FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Starmers switching No 10 Xmas lights
Starmers switching No 10 Xmas lights
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
"Can this man get an more boring?" I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. | |||
"Can this man get an more boring?" Pretty sure this is a duty he has to perform and would assume the past PM's did the same whether it's boring or not | |||
| |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here." Who is saying Starmer was at fault? He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? " The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. " He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it?" I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? " but you feel strongly enough to complain about the about a thread complaining about starmer and you say yr not a labour supporter lol | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? but you feel strongly enough to complain about the about a thread complaining about starmer and you say yr not a labour supporter lol" Yes it's a phenomena how wound up people are getting over absolutely nothing. You don't have to be a Labour supporter, a non-Labour supporter or have any opinion on Labour to look at the ridiculous over the top hysteria that surrounds all the non-news. Personally I find it interesting how the media can wind people up, misdirect them and influence their behaviour. | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? but you feel strongly enough to complain about the about a thread complaining about starmer and you say yr not a labour supporter lol Yes it's a phenomena how wound up people are getting over absolutely nothing. You don't have to be a Labour supporter, a non-Labour supporter or have any opinion on Labour to look at the ridiculous over the top hysteria that surrounds all the non-news. Personally I find it interesting how the media can wind people up, misdirect them and influence their behaviour. " agree on that part how can anyone trust mainstream media anymore I think ppl on here are too smart to wach or listen to that now social media and YouTube is the future I thought you where a bbc sky news cnn guy tho | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? " Possibly, if you have thoughts on his very dull deliveries that changed the mood of the country and not for the better. I think you should watch it. Personally, I thought it was awful, abstractly it summed up his premiership for me. | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? but you feel strongly enough to complain about the about a thread complaining about starmer and you say yr not a labour supporter lol Yes it's a phenomena how wound up people are getting over absolutely nothing. You don't have to be a Labour supporter, a non-Labour supporter or have any opinion on Labour to look at the ridiculous over the top hysteria that surrounds all the non-news. Personally I find it interesting how the media can wind people up, misdirect them and influence their behaviour. agree on that part how can anyone trust mainstream media anymore I think ppl on here are too smart to wach or listen to that now social media and YouTube is the future I thought you where a bbc sky news cnn guy tho " I don't think I've ever watched sky news or CNN Social media and YouTube are hotbeds of misinformation. There's literally no controls there, anyone can post any bullshit and pretend it's real. | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? Possibly, if you have thoughts on his very dull deliveries that changed the mood of the country and not for the better. I think you should watch it. Personally, I thought it was awful, abstractly it summed up his premiership for me. " I'll watch it later. People's reaction to it is a million times more interesting to me than actual event itself. | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? but you feel strongly enough to complain about the about a thread complaining about starmer and you say yr not a labour supporter lol Yes it's a phenomena how wound up people are getting over absolutely nothing. You don't have to be a Labour supporter, a non-Labour supporter or have any opinion on Labour to look at the ridiculous over the top hysteria that surrounds all the non-news. Personally I find it interesting how the media can wind people up, misdirect them and influence their behaviour. agree on that part how can anyone trust mainstream media anymore I think ppl on here are too smart to wach or listen to that now social media and YouTube is the future I thought you where a bbc sky news cnn guy tho I don't think I've ever watched sky news or CNN Social media and YouTube are hotbeds of misinformation. There's literally no controls there, anyone can post any bullshit and pretend it's real." you keep saying this but won’t ever say what you do watch tho hmmmm | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? but you feel strongly enough to complain about the about a thread complaining about starmer and you say yr not a labour supporter lol Yes it's a phenomena how wound up people are getting over absolutely nothing. You don't have to be a Labour supporter, a non-Labour supporter or have any opinion on Labour to look at the ridiculous over the top hysteria that surrounds all the non-news. Personally I find it interesting how the media can wind people up, misdirect them and influence their behaviour. agree on that part how can anyone trust mainstream media anymore I think ppl on here are too smart to wach or listen to that now social media and YouTube is the future I thought you where a bbc sky news cnn guy tho I don't think I've ever watched sky news or CNN Social media and YouTube are hotbeds of misinformation. There's literally no controls there, anyone can post any bullshit and pretend it's real.you keep saying this but won’t ever say what you do watch tho hmmmm" It's utterly irrelevant to the conversation. | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? but you feel strongly enough to complain about the about a thread complaining about starmer and you say yr not a labour supporter lol Yes it's a phenomena how wound up people are getting over absolutely nothing. You don't have to be a Labour supporter, a non-Labour supporter or have any opinion on Labour to look at the ridiculous over the top hysteria that surrounds all the non-news. Personally I find it interesting how the media can wind people up, misdirect them and influence their behaviour. agree on that part how can anyone trust mainstream media anymore I think ppl on here are too smart to wach or listen to that now social media and YouTube is the future I thought you where a bbc sky news cnn guy tho I don't think I've ever watched sky news or CNN Social media and YouTube are hotbeds of misinformation. There's literally no controls there, anyone can post any bullshit and pretend it's real.you keep saying this but won’t ever say what you do watch tho hmmmm It's utterly irrelevant to the conversation. " ah so you criticise ppl for believing the media but once again refuse to say what media you use lol fantastic | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? but you feel strongly enough to complain about the about a thread complaining about starmer and you say yr not a labour supporter lol Yes it's a phenomena how wound up people are getting over absolutely nothing. You don't have to be a Labour supporter, a non-Labour supporter or have any opinion on Labour to look at the ridiculous over the top hysteria that surrounds all the non-news. Personally I find it interesting how the media can wind people up, misdirect them and influence their behaviour. agree on that part how can anyone trust mainstream media anymore I think ppl on here are too smart to wach or listen to that now social media and YouTube is the future I thought you where a bbc sky news cnn guy tho I don't think I've ever watched sky news or CNN Social media and YouTube are hotbeds of misinformation. There's literally no controls there, anyone can post any bullshit and pretend it's real." no controls unless its against main stream narratives or involves key words so theres hardly no controls | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? but you feel strongly enough to complain about the about a thread complaining about starmer and you say yr not a labour supporter lol Yes it's a phenomena how wound up people are getting over absolutely nothing. You don't have to be a Labour supporter, a non-Labour supporter or have any opinion on Labour to look at the ridiculous over the top hysteria that surrounds all the non-news. Personally I find it interesting how the media can wind people up, misdirect them and influence their behaviour. agree on that part how can anyone trust mainstream media anymore I think ppl on here are too smart to wach or listen to that now social media and YouTube is the future I thought you where a bbc sky news cnn guy tho I don't think I've ever watched sky news or CNN Social media and YouTube are hotbeds of misinformation. There's literally no controls there, anyone can post any bullshit and pretend it's real.you keep saying this but won’t ever say what you do watch tho hmmmm It's utterly irrelevant to the conversation. ah so you criticise ppl for believing the media but once again refuse to say what media you use lol fantastic " Maybe you've mixed me up with someone else? I haven't critisied anyone. | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? but you feel strongly enough to complain about the about a thread complaining about starmer and you say yr not a labour supporter lol Yes it's a phenomena how wound up people are getting over absolutely nothing. You don't have to be a Labour supporter, a non-Labour supporter or have any opinion on Labour to look at the ridiculous over the top hysteria that surrounds all the non-news. Personally I find it interesting how the media can wind people up, misdirect them and influence their behaviour. agree on that part how can anyone trust mainstream media anymore I think ppl on here are too smart to wach or listen to that now social media and YouTube is the future I thought you where a bbc sky news cnn guy tho I don't think I've ever watched sky news or CNN Social media and YouTube are hotbeds of misinformation. There's literally no controls there, anyone can post any bullshit and pretend it's real.you keep saying this but won’t ever say what you do watch tho hmmmm It's utterly irrelevant to the conversation. ah so you criticise ppl for believing the media but once again refuse to say what media you use lol fantastic Maybe you've mixed me up with someone else? I haven't critisied anyone. " You regularly speak about GB News/The Mail/The Express. The gaslighting is off the scale  | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? " No because your as interesting as SKS | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? No because your as interesting as SKS" So only interesting people are interested in uninteresting news stories about boring people? Amazing. | |||
| |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? No because your as interesting as SKS So only interesting people are interested in uninteresting news stories about boring people? Amazing. " lol that quite witty for you two tone.  | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? No because your as interesting as SKS So only interesting people are interested in uninteresting news stories about boring people? Amazing. lol that quite witty for you two tone. "  | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? No because your as interesting as SKS So only interesting people are interested in uninteresting news stories about boring people? Amazing. " Seems strange for a non labour supporter, like you to love the Labour government so much x | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? No because your as interesting as SKS So only interesting people are interested in uninteresting news stories about boring people? Amazing. Seems strange for a non labour supporter, like you to love the Labour government so much x" Have you mixed me up with someone else? I've been critical of the labour government. Starmer turning on Xmas lights is below which jam to have on my toast for breakfast, in order of importance. | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? but you feel strongly enough to complain about the about a thread complaining about starmer and you say yr not a labour supporter lol Yes it's a phenomena how wound up people are getting over absolutely nothing. You don't have to be a Labour supporter, a non-Labour supporter or have any opinion on Labour to look at the ridiculous over the top hysteria that surrounds all the non-news. Personally I find it interesting how the media can wind people up, misdirect them and influence their behaviour. agree on that part how can anyone trust mainstream media anymore I think ppl on here are too smart to wach or listen to that now social media and YouTube is the future I thought you where a bbc sky news cnn guy tho I don't think I've ever watched sky news or CNN Social media and YouTube are hotbeds of misinformation. There's literally no controls there, anyone can post any bullshit and pretend it's real." Couldn't agree more! Bbc, sky, cnn, msnbc, nbc, C4, fox news, gb news, rte, russia today, al jazera, daily mail, guardian, times, Washington Post, new York Times, ceebeebies etc etc...then you have the WEF, WHO, IPCC, NASA, NATO, united nations, stonewall, BLM, tucker carlson...etc etc ALL on youtube. All as you rightly described as a "hotbed of misinformation" Or do you just describe the ones you dislike or disagree with you as "hotbeds of misinformation"? Or have you changed your mind about you tube now that you've thought about it? | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? but you feel strongly enough to complain about the about a thread complaining about starmer and you say yr not a labour supporter lol Yes it's a phenomena how wound up people are getting over absolutely nothing. You don't have to be a Labour supporter, a non-Labour supporter or have any opinion on Labour to look at the ridiculous over the top hysteria that surrounds all the non-news. Personally I find it interesting how the media can wind people up, misdirect them and influence their behaviour. agree on that part how can anyone trust mainstream media anymore I think ppl on here are too smart to wach or listen to that now social media and YouTube is the future I thought you where a bbc sky news cnn guy tho I don't think I've ever watched sky news or CNN Social media and YouTube are hotbeds of misinformation. There's literally no controls there, anyone can post any bullshit and pretend it's real. Couldn't agree more! Bbc, sky, cnn, msnbc, nbc, C4, fox news, gb news, rte, russia today, al jazera, daily mail, guardian, times, Washington Post, new York Times, ceebeebies etc etc...then you have the WEF, WHO, IPCC, NASA, NATO, united nations, stonewall, BLM, tucker carlson...etc etc ALL on youtube. All as you rightly described as a "hotbed of misinformation" Or do you just describe the ones you dislike or disagree with you as "hotbeds of misinformation"? Or have you changed your mind about you tube now that you've thought about it? " Erm. YouTube in general is a hotbed of misinformation. This is still true. No matter how angry you get about it. | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? No because your as interesting as SKS So only interesting people are interested in uninteresting news stories about boring people? Amazing. Seems strange for a non labour supporter, like you to love the Labour government so much x Have you mixed me up with someone else? I've been critical of the labour government. Starmer turning on Xmas lights is below which jam to have on my toast for breakfast, in order of importance. " Mmmmm , no you haven’t , it’s the rest of the forum here two tone , we know you. | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? but you feel strongly enough to complain about the about a thread complaining about starmer and you say yr not a labour supporter lol Yes it's a phenomena how wound up people are getting over absolutely nothing. You don't have to be a Labour supporter, a non-Labour supporter or have any opinion on Labour to look at the ridiculous over the top hysteria that surrounds all the non-news. Personally I find it interesting how the media can wind people up, misdirect them and influence their behaviour. agree on that part how can anyone trust mainstream media anymore I think ppl on here are too smart to wach or listen to that now social media and YouTube is the future I thought you where a bbc sky news cnn guy tho I don't think I've ever watched sky news or CNN Social media and YouTube are hotbeds of misinformation. There's literally no controls there, anyone can post any bullshit and pretend it's real. Couldn't agree more! Bbc, sky, cnn, msnbc, nbc, C4, fox news, gb news, rte, russia today, al jazera, daily mail, guardian, times, Washington Post, new York Times, ceebeebies etc etc...then you have the WEF, WHO, IPCC, NASA, NATO, united nations, stonewall, BLM, tucker carlson...etc etc ALL on youtube. All as you rightly described as a "hotbed of misinformation" Or do you just describe the ones you dislike or disagree with you as "hotbeds of misinformation"? Or have you changed your mind about you tube now that you've thought about it? Erm. YouTube in general is a hotbed of misinformation. This is still true. No matter how angry you get about it." Misinformation??? Just need to watch the video of the tool, switching on number 10 Xmas tree lights. SKS has about as much charisma as a blank sheet of paper. | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? but you feel strongly enough to complain about the about a thread complaining about starmer and you say yr not a labour supporter lol Yes it's a phenomena how wound up people are getting over absolutely nothing. You don't have to be a Labour supporter, a non-Labour supporter or have any opinion on Labour to look at the ridiculous over the top hysteria that surrounds all the non-news. Personally I find it interesting how the media can wind people up, misdirect them and influence their behaviour. agree on that part how can anyone trust mainstream media anymore I think ppl on here are too smart to wach or listen to that now social media and YouTube is the future I thought you where a bbc sky news cnn guy tho I don't think I've ever watched sky news or CNN Social media and YouTube are hotbeds of misinformation. There's literally no controls there, anyone can post any bullshit and pretend it's real. Couldn't agree more! Bbc, sky, cnn, msnbc, nbc, C4, fox news, gb news, rte, russia today, al jazera, daily mail, guardian, times, Washington Post, new York Times, ceebeebies etc etc...then you have the WEF, WHO, IPCC, NASA, NATO, united nations, stonewall, BLM, tucker carlson...etc etc ALL on youtube. All as you rightly described as a "hotbed of misinformation" Or do you just describe the ones you dislike or disagree with you as "hotbeds of misinformation"? Or have you changed your mind about you tube now that you've thought about it? Erm. YouTube in general is a hotbed of misinformation. This is still true. No matter how angry you get about it." Nice attempt at dodging the points I raise. Totally not angry btw. So it's safe to assume that you consider all the organisations I listed as misinformation because they put content on you tube?....or just the ones you dislike/disagree with? It's a simple question really.... | |||
| |||
"I think it's long overdue to return to some form of modesty if not inconspicuous politics. . eg, MP's are either in the HOP voting, or in their surgeries dealing with local issues. No TV interviews No celebrity shows No media opportunities. . In essence, the only time they need a mention is when they either take up post, leave post, or are dismissed / arrested / resign. . Apart from that, they are just faceless civil servants and should act that way." Yeah but a shit load of them are on youtube and apparently that's a hotbed of misinformation. ....if they say or do something that two bob note disagrees with | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? No because your as interesting as SKS So only interesting people are interested in uninteresting news stories about boring people? Amazing. Seems strange for a non labour supporter, like you to love the Labour government so much x Have you mixed me up with someone else? I've been critical of the labour government. Starmer turning on Xmas lights is below which jam to have on my toast for breakfast, in order of importance. Mmmmm , no you haven’t , it’s the rest of the forum here two tone , we know you. " What? You've definitely mixed me up with someone else. | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? but you feel strongly enough to complain about the about a thread complaining about starmer and you say yr not a labour supporter lol Yes it's a phenomena how wound up people are getting over absolutely nothing. You don't have to be a Labour supporter, a non-Labour supporter or have any opinion on Labour to look at the ridiculous over the top hysteria that surrounds all the non-news. Personally I find it interesting how the media can wind people up, misdirect them and influence their behaviour. agree on that part how can anyone trust mainstream media anymore I think ppl on here are too smart to wach or listen to that now social media and YouTube is the future I thought you where a bbc sky news cnn guy tho I don't think I've ever watched sky news or CNN Social media and YouTube are hotbeds of misinformation. There's literally no controls there, anyone can post any bullshit and pretend it's real. Couldn't agree more! Bbc, sky, cnn, msnbc, nbc, C4, fox news, gb news, rte, russia today, al jazera, daily mail, guardian, times, Washington Post, new York Times, ceebeebies etc etc...then you have the WEF, WHO, IPCC, NASA, NATO, united nations, stonewall, BLM, tucker carlson...etc etc ALL on youtube. All as you rightly described as a "hotbed of misinformation" Or do you just describe the ones you dislike or disagree with you as "hotbeds of misinformation"? Or have you changed your mind about you tube now that you've thought about it? Erm. YouTube in general is a hotbed of misinformation. This is still true. No matter how angry you get about it. Nice attempt at dodging the points I raise. Totally not angry btw. So it's safe to assume that you consider all the organisations I listed as misinformation because they put content on you tube?....or just the ones you dislike/disagree with? It's a simple question really...." The point you seem to have raised is that because some legitimate entities use YouTube. None of the content is misinformation, or all of them are misinformation. The point is so silly it doesn't deserve addressing. | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? but you feel strongly enough to complain about the about a thread complaining about starmer and you say yr not a labour supporter lol Yes it's a phenomena how wound up people are getting over absolutely nothing. You don't have to be a Labour supporter, a non-Labour supporter or have any opinion on Labour to look at the ridiculous over the top hysteria that surrounds all the non-news. Personally I find it interesting how the media can wind people up, misdirect them and influence their behaviour. agree on that part how can anyone trust mainstream media anymore I think ppl on here are too smart to wach or listen to that now social media and YouTube is the future I thought you where a bbc sky news cnn guy tho I don't think I've ever watched sky news or CNN Social media and YouTube are hotbeds of misinformation. There's literally no controls there, anyone can post any bullshit and pretend it's real. Couldn't agree more! Bbc, sky, cnn, msnbc, nbc, C4, fox news, gb news, rte, russia today, al jazera, daily mail, guardian, times, Washington Post, new York Times, ceebeebies etc etc...then you have the WEF, WHO, IPCC, NASA, NATO, united nations, stonewall, BLM, tucker carlson...etc etc ALL on youtube. All as you rightly described as a "hotbed of misinformation" Or do you just describe the ones you dislike or disagree with you as "hotbeds of misinformation"? Or have you changed your mind about you tube now that you've thought about it? Erm. YouTube in general is a hotbed of misinformation. This is still true. No matter how angry you get about it. Nice attempt at dodging the points I raise. Totally not angry btw. So it's safe to assume that you consider all the organisations I listed as misinformation because they put content on you tube?....or just the ones you dislike/disagree with? It's a simple question really.... The point you seem to have raised is that because some legitimate entities use YouTube. None of the content is misinformation, or all of them are misinformation. The point is so silly it doesn't deserve addressing. " I think it's fascinating actually. So you're the arbitrar of what is and isn't misinformation on you tube? Have ANY or ALL or NONE of the organisations I listed previously been guilty of broadcasting misinformation at some time or other on you tube? This "hotbed" of yours seems to be cooling by the minute... | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? Possibly, if you have thoughts on his very dull deliveries that changed the mood of the country and not for the better. I think you should watch it. Personally, I thought it was awful, abstractly it summed up his premiership for me. I'll watch it later. People's reaction to it is a million times more interesting to me than actual event itself." Later it is, what did you think? Can you see my abstract connection from the lights switch on to his leadership to date? | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? but you feel strongly enough to complain about the about a thread complaining about starmer and you say yr not a labour supporter lol Yes it's a phenomena how wound up people are getting over absolutely nothing. You don't have to be a Labour supporter, a non-Labour supporter or have any opinion on Labour to look at the ridiculous over the top hysteria that surrounds all the non-news. Personally I find it interesting how the media can wind people up, misdirect them and influence their behaviour. agree on that part how can anyone trust mainstream media anymore I think ppl on here are too smart to wach or listen to that now social media and YouTube is the future I thought you where a bbc sky news cnn guy tho I don't think I've ever watched sky news or CNN Social media and YouTube are hotbeds of misinformation. There's literally no controls there, anyone can post any bullshit and pretend it's real. Couldn't agree more! Bbc, sky, cnn, msnbc, nbc, C4, fox news, gb news, rte, russia today, al jazera, daily mail, guardian, times, Washington Post, new York Times, ceebeebies etc etc...then you have the WEF, WHO, IPCC, NASA, NATO, united nations, stonewall, BLM, tucker carlson...etc etc ALL on youtube. All as you rightly described as a "hotbed of misinformation" Or do you just describe the ones you dislike or disagree with you as "hotbeds of misinformation"? Or have you changed your mind about you tube now that you've thought about it? Erm. YouTube in general is a hotbed of misinformation. This is still true. No matter how angry you get about it. Nice attempt at dodging the points I raise. Totally not angry btw. So it's safe to assume that you consider all the organisations I listed as misinformation because they put content on you tube?....or just the ones you dislike/disagree with? It's a simple question really.... The point you seem to have raised is that because some legitimate entities use YouTube. None of the content is misinformation, or all of them are misinformation. The point is so silly it doesn't deserve addressing. I think it's fascinating actually. So you're the arbitrar of what is and isn't misinformation on you tube? " Nope, and I have absolutely no idea what this has got to do with the point. I haven't claimed this, nothing I have said has alluded to this. You appear to have just made up something about me. " Have ANY or ALL or NONE of the organisations I listed previously been guilty of broadcasting misinformation at some time or other on you tube? " No idea, I haven't monitored their content. And again, no clue how this is even vaguely related to the point. " This "hotbed" of yours seems to be cooling by the minute..." I don't have a "hotbed". And I have no clue why you're trying to make this about me. None of this has anything to do with me. | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? Possibly, if you have thoughts on his very dull deliveries that changed the mood of the country and not for the better. I think you should watch it. Personally, I thought it was awful, abstractly it summed up his premiership for me. I'll watch it later. People's reaction to it is a million times more interesting to me than actual event itself. Later it is, what did you think? Can you see my abstract connection from the lights switch on to his leadership to date?" No. I thought it was completely inane. | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? Possibly, if you have thoughts on his very dull deliveries that changed the mood of the country and not for the better. I think you should watch it. Personally, I thought it was awful, abstractly it summed up his premiership for me. I'll watch it later. People's reaction to it is a million times more interesting to me than actual event itself. Later it is, what did you think? Can you see my abstract connection from the lights switch on to his leadership to date? No. I thought it was completely inane." Exactly | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? Possibly, if you have thoughts on his very dull deliveries that changed the mood of the country and not for the better. I think you should watch it. Personally, I thought it was awful, abstractly it summed up his premiership for me. I'll watch it later. People's reaction to it is a million times more interesting to me than actual event itself. Later it is, what did you think? Can you see my abstract connection from the lights switch on to his leadership to date? No. I thought it was completely inane. Exactly " Okay. I'm not sure what you're getting at? | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? but you feel strongly enough to complain about the about a thread complaining about starmer and you say yr not a labour supporter lol Yes it's a phenomena how wound up people are getting over absolutely nothing. You don't have to be a Labour supporter, a non-Labour supporter or have any opinion on Labour to look at the ridiculous over the top hysteria that surrounds all the non-news. Personally I find it interesting how the media can wind people up, misdirect them and influence their behaviour. agree on that part how can anyone trust mainstream media anymore I think ppl on here are too smart to wach or listen to that now social media and YouTube is the future I thought you where a bbc sky news cnn guy tho I don't think I've ever watched sky news or CNN Social media and YouTube are hotbeds of misinformation. There's literally no controls there, anyone can post any bullshit and pretend it's real. Couldn't agree more! Bbc, sky, cnn, msnbc, nbc, C4, fox news, gb news, rte, russia today, al jazera, daily mail, guardian, times, Washington Post, new York Times, ceebeebies etc etc...then you have the WEF, WHO, IPCC, NASA, NATO, united nations, stonewall, BLM, tucker carlson...etc etc ALL on youtube. All as you rightly described as a "hotbed of misinformation" Or do you just describe the ones you dislike or disagree with you as "hotbeds of misinformation"? Or have you changed your mind about you tube now that you've thought about it? Erm. YouTube in general is a hotbed of misinformation. This is still true. No matter how angry you get about it. Nice attempt at dodging the points I raise. Totally not angry btw. So it's safe to assume that you consider all the organisations I listed as misinformation because they put content on you tube?....or just the ones you dislike/disagree with? It's a simple question really.... The point you seem to have raised is that because some legitimate entities use YouTube. None of the content is misinformation, or all of them are misinformation. The point is so silly it doesn't deserve addressing. I think it's fascinating actually. So you're the arbitrar of what is and isn't misinformation on you tube? Nope, and I have absolutely no idea what this has got to do with the point. I haven't claimed this, nothing I have said has alluded to this. You appear to have just made up something about me. Have ANY or ALL or NONE of the organisations I listed previously been guilty of broadcasting misinformation at some time or other on you tube? No idea, I haven't monitored their content. And again, no clue how this is even vaguely related to the point. This "hotbed" of yours seems to be cooling by the minute... I don't have a "hotbed". And I have no clue why you're trying to make this about me. None of this has anything to do with me. " So how can you criticise and brand you tube content as misinformation (hotbed) if you haven't watched any? You said that you tube is a "hotbed of misinformation" and I'm fascinated by your statement...even more so now that I learn that you've not watched the content. Is it entirely arrogance and ignorance on your part? Hell, maybe there's something amiss with your broadband connection! There must be a reason behind your broad-brush approach to criticising youtube content from the BBC, ipcc, gb news and the Disney channel....to name but a few | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? but you feel strongly enough to complain about the about a thread complaining about starmer and you say yr not a labour supporter lol Yes it's a phenomena how wound up people are getting over absolutely nothing. You don't have to be a Labour supporter, a non-Labour supporter or have any opinion on Labour to look at the ridiculous over the top hysteria that surrounds all the non-news. Personally I find it interesting how the media can wind people up, misdirect them and influence their behaviour. agree on that part how can anyone trust mainstream media anymore I think ppl on here are too smart to wach or listen to that now social media and YouTube is the future I thought you where a bbc sky news cnn guy tho I don't think I've ever watched sky news or CNN Social media and YouTube are hotbeds of misinformation. There's literally no controls there, anyone can post any bullshit and pretend it's real. Couldn't agree more! Bbc, sky, cnn, msnbc, nbc, C4, fox news, gb news, rte, russia today, al jazera, daily mail, guardian, times, Washington Post, new York Times, ceebeebies etc etc...then you have the WEF, WHO, IPCC, NASA, NATO, united nations, stonewall, BLM, tucker carlson...etc etc ALL on youtube. All as you rightly described as a "hotbed of misinformation" Or do you just describe the ones you dislike or disagree with you as "hotbeds of misinformation"? Or have you changed your mind about you tube now that you've thought about it? Erm. YouTube in general is a hotbed of misinformation. This is still true. No matter how angry you get about it. Nice attempt at dodging the points I raise. Totally not angry btw. So it's safe to assume that you consider all the organisations I listed as misinformation because they put content on you tube?....or just the ones you dislike/disagree with? It's a simple question really.... The point you seem to have raised is that because some legitimate entities use YouTube. None of the content is misinformation, or all of them are misinformation. The point is so silly it doesn't deserve addressing. I think it's fascinating actually. So you're the arbitrar of what is and isn't misinformation on you tube? Nope, and I have absolutely no idea what this has got to do with the point. I haven't claimed this, nothing I have said has alluded to this. You appear to have just made up something about me. Have ANY or ALL or NONE of the organisations I listed previously been guilty of broadcasting misinformation at some time or other on you tube? No idea, I haven't monitored their content. And again, no clue how this is even vaguely related to the point. This "hotbed" of yours seems to be cooling by the minute... I don't have a "hotbed". And I have no clue why you're trying to make this about me. None of this has anything to do with me. So how can you criticise and brand you tube content as misinformation (hotbed) if you haven't watched any?" I haven't critisied it. I've described it. And I have watched some YouTube, for entertainment. " You said that you tube is a "hotbed of misinformation" and I'm fascinated by your statement...even more so now that I learn that you've not watched the content. " I have watched some. YouTube lets any user upload content. IE Dave from the pub can upload a video saying Covid isn't real, climate science isn't real, Brexit was a good idea, the moon is made of cheese. " Is it entirely arrogance and ignorance on your part? " The ability to describe how YouTube works is arrogance and ignorance? Okay. " Hell, maybe there's something amiss with your broadband connection! There must be a reason behind your broad-brush approach to criticising youtube content from the BBC, ipcc, gb news and the Disney channel....to name but a few" Not sure why this is turning into an elongated string of made up irrelevant nonsense about me. Maybe try to stick to the topic instead? | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? but you feel strongly enough to complain about the about a thread complaining about starmer and you say yr not a labour supporter lol Yes it's a phenomena how wound up people are getting over absolutely nothing. You don't have to be a Labour supporter, a non-Labour supporter or have any opinion on Labour to look at the ridiculous over the top hysteria that surrounds all the non-news. Personally I find it interesting how the media can wind people up, misdirect them and influence their behaviour. agree on that part how can anyone trust mainstream media anymore I think ppl on here are too smart to wach or listen to that now social media and YouTube is the future I thought you where a bbc sky news cnn guy tho I don't think I've ever watched sky news or CNN Social media and YouTube are hotbeds of misinformation. There's literally no controls there, anyone can post any bullshit and pretend it's real. Couldn't agree more! Bbc, sky, cnn, msnbc, nbc, C4, fox news, gb news, rte, russia today, al jazera, daily mail, guardian, times, Washington Post, new York Times, ceebeebies etc etc...then you have the WEF, WHO, IPCC, NASA, NATO, united nations, stonewall, BLM, tucker carlson...etc etc ALL on youtube. All as you rightly described as a "hotbed of misinformation" Or do you just describe the ones you dislike or disagree with you as "hotbeds of misinformation"? Or have you changed your mind about you tube now that you've thought about it? Erm. YouTube in general is a hotbed of misinformation. This is still true. No matter how angry you get about it. Nice attempt at dodging the points I raise. Totally not angry btw. So it's safe to assume that you consider all the organisations I listed as misinformation because they put content on you tube?....or just the ones you dislike/disagree with? It's a simple question really.... The point you seem to have raised is that because some legitimate entities use YouTube. None of the content is misinformation, or all of them are misinformation. The point is so silly it doesn't deserve addressing. I think it's fascinating actually. So you're the arbitrar of what is and isn't misinformation on you tube? Nope, and I have absolutely no idea what this has got to do with the point. I haven't claimed this, nothing I have said has alluded to this. You appear to have just made up something about me. Have ANY or ALL or NONE of the organisations I listed previously been guilty of broadcasting misinformation at some time or other on you tube? No idea, I haven't monitored their content. And again, no clue how this is even vaguely related to the point. This "hotbed" of yours seems to be cooling by the minute... I don't have a "hotbed". And I have no clue why you're trying to make this about me. None of this has anything to do with me. So how can you criticise and brand you tube content as misinformation (hotbed) if you haven't watched any? I haven't critisied it. I've described it. And I have watched some YouTube, for entertainment. You said that you tube is a "hotbed of misinformation" and I'm fascinated by your statement...even more so now that I learn that you've not watched the content. I have watched some. YouTube lets any user upload content. IE Dave from the pub can upload a video saying Covid isn't real, climate science isn't real, Brexit was a good idea, the moon is made of cheese. Is it entirely arrogance and ignorance on your part? The ability to describe how YouTube works is arrogance and ignorance? Okay. Hell, maybe there's something amiss with your broadband connection! There must be a reason behind your broad-brush approach to criticising youtube content from the BBC, ipcc, gb news and the Disney channel....to name but a few Not sure why this is turning into an elongated string of made up irrelevant nonsense about me. Maybe try to stick to the topic instead?" Soooo triggered....fantastic!! Like blasting lefty fish in a bucket | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? but you feel strongly enough to complain about the about a thread complaining about starmer and you say yr not a labour supporter lol Yes it's a phenomena how wound up people are getting over absolutely nothing. You don't have to be a Labour supporter, a non-Labour supporter or have any opinion on Labour to look at the ridiculous over the top hysteria that surrounds all the non-news. Personally I find it interesting how the media can wind people up, misdirect them and influence their behaviour. agree on that part how can anyone trust mainstream media anymore I think ppl on here are too smart to wach or listen to that now social media and YouTube is the future I thought you where a bbc sky news cnn guy tho I don't think I've ever watched sky news or CNN Social media and YouTube are hotbeds of misinformation. There's literally no controls there, anyone can post any bullshit and pretend it's real. Couldn't agree more! Bbc, sky, cnn, msnbc, nbc, C4, fox news, gb news, rte, russia today, al jazera, daily mail, guardian, times, Washington Post, new York Times, ceebeebies etc etc...then you have the WEF, WHO, IPCC, NASA, NATO, united nations, stonewall, BLM, tucker carlson...etc etc ALL on youtube. All as you rightly described as a "hotbed of misinformation" Or do you just describe the ones you dislike or disagree with you as "hotbeds of misinformation"? Or have you changed your mind about you tube now that you've thought about it? Erm. YouTube in general is a hotbed of misinformation. This is still true. No matter how angry you get about it. Nice attempt at dodging the points I raise. Totally not angry btw. So it's safe to assume that you consider all the organisations I listed as misinformation because they put content on you tube?....or just the ones you dislike/disagree with? It's a simple question really.... The point you seem to have raised is that because some legitimate entities use YouTube. None of the content is misinformation, or all of them are misinformation. The point is so silly it doesn't deserve addressing. I think it's fascinating actually. So you're the arbitrar of what is and isn't misinformation on you tube? Nope, and I have absolutely no idea what this has got to do with the point. I haven't claimed this, nothing I have said has alluded to this. You appear to have just made up something about me. Have ANY or ALL or NONE of the organisations I listed previously been guilty of broadcasting misinformation at some time or other on you tube? No idea, I haven't monitored their content. And again, no clue how this is even vaguely related to the point. This "hotbed" of yours seems to be cooling by the minute... I don't have a "hotbed". And I have no clue why you're trying to make this about me. None of this has anything to do with me. So how can you criticise and brand you tube content as misinformation (hotbed) if you haven't watched any? I haven't critisied it. I've described it. And I have watched some YouTube, for entertainment. You said that you tube is a "hotbed of misinformation" and I'm fascinated by your statement...even more so now that I learn that you've not watched the content. I have watched some. YouTube lets any user upload content. IE Dave from the pub can upload a video saying Covid isn't real, climate science isn't real, Brexit was a good idea, the moon is made of cheese. Is it entirely arrogance and ignorance on your part? The ability to describe how YouTube works is arrogance and ignorance? Okay. Hell, maybe there's something amiss with your broadband connection! There must be a reason behind your broad-brush approach to criticising youtube content from the BBC, ipcc, gb news and the Disney channel....to name but a few Not sure why this is turning into an elongated string of made up irrelevant nonsense about me. Maybe try to stick to the topic instead? Soooo triggered....fantastic!! Like blasting lefty fish in a bucket "As you're unable to discuss the topic without making up bullshit and attacking people, I'll leave you to it. | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? Possibly, if you have thoughts on his very dull deliveries that changed the mood of the country and not for the better. I think you should watch it. Personally, I thought it was awful, abstractly it summed up his premiership for me. I'll watch it later. People's reaction to it is a million times more interesting to me than actual event itself. Later it is, what did you think? Can you see my abstract connection from the lights switch on to his leadership to date? No. I thought it was completely inane. Exactly Okay. I'm not sure what you're getting at? " That is how I see Starmer’s leadership and government, inane, lacking sense. Exactly what you say you saw watching the lights being switched on. I’m actually starting to feel sorry for him, he looked lonely, surrounded by people who didn’t interact or support him. | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? but you feel strongly enough to complain about the about a thread complaining about starmer and you say yr not a labour supporter lol Yes it's a phenomena how wound up people are getting over absolutely nothing. You don't have to be a Labour supporter, a non-Labour supporter or have any opinion on Labour to look at the ridiculous over the top hysteria that surrounds all the non-news. Personally I find it interesting how the media can wind people up, misdirect them and influence their behaviour. agree on that part how can anyone trust mainstream media anymore I think ppl on here are too smart to wach or listen to that now social media and YouTube is the future I thought you where a bbc sky news cnn guy tho I don't think I've ever watched sky news or CNN Social media and YouTube are hotbeds of misinformation. There's literally no controls there, anyone can post any bullshit and pretend it's real. Couldn't agree more! Bbc, sky, cnn, msnbc, nbc, C4, fox news, gb news, rte, russia today, al jazera, daily mail, guardian, times, Washington Post, new York Times, ceebeebies etc etc...then you have the WEF, WHO, IPCC, NASA, NATO, united nations, stonewall, BLM, tucker carlson...etc etc ALL on youtube. All as you rightly described as a "hotbed of misinformation" Or do you just describe the ones you dislike or disagree with you as "hotbeds of misinformation"? Or have you changed your mind about you tube now that you've thought about it? Erm. YouTube in general is a hotbed of misinformation. This is still true. No matter how angry you get about it. Nice attempt at dodging the points I raise. Totally not angry btw. So it's safe to assume that you consider all the organisations I listed as misinformation because they put content on you tube?....or just the ones you dislike/disagree with? It's a simple question really.... The point you seem to have raised is that because some legitimate entities use YouTube. None of the content is misinformation, or all of them are misinformation. The point is so silly it doesn't deserve addressing. I think it's fascinating actually. So you're the arbitrar of what is and isn't misinformation on you tube? Nope, and I have absolutely no idea what this has got to do with the point. I haven't claimed this, nothing I have said has alluded to this. You appear to have just made up something about me. Have ANY or ALL or NONE of the organisations I listed previously been guilty of broadcasting misinformation at some time or other on you tube? No idea, I haven't monitored their content. And again, no clue how this is even vaguely related to the point. This "hotbed" of yours seems to be cooling by the minute... I don't have a "hotbed". And I have no clue why you're trying to make this about me. None of this has anything to do with me. So how can you criticise and brand you tube content as misinformation (hotbed) if you haven't watched any? I haven't critisied it. I've described it. And I have watched some YouTube, for entertainment. You said that you tube is a "hotbed of misinformation" and I'm fascinated by your statement...even more so now that I learn that you've not watched the content. I have watched some. YouTube lets any user upload content. IE Dave from the pub can upload a video saying Covid isn't real, climate science isn't real, Brexit was a good idea, the moon is made of cheese. Is it entirely arrogance and ignorance on your part? The ability to describe how YouTube works is arrogance and ignorance? Okay. Hell, maybe there's something amiss with your broadband connection! There must be a reason behind your broad-brush approach to criticising youtube content from the BBC, ipcc, gb news and the Disney channel....to name but a few Not sure why this is turning into an elongated string of made up irrelevant nonsense about me. Maybe try to stick to the topic instead? Soooo triggered....fantastic!! Like blasting lefty fish in a bucket
As you're unable to discuss the topic without making up bullshit and attacking people, I'll leave you to it. "Attacked or shown up to be a fool? I'm sure there's a safe space for you close by  | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? Possibly, if you have thoughts on his very dull deliveries that changed the mood of the country and not for the better. I think you should watch it. Personally, I thought it was awful, abstractly it summed up his premiership for me. I'll watch it later. People's reaction to it is a million times more interesting to me than actual event itself. Later it is, what did you think? Can you see my abstract connection from the lights switch on to his leadership to date? No. I thought it was completely inane. Exactly Okay. I'm not sure what you're getting at? That is how I see Starmer’s leadership and government, inane, lacking sense. Exactly what you say you saw watching the lights being switched on. I’m actually starting to feel sorry for him, he looked lonely, surrounded by people who didn’t interact or support him. " Oh I see. I'm generally with you. Most of the people on here aren't seeing his leadership like that. As per the multiple posts attacking him for every and anything. IE turning on Christmas lights in a similar manner to all previous PMs. One guy even advocated starting a civil war over Labour being in government. | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? Possibly, if you have thoughts on his very dull deliveries that changed the mood of the country and not for the better. I think you should watch it. Personally, I thought it was awful, abstractly it summed up his premiership for me. I'll watch it later. People's reaction to it is a million times more interesting to me than actual event itself. Later it is, what did you think? Can you see my abstract connection from the lights switch on to his leadership to date? No. I thought it was completely inane. Exactly Okay. I'm not sure what you're getting at? That is how I see Starmer’s leadership and government, inane, lacking sense. Exactly what you say you saw watching the lights being switched on. I’m actually starting to feel sorry for him, he looked lonely, surrounded by people who didn’t interact or support him. Oh I see. I'm generally with you. Most of the people on here aren't seeing his leadership like that. As per the multiple posts attacking him for every and anything. IE turning on Christmas lights in a similar manner to all previous PMs. One guy even advocated starting a civil war over Labour being in government." Yes SKS is possible more hated than Thatcher. I can’t remember a labour leader so disliked. | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? Possibly, if you have thoughts on his very dull deliveries that changed the mood of the country and not for the better. I think you should watch it. Personally, I thought it was awful, abstractly it summed up his premiership for me. I'll watch it later. People's reaction to it is a million times more interesting to me than actual event itself. Later it is, what did you think? Can you see my abstract connection from the lights switch on to his leadership to date? No. I thought it was completely inane. Exactly Okay. I'm not sure what you're getting at? That is how I see Starmer’s leadership and government, inane, lacking sense. Exactly what you say you saw watching the lights being switched on. I’m actually starting to feel sorry for him, he looked lonely, surrounded by people who didn’t interact or support him. Oh I see. I'm generally with you. Most of the people on here aren't seeing his leadership like that. As per the multiple posts attacking him for every and anything. IE turning on Christmas lights in a similar manner to all previous PMs. One guy even advocated starting a civil war over Labour being in government. Yes SKS is possible more hated than Thatcher. I can’t remember a labour leader so disliked. " And that's an interesting point. Why. Is it because he switched on some Christmas lights? No, it's because the media scrutinises his politics, rightly but we've been used to the media giving the government a free ride, so it feels worse. And then wrongly hammering him for turning on the lights. Which is clearly ridiculous, but it is winding up a certain element. | |||
| |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? Possibly, if you have thoughts on his very dull deliveries that changed the mood of the country and not for the better. I think you should watch it. Personally, I thought it was awful, abstractly it summed up his premiership for me. I'll watch it later. People's reaction to it is a million times more interesting to me than actual event itself. Later it is, what did you think? Can you see my abstract connection from the lights switch on to his leadership to date? No. I thought it was completely inane. Exactly Okay. I'm not sure what you're getting at? That is how I see Starmer’s leadership and government, inane, lacking sense. Exactly what you say you saw watching the lights being switched on. I’m actually starting to feel sorry for him, he looked lonely, surrounded by people who didn’t interact or support him. Oh I see. I'm generally with you. Most of the people on here aren't seeing his leadership like that. As per the multiple posts attacking him for every and anything. IE turning on Christmas lights in a similar manner to all previous PMs. One guy even advocated starting a civil war over Labour being in government. Yes SKS is possible more hated than Thatcher. I can’t remember a labour leader so disliked. And that's an interesting point. Why. Is it because he switched on some Christmas lights? No, it's because the media scrutinises his politics, rightly but we've been used to the media giving the government a free ride, so it feels worse. And then wrongly hammering him for turning on the lights. Which is clearly ridiculous, but it is winding up a certain element. " I think it justified he’s a nonce . | |||
"Can this man get an more boring? I fear we've scraped through the bottom of the Everyrhing-is-Starmers-fault barrel here. Who is saying Starmer was at fault? The OP, for being "boring" for turning on Christmas lights. He had the usual press gathering for the Downing St, Christmas lights switch on, have you watched it? I haven't watched it. But if I had, do you think I would feel strongly enough to start yet another thread on here complaining about Starmer? Possibly, if you have thoughts on his very dull deliveries that changed the mood of the country and not for the better. I think you should watch it. Personally, I thought it was awful, abstractly it summed up his premiership for me. I'll watch it later. People's reaction to it is a million times more interesting to me than actual event itself. Later it is, what did you think? Can you see my abstract connection from the lights switch on to his leadership to date? No. I thought it was completely inane. Exactly Okay. I'm not sure what you're getting at? That is how I see Starmer’s leadership and government, inane, lacking sense. Exactly what you say you saw watching the lights being switched on. I’m actually starting to feel sorry for him, he looked lonely, surrounded by people who didn’t interact or support him. Oh I see. I'm generally with you. Most of the people on here aren't seeing his leadership like that. As per the multiple posts attacking him for every and anything. IE turning on Christmas lights in a similar manner to all previous PMs. One guy even advocated starting a civil war over Labour being in government. Yes SKS is possible more hated than Thatcher. I can’t remember a labour leader so disliked. And that's an interesting point. Why. Is it because he switched on some Christmas lights? No, it's because the media scrutinises his politics, rightly but we've been used to the media giving the government a free ride, so it feels worse. And then wrongly hammering him for turning on the lights. Which is clearly ridiculous, but it is winding up a certain element. I think it justified he’s a nonce . " This is a good example. The genuine criticism of the Labour government is lost amongst the tidal wave of utter bullshit like this. | |||
