FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > 2.5 million for ...

2.5 million for ...

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By *usybee73 OP   Man 12 weeks ago

in the sticks

Windfarms not wind farming according to the Telegraph? Ed bacon sandwich miliband flagship is paying out not to puduce?

If true? How long has it been happening and what scale?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *0shadesOfFilthMan 12 weeks ago

nearby

It reads “Known as constraint payments, they are paid out by the National Grid to incentivise wind farms to reduce output when more energy is generated than can be used locally or exported to consumers elsewhere in the UK, usually as a result of higher wind speeds”

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *0shadesOfFilthMan 12 weeks ago

nearby

The payouts, which will ultimately be added to consumer bills, have been made almost every day this month and have varied between £227,192 and £8,408 per day.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *0shadesOfFilthMan 12 weeks ago

nearby

Torygraph is Paywall, so have copied

“Dr John Constable, the director of the REF, said: “The paradoxical outcome is that wind farm developers actually make more money when they are paid to reduce output rather than when they are selling normally on the market. The British consumer is being ripped off, and developers are laughing all the way to the bank.

“All you hear from Ed Miliband is that more renewable energy will make energy cheap – but unless he deals with the constraint payment programme, that is simply an illusion.”

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *eroy1000Man 12 weeks ago

milton keynes


"The payouts, which will ultimately be added to consumer bills, have been made almost every day this month and have varied between £227,192 and £8,408 per day.

"

Seems an oddd system. If the grid does not need power why not, just say so to the producer. I'm sure there is a perfectly logical reason but on the face of it seems very odd, especially as the bill payer picks up the tab

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *usybee73 OP   Man 12 weeks ago

in the sticks


"Torygraph is Paywall, so have copied

“Dr John Constable, the director of the REF, said: “The paradoxical outcome is that wind farm developers actually make more money when they are paid to reduce output rather than when they are selling normally on the market. The British consumer is being ripped off, and developers are laughing all the way to the bank.

“All you hear from Ed Miliband is that more renewable energy will make energy cheap – but unless he deals with the constraint payment programme, that is simply an illusion.”"

Thank you for the quote 👍 so people are paying for them not to work? How can that be fair, especially to those who the labour proposes to represent?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) 12 weeks ago

I mean, I expect nothing less.

Every aspect of government and the lower/higher tendrils of governance therein are all corrupt and do not serve the masses.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *rthur WrightusMan 12 weeks ago

Round the Bend


"Torygraph is Paywall, so have copied

“Dr John Constable, the director of the REF, said: “The paradoxical outcome is that wind farm developers actually make more money when they are paid to reduce output rather than when they are selling normally on the market. The British consumer is being ripped off, and developers are laughing all the way to the bank.

“All you hear from Ed Miliband is that more renewable energy will make energy cheap – but unless he deals with the constraint payment programme, that is simply an illusion.”

Thank you for the quote 👍 so people are paying for them not to work? How can that be fair, especially to those who the labour proposes to represent?"

Not familiar with any of the above, but since fitting myself up with solar, battery etc a certain fishy elec supplier does have a tariff that pass on very cheap or free electricity at times of surplus, usually in the middle of the night. I imagine other suppliers do to.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *hrill CollinsMan 12 weeks ago

The Outer Rim

fossil fuel power stations are also paid not to produce in their off demand periods in fairness

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *rDiscretionXXXMan 12 weeks ago

Gilfach


"The payouts, which will ultimately be added to consumer bills, have been made almost every day this month and have varied between £227,192 and £8,408 per day."


"Seems an oddd system. If the grid does not need power why not, just say so to the producer. I'm sure there is a perfectly logical reason but on the face of it seems very odd, especially as the bill payer picks up the tab"

The electrical grid is very delicate, and needs to have a fine balance of power inputs. Too much and things start breaking, too little and things stop working. You have to have just the right amount of power.

To balance it the grid's owners predict power usage every 10 minutes, and hold auctions every half an hour. Companies offer to generate more power for a certain price, or to generate less for a certain price. If an adjustment is needed, the grid will tell the cheapest operator to generate more/less, and then pay them whatever they bid at.

The job used to be fairly simple with most power stations having a slow ramp up/down time, so supply was fairly constant. It's now much more difficult with wind and solar being very unpredictable. Most of the reason why we are building interconnectors with Europe is so that we can grab/dump power more easily to balance the grid out.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By *eroy1000Man 12 weeks ago

milton keynes


"The payouts, which will ultimately be added to consumer bills, have been made almost every day this month and have varied between £227,192 and £8,408 per day.

Seems an oddd system. If the grid does not need power why not, just say so to the producer. I'm sure there is a perfectly logical reason but on the face of it seems very odd, especially as the bill payer picks up the tab

The electrical grid is very delicate, and needs to have a fine balance of power inputs. Too much and things start breaking, too little and things stop working. You have to have just the right amount of power.

To balance it the grid's owners predict power usage every 10 minutes, and hold auctions every half an hour. Companies offer to generate more power for a certain price, or to generate less for a certain price. If an adjustment is needed, the grid will tell the cheapest operator to generate more/less, and then pay them whatever they bid at.

The job used to be fairly simple with most power stations having a slow ramp up/down time, so supply was fairly constant. It's now much more difficult with wind and solar being very unpredictable. Most of the reason why we are building interconnectors with Europe is so that we can grab/dump power more easily to balance the grid out."

Very informative. Thanks

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.0312

0