FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Spain veto
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Seem's people were right there is a Spanish EU veto problem is it's not the country they thought it would be So there we have it Spain's veto is on Gibraltar not Scotland Glad its been cleared up not that myth about Spain will veto an independent Scotland is dead in the water now " Maybe look into this a bit more thoroughly. But in short, Spain are talking bollocks on Gibralter | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Seem's people were right there is a Spanish EU veto problem is it's not the country they thought it would be So there we have it Spain's veto is on Gibraltar not Scotland Glad its been cleared up not that myth about Spain will veto an independent Scotland is dead in the water now Maybe look into this a bit more thoroughly. But in short, Spain are talking bollocks on Gibralter" Gibralter?... Where is that? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Seem's people were right there is a Spanish EU veto problem is it's not the country they thought it would be So there we have it Spain's veto is on Gibraltar not Scotland Glad its been cleared up not that myth about Spain will veto an independent Scotland is dead in the water now Maybe look into this a bit more thoroughly. But in short, Spain are talking bollocks on Gibralter Gibralter?... Where is that?" One vowel later . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It is strange how everone in England is so sure that Gib wants to remain British. Considering that Gib had the highest turnout in the referendum and overwhelming voted to remain in the EU. And for any who doubt me here are the figures: Votes % Remain 19,322 95.91% Leave 823 4.09% Valid votes 20,145 99.87% Invalid or blank votes 27 0.13% Total votes 20,172 100.00% Registered voters/turnout 24,119 83.64%" Strange? What has Chief Minister Picardo said? ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well it was nice of the PM to right about the importance of keeping to border between Spain and Gibraltar open and free etc. I think that was on page 7 of the letter. Tusk did get all 7 pages right? " Was there really any need for 6? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well it was nice of the PM to right about the importance of keeping to border between Spain and Gibraltar open and free etc. I think that was on page 7 of the letter. Tusk did get all 7 pages right? Was there really any need for 6?" 6? 6?! What do you mean 6?! There were meant to be 7!!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well it was nice of the PM to right about the importance of keeping to border between Spain and Gibraltar open and free etc. I think that was on page 7 of the letter. Tusk did get all 7 pages right? Was there really any need for 6? 6? 6?! What do you mean 6?! There were meant to be 7!!!" Maybe but she got so far and thought aah fuck it, they get the gist | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It is strange how everone in England is so sure that Gib wants to remain British. Considering that Gib had the highest turnout in the referendum and overwhelming voted to remain in the EU. And for any who doubt me here are the figures: Votes % Remain 19,322 95.91% Leave 823 4.09% Valid votes 20,145 99.87% Invalid or blank votes 27 0.13% Total votes 20,172 100.00% Registered voters/turnout 24,119 83.64%" Gibralter voted 99% in favour to remain under British Sovereignty. Pretty clear cut really. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Seem's people were right there is a Spanish EU veto problem is it's not the country they thought it would be So there we have it Spain's veto is on Gibraltar not Scotland Glad its been cleared up not that myth about Spain will veto an independent Scotland is dead in the water now Maybe look into this a bit more thoroughly. But in short, Spain are talking bollocks on Gibralter Gibralter?... Where is that?" Southern UK | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Gibralter voted 99% in favour to remain under British Sovereignty. Pretty clear cut really." Right, in 1967 12,138 voted to remain in the UK so that means it is fine to ignore the 19,322 that voted to remain in the EU in 2016. Your idea of democracy are also pretty clear cut. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Gibralter voted 99% in favour to remain under British Sovereignty. Pretty clear cut really. Right, in 1967 12,138 voted to remain in the UK so that means it is fine to ignore the 19,322 that voted to remain in the EU in 2016. Your idea of democracy are also pretty clear cut." In 2002 99% voted to remain Under British Sovereignty. I think 99% of the population of the rock know what they prefer far more than you do ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"In 2002 99% voted to remain Under British Sovereignty. I think 99% of the population of the rock know what they prefer far more than you do ![]() They have... They voted to stay in the EU, and their vote was separate to that of the UK. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"In 2002 99% voted to remain Under British Sovereignty. I think 99% of the population of the rock know what they prefer far more than you do ![]() Get your facts right sunny. They voted as part of a UK wide referendum that was 52% in favour of leaving the EU. They are proud of their British Sovereignty, hence only 800 people voted against it in 2002. The British Goverment needs to ensure it does all it can to ensure the good people of Gibralter do not suffer because of any vindicative actions by Spain or the EU. The Spanish do their best to make life difficult for them as it is. They need support, not to be used as a political pawn. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"In 2002 99% voted to remain Under British Sovereignty. I think 99% of the population of the rock know what they prefer far more than you do ![]() Put ye bollocks where ye mouth is and start a petition to let the Gibralan's have a referendum. The UK or the EU, now that the circumstances have changed a rigorous exercise of democracy is needed to see if they really wish to be the southern UK, or whether they wish to remain part of the EU - however that would work out. Come on, it's democracy. You have to let the people have a say, and in a rigorous democracy we would devolve democracy to the local levels to see if politicians are representing their constituents correctly. In short I call bollocks, I imagine that leaving the EU and single market - if that is what we finally end up dong, would push a significant amount of the population to vote showing their is an issue with the direction the UK is going in. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Get your facts right sunny. They voted as part of a UK wide referendum that was 52% in favour of leaving the EU. They are proud of their British Sovereignty, hence only 800 people voted against it in 2002. The British Goverment needs to ensure it does all it can to ensure the good people of Gibralter do not suffer because of any vindicative actions by Spain or the EU. The Spanish do their best to make life difficult for them as it is. They need support, not to be used as a political pawn." This is the Act which gave a vote to the people of Gib. European Union (Referendum) Act 2016 Parliament of Gibraltar An act to enable the full participation of Gibraltar in the United Kingdom’s referendum on whether it should remain a member of the European Union, and to provide for the making of subsidiary legislation in connection therewith and for matters connected thereto, including amending primary legislation by subsidiary legislation as the circumstances require. You will note it is the Sovereign Parliament of Gibraltar, not the British parliament that passed the act. Therefore regardless of what you may (or the Governor) say or think Gibraltar voted to remain in the EU and that vote is totally separate from the UK vote. I expect that at some point some Gibraltarian is going to make a legal challenge to the UK's right to force the Sovereign Parliament of Gibraltar out of the EU against the overwhelming expressed will of Gibraltar. And you stick your condescending 'sonny' right up your ignorant (I served in NI [but cant tell] anyone what I did at the height of the troubles between my mother spitting me out and the age of 15) arse! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Get your facts right sunny. They voted as part of a UK wide referendum that was 52% in favour of leaving the EU. They are proud of their British Sovereignty, hence only 800 people voted against it in 2002. The British Goverment needs to ensure it does all it can to ensure the good people of Gibralter do not suffer because of any vindicative actions by Spain or the EU. The Spanish do their best to make life difficult for them as it is. They need support, not to be used as a political pawn. This is the Act which gave a vote to the people of Gib. European Union (Referendum) Act 2016 Parliament of Gibraltar An act to enable the full participation of Gibraltar in the United Kingdom’s referendum on whether it should remain a member of the European Union, and to provide for the making of subsidiary legislation in connection therewith and for matters connected thereto, including amending primary legislation by subsidiary legislation as the circumstances require. You will note it is the Sovereign Parliament of Gibraltar, not the British parliament that passed the act. Therefore regardless of what you may (or the Governor) say or think Gibraltar voted to remain in the EU and that vote is totally separate from the UK vote. I expect that at some point some Gibraltarian is going to make a legal challenge to the UK's right to force the Sovereign Parliament of Gibraltar out of the EU against the overwhelming expressed will of Gibraltar. And you stick your condescending 'sonny' right up your ignorant (I served in NI [but cant tell] anyone what I did at the height of the troubles between my mother spitting me out and the age of 15) arse!" The good people of Gilbraltar didn't vote to leave UK sovereignty. Thats not too difficult for you to understand is it. At the moment Spain and the EU are coming out with loads of bluster and a small minority of idiots in the UK are sucking it up. No one knows what will happen during and after negotiations so it is all conjecture. It will be down to Gilbraltar and the UK Government to make any decisions not people like me or you. To my knowledge, unlike a handful a Scots, the Brits in Gilbraltar have not made a noise about a referendum. So get back in your pram, sunny. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Were getting pushed around by a bunch of egg heads in Belgium who havent even got tanks let alone nukes. What sort of negotiating are we fucking playing at. Page 1 Give us everything or you get 50 mega tonnes dropped on you at day break. Come on this isnt Putin were dealing with, show some back bone you Nancys" ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I say lets nuke them and have done with it. We'll see how much Spain wants it back then ![]() The yanks nearly did that by accident! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I say lets nuke them and have done with it. We'll see how much Spain wants it back then ![]() . Its times like this where we need a small comedic relief!https://youtu.be/76OlqSd_5k8 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I say lets nuke them and have done with it. We'll see how much Spain wants it back then ![]() I remember that...losing missiles in the sea! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why should we be suprised about Spain moving in on Gibraltar? Back in the 1700's when GB was the top gun we took it from the Spanish. So why would the Spanish give up on something taken from them by force? There are 2 sides to every story! This is just the first of many issues to be raised. Falklands, British Colonialism may come back and bite us on the bum. The East India company were great traders, but any opposition involved them bringing in the British Army as "persuaders". Slavery etc etc - we have opened a can of worms I fear." . Thats true,i vote we start at giving back the USA and Canada to the native Indians, and then Pakistan and Bangladesh? back to the Indians ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I say lets nuke them and have done with it. We'll see how much Spain wants it back then ![]() That is very true. Remember that next time anyone gets their kit off on Play Vera. The site of the nuke is only a handful of miles away and the land is still contaminated. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I say lets nuke them and have done with it. We'll see how much Spain wants it back then ![]() . We should have nuked Chernobyl, weve been raising radioactive sheep here for 30 years | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why should we be suprised about Spain moving in on Gibraltar? Back in the 1700's when GB was the top gun we took it from the Spanish. So why would the Spanish give up on something taken from them by force? There are 2 sides to every story! This is just the first of many issues to be raised. Falklands, British Colonialism may come back and bite us on the bum. The East India company were great traders, but any opposition involved them bringing in the British Army as "persuaders". Slavery etc etc - we have opened a can of worms I fear.. Thats true,i vote we start at giving back the USA and Canada to the native Indians, and then Pakistan and Bangladesh? back to the Indians ![]() Seeing as Spain only ruled Gibraltar for 240 years before it was ceded to the UK (300 years) maybe Tunisia, Morrocco, Italy and Germany can put a claim in for it too ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why should we be suprised about Spain moving in on Gibraltar? Back in the 1700's when GB was the top gun we took it from the Spanish. So why would the Spanish give up on something taken from them by force? There are 2 sides to every story! This is just the first of many issues to be raised. Falklands, British Colonialism may come back and bite us on the bum. The East India company were great traders, but any opposition involved them bringing in the British Army as "persuaders". Slavery etc etc - we have opened a can of worms I fear.. Thats true,i vote we start at giving back the USA and Canada to the native Indians, and then Pakistan and Bangladesh? back to the Indians ![]() ![]() . Or the Muslim empire that ruled Spain for 500 years could put a claim in for Spain! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why should we be suprised about Spain moving in on Gibraltar? Back in the 1700's when GB was the top gun we took it from the Spanish. So why would the Spanish give up on something taken from them by force? There are 2 sides to every story! This is just the first of many issues to be raised. Falklands, British Colonialism may come back and bite us on the bum. The East India company were great traders, but any opposition involved them bringing in the British Army as "persuaders". Slavery etc etc - we have opened a can of worms I fear.. Thats true,i vote we start at giving back the USA and Canada to the native Indians, and then Pakistan and Bangladesh? back to the Indians ![]() ![]() Oh ye, and maybe Spain could put a claim in for Portugal? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Seem's people were right there is a Spanish EU veto problem is it's not the country they thought it would be So there we have it Spain's veto is on Gibraltar not Scotland Glad its been cleared up not that myth about Spain will veto an independent Scotland is dead in the water now Maybe look into this a bit more thoroughly. But in short, Spain are talking bollocks on Gibralter Gibralter?... Where is that? One vowel later ." ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Seem's people were right there is a Spanish EU veto problem is it's not the country they thought it would be So there we have it Spain's veto is on Gibraltar not Scotland Glad its been cleared up not that myth about Spain will veto an independent Scotland is dead in the water now Maybe look into this a bit more thoroughly. But in short, Spain are talking bollocks on Gibralter Gibralter?... Where is that? One vowel later . ![]() Duh? Who's worried? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why should we be suprised about Spain moving in on Gibraltar? Back in the 1700's when GB was the top gun we took it from the Spanish. So why would the Spanish give up on something taken from them by force? There are 2 sides to every story! This is just the first of many issues to be raised. Falklands, British Colonialism may come back and bite us on the bum. The East India company were great traders, but any opposition involved them bringing in the British Army as "persuaders". Slavery etc etc - we have opened a can of worms I fear.. Thats true,i vote we start at giving back the USA and Canada to the native Indians, and then Pakistan and Bangladesh? back to the Indians ![]() ![]() So where is the geographic location? It's on the Spanish peninsula! UK needs to face facts - got enough to worry about without worrying about overseas territories? How much do they cost the UK taxpayer to support? Gibraltar could have the same status as Andorra? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why should we be suprised about Spain moving in on Gibraltar? Back in the 1700's when GB was the top gun we took it from the Spanish. So why would the Spanish give up on something taken from them by force? There are 2 sides to every story! This is just the first of many issues to be raised. Falklands, British Colonialism may come back and bite us on the bum. The East India company were great traders, but any opposition involved them bringing in the British Army as "persuaders". Slavery etc etc - we have opened a can of worms I fear.. Thats true,i vote we start at giving back the USA and Canada to the native Indians, and then Pakistan and Bangladesh? back to the Indians ![]() ![]() And be out of the EU too? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So were we right not to give a unilateral agreement on citizen's rights? Perhaps the Goverment knew this was coming?" ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why not just offer Gibraltar indendence ? " . I thought it was independent ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why should we be suprised about Spain moving in on Gibraltar? Back in the 1700's when GB was the top gun we took it from the Spanish. So why would the Spanish give up on something taken from them by force? There are 2 sides to every story! This is just the first of many issues to be raised. Falklands, British Colonialism may come back and bite us on the bum. The East India company were great traders, but any opposition involved them bringing in the British Army as "persuaders". Slavery etc etc - we have opened a can of worms I fear.. Thats true,i vote we start at giving back the USA and Canada to the native Indians, and then Pakistan and Bangladesh? back to the Indians ![]() ![]() Andorra is NOT in the EU! It is a sovereign state, which is under Spanish/French protection - Similar to Liechtenstein, Monaco etc | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why should we be suprised about Spain moving in on Gibraltar? Back in the 1700's when GB was the top gun we took it from the Spanish. So why would the Spanish give up on something taken from them by force? There are 2 sides to every story! This is just the first of many issues to be raised. Falklands, British Colonialism may come back and bite us on the bum. The East India company were great traders, but any opposition involved them bringing in the British Army as "persuaders". Slavery etc etc - we have opened a can of worms I fear.. Thats true,i vote we start at giving back the USA and Canada to the native Indians, and then Pakistan and Bangladesh? back to the Indians ![]() ![]() I know its not in the EU. Thats what I mean. Would it be better off out of the EU like Andorra? Or would it have to leave the EU anyway? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Spain are pissing in the wind on Gibraltar, and they know it. I thought the EU were negotiating as one voice, two days in and they are already split. Are Spain going to hand back their North African enclave?" The EU is never really one voice,never has been never will be.For me this is why the EU is doomed to failure. However Gibralter could really cause a lot of problems because the Spanish will now get support from others to get us a bad deal,this is a tricky one,lets see how May handles it,I think this could be a real spanner in the works unfortunatly | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why should we be suprised about Spain moving in on Gibraltar? Back in the 1700's when GB was the top gun we took it from the Spanish. So why would the Spanish give up on something taken from them by force? There are 2 sides to every story! This is just the first of many issues to be raised. Falklands, British Colonialism may come back and bite us on the bum. The East India company were great traders, but any opposition involved them bringing in the British Army as "persuaders". Slavery etc etc - we have opened a can of worms I fear.. Thats true,i vote we start at giving back the USA and Canada to the native Indians, and then Pakistan and Bangladesh? back to the Indians ![]() ![]() Im part Norwegian so i'm gonna take England and parts of Scotland and ireland for my ancestors mwhahaha! Viva la Danelaw! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why should we be suprised about Spain moving in on Gibraltar? Back in the 1700's when GB was the top gun we took it from the Spanish. So why would the Spanish give up on something taken from them by force? There are 2 sides to every story! This is just the first of many issues to be raised. Falklands, British Colonialism may come back and bite us on the bum. The East India company were great traders, but any opposition involved them bringing in the British Army as "persuaders". Slavery etc etc - we have opened a can of worms I fear.. Thats true,i vote we start at giving back the USA and Canada to the native Indians, and then Pakistan and Bangladesh? back to the Indians ![]() ![]() Sod it lets just reform the roman empire, solves everything right? Then we can get to the real pressing issue of our time and retake constantinople! ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why should we be suprised about Spain moving in on Gibraltar? Back in the 1700's when GB was the top gun we took it from the Spanish. So why would the Spanish give up on something taken from them by force? There are 2 sides to every story! This is just the first of many issues to be raised. Falklands, British Colonialism may come back and bite us on the bum. The East India company were great traders, but any opposition involved them bringing in the British Army as "persuaders". Slavery etc etc - we have opened a can of worms I fear.. Thats true,i vote we start at giving back the USA and Canada to the native Indians, and then Pakistan and Bangladesh? back to the Indians ![]() ![]() I apologise that I mis-read your question, now that you've expanded it I understand what you mean. To answer your question, I don't know the answer and why would I? That's for an expert to answer not me, no one has ever left the EU before,so there is no evidence to refer to. Ask me the question in 5 years from now and then we will have a proven track record to refer to! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why should we be suprised about Spain moving in on Gibraltar? Back in the 1700's when GB was the top gun we took it from the Spanish. So why would the Spanish give up on something taken from them by force? There are 2 sides to every story! This is just the first of many issues to be raised. Falklands, British Colonialism may come back and bite us on the bum. The East India company were great traders, but any opposition involved them bringing in the British Army as "persuaders". Slavery etc etc - we have opened a can of worms I fear.. Thats true,i vote we start at giving back the USA and Canada to the native Indians, and then Pakistan and Bangladesh? back to the Indians ![]() ![]() ![]() . I was trying to take Berlin last night after watching Dr strange love. ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why should we be suprised about Spain moving in on Gibraltar? Back in the 1700's when GB was the top gun we took it from the Spanish. So why would the Spanish give up on something taken from them by force? There are 2 sides to every story! This is just the first of many issues to be raised. Falklands, British Colonialism may come back and bite us on the bum. The East India company were great traders, but any opposition involved them bringing in the British Army as "persuaders". Slavery etc etc - we have opened a can of worms I fear.. Thats true,i vote we start at giving back the USA and Canada to the native Indians, and then Pakistan and Bangladesh? back to the Indians ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Berlin is of no issue. The West must take back Constantinople from the Kebabs. Deus Vult! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why should we be suprised about Spain moving in on Gibraltar? Back in the 1700's when GB was the top gun we took it from the Spanish. So why would the Spanish give up on something taken from them by force? There are 2 sides to every story! This is just the first of many issues to be raised. Falklands, British Colonialism may come back and bite us on the bum. The East India company were great traders, but any opposition involved them bringing in the British Army as "persuaders". Slavery etc etc - we have opened a can of worms I fear.. Thats true,i vote we start at giving back the USA and Canada to the native Indians, and then Pakistan and Bangladesh? back to the Indians ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() To clarify I'm a wee bit merry and am currently trolling Alt-Reich youtubers. God they post some crap. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's not going to be easy that's for sure! If anyone has ever served on a committee they will know how difficult it is to get things through. Having said that we have the best Britain can muster so I am sure we will get the best deal!" Hahahahahaha. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Further evidence Spain will not veto an independent Scotland. Spanish foreign minster rules it out Lmao the British media for months and months were so confident Spain would veto Scotland being in the EU they didnt see that coming with a Spanish veto over Gibralter. This is why you cant believe a word of the British media they are feart to lose Scotland. " True but he also said Scotland would have to wait in the queue meet the required rules and regulations and be willing to adopt the Euro, please correct me if I,m wrong. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Further evidence Spain will not veto an independent Scotland. Spanish foreign minster rules it out Lmao the British media for months and months were so confident Spain would veto Scotland being in the EU they didnt see that coming with a Spanish veto over Gibralter. This is why you cant believe a word of the British media they are feart to lose Scotland. True but he also said Scotland would have to wait in the queue meet the required rules and regulations and be willing to adopt the Euro, please correct me if I,m wrong. " There is no queue you either meet the criteria or you dont and no country is forced to use the euro. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Further evidence Spain will not veto an independent Scotland. Spanish foreign minster rules it out Lmao the British media for months and months were so confident Spain would veto Scotland being in the EU they didnt see that coming with a Spanish veto over Gibralter. This is why you cant believe a word of the British media they are feart to lose Scotland. True but he also said Scotland would have to wait in the queue meet the required rules and regulations and be willing to adopt the Euro, please correct me if I,m wrong. There is no queue you either meet the criteria or you dont and no country is forced to use the euro. " I think you need to dig a bit deeper into both those points. You may well be surprised! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Further evidence Spain will not veto an independent Scotland. Spanish foreign minster rules it out Lmao the British media for months and months were so confident Spain would veto Scotland being in the EU they didnt see that coming with a Spanish veto over Gibralter. This is why you cant believe a word of the British media they are feart to lose Scotland. True but he also said Scotland would have to wait in the queue meet the required rules and regulations and be willing to adopt the Euro, please correct me if I,m wrong. There is no queue you either meet the criteria or you dont and no country is forced to use the euro. " If you are stuck, just Google "Dastis and the Guardian " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The sickest part about the Spain and the veto over Gibralter is the fact is we are hearing people come out and say the UK will go to war yeah war to defend Gibralter Have the UK not learned a damn thing about going to war with countries. They cant accept the fact the British empire is over" What does Gibraltar have to do with the Empire? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The sickest part about the Spain and the veto over Gibralter is the fact is we are hearing people come out and say the UK will go to war yeah war to defend Gibralter Have the UK not learned a damn thing about going to war with countries. They cant accept the fact the British empire is over What does Gibraltar have to do with the Empire?" Well i would considering Gibralter voted to remain in the EU and the UK think they know best for Gibralter i would say give the people of Gibralter a referendum for them to decide if they want to be part of the UK out of the EU or now but we all know the UK government aint gonna do that as then they would have to give Scotland and N.Ireland referendums. Also yes i do knwo back in the early 2000's Gibralter wanted to be part of the UK but things change in live and in 2016 the also voted to remain in the EU. The problem is the Tories think they know whats best for Scotland , Wales , N.Ireland and Gibralter even though not one of these countries voted for the Tories. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The sickest part about the Spain and the veto over Gibralter is the fact is we are hearing people come out and say the UK will go to war yeah war to defend Gibralter Have the UK not learned a damn thing about going to war with countries. They cant accept the fact the British empire is over What does Gibraltar have to do with the Empire? Well i would considering Gibralter voted to remain in the EU and the UK think they know best for Gibralter i would say give the people of Gibralter a referendum for them to decide if they want to be part of the UK out of the EU or now but we all know the UK government aint gonna do that as then they would have to give Scotland and N.Ireland referendums. Also yes i do knwo back in the early 2000's Gibralter wanted to be part of the UK but things change in live and in 2016 the also voted to remain in the EU. The problem is the Tories think they know whats best for Scotland , Wales , N.Ireland and Gibralter even though not one of these countries voted for the Tories. " ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Remainers said during the referendum that the had been a force for peace between its members for 60 years which was, in characteristic fashion, denied by the brexiters. 4 days after we trigger article 50 and already there are calls for us to go to war with Spain over Gibraltar like we did over the falklands. I thought they want to take us back to the 1950's, not 1590's! Fucking lunatics. " Who has mentioned "war"? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Remainers said during the referendum that the had been a force for peace between its members for 60 years which was, in characteristic fashion, denied by the brexiters. 4 days after we trigger article 50 and already there are calls for us to go to war with Spain over Gibraltar like we did over the falklands. I thought they want to take us back to the 1950's, not 1590's! Fucking lunatics. " A tad over dramatic. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Further evidence Spain will not veto an independent Scotland. Spanish foreign minster rules it out Lmao the British media for months and months were so confident Spain would veto Scotland being in the EU they didnt see that coming with a Spanish veto over Gibralter. This is why you cant believe a word of the British media they are feart to lose Scotland. True but he also said Scotland would have to wait in the queue meet the required rules and regulations and be willing to adopt the Euro, please correct me if I,m wrong. There is no queue you either meet the criteria or you dont and no country is forced to use the euro. " I think you,ll find there are 4 countries already waiting to join, but the EU have said no other countries can start talks until 2020. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Further evidence Spain will not veto an independent Scotland. Spanish foreign minster rules it out Lmao the British media for months and months were so confident Spain would veto Scotland being in the EU they didnt see that coming with a Spanish veto over Gibralter. This is why you cant believe a word of the British media they are feart to lose Scotland. True but he also said Scotland would have to wait in the queue meet the required rules and regulations and be willing to adopt the Euro, please correct me if I,m wrong. There is no queue you either meet the criteria or you dont and no country is forced to use the euro. I think you,ll find there are 4 countries already waiting to join, but the EU have said no other countries can start talks until 2020." Yeah and why are they waiting ? Could it be as right now none of them might the criteria ? Now the EU have come and said Scotland could be fast tracked you would think after the whole Spain veto on independence being debunked people would start listening to what the EU are saying and not what the British media are telling you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Seem's people were right there is a Spanish EU veto problem is it's not the country they thought it would be So there we have it Spain's veto is on Gibraltar not Scotland Glad its been cleared up not that myth about Spain will veto an independent Scotland is dead in the water now Maybe look into this a bit more thoroughly. But in short, Spain are talking bollocks on Gibralter Gibralter?... Where is that? Southern UK" Nah...Southern UK is the Falklands ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Further evidence Spain will not veto an independent Scotland. Spanish foreign minster rules it out Lmao the British media for months and months were so confident Spain would veto Scotland being in the EU they didnt see that coming with a Spanish veto over Gibralter. This is why you cant believe a word of the British media they are feart to lose Scotland. True but he also said Scotland would have to wait in the queue meet the required rules and regulations and be willing to adopt the Euro, please correct me if I,m wrong. There is no queue you either meet the criteria or you dont and no country is forced to use the euro. I think you,ll find there are 4 countries already waiting to join, but the EU have said no other countries can start talks until 2020. Yeah and why are they waiting ? Could it be as right now none of them might the criteria ? Now the EU have come and said Scotland could be fast tracked you would think after the whole Spain veto on independence being debunked people would start listening to what the EU are saying and not what the British media are telling you." Let's get one thing straight. Spain will veto Scotland. It has no other choice. As much as some in Spain would love to rub Britain's nose in it over Gibraltar, and they would be sorely tempted to do so, they won't risk it. The risk of losing Catalonia and the Basque region including the cities of Barcelona, Bilbao, Pamplona, San Sebastian, and Vittoria is far too big a gamble to take just to make a point about a lump of rock sticking out into the Med. Catalan and Basque nationalism is just as strong as Scotland's and they are chomping at the bit for an excuse to go for it. Whatever the other arguments are about Scottish independence I will leave to the Scottish to decide. However betting the farm on the myth that the Spanish will back down is a bet than Scotland will certainly lose. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It is strange how everone in England is so sure that Gib wants to remain British. Considering that Gib had the highest turnout in the referendum and overwhelming voted to remain in the EU. And for any who doubt me here are the figures: Votes % Remain 19,322 95.91% Leave 823 4.09% Valid votes 20,145 99.87% Invalid or blank votes 27 0.13% Total votes 20,172 100.00% Registered voters/turnout 24,119 83.64%" not strange at all i spend lots of time in gib and they are very patriotic and want to remain british despite voting to remain. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why should we be suprised about Spain moving in on Gibraltar? Back in the 1700's when GB was the top gun we took it from the Spanish. So why would the Spanish give up on something taken from them by force? There are 2 sides to every story! This is just the first of many issues to be raised. Falklands, British Colonialism may come back and bite us on the bum. The East India company were great traders, but any opposition involved them bringing in the British Army as "persuaders". Slavery etc etc - we have opened a can of worms I fear." I think you need to read up on history,we did not take gib by force it was ceded to britain under the treaty of utrecht after the war of succession if britain hadnt helped all spanish would now be french. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why should we be suprised about Spain moving in on Gibraltar? Back in the 1700's when GB was the top gun we took it from the Spanish. So why would the Spanish give up on something taken from them by force? There are 2 sides to every story! This is just the first of many issues to be raised. Falklands, British Colonialism may come back and bite us on the bum. The East India company were great traders, but any opposition involved them bringing in the British Army as "persuaders". Slavery etc etc - we have opened a can of worms I fear.I think you need to read up on history,we did not take gib by force it was ceded to britain under the treaty of utrecht after the war of succession if britain hadnt helped all spanish would now be french. " ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm surprised that Spain hasn't asked the EU for Portugal back, and that Spain, France and Austria haven't laid claim to parts of Italy. Gibraltar has been British for a lot longer than Italy has existed!" This is the problem...were do you actually stop? How far in time do you go back? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm surprised that Spain hasn't asked the EU for Portugal back, and that Spain, France and Austria haven't laid claim to parts of Italy. Gibraltar has been British for a lot longer than Italy has existed! This is the problem...were do you actually stop? How far in time do you go back?" The indian nations just last week sent a invoice for $300 trillion dollars to the white house for rent arrears. ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm surprised that Spain hasn't asked the EU for Portugal back, and that Spain, France and Austria haven't laid claim to parts of Italy. Gibraltar has been British for a lot longer than Italy has existed! This is the problem...were do you actually stop? How far in time do you go back?The indian nations just last week sent a invoice for $300 trillion dollars to the white house for rent arrears. ![]() But wasn't it British settlers who first went to the states and set up colonies? Maybe trump will forward the bill on to us! ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm surprised that Spain hasn't asked the EU for Portugal back, and that Spain, France and Austria haven't laid claim to parts of Italy. Gibraltar has been British for a lot longer than Italy has existed!" Or Germany for that matter. ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm surprised that Spain hasn't asked the EU for Portugal back, and that Spain, France and Austria haven't laid claim to parts of Italy. Gibraltar has been British for a lot longer than Italy has existed! Or Germany for that matter. ![]() Have the borders of any country changed since the became members of the EU and its predecessor organisations? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm surprised that Spain hasn't asked the EU for Portugal back, and that Spain, France and Austria haven't laid claim to parts of Italy. Gibraltar has been British for a lot longer than Italy has existed! Or Germany for that matter. ![]() Germany's has | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm surprised that Spain hasn't asked the EU for Portugal back, and that Spain, France and Austria haven't laid claim to parts of Italy. Gibraltar has been British for a lot longer than Italy has existed! Or Germany for that matter. ![]() Which parts has it lost or gained since joining? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm surprised that Spain hasn't asked the EU for Portugal back, and that Spain, France and Austria haven't laid claim to parts of Italy. Gibraltar has been British for a lot longer than Italy has existed! Or Germany for that matter. ![]() East Germany | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm surprised that Spain hasn't asked the EU for Portugal back, and that Spain, France and Austria haven't laid claim to parts of Italy. Gibraltar has been British for a lot longer than Italy has existed! Or Germany for that matter. ![]() True, or you could say that East Germany gained West Germany ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm surprised that Spain hasn't asked the EU for Portugal back, and that Spain, France and Austria haven't laid claim to parts of Italy. Gibraltar has been British for a lot longer than Italy has existed! Or Germany for that matter. ![]() No, but WTF has that got to do with Gibraltar? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm surprised that Spain hasn't asked the EU for Portugal back, and that Spain, France and Austria haven't laid claim to parts of Italy. Gibraltar has been British for a lot longer than Italy has existed! Or Germany for that matter. ![]() ![]() How could you say that? Which side's laws, currency, political systems etc did the new Germany take on? West or East? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm surprised that Spain hasn't asked the EU for Portugal back, and that Spain, France and Austria haven't laid claim to parts of Italy. Gibraltar has been British for a lot longer than Italy has existed! Or Germany for that matter. ![]() ![]() Pity it wasn't the other way, they'd have been out of the EU then ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"How come Gibraltar doesn't have the Union flag somewhere on it's flag? All the other British Overseas's Territories do?" So does Hawaii | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm surprised that Spain hasn't asked the EU for Portugal back, and that Spain, France and Austria haven't laid claim to parts of Italy. Gibraltar has been British for a lot longer than Italy has existed! This is the problem...were do you actually stop? How far in time do you go back?The indian nations just last week sent a invoice for $300 trillion dollars to the white house for rent arrears. ![]() ![]() The invoice states its from 1776 til today.I would expect one will go downing streets soon.They are taking the cue from President Trump’s decision to hand Germany an invoice for NATO services. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"How come Gibraltar doesn't have the Union flag somewhere on it's flag? All the other British Overseas's Territories do?" Ah, the flag is basically a Spanish Coat of Arms. ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And Italy's is basically Mexico's..... Romania's is Chad's, Andorra's and Moldova's....., Netherlands, croatia and paraguay, ....Egypt, Iraq, Syria and Yemen basically the same...monaco and Indonesia.... Ireland and Ivory Coast ..... and as for Colombia, Ecuador and Venezuela! ![]() ![]() ![]() Mexico's is fairly recognisable with the eagle on a cactus. Australia and NZ look very similar to me. Mozambique has an AK-47 on their flag! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You'll be getting an invite from Sheldon Cooper soon." ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"We also got Minorca as part of the deal but we handed that back in 1802." How bloody stupid are we...! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If Gibraltar are forced to choose between the UK and Spain, they will choose Spain won't they? The weather's much better. " Well they did vote to remain in the EU. Yes, yes i know they also voted to part of the UK in the early 2000's but things change and they didnt see that coming in the early 2000's being out of the EU. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If Gibraltar are forced to choose between the UK and Spain, they will choose Spain won't they? The weather's much better. Well they did vote to remain in the EU. Yes, yes i know they also voted to part of the UK in the early 2000's but things change and they didnt see that coming in the early 2000's being out of the EU. " Apart from the fact that they are proud of their British heritage, La Linea the nearest Spanish town and in the Eurozone 35% unemployment. Gibraltar, part of the UK, out of the Eurozone and 1% unemployment. Ye, I wonder what they'd choose ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If Gibraltar are forced to choose between the UK and Spain, they will choose Spain won't they? The weather's much better. Well they did vote to remain in the EU. Yes, yes i know they also voted to part of the UK in the early 2000's but things change and they didnt see that coming in the early 2000's being out of the EU. Apart from the fact that they are proud of their British heritage, La Linea the nearest Spanish town and in the Eurozone 35% unemployment. Gibraltar, part of the UK, out of the Eurozone and 1% unemployment. Ye, I wonder what they'd choose ![]() Not to mention the tax rate difference ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's a generally held belief in Brussels that because Scotland already has EU rules and laws in place, joining the EU as an independent country would be very much quicker. The time frame it would happen within would be much shorter than other countries not already members." While that is certainly true. the scottish economy doesnt meet the financial test AFAIK,it would need to have a central bank and most crucially adopt the euro, last time NS said they would keep the pound which plainly isnt going to happen and would be against the EU's own rules on new members | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's a generally held belief in Brussels that because Scotland already has EU rules and laws in place, joining the EU as an independent country would be very much quicker. The time frame it would happen within would be much shorter than other countries not already members. While that is certainly true. the scottish economy doesnt meet the financial test AFAIK,it would need to have a central bank and most crucially adopt the euro, last time NS said they would keep the pound which plainly isnt going to happen and would be against the EU's own rules on new members" Scotland can join the EU without joining the Euro. 'All EU members which have joined the bloc since the signing of the Maastricht treaty in 1992 are legally obliged to adopt the euro once they meet the criteria' but 'Since the convergence criteria require participation in the ERM, and non-eurozone states are responsible for deciding when to join ERM, they can ultimately control when they adopt the euro by staying outside the ERM and thus deliberately failing to meet the convergence criteria until they wish to. In some non-eurozone states without an opt-out, there has been discussion about holding referendums on approving their euro adoption.[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Of the 16 states which have acceded to EU since 1992, the only state to have staged a euro referendum to date is Sweden, which in 2003 rejected its government's proposal to adopt the euro in 2006.' | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"so what currency are they going to use they cant use the BoE as a central bank to back their currency, who would set their interest rate and monetary policy, their is no way the uk government would allow a country which it has no control over use the BoE as the lender of last resort,its dream land" No, the pound sterling is used by other countries the UK has no control over. I would hope this issue is better addressed in the run up to any vote this time. I had the impression that not enough was explained properly about the options and basically, the No side shouted louder than the YES side did. Attempts were made to explain but not forcefully enough. Or, possibly not reported by the media- newspapers or television news. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"so what currency are they going to use they cant use the BoE as a central bank to back their currency, who would set their interest rate and monetary policy, their is no way the uk government would allow a country which it has no control over use the BoE as the lender of last resort,its dream land No, the pound sterling is used by other countries the UK has no control over. I would hope this issue is better addressed in the run up to any vote this time. I had the impression that not enough was explained properly about the options and basically, the No side shouted louder than the YES side did. Attempts were made to explain but not forcefully enough. Or, possibly not reported by the media- newspapers or television news." Only a few small Crown dependencies use Pound Sterling, as they are deemed too small to administer their own banking system. An independent Scotland will not be able to use the Pound. If it wants to be an accession country into the EU, it will have to adopt the Euro. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They would use a new Scottish pound pegged to sterling to begin with. Lots of big hurdles but doable. " Why would they want to keep it pegged to sterling? How would they keep it pegged to sterling? Why wouldn't they keep it pegged to the Euro? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Don't think it does. There are other ways to meet the criteria. Plenty of countries not yet in the euro but are in the EU. " That is true but "new" member states, as Scotland will be, have to adopt the Euro. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Don't think it does. There are other ways to meet the criteria. Plenty of countries not yet in the euro but are in the EU. " It's pretty obvious it does. Economic and Monetary Union. Tell me the other ways please? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The Basque separatist movement ETA has now said it will dis-arm, and therefore start negotiations with the Spanish Goverment regarding Catalonian independence. Bet the Spanish Goverment are going to love that!" Did i just read it was all kicking off over in Guiana, the French oversees occupied territory in south America which is part of the EU and uses the euro. Oh and coincidentally is used by the EU for its space operations!. What happening, do the locals want it back by any chance? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They would use a new Scottish pound pegged to sterling to begin with. Lots of big hurdles but doable. " . I thought all new member states were required to adopt the euro?. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They would use a new Scottish pound pegged to sterling to begin with. Lots of big hurdles but doable. . I thought all new member states were required to adopt the euro?. " Technically yes. As I posted earlier 'All EU members which have joined the bloc since the signing of the Maastricht treaty in 1992 are legally obliged to adopt the euro once they meet the criteria' but 'Since the convergence criteria require participation in the ERM, and non-eurozone states are responsible for deciding when to join ERM, they can ultimately control when they adopt the euro by staying outside the ERM and thus deliberately failing to meet the convergence criteria until they wish to.' Of the 28 countries in the EU, 19 are in the Eurozone and have the Euro as their currency. Denmark and the UK, who were both members prior to 1992, negotiated opt outs from the Euro. We are not part of the ERM II, Denmark are, but are still not in the Euro. There are therefore seven other countries in the EU as full members but not yet forced into adopting the euro. Bulgaria joined in 2007, still not using the Euro 10 years later, same with Romania. Croatia joined in 2013. The Czech Republic joined in 2004, not using the Euro 13 years later, same with Hungary and Poland. Sweden joined in 1995. 22 years later, despite having joined post 1992, they still use the Krona. In 2003 they held a referendum on whether to adopt the Euro. 56% voted no so they didn't. The EU is painted by Brexiters as this imposing, undemocratic behemoth forcing its will on others. It's fantasy. They didn't impose the Euro on two of its existing members, ourselves and Denmark, against the wishes of its people and even though they want new countries to adopt the Euro, hence the stated objective, they allow the wriggle room even then to stay out if that country doesn't want to. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" It's fantasy. They didn't impose the Euro on two of its existing members, ourselves and Denmark, against the wishes of its people and even though they want new countries to adopt the Euro, hence the stated objective, they allow the wriggle room even then to stay out if that country doesn't want to. " . I didnt mean it in the forced sense,i genuinely thought all new members were required to adopt the euro if they meet the criteria. I dont see that as a problem perse and wouldnt give countries wiggle room just because they dont want the euro. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The EU could not impose the euro on the UK and Denmark because they have an exemption opt out in the Masstricht Treaty. Imposing it would be in breach of that treaty. " So in summary the EU wants countries to join the euro if they want to join the euro, but allows them not to if they don't. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The EU could not impose the euro on the UK and Denmark because they have an exemption opt out in the Masstricht Treaty. Imposing it would be in breach of that treaty. So in summary the EU wants countries to join the euro if they want to join the euro, but allows them not to if they don't. " No. Do new members have an opt out when they signed the Maastricht Treaty? Oh hang on, they didn't sign it did they? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" So in summary, at the moment, the EU wants member states with independent currencies to join the euro if they want to join the euro, but allows them not to, if they are unable or unwilling to meet the convergence criteria. " ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The EU could not impose the euro on the UK and Denmark because they have an exemption opt out in the Masstricht Treaty. Imposing it would be in breach of that treaty. So in summary the EU wants countries to join the euro if they want to join the euro, but allows them not to if they don't. No. Do new members have an opt out when they signed the Maastricht Treaty? Oh hang on, they didn't sign it did they?" What the hell sort of point is that to make? Is there a country that has been a member for 22 years that hasn't adopted the euro? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They would use a new Scottish pound pegged to sterling to begin with. Lots of big hurdles but doable. Why would they want to keep it pegged to sterling? How would they keep it pegged to sterling? Why wouldn't they keep it pegged to the Euro? " Still waiting for an answer......... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A Sweden, but they do have their own central bank and currency. Scotland on the other hand..." Would need to, though it is not impossible they would retain the pound. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They would use a new Scottish pound pegged to sterling to begin with. Lots of big hurdles but doable. Why would they want to keep it pegged to sterling? How would they keep it pegged to sterling? Why wouldn't they keep it pegged to the Euro? Still waiting for an answer........." You want all these details all of a sudden. Funny how when brexiters are asked for details on anything we never get any. We don't even get a plan. There are many different options, none of which are easy but perfectly possible. Or do you not think it is possible for a newly independent country with already existing key institutions, such as a parliament and legal system to develop its own currency? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A Sweden, but they do have their own central bank and currency. Scotland on the other hand... Would need to, though it is not impossible they would retain the pound. " . If they retain sterling your not independent, momentary policy is key to any sovereignty. Thats why i disagree with the euro, the monetary policy of which is controlled by Germany for Germany, which is good for Germany but terrible for Greece, Spain Italy Portugal, these countries are massively net importers like the UK, Germany is a net exporter, its impossible to run the same monetary policy for all of them?. So then if you cant you have to run a different fiscal policy but again the EU rules are no greater than 3 % deficits, now if you cant run a different monetary policy and you cant run big deficits?either and your a net importers which means your hemorrhaging cash outwards every month your only option is to export more, thats great but in reality your in a closed EU market where your main competitor is Germany who already has monetary policy set for it? Thats a big ask to defeat them by the likes of Greece. The banking crises exposed these flaws in EU policy that were always there, unfortunately they just seem to be trying to tuff it out and hoping the banking shit will disappear rather than actually solving the problem | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They would use a new Scottish pound pegged to sterling to begin with. Lots of big hurdles but doable. Why would they want to keep it pegged to sterling? How would they keep it pegged to sterling? Why wouldn't they keep it pegged to the Euro? Still waiting for an answer......... You want all these details all of a sudden. Funny how when brexiters are asked for details on anything we never get any. We don't even get a plan. There are many different options, none of which are easy but perfectly possible. Or do you not think it is possible for a newly independent country with already existing key institutions, such as a parliament and legal system to develop its own currency?" Where have I did that? It was you who said they would have the Scottish pound (which, btw, they can call their new currency exactly what they want. But you also said that they would peg their currency to the pound sterling - I asked you 3 questions for you to substantiate your statement. Can't understand why they wouldn't peg it to the Euro, as they would want to join the EU. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You think they should join the euro, but I don't think the SNP or the Scottish people do. It's up to them, Europe won't make them, can't make them join the euro. " Correct no country that joins the EU are forced into using the euro its all scare stories. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You think they should join the euro, but I don't think the SNP or the Scottish people do. It's up to them, Europe won't make them, can't make them join the euro. " Again, I haven't said that either! Stop deflecting and answer the questions I asked! Or are you unable to! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The attractiveness of pegging to sterling rather than the euro is because that is the currency the Scots are used to, the rest of the uk are its biggest trading partner partner. The uk as a whole didn't want to join the euro, I've not seen any polls for Scotland only but I assume, while they want to be in the eu, they probably are wary of joining the euro. But it's not the only way they can go, just, to me, the most sensible way to start off since the English seem unlikely to agree to a currency union. Unofficial sterlingisation prevents it having a say in key decisions. What would your choice be? Pegging to a range of currencies? Floating? " . If its going to peg its currency to another, which in itself is a very costly exercise and its main income would be oil levy tax then it would only make sense to peg it to the dollar like Saudi Arabia has done for thirty years, however even Saudi Arabia which is rich beyond Scotlands dreams has almost bankrupted itself pegging its riyal to the dollar. The only real alternative Scotland would have is bargaining? to retain sterling as its currency, now that would be a hard thing to bargain out for both sides as theres pros and cons for both Scotland and the ruk. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The attractiveness of pegging to sterling rather than the euro is because that is the currency the Scots are used to, the rest of the uk are its biggest trading partner partner. The uk as a whole didn't want to join the euro, I've not seen any polls for Scotland only but I assume, while they want to be in the eu, they probably are wary of joining the euro. But it's not the only way they can go, just, to me, the most sensible way to start off since the English seem unlikely to agree to a currency union. Unofficial sterlingisation prevents it having a say in key decisions. What would your choice be? Pegging to a range of currencies? Floating? " I just can't understand why they would want to leave the UK, join the EU, and then peg their new currency to sterling and not the Euro. Especially when remainers, which Scotland are, keep banging on about the drop in sterling, how unstable it us, and how poor that drop is going to make us. Neither can I see how the EU would accept Scotland as a new number with its currency pegged to sterling. Like someone said in a previous post, if they're going to rely heavily on oil , and choose not to peg to the Euro ( what do they know about the Euro that we don't?!), why wouldn't they peg against the dollar? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As I understand it, their are several viable options and pegging against the dollar or the euro are certainly serious contenders, but every option has it's downside. I think just because of the historical ties to sterling, the closeness of the trade ties with the rest of the UK and the general comfort the Scottish people have with the pound, that is the preferred initial option. There is nothing to stop them moving to a different option in the mid-term. " . Why would you peg to the euro, your oil would be sold in dollars? What happens if the euro gains alot of ground against the dollar, your losing money hand over fist. To peg your currency costs you alot, you have to buy your own bonds to keep it maintained or in Switzerlands case when it tried pegging to the euro it had to sell vast amounts of gold and lowering its interest rates massively as the market said its currency should be higher than the euro, eventually it had to abandon the idea because it was costing them a fortune and causing problems internally? suppressed interest rates. Pegging for Scotland would be a disaster. They have two viable options. 1 continue to use sterling 2 float their own currency | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You think they should join the euro, but I don't think the SNP or the Scottish people do. It's up to them, Europe won't make them, can't make them join the euro. Correct no country that joins the EU are forced into using the euro its all scare stories. " While you are right to say that initially " no country is forced to join the Euro" I think you will find that any new member state has to agree a timetable to join it. Other than joining the Euro, anything else that Scotland tries to take on would only be in the short term. Long term they would have to join the Euro. However it is only an academic point as I still say that when the chips are down Spain will veto Scotland. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You think they should join the euro, but I don't think the SNP or the Scottish people do. It's up to them, Europe won't make them, can't make them join the euro. Correct no country that joins the EU are forced into using the euro its all scare stories. While you are right to say that initially " no country is forced to join the Euro" I think you will find that any new member state has to agree a timetable to join it. Other than joining the Euro, anything else that Scotland tries to take on would only be in the short term. Long term they would have to join the Euro. However it is only an academic point as I still say that when the chips are down Spain will veto Scotland. " Thank you for saying no new member is forced to use the Euro. That is your opinion but Spain has made it very clear they would not veto an independent Scotland. Notice how the British media are not reporting 3 important things today 1. 50 top European politicians welcome Scotland in the EU. 2. Nicola Sturgeon has the highest approval ratings in Scotland and the rest are all negative. 3. New Ashcroft poll says the Majority of Scots think the UK is fucked with brexit. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You think they should join the euro, but I don't think the SNP or the Scottish people do. It's up to them, Europe won't make them, can't make them join the euro. Correct no country that joins the EU are forced into using the euro its all scare stories. While you are right to say that initially " no country is forced to join the Euro" I think you will find that any new member state has to agree a timetable to join it. Other than joining the Euro, anything else that Scotland tries to take on would only be in the short term. Long term they would have to join the Euro. However it is only an academic point as I still say that when the chips are down Spain will veto Scotland. Thank you for saying no new member is forced to use the Euro. That is your opinion but Spain has made it very clear they would not veto an independent Scotland. Notice how the British media are not reporting 3 important things today 1. 50 top European politicians welcome Scotland in the EU. 2. Nicola Sturgeon has the highest approval ratings in Scotland and the rest are all negative. 3. New Ashcroft poll says the Majority of Scots think the UK is fucked with brexit. " I'm pretty sure it's 50 MEP's and not 50 "top" European politicians welcoming Scotland. The media did report that Scottish growth during Q4 2016 was minus 0.2% against plus 0.7% for the rest of the UK for the same period. Growth for Scotland for 2016 was stagnant, whilst the rest of us maintained 1.9%, which I believe was the highest in the EU. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You think they should join the euro, but I don't think the SNP or the Scottish people do. It's up to them, Europe won't make them, can't make them join the euro. Correct no country that joins the EU are forced into using the euro its all scare stories. While you are right to say that initially " no country is forced to join the Euro" I think you will find that any new member state has to agree a timetable to join it. Other than joining the Euro, anything else that Scotland tries to take on would only be in the short term. Long term they would have to join the Euro. However it is only an academic point as I still say that when the chips are down Spain will veto Scotland. Thank you for saying no new member is forced to use the Euro. That is your opinion but Spain has made it very clear they would not veto an independent Scotland. Notice how the British media are not reporting 3 important things today 1. 50 top European politicians welcome Scotland in the EU. 2. Nicola Sturgeon has the highest approval ratings in Scotland and the rest are all negative. 3. New Ashcroft poll says the Majority of Scots think the UK is fucked with brexit. I'm pretty sure it's 50 MEP's and not 50 "top" European politicians welcoming Scotland. The media did report that Scottish growth during Q4 2016 was minus 0.2% against plus 0.7% for the rest of the UK for the same period. Growth for Scotland for 2016 was stagnant, whilst the rest of us maintained 1.9%, which I believe was the highest in the EU." Let me guess so this where you will tell me its all SNP fault for the Scottish economy being in the minus ? Yet by design the Scottish government do not controls almost none of Scotlands meaningful economic levers. Once again Westminster fucking up Scotland and the UK and people just accept it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well it was nice of the PM to right about the importance of keeping to border between Spain and Gibraltar open and free etc. I think that was on page 7 of the letter. Tusk did get all 7 pages right? Was there really any need for 6? 6? 6?! What do you mean 6?! There were meant to be 7!!! Maybe but she got so far and thought aah fuck it, they get the gist" lol ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Do Scotland actually have any money? Don't you have to have reserves of billions of pounds or equivalent before you can create your own currency?" They could pay in salmon or Angus beef | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And Italy's is basically Mexico's..... Romania's is Chad's, Andorra's and Moldova's....., Netherlands, croatia and paraguay, ....Egypt, Iraq, Syria and Yemen basically the same...monaco and Indonesia.... Ireland and Ivory Coast ..... and as for Colombia, Ecuador and Venezuela! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |