FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Electoral Interference
Electoral Interference
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By *LCC OP Couple
over a year ago
Cambridge |
Isn't it a bit strange that the U.S. president is blaming the Russians for interfering in the election and that the US will strike back, when the President elect actually ASKED the Russians to hack his opponents emails? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
It's time Obama kept his mouth shut now, he did enough damage helping to start the war in Syria. The Russians couldn't influence the election so by saying things like this it just makes them look more powerful than they are and himself more stupid than he is, if thats possible |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oo hotCouple
over a year ago
North West |
"It's time Obama kept his mouth shut now, he did enough damage helping to start the war in Syria. The Russians couldn't influence the election so by saying things like this it just makes them look more powerful than they are and himself more stupid than he is, if thats possible"
The CIA is a Federal, non political Agency. They would likely know more about what is going on than Donald's mates over at Breitbart.
Then again, we have had enough of experts telling us what we don't want to hear and we now much prefer to hear fake shit presented as news, as long as it fits with our point of view. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It's time Obama kept his mouth shut now, he did enough damage helping to start the war in Syria. The Russians couldn't influence the election so by saying things like this it just makes them look more powerful than they are and himself more stupid than he is, if thats possible
The CIA is a Federal, non political Agency. They would likely know more about what is going on than Donald's mates over at Breitbart.
Then again, we have had enough of experts telling us what we don't want to hear and we now much prefer to hear fake shit presented as news, as long as it fits with our point of view."
You mean like the German minister who said, this week, that the Russians are encouraging sex attacks in Germany to undermine Merkel in the run up to the election?
Talk about getting your excuses in early or what? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *obka3Couple
over a year ago
bournemouth |
"It's time Obama kept his mouth shut now, he did enough damage helping to start the war in Syria. The Russians couldn't influence the election so by saying things like this it just makes them look more powerful than they are and himself more stupid than he is, if thats possible
The CIA is a Federal, non political Agency. They would likely know more about what is going on than Donald's mates over at Breitbart.
Then again, we have had enough of experts telling us what we don't want to hear and we now much prefer to hear fake shit presented as news, as long as it fits with our point of view."
Now remind me were they the non political agency that has tried to distabilise many countries and remove various leaders, oh didnt they admit hacking into frau merkels phone as well, we do it the yanks do it the chinese do it and the russians do it and if anyone believes much of what they get told by governments or media outlets then thye need to get real |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *LCC OP Couple
over a year ago
Cambridge |
"It's time Obama kept his mouth shut now, he did enough damage helping to start the war in Syria. The Russians couldn't influence the election so by saying things like this it just makes them look more powerful than they are and himself more stupid than he is, if thats possible
The CIA is a Federal, non political Agency. They would likely know more about what is going on than Donald's mates over at Breitbart.
Then again, we have had enough of experts telling us what we don't want to hear and we now much prefer to hear fake shit presented as news, as long as it fits with our point of view.
You mean like the German minister who said, this week, that the Russians are encouraging sex attacks in Germany to undermine Merkel in the run up to the election?
Talk about getting your excuses in early or what?"
No, a federal intelligence agency is not the same as a politician. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I'm not bothered who hacked them I'm just bothered about the content of the emails!.
She could have just publicised all her emails, transcripts and speech's of course if she had nothing to hide |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It's time Obama kept his mouth shut now, he did enough damage helping to start the war in Syria. The Russians couldn't influence the election so by saying things like this it just makes them look more powerful than they are and himself more stupid than he is, if thats possible
The CIA is a Federal, non political Agency. They would likely know more about what is going on than Donald's mates over at Breitbart.
Then again, we have had enough of experts telling us what we don't want to hear and we now much prefer to hear fake shit presented as news, as long as it fits with our point of view.
You mean like the German minister who said, this week, that the Russians are encouraging sex attacks in Germany to undermine Merkel in the run up to the election?
Talk about getting your excuses in early or what?
No, a federal intelligence agency is not the same as a politician."
No now you are telling me that politicians are not experts?
I'm shocked. Whatever next?  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *LCC OP Couple
over a year ago
Cambridge |
"It's time Obama kept his mouth shut now, he did enough damage helping to start the war in Syria. The Russians couldn't influence the election so by saying things like this it just makes them look more powerful than they are and himself more stupid than he is, if thats possible
The CIA is a Federal, non political Agency. They would likely know more about what is going on than Donald's mates over at Breitbart.
Then again, we have had enough of experts telling us what we don't want to hear and we now much prefer to hear fake shit presented as news, as long as it fits with our point of view.
You mean like the German minister who said, this week, that the Russians are encouraging sex attacks in Germany to undermine Merkel in the run up to the election?
Talk about getting your excuses in early or what?
No, a federal intelligence agency is not the same as a politician.
No now you are telling me that politicians are not experts?
I'm shocked. Whatever next? "
Actually I said a federal intelligence agency was not the same as a politician. But no, i have never said that politicians are experts. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"You mean like the German minister who said, this week, that the Russians are encouraging sex attacks in Germany to undermine Merkel in the run up to the election?
Talk about getting your excuses in early or what?"
Merkel and her cronies are turning political correctness and hand-washing (of responsibility) into an art form. Thanks to their reckless, open door policy to illegal immigrants Cologne police and no doubt other police forces are increasing the police presence at this year's New Year's celebrations TENFOLD in order to protect German women from Merkel's guests. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I'm not bothered who hacked them I'm just bothered about the content of the emails!.
She could have just publicised all her emails, transcripts and speech's of course if she had nothing to hide"
Exactly! What is the accusation of Obama and Hillary Clinton cronies?
Something along the lines of....."You Russians hacked Hillary's emails and released them into the public domain, so rather than our public propaganda on mainstream news like CNN that we wanted everyone to swallow, the public got a cold hard look at the reality of Hillary Clinton's personal private emails which were truthful and factual but we didn't want anyone to see it or hear the truth in the emails".
It seems Obama is accusing Russia of exposing the truth, lol.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
Now remind me were they the non political agency that has tried to distabilise many countries and remove various leaders, oh didnt they admit hacking into frau merkels phone as well, we do it the yanks do it the chinese do it and the russians do it and if anyone believes much of what they get told by governments or media outlets then thye need to get real "
.
Yes it's kinda hilarious that the CIA should complain about a foreign government medaling in other country's elections to get a right politican elected....I mean that's they're business, they've spent 70 years doing just that in el Salvador, Nicaragua , Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan , Pakistan , Libya, Syria , Cuba, Chile, Argentina, Philippines, Indonesia, Panama, Ukraine, Costa Rica, Venezuela....
I mean even dear old Hillary is on record saying.... I'm not happy about the elections in Palestine, I wasn't in favour of letting them have one and if we were going to the least we should have done was something to make sure we got the person we wanted elected!!! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'm not bothered who hacked them I'm just bothered about the content of the emails!.
She could have just publicised all her emails, transcripts and speech's of course if she had nothing to hide
Exactly! What is the accusation of Obama and Hillary Clinton cronies?
Something along the lines of....."You Russians hacked Hillary's emails and released them into the public domain, so rather than our public propaganda on mainstream news like CNN that we wanted everyone to swallow, the public got a cold hard look at the reality of Hillary Clinton's personal private emails which were truthful and factual but we didn't want anyone to see it or hear the truth in the emails".
It seems Obama is accusing Russia of exposing the truth, lol. "
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"It's time Obama kept his mouth shut now, he did enough damage helping to start the war in Syria. The Russians couldn't influence the election so by saying things like this it just makes them look more powerful than they are and himself more stupid than he is, if thats possible
The CIA is a Federal, non political Agency. They would likely know more about what is going on than Donald's mates over at Breitbart.
Then again, we have had enough of experts telling us what we don't want to hear and we now much prefer to hear fake shit presented as news, as long as it fits with our point of view."
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *abioMan
over a year ago
Newcastle and Gateshead |
"I'm not bothered who hacked them I'm just bothered about the content of the emails!.
She could have just publicised all her emails, transcripts and speech's of course if she had nothing to hide"
it wasn't her emails they hacked.... it was john podesta's (her campaign manager).... and the DNC's, (her parties) of which 14 different federal and public agencies has already pointed the finger at russia....
do you ever wonder why if was only one side's mails that were hacked and not the other???
russian's give the info to wikileaks... wikileaks give them to the world....
and the day after the election... funny enough all the leaks stopped being published..... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
Now remind me were they the non political agency that has tried to distabilise many countries and remove various leaders, oh didnt they admit hacking into frau merkels phone as well, we do it the yanks do it the chinese do it and the russians do it and if anyone believes much of what they get told by governments or media outlets then thye need to get real .
Yes it's kinda hilarious that the CIA should complain about a foreign government medaling in other country's elections to get a right politican elected....I mean that's they're business, they've spent 70 years doing just that in el Salvador, Nicaragua , Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan , Pakistan , Libya, Syria , Cuba, Chile, Argentina, Philippines, Indonesia, Panama, Ukraine, Costa Rica, Venezuela....
I mean even dear old Hillary is on record saying.... I'm not happy about the elections in Palestine, I wasn't in favour of letting them have one and if we were going to the least we should have done was something to make sure we got the person we wanted elected!!!"
Just saw Obama on the 10 o clock news saying "we don't want outside influence in our elections". This from the man who stuck his nose in our EU referendum campaign. You really couldn't make it up. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'm not bothered who hacked them I'm just bothered about the content of the emails!.
She could have just publicised all her emails, transcripts and speech's of course if she had nothing to hide
it wasn't her emails they hacked.... it was john podesta's (her campaign manager).... and the DNC's, (her parties) of which 14 different federal and public agencies has already pointed the finger at russia....
do you ever wonder why if was only one side's mails that were hacked and not the other???
russian's give the info to wikileaks... wikileaks give them to the world....
and the day after the election... funny enough all the leaks stopped being published..... "
.
Yes I'm with you mate, I'm just saying the Russians didn't force the DNC, podesta, or Clinton to be A bunch of twats, they did that all on their own....
Don't get me wrong I'm no trump fan, the man's a fucking loon... But I wouldn't not slag Hillary off for being a corrupt shit bag just because the loon might get in, to me there two sides of the same coin, she's just a lot slicker than him |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'm not bothered who hacked them I'm just bothered about the content of the emails!.
She could have just publicised all her emails, transcripts and speech's of course if she had nothing to hide
it wasn't her emails they hacked.... it was john podesta's (her campaign manager).... and the DNC's, (her parties) of which 14 different federal and public agencies has already pointed the finger at russia....
do you ever wonder why if was only one side's mails that were hacked and not the other???
russian's give the info to wikileaks... wikileaks give them to the world....
and the day after the election... funny enough all the leaks stopped being published..... .
Yes I'm with you mate, I'm just saying the Russians didn't force the DNC, podesta, or Clinton to be A bunch of twats, they did that all on their own....
Don't get me wrong I'm no trump fan, the man's a fucking loon... But I wouldn't not slag Hillary off for being a corrupt shit bag just because the loon might get in, to me there two sides of the same coin, she's just a lot slicker than him"
All politicians are shit bags |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I'm not bothered who hacked them I'm just bothered about the content of the emails!.
She could have just publicised all her emails, transcripts and speech's of course if she had nothing to hide
it wasn't her emails they hacked.... it was john podesta's (her campaign manager).... and the DNC's, (her parties) of which 14 different federal and public agencies has already pointed the finger at russia....
do you ever wonder why if was only one side's mails that were hacked and not the other???
russian's give the info to wikileaks... wikileaks give them to the world....
and the day after the election... funny enough all the leaks stopped being published..... .
Yes I'm with you mate, I'm just saying the Russians didn't force the DNC, podesta, or Clinton to be A bunch of twats, they did that all on their own....
Don't get me wrong I'm no trump fan, the man's a fucking loon... But I wouldn't not slag Hillary off for being a corrupt shit bag just because the loon might get in, to me there two sides of the same coin, she's just a lot slicker than him
All politicians are shit bags"
How can yo.........
That is not tr..........
That is unf...........
No, on second thought you are right. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
According to the mail, an ex British ambassador who works at wiki leaks says he flew to Washington to collect the emails from a bunch of disgruntled DNC party workers who were finally pushed into after seeing Hillary and the dnc blatantly rig the democratic primaries against Bernie sanders!.
Who knows if the daily mail story is correct but then who knows if the CIA aren't just lying about Russia? I mean it wouldn't be the first time would it!!, it's not like the CIA has shown us any evidence for it |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"According to the mail, an ex British ambassador who works at wiki leaks says he flew to Washington to collect the emails from a bunch of disgruntled DNC party workers who were finally pushed into after seeing Hillary and the dnc blatantly rig the democratic primaries against Bernie sanders!.
Who knows if the daily mail story is correct but then who knows if the CIA aren't just lying about Russia? I mean it wouldn't be the first time would it!!, it's not like the CIA has shown us any evidence for it"
Were the CIA honest about Saddam Hussain having weapons of mass destruction? Nuff said I think to prove that they have been less than honest in the past. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'm not bothered who hacked them I'm just bothered about the content of the emails!.
She could have just publicised all her emails, transcripts and speech's of course if she had nothing to hide"
The true story here.
obama just needs to go away he came in blaming everyone prior to him for his blunders and now he is trying to blame his replacements for his blunders.
He is an absolute delusional wack job |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I'm not bothered who hacked them I'm just bothered about the content of the emails!.
She could have just publicised all her emails, transcripts and speech's of course if she had nothing to hide
The true story here.
obama just needs to go away he came in blaming everyone prior to him for his blunders and now he is trying to blame his replacements for his blunders.
He is an absolute delusional wack job"
I'd second that, the sooner Obama fucks off out of office the better. Hopefully the new President elect Donald Trump can develop much better USA/Russia relations which will be for the better not only for the USA and Russia but for the rest of the world too. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *abioMan
over a year ago
Newcastle and Gateshead |
"
I'd second that, the sooner Obama fucks off out of office the better. Hopefully the new President elect Donald Trump can develop much better USA/Russia relations which will be for the better not only for the USA and Russia but for the rest of the world too. "
ya think.... whilst blundering in a policy that will cause some sort of effect in the US/China relationship instead...
ya... world safer.... riiiiiight!!! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *LCC OP Couple
over a year ago
Cambridge |
"I'm not bothered who hacked them I'm just bothered about the content of the emails!.
She could have just publicised all her emails, transcripts and speech's of course if she had nothing to hide
The true story here.
obama just needs to go away he came in blaming everyone prior to him for his blunders and now he is trying to blame his replacements for his blunders.
He is an absolute delusional wack job
I'd second that, the sooner Obama fucks off out of office the better. Hopefully the new President elect Donald Trump can develop much better USA/Russia relations which will be for the better not only for the USA and Russia but for the rest of the world too. "
Well Trump has to pay back Putin for winning the elction for him. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I'm not bothered who hacked them I'm just bothered about the content of the emails!.
She could have just publicised all her emails, transcripts and speech's of course if she had nothing to hide
The true story here.
obama just needs to go away he came in blaming everyone prior to him for his blunders and now he is trying to blame his replacements for his blunders.
He is an absolute delusional wack job
I'd second that, the sooner Obama fucks off out of office the better. Hopefully the new President elect Donald Trump can develop much better USA/Russia relations which will be for the better not only for the USA and Russia but for the rest of the world too.
Well Trump has to pay back Putin for winning the elction for him."
So Putin (allegedly) exposed the truth in the Clinton campaign private emails and made them public knowledge, and how the democrat party rigged the primaries against Sanders. Hillary Clinton is the crooked one who brought about her own demise with the content in the emails. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Isn't it a bit strange that the U.S. president is blaming the Russians for interfering in the election and that the US will strike back, when the President elect actually ASKED the Russians to hack his opponents emails? "
julian assange in a interview yesterday with sean hannity said that wikileaks did not get its leaked documents from the Russians but from an insider.
But go ahead keep on blaming the russians for everything just like hillary.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"julian assange in a interview yesterday with sean hannity said that wikileaks did not get its leaked documents from the Russians but from an insider.
But go ahead keep on blaming the russians for everything just like hillary.
"
And of course the man who has been held up in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London since 2012 because he is wanted dead or alive by the US government is going to say he got information from the Russians...  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"julian assange in a interview yesterday with sean hannity said that wikileaks did not get its leaked documents from the Russians but from an insider.
But go ahead keep on blaming the russians for everything just like hillary.
And of course the man who has been held up in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London since 2012 because he is wanted dead or alive by the US government is going to say he got information from the Russians... "
I believe what assange says over the same group of people that told everyone that saddam had weapons of mass destruction any day of the week. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *LCC OP Couple
over a year ago
Cambridge |
"julian assange in a interview yesterday with sean hannity said that wikileaks did not get its leaked documents from the Russians but from an insider.
But go ahead keep on blaming the russians for everything just like hillary.
And of course the man who has been held up in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London since 2012 because he is wanted dead or alive by the US government is going to say he got information from the Russians...
I believe what assange says over the same group of people that told everyone that saddam had weapons of mass destruction any day of the week."
So did the security services say there were WMD and Blair was as innocently taken in by them as everyone else, or did Blair and his team embellish and "sex up" the intelligence reports meaning that the security services didn't actually say there were WMD in Iraq? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *LCC OP Couple
over a year ago
Cambridge |
"So did the security services say there were WMD and Blair was as innocently taken in by them as everyone else, or did Blair and his team embellish and "sex up" the intelligence reports meaning that the security services didn't actually say there were WMD in Iraq?
Of course we all know it was Tone after he had had a chat with his mate doublU. But why let the facts as proven in the documents get in the way of refusing to believe those who spend their working lives trying to keep us safe? Much better to believe the man who is facing the death penalty for aiding hostile powers if the USA gets hold of him. Because he would have no reason to sew discord in the US political system. "
Don't you just love catching people in their own arguments? Tying them up in their own logic! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"So did the security services say there were WMD and Blair was as innocently taken in by them as everyone else, or did Blair and his team embellish and "sex up" the intelligence reports meaning that the security services didn't actually say there were WMD in Iraq?
Of course we all know it was Tone after he had had a chat with his mate doublU. But why let the facts as proven in the documents get in the way of refusing to believe those who spend their working lives trying to keep us safe? Much better to believe the man who is facing the death penalty for aiding hostile powers if the USA gets hold of him. Because he would have no reason to sew discord in the US political system.
Don't you just love catching people in their own arguments? Tying them up in their own logic! "
no ones caught anyone up with anything.
all I know is I trust assange when he says his source was from inside the us goverment than I do the us goverment saying it was the russians.
simple as that.
you can choose to think anything you want to, thats your perogative to do so.
end of the day it doesn't matter where the information came from when that information is based on facts.
it was rightfully brought into the public domain, whether it was russia or a inside whistle blower does not matter when the truth exposed the Clintons for what they are.
now carry on posting nonsense and BS like majority of your posts.
You're just a sore loser over brexit and now again over the US elections.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"end of the day it doesn't matter where the information came from when that information is based on facts."
Absolutely wrong!
In fact there is even precedent in recent US history regarding the use of stolen documents to discredit a candidate prior to a Presidential Election.
The president involved was on Richard Millhouse Nixon, the thefts were from the Democratic Headquarters in the Watergate Building and the conspirators were The Committee to Reelect the President, the result being the impeachment of above named 'tricky dicky'.
This time there was live coverage of a Presidential candidate asking the Russian President to have his security services hack the email accounts of the democratic party and publish anything damming they found. That my friend is 'incitement' and that is criminal!
That Trump would ask the head of a hostile foreign power to do it publicly and then claim that it is his right to that and tell his supporters to beat up hecklers as his utterances are covered by the 1st. amendment of the US constitution is beyond the pale! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"end of the day it doesn't matter where the information came from when that information is based on facts.
Absolutely wrong!
In fact there is even precedent in recent US history regarding the use of stolen documents to discredit a candidate prior to a Presidential Election.
The president involved was on Richard Millhouse Nixon, the thefts were from the Democratic Headquarters in the Watergate Building and the conspirators were The Committee to Reelect the President, the result being the impeachment of above named 'tricky dicky'.
This time there was live coverage of a Presidential candidate asking the Russian President to have his security services hack the email accounts of the democratic party and publish anything damming they found. That my friend is 'incitement' and that is criminal!
That Trump would ask the head of a hostile foreign power to do it publicly and then claim that it is his right to that and tell his supporters to beat up hecklers as his utterances are covered by the 1st. amendment of the US constitution is beyond the pale!"
So you'd rather the true and factual information about the primaries being rigged against Bernie Sanders was kept hidden from the public then, plus all the other corrupt crap the Clinton's were embroiled in which was exposed in the release of the emails? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"end of the day it doesn't matter where the information came from when that information is based on facts.
Absolutely wrong!
In fact there is even precedent in recent US history regarding the use of stolen documents to discredit a candidate prior to a Presidential Election.
The president involved was on Richard Millhouse Nixon, the thefts were from the Democratic Headquarters in the Watergate Building and the conspirators were The Committee to Reelect the President, the result being the impeachment of above named 'tricky dicky'.
This time there was live coverage of a Presidential candidate asking the Russian President to have his security services hack the email accounts of the democratic party and publish anything damming they found. That my friend is 'incitement' and that is criminal!
That Trump would ask the head of a hostile foreign power to do it publicly and then claim that it is his right to that and tell his supporters to beat up hecklers as his utterances are covered by the 1st. amendment of the US constitution is beyond the pale!"
you do realise that wikileaks was already dumping leaked classified documents about hillary way before trump said what he said.
and if you think trump was serious when he said in jest for russia to hack clintons emails you are very naive.
Also whats this about " hostile foreign power" ?
Only hostile country in the past 2 decades has been the US with the obama, bush,clinton governments making regime change after regime change and causing a destabilised middle east and the vast majority of the terrorism we have today.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"So you'd rather the true and factual information about the primaries being rigged against Bernie Sanders was kept hidden from the public then, plus all the other corrupt crap the Clinton's were embroiled in which was exposed in the release of the emails? "
No, I think Bernie was burned by the Democratic party elite, and I am all in favour of total transparency. That means everyone's mails, emails and DNA should be available for law enforcement.
However while that is not the case everyone and every organisation must have their privacy totally protected. There can not be one set of rules for those you approve of and another for those you don't.
That is the whole point of law! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"you do realise that wikileaks was already dumping leaked classified documents about hillary way before trump said what he said.
and if you think trump was serious when he said in jest for russia to hack clintons emails you are very naive.
Also whats this about " hostile foreign power" ?
Only hostile country in the past 2 decades has been the US with the obama, bush,clinton governments making regime change after regime change and causing a destabilised middle east and the vast majority of the terrorism we have today.
"
WoW!
Trump jests...
Would that include hit them Ill pay the legal costs if your prosecuted?
Or "Lock her up!"
Or "If she weren't my daughter I'd do her, she is a fine bit of ass".
Or "you can do anything when your famous".
And how does the USA is the only hostile country work?
How about Russia invading Chechnya?
Or Russia invading Ukraine?
Or Iraq invading Kuwait?
Or Afghanistan hosting international terrorists and helping them attack the USA?
Or Syria attacking Lebanon?
Seems to me that you have a very selective memory, and an even more selective view of what is morally OK.
By the way if you incite crime and someone acts on it you share responsibility and claiming it was a joke does not absolve you of that responsibility. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"you do realise that wikileaks was already dumping leaked classified documents about hillary way before trump said what he said.
and if you think trump was serious when he said in jest for russia to hack clintons emails you are very naive.
Also whats this about " hostile foreign power" ?
Only hostile country in the past 2 decades has been the US with the obama, bush,clinton governments making regime change after regime change and causing a destabilised middle east and the vast majority of the terrorism we have today.
WoW!
Trump jests...
Would that include hit them Ill pay the legal costs if your prosecuted?
Or "Lock her up!"
Or "If she weren't my daughter I'd do her, she is a fine bit of ass".
Or "you can do anything when your famous".
And how does the USA is the only hostile country work?
How about Russia invading Chechnya?
Or Russia invading Ukraine?
Or Iraq invading Kuwait?
Or Afghanistan hosting international terrorists and helping them attack the USA?
Or Syria attacking Lebanon?
Seems to me that you have a very selective memory, and an even more selective view of what is morally OK.
By the way if you incite crime and someone acts on it you share responsibility and claiming it was a joke does not absolve you of that responsibility. "
"Lock her up"
I hope he was serious about that.
"If she weren't my daughter id be doing her shes a fine bit of ass"
He never ever said that he said "if ivanka wasn't his daughter he would date her"
Nice miss qoute there
"You can do anything when your famouse"
Another misquote.
He said "they let you do anything when your famouse"
Which we all know is true women throw them selfs at celebritys all the time.
also he apologised for saying that ten years ago.
"Russia invading ukraine"
Sorry but russia took back crimera without a gun fired or anyone killed and its what the people of crimera wanted as ukraine was in a state of disorder and they took back crimera which was given to ukraine during when ukraine was part of the soviet union.
they took it back before the west could take advantage and use it strategically and I dont blame russia for doing so as the aggressive west is putting missile systems ever closer around russias borders.
your just clutching at straws with the rest. ..yes I know theres been conflicts with other countrys but your just ignoring my point that the US has invaded and brought regine change to multiple country's this past decade and are the worlds aggressors.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"you do realise that wikileaks was already dumping leaked classified documents about hillary way before trump said what he said.
and if you think trump was serious when he said in jest for russia to hack clintons emails you are very naive.
Also whats this about " hostile foreign power" ?
Only hostile country in the past 2 decades has been the US with the obama, bush,clinton governments making regime change after regime change and causing a destabilised middle east and the vast majority of the terrorism we have today.
WoW!
Trump jests...
Would that include hit them Ill pay the legal costs if your prosecuted?
Or "Lock her up!"
Or "If she weren't my daughter I'd do her, she is a fine bit of ass".
Or "you can do anything when your famous".
And how does the USA is the only hostile country work?
How about Russia invading Chechnya?
Or Russia invading Ukraine?
Or Iraq invading Kuwait?
Or Afghanistan hosting international terrorists and helping them attack the USA?
Or Syria attacking Lebanon?
Seems to me that you have a very selective memory, and an even more selective view of what is morally OK.
By the way if you incite crime and someone acts on it you share responsibility and claiming it was a joke does not absolve you of that responsibility.
"Lock her up"
I hope he was serious about that.
"If she weren't my daughter id be doing her shes a fine bit of ass"
He never ever said that he said "if ivanka wasn't his daughter he would date her"
Nice miss qoute there
"You can do anything when your famouse"
Another misquote.
He said "they let you do anything when your famouse"
Which we all know is true women throw them selfs at celebritys all the time.
also he apologised for saying that ten years ago.
"Russia invading ukraine"
Sorry but russia took back crimera without a gun fired or anyone killed and its what the people of crimera wanted as ukraine was in a state of disorder and they took back crimera which was given to ukraine during when ukraine was part of the soviet union.
they took it back before the west could take advantage and use it strategically and I dont blame russia for doing so as the aggressive west is putting missile systems ever closer around russias borders.
your just clutching at straws with the rest. ..yes I know theres been conflicts with other countrys but your just ignoring my point that the US has invaded and brought regine change to multiple country's this past decade and are the worlds aggressors.
"
.. ..well said. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
