FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Schrodinger's immigrants
Schrodinger's immigrants
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
The ability to hold two factually contradictory statements as simultaneously true is a real skill - maybe we could market it ? There must be a research opportunity there - a study of how a human can survive without a fully functioning brain?
I heard they were sending all the money home to their families while at the same time having them all over here as well..... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
For all of the older folk on here, there is a rumour that Erwin wasn't a big fan of the TV show "Take Your Pick" - he quite liked the Yes/No eliminator but got quite upset when people chose not to Take the Money...... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'm amazed how many people openly support and condone the inhumane slaughter of animals for medical or scientific experiments  "
No cats were harmed in this thought experiment.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'm amazed how many people openly support and condone the inhumane slaughter of animals for medical or scientific experiments No cats were harmed in this thought experiment. "
So the experiment is complete bollocks as it is just the theory and not proven. Wow, I'm so impressed....not!  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *LCCCouple
over a year ago
Cambridge |
"I'm amazed how many people openly support and condone the inhumane slaughter of animals for medical or scientific experiments No cats were harmed in this thought experiment.
So the experiment is complete bollocks as it is just the theory and not proven. Wow, I'm so impressed....not! "
So you're disappointed that no cats were hurt?  nice. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'm amazed how many people openly support and condone the inhumane slaughter of animals for medical or scientific experiments No cats were harmed in this thought experiment.
So the experiment is complete bollocks as it is just the theory and not proven. Wow, I'm so impressed....not! "
Actually it was a great success. .
The experiment was designed to illustrate the flaws of the ‘Copenhagen interpretation’ of quantum mechanics, which states that a particle exists in all states at once until observed.
If the Copenhagen interpretation suggests the radioactive material can have simultaneously decayed and not decayed in the sealed environment, then it follows the cat too is both alive and dead until the box is opened.
Common sense tells us this is not the case, and Schrödinger used this to highlight the limits of the Copenhagen interpretation when applied to practical situations. The cat is actually either dead or alive, whether or not it has been observed. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'm amazed how many people openly support and condone the inhumane slaughter of animals for medical or scientific experiments No cats were harmed in this thought experiment.
So the experiment is complete bollocks as it is just the theory and not proven. Wow, I'm so impressed....not! Actually it was a great success. .
The experiment was designed to illustrate the flaws of the ‘Copenhagen interpretation’ of quantum mechanics, which states that a particle exists in all states at once until observed.
If the Copenhagen interpretation suggests the radioactive material can have simultaneously decayed and not decayed in the sealed environment, then it follows the cat too is both alive and dead until the box is opened.
Common sense tells us this is not the case, and Schrödinger used this to highlight the limits of the Copenhagen interpretation when applied to practical situations. The cat is actually either dead or alive, whether or not it has been observed."
I could have told you that. It ain't difficult |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'm amazed how many people openly support and condone the inhumane slaughter of animals for medical or scientific experiments No cats were harmed in this thought experiment.
So the experiment is complete bollocks as it is just the theory and not proven. Wow, I'm so impressed....not!
So you're disappointed that no cats were hurt? nice."
Deflecting again! I was disappointed how people,such as you, got a kick out of the thought of a cat dying. Read my original post and try to comprehend what is written |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *onyxptMan
over a year ago
st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal |
"I'm amazed how many people openly support and condone the inhumane slaughter of animals for medical or scientific experiments No cats were harmed in this thought experiment.
So the experiment is complete bollocks as it is just the theory and not proven. Wow, I'm so impressed....not!
So you're disappointed that no cats were hurt? nice.
Deflecting again! I was disappointed how people,such as you, got a kick out of the thought of a cat dying. Read my original post and try to comprehend what is written "
mmmm.... why do I find this familiar ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'm amazed how many people openly support and condone the inhumane slaughter of animals for medical or scientific experiments No cats were harmed in this thought experiment.
So the experiment is complete bollocks as it is just the theory and not proven. Wow, I'm so impressed....not! Actually it was a great success. .
The experiment was designed to illustrate the flaws of the ‘Copenhagen interpretation’ of quantum mechanics, which states that a particle exists in all states at once until observed.
If the Copenhagen interpretation suggests the radioactive material can have simultaneously decayed and not decayed in the sealed environment, then it follows the cat too is both alive and dead until the box is opened.
Common sense tells us this is not the case, and Schrödinger used this to highlight the limits of the Copenhagen interpretation when applied to practical situations. The cat is actually either dead or alive, whether or not it has been observed.
I could have told you that. It ain't difficult "
really so why the concern for theoretical cats.. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'm amazed how many people openly support and condone the inhumane slaughter of animals for medical or scientific experiments No cats were harmed in this thought experiment.
So the experiment is complete bollocks as it is just the theory and not proven. Wow, I'm so impressed....not! Actually it was a great success. .
The experiment was designed to illustrate the flaws of the ‘Copenhagen interpretation’ of quantum mechanics, which states that a particle exists in all states at once until observed.
If the Copenhagen interpretation suggests the radioactive material can have simultaneously decayed and not decayed in the sealed environment, then it follows the cat too is both alive and dead until the box is opened.
Common sense tells us this is not the case, and Schrödinger used this to highlight the limits of the Copenhagen interpretation when applied to practical situations. The cat is actually either dead or alive, whether or not it has been observed.
I could have told you that. It ain't difficult really so why the concern for theoretical cats.. "
I could have told you something is either dead or alive. Keep up dear fellow, it's not nuclear science |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *LCCCouple
over a year ago
Cambridge |
"I'm amazed how many people openly support and condone the inhumane slaughter of animals for medical or scientific experiments No cats were harmed in this thought experiment.
So the experiment is complete bollocks as it is just the theory and not proven. Wow, I'm so impressed....not!
So you're disappointed that no cats were hurt? nice.
Deflecting again! I was disappointed how people,such as you, got a kick out of the thought of a cat dying. Read my original post and try to comprehend what is written "
Where did I say I got a kick out of cats dying? You are the one who was unimpressed that no cats were harmed. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'm amazed how many people openly support and condone the inhumane slaughter of animals for medical or scientific experiments No cats were harmed in this thought experiment.
So the experiment is complete bollocks as it is just the theory and not proven. Wow, I'm so impressed....not!
So you're disappointed that no cats were hurt? nice.
Deflecting again! I was disappointed how people,such as you, got a kick out of the thought of a cat dying. Read my original post and try to comprehend what is written
Where did I say I got a kick out of cats dying? You are the one who was unimpressed that no cats were harmed. "
Read my first post comprehension is really a very weak area of yours isn't it |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *LCCCouple
over a year ago
Cambridge |
"I'm amazed how many people openly support and condone the inhumane slaughter of animals for medical or scientific experiments No cats were harmed in this thought experiment.
So the experiment is complete bollocks as it is just the theory and not proven. Wow, I'm so impressed....not!
So you're disappointed that no cats were hurt? nice.
Deflecting again! I was disappointed how people,such as you, got a kick out of the thought of a cat dying. Read my original post and try to comprehend what is written
Where did I say I got a kick out of cats dying? You are the one who was unimpressed that no cats were harmed.
Read my first post comprehension is really a very weak area of yours isn't it "
First post: animals shouldn't be hurt
Response: they weren't hurt
2nd post: not impressed they weren't hurt.
My comprehension is fine, if you meant something different, perhaps you need to brush up on your communication skills. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'm amazed how many people openly support and condone the inhumane slaughter of animals for medical or scientific experiments No cats were harmed in this thought experiment.
So the experiment is complete bollocks as it is just the theory and not proven. Wow, I'm so impressed....not!
So you're disappointed that no cats were hurt? nice.
Deflecting again! I was disappointed how people,such as you, got a kick out of the thought of a cat dying. Read my original post and try to comprehend what is written
Where did I say I got a kick out of cats dying? You are the one who was unimpressed that no cats were harmed.
Read my first post comprehension is really a very weak area of yours isn't it
First post: animals shouldn't be hurt
Response: they weren't hurt
2nd post: not impressed they weren't hurt.
My comprehension is fine, if you meant something different, perhaps you need to brush up on your communication skills. "
Seems like there is a Schrodinger's point in his comments. Funny. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'm amazed how many people openly support and condone the inhumane slaughter of animals for medical or scientific experiments No cats were harmed in this thought experiment.
So the experiment is complete bollocks as it is just the theory and not proven. Wow, I'm so impressed....not!
So you're disappointed that no cats were hurt? nice.
Deflecting again! I was disappointed how people,such as you, got a kick out of the thought of a cat dying. Read my original post and try to comprehend what is written
Where did I say I got a kick out of cats dying? You are the one who was unimpressed that no cats were harmed.
Read my first post comprehension is really a very weak area of yours isn't it
First post: animals shouldn't be hurt
Response: they weren't hurt
2nd post: not impressed they weren't hurt.
My comprehension is fine, if you meant something different, perhaps you need to brush up on your communication skills. "
Your comprehension is shite! Show me the exact statement where I say I'm not impressed animals weren't hurt. Don't try and deflect that you got off on the hypethetical prospect of murdering animals to make a political point. Sicko! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
