FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Labour refusal to launch grooming inquiry
Labour refusal to launch grooming inquiry
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Wow how low can labour sink it’s totally shocking " I wonder why they don’t want to? I wonder who was in charge of the CPS between 2008-2013?…… 🤔 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Wow how low can labour sink it’s totally shocking " It's weird - scum usually floats but Labour and their supporters have managed to defy science  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://news.sky.com/story/kemi-badenoch-calls-for-long-overdue-national-inquiry-into-uk-grooming-scandal-13282797 Hmmmm a bit suspect of right wing having a go at left wing when this is historic. An inquiry did take place. Oh and remember the drama about the Rotherham girls, the police and social workers failed to protect, so who's to say the cps were even involved. " A national inquiry has never taken place. You are right that it's historic and is on both Labour and the Tories though. Kemi is just playing politics here, she had her chance. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://news.sky.com/story/kemi-badenoch-calls-for-long-overdue-national-inquiry-into-uk-grooming-scandal-13282797 Hmmmm a bit suspect of right wing having a go at left wing when this is historic. An inquiry did take place. Oh and remember the drama about the Rotherham girls, the police and social workers failed to protect, so who's to say the cps were even involved. A national inquiry has never taken place. You are right that it's historic and is on both Labour and the Tories though. Kemi is just playing politics here, she had her chance. "  it’s a pretty cheap shot and she should be ashamed. I see that gulper Philp has been doing the rounds trying to avoid answering the question why a national enquiry is needed now but not last October when the same Oldham council asked for one. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://news.sky.com/story/kemi-badenoch-calls-for-long-overdue-national-inquiry-into-uk-grooming-scandal-13282797 Hmmmm a bit suspect of right wing having a go at left wing when this is historic. An inquiry did take place. Oh and remember the drama about the Rotherham girls, the police and social workers failed to protect, so who's to say the cps were even involved. A national inquiry has never taken place. You are right that it's historic and is on both Labour and the Tories though. Kemi is just playing politics here, she had her chance. it’s a pretty cheap shot and she should be ashamed. I see that gulper Philp has been doing the rounds trying to avoid answering the question why a national enquiry is needed now but not last October when the same Oldham council asked for one."I'm not entirely sure of the reference. Oldham council voted in July to ask for an inquiry. What about last October and who is 'Gulper Philp'? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://news.sky.com/story/kemi-badenoch-calls-for-long-overdue-national-inquiry-into-uk-grooming-scandal-13282797 Hmmmm a bit suspect of right wing having a go at left wing when this is historic. An inquiry did take place. Oh and remember the drama about the Rotherham girls, the police and social workers failed to protect, so who's to say the cps were even involved. A national inquiry has never taken place. You are right that it's historic and is on both Labour and the Tories though. Kemi is just playing politics here, she had her chance. " I didn't state a national inquiry took place but an inquiry. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://news.sky.com/story/kemi-badenoch-calls-for-long-overdue-national-inquiry-into-uk-grooming-scandal-13282797 Hmmmm a bit suspect of right wing having a go at left wing when this is historic. An inquiry did take place. Oh and remember the drama about the Rotherham girls, the police and social workers failed to protect, so who's to say the cps were even involved. A national inquiry has never taken place. You are right that it's historic and is on both Labour and the Tories though. Kemi is just playing politics here, she had her chance. I didn't state a national inquiry took place but an inquiry." Isn't the thread specifically about a NATIONAL enquiry? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://news.sky.com/story/kemi-badenoch-calls-for-long-overdue-national-inquiry-into-uk-grooming-scandal-13282797 Hmmmm a bit suspect of right wing having a go at left wing when this is historic. An inquiry did take place. Oh and remember the drama about the Rotherham girls, the police and social workers failed to protect, so who's to say the cps were even involved. A national inquiry has never taken place. You are right that it's historic and is on both Labour and the Tories though. Kemi is just playing politics here, she had her chance. I didn't state a national inquiry took place but an inquiry. Isn't the thread specifically about a NATIONAL enquiry?" it is but ppl always try to side track it away from the grooming gangs wonder why that is hmmm | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://news.sky.com/story/kemi-badenoch-calls-for-long-overdue-national-inquiry-into-uk-grooming-scandal-13282797 Hmmmm a bit suspect of right wing having a go at left wing when this is historic. An inquiry did take place. Oh and remember the drama about the Rotherham girls, the police and social workers failed to protect, so who's to say the cps were even involved. A national inquiry has never taken place. You are right that it's historic and is on both Labour and the Tories though. Kemi is just playing politics here, she had her chance. I didn't state a national inquiry took place but an inquiry. Isn't the thread specifically about a NATIONAL enquiry?" I put up the link. OP couldn't be bothered. Besides, having had an inquiry is still relevant. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://news.sky.com/story/kemi-badenoch-calls-for-long-overdue-national-inquiry-into-uk-grooming-scandal-13282797 Hmmmm a bit suspect of right wing having a go at left wing when this is historic. An inquiry did take place. Oh and remember the drama about the Rotherham girls, the police and social workers failed to protect, so who's to say the cps were even involved. A national inquiry has never taken place. You are right that it's historic and is on both Labour and the Tories though. Kemi is just playing politics here, she had her chance. I didn't state a national inquiry took place but an inquiry. Isn't the thread specifically about a NATIONAL enquiry? it is but ppl always try to side track it away from the grooming gangs wonder why that is hmmm" That makes no sense. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://news.sky.com/story/kemi-badenoch-calls-for-long-overdue-national-inquiry-into-uk-grooming-scandal-13282797 Hmmmm a bit suspect of right wing having a go at left wing when this is historic. An inquiry did take place. Oh and remember the drama about the Rotherham girls, the police and social workers failed to protect, so who's to say the cps were even involved. A national inquiry has never taken place. You are right that it's historic and is on both Labour and the Tories though. Kemi is just playing politics here, she had her chance. I didn't state a national inquiry took place but an inquiry. Isn't the thread specifically about a NATIONAL enquiry? I put up the link. OP couldn't be bothered. Besides, having had an inquiry is still relevant. " It is quite clear that the OP is speaking about a national enquiry. You provided no such link to one. Both parties in power have refused that. Let's not try to sidestep the actual topic here. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why should it be restricted to Oldham Prince Andrew and Church of England also need investigating " What about Bill Wyman? Mrs x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://news.sky.com/story/kemi-badenoch-calls-for-long-overdue-national-inquiry-into-uk-grooming-scandal-13282797 Hmmmm a bit suspect of right wing having a go at left wing when this is historic. An inquiry did take place. Oh and remember the drama about the Rotherham girls, the police and social workers failed to protect, so who's to say the cps were even involved. A national inquiry has never taken place. You are right that it's historic and is on both Labour and the Tories though. Kemi is just playing politics here, she had her chance. it’s a pretty cheap shot and she should be ashamed. I see that gulper Philp has been doing the rounds trying to avoid answering the question why a national enquiry is needed now but not last October when the same Oldham council asked for one.
I'm not entirely sure of the reference. Oldham council voted in July to ask for an inquiry.
What about last October and who is 'Gulper Philp'?"Sorry I’ve lost track of the years. Oldham council asked for a national enquiry in October 2023. Gulper is Chris Philp. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://news.sky.com/story/kemi-badenoch-calls-for-long-overdue-national-inquiry-into-uk-grooming-scandal-13282797 Hmmmm a bit suspect of right wing having a go at left wing when this is historic. An inquiry did take place. Oh and remember the drama about the Rotherham girls, the police and social workers failed to protect, so who's to say the cps were even involved. A national inquiry has never taken place. You are right that it's historic and is on both Labour and the Tories though. Kemi is just playing politics here, she had her chance. it’s a pretty cheap shot and she should be ashamed. I see that gulper Philp has been doing the rounds trying to avoid answering the question why a national enquiry is needed now but not last October when the same Oldham council asked for one.
I'm not entirely sure of the reference. Oldham council voted in July to ask for an inquiry.
What about last October and who is 'Gulper Philp'?
Sorry I’ve lost track of the years. Oldham council asked for a national enquiry in October 2023. Gulper is Chris Philp."Right, Oldham council have repeatedly asked for inquiries, across both party terms. I'm not sure why this particular refusal of Labour's is a Tory issue. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://news.sky.com/story/kemi-badenoch-calls-for-long-overdue-national-inquiry-into-uk-grooming-scandal-13282797 Hmmmm a bit suspect of right wing having a go at left wing when this is historic. An inquiry did take place. Oh and remember the drama about the Rotherham girls, the police and social workers failed to protect, so who's to say the cps were even involved. A national inquiry has never taken place. You are right that it's historic and is on both Labour and the Tories though. Kemi is just playing politics here, she had her chance. I didn't state a national inquiry took place but an inquiry. Isn't the thread specifically about a NATIONAL enquiry? I put up the link. OP couldn't be bothered. Besides, having had an inquiry is still relevant. It is quite clear that the OP is speaking about a national enquiry. You provided no such link to one. Both parties in power have refused that. Let's not try to sidestep the actual topic here. " I provided the link to the story | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Wow how low can labour sink it’s totally shocking " Really low, I would imagine, if you happen to be their opposition. That's how party politics operates! Your shock has been duly noted. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Wow how low can labour sink it’s totally shocking Really low, I would imagine, if you happen to be their opposition. That's how party politics operates! Your shock has been duly noted." What is shocking is that the Westminster twats of both sides think that the electorate has a short memory. It wouldn't matter if it did... we have info at our fingertips. So it matters not who is in power we can look back to any recorded moment to see other guilty parties. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"there should clearly be an enquiry into why the english north of the midlands are predisposed to grooming etc ... it's obviously some sickness engrained in their cultural roots that's dragged on for some reason and they need to be sorted out once and for all .... disgusting" or is it that its just been exposed up here? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://news.sky.com/story/kemi-badenoch-calls-for-long-overdue-national-inquiry-into-uk-grooming-scandal-13282797 Hmmmm a bit suspect of right wing having a go at left wing when this is historic. An inquiry did take place. Oh and remember the drama about the Rotherham girls, the police and social workers failed to protect, so who's to say the cps were even involved. A national inquiry has never taken place. You are right that it's historic and is on both Labour and the Tories though. Kemi is just playing politics here, she had her chance. it’s a pretty cheap shot and she should be ashamed. I see that gulper Philp has been doing the rounds trying to avoid answering the question why a national enquiry is needed now but not last October when the same Oldham council asked for one.
I'm not entirely sure of the reference. Oldham council voted in July to ask for an inquiry.
What about last October and who is 'Gulper Philp'?
Sorry I’ve lost track of the years. Oldham council asked for a national enquiry in October 2023. Gulper is Chris Philp.
Right, Oldham council have repeatedly asked for inquiries, across both party terms.
I'm not sure why this particular refusal of Labour's is a Tory issue. "I was pointing out the hypocrisy of the Tories to criticise Labour when they had also refused a national enquiry. Labour have been rightly criticised for saying one thing when they were in opposition and doing another when in power, but the tories were actually in a position to bring about a national enquiry and declined it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://news.sky.com/story/kemi-badenoch-calls-for-long-overdue-national-inquiry-into-uk-grooming-scandal-13282797 Hmmmm a bit suspect of right wing having a go at left wing when this is historic. An inquiry did take place. Oh and remember the drama about the Rotherham girls, the police and social workers failed to protect, so who's to say the cps were even involved. A national inquiry has never taken place. You are right that it's historic and is on both Labour and the Tories though. Kemi is just playing politics here, she had her chance. it’s a pretty cheap shot and she should be ashamed. I see that gulper Philp has been doing the rounds trying to avoid answering the question why a national enquiry is needed now but not last October when the same Oldham council asked for one.
I'm not entirely sure of the reference. Oldham council voted in July to ask for an inquiry.
What about last October and who is 'Gulper Philp'?
Sorry I’ve lost track of the years. Oldham council asked for a national enquiry in October 2023. Gulper is Chris Philp.
Right, Oldham council have repeatedly asked for inquiries, across both party terms.
I'm not sure why this particular refusal of Labour's is a Tory issue.
I was pointing out the hypocrisy of the Tories to criticise Labour when they had also refused a national enquiry.
Labour have been rightly criticised for saying one thing when they were in opposition and doing another when in power, but the tories were actually in a position to bring about a national enquiry and declined it."that’s going to be labours theme for 4 more yrs or saying one thing in opposition and doing nothing in power tho so even if we get a national enquiry nothing will be learned the grooming is still going on pooor young girls r@ped by pervs fucking discusting | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why aren’t the lefties on here as discussed as the rest of us on this should be ashamed of themselves hang yr head in shame " As both the Labour and Conservative governments have declined to set up a national enquiry I’m not sure it’s only a “lefties” issue. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why aren’t the lefties on here as discussed as the rest of us on this should be ashamed of themselves hang yr head in shame As both the Labour and Conservative governments have declined to set up a national enquiry I’m not sure it’s only a “lefties” issue." sorry I was talking about the lefties on fab tbf that’s all is in the torries and labour lefties | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There are at least 25 English towns and cities where gangs of Pakistani heritage men have r@ped and tortured overwhelmingly white working class female children. Much of this was organised crime involving moving girls around the country and clearly the different locations are connected. There is evidence that the crimes are ongoing in many places. It's one of the worst crimes in Britain in the last 50 years and the cover up of these crimes by every state agency is one of the greatest scandals. Of course there should be a wide ranging national public enquiry." exactly I’d say the worst crimes iv heard of happening in my life time and correct it’s still going on I think it was Rotherham that the police had 250 names of suspects and only charged around 11 Tommy Robinson gave them 300 names and this was one town thousands of kids where victims it must be in the tens of thousands across the U.K. how how can this not be the most important thing in goverment to sort out it boils my piss | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Just imagine the outcry if it was the other way round and it was white grooming gangs using Pakistani Indian Bangladeshi and Muslim girls!" if that was the case this site would blow up just look at this forum when a black man is killed by a white cop over the pond it’s meltdown on here but tens of thousand poor white kids killed r@ped trafficked by mainly Pakistani pervs and it’s not such a big issue insane isn’t it it’s seems it’s just not that bad to some fucking weired | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why should it be restricted to Oldham Prince Andrew and Church of England also need investigating What about Bill Wyman? Mrs x" What a cheap shot. Leave Bill Wyman out of this as it's an unfair jibe. He isn't able to defend himself until he has discussed this with his other half and is unable to do so until she has finished her geography homework. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Have the people who are making this suddenly such a big issue, explained why it wasn't on their watch? " because they didn't think anything of it until President Musk told them what to think. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Have the people who are making this suddenly such a big issue, explained why it wasn't on their watch? because they didn't think anything of it until President Musk told them what to think." it’s nothing to do with musk this was happening before he had twitter | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Have the people who are making this suddenly such a big issue, explained why it wasn't on their watch? I wonder if they'll be regurgitating all the things that they failed with, whilst they are desperate for attention and relevance. " The Jay Enquiry into Rotherham was established by the Conservatives Govt who also set up a new unit to specifically investigate further this type of crime. Part of this was an analysis of the background of the offenders but the current Labour Home Office has not yet released the findings. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Have the people who are making this suddenly such a big issue, explained why it wasn't on their watch? because they didn't think anything of it until President Musk told them what to think." President Musk .... the bloke who bankrolled the political campaign of a proven rapist and convicted criminal who has a plethora of photos in the public domain of him at various parties, stood with his then besty who was convicted for trafficking underage girls to attend at those events he organised.... President Musk needs to get his own house together before ordering his minions to push his fake news about other people on social media | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Have the people who are making this suddenly such a big issue, explained why it wasn't on their watch? because they didn't think anything of it until President Musk told them what to think. President Musk .... the bloke who bankrolled the political campaign of a proven rapist and convicted criminal who has a plethora of photos in the public domain of him at various parties, stood with his then besty who was convicted for trafficking underage girls to attend at those events he organised.... President Musk needs to get his own house together before ordering his minions to push his fake news about other people on social media "you need help and fast mate | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Have the people who are making this suddenly such a big issue, explained why it wasn't on their watch? because they didn't think anything of it until President Musk told them what to think. President Musk .... the bloke who bankrolled the political campaign of a proven rapist and convicted criminal who has a plethora of photos in the public domain of him at various parties, stood with his then besty who was convicted for trafficking underage girls to attend at those events he organised.... President Musk needs to get his own house together before ordering his minions to push his fake news about other people on social media you need help and fast mate "😂😂😂 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://news.sky.com/story/kemi-badenoch-calls-for-long-overdue-national-inquiry-into-uk-grooming-scandal-13282797 Hmmmm a bit suspect of right wing having a go at left wing when this is historic. An inquiry did take place. Oh and remember the drama about the Rotherham girls, the police and social workers failed to protect, so who's to say the cps were even involved. " An enquiry sponsored by musk ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://news.sky.com/story/kemi-badenoch-calls-for-long-overdue-national-inquiry-into-uk-grooming-scandal-13282797 Hmmmm a bit suspect of right wing having a go at left wing when this is historic. An inquiry did take place. Oh and remember the drama about the Rotherham girls, the police and social workers failed to protect, so who's to say the cps were even involved. An enquiry sponsored by musk ?" tommy ten names has sponsored it with a go fund me i heard | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why aren’t the lefties on here as discussed as the rest of us on this should be ashamed of themselves hang yr head in shame As both the Labour and Conservative governments have declined to set up a national enquiry I’m not sure it’s only a “lefties” issue. sorry I was talking about the lefties on fab tbf that’s all is in the torries and labour lefties " I'm not going to hang my head in shame cos I'm left. Did you hang your head in shame with the Tories in power with their shitshow of a govt? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why aren’t the lefties on here as discussed as the rest of us on this should be ashamed of themselves hang yr head in shame As both the Labour and Conservative governments have declined to set up a national enquiry I’m not sure it’s only a “lefties” issue. sorry I was talking about the lefties on fab tbf that’s all is in the torries and labour lefties I'm not going to hang my head in shame cos I'm left. Did you hang your head in shame with the Tories in power with their shitshow of a govt? " if tories are right wing then i must of done 3 loops to the right and back round again 😂 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://news.sky.com/story/kemi-badenoch-calls-for-long-overdue-national-inquiry-into-uk-grooming-scandal-13282797 Hmmmm a bit suspect of right wing having a go at left wing when this is historic. An inquiry did take place. Oh and remember the drama about the Rotherham girls, the police and social workers failed to protect, so who's to say the cps were even involved. An enquiry sponsored by musk ?tommy ten names has sponsored it with a go fund me i heard " if it wasn’t for Tommy we mite never of got to hear about it for that alone he deserves credit no matter what ppls opinion of him are he may of saved young girls lives by shining a light on it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://news.sky.com/story/kemi-badenoch-calls-for-long-overdue-national-inquiry-into-uk-grooming-scandal-13282797 Hmmmm a bit suspect of right wing having a go at left wing when this is historic. An inquiry did take place. Oh and remember the drama about the Rotherham girls, the police and social workers failed to protect, so who's to say the cps were even involved. An enquiry sponsored by musk ?tommy ten names has sponsored it with a go fund me i heard if it wasn’t for Tommy we mite never of got to hear about it for that alone he deserves credit no matter what ppls opinion of him are he may of saved young girls lives by shining a light on it " said the same before and 100% agree. Does he attack 1 single group of individuals with his work. Yes is there many other religions and nationalities with sick child mole ***sters yes but 1 man cant investigate and expose every single problem in the country he just works and exposes 1 of the problems he knows about | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why have Labour adopted that approach?" Perhaps because these crimes almost all took place under Labour Councils ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why have Labour adopted that approach? Perhaps because these crimes almost all took place under Labour Councils ?" sorry but took means theyve stopped id bet my life savings theyre still going on | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why have Labour adopted that approach? Perhaps because these crimes almost all took place under Labour Councils ?sorry but took means theyve stopped id bet my life savings theyre still going on" Unfortunately I believe you're correct. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://news.sky.com/story/kemi-badenoch-calls-for-long-overdue-national-inquiry-into-uk-grooming-scandal-13282797 Hmmmm a bit suspect of right wing having a go at left wing when this is historic. An inquiry did take place. Oh and remember the drama about the Rotherham girls, the police and social workers failed to protect, so who's to say the cps were even involved. An enquiry sponsored by musk ?tommy ten names has sponsored it with a go fund me i heard if it wasn’t for Tommy we mite never of got to hear about it for that alone he deserves credit no matter what ppls opinion of him are he may of saved young girls lives by shining a light on it " There was a dramatisation about it, based from the viewpoint of the whistle-blower. "Three girls", 2017. It was devastating. I have no shame saying i cried. I only heard of Tommy Robinson last year. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Have the people who are making this suddenly such a big issue, explained why it wasn't on their watch? I wonder if they'll be regurgitating all the things that they failed with, whilst they are desperate for attention and relevance. The Jay Enquiry into Rotherham was established by the Conservatives Govt who also set up a new unit to specifically investigate further this type of crime. Part of this was an analysis of the background of the offenders but the current Labour Home Office has not yet released the findings." The Independent Inquiry into Child Sex Abuse (IICSA), which published its final report in 2022, described the sexual abuse of children as an "epidemic that leaves tens of thousands of victims in its poisonous wake". It knitted several previous inquiries together alongside its own investigations. Professor Jay said in November she felt "frustrated" that none of her report's 20 recommendations to tackle abuse had been implemented more than two years later She said: "It's a difficult subject matter, but it is essential that there's some public understanding of it. She said: "It's a difficult subject matter, but it is essential that there's some public understanding of it. "It doesn't need more consultation, it does not need more research or discussion, it just needs to be done." It appears Professor Jay blames both governments. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Have the people who are making this suddenly such a big issue, explained why it wasn't on their watch? I wonder if they'll be regurgitating all the things that they failed with, whilst they are desperate for attention and relevance. The Jay Enquiry into Rotherham was established by the Conservatives Govt who also set up a new unit to specifically investigate further this type of crime. Part of this was an analysis of the background of the offenders but the current Labour Home Office has not yet released the findings. The Independent Inquiry into Child Sex Abuse (IICSA), which published its final report in 2022, described the sexual abuse of children as an "epidemic that leaves tens of thousands of victims in its poisonous wake". It knitted several previous inquiries together alongside its own investigations. Professor Jay said in November she felt "frustrated" that none of her report's 20 recommendations to tackle abuse had been implemented more than two years later She said: "It's a difficult subject matter, but it is essential that there's some public understanding of it. She said: "It's a difficult subject matter, but it is essential that there's some public understanding of it. "It doesn't need more consultation, it does not need more research or discussion, it just needs to be done." It appears Professor Jay blames both governments. " as another forum member constanly said "should of voted ukip" 😂might be time to give them a go | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Have the people who are making this suddenly such a big issue, explained why it wasn't on their watch? because they didn't think anything of it until President Musk told them what to think." Personally, I think having this put back in the limelight by anyone is shameful. It should have had an enquiry by the Tories, and now labour are in should have been enacted on by starmer and co. I don't care who suggests it as long as it's done because if it isn't, then incompetent useless individuals will let it happen again | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Like other examples of absolute failures over the decades by different institutions, authorities and governments this issue shames us as a country.. Incompetence, collision, cover ups are the commonalities with such scandals like Hillsborough, Infected blood, Sub postmasters, maternity failings and this the abuse of children.. None of them affect or affected the establishment and those in power and no one is ever truly held to the same accountability as those down the chain are.. 'lessons will be learned' is hollow, meaningless and yet we seem to swallow it time after time.." Absolutely  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Have the people who are making this suddenly such a big issue, explained why it wasn't on their watch? I wonder if they'll be regurgitating all the things that they failed with, whilst they are desperate for attention and relevance. The Jay Enquiry into Rotherham was established by the Conservatives Govt who also set up a new unit to specifically investigate further this type of crime. Part of this was an analysis of the background of the offenders but the current Labour Home Office has not yet released the findings. The Independent Inquiry into Child Sex Abuse (IICSA), which published its final report in 2022, described the sexual abuse of children as an "epidemic that leaves tens of thousands of victims in its poisonous wake". It knitted several previous inquiries together alongside its own investigations. Professor Jay said in November she felt "frustrated" that none of her report's 20 recommendations to tackle abuse had been implemented more than two years later She said: "It's a difficult subject matter, but it is essential that there's some public understanding of it. She said: "It's a difficult subject matter, but it is essential that there's some public understanding of it. "It doesn't need more consultation, it does not need more research or discussion, it just needs to be done." It appears Professor Jay blames both governments. " Most of her recommendations are agency specific- Councils, police, Child Protection agencies, etc rather than political action. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Like other examples of absolute failures over the decades by different institutions, authorities and governments this issue shames us as a country.. Incompetence, collision, cover ups are the commonalities with such scandals like Hillsborough, Infected blood, Sub postmasters, maternity failings and this the abuse of children.. None of them affect or affected the establishment and those in power and no one is ever truly held to the same accountability as those down the chain are.. 'lessons will be learned' is hollow, meaningless and yet we seem to swallow it time after time.." Exactly this, and off topic there are still at least 10000 buildings housing hundreds of thousands of residents, that are still covered in the flammable cladding which was at the centre of the Grenfell disaster. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Like other examples of absolute failures over the decades by different institutions, authorities and governments this issue shames us as a country.. Incompetence, collision, cover ups are the commonalities with such scandals like Hillsborough, Infected blood, Sub postmasters, maternity failings and this the abuse of children.. None of them affect or affected the establishment and those in power and no one is ever truly held to the same accountability as those down the chain are.. 'lessons will be learned' is hollow, meaningless and yet we seem to swallow it time after time.. Exactly this, and off topic there are still at least 10000 buildings housing hundreds of thousands of residents, that are still covered in the flammable cladding which was at the centre of the Grenfell disaster. " That was one I realised to my embarrassment I missed, the effects on so many from that total dereliction of duty by Blair in 2005 and subsequent governments since is yet another.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"In my opinion, our "governments" are and have been selfishly cautious about framing the grooming cases as a nationwide problem for fear of stoking racial tension and creating political backlash. If I'm correct in my opinion, we have learnt nothing and fear everything. " it's not just the grooming gangs. During the riots your find plenty of videos online showing large numbers of muslims shutting down roads at many roundabouts some armed with machetes etc. Police no where to be seen! The authorities have been conditioned to turn a blind eye in fear of being called racist. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Wow how low can labour sink it’s totally shocking " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://news.sky.com/story/kemi-badenoch-calls-for-long-overdue-national-inquiry-into-uk-grooming-scandal-13282797 Hmmmm a bit suspect of right wing having a go at left wing when this is historic. An inquiry did take place. Oh and remember the drama about the Rotherham girls, the police and social workers failed to protect, so who's to say the cps were even involved. A national inquiry has never taken place. You are right that it's historic and is on both Labour and the Tories though. Kemi is just playing politics here, she had her chance. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Because the uncomfortable truth is if they did that… they would probably find it was going on in churches and care homes way more than certain gangs of ethnicities " A pretty tasteless piece of whataboutery. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Because the uncomfortable truth is if they did that… they would probably find it was going on in churches and care homes way more than certain gangs of ethnicities " I wouldn't start to compare. I fully accept that it is a crime which can be carried out within certain groups, whether vocational, ethnic or cultural. Regardless, it finally needs to be called out. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Here’s something the majority of you fail to understand Facts https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independent_Inquiry_into_Child_Sexual_Abuse" If you knew anything about that Inquiry you'd know it did not investigate the grooming gangs in isolation and hardly mentioned them at all in it's findings. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Because the uncomfortable truth is if they did that… they would probably find it was going on in churches and care homes way more than certain gangs of ethnicities " Uncomfortable? So what? The focus should be on national support structures and how they have or haven’t responded to these awful acts of abuse, regardless of the perpetrators! I also agree with how inadequately this was framed from the get go, grooming? Is that really what the act was in the case we are talking about in this thread? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Here’s something the majority of you fail to understand Facts https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independent_Inquiry_into_Child_Sexual_Abuse If you knew anything about that Inquiry you'd know it did not investigate the grooming gangs in isolation and hardly mentioned them at all in it's findings. " https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal#Jay_inquiry | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Here’s something the majority of you fail to understand Facts https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independent_Inquiry_into_Child_Sexual_Abuse If you knew anything about that Inquiry you'd know it did not investigate the grooming gangs in isolation and hardly mentioned them at all in it's findings. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal#Jay_inquiry" Yes you've already posted this. An Inquiry into one town, not a national Inquiry. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Jay has said that there doesn't need to be another inquiry on a National basis but that the findings of her inquiry which she was critical of the last government in not implementing should now be carried out.. Surely that is the essential thing to do ..? It won't stop local authorities from carrying out their own inquiries as Oldham are now to do as the national recommendations are hopefully enacted .. One often hears that victims not just of this type of crime want the same to not happen to anyone else, if Jays report is to mean anything to the victims who relived their own horrendous suffering during that then kicking the can down the road for some new and massively expensive national inquiry makes no sense.. Sadly the issue has become less about the actual victims it seems and people are happy to use the harms done to them to try to score cheap political points.. Such things should be above that.." I disagree with Jay, she is suggesting that the 15 investigations will cover all bases, she is suggesting this in isolation. The framework of a national inquiry would need to be established and if the work Jay has completed fulfils the framework then I would agree with her. We go down this path so many times and never seem to learn, looking into silo's creates silo's. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Here’s something the majority of you fail to understand Facts https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independent_Inquiry_into_Child_Sexual_Abuse If you knew anything about that Inquiry you'd know it did not investigate the grooming gangs in isolation and hardly mentioned them at all in it's findings. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal#Jay_inquiry Yes you've already posted this. An Inquiry into one town, not a national Inquiry." No I did not post this before. I posted a contextual link, sky news. Someone else posted the wiki link for the statutory Inquiry of child abuse. Alexis Jay headed both. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Jay has said that there doesn't need to be another inquiry on a National basis but that the findings of her inquiry which she was critical of the last government in not implementing should now be carried out.. Surely that is the essential thing to do ..? It won't stop local authorities from carrying out their own inquiries as Oldham are now to do as the national recommendations are hopefully enacted .. One often hears that victims not just of this type of crime want the same to not happen to anyone else, if Jays report is to mean anything to the victims who relived their own horrendous suffering during that then kicking the can down the road for some new and massively expensive national inquiry makes no sense.. Sadly the issue has become less about the actual victims it seems and people are happy to use the harms done to them to try to score cheap political points.. Such things should be above that.." Having read the debacle of the statutory inquiry and multiple changes of chair, it's no wonder another statutory/public/national is not wanted. And as you stated, not needed. The council have probably requested and requested it because they then would not have to fund it. They, however, do need to do a local one to decide responsibility and accountability. Jay's recommendations need to be implemented. Having delved deeper into this, another Inquiry through govt is actually not needed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Jay has said that there doesn't need to be another inquiry on a National basis but that the findings of her inquiry which she was critical of the last government in not implementing should now be carried out.. Surely that is the essential thing to do ..? It won't stop local authorities from carrying out their own inquiries as Oldham are now to do as the national recommendations are hopefully enacted .. One often hears that victims not just of this type of crime want the same to not happen to anyone else, if Jays report is to mean anything to the victims who relived their own horrendous suffering during that then kicking the can down the road for some new and massively expensive national inquiry makes no sense.. Sadly the issue has become less about the actual victims it seems and people are happy to use the harms done to them to try to score cheap political points.. Such things should be above that.. I disagree with Jay, she is suggesting that the 15 investigations will cover all bases, she is suggesting this in isolation. The framework of a national inquiry would need to be established and if the work Jay has completed fulfils the framework then I would agree with her. We go down this path so many times and never seem to learn, looking into silo's creates silo's. " I don't get what you're saying. A silo of recommendations has not been created. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Jay has said that there doesn't need to be another inquiry on a National basis but that the findings of her inquiry which she was critical of the last government in not implementing should now be carried out.. Surely that is the essential thing to do ..? It won't stop local authorities from carrying out their own inquiries as Oldham are now to do as the national recommendations are hopefully enacted .. One often hears that victims not just of this type of crime want the same to not happen to anyone else, if Jays report is to mean anything to the victims who relived their own horrendous suffering during that then kicking the can down the road for some new and massively expensive national inquiry makes no sense.. Sadly the issue has become less about the actual victims it seems and people are happy to use the harms done to them to try to score cheap political points.. Such things should be above that.. I disagree with Jay, she is suggesting that the 15 investigations will cover all bases, she is suggesting this in isolation. The framework of a national inquiry would need to be established and if the work Jay has completed fulfils the framework then I would agree with her. We go down this path so many times and never seem to learn, looking into silo's creates silo's. " I bet she’s crushed that someone on a swinging forum disagrees with her. I believe it was Michael Gove who said “ we’ve had enough of experts “ | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Jay has said that there doesn't need to be another inquiry on a National basis but that the findings of her inquiry which she was critical of the last government in not implementing should now be carried out.. Surely that is the essential thing to do ..? It won't stop local authorities from carrying out their own inquiries as Oldham are now to do as the national recommendations are hopefully enacted .. One often hears that victims not just of this type of crime want the same to not happen to anyone else, if Jays report is to mean anything to the victims who relived their own horrendous suffering during that then kicking the can down the road for some new and massively expensive national inquiry makes no sense.. Sadly the issue has become less about the actual victims it seems and people are happy to use the harms done to them to try to score cheap political points.. Such things should be above that.. I disagree with Jay, she is suggesting that the 15 investigations will cover all bases, she is suggesting this in isolation. The framework of a national inquiry would need to be established and if the work Jay has completed fulfils the framework then I would agree with her. We go down this path so many times and never seem to learn, looking into silo's creates silo's. I bet she’s crushed that someone on a swinging forum disagrees with her. I believe it was Michael Gove who said “ we’ve had enough of experts “" Have you got an opinion you would like to share on the subject, or is just insults again? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Jay has said that there doesn't need to be another inquiry on a National basis but that the findings of her inquiry which she was critical of the last government in not implementing should now be carried out.. Surely that is the essential thing to do ..? It won't stop local authorities from carrying out their own inquiries as Oldham are now to do as the national recommendations are hopefully enacted .. One often hears that victims not just of this type of crime want the same to not happen to anyone else, if Jays report is to mean anything to the victims who relived their own horrendous suffering during that then kicking the can down the road for some new and massively expensive national inquiry makes no sense.. Sadly the issue has become less about the actual victims it seems and people are happy to use the harms done to them to try to score cheap political points.. Such things should be above that.. I disagree with Jay, she is suggesting that the 15 investigations will cover all bases, she is suggesting this in isolation. The framework of a national inquiry would need to be established and if the work Jay has completed fulfils the framework then I would agree with her. We go down this path so many times and never seem to learn, looking into silo's creates silo's. I don't get what you're saying. A silo of recommendations has not been created." As I said in my post if the framework for a national inquiry would be met by the work Jay did, then great, but until that is known drawing a line under it seems premature. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Jay has said that there doesn't need to be another inquiry on a National basis but that the findings of her inquiry which she was critical of the last government in not implementing should now be carried out.. Surely that is the essential thing to do ..? It won't stop local authorities from carrying out their own inquiries as Oldham are now to do as the national recommendations are hopefully enacted .. One often hears that victims not just of this type of crime want the same to not happen to anyone else, if Jays report is to mean anything to the victims who relived their own horrendous suffering during that then kicking the can down the road for some new and massively expensive national inquiry makes no sense.. Sadly the issue has become less about the actual victims it seems and people are happy to use the harms done to them to try to score cheap political points.. Such things should be above that.. I disagree with Jay, she is suggesting that the 15 investigations will cover all bases, she is suggesting this in isolation. The framework of a national inquiry would need to be established and if the work Jay has completed fulfils the framework then I would agree with her. We go down this path so many times and never seem to learn, looking into silo's creates silo's. I bet she’s crushed that someone on a swinging forum disagrees with her. I believe it was Michael Gove who said “ we’ve had enough of experts “ Have you got an opinion you would like to share on the subject, or is just insults again?" My opinion is I’m not qualified to disagree with an expert. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Jay has said that there doesn't need to be another inquiry on a National basis but that the findings of her inquiry which she was critical of the last government in not implementing should now be carried out.. Surely that is the essential thing to do ..? It won't stop local authorities from carrying out their own inquiries as Oldham are now to do as the national recommendations are hopefully enacted .. One often hears that victims not just of this type of crime want the same to not happen to anyone else, if Jays report is to mean anything to the victims who relived their own horrendous suffering during that then kicking the can down the road for some new and massively expensive national inquiry makes no sense.. Sadly the issue has become less about the actual victims it seems and people are happy to use the harms done to them to try to score cheap political points.. Such things should be above that.. I disagree with Jay, she is suggesting that the 15 investigations will cover all bases, she is suggesting this in isolation. The framework of a national inquiry would need to be established and if the work Jay has completed fulfils the framework then I would agree with her. We go down this path so many times and never seem to learn, looking into silo's creates silo's. I don't get what you're saying. A silo of recommendations has not been created. As I said in my post if the framework for a national inquiry would be met by the work Jay did, then great, but until that is known drawing a line under it seems premature. " I know what you said but the silo comment is beyond me. Jay was on the panel for the STATUTORY inquiry on child abuse (all child abuse (not silo): Savile, Catholic church, care homes, police etc). On the panel due to being Chair of the Rotherham inquiry (silo). It became STATUTORY to give the panel more powers, ie to subpoena people if required. Jay became chair x amount of years in. Initially they weren't going to be looking at individual cases (not silo), but decided it may be necessary (not silo as evidence equals part of a whole). FFW - recommendations for any institution/person involved with children when sex abuse is suspected, guidance for them to follow. Which in itself, as I have done child safeguarding training (mandatory) for donkeys years, as should all of the people involved in public institutions, is beyond belief the decades this has gone on (ie all abuse is covered in the training) .
So, again, elaborate. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Jay has said that there doesn't need to be another inquiry on a National basis but that the findings of her inquiry which she was critical of the last government in not implementing should now be carried out.. Surely that is the essential thing to do ..? It won't stop local authorities from carrying out their own inquiries as Oldham are now to do as the national recommendations are hopefully enacted .. One often hears that victims not just of this type of crime want the same to not happen to anyone else, if Jays report is to mean anything to the victims who relived their own horrendous suffering during that then kicking the can down the road for some new and massively expensive national inquiry makes no sense.. Sadly the issue has become less about the actual victims it seems and people are happy to use the harms done to them to try to score cheap political points.. Such things should be above that.. I disagree with Jay, she is suggesting that the 15 investigations will cover all bases, she is suggesting this in isolation. The framework of a national inquiry would need to be established and if the work Jay has completed fulfils the framework then I would agree with her. We go down this path so many times and never seem to learn, looking into silo's creates silo's. I bet she’s crushed that someone on a swinging forum disagrees with her. I believe it was Michael Gove who said “ we’ve had enough of experts “ Have you got an opinion you would like to share on the subject, or is just insults again? My opinion is I’m not qualified to disagree with an expert." You’re entitled to an opinion that disagrees with an expert, it doesn’t make it any less valid. Maybe you could refrain from the insults going forward? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Jay has said that there doesn't need to be another inquiry on a National basis but that the findings of her inquiry which she was critical of the last government in not implementing should now be carried out.. Surely that is the essential thing to do ..? It won't stop local authorities from carrying out their own inquiries as Oldham are now to do as the national recommendations are hopefully enacted .. One often hears that victims not just of this type of crime want the same to not happen to anyone else, if Jays report is to mean anything to the victims who relived their own horrendous suffering during that then kicking the can down the road for some new and massively expensive national inquiry makes no sense.. Sadly the issue has become less about the actual victims it seems and people are happy to use the harms done to them to try to score cheap political points.. Such things should be above that.. I disagree with Jay, she is suggesting that the 15 investigations will cover all bases, she is suggesting this in isolation. The framework of a national inquiry would need to be established and if the work Jay has completed fulfils the framework then I would agree with her. We go down this path so many times and never seem to learn, looking into silo's creates silo's. I bet she’s crushed that someone on a swinging forum disagrees with her. I believe it was Michael Gove who said “ we’ve had enough of experts “ Have you got an opinion you would like to share on the subject, or is just insults again? My opinion is I’m not qualified to disagree with an expert. You’re entitled to an opinion that disagrees with an expert, it doesn’t make it any less valid. Maybe you could refrain from the insults going forward? " What insults? Come on, you're better than that. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Jay has said that there doesn't need to be another inquiry on a National basis but that the findings of her inquiry which she was critical of the last government in not implementing should now be carried out.. Surely that is the essential thing to do ..? It won't stop local authorities from carrying out their own inquiries as Oldham are now to do as the national recommendations are hopefully enacted .. One often hears that victims not just of this type of crime want the same to not happen to anyone else, if Jays report is to mean anything to the victims who relived their own horrendous suffering during that then kicking the can down the road for some new and massively expensive national inquiry makes no sense.. Sadly the issue has become less about the actual victims it seems and people are happy to use the harms done to them to try to score cheap political points.. Such things should be above that.. I disagree with Jay, she is suggesting that the 15 investigations will cover all bases, she is suggesting this in isolation. The framework of a national inquiry would need to be established and if the work Jay has completed fulfils the framework then I would agree with her. We go down this path so many times and never seem to learn, looking into silo's creates silo's. I don't get what you're saying. A silo of recommendations has not been created. As I said in my post if the framework for a national inquiry would be met by the work Jay did, then great, but until that is known drawing a line under it seems premature. I know what you said but the silo comment is beyond me. Jay was on the panel for the STATUTORY inquiry on child abuse (all child abuse (not silo): Savile, Catholic church, care homes, police etc). On the panel due to being Chair of the Rotherham inquiry (silo). It became STATUTORY to give the panel more powers, ie to subpoena people if required. Jay became chair x amount of years in. Initially they weren't going to be looking at individual cases (not silo), but decided it may be necessary (not silo as evidence equals part of a whole). FFW - recommendations for any institution/person involved with children when sex abuse is suspected, guidance for them to follow. Which in itself, as I have done child safeguarding training (mandatory) for donkeys years, as should all of the people involved in public institutions, is beyond belief the decades this has gone on (ie all abuse is covered in the training) .
So, again, elaborate."I would hope that a national inquiry would thoroughly examine the performance of all support services across the entire country, rather than focusing on selected areas or potentially overlooking others. That’s the fundamental purpose of a national inquiry to provide a comprehensive and unified understanding. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Jay has said that there doesn't need to be another inquiry on a National basis but that the findings of her inquiry which she was critical of the last government in not implementing should now be carried out.. Surely that is the essential thing to do ..? It won't stop local authorities from carrying out their own inquiries as Oldham are now to do as the national recommendations are hopefully enacted .. One often hears that victims not just of this type of crime want the same to not happen to anyone else, if Jays report is to mean anything to the victims who relived their own horrendous suffering during that then kicking the can down the road for some new and massively expensive national inquiry makes no sense.. Sadly the issue has become less about the actual victims it seems and people are happy to use the harms done to them to try to score cheap political points.. Such things should be above that.. I disagree with Jay, she is suggesting that the 15 investigations will cover all bases, she is suggesting this in isolation. The framework of a national inquiry would need to be established and if the work Jay has completed fulfils the framework then I would agree with her. We go down this path so many times and never seem to learn, looking into silo's creates silo's. I bet she’s crushed that someone on a swinging forum disagrees with her. I believe it was Michael Gove who said “ we’ve had enough of experts “ Have you got an opinion you would like to share on the subject, or is just insults again? My opinion is I’m not qualified to disagree with an expert. You’re entitled to an opinion that disagrees with an expert, it doesn’t make it any less valid. Maybe you could refrain from the insults going forward? " I find it strange that the opinion of an expert in a particular field is not considered to be more important than a person with no expertise in the same field. This phenomenon came to the fore in the brexit referendum and remains to this day. I’m not sure what you mean by insults going forward. I haven’t made a habit of insulting you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why should it be restricted to Oldham Prince Andrew and Church of England also need investigating " I wish they would. They should look at children's homes too. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Jay has said that there doesn't need to be another inquiry on a National basis but that the findings of her inquiry which she was critical of the last government in not implementing should now be carried out.. Surely that is the essential thing to do ..? It won't stop local authorities from carrying out their own inquiries as Oldham are now to do as the national recommendations are hopefully enacted .. One often hears that victims not just of this type of crime want the same to not happen to anyone else, if Jays report is to mean anything to the victims who relived their own horrendous suffering during that then kicking the can down the road for some new and massively expensive national inquiry makes no sense.. Sadly the issue has become less about the actual victims it seems and people are happy to use the harms done to them to try to score cheap political points.. Such things should be above that.. I disagree with Jay, she is suggesting that the 15 investigations will cover all bases, she is suggesting this in isolation. The framework of a national inquiry would need to be established and if the work Jay has completed fulfils the framework then I would agree with her. We go down this path so many times and never seem to learn, looking into silo's creates silo's. " Push it down the road till the next government decides it doesn't agree with the terms of the last enquiry into whatever wasn't how they would have done it isn't the most effective way to at least get something done.. A spokesperson, herself a survivor of child abuse from the Survivors Trust said that implementation of another enquiry would only push back further the recommendations of Jay's report.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Jay has said that there doesn't need to be another inquiry on a National basis but that the findings of her inquiry which she was critical of the last government in not implementing should now be carried out.. Surely that is the essential thing to do ..? It won't stop local authorities from carrying out their own inquiries as Oldham are now to do as the national recommendations are hopefully enacted .. One often hears that victims not just of this type of crime want the same to not happen to anyone else, if Jays report is to mean anything to the victims who relived their own horrendous suffering during that then kicking the can down the road for some new and massively expensive national inquiry makes no sense.. Sadly the issue has become less about the actual victims it seems and people are happy to use the harms done to them to try to score cheap political points.. Such things should be above that.. I disagree with Jay, she is suggesting that the 15 investigations will cover all bases, she is suggesting this in isolation. The framework of a national inquiry would need to be established and if the work Jay has completed fulfils the framework then I would agree with her. We go down this path so many times and never seem to learn, looking into silo's creates silo's. I don't get what you're saying. A silo of recommendations has not been created. As I said in my post if the framework for a national inquiry would be met by the work Jay did, then great, but until that is known drawing a line under it seems premature. I know what you said but the silo comment is beyond me. Jay was on the panel for the STATUTORY inquiry on child abuse (all child abuse (not silo): Savile, Catholic church, care homes, police etc). On the panel due to being Chair of the Rotherham inquiry (silo). It became STATUTORY to give the panel more powers, ie to subpoena people if required. Jay became chair x amount of years in. Initially they weren't going to be looking at individual cases (not silo), but decided it may be necessary (not silo as evidence equals part of a whole). FFW - recommendations for any institution/person involved with children when sex abuse is suspected, guidance for them to follow. Which in itself, as I have done child safeguarding training (mandatory) for donkeys years, as should all of the people involved in public institutions, is beyond belief the decades this has gone on (ie all abuse is covered in the training) .
So, again, elaborate.
I would hope that a national inquiry would thoroughly examine the performance of all support services across the entire country, rather than focusing on selected areas or potentially overlooking others. That’s the fundamental purpose of a national inquiry to provide a comprehensive and unified understanding."Are you for real? Inquiries are expensive and you want one looking at the good, the bad, the ugly?
The nature of inquiries is looking at what went wrong and why, what can be done to ensure no repeats ie safety nets. THIS has been done.
It would be up to individual institutions through individuals to network and see gold standards in other areas and then adapt/adopt. Oh and for the heads of the institutions to recognise what can be useful nationally. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Jay has said that there doesn't need to be another inquiry on a National basis but that the findings of her inquiry which she was critical of the last government in not implementing should now be carried out.. Surely that is the essential thing to do ..? It won't stop local authorities from carrying out their own inquiries as Oldham are now to do as the national recommendations are hopefully enacted .. One often hears that victims not just of this type of crime want the same to not happen to anyone else, if Jays report is to mean anything to the victims who relived their own horrendous suffering during that then kicking the can down the road for some new and massively expensive national inquiry makes no sense.. Sadly the issue has become less about the actual victims it seems and people are happy to use the harms done to them to try to score cheap political points.. Such things should be above that.. I disagree with Jay, she is suggesting that the 15 investigations will cover all bases, she is suggesting this in isolation. The framework of a national inquiry would need to be established and if the work Jay has completed fulfils the framework then I would agree with her. We go down this path so many times and never seem to learn, looking into silo's creates silo's. Push it down the road till the next government decides it doesn't agree with the terms of the last enquiry into whatever wasn't how they would have done it isn't the most effective way to at least get something done.. A spokesperson, herself a survivor of child abuse from the Survivors Trust said that implementation of another enquiry would only push back further the recommendations of Jay's report.. " And one of the recommendations, punitive damages. We know how successive govts like to hold back the millions it'll cost them. Billions if you include the post office scandal, the blood scandal and smaller cases that don't make it into msm. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Jay has said that there doesn't need to be another inquiry on a National basis but that the findings of her inquiry which she was critical of the last government in not implementing should now be carried out.. Surely that is the essential thing to do ..? It won't stop local authorities from carrying out their own inquiries as Oldham are now to do as the national recommendations are hopefully enacted .. One often hears that victims not just of this type of crime want the same to not happen to anyone else, if Jays report is to mean anything to the victims who relived their own horrendous suffering during that then kicking the can down the road for some new and massively expensive national inquiry makes no sense.. Sadly the issue has become less about the actual victims it seems and people are happy to use the harms done to them to try to score cheap political points.. Such things should be above that.. I disagree with Jay, she is suggesting that the 15 investigations will cover all bases, she is suggesting this in isolation. The framework of a national inquiry would need to be established and if the work Jay has completed fulfils the framework then I would agree with her. We go down this path so many times and never seem to learn, looking into silo's creates silo's. Push it down the road till the next government decides it doesn't agree with the terms of the last enquiry into whatever wasn't how they would have done it isn't the most effective way to at least get something done.. A spokesperson, herself a survivor of child abuse from the Survivors Trust said that implementation of another enquiry would only push back further the recommendations of Jay's report.. And one of the recommendations, punitive damages. We know how successive govts like to hold back the millions it'll cost them. Billions if you include the post office scandal, the blood scandal and smaller cases that don't make it into msm." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Jay has said that there doesn't need to be another inquiry on a National basis but that the findings of her inquiry which she was critical of the last government in not implementing should now be carried out.. Surely that is the essential thing to do ..? It won't stop local authorities from carrying out their own inquiries as Oldham are now to do as the national recommendations are hopefully enacted .. One often hears that victims not just of this type of crime want the same to not happen to anyone else, if Jays report is to mean anything to the victims who relived their own horrendous suffering during that then kicking the can down the road for some new and massively expensive national inquiry makes no sense.. Sadly the issue has become less about the actual victims it seems and people are happy to use the harms done to them to try to score cheap political points.. Such things should be above that.. I disagree with Jay, she is suggesting that the 15 investigations will cover all bases, she is suggesting this in isolation. The framework of a national inquiry would need to be established and if the work Jay has completed fulfils the framework then I would agree with her. We go down this path so many times and never seem to learn, looking into silo's creates silo's. I don't get what you're saying. A silo of recommendations has not been created. As I said in my post if the framework for a national inquiry would be met by the work Jay did, then great, but until that is known drawing a line under it seems premature. I know what you said but the silo comment is beyond me. Jay was on the panel for the STATUTORY inquiry on child abuse (all child abuse (not silo): Savile, Catholic church, care homes, police etc). On the panel due to being Chair of the Rotherham inquiry (silo). It became STATUTORY to give the panel more powers, ie to subpoena people if required. Jay became chair x amount of years in. Initially they weren't going to be looking at individual cases (not silo), but decided it may be necessary (not silo as evidence equals part of a whole). FFW - recommendations for any institution/person involved with children when sex abuse is suspected, guidance for them to follow. Which in itself, as I have done child safeguarding training (mandatory) for donkeys years, as should all of the people involved in public institutions, is beyond belief the decades this has gone on (ie all abuse is covered in the training) .
So, again, elaborate.
I would hope that a national inquiry would thoroughly examine the performance of all support services across the entire country, rather than focusing on selected areas or potentially overlooking others. That’s the fundamental purpose of a national inquiry to provide a comprehensive and unified understanding.
Are you for real? Inquiries are expensive and you want one looking at the good, the bad, the ugly?
The nature of inquiries is looking at what went wrong and why, what can be done to ensure no repeats ie safety nets. THIS has been done.
It would be up to individual institutions through individuals to network and see gold standards in other areas and then adapt/adopt. Oh and for the heads of the institutions to recognise what can be useful nationally."Yes, I’m absolutely serious. I’ll repeat: if a national inquiry framework is established and the work already completed satisfies it, then fine, we don’t need one. But until such a framework exists, we’re hoping the work done is enough. The Rotherham Inquiry wasn’t sufficient, which led to IICSA, and even that has been criticised for not covering all bases. We’ve seen this pattern before: Hillsborough, Grenfell, Savile, and others all started as localised inquiries before their scope had to be extended nationally. Given the sheer number of victims and the multiple services involved, I believe a deep dive at national level is justified regardless of cost. Without it, how can we be sure there aren’t other areas covering up similar issues, leaving the problem far wider than we currently understand? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Jay has said that there doesn't need to be another inquiry on a National basis but that the findings of her inquiry which she was critical of the last government in not implementing should now be carried out.. Surely that is the essential thing to do ..? It won't stop local authorities from carrying out their own inquiries as Oldham are now to do as the national recommendations are hopefully enacted .. One often hears that victims not just of this type of crime want the same to not happen to anyone else, if Jays report is to mean anything to the victims who relived their own horrendous suffering during that then kicking the can down the road for some new and massively expensive national inquiry makes no sense.. Sadly the issue has become less about the actual victims it seems and people are happy to use the harms done to them to try to score cheap political points.. Such things should be above that.. I disagree with Jay, she is suggesting that the 15 investigations will cover all bases, she is suggesting this in isolation. The framework of a national inquiry would need to be established and if the work Jay has completed fulfils the framework then I would agree with her. We go down this path so many times and never seem to learn, looking into silo's creates silo's. I don't get what you're saying. A silo of recommendations has not been created. As I said in my post if the framework for a national inquiry would be met by the work Jay did, then great, but until that is known drawing a line under it seems premature. I know what you said but the silo comment is beyond me. Jay was on the panel for the STATUTORY inquiry on child abuse (all child abuse (not silo): Savile, Catholic church, care homes, police etc). On the panel due to being Chair of the Rotherham inquiry (silo). It became STATUTORY to give the panel more powers, ie to subpoena people if required. Jay became chair x amount of years in. Initially they weren't going to be looking at individual cases (not silo), but decided it may be necessary (not silo as evidence equals part of a whole). FFW - recommendations for any institution/person involved with children when sex abuse is suspected, guidance for them to follow. Which in itself, as I have done child safeguarding training (mandatory) for donkeys years, as should all of the people involved in public institutions, is beyond belief the decades this has gone on (ie all abuse is covered in the training) .
So, again, elaborate.
I would hope that a national inquiry would thoroughly examine the performance of all support services across the entire country, rather than focusing on selected areas or potentially overlooking others. That’s the fundamental purpose of a national inquiry to provide a comprehensive and unified understanding.
Are you for real? Inquiries are expensive and you want one looking at the good, the bad, the ugly?
The nature of inquiries is looking at what went wrong and why, what can be done to ensure no repeats ie safety nets. THIS has been done.
It would be up to individual institutions through individuals to network and see gold standards in other areas and then adapt/adopt. Oh and for the heads of the institutions to recognise what can be useful nationally.
Yes, I’m absolutely serious. I’ll repeat: if a national inquiry framework is established and the work already completed satisfies it, then fine, we don’t need one. But until such a framework exists, we’re hoping the work done is enough.
The Rotherham Inquiry wasn’t sufficient, which led to IICSA, and even that has been criticised for not covering all bases. We’ve seen this pattern before: Hillsborough, Grenfell, Savile, and others all started as localised inquiries before their scope had to be extended nationally.
Given the sheer number of victims and the multiple services involved, I believe a deep dive at national level is justified regardless of cost. Without it, how can we be sure there aren’t other areas covering up similar issues, leaving the problem far wider than we currently understand?"i think it were more a case of, gibe them some numbers in jail and names and keep mr lennon quiet keep them problems up north theres nothing to see down here | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Jay has said that there doesn't need to be another inquiry on a National basis but that the findings of her inquiry which she was critical of the last government in not implementing should now be carried out.. Surely that is the essential thing to do ..? It won't stop local authorities from carrying out their own inquiries as Oldham are now to do as the national recommendations are hopefully enacted .. One often hears that victims not just of this type of crime want the same to not happen to anyone else, if Jays report is to mean anything to the victims who relived their own horrendous suffering during that then kicking the can down the road for some new and massively expensive national inquiry makes no sense.. Sadly the issue has become less about the actual victims it seems and people are happy to use the harms done to them to try to score cheap political points.. Such things should be above that.. I disagree with Jay, she is suggesting that the 15 investigations will cover all bases, she is suggesting this in isolation. The framework of a national inquiry would need to be established and if the work Jay has completed fulfils the framework then I would agree with her. We go down this path so many times and never seem to learn, looking into silo's creates silo's. I don't get what you're saying. A silo of recommendations has not been created. As I said in my post if the framework for a national inquiry would be met by the work Jay did, then great, but until that is known drawing a line under it seems premature. I know what you said but the silo comment is beyond me. Jay was on the panel for the STATUTORY inquiry on child abuse (all child abuse (not silo): Savile, Catholic church, care homes, police etc). On the panel due to being Chair of the Rotherham inquiry (silo). It became STATUTORY to give the panel more powers, ie to subpoena people if required. Jay became chair x amount of years in. Initially they weren't going to be looking at individual cases (not silo), but decided it may be necessary (not silo as evidence equals part of a whole). FFW - recommendations for any institution/person involved with children when sex abuse is suspected, guidance for them to follow. Which in itself, as I have done child safeguarding training (mandatory) for donkeys years, as should all of the people involved in public institutions, is beyond belief the decades this has gone on (ie all abuse is covered in the training) .
So, again, elaborate.
I would hope that a national inquiry would thoroughly examine the performance of all support services across the entire country, rather than focusing on selected areas or potentially overlooking others. That’s the fundamental purpose of a national inquiry to provide a comprehensive and unified understanding.
Are you for real? Inquiries are expensive and you want one looking at the good, the bad, the ugly?
The nature of inquiries is looking at what went wrong and why, what can be done to ensure no repeats ie safety nets. THIS has been done.
It would be up to individual institutions through individuals to network and see gold standards in other areas and then adapt/adopt. Oh and for the heads of the institutions to recognise what can be useful nationally.
Yes, I’m absolutely serious. I’ll repeat: if a national inquiry framework is established and the work already completed satisfies it, then fine, we don’t need one. But until such a framework exists, we’re hoping the work done is enough.
The Rotherham Inquiry wasn’t sufficient, which led to IICSA, and even that has been criticised for not covering all bases. We’ve seen this pattern before: Hillsborough, Grenfell, Savile, and others all started as localised inquiries before their scope had to be extended nationally.
Given the sheer number of victims and the multiple services involved, I believe a deep dive at national level is justified regardless of cost. Without it, how can we be sure there aren’t other areas covering up similar issues, leaving the problem far wider than we currently understand?"The IICSA made a big mistake by not covering grooming gangs as a separate category and recognising the particular characteristics of these crimes and the multitude of state failings in covering them up. This is not an issue which is going away, no matter how much Sir Kier and his poodles try to paint it as a 'far right' conspiracy. The truth will out. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Jay has said that there doesn't need to be another inquiry on a National basis but that the findings of her inquiry which she was critical of the last government in not implementing should now be carried out.. Surely that is the essential thing to do ..? It won't stop local authorities from carrying out their own inquiries as Oldham are now to do as the national recommendations are hopefully enacted .. One often hears that victims not just of this type of crime want the same to not happen to anyone else, if Jays report is to mean anything to the victims who relived their own horrendous suffering during that then kicking the can down the road for some new and massively expensive national inquiry makes no sense.. Sadly the issue has become less about the actual victims it seems and people are happy to use the harms done to them to try to score cheap political points.. Such things should be above that.. I disagree with Jay, she is suggesting that the 15 investigations will cover all bases, she is suggesting this in isolation. The framework of a national inquiry would need to be established and if the work Jay has completed fulfils the framework then I would agree with her. We go down this path so many times and never seem to learn, looking into silo's creates silo's. I don't get what you're saying. A silo of recommendations has not been created. As I said in my post if the framework for a national inquiry would be met by the work Jay did, then great, but until that is known drawing a line under it seems premature. I know what you said but the silo comment is beyond me. Jay was on the panel for the STATUTORY inquiry on child abuse (all child abuse (not silo): Savile, Catholic church, care homes, police etc). On the panel due to being Chair of the Rotherham inquiry (silo). It became STATUTORY to give the panel more powers, ie to subpoena people if required. Jay became chair x amount of years in. Initially they weren't going to be looking at individual cases (not silo), but decided it may be necessary (not silo as evidence equals part of a whole). FFW - recommendations for any institution/person involved with children when sex abuse is suspected, guidance for them to follow. Which in itself, as I have done child safeguarding training (mandatory) for donkeys years, as should all of the people involved in public institutions, is beyond belief the decades this has gone on (ie all abuse is covered in the training) .
So, again, elaborate.
I would hope that a national inquiry would thoroughly examine the performance of all support services across the entire country, rather than focusing on selected areas or potentially overlooking others. That’s the fundamental purpose of a national inquiry to provide a comprehensive and unified understanding.
Are you for real? Inquiries are expensive and you want one looking at the good, the bad, the ugly?
The nature of inquiries is looking at what went wrong and why, what can be done to ensure no repeats ie safety nets. THIS has been done.
It would be up to individual institutions through individuals to network and see gold standards in other areas and then adapt/adopt. Oh and for the heads of the institutions to recognise what can be useful nationally.
Yes, I’m absolutely serious. I’ll repeat: if a national inquiry framework is established and the work already completed satisfies it, then fine, we don’t need one. But until such a framework exists, we’re hoping the work done is enough.
The Rotherham Inquiry wasn’t sufficient, which led to IICSA, and even that has been criticised for not covering all bases. We’ve seen this pattern before: Hillsborough, Grenfell, Savile, and others all started as localised inquiries before their scope had to be extended nationally.
Given the sheer number of victims and the multiple services involved, I believe a deep dive at national level is justified regardless of cost. Without it, how can we be sure there aren’t other areas covering up similar issues, leaving the problem far wider than we currently understand?
The IICSA made a big mistake by not covering grooming gangs as a separate category and recognising the particular characteristics of these crimes and the multitude of state failings in covering them up.
This is not an issue which is going away, no matter how much Sir Kier and his poodles try to paint it as a 'far right' conspiracy. The truth will out."What is the truth? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Because the uncomfortable truth is if they did that… they would probably find it was going on in churches and care homes way more than certain gangs of ethnicities " The IISCA report did feature stand alone sections on abuse in care homes and the Catholic Church. I did not do the same for Pakistan heritage grooming gangs. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yvette Cooper getting tough on grooming gangs live at 6pm today. Now I wonder how they've got round to debating it in parliament this evening " Probably because today was the first day back in parliament. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Because the uncomfortable truth is if they did that… they would probably find it was going on in churches and care homes way more than certain gangs of ethnicities The IISCA report did feature stand alone sections on abuse in care homes and the Catholic Church. I did not do the same for Pakistan heritage grooming gangs." Possibly due to the Rotherham inquiry. It was noted it wasn't just Rotherham. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
Go to the IICSA website and look at the timeline. Then you can stop whingeing about the current govt other than moan the recommendations haven't been applied by them or the previous twats! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"For all those who thought a national inquiry hasn't been done - it has. The IICSA looked into the abuse of children in England and Wales. For all those people who think it did not look into the grooming by Pakistani males, it did, it comes under abuse by organised networks! There you go, done, case closed
Go to the IICSA website and look at the timeline. Then you can stop whingeing about the current govt other than moan the recommendations haven't been applied by them or the previous twats!"You do seem to want to throw yourself under the bus for this government. I couldn’t care less which party is in power, I want a national inquiry into what they call grooming gangs, I have another name for them. I don’t want a slice of it, and I don’t want other things thrown into the mix. I want every supporting function in every county scrutinised, past, present and future. Is that too much to ask for? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"For all those who thought a national inquiry hasn't been done - it has. The IICSA looked into the abuse of children in England and Wales. For all those people who think it did not look into the grooming by Pakistani males, it did, it comes under abuse by organised networks! There you go, done, case closed
Go to the IICSA website and look at the timeline. Then you can stop whingeing about the current govt other than moan the recommendations haven't been applied by them or the previous twats!
You do seem to want to throw yourself under the bus for this government.
I couldn’t care less which party is in power, I want a national inquiry into what they call grooming gangs, I have another name for them. I don’t want a slice of it, and I don’t want other things thrown into the mix. I want every supporting function in every county scrutinised, past, present and future.
Is that too much to ask for? "No it isn't too much to ask for. It would take a couple of years to have anothe enquiry. They should go for it anyway and in the meantime implement action as best they can with current enquiries completed Starting with the chief of police in areas already mentioned and why shocking incidents were allowed to happen and bring dicsiplary action to any officers, councilors etc . I'm sure there will be procedures already in place that can be implimented. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yvette Cooper getting tough on grooming gangs live at 6pm today. Now I wonder how they've got round to debating it in parliament this evening Probably because today was the first day back in parliament." It's been going on for decades | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yvette Cooper getting tough on grooming gangs live at 6pm today. Now I wonder how they've got round to debating it in parliament this evening Probably because today was the first day back in parliament. It's been going on for decades " The question was about Yvette Cooper. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"For all those who thought a national inquiry hasn't been done - it has. The IICSA looked into the abuse of children in England and Wales. For all those people who think it did not look into the grooming by Pakistani males, it did, it comes under abuse by organised networks! There you go, done, case closed
Go to the IICSA website and look at the timeline. Then you can stop whingeing about the current govt other than moan the recommendations haven't been applied by them or the previous twats!
You do seem to want to throw yourself under the bus for this government.
I couldn’t care less which party is in power, I want a national inquiry into what they call grooming gangs, I have another name for them. I don’t want a slice of it, and I don’t want other things thrown into the mix. I want every supporting function in every county scrutinised, past, present and future.
Is that too much to ask for? " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"For all those who thought a national inquiry hasn't been done - it has. The IICSA looked into the abuse of children in England and Wales. For all those people who think it did not look into the grooming by Pakistani males, it did, it comes under abuse by organised networks! There you go, done, case closed
Go to the IICSA website and look at the timeline. Then you can stop whingeing about the current govt other than moan the recommendations haven't been applied by them or the previous twats!
You do seem to want to throw yourself under the bus for this government.
I couldn’t care less which party is in power, I want a national inquiry into what they call grooming gangs, I have another name for them. I don’t want a slice of it, and I don’t want other things thrown into the mix. I want every supporting function in every county scrutinised, past, present and future.
Is that too much to ask for? "Yes! It's been done! And how am I throwing myself under the bus when what YOU are asking for has been done? Grooming gangs = organised networks. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yvette Cooper getting tough on grooming gangs live at 6pm today. Now I wonder how they've got round to debating it in parliament this evening Probably because today was the first day back in parliament. It's been going on for decades The question was about Yvette Cooper." She's been going on for decades   . Sorry yvette  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"For all those who thought a national inquiry hasn't been done - it has. The IICSA looked into the abuse of children in England and Wales. For all those people who think it did not look into the grooming by Pakistani males, it did, it comes under abuse by organised networks! There you go, done, case closed
Go to the IICSA website and look at the timeline. Then you can stop whingeing about the current govt other than moan the recommendations haven't been applied by them or the previous twats!"If you're going to discuss such gravely serious issues you need to do better than a quick glance on Wikipedia. The Inquiry examined organised gang activity in just six locations, none of which had recorded convictions for Pakistani heritage gangs. None of the Northern towns such as Rotherham, Rochdale or Telford where literally thousands of girls were victims were examined. None of the 50 towns and cities where convictions have been secured against Pakistani heritage gangs targeting white girls were examined. If you think that represents any sort of justice or closure for the many thousands of victims of these gangs (estimated at over 250,000 by some) then you are badly mistaken. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"For all those who thought a national inquiry hasn't been done - it has. The IICSA looked into the abuse of children in England and Wales. For all those people who think it did not look into the grooming by Pakistani males, it did, it comes under abuse by organised networks! There you go, done, case closed
Go to the IICSA website and look at the timeline. Then you can stop whingeing about the current govt other than moan the recommendations haven't been applied by them or the previous twats!
You do seem to want to throw yourself under the bus for this government.
I couldn’t care less which party is in power, I want a national inquiry into what they call grooming gangs, I have another name for them. I don’t want a slice of it, and I don’t want other things thrown into the mix. I want every supporting function in every county scrutinised, past, present and future.
Is that too much to ask for?
Yes!
It's been done!
And how am I throwing myself under the bus when what YOU are asking for has been done?
Grooming gangs = organised networks.
"Your perception is way off from what I'm suggesting needs to happen, so I will leave this here. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"For all those who thought a national inquiry hasn't been done - it has. The IICSA looked into the abuse of children in England and Wales. For all those people who think it did not look into the grooming by Pakistani males, it did, it comes under abuse by organised networks! There you go, done, case closed
Go to the IICSA website and look at the timeline. Then you can stop whingeing about the current govt other than moan the recommendations haven't been applied by them or the previous twats!
If you're going to discuss such gravely serious issues you need to do better than a quick glance on Wikipedia.
The Inquiry examined organised gang activity in just six locations, none of which had recorded convictions for Pakistani heritage gangs. None of the Northern towns such as Rotherham, Rochdale or Telford where literally thousands of girls were victims were examined. None of the 50 towns and cities where convictions have been secured against Pakistani heritage gangs targeting white girls were examined.
If you think that represents any sort of justice or closure for the many thousands of victims of these gangs (estimated at over 250,000 by some) then you are badly mistaken. "Oh deary me, why would I make claims from the IICSA website, if I didn't go onto the IICSA website. It clearly states they didn't use Rotherham, Oxford and one other as they wanted areas not before examined (this was for the organised networks). Btw the perps also targeted Asian girls but the inquiry (may have been the Rotherham one) believe these were under-reported due to culture. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"For all those who thought a national inquiry hasn't been done - it has. The IICSA looked into the abuse of children in England and Wales. For all those people who think it did not look into the grooming by Pakistani males, it did, it comes under abuse by organised networks! There you go, done, case closed
Go to the IICSA website and look at the timeline. Then you can stop whingeing about the current govt other than moan the recommendations haven't been applied by them or the previous twats!
If you're going to discuss such gravely serious issues you need to do better than a quick glance on Wikipedia.
The Inquiry examined organised gang activity in just six locations, none of which had recorded convictions for Pakistani heritage gangs. None of the Northern towns such as Rotherham, Rochdale or Telford where literally thousands of girls were victims were examined. None of the 50 towns and cities where convictions have been secured against Pakistani heritage gangs targeting white girls were examined.
If you think that represents any sort of justice or closure for the many thousands of victims of these gangs (estimated at over 250,000 by some) then you are badly mistaken.
Oh deary me, why would I make claims from the IICSA website, if I didn't go onto the IICSA website. It clearly states they didn't use Rotherham, Oxford and one other as they wanted areas not before examined (this was for the organised networks).
Btw the perps also targeted Asian girls but the inquiry (may have been the Rotherham one) believe these were under-reported due to culture."My apologies then if you have read the report. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The real threat here is from the world's most currently dangerous man / organisation..... Musk and X ." Yes that's the real issue here. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Anyone who voted these scumbags in should be ashamed.. " The last government that Professor Jay called weak in their response to her recommendations and did fuck all for two years but now several of them are literally on a crusade .. Those ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yvette Cooper getting tough on grooming gangs live at 6pm today. Now I wonder how they've got round to debating it in parliament this evening Probably because today was the first day back in parliament. It's been going on for decades The question was about Yvette Cooper." What's more important to you? Getting the likes of Yvette Cooper and other politicians into action and do their jobs and get people prosecuted and locked up Or Moaning about foreign nationals that have motivated the govt. into action? I'm pleased that someone!, anyone! In this case the likes of Elon musk has got this government to get results and into action against these evil criminals and you should be pleased too! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Anyone who voted these scumbags in should be ashamed.. " The labour party deceived the public to get into power. They're liars and even though I thought he was dodgy as fuck and I didn't vote for them I never thought he'd be this bad! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Anyone who voted these scumbags in should be ashamed.. The labour party deceived the public to get into power. They're liars and even though I thought he was dodgy as fuck and I didn't vote for them I never thought he'd be this bad!" Politicians lie..
How long has this been going on..?
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Anyone who voted these scumbags in should be ashamed.. The labour party deceived the public to get into power. They're liars and even though I thought he was dodgy as fuck and I didn't vote for them I never thought he'd be this bad! Politicians lie..
How long has this been going on..?
" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Anyone who voted these scumbags in should be ashamed.. The labour party deceived the public to get into power. They're liars and even though I thought he was dodgy as fuck and I didn't vote for them I never thought he'd be this bad! Politicians lie..
How long has this been going on..?
"To various degrees in the past but this : Free gear Two tier starmer takes the trophy 🏆 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Anyone who voted these scumbags in should be ashamed.. The labour party deceived the public to get into power. They're liars and even though I thought he was dodgy as fuck and I didn't vote for them I never thought he'd be this bad! Politicians lie..
How long has this been going on..?
To various degrees in the past but this :
Free gear Two tier starmer
takes the trophy 🏆"He's not even in the same league as Boris was, will always be..  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Anyone who voted these scumbags in should be ashamed.. The labour party deceived the public to get into power. They're liars and even though I thought he was dodgy as fuck and I didn't vote for them I never thought he'd be this bad! Politicians lie..
How long has this been going on..?
To various degrees in the past but this :
Free gear Two tier starmer
takes the trophy 🏆"He could lie every day for a year and the crown would belong to bojo | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Anyone who voted these scumbags in should be ashamed.. The labour party deceived the public to get into power. They're liars and even though I thought he was dodgy as fuck and I didn't vote for them I never thought he'd be this bad! Politicians lie..
How long has this been going on..?
To various degrees in the past but this :
Free gear Two tier starmer
takes the trophy 🏆
He's not even in the same league as Boris was, will always be..
"No, you have poor memory, name one thing he didn't lie about. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Anyone who voted these scumbags in should be ashamed.. The labour party deceived the public to get into power. They're liars and even though I thought he was dodgy as fuck and I didn't vote for them I never thought he'd be this bad! Politicians lie..
How long has this been going on..?
To various degrees in the past but this :
Free gear Two tier starmer
takes the trophy 🏆
He's not even in the same league as Boris was, will always be..
No, you have poor memory, name one thing he didn't lie about. "Alphabetical? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"What did the previous government say or do, after the earlier inquiry? I'm guessing almost nothing, despite the investment into research and recommendations already made https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp836w074gko" Exactly! Jenerick was on TV today blustering on about being tough on those responsible but they dragged their heels over it after 14 years in charge | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Anyone who voted these scumbags in should be ashamed.. " What about the Government that ordered the last enquiry, spent £200 million and sat on from 2022 until July 2024 without even mentioning it? At least the current Government have committed to implement the recommendations in that report (and go further). What names have you got for the last Government who sat on the report and now shout from the sidelines that another report should be written. Hypocrites? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"What did the previous government say or do, after the earlier inquiry? I'm guessing almost nothing, despite the investment into research and recommendations already made https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp836w074gko Exactly! Jenerick was on TV today blustering on about being tough on those responsible but they dragged their heels over it after 14 years in charge " They didn’t drag their heels, they did nothing at all. The current Government have agreed to implement the 2022 recommendations and even the author of that report does not feel it worthwhile spending another £200 million or so to conduct another very similar investigation. When the answers can be found by implementing the recommendations that she made 3 years ago. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The real threat here is from the world's most currently dangerous man / organisation..... Musk and X ." It's fine to disagree with Elon Musk. In fact, it would be bizarre to agree with him on every issue. But if you are British, and if you are more bothered about his statements than about the industrialised r@pe of underage girls, you need to ask yourself some hard questions. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"What did the previous government say or do, after the earlier inquiry? I'm guessing almost nothing, despite the investment into research and recommendations already made https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp836w074gko Exactly! Jenerick was on TV today blustering on about being tough on those responsible but they dragged their heels over it after 14 years in charge They didn’t drag their heels, they did nothing at all. The current Government have agreed to implement the 2022 recommendations and even the author of that report does not feel it worthwhile spending another £200 million or so to conduct another very similar investigation. When the answers can be found by implementing the recommendations that she made 3 years ago." Did nothing... Set up Rotherham Inquiry Set up IICSA Inquiry Established specialist task force to deal with grooming gangs leading to more prosecutions. Labour are only acting now they've been shamed by Elon Musk ! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"To their credit Priti Patel and Suella Braverman both did a lot of work on this issue as Home Secretaries. As far as I'm aware no Labour Home Secretary in the 1997-2010 Govts took any interest." It's come to light lately that the cps at the time headed by Starmer and the govt at the time headed by Brown put pressure on the police to leave it alone sighting not wanting to raise racial tension. They were of course glad of the votes from the ethnic not so minorities | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Channel 4 are showing a 3 part documentary on the ellie Williams fake grooming case. Just wondering with the last few days of the grooming gangs all over the news is this just bad timing or something else?" Typical C4 really | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"What did the previous government say or do, after the earlier inquiry? I'm guessing almost nothing, despite the investment into research and recommendations already made https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp836w074gko Exactly! Jenerick was on TV today blustering on about being tough on those responsible but they dragged their heels over it after 14 years in charge " So you now admit to having a fuller picture. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"What did the previous government say or do, after the earlier inquiry? I'm guessing almost nothing, despite the investment into research and recommendations already made https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp836w074gko Exactly! Jenerick was on TV today blustering on about being tough on those responsible but they dragged their heels over it after 14 years in charge They didn’t drag their heels, they did nothing at all. The current Government have agreed to implement the 2022 recommendations and even the author of that report does not feel it worthwhile spending another £200 million or so to conduct another very similar investigation. When the answers can be found by implementing the recommendations that she made 3 years ago. Did nothing... Set up Rotherham Inquiry Set up IICSA Inquiry Established specialist task force to deal with grooming gangs leading to more prosecutions. Labour are only acting now they've been shamed by Elon Musk !"
Ok the previous poster was wrong about tories doing nothing, however, the tories sat on the recommendations for two years. It doesn't matter what spurred labour into acting, but they've done so in 6 months. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"What did the previous government say or do, after the earlier inquiry? I'm guessing almost nothing, despite the investment into research and recommendations already made https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp836w074gko Exactly! Jenerick was on TV today blustering on about being tough on those responsible but they dragged their heels over it after 14 years in charge They didn’t drag their heels, they did nothing at all. The current Government have agreed to implement the 2022 recommendations and even the author of that report does not feel it worthwhile spending another £200 million or so to conduct another very similar investigation. When the answers can be found by implementing the recommendations that she made 3 years ago. Did nothing... Set up Rotherham Inquiry Set up IICSA Inquiry Established specialist task force to deal with grooming gangs leading to more prosecutions. Labour are only acting now they've been shamed by Elon Musk !
Ok the previous poster was wrong about tories doing nothing, however, the tories sat on the recommendations for two years. It doesn't matter what spurred labour into acting, but they've done so in 6 months."You said you'd looked at IICSA report. If so you'd see there is an extensive list of recommendations and a matching response (to date). There are many positive responses from Govt and its entirely false to say the previous Govt 'sat on its hands' but many of the recommendations required complex legislation that does take time to draft, pass and enforce. If the Inquiry had been better focused I'm sure the responses would also have been easier to implement. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"What did the previous government say or do, after the earlier inquiry? I'm guessing almost nothing, despite the investment into research and recommendations already made https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp836w074gko Exactly! Jenerick was on TV today blustering on about being tough on those responsible but they dragged their heels over it after 14 years in charge They didn’t drag their heels, they did nothing at all. The current Government have agreed to implement the 2022 recommendations and even the author of that report does not feel it worthwhile spending another £200 million or so to conduct another very similar investigation. When the answers can be found by implementing the recommendations that she made 3 years ago. Did nothing... Set up Rotherham Inquiry Set up IICSA Inquiry Established specialist task force to deal with grooming gangs leading to more prosecutions. Labour are only acting now they've been shamed by Elon Musk !" Jesus fucking Christ!!! 
I do wonder if people go back and proof read.. because “Leo” this is bad, even for you!!
So let’s do a really simple LTDR version
Conservative government sets up 2nd enquiry in 2019….
enquiry publishes report in 2022….
Report makes 20 recommendations for improvements and implementation
Conservative government sweep report under the rug… implementing ZERO of the recommendations
Government changes in 2024….. labour say they will go back and implement the majority of the recommendations from the 2022 report
And yet you want to blame who????????
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"What did the previous government say or do, after the earlier inquiry? I'm guessing almost nothing, despite the investment into research and recommendations already made https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp836w074gko Exactly! Jenerick was on TV today blustering on about being tough on those responsible but they dragged their heels over it after 14 years in charge They didn’t drag their heels, they did nothing at all. The current Government have agreed to implement the 2022 recommendations and even the author of that report does not feel it worthwhile spending another £200 million or so to conduct another very similar investigation. When the answers can be found by implementing the recommendations that she made 3 years ago. Did nothing... Set up Rotherham Inquiry Set up IICSA Inquiry Established specialist task force to deal with grooming gangs leading to more prosecutions. Labour are only acting now they've been shamed by Elon Musk ! Jesus fucking Christ!!!
I do wonder if people go back and proof read.. because “Leo” this is bad, even for you!!
So let’s do a really simple LTDR version
Conservative government sets up 2nd enquiry in 2019….
enquiry publishes report in 2022….
Report makes 20 recommendations for improvements and implementation
Conservative government sweep report under the rug… implementing ZERO of the recommendations
Government changes in 2024….. labour say they will go back and implement the majority of the recommendations from the 2022 report
And yet you want to blame who????????
"Oh dear Fabio, even for you this is bad
The IICSA was set up in 2015, not 2019.
If you go to the official website you'll see all the Recommendations have a Response section. It's right underneath, you won't miss it. These detail a range of responses to date. One example would be the Online Safety Act 2023 but there are many more. Even a mathematics graduate such as yourself should know that is more than ZERO. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Wow how low can labour sink it’s totally shocking " what do u expect from them wrong-uns, their all rolf harris supporters going around savilleing it, i think that its about time that the good public should have our own enquiry but we shud do it constructivly, not just running around smashing & burning everything we can, not like what happened when them little angels in southport were snatched from their loved ones, lets put the GREAT BACK IN2 ER MANCHESTER P.S. NICEONE ELON FOR SAYING IT AS IT IS !!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"What did the previous government say or do, after the earlier inquiry? I'm guessing almost nothing, despite the investment into research and recommendations already made LOOK AT YOU BOTH TiT4TaT all i can say is 'you wont learn nothing if ya dont listen' YOU KNOW EVERYTHING, ABOUT, FUCK ALL. !!! https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp836w074gko Exactly! Jenerick was on TV today blustering on about being tough on those responsible but they dragged their heels over it after 14 years in charge They didn’t drag their heels, they did nothing at all. The current Government have agreed to implement the 2022 recommendations and even the author of that report does not feel it worthwhile spending another £200 million or so to conduct another very similar investigation. When the answers can be found by implementing the recommendations that she made 3 years ago. Did nothing... Set up Rotherham Inquiry Set up IICSA Inquiry Established specialist task force to deal with grooming gangs leading to more prosecutions. Labour are only acting now they've been shamed by Elon Musk ! Jesus fucking Christ!!!
I do wonder if people go back and proof read.. because “Leo” this is bad, even for you!!
So let’s do a really simple LTDR version
Conservative government sets up 2nd enquiry in 2019….
enquiry publishes report in 2022….
Report makes 20 recommendations for improvements and implementation
Conservative government sweep report under the rug… implementing ZERO of the recommendations
Government changes in 2024….. labour say they will go back and implement the majority of the recommendations from the 2022 report
And yet you want to blame who????????
" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"What did the previous government say or do, after the earlier inquiry? I'm guessing almost nothing, despite the investment into research and recommendations already made https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp836w074gko Exactly! Jenerick was on TV today blustering on about being tough on those responsible but they dragged their heels over it after 14 years in charge They didn’t drag their heels, they did nothing at all. The current Government have agreed to implement the 2022 recommendations and even the author of that report does not feel it worthwhile spending another £200 million or so to conduct another very similar investigation. When the answers can be found by implementing the recommendations that she made 3 years ago. Did nothing... Set up Rotherham Inquiry Set up IICSA Inquiry Established specialist task force to deal with grooming gangs leading to more prosecutions. Labour are only acting now they've been shamed by Elon Musk !
Ok the previous poster was wrong about tories doing nothing, however, the tories sat on the recommendations for two years. It doesn't matter what spurred labour into acting, but they've done so in 6 months.
You said you'd looked at IICSA report. If so you'd see there is an extensive list of recommendations and a matching response (to date). There are many positive responses from Govt and its entirely false to say the previous Govt 'sat on its hands' but many of the recommendations required complex legislation that does take time to draft, pass and enforce. If the Inquiry had been better focused I'm sure the responses would also have been easier to implement."I haven't read the govt response | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"What did the previous government say or do, after the earlier inquiry? I'm guessing almost nothing, despite the investment into research and recommendations already made https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp836w074gko Exactly! Jenerick was on TV today blustering on about being tough on those responsible but they dragged their heels over it after 14 years in charge They didn’t drag their heels, they did nothing at all. The current Government have agreed to implement the 2022 recommendations and even the author of that report does not feel it worthwhile spending another £200 million or so to conduct another very similar investigation. When the answers can be found by implementing the recommendations that she made 3 years ago. Did nothing... Set up Rotherham Inquiry Set up IICSA Inquiry Established specialist task force to deal with grooming gangs leading to more prosecutions. Labour are only acting now they've been shamed by Elon Musk !
Ok the previous poster was wrong about tories doing nothing, however, the tories sat on the recommendations for two years. It doesn't matter what spurred labour into acting, but they've done so in 6 months.
You said you'd looked at IICSA report. If so you'd see there is an extensive list of recommendations and a matching response (to date). There are many positive responses from Govt and its entirely false to say the previous Govt 'sat on its hands' but many of the recommendations required complex legislation that does take time to draft, pass and enforce. If the Inquiry had been better focused I'm sure the responses would also have been easier to implement.
I haven't read the govt response"The Responses are part of the Report. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"2015 is report number 1 my friend……. 2019 is the start of report number 2…. You know the one famously boris Johnson didn’t want to go ahead, because “reports and enquiries are like spaffing money up a wall” "You're getting confused with Inquiries and Reports. The IICSA was set up in 2015; it then issued periodic reports until the Final Report in 2022. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I would rather the resources were used to catch the offenders instead of wasting time and money talking about them, although we probably got no where to lock them up so stalling tactics might be used." On that note, I’ve read that the Home Office is refusing to disclose the deportation numbers of foreign criminal gang members convicted of these crimes. This lack of transparency shines a light on the need for a national inquiry to fully understand the extent of the issues and failings. Jay’s claim that an inquiry is unnecessary smacks of complacency. While the submitted proposals absolutely need to be implemented without delay, we must also lift the covers nationally and examine all the failings however uncomfortable. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Just imagine the outcry if it was the other way round and it was white grooming gangs using Pakistani Indian Bangladeshi and Muslim girls!" Like Asia, which has Japanese, Chinese, Indonesias etc etc country - India also has Hindus, Muslims, Sikh, Buddhist, Christian, Zororastrians, Bahais, polytheist, pluralist and non believers all exist and live in this large country - so keep Indians out of this as they haven’t got anything to do with such heinous act. Many Whites here feel entitled to say Asians - I say you are calling out everyone living on the largest continent on this planet, a culprit…have some common sense.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Just imagine the outcry if it was the other way round and it was white grooming gangs using Pakistani Indian Bangladeshi and Muslim girls! Like Asia, which has Japanese, Chinese, Indonesias etc etc country - India also has Hindus, Muslims, Sikh, Buddhist, Christian, Zororastrians, Bahais, polytheist, pluralist and non believers all exist and live in this large country - so keep Indians out of this as they haven’t got anything to do with such heinous act. Many Whites here feel entitled to say Asians - I say you are calling out everyone living on the largest continent on this planet, a culprit…have some common sense.." The poster was posing the question of whether things would be different if the victims were of ethnic minorities and perps white. The victims are all ethnicities (providing they're vulnerable, is my take on it). | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"What did the previous government say or do, after the earlier inquiry? I'm guessing almost nothing, despite the investment into research and recommendations already made https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp836w074gko Exactly! Jenerick was on TV today blustering on about being tough on those responsible but they dragged their heels over it after 14 years in charge They didn’t drag their heels, they did nothing at all. The current Government have agreed to implement the 2022 recommendations and even the author of that report does not feel it worthwhile spending another £200 million or so to conduct another very similar investigation. When the answers can be found by implementing the recommendations that she made 3 years ago. Did nothing... Set up Rotherham Inquiry Set up IICSA Inquiry Established specialist task force to deal with grooming gangs leading to more prosecutions. Labour are only acting now they've been shamed by Elon Musk !
Ok the previous poster was wrong about tories doing nothing, however, the tories sat on the recommendations for two years. It doesn't matter what spurred labour into acting, but they've done so in 6 months.
You said you'd looked at IICSA report. If so you'd see there is an extensive list of recommendations and a matching response (to date). There are many positive responses from Govt and its entirely false to say the previous Govt 'sat on its hands' but many of the recommendations required complex legislation that does take time to draft, pass and enforce. If the Inquiry had been better focused I'm sure the responses would also have been easier to implement.
I haven't read the govt response
The Responses are part of the Report."If I didn't state it, I definitely implied it, I looked via the timeline. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I would rather the resources were used to catch the offenders instead of wasting time and money talking about them, although we probably got no where to lock them up so stalling tactics might be used." Yes! Investigations, not further inquiries. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I would rather the resources were used to catch the offenders instead of wasting time and money talking about them, although we probably got no where to lock them up so stalling tactics might be used. On that note, I’ve read that the Home Office is refusing to disclose the deportation numbers of foreign criminal gang members convicted of these crimes. This lack of transparency shines a light on the need for a national inquiry to fully understand the extent of the issues and failings. Jay’s claim that an inquiry is unnecessary smacks of complacency. While the submitted proposals absolutely need to be implemented without delay, we must also lift the covers nationally and examine all the failings however uncomfortable. " Call panorama
The inquiry was never set up to look at every individual case. But enough examples to compose recommendations. They compiled over 2 million reports (goes to check...). | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I would rather the resources were used to catch the offenders instead of wasting time and money talking about them, although we probably got no where to lock them up so stalling tactics might be used. On that note, I’ve read that the Home Office is refusing to disclose the deportation numbers of foreign criminal gang members convicted of these crimes. This lack of transparency shines a light on the need for a national inquiry to fully understand the extent of the issues and failings. Jay’s claim that an inquiry is unnecessary smacks of complacency. While the submitted proposals absolutely need to be implemented without delay, we must also lift the covers nationally and examine all the failings however uncomfortable. Call panorama
The inquiry was never set up to look at every individual case. But enough examples to compose recommendations. They compiled over 2 million reports (goes to check...)."Nearly 3 million pages of evidence received and processed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I would rather the resources were used to catch the offenders instead of wasting time and money talking about them, although we probably got no where to lock them up so stalling tactics might be used. On that note, I’ve read that the Home Office is refusing to disclose the deportation numbers of foreign criminal gang members convicted of these crimes. This lack of transparency shines a light on the need for a national inquiry to fully understand the extent of the issues and failings. Jay’s claim that an inquiry is unnecessary smacks of complacency. While the submitted proposals absolutely need to be implemented without delay, we must also lift the covers nationally and examine all the failings however uncomfortable. Call panorama
The inquiry was never set up to look at every individual case. But enough examples to compose recommendations. They compiled over 2 million reports (goes to check...).
Nearly 3 million pages of evidence received and processed."That might be the case, A subset of insights, but they are unlikely to capture the full picture of systemic failings or regional variations across the country. The point about the Home Office not disclosing the deportation figures, what does this mean nationally, there are far too many gaps as you can see. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"2015 is report number 1 my friend……. 2019 is the start of report number 2…. You know the one famously boris Johnson didn’t want to go ahead, because “reports and enquiries are like spaffing money up a wall”
You're getting confused with Inquiries and Reports. The IICSA was set up in 2015; it then issued periodic reports until the Final Report in 2022."Nope… and I am actually going to correct myself a little here… Public enquiry no.1 on the subject started in 2014 under Teresa May, took 2 years, cost 180 million pounds Public enquiry no.2 on the subject started in 2019 under Boris Johnson, took 3 years, cost 200 millions pounds (hence the spaffing money up against the wall quote) Conclusion remains 20 recommendations were made in which ZERO were implemented… And since you are jumping on “time” as an excuse.. the conservatives had 2 years to start acting on the conclusions… Labour have had 6 months so far! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Just imagine the outcry if it was the other way round and it was white grooming gangs using Pakistani Indian Bangladeshi and Muslim girls! Like Asia, which has Japanese, Chinese, Indonesias etc etc country - India also has Hindus, Muslims, Sikh, Buddhist, Christian, Zororastrians, Bahais, polytheist, pluralist and non believers all exist and live in this large country - so keep Indians out of this as they haven’t got anything to do with such heinous act. Many Whites here feel entitled to say Asians - I say you are calling out everyone living on the largest continent on this planet, a culprit…have some common sense.. The poster was posing the question of whether things would be different if the victims were of ethnic minorities and perps white. The victims are all ethnicities (providing they're vulnerable, is my take on it)." Yeah get it - but poster limiting it to Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi people? Why not including other countries in Asia? This is what I call biases when framing a question or answering. Just because IPB people look the same - many here think we share the same values, and easy to slander, which isn’t the case. Indians have huge Hindu majority, who are peaceful and law abiding citizens here. You want to talk about the reverse victimisation, then have a courage to finger point at those who were the actual perpetrators or the country they belong to? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Just imagine the outcry if it was the other way round and it was white grooming gangs using Pakistani Indian Bangladeshi and Muslim girls! Like Asia, which has Japanese, Chinese, Indonesias etc etc country - India also has Hindus, Muslims, Sikh, Buddhist, Christian, Zororastrians, Bahais, polytheist, pluralist and non believers all exist and live in this large country - so keep Indians out of this as they haven’t got anything to do with such heinous act. Many Whites here feel entitled to say Asians - I say you are calling out everyone living on the largest continent on this planet, a culprit…have some common sense.. The poster was posing the question of whether things would be different if the victims were of ethnic minorities and perps white. The victims are all ethnicities (providing they're vulnerable, is my take on it). Yeah get it - but poster limiting it to Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi people? Why not including other countries in Asia? This is what I call biases when framing a question or answering. Just because IPB people look the same - many here think we share the same values, and easy to slander, which isn’t the case. Indians have huge Hindu majority, who are peaceful and law abiding citizens here. You want to talk about the reverse victimisation, then have a courage to finger point at those who were the actual perpetrators or the country they belong to? " Nearly one in four Indian men have committed sexual violence once in their lifetime and one in five has admittedly forced their partners and wife to have sex with them. The findings of international men and gender equality survey reflects a new low for Indian men. Times of India | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Just imagine the outcry if it was the other way round and it was white grooming gangs using Pakistani Indian Bangladeshi and Muslim girls! Like Asia, which has Japanese, Chinese, Indonesias etc etc country - India also has Hindus, Muslims, Sikh, Buddhist, Christian, Zororastrians, Bahais, polytheist, pluralist and non believers all exist and live in this large country - so keep Indians out of this as they haven’t got anything to do with such heinous act. Many Whites here feel entitled to say Asians - I say you are calling out everyone living on the largest continent on this planet, a culprit…have some common sense.. The poster was posing the question of whether things would be different if the victims were of ethnic minorities and perps white. The victims are all ethnicities (providing they're vulnerable, is my take on it). Yeah get it - but poster limiting it to Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi people? Why not including other countries in Asia? This is what I call biases when framing a question or answering. Just because IPB people look the same - many here think we share the same values, and easy to slander, which isn’t the case. Indians have huge Hindu majority, who are peaceful and law abiding citizens here. You want to talk about the reverse victimisation, then have a courage to finger point at those who were the actual perpetrators or the country they belong to? Nearly one in four Indian men have committed sexual violence once in their lifetime and one in five has admittedly forced their partners and wife to have sex with them. The findings of international men and gender equality survey reflects a new low for Indian men. Times of India " Unlike Japan, china and Indonesia and other nations in South Asia. It stems from attempting to preserve a patriarchal society with the ruse of maintaining traditional culture. Indians worship and revere women deities, but treating their mortal counterparts with equality and respect is a different matter. Boys are preferred, and despite a law to ban selective sex abortions, female feticide does take place. Boys are better fed and educated than their sisters and it is not uncommon for Indian women to eat what is left after the males in the family have had their fill. So unless something is done about this mindset, the problem of r#pe will persist. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Just imagine the outcry if it was the other way round and it was white grooming gangs using Pakistani Indian Bangladeshi and Muslim girls! Like Asia, which has Japanese, Chinese, Indonesias etc etc country - India also has Hindus, Muslims, Sikh, Buddhist, Christian, Zororastrians, Bahais, polytheist, pluralist and non believers all exist and live in this large country - so keep Indians out of this as they haven’t got anything to do with such heinous act. Many Whites here feel entitled to say Asians - I say you are calling out everyone living on the largest continent on this planet, a culprit…have some common sense.. The poster was posing the question of whether things would be different if the victims were of ethnic minorities and perps white. The victims are all ethnicities (providing they're vulnerable, is my take on it). Yeah get it - but poster limiting it to Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi people? Why not including other countries in Asia? This is what I call biases when framing a question or answering. Just because IPB people look the same - many here think we share the same values, and easy to slander, which isn’t the case. Indians have huge Hindu majority, who are peaceful and law abiding citizens here. You want to talk about the reverse victimisation, then have a courage to finger point at those who were the actual perpetrators or the country they belong to? Nearly one in four Indian men have committed sexual violence once in their lifetime and one in five has admittedly forced their partners and wife to have sex with them. The findings of international men and gender equality survey reflects a new low for Indian men. Times of India Unlike Japan, china and Indonesia and other nations in South Asia. It stems from attempting to preserve a patriarchal society with the ruse of maintaining traditional culture. Indians worship and revere women deities, but treating their mortal counterparts with equality and respect is a different matter. Boys are preferred, and despite a law to ban selective sex abortions, female feticide does take place. Boys are better fed and educated than their sisters and it is not uncommon for Indian women to eat what is left after the males in the family have had their fill. So unless something is done about this mindset, the problem of r#pe will persist." Just one example out of 100’s of crimes committed by Indians is a 20-year old Indian origin Hindu student preet Vikal. He’s has been sentenced to more than six years imprisonment for r#ping an "intoxicated" woman while she was on a night out with friends last year in Wales. Stranger attacks such as these are extremely unusual in Cardiff. Preet Vikal showed no remorse and also took a "trophy photograph" of her on his bed. He was sentenced to six years and nine months only. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Just imagine the outcry if it was the other way round and it was white grooming gangs using Pakistani Indian Bangladeshi and Muslim girls! Like Asia, which has Japanese, Chinese, Indonesias etc etc country - India also has Hindus, Muslims, Sikh, Buddhist, Christian, Zororastrians, Bahais, polytheist, pluralist and non believers all exist and live in this large country - so keep Indians out of this as they haven’t got anything to do with such heinous act. Many Whites here feel entitled to say Asians - I say you are calling out everyone living on the largest continent on this planet, a culprit…have some common sense.. The poster was posing the question of whether things would be different if the victims were of ethnic minorities and perps white. The victims are all ethnicities (providing they're vulnerable, is my take on it). Yeah get it - but poster limiting it to Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi people? Why not including other countries in Asia? This is what I call biases when framing a question or answering. Just because IPB people look the same - many here think we share the same values, and easy to slander, which isn’t the case. Indians have huge Hindu majority, who are peaceful and law abiding citizens here. You want to talk about the reverse victimisation, then have a courage to finger point at those who were the actual perpetrators or the country they belong to? Nearly one in four Indian men have committed sexual violence once in their lifetime and one in five has admittedly forced their partners and wife to have sex with them. The findings of international men and gender equality survey reflects a new low for Indian men. Times of India Unlike Japan, china and Indonesia and other nations in South Asia. It stems from attempting to preserve a patriarchal society with the ruse of maintaining traditional culture. Indians worship and revere women deities, but treating their mortal counterparts with equality and respect is a different matter. Boys are preferred, and despite a law to ban selective sex abortions, female feticide does take place. Boys are better fed and educated than their sisters and it is not uncommon for Indian women to eat what is left after the males in the family have had their fill. So unless something is done about this mindset, the problem of r#pe will persist. Just one example out of 100’s of crimes committed by Indians is a 20-year old Indian origin Hindu student preet Vikal. He’s has been sentenced to more than six years imprisonment for r#ping an "intoxicated" woman while she was on a night out with friends last year in Wales. Stranger attacks such as these are extremely unusual in Cardiff. Preet Vikal showed no remorse and also took a "trophy photograph" of her on his bed. He was sentenced to six years and nine months only. " Also the case of Aman Vyas a Hindu migrant from India, a serial attacker who r#ped four women and murdered his final victim, dumping her body in a children’s playground. He turned a small patch of east London into what was described to a court as a “hunting ground” for a two-month spree of attacks in 2009. He was sentenced for six counts of r#pe, GBH and 2009 killing of Michelle Samaraweera. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
