FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > US Presidential Election - The Final Countdown 🇺🇲

US Presidential Election - The Final Countdown 🇺🇲

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By *eoBlooms OP   Man 4 hours ago

Springfield

Four days left until the USA votes for its next President - will it be Harris or Trump ?

Share your thoughts and predictions here.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *uffleskloofMan 4 hours ago

Walsall

Part way through Rogan’s interview with JD Vance.

Typically for Rogan it’s a long one at three hours.

But Vance is pretty eloquent and relatable. Very down to earth. I suspect this is where Trump and Vance have a big advantage over Harris/Walz.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *eoBlooms OP   Man 4 hours ago

Springfield


"Part way through Rogan’s interview with JD Vance.

Typically for Rogan it’s a long one at three hours.

But Vance is pretty eloquent and relatable. Very down to earth. I suspect this is where Trump and Vance have a big advantage over Harris/Walz.

"

Yes I heard he came across well.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *onyandtrapMan 4 hours ago

manchester


"Four days left until the USA votes for its next President - will it be Harris or Trump ?

Share your thoughts and predictions here. "

Trump to win, the bookies are rarely wrong

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *resesse_MelioremCouple 3 hours ago

Border of London

All the democrats needed to do was put up any articulate, charismatic, 40-65 year old person, with a clean record and a nice smile.

Instead they put up an already unpopular person, whose sole poll bump was from being "not senile", whose core argument is "I'm not Trump".

So now it's a race.

The Democratic Party and left wing media do all the heavy lifting for Trump. If they just ignored him entirely, gave no oxygen to his shenanigans and focused on the positives of Kamala's campaign (can anyone even name any?), then it would be a much easier fight for them.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan 3 hours ago

golden fields


"All the democrats needed to do was put up any articulate, charismatic, 40-65 year old person, with a clean record and a nice smile.

Instead they put up an already unpopular person, whose sole poll bump was from being "not senile", whose core argument is "I'm not Trump".

So now it's a race.

The Democratic Party and left wing media do all the heavy lifting for Trump. If they just ignored him entirely, gave no oxygen to his shenanigans and focused on the positives of Kamala's campaign (can anyone even name any?), then it would be a much easier fight for them."

How come this tactic works for Trump and the right wing media, just constantly slagging off Kamala and Biden?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *irldnCouple 3 hours ago

Brighton


"All the democrats needed to do was put up any articulate, charismatic, 40-65 year old person, with a clean record and a nice smile."

I think this is almost right but suspect we should add not female and not a POC.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan 3 hours ago

golden fields


"All the democrats needed to do was put up any articulate, charismatic, 40-65 year old person, with a clean record and a nice smile.

I think this is almost right but suspect we should add not female and not a POC."

Whomever the candidate would have been, the media would have gone for them.

Just look at the attacks Harris received for the tone of her laugh.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *uffleskloofMan 3 hours ago

Walsall

The Democrats have messed up their response to Trump right from the start.

Instead of the Russia Collusion hoax, falsely framing him as a fascist, trying to put him in jail, and generally losing their minds because they lost in 2016, all of which has backfired on them massively, all they really needed to do was say “yeah Donald, he’s an American icon, great businessman and media star, we all love him, but you know what we just disagree on policy and here’s why”.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan 3 hours ago

golden fields


"The Democrats have messed up their response to Trump right from the start.

Instead of the Russia Collusion hoax, falsely framing him as a fascist, trying to put him in jail, and generally losing their minds because they lost in 2016, all of which has backfired on them massively, all they really needed to do was say “yeah Donald, he’s an American icon, great businessman and media star, we all love him, but you know what we just disagree on policy and here’s why”.

"

Some amazing comedy in here "great businessman".

Your posts are missed during your regular profile transitions!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *rDiscretionXXXMan 3 hours ago

Gilfach


"All the democrats needed to do was put up any articulate, charismatic, 40-65 year old person, with a clean record and a nice smile.

Instead they put up an already unpopular person, whose sole poll bump was from being "not senile", whose core argument is "I'm not Trump".

So now it's a race.

The Democratic Party and left wing media do all the heavy lifting for Trump. If they just ignored him entirely, gave no oxygen to his shenanigans and focused on the positives of Kamala's campaign (can anyone even name any?), then it would be a much easier fight for them."


"How come this tactic works for Trump and the right wing media, just constantly slagging off Kamala and Biden?"

Because Trump is playing by different rules. He can say something one day, and the exact opposite the day after, and no one will bat an eyelid. No one expects him to be consistent, or to make sense.

On the other side, Kamala is still trying to fight like a politician, focusing on policies and moral character. If she just completely ignored Trump, smiled a lot, and kept asserting that America will be better when she's in charge, she'd be a lot higher in the polls.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *eoBlooms OP   Man 3 hours ago

Springfield


"All the democrats needed to do was put up any articulate, charismatic, 40-65 year old person, with a clean record and a nice smile.

I think this is almost right but suspect we should add not female and not a POC."

Obama won two elections easily as a black candidate. I'm sure a strong female candidate could also be successful.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *eoBlooms OP   Man 2 hours ago

Springfield


"All the democrats needed to do was put up any articulate, charismatic, 40-65 year old person, with a clean record and a nice smile.

Instead they put up an already unpopular person, whose sole poll bump was from being "not senile", whose core argument is "I'm not Trump".

So now it's a race.

The Democratic Party and left wing media do all the heavy lifting for Trump. If they just ignored him entirely, gave no oxygen to his shenanigans and focused on the positives of Kamala's campaign (can anyone even name any?), then it would be a much easier fight for them."

Excellent analysis!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan 2 hours ago

golden fields


"All the democrats needed to do was put up any articulate, charismatic, 40-65 year old person, with a clean record and a nice smile.

Instead they put up an already unpopular person, whose sole poll bump was from being "not senile", whose core argument is "I'm not Trump".

So now it's a race.

The Democratic Party and left wing media do all the heavy lifting for Trump. If they just ignored him entirely, gave no oxygen to his shenanigans and focused on the positives of Kamala's campaign (can anyone even name any?), then it would be a much easier fight for them.

How come this tactic works for Trump and the right wing media, just constantly slagging off Kamala and Biden?

Because Trump is playing by different rules. He can say something one day, and the exact opposite the day after, and no one will bat an eyelid. No one expects him to be consistent, or to make sense.

On the other side, Kamala is still trying to fight like a politician, focusing on policies and moral character. If she just completely ignored Trump, smiled a lot, and kept asserting that America will be better when she's in charge, she'd be a lot higher in the polls."

Thank you. Interesting.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *eoBlooms OP   Man 2 hours ago

Springfield


"All the democrats needed to do was put up any articulate, charismatic, 40-65 year old person, with a clean record and a nice smile.

I think this is almost right but suspect we should add not female and not a POC.

Whomever the candidate would have been, the media would have gone for them.

Just look at the attacks Harris received for the tone of her laugh. "

If the media had been more honest about Biden's mental decline the Dems would be in a much stronger position with a better candidate. Harris is often an embarrassment in her public appearances - she was booed at her own rally this week!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *uffleskloofMan 2 hours ago

Walsall


"The Democrats have messed up their response to Trump right from the start.

Instead of the Russia Collusion hoax, falsely framing him as a fascist, trying to put him in jail, and generally losing their minds because they lost in 2016, all of which has backfired on them massively, all they really needed to do was say “yeah Donald, he’s an American icon, great businessman and media star, we all love him, but you know what we just disagree on policy and here’s why”.

Some amazing comedy in here "great businessman".

Your posts are missed during your regular profile transitions!

"

Two verifications

Over a year old

Both “by webcam”

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan 2 hours ago

golden fields


"The Democrats have messed up their response to Trump right from the start.

Instead of the Russia Collusion hoax, falsely framing him as a fascist, trying to put him in jail, and generally losing their minds because they lost in 2016, all of which has backfired on them massively, all they really needed to do was say “yeah Donald, he’s an American icon, great businessman and media star, we all love him, but you know what we just disagree on policy and here’s why”.

Some amazing comedy in here "great businessman".

Your posts are missed during your regular profile transitions!

Two verifications

Over a year old

Both “by webcam”"

Stalked me on one of your many other profiles that I haven't blocked yet?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *uffleskloofMan 2 hours ago

Walsall


"The Democrats have messed up their response to Trump right from the start.

Instead of the Russia Collusion hoax, falsely framing him as a fascist, trying to put him in jail, and generally losing their minds because they lost in 2016, all of which has backfired on them massively, all they really needed to do was say “yeah Donald, he’s an American icon, great businessman and media star, we all love him, but you know what we just disagree on policy and here’s why”.

Some amazing comedy in here "great businessman".

Your posts are missed during your regular profile transitions!

Two verifications

Over a year old

Both “by webcam”

Stalked me on one of your many other profiles that I haven't blocked yet? "

I have no interest in you at all and have no idea what you are talking about.

I’d prefer if you stick to the topic and avoid personal commentary.

Otherwise please avoid interacting with me at all in the forums.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan 2 hours ago

golden fields


"The Democrats have messed up their response to Trump right from the start.

Instead of the Russia Collusion hoax, falsely framing him as a fascist, trying to put him in jail, and generally losing their minds because they lost in 2016, all of which has backfired on them massively, all they really needed to do was say “yeah Donald, he’s an American icon, great businessman and media star, we all love him, but you know what we just disagree on policy and here’s why”.

Some amazing comedy in here "great businessman".

Your posts are missed during your regular profile transitions!

Two verifications

Over a year old

Both “by webcam”

Stalked me on one of your many other profiles that I haven't blocked yet?

I have no interest in you at all and have no idea what you are talking about."

Then why are you stalking my profile with one of your other accounts?


"

I’d prefer if you stick to the topic and avoid personal commentary.

"

Then why are you poking around my profile and making comments about it on here?


"

Otherwise please avoid interacting with me at all in the forums.

"

Why, it's a forum, we can all reply to whomever we want, and ignore whomever we want.

Does it upset you when it's pointed out that come back every six weeks with a new account? If so, I'll stop.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *uffleskloofMan 2 hours ago

Walsall


"The Democrats have messed up their response to Trump right from the start.

Instead of the Russia Collusion hoax, falsely framing him as a fascist, trying to put him in jail, and generally losing their minds because they lost in 2016, all of which has backfired on them massively, all they really needed to do was say “yeah Donald, he’s an American icon, great businessman and media star, we all love him, but you know what we just disagree on policy and here’s why”.

Some amazing comedy in here "great businessman".

Your posts are missed during your regular profile transitions!

Two verifications

Over a year old

Both “by webcam”

Stalked me on one of your many other profiles that I haven't blocked yet?

I have no interest in you at all and have no idea what you are talking about.

Then why are you stalking my profile with one of your other accounts?

I’d prefer if you stick to the topic and avoid personal commentary.

Then why are you poking around my profile and making comments about it on here?

Otherwise please avoid interacting with me at all in the forums.

Why, it's a forum, we can all reply to whomever we want, and ignore whomever we want.

Does it upset you when it's pointed out that come back every six weeks with a new account? If so, I'll stop."

The topic here is the US elections.

I am simply asking you to stick to the topic.

Your comments seem particularly personal and abusive. I have requested politely that you desist and stick to the topic.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *eoBlooms OP   Man 2 hours ago

Springfield

Please keep on subject

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *resesse_MelioremCouple 1 hour ago

Border of London


"All the democrats needed to do was put up any articulate, charismatic, 40-65 year old person, with a clean record and a nice smile.

I think this is almost right but suspect we should add not female and not a POC."

It worked for Obama. It would've worked if Hillary weren't loathed.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *resesse_MelioremCouple 1 hour ago

Border of London


"All the democrats needed to do was put up any articulate, charismatic, 40-65 year old person, with a clean record and a nice smile.

Instead they put up an already unpopular person, whose sole poll bump was from being "not senile", whose core argument is "I'm not Trump".

So now it's a race.

The Democratic Party and left wing media do all the heavy lifting for Trump. If they just ignored him entirely, gave no oxygen to his shenanigans and focused on the positives of Kamala's campaign (can anyone even name any?), then it would be a much easier fight for them.

How come this tactic works for Trump and the right wing media, just constantly slagging off Kamala and Biden?"

Kamala is neither charismatic nor articulate.

Biden is not 40-65.

As to the media, Trump (specifically) is nothing without notoriety. It's the aggression that makes him notorious.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *oxychick35Couple 48 minutes ago

thornaby


"All the democrats needed to do was put up any articulate, charismatic, 40-65 year old person, with a clean record and a nice smile.

I think this is almost right but suspect we should add not female and not a POC.

Whomever the candidate would have been, the media would have gone for them.

Just look at the attacks Harris received for the tone of her laugh. "

omg that’s class the media and attacks trump as had as never been seen before in the history of politics and you claim Harris is under attack haha comedy gold

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *abioMan 7 minutes ago

Newcastle and Gateshead

For some who has had an assassination attempt on them it would be pretty reckless of them to say that any political opposition should have a firing squad lined up against them….

And yet this is exactly what Donald Trump did with regards to Liz Cheney just last night

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By *irldnCouple 3 minutes ago

Brighton


"All the democrats needed to do was put up any articulate, charismatic, 40-65 year old person, with a clean record and a nice smile.

I think this is almost right but suspect we should add not female and not a POC.

Obama won two elections easily as a black candidate. I'm sure a strong female candidate could also be successful."

I would hope so too but not convinced. The MAGAs will see that as another reason to stick with their boy!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.0312

0