FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Starmer’s World Tour
Starmer’s World Tour
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
"Since becoming PM in July, Starmer has taken 14 international trips at taxpayers’ expense. Now we all know that Labour love a freebie, but isn’t this just taking the piss? The government keeps lecturing everyone about the “climate emergency”, and say they are providing “global leadership” on the issue. But once again looks like one rule for them, and another rule for the plebs." ...so where's he gone this time, golfing, sun holiday...? | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
 | |||
"Since becoming PM in July, Starmer has taken 14 international trips at taxpayers’ expense. Now we all know that Labour love a freebie, but isn’t this just taking the piss? The government keeps lecturing everyone about the “climate emergency”, and say they are providing “global leadership” on the issue. But once again looks like one rule for them, and another rule for the plebs." In shock news, PM attends meetings in other countries as part of his role as the leader of the government. | |||
"Since becoming PM in July, Starmer has taken 14 international trips at taxpayers’ expense. Now we all know that Labour love a freebie, but isn’t this just taking the piss? The government keeps lecturing everyone about the “climate emergency”, and say they are providing “global leadership” on the issue. But once again looks like one rule for them, and another rule for the plebs. In shock news, PM attends meetings in other countries as part of his role as the leader of the government. " He seems to attend meetings that nobody else bothers going to, like COP29. I’m surprised that a climate alarmist such as yourself is so keen to defend Starmer’s unnecessary carbon emissions. | |||
"Since becoming PM in July, Starmer has taken 14 international trips at taxpayers’ expense. Now we all know that Labour love a freebie, but isn’t this just taking the piss? The government keeps lecturing everyone about the “climate emergency”, and say they are providing “global leadership” on the issue. But once again looks like one rule for them, and another rule for the plebs. In shock news, PM attends meetings in other countries as part of his role as the leader of the government. He seems to attend meetings that nobody else bothers going to, like COP29. I’m surprised that a climate alarmist such as yourself is so keen to defend Starmer’s unnecessary carbon emissions." COP29 is important. Understanding climate science isn't being a "climate alarmist". | |||
"Since becoming PM in July, Starmer has taken 14 international trips at taxpayers’ expense. Now we all know that Labour love a freebie, but isn’t this just taking the piss? The government keeps lecturing everyone about the “climate emergency”, and say they are providing “global leadership” on the issue. But once again looks like one rule for them, and another rule for the plebs. In shock news, PM attends meetings in other countries as part of his role as the leader of the government. He seems to attend meetings that nobody else bothers going to, like COP29. I’m surprised that a climate alarmist such as yourself is so keen to defend Starmer’s unnecessary carbon emissions." Do as I say, not as I do ... Surely they can do zoom calls/conference 😳 | |||
"Since becoming PM in July, Starmer has taken 14 international trips at taxpayers’ expense. Now we all know that Labour love a freebie, but isn’t this just taking the piss? The government keeps lecturing everyone about the “climate emergency”, and say they are providing “global leadership” on the issue. But once again looks like one rule for them, and another rule for the plebs. In shock news, PM attends meetings in other countries as part of his role as the leader of the government. He seems to attend meetings that nobody else bothers going to, like COP29. I’m surprised that a climate alarmist such as yourself is so keen to defend Starmer’s unnecessary carbon emissions. COP29 is important. Understanding climate science isn't being a "climate alarmist". "Yes Starmer’s government definitely seems to have considered COP29 to be more important than anyone else. Officials attending COP29 by country: UK 470 US 405 Germany 325 France 115 India 111 Such shocking damage to the planet. | |||
"Since becoming PM in July, Starmer has taken 14 international trips at taxpayers’ expense. Now we all know that Labour love a freebie, but isn’t this just taking the piss? The government keeps lecturing everyone about the “climate emergency”, and say they are providing “global leadership” on the issue. But once again looks like one rule for them, and another rule for the plebs. In shock news, PM attends meetings in other countries as part of his role as the leader of the government. He seems to attend meetings that nobody else bothers going to, like COP29. I’m surprised that a climate alarmist such as yourself is so keen to defend Starmer’s unnecessary carbon emissions. Do as I say, not as I do ... Surely they can do zoom calls/conference 😳 " Starmer is telling UK citizens not to attend COP29? Have heard lots of silly things on here. But then there's always something new. | |||
"Since becoming PM in July, Starmer has taken 14 international trips at taxpayers’ expense. Now we all know that Labour love a freebie, but isn’t this just taking the piss? The government keeps lecturing everyone about the “climate emergency”, and say they are providing “global leadership” on the issue. But once again looks like one rule for them, and another rule for the plebs. In shock news, PM attends meetings in other countries as part of his role as the leader of the government. He seems to attend meetings that nobody else bothers going to, like COP29. I’m surprised that a climate alarmist such as yourself is so keen to defend Starmer’s unnecessary carbon emissions. COP29 is important. Understanding climate science isn't being a "climate alarmist".
Yes Starmer’s government definitely seems to have considered COP29 to be more important than anyone else.
Officials attending COP29 by country:
UK 470
US 405
Germany 325
France 115
India 111
Such shocking damage to the planet."He's a leader in a one person race.🤦♂️ | |||
"Since becoming PM in July, Starmer has taken 14 international trips at taxpayers’ expense. Now we all know that Labour love a freebie, but isn’t this just taking the piss? The government keeps lecturing everyone about the “climate emergency”, and say they are providing “global leadership” on the issue. But once again looks like one rule for them, and another rule for the plebs. In shock news, PM attends meetings in other countries as part of his role as the leader of the government. He seems to attend meetings that nobody else bothers going to, like COP29. I’m surprised that a climate alarmist such as yourself is so keen to defend Starmer’s unnecessary carbon emissions. COP29 is important. Understanding climate science isn't being a "climate alarmist".
Yes Starmer’s government definitely seems to have considered COP29 to be more important than anyone else.
Officials attending COP29 by country:
UK 470
US 405
Germany 325
France 115
India 111
Such shocking damage to the planet."What's the damage to the planet compared to say, not transitioning off fossil fuels for electricity generation? | |||
"Since becoming PM in July, Starmer has taken 14 international trips at taxpayers’ expense. Now we all know that Labour love a freebie, but isn’t this just taking the piss? The government keeps lecturing everyone about the “climate emergency”, and say they are providing “global leadership” on the issue. But once again looks like one rule for them, and another rule for the plebs. In shock news, PM attends meetings in other countries as part of his role as the leader of the government. He seems to attend meetings that nobody else bothers going to, like COP29. I’m surprised that a climate alarmist such as yourself is so keen to defend Starmer’s unnecessary carbon emissions. COP29 is important. Understanding climate science isn't being a "climate alarmist".
Yes Starmer’s government definitely seems to have considered COP29 to be more important than anyone else.
Officials attending COP29 by country:
UK 470
US 405
Germany 325
France 115
India 111
Such shocking damage to the planet.
What's the damage to the planet compared to say, not transitioning off fossil fuels for electricity generation?"I’m sure those 470 taxpayer funded UK officials flying to Azerbaijan have made all the difference. | |||
"Since becoming PM in July, Starmer has taken 14 international trips at taxpayers’ expense. Now we all know that Labour love a freebie, but isn’t this just taking the piss? The government keeps lecturing everyone about the “climate emergency”, and say they are providing “global leadership” on the issue. But once again looks like one rule for them, and another rule for the plebs. In shock news, PM attends meetings in other countries as part of his role as the leader of the government. He seems to attend meetings that nobody else bothers going to, like COP29. I’m surprised that a climate alarmist such as yourself is so keen to defend Starmer’s unnecessary carbon emissions. COP29 is important. Understanding climate science isn't being a "climate alarmist".
Yes Starmer’s government definitely seems to have considered COP29 to be more important than anyone else.
Officials attending COP29 by country:
UK 470
US 405
Germany 325
France 115
India 111
Such shocking damage to the planet.
What's the damage to the planet compared to say, not transitioning off fossil fuels for electricity generation?
I’m sure those 470 taxpayer funded UK officials flying to Azerbaijan have made all the difference.
"So you don't know, it's just rhetoric. Anyway, if climate science isn't real, what does it matter who flies where? | |||
"Since becoming PM in July, Starmer has taken 14 international trips at taxpayers’ expense. Now we all know that Labour love a freebie, but isn’t this just taking the piss? The government keeps lecturing everyone about the “climate emergency”, and say they are providing “global leadership” on the issue. But once again looks like one rule for them, and another rule for the plebs. In shock news, PM attends meetings in other countries as part of his role as the leader of the government. He seems to attend meetings that nobody else bothers going to, like COP29. I’m surprised that a climate alarmist such as yourself is so keen to defend Starmer’s unnecessary carbon emissions. COP29 is important. Understanding climate science isn't being a "climate alarmist".
Yes Starmer’s government definitely seems to have considered COP29 to be more important than anyone else.
Officials attending COP29 by country:
UK 470
US 405
Germany 325
France 115
India 111
Such shocking damage to the planet.
What's the damage to the planet compared to say, not transitioning off fossil fuels for electricity generation?
I’m sure those 470 taxpayer funded UK officials flying to Azerbaijan have made all the difference.
So you don't know, it's just rhetoric.
Anyway, if climate science isn't real, what does it matter who flies where?"It doesn’t matter to me at all, save for the obvious waste of taxpayers money to no end. I would have thought a climate alarmist would quite alarmed by it all. | |||
"Since becoming PM in July, Starmer has taken 14 international trips at taxpayers’ expense. Now we all know that Labour love a freebie, but isn’t this just taking the piss? The government keeps lecturing everyone about the “climate emergency”, and say they are providing “global leadership” on the issue. But once again looks like one rule for them, and another rule for the plebs. In shock news, PM attends meetings in other countries as part of his role as the leader of the government. He seems to attend meetings that nobody else bothers going to, like COP29. I’m surprised that a climate alarmist such as yourself is so keen to defend Starmer’s unnecessary carbon emissions. COP29 is important. Understanding climate science isn't being a "climate alarmist".
Yes Starmer’s government definitely seems to have considered COP29 to be more important than anyone else.
Officials attending COP29 by country:
UK 470
US 405
Germany 325
France 115
India 111
Such shocking damage to the planet.
What's the damage to the planet compared to say, not transitioning off fossil fuels for electricity generation?
I’m sure those 470 taxpayer funded UK officials flying to Azerbaijan have made all the difference.
So you don't know, it's just rhetoric.
Anyway, if climate science isn't real, what does it matter who flies where?
It doesn’t matter to me at all, save for the obvious waste of taxpayers money to no end.
I would have thought a climate alarmist would quite alarmed by it all."If it doesn't matter at all, why do you keep mentioning it? I never met a climate alarmist so wouldn't know what they'd think. | |||
| |||
| |||
"Since becoming PM in July, Starmer has taken 14 international trips at taxpayers’ expense. Now we all know that Labour love a freebie, but isn’t this just taking the piss? The government keeps lecturing everyone about the “climate emergency”, and say they are providing “global leadership” on the issue. But once again looks like one rule for them, and another rule for the plebs. In shock news, PM attends meetings in other countries as part of his role as the leader of the government. He seems to attend meetings that nobody else bothers going to, like COP29. I’m surprised that a climate alarmist such as yourself is so keen to defend Starmer’s unnecessary carbon emissions. COP29 is important. Understanding climate science isn't being a "climate alarmist".
Yes Starmer’s government definitely seems to have considered COP29 to be more important than anyone else.
Officials attending COP29 by country:
UK 470
US 405
Germany 325
France 115
India 111
Such shocking damage to the planet.
What's the damage to the planet compared to say, not transitioning off fossil fuels for electricity generation?
I’m sure those 470 taxpayer funded UK officials flying to Azerbaijan have made all the difference.
So you don't know, it's just rhetoric.
Anyway, if climate science isn't real, what does it matter who flies where?
It doesn’t matter to me at all, save for the obvious waste of taxpayers money to no end.
I would have thought a climate alarmist would quite alarmed by it all.
If it doesn't matter at all, why do you keep mentioning it?
I never met a climate alarmist so wouldn't know what they'd think."I think Starmer would do better to take a stand. “We in the UK believe that fighting the climate crisis is existential. So we are no longer going to send anyone to international conferences about it. We have ambassadors in-country who can attend, and can make our experts available to attend online”. | |||
"Since becoming PM in July, Starmer has taken 14 international trips at taxpayers’ expense. Now we all know that Labour love a freebie, but isn’t this just taking the piss? The government keeps lecturing everyone about the “climate emergency”, and say they are providing “global leadership” on the issue. But once again looks like one rule for them, and another rule for the plebs. In shock news, PM attends meetings in other countries as part of his role as the leader of the government. He seems to attend meetings that nobody else bothers going to, like COP29. I’m surprised that a climate alarmist such as yourself is so keen to defend Starmer’s unnecessary carbon emissions. COP29 is important. Understanding climate science isn't being a "climate alarmist".
Yes Starmer’s government definitely seems to have considered COP29 to be more important than anyone else.
Officials attending COP29 by country:
UK 470
US 405
Germany 325
France 115
India 111
Such shocking damage to the planet.
What's the damage to the planet compared to say, not transitioning off fossil fuels for electricity generation?
I’m sure those 470 taxpayer funded UK officials flying to Azerbaijan have made all the difference.
So you don't know, it's just rhetoric.
Anyway, if climate science isn't real, what does it matter who flies where?
It doesn’t matter to me at all, save for the obvious waste of taxpayers money to no end.
I would have thought a climate alarmist would quite alarmed by it all.
If it doesn't matter at all, why do you keep mentioning it?
I never met a climate alarmist so wouldn't know what they'd think.
I think Starmer would do better to take a stand.
“We in the UK believe that fighting the climate crisis is existential. So we are no longer going to send anyone to international conferences about it. We have ambassadors in-country who can attend, and can make our experts available to attend online”."Why should he do that if climate science isn't real? Doesn't matter who flies where or when. | |||
"Since becoming PM in July, Starmer has taken 14 international trips at taxpayers’ expense. Now we all know that Labour love a freebie, but isn’t this just taking the piss? The government keeps lecturing everyone about the “climate emergency”, and say they are providing “global leadership” on the issue. But once again looks like one rule for them, and another rule for the plebs. In shock news, PM attends meetings in other countries as part of his role as the leader of the government. He seems to attend meetings that nobody else bothers going to, like COP29. I’m surprised that a climate alarmist such as yourself is so keen to defend Starmer’s unnecessary carbon emissions. COP29 is important. Understanding climate science isn't being a "climate alarmist".
Yes Starmer’s government definitely seems to have considered COP29 to be more important than anyone else.
Officials attending COP29 by country:
UK 470
US 405
Germany 325
France 115
India 111
Such shocking damage to the planet.
What's the damage to the planet compared to say, not transitioning off fossil fuels for electricity generation?
I’m sure those 470 taxpayer funded UK officials flying to Azerbaijan have made all the difference.
So you don't know, it's just rhetoric.
Anyway, if climate science isn't real, what does it matter who flies where?
It doesn’t matter to me at all, save for the obvious waste of taxpayers money to no end.
I would have thought a climate alarmist would quite alarmed by it all.
If it doesn't matter at all, why do you keep mentioning it?
I never met a climate alarmist so wouldn't know what they'd think.
I think Starmer would do better to take a stand.
“We in the UK believe that fighting the climate crisis is existential. So we are no longer going to send anyone to international conferences about it. We have ambassadors in-country who can attend, and can make our experts available to attend online”.
Why should he do that if climate science isn't real? Doesn't matter who flies where or when. "That’s the problem. You say that the climate crisis is existential. But if it were, tens of thousands of people wouldn’t be flying around the world every year for some free food and board and a few goodie bags. | |||
"Since becoming PM in July, Starmer has taken 14 international trips at taxpayers’ expense. Now we all know that Labour love a freebie, but isn’t this just taking the piss? The government keeps lecturing everyone about the “climate emergency”, and say they are providing “global leadership” on the issue. But once again looks like one rule for them, and another rule for the plebs. In shock news, PM attends meetings in other countries as part of his role as the leader of the government. He seems to attend meetings that nobody else bothers going to, like COP29. I’m surprised that a climate alarmist such as yourself is so keen to defend Starmer’s unnecessary carbon emissions. COP29 is important. Understanding climate science isn't being a "climate alarmist".
Yes Starmer’s government definitely seems to have considered COP29 to be more important than anyone else.
Officials attending COP29 by country:
UK 470
US 405
Germany 325
France 115
India 111
Such shocking damage to the planet.
What's the damage to the planet compared to say, not transitioning off fossil fuels for electricity generation?
I’m sure those 470 taxpayer funded UK officials flying to Azerbaijan have made all the difference.
So you don't know, it's just rhetoric.
Anyway, if climate science isn't real, what does it matter who flies where?
It doesn’t matter to me at all, save for the obvious waste of taxpayers money to no end.
I would have thought a climate alarmist would quite alarmed by it all.
If it doesn't matter at all, why do you keep mentioning it?
I never met a climate alarmist so wouldn't know what they'd think.
I think Starmer would do better to take a stand.
“We in the UK believe that fighting the climate crisis is existential. So we are no longer going to send anyone to international conferences about it. We have ambassadors in-country who can attend, and can make our experts available to attend online”.
Why should he do that if climate science isn't real? Doesn't matter who flies where or when.
That’s the problem.
You say that the climate crisis is existential.
But if it were, tens of thousands of people wouldn’t be flying around the world every year for some free food and board and a few goodie bags."Just to be clear, your argument that climate science isn't real is based on people taking flights? You know you could just spend a small amount of time to read about it and understand? It would take way less time than you currently spend denying its happening. | |||
"Since becoming PM in July, Starmer has taken 14 international trips at taxpayers’ expense. Now we all know that Labour love a freebie, but isn’t this just taking the piss? The government keeps lecturing everyone about the “climate emergency”, and say they are providing “global leadership” on the issue. But once again looks like one rule for them, and another rule for the plebs. In shock news, PM attends meetings in other countries as part of his role as the leader of the government. He seems to attend meetings that nobody else bothers going to, like COP29. I’m surprised that a climate alarmist such as yourself is so keen to defend Starmer’s unnecessary carbon emissions. COP29 is important. Understanding climate science isn't being a "climate alarmist".
Yes Starmer’s government definitely seems to have considered COP29 to be more important than anyone else.
Officials attending COP29 by country:
UK 470
US 405
Germany 325
France 115
India 111
Such shocking damage to the planet.
What's the damage to the planet compared to say, not transitioning off fossil fuels for electricity generation?
I’m sure those 470 taxpayer funded UK officials flying to Azerbaijan have made all the difference.
So you don't know, it's just rhetoric.
Anyway, if climate science isn't real, what does it matter who flies where?
It doesn’t matter to me at all, save for the obvious waste of taxpayers money to no end.
I would have thought a climate alarmist would quite alarmed by it all.
If it doesn't matter at all, why do you keep mentioning it?
I never met a climate alarmist so wouldn't know what they'd think.
I think Starmer would do better to take a stand.
“We in the UK believe that fighting the climate crisis is existential. So we are no longer going to send anyone to international conferences about it. We have ambassadors in-country who can attend, and can make our experts available to attend online”.
Why should he do that if climate science isn't real? Doesn't matter who flies where or when.
That’s the problem.
You say that the climate crisis is existential.
But if it were, tens of thousands of people wouldn’t be flying around the world every year for some free food and board and a few goodie bags.
Just to be clear, your argument that climate science isn't real is based on people taking flights?
You know you could just spend a small amount of time to read about it and understand? It would take way less time than you currently spend denying its happening. "I’m saying that climate science is very real and I’d like the UK government to act like it is. | |||
"Since becoming PM in July, Starmer has taken 14 international trips at taxpayers’ expense. Now we all know that Labour love a freebie, but isn’t this just taking the piss? The government keeps lecturing everyone about the “climate emergency”, and say they are providing “global leadership” on the issue. But once again looks like one rule for them, and another rule for the plebs. In shock news, PM attends meetings in other countries as part of his role as the leader of the government. He seems to attend meetings that nobody else bothers going to, like COP29. I’m surprised that a climate alarmist such as yourself is so keen to defend Starmer’s unnecessary carbon emissions. COP29 is important. Understanding climate science isn't being a "climate alarmist".
Yes Starmer’s government definitely seems to have considered COP29 to be more important than anyone else.
Officials attending COP29 by country:
UK 470
US 405
Germany 325
France 115
India 111
Such shocking damage to the planet.
What's the damage to the planet compared to say, not transitioning off fossil fuels for electricity generation?
I’m sure those 470 taxpayer funded UK officials flying to Azerbaijan have made all the difference.
So you don't know, it's just rhetoric.
Anyway, if climate science isn't real, what does it matter who flies where?
It doesn’t matter to me at all, save for the obvious waste of taxpayers money to no end.
I would have thought a climate alarmist would quite alarmed by it all.
If it doesn't matter at all, why do you keep mentioning it?
I never met a climate alarmist so wouldn't know what they'd think.
I think Starmer would do better to take a stand.
“We in the UK believe that fighting the climate crisis is existential. So we are no longer going to send anyone to international conferences about it. We have ambassadors in-country who can attend, and can make our experts available to attend online”.
Why should he do that if climate science isn't real? Doesn't matter who flies where or when.
That’s the problem.
You say that the climate crisis is existential.
But if it were, tens of thousands of people wouldn’t be flying around the world every year for some free food and board and a few goodie bags.
Just to be clear, your argument that climate science isn't real is based on people taking flights?
You know you could just spend a small amount of time to read about it and understand? It would take way less time than you currently spend denying its happening.
I’m saying that climate science is very real and I’d like the UK government to act like it is."By not attending climate change conferences? | |||
"Since becoming PM in July, Starmer has taken 14 international trips at taxpayers’ expense. Now we all know that Labour love a freebie, but isn’t this just taking the piss? The government keeps lecturing everyone about the “climate emergency”, and say they are providing “global leadership” on the issue. But once again looks like one rule for them, and another rule for the plebs. In shock news, PM attends meetings in other countries as part of his role as the leader of the government. He seems to attend meetings that nobody else bothers going to, like COP29. I’m surprised that a climate alarmist such as yourself is so keen to defend Starmer’s unnecessary carbon emissions. COP29 is important. Understanding climate science isn't being a "climate alarmist".
Yes Starmer’s government definitely seems to have considered COP29 to be more important than anyone else.
Officials attending COP29 by country:
UK 470
US 405
Germany 325
France 115
India 111
Such shocking damage to the planet.
What's the damage to the planet compared to say, not transitioning off fossil fuels for electricity generation?
I’m sure those 470 taxpayer funded UK officials flying to Azerbaijan have made all the difference.
So you don't know, it's just rhetoric.
Anyway, if climate science isn't real, what does it matter who flies where?
It doesn’t matter to me at all, save for the obvious waste of taxpayers money to no end.
I would have thought a climate alarmist would quite alarmed by it all.
If it doesn't matter at all, why do you keep mentioning it?
I never met a climate alarmist so wouldn't know what they'd think.
I think Starmer would do better to take a stand.
“We in the UK believe that fighting the climate crisis is existential. So we are no longer going to send anyone to international conferences about it. We have ambassadors in-country who can attend, and can make our experts available to attend online”.
Why should he do that if climate science isn't real? Doesn't matter who flies where or when.
That’s the problem.
You say that the climate crisis is existential.
But if it were, tens of thousands of people wouldn’t be flying around the world every year for some free food and board and a few goodie bags.
Just to be clear, your argument that climate science isn't real is based on people taking flights?
You know you could just spend a small amount of time to read about it and understand? It would take way less time than you currently spend denying its happening.
I’m saying that climate science is very real and I’d like the UK government to act like it is."Well done you for not making it personal .... | |||
| |||
| |||
"Since becoming PM in July, Starmer has taken 14 international trips at taxpayers’ expense. Now we all know that Labour love a freebie, but isn’t this just taking the piss? The government keeps lecturing everyone about the “climate emergency”, and say they are providing “global leadership” on the issue. But once again looks like one rule for them, and another rule for the plebs. In shock news, PM attends meetings in other countries as part of his role as the leader of the government. He seems to attend meetings that nobody else bothers going to, like COP29. I’m surprised that a climate alarmist such as yourself is so keen to defend Starmer’s unnecessary carbon emissions. COP29 is important. Understanding climate science isn't being a "climate alarmist".
Yes Starmer’s government definitely seems to have considered COP29 to be more important than anyone else.
Officials attending COP29 by country:
UK 470
US 405
Germany 325
France 115
India 111
Such shocking damage to the planet.
What's the damage to the planet compared to say, not transitioning off fossil fuels for electricity generation?
I’m sure those 470 taxpayer funded UK officials flying to Azerbaijan have made all the difference.
So you don't know, it's just rhetoric.
Anyway, if climate science isn't real, what does it matter who flies where?
It doesn’t matter to me at all, save for the obvious waste of taxpayers money to no end.
I would have thought a climate alarmist would quite alarmed by it all.
If it doesn't matter at all, why do you keep mentioning it?
I never met a climate alarmist so wouldn't know what they'd think.
I think Starmer would do better to take a stand.
“We in the UK believe that fighting the climate crisis is existential. So we are no longer going to send anyone to international conferences about it. We have ambassadors in-country who can attend, and can make our experts available to attend online”.
Why should he do that if climate science isn't real? Doesn't matter who flies where or when.
That’s the problem.
You say that the climate crisis is existential.
But if it were, tens of thousands of people wouldn’t be flying around the world every year for some free food and board and a few goodie bags.
Just to be clear, your argument that climate science isn't real is based on people taking flights?
You know you could just spend a small amount of time to read about it and understand? It would take way less time than you currently spend denying its happening.
I’m saying that climate science is very real and I’d like the UK government to act like it is.
By not attending climate change conferences?
"Can you give me anything concrete that has come out of COP, other than the next pact, agreement or protocol that simply is not adhered to? | |||
| |||
"Since becoming PM in July, Starmer has taken 14 international trips at taxpayers’ expense. Now we all know that Labour love a freebie, but isn’t this just taking the piss? The government keeps lecturing everyone about the “climate emergency”, and say they are providing “global leadership” on the issue. But once again looks like one rule for them, and another rule for the plebs. In shock news, PM attends meetings in other countries as part of his role as the leader of the government. He seems to attend meetings that nobody else bothers going to, like COP29. I’m surprised that a climate alarmist such as yourself is so keen to defend Starmer’s unnecessary carbon emissions. COP29 is important. Understanding climate science isn't being a "climate alarmist". "yeah, the taliban were there but very few leaders of the major nations….. lots of oil deals done mind 👍🏻 | |||
"Not read all the post. BUT But why cant they stay in their own countries and do Teams. No trains No planes or No cars Just sayin" | |||
"Since becoming PM in July, Starmer has taken 14 international trips at taxpayers’ expense. Now we all know that Labour love a freebie, but isn’t this just taking the piss? The government keeps lecturing everyone about the “climate emergency”, and say they are providing “global leadership” on the issue. But once again looks like one rule for them, and another rule for the plebs. In shock news, PM attends meetings in other countries as part of his role as the leader of the government. He seems to attend meetings that nobody else bothers going to, like COP29. I’m surprised that a climate alarmist such as yourself is so keen to defend Starmer’s unnecessary carbon emissions. COP29 is important. Understanding climate science isn't being a "climate alarmist".
Yes Starmer’s government definitely seems to have considered COP29 to be more important than anyone else.
Officials attending COP29 by country:
UK 470
US 405
Germany 325
France 115
India 111
Such shocking damage to the planet.
What's the damage to the planet compared to say, not transitioning off fossil fuels for electricity generation?
I’m sure those 470 taxpayer funded UK officials flying to Azerbaijan have made all the difference.
So you don't know, it's just rhetoric.
Anyway, if climate science isn't real, what does it matter who flies where?
It doesn’t matter to me at all, save for the obvious waste of taxpayers money to no end.
I would have thought a climate alarmist would quite alarmed by it all.
If it doesn't matter at all, why do you keep mentioning it?
I never met a climate alarmist so wouldn't know what they'd think.
I think Starmer would do better to take a stand.
“We in the UK believe that fighting the climate crisis is existential. So we are no longer going to send anyone to international conferences about it. We have ambassadors in-country who can attend, and can make our experts available to attend online”.
Why should he do that if climate science isn't real? Doesn't matter who flies where or when.
That’s the problem.
You say that the climate crisis is existential.
But if it were, tens of thousands of people wouldn’t be flying around the world every year for some free food and board and a few goodie bags.
Just to be clear, your argument that climate science isn't real is based on people taking flights?
You know you could just spend a small amount of time to read about it and understand? It would take way less time than you currently spend denying its happening.
I’m saying that climate science is very real and I’d like the UK government to act like it is.
By not attending climate change conferences?
Can you give me anything concrete that has come out of COP, other than the next pact, agreement or protocol that simply is not adhered to?"I'll answer the question if you can explain how it's related to my requests for clarity on Buck's posts. | |||
| |||
"Since becoming PM in July, Starmer has taken 14 international trips at taxpayers’ expense. Now we all know that Labour love a freebie, but isn’t this just taking the piss? The government keeps lecturing everyone about the “climate emergency”, and say they are providing “global leadership” on the issue. But once again looks like one rule for them, and another rule for the plebs. In shock news, PM attends meetings in other countries as part of his role as the leader of the government. " … and nearly 500 reps go to cop29. Indefensible | |||
"Since becoming PM in July, Starmer has taken 14 international trips at taxpayers’ expense. Now we all know that Labour love a freebie, but isn’t this just taking the piss? The government keeps lecturing everyone about the “climate emergency”, and say they are providing “global leadership” on the issue. But once again looks like one rule for them, and another rule for the plebs. In shock news, PM attends meetings in other countries as part of his role as the leader of the government. He seems to attend meetings that nobody else bothers going to, like COP29. I’m surprised that a climate alarmist such as yourself is so keen to defend Starmer’s unnecessary carbon emissions. COP29 is important. Understanding climate science isn't being a "climate alarmist".
Yes Starmer’s government definitely seems to have considered COP29 to be more important than anyone else.
Officials attending COP29 by country:
UK 470
US 405
Germany 325
France 115
India 111
Such shocking damage to the planet.
What's the damage to the planet compared to say, not transitioning off fossil fuels for electricity generation?
I’m sure those 470 taxpayer funded UK officials flying to Azerbaijan have made all the difference.
So you don't know, it's just rhetoric.
Anyway, if climate science isn't real, what does it matter who flies where?
It doesn’t matter to me at all, save for the obvious waste of taxpayers money to no end.
I would have thought a climate alarmist would quite alarmed by it all.
If it doesn't matter at all, why do you keep mentioning it?
I never met a climate alarmist so wouldn't know what they'd think.
I think Starmer would do better to take a stand.
“We in the UK believe that fighting the climate crisis is existential. So we are no longer going to send anyone to international conferences about it. We have ambassadors in-country who can attend, and can make our experts available to attend online”.
Why should he do that if climate science isn't real? Doesn't matter who flies where or when.
That’s the problem.
You say that the climate crisis is existential.
But if it were, tens of thousands of people wouldn’t be flying around the world every year for some free food and board and a few goodie bags.
Just to be clear, your argument that climate science isn't real is based on people taking flights?
You know you could just spend a small amount of time to read about it and understand? It would take way less time than you currently spend denying its happening.
I’m saying that climate science is very real and I’d like the UK government to act like it is.
By not attending climate change conferences?
Can you give me anything concrete that has come out of COP, other than the next pact, agreement or protocol that simply is not adhered to?
I'll answer the question if you can explain how it's related to my requests for clarity on Buck's posts. "You questioned / suggested Starmer travelling to climate conferences was a good way to address climate change. My question is what has COP accomplished, that hasn’t been dropped or failed to be implemented? It’s the biggest climate change conference and it seems to deliver nothing but hot air. So, what’s the point of Starmer going? Other world leaders didn’t turn up… | |||
| |||
"Starmer has gone to cop 29 , To get away from the farmers as they protest in London , he’s just a spineless twat I’m just waiting for adverse comments " Yeah, starmer’s farmers come to visit him and he runs away | |||
| |||
"Since becoming PM in July, Starmer has taken 14 international trips at taxpayers’ expense. Now we all know that Labour love a freebie, but isn’t this just taking the piss? The government keeps lecturing everyone about the “climate emergency”, and say they are providing “global leadership” on the issue. But once again looks like one rule for them, and another rule for the plebs. In shock news, PM attends meetings in other countries as part of his role as the leader of the government. He seems to attend meetings that nobody else bothers going to, like COP29. I’m surprised that a climate alarmist such as yourself is so keen to defend Starmer’s unnecessary carbon emissions. COP29 is important. Understanding climate science isn't being a "climate alarmist".
Yes Starmer’s government definitely seems to have considered COP29 to be more important than anyone else.
Officials attending COP29 by country:
UK 470
US 405
Germany 325
France 115
India 111
Such shocking damage to the planet.
What's the damage to the planet compared to say, not transitioning off fossil fuels for electricity generation?
I’m sure those 470 taxpayer funded UK officials flying to Azerbaijan have made all the difference.
So you don't know, it's just rhetoric.
Anyway, if climate science isn't real, what does it matter who flies where?
It doesn’t matter to me at all, save for the obvious waste of taxpayers money to no end.
I would have thought a climate alarmist would quite alarmed by it all.
If it doesn't matter at all, why do you keep mentioning it?
I never met a climate alarmist so wouldn't know what they'd think.
I think Starmer would do better to take a stand.
“We in the UK believe that fighting the climate crisis is existential. So we are no longer going to send anyone to international conferences about it. We have ambassadors in-country who can attend, and can make our experts available to attend online”.
Why should he do that if climate science isn't real? Doesn't matter who flies where or when.
That’s the problem.
You say that the climate crisis is existential.
But if it were, tens of thousands of people wouldn’t be flying around the world every year for some free food and board and a few goodie bags.
Just to be clear, your argument that climate science isn't real is based on people taking flights?
You know you could just spend a small amount of time to read about it and understand? It would take way less time than you currently spend denying its happening.
I’m saying that climate science is very real and I’d like the UK government to act like it is.
By not attending climate change conferences?
Can you give me anything concrete that has come out of COP, other than the next pact, agreement or protocol that simply is not adhered to?
I'll answer the question if you can explain how it's related to my requests for clarity on Buck's posts.
You questioned / suggested Starmer travelling to climate conferences was a good way to address climate change.
My question is what has COP accomplished, that hasn’t been dropped or failed to be implemented? It’s the biggest climate change conference and it seems to deliver nothing but hot air.
So, what’s the point of Starmer going? Other world leaders didn’t turn up… "I don't know. I'm not here to defend COP. | |||
"Since becoming PM in July, Starmer has taken 14 international trips at taxpayers’ expense. Now we all know that Labour love a freebie, but isn’t this just taking the piss? The government keeps lecturing everyone about the “climate emergency”, and say they are providing “global leadership” on the issue. But once again looks like one rule for them, and another rule for the plebs. In shock news, PM attends meetings in other countries as part of his role as the leader of the government. He seems to attend meetings that nobody else bothers going to, like COP29. I’m surprised that a climate alarmist such as yourself is so keen to defend Starmer’s unnecessary carbon emissions. COP29 is important. Understanding climate science isn't being a "climate alarmist".
Yes Starmer’s government definitely seems to have considered COP29 to be more important than anyone else.
Officials attending COP29 by country:
UK 470
US 405
Germany 325
France 115
India 111
Such shocking damage to the planet.
What's the damage to the planet compared to say, not transitioning off fossil fuels for electricity generation?
I’m sure those 470 taxpayer funded UK officials flying to Azerbaijan have made all the difference.
So you don't know, it's just rhetoric.
Anyway, if climate science isn't real, what does it matter who flies where?
It doesn’t matter to me at all, save for the obvious waste of taxpayers money to no end.
I would have thought a climate alarmist would quite alarmed by it all.
If it doesn't matter at all, why do you keep mentioning it?
I never met a climate alarmist so wouldn't know what they'd think.
I think Starmer would do better to take a stand.
“We in the UK believe that fighting the climate crisis is existential. So we are no longer going to send anyone to international conferences about it. We have ambassadors in-country who can attend, and can make our experts available to attend online”.
Why should he do that if climate science isn't real? Doesn't matter who flies where or when.
That’s the problem.
You say that the climate crisis is existential.
But if it were, tens of thousands of people wouldn’t be flying around the world every year for some free food and board and a few goodie bags.
Just to be clear, your argument that climate science isn't real is based on people taking flights?
You know you could just spend a small amount of time to read about it and understand? It would take way less time than you currently spend denying its happening.
I’m saying that climate science is very real and I’d like the UK government to act like it is.
By not attending climate change conferences?
Can you give me anything concrete that has come out of COP, other than the next pact, agreement or protocol that simply is not adhered to?
I'll answer the question if you can explain how it's related to my requests for clarity on Buck's posts.
You questioned / suggested Starmer travelling to climate conferences was a good way to address climate change.
My question is what has COP accomplished, that hasn’t been dropped or failed to be implemented? It’s the biggest climate change conference and it seems to deliver nothing but hot air.
So, what’s the point of Starmer going? Other world leaders didn’t turn up…
I don't know. I'm not here to defend COP."You indicated support for the idea that Starmer should travel for climate change conferences, but I do understand why you would be reluctant to support his visit to COP, it seems the only thing it delivers is a grandstand for gesturing. | |||
"Since becoming PM in July, Starmer has taken 14 international trips at taxpayers’ expense. Now we all know that Labour love a freebie, but isn’t this just taking the piss? The government keeps lecturing everyone about the “climate emergency”, and say they are providing “global leadership” on the issue. But once again looks like one rule for them, and another rule for the plebs. In shock news, PM attends meetings in other countries as part of his role as the leader of the government. He seems to attend meetings that nobody else bothers going to, like COP29. I’m surprised that a climate alarmist such as yourself is so keen to defend Starmer’s unnecessary carbon emissions. COP29 is important. Understanding climate science isn't being a "climate alarmist".
Yes Starmer’s government definitely seems to have considered COP29 to be more important than anyone else.
Officials attending COP29 by country:
UK 470
US 405
Germany 325
France 115
India 111
Such shocking damage to the planet.
What's the damage to the planet compared to say, not transitioning off fossil fuels for electricity generation?
I’m sure those 470 taxpayer funded UK officials flying to Azerbaijan have made all the difference.
So you don't know, it's just rhetoric.
Anyway, if climate science isn't real, what does it matter who flies where?
It doesn’t matter to me at all, save for the obvious waste of taxpayers money to no end.
I would have thought a climate alarmist would quite alarmed by it all.
If it doesn't matter at all, why do you keep mentioning it?
I never met a climate alarmist so wouldn't know what they'd think.
I think Starmer would do better to take a stand.
“We in the UK believe that fighting the climate crisis is existential. So we are no longer going to send anyone to international conferences about it. We have ambassadors in-country who can attend, and can make our experts available to attend online”.
Why should he do that if climate science isn't real? Doesn't matter who flies where or when.
That’s the problem.
You say that the climate crisis is existential.
But if it were, tens of thousands of people wouldn’t be flying around the world every year for some free food and board and a few goodie bags.
Just to be clear, your argument that climate science isn't real is based on people taking flights?
You know you could just spend a small amount of time to read about it and understand? It would take way less time than you currently spend denying its happening.
I’m saying that climate science is very real and I’d like the UK government to act like it is.
By not attending climate change conferences?
Can you give me anything concrete that has come out of COP, other than the next pact, agreement or protocol that simply is not adhered to?
I'll answer the question if you can explain how it's related to my requests for clarity on Buck's posts.
You questioned / suggested Starmer travelling to climate conferences was a good way to address climate change.
My question is what has COP accomplished, that hasn’t been dropped or failed to be implemented? It’s the biggest climate change conference and it seems to deliver nothing but hot air.
So, what’s the point of Starmer going? Other world leaders didn’t turn up…
I don't know. I'm not here to defend COP.
You indicated support for the idea that Starmer should travel for climate change conferences,
"If I did, it was unintended. I was asking why Buck was against it. " but I do understand why you would be reluctant to support his visit to COP, it seems the only thing it delivers is a grandstand for gesturing. " Sadly yes. Too many countries political systems serve the needs of the oil industry. It's an uphill battle to get anything done. | |||
"Since becoming PM in July, Starmer has taken 14 international trips at taxpayers’ expense. Now we all know that Labour love a freebie, but isn’t this just taking the piss? The government keeps lecturing everyone about the “climate emergency”, and say they are providing “global leadership” on the issue. But once again looks like one rule for them, and another rule for the plebs. In shock news, PM attends meetings in other countries as part of his role as the leader of the government. He seems to attend meetings that nobody else bothers going to, like COP29. I’m surprised that a climate alarmist such as yourself is so keen to defend Starmer’s unnecessary carbon emissions. COP29 is important. Understanding climate science isn't being a "climate alarmist".
Yes Starmer’s government definitely seems to have considered COP29 to be more important than anyone else.
Officials attending COP29 by country:
UK 470
US 405
Germany 325
France 115
India 111
Such shocking damage to the planet.
What's the damage to the planet compared to say, not transitioning off fossil fuels for electricity generation?
I’m sure those 470 taxpayer funded UK officials flying to Azerbaijan have made all the difference.
So you don't know, it's just rhetoric.
Anyway, if climate science isn't real, what does it matter who flies where?
It doesn’t matter to me at all, save for the obvious waste of taxpayers money to no end.
I would have thought a climate alarmist would quite alarmed by it all.
If it doesn't matter at all, why do you keep mentioning it?
I never met a climate alarmist so wouldn't know what they'd think.
I think Starmer would do better to take a stand.
“We in the UK believe that fighting the climate crisis is existential. So we are no longer going to send anyone to international conferences about it. We have ambassadors in-country who can attend, and can make our experts available to attend online”.
Why should he do that if climate science isn't real? Doesn't matter who flies where or when.
That’s the problem.
You say that the climate crisis is existential.
But if it were, tens of thousands of people wouldn’t be flying around the world every year for some free food and board and a few goodie bags.
Just to be clear, your argument that climate science isn't real is based on people taking flights?
You know you could just spend a small amount of time to read about it and understand? It would take way less time than you currently spend denying its happening.
I’m saying that climate science is very real and I’d like the UK government to act like it is.
By not attending climate change conferences?
Can you give me anything concrete that has come out of COP, other than the next pact, agreement or protocol that simply is not adhered to?
I'll answer the question if you can explain how it's related to my requests for clarity on Buck's posts.
You questioned / suggested Starmer travelling to climate conferences was a good way to address climate change.
My question is what has COP accomplished, that hasn’t been dropped or failed to be implemented? It’s the biggest climate change conference and it seems to deliver nothing but hot air.
So, what’s the point of Starmer going? Other world leaders didn’t turn up…
I don't know. I'm not here to defend COP.
You indicated support for the idea that Starmer should travel for climate change conferences,
If I did, it was unintended. I was asking why Buck was against it.
but I do understand why you would be reluctant to support his visit to COP, it seems the only thing it delivers is a grandstand for gesturing.
Sadly yes. Too many countries political systems serve the needs of the oil industry. It's an uphill battle to get anything done. "I agree, and I think frustration on action comes from a lack of honesty from governments. Completely removing oil would be economically disastrous, and leaders know this. But instead of clearly communicating the necessary milestones for a gradual and realistic transition, they make vague promises, which fuels public mistrust in their commitment. | |||
