FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > fbi and clinton

fbi and clinton

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By *iverpool Lover OP   Man  over a year ago

liverpool

George orwells animal farm book comes to mind when I woke up and seen clinton has been let off by the fbi for the second time.

"All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others".

So a week after they reopened the case and 2 days before the election they let clinton off the hook again despite overwhelming evidence she lied, deleted emails under a surpena, miss handled classified information,was getting her maid to photo copy classified information regularly, not to mention all the dealings with her foundation that ill not go into.

how can the fbi take over a year to get through 300,000 emails the first time and then this time they had 650,000 emails and managed to get through them in a little over a week.

if anyone else had done what hillary had they would be locked up no doubt about it.

There is a military guy locked up earlirr this year for taking a photo on the sub he was stationed in. (As an exsmple at how strict they are when it comes to classified stuff).

It just beggers belief that somone has corrupt as her and it all out in the light shes actually going to get away with it.

not only just get away with it but possibly about to become the next president.

sad sad times.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple  over a year ago

in Lancashire

Or simply no evidence that reaches the threshold that applies?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"if anyone else had done what hillary had they would be locked up no doubt about it."

Do you mean like Secretaries of State Rice, Powell and Kerry who all all used private email servers?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"if anyone else had done what hillary had they would be locked up no doubt about it.

Do you mean like Secretaries of State Rice, Powell and Kerry who all all used private email servers? "

They too should have answered for their crimes. It doesn't mean that she should not. You can't have a criminal in charge of a so called "democracy."

The fact that the FBI have dropped this stinks of corruption.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"if anyone else had done what hillary had they would be locked up no doubt about it.

Do you mean like Secretaries of State Rice, Powell and Kerry who all all used private email servers?

They too should have answered for their crimes. It doesn't mean that she should not. You can't have a criminal in charge of a so called "democracy."

The fact that the FBI have dropped this stinks of corruption."

And yet she hasn't done anything illegal, so not a criminal

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *anes HubbyCouple  over a year ago

Babbacombe Torquay

Clutching at straws.......

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

She is a criminal alright, but she will get away with it, just like her hubby.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *iverpool Lover OP   Man  over a year ago

liverpool


"if anyone else had done what hillary had they would be locked up no doubt about it.

Do you mean like Secretaries of State Rice, Powell and Kerry who all all used private email servers?

They too should have answered for their crimes. It doesn't mean that she should not. You can't have a criminal in charge of a so called "democracy."

The fact that the FBI have dropped this stinks of corruption.

And yet she hasn't done anything illegal, so not a criminal "

But she has the somthing illlegal but like I said "all animals are equal but some are more equal than others"

Simple is that and anyone that votes for her is basically saying they are ok with that.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *anes HubbyCouple  over a year ago

Babbacombe Torquay

No, they are saying they don't believe she is a criminal.....having seen their Federal Bureau of Investigation confirm this.....so they have made an informed choice.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *iverpool Lover OP   Man  over a year ago

liverpool

The stance a lot of you are taking is only because of how much you dislike trump.

If it was anyone else running against hillary that was remotely likable, I'm guessing your stance would be very much different went it comes to whats come out about hillary., not just the emails but the clinton foundation.

which is a shame really.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *anes HubbyCouple  over a year ago

Babbacombe Torquay

My distaste for Trump is minuscule compared to your vitriolic dislike of Clinton.....that's the difference.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"The stance a lot of you are taking is only because of how much you dislike trump.

If it was anyone else running against hillary that was remotely likable, I'm guessing your stance would be very much different went it comes to whats come out about hillary., not just the emails but the clinton foundation.

which is a shame really.

"

If you left out names of the people and country concerned you might easily conclude we were talking about a Banana Republic or a former Soviet bloc State.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Why out of the whole country they could not have found better candidates is what the real tragedy is

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"if anyone else had done what hillary had they would be locked up no doubt about it.

Do you mean like Secretaries of State Rice, Powell and Kerry who all all used private email servers?

They too should have answered for their crimes. It doesn't mean that she should not. You can't have a criminal in charge of a so called "democracy."

The fact that the FBI have dropped this stinks of corruption.

And yet she hasn't done anything illegal, so not a criminal

But she has the somthing illlegal but like I said "all animals are equal but some are more equal than others"

Simple is that and anyone that votes for her is basically saying they are ok with that.

"

Illegal in your mind, but not in the view of the highest law enforcement agency in the US. What makes you more qualified on the the US legal system than the FBI?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *LCCCouple  over a year ago

Cambridge


"The stance a lot of you are taking is only because of how much you dislike trump.

If it was anyone else running against hillary that was remotely likable, I'm guessing your stance would be very much different went it comes to whats come out about hillary., not just the emails but the clinton foundation.

which is a shame really.

"

Well you are saying that she has broken the law in regards to her emails, yet completely ingnoring the fact that the two previous and one subsequent secretaries of state did exactly the same thing. So is she equal to them, or more equal to them?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *anes HubbyCouple  over a year ago

Babbacombe Torquay

It certainly shows the current weakness in the Republican party, any half decent Republcan candidate would have trounced Clinton, yet they are stuck with a man that they as a party clearly don't like......If Trump really had any confidence in himself and his political message he would have, and should have, formed a Third Way party.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *iverpool Lover OP   Man  over a year ago

liverpool


"My distaste for Trump is minuscule compared to your vitriolic dislike of Clinton.....that's the difference.

"

and thats BS just like everything else you post.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *iverpool Lover OP   Man  over a year ago

liverpool


"The stance a lot of you are taking is only because of how much you dislike trump.

If it was anyone else running against hillary that was remotely likable, I'm guessing your stance would be very much different went it comes to whats come out about hillary., not just the emails but the clinton foundation.

which is a shame really.

Well you are saying that she has broken the law in regards to her emails, yet completely ingnoring the fact that the two previous and one subsequent secretaries of state did exactly the same thing. So is she equal to them, or more equal to them? "

i agree they should all be punished but I dont recall a surpena on either of those 2 and still went and deleted emails and physically destroying devices to try and conceal what they did.

I dont recall those 2 having a foundation taking money from foreign countrys for talks in exchange for favours.

using money from their foundation to pay for things like her daughters wedding and 10 years of comfy living, stealing money that was meant for Haiti.

She's corrupt to the core

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"My distaste for Trump is minuscule compared to your vitriolic dislike of Clinton.....that's the difference.

and thats BS just like everything else you post. "

never a truer message written, spot on

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"if anyone else had done what hillary had they would be locked up no doubt about it.

Do you mean like Secretaries of State Rice, Powell and Kerry who all all used private email servers?

They too should have answered for their crimes. It doesn't mean that she should not. You can't have a criminal in charge of a so called "democracy."

The fact that the FBI have dropped this stinks of corruption.

And yet she hasn't done anything illegal, so not a criminal

But she has the somthing illlegal but like I said "all animals are equal but some are more equal than others"

Simple is that and anyone that votes for her is basically saying they are ok with that.

Illegal in your mind, but not in the view of the highest law enforcement agency in the US. What makes you more qualified on the the US legal system than the FBI? "

.

See that's an interesting point.

Now 17 us agencies have said there's no evidence suggest Russia has tried hacking Clinton's emails, only the department of homeland security has suggested it has attempted it..... That's not stopped Clinton from constantly telling everybody that Putin and Russia are actively trying to sabotage her campaign for trump!.

Also I belive she's said when she gets elected "they'll be monetary, political and military" payback for it?.

.

.

If I was an American I'd be voting Jill stein

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *anes HubbyCouple  over a year ago

Babbacombe Torquay


"My distaste for Trump is minuscule compared to your vitriolic dislike of Clinton.....that's the difference.

and thats BS just like everything else you post. "

Well you started the thread, if you only expect responses that agree with you then you will be very dissapointed.....

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *iverpool Lover OP   Man  over a year ago

liverpool


"My distaste for Trump is minuscule compared to your vitriolic dislike of Clinton.....that's the difference.

and thats BS just like everything else you post.

Well you started the thread, if you only expect responses that agree with you then you will be very dissapointed....."

don't expect everyone to agree with my post and happy to debate different opinions, but I will call out BS when I see it and you sir post BS a LOT.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple  over a year ago

in Lancashire


"The stance a lot of you are taking is only because of how much you dislike trump.

If it was anyone else running against hillary that was remotely likable, I'm guessing your stance would be very much different went it comes to whats come out about hillary., not just the emails but the clinton foundation.

which is a shame really.

"

equally there is dirt on Trump or is an objective way not allowed..

they are both far from ideal candidates, based purely on what I have actually seen which is out there in the mainstream media and not on some unaccountable website's with unknown people or maybe other Government's agencies running them then the footage and the audio of Trump of when he spoke about ten year olds and his own daughter plus his public comments are enough for me to say the guy has serious issue's with many area's that make him unfit to be a prospective leader of a nation..

what is a shame is actually saying 'its a shame really' because others have a different view ..

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *iverpool Lover OP   Man  over a year ago

liverpool


"if anyone else had done what hillary had they would be locked up no doubt about it.

Do you mean like Secretaries of State Rice, Powell and Kerry who all all used private email servers?

They too should have answered for their crimes. It doesn't mean that she should not. You can't have a criminal in charge of a so called "democracy."

The fact that the FBI have dropped this stinks of corruption.

And yet she hasn't done anything illegal, so not a criminal

But she has the somthing illlegal but like I said "all animals are equal but some are more equal than others"

Simple is that and anyone that votes for her is basically saying they are ok with that.

Illegal in your mind, but not in the view of the highest law enforcement agency in the US. What makes you more qualified on the the US legal system than the FBI? .

See that's an interesting point.

Now 17 us agencies have said there's no evidence suggest Russia has tried hacking Clinton's emails, only the department of homeland security has suggested it has attempted it..... That's not stopped Clinton from constantly telling everybody that Putin and Russia are actively trying to sabotage her campaign for trump!.

Also I belive she's said when she gets elected "they'll be monetary, political and military" payback for it?.

.

.

If I was an American I'd be voting Jill stein "

if clinton gets in you can be sure sometime within the 4 years shes leader that there will be some kind of war with russia, its on the cards.

which is the main reason I want trump to win, sure hes far from perfect, the one thing hes said and stuck with me throughout all this is that he wants to rebuild relations with russia and that to me is a no brainer for a safer world.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *iverpool Lover OP   Man  over a year ago

liverpool


"The stance a lot of you are taking is only because of how much you dislike trump.

If it was anyone else running against hillary that was remotely likable, I'm guessing your stance would be very much different went it comes to whats come out about hillary., not just the emails but the clinton foundation.

which is a shame really.

equally there is dirt on Trump or is an objective way not allowed..

they are both far from ideal candidates, based purely on what I have actually seen which is out there in the mainstream media and not on some unaccountable website's with unknown people or maybe other Government's agencies running them then the footage and the audio of Trump of when he spoke about ten year olds and his own daughter plus his public comments are enough for me to say the guy has serious issue's with many area's that make him unfit to be a prospective leader of a nation..

what is a shame is actually saying 'its a shame really' because others have a different view .."

well its a shame that you think its a shame that I think its a shame.

shame on me

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple  over a year ago

in Lancashire


"if anyone else had done what hillary had they would be locked up no doubt about it.

Do you mean like Secretaries of State Rice, Powell and Kerry who all all used private email servers?

They too should have answered for their crimes. It doesn't mean that she should not. You can't have a criminal in charge of a so called "democracy."

The fact that the FBI have dropped this stinks of corruption.

And yet she hasn't done anything illegal, so not a criminal

But she has the somthing illlegal but like I said "all animals are equal but some are more equal than others"

Simple is that and anyone that votes for her is basically saying they are ok with that.

Illegal in your mind, but not in the view of the highest law enforcement agency in the US. What makes you more qualified on the the US legal system than the FBI? .

See that's an interesting point.

Now 17 us agencies have said there's no evidence suggest Russia has tried hacking Clinton's emails, only the department of homeland security has suggested it has attempted it..... That's not stopped Clinton from constantly telling everybody that Putin and Russia are actively trying to sabotage her campaign for trump!.

Also I belive she's said when she gets elected "they'll be monetary, political and military" payback for it?.

.

.

If I was an American I'd be voting Jill stein

if clinton gets in you can be sure sometime within the 4 years shes leader that there will be some kind of war with russia, its on the cards.

which is the main reason I want trump to win, sure hes far from perfect, the one thing hes said and stuck with me throughout all this is that he wants to rebuild relations with russia and that to me is a no brainer for a safer world."

why would what he has said about Putin and Russia etc hold any weight given he has been all over the place whenever he has actually spoken about any policies..

he bottled it when he met the Mexican guy about the wall then gave it charley big spuds when he was back on the podium..

he's pretty erratic on policies which is why he has only been negative in his campaign..

be glad when its over..

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Which is why I said I'd vote Jill stein

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Here's a special treat for Clinton fans...the lyrics of a song 'lovingly' sang by someone called Jay Z at another fundraising event for the Clinton Family. It's called: Jigga My Nigga, and I understand Hillary sang along!?

"(Jigga) What’s my motherfuckin name?

(Jigga) And who I’m rollin with huh?

(My niggas) Uh-huh-uh-uhh-uhh-uhh

Niggas better get it right, bitches better get it right, WHO?

(Jigga) What’s my motherfuckin name?

(Jigga) And who I’m rollin with huh?

(My niggas) Uh-huh-uh-uhh-uhh-uhh

Niggas better get it right, bitches better get it right"

I can't wait for Hillary's inauguration speech...on the other hand!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *igsteve43Man  over a year ago

derby


"if anyone else had done what hillary had they would be locked up no doubt about it.

Do you mean like Secretaries of State Rice, Powell and Kerry who all all used private email servers?

They too should have answered for their crimes. It doesn't mean that she should not. You can't have a criminal in charge of a so called "democracy."

The fact that the FBI have dropped this stinks of corruption.

And yet she hasn't done anything illegal, so not a criminal "

Correct me if im wrong but surely paying someone to stay quiet about rape would be classed as perverting the course of justice

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple  over a year ago

in Lancashire


"if anyone else had done what hillary had they would be locked up no doubt about it.

Do you mean like Secretaries of State Rice, Powell and Kerry who all all used private email servers?

They too should have answered for their crimes. It doesn't mean that she should not. You can't have a criminal in charge of a so called "democracy."

The fact that the FBI have dropped this stinks of corruption.

And yet she hasn't done anything illegal, so not a criminal

Correct me if im wrong but surely paying someone to stay quiet about rape would be classed as perverting the course of justice

"

probably not the first time trump has done so..

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple  over a year ago

in Lancashire


"Here's a special treat for Clinton fans...the lyrics of a song 'lovingly' sang by someone called Jay Z at another fundraising event for the Clinton Family. It's called: Jigga My Nigga, and I understand Hillary sang along!?

"(Jigga) What’s my motherfuckin name?

(Jigga) And who I’m rollin with huh?

(My niggas) Uh-huh-uh-uhh-uhh-uhh

Niggas better get it right, bitches better get it right, WHO?

(Jigga) What’s my motherfuckin name?

(Jigga) And who I’m rollin with huh?

(My niggas) Uh-huh-uh-uhh-uhh-uhh

Niggas better get it right, bitches better get it right"

I can't wait for Hillary's inauguration speech...on the other hand!

"

in other news..

only one candidate is being endorsed and is happy to have been by the klan..

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *abioMan  over a year ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"George orwells animal farm book comes to mind when I woke up and seen clinton has been let off by the fbi for the second time.

"All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others".

So a week after they reopened the case and 2 days before the election they let clinton off the hook again despite overwhelming evidence she lied, deleted emails under a surpena, miss handled classified information,was getting her maid to photo copy classified information regularly, not to mention all the dealings with her foundation that ill not go into.

how can the fbi take over a year to get through 300,000 emails the first time and then this time they had 650,000 emails and managed to get through them in a little over a week.

if anyone else had done what hillary had they would be locked up no doubt about it.

There is a military guy locked up earlirr this year for taking a photo on the sub he was stationed in. (As an exsmple at how strict they are when it comes to classified stuff).

It just beggers belief that somone has corrupt as her and it all out in the light shes actually going to get away with it.

not only just get away with it but possibly about to become the next president.

sad sad times.

"

You have been reading the breibart spinning points haven't you....

The FBI said that not all the mail on the computer in question were stuff that related to Clinton... and the ones that were were duplicates of ones that they had already seen

Thanks for playing though...

Swing and a miss!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ord Willy McFuck-BucketMan  over a year ago

newcastle

None of these new emails were either from or to Clinton and the 650,000 number was made up by trump, just like the 650 million immigrants he said she will let into America next week. Fuck he does like that 650 thing maybe it is the number of times he lies every hour

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *abioMan  over a year ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"

See that's an interesting point.

Now 17 us agencies have said there's no evidence suggest Russia has tried hacking Clinton's emails, only the department of homeland security has suggested it has attempted it..... That's not stopped Clinton from constantly telling everybody that Putin and Russia are actively trying to sabotage her campaign for trump!.

Also I belive she's said when she gets elected "they'll be monetary, political and military" payback for it?.

.

.

If I was an American I'd be voting Jill stein "

can i please provide a quote for that please.... because the actual original was that there were 17 US agencies, private, public and governmental agencies that said that russia WERE involved in the hacking....

so i just find it "convienient" that now exactly 17 come out against it..... who'd da funked it?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

See that's an interesting point.

Now 17 us agencies have said there's no evidence suggest Russia has tried hacking Clinton's emails, only the department of homeland security has suggested it has attempted it..... That's not stopped Clinton from constantly telling everybody that Putin and Russia are actively trying to sabotage her campaign for trump!.

Also I belive she's said when she gets elected "they'll be monetary, political and military" payback for it?.

.

.

If I was an American I'd be voting Jill stein

can i please provide a quote for that please.... because the actual original was that there were 17 US agencies, private, public and governmental agencies that said that russia WERE involved in the hacking....

so i just find it "convienient" that now exactly 17 come out against it..... who'd da funked it?

"

.

I worded that wrongly, what I should have said is Clinton claimed there was 17 agencies that "show" that Russia was responsible for hacking her emails when in fact there are only two, the 17 haven't actually said anything, the two have just said it "looks like" what the Russian state would do but have no evidence!.... On that basis Clinton would like military action on Russia?.

.

I read an interesting article on a NSA whistleblower who claims that the NSA FBI and CIA have always had access to every single persons emails in the USA and have for at least ten years?. On that basis the former analyst said the hack was more likely from inside the USA than outside....

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.0468

0