is... some posters on here act stupid , or at least have no respect for other posters !

One thing is robust debate that can at times get a bit heated ! Another is inferring to others statements or ideas they did not make or defend ! That is a form of provocation used often by those who either are not intellectually capable of a proper response, or simply want to troll threads provoking others !

Now on your other statement.....

"Either the Russians themselves or trumps own team?"

I don't get where you could get any reasonable explanation for either of these two to leak confidential content of a meeting !

What would be gained by that ?

Care to elaborate ?

Seems some want to cry wolf and run to teacher too when it's baseless however..

So after a closed meeting in the white house between trump and the Russians the gist of conversation is leaked?

Work it out unless your saying the media did it or do you think that this was also down to Obama?

Note it has not been denied by the white house..

But are are still missing the point !

"I don't get where you could get any reasonable explanation for either of these two to leak confidential content of a meeting !

What would be gained by that ? "

The issue is the leak ! Not the content of what was discussed !

"

So focus on the leak then. Who leaked it?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple  over a year ago

in Lancashire


"Before this degenerates into some running off to teacher crying they've been made to look stupid..

Trump's conversation with the Russians re Comey do not look good at all and this time the leak can't be blamed on the guy sacked ..

Either the Russians themselves or trumps own team?

The problem is... some posters on here act stupid , or at least have no respect for other posters !

One thing is robust debate that can at times get a bit heated ! Another is inferring to others statements or ideas they did not make or defend ! That is a form of provocation used often by those who either are not intellectually capable of a proper response, or simply want to troll threads provoking others !

Now on your other statement.....

"Either the Russians themselves or trumps own team?"

I don't get where you could get any reasonable explanation for either of these two to leak confidential content of a meeting !

What would be gained by that ?

Care to elaborate ?

Seems some want to cry wolf and run to teacher too when it's baseless however..

So after a closed meeting in the white house between trump and the Russians the gist of conversation is leaked?

Work it out unless your saying the media did it or do you think that this was also down to Obama?

Note it has not been denied by the white house..

But are are still missing the point !

"I don't get where you could get any reasonable explanation for either of these two to leak confidential content of a meeting !

What would be gained by that ? "

The issue is the leak ! Not the content of what was discussed !

"

Is there something about a closed meeting in the white house between 2 parties and the information being leaked to the media..

That's .. To the media to try and make it easier for you to grasp..

So, Tony just whom do you think could have leaked the conversation between 2 parties in a closed session to the media?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *illwill69uMan  over a year ago

moston

Oh my god Tony, you keep talking about looking deeper. Have you forgotten the first things you learned in the military and all your training?

Bullshit Baffles Brains! and Keep It Simple Stupid!

What is going on? And what do the Russians gain from leaking stuff?

Answers:

Destabilisation of the major threat to the reestablishment of a Russian empire. Sewing seeds of distrust between the USA and it's allies that will lead to a breakdown in coordinated cooperation against Russia's expansionist agenda.

Of course getting a man elected to the office of president of the USA that has already been compromised by a KGB honey trap and is in debt to the Russian mafia is too good to be true, that he is a right wing republican is just the icing on the cake!

But hey what do I know, there is no fire, all this smoke is fake news. He has alternative facts to prove it, Trump is the best thing for democracy and probity that the US has ever seen! He is great, so great, amazing, he is moving so fast, nobody can keep up with him.

Try turning on your bullshit detector and pointing it at what is coming from Trump and his administration. If it does not squoke check the batteries or get a new bullshit meter!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *imiUKMan  over a year ago

Hereford


"Oh my god Tony, you keep talking about looking deeper. Have you forgotten the first things you learned in the military and all your training?

Bullshit Baffles Brains! and Keep It Simple Stupid!

What is going on? And what do the Russians gain from leaking stuff?

Answers:

Destabilisation of the major threat to the reestablishment of a Russian empire. Sewing seeds of distrust between the USA and it's allies that will lead to a breakdown in coordinated cooperation against Russia's expansionist agenda.

Of course getting a man elected to the office of president of the USA that has already been compromised by a KGB honey trap and is in debt to the Russian mafia is too good to be true, that he is a right wing republican is just the icing on the cake!

But hey what do I know, there is no fire, all this smoke is fake news. He has alternative facts to prove it, Trump is the best thing for democracy and probity that the US has ever seen! He is great, so great, amazing, he is moving so fast, nobody can keep up with him.

Try turning on your bullshit detector and pointing it at what is coming from Trump and his administration. If it does not squoke check the batteries or get a new bullshit meter!"

This; and I'm sure that his acting like an actual retard is a clever ploy, right down to those "cleverly thought out" spelling and grammar gems on Twitter.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"Before this degenerates into some running off to teacher crying they've been made to look stupid..

Trump's conversation with the Russians re Comey do not look good at all and this time the leak can't be blamed on the guy sacked ..

Either the Russians themselves or trumps own team?

The problem is... some posters on here act stupid , or at least have no respect for other posters !

One thing is robust debate that can at times get a bit heated ! Another is inferring to others statements or ideas they did not make or defend ! That is a form of provocation used often by those who either are not intellectually capable of a proper response, or simply want to troll threads provoking others !

Now on your other statement.....

"Either the Russians themselves or trumps own team?"

I don't get where you could get any reasonable explanation for either of these two to leak confidential content of a meeting !

What would be gained by that ?

Care to elaborate ?

Seems some want to cry wolf and run to teacher too when it's baseless however..

So after a closed meeting in the white house between trump and the Russians the gist of conversation is leaked?

Work it out unless your saying the media did it or do you think that this was also down to Obama?

Note it has not been denied by the white house..

But are are still missing the point !

"I don't get where you could get any reasonable explanation for either of these two to leak confidential content of a meeting !

What would be gained by that ? "

The issue is the leak ! Not the content of what was discussed !

So focus on the leak then. Who leaked it?"

Are ready to apologise yet ? No ?

Then stop pretending that all is well !

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"Before this degenerates into some running off to teacher crying they've been made to look stupid..

Trump's conversation with the Russians re Comey do not look good at all and this time the leak can't be blamed on the guy sacked ..

Either the Russians themselves or trumps own team?

The problem is... some posters on here act stupid , or at least have no respect for other posters !

One thing is robust debate that can at times get a bit heated ! Another is inferring to others statements or ideas they did not make or defend ! That is a form of provocation used often by those who either are not intellectually capable of a proper response, or simply want to troll threads provoking others !

Now on your other statement.....

"Either the Russians themselves or trumps own team?"

I don't get where you could get any reasonable explanation for either of these two to leak confidential content of a meeting !

What would be gained by that ?

Care to elaborate ?

Seems some want to cry wolf and run to teacher too when it's baseless however..

So after a closed meeting in the white house between trump and the Russians the gist of conversation is leaked?

Work it out unless your saying the media did it or do you think that this was also down to Obama?

Note it has not been denied by the white house..

But are are still missing the point !

"I don't get where you could get any reasonable explanation for either of these two to leak confidential content of a meeting !

What would be gained by that ? "

The issue is the leak ! Not the content of what was discussed !

Is there something about a closed meeting in the white house between 2 parties and the information being leaked to the media..

That's .. To the media to try and make it easier for you to grasp..

So, Tony just whom do you think could have leaked the conversation between 2 parties in a closed session to the media?"

Simple !

Someone ,an aide or agent that was present in the preparation of the meeting! It could even be someone who was involve in briefing the president !

There are a lot of agencies involved in that process , and some of them have conflicting agendas! All it takes is for one to feel that Trumps agenda does not coincide with their own , to take the opportunity to undermine him, with the help of the lamestream media !

Problem is its becoming "normal" to leak information that compromises US interest or even national Security !

Two examples are the Obama pardon of Bradley/Chelsie Manning , and Hillary´s emails ! She got away with it too !

So I repeat its serious when everybody is (wrongly) focused on what was said , and not the fact that it was leaked and should never have been made public in first place !

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"Oh my god Tony, you keep talking about looking deeper. Have you forgotten the first things you learned in the military and all your training?

Bullshit Baffles Brains! and Keep It Simple Stupid!

What is going on? And what do the Russians gain from leaking stuff?

Answers:

Destabilisation of the major threat to the reestablishment of a Russian empire. Sewing seeds of distrust between the USA and it's allies that will lead to a breakdown in coordinated cooperation against Russia's expansionist agenda.

Of course getting a man elected to the office of president of the USA that has already been compromised by a KGB honey trap and is in debt to the Russian mafia is too good to be true, that he is a right wing republican is just the icing on the cake!

But hey what do I know, there is no fire, all this smoke is fake news. He has alternative facts to prove it, Trump is the best thing for democracy and probity that the US has ever seen! He is great, so great, amazing, he is moving so fast, nobody can keep up with him.

Try turning on your bullshit detector and pointing it at what is coming from Trump and his administration. If it does not squoke check the batteries or get a new bullshit meter!"

lol...on that level there is no BS meter needed ! I assume its everywhere !

But Will, your answer is tainted with your political bias !

Applying the KISS principle you mention,the conclusion is what I mentioned before !

Neither Russia nor USA benefit from the leak !

Only Isis does !

Everybody else looses !

Oh! And lets not forget the biggest winners are anyone that wants to undermine Trump at any cost , even if that involves compromising the US and its allies , and helping Isis in the process !

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *illwill69uMan  over a year ago

moston

Really Tony? My bias? How about yours?

Maybe you would like to explain who released the photos of Trump with the Russian ambassador and foreign secretary in the oval office? Remember only Russian state media were allowed any access to that meeting because it was so sensitive.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"Really Tony? My bias? How about yours?

Maybe you would like to explain who released the photos of Trump with the Russian ambassador and foreign secretary in the oval office? Remember only Russian state media were allowed any access to that meeting because it was so sensitive. "

What is the problem with the photos ?

I don't see any !

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *illwill69uMan  over a year ago

moston


"Really Tony? My bias? How about yours?

Maybe you would like to explain who released the photos of Trump with the Russian ambassador and foreign secretary in the oval office? Remember only Russian state media were allowed any access to that meeting because it was so sensitive.

What is the problem with the photos ?

I don't see any !"

Of course you don't see a problem...

Unfortunately you remind me of the black night in Monty Pythons holy grail...

I cant see a problem = It's only a flesh wound...

Even the Donald realised how damaging photos of him welcoming the Russians into the Oval Office would be, that is why he banned all western media from the meeting and ordered a communications blackout.

but you don't see a problem with the Russians releasing photos of Trump welcoming a Russian spymaster and a senior Russian government minister to a SECRET MEETING in the OVAL OFFICE where HE PASSED HIGHLY CLASSIFIED MATERIAL THE PROPERTY OF AN ALLY to said Russians!

And you accuse others (me!) of justifying the unjustifiable because of political bias!

Wake up to yourself! Your either like me, a very political animal that places national security above all political affiliations. Or (as you keep portraying yourself) you are a die hard right wing fundamentalist who wraps himself in the flag and thinks that that equates to patriotism while defending treason because the traitor claims to hold right wing views!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple  over a year ago

in Lancashire


"Before this degenerates into some running off to teacher crying they've been made to look stupid..

Trump's conversation with the Russians re Comey do not look good at all and this time the leak can't be blamed on the guy sacked ..

Either the Russians themselves or trumps own team?

The problem is... some posters on here act stupid , or at least have no respect for other posters !

One thing is robust debate that can at times get a bit heated ! Another is inferring to others statements or ideas they did not make or defend ! That is a form of provocation used often by those who either are not intellectually capable of a proper response, or simply want to troll threads provoking others !

Now on your other statement.....

"Either the Russians themselves or trumps own team?"

I don't get where you could get any reasonable explanation for either of these two to leak confidential content of a meeting !

What would be gained by that ?

Care to elaborate ?

Seems some want to cry wolf and run to teacher too when it's baseless however..

So after a closed meeting in the white house between trump and the Russians the gist of conversation is leaked?

Work it out unless your saying the media did it or do you think that this was also down to Obama?

Note it has not been denied by the white house..

But are are still missing the point !

"I don't get where you could get any reasonable explanation for either of these two to leak confidential content of a meeting !

What would be gained by that ? "

The issue is the leak ! Not the content of what was discussed !

Is there something about a closed meeting in the white house between 2 parties and the information being leaked to the media..

That's .. To the media to try and make it easier for you to grasp..

So, Tony just whom do you think could have leaked the conversation between 2 parties in a closed session to the media?

Simple !

Someone ,an aide or agent that was present in the preparation of the meeting! It could even be someone who was involve in briefing the president !

There are a lot of agencies involved in that process , and some of them have conflicting agendas! All it takes is for one to feel that Trumps agenda does not coincide with their own , to take the opportunity to undermine him, with the help of the lamestream media !

Problem is its becoming "normal" to leak information that compromises US interest or even national Security !

Two examples are the Obama pardon of Bradley/Chelsie Manning , and Hillary´s emails ! She got away with it too !

So I repeat its serious when everybody is (wrongly) focused on what was said , and not the fact that it was leaked and should never have been made public in first place ! "

your seriously saying that Trumps comments to the Russians were scripted and would have been run by or suggested by his adviser's ?

that in a 'strategy' meeting before he met the Russians, he used the phrase 'nutjob','he is crazy' and that in sacking him i have taken the pressure off..?

because if you are that's hilarious to think that those comments would not have been flagged up by his inner circle for the very reasons that are now part of this issue..

He would have had some people in with him yes but they would be his most trusted..

but if one of them (Trumps habit of off scripting is not new btw) has leaked it then it says a lot about how his presidency looks from the inside given this latest faux pas adds more work for Mueller..

Hey Tony, here's a thought..

do you think it could have been the Russians..?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"Before this degenerates into some running off to teacher crying they've been made to look stupid..

Trump's conversation with the Russians re Comey do not look good at all and this time the leak can't be blamed on the guy sacked ..

Either the Russians themselves or trumps own team?

The problem is... some posters on here act stupid , or at least have no respect for other posters !

One thing is robust debate that can at times get a bit heated ! Another is inferring to others statements or ideas they did not make or defend ! That is a form of provocation used often by those who either are not intellectually capable of a proper response, or simply want to troll threads provoking others !

Now on your other statement.....

"Either the Russians themselves or trumps own team?"

I don't get where you could get any reasonable explanation for either of these two to leak confidential content of a meeting !

What would be gained by that ?

Care to elaborate ?

Seems some want to cry wolf and run to teacher too when it's baseless however..

So after a closed meeting in the white house between trump and the Russians the gist of conversation is leaked?

Work it out unless your saying the media did it or do you think that this was also down to Obama?

Note it has not been denied by the white house..

But are are still missing the point !

"I don't get where you could get any reasonable explanation for either of these two to leak confidential content of a meeting !

What would be gained by that ? "

The issue is the leak ! Not the content of what was discussed !

Is there something about a closed meeting in the white house between 2 parties and the information being leaked to the media..

That's .. To the media to try and make it easier for you to grasp..

So, Tony just whom do you think could have leaked the conversation between 2 parties in a closed session to the media?

Simple !

Someone ,an aide or agent that was present in the preparation of the meeting! It could even be someone who was involve in briefing the president !

There are a lot of agencies involved in that process , and some of them have conflicting agendas! All it takes is for one to feel that Trumps agenda does not coincide with their own , to take the opportunity to undermine him, with the help of the lamestream media !

Problem is its becoming "normal" to leak information that compromises US interest or even national Security !

Two examples are the Obama pardon of Bradley/Chelsie Manning , and Hillary´s emails ! She got away with it too !

So I repeat its serious when everybody is (wrongly) focused on what was said , and not the fact that it was leaked and should never have been made public in first place ! "

There was no plan for trump to disclose what he disclosed. So your story about an aide doesn't add up.

If there had been a plan, there wouldn't have been a story or a leak.

I'm just trying to move the thread forward, why do you to keep on dragging it back to where you made yourself look daft? You still haven't answered the original question as to which president you remember who didn't get death threats.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple  over a year ago

in Lancashire


".........

So theres almost no way that Trump will be gone before February 2018 unless he dies or falls ill....,,,

..........Or gets JFK'd

Not a nice thing to think of anyone. That said, any person of the mindset to do this would likely come from the type of people who voted for Trump. If he gets the bullet it'll be ordered from within.Its never a lone crazy.

His daughter

How typical !

You , and other lefty fanatical anti Trumpers are openly discussing the possibility political assassination of him or family members!

You are careful to call it JFK´d but still its a sick disturbing discussion !

People have been timed out by the mods from the forums for a lot less !

But in a typical lefty double standard, you discuss it, but say it is more likely that someone on the right would do it!

If memory serves me right , and if we are to believe the official story , it was Oswald .....

And Oswald was a communist.... "

just re read this..

do you not think even without factoring in the current climate and the previous assassination attempts and those that in the eyes of the perpetrator were successful that the secret service you know those traditionally sandal wearing tree loving lefty pinko's should not discuss the possibility of such things..

and as they patently do so are they also sick and disturbed or just doing their job..?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"Before this degenerates into some running off to teacher crying they've been made to look stupid..

Trump's conversation with the Russians re Comey do not look good at all and this time the leak can't be blamed on the guy sacked ..

Either the Russians themselves or trumps own team?

The problem is... some posters on here act stupid , or at least have no respect for other posters !

One thing is robust debate that can at times get a bit heated ! Another is inferring to others statements or ideas they did not make or defend ! That is a form of provocation used often by those who either are not intellectually capable of a proper response, or simply want to troll threads provoking others !

Now on your other statement.....

"Either the Russians themselves or trumps own team?"

I don't get where you could get any reasonable explanation for either of these two to leak confidential content of a meeting !

What would be gained by that ?

Care to elaborate ?

Seems some want to cry wolf and run to teacher too when it's baseless however..

So after a closed meeting in the white house between trump and the Russians the gist of conversation is leaked?

Work it out unless your saying the media did it or do you think that this was also down to Obama?

Note it has not been denied by the white house..

But are are still missing the point !

"I don't get where you could get any reasonable explanation for either of these two to leak confidential content of a meeting !

What would be gained by that ? "

The issue is the leak ! Not the content of what was discussed !

Is there something about a closed meeting in the white house between 2 parties and the information being leaked to the media..

That's .. To the media to try and make it easier for you to grasp..

So, Tony just whom do you think could have leaked the conversation between 2 parties in a closed session to the media?

Simple !

Someone ,an aide or agent that was present in the preparation of the meeting! It could even be someone who was involve in briefing the president !

There are a lot of agencies involved in that process , and some of them have conflicting agendas! All it takes is for one to feel that Trumps agenda does not coincide with their own , to take the opportunity to undermine him, with the help of the lamestream media !

Problem is its becoming "normal" to leak information that compromises US interest or even national Security !

Two examples are the Obama pardon of Bradley/Chelsie Manning , and Hillary´s emails ! She got away with it too !

So I repeat its serious when everybody is (wrongly) focused on what was said , and not the fact that it was leaked and should never have been made public in first place !

your seriously saying that Trumps comments to the Russians were scripted and would have been run by or suggested by his adviser's ?

that in a 'strategy' meeting before he met the Russians, he used the phrase 'nutjob','he is crazy' and that in sacking him i have taken the pressure off..?

because if you are that's hilarious to think that those comments would not have been flagged up by his inner circle for the very reasons that are now part of this issue..

He would have had some people in with him yes but they would be his most trusted..

but if one of them (Trumps habit of off scripting is not new btw) has leaked it then it says a lot about how his presidency looks from the inside given this latest faux pas adds more work for Mueller..

Hey Tony, here's a thought..

do you think it could have been the Russians..?

"

No! nothing of what you question me about makes any sense ! and I didn't infer any of it ! You are !

Its procedure to get briefed and meet with certain elements of the admin , before an event like that ! Not all of the people involved are necessarily, supporters of the president , but all have one common obligation !

They have to maintain confidentiality, of what goes on in meetings or briefings of that nature !

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"Before this degenerates into some running off to teacher crying they've been made to look stupid..

Trump's conversation with the Russians re Comey do not look good at all and this time the leak can't be blamed on the guy sacked ..

Either the Russians themselves or trumps own team?

The problem is... some posters on here act stupid , or at least have no respect for other posters !

One thing is robust debate that can at times get a bit heated ! Another is inferring to others statements or ideas they did not make or defend ! That is a form of provocation used often by those who either are not intellectually capable of a proper response, or simply want to troll threads provoking others !

Now on your other statement.....

"Either the Russians themselves or trumps own team?"

I don't get where you could get any reasonable explanation for either of these two to leak confidential content of a meeting !

What would be gained by that ?

Care to elaborate ?

Seems some want to cry wolf and run to teacher too when it's baseless however..

So after a closed meeting in the white house between trump and the Russians the gist of conversation is leaked?

Work it out unless your saying the media did it or do you think that this was also down to Obama?

Note it has not been denied by the white house..

But are are still missing the point !

"I don't get where you could get any reasonable explanation for either of these two to leak confidential content of a meeting !

What would be gained by that ? "

The issue is the leak ! Not the content of what was discussed !

Is there something about a closed meeting in the white house between 2 parties and the information being leaked to the media..

That's .. To the media to try and make it easier for you to grasp..

So, Tony just whom do you think could have leaked the conversation between 2 parties in a closed session to the media?

Simple !

Someone ,an aide or agent that was present in the preparation of the meeting! It could even be someone who was involve in briefing the president !

There are a lot of agencies involved in that process , and some of them have conflicting agendas! All it takes is for one to feel that Trumps agenda does not coincide with their own , to take the opportunity to undermine him, with the help of the lamestream media !

Problem is its becoming "normal" to leak information that compromises US interest or even national Security !

Two examples are the Obama pardon of Bradley/Chelsie Manning , and Hillary´s emails ! She got away with it too !

So I repeat its serious when everybody is (wrongly) focused on what was said , and not the fact that it was leaked and should never have been made public in first place !

There was no plan for trump to disclose what he disclosed. So your story about an aide doesn't add up.

If there had been a plan, there wouldn't have been a story or a leak.

I'm just trying to move the thread forward, why do you to keep on dragging it back to where you made yourself look daft? You still haven't answered the original question as to which president you remember who didn't get death threats."

Lol.... stop trolling !

You post stupid stuff , then try and make it seem like I said something I dint ?

Are you ready to apologise yet ?

If not refrain from trying to interact with me !

Trolling and ignorance merits no response !

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"Really Tony? My bias? How about yours?

Maybe you would like to explain who released the photos of Trump with the Russian ambassador and foreign secretary in the oval office? Remember only Russian state media were allowed any access to that meeting because it was so sensitive.

What is the problem with the photos ?

I don't see any !

Of course you don't see a problem...

Unfortunately you remind me of the black night in Monty Pythons holy grail...

I cant see a problem = It's only a flesh wound...

Even the Donald realised how damaging photos of him welcoming the Russians into the Oval Office would be, that is why he banned all western media from the meeting and ordered a communications blackout.

but you don't see a problem with the Russians releasing photos of Trump welcoming a Russian spymaster and a senior Russian government minister to a SECRET MEETING in the OVAL OFFICE where HE PASSED HIGHLY CLASSIFIED MATERIAL THE PROPERTY OF AN ALLY to said Russians!

And you accuse others (me!) of justifying the unjustifiable because of political bias!

Wake up to yourself! Your either like me, a very political animal that places national security above all political affiliations. Or (as you keep portraying yourself) you are a die hard right wing fundamentalist who wraps himself in the flag and thinks that that equates to patriotism while defending treason because the traitor claims to hold right wing views!"

Really Will ! don't get your rant !

What is the work office of the president in the white house ?

mmmm... could it be the...Oval office ?

What is so wrong with Trump having a work meeting in his place of work ?

Were you expecting him to have that formal meeting on the White house Lawn ...or porch ?

Where have previous presidents met with foreign officials on a state mission ?

Really Will !

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"Before this degenerates into some running off to teacher crying they've been made to look stupid..

Trump's conversation with the Russians re Comey do not look good at all and this time the leak can't be blamed on the guy sacked ..

Either the Russians themselves or trumps own team?

The problem is... some posters on here act stupid , or at least have no respect for other posters !

One thing is robust debate that can at times get a bit heated ! Another is inferring to others statements or ideas they did not make or defend ! That is a form of provocation used often by those who either are not intellectually capable of a proper response, or simply want to troll threads provoking others !

Now on your other statement.....

"Either the Russians themselves or trumps own team?"

I don't get where you could get any reasonable explanation for either of these two to leak confidential content of a meeting !

What would be gained by that ?

Care to elaborate ?

Seems some want to cry wolf and run to teacher too when it's baseless however..

So after a closed meeting in the white house between trump and the Russians the gist of conversation is leaked?

Work it out unless your saying the media did it or do you think that this was also down to Obama?

Note it has not been denied by the white house..

But are are still missing the point !

"I don't get where you could get any reasonable explanation for either of these two to leak confidential content of a meeting !

What would be gained by that ? "

The issue is the leak ! Not the content of what was discussed !

Is there something about a closed meeting in the white house between 2 parties and the information being leaked to the media..

That's .. To the media to try and make it easier for you to grasp..

So, Tony just whom do you think could have leaked the conversation between 2 parties in a closed session to the media?

Simple !

Someone ,an aide or agent that was present in the preparation of the meeting! It could even be someone who was involve in briefing the president !

There are a lot of agencies involved in that process , and some of them have conflicting agendas! All it takes is for one to feel that Trumps agenda does not coincide with their own , to take the opportunity to undermine him, with the help of the lamestream media !

Problem is its becoming "normal" to leak information that compromises US interest or even national Security !

Two examples are the Obama pardon of Bradley/Chelsie Manning , and Hillary´s emails ! She got away with it too !

So I repeat its serious when everybody is (wrongly) focused on what was said , and not the fact that it was leaked and should never have been made public in first place !

There was no plan for trump to disclose what he disclosed. So your story about an aide doesn't add up.

If there had been a plan, there wouldn't have been a story or a leak.

I'm just trying to move the thread forward, why do you to keep on dragging it back to where you made yourself look daft? You still haven't answered the original question as to which president you remember who didn't get death threats.

Lol.... stop trolling !

You post stupid stuff , then try and make it seem like I said something I dint ?

Are you ready to apologise yet ?

If not refrain from trying to interact with me !

Trolling and ignorance merits no response ! "

Right, so most presidents you can remember didn't receive death threats, but you can't name them? There can only have been 10 or 12 in your lifetime I would imagine, if it. JFK was assassinated, Reagan was shot, Trump has received death threats, the WH was shot at during Obama' presidency, Bush Jnr nearly had a plane flown into the WH, so come on, which presidents haven't had death threats. I have just proven that Trump isn't the only one. So stop running and hiding. Tell us which presidents didn't get death threats.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"Before this degenerates into some running off to teacher crying they've been made to look stupid..

Trump's conversation with the Russians re Comey do not look good at all and this time the leak can't be blamed on the guy sacked ..

Either the Russians themselves or trumps own team?

The problem is... some posters on here act stupid , or at least have no respect for other posters !

One thing is robust debate that can at times get a bit heated ! Another is inferring to others statements or ideas they did not make or defend ! That is a form of provocation used often by those who either are not intellectually capable of a proper response, or simply want to troll threads provoking others !

Now on your other statement.....

"Either the Russians themselves or trumps own team?"

I don't get where you could get any reasonable explanation for either of these two to leak confidential content of a meeting !

What would be gained by that ?

Care to elaborate ?

Seems some want to cry wolf and run to teacher too when it's baseless however..

So after a closed meeting in the white house between trump and the Russians the gist of conversation is leaked?

Work it out unless your saying the media did it or do you think that this was also down to Obama?

Note it has not been denied by the white house..

But are are still missing the point !

"I don't get where you could get any reasonable explanation for either of these two to leak confidential content of a meeting !

What would be gained by that ? "

The issue is the leak ! Not the content of what was discussed !

Is there something about a closed meeting in the white house between 2 parties and the information being leaked to the media..

That's .. To the media to try and make it easier for you to grasp..

So, Tony just whom do you think could have leaked the conversation between 2 parties in a closed session to the media?

Simple !

Someone ,an aide or agent that was present in the preparation of the meeting! It could even be someone who was involve in briefing the president !

There are a lot of agencies involved in that process , and some of them have conflicting agendas! All it takes is for one to feel that Trumps agenda does not coincide with their own , to take the opportunity to undermine him, with the help of the lamestream media !

Problem is its becoming "normal" to leak information that compromises US interest or even national Security !

Two examples are the Obama pardon of Bradley/Chelsie Manning , and Hillary´s emails ! She got away with it too !

So I repeat its serious when everybody is (wrongly) focused on what was said , and not the fact that it was leaked and should never have been made public in first place !

There was no plan for trump to disclose what he disclosed. So your story about an aide doesn't add up.

If there had been a plan, there wouldn't have been a story or a leak.

I'm just trying to move the thread forward, why do you to keep on dragging it back to where you made yourself look daft? You still haven't answered the original question as to which president you remember who didn't get death threats.

Lol.... stop trolling !

You post stupid stuff , then try and make it seem like I said something I dint ?

Are you ready to apologise yet ?

If not refrain from trying to interact with me !

Trolling and ignorance merits no response !

Right, so most presidents you can remember didn't receive death threats, but you can't name them? There can only have been 10 or 12 in your lifetime I would imagine, if it. JFK was assassinated, Reagan was shot, Trump has received death threats, the WH was shot at during Obama' presidency, Bush Jnr nearly had a plane flown into the WH, so come on, which presidents haven't had death threats. I have just proven that Trump isn't the only one. So stop running and hiding. Tell us which presidents didn't get death threats. "

Lol... you keep trying to make make people forget you blunder , and the fact you dont have the personality or balls to admit you were wrong !

So let me remind you and everybody else !

"

".........

So theres almost no way that Trump will be gone before February 2018 unless he dies or falls ill....,,,

..........Or gets JFK'd

Not a nice thing to think of anyone. That said, any person of the mindset to do this would likely come from the type of people who voted for Trump. If he gets the bullet it'll be ordered from within.Its never a lone crazy.

His daughter

How typical !

You , and other lefty fanatical anti Trumpers are openly discussing the possibility political assassination of him or family members!

You are careful to call it JFK´d but still its a sick disturbing discussion !

People have been timed out by the mods from the forums for a lot less !

But in a typical lefty double standard, you discuss it, but say it is more likely that someone on the right would do it!

If memory serves me right , and if we are to believe the official story , it was Oswald .....

And Oswald was a communist....

Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?

Yes.... most of them !

so why does the US spend such a ridiculous amount on the secret service? Air Force 1, Marine 1, multiple back ups and decoys etc?

Duhhh

The question is so ridiculous it defies belief !

But as usual I will help you, with a question !

Why does any head of state , president , or prime minister of any country have security personnel/details ?

So they don't get assassinated

Are you asking or stating ?

Either way its still ridiculous ! "

It's ridiculous that you think trump is the first president to get death threats."

When you acknowledge I said no such thing , and apologise for your mistake , I might treat you as a "normal" poster !

Until then .... STOP Trolling !

Grow up !

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge

Generally speaking, the level of threats each post-war president has faced has remained stable,” Ayton told The Daily Caller in an interview about his new book, “Hunting the President: Threats, Plots and Assassination Attempts — From FDR to Obama.”

“However, from my research, I would hazard a guess that the most -threatened president in American history has to be Lyndon Johnson, mainly because of the Vietnam War,” he continued. “He is possibly the only president who confined his public speaking events to ‘safe’ venues like military bases. The apex of demonstrations against the war during his presidency occurred in 1968 and the Secret Service persuaded Johnson that the level of hatred directed towards him would make it more likely than not fanatical anti-war militant groups or individuals would make an attempt on his life.”

So they guy who wrote the book on it says that they have all received death threats, so he says your bullshitting tony!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"Generally speaking, the level of threats each post-war president has faced has remained stable,” Ayton told The Daily Caller in an interview about his new book, “Hunting the President: Threats, Plots and Assassination Attempts — From FDR to Obama.”

“However, from my research, I would hazard a guess that the most -threatened president in American history has to be Lyndon Johnson, mainly because of the Vietnam War,” he continued. “He is possibly the only president who confined his public speaking events to ‘safe’ venues like military bases. The apex of demonstrations against the war during his presidency occurred in 1968 and the Secret Service persuaded Johnson that the level of hatred directed towards him would make it more likely than not fanatical anti-war militant groups or individuals would make an attempt on his life.”

So they guy who wrote the book on it says that they have all received death threats, so he says your bullshitting tony!"

You insist on deflecting and continuing to try and put words in my mouth !

Unbelievable !

Stop Trolling !

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"Generally speaking, the level of threats each post-war president has faced has remained stable,” Ayton told The Daily Caller in an interview about his new book, “Hunting the President: Threats, Plots and Assassination Attempts — From FDR to Obama.”

“However, from my research, I would hazard a guess that the most -threatened president in American history has to be Lyndon Johnson, mainly because of the Vietnam War,” he continued. “He is possibly the only president who confined his public speaking events to ‘safe’ venues like military bases. The apex of demonstrations against the war during his presidency occurred in 1968 and the Secret Service persuaded Johnson that the level of hatred directed towards him would make it more likely than not fanatical anti-war militant groups or individuals would make an attempt on his life.”

So they guy who wrote the book on it says that they have all received death threats, so he says your bullshitting tony!

You insist on deflecting and continuing to try and put words in my mouth !

Unbelievable !

Stop Trolling ! "

Im not putting words in your mouth.

I said "Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?"

You said "Yes.... most of them !"

So which presidents can you remember where death threats weren't made?

That author says all presidents since FDR received death threats. I don't believe you were born before FDR was made president, but correct me if I'm mistaken on that point.

Simple question, which presidents Tony?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"Generally speaking, the level of threats each post-war president has faced has remained stable,” Ayton told The Daily Caller in an interview about his new book, “Hunting the President: Threats, Plots and Assassination Attempts — From FDR to Obama.”

“However, from my research, I would hazard a guess that the most -threatened president in American history has to be Lyndon Johnson, mainly because of the Vietnam War,” he continued. “He is possibly the only president who confined his public speaking events to ‘safe’ venues like military bases. The apex of demonstrations against the war during his presidency occurred in 1968 and the Secret Service persuaded Johnson that the level of hatred directed towards him would make it more likely than not fanatical anti-war militant groups or individuals would make an attempt on his life.”

So they guy who wrote the book on it says that they have all received death threats, so he says your bullshitting tony!

You insist on deflecting and continuing to try and put words in my mouth !

Unbelievable !

Stop Trolling !

Im not putting words in your mouth.

I said "Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?"

You said "Yes.... most of them !"

So which presidents can you remember where death threats weren't made?

That author says all presidents since FDR received death threats. I don't believe you were born before FDR was made president, but correct me if I'm mistaken on that point.

Simple question, which presidents Tony? "

You insist on deflecting!

Just to remind you AGAIN !

"It's ridiculous that you think trump is the first president to get death threats."

When you acknowledge I said no such thing , and apologise for your mistake , I might treat you as a "normal" poster !

Until then .... STOP Trolling !

Grow up !

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"Generally speaking, the level of threats each post-war president has faced has remained stable,” Ayton told The Daily Caller in an interview about his new book, “Hunting the President: Threats, Plots and Assassination Attempts — From FDR to Obama.”

“However, from my research, I would hazard a guess that the most -threatened president in American history has to be Lyndon Johnson, mainly because of the Vietnam War,” he continued. “He is possibly the only president who confined his public speaking events to ‘safe’ venues like military bases. The apex of demonstrations against the war during his presidency occurred in 1968 and the Secret Service persuaded Johnson that the level of hatred directed towards him would make it more likely than not fanatical anti-war militant groups or individuals would make an attempt on his life.”

So they guy who wrote the book on it says that they have all received death threats, so he says your bullshitting tony!

You insist on deflecting and continuing to try and put words in my mouth !

Unbelievable !

Stop Trolling !

Im not putting words in your mouth.

I said "Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?"

You said "Yes.... most of them !"

So which presidents can you remember where death threats weren't made?

That author says all presidents since FDR received death threats. I don't believe you were born before FDR was made president, but correct me if I'm mistaken on that point.

Simple question, which presidents Tony?

You insist on deflecting!

Just to remind you AGAIN !

"It's ridiculous that you think trump is the first president to get death threats."

When you acknowledge I said no such thing , and apologise for your mistake , I might treat you as a "normal" poster !

Until then .... STOP Trolling !

Grow up ! "

And before that you said most of them haven't received threats. Unless you can tell me which ones have and havent received threats, I'm going to take your faux outrage at the mention of trump being assassinated as belief he was the first.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge

Comey is in front of the senate intelligence committee in 2 weeks, so the story is going to continue to rumble on, doing more and more damage to the president.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"Generally speaking, the level of threats each post-war president has faced has remained stable,” Ayton told The Daily Caller in an interview about his new book, “Hunting the President: Threats, Plots and Assassination Attempts — From FDR to Obama.”

“However, from my research, I would hazard a guess that the most -threatened president in American history has to be Lyndon Johnson, mainly because of the Vietnam War,” he continued. “He is possibly the only president who confined his public speaking events to ‘safe’ venues like military bases. The apex of demonstrations against the war during his presidency occurred in 1968 and the Secret Service persuaded Johnson that the level of hatred directed towards him would make it more likely than not fanatical anti-war militant groups or individuals would make an attempt on his life.”

So they guy who wrote the book on it says that they have all received death threats, so he says your bullshitting tony!

You insist on deflecting and continuing to try and put words in my mouth !

Unbelievable !

Stop Trolling !

Im not putting words in your mouth.

I said "Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?"

You said "Yes.... most of them !"

So which presidents can you remember where death threats weren't made?

That author says all presidents since FDR received death threats. I don't believe you were born before FDR was made president, but correct me if I'm mistaken on that point.

Simple question, which presidents Tony?

You insist on deflecting!

Just to remind you AGAIN !

"It's ridiculous that you think trump is the first president to get death threats."

When you acknowledge I said no such thing , and apologise for your mistake , I might treat you as a "normal" poster !

Until then .... STOP Trolling !

Grow up !

And before that you said most of them haven't received threats. Unless you can tell me which ones have and havent received threats, I'm going to take your faux outrage at the mention of trump being assassinated as belief he was the first. "

mmm..interesting now you are changing your tune ....

So you are a "clever" Troll.. :

"I'm going to take your faux outrage at the mention of trump being assassinated as belief he was the first."

So it was you that mentioned it then ? not me !

Seems you Finally admitting it , if in a sneaky way !

Is the apology coming on the next post then ?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"Generally speaking, the level of threats each post-war president has faced has remained stable,” Ayton told The Daily Caller in an interview about his new book, “Hunting the President: Threats, Plots and Assassination Attempts — From FDR to Obama.”

“However, from my research, I would hazard a guess that the most -threatened president in American history has to be Lyndon Johnson, mainly because of the Vietnam War,” he continued. “He is possibly the only president who confined his public speaking events to ‘safe’ venues like military bases. The apex of demonstrations against the war during his presidency occurred in 1968 and the Secret Service persuaded Johnson that the level of hatred directed towards him would make it more likely than not fanatical anti-war militant groups or individuals would make an attempt on his life.”

So they guy who wrote the book on it says that they have all received death threats, so he says your bullshitting tony!

You insist on deflecting and continuing to try and put words in my mouth !

Unbelievable !

Stop Trolling !

Im not putting words in your mouth.

I said "Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?"

You said "Yes.... most of them !"

So which presidents can you remember where death threats weren't made?

That author says all presidents since FDR received death threats. I don't believe you were born before FDR was made president, but correct me if I'm mistaken on that point.

Simple question, which presidents Tony?

You insist on deflecting!

Just to remind you AGAIN !

"It's ridiculous that you think trump is the first president to get death threats."

When you acknowledge I said no such thing , and apologise for your mistake , I might treat you as a "normal" poster !

Until then .... STOP Trolling !

Grow up !

And before that you said most of them haven't received threats. Unless you can tell me which ones have and havent received threats, I'm going to take your faux outrage at the mention of trump being assassinated as belief he was the first.

mmm..interesting now you are changing your tune ....

So you are a "clever" Troll.. :

"I'm going to take your faux outrage at the mention of trump being assassinated as belief he was the first."

So it was you that mentioned it then ? not me !

Seems you Finally admitting it , if in a sneaky way !

Is the apology coming on the next post then ? "

I see you are still refusing to answer the question. Why so cowardly tony? Why can't you tell us which presidents didn't get death threats?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

it's been leaked to the media that white house lawyers are "researching impeachment procedures" in preperation for the event

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"Generally speaking, the level of threats each post-war president has faced has remained stable,” Ayton told The Daily Caller in an interview about his new book, “Hunting the President: Threats, Plots and Assassination Attempts — From FDR to Obama.”

“However, from my research, I would hazard a guess that the most -threatened president in American history has to be Lyndon Johnson, mainly because of the Vietnam War,” he continued. “He is possibly the only president who confined his public speaking events to ‘safe’ venues like military bases. The apex of demonstrations against the war during his presidency occurred in 1968 and the Secret Service persuaded Johnson that the level of hatred directed towards him would make it more likely than not fanatical anti-war militant groups or individuals would make an attempt on his life.”

So they guy who wrote the book on it says that they have all received death threats, so he says your bullshitting tony!

You insist on deflecting and continuing to try and put words in my mouth !

Unbelievable !

Stop Trolling !

Im not putting words in your mouth.

I said "Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?"

You said "Yes.... most of them !"

So which presidents can you remember where death threats weren't made?

That author says all presidents since FDR received death threats. I don't believe you were born before FDR was made president, but correct me if I'm mistaken on that point.

Simple question, which presidents Tony?

You insist on deflecting!

Just to remind you AGAIN !

"It's ridiculous that you think trump is the first president to get death threats."

When you acknowledge I said no such thing , and apologise for your mistake , I might treat you as a "normal" poster !

Until then .... STOP Trolling !

Grow up !

And before that you said most of them haven't received threats. Unless you can tell me which ones have and havent received threats, I'm going to take your faux outrage at the mention of trump being assassinated as belief he was the first.

mmm..interesting now you are changing your tune ....

So you are a "clever" Troll.. :

"I'm going to take your faux outrage at the mention of trump being assassinated as belief he was the first."

So it was you that mentioned it then ? not me !

Seems you Finally admitting it , if in a sneaky way !

Is the apology coming on the next post then ?

I see you are still refusing to answer the question. Why so cowardly tony? Why can't you tell us which presidents didn't get death threats? "

mmm... no apology ?

Seems you have stepped back into full TROLL mode!

And now you are even trying to bait me by calling me coward !...lol

So I insist ! :

"I'm going to take your faux outrage at the mention of trump being assassinated as belief he was the first."

So it was you that mentioned it then ? not me !

Seems you Finally admitting it , if in a sneaky way !

Is the apology coming on the next post then ?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"Generally speaking, the level of threats each post-war president has faced has remained stable,” Ayton told The Daily Caller in an interview about his new book, “Hunting the President: Threats, Plots and Assassination Attempts — From FDR to Obama.”

“However, from my research, I would hazard a guess that the most -threatened president in American history has to be Lyndon Johnson, mainly because of the Vietnam War,” he continued. “He is possibly the only president who confined his public speaking events to ‘safe’ venues like military bases. The apex of demonstrations against the war during his presidency occurred in 1968 and the Secret Service persuaded Johnson that the level of hatred directed towards him would make it more likely than not fanatical anti-war militant groups or individuals would make an attempt on his life.”

So they guy who wrote the book on it says that they have all received death threats, so he says your bullshitting tony!

You insist on deflecting and continuing to try and put words in my mouth !

Unbelievable !

Stop Trolling !

Im not putting words in your mouth.

I said "Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?"

You said "Yes.... most of them !"

So which presidents can you remember where death threats weren't made?

That author says all presidents since FDR received death threats. I don't believe you were born before FDR was made president, but correct me if I'm mistaken on that point.

Simple question, which presidents Tony?

You insist on deflecting!

Just to remind you AGAIN !

"It's ridiculous that you think trump is the first president to get death threats."

When you acknowledge I said no such thing , and apologise for your mistake , I might treat you as a "normal" poster !

Until then .... STOP Trolling !

Grow up !

And before that you said most of them haven't received threats. Unless you can tell me which ones have and havent received threats, I'm going to take your faux outrage at the mention of trump being assassinated as belief he was the first.

mmm..interesting now you are changing your tune ....

So you are a "clever" Troll.. :

"I'm going to take your faux outrage at the mention of trump being assassinated as belief he was the first."

So it was you that mentioned it then ? not me !

Seems you Finally admitting it , if in a sneaky way !

Is the apology coming on the next post then ?

I see you are still refusing to answer the question. Why so cowardly tony? Why can't you tell us which presidents didn't get death threats?

mmm... no apology ?

Seems you have stepped back into full TROLL mode!

And now you are even trying to bait me by calling me coward !...lol

So I insist ! :

"I'm going to take your faux outrage at the mention of trump being assassinated as belief he was the first."

So it was you that mentioned it then ? not me !

Seems you Finally admitting it , if in a sneaky way !

Is the apology coming on the next post then ?

"

I guess you really are too scared to tell us which presidents didn't get death threats then. I don't really understand why, however it must really be linked to your sense of self if you are so reluctant to tell us. Very strange.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"Generally speaking, the level of threats each post-war president has faced has remained stable,” Ayton told The Daily Caller in an interview about his new book, “Hunting the President: Threats, Plots and Assassination Attempts — From FDR to Obama.”

“However, from my research, I would hazard a guess that the most -threatened president in American history has to be Lyndon Johnson, mainly because of the Vietnam War,” he continued. “He is possibly the only president who confined his public speaking events to ‘safe’ venues like military bases. The apex of demonstrations against the war during his presidency occurred in 1968 and the Secret Service persuaded Johnson that the level of hatred directed towards him would make it more likely than not fanatical anti-war militant groups or individuals would make an attempt on his life.”

So they guy who wrote the book on it says that they have all received death threats, so he says your bullshitting tony!

You insist on deflecting and continuing to try and put words in my mouth !

Unbelievable !

Stop Trolling !

Im not putting words in your mouth.

I said "Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?"

You said "Yes.... most of them !"

So which presidents can you remember where death threats weren't made?

That author says all presidents since FDR received death threats. I don't believe you were born before FDR was made president, but correct me if I'm mistaken on that point.

Simple question, which presidents Tony?

You insist on deflecting!

Just to remind you AGAIN !

"It's ridiculous that you think trump is the first president to get death threats."

When you acknowledge I said no such thing , and apologise for your mistake , I might treat you as a "normal" poster !

Until then .... STOP Trolling !

Grow up !

And before that you said most of them haven't received threats. Unless you can tell me which ones have and havent received threats, I'm going to take your faux outrage at the mention of trump being assassinated as belief he was the first.

mmm..interesting now you are changing your tune ....

So you are a "clever" Troll.. :

"I'm going to take your faux outrage at the mention of trump being assassinated as belief he was the first."

So it was you that mentioned it then ? not me !

Seems you Finally admitting it , if in a sneaky way !

Is the apology coming on the next post then ?

I see you are still refusing to answer the question. Why so cowardly tony? Why can't you tell us which presidents didn't get death threats?

mmm... no apology ?

Seems you have stepped back into full TROLL mode!

And now you are even trying to bait me by calling me coward !...lol

So I insist ! :

"I'm going to take your faux outrage at the mention of trump being assassinated as belief he was the first."

So it was you that mentioned it then ? not me !

Seems you Finally admitting it , if in a sneaky way !

Is the apology coming on the next post then ?

I guess you really are too scared to tell us which presidents didn't get death threats then. I don't really understand why, however it must really be linked to your sense of self if you are so reluctant to tell us. Very strange."

lol... want a reply ?

Stop TROLLING and apologise !

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"Generally speaking, the level of threats each post-war president has faced has remained stable,” Ayton told The Daily Caller in an interview about his new book, “Hunting the President: Threats, Plots and Assassination Attempts — From FDR to Obama.”

“However, from my research, I would hazard a guess that the most -threatened president in American history has to be Lyndon Johnson, mainly because of the Vietnam War,” he continued. “He is possibly the only president who confined his public speaking events to ‘safe’ venues like military bases. The apex of demonstrations against the war during his presidency occurred in 1968 and the Secret Service persuaded Johnson that the level of hatred directed towards him would make it more likely than not fanatical anti-war militant groups or individuals would make an attempt on his life.”

So they guy who wrote the book on it says that they have all received death threats, so he says your bullshitting tony!

You insist on deflecting and continuing to try and put words in my mouth !

Unbelievable !

Stop Trolling !

Im not putting words in your mouth.

I said "Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?"

You said "Yes.... most of them !"

So which presidents can you remember where death threats weren't made?

That author says all presidents since FDR received death threats. I don't believe you were born before FDR was made president, but correct me if I'm mistaken on that point.

Simple question, which presidents Tony?

You insist on deflecting!

Just to remind you AGAIN !

"It's ridiculous that you think trump is the first president to get death threats."

When you acknowledge I said no such thing , and apologise for your mistake , I might treat you as a "normal" poster !

Until then .... STOP Trolling !

Grow up !

And before that you said most of them haven't received threats. Unless you can tell me which ones have and havent received threats, I'm going to take your faux outrage at the mention of trump being assassinated as belief he was the first.

mmm..interesting now you are changing your tune ....

So you are a "clever" Troll.. :

"I'm going to take your faux outrage at the mention of trump being assassinated as belief he was the first."

So it was you that mentioned it then ? not me !

Seems you Finally admitting it , if in a sneaky way !

Is the apology coming on the next post then ?

I see you are still refusing to answer the question. Why so cowardly tony? Why can't you tell us which presidents didn't get death threats?

mmm... no apology ?

Seems you have stepped back into full TROLL mode!

And now you are even trying to bait me by calling me coward !...lol

So I insist ! :

"I'm going to take your faux outrage at the mention of trump being assassinated as belief he was the first."

So it was you that mentioned it then ? not me !

Seems you Finally admitting it , if in a sneaky way !

Is the apology coming on the next post then ?

I guess you really are too scared to tell us which presidents didn't get death threats then. I don't really understand why, however it must really be linked to your sense of self if you are so reluctant to tell us. Very strange.

lol... want a reply ?

Stop TROLLING and apologise !

"

Why should I apologise when the only president that you have said so far that has ever received a death threat is trump. This is patently ridiculous as since WWII 1 president has been assassinated and another shot. Trump wasn't the first president to get death threats tony.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"Generally speaking, the level of threats each post-war president has faced has remained stable,” Ayton told The Daily Caller in an interview about his new book, “Hunting the President: Threats, Plots and Assassination Attempts — From FDR to Obama.”

“However, from my research, I would hazard a guess that the most -threatened president in American history has to be Lyndon Johnson, mainly because of the Vietnam War,” he continued. “He is possibly the only president who confined his public speaking events to ‘safe’ venues like military bases. The apex of demonstrations against the war during his presidency occurred in 1968 and the Secret Service persuaded Johnson that the level of hatred directed towards him would make it more likely than not fanatical anti-war militant groups or individuals would make an attempt on his life.”

So they guy who wrote the book on it says that they have all received death threats, so he says your bullshitting tony!

You insist on deflecting and continuing to try and put words in my mouth !

Unbelievable !

Stop Trolling !

Im not putting words in your mouth.

I said "Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?"

You said "Yes.... most of them !"

So which presidents can you remember where death threats weren't made?

That author says all presidents since FDR received death threats. I don't believe you were born before FDR was made president, but correct me if I'm mistaken on that point.

Simple question, which presidents Tony?

You insist on deflecting!

Just to remind you AGAIN !

"It's ridiculous that you think trump is the first president to get death threats."

When you acknowledge I said no such thing , and apologise for your mistake , I might treat you as a "normal" poster !

Until then .... STOP Trolling !

Grow up !

And before that you said most of them haven't received threats. Unless you can tell me which ones have and havent received threats, I'm going to take your faux outrage at the mention of trump being assassinated as belief he was the first.

mmm..interesting now you are changing your tune ....

So you are a "clever" Troll.. :

"I'm going to take your faux outrage at the mention of trump being assassinated as belief he was the first."

So it was you that mentioned it then ? not me !

Seems you Finally admitting it , if in a sneaky way !

Is the apology coming on the next post then ?

I see you are still refusing to answer the question. Why so cowardly tony? Why can't you tell us which presidents didn't get death threats?

mmm... no apology ?

Seems you have stepped back into full TROLL mode!

And now you are even trying to bait me by calling me coward !...lol

So I insist ! :

"I'm going to take your faux outrage at the mention of trump being assassinated as belief he was the first."

So it was you that mentioned it then ? not me !

Seems you Finally admitting it , if in a sneaky way !

Is the apology coming on the next post then ?

I guess you really are too scared to tell us which presidents didn't get death threats then. I don't really understand why, however it must really be linked to your sense of self if you are so reluctant to tell us. Very strange.

lol... want a reply ?

Stop TROLLING and apologise !

Why should I apologise when the only president that you have said so far that has ever received a death threat is trump. This is patently ridiculous as since WWII 1 president has been assassinated and another shot. Trump wasn't the first president to get death threats tony."

Lol.... Incredible ! Now you have done it twice !

Jesus ! how utterly inept can you be

"Why should I apologise when the only president that you have said so far that has ever received a death threat is trump."

Unbelievable !!

WHERE DID I SAY THAT ?

Is that simple enough for you ?

Let me help your 5 year old brain !

All you need to do is copy-paste a quote from one of my posts ,where I say that !

GOT IT ... DUHHH

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"Generally speaking, the level of threats each post-war president has faced has remained stable,” Ayton told The Daily Caller in an interview about his new book, “Hunting the President: Threats, Plots and Assassination Attempts — From FDR to Obama.”

“However, from my research, I would hazard a guess that the most -threatened president in American history has to be Lyndon Johnson, mainly because of the Vietnam War,” he continued. “He is possibly the only president who confined his public speaking events to ‘safe’ venues like military bases. The apex of demonstrations against the war during his presidency occurred in 1968 and the Secret Service persuaded Johnson that the level of hatred directed towards him would make it more likely than not fanatical anti-war militant groups or individuals would make an attempt on his life.”

So they guy who wrote the book on it says that they have all received death threats, so he says your bullshitting tony!

You insist on deflecting and continuing to try and put words in my mouth !

Unbelievable !

Stop Trolling !

Im not putting words in your mouth.

I said "Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?"

You said "Yes.... most of them !"

So which presidents can you remember where death threats weren't made?

That author says all presidents since FDR received death threats. I don't believe you were born before FDR was made president, but correct me if I'm mistaken on that point.

Simple question, which presidents Tony?

You insist on deflecting!

Just to remind you AGAIN !

"It's ridiculous that you think trump is the first president to get death threats."

When you acknowledge I said no such thing , and apologise for your mistake , I might treat you as a "normal" poster !

Until then .... STOP Trolling !

Grow up !

And before that you said most of them haven't received threats. Unless you can tell me which ones have and havent received threats, I'm going to take your faux outrage at the mention of trump being assassinated as belief he was the first.

mmm..interesting now you are changing your tune ....

So you are a "clever" Troll.. :

"I'm going to take your faux outrage at the mention of trump being assassinated as belief he was the first."

So it was you that mentioned it then ? not me !

Seems you Finally admitting it , if in a sneaky way !

Is the apology coming on the next post then ?

I see you are still refusing to answer the question. Why so cowardly tony? Why can't you tell us which presidents didn't get death threats?

mmm... no apology ?

Seems you have stepped back into full TROLL mode!

And now you are even trying to bait me by calling me coward !...lol

So I insist ! :

"I'm going to take your faux outrage at the mention of trump being assassinated as belief he was the first."

So it was you that mentioned it then ? not me !

Seems you Finally admitting it , if in a sneaky way !

Is the apology coming on the next post then ?

I guess you really are too scared to tell us which presidents didn't get death threats then. I don't really understand why, however it must really be linked to your sense of self if you are so reluctant to tell us. Very strange.

lol... want a reply ?

Stop TROLLING and apologise !

Why should I apologise when the only president that you have said so far that has ever received a death threat is trump. This is patently ridiculous as since WWII 1 president has been assassinated and another shot. Trump wasn't the first president to get death threats tony.

Lol.... Incredible ! Now you have done it twice !

Jesus ! how utterly inept can you be

"Why should I apologise when the only president that you have said so far that has ever received a death threat is trump."

Unbelievable !!

WHERE DID I SAY THAT ?

Is that simple enough for you ?

Let me help your 5 year old brain !

All you need to do is copy-paste a quote from one of my posts ,where I say that !

GOT IT ... DUHHH "

You haven't named any other president!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"Generally speaking, the level of threats each post-war president has faced has remained stable,” Ayton told The Daily Caller in an interview about his new book, “Hunting the President: Threats, Plots and Assassination Attempts — From FDR to Obama.”

“However, from my research, I would hazard a guess that the most -threatened president in American history has to be Lyndon Johnson, mainly because of the Vietnam War,” he continued. “He is possibly the only president who confined his public speaking events to ‘safe’ venues like military bases. The apex of demonstrations against the war during his presidency occurred in 1968 and the Secret Service persuaded Johnson that the level of hatred directed towards him would make it more likely than not fanatical anti-war militant groups or individuals would make an attempt on his life.”

So they guy who wrote the book on it says that they have all received death threats, so he says your bullshitting tony!

You insist on deflecting and continuing to try and put words in my mouth !

Unbelievable !

Stop Trolling !

Im not putting words in your mouth.

I said "Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?"

You said "Yes.... most of them !"

So which presidents can you remember where death threats weren't made?

That author says all presidents since FDR received death threats. I don't believe you were born before FDR was made president, but correct me if I'm mistaken on that point.

Simple question, which presidents Tony?

You insist on deflecting!

Just to remind you AGAIN !

"It's ridiculous that you think trump is the first president to get death threats."

When you acknowledge I said no such thing , and apologise for your mistake , I might treat you as a "normal" poster !

Until then .... STOP Trolling !

Grow up !

And before that you said most of them haven't received threats. Unless you can tell me which ones have and havent received threats, I'm going to take your faux outrage at the mention of trump being assassinated as belief he was the first.

mmm..interesting now you are changing your tune ....

So you are a "clever" Troll.. :

"I'm going to take your faux outrage at the mention of trump being assassinated as belief he was the first."

So it was you that mentioned it then ? not me !

Seems you Finally admitting it , if in a sneaky way !

Is the apology coming on the next post then ?

I see you are still refusing to answer the question. Why so cowardly tony? Why can't you tell us which presidents didn't get death threats?

mmm... no apology ?

Seems you have stepped back into full TROLL mode!

And now you are even trying to bait me by calling me coward !...lol

So I insist ! :

"I'm going to take your faux outrage at the mention of trump being assassinated as belief he was the first."

So it was you that mentioned it then ? not me !

Seems you Finally admitting it , if in a sneaky way !

Is the apology coming on the next post then ?

I guess you really are too scared to tell us which presidents didn't get death threats then. I don't really understand why, however it must really be linked to your sense of self if you are so reluctant to tell us. Very strange.

lol... want a reply ?

Stop TROLLING and apologise !

Why should I apologise when the only president that you have said so far that has ever received a death threat is trump. This is patently ridiculous as since WWII 1 president has been assassinated and another shot. Trump wasn't the first president to get death threats tony.

Lol.... Incredible ! Now you have done it twice !

Jesus ! how utterly inept can you be

"Why should I apologise when the only president that you have said so far that has ever received a death threat is trump."

Unbelievable !!

WHERE DID I SAY THAT ?

Is that simple enough for you ?

Let me help your 5 year old brain !

All you need to do is copy-paste a quote from one of my posts ,where I say that !

GOT IT ... DUHHH

You haven't named any other president! "

So its YOU ASSUMING Something I dint say !

lol.... a statement by assumption !

So....are you admitting I didn't actually say what in inferred ?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"Generally speaking, the level of threats each post-war president has faced has remained stable,” Ayton told The Daily Caller in an interview about his new book, “Hunting the President: Threats, Plots and Assassination Attempts — From FDR to Obama.”

“However, from my research, I would hazard a guess that the most -threatened president in American history has to be Lyndon Johnson, mainly because of the Vietnam War,” he continued. “He is possibly the only president who confined his public speaking events to ‘safe’ venues like military bases. The apex of demonstrations against the war during his presidency occurred in 1968 and the Secret Service persuaded Johnson that the level of hatred directed towards him would make it more likely than not fanatical anti-war militant groups or individuals would make an attempt on his life.”

So they guy who wrote the book on it says that they have all received death threats, so he says your bullshitting tony!

You insist on deflecting and continuing to try and put words in my mouth !

Unbelievable !

Stop Trolling !

Im not putting words in your mouth.

I said "Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?"

You said "Yes.... most of them !"

So which presidents can you remember where death threats weren't made?

That author says all presidents since FDR received death threats. I don't believe you were born before FDR was made president, but correct me if I'm mistaken on that point.

Simple question, which presidents Tony?

You insist on deflecting!

Just to remind you AGAIN !

"It's ridiculous that you think trump is the first president to get death threats."

When you acknowledge I said no such thing , and apologise for your mistake , I might treat you as a "normal" poster !

Until then .... STOP Trolling !

Grow up !

And before that you said most of them haven't received threats. Unless you can tell me which ones have and havent received threats, I'm going to take your faux outrage at the mention of trump being assassinated as belief he was the first.

mmm..interesting now you are changing your tune ....

So you are a "clever" Troll.. :

"I'm going to take your faux outrage at the mention of trump being assassinated as belief he was the first."

So it was you that mentioned it then ? not me !

Seems you Finally admitting it , if in a sneaky way !

Is the apology coming on the next post then ?

I see you are still refusing to answer the question. Why so cowardly tony? Why can't you tell us which presidents didn't get death threats?

mmm... no apology ?

Seems you have stepped back into full TROLL mode!

And now you are even trying to bait me by calling me coward !...lol

So I insist ! :

"I'm going to take your faux outrage at the mention of trump being assassinated as belief he was the first."

So it was you that mentioned it then ? not me !

Seems you Finally admitting it , if in a sneaky way !

Is the apology coming on the next post then ?

I guess you really are too scared to tell us which presidents didn't get death threats then. I don't really understand why, however it must really be linked to your sense of self if you are so reluctant to tell us. Very strange.

lol... want a reply ?

Stop TROLLING and apologise !

Why should I apologise when the only president that you have said so far that has ever received a death threat is trump. This is patently ridiculous as since WWII 1 president has been assassinated and another shot. Trump wasn't the first president to get death threats tony.

Lol.... Incredible ! Now you have done it twice !

Jesus ! how utterly inept can you be

"Why should I apologise when the only president that you have said so far that has ever received a death threat is trump."

Unbelievable !!

WHERE DID I SAY THAT ?

Is that simple enough for you ?

Let me help your 5 year old brain !

All you need to do is copy-paste a quote from one of my posts ,where I say that !

GOT IT ... DUHHH

You haven't named any other president!

So its YOU ASSUMING Something I dint say !

lol.... a statement by assumption !

So....are you admitting I didn't actually say what in inferred ? "

You have only been able to name one president, trump, that had received death threats. You said most of the presidents that you can remember, didn't receive any death threats. That's nonsense Tony. Trump isn't the only president to receive death threats. You know this, that's why you are incapable of naming a single president that you can remember that didn't get death threats. Not one Tony, you can't name one.

Do you know why you cant name one? Because they all received death threats!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"Generally speaking, the level of threats each post-war president has faced has remained stable,” Ayton told The Daily Caller in an interview about his new book, “Hunting the President: Threats, Plots and Assassination Attempts — From FDR to Obama.”

“However, from my research, I would hazard a guess that the most -threatened president in American history has to be Lyndon Johnson, mainly because of the Vietnam War,” he continued. “He is possibly the only president who confined his public speaking events to ‘safe’ venues like military bases. The apex of demonstrations against the war during his presidency occurred in 1968 and the Secret Service persuaded Johnson that the level of hatred directed towards him would make it more likely than not fanatical anti-war militant groups or individuals would make an attempt on his life.”

So they guy who wrote the book on it says that they have all received death threats, so he says your bullshitting tony!

You insist on deflecting and continuing to try and put words in my mouth !

Unbelievable !

Stop Trolling !

Im not putting words in your mouth.

I said "Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?"

You said "Yes.... most of them !"

So which presidents can you remember where death threats weren't made?

That author says all presidents since FDR received death threats. I don't believe you were born before FDR was made president, but correct me if I'm mistaken on that point.

Simple question, which presidents Tony?

You insist on deflecting!

Just to remind you AGAIN !

"It's ridiculous that you think trump is the first president to get death threats."

When you acknowledge I said no such thing , and apologise for your mistake , I might treat you as a "normal" poster !

Until then .... STOP Trolling !

Grow up !

And before that you said most of them haven't received threats. Unless you can tell me which ones have and havent received threats, I'm going to take your faux outrage at the mention of trump being assassinated as belief he was the first.

mmm..interesting now you are changing your tune ....

So you are a "clever" Troll.. :

"I'm going to take your faux outrage at the mention of trump being assassinated as belief he was the first."

So it was you that mentioned it then ? not me !

Seems you Finally admitting it , if in a sneaky way !

Is the apology coming on the next post then ?

I see you are still refusing to answer the question. Why so cowardly tony? Why can't you tell us which presidents didn't get death threats?

mmm... no apology ?

Seems you have stepped back into full TROLL mode!

And now you are even trying to bait me by calling me coward !...lol

So I insist ! :

"I'm going to take your faux outrage at the mention of trump being assassinated as belief he was the first."

So it was you that mentioned it then ? not me !

Seems you Finally admitting it , if in a sneaky way !

Is the apology coming on the next post then ?

I guess you really are too scared to tell us which presidents didn't get death threats then. I don't really understand why, however it must really be linked to your sense of self if you are so reluctant to tell us. Very strange.

lol... want a reply ?

Stop TROLLING and apologise !

Why should I apologise when the only president that you have said so far that has ever received a death threat is trump. This is patently ridiculous as since WWII 1 president has been assassinated and another shot. Trump wasn't the first president to get death threats tony.

Lol.... Incredible ! Now you have done it twice !

Jesus ! how utterly inept can you be

"Why should I apologise when the only president that you have said so far that has ever received a death threat is trump."

Unbelievable !!

WHERE DID I SAY THAT ?

Is that simple enough for you ?

Let me help your 5 year old brain !

All you need to do is copy-paste a quote from one of my posts ,where I say that !

GOT IT ... DUHHH

You haven't named any other president!

So its YOU ASSUMING Something I dint say !

lol.... a statement by assumption !

So....are you admitting I didn't actually say what in inferred ?

You have only been able to name one president, trump, that had received death threats. You said most of the presidents that you can remember, didn't receive any death threats. That's nonsense Tony. Trump isn't the only president to receive death threats. You know this, that's why you are incapable of naming a single president that you can remember that didn't get death threats. Not one Tony, you can't name one.

Do you know why you cant name one? Because they all received death threats! "

Lol...Troll time again !

You take one step forward ...then two backwards.... so guess I will have to repeat AGAIN :

"Why should I apologise when the only president that you have said so far that has ever received a death threat is trump."

Unbelievable !!

WHERE DID I SAY THAT ?

Is that simple enough for you ?

Let me help your 5 year old brain !

All you need to do is copy-paste a quote from one of my posts ,where I say that !

GOT IT ... DUHHH

I will keep repeating this until you admit your mistake !

Repeating is how one teaches stubborn children !

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"Generally speaking, the level of threats each post-war president has faced has remained stable,” Ayton told The Daily Caller in an interview about his new book, “Hunting the President: Threats, Plots and Assassination Attempts — From FDR to Obama.”

“However, from my research, I would hazard a guess that the most -threatened president in American history has to be Lyndon Johnson, mainly because of the Vietnam War,” he continued. “He is possibly the only president who confined his public speaking events to ‘safe’ venues like military bases. The apex of demonstrations against the war during his presidency occurred in 1968 and the Secret Service persuaded Johnson that the level of hatred directed towards him would make it more likely than not fanatical anti-war militant groups or individuals would make an attempt on his life.”

So they guy who wrote the book on it says that they have all received death threats, so he says your bullshitting tony!

You insist on deflecting and continuing to try and put words in my mouth !

Unbelievable !

Stop Trolling !

Im not putting words in your mouth.

I said "Can you remember a US president where assassination hasn't been discussed?"

You said "Yes.... most of them !"

So which presidents can you remember where death threats weren't made?

That author says all presidents since FDR received death threats. I don't believe you were born before FDR was made president, but correct me if I'm mistaken on that point.

Simple question, which presidents Tony?

You insist on deflecting!

Just to remind you AGAIN !

"It's ridiculous that you think trump is the first president to get death threats."

When you acknowledge I said no such thing , and apologise for your mistake , I might treat you as a "normal" poster !

Until then .... STOP Trolling !

Grow up !

And before that you said most of them haven't received threats. Unless you can tell me which ones have and havent received threats, I'm going to take your faux outrage at the mention of trump being assassinated as belief he was the first.

mmm..interesting now you are changing your tune ....

So you are a "clever" Troll.. :

"I'm going to take your faux outrage at the mention of trump being assassinated as belief he was the first."

So it was you that mentioned it then ? not me !

Seems you Finally admitting it , if in a sneaky way !

Is the apology coming on the next post then ?

I see you are still refusing to answer the question. Why so cowardly tony? Why can't you tell us which presidents didn't get death threats?

mmm... no apology ?

Seems you have stepped back into full TROLL mode!

And now you are even trying to bait me by calling me coward !...lol

So I insist ! :

"I'm going to take your faux outrage at the mention of trump being assassinated as belief he was the first."

So it was you that mentioned it then ? not me !

Seems you Finally admitting it , if in a sneaky way !

Is the apology coming on the next post then ?

I guess you really are too scared to tell us which presidents didn't get death threats then. I don't really understand why, however it must really be linked to your sense of self if you are so reluctant to tell us. Very strange.

lol... want a reply ?

Stop TROLLING and apologise !

Why should I apologise when the only president that you have said so far that has ever received a death threat is trump. This is patently ridiculous as since WWII 1 president has been assassinated and another shot. Trump wasn't the first president to get death threats tony.

Lol.... Incredible ! Now you have done it twice !

Jesus ! how utterly inept can you be

"Why should I apologise when the only president that you have said so far that has ever received a death threat is trump."

Unbelievable !!

WHERE DID I SAY THAT ?

Is that simple enough for you ?

Let me help your 5 year old brain !

All you need to do is copy-paste a quote from one of my posts ,where I say that !

GOT IT ... DUHHH

You haven't named any other president!

So its YOU ASSUMING Something I dint say !

lol.... a statement by assumption !

So....are you admitting I didn't actually say what in inferred ?

You have only been able to name one president, trump, that had received death threats. You said most of the presidents that you can remember, didn't receive any death threats. That's nonsense Tony. Trump isn't the only president to receive death threats. You know this, that's why you are incapable of naming a single president that you can remember that didn't get death threats. Not one Tony, you can't name one.

Do you know why you cant name one? Because they all received death threats!

Lol...Troll time again !

You take one step forward ...then two backwards.... so guess I will have to repeat AGAIN :

"Why should I apologise when the only president that you have said so far that has ever received a death threat is trump."

Unbelievable !!

WHERE DID I SAY THAT ?

Is that simple enough for you ?

Let me help your 5 year old brain !

All you need to do is copy-paste a quote from one of my posts ,where I say that !

GOT IT ... DUHHH

I will keep repeating this until you admit your mistake !

Repeating is how one teaches stubborn children ! "

Where did you say that? Tell you what tony, you show me where you named another president, because if you haven't named any other, then the only one you have named is trump!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *illwill69uMan  over a year ago

moston

please stop feeding the troll...

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"it's been leaked to the media that white house lawyers are "researching impeachment procedures" in preperation for the event "

bump

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"please stop feeding the troll...

"

Fine, I'll stop, but if you guys backed me up and told him it's bullshit and that all presidents receive death threats maybe he would listen.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"it's been leaked to the media that white house lawyers are "researching impeachment procedures" in preperation for the event

bump"

I think that's a long time down the road yet.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple  over a year ago

in Lancashire


"please stop feeding the troll...

Fine, I'll stop, but if you guys backed me up and told him it's bullshit and that all presidents receive death threats maybe he would listen."

you had me until 'maybe..'

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"please stop feeding the troll...

Fine, I'll stop, but if you guys backed me up and told him it's bullshit and that all presidents receive death threats maybe he would listen."

Are saying you are going to stop TROLLING ? Good news

All you got to do is to stop making statements , then saying others said it !

But that is an old pattern you use when you have to coherent or valid argument ...so I doubt you will stop !

Ready to apologise yet ?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"please stop feeding the troll...

Fine, I'll stop, but if you guys backed me up and told him it's bullshit and that all presidents receive death threats maybe he would listen.

you had me until 'maybe..'

"

I know, its pretty ridiculous the things that people will cling to on here, even in the face of overwhelming evidence. I guess this is the new level of political discourse with “alternative facts”.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *illwill69uMan  over a year ago

moston


"Fine, I'll stop, but if you guys backed me up and told him it's bullshit and that all presidents receive death threats maybe he would listen."

LoL...

You seemed to be having so much fun I did not want to interupt, but...

Sorry to say I just got bored of having to scroll down endless repeats of the same posts just to see the same thing again and again...

By the way you may like to read this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threatening_the_President_of_the_United_States

I know wikipedia is not a great reference authority but it does make interesting reading...

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple  over a year ago

in Lancashire


"please stop feeding the troll...

Fine, I'll stop, but if you guys backed me up and told him it's bullshit and that all presidents receive death threats maybe he would listen.

you had me until 'maybe..'

I know, its pretty ridiculous the things that people will cling to on here, even in the face of overwhelming evidence. I guess this is the new level of political discourse with “alternative facts”."

its what Trump does very well, not the bit about goes off on an unscripted rant... although

its the deflect and chuck out false outrage to divert from ones faux pas..

mind you they say impersonation is the best form of flattery..

or in the case of Trump, ones arse is an alternative mouthpiece..

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *xplicitlyricsMan  over a year ago

south dublin


"please stop feeding the troll...

Fine, I'll stop, but if you guys backed me up and told him it's bullshit and that all presidents receive death threats maybe he would listen."

No he wouldnt, trolls dont listen thats why theyre trolls

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"Fine, I'll stop, but if you guys backed me up and told him it's bullshit and that all presidents receive death threats maybe he would listen.

LoL...

You seemed to be having so much fun I did not want to interupt, but...

Sorry to say I just got bored of having to scroll down endless repeats of the same posts just to see the same thing again and again...

By the way you may like to read this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threatening_the_President_of_the_United_States

I know wikipedia is not a great reference authority but it does make interesting reading...

"

There would be no need to repeat anything if posters owned up to their mistakes on here ! I have , and so have you Will !

But it takes personality to own up to ones mistakes !

So tell me Will... is it correct to accuse or attribute a statement of something you didn't say/post ?

What would you do if someone twisted a post thereby putting words in your mouth?

Would you not ask them to stand corrected ?

Its all written down ! if anybody on here has any doubts as to what was said... just go back and read the posts !

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"please stop feeding the troll...

Fine, I'll stop, but if you guys backed me up and told him it's bullshit and that all presidents receive death threats maybe he would listen.

No he wouldnt, trolls dont listen thats why theyre trolls "

Troll backs Troll

What a surprise !

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"please stop feeding the troll...

Fine, I'll stop, but if you guys backed me up and told him it's bullshit and that all presidents receive death threats maybe he would listen.

you had me until 'maybe..'

I know, its pretty ridiculous the things that people will cling to on here, even in the face of overwhelming evidence. I guess this is the new level of political discourse with “alternative facts”."

Wow I am amazed on how well you talk about yourself ! lol...

Lets see... you post shite then you don't agree or like my reply .... so you twist what you wrote to make it seem like I said it !

Alternative facts indeed !

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"please stop feeding the troll...

Fine, I'll stop, but if you guys backed me up and told him it's bullshit and that all presidents receive death threats maybe he would listen.

you had me until 'maybe..'

I know, its pretty ridiculous the things that people will cling to on here, even in the face of overwhelming evidence. I guess this is the new level of political discourse with “alternative facts”.

its what Trump does very well, not the bit about goes off on an unscripted rant... although

its the deflect and chuck out false outrage to divert from ones faux pas..

mind you they say impersonation is the best form of flattery..

or in the case of Trump, ones arse is an alternative mouthpiece.. "

Yeah, some of the posters on here remind me of Comical Ali, the Iraqi information minister that said that Saddam’s troops were beating the allied coalition!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"Fine, I'll stop, but if you guys backed me up and told him it's bullshit and that all presidents receive death threats maybe he would listen.

LoL...

You seemed to be having so much fun I did not want to interupt, but...

Sorry to say I just got bored of having to scroll down endless repeats of the same posts just to see the same thing again and again...

By the way you may like to read this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threatening_the_President_of_the_United_States

I know wikipedia is not a great reference authority but it does make interesting reading...

"

I think this one more perfectly contradicts the bullshit that most presidents don’t receive death threats

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_presidential_assassination_attempts_and_plots

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal

[Removed by poster at 23/05/17 00:36:50]

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal

[Removed by poster at 23/05/17 00:39:28]

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"Fine, I'll stop, but if you guys backed me up and told him it's bullshit and that all presidents receive death threats maybe he would listen.

LoL...

You seemed to be having so much fun I did not want to interupt, but...

Sorry to say I just got bored of having to scroll down endless repeats of the same posts just to see the same thing again and again...

By the way you may like to read this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threatening_the_President_of_the_United_States

I know wikipedia is not a great reference authority but it does make interesting reading...

I think this one more perfectly contradicts the bullshit that most presidents don’t receive death threats

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_presidential_assassination_attempts_

and_plots "

Lol.... I love it ! I knew sooner or later you would trip over yourself!

So.... how do you feel about shooting yourself in the foot ?... lol...

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge

The WH won't deny that they may try to use executive privilege to silence Comey. Now why would they want to do that I wonder?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *illwill69uMan  over a year ago

moston


"The WH won't deny that they may try to use executive privilege to silence Comey. Now why would they want to do that I wonder? "

Why indeed?

I believe Nixon tried the same trick a few weeks before he resigned...

The question is after all Trumps shouting about draining the swamp and locking her up on the election trail will the GOP have the nerve and the balls to stick 2 fingers up to the American people and give Trump, his family and administration immunity? Or will Trump be the first president to face federal criminal charges for the way he got himself elected?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"The WH won't deny that they may try to use executive privilege to silence Comey. Now why would they want to do that I wonder?

Why indeed?

I believe Nixon tried the same trick a few weeks before he resigned...

The question is after all Trumps shouting about draining the swamp and locking her up on the election trail will the GOP have the nerve and the balls to stick 2 fingers up to the American people and give Trump, his family and administration immunity? Or will Trump be the first president to face federal criminal charges for the way he got himself elected?"

Oh !

And how was that?

Witch Hunt continues......

BS meter on max!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.4531

0