FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > John McDonnel on Question Time
John McDonnel on Question Time
Jump to: Newest in thread
"Not half as bad as the nasty tory cow 
don't like her myself but she was right when she called the lying Marxist a nasty man  "
I think the jury is still out on May but McConnell is guilty as charged as a nasty Marxist dinosaur who should never attain high office. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Not half as bad as the nasty tory cow
don't like her myself but she was right when she called the lying Marxist a nasty man
I think the jury is still out on May but McConnell is guilty as charged as a nasty Marxist dinosaur who should never attain high office."
I meant the Tory MP Anna Soubry (sic?) who was on the show last night but ye, a good start by May but still early days |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Not half as bad as the nasty tory cow
don't like her myself but she was right when she called the lying Marxist a nasty man
I think the jury is still out on May but McConnell is guilty as charged as a nasty Marxist dinosaur who should never attain high office."
He reminds me of one of the pigs in animal farm. Completely shameless and would say anything to get into or hold on to power. He's a little poodle to Corbyn, which is funny because the tramps in Reading usually have bigger dogs. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Not half as bad as the nasty tory cow
don't like her myself but she was right when she called the lying Marxist a nasty man
I think the jury is still out on May but McConnell is guilty as charged as a nasty Marxist dinosaur who should never attain high office.
He reminds me of one of the pigs in animal farm. Completely shameless and would say anything to get into or hold on to power. He's a little poodle to Corbyn, which is funny because the tramps in Reading usually have bigger dogs. "
You could have said much the same about Cameron & Obsourne tbh... give the pigs some time to grow into their jobs... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Not half as bad as the nasty tory cow
don't like her myself but she was right when she called the lying Marxist a nasty man
I think the jury is still out on May but McConnell is guilty as charged as a nasty Marxist dinosaur who should never attain high office.
He reminds me of one of the pigs in animal farm. Completely shameless and would say anything to get into or hold on to power. He's a little poodle to Corbyn, which is funny because the tramps in Reading usually have bigger dogs.
You could have said much the same about Cameron & Obsourne tbh... give the pigs some time to grow into their jobs..."
No they are very different. They are more like the ducks in animal farm. Not really doing very much but making a fair bit of noise in the process of not doing very much. But ultimately, not a dangerous animal. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Not half as bad as the nasty tory cow
don't like her myself but she was right when she called the lying Marxist a nasty man
I think the jury is still out on May but McConnell is guilty as charged as a nasty Marxist dinosaur who should never attain high office.
He reminds me of one of the pigs in animal farm. Completely shameless and would say anything to get into or hold on to power. He's a little poodle to Corbyn, which is funny because the tramps in Reading usually have bigger dogs.
You could have said much the same about Cameron & Obsourne tbh... give the pigs some time to grow into their jobs...
No they are very different. They are more like the ducks in animal farm. Not really doing very much but making a fair bit of noise in the process of not doing very much. But ultimately, not a dangerous animal. "
Yes, and on reflection I wouldn't trust Cameron with a pig |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Not half as bad as the nasty tory cow
don't like her myself but she was right when she called the lying Marxist a nasty man
I think the jury is still out on May but McConnell is guilty as charged as a nasty Marxist dinosaur who should never attain high office.
He reminds me of one of the pigs in animal farm. Completely shameless and would say anything to get into or hold on to power. He's a little poodle to Corbyn, which is funny because the tramps in Reading usually have bigger dogs.
You could have said much the same about Cameron & Obsourne tbh... give the pigs some time to grow into their jobs...
No they are very different. They are more like the ducks in animal farm. Not really doing very much but making a fair bit of noise in the process of not doing very much. But ultimately, not a dangerous animal.
Yes, and on reflection I wouldn't trust Cameron with a pig "
I'd trust him to run a supermarket store. He's quite capable of doing today, what he did yesterday. As long as nothing needs to change then he's reliable.
I wouldn't even trust Corbyn with stacking shelves. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"On the other hand he'd keep us out of pointless, costly wars, look after the NHS, tackle the housing crisis, protect small businesses and workers rights and support our schools and universities."
Yes you are right. Mrs May would do all of that. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Not half as bad as the nasty tory cow
don't like her myself but she was right when she called the lying Marxist a nasty man
I think the jury is still out on May but McConnell is guilty as charged as a nasty Marxist dinosaur who should never attain high office.
He reminds me of one of the pigs in animal farm. Completely shameless and would say anything to get into or hold on to power. He's a little poodle to Corbyn, which is funny because the tramps in Reading usually have bigger dogs.
You could have said much the same about Cameron & Obsourne tbh... give the pigs some time to grow into their jobs...
No they are very different. They are more like the ducks in animal farm. Not really doing very much but making a fair bit of noise in the process of not doing very much. But ultimately, not a dangerous animal.
Yes, and on reflection I wouldn't trust Cameron with a pig "
David Camerons family and that of his wife are very successfull in their own right ignoring politics. You do not make these achievements by chance |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Not half as bad as the nasty tory cow
don't like her myself but she was right when she called the lying Marxist a nasty man
I think the jury is still out on May but McConnell is guilty as charged as a nasty Marxist dinosaur who should never attain high office.
He reminds me of one of the pigs in animal farm. Completely shameless and would say anything to get into or hold on to power. He's a little poodle to Corbyn, which is funny because the tramps in Reading usually have bigger dogs.
You could have said much the same about Cameron & Obsourne tbh... give the pigs some time to grow into their jobs...
No they are very different. They are more like the ducks in animal farm. Not really doing very much but making a fair bit of noise in the process of not doing very much. But ultimately, not a dangerous animal.
Yes, and on reflection I wouldn't trust Cameron with a pig David Camerons family and that of his wife are very successfull in their own right ignoring politics. You do not make these achievements by chance "
Define: 'successful' please? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
He's a hilarious parasite.
He gives a big lecture on how he wants "straight talking politics" and within 3 minutes denies that he is a Marxist even though DD reads a direct quote from him that says "i am a Marxist".
You couldn't make it up! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"He's a hilarious parasite.
He gives a big lecture on how he wants "straight talking politics" and within 3 minutes denies that he is a Marxist even though DD reads a direct quote from him that says "i am a Marxist".
You couldn't make it up! "
McDonnel showed everyone what he is when he threw Chairman Mao's little red book across the despatchbox at George Osborne in the House of Commons several months ago. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Not half as bad as the nasty tory cow
don't like her myself but she was right when she called the lying Marxist a nasty man
I think the jury is still out on May but McConnell is guilty as charged as a nasty Marxist dinosaur who should never attain high office.
I meant the Tory MP Anna Soubry (sic?) who was on the show last night but ye, a good start by May but still early days"
I didn't see Question Time myself (must watch it on iplayer) but I read in the paper that they had to stop filming when an argument erupted between McDonnel and Alistair Campbell over who lost the most support for Labour and McDonnel called Campbell a "Fucking arsehole" |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"He's a hilarious parasite.
He gives a big lecture on how he wants "straight talking politics" and within 3 minutes denies that he is a Marxist even though DD reads a direct quote from him that says "i am a Marxist".
You couldn't make it up!
McDonnel showed everyone what he is when he threw Chairman Mao's little red book across the despatchbox at George Osborne in the House of Commons several months ago. "
Marxist? Maybe. Personally I think McConnell and Corbyn have more in common with Stalin. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Not half as bad as the nasty tory cow
don't like her myself but she was right when she called the lying Marxist a nasty man
I think the jury is still out on May but McConnell is guilty as charged as a nasty Marxist dinosaur who should never attain high office.
I meant the Tory MP Anna Soubry (sic?) who was on the show last night but ye, a good start by May but still early days
I didn't see Question Time myself (must watch it on iplayer) but I read in the paper that they had to stop filming when an argument erupted between McDonnel and Alistair Campbell over who lost the most support for Labour and McDonnel called Campbell a "Fucking arsehole" "
Old Labour hate New Labour because New Labour were successful. Old Labour just want to be a protest movement sat on their high horse.
It scares the shit out of them to think they might actually have to run something and come up with some better ideas themselves. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"He's a hilarious parasite.
He gives a big lecture on how he wants "straight talking politics" and within 3 minutes denies that he is a Marxist even though DD reads a direct quote from him that says "i am a Marxist".
You couldn't make it up! "
What is a Marxist?
When Corbyn was asked if he was a Marxist he once replied 'now that is an interesting question'
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"He's a hilarious parasite.
He gives a big lecture on how he wants "straight talking politics" and within 3 minutes denies that he is a Marxist even though DD reads a direct quote from him that says "i am a Marxist".
You couldn't make it up!
What is a Marxist?
When Corbyn was asked if he was a Marxist he once replied 'now that is an interesting question'
"
Can you imagine the reaction if someone in UKIP or Conservatives was asked "are you a fascist?" and they gave that reply? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Pisser And he also sympathises with those who plant bombs."
If you mean Hamas or Isis, no he doesn't? If you mean the IRA, he sympathasised with the cause, to a degree. He condemned their violence. He was one of the first advocates of getting around a table, talking to them and coming to a negotiated solution for a peace to benefit the ordinary people of Ireland.
Tell me, was he right or was your great hero, Maggie Thatcher, successful with her approach?
I would like to remind you that Corbyn was advocating this policy in the 70's and 80's when it was not popular with the establishment. He was branded a traitor back then, rather than acknowledged as a visionary, lies which still persist today and the meme is repeated by fucktards and malicious tossers.
His argument wasn't judged the right one at the time, but history has judged him right.
If you are talking about the uk dropping bombs then he LED the Stop the War coalition to try and stop the Iraq war. In this he was joined by 100 labour MP's, and all the lib Dems. The Tories, as usual, were all for war.
How has history (and Chilcot) judged him?
If you are talking about South Africa, while Mrs Thatcher and the Right supported the apartheid regime and opposed nelson Mandela as a terrorist, Corbyn, once Mandela rejected violence, was a big supporter of the bomb planter and a passionate anti apartheid campaigner.
Again, how has history judged him?
With Hamas, Corbyn condemns the violent methods, but at the same time condemns the treatment of the Palestinian people by the Jewish government. This treatment is disgraceful and does have many similarities with the Apartheid system in South Africa. Corbyn is consistent. He advocates getting around a table of all parties to come to a solution which will not only be just and fair to the oppressed Palestinians, but will actually benefit the whole world.
He makes a distinction between the Israeli government and the Jewish people yet he is branded an anti Semite and a terrorist sympathiser.
He condemns islamophobia and his branded a friend of Isis.
How do you think history will judge him?
How will it judge those who not only deride his views but who misrepresent them? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"He's a hilarious parasite.
He gives a big lecture on how he wants "straight talking politics" and within 3 minutes denies that he is a Marxist even though DD reads a direct quote from him that says "i am a Marxist".
You couldn't make it up!
What is a Marxist?
When Corbyn was asked if he was a Marxist he once replied 'now that is an interesting question'
Can you imagine the reaction if someone in UKIP or Conservatives was asked "are you a fascist?" and they gave that reply? "
I'm sorry, I missed your definition. Good luck with it. Are you avoiding it? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Pisser And he also sympathises with those who plant bombs.
If you mean Hamas or Isis, no he doesn't? If you mean the IRA, he sympathasised with the cause, to a degree. He condemned their violence. He was one of the first advocates of getting around a table, talking to them and coming to a negotiated solution for a peace to benefit the ordinary people of Ireland.
Tell me, was he right or was your great hero, Maggie Thatcher, successful with her approach?
I would like to remind you that Corbyn was advocating this policy in the 70's and 80's when it was not popular with the establishment. He was branded a traitor back then, rather than acknowledged as a visionary, lies which still persist today and the meme is repeated by fucktards and malicious tossers.
His argument wasn't judged the right one at the time, but history has judged him right.
If you are talking about the uk dropping bombs then he LED the Stop the War coalition to try and stop the Iraq war. In this he was joined by 100 labour MP's, and all the lib Dems. The Tories, as usual, were all for war.
How has history (and Chilcot) judged him?
If you are talking about South Africa, while Mrs Thatcher and the Right supported the apartheid regime and opposed nelson Mandela as a terrorist, Corbyn, once Mandela rejected violence, was a big supporter of the bomb planter and a passionate anti apartheid campaigner.
Again, how has history judged him?
With Hamas, Corbyn condemns the violent methods, but at the same time condemns the treatment of the Palestinian people by the Jewish government. This treatment is disgraceful and does have many similarities with the Apartheid system in South Africa. Corbyn is consistent. He advocates getting around a table of all parties to come to a solution which will not only be just and fair to the oppressed Palestinians, but will actually benefit the whole world.
He makes a distinction between the Israeli government and the Jewish people yet he is branded an anti Semite and a terrorist sympathiser.
He condemns islamophobia and his branded a friend of Isis.
How do you think history will judge him?
How will it judge those who not only deride his views but who misrepresent them?"
i dont think Corbyn or Mc Donnel have to worry about how people will judge them. Neither will ever be in power. If anything Corbyn would be remembered as the man who destroyed the Labour party |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
" i dont think Corbyn or Mc Donnel have to worry about how people will judge them. Neither will ever be in power. If anything Corbyn would be remembered as the man who destroyed the Labour party "
Perhaps in England yes,
Jim Murphy and Kezia Dugdale have already destroyed Labour in Scotland |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"He's a hilarious parasite.
He gives a big lecture on how he wants "straight talking politics" and within 3 minutes denies that he is a Marxist even though DD reads a direct quote from him that says "i am a Marxist".
You couldn't make it up!
What is a Marxist?
When Corbyn was asked if he was a Marxist he once replied 'now that is an interesting question'
Can you imagine the reaction if someone in UKIP or Conservatives was asked "are you a fascist?" and they gave that reply?
I'm sorry, I missed your definition. Good luck with it. Are you avoiding it?"
No it's just really obvious, 'someone who subscribes to the ideology set out by Karl Marx in the books such as Das Kapital and the Communist Manifesto'. You know, the same ideology that inspired the most murderous regimes in history and ruined the economies of everyone who tried them. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Pisser And he also sympathises with those who plant bombs.
If you mean Hamas or Isis, no he doesn't? If you mean the IRA, he sympathasised with the cause, to a degree. He condemned their violence. He was one of the first advocates of getting around a table, talking to them and coming to a negotiated solution for a peace to benefit the ordinary people of Ireland.
Tell me, was he right or was your great hero, Maggie Thatcher, successful with her approach?
I would like to remind you that Corbyn was advocating this policy in the 70's and 80's when it was not popular with the establishment. He was branded a traitor back then, rather than acknowledged as a visionary, lies which still persist today and the meme is repeated by fucktards and malicious tossers.
His argument wasn't judged the right one at the time, but history has judged him right.
If you are talking about the uk dropping bombs then he LED the Stop the War coalition to try and stop the Iraq war. In this he was joined by 100 labour MP's, and all the lib Dems. The Tories, as usual, were all for war.
How has history (and Chilcot) judged him?
If you are talking about South Africa, while Mrs Thatcher and the Right supported the apartheid regime and opposed nelson Mandela as a terrorist, Corbyn, once Mandela rejected violence, was a big supporter of the bomb planter and a passionate anti apartheid campaigner.
Again, how has history judged him?
With Hamas, Corbyn condemns the violent methods, but at the same time condemns the treatment of the Palestinian people by the Jewish government. This treatment is disgraceful and does have many similarities with the Apartheid system in South Africa. Corbyn is consistent. He advocates getting around a table of all parties to come to a solution which will not only be just and fair to the oppressed Palestinians, but will actually benefit the whole world.
He makes a distinction between the Israeli government and the Jewish people yet he is branded an anti Semite and a terrorist sympathiser.
He condemns islamophobia and his branded a friend of Isis.
How do you think history will judge him?
How will it judge those who not only deride his views but who misrepresent them?"
Sounds like a one trick pony who simply always condemns violence and takes credit when violence has consequences! Wouldn't have been a good strategy in WW2 and glad we didn't quit NATO to cosy up the Soviet union as he would have liked. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
