FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Scotland; what would happen after Independence

Scotland; what would happen after Independence

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

Particularly with regards to political parties

Remember once Independence is achieved Scotland can vote in any party they wish, that is provided that the likes of Scottish Tories still hang around to be voted in, or if they pack their bags and return to Westminster.

Would The Conservative Party still remain in Scotland?

.

Scottish Labour; their ties would be cut from Westminster and they would have to consider Scotland first, could they actually manage to do this?

Lib Dems, this party would definitely remain, they would go anywhere possible for a vote of any type.

Politics in Scotland would change

an Independent Scotland does not mean a SNP Scotland

.

what do you think the direction of other parties would take when their ties to Westminster are severed.

??

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ercuryMan  over a year ago

Grantham

There will be no need for a Conservative party in an independent Scotland.

All the wealthy and high tax payers will have left, as they will certainly not like having to pay a punitive tax rate.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge

What about Scottish UKIP?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Particularly with regards to political parties

Remember once Independence is achieved Scotland can vote in any party they wish, that is provided that the likes of Scottish Tories still hang around to be voted in, or if they pack their bags and return to Westminster.

Would The Conservative Party still remain in Scotland?

.

Scottish Labour; their ties would be cut from Westminster and they would have to consider Scotland first, could they actually manage to do this?

Lib Dems, this party would definitely remain, they would go anywhere possible for a vote of any type.

Politics in Scotland would change

an Independent Scotland does not mean a SNP Scotland

.

what do you think the direction of other parties would take when their ties to Westminster are severed.

??"

The Scottish Tories are actually 'The Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party' and although part of the 'Conservative Party' are able to operate with a high degree of autonomy.

In the event of an independent Scotland, I have little doubt that the existing mainstream parties would continue. What would be more interesting would be what happens to the SNP. Would they become an irrelevance having achieved their aim? A bit like UKIP has become now that Brexit is underway.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"What about Scottish UKIP? "

There is no Scottish UKIP nor will there ever be at least as far as politics in Scotland is concerned.

1 MEP who managed to scrape in as a result of PR. Not a brilliant showing.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *oo hotCouple  over a year ago

North West


"There will be no need for a Conservative party in an independent Scotland.

All the wealthy and high tax payers will have left, as they will certainly not like having to pay a punitive tax rate. "

You dont know that. As has been seen from the example of Norway - higher taxes seems to make for happier people. Whereas the race to the bottom appears to encourage a blame culture, division and much angst.

There is nothing wrong with having a social conscience and living in a country that looks after its citizens well. You just have to be intelligent enough to realise that it has to be paid for and to vote in politicians that are intelligent enough to be good custodians of the trust that you put in them.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ercuryMan  over a year ago

Grantham


"There will be no need for a Conservative party in an independent Scotland.

All the wealthy and high tax payers will have left, as they will certainly not like having to pay a punitive tax rate.

You dont know that. As has been seen from the example of Norway - higher taxes seems to make for happier people. Whereas the race to the bottom appears to encourage a blame culture, division and much angst.

There is nothing wrong with having a social conscience and living in a country that looks after its citizens well. You just have to be intelligent enough to realise that it has to be paid for and to vote in politicians that are intelligent enough to be good custodians of the trust that you put in them."

True but they will look over the wall and see our 40% tax rate compared to what in Scotland...50%, 60%?

Of course, they may well say "sod it" and go elsewhere.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *oo hotCouple  over a year ago

North West


"There will be no need for a Conservative party in an independent Scotland.

All the wealthy and high tax payers will have left, as they will certainly not like having to pay a punitive tax rate.

You dont know that. As has been seen from the example of Norway - higher taxes seems to make for happier people. Whereas the race to the bottom appears to encourage a blame culture, division and much angst.

There is nothing wrong with having a social conscience and living in a country that looks after its citizens well. You just have to be intelligent enough to realise that it has to be paid for and to vote in politicians that are intelligent enough to be good custodians of the trust that you put in them.

True but they will look over the wall and see our 40% tax rate compared to what in Scotland...50%, 60%?

Of course, they may well say "sod it" and go elsewhere.

"

Why dont the Norweigans, Swedes, Danes and Icelandic folk say sod it and move elsewhere?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ane DTV/TS  over a year ago

London - till 25th

All based on the assumption that we'll vote for it of course.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"All based on the assumption that we'll vote for it of course.

"

Well, it is a hypothetical discussion.

I, for one, don't believe that a 10% difference on the higher rate tax would make a huge difference otherwise everyone who earns over say £100 million would already be tax exiles.

Sir Alan Sugar paid £58 million in tax on his £181 million dividend last year and said in a recent interview that he wouldn't dream of living elsewhere. I suspect quite a lot of higher rate tax payers feel the same way.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ercuryMan  over a year ago

Grantham


"There will be no need for a Conservative party in an independent Scotland.

All the wealthy and high tax payers will have left, as they will certainly not like having to pay a punitive tax rate.

You dont know that. As has been seen from the example of Norway - higher taxes seems to make for happier people. Whereas the race to the bottom appears to encourage a blame culture, division and much angst.

There is nothing wrong with having a social conscience and living in a country that looks after its citizens well. You just have to be intelligent enough to realise that it has to be paid for and to vote in politicians that are intelligent enough to be good custodians of the trust that you put in them.

True but they will look over the wall and see our 40% tax rate compared to what in Scotland...50%, 60%?

Of course, they may well say "sod it" and go elsewhere.

Why dont the Norweigans, Swedes, Danes and Icelandic folk say sod it and move elsewhere? "

Perhaps they get back more for their contribution?

Any scanandavian experts know?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

To summarise ..alot of the people who want brexit are against Scotland independence ..those that say Britian would be fine without its biggest market are the same who say Scotland can't survive without its biggest market...those that say the UK shouldn't pay any eu bill are the same that say the Scots have to take their share of the national debt ....those that say the city of London will be fine without the eu a are the same to say Scotland is fucked but falling oil prices...in short the debate will be filled with people with bias views and will end with personal attacks

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *egionaireMan  over a year ago

ramsey

Hmmmm what would Scotland do for defence especially as it would appear most Russian air incursions take place over Scotland It is my understanding they are her majesty queen Elizabeth the second armed forces. I see no queen Nicola.Scotland's budget may just stretch to single tornado aircraft

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Hmmmm what would Scotland do for defence especially as it would appear most Russian air incursions take place over Scotland It is my understanding they are her majesty queen Elizabeth the second armed forces. I see no queen Nicola.Scotland's budget may just stretch to single tornado aircraft"

I think you'll find Scotland has paid it's fair share in both terms of budget and lives lost. To suggest that all Scotland would be entitled to is one Tornado is disrespectful to the many Scots that laid down their lives in the defence of the UK.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *egionaireMan  over a year ago

ramsey

No its not being disrespectful to any of those of who have served or fallen in the service of their country .However if you want independence how are you going to fund your defence as your budget is limited and by the way your leader is talking you don't want anything more to do with the rest of the union.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *issing in actionWoman  over a year ago

Llanelli

Scotland won't need to spend as much on defence if it's not part of UK and keeping its nose out of other people's business. Ireland spends less than Luxembourg.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"No its not being disrespectful to any of those of who have served or fallen in the service of their country .However if you want independence how are you going to fund your defence as your budget is limited and by the way your leader is talking you don't want anything more to do with the rest of the union.

"

There have been a number of other posts about Scotland having to accept part of the national debt in the event of independence. By the same token, Scotland would be entitled to it's share of the armed forces. Or does it not work like that in your mind?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *egionaireMan  over a year ago

ramsey

As far as I am concerned you can have what you want but as most major defence weapons carry a nuclear deterrent how are you going to pay for it and its up keep.as for Luxembourg and Ireland I think you will find they are reliant on the larger nations around them for their current level of peace and tranquillity at the expense of those nations service personnel

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ercuryMan  over a year ago

Grantham

And by the time Scotland gets Independence, the tornados will be long gone!

Typhoons and the new Lightning will be the strike force, along with drones but I would imagine that Scotland would benefit from surveillance aircraft to assist in SAR operations and some warships for customs and fisheries protection.

Their land forces need no introduction; some of the best fighting forces to have operated with the British Army.

Maybe The Black Watch and The Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders will rise again!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ercuryMan  over a year ago

Grantham


"As far as I am concerned you can have what you want but as most major defence weapons carry a nuclear deterrent how are you going to pay for it and its up keep.as for Luxembourg and Ireland I think you will find they are reliant on the larger nations around them for their current level of peace and tranquillity at the expense of those nations service personnel"

An independent Scotland will be nuclear weapon free!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"As far as I am concerned you can have what you want but as most major defence weapons carry a nuclear deterrent how are you going to pay for it and its up keep.as for Luxembourg and Ireland I think you will find they are reliant on the larger nations around them for their current level of peace and tranquillity at the expense of those nations service personnel

An independent Scotland will be nuclear weapon free!"

and no longer a target. Which part of uk will get the subs probably far far away from london and the home counties.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"As far as I am concerned you can have what you want but as most major defence weapons carry a nuclear deterrent how are you going to pay for it and its up keep.as for Luxembourg and Ireland I think you will find they are reliant on the larger nations around them for their current level of peace and tranquillity at the expense of those nations service personnel"

We don't actually want nuclear weapons so you're welcome to them.

Ireland relies on other nations for their defence, do they?

Don't think the Irish would be happy with that opinion.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *egionaireMan  over a year ago

ramsey

Hi it would be good to see those historic regiments rise again but who will pay from them .as for nuclear free hmmmm tell that to the residents of Edinburgh and Glasgow if the English cities of Carlisle and Newcastle are targeted remember Chernobyl and the fall out from that and that was from a long way from England.my view is not against independence but how the people fund it.the wider picture has wider reaching consequences which Nicola is not telling people

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ercuryMan  over a year ago

Grantham


"As far as I am concerned you can have what you want but as most major defence weapons carry a nuclear deterrent how are you going to pay for it and its up keep.as for Luxembourg and Ireland I think you will find they are reliant on the larger nations around them for their current level of peace and tranquillity at the expense of those nations service personnel

An independent Scotland will be nuclear weapon free!and no longer a target. Which part of uk will get the subs probably far far away from london and the home counties."

My guess is the subs will have to share US bases until we get our own.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"As far as I am concerned you can have what you want but as most major defence weapons carry a nuclear deterrent how are you going to pay for it and its up keep.as for Luxembourg and Ireland I think you will find they are reliant on the larger nations around them for their current level of peace and tranquillity at the expense of those nations service personnel

An independent Scotland will be nuclear weapon free!and no longer a target. Which part of uk will get the subs probably far far away from london and the home counties.

My guess is the subs will have to share US bases until we get our own."

yeah most likley the war heads are owned by the Americans and they must give permission to launch them before we can.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *egionaireMan  over a year ago

ramsey

But nicola does not want any nuclear deterrent in Scotland so the US will pull their bases as will the royal navy.Barrow could service them and the weapons.hence more job losses.also a sub is no good being in port its deterrent is being hidden in the ocean.as for air incursions we don't get many bear bombers trying to fly in to English airspace.I know as I was a phantom pilot based in luechars

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"There will be no need for a Conservative party in an independent Scotland.

All the wealthy and high tax payers will have left, as they will certainly not like having to pay a punitive tax rate.

You dont know that. As has been seen from the example of Norway - higher taxes seems to make for happier people. Whereas the race to the bottom appears to encourage a blame culture, division and much angst.

There is nothing wrong with having a social conscience and living in a country that looks after its citizens well. You just have to be intelligent enough to realise that it has to be paid for and to vote in politicians that are intelligent enough to be good custodians of the trust that you put in them.

True but they will look over the wall and see our 40% tax rate compared to what in Scotland...50%, 60%?

Of course, they may well say "sod it" and go elsewhere.

Why dont the Norweigans, Swedes, Danes and Icelandic folk say sod it and move elsewhere? "

.

Norway is slightly different case as its oil rich, it never sold its oil rights to oil companies and from that theyve built up one of if not the worlds largest state fund.

Thats why them and Switzerland have never joined the EU, it just wouldnt work for them as they both need to run their economies specifically for their uniqueness.

Sweden is different, there in economic trouble like all the rest of us, the Swedish rich disappear abroad pretty quickly despite quite stringent rules on tax avoidance never mind evasion.

The Scandinavian happiness one is very hard to pinpoint on why, its a collection of things and not one thing in particular

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

Glad to read that no one has brought up the subject of "West Coast" oil reserves

Will England be better or worse off when Scotland gains independence.

(I wonder if anyone will have the guts to admit - worse off)

please feel free to continue.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *icklybitMan  over a year ago

Ayrshire

An independent Scotland is committed to joining the NATO nuclear alliance, in doing so it is required to spend 2% of GDP on defence. Currently the UK spends between 1.98% and 2.21% depending on sources. If they are serious about NATO membership would it pay its share?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Glad to read that no one has brought up the subject of "West Coast" oil reserves

Will England be better or worse off when Scotland gains independence.

(I wonder if anyone will have the guts to admit - worse off)

please feel free to continue."

.

I dont know anything about them, could you fill us in?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"But nicola does not want any nuclear deterrent in Scotland so the US will pull their bases as will the royal navy.Barrow could service them and the weapons.hence more job losses.also a sub is no good being in port its deterrent is being hidden in the ocean.as for air incursions we don't get many bear bombers trying to fly in to English airspace.I know as I was a phantom pilot based in luechars"
Barrow could do with extra jobs its a deprived area.Not good for the jobs in Scotland but i think trident is a cold war weapon which has had its time.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

Scotland could be sitting on more than double the amount of oil and gas reserves currently predicted, a new independent industry investigation has found. The investigation reveals that the scale of Scotland’s untapped frontier West Coast or Atlantic Margin has been underestimated.

The investigation was undertaken by oilandgaspeople.com, the world’s largest oil and gas industry jobs board, and independent North Sea oil and gas industry experts. The investigation included interviews with industry experts and collated seismic and expert evidence from a range of independent sources such as the British Geological Survey, DECC, oil and gas companies, the Institute of Petroleum Engineering and the Energy Institute.

The findings show that the current predictions of extensive untapped reserves of oil and gas could be underestimated by 100%. The West Coast alone could provide oil and gas for at least 100 years with an estimated value of more than £1 trillion.

Yet the area – off the west coast of Scotland and Outer Hebrides and Shetland –has remained largely untapped due to deep waters and difficult geological conditions.

This is despite strong geological evidence for oil and gas reserves, including that the major basins in the area are filled with thick sedimentary successions – which helps produce and then reservoir oil and gas. These geological conditions support the formation of gigantic, or ‘supermassive’ oil reserves.

But the investigation found that oil exploration, discoveries and production in the area are set to dramatically increase over the next ten years as continual improvements in drilling technology, rig design and seismic surveying makes the area more accessible. This activity is supported by the Bank of Scotland’s recent report predicting the need for 37,000 new jobs over the next two years in support of the current Scottish oil boom. As a result, the investigation found that the most recent round of DECC licensing for exploration has seen an increase in oil majors, such as BP, Chevron, Statoil, Total, and Shell, begin prospecting.

The investigation also found over the next 10 years upwards of one million barrels a day could be pumped from the Atlantic Margins if more than £1.5 billion is invested to extract it.

The investigation revealed a consensus among industry experts and companies that it’s not a case of if, but when oil and gas reserves larger than in the North Sea will be discovered in the Atlantic Margin. The only barrier was the current lack of test drilling and technology. Many cited the case of BP’s Clair Ridge as an example of how technical difficulties once overcome can lead to new oil reserves. BP employed advanced recovery techniques to access fields in the Clair Ridge that were previously inaccessible due to geographical issues such as deep water. In the 1970s, drilling companies believed such fields were out of reach, but now that new technology has opened these fields up, the Clair Ridge alone will produce 120,000 barrels per day at peak levels of production. This translates to an estimated eight billion barrels of oil worth approximately £300 billion

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *egionaireMan  over a year ago

ramsey

trident may have had its time in regard to being a modern weapon but I still would not like to be on the end of its bucket of sunshine where ever it is directed to.as for NATO spending the UK is a big spender compared to other European countries.that's why I query Scotland's ability to raise funds to maintain its independence.it's no use saying we are neutral Belgium said it twice in the past 100years look where it got them

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"trident may have had its time in regard to being a modern weapon but I still would not like to be on the end of its bucket of sunshine where ever it is directed to.as for NATO spending the UK is a big spender compared to other European countries.that's why I query Scotland's ability to raise funds to maintain its independence.it's no use saying we are neutral Belgium said it twice in the past 100years look where it got them"
Neutrality isnt so bad you dont need to waste money on standing armies and updating your weapons every 20 years.Scotland could manage its air space and waters with drones.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I voted brexit and I'm happy if the Scottish people want to leave the UK. But then you can sort out your own issues out and who is going to pay for the boarders as we don't want free movement of people entering the UK once Scotland is with the EU. As I was watching Scottish Parliament why wasn't the snp ashamed they didn't help with education and other things in Scotland but is only push for a second referendum?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *icklybitMan  over a year ago

Ayrshire

Secret oil fields. ?? Scotland could be? Look at that "could be", the comes from Oil and gas people, whos CEO Kevin Forbes has previous in bogus press releases. Being an ardent independence supporter he is well versed in gilding the lily. Lets look at the article. It says "a new independent industry investigation has found," it is neither independent nor is it an investigation. Who were these experts, they remain unnamed? Where is the seismic evidence to support the claim? What input did the British Geological Survey and the Department of Energy and Climate Change have to this report as there are no links given. What Oil and Gas companies contributed to it? We will never know. "Findings show," What findings? This is propaganda of the worst kind and to see it regurgitated here two and a half years after it was originally published show the contempt of the reader when it includes the line, " This activity is supported by the Bank of Scotland’s recent report predicting the need for 37,000 new jobs over the next two years in support of the current Scottish oil boom." We have seen what has happened to the O&G industry since then. Who kidding who here? Is it ignorance or is it a deliberate attempt to mislead people into voting for independence. It doesnt say much for you case when you rely on lies or ignorance.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

tickybit

you are aware reserves were drilled & capped in 1974, it was BP that carried this out on west coast of Scotland.

these wells are still capped today and cannot be used due to submarine activity on west coast.

Don't tell me you are unaware of this,

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"tickybit

you are aware reserves were drilled & capped in 1974, it was BP that carried this out on west coast of Scotland.

these wells are still capped today and cannot be used due to submarine activity on west coast.

Don't tell me you are unaware of this, "

.

Yes i didnt quote your long bit too save space but i did read it!

As already said theres a lot of ifs and maybes but no actual theres definitely oil there?.

I mean i remember David Cameron saying theres enough oil and gas in English fracking to be the new Saudi Arabia but where is it?.

The other problem i foresee is this 100 year bit! Arent we supposed to be off oil in the next 25 or face disaster?, how much would Scotland have to spend get it out of the ground? , When is that likely to happen? , Do they actually own the field?, and when is it likely that youll have no market for it ie100 years seems bollocks to me?.

Those are the questions i think would have to be investigated more before id put in on that evidence

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

A potential oil boom off the west coast of Scotland was blocked by Westminster defence chiefs.

Declassified UK Government papers from the 1980s show for the first time how the Ministry of Defence was prepared to “pull out all the stops” to prevent any North Sea-style bonanza in the Firth of Clyde.

Ministers at the time said oil firms were “expecting something exploitable” following a series of geological surveys of the area.

But MoD bosses objected to energy giant BP installing drilling rigs in the seas just south of Arran because of fears it would interfere with a vital training and exercise area for nuclear submarines.

Documents from 1983 show how the MoD’s “blanket refusal” to allow test drilling effectively ruled out establishing the full scale of any reserves in the Firth of Clyde.

Chic Brodie, SNP MSP for the South of Scotland, last night accused the UK Government of a “massive cover up”.

He said: “We now have clear evidence the MoD in the early 1980s made it very clear to the Department of Energy it would not tolerate oil drilling and production in the Firth of Clyde.

“This is another McCrone-type deception of the potential use of Scotland’s natural assets.

“I am angry that the people of the West Coast of Scotland, and indeed Scotland as a whole, have been deprived of the economic benefits and income that would have flowed from oil and gas production.”

Last month The Sunday Post reported the claims of David Lambie, a Labour MP in Ayrshire between 1970 and 1992, that he’d been told by key figures in Margaret Thatcher’s Government there was oil in the Firth of Clyde but any further exploration was blocked by the MoD.

Now the claims have been substantiated by a cache of UK Government documents, letters and internal briefings from the early 1980s lodged at the National Archives of Scotland.

The files show three firms, including BP and the then state-owned British National Oil Corporation, undertook seismic surveys in area south of Arran and east of Kintyre in early 1981.

BP then applied for a production licence in the summer of that year for a large area of sea spanning the breadth of the Firth of Clyde.

Letters between the Department for Energy and MoD show defence chiefs asked for no drilling rigs in this area and BP did not pursue its application.

An internal briefing paper from the Industry Department for Scotland in 1984 shows how the department was not told why the application was withdrawn but states “it is a reasonable assumption that opposition from MoD and others (including the Scottish Office) played a large part in the decision”.

A separate document from the Department for Energy states this original plan would have “undoubtedly been the subject of sustained objection from the MoD”.

Speculation over the oil off the Ayrshire coast never went away and in June, 1983 the then Scottish Secretary of State George Younger told The Times newspaper: “The oil companies are playing their cards pretty close to their chests, but they are expecting something exploitable.”

The papers show BP at that time had submitted a revised application for a production licence in a much smaller, 92 square mile stretch of water south of Arran.

A confidential briefing for Mr Younger from November 1983 concedes the “possibility of finding oil or gas in exploitable quantities cannot be confirmed until exploration drilling has taken place” but added the “MoD are known to be very strongly opposed to any drilling taking place in the Firth of Clyde”.

A handwritten note by one of the officials preparing the report said he’d been told by a counterpart in the MoD that “his department’s position was that they saw the Clyde as being of immense strategic importance and that they would pull out all stops to prevent any exploration activity taking place.”

Further documents from 1983 show the Department for Energy asked the MoD to overturn its ban on drilling rigs, which stemmed from the original 1981 BP application, in light of the firm’s revised plans.

The letter to defence chiefs states: “This blanket refusal to agree to any rig under any circumstances rules out testing the area’s hydrocarbon potential and I would expect that only very compelling reasons would lead the MoD to [accept] such a request.”

Five months after this request, a production licence was issued to BP for the revised area but with “restrictions crucially, including no drilling rigs.

Both BP and the UK Government have confirmed that no drilling took place, meaning the full extent of any exploitable reserves in the Firth of Clyde remains unknown.

Labour Peer Lord Foulkes, who at the time was MP for Carrick, Cumnock and Doon Valley, said a constituent approached him with draft maps which showed the geology of the Firth of Clyde indicated major deposits of oil and gas.

He said: “We knew the blockage was down to the MoD so it is nice to be finally vindicated.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 23/03/17 19:05:20]

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *icklybitMan  over a year ago

Ayrshire

Where did you copy and paste that from?

I still await your thoughts on the letter from V Reading.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *oo hotCouple  over a year ago

North West


"I voted brexit and I'm happy if the Scottish people want to leave the UK. But then you can sort out your own issues out and who is going to pay for the boarders as we don't want free movement of people entering the UK once Scotland is with the EU. As I was watching Scottish Parliament why wasn't the snp ashamed they didn't help with education and other things in Scotland but is only push for a second referendum? "

If you dont want people crossing the border then you need to create and man that border. If the Sots dont feel the need for a hard border, why would they create one?

Is this one of the Trumpesque moments where the might English tell the Scots that they are going to build a border (wall?) and pay for it.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *icklybitMan  over a year ago

Ayrshire

As Scotland (supposedly) is in the EU and the UK is not, the border becomes one not between just England and Scotland but also the EU and a non EU country.

This means it is a EU Frontier Border and must be an active border with the usual checks.

That is EU policy as it stands.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"Where did you copy and paste that from?

I still await your thoughts on the letter from V Reading. "

something else to ponder on;

Total turns on gas from west of Shetland vast Laggan and Tormore fields

And ofcourse

Clair ridge

Loyal,

Solan,

Clair

Lancaster

Foinaven

Schiehallion

Rosebank

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Oh I see so that will be UK problem that EU workers use Scotland open doors to enter the rest of the UK. Snp had many failures in education and other things how would she manage in Scotland as a pm or president

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"Particularly with regards to political parties

Remember once Independence is achieved Scotland can vote in any party they wish, that is provided that the likes of Scottish Tories still hang around to be voted in, or if they pack their bags and return to Westminster.

Would The Conservative Party still remain in Scotland?

.

Scottish Labour; their ties would be cut from Westminster and they would have to consider Scotland first, could they actually manage to do this?

Lib Dems, this party would definitely remain, they would go anywhere possible for a vote of any type.

Politics in Scotland would change

an Independent Scotland does not mean a SNP Scotland

.

what do you think the direction of other parties would take when their ties to Westminster are severed.

??

The Scottish Tories are actually 'The Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party' and although part of the 'Conservative Party' are able to operate with a high degree of autonomy.

In the event of an independent Scotland, I have little doubt that the existing mainstream parties would continue. What would be more interesting would be what happens to the SNP. Would they become an irrelevance having achieved their aim? A bit like UKIP has become now that Brexit is underway."

I believe the Tories would break up, Ruth Davidson would be poached and taken down south, much as I dislike her, many Westminster Tories are impressed with her, I think her career will go much further, down south

waydown south

Westminster land.

Labour; they are in serious trouble, thought they would have learned their lesson after Jim Murphy but no, they go worse and put Kazia Dugdale in charge

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Wait a minute, it's gone from trillions of oil to theres a possibility of oil in extractable quantity!.

Thats a big fucking difference mate lol.

Also Whats with these nuclear subs, they navigate the entire worlds oceans including deep sea canyons and under moving ice and mountains in the North pole but they cant just miss a friggin oil rig ..

This sounds like a bit of a conspiracy theory to be honest and i certainly wouldnt bet the future of my country on that small amount of evidence.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

pm sent.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *issing in actionWoman  over a year ago

Llanelli


"As Scotland (supposedly) is in the EU and the UK is not, the border becomes one not between just England and Scotland but also the EU and a non EU country.

This means it is a EU Frontier Border and must be an active border with the usual checks.

That is EU policy as it stands. "

This must be the same checkpoint they say they're not going to reinstate in Ireland

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *icklybitMan  over a year ago

Ayrshire

It is, giving the Irish a bit of a dilemma. Thats the concern we all have.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *omaMan  over a year ago

Glasgow


"An independent Scotland is committed to joining the NATO nuclear alliance, in doing so it is required to spend 2% of GDP on defence. Currently the UK spends between 1.98% and 2.21% depending on sources. If they are serious about NATO membership would it pay its share?"

If Scotland became Independent country would they then not need to Apply to become a member state in NATO?

As with being a member of the EU it's not a clear cut thing

and, if successful in any NATO application, there might be a clause to the effect of Scotland would be expected to facilitate the nuclear deterrent in its waters etc . . . what then for Scotland? Would she submit to such an undertaking or turn her back on NATO?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *inkyHnSCouple  over a year ago

The Council of Elrond

Pop quiz how many countries in NATO do NOT have nuclear weapons ?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ercuryMan  over a year ago

Grantham


"Pop quiz how many countries in NATO do NOT have nuclear weapons ? "

All but two

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *icklybitMan  over a year ago

Ayrshire

How many shelter under the nuclear alliance? All of them. As the Warsaw Summit Communique reiterated "As long as nuclear weapons exist, NATO will remain a nuclear alliance." We have an independent Scotland intent in joining the nuclear alliance yet they are against nuclear weapons!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"How many shelter under the nuclear alliance? All of them. As the Warsaw Summit Communique reiterated "As long as nuclear weapons exist, NATO will remain a nuclear alliance." We have an independent Scotland intent in joining the nuclear alliance yet they are against nuclear weapons!"

You mean the snp & greens are

that is not the "whole" of Scotland, and there will be give & take

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *UNKIEMan  over a year ago

south east


"

As with being a member of the EU it's not a clear cut thing

and, if successful in any NATO application, there might be a clause to the effect of Scotland would be expected to facilitate the nuclear deterrent in its waters etc . . . what then for Scotland? Would she submit to such an undertaking or turn her back on NATO?"

Having read the criteria for which members to join nato i didnt read that anywhere ..or is that just something made up for scotland

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *entralscotscpl7Couple  over a year ago

Falkirk


"And by the time Scotland gets Independence, the tornados will be long gone!

Typhoons and the new Lightning will be the strike force, along with drones but I would imagine that Scotland would benefit from surveillance aircraft to assist in SAR operations and some warships for customs and fisheries protection.

Their land forces need no introduction; some of the best fighting forces to have operated with the British Army.

Maybe The Black Watch and The Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders will rise again!"

NO/SP

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *icklybitMan  over a year ago

Ayrshire

From NATO, "All NATO members, including potential new members, are members of the Alliance in all respects, including their commitment to the Alliance's policy on nuclear weapons, and the guarantees which that policy affords to all Allies."

Also, "NATO’s nuclear policy is based on NATO’s 2010 Strategic Concept and the 2012 Deterrence and Defence Posture Review.

The fundamental purpose of NATO’s nuclear forces is deterrence.

Deterrence, based on an appropriate mix of nuclear and conventional capabilities, remains a core element of NATO’s overall strategy.

Nuclear weapons are a core component of the Alliance’s overall capabilities for deterrence and defence alongside conventional and missile defence forces.

NATO is committed to arms control, disarmament and non-proliferation, but as long as nuclear weapons exist, it will remain a nuclear alliance.

The Nuclear Planning Group provides the forum for consultation on NATO’s nuclear deterrence."

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"What about Scottish UKIP?

There is no Scottish UKIP nor will there ever be at least as far as politics in Scotland is concerned.

1 MEP who managed to scrape in as a result of PR. Not a brilliant showing."

Also, if Scotland votes to leave the UK, UKIP will not be relevant to an independent Scotland

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *icklybitMan  over a year ago

Ayrshire

The party maybe, but 1 million people in Scotland voted to leave the EU.

The anti EU sentiment is alive in Scotland, it's just not found its way to UKIP.

Polls suggest that 30% of snp voters also voted to leave the EU.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

IF Independence came about after 5 years at most the people would realise we had been sold a Brigadoon fantasy...The likes of Nicola and Salmond would have retired by then siting "Health" reasons and would sit on massive pensions while the Plebs like you and me would be well and truly fucked. Party wise we would have coalitions from here to eternity. Sorry to rain on the parade

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Don't rule out a possible Scottish Sin Fien or a Scottish Dup ?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *icklybitMan  over a year ago

Ayrshire

The Ulsterisation of Scotland is underway.

Just look at the social media and the likes of Salmond stoking it up.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *inkyHnSCouple  over a year ago

The Council of Elrond

[Removed by poster at 30/03/17 18:51:01]

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *inkyHnSCouple  over a year ago

The Council of Elrond

Key word there ''Suggest''

Thats as bad as Scottish Labour saying their sources say yet they never tell you the source could be anyone.

Now for the Scottish independence referendum it was not about any parties no matter how much unionists try and paint the picture it was all about SNP as independence is far bigger than any party.

Also the EU referendum was not about any parties and i dont know about anyone else but there was not one person standing out my polling station on the 23rd June asking which party do you support and vote for

Polls will never ever tell you the true figure they ask a example of people and the SNP have 120,000 + members and in the Scottish elections they managed to get over a million voters i doubt whoever ran the poll asked all the members and all 1 millon who voted for them in the election.

Now am not saying there was no SNP voters out there that voted leave as am sure there was but no one will ever know the true figure so its mute really

All people need to know is 62 majority voted to remain in Scotland that is ALL Scottish council areas btw

Also ths what about the leave voters in Scotland i could ask the very same about the 45% that voted to leave the UK how in the 2 and a half years have the unionist parties tried to win and earn back our trust ? And the 55% keep saying to move on from 2014 again why cant the 38% accept the 62% majority ? It swings both ways

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *icklybitMan  over a year ago

Ayrshire

Yes "suggest", that's what polls do, they take carefully selected samples and project it to the general population.

The vote was for the UK,s membership of the EU, not Scotlands.

It was not a vote for Scottish independence nor was it a vote for another divisive referendum.

We voted to stay in the UK and the UK decided to leave the EU.

We may not like the result but as democrats we should accept it.

There is no credible alternative.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *inkyHnSCouple  over a year ago

The Council of Elrond


"Yes "suggest", that's what polls do, they take carefully selected samples and project it to the general population.

The vote was for the UK,s membership of the EU, not Scotlands.

It was not a vote for Scottish independence nor was it a vote for another divisive referendum.

We voted to stay in the UK and the UK decided to leave the EU.

We may not like the result but as democrats we should accept it.

There is no credible alternative.

"

Yes again i know this was a UK vote on the EU

And no matter how much people want to hide it it cant be done 62% of Scotland voted to remain

Now since the UK government dont want to have the devolved governments to play a part in talks as the Surpreme court may have said its the UK that will deal with the EU it in no way said the UK government cant bring in the devolved governments to to hear there side the Tories think the speak for the whole of the UK yet 1 Tory mp in Scotland thinks he can overrule an elected party in government that goes against democracy and it edges alot closer to Tory dictatorship in Scotland when they have no mandate in Scotland.

Where is any legal document from 2014 to say 100% the UK government wont ever get rid of Holyrood ? There word is no good as we all know the Tories are a bunch of lying bastards all i have to say is child tax credits to know how much they do lie.

The only way i will accept brexit if the Uk government respect Scotland remain vote or give the people of Scotland a vote on the final feal and just before the UK leaves Scotland gets to decide on if we agree on brexit or prefer independence

No one can surely say people are not allowed to change their minds there is people in Scotland that voted no on the promise the EU would be safe in the UK and now its now they do have the right to change their minds.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ercuryMan  over a year ago

Grantham

To be my usual pedantic self, it was actually 62% of the Scottish people that voted.

That's not the same as 62% of Scotland.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *inkyHnSCouple  over a year ago

The Council of Elrond


"To be my usual pedantic self, it was actually 62% of the Scottish people that voted.

That's not the same as 62% of Scotland."

Ok let me try again out of everyone that voted 62% majority voted to remain

I could twist that and then say Scotland didnt vote to stay in the UK only 55% of voters did again it swings both ways with this lol

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *icklybitMan  over a year ago

Ayrshire

If you want to know about the permanence of the Scottish Parliament can I direct you to the Scotland Act 2016.

You should have known that.

Tell us more about the independence deal for Scotland that is on offer, you will say "wait and see", but you're not waiting and seeing are you?

You will vote for it because that's all that matters.

Independence transcends all, and to hell with the consequences.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

The notion that we are all outraged at being "Dragged" out of the EU is not working as a tactic.....The apathy from fellow workers and friends is well...not that bothered to be honest....I voted remain..still believe it was the way to vote..But that is democracy for you i lost 52% to 48%...and in 2014 it was an even greater margin..so let us face the future united not split apart .

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *inkyHnSCouple  over a year ago

The Council of Elrond


"The notion that we are all outraged at being "Dragged" out of the EU is not working as a tactic.....The apathy from fellow workers and friends is well...not that bothered to be honest....I voted remain..still believe it was the way to vote..But that is democracy for you i lost 52% to 48%...and in 2014 it was an even greater margin..so let us face the future united not split apart . "

Yeah the problem is you speak for you and i speak for me but none of us can speak for others.

Now there will be no voters out and n 2014 the promise was to vote no and the EU would be safe in the UK people are allowed to change their minds if want to and why deny anyone a vote if they have changed their minds on independence ?

Do pro union people accept the SNP were elected on their 2015 and 2016 manifesto's and do have a mandate to seek a independence referendum if the UK government will not respect the Scottish vote If they were to respect it then all talk of independence goes away.

In 2 and a half years its the pro union side that have not delivered on their side of the promises that has brought back the Independence debate/

If the respect Scotland vote to remain in the EU and single market and deliver on Home rule hey i dont mind being in the UK even though i believe every country should be independent i just wish the pro union side would deliver on their promise to Scotland and not to keep Shafting Scotland. or else independence will never ever go away and you cant stop people believing in self govern

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *inkyHnSCouple  over a year ago

The Council of Elrond

Anyways its been a joy to debate with you all but i have to go make dinner the Mrs is ill so am left to create a masterpiece of a dinner lmao

I hope you all enjoy your night and be naughty lol

Happy swinging

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge

why not a federal system for the whole of the UK?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *inkyHnSCouple  over a year ago

The Council of Elrond


"why not a federal system for the whole of the UK?"

problem is what that Labour in Scotland have been going on and on and on about giving Scotland Home Rule for over a 100 years and still waiting for that.

Also in 2014 the no side said devo max will be promised to Scotland and then in the Scotland bill Labour offered the least amount of powers now they are pulling out the big guns again with Gordon Brown trying to shaft Scotland again with more powers talks nah had enough of the bullshit

And even that would England want it ? Which regions would get more powers over others ? Same with Wales and N.Ireland

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"why not a federal system for the whole of the UK?

problem is what that Labour in Scotland have been going on and on and on about giving Scotland Home Rule for over a 100 years and still waiting for that.

Also in 2014 the no side said devo max will be promised to Scotland and then in the Scotland bill Labour offered the least amount of powers now they are pulling out the big guns again with Gordon Brown trying to shaft Scotland again with more powers talks nah had enough of the bullshit

And even that would England want it ? Which regions would get more powers over others ? Same with Wales and N.Ireland

"

In a federal system, you decide what powers the federal government gets, let's say foreign policy, defence, international trade etc. And then the states get everything else thats not the responsibility of the federal government. So England, Wales, NI and Scotland would be absolutely equal.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *inkyHnSCouple  over a year ago

The Council of Elrond


"why not a federal system for the whole of the UK?

problem is what that Labour in Scotland have been going on and on and on about giving Scotland Home Rule for over a 100 years and still waiting for that.

Also in 2014 the no side said devo max will be promised to Scotland and then in the Scotland bill Labour offered the least amount of powers now they are pulling out the big guns again with Gordon Brown trying to shaft Scotland again with more powers talks nah had enough of the bullshit

And even that would England want it ? Which regions would get more powers over others ? Same with Wales and N.Ireland

In a federal system, you decide what powers the federal government gets, let's say foreign policy, defence, international trade etc. And then the states get everything else thats not the responsibility of the federal government. So England, Wales, NI and Scotland would be absolutely equal."

Like i said Scotland has been down that road before many times with Labour promising Home Rule and still Scotland doesnt have Home rule and they have a cheek to bring Gordon Brown out again to seel Scotland another lie about more powers and once again he has no power to deliver what he is saying.

So Scotland will say no thanks this will be a straight out decide UK or independence for Scotland unless the PM does u-turn and respect Scotland's vote

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"why not a federal system for the whole of the UK?

problem is what that Labour in Scotland have been going on and on and on about giving Scotland Home Rule for over a 100 years and still waiting for that.

Also in 2014 the no side said devo max will be promised to Scotland and then in the Scotland bill Labour offered the least amount of powers now they are pulling out the big guns again with Gordon Brown trying to shaft Scotland again with more powers talks nah had enough of the bullshit

And even that would England want it ? Which regions would get more powers over others ? Same with Wales and N.Ireland

In a federal system, you decide what powers the federal government gets, let's say foreign policy, defence, international trade etc. And then the states get everything else thats not the responsibility of the federal government. So England, Wales, NI and Scotland would be absolutely equal.

Like i said Scotland has been down that road before many times with Labour promising Home Rule and still Scotland doesnt have Home rule and they have a cheek to bring Gordon Brown out again to seel Scotland another lie about more powers and once again he has no power to deliver what he is saying.

So Scotland will say no thanks this will be a straight out decide UK or independence for Scotland unless the PM does u-turn and respect Scotland's vote"

Well let's be honest, it hasn't, there has never been a referendum on the UK adopting a federal system.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *oo hotCouple  over a year ago

North West

I have said before and I still think it the case that the Brexit vote will be the beginning of the end of the United Kingdom. I don't see the Scots being bought off again by meaningless promises.

They have seen the attitude of the English who want Brexit at any cost and the complete disregard for Scotland and its people therein.

I don't want to see the break up of the United Kingdom, but I don't see how it can now be stopped. Good luck Scotland.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *entaur_UKMan  over a year ago

Cannock


"The notion that we are all outraged at being "Dragged" out of the EU is not working as a tactic.....The apathy from fellow workers and friends is well...not that bothered to be honest....I voted remain..still believe it was the way to vote..But that is democracy for you i lost 52% to 48%...and in 2014 it was an even greater margin..so let us face the future united not split apart . "

There was an SNP guy on the BBC This Week programme with Andrew Neil just over an hour ago and when Andrew Neil confronted him with 2 of the latest polls in Scotland the SNP guy had no answer.

The 2 polls Andrew Neil referred to as follows....

Around 60% of Scots now want the same Brexit deal as the rest of the UK.

Around 60% of Scots think EU migrants should be treated the same as non EU migrants (in other words no special preferential treatment for EU migrants which they have been getting while we're in the EU and all migrants should be treated on an equal footing which Is a key feature of Brexit).

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ercuryMan  over a year ago

Grantham


"The notion that we are all outraged at being "Dragged" out of the EU is not working as a tactic.....The apathy from fellow workers and friends is well...not that bothered to be honest....I voted remain..still believe it was the way to vote..But that is democracy for you i lost 52% to 48%...and in 2014 it was an even greater margin..so let us face the future united not split apart .

There was an SNP guy on the BBC This Week programme with Andrew Neil just over an hour ago and when Andrew Neil confronted him with 2 of the latest polls in Scotland the SNP guy had no answer.

The 2 polls Andrew Neil referred to as follows....

Around 60% of Scots now want the same Brexit deal as the rest of the UK.

Around 60% of Scots think EU migrants should be treated the same as non EU migrants (in other words no special preferential treatment for EU migrants which they have been getting while we're in the EU and all migrants should be treated on an equal footing which Is a key feature of Brexit)."

Which just shows what hypocrites the Scottish Greens are! Let's hope they don't have their version of "Lib-Dem 2015".

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *icklybitMan  over a year ago

Ayrshire

Or the snp of 1979.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"There will be no need for a Conservative party in an independent Scotland.

All the wealthy and high tax payers will have left, as they will certainly not like having to pay a punitive tax rate.

You dont know that. As has been seen from the example of Norway - higher taxes seems to make for happier people. Whereas the race to the bottom appears to encourage a blame culture, division and much angst.

There is nothing wrong with having a social conscience and living in a country that looks after its citizens well. You just have to be intelligent enough to realise that it has to be paid for and to vote in politicians that are intelligent enough to be good custodians of the trust that you put in them."

I am paying the green / snp higher rate tax and so are some of my friends

Happy I am fucking livid

Clearly these morons have not heard of fiscal drag.

My income has been plummeting and they are adding to the problem

Happy to pay more tax !!!!

My arse !!!!!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"No its not being disrespectful to any of those of who have served or fallen in the service of their country .However if you want independence how are you going to fund your defence as your budget is limited and by the way your leader is talking you don't want anything more to do with the rest of the union.

"

The snp don't have any defence policy apart from get rid of trident and keep our fingers crossed! !

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Scotland could be sitting on more than double the amount of oil and gas reserves currently predicted, a new independent industry investigation has found. The investigation reveals that the scale of Scotland’s untapped frontier West Coast or Atlantic Margin has been underestimated.

The investigation was undertaken by oilandgaspeople.com, the world’s largest oil and gas industry jobs board, and independent North Sea oil and gas industry experts. The investigation included interviews with industry experts and collated seismic and expert evidence from a range of independent sources such as the British Geological Survey, DECC, oil and gas companies, the Institute of Petroleum Engineering and the Energy Institute.

The findings show that the current predictions of extensive untapped reserves of oil and gas could be underestimated by 100%. The West Coast alone could provide oil and gas for at least 100 years with an estimated value of more than £1 trillion.

Yet the area – off the west coast of Scotland and Outer Hebrides and Shetland –has remained largely untapped due to deep waters and difficult geological conditions.

This is despite strong geological evidence for oil and gas reserves, including that the major basins in the area are filled with thick sedimentary successions – which helps produce and then reservoir oil and gas. These geological conditions support the formation of gigantic, or ‘supermassive’ oil reserves.

But the investigation found that oil exploration, discoveries and production in the area are set to dramatically increase over the next ten years as continual improvements in drilling technology, rig design and seismic surveying makes the area more accessible. This activity is supported by the Bank of Scotland’s recent report predicting the need for 37,000 new jobs over the next two years in support of the current Scottish oil boom. As a result, the investigation found that the most recent round of DECC licensing for exploration has seen an increase in oil majors, such as BP, Chevron, Statoil, Total, and Shell, begin prospecting.

The investigation also found over the next 10 years upwards of one million barrels a day could be pumped from the Atlantic Margins if more than £1.5 billion is invested to extract it.

The investigation revealed a consensus among industry experts and companies that it’s not a case of if, but when oil and gas reserves larger than in the North Sea will be discovered in the Atlantic Margin. The only barrier was the current lack of test drilling and technology. Many cited the case of BP’s Clair Ridge as an example of how technical difficulties once overcome can lead to new oil reserves. BP employed advanced recovery techniques to access fields in the Clair Ridge that were previously inaccessible due to geographical issues such as deep water. In the 1970s, drilling companies believed such fields were out of reach, but now that new technology has opened these fields up, the Clair Ridge alone will produce 120,000 barrels per day at peak levels of production. This translates to an estimated eight billion barrels of oil worth approximately £300 billion"

And with all this extra oil on the open market

the price falls !!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Scotland could be sitting on more than double the amount of oil and gas reserves currently predicted, a new independent industry investigation has found. The investigation reveals that the scale of Scotland’s untapped frontier West Coast or Atlantic Margin has been underestimated.

The investigation was undertaken by oilandgaspeople.com, the world’s largest oil and gas industry jobs board, and independent North Sea oil and gas industry experts. The investigation included interviews with industry experts and collated seismic and expert evidence from a range of independent sources such as the British Geological Survey, DECC, oil and gas companies, the Institute of Petroleum Engineering and the Energy Institute.

The findings show that the current predictions of extensive untapped reserves of oil and gas could be underestimated by 100%. The West Coast alone could provide oil and gas for at least 100 years with an estimated value of more than £1 trillion.

Yet the area – off the west coast of Scotland and Outer Hebrides and Shetland –has remained largely untapped due to deep waters and difficult geological conditions.

This is despite strong geological evidence for oil and gas reserves, including that the major basins in the area are filled with thick sedimentary successions – which helps produce and then reservoir oil and gas. These geological conditions support the formation of gigantic, or ‘supermassive’ oil reserves.

But the investigation found that oil exploration, discoveries and production in the area are set to dramatically increase over the next ten years as continual improvements in drilling technology, rig design and seismic surveying makes the area more accessible. This activity is supported by the Bank of Scotland’s recent report predicting the need for 37,000 new jobs over the next two years in support of the current Scottish oil boom. As a result, the investigation found that the most recent round of DECC licensing for exploration has seen an increase in oil majors, such as BP, Chevron, Statoil, Total, and Shell, begin prospecting.

The investigation also found over the next 10 years upwards of one million barrels a day could be pumped from the Atlantic Margins if more than £1.5 billion is invested to extract it.

The investigation revealed a consensus among industry experts and companies that it’s not a case of if, but when oil and gas reserves larger than in the North Sea will be discovered in the Atlantic Margin. The only barrier was the current lack of test drilling and technology. Many cited the case of BP’s Clair Ridge as an example of how technical difficulties once overcome can lead to new oil reserves. BP employed advanced recovery techniques to access fields in the Clair Ridge that were previously inaccessible due to geographical issues such as deep water. In the 1970s, drilling companies believed such fields were out of reach, but now that new technology has opened these fields up, the Clair Ridge alone will produce 120,000 barrels per day at peak levels of production. This translates to an estimated eight billion barrels of oil worth approximately £300 billion"

And with all this extra oil on the open market

the price falls !!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *uietly_confident66Man  over a year ago

Edinburgh

Well its not going to happen so its imaterial and hypothetical

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *uietly_confident66Man  over a year ago

Edinburgh

Well its not going to happen so its imaterial and hypothetical

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Being honest there is no economic case at all for an independent Scotland...It is the fanatics and political malcontents that cry loudest of Freedom, Well unlike some on here i do not feel a "victim" or" under duress" from a foreign nation. I do feel Nicola is getting more shrill and slightly desperate..Is she thinking she is getting found out? Failing economy, health, transport ,education her success rate is poor and her other Ministers mostly promoted away above there abilities.....Check on there qualifications it is very revealing as to the lack of good governance we are getting.....Oh and new policies? when do we get any at all...

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Being honest there is no economic case at all for an independent Scotland...It is the fanatics and political malcontents that cry loudest of Freedom, Well unlike some on here i do not feel a "victim" or" under duress" from a foreign nation. I do feel Nicola is getting more shrill and slightly desperate..Is she thinking she is getting found out? Failing economy, health, transport ,education her success rate is poor and her other Ministers mostly promoted away above there abilities.....Check on there qualifications it is very revealing as to the lack of good governance we are getting.....Oh and new policies? when do we get any at all... "

I'm not getting into the debate but Sturgeon appears to be an opportunist.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *tillup4funMan  over a year ago

Wakefield


"Being honest there is no economic case at all for an independent Scotland...It is the fanatics and political malcontents that cry loudest of Freedom, Well unlike some on here i do not feel a "victim" or" under duress" from a foreign nation. I do feel Nicola is getting more shrill and slightly desperate..Is she thinking she is getting found out? Failing economy, health, transport ,education her success rate is poor and her other Ministers mostly promoted away above there abilities.....Check on there qualifications it is very revealing as to the lack of good governance we are getting.....Oh and new policies? when do we get any at all... "

It keeps her in a job and in the headlines.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *UNKIEMan  over a year ago

south east


"Being honest there is no economic case at all for an independent Scotland...It is the fanatics and political malcontents that cry loudest of Freedom, Well unlike some on here i do not feel a "victim" or" under duress" from a foreign nation. I do feel Nicola is getting more shrill and slightly desperate..Is she thinking she is getting found out? Failing economy, health, transport ,education her success rate is poor and her other Ministers mostly promoted away above there abilities.....Check on there qualifications it is very revealing as to the lack of good governance we are getting.....Oh and new policies? when do we get any at all...

It keeps her in a job and in the headlines. "

I think you'll find its the voters in scotland thats keeping her in a job

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *tillup4funMan  over a year ago

Wakefield


"Being honest there is no economic case at all for an independent Scotland...It is the fanatics and political malcontents that cry loudest of Freedom, Well unlike some on here i do not feel a "victim" or" under duress" from a foreign nation. I do feel Nicola is getting more shrill and slightly desperate..Is she thinking she is getting found out? Failing economy, health, transport ,education her success rate is poor and her other Ministers mostly promoted away above there abilities.....Check on there qualifications it is very revealing as to the lack of good governance we are getting.....Oh and new policies? when do we get any at all...

It keeps her in a job and in the headlines.

I think you'll find its the voters in scotland thats keeping her in a job "

Don't know from experience but from what I,v read on here from other posters that live in Scotland she not doing too good a job on things like education whats your view on her performance?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *UNKIEMan  over a year ago

south east


"Being honest there is no economic case at all for an independent Scotland...It is the fanatics and political malcontents that cry loudest of Freedom, Well unlike some on here i do not feel a "victim" or" under duress" from a foreign nation. I do feel Nicola is getting more shrill and slightly desperate..Is she thinking she is getting found out? Failing economy, health, transport ,education her success rate is poor and her other Ministers mostly promoted away above there abilities.....Check on there qualifications it is very revealing as to the lack of good governance we are getting.....Oh and new policies? when do we get any at all...

It keeps her in a job and in the headlines.

I think you'll find its the voters in scotland thats keeping her in a job

Don't know from experience but from what I,v read on here from other posters that live in Scotland she not doing too good a job on things like education whats your view on her performance? "

To be honest i have no problem with her leadership or performance ..especially when you look at the opposition ...kezia (labour) has absolutely no idea what she's doing and ruth is just the tory partys spokesperson in scotland ..neither have scotlands interest at heart or at least dont show it ..all they do is fight snp on everything without putting up reasonable alternatives

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *icklybitMan  over a year ago

Ayrshire

The Scottish government hasn't passed any legislation since March last year.

Everytime there is a crisis in Policing, education or health a token commission of "experts" is convened,in other word's "kicked to the kerb," it's conclusions we never hear about. In other words "swept under the carpet." Unless they can, however tenuous, blame it on TOARIES or WESTMONSTER.

PISA damned education standards in Scotland and Audit Scotland showed that the NHS was missing most of its targets and our Police service is running a £47m deficit.

But by highlighting this I am talking Scotland down and being a traitorous Quisling.

That's where we are in Scotland, if you speak against the current government you are tarred with that brush.

One leader

One party

One people

Dissent will not be tolerated.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"The Scottish government hasn't passed any legislation since March last year.

Everytime there is a crisis in Policing, education or health a token commission of "experts" is convened,in other word's "kicked to the kerb," it's conclusions we never hear about. In other words "swept under the carpet." Unless they can, however tenuous, blame it on TOARIES or WESTMONSTER.

PISA damned education standards in Scotland and Audit Scotland showed that the NHS was missing most of its targets and our Police service is running a £47m deficit.

But by highlighting this I am talking Scotland down and being a traitorous Quisling.

That's where we are in Scotland, if you speak against the current government you are tarred with that brush.

One leader

One party

One people

Dissent will not be tolerated. "

Do you call yourself a traitoruos quisling? Or has someone on this post called you it ? Or are you just making it up to show independence supporters in a bad light ?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *icklybitMan  over a year ago

Ayrshire

Get on social media and see it for your self? And yes Ive been called those things and a great many others too. I,m sure weve seen the same sort of thing in the Brexit debates. Of course, you may not have seen it, that does not mean it never happened. I do hope that you are not one of the nationalists that Orwell spoke of when he wrote: " The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed by his own side, but he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing about them."

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Oh all Nationalists are not blind to the faults in there case for independece or have a chip on there shoulders, but too many seem blind to a reasonable question and can only resort to finger pointing. I expect better from my first minister than it was someone elses fault on every policy in which her govt is failing. I do hope she will respond to legitimate concerns over the economy post any referendum .She did promise to serve "all the people of Scotland"...not a myopic dogmatic few who was to leave the UK regardless of cost to the people...It is my belief that Nationalists like communists make people fit the system rather than the other way around

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *leasure domMan  over a year ago

Edinburgh

British nationalism: good; Scottish nationalism: bad.

Third Reich: bad, British empire: wonderful.

Britain's catastrophic debt mountain: manageable; Scotland's capability for economic survival: most unlikely (uniquely among nations blessed with oil, whisky, premium food)

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Honey please look at the figures....Base your beliefs on the figures not what you want them to be ......I would love to believe as some on here do that post independence .This country would be a land where the old ,sick and disabled were looked after properly. Where we all looked after each other. We all had good jobs with terms and conditions to match. But and it is a big but.....It is a fantasy like me winning the X factor ....it is not based on reality. Look at Greece for an example of living way beyond your means

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Get on social media and see it for your self? And yes Ive been called those things and a great many others too. I,m sure weve seen the same sort of thing in the Brexit debates. Of course, you may not have seen it, that does not mean it never happened. I do hope that you are not one of the nationalists that Orwell spoke of when he wrote: " The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed by his own side, but he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing about them.""

Have seen alot of name calling by both sides but the hatred from some unionists is quite bad and you will remember it was unionists who caused all the trouble in glasgow with their nazi salutes and songs of hate against scotland.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"The Scottish government hasn't passed any legislation since March last year.

Everytime there is a crisis in Policing, education or health a token commission of "experts" is convened,in other word's "kicked to the kerb," it's conclusions we never hear about. In other words "swept under the carpet." Unless they can, however tenuous, blame it on TOARIES or WESTMONSTER.

PISA damned education standards in Scotland and Audit Scotland showed that the NHS was missing most of its targets and our Police service is running a £47m deficit.

But by highlighting this I am talking Scotland down and being a traitorous Quisling.

That's where we are in Scotland, if you speak against the current government you are tarred with that brush.

One leader

One party

One people

Dissent will not be tolerated.

Do you call yourself a traitoruos quisling? Or has someone on this post called you it ? Or are you just making it up to show independence supporters in a bad light ?"

Have a read of wings over Scotland or Bella Caledonia to see what the feeling against people with a different opinion is.

we could discuss this in the Jimmy watt

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"The Scottish government hasn't passed any legislation since March last year.

Everytime there is a crisis in Policing, education or health a token commission of "experts" is convened,in other word's "kicked to the kerb," it's conclusions we never hear about. In other words "swept under the carpet." Unless they can, however tenuous, blame it on TOARIES or WESTMONSTER.

PISA damned education standards in Scotland and Audit Scotland showed that the NHS was missing most of its targets and our Police service is running a £47m deficit.

But by highlighting this I am talking Scotland down and being a traitorous Quisling.

That's where we are in Scotland, if you speak against the current government you are tarred with that brush.

One leader

One party

One people

Dissent will not be tolerated.

Do you call yourself a traitoruos quisling? Or has someone on this post called you it ? Or are you just making it up to show independence supporters in a bad light ?

Have a read of wings over Scotland or Bella Caledonia to see what the feeling against people with a different opinion is.

we could discuss this in the Jimmy watt "

I know what gets said but its from both sides

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *UNKIEMan  over a year ago

south east

Is it really that bad that the scottish government want to give the people of scotland a "choice" once details of what brexit means to us comes out rather than doing nothing and just accepting blindly what scraps westminster decide we're worthy of ..what ever way indyref2 falls.. at least we can say we had a choice ..and before anyone says we had a choice in 2014..this next choice is quite different from the last

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *icklybitMan  over a year ago

Ayrshire

How so? What are they offering? Any answers on currency, central bank and costs, EU status and the cost to us, the deficit and how we would need to reduce it for entry, would tax go up, services slashed or a combination of both? Is the EU outwith the UK worth it without the opt outs we enjoyed with UK membership, VAT rises Schengen the euro convergence and growth and stabilith pact? What choice is that? Post Brexit its like standing in the rain getting soaked and the snp suggest we take shelter in a burning building.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *icklybitMan  over a year ago

Ayrshire

It may get said from both sides but that doesnt excuse it. I havent abused people with nasty personal comments but I have received them, and on here too. I suppose if thats all theyve got, then they cant have much of an argument. And I wont be silenced.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *icklybitMan  over a year ago

Ayrshire


"The Scottish government hasn't passed any legislation since March last year.

Everytime there is a crisis in Policing, education or health a token commission of "experts" is convened,in other word's "kicked to the kerb," it's conclusions we never hear about. In other words "swept under the carpet." Unless they can, however tenuous, blame it on TOARIES or WESTMONSTER.

PISA damned education standards in Scotland and Audit Scotland showed that the NHS was missing most of its targets and our Police service is running a £47m deficit.

But by highlighting this I am talking Scotland down and being a traitorous Quisling.

That's where we are in Scotland, if you speak against the current government you are tarred with that brush.

One leader

One party

One people

Dissent will not be tolerated.

Do you call yourself a traitoruos quisling? Or has someone on this post called you it ? Or are you just making it up to show independence supporters in a bad light ?

Have a read of wings over Scotland or Bella Caledonia to see what the feeling against people with a different opinion is.

we could discuss this in the Jimmy watt "

And my references would be a bit better than a fake reverend from Bath or the nobodies that write for Bella, exception being Loki, he is at least honest.You should come to Ayrshire and meet, its nice in the summer.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Something that Nicola Sturgeon manages to get away with is the slight distortion of the facts.

It is true that 62% of Scots voted to remain in the European Union, but we must put this into perspective. It is a percentage of those who turned out to cast a vote.

Let me give you an example.

If only 100 people had bothered to vote in the EU referendum, and 62 of those chose to remain in the EU, the level of support for EU membership would still be, yes, you've guessed it, 62%

That would hardly be the 'Majority of Scots' supporting membership of the EU.

It's far more important to consider the ACTUAL number of votes.

Firstly, let's look at the 2014 Scottish Independence referendum.

2,01,926 people voted to remain part of the United Kingdom, while 1,617,989 voted for independence.

In the EU referendum, 1,661,191 Scots voted to remain within the EU while 1,018,322 wanted to leave.

So fewer people cast a vote in Scotland in the EU referendum than they did for the Independence vote, and support, in Scotland, for remaining in the EU was weaker than for remaining part of the UK.

Now let's look at the total votes for the whole of the UK (of which Scotland voted to remain a part of)

17,410,742 people voted to leave the EU while 16,141,241 wanted to stay.

Now, as Ms Sturgeon prefers to concentrate on the percentages rather than the actual numbers, let's consider the percentage of the Scottish vote.

5.8% of the Leave vote was from Scotland

10.29% of Remain voters were north of the border.

Now, if Ms Sturgeon were to quote this figure, it would suggest that twice as many Scots voted to remain in the EU than those wanting to leave, but, as I have shown, this is simply not the case.

OK, so let's consider the 'Voice' of Scotland. Of the total number of votes cast (ignoring spoilt ballots etc - counting only 'Yes' and 'No' votes)

2,679,513 votes were cast in Scotland, which were part of the 33,551,983 votes cast throughout the UK, which equates to a grand total of 7.9% of the vote.

Not such a strong figure now is it, and yet Nicola Sturgeon is of the opinion that somehow 7.9% of the turnout is enough to over-rule, interfere or otherwise with the democratic decision of the Entire kingdom.

Just to be clear here, I'm not trying to cause an argument amongst the good people here on fab, but just trying to look at things from a different angle and inject some facts to the argument.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

We would be better off and the Scots would be Skint

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Sorry meant to smile then

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *UNKIEMan  over a year ago

south east


"How so? What are they offering? Any answers on currency, central bank and costs, EU status and the cost to us, the deficit and how we would need to reduce it for entry, would tax go up, services slashed or a combination of both? Is the EU outwith the UK worth it without the opt outs we enjoyed with UK membership, VAT rises Schengen the euro convergence and growth and stabilith pact? What choice is that? Post Brexit its like standing in the rain getting soaked and the snp suggest we take shelter in a burning building."

At the end of the day the scottish government MUST have those answers ready in 18 months - 2 yrs just as the brexit details must be made available.. once all these facts "from both sides" are then and only then can we make an informed decision i personally would rather have a choice than just accept whatever is thrown at me ..but hey thats just me

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *mmabluTV/TS  over a year ago

upton wirral

Well there would be no need for the SNP so that makes everything a different ball game,they would be redundant like UKIP.

However what I think would be more likely is that Sturgeon would want a one party state and have a left wing dictatorship and wrecking the whole economy like Mgabi in Zambia

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Scotland; what would happen after Independence? ....

taking the question in the thread title on face value and the answers in relation to the other brexit threads on this forum then the remoaners would STFU and GTFO .... or just stamp their feet in a futile tantrum of dispair

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

SNP government have passed hee haw laws in Scotland in the last 12 months. They are a puppet government hell bent on independence at any cost. Their last attempt saw them base their economy on oil at over $130 a barrel. Crazy. What do we manufacture in Scotland? Hee haw. So economic growth will depend on alcohol sales, tourism and what? Oil sales? Check the price. Plus if we were to keep the pound, our fiscal policy would have to be agreed by the bank of England, each year! The hope of entering in to the EU is also a sham. Indipendance is a joke. At a time when the world is going nuts, we are better together. 400 less police officers, NHS Scotland failing 7 of their 8 targets. Plus .... want to remain in single EU market with all the free movement etc.... Plus... the I want out of the UK but remain in EU policy is bonkers. Who's gonna pay for the border at Berwick? Wake up..... stop sniffing glue and watching Braveheart on repeat!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

so the question is ... Scotland; what would happen after Independence?

well ... the folks of scotland would get to fuck things up their own way instead of some peeps from sussex doing it for them by proxy

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *aucy3Couple  over a year ago

glasgow


"Oh all Nationalists are not blind to the faults in there case for independece or have a chip on there in shoulders, but too many seem blind to a reasonable question and can only resort to finger pointing. I expect better from my first minister than it was someone elses fault on every policy in which her govt is failing. I do hope she will respond to legitimate concerns over the economy post any referendum .She did promise to serve "all the people of Scotland"...not a myopic dogmatic few who was to leave the UK regardless of cost to the people...It is my belief that Nationalists like communists make people fit the system rather than the other way around "

I love this post,thanks

pretty much,hits the nail on the head.

It's true,not all,

but far too many do have a chip on their shoulder.

They attempt to shout down,and intimidate,

Anyone expressing any opinion,

Other than their own.

.

Some will even resort to sending forum replies,

In a private message,

Containing abusive drivel.

Knowing that posting the same reply on the forum,

Would only show them up for the,

Intolerant,undignified,narrow minded,bully boy,ned,

that they truly are.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"As far as I am concerned you can have what you want but as most major defence weapons carry a nuclear deterrent how are you going to pay for it and its up keep.as for Luxembourg and Ireland I think you will find they are reliant on the larger nations around them for their current level of peace and tranquillity at the expense of those nations service personnel

We don't actually want nuclear weapons so you're welcome to them.

Ireland relies on other nations for their defence, do they?

Don't think the Irish would be happy with that opinion."

We rely on goodwill and not prancing around the world sticking our nose into other people's business.

"Why has Britain so many enemies? " is the question you should be asking.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *icklybitMan  over a year ago

Ayrshire

Jealousy maybe?

Why is Irelands greatest export its young and talented people?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *oorland2Couple  over a year ago

Stoke


"Jealousy maybe?

Why is Irelands greatest export its young and talented people? "

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *oorland2Couple  over a year ago

Stoke


"As far as I am concerned you can have what you want but as most major defence weapons carry a nuclear deterrent how are you going to pay for it and its up keep.as for Luxembourg and Ireland I think you will find they are reliant on the larger nations around them for their current level of peace and tranquillity at the expense of those nations service personnel

We don't actually want nuclear weapons so you're welcome to them.

Ireland relies on other nations for their defence, do they?

Don't think the Irish would be happy with that opinion.

We rely on goodwill and not prancing around the world sticking our nose into other people's business.

"Why has Britain so many enemies? " is the question you should be asking. "

its strange how many peeps from all over the world want to come and set home in the racist xenophobic world dominating country

Or does our free thinking, business like approach to life appeal to those who hate us.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Why do SNP moan and groan about laws made in Westminster that they want to rid us of and then at the same time are happy to want laws made in Brussels and Strasbourg?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *oorland2Couple  over a year ago

Stoke


"SNP government have passed hee haw laws in Scotland in the last 12 months. They are a puppet government hell bent on independence at any cost. Their last attempt saw them base their economy on oil at over $130 a barrel. Crazy. What do we manufacture in Scotland? Hee haw. So economic growth will depend on alcohol sales, tourism and what? Oil sales? Check the price. Plus if we were to keep the pound, our fiscal policy would have to be agreed by the bank of England, each year! The hope of entering in to the EU is also a sham. Indipendance is a joke. At a time when the world is going nuts, we are better together. 400 less police officers, NHS Scotland failing 7 of their 8 targets. Plus .... want to remain in single EU market with all the free movement etc.... Plus... the I want out of the UK but remain in EU policy is bonkers. Who's gonna pay for the border at Berwick? Wake up..... stop sniffing glue and watching Braveheart on repeat! "

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"As far as I am concerned you can have what you want but as most major defence weapons carry a nuclear deterrent how are you going to pay for it and its up keep.as for Luxembourg and Ireland I think you will find they are reliant on the larger nations around them for their current level of peace and tranquillity at the expense of those nations service personnel

We don't actually want nuclear weapons so you're welcome to them.

Ireland relies on other nations for their defence, do they?

Don't think the Irish would be happy with that opinion.

We rely on goodwill and not prancing around the world sticking our nose into other people's business.

"Why has Britain so many enemies? " is the question you should be asking.

its strange how many peeps from all over the world want to come and set home in the racist xenophobic world dominating country

Or does our free thinking, business like approach to life appeal to those who hate us."

People tolerate fukwits and dribbling minds all the time.Just look at this forum.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *oo hotCouple  over a year ago

North West


"Why do SNP moan and groan about laws made in Westminster that they want to rid us of and then at the same time are happy to want laws made in Brussels and Strasbourg?

"

Oh dear... just because you want to believe something is true, doesn't make it actually true.

Scotland is a junior and subservient partner to England in the United Kingdom. They would be an equal partner with full voting rights on all EU directives and regulations. There s a huge difference between being a full partner in a Union and being a subservient partner.

A number of Scots are a bit fed up of being England's bitch and would prefer a more equal relationship with their close economic and political partners.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Why do SNP moan and groan about laws made in Westminster that they want to rid us of and then at the same time are happy to want laws made in Brussels and Strasbourg?

Oh dear... just because you want to believe something is true, doesn't make it actually true.

Scotland is a junior and subservient partner to England in the United Kingdom. They would be an equal partner with full voting rights on all EU directives and regulations. There s a huge difference between being a full partner in a Union and being a subservient partner.

A number of Scots are a bit fed up of being England's bitch and would prefer a more equal relationship with their close economic and political partners. "

What would happen if Scotland ever got into financial difficulties like say, Greece? Who's bitch are Greece?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ercuryMan  over a year ago

Grantham

Scotland could always go for total independence from everyone of course. No UK, no EU....bitch to no one then.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *obka3Couple  over a year ago

bournemouth


"Why do SNP moan and groan about laws made in Westminster that they want to rid us of and then at the same time are happy to want laws made in Brussels and Strasbourg?

Oh dear... just because you want to believe something is true, doesn't make it actually true.

Scotland is a junior and subservient partner to England in the United Kingdom. They would be an equal partner with full voting rights on all EU directives and regulations. There s a huge difference between being a full partner in a Union and being a subservient partner.

A number of Scots are a bit fed up of being England's bitch and would prefer a more equal relationship with their close economic and political partners. "

Just because YOU believe something doesnt make it true either.

The scots have 9 % of uk mps yet are 8% of the uk population, they have 6 meps out of 751 thats 0.8% yet they have 1% of the eu population and if independent they would be 3.5% of the eu council of ministers. Compared to the influence they have in the uk as part of the uk and more importantly the influence they have in the eu as part of the uk the influence they would have in the eu as an independent country would be very minor

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *oo hotCouple  over a year ago

North West


"Why do SNP moan and groan about laws made in Westminster that they want to rid us of and then at the same time are happy to want laws made in Brussels and Strasbourg?

Oh dear... just because you want to believe something is true, doesn't make it actually true.

Scotland is a junior and subservient partner to England in the United Kingdom. They would be an equal partner with full voting rights on all EU directives and regulations. There s a huge difference between being a full partner in a Union and being a subservient partner.

A number of Scots are a bit fed up of being England's bitch and would prefer a more equal relationship with their close economic and political partners.

Just because YOU believe something doesnt make it true either.

The scots have 9 % of uk mps yet are 8% of the uk population, they have 6 meps out of 751 thats 0.8% yet they have 1% of the eu population and if independent they would be 3.5% of the eu council of ministers. Compared to the influence they have in the uk as part of the uk and more importantly the influence they have in the eu as part of the uk the influence they would have in the eu as an independent country would be very minor"

Let's take the Brexit example. All 27 EU Member States will get a say on the final Brexit deal. Scotland won't in its relationship with England. If it were a member of the EU as an independent nation it gets a say. For some people, that is important.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *oo hotCouple  over a year ago

North West


"Scotland could always go for total independence from everyone of course. No UK, no EU....bitch to no one then. "

The fact that you have bought into Herr Farage's line about "Independence" - speaks volumes. The EU is made up of currently 28 independent states all of whom retain their own Sovereignty (as explained in the recent White Paper). Just because you and other easily led Brexiters chose to believe Herr Farage than believe the truth doesn't change the facts.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *icklybitMan  over a year ago

Ayrshire

It can't be a member as it doesn't comply with the T&C,s required to be one.

An important hurdle which can't be brushed aside in reality, to become one would be a long and painful journey.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *obka3Couple  over a year ago

bournemouth


"Why do SNP moan and groan about laws made in Westminster that they want to rid us of and then at the same time are happy to want laws made in Brussels and Strasbourg?

Oh dear... just because you want to believe something is true, doesn't make it actually true.

Scotland is a junior and subservient partner to England in the United Kingdom. They would be an equal partner with full voting rights on all EU directives and regulations. There s a huge difference between being a full partner in a Union and being a subservient partner.

A number of Scots are a bit fed up of being England's bitch and would prefer a more equal relationship with their close economic and political partners.

Just because YOU believe something doesnt make it true either.

The scots have 9 % of uk mps yet are 8% of the uk population, they have 6 meps out of 751 thats 0.8% yet they have 1% of the eu population and if independent they would be 3.5% of the eu council of ministers. Compared to the influence they have in the uk as part of the uk and more importantly the influence they have in the eu as part of the uk the influence they would have in the eu as an independent country would be very minor

Let's take the Brexit example. All 27 EU Member States will get a say on the final Brexit deal. Scotland won't in its relationship with England. If it were a member of the EU as an independent nation it gets a say. For some people, that is important."

Scotland gets a say via the UK just because it doesnt get all it wants doesnt mean its view is ignored,just as many who want all immigration stopped wont obtain that

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ostafunMan  over a year ago

near ipswich

It seems strange to me that the snp wanted independence from the uk even though it would have taken them out of the eu and now they want independence to keep them in the eu.Seems to me its just an excuse for a referendum again.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By *ercuryMan  over a year ago

Grantham


"Scotland could always go for total independence from everyone of course. No UK, no EU....bitch to no one then.

The fact that you have bought into Herr Farage's line about "Independence" - speaks volumes. The EU is made up of currently 28 independent states all of whom retain their own Sovereignty (as explained in the recent White Paper). Just because you and other easily led Brexiters chose to believe Herr Farage than believe the truth doesn't change the facts."

The fact that I finished my posting with a laugh sort of gave it away that it was a tongue in cheek remark.

I don't, and never have done, brought into anything Farage has said, I am intelligent enough to search out facts and act on them.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.2500

0