FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Employers NI increase
Employers NI increase
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
"Does it occur to anyone in govt that the NHS is one of, if not, the biggest employers in the UK? How much of their increased funding will be lost here?" It's a great way to greatly increase the amount of funding for the NHS on paper, whilst not increasing it by very much in real terms. Genius marketing! | |||
"Does it occur to anyone in govt that the NHS is one of, if not, the biggest employers in the UK? How much of their increased funding will be lost here?" It is only a notional charge between Government departments. For instance, if the new NI will cost the NHS £30 million more the Treasury will just give them £30 million more to pay it. | |||
"Does it occur to anyone in govt that the NHS is one of, if not, the biggest employers in the UK? How much of their increased funding will be lost here? It is only a notional charge between Government departments. For instance, if the new NI will cost the NHS £30 million more the Treasury will just give them £30 million more to pay it. " We call it “wooden dollars” it’s like charging Govt depts VAT, it just flows around and around generating admin work. | |||
"Does it occur to anyone in govt that the NHS is one of, if not, the biggest employers in the UK? How much of their increased funding will be lost here? It is only a notional charge between Government departments. For instance, if the new NI will cost the NHS £30 million more the Treasury will just give them £30 million more to pay it. We call it “wooden dollars” it’s like charging Govt depts VAT, it just flows around and around generating admin work." Sounds like communism , 100% employment by making even more admin. If they understood how to really create efficiencies they would ruthlessly eliminate all this kind of stuff. | |||
"Does it occur to anyone in govt that the NHS is one of, if not, the biggest employers in the UK? How much of their increased funding will be lost here? It is only a notional charge between Government departments. For instance, if the new NI will cost the NHS £30 million more the Treasury will just give them £30 million more to pay it. We call it “wooden dollars” it’s like charging Govt depts VAT, it just flows around and around generating admin work. Sounds like communism , 100% employment by making even more admin. If they understood how to really create efficiencies they would ruthlessly eliminate all this kind of stuff. " Yeah obviously modelled on all those communist countries with 100% employment.  | |||
