FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Manchester airport attacks
Manchester airport attacks
Jump to: Newest in thread
"ABH? It was GBH. They'll probably get a couple of years for ABH though.
The officers injuries were not sufficient for GBH."
'Serious physical harm including broken bones' puts it into the GBH category. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"ABH? It was GBH. They'll probably get a couple of years for ABH though.
The officers injuries were not sufficient for GBH."
a female officer knocked out with a broken nose not sufficient what injury do they need imagine if it was one of them rioters wonder what the sentence would be lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
One has been charged with two counts of causing ABH
One charge of assaulting an emergency worker.
one charge of common assault.
the other brother
one charge of assaulting an emergency worker causing ABH.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"ABH? It was GBH. They'll probably get a couple of years for ABH though.
The officers injuries were not sufficient for GBH."
A Police Officer should be able to safely get home each day with no broken bones. It's GBH. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"ABH? It was GBH. They'll probably get a couple of years for ABH though.
The officers injuries were not sufficient for GBH.
'Serious physical harm including broken bones' puts it into the GBH category. "
A broken nose has never been GBH. I had mine broken twice. They were only charged ABH on both occasions. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"ABH? It was GBH. They'll probably get a couple of years for ABH though.
The officers injuries were not sufficient for GBH.
'Serious physical harm including broken bones' puts it into the GBH category.
A broken nose has never been GBH. I had mine broken twice. They were only charged ABH on both occasions."
I thought attacking someone causing injury in a public place was gbh |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"ABH? It was GBH. They'll probably get a couple of years for ABH though.
The officers injuries were not sufficient for GBH.
'Serious physical harm including broken bones' puts it into the GBH category.
A broken nose has never been GBH. I had mine broken twice. They were only charged ABH on both occasions. I thought attacking someone causing injury in a public place was gbh "
No the charge depends on the severity of the injuries. A broken nose is not as severe as say a broken jaw, skull, limbs. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"ABH? It was GBH. They'll probably get a couple of years for ABH though.
The officers injuries were not sufficient for GBH.
'Serious physical harm including broken bones' puts it into the GBH category.
A broken nose has never been GBH. I had mine broken twice. They were only charged ABH on both occasions. I thought attacking someone causing injury in a public place was gbh
No the charge depends on the severity of the injuries. A broken nose is not as severe as say a broken jaw, skull, limbs. "
ok if a broken nose and knocked out isn’t severe enough we need a change in the law |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"ABH? It was GBH. They'll probably get a couple of years for ABH though.
The officers injuries were not sufficient for GBH.
'Serious physical harm including broken bones' puts it into the GBH category.
A broken nose has never been GBH. I had mine broken twice. They were only charged ABH on both occasions. I thought attacking someone causing injury in a public place was gbh
No the charge depends on the severity of the injuries. A broken nose is not as severe as say a broken jaw, skull, limbs. ok if a broken nose and knocked out isn’t severe enough we need a change in the law "
That’s as maybe but they have been changed according to the current charging standards. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"ABH? It was GBH. They'll probably get a couple of years for ABH though.
The officers injuries were not sufficient for GBH.
'Serious physical harm including broken bones' puts it into the GBH category.
A broken nose has never been GBH. I had mine broken twice. They were only charged ABH on both occasions. I thought attacking someone causing injury in a public place was gbh
No the charge depends on the severity of the injuries. A broken nose is not as severe as say a broken jaw, skull, limbs. ok if a broken nose and knocked out isn’t severe enough we need a change in the law
That’s as maybe but they have been changed according to the current charging standards."
aw well hope they get a sentence someone else would get for the crimes I doubt it tho probs less than a tweet gets ya now lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"ABH? It was GBH. They'll probably get a couple of years for ABH though.
The officers injuries were not sufficient for GBH.
'Serious physical harm including broken bones' puts it into the GBH category.
A broken nose has never been GBH. I had mine broken twice. They were only charged ABH on both occasions. I thought attacking someone causing injury in a public place was gbh
No the charge depends on the severity of the injuries. A broken nose is not as severe as say a broken jaw, skull, limbs. ok if a broken nose and knocked out isn’t severe enough we need a change in the law
That’s as maybe but they have been changed according to the current charging standards."
current standards .... that's why nutty niges race riot army didn't get the death penalty they deserved  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"ABH? It was GBH. They'll probably get a couple of years for ABH though.
The officers injuries were not sufficient for GBH.
'Serious physical harm including broken bones' puts it into the GBH category.
A broken nose has never been GBH. I had mine broken twice. They were only charged ABH on both occasions. I thought attacking someone causing injury in a public place was gbh
No the charge depends on the severity of the injuries. A broken nose is not as severe as say a broken jaw, skull, limbs. ok if a broken nose and knocked out isn’t severe enough we need a change in the law
That’s as maybe but they have been changed according to the current charging standards.
current standards .... that's why nutty niges race riot army didn't get the death penalty they deserved "
it wasn’t anything to do with farage and the death penalty really get a grip so what should the scum at the airport get then ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By *hirleyMan 2 weeks ago
somewhere |
Not surprised to see certain profiles have the opinions they do here lol.
I'm happy to see that these two scumbags have been put to justice though... for balance, the potential sentence/punishment I feel may come lenient to them, but I also know that's something that is caused by what our current laws are, maybe it needs to be revisited and that takes time and decent parliament, 'looking at you house of lords'
I do believe in preventing these things happening though through getting people to respect, is a better use of time and money than just blankets of strict draconian laws and resources to oppress the masses. I do not see third world countries with brutal punishments have rid themselves any better of crime |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Sorry to see two such fine pillocks of the community involved in an obvious misunderstanding over parking tickets. Hopefully they'll get a few hours litter picking and never cause any trouble again.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"They got off light
Israeli cops would have slotted them on the spot.
i agree .... the scummy race rioters should've been offed outside the hotel etc. "
pls seek help I don’t think posting shit like that makes you any better than them |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"ABH? It was GBH. They'll probably get a couple of years for ABH though.
The officers injuries were not sufficient for GBH.
'Serious physical harm including broken bones' puts it into the GBH category.
A broken nose has never been GBH. I had mine broken twice. They were only charged ABH on both occasions."
Fair enough, they should rewrite the guidelines to exclude certain bones then. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"ABH? It was GBH. They'll probably get a couple of years for ABH though.
The officers injuries were not sufficient for GBH.
'Serious physical harm including broken bones' puts it into the GBH category.
A broken nose has never been GBH. I had mine broken twice. They were only charged ABH on both occasions. I thought attacking someone causing injury in a public place was gbh
No the charge depends on the severity of the injuries. A broken nose is not as severe as say a broken jaw, skull, limbs. ok if a broken nose and knocked out isn’t severe enough we need a change in the law
That’s as maybe but they have been changed according to the current charging standards.
current standards .... that's why nutty niges race riot army didn't get the death penalty they deserved "
You're a strange little man aren't you |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"ABH? It was GBH. They'll probably get a couple of years for ABH though.
The officers injuries were not sufficient for GBH.
'Serious physical harm including broken bones' puts it into the GBH category.
A broken nose has never been GBH. I had mine broken twice. They were only charged ABH on both occasions. I thought attacking someone causing injury in a public place was gbh
No the charge depends on the severity of the injuries. A broken nose is not as severe as say a broken jaw, skull, limbs. ok if a broken nose and knocked out isn’t severe enough we need a change in the law
That’s as maybe but they have been changed according to the current charging standards.
current standards .... that's why nutty niges race riot army didn't get the death penalty they deserved
You're a strange little man aren't you"
let's face it, everything is strange to people in bridgend butty |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"ABH? It was GBH. They'll probably get a couple of years for ABH though.
The officers injuries were not sufficient for GBH.
'Serious physical harm including broken bones' puts it into the GBH category.
A broken nose has never been GBH. I had mine broken twice. They were only charged ABH on both occasions.
Fair enough, they should rewrite the guidelines to exclude certain bones then. "
As far as sentencing is concerned there wouldn’t be much difference between what would be considered a high level ABH and a low level GBH.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"ABH? It was GBH. They'll probably get a couple of years for ABH though.
The officers injuries were not sufficient for GBH.
'Serious physical harm including broken bones' puts it into the GBH category.
A broken nose has never been GBH. I had mine broken twice. They were only charged ABH on both occasions.
Fair enough, they should rewrite the guidelines to exclude certain bones then.
As far as sentencing is concerned there wouldn’t be much difference between what would be considered a high level ABH and a low level GBH.
"
Maybe not. But, and it's a big one, they won't get maximum tariffs. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"ABH? It was GBH. They'll probably get a couple of years for ABH though.
The officers injuries were not sufficient for GBH.
'Serious physical harm including broken bones' puts it into the GBH category.
A broken nose has never been GBH. I had mine broken twice. They were only charged ABH on both occasions.
Fair enough, they should rewrite the guidelines to exclude certain bones then.
As far as sentencing is concerned there wouldn’t be much difference between what would be considered a high level ABH and a low level GBH.
Maybe not. But, and it's a big one, they won't get maximum tariffs. "
There is more chance of receiving a maximum sentence for ABH than if they were charged with GBH, again because a broken nose would be classified as serious injury under ABH but would be classified as minor injury under GBH. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"ABH? It was GBH. They'll probably get a couple of years for ABH though.
The officers injuries were not sufficient for GBH.
'Serious physical harm including broken bones' puts it into the GBH category.
A broken nose has never been GBH. I had mine broken twice. They were only charged ABH on both occasions.
Fair enough, they should rewrite the guidelines to exclude certain bones then.
As far as sentencing is concerned there wouldn’t be much difference between what would be considered a high level ABH and a low level GBH.
Maybe not. But, and it's a big one, they won't get maximum tariffs.
There is more chance of receiving a maximum sentence for ABH than if they were charged with GBH, again because a broken nose would be classified as serious injury under ABH but would be classified as minor injury under GBH."
Section 20 GBH (the lesser of GBH charges) is a max 5 year term, the same as ABH.
I guarantee they get nowhere near the max. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Why not simply wait for the full outcome rather than endless nonsense on what the final outcome might or might not be. 
"
so what its basically telling us is in the future im better off, going to the riots and braking a few noses aslong as i dont film it or send any tweets online about my views 😂country is fucked. I would be fucking fewmin if i were the officer and this is how the criminal system has your back its a joke |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Whoever makes the laws has obviously never been a victim.... these so-called intelligent legal eagles/ lawmakers are more interested in the welfare of the criminal than the victim....way more money to be made.
They complicate the system by splitting hairs over what is ABH and GBH....assault is assault in my book..simple.
Found carrying a knife = immediate 5 years... no excuses.
Found using the knife = immediate 15 years...no excuses.
Commit murder with a knife = life... throw away the key..
Simple. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
