FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Stephen Laxley Lennon
Stephen Laxley Lennon
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"18 months." Probably, I wonder why he pled guilty | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"To get a third of his sentence " Ah, why did he keep saying he was innocent then? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He was going to be found guilty no matter what it’s what they do to him " Because he is guilty | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Your entitled to yr opinion fantastic lol" Who? It’s not my opinion, it’s a fact that he pled guilty, | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"To get a third of his sentence Ah, why did he keep saying he was innocent then? " He needed his supporters to fund his legal case because he was going to plead not guilty and fight the system. It seems his hotel bill was higher than he thought and there wasn’t enough left in the kitty. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"To get a third of his sentence Ah, why did he keep saying he was innocent then? He needed his supporters to fund his legal case because he was going to plead not guilty and fight the system. It seems his hotel bill was higher than he thought and there wasn’t enough left in the kitty." Makes sense, i wonder if people will keep sending him money | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He broke the injunction a few times, so the had to plead guilty. He was sued for a hundred thousand and an injunction was put in place which he broke claiming he had been silenced. He then showed the film to his followers at a rally and fled the country the next day. So yes he is guilty of breaking the injunction, he still faces charges under the terror act, an act sold to us as a protection, which are now being used against us." Sounds like he is either stupid or ignorant of the law | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He broke the injunction a few times, so the had to plead guilty. He was sued for a hundred thousand and an injunction was put in place which he broke claiming he had been silenced. He then showed the film to his followers at a rally and fled the country the next day. So yes he is guilty of breaking the injunction, he still faces charges under the terror act, an act sold to us as a protection, which are now being used against us. Sounds like he is either stupid or ignorant of the law " Both maybe  | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He broke the injunction a few times, so the had to plead guilty. He was sued for a hundred thousand and an injunction was put in place which he broke claiming he had been silenced. He then showed the film to his followers at a rally and fled the country the next day. So yes he is guilty of breaking the injunction, he still faces charges under the terror act, an act sold to us as a protection, which are now being used against us. Sounds like he is either stupid or ignorant of the law Both maybe "Ha, definitely, even reform are distancing themselves from him and his supporters, | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Interesting to now see how his supporters and those who shelled out to finance the fight square that circle,that all along he knew he was guilty yet strung them along.. " Doesn't seem to matter to them, they supported him through his race hate campaigning, they'll support him getting banged up in jail. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Any remorse lol he showed a video and it turned out to be true lol the goverment have been after him for years someone said his race hate iv asked lots times where is it ?" If it turned out to be true why did a court find him guilty of libel? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Any remorse lol he showed a video and it turned out to be true lol the goverment have been after him for years someone said his race hate iv asked lots times where is it ?" Do you know why he was sent to prison? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Any remorse lol he showed a video and it turned out to be true lol the goverment have been after him for years someone said his race hate iv asked lots times where is it ?" If it had been true he would not have been found guilty of liable and ordered to pay £100,000 pounds and explicitly warned to not to keep defaming that person…. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Any remorse lol he showed a video and it turned out to be true lol the goverment have been after him for years someone said his race hate iv asked lots times where is it ? If it had been true he would not have been found guilty of liable and ordered to pay £100,000 pounds and explicitly warned to not to keep defaming that person…." And he wouldn’t have then pled guilty aswell, Stephen is either a moron or a coward | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Any remorse lol he showed a video and it turned out to be true lol the goverment have been after him for years someone said his race hate iv asked lots times where is it ? If it turned out to be true why did a court find him guilty of libel?" Infamy Infamy, they all got it in for me.....he would say. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" someone said his race hate iv asked lots times where is it ?" He's been promoting race hate for years and year. It's only more recently that he's pretended to give a fuck about grooming gangs. Just a way to extract more cash from the morons that follow him. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"18 months. Probably, I wonder why he pled guilty " He was going to lose and so will only serve half of that, going to trial would have added another 6 months to his sentence. He will be out in 8 months this way 👍 | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"18 months. Probably, I wonder why he pled guilty He was going to lose and so will only serve half of that, going to trial would have added another 6 months to his sentence. He will be out in 8 months this way 👍" He was going to lose because he is guilty, | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions?" I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has." Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions?" They probably could.. the answer may be it’s not worth there while status wise and financially to go after them … compensation vs legal costs | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? They probably could.. the answer may be it’s not worth there while status wise and financially to go after them … compensation vs legal costs " Possibly, there is a slight issue with that. They were paid and subsequently broke NDAs. Easy pickings I would've thought. Apart from the fact that the council would have to admit those things. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous " I watched it, no idea if they was telling the truth or it was a pack of lies but why was the head teacher forced to sign a nda to keep his pension and another school worker told the same, I think they said something like £200 plus thousand was paid out for them to stay silent | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous I watched it, no idea if they was telling the truth or it was a pack of lies but why was the head teacher forced to sign a nda to keep his pension and another school worker told the same, I think they said something like £200 plus thousand was paid out for them to stay silent " Did they state that in court? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous I watched it, no idea if they was telling the truth or it was a pack of lies but why was the head teacher forced to sign a nda to keep his pension and another school worker told the same, I think they said something like £200 plus thousand was paid out for them to stay silent Did they state that in court?" no but did on a wire recording along side other teachers from the school and 5 students as witnesses explaining how many incidents including a stabbing they had been with the syrian boy at the school showing how he werent innocent but trial with no jury said they were all lying and found him guilty 🤷 | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous I watched it, no idea if they was telling the truth or it was a pack of lies but why was the head teacher forced to sign a nda to keep his pension and another school worker told the same, I think they said something like £200 plus thousand was paid out for them to stay silent Did they state that in court?no but did on a wire recording along side other teachers from the school and 5 students as witnesses explaining how many incidents including a stabbing they had been with the syrian boy at the school showing how he werent innocent but trial with no jury said they were all lying and found him guilty 🤷" and apperantly his reason for releasing the video were to do right by the 5 school kids whos lives are now ruined and tarnished by the results of the court hearing, he said he struggled to keep quiet knowing he had the documentary ready for uk release providing all the evidence to clear the kids names even if it meant him getting jail | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous I watched it, no idea if they was telling the truth or it was a pack of lies but why was the head teacher forced to sign a nda to keep his pension and another school worker told the same, I think they said something like £200 plus thousand was paid out for them to stay silent Did they state that in court?no but did on a wire recording along side other teachers from the school and 5 students as witnesses explaining how many incidents including a stabbing they had been with the syrian boy at the school showing how he werent innocent but trial with no jury said they were all lying and found him guilty 🤷and apperantly his reason for releasing the video were to do right by the 5 school kids whos lives are now ruined and tarnished by the results of the court hearing, he said he struggled to keep quiet knowing he had the documentary ready for uk release providing all the evidence to clear the kids names even if it meant him getting jail " There was no ‘evidence’ it was bull shit and lies, hence why he pleaded guilty and is now in prison | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"All this 'evidence' in his favour against him losing the libel case must be in the hands of his lawyers surely? Or are there other reasons he's not appealed using it? " no idea but he were refused a trial by jury and whatevwr reason judge deemed his witnesses as liars 🤷hence the compensation awarded to jamal and his father jihad, i do remember somewhere saying the only way the minors could be used as evidence were if they were publicly named, not sure if thats a thing but seems it werent for the bulger boys?? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Any remorse lol he showed a video and it turned out to be true lol the goverment have been after him for years someone said his race hate iv asked lots times where is it ? If it had been true he would not have been found guilty of liable and ordered to pay £100,000 pounds and explicitly warned to not to keep defaming that person…." was t the kid he named a total twat beating up kids threatening them all the time | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous I watched it, no idea if they was telling the truth or it was a pack of lies but why was the head teacher forced to sign a nda to keep his pension and another school worker told the same, I think they said something like £200 plus thousand was paid out for them to stay silent Did they state that in court?no but did on a wire recording along side other teachers from the school and 5 students as witnesses explaining how many incidents including a stabbing they had been with the syrian boy at the school showing how he werent innocent but trial with no jury said they were all lying and found him guilty 🤷and apperantly his reason for releasing the video were to do right by the 5 school kids whos lives are now ruined and tarnished by the results of the court hearing, he said he struggled to keep quiet knowing he had the documentary ready for uk release providing all the evidence to clear the kids names even if it meant him getting jail There was no ‘evidence’ it was bull shit and lies, hence why he pleaded guilty and is now in prison " he pleaded guilty for breaching the terms of court not for making the video | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous I watched it, no idea if they was telling the truth or it was a pack of lies but why was the head teacher forced to sign a nda to keep his pension and another school worker told the same, I think they said something like £200 plus thousand was paid out for them to stay silent Did they state that in court?no but did on a wire recording along side other teachers from the school and 5 students as witnesses explaining how many incidents including a stabbing they had been with the syrian boy at the school showing how he werent innocent but trial with no jury said they were all lying and found him guilty 🤷and apperantly his reason for releasing the video were to do right by the 5 school kids whos lives are now ruined and tarnished by the results of the court hearing, he said he struggled to keep quiet knowing he had the documentary ready for uk release providing all the evidence to clear the kids names even if it meant him getting jail There was no ‘evidence’ it was bull shit and lies, hence why he pleaded guilty and is now in prison " What they say on an edited video is not evidence as far as a court is concerned. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Any remorse lol he showed a video and it turned out to be true lol the goverment have been after him for years someone said his race hate iv asked lots times where is it ? If it had been true he would not have been found guilty of liable and ordered to pay £100,000 pounds and explicitly warned to not to keep defaming that person…. was t the kid he named a total twat beating up kids threatening them all the time " and also a stabbing within the school on record | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous I watched it, no idea if they was telling the truth or it was a pack of lies but why was the head teacher forced to sign a nda to keep his pension and another school worker told the same, I think they said something like £200 plus thousand was paid out for them to stay silent Did they state that in court?no but did on a wire recording along side other teachers from the school and 5 students as witnesses explaining how many incidents including a stabbing they had been with the syrian boy at the school showing how he werent innocent but trial with no jury said they were all lying and found him guilty 🤷and apperantly his reason for releasing the video were to do right by the 5 school kids whos lives are now ruined and tarnished by the results of the court hearing, he said he struggled to keep quiet knowing he had the documentary ready for uk release providing all the evidence to clear the kids names even if it meant him getting jail There was no ‘evidence’ it was bull shit and lies, hence why he pleaded guilty and is now in prison he pleaded guilty for breaching the terms of court not for making the video " So he knew the video was libellous, untrue and the fool still showed it, is he ignorant or a moron? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous I watched it, no idea if they was telling the truth or it was a pack of lies but why was the head teacher forced to sign a nda to keep his pension and another school worker told the same, I think they said something like £200 plus thousand was paid out for them to stay silent Did they state that in court?no but did on a wire recording along side other teachers from the school and 5 students as witnesses explaining how many incidents including a stabbing they had been with the syrian boy at the school showing how he werent innocent but trial with no jury said they were all lying and found him guilty 🤷and apperantly his reason for releasing the video were to do right by the 5 school kids whos lives are now ruined and tarnished by the results of the court hearing, he said he struggled to keep quiet knowing he had the documentary ready for uk release providing all the evidence to clear the kids names even if it meant him getting jail There was no ‘evidence’ it was bull shit and lies, hence why he pleaded guilty and is now in prison he pleaded guilty for breaching the terms of court not for making the video So he knew the video was libellous, untrue and the fool still showed it, is he ignorant or a moron? " not sure how you got to that conclusion from what i said, id try again 👍 | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous I watched it, no idea if they was telling the truth or it was a pack of lies but why was the head teacher forced to sign a nda to keep his pension and another school worker told the same, I think they said something like £200 plus thousand was paid out for them to stay silent Did they state that in court?no but did on a wire recording along side other teachers from the school and 5 students as witnesses explaining how many incidents including a stabbing they had been with the syrian boy at the school showing how he werent innocent but trial with no jury said they were all lying and found him guilty 🤷and apperantly his reason for releasing the video were to do right by the 5 school kids whos lives are now ruined and tarnished by the results of the court hearing, he said he struggled to keep quiet knowing he had the documentary ready for uk release providing all the evidence to clear the kids names even if it meant him getting jail There was no ‘evidence’ it was bull shit and lies, hence why he pleaded guilty and is now in prison What they say on an edited video is not evidence as far as a court is concerned." maybe not im not sure but 5 kids standing in court should be enough | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous I watched it, no idea if they was telling the truth or it was a pack of lies but why was the head teacher forced to sign a nda to keep his pension and another school worker told the same, I think they said something like £200 plus thousand was paid out for them to stay silent Did they state that in court?no but did on a wire recording along side other teachers from the school and 5 students as witnesses explaining how many incidents including a stabbing they had been with the syrian boy at the school showing how he werent innocent but trial with no jury said they were all lying and found him guilty 🤷and apperantly his reason for releasing the video were to do right by the 5 school kids whos lives are now ruined and tarnished by the results of the court hearing, he said he struggled to keep quiet knowing he had the documentary ready for uk release providing all the evidence to clear the kids names even if it meant him getting jail There was no ‘evidence’ it was bull shit and lies, hence why he pleaded guilty and is now in prison he pleaded guilty for breaching the terms of court not for making the video So he knew the video was libellous, untrue and the fool still showed it, is he ignorant or a moron? not sure how you got to that conclusion from what i said, id try again 👍" It’s simple, he was banned from showing the video, he apparently knew that if he did it again he would be in contempt, so the moron showed it again , now he is in prison , | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous I watched it, no idea if they was telling the truth or it was a pack of lies but why was the head teacher forced to sign a nda to keep his pension and another school worker told the same, I think they said something like £200 plus thousand was paid out for them to stay silent Did they state that in court?no but did on a wire recording along side other teachers from the school and 5 students as witnesses explaining how many incidents including a stabbing they had been with the syrian boy at the school showing how he werent innocent but trial with no jury said they were all lying and found him guilty 🤷and apperantly his reason for releasing the video were to do right by the 5 school kids whos lives are now ruined and tarnished by the results of the court hearing, he said he struggled to keep quiet knowing he had the documentary ready for uk release providing all the evidence to clear the kids names even if it meant him getting jail There was no ‘evidence’ it was bull shit and lies, hence why he pleaded guilty and is now in prison What they say on an edited video is not evidence as far as a court is concerned.maybe not im not sure but 5 kids standing in court should be enough " When are they going to court? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous I watched it, no idea if they was telling the truth or it was a pack of lies but why was the head teacher forced to sign a nda to keep his pension and another school worker told the same, I think they said something like £200 plus thousand was paid out for them to stay silent Did they state that in court?no but did on a wire recording along side other teachers from the school and 5 students as witnesses explaining how many incidents including a stabbing they had been with the syrian boy at the school showing how he werent innocent but trial with no jury said they were all lying and found him guilty 🤷and apperantly his reason for releasing the video were to do right by the 5 school kids whos lives are now ruined and tarnished by the results of the court hearing, he said he struggled to keep quiet knowing he had the documentary ready for uk release providing all the evidence to clear the kids names even if it meant him getting jail There was no ‘evidence’ it was bull shit and lies, hence why he pleaded guilty and is now in prison he pleaded guilty for breaching the terms of court not for making the video So he knew the video was libellous, untrue and the fool still showed it, is he ignorant or a moron? not sure how you got to that conclusion from what i said, id try again 👍 It’s simple, he was banned from showing the video, he apparently knew that if he did it again he would be in contempt, so the moron showed it again , now he is in prison , "yep thats what i said, that isnt what u said above 😂 | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous I watched it, no idea if they was telling the truth or it was a pack of lies but why was the head teacher forced to sign a nda to keep his pension and another school worker told the same, I think they said something like £200 plus thousand was paid out for them to stay silent Did they state that in court?no but did on a wire recording along side other teachers from the school and 5 students as witnesses explaining how many incidents including a stabbing they had been with the syrian boy at the school showing how he werent innocent but trial with no jury said they were all lying and found him guilty 🤷and apperantly his reason for releasing the video were to do right by the 5 school kids whos lives are now ruined and tarnished by the results of the court hearing, he said he struggled to keep quiet knowing he had the documentary ready for uk release providing all the evidence to clear the kids names even if it meant him getting jail There was no ‘evidence’ it was bull shit and lies, hence why he pleaded guilty and is now in prison he pleaded guilty for breaching the terms of court not for making the video So he knew the video was libellous, untrue and the fool still showed it, is he ignorant or a moron? not sure how you got to that conclusion from what i said, id try again 👍 It’s simple, he was banned from showing the video, he apparently knew that if he did it again he would be in contempt, so the moron showed it again , now he is in prison , yep thats what i said, that isnt what u said above 😂"Ah, I just clarified it, I feel a bit sorry for Stephen, he is obviously a bit thick and being used | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous I watched it, no idea if they was telling the truth or it was a pack of lies but why was the head teacher forced to sign a nda to keep his pension and another school worker told the same, I think they said something like £200 plus thousand was paid out for them to stay silent Did they state that in court?no but did on a wire recording along side other teachers from the school and 5 students as witnesses explaining how many incidents including a stabbing they had been with the syrian boy at the school showing how he werent innocent but trial with no jury said they were all lying and found him guilty 🤷and apperantly his reason for releasing the video were to do right by the 5 school kids whos lives are now ruined and tarnished by the results of the court hearing, he said he struggled to keep quiet knowing he had the documentary ready for uk release providing all the evidence to clear the kids names even if it meant him getting jail There was no ‘evidence’ it was bull shit and lies, hence why he pleaded guilty and is now in prison he pleaded guilty for breaching the terms of court not for making the video So he knew the video was libellous, untrue and the fool still showed it, is he ignorant or a moron? not sure how you got to that conclusion from what i said, id try again 👍 It’s simple, he was banned from showing the video, he apparently knew that if he did it again he would be in contempt, so the moron showed it again , now he is in prison , yep thats what i said, that isnt what u said above 😂
Ah, I just clarified it, I feel a bit sorry for Stephen, he is obviously a bit thick and being used "some people just have a backbone and stand for what they know/beleive to be right and would rather do a bit of jail than live with the regret | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous I watched it, no idea if they was telling the truth or it was a pack of lies but why was the head teacher forced to sign a nda to keep his pension and another school worker told the same, I think they said something like £200 plus thousand was paid out for them to stay silent Did they state that in court?no but did on a wire recording along side other teachers from the school and 5 students as witnesses explaining how many incidents including a stabbing they had been with the syrian boy at the school showing how he werent innocent but trial with no jury said they were all lying and found him guilty 🤷and apperantly his reason for releasing the video were to do right by the 5 school kids whos lives are now ruined and tarnished by the results of the court hearing, he said he struggled to keep quiet knowing he had the documentary ready for uk release providing all the evidence to clear the kids names even if it meant him getting jail There was no ‘evidence’ it was bull shit and lies, hence why he pleaded guilty and is now in prison he pleaded guilty for breaching the terms of court not for making the video So he knew the video was libellous, untrue and the fool still showed it, is he ignorant or a moron? not sure how you got to that conclusion from what i said, id try again 👍 It’s simple, he was banned from showing the video, he apparently knew that if he did it again he would be in contempt, so the moron showed it again , now he is in prison , yep thats what i said, that isnt what u said above 😂
Ah, I just clarified it, I feel a bit sorry for Stephen, he is obviously a bit thick and being used some people just have a backbone and stand for what they know/beleive to be right and would rather do a bit of jail than live with the regret "He will be crying in prison again , clever people don’t go to prison for contempt, he is a moron | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous I watched it, no idea if they was telling the truth or it was a pack of lies but why was the head teacher forced to sign a nda to keep his pension and another school worker told the same, I think they said something like £200 plus thousand was paid out for them to stay silent Did they state that in court?no but did on a wire recording along side other teachers from the school and 5 students as witnesses explaining how many incidents including a stabbing they had been with the syrian boy at the school showing how he werent innocent but trial with no jury said they were all lying and found him guilty 🤷and apperantly his reason for releasing the video were to do right by the 5 school kids whos lives are now ruined and tarnished by the results of the court hearing, he said he struggled to keep quiet knowing he had the documentary ready for uk release providing all the evidence to clear the kids names even if it meant him getting jail There was no ‘evidence’ it was bull shit and lies, hence why he pleaded guilty and is now in prison he pleaded guilty for breaching the terms of court not for making the video So he knew the video was libellous, untrue and the fool still showed it, is he ignorant or a moron? not sure how you got to that conclusion from what i said, id try again 👍 It’s simple, he was banned from showing the video, he apparently knew that if he did it again he would be in contempt, so the moron showed it again , now he is in prison , yep thats what i said, that isnt what u said above 😂
Ah, I just clarified it, I feel a bit sorry for Stephen, he is obviously a bit thick and being used some people just have a backbone and stand for what they know/beleive to be right and would rather do a bit of jail than live with the regret
He will be crying in prison again , clever people don’t go to prison for contempt, he is a moron "maybe he is but i have respect for him for standing up for somebody elses kid getting jailed for it and its not even his own child most parents wouldnt have the spine to do it for there own blood let alone someone elses | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous I watched it, no idea if they was telling the truth or it was a pack of lies but why was the head teacher forced to sign a nda to keep his pension and another school worker told the same, I think they said something like £200 plus thousand was paid out for them to stay silent Did they state that in court?no but did on a wire recording along side other teachers from the school and 5 students as witnesses explaining how many incidents including a stabbing they had been with the syrian boy at the school showing how he werent innocent but trial with no jury said they were all lying and found him guilty 🤷and apperantly his reason for releasing the video were to do right by the 5 school kids whos lives are now ruined and tarnished by the results of the court hearing, he said he struggled to keep quiet knowing he had the documentary ready for uk release providing all the evidence to clear the kids names even if it meant him getting jail There was no ‘evidence’ it was bull shit and lies, hence why he pleaded guilty and is now in prison he pleaded guilty for breaching the terms of court not for making the video So he knew the video was libellous, untrue and the fool still showed it, is he ignorant or a moron? not sure how you got to that conclusion from what i said, id try again 👍 It’s simple, he was banned from showing the video, he apparently knew that if he did it again he would be in contempt, so the moron showed it again , now he is in prison , yep thats what i said, that isnt what u said above 😂
Ah, I just clarified it, I feel a bit sorry for Stephen, he is obviously a bit thick and being used some people just have a backbone and stand for what they know/beleive to be right and would rather do a bit of jail than live with the regret
He will be crying in prison again , clever people don’t go to prison for contempt, he is a moron maybe he is but i have respect for him for standing up for somebody elses kid getting jailed for it and its not even his own child most parents wouldnt have the spine to do it for there own blood let alone someone elses "By bullying and libelling another child? Do these other children have parents? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous I watched it, no idea if they was telling the truth or it was a pack of lies but why was the head teacher forced to sign a nda to keep his pension and another school worker told the same, I think they said something like £200 plus thousand was paid out for them to stay silent Did they state that in court?no but did on a wire recording along side other teachers from the school and 5 students as witnesses explaining how many incidents including a stabbing they had been with the syrian boy at the school showing how he werent innocent but trial with no jury said they were all lying and found him guilty 🤷and apperantly his reason for releasing the video were to do right by the 5 school kids whos lives are now ruined and tarnished by the results of the court hearing, he said he struggled to keep quiet knowing he had the documentary ready for uk release providing all the evidence to clear the kids names even if it meant him getting jail There was no ‘evidence’ it was bull shit and lies, hence why he pleaded guilty and is now in prison he pleaded guilty for breaching the terms of court not for making the video So he knew the video was libellous, untrue and the fool still showed it, is he ignorant or a moron? not sure how you got to that conclusion from what i said, id try again 👍 It’s simple, he was banned from showing the video, he apparently knew that if he did it again he would be in contempt, so the moron showed it again , now he is in prison , yep thats what i said, that isnt what u said above 😂
Ah, I just clarified it, I feel a bit sorry for Stephen, he is obviously a bit thick and being used some people just have a backbone and stand for what they know/beleive to be right and would rather do a bit of jail than live with the regret
He will be crying in prison again , clever people don’t go to prison for contempt, he is a moron maybe he is but i have respect for him for standing up for somebody elses kid getting jailed for it and its not even his own child most parents wouldnt have the spine to do it for there own blood let alone someone elses
By bullying and libelling another child? Do these other children have parents?
"yeah his dad is called jihad 😂sounds a lovely fella | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous I watched it, no idea if they was telling the truth or it was a pack of lies but why was the head teacher forced to sign a nda to keep his pension and another school worker told the same, I think they said something like £200 plus thousand was paid out for them to stay silent Did they state that in court?" What bit are you referring to ? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous I watched it, no idea if they was telling the truth or it was a pack of lies but why was the head teacher forced to sign a nda to keep his pension and another school worker told the same, I think they said something like £200 plus thousand was paid out for them to stay silent Did they state that in court?no but did on a wire recording along side other teachers from the school and 5 students as witnesses explaining how many incidents including a stabbing they had been with the syrian boy at the school showing how he werent innocent but trial with no jury said they were all lying and found him guilty 🤷and apperantly his reason for releasing the video were to do right by the 5 school kids whos lives are now ruined and tarnished by the results of the court hearing, he said he struggled to keep quiet knowing he had the documentary ready for uk release providing all the evidence to clear the kids names even if it meant him getting jail There was no ‘evidence’ it was bull shit and lies, hence why he pleaded guilty and is now in prison he pleaded guilty for breaching the terms of court not for making the video So he knew the video was libellous, untrue and the fool still showed it, is he ignorant or a moron? not sure how you got to that conclusion from what i said, id try again 👍 It’s simple, he was banned from showing the video, he apparently knew that if he did it again he would be in contempt, so the moron showed it again , now he is in prison , yep thats what i said, that isnt what u said above 😂
Ah, I just clarified it, I feel a bit sorry for Stephen, he is obviously a bit thick and being used some people just have a backbone and stand for what they know/beleive to be right and would rather do a bit of jail than live with the regret
He will be crying in prison again , clever people don’t go to prison for contempt, he is a moron maybe he is but i have respect for him for standing up for somebody elses kid getting jailed for it and its not even his own child most parents wouldnt have the spine to do it for there own blood let alone someone elses
By bullying and libelling another child? Do these other children have parents?
yeah his dad is called jihad 😂sounds a lovely fella "That makes no sense, hopefully Stephen has learnt his lesson , next time he showed that video it will be 5 years | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous I watched it, no idea if they was telling the truth or it was a pack of lies but why was the head teacher forced to sign a nda to keep his pension and another school worker told the same, I think they said something like £200 plus thousand was paid out for them to stay silent Did they state that in court?no but did on a wire recording along side other teachers from the school and 5 students as witnesses explaining how many incidents including a stabbing they had been with the syrian boy at the school showing how he werent innocent but trial with no jury said they were all lying and found him guilty 🤷and apperantly his reason for releasing the video were to do right by the 5 school kids whos lives are now ruined and tarnished by the results of the court hearing, he said he struggled to keep quiet knowing he had the documentary ready for uk release providing all the evidence to clear the kids names even if it meant him getting jail There was no ‘evidence’ it was bull shit and lies, hence why he pleaded guilty and is now in prison he pleaded guilty for breaching the terms of court not for making the video So he knew the video was libellous, untrue and the fool still showed it, is he ignorant or a moron? not sure how you got to that conclusion from what i said, id try again 👍 It’s simple, he was banned from showing the video, he apparently knew that if he did it again he would be in contempt, so the moron showed it again , now he is in prison , yep thats what i said, that isnt what u said above 😂
Ah, I just clarified it, I feel a bit sorry for Stephen, he is obviously a bit thick and being used some people just have a backbone and stand for what they know/beleive to be right and would rather do a bit of jail than live with the regret
He will be crying in prison again , clever people don’t go to prison for contempt, he is a moron maybe he is but i have respect for him for standing up for somebody elses kid getting jailed for it and its not even his own child most parents wouldnt have the spine to do it for there own blood let alone someone elses "Whatever truth you choose to believe the fact is he is a criminal, a racist and certainly not my idea of a hero | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous I watched it, no idea if they was telling the truth or it was a pack of lies but why was the head teacher forced to sign a nda to keep his pension and another school worker told the same, I think they said something like £200 plus thousand was paid out for them to stay silent Did they state that in court?no but did on a wire recording along side other teachers from the school and 5 students as witnesses explaining how many incidents including a stabbing they had been with the syrian boy at the school showing how he werent innocent but trial with no jury said they were all lying and found him guilty 🤷and apperantly his reason for releasing the video were to do right by the 5 school kids whos lives are now ruined and tarnished by the results of the court hearing, he said he struggled to keep quiet knowing he had the documentary ready for uk release providing all the evidence to clear the kids names even if it meant him getting jail There was no ‘evidence’ it was bull shit and lies, hence why he pleaded guilty and is now in prison he pleaded guilty for breaching the terms of court not for making the video So he knew the video was libellous, untrue and the fool still showed it, is he ignorant or a moron? not sure how you got to that conclusion from what i said, id try again 👍 It’s simple, he was banned from showing the video, he apparently knew that if he did it again he would be in contempt, so the moron showed it again , now he is in prison , yep thats what i said, that isnt what u said above 😂
Ah, I just clarified it, I feel a bit sorry for Stephen, he is obviously a bit thick and being used some people just have a backbone and stand for what they know/beleive to be right and would rather do a bit of jail than live with the regret
He will be crying in prison again , clever people don’t go to prison for contempt, he is a moron maybe he is but i have respect for him for standing up for somebody elses kid getting jailed for it and its not even his own child most parents wouldnt have the spine to do it for there own blood let alone someone elses
Whatever truth you choose to believe the fact is he is a criminal, a racist and certainly not my idea of a hero"On the plus side they haven’t had to waste a prison cell on him as they have put him a hamster cage | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous I watched it, no idea if they was telling the truth or it was a pack of lies but why was the head teacher forced to sign a nda to keep his pension and another school worker told the same, I think they said something like £200 plus thousand was paid out for them to stay silent Did they state that in court?no but did on a wire recording along side other teachers from the school and 5 students as witnesses explaining how many incidents including a stabbing they had been with the syrian boy at the school showing how he werent innocent but trial with no jury said they were all lying and found him guilty 🤷and apperantly his reason for releasing the video were to do right by the 5 school kids whos lives are now ruined and tarnished by the results of the court hearing, he said he struggled to keep quiet knowing he had the documentary ready for uk release providing all the evidence to clear the kids names even if it meant him getting jail There was no ‘evidence’ it was bull shit and lies, hence why he pleaded guilty and is now in prison he pleaded guilty for breaching the terms of court not for making the video So he knew the video was libellous, untrue and the fool still showed it, is he ignorant or a moron? not sure how you got to that conclusion from what i said, id try again 👍 It’s simple, he was banned from showing the video, he apparently knew that if he did it again he would be in contempt, so the moron showed it again , now he is in prison , yep thats what i said, that isnt what u said above 😂
Ah, I just clarified it, I feel a bit sorry for Stephen, he is obviously a bit thick and being used some people just have a backbone and stand for what they know/beleive to be right and would rather do a bit of jail than live with the regret
He will be crying in prison again , clever people don’t go to prison for contempt, he is a moron maybe he is but i have respect for him for standing up for somebody elses kid getting jailed for it and its not even his own child most parents wouldnt have the spine to do it for there own blood let alone someone elses
Whatever truth you choose to believe the fact is he is a criminal, a racist and certainly not my idea of a hero
On the plus side they haven’t had to waste a prison cell on him as they have put him a hamster cage "🤦id expect this kind of intellect from a teen not a grown adult | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous I watched it, no idea if they was telling the truth or it was a pack of lies but why was the head teacher forced to sign a nda to keep his pension and another school worker told the same, I think they said something like £200 plus thousand was paid out for them to stay silent Did they state that in court?no but did on a wire recording along side other teachers from the school and 5 students as witnesses explaining how many incidents including a stabbing they had been with the syrian boy at the school showing how he werent innocent but trial with no jury said they were all lying and found him guilty 🤷and apperantly his reason for releasing the video were to do right by the 5 school kids whos lives are now ruined and tarnished by the results of the court hearing, he said he struggled to keep quiet knowing he had the documentary ready for uk release providing all the evidence to clear the kids names even if it meant him getting jail There was no ‘evidence’ it was bull shit and lies, hence why he pleaded guilty and is now in prison he pleaded guilty for breaching the terms of court not for making the video So he knew the video was libellous, untrue and the fool still showed it, is he ignorant or a moron? not sure how you got to that conclusion from what i said, id try again 👍 It’s simple, he was banned from showing the video, he apparently knew that if he did it again he would be in contempt, so the moron showed it again , now he is in prison , yep thats what i said, that isnt what u said above 😂
Ah, I just clarified it, I feel a bit sorry for Stephen, he is obviously a bit thick and being used some people just have a backbone and stand for what they know/beleive to be right and would rather do a bit of jail than live with the regret
He will be crying in prison again , clever people don’t go to prison for contempt, he is a moron maybe he is but i have respect for him for standing up for somebody elses kid getting jailed for it and its not even his own child most parents wouldnt have the spine to do it for there own blood let alone someone elses
Whatever truth you choose to believe the fact is he is a criminal, a racist and certainly not my idea of a hero
On the plus side they haven’t had to waste a prison cell on him as they have put him a hamster cage 🤦id expect this kind of intellect from a teen not a grown adult " | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous I watched it, no idea if they was telling the truth or it was a pack of lies but why was the head teacher forced to sign a nda to keep his pension and another school worker told the same, I think they said something like £200 plus thousand was paid out for them to stay silent Did they state that in court?no but did on a wire recording along side other teachers from the school and 5 students as witnesses explaining how many incidents including a stabbing they had been with the syrian boy at the school showing how he werent innocent but trial with no jury said they were all lying and found him guilty 🤷and apperantly his reason for releasing the video were to do right by the 5 school kids whos lives are now ruined and tarnished by the results of the court hearing, he said he struggled to keep quiet knowing he had the documentary ready for uk release providing all the evidence to clear the kids names even if it meant him getting jail There was no ‘evidence’ it was bull shit and lies, hence why he pleaded guilty and is now in prison he pleaded guilty for breaching the terms of court not for making the video So he knew the video was libellous, untrue and the fool still showed it, is he ignorant or a moron? not sure how you got to that conclusion from what i said, id try again 👍 It’s simple, he was banned from showing the video, he apparently knew that if he did it again he would be in contempt, so the moron showed it again , now he is in prison , yep thats what i said, that isnt what u said above 😂
Ah, I just clarified it, I feel a bit sorry for Stephen, he is obviously a bit thick and being used some people just have a backbone and stand for what they know/beleive to be right and would rather do a bit of jail than live with the regret
He will be crying in prison again , clever people don’t go to prison for contempt, he is a moron maybe he is but i have respect for him for standing up for somebody elses kid getting jailed for it and its not even his own child most parents wouldnt have the spine to do it for there own blood let alone someone elses
By bullying and libelling another child? Do these other children have parents?
yeah his dad is called jihad 😂sounds a lovely fella "Jihad has several meanings, not all bad.. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous " Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. " Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous I watched it, no idea if they was telling the truth or it was a pack of lies but why was the head teacher forced to sign a nda to keep his pension and another school worker told the same, I think they said something like £200 plus thousand was paid out for them to stay silent Did they state that in court?no but did on a wire recording along side other teachers from the school and 5 students as witnesses explaining how many incidents including a stabbing they had been with the syrian boy at the school showing how he werent innocent but trial with no jury said they were all lying and found him guilty 🤷and apperantly his reason for releasing the video were to do right by the 5 school kids whos lives are now ruined and tarnished by the results of the court hearing, he said he struggled to keep quiet knowing he had the documentary ready for uk release providing all the evidence to clear the kids names even if it meant him getting jail There was no ‘evidence’ it was bull shit and lies, hence why he pleaded guilty and is now in prison he pleaded guilty for breaching the terms of court not for making the video So he knew the video was libellous, untrue and the fool still showed it, is he ignorant or a moron? not sure how you got to that conclusion from what i said, id try again 👍 It’s simple, he was banned from showing the video, he apparently knew that if he did it again he would be in contempt, so the moron showed it again , now he is in prison , yep thats what i said, that isnt what u said above 😂
Ah, I just clarified it, I feel a bit sorry for Stephen, he is obviously a bit thick and being used some people just have a backbone and stand for what they know/beleive to be right and would rather do a bit of jail than live with the regret
He will be crying in prison again , clever people don’t go to prison for contempt, he is a moron maybe he is but i have respect for him for standing up for somebody elses kid getting jailed for it and its not even his own child most parents wouldnt have the spine to do it for there own blood let alone someone elses
By bullying and libelling another child? Do these other children have parents?
yeah his dad is called jihad 😂sounds a lovely fella
That makes no sense, hopefully Stephen has learnt his lesson , next time he showed that video it will be 5 years "Don't think it would bother him. The bigger martyr he appears, the more donations will keep flowing. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous I watched it, no idea if they was telling the truth or it was a pack of lies but why was the head teacher forced to sign a nda to keep his pension and another school worker told the same, I think they said something like £200 plus thousand was paid out for them to stay silent Did they state that in court?no but did on a wire recording along side other teachers from the school and 5 students as witnesses explaining how many incidents including a stabbing they had been with the syrian boy at the school showing how he werent innocent but trial with no jury said they were all lying and found him guilty 🤷and apperantly his reason for releasing the video were to do right by the 5 school kids whos lives are now ruined and tarnished by the results of the court hearing, he said he struggled to keep quiet knowing he had the documentary ready for uk release providing all the evidence to clear the kids names even if it meant him getting jail There was no ‘evidence’ it was bull shit and lies, hence why he pleaded guilty and is now in prison he pleaded guilty for breaching the terms of court not for making the video So he knew the video was libellous, untrue and the fool still showed it, is he ignorant or a moron? not sure how you got to that conclusion from what i said, id try again 👍 It’s simple, he was banned from showing the video, he apparently knew that if he did it again he would be in contempt, so the moron showed it again , now he is in prison , yep thats what i said, that isnt what u said above 😂
Ah, I just clarified it, I feel a bit sorry for Stephen, he is obviously a bit thick and being used some people just have a backbone and stand for what they know/beleive to be right and would rather do a bit of jail than live with the regret
He will be crying in prison again , clever people don’t go to prison for contempt, he is a moron maybe he is but i have respect for him for standing up for somebody elses kid getting jailed for it and its not even his own child most parents wouldnt have the spine to do it for there own blood let alone someone elses
By bullying and libelling another child? Do these other children have parents?
yeah his dad is called jihad 😂sounds a lovely fella
That makes no sense, hopefully Stephen has learnt his lesson , next time he showed that video it will be 5 years
Don't think it would bother him. The bigger martyr he appears, the more donations will keep flowing. "Maybe, but he did cry last time he was in prison, can’t be good for his family either, | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me " It's amazing but people can gave totally different opinions watching the same video.. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me " All your telling me is you don't have your own mind. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me It's amazing but people can gave totally different opinions watching the same video.." Irrelevant , a court of law has found it libellous , Stephen won’t be showing it again | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me All your telling me is you don't have your own mind. " I have my own mind, but I believe the opinion of law professional and judges over a career criminal and racist. What about you? Who do you believe | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me All your telling me is you don't have your own mind. I have my own mind, but I believe the opinion of law professional and judges over a career criminal and racist. What about you? Who do you believe " a court of law also found nelson mandela guilty at the time too | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me It's amazing but people can gave totally different opinions watching the same video.. Irrelevant , a court of law has found it libellous , Stephen won’t be showing it again " its online and still available for all to see 😂😂😂 | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me It's amazing but people can gave totally different opinions watching the same video.. Irrelevant , a court of law has found it libellous , Stephen won’t be showing it again its online and still available for all to see 😂😂😂" Then why did Stephen feel the need to broadcast it at a rally? He is obviously a bigger moron that I though, | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me All your telling me is you don't have your own mind. I have my own mind, but I believe the opinion of law professional and judges over a career criminal and racist. What about you? Who do you believe a court of law also found nelson mandela guilty at the time too " In the uk? I must have missed that | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me All your telling me is you don't have your own mind. I have my own mind, but I believe the opinion of law professional and judges over a career criminal and racist. What about you? Who do you believe a court of law also found nelson mandela guilty at the time too In the uk? I must have missed that " people have been jailed before and later found not guilty after years so im not sure your argument has any basis | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me All your telling me is you don't have your own mind. I have my own mind, but I believe the opinion of law professional and judges over a career criminal and racist. What about you? Who do you believe a court of law also found nelson mandela guilty at the time too In the uk? I must have missed that people have been jailed before and later found not guilty after years so im not sure your argument has any basis " He pled guilty , | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"All this 'evidence' in his favour against him losing the libel case must be in the hands of his lawyers surely? Or are there other reasons he's not appealed using it? no idea but he were refused a trial by jury and whatevwr reason judge deemed his witnesses as liars 🤷hence the compensation awarded to jamal and his father jihad, i do remember somewhere saying the only way the minors could be used as evidence were if they were publicly named, not sure if thats a thing but seems it werent for the bulger boys?? " A) this was a civil case originally rather than the bulger case which was a criminal case B) the bulger killers were only named after the case had finished.. and only after the court lifted the normal restrictions of not naming under 18’s because apparently half of Liverpool already knew the names and the judge ruled there was no way to reasonably hide their names | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me All your telling me is you don't have your own mind. I have my own mind, but I believe the opinion of law professional and judges over a career criminal and racist. What about you? Who do you believe a court of law also found nelson mandela guilty at the time too " Are the specials going to release a new song “ free Tommy Robinson” | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me All your telling me is you don't have your own mind. I have my own mind, but I believe the opinion of law professional and judges over a career criminal and racist. What about you? Who do you believe a court of law also found nelson mandela guilty at the time too Are the specials going to release a new song “ free Tommy Robinson”" , more likely to be right said Fred | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Your entitled to yr opinion fantastic lol" | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me All your telling me is you don't have your own mind. I have my own mind, but I believe the opinion of law professional and judges over a career criminal and racist. What about you? Who do you believe a court of law also found nelson mandela guilty at the time too In the uk? I must have missed that people have been jailed before and later found not guilty after years so im not sure your argument has any basis " Is that your closing argument? Your ' I rest my case' statement.. 
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me All your telling me is you don't have your own mind. I have my own mind, but I believe the opinion of law professional and judges over a career criminal and racist. What about you? Who do you believe a court of law also found nelson mandela guilty at the time too In the uk? I must have missed that people have been jailed before and later found not guilty after years so im not sure your argument has any basis Is that your closing argument? Your ' I rest my case' statement..
"Maybe he is one of Stephen’s lawyers | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" Don't think it would bother him. The bigger martyr he appears, the more donations will keep flowing. " Which goes back to the question I asked and none of his advocates on this have answered “Why does he need a defence fund if he is going to plead guilty?” At what point do you realise it’s all a grift! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me All your telling me is you don't have your own mind. I have my own mind, but I believe the opinion of law professional and judges over a career criminal and racist. What about you? Who do you believe " I prefer to lookalike what's available and make my own mind up. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me All your telling me is you don't have your own mind. I have my own mind, but I believe the opinion of law professional and judges over a career criminal and racist. What about you? Who do you believe I prefer to lookalike what's available and make my own mind up. " I see, were you at the first court case? Did you see all the evidence presented to the judge | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me All your telling me is you don't have your own mind. I have my own mind, but I believe the opinion of law professional and judges over a career criminal and racist. What about you? Who do you believe I prefer to lookalike what's available and make my own mind up. I see, were you at the first court case? Did you see all the evidence presented to the judge " I have read the judgement and watched the subsequent film. You don't actually need to be in a UK court to know what happened. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me All your telling me is you don't have your own mind. I have my own mind, but I believe the opinion of law professional and judges over a career criminal and racist. What about you? Who do you believe I prefer to lookalike what's available and make my own mind up. I see, were you at the first court case? Did you see all the evidence presented to the judge I have read the judgement and watched the subsequent film. You don't actually need to be in a UK court to know what happened. " You read through all the evidence, fair play to you, | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" Don't think it would bother him. The bigger martyr he appears, the more donations will keep flowing. Which goes back to the question I asked and none of his advocates on this have answered “Why does he need a defence fund if he is going to plead guilty?” At what point do you realise it’s all a grift! " The Crown are claiming 80k for the costs of prosecuting. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me All your telling me is you don't have your own mind. I have my own mind, but I believe the opinion of law professional and judges over a career criminal and racist. What about you? Who do you believe I prefer to lookalike what's available and make my own mind up. I see, were you at the first court case? Did you see all the evidence presented to the judge I have read the judgement and watched the subsequent film. You don't actually need to be in a UK court to know what happened. You read through all the evidence, fair play to you, " Try it mate, it might open your mind to views other than just accepting what you're told. I probably shouldn't expect anything else, mind. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me All your telling me is you don't have your own mind. I have my own mind, but I believe the opinion of law professional and judges over a career criminal and racist. What about you? Who do you believe I prefer to lookalike what's available and make my own mind up. I see, were you at the first court case? Did you see all the evidence presented to the judge I have read the judgement and watched the subsequent film. You don't actually need to be in a UK court to know what happened. You read through all the evidence, fair play to you, Try it mate, it might open your mind to views other than just accepting what you're told. I probably shouldn't expect anything else, mind. " Nah, I have a life, I will leave it to the professionals, so what is it about a habitual criminal, founder member of the EDL and known liar that you find so trustworthy ? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me All your telling me is you don't have your own mind. I have my own mind, but I believe the opinion of law professional and judges over a career criminal and racist. What about you? Who do you believe I prefer to lookalike what's available and make my own mind up. I see, were you at the first court case? Did you see all the evidence presented to the judge I have read the judgement and watched the subsequent film. You don't actually need to be in a UK court to know what happened. You read through all the evidence, fair play to you, Try it mate, it might open your mind to views other than just accepting what you're told. I probably shouldn't expect anything else, mind. Nah, I have a life, I will leave it to the professionals, so what is it about a habitual criminal, founder member of the EDL and known liar that you find so trustworthy ? " You have a life
Who said I found him trustworthy? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me All your telling me is you don't have your own mind. I have my own mind, but I believe the opinion of law professional and judges over a career criminal and racist. What about you? Who do you believe I prefer to lookalike what's available and make my own mind up. I see, were you at the first court case? Did you see all the evidence presented to the judge I have read the judgement and watched the subsequent film. You don't actually need to be in a UK court to know what happened. You read through all the evidence, fair play to you, Try it mate, it might open your mind to views other than just accepting what you're told. I probably shouldn't expect anything else, mind. Nah, I have a life, I will leave it to the professionals, so what is it about a habitual criminal, founder member of the EDL and known liar that you find so trustworthy ? You have a life
Who said I found him trustworthy?"You’re in here defending him? Do you think the documentary was libellous or not ? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me All your telling me is you don't have your own mind. I have my own mind, but I believe the opinion of law professional and judges over a career criminal and racist. What about you? Who do you believe I prefer to lookalike what's available and make my own mind up. I see, were you at the first court case? Did you see all the evidence presented to the judge I have read the judgement and watched the subsequent film. You don't actually need to be in a UK court to know what happened. You read through all the evidence, fair play to you, Try it mate, it might open your mind to views other than just accepting what you're told. I probably shouldn't expect anything else, mind. Nah, I have a life, I will leave it to the professionals, so what is it about a habitual criminal, founder member of the EDL and known liar that you find so trustworthy ? You have a life
Who said I found him trustworthy?
You’re in here defending him? Do you think the documentary was libellous or not ? "You're not very bright are you? Have I defended him? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me All your telling me is you don't have your own mind. I have my own mind, but I believe the opinion of law professional and judges over a career criminal and racist. What about you? Who do you believe I prefer to lookalike what's available and make my own mind up. I see, were you at the first court case? Did you see all the evidence presented to the judge I have read the judgement and watched the subsequent film. You don't actually need to be in a UK court to know what happened. You read through all the evidence, fair play to you, Try it mate, it might open your mind to views other than just accepting what you're told. I probably shouldn't expect anything else, mind. Nah, I have a life, I will leave it to the professionals, so what is it about a habitual criminal, founder member of the EDL and known liar that you find so trustworthy ? You have a life
Who said I found him trustworthy?
You’re in here defending him? Do you think the documentary was libellous or not ?
You're not very bright are you?
Have I defended him?
"Pardon? You have read all the evidence, do you think the documentary is libellous? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" Don't think it would bother him. The bigger martyr he appears, the more donations will keep flowing. Which goes back to the question I asked and none of his advocates on this have answered “Why does he need a defence fund if he is going to plead guilty?” At what point do you realise it’s all a grift! " Being conned is one of the hardest things for anyone to admit. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me All your telling me is you don't have your own mind. I have my own mind, but I believe the opinion of law professional and judges over a career criminal and racist. What about you? Who do you believe I prefer to lookalike what's available and make my own mind up. I see, were you at the first court case? Did you see all the evidence presented to the judge I have read the judgement and watched the subsequent film. You don't actually need to be in a UK court to know what happened. You read through all the evidence, fair play to you, Try it mate, it might open your mind to views other than just accepting what you're told. I probably shouldn't expect anything else, mind. Nah, I have a life, I will leave it to the professionals, so what is it about a habitual criminal, founder member of the EDL and known liar that you find so trustworthy ? You have a life
Who said I found him trustworthy?
You’re in here defending him? Do you think the documentary was libellous or not ?
You're not very bright are you?
Have I defended him?
Pardon? You have read all the evidence, do you think the documentary is libellous? "Have I defended him? I think the evidence and film leave a lot of questions unanswered. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" Don't think it would bother him. The bigger martyr he appears, the more donations will keep flowing. Which goes back to the question I asked and none of his advocates on this have answered “Why does he need a defence fund if he is going to plead guilty?” At what point do you realise it’s all a grift! Being conned is one of the hardest things for anyone to admit. " When Nick Lowles says Tommy's costs for this will be around 100k. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me All your telling me is you don't have your own mind. I have my own mind, but I believe the opinion of law professional and judges over a career criminal and racist. What about you? Who do you believe I prefer to lookalike what's available and make my own mind up. I see, were you at the first court case? Did you see all the evidence presented to the judge I have read the judgement and watched the subsequent film. You don't actually need to be in a UK court to know what happened. You read through all the evidence, fair play to you, Try it mate, it might open your mind to views other than just accepting what you're told. I probably shouldn't expect anything else, mind. Nah, I have a life, I will leave it to the professionals, so what is it about a habitual criminal, founder member of the EDL and known liar that you find so trustworthy ? You have a life
Who said I found him trustworthy?
You’re in here defending him? Do you think the documentary was libellous or not ?
You're not very bright are you?
Have I defended him?
Pardon? You have read all the evidence, do you think the documentary is libellous?
Have I defended him?
I think the evidence and film leave a lot of questions unanswered. "In your opinion is the film libellous, after all, you read all the evidence | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me All your telling me is you don't have your own mind. I have my own mind, but I believe the opinion of law professional and judges over a career criminal and racist. What about you? Who do you believe I prefer to lookalike what's available and make my own mind up. I see, were you at the first court case? Did you see all the evidence presented to the judge I have read the judgement and watched the subsequent film. You don't actually need to be in a UK court to know what happened. You read through all the evidence, fair play to you, Try it mate, it might open your mind to views other than just accepting what you're told. I probably shouldn't expect anything else, mind. Nah, I have a life, I will leave it to the professionals, so what is it about a habitual criminal, founder member of the EDL and known liar that you find so trustworthy ? You have a life
Who said I found him trustworthy?
You’re in here defending him? Do you think the documentary was libellous or not ?
You're not very bright are you?
Have I defended him?
Pardon? You have read all the evidence, do you think the documentary is libellous?
Have I defended him?
I think the evidence and film leave a lot of questions unanswered.
In your opinion is the film libellous, after all, you read all the evidence "What did I just say? How can I possibly answer your question when I don't believe I have the full story. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me All your telling me is you don't have your own mind. I have my own mind, but I believe the opinion of law professional and judges over a career criminal and racist. What about you? Who do you believe I prefer to lookalike what's available and make my own mind up. I see, were you at the first court case? Did you see all the evidence presented to the judge I have read the judgement and watched the subsequent film. You don't actually need to be in a UK court to know what happened. You read through all the evidence, fair play to you, Try it mate, it might open your mind to views other than just accepting what you're told. I probably shouldn't expect anything else, mind. Nah, I have a life, I will leave it to the professionals, so what is it about a habitual criminal, founder member of the EDL and known liar that you find so trustworthy ? You have a life
Who said I found him trustworthy?
You’re in here defending him? Do you think the documentary was libellous or not ?
You're not very bright are you?
Have I defended him?
Pardon? You have read all the evidence, do you think the documentary is libellous?
Have I defended him?
I think the evidence and film leave a lot of questions unanswered.
In your opinion is the film libellous, after all, you read all the evidence
What did I just say?
How can I possibly answer your question when I don't believe I have the full story.
"Tbh, this is why your better of leaving it to the judge , he has all the evidence , and knows more about the case and the law than you do | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me All your telling me is you don't have your own mind. I have my own mind, but I believe the opinion of law professional and judges over a career criminal and racist. What about you? Who do you believe I prefer to lookalike what's available and make my own mind up. I see, were you at the first court case? Did you see all the evidence presented to the judge I have read the judgement and watched the subsequent film. You don't actually need to be in a UK court to know what happened. You read through all the evidence, fair play to you, Try it mate, it might open your mind to views other than just accepting what you're told. I probably shouldn't expect anything else, mind. Nah, I have a life, I will leave it to the professionals, so what is it about a habitual criminal, founder member of the EDL and known liar that you find so trustworthy ? You have a life
Who said I found him trustworthy?
You’re in here defending him? Do you think the documentary was libellous or not ?
You're not very bright are you?
Have I defended him?
Pardon? You have read all the evidence, do you think the documentary is libellous?
Have I defended him?
I think the evidence and film leave a lot of questions unanswered.
In your opinion is the film libellous, after all, you read all the evidence
What did I just say?
How can I possibly answer your question when I don't believe I have the full story.
Tbh, this is why your better of leaving it to the judge , he has all the evidence , and knows more about the case and the law than you do "The judge doesn't have the answers to the questions I'd like. If you had read the judgement, you would know that. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me All your telling me is you don't have your own mind. I have my own mind, but I believe the opinion of law professional and judges over a career criminal and racist. What about you? Who do you believe I prefer to lookalike what's available and make my own mind up. I see, were you at the first court case? Did you see all the evidence presented to the judge I have read the judgement and watched the subsequent film. You don't actually need to be in a UK court to know what happened. You read through all the evidence, fair play to you, Try it mate, it might open your mind to views other than just accepting what you're told. I probably shouldn't expect anything else, mind. Nah, I have a life, I will leave it to the professionals, so what is it about a habitual criminal, founder member of the EDL and known liar that you find so trustworthy ? You have a life
Who said I found him trustworthy?
You’re in here defending him? Do you think the documentary was libellous or not ?
You're not very bright are you?
Have I defended him?
Pardon? You have read all the evidence, do you think the documentary is libellous?
Have I defended him?
I think the evidence and film leave a lot of questions unanswered.
In your opinion is the film libellous, after all, you read all the evidence
What did I just say?
How can I possibly answer your question when I don't believe I have the full story.
Tbh, this is why your better of leaving it to the judge , he has all the evidence , and knows more about the case and the law than you do
The judge doesn't have the answers to the questions I'd like.
If you had read the judgement, you would know that. "Leave it to the experts , | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Your entitled to yr opinion fantastic lol" The evidence of his criminal act of breaking a court order is on his own website and, when sentenced, he refused to take it down. It is not a matter of opinion. It is a matter of Fact. There is a difference. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me All your telling me is you don't have your own mind. I have my own mind, but I believe the opinion of law professional and judges over a career criminal and racist. What about you? Who do you believe I prefer to lookalike what's available and make my own mind up. I see, were you at the first court case? Did you see all the evidence presented to the judge I have read the judgement and watched the subsequent film. You don't actually need to be in a UK court to know what happened. You read through all the evidence, fair play to you, Try it mate, it might open your mind to views other than just accepting what you're told. I probably shouldn't expect anything else, mind. Nah, I have a life, I will leave it to the professionals, so what is it about a habitual criminal, founder member of the EDL and known liar that you find so trustworthy ? You have a life
Who said I found him trustworthy?
You’re in here defending him? Do you think the documentary was libellous or not ?
You're not very bright are you?
Have I defended him?
Pardon? You have read all the evidence, do you think the documentary is libellous?
Have I defended him?
I think the evidence and film leave a lot of questions unanswered.
In your opinion is the film libellous, after all, you read all the evidence
What did I just say?
How can I possibly answer your question when I don't believe I have the full story.
Tbh, this is why your better of leaving it to the judge , he has all the evidence , and knows more about the case and the law than you do
The judge doesn't have the answers to the questions I'd like.
If you had read the judgement, you would know that.
Leave it to the experts , " | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Can anyone, those who have watched his film and other material as well as those like myself who haven't explain why he didn't use the appeals system after being found to have labelled..? " Anyone attempting to answer that question would be guessing. Here's mine... Either - It was pleaser to go bankrupt Or - He had no grounds for appeal. Look for the grounds on civil cases. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me " "a court of law" found the Guildford four and the Birmingham six guilty, among many other miscarriages of justice through out the years. Belive everything you hear,read, or have been feed by MSM? without actually looking into it??? No need to reply, I already know the answer | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me "a court of law" found the Guildford four and the Birmingham six guilty, among many other miscarriages of justice through out the years. Belive everything you hear,read, or have been feed by MSM? without actually looking into it??? No need to reply, I already know the answer "Do you know why he went to prison? Have you sent him any money ? He is desperate for cash | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"To get a third of his sentence Ah, why did he keep saying he was innocent then? " To grift more money from his idiotic followers. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me "a court of law" found the Guildford four and the Birmingham six guilty, among many other miscarriages of justice through out the years. Belive everything you hear,read, or have been feed by MSM? without actually looking into it??? No need to reply, I already know the answer "Any reason to believe this case is also a miscarriage of justice? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me "a court of law" found the Guildford four and the Birmingham six guilty, among many other miscarriages of justice through out the years. Belive everything you hear,read, or have been feed by MSM? without actually looking into it??? No need to reply, I already know the answer
Any reason to believe this case is also a miscarriage of justice?"Did I say it was? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Its quite hilarious to see how some people are so far detached from the real world and justice system and how corrupt some of it is 😂id love to live a live so nieve " It’s hilarious to watch how some people can defend a habitual criminal and liar I’d love to live a life (not live) so naive (not nieve) | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Its quite hilarious to see how some people are so far detached from the real world and justice system and how corrupt some of it is 😂id love to live a live so nieve It’s hilarious to watch how some people can defend a habitual criminal and liar I’d love to live a life (not live) so naive (not nieve) "im more concerned u hate a man who exposes nonces pedos and rapists tbh its a little bit alarming | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Its quite hilarious to see how some people are so far detached from the real world and justice system and how corrupt some of it is 😂id love to live a live so nieve It’s hilarious to watch how some people can defend a habitual criminal and liar I’d love to live a life (not live) so naive (not nieve) im more concerned u hate a man who exposes nonces pedos and rapists tbh its a little bit alarming "I don’t hate Stephen, I feel a both sorry for him, his paymasters have set him right up here . Btw, he has never exposed anyone , that work was done by others, a lot of his mates in the EDL are pedos and nonces though | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Its quite hilarious to see how some people are so far detached from the real world and justice system and how corrupt some of it is 😂id love to live a live so nieve It’s hilarious to watch how some people can defend a habitual criminal and liar I’d love to live a life (not live) so naive (not nieve) im more concerned u hate a man who exposes nonces pedos and rapists tbh its a little bit alarming
I don’t hate Stephen, I feel a both sorry for him, his paymasters have set him right up here . Btw, he has never exposed anyone , that work was done by others, a lot of his mates in the EDL are pedos and nonces though "oooof carefull there saying things like that u could end up there with him for that | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Its quite hilarious to see how some people are so far detached from the real world and justice system and how corrupt some of it is 😂id love to live a live so nieve It’s hilarious to watch how some people can defend a habitual criminal and liar I’d love to live a life (not live) so naive (not nieve) im more concerned u hate a man who exposes nonces pedos and rapists tbh its a little bit alarming
I don’t hate Stephen, I feel a both sorry for him, his paymasters have set him right up here . Btw, he has never exposed anyone , that work was done by others, a lot of his mates in the EDL are pedos and nonces though oooof carefull there saying things like that u could end up there with him for that "Doubt it , | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Its quite hilarious to see how some people are so far detached from the real world and justice system and how corrupt some of it is 😂id love to live a live so nieve It’s hilarious to watch how some people can defend a habitual criminal and liar I’d love to live a life (not live) so naive (not nieve) im more concerned u hate a man who exposes nonces pedos and rapists tbh its a little bit alarming
I don’t hate Stephen, I feel a both sorry for him, his paymasters have set him right up here . Btw, he has never exposed anyone , that work was done by others, a lot of his mates in the EDL are pedos and nonces though oooof carefull there saying things like that u could end up there with him for that
Doubt it ,
"too arrd? 😂😂 | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous Having never watched it you clearly have no idea. And then you continue to peddle lies about him, knowing its really easy to find the truth. I'll help you out here though as it seems you struggle to read. He pleaded guilty to contempt, rightfully. He did not plead guilty to lying in his film. Why do I need to watch it, a court of law has found it libellous , that is good enough for me "a court of law" found the Guildford four and the Birmingham six guilty, among many other miscarriages of justice through out the years. Belive everything you hear,read, or have been feed by MSM? without actually looking into it??? No need to reply, I already know the answer
Any reason to believe this case is also a miscarriage of justice?
Did I say it was? "I don't know, that's why I asked. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Its quite hilarious to see how some people are so far detached from the real world and justice system and how corrupt some of it is 😂id love to live a live so nieve It’s hilarious to watch how some people can defend a habitual criminal and liar I’d love to live a life (not live) so naive (not nieve) im more concerned u hate a man who exposes nonces pedos and rapists tbh its a little bit alarming "Wait. We're talking about Tommy Robinson? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"He is guilty of breaking the injunction, he would've been stupid to plead not guilty to that charge. Anyone gonna attempt to answer scrums questions? I can’t answer that question because I haven’t seen said video. However I presume that the court has. Tbh, why would anyone need to watch it, it’s obviously full of lies and is libellous I watched it, no idea if they was telling the truth or it was a pack of lies but why was the head teacher forced to sign a nda to keep his pension and another school worker told the same, I think they said something like £200 plus thousand was paid out for them to stay silent Did they state that in court?no but did on a wire recording along side other teachers from the school and 5 students as witnesses explaining how many incidents including a stabbing they had been with the syrian boy at the school showing how he werent innocent but trial with no jury said they were all lying and found him guilty 🤷and apperantly his reason for releasing the video were to do right by the 5 school kids whos lives are now ruined and tarnished by the results of the court hearing, he said he struggled to keep quiet knowing he had the documentary ready for uk release providing all the evidence to clear the kids names even if it meant him getting jail There was no ‘evidence’ it was bull shit and lies, hence why he pleaded guilty and is now in prison he pleaded guilty for breaching the terms of court not for making the video So he knew the video was libellous, untrue and the fool still showed it, is he ignorant or a moron? not sure how you got to that conclusion from what i said, id try again 👍 It’s simple, he was banned from showing the video, he apparently knew that if he did it again he would be in contempt, so the moron showed it again , now he is in prison , yep thats what i said, that isnt what u said above 😂
Ah, I just clarified it, I feel a bit sorry for Stephen, he is obviously a bit thick and being used some people just have a backbone and stand for what they know/beleive to be right and would rather do a bit of jail than live with the regret
He will be crying in prison again , clever people don’t go to prison for contempt, he is a moron maybe he is but i have respect for him for standing up for somebody elses kid getting jailed for it and its not even his own child most parents wouldnt have the spine to do it for there own blood let alone someone elses "and he got the grooming gangs onto the news hats of to him for that he stood for what he believed when police social services had there heads in the sand | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Tommy probably pleaded guilty due to what he could have faced if he didn't. I did something a few years ago n was told if I pleaded not guilty I was looking at 10 years if found guilty, but if I pleaded guilty I would get about 18 months n out within a year n that was about 15 years ago before all this letting 1,000's out early for major crimes, so I chose the guilty option. Plus it looked like the government wanted him locked up no matter what so he would have had one hell of a fight on his hands pleading not guilty " Let me get this right you committed a crime where the tariff if found guilty was 10 years but if you were to plead guilty you would only serve 18 months and be out in under 12 months. The highest reduction for a guilty plea is one third on the first appearance dropping to a quarter at any subsequent appearances. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Tommy probably pleaded guilty due to what he could have faced if he didn't. I did something a few years ago n was told if I pleaded not guilty I was looking at 10 years if found guilty, but if I pleaded guilty I would get about 18 months n out within a year n that was about 15 years ago before all this letting 1,000's out early for major crimes, so I chose the guilty option. Plus it looked like the government wanted him locked up no matter what so he would have had one hell of a fight on his hands pleading not guilty Let me get this right you committed a crime where the tariff if found guilty was 10 years but if you were to plead guilty you would only serve 18 months and be out in under 12 months. The highest reduction for a guilty plea is one third on the first appearance dropping to a quarter at any subsequent appearances." 🤣🤣is it balls, theres many walk free from hefty sentances that must have loose lips | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Tommy probably pleaded guilty due to what he could have faced if he didn't. I did something a few years ago n was told if I pleaded not guilty I was looking at 10 years if found guilty, but if I pleaded guilty I would get about 18 months n out within a year n that was about 15 years ago before all this letting 1,000's out early for major crimes, so I chose the guilty option. Plus it looked like the government wanted him locked up no matter what so he would have had one hell of a fight on his hands pleading not guilty Let me get this right you committed a crime where the tariff if found guilty was 10 years but if you were to plead guilty you would only serve 18 months and be out in under 12 months. The highest reduction for a guilty plea is one third on the first appearance dropping to a quarter at any subsequent appearances.🤣🤣is it balls, theres many walk free from hefty sentances that must have loose lips " If you say so. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Tommy probably pleaded guilty due to what he could have faced if he didn't. I did something a few years ago n was told if I pleaded not guilty I was looking at 10 years if found guilty, but if I pleaded guilty I would get about 18 months n out within a year n that was about 15 years ago before all this letting 1,000's out early for major crimes, so I chose the guilty option. Plus it looked like the government wanted him locked up no matter what so he would have had one hell of a fight on his hands pleading not guilty " In the case of contempt of court the maximum sentence is actually 2 years.. so the agreement for him to get 18 months didn’t really save him a lot of time The amount of excuses people are giving him for pleading guilty is astounding He did what he did.. no remorse, no contrition.. and though he was above the court | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Tommy probably pleaded guilty due to what he could have faced if he didn't. I did something a few years ago n was told if I pleaded not guilty I was looking at 10 years if found guilty, but if I pleaded guilty I would get about 18 months n out within a year n that was about 15 years ago before all this letting 1,000's out early for major crimes, so I chose the guilty option. Plus it looked like the government wanted him locked up no matter what so he would have had one hell of a fight on his hands pleading not guilty In the case of contempt of court the maximum sentence is actually 2 years.. so the agreement for him to get 18 months didn’t really save him a lot of time The amount of excuses people are giving him for pleading guilty is astounding He did what he did.. no remorse, no contrition.. and though he was above the court " what did he do _abio and why show remorse and that 6 months may save his life | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Tommy probably pleaded guilty due to what he could have faced if he didn't. I did something a few years ago n was told if I pleaded not guilty I was looking at 10 years if found guilty, but if I pleaded guilty I would get about 18 months n out within a year n that was about 15 years ago before all this letting 1,000's out early for major crimes, so I chose the guilty option. Plus it looked like the government wanted him locked up no matter what so he would have had one hell of a fight on his hands pleading not guilty In the case of contempt of court the maximum sentence is actually 2 years.. so the agreement for him to get 18 months didn’t really save him a lot of time The amount of excuses people are giving him for pleading guilty is astounding He did what he did.. no remorse, no contrition.. and though he was above the court what did he do _abio and why show remorse and that 6 months may save his life " Save his life?? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Tommy probably pleaded guilty due to what he could have faced if he didn't. I did something a few years ago n was told if I pleaded not guilty I was looking at 10 years if found guilty, but if I pleaded guilty I would get about 18 months n out within a year n that was about 15 years ago before all this letting 1,000's out early for major crimes, so I chose the guilty option. Plus it looked like the government wanted him locked up no matter what so he would have had one hell of a fight on his hands pleading not guilty In the case of contempt of court the maximum sentence is actually 2 years.. so the agreement for him to get 18 months didn’t really save him a lot of time The amount of excuses people are giving him for pleading guilty is astounding He did what he did.. no remorse, no contrition.. and though he was above the court " I know I keep saying it but he is prison because he is a moron, | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Tommy probably pleaded guilty due to what he could have faced if he didn't. I did something a few years ago n was told if I pleaded not guilty I was looking at 10 years if found guilty, but if I pleaded guilty I would get about 18 months n out within a year n that was about 15 years ago before all this letting 1,000's out early for major crimes, so I chose the guilty option. Plus it looked like the government wanted him locked up no matter what so he would have had one hell of a fight on his hands pleading not guilty In the case of contempt of court the maximum sentence is actually 2 years.. so the agreement for him to get 18 months didn’t really save him a lot of time The amount of excuses people are giving him for pleading guilty is astounding He did what he did.. no remorse, no contrition.. and though he was above the court what did he do _abio and why show remorse and that 6 months may save his life " The family of the boy he libelled received death threats because of his lies.. Tbh as with anyone in custody they should be safe but are you sure your not over reacting? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Tommy probably pleaded guilty due to what he could have faced if he didn't. I did something a few years ago n was told if I pleaded not guilty I was looking at 10 years if found guilty, but if I pleaded guilty I would get about 18 months n out within a year n that was about 15 years ago before all this letting 1,000's out early for major crimes, so I chose the guilty option. Plus it looked like the government wanted him locked up no matter what so he would have had one hell of a fight on his hands pleading not guilty In the case of contempt of court the maximum sentence is actually 2 years.. so the agreement for him to get 18 months didn’t really save him a lot of time The amount of excuses people are giving him for pleading guilty is astounding He did what he did.. no remorse, no contrition.. and though he was above the court what did he do _abio and why show remorse and that 6 months may save his life The family of the boy he libelled received death threats because of his lies.. Tbh as with anyone in custody they should be safe but are you sure your not over reacting?" What did he lie about? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Tommy probably pleaded guilty due to what he could have faced if he didn't. I did something a few years ago n was told if I pleaded not guilty I was looking at 10 years if found guilty, but if I pleaded guilty I would get about 18 months n out within a year n that was about 15 years ago before all this letting 1,000's out early for major crimes, so I chose the guilty option. Plus it looked like the government wanted him locked up no matter what so he would have had one hell of a fight on his hands pleading not guilty In the case of contempt of court the maximum sentence is actually 2 years.. so the agreement for him to get 18 months didn’t really save him a lot of time The amount of excuses people are giving him for pleading guilty is astounding He did what he did.. no remorse, no contrition.. and though he was above the court what did he do _abio and why show remorse and that 6 months may save his life The family of the boy he libelled received death threats because of his lies.. Tbh as with anyone in custody they should be safe but are you sure you’re not over reacting?" so did the boy Tommy took in and lived with him for two yrs that boy had his life ruined of the said boy look into it further it’s a shocking story it’s an interview with Tommy and Jordan Peterson | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Tommy probably pleaded guilty due to what he could have faced if he didn't. I did something a few years ago n was told if I pleaded not guilty I was looking at 10 years if found guilty, but if I pleaded guilty I would get about 18 months n out within a year n that was about 15 years ago before all this letting 1,000's out early for major crimes, so I chose the guilty option. Plus it looked like the government wanted him locked up no matter what so he would have had one hell of a fight on his hands pleading not guilty In the case of contempt of court the maximum sentence is actually 2 years.. so the agreement for him to get 18 months didn’t really save him a lot of time The amount of excuses people are giving him for pleading guilty is astounding He did what he did.. no remorse, no contrition.. and though he was above the court what did he do _abio and why show remorse and that 6 months may save his life The family of the boy he libelled received death threats because of his lies.. Tbh as with anyone in custody they should be safe but are you sure you’re not over reacting?so did the boy Tommy took in and lived with him for two yrs that boy had his life ruined of the said boy look into it further it’s a shocking story it’s an interview with Tommy and Jordan Peterson " What? Stephen libelled a school boy, he is a bully and a moron | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Tommy probably pleaded guilty due to what he could have faced if he didn't. I did something a few years ago n was told if I pleaded not guilty I was looking at 10 years if found guilty, but if I pleaded guilty I would get about 18 months n out within a year n that was about 15 years ago before all this letting 1,000's out early for major crimes, so I chose the guilty option. Plus it looked like the government wanted him locked up no matter what so he would have had one hell of a fight on his hands pleading not guilty In the case of contempt of court the maximum sentence is actually 2 years.. so the agreement for him to get 18 months didn’t really save him a lot of time The amount of excuses people are giving him for pleading guilty is astounding He did what he did.. no remorse, no contrition.. and though he was above the court what did he do _abio and why show remorse and that 6 months may save his life The family of the boy he libelled received death threats because of his lies.. Tbh as with anyone in custody they should be safe but are you sure your not over reacting? What did he lie about? " Do you know what libel is? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Tommy probably pleaded guilty due to what he could have faced if he didn't. I did something a few years ago n was told if I pleaded not guilty I was looking at 10 years if found guilty, but if I pleaded guilty I would get about 18 months n out within a year n that was about 15 years ago before all this letting 1,000's out early for major crimes, so I chose the guilty option. Plus it looked like the government wanted him locked up no matter what so he would have had one hell of a fight on his hands pleading not guilty In the case of contempt of court the maximum sentence is actually 2 years.. so the agreement for him to get 18 months didn’t really save him a lot of time The amount of excuses people are giving him for pleading guilty is astounding He did what he did.. no remorse, no contrition.. and though he was above the court what did he do _abio and why show remorse and that 6 months may save his life The family of the boy he libelled received death threats because of his lies.. Tbh as with anyone in custody they should be safe but are you sure your not over reacting? What did he lie about? " Seriously? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Tommy probably pleaded guilty due to what he could have faced if he didn't. I did something a few years ago n was told if I pleaded not guilty I was looking at 10 years if found guilty, but if I pleaded guilty I would get about 18 months n out within a year n that was about 15 years ago before all this letting 1,000's out early for major crimes, so I chose the guilty option. Plus it looked like the government wanted him locked up no matter what so he would have had one hell of a fight on his hands pleading not guilty In the case of contempt of court the maximum sentence is actually 2 years.. so the agreement for him to get 18 months didn’t really save him a lot of time The amount of excuses people are giving him for pleading guilty is astounding He did what he did.. no remorse, no contrition.. and though he was above the court what did he do _abio and why show remorse and that 6 months may save his life The family of the boy he libelled received death threats because of his lies.. Tbh as with anyone in custody they should be safe but are you sure you’re not over reacting?so did the boy Tommy took in and lived with him for two yrs that boy had his life ruined of the said boy look into it further it’s a shocking story it’s an interview with Tommy and Jordan Peterson " or the james english interview, always worth a watch is james | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"it's amusing how this bloke manages to groom morons into believing his wild claims" what are his wild claims then what have you seen to say that ? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"it's amusing how this bloke manages to groom morons into believing his wild claims" It’s all part of his grift, | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"it's amusing how this bloke manages to groom morons into believing his wild claims It’s all part of his grift, " You want to get a life or a friend away from these forums. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"it's amusing how this bloke manages to groom morons into believing his wild claims It’s all part of his grift, You want to get a life or a friend away from these forums. " Pardon? Is everything ok? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" You don’t get time off for good behaviour if you don’t show any remorse or contriction… " --------------------- You do. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
