FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Not that it will be acknowledged … jack smith report on Trump and January 6th
Not that it will be acknowledged … jack smith report on Trump and January 6th
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By *oo hotCouple 5 weeks ago
North West |
"Summary please Fabio  "
If it were not “for Mr Trump’s election and imminent return to the presidency, the office assessed that the admissible evidence was sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction at trial.”
Astonishing that had he been convicted he could not have run for President, but helpful Judges and throwing $millions at his lawyers to delay the process means that he has avoided justice.
Real two tier justice. As long as you are a billionaire. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Summary please Fabio
If it were not “for Mr Trump’s election and imminent return to the presidency, the office assessed that the admissible evidence was sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction at trial.”
Astonishing that had he been convicted he could not have run for President, but helpful Judges and throwing $millions at his lawyers to delay the process means that he has avoided justice.
Real two tier justice. As long as you are a billionaire. "
I'm sure any other job and his application would have been quashed, or his offer for post rescinded.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oo hotCouple 5 weeks ago
North West |
"Jack Smith is a tad salty don’t you think"
Jack Smith “My office had one north star: to follow the facts and law wherever they led. Nothing more and nothing less. To all who know me well, the claim from Mr Trump that my decisions as a prosecutor were influenced or directed by the Biden administration or other political actors is, in a word, laughable.” |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oo hotCouple 5 weeks ago
North West |
"Jack Smith put together two cases against Trump, neither of which was even heard in court.
Trump was elected President.
I think he'll survive this one. "
You are correct.
Two tier justice wins for some - especially if you had previously appointed the Judge and stuffed the Supreme Court.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Jack Smith put together two cases against Trump, neither of which was even heard in court.
Trump was elected President.
I think he'll survive this one.
You are correct.
Two tier justice wins for some - especially if you had previously appointed the Judge and stuffed the Supreme Court.
"
Also if you pardon your degenerate criminal son for life  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *otMe66Man 5 weeks ago
Terra Firma |
"Jack Smith is a tad salty don’t you think
Jack Smith “My office had one north star: to follow the facts and law wherever they led. Nothing more and nothing less. To all who know me well, the claim from Mr Trump that my decisions as a prosecutor were influenced or directed by the Biden administration or other political actors is, in a word, laughable.”"
I think you should get that put on a t-shirt 
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oo hotCouple 5 weeks ago
North West |
"Jack Smith put together two cases against Trump, neither of which was even heard in court.
Trump was elected President.
I think he'll survive this one.
You are correct.
Two tier justice wins for some - especially if you had previously appointed the Judge and stuffed the Supreme Court.
Also if you pardon your degenerate criminal son for life "
I didn’t realise Hunter was trying to elected as President?
Are you condoning two tier justice now?
It was seen as a slur here in the U.K. in the summer, but seemingly in the US as long as you can strong arm the judiciary and grease a few palms because you are a multi Millionnaire - no problem.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *d4ugirlsMan 5 weeks ago
Green Cove Springs |
"Jack Smith put together two cases against Trump, neither of which was even heard in court.
Trump was elected President.
I think he'll survive this one. "
Yep, the usual Trump Haters on here worried about US politics.
Enough chaos in the UK to worry about, too bad they are directing their energy toward Trump living in their head, instead of fighting for the removal of starmer and his clown show. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
All Trump did is say fight back. He didn't actually say storm the Whitehouse and kill people. That was mob mentality. If he said to his supporters if we lose the election feel sorry for yourself, go jump off a bridge, would they?
He was speaking metaphorically fight back. He could see what the court was aiming to twist things against him hence the stall and delay.
Pelosi hates him and threatened to have him bumped off metaphorically should she be in court for the attempt on his life?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"... the office assessed that the admissible evidence was sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction at trial."
Surely that's what all prosecutors think when they assemble a case, and yet the courts still return not guilty verdicts. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I agree with the post suggesting that we have more to worry about with our own degenerate " Starmer "
However. In my opinion, the US does have an election system as dodgy as a 3rd world country. Biden , although on the surface comes across as a more honest man ( although now without even one functional brain cell ).it's an illusion. He's just as corrupt as Trump. He's just a life long professional liar.....sorry, I meant politician.
He finally proved it by using his presidential power to allow his son to avoid justice. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"All Trump did is say fight back. He didn't actually say storm the Whitehouse and kill people. That was mob mentality. If he said to his supporters if we lose the election feel sorry for yourself, go jump off a bridge, would they?
He was speaking metaphorically fight back. He could see what the court was aiming to twist things against him hence the stall and delay.
Pelosi hates him and threatened to have him bumped off metaphorically should she be in court for the attempt on his life?
"
Or Biden saying a "cross hair" needs to be put on trump before he got shot at?
Don't you dare come here making common sense arguments
People want to be outraged, don't ruin it for him
Remember, Orange Man Bad |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Except for very serious criminal offences I think it's right that former Presidents should have immunity from prosecution. Most Judges and DA's in the US are political appointees while finding a jury which would be impartial about any former President is an impossibility. A New York Court would probably convict Trump whatever the evidence while a Texas Court would probably acquit.
Richard Nixon's involvement in Watergate was far more serious and direct than Trump's in the Capitol Riots but he was rightly pardoned and given immunity from future prosecutions to avoid setting a bad precedent. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oo hotCouple 5 weeks ago
North West |
"Except for very serious criminal offences I think it's right that former Presidents should have immunity from prosecution. Most Judges and DA's in the US are political appointees while finding a jury which would be impartial about any former President is an impossibility. A New York Court would probably convict Trump whatever the evidence while a Texas Court would probably acquit.
Richard Nixon's involvement in Watergate was far more serious and direct than Trump's in the Capitol Riots but he was rightly pardoned and given immunity from future prosecutions to avoid setting a bad precedent. "
Wow
Inciting an insurrection not serious?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Except for very serious criminal offences I think it's right that former Presidents should have immunity from prosecution. Most Judges and DA's in the US are political appointees while finding a jury which would be impartial about any former President is an impossibility. A New York Court would probably convict Trump whatever the evidence while a Texas Court would probably acquit.
Richard Nixon's involvement in Watergate was far more serious and direct than Trump's in the Capitol Riots but he was rightly pardoned and given immunity from future prosecutions to avoid setting a bad precedent.
Wow
Inciting an insurrection not serious?
"
Why didn't you say the same about this that was quoted earlier .....
Or Biden saying a "cross hair" needs to be put on trump before he got shot at?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *otMe66Man 5 weeks ago
Terra Firma |
"Except for very serious criminal offences I think it's right that former Presidents should have immunity from prosecution. Most Judges and DA's in the US are political appointees while finding a jury which would be impartial about any former President is an impossibility. A New York Court would probably convict Trump whatever the evidence while a Texas Court would probably acquit.
Richard Nixon's involvement in Watergate was far more serious and direct than Trump's in the Capitol Riots but he was rightly pardoned and given immunity from future prosecutions to avoid setting a bad precedent.
Wow
Inciting an insurrection not serious?
"
Who has been convicted of inciting an insurrection?
I'm not following
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
