FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Rwanda can’t guarantee how many people it will take in from UK
Rwanda can’t guarantee how many people it will take in from UK
Jump to: Newest in thread
Sunaks scheme in more trouble as Rwandan government refused to give assurances that the 52,000 eligible asylum seekers will be accepted, saying it would be ‘thousands’
That £400 million scheme not looking such a good idea now |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I don't think anyone said they will take all 52,000 to begin with. And thousands is a huge range, with it's minima much bigger the 200 the left wing fake news outlets were peddling out"
“Left wing fake new outlets”
Ha ha ha ha!!! Delusional Trumpism at its finest! Now tell us the one about how nationalism will save the country  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"“Not looking such a great idea now”
It’s never looked like a great idea. Monumental stupidity of the highest order!
In fairness, it's worked a treat though. "
At wasting vast quantities of money that the government is short of? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"“Not looking such a great idea now”
It’s never looked like a great idea. Monumental stupidity of the highest order!
In fairness, it's worked a treat though.
At wasting vast quantities of money that the government is short of?"
The government don't care about wasting a couple of hundred million, it's peanuts compared to what they gave their mates for faulty PPE. Besides, investing public money to try to win back voters who defected to even more right wing and hateful political parties isn't something they'd worry about.
And it is working, just look at how many people on here have a massive boner for anything anti-immigrant. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By (user no longer on site) 36 weeks ago
|
The issue with the 200 (which is miss interpreting what's been said) is the government have no control of the narrative.
The best we have of a HMG view is the note between Boris and Sunak on budgets.
It's tumble. And the media loves vacuum.
I'd hope that there is some minimum given the money being sent. My suspicion is no. We were going to do this off the back of a MoU. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
It's just been standard immoral posturing, not bothered about the huge cost from public money. And the even more immoral legislation, deriding the legal system checks and balances, to truly having people kept safely, shows their moral bankruptcy. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
It looks like the scheme is already working . A significant number of people have already crossed the border to the Republic of Ireland.
Ww need to invest a lot more money and track down anyone who is staying in the country illegally. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It looks like the scheme is already working .
"
"
A significant number of people have already crossed the border to the Republic of Ireland.
"
"
Ww need to invest a lot more money and track down anyone who is staying in the country illegally. "
That's right, we need to spunk away millions more to make sure we get more fringe elements of the electorate back in line at the ballot boxes.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The issue with the 200 (which is miss interpreting what's been said) is the government have no control of the narrative.
The best we have of a HMG view is the note between Boris and Sunak on budgets.
It's tumble. And the media loves vacuum.
I'd hope that there is some minimum given the money being sent. My suspicion is no. We were going to do this off the back of a MoU. "
I'd go as far as saying most on here (politics forum) is misinterpreted for various reasons. Some do it deliberately out of ignorance, laziness or click bait, some because it suits their narrative. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
