FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Definition of Terrorism

Definition of Terrorism

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By *asyuk OP   Man  over a year ago

West London

This is getting a bit weird. I read a hint of this before but it seems to be a "thing" in the US that white people are not being charged with terrorism as they aren't influenced by non-US citizens. Their hate is home-grown

'A man who allegedly plotted to carry out an attack “in the style of Dylann Roof” has been arrested - but not charged under any terrorism laws.'

The charge could be changed of course.

"Benjamin Thomas Samuel McDowell, 29, was detained by the FBI in South Carolina on Wednesday for illegally buying a gun with the intention of carrying out a mass shooting “against non-whites”. He was charged with possession of a fire arm."

http://newscdn.newsrep.net/h5/nrshare.html?r=3&lan=en_GB&pid=14&id=FS9014804QM_uk&app_lan=&mcc=234&declared_lan=en_GB&pubaccount=ocms_0&referrer=200620&showall=1&mcc=234

This follows Robert Doggart also not facing terrorism charges for planning to attack a mosque:

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/new-york-mosque-attack-plotter-robert-doggart-not-terror-charges-tennessee-islamberg-hancock-muslim-a7581701.html%3famp

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"This is getting a bit weird. I read a hint of this before but it seems to be a "thing" in the US that white people are not being charged with terrorism as they aren't influenced by non-US citizens. Their hate is home-grown

'A man who allegedly plotted to carry out an attack “in the style of Dylann Roof” has been arrested - but not charged under any terrorism laws.'

The charge could be changed of course.

"Benjamin Thomas Samuel McDowell, 29, was detained by the FBI in South Carolina on Wednesday for illegally buying a gun with the intention of carrying out a mass shooting “against non-whites”. He was charged with possession of a fire arm."

http://newscdn.newsrep.net/h5/nrshare.html?r=3&lan=en_GB&pid=14&id=FS9014804QM_uk&app_lan=&mcc=234&declared_lan=en_GB&pubaccount=ocms_0&referrer=200620&showall=1&mcc=234

This follows Robert Doggart also not facing terrorism charges for planning to attack a mosque:

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/new-york-mosque-attack-plotter-robert-doggart-not-terror-charges-tennessee-islamberg-hancock-muslim-a7581701.html%3famp

"

The christian minister Doggart is a very interesting story .Doggart, via an FBI wiretap and conversations with an FBI informant, had revealed his detailed plan to travel from his home in Tennessee to New York state to attack the people of Islamberg, a community of approximately 200 black Muslim Americans near the Pennsylvania border. If a Muslim cleric had been arrested shortly before the attack, he would have rightfully been charged with terrorism and held without bail. But when that identical plot is concocted by a Christian minister planning to slaughter Muslims who live in upstate New York, not only is he released on bail and not charged with terrorism, he’s possibly going to walk free.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

It's always going to be contentious this issue as has been said many times before , one mans terriers is another mans freedom Fighter !

Mandela , Johnny Adair , Mcguiness, Arafat , Sharron , to name but a few !

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It's always going to be contentious this issue as has been said many times before , one mans terriers is another mans freedom Fighter !

Mandela , Johnny Adair , Mcguiness, Arafat , Sharron , to name but a few ! "

Its very contentious.The silence from the Alt. Right in the forum is telling.They can only foam at the mouth at islamic terrorism and look the other way when a Christian minister plans on slaughtering black muslims.I guess they are too busy .

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *obka3Couple  over a year ago

bournemouth


"It's always going to be contentious this issue as has been said many times before , one mans terriers is another mans freedom Fighter !

Mandela , Johnny Adair , Mcguiness, Arafat , Sharron , to name but a few ! Its very contentious.The silence from the Alt. Right in the forum is telling.They can only foam at the mouth at islamic terrorism and look the other way when a Christian minister plans on slaughtering black muslims.I guess they are too busy . "

Hows your mate blair ? Bet plenty of iraqi's call him a terrorist

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It's always going to be contentious this issue as has been said many times before , one mans terriers is another mans freedom Fighter !

Mandela , Johnny Adair , Mcguiness, Arafat , Sharron , to name but a few ! Its very contentious.The silence from the Alt. Right in the forum is telling.They can only foam at the mouth at islamic terrorism and look the other way when a Christian minister plans on slaughtering black muslims.I guess they are too busy .

Hows your mate blair ? Bet plenty of iraqi's call him a terrorist "

Perhaps he is just Misunderstood

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *asyuk OP   Man  over a year ago

West London


"It's always going to be contentious this issue as has been said many times before , one mans terriers is another mans freedom Fighter !

Mandela , Johnny Adair , Mcguiness, Arafat , Sharron , to name but a few ! "

Really? How are these two cases and how the law is being applied equivalent to the examples you've given?

What's the nuance that allows the state to treat white supremacists wanting to kill Muslim or coloured people in the US different to Islamists wanting to kill other people?

In Northern Ireland both IRA and Loyalist terrorists were investigated and imprisoned.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It's always going to be contentious this issue as has been said many times before , one mans terriers is another mans freedom Fighter !

Mandela , Johnny Adair , Mcguiness, Arafat , Sharron , to name but a few ! Its very contentious.The silence from the Alt. Right in the forum is telling.They can only foam at the mouth at islamic terrorism and look the other way when a Christian minister plans on slaughtering black muslims.I guess they are too busy .

Hows your mate blair ? Bet plenty of iraqi's call him a terrorist "

Blair is just a weapons-grade arsehole. He should have stayed away from the public eye instead of returning to spout his ridiculous rubbish and stir the pot. Nothing but lies every time he opens his mouth. Terrorist, yes to many people. War criminal, undoubtedly. Arsehole, one hundred percent.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 18/02/17 18:34:39]

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It's always going to be contentious this issue as has been said many times before , one mans terriers is another mans freedom Fighter !

Mandela , Johnny Adair , Mcguiness, Arafat , Sharron , to name but a few ! Its very contentious.The silence from the Alt. Right in the forum is telling.They can only foam at the mouth at islamic terrorism and look the other way when a Christian minister plans on slaughtering black muslims.I guess they are too busy .

Hows your mate blair ? Bet plenty of iraqi's call him a terrorist

Perhaps he is just Misunderstood "

Fair play to you stevie. Your the only Islamaphobe to respond regardless of the incoherence of your response.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *asyuk OP   Man  over a year ago

West London


"

Hows your mate blair ? Bet plenty of iraqi's call him a terrorist "

Yep. Every US President since Roosevelt. Every Soviet President plus Putin. Probably every British Prime minster ever and any country that's ever had an empire.

Slightly off topic though

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It's always going to be contentious this issue as has been said many times before , one mans terriers is another mans freedom Fighter !

Mandela , Johnny Adair , Mcguiness, Arafat , Sharron , to name but a few ! Its very contentious.The silence from the Alt. Right in the forum is telling.They can only foam at the mouth at islamic terrorism and look the other way when a Christian minister plans on slaughtering black muslims.I guess they are too busy .

Hows your mate blair ? Bet plenty of iraqi's call him a terrorist

Blair is just a weapons-grade arsehole. He should have stayed away from the public eye instead of returning to spout his ridiculous rubbish and stir the pot. Nothing but lies every time he opens his mouth. Terrorist, yes to many people. War criminal, undoubtedly. Arsehole, one hundred percent."

So what are your thoughts on the minister who planned to slaughter muslims.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Hows your mate blair ? Bet plenty of iraqi's call him a terrorist

Yep. Every US President since Roosevelt. Every Soviet President plus Putin. Probably every British Prime minster ever and any country that's ever had an empire.

Slightly off topic though "

Since when is Stevie interested in the topic of white christian terrorists. It undermines his world view We cant have that...

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It's always going to be contentious this issue as has been said many times before , one mans terriers is another mans freedom Fighter !

Mandela , Johnny Adair , Mcguiness, Arafat , Sharron , to name but a few ! Its very contentious.The silence from the Alt. Right in the forum is telling.They can only foam at the mouth at islamic terrorism and look the other way when a Christian minister plans on slaughtering black muslims.I guess they are too busy . "

Not True !!! I'm Right wing but try to be Fair !

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Ps I have no truck with right wing Christian terriers I ether , it's just at the moment they are out numbered by Islamic Terroists !!!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *imiUKMan  over a year ago

Hereford


"Ps I have no truck with right wing Christian terriers I ether , it's just at the moment they are out numbered by Islamic Terroists !!!"

I suspect that my terrier is right wing.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Ps I have no truck with right wing Christian terriers I ether , it's just at the moment they are out numbered by Islamic Terroists !!!

I suspect that my terrier is right wing. "

Nowt wrong with that

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Ps I have no truck with right wing Christian terriers I ether , it's just at the moment they are out numbered by Islamic Terroists !!!

I suspect that my terrier is right wing.

Nowt wrong with that "

I had terrier that was right wing and collies and huskies that were liberal.I think terriers might suffer from small man syndrome. Nothing wrong with being on the right just dont fall off the edge.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Ps I have no truck with right wing Christian terriers I ether , it's just at the moment they are out numbered by Islamic Terroists !!!

I suspect that my terrier is right wing.

Nowt wrong with that I had terrier that was right wing and collies and huskies that were liberal.I think terriers might suffer from small man syndrome. Nothing wrong with being on the right just dont fall off the edge.

"

lol I don't agree with you much but like your humour

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Ps I have no truck with right wing Christian terriers I ether , it's just at the moment they are out numbered by Islamic Terroists !!!

I suspect that my terrier is right wing.

Nowt wrong with that I had terrier that was right wing and collies and huskies that were liberal.I think terriers might suffer from small man syndrome. Nothing wrong with being on the right just dont fall off the edge.

lol I don't agree with you much but like your humour "

I find humour the best response often.I dont like people who agree with me all the time. I'm going to quote hitchens who i think you'll like.

"Never be a spectator of unfairness or stupidity. Seek out argument and disputation for their own sake; the grave will supply plenty of time for silence. Suspect your own motives, and all excuses. Do not live for others any more than you would expect others to live for you."

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *asyuk OP   Man  over a year ago

West London


"Ps I have no truck with right wing Christian terriers I ether , it's just at the moment they are out numbered by Islamic Terroists !!!

I suspect that my terrier is right wing.

Nowt wrong with that I had terrier that was right wing and collies and huskies that were liberal.I think terriers might suffer from small man syndrome. Nothing wrong with being on the right just dont fall off the edge.

lol I don't agree with you much but like your humour I find humour the best response often.I dont like people who agree with me all the time. I'm going to quote hitchens who i think you'll like.

"Never be a spectator of unfairness or stupidity. Seek out argument and disputation for their own sake; the grave will supply plenty of time for silence. Suspect your own motives, and all excuses. Do not live for others any more than you would expect others to live for you.""

The second sentence is blocks though. Substitute "friends and family" and we have something I can live with.

I'm a soft liberal with only a slight inclination to call people out though

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *asyuk OP   Man  over a year ago

West London


"Ps I have no truck with right wing Christian terriers I ether , it's just at the moment they are out numbered by Islamic Terroists !!!

I suspect that my terrier is right wing.

Nowt wrong with that I had terrier that was right wing and collies and huskies that were liberal.I think terriers might suffer from small man syndrome. Nothing wrong with being on the right just dont fall off the edge.

lol I don't agree with you much but like your humour I find humour the best response often.I dont like people who agree with me all the time. I'm going to quote hitchens who i think you'll like.

"Never be a spectator of unfairness or stupidity. Seek out argument and disputation for their own sake; the grave will supply plenty of time for silence. Suspect your own motives, and all excuses. Do not live for others any more than you would expect others to live for you."

The second sentence is blocks though. Substitute "friends and family" and we have something I can live with.

I'm a soft liberal with only a slight inclination to call people out though "

Bollocks*

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Ps I have no truck with right wing Christian terriers I ether , it's just at the moment they are out numbered by Islamic Terroists !!!

I suspect that my terrier is right wing.

Nowt wrong with that I had terrier that was right wing and collies and huskies that were liberal.I think terriers might suffer from small man syndrome. Nothing wrong with being on the right just dont fall off the edge.

lol I don't agree with you much but like your humour I find humour the best response often.I dont like people who agree with me all the time. I'm going to quote hitchens who i think you'll like.

"Never be a spectator of unfairness or stupidity. Seek out argument and disputation for their own sake; the grave will supply plenty of time for silence. Suspect your own motives, and all excuses. Do not live for others any more than you would expect others to live for you.""

If you mean Peter Hitchens , yes I do

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Ps I have no truck with right wing Christian terriers I ether , it's just at the moment they are out numbered by Islamic Terroists !!!

I suspect that my terrier is right wing.

Nowt wrong with that I had terrier that was right wing and collies and huskies that were liberal.I think terriers might suffer from small man syndrome. Nothing wrong with being on the right just dont fall off the edge.

lol I don't agree with you much but like your humour I find humour the best response often.I dont like people who agree with me all the time. I'm going to quote hitchens who i think you'll like.

"Never be a spectator of unfairness or stupidity. Seek out argument and disputation for their own sake; the grave will supply plenty of time for silence. Suspect your own motives, and all excuses. Do not live for others any more than you would expect others to live for you."

The second sentence is blocks though. Substitute "friends and family" and we have something I can live with.

I'm a soft liberal with only a slight inclination to call people out though

Bollocks*"

Lol I know why you put Nollocks but at a glance it does look like your saying Bollocks to your own Post

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Ps I have no truck with right wing Christian terriers I ether , it's just at the moment they are out numbered by Islamic Terroists !!!

I suspect that my terrier is right wing.

Nowt wrong with that I had terrier that was right wing and collies and huskies that were liberal.I think terriers might suffer from small man syndrome. Nothing wrong with being on the right just dont fall off the edge.

lol I don't agree with you much but like your humour I find humour the best response often.I dont like people who agree with me all the time. I'm going to quote hitchens who i think you'll like.

"Never be a spectator of unfairness or stupidity. Seek out argument and disputation for their own sake; the grave will supply plenty of time for silence. Suspect your own motives, and all excuses. Do not live for others any more than you would expect others to live for you."

The second sentence is blocks though. Substitute "friends and family" and we have something I can live with.

I'm a soft liberal with only a slight inclination to call people out though

Bollocks*

Lol I know why you put Nollocks but at a glance it does look like your saying Bollocks to your own Post "

Ps I didn't mean Nollocks

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Ps I have no truck with right wing Christian terriers I ether , it's just at the moment they are out numbered by Islamic Terroists !!!

I suspect that my terrier is right wing.

Nowt wrong with that I had terrier that was right wing and collies and huskies that were liberal.I think terriers might suffer from small man syndrome. Nothing wrong with being on the right just dont fall off the edge.

lol I don't agree with you much but like your humour I find humour the best response often.I dont like people who agree with me all the time. I'm going to quote hitchens who i think you'll like.

"Never be a spectator of unfairness or stupidity. Seek out argument and disputation for their own sake; the grave will supply plenty of time for silence. Suspect your own motives, and all excuses. Do not live for others any more than you would expect others to live for you."

If you mean Peter Hitchens , yes I do "

Wash your mouth out. Peter hitchens is the lesser brother of the late great Christopher Hitchens.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *asyuk OP   Man  over a year ago

West London


"

Bollocks*

Lol I know why you put Nollocks but at a glance it does look like your saying Bollocks to your own Post

Ps I didn't mean Nollocks "

It's these foreign spellcheckers coming over here and moderating our language. We need to take our software back!

I am, however, always prepared to accept that my opinion may be bollocks, but as most people in most threads dodge questions that are awkward I tend to maintain those I have.

In that subject, what do you think of this particular contradiction in the definition of terrorism?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *abioMan  over a year ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"This is getting a bit weird. I read a hint of this before but it seems to be a "thing" in the US that white people are not being charged with terrorism as they aren't influenced by non-US citizens. Their hate is home-grown

'A man who allegedly plotted to carry out an attack “in the style of Dylann Roof” has been arrested - but not charged under any terrorism laws.'

The charge could be changed of course.

"Benjamin Thomas Samuel McDowell, 29, was detained by the FBI in South Carolina on Wednesday for illegally buying a gun with the intention of carrying out a mass shooting “against non-whites”. He was charged with possession of a fire arm."

"

that is because in one of the EO Trump has signed... the administration have actually changed the definition of what they "perceive" to be a terrorist act.........

so where orlando and san bernidino are still considered to be acts of terror... the attack on the charleston 9 by dylan roof, and the attack on the sikh temple by white supremisists too think to know the difference between sikhs and muslims now are not....

which is why for example you saw trump tweeting and being all over the attack in quebec when a person of interest they were after was moroccan... but when it turned out he was just a witness and the person who did it was a far right white activist... all you got was radio silence

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"This is getting a bit weird. I read a hint of this before but it seems to be a "thing" in the US that white people are not being charged with terrorism as they aren't influenced by non-US citizens. Their hate is home-grown

'A man who allegedly plotted to carry out an attack “in the style of Dylann Roof” has been arrested - but not charged under any terrorism laws.'

The charge could be changed of course.

"Benjamin Thomas Samuel McDowell, 29, was detained by the FBI in South Carolina on Wednesday for illegally buying a gun with the intention of carrying out a mass shooting “against non-whites”. He was charged with possession of a fire arm."

that is because in one of the EO Trump has signed... the administration have actually changed the definition of what they "perceive" to be a terrorist act.........

so where orlando and san bernidino are still considered to be acts of terror... the attack on the charleston 9 by dylan roof, and the attack on the sikh temple by white supremisists too think to know the difference between sikhs and muslims now are not....

which is why for example you saw trump tweeting and being all over the attack in quebec when a person of interest they were after was moroccan... but when it turned out he was just a witness and the person who did it was a far right white activist... all you got was radio silence"

We got radio silence on this thread also..

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"This is getting a bit weird. I read a hint of this before but it seems to be a "thing" in the US that white people are not being charged with terrorism as they aren't influenced by non-US citizens. Their hate is home-grown

'A man who allegedly plotted to carry out an attack “in the style of Dylann Roof” has been arrested - but not charged under any terrorism laws.'

The charge could be changed of course.

"Benjamin Thomas Samuel McDowell, 29, was detained by the FBI in South Carolina on Wednesday for illegally buying a gun with the intention of carrying out a mass shooting “against non-whites”. He was charged with possession of a fire arm."

that is because in one of the EO Trump has signed... the administration have actually changed the definition of what they "perceive" to be a terrorist act.........

so where orlando and san bernidino are still considered to be acts of terror... the attack on the charleston 9 by dylan roof, and the attack on the sikh temple by white supremisists too think to know the difference between sikhs and muslims now are not....

which is why for example you saw trump tweeting and being all over the attack in quebec when a person of interest they were after was moroccan... but when it turned out he was just a witness and the person who did it was a far right white activist... all you got was radio silence We got radio silence on this thread also.. "

No Silence from me ! All terrisist attacks are wrong ! Especially on Sikhs I've always liked them

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"This is getting a bit weird. I read a hint of this before but it seems to be a "thing" in the US that white people are not being charged with terrorism as they aren't influenced by non-US citizens. Their hate is home-grown

'A man who allegedly plotted to carry out an attack “in the style of Dylann Roof” has been arrested - but not charged under any terrorism laws.'

The charge could be changed of course.

"Benjamin Thomas Samuel McDowell, 29, was detained by the FBI in South Carolina on Wednesday for illegally buying a gun with the intention of carrying out a mass shooting “against non-whites”. He was charged with possession of a fire arm."

that is because in one of the EO Trump has signed... the administration have actually changed the definition of what they "perceive" to be a terrorist act.........

so where orlando and san bernidino are still considered to be acts of terror... the attack on the charleston 9 by dylan roof, and the attack on the sikh temple by white supremisists too think to know the difference between sikhs and muslims now are not....

which is why for example you saw trump tweeting and being all over the attack in quebec when a person of interest they were after was moroccan... but when it turned out he was just a witness and the person who did it was a far right white activist... all you got was radio silence We got radio silence on this thread also..

No Silence from me ! All terrisist attacks are wrong ! Especially on Sikhs I've always liked them "

Yes ive known many sikhs.I remember the sikh on the tube post 7/7 who had on his back pack "I'm a Sikh dont freak! " Good people who like a drink also.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"This is getting a bit weird. I read a hint of this before but it seems to be a "thing" in the US that white people are not being charged with terrorism as they aren't influenced by non-US citizens. Their hate is home-grown

'A man who allegedly plotted to carry out an attack “in the style of Dylann Roof” has been arrested - but not charged under any terrorism laws.'

The charge could be changed of course.

"Benjamin Thomas Samuel McDowell, 29, was detained by the FBI in South Carolina on Wednesday for illegally buying a gun with the intention of carrying out a mass shooting “against non-whites”. He was charged with possession of a fire arm."

that is because in one of the EO Trump has signed... the administration have actually changed the definition of what they "perceive" to be a terrorist act.........

so where orlando and san bernidino are still considered to be acts of terror... the attack on the charleston 9 by dylan roof, and the attack on the sikh temple by white supremisists too think to know the difference between sikhs and muslims now are not....

which is why for example you saw trump tweeting and being all over the attack in quebec when a person of interest they were after was moroccan... but when it turned out he was just a witness and the person who did it was a far right white activist... all you got was radio silence We got radio silence on this thread also..

No Silence from me ! All terrisist attacks are wrong ! Especially on Sikhs I've always liked them Yes ive known many sikhs.I remember the sikh on the tube post 7/7 who had on his back pack "I'm a Sikh dont freak! " Good people who like a drink also. "

Our local Sikh shop owner ( not a paki shop ! ) as everyone called it ! Used to shut x mad day he called it his big holiday lol , but used to tell my dad to ring the bell if he was stuck for out

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"This is getting a bit weird. I read a hint of this before but it seems to be a "thing" in the US that white people are not being charged with terrorism as they aren't influenced by non-US citizens. Their hate is home-grown

'A man who allegedly plotted to carry out an attack “in the style of Dylann Roof” has been arrested - but not charged under any terrorism laws.'

The charge could be changed of course.

"Benjamin Thomas Samuel McDowell, 29, was detained by the FBI in South Carolina on Wednesday for illegally buying a gun with the intention of carrying out a mass shooting “against non-whites”. He was charged with possession of a fire arm."

that is because in one of the EO Trump has signed... the administration have actually changed the definition of what they "perceive" to be a terrorist act.........

so where orlando and san bernidino are still considered to be acts of terror... the attack on the charleston 9 by dylan roof, and the attack on the sikh temple by white supremisists too think to know the difference between sikhs and muslims now are not....

which is why for example you saw trump tweeting and being all over the attack in quebec when a person of interest they were after was moroccan... but when it turned out he was just a witness and the person who did it was a far right white activist... all you got was radio silence We got radio silence on this thread also..

No Silence from me ! All terrisist attacks are wrong ! Especially on Sikhs I've always liked them Yes ive known many sikhs.I remember the sikh on the tube post 7/7 who had on his back pack "I'm a Sikh dont freak! " Good people who like a drink also.

Our local Sikh shop owner ( not a paki shop ! ) as everyone called it ! Used to shut x mad day he called it his big holiday lol , but used to tell my dad to ring the bell if he was stuck for out "

Sikhs are lovely people.I had fun with a lovely married sikh women once in Manchester while renovating her house. Good times.Good people.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"This is getting a bit weird. I read a hint of this before but it seems to be a "thing" in the US that white people are not being charged with terrorism as they aren't influenced by non-US citizens. Their hate is home-grown

'A man who allegedly plotted to carry out an attack “in the style of Dylann Roof” has been arrested - but not charged under any terrorism laws.'

The charge could be changed of course.

"Benjamin Thomas Samuel McDowell, 29, was detained by the FBI in South Carolina on Wednesday for illegally buying a gun with the intention of carrying out a mass shooting “against non-whites”. He was charged with possession of a fire arm."

that is because in one of the EO Trump has signed... the administration have actually changed the definition of what they "perceive" to be a terrorist act.........

so where orlando and san bernidino are still considered to be acts of terror... the attack on the charleston 9 by dylan roof, and the attack on the sikh temple by white supremisists too think to know the difference between sikhs and muslims now are not....

which is why for example you saw trump tweeting and being all over the attack in quebec when a person of interest they were after was moroccan... but when it turned out he was just a witness and the person who did it was a far right white activist... all you got was radio silence We got radio silence on this thread also..

No Silence from me ! All terrisist attacks are wrong ! Especially on Sikhs I've always liked them Yes ive known many sikhs.I remember the sikh on the tube post 7/7 who had on his back pack "I'm a Sikh dont freak! " Good people who like a drink also.

Our local Sikh shop owner ( not a paki shop ! ) as everyone called it ! Used to shut x mad day he called it his big holiday lol , but used to tell my dad to ring the bell if he was stuck for out Sikhs are lovely people.I had fun with a lovely married sikh women once in Manchester while renovating her house. Good times.Good people. "

Yes I know we shouldn't generalise but I agree

And I've never heard of a Sikh Terroist !

I've heard of Muslim , Christian , Hindu , but not a Sikh Teroist !

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"This is getting a bit weird. I read a hint of this before but it seems to be a "thing" in the US that white people are not being charged with terrorism as they aren't influenced by non-US citizens. Their hate is home-grown

'A man who allegedly plotted to carry out an attack “in the style of Dylann Roof” has been arrested - but not charged under any terrorism laws.'

The charge could be changed of course.

"Benjamin Thomas Samuel McDowell, 29, was detained by the FBI in South Carolina on Wednesday for illegally buying a gun with the intention of carrying out a mass shooting “against non-whites”. He was charged with possession of a fire arm."

that is because in one of the EO Trump has signed... the administration have actually changed the definition of what they "perceive" to be a terrorist act.........

so where orlando and san bernidino are still considered to be acts of terror... the attack on the charleston 9 by dylan roof, and the attack on the sikh temple by white supremisists too think to know the difference between sikhs and muslims now are not....

which is why for example you saw trump tweeting and being all over the attack in quebec when a person of interest they were after was moroccan... but when it turned out he was just a witness and the person who did it was a far right white activist... all you got was radio silence We got radio silence on this thread also..

No Silence from me ! All terrisist attacks are wrong ! Especially on Sikhs I've always liked them Yes ive known many sikhs.I remember the sikh on the tube post 7/7 who had on his back pack "I'm a Sikh dont freak! " Good people who like a drink also.

Our local Sikh shop owner ( not a paki shop ! ) as everyone called it ! Used to shut x mad day he called it his big holiday lol , but used to tell my dad to ring the bell if he was stuck for out Sikhs are lovely people.I had fun with a lovely married sikh women once in Manchester while renovating her house. Good times.Good people.

Yes I know we shouldn't generalise but I agree

And I've never heard of a Sikh Terroist !

I've heard of Muslim , Christian , Hindu , but not a Sikh Teroist ! "

True.We shouldn't generalise. But unlike Christians and Muslims they dont want to convert you to their religon.The singhs and kaurs of the uk are welcome in my book.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *vsnikkiTV/TS  over a year ago

Limavady


"This is getting a bit weird. I read a hint of this before but it seems to be a "thing" in the US that white people are not being charged with terrorism as they aren't influenced by non-US citizens. Their hate is home-grown

'A man who allegedly plotted to carry out an attack “in the style of Dylann Roof” has been arrested - but not charged under any terrorism laws.'

The charge could be changed of course.

"Benjamin Thomas Samuel McDowell, 29, was detained by the FBI in South Carolina on Wednesday for illegally buying a gun with the intention of carrying out a mass shooting “against non-whites”. He was charged with possession of a fire arm."

that is because in one of the EO Trump has signed... the administration have actually changed the definition of what they "perceive" to be a terrorist act.........

so where orlando and san bernidino are still considered to be acts of terror... the attack on the charleston 9 by dylan roof, and the attack on the sikh temple by white supremisists too think to know the difference between sikhs and muslims now are not....

which is why for example you saw trump tweeting and being all over the attack in quebec when a person of interest they were after was moroccan... but when it turned out he was just a witness and the person who did it was a far right white activist... all you got was radio silence We got radio silence on this thread also..

No Silence from me ! All terrisist attacks are wrong ! Especially on Sikhs I've always liked them Yes ive known many sikhs.I remember the sikh on the tube post 7/7 who had on his back pack "I'm a Sikh dont freak! " Good people who like a drink also.

Our local Sikh shop owner ( not a paki shop ! ) as everyone called it ! Used to shut x mad day he called it his big holiday lol , but used to tell my dad to ring the bell if he was stuck for out Sikhs are lovely people.I had fun with a lovely married sikh women once in Manchester while renovating her house. Good times.Good people.

Yes I know we shouldn't generalise but I agree

And I've never heard of a Sikh Terroist !

I've heard of Muslim , Christian , Hindu , but not a Sikh Teroist ! "

I know it's a while ago but there was considerable violence by Sikhs on Muslims during the partition of India in the late 40s.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"This is getting a bit weird. I read a hint of this before but it seems to be a "thing" in the US that white people are not being charged with terrorism as they aren't influenced by non-US citizens. Their hate is home-grown

'A man who allegedly plotted to carry out an attack “in the style of Dylann Roof” has been arrested - but not charged under any terrorism laws.'

The charge could be changed of course.

"Benjamin Thomas Samuel McDowell, 29, was detained by the FBI in South Carolina on Wednesday for illegally buying a gun with the intention of carrying out a mass shooting “against non-whites”. He was charged with possession of a fire arm."

that is because in one of the EO Trump has signed... the administration have actually changed the definition of what they "perceive" to be a terrorist act.........

so where orlando and san bernidino are still considered to be acts of terror... the attack on the charleston 9 by dylan roof, and the attack on the sikh temple by white supremisists too think to know the difference between sikhs and muslims now are not....

which is why for example you saw trump tweeting and being all over the attack in quebec when a person of interest they were after was moroccan... but when it turned out he was just a witness and the person who did it was a far right white activist... all you got was radio silence We got radio silence on this thread also..

No Silence from me ! All terrisist attacks are wrong ! Especially on Sikhs I've always liked them Yes ive known many sikhs.I remember the sikh on the tube post 7/7 who had on his back pack "I'm a Sikh dont freak! " Good people who like a drink also.

Our local Sikh shop owner ( not a paki shop ! ) as everyone called it ! Used to shut x mad day he called it his big holiday lol , but used to tell my dad to ring the bell if he was stuck for out Sikhs are lovely people.I had fun with a lovely married sikh women once in Manchester while renovating her house. Good times.Good people.

Yes I know we shouldn't generalise but I agree

And I've never heard of a Sikh Terroist !

I've heard of Muslim , Christian , Hindu , but not a Sikh Teroist ! True.We shouldn't generalise. But unlike Christians and Muslims they dont want to convert you to their religon.The singhs and kaurs of the uk are welcome in my book.

"

Yes in my U K I P voting book as well

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"Ps I have no truck with right wing Christian terriers I ether , it's just at the moment they are out numbered by Islamic Terroists !!!

I suspect that my terrier is right wing.

Nowt wrong with that I had terrier that was right wing and collies and huskies that were liberal.I think terriers might suffer from small man syndrome. Nothing wrong with being on the right just dont fall off the edge. "

Wow Bob... Unusual but I find myself agreeing with you

Very adequate parallel !

mmm...Liberal Collies make sense to me, after all aren't they herding dogs ? Right type for all those lefty sheep..lol.. And huskies...well they are mostly useful when tied up pulling something , otherwise they just run.... make a noise,or fight amongst themselves...

Yes ..again quite right , there is a danger of falling of the edge....then land on the lefties that have fallen off before

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By *onyxptMan  over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"It's always going to be contentious this issue as has been said many times before , one mans terriers is another mans freedom Fighter !

Mandela , Johnny Adair , Mcguiness, Arafat , Sharron , to name but a few ! Its very contentious.The silence from the Alt. Right in the forum is telling.They can only foam at the mouth at islamic terrorism and look the other way when a Christian minister plans on slaughtering black muslims.I guess they are too busy .

Hows your mate blair ? Bet plenty of iraqi's call him a terrorist

Blair is just a weapons-grade arsehole. He should have stayed away from the public eye instead of returning to spout his ridiculous rubbish and stir the pot. Nothing but lies every time he opens his mouth. Terrorist, yes to many people. War criminal, undoubtedly. Arsehole, one hundred percent.So what are your thoughts on the minister who planned to slaughter muslims."

I think he got confused ! lol.... got d*unk or high on something!

Picked up the Coran or Kuran instead of the Bible, and started reading..... that his holy duty was to kill all infidels

As a devout man he was just doing what the holy book told him

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.0781

0