 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Ex leader of Afghanistan...... what a total knob.
His (ex) government have been fighting against Taliban/AlQueda/ISIS for years. The terrorists hide out in fortified cave systems and attack and kill government forces at will...then retreat back.
Trump has just sanctioned use of a big "fuck-off" bomb which has apparently destroyed a whole network of caves and tunnels and killed 36 ISIS jihadists.
Karsi has said it is terrible and called for Afghanistan to turn on America. Is he a total knobhead? Or is this only since he is out of office as he begged the Americans to save his government from being totally over-run by these groups not so long ago. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Hes just realised something.
Hes got zero chance of controlling the yanks but!
A small chance of controlling the religious hardliners.
So hes going with the odds |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *imiUKMan
over a year ago
Hereford |
I think that possibly, just because you want rid of an organisation, it does not nescessarily equate to a request for the yanks to come and bomb the fuck out of your country on your behalf.... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I think that possibly, just because you want rid of an organisation, it does not nescessarily equate to a request for the yanks to come and bomb the fuck out of your country on your behalf...."
As lots my trainees say, who are ex forces personnel. Afghan, a fucking shit hole, dominated by medieval opium sky God followers. Who really gives a shit about it.
Best thing is fighting the Islamic fundamentalists over there, keeps most of them of our shores. And if any home grown Islamic nutters want to join them, let them go, but refuse them access back in to the UK
After all there plenty of Islamic Stan for them and their families to set up home in.
I await the backlash from the liberal elite... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *imiUKMan
over a year ago
Hereford |
"I think that possibly, just because you want rid of an organisation, it does not nescessarily equate to a request for the yanks to come and bomb the fuck out of your country on your behalf....
As lots my trainees say, who are ex forces personnel. Afghan, a fucking shit hole, dominated by medieval opium sky God followers. Who really gives a shit about it.
Best thing is fighting the Islamic fundamentalists over there, keeps most of them of our shores. And if any home grown Islamic nutters want to join them, let them go, but refuse them access back in to the UK
After all there plenty of Islamic Stan for them and their families to set up home in.
I await the backlash from the liberal elite..."
Western Governments do (as did the USSR in the '70s), clearly or they wouldn't have sent troops over there.
There are plenty of hideous regimes that we don't bother to send troops to - Heard of Boko Haram? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I think that possibly, just because you want rid of an organisation, it does not nescessarily equate to a request for the yanks to come and bomb the fuck out of your country on your behalf....
As lots my trainees say, who are ex forces personnel. Afghan, a fucking shit hole, dominated by medieval opium sky God followers. Who really gives a shit about it.
Best thing is fighting the Islamic fundamentalists over there, keeps most of them of our shores. And if any home grown Islamic nutters want to join them, let them go, but refuse them access back in to the UK
After all there plenty of Islamic Stan for them and their families to set up home in.
I await the backlash from the liberal elite...
Western Governments do (as did the USSR in the '70s), clearly or they wouldn't have sent troops over there.
There are plenty of hideous regimes that we don't bother to send troops to - Heard of Boko Haram?"
Mmmmm let me think about it, yep it's a yes from me |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *imiUKMan
over a year ago
Hereford |
"I think that possibly, just because you want rid of an organisation, it does not nescessarily equate to a request for the yanks to come and bomb the fuck out of your country on your behalf....
As lots my trainees say, who are ex forces personnel. Afghan, a fucking shit hole, dominated by medieval opium sky God followers. Who really gives a shit about it.
Best thing is fighting the Islamic fundamentalists over there, keeps most of them of our shores. And if any home grown Islamic nutters want to join them, let them go, but refuse them access back in to the UK
After all there plenty of Islamic Stan for them and their families to set up home in.
I await the backlash from the liberal elite...
Western Governments do (as did the USSR in the '70s), clearly or they wouldn't have sent troops over there.
There are plenty of hideous regimes that we don't bother to send troops to - Heard of Boko Haram?
Mmmmm let me think about it, yep it's a yes from me"
So; clearly we must give a fuck about it for some reason, and I'm fairly sure that "Islamic extremism" aint it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
36 sons of satan who want to turn the world back to the stone age have been granted their wish.
Their journey will be as a kit of a thousand shredded body parts, so they won't be much use to the ugly septuagenarian virgins as promised. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"36 sons of satan who want to turn the world back to the stone age have been granted their wish.
Their journey will be as a kit of a thousand shredded body parts, so they won't be much use to the ugly septuagenarian virgins as promised. "
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *onyxptMan
over a year ago
st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal |
"Revised figure.....now reported as 80 of the sick, twisted bastards who won't be passing on their vile ideas...or there genes!"
Its a rare occasion we get good news from that place !  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
America exlpode the MOAB (mother of all bombs)
Another case of 'shock and awe'...
But the shock and awe came from Russia who who revealed they have a similar bomb that is nearly twice as big...
It's a DOAB (the daddy of all bombs)...
Seems Putin just jizzed on the Donald again...
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *onyxptMan
over a year ago
st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal |
"America exlpode the MOAB (mother of all bombs)
Another case of 'shock and awe'...
But the shock and awe came from Russia who who revealed they have a similar bomb that is nearly twice as big...
It's a DOAB (the daddy of all bombs)...
Seems Putin just jizzed on the Donald again...
"
Come on Will ... that was old news before Trump came on the scene !
I expect you know MOAB actually stands for " Massive Ordnance Air Blast"
Not as catchy ..... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I expect you know MOAB actually stands for " Massive Ordnance Air Blast"
Not as catchy ..... "
Would that be a thermobarric (very hot and makes a big bang) air fire (modified napam [as napam is a banned weapon] that explodes in mid air and uses a hypersonic pressure and heat blast to devastate its target) and is dropped from the rear of a 'jolly green giant' (that's a C130 gunship conversion that also has 2 howitzers that have fire arcs of fire to either side and nearly directly downward as well as a forward mounted 30mm gatling gun as mounted in the warthog). The same as used to devastating effect on the death road out of Kuwait in 91 and brought the first gulf war to a premature end and caused the second gulf war when junior decided he needed to finish daddy's business in Iraq. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *onyxptMan
over a year ago
st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal |
"I expect you know MOAB actually stands for " Massive Ordnance Air Blast"
Not as catchy .....
Would that be a thermobarric (very hot and makes a big bang) air fire (modified napam [as napam is a banned weapon] that explodes in mid air and uses a hypersonic pressure and heat blast to devastate its target) and is dropped from the rear of a 'jolly green giant' (that's a C130 gunship conversion that also has 2 howitzers that have fire arcs of fire to either side and nearly directly downward as well as a forward mounted 30mm gatling gun as mounted in the warthog). The same as used to devastating effect on the death road out of Kuwait in 91 and brought the first gulf war to a premature end and caused the second gulf war when junior decided he needed to finish daddy's business in Iraq."
As far as I know , the MOAB is not a thermobaric weapon ! Its air blast detonation improves efficiency ! If it was a penetration on detonated on impact the destruction radius would be diminished !
From what I heard , the Russian version is actually a hybrid that has thermobaric capacity too ! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
As far as I know , the MOAB is not a thermobaric weapon ! Its air blast detonation improves efficiency ! If it was a penetration on detonated on impact the destruction radius would be diminished !
From what I heard , the Russian version is actually a hybrid that has thermobaric capacity too ! "
Yep most definitely a thermobaric device, regardless of what was claimed by the yanks all those krispy creamed Iraqis and the speed at which the war finished were all the evidence anyone really needed to work out what type of a weapon it was. I expect the Donald expects he will be able to label any photographs that emerge as false news and false photos. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *onyxptMan
over a year ago
st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal |
"
As far as I know , the MOAB is not a thermobaric weapon ! Its air blast detonation improves efficiency ! If it was a penetration on detonated on impact the destruction radius would be diminished !
From what I heard , the Russian version is actually a hybrid that has thermobaric capacity too !
Yep most definitely a thermobaric device, regardless of what was claimed by the yanks all those krispy creamed Iraqis and the speed at which the war finished were all the evidence anyone really needed to work out what type of a weapon it was. I expect the Donald expects he will be able to label any photographs that emerge as false news and false photos."
Will I think you are confusing things !
The MOAB (GBU-43) is not thermobaric , and it was never used before !
Air blast means it detonates above ground , not on contact !
Its basically an updated version of the Vietnam era "daisy cutter"
It was tested back in 2003 , but its operational use was only now !
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
