FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > englands richest woman
englands richest woman
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
when englands richest woman wants one of her doss houses to have a bit of a make over - who pays ? well certianly not her  looks like the rest of us will be stumping up the loot |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *obka3Couple
over a year ago
bournemouth |
"when englands richest woman wants one of her doss houses to have a bit of a make over - who pays ? well certianly not her looks like the rest of us will be stumping up the loot "
If you rentor live in a tied house do you or the landlord pay for the upkeep ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"when englands richest woman wants one of her doss houses to have a bit of a make over - who pays ? well certianly not her looks like the rest of us will be stumping up the loot
If you rentor live in a tied house do you or the landlord pay for the upkeep ? "
this.. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ammskiMan
over a year ago
lytham st.annes |
"when englands richest woman wants one of her doss houses to have a bit of a make over - who pays ? well certianly not her looks like the rest of us will be stumping up the loot
If you rentor live in a tied house do you or the landlord pay for the upkeep ?
this.."
. But does she pay rent and who too !!! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
She doesn't own Buck house it's held in trust by Crown estates.
So maybe Crown estates should pay for the re furb.Although I do believe it is publicly funded, so yes we will be picking up the tab
On a personal note I do not believe the public should pay for the re furb just like I do not think the public should pay for royal weddings.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"She doesn't own Buck house it's held in trust by Crown estates.
So maybe Crown estates should pay for the re furb.Although I do believe it is publicly funded, so yes we will be picking up the tab
On a personal note I do not believe the public should pay for the re furb just like I do not think the public should pay for royal weddings.
the public shouldnt be paying for anything royal , if they want a wedding then let them do what the rest of us do , pay for it themselves
"
if they have an urge to stay in rented accom then there are a few places in glasgow i wouldnt mind putting them in but i am not sure they would be too keen |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"She doesn't own Buck house it's held in trust by Crown estates.
So maybe Crown estates should pay for the re furb.Although I do believe it is publicly funded, so yes we will be picking up the tab
On a personal note I do not believe the public should pay for the re furb just like I do not think the public should pay for royal weddings.
"
So using that analogy should not the Royal family get to keep the countless millions that that are generated by the very bieng of the Royal estates?
Tourists don't go to London just to shop 
Ther come to see the pomp and ceremony  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"She doesn't own Buck house it's held in trust by Crown estates.
So maybe Crown estates should pay for the re furb.Although I do believe it is publicly funded, so yes we will be picking up the tab
On a personal note I do not believe the public should pay for the re furb just like I do not think the public should pay for royal weddings.
So using that analogy should not the Royal family get to keep the countless millions that that are generated by the very bieng of the Royal estates?
Tourists don't go to London just to shop
Ther come to see the pomp and ceremony "
i am sure liz wouldnt mind if she didnt have to take a wee ride to the house of lairs every year to read out a shite statement written for her by a bunch of charletons |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"when englands richest woman wants one of her doss houses to have a bit of a make over - who pays ? well certianly not her looks like the rest of us will be stumping up the loot "
When we consider what the Royal Family do for the tourist industry she is a bargain.
The Royal Family do a great job for the country . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *obka3Couple
over a year ago
bournemouth |
"If we pay for it , the palace should be fully open to the public !!!
It would bring in millions !
I think the Queen spends more time at Windsor anyway "
If you lived in a tied house would you allow others in to look round ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"If we pay for it , the palace should be fully open to the public !!!
It would bring in millions !
I think the Queen spends more time at Windsor anyway
If you lived in a tied house would you allow others in to look round ?"
If I was the Queen I would buy it
Problem Solved  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *obka3Couple
over a year ago
bournemouth |
"It already belongs to her...
And the cost to the nation of the Monarchy (privy purse) is little compared to what the nation gets in return."
It belongs to the crown estates but I agree the income she brings in is huge compared to the cost |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It belongs to the crown estates but I agree the income she brings in is huge compared to the cost "
I take it you know the history of the Crown Estates. Maybe you would like to explain to others how the Crown Estates came into being and what would happen to the Crown Estates should parliament decide to revoke the Crown settlement that is the Privy Purse and how much that would cost the the Exchequer. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *obka3Couple
over a year ago
bournemouth |
"It belongs to the crown estates but I agree the income she brings in is huge compared to the cost
I take it you know the history of the Crown Estates. Maybe you would like to explain to others how the Crown Estates came into being and what would happen to the Crown Estates should parliament decide to revoke the Crown settlement that is the Privy Purse and how much that would cost the the Exchequer."
IIRC The crown estate "profit" goes to the government the queen gets a % tofund her role and her maj pays the equivalent amount of tax on her income after paying for all the mionr royals .
Three hundred years ago the monarch paid all the costs of running the country from the income of thecrown estate tax was raised to pay for wars,then parliament started spending lots for "our" benefit and taxed us forthe privilage  ,can we go back to the old ways please |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *obka3Couple
over a year ago
bournemouth |
"It belongs to the crown estates but I agree the income she brings in is huge compared to the cost
I take it you know the history of the Crown Estates. Maybe you would like to explain to others how the Crown Estates came into being and what would happen to the Crown Estates should parliament decide to revoke the Crown settlement that is the Privy Purse and how much that would cost the the Exchequer.
IIRC The crown estate "profit" goes to the government the queen gets a % tofund her role and her maj pays the equivalent amount of tax on her income after paying for all the mionr royals .
Three hundred years ago the monarch paid all the costs of running the country from the income of thecrown estate tax was raised to pay for wars,then parliament started spending lots for "our" benefit and taxed us forthe privilage ,can we go back to the old ways please "
Edit should have put pays an equivalent amount TO taxon income from the privy purse |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Three hundred years ago the monarch paid all the costs of running the country from the income of thecrown estate tax was raised to pay for wars,then parliament started spending lots for "our" benefit and taxed us forthe privilage ,can we go back to the old ways please "
You do realise if we go back to the old system the Crown Estates revert to the Monarchy...
2015/16 the Crown Estate raised £304.1 million for the exchequer, in return the exchequer paid the Crown £40.1 million in the privy purse settlement.
That would mean returning to the old system would cost the country £264 million a year at last years rates. Do those who begrudge the Monarchy its settlement still think we get a bad deal? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *obka3Couple
over a year ago
bournemouth |
"Three hundred years ago the monarch paid all the costs of running the country from the income of thecrown estate tax was raised to pay for wars,then parliament started spending lots for "our" benefit and taxed us forthe privilage ,can we go back to the old ways please
You do realise if we go back to the old system the Crown Estates revert to the Monarchy...
2015/16 the Crown Estate raised £304.1 million for the exchequer, in return the exchequer paid the Crown £40.1 million in the privy purse settlement.
That would mean returning to the old system would cost the country £264 million a year at last years rates. Do those who begrudge the Monarchy its settlement still think we get a bad deal? "
Yes but the monarch would be paying for all the countries bills
I am great believer in the monarchy and think we get very good value from them, we went round the old royal yacht this year,it wasnt at all luxurious especially compared to the likes of philip green's etc, regal yes pretentious no |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I am great believer in the monarchy and think we get very good value from them, we went round the old royal yacht this year,it wasnt at all luxurious especially compared to the likes of philip green's etc, regal yes pretentious no"
So am I. By the way, did you know that the Royal Yacht was the RN's hospital ship prior to being decommissioned. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *obka3Couple
over a year ago
bournemouth |
"I am great believer in the monarchy and think we get very good value from them, we went round the old royal yacht this year,it wasnt at all luxurious especially compared to the likes of philip green's etc, regal yes pretentious no
So am I. By the way, did you know that the Royal Yacht was the RN's hospital ship prior to being decommissioned."
I didnt before we went round it, well worth a couple of hours touring round,some interesting momentos in the dinning room |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"It belongs to the crown estates but I agree the income she brings in is huge compared to the cost
I take it you know the history of the Crown Estates. Maybe you would like to explain to others how the Crown Estates came into being and what would happen to the Crown Estates should parliament decide to revoke the Crown settlement that is the Privy Purse and how much that would cost the the Exchequer.
IIRC The crown estate "profit" goes to the government the queen gets a % tofund her role and her maj pays the equivalent amount of tax on her income after paying for all the mionr royals .
Three hundred years ago the monarch paid all the costs of running the country from the income of thecrown estate tax was raised to pay for wars,then parliament started spending lots for "our" benefit and taxed us forthe privilage ,can we go back to the old ways please "
we should definitely go back to the old ways , and every january 30th we can follow the precident allready set , that should bring in a shite load of tourist cash to keep the country afloat |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *eavenNhellCouple
over a year ago
carrbrook stalybridge |
"I am great believer in the monarchy and think we get very good value from them, we went round the old royal yacht this year,it wasnt at all luxurious especially compared to the likes of philip green's etc, regal yes pretentious no
So am I. By the way, did you know that the Royal Yacht was the RN's hospital ship prior to being decommissioned."
designed to be but never used for as it wouldn't do to lose it not usable by it's absence in the Falklands |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"when englands richest woman wants one of her doss houses to have a bit of a make over - who pays ? well certianly not her looks like the rest of us will be stumping up the loot "
The queen is one of the worlds richest if not the richest. Don't you get it. We are all slaves to the system |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"designed to be but never used for as it wouldn't do to lose it not usable by it's absence in the Falklands "
It didn't go to the Falklands because it was not big enough or stable enough to be able to cope with the South Atlantic in mid winter. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
