FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Politically opposed relationships
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’ll turn a blind eye to any ladies political stance if she lets me put my cock up her arse hole " Here here but the opposite for me especially me being a lady and all that crap. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I’ll turn a blind eye to any ladies political stance if she lets me put my cock up her arse hole " same here, as a centrist I don't go left or right just straight down the middle and aim for the bullseye | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Tories are a hard limit. Can't fuck someone I can't respect " Do you actively ask meets? I obviously have these convos dating wise. But not for fab. No one on here or in a club has ever asked me anything like this and no one would know my views from here? …. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I could fuck a Tory but I definitely couldn’t be in a relationship one. Relationships can be hard enough without arguing about politics too. " Ditto, I'd f**k a Tory as long they didn't talk to me much..relationship? Forget about it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Tories are a hard limit. Can't fuck someone I can't respect Do you actively ask meets? I obviously have these convos dating wise. But not for fab. No one on here or in a club has ever asked me anything like this and no one would know my views from here? …. " I ask to see evidence of politically affiliation AND check for minty fresh breath | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’ll turn a blind eye to any ladies political stance if she lets me put my cock up her arse hole " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’ll turn a blind eye to any ladies political stance if she lets me put my cock up her arse hole " Tackling the serious and important issues there then. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Could never live with a socialist… most are insufferable hypocrites " You don't benefit from any of the perks of socialism such as the nhs then? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All political parties are bellends, so doesn't bother me in the slightest. " This makes the most sense to me. Excellent comment. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I could fuck a Tory but I definitely couldn’t be in a relationship one. Relationships can be hard enough without arguing about politics too. " I agree. Just meeting for sex is one thing but to have an ongoing relationship, there surely has to be compatibility of views, though to me fairness, honesty and inclusivity are more important than party labels. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’ll turn a blind eye to any ladies political stance if she lets me put my cock up her arse hole Tackling the serious and important issues there then." That's Rex. The most serious man you'll ever meet | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I couldn’t be with anyone so serious about politics that they let it dictate their friendships and relationships I see it often on dating apps “No tories” Enjoy letting politicians that give no fuck about you on either side rule your relationships" Couldn't have put it better myself. We know they're self serving pigs. But come election time it's 'please vote for me i really do care'. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Could never live with a socialist… most are insufferable hypocrites You don't benefit from any of the perks of socialism such as the nhs then?" My experience of our “wonderful” NHS has been appalling over the years… there are far more efficient healthcare services elsewhere. Socialism doesn’t work… | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Could never live with a socialist… most are insufferable hypocrites You don't benefit from any of the perks of socialism such as the nhs then? My experience of our “wonderful” NHS has been appalling over the years… there are far more efficient healthcare services elsewhere. Socialism doesn’t work… " Millions slag off the rich yet spend there money on lottery tickets every week in the hope of joining them… oh the irony | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I couldn’t be with anyone so serious about politics that they let it dictate their friendships and relationships I see it often on dating apps “No tories” Enjoy letting politicians that give no fuck about you on either side rule your relationships" +1 Politicians don't give a single fuck about you or your lives. They just want power. Why would anyone let these political parties dictate their relationships? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Could never live with a socialist… most are insufferable hypocrites You don't benefit from any of the perks of socialism such as the nhs then? My experience of our “wonderful” NHS has been appalling over the years… there are far more efficient healthcare services elsewhere. Socialism doesn’t work… " On its own? No..but elements of socialism are required for a healthy society...NHS, police, fire services, welfare.. ...socialism often isn't implemented probably, or with any real good faith, but it's absolutely necessary | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It’s amazing how strongly people care about these things yet as people have said these politicians are usually incompetent, self serving people. Politics goes in cycles big government, small government, big government, etc. . It’s spend, spend, spend or cut, cut, cut. Don’t know why you’d rule out almost half the country because they don’t vote the same as you. It’s not very inclusive. Sometimes you learn the most and have the best experiences when you don’t live in an echo chamber. " Why do I have to be inclusive for the most intimate of acts? It's not a dinner party. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It’s amazing how strongly people care about these things yet as people have said these politicians are usually incompetent, self serving people. Politics goes in cycles big government, small government, big government, etc. . It’s spend, spend, spend or cut, cut, cut. Don’t know why you’d rule out almost half the country because they don’t vote the same as you. It’s not very inclusive. Sometimes you learn the most and have the best experiences when you don’t live in an echo chamber. " Exactly this Are politics really that important to miss out on what could be the greatest thing to ever happen? I know that’s easier to say as someone who wouldn’t vote for any of the cunts they are all corrupt lying worthless sacks of shit regardless of what party they belong and there is nothing we can do to change it so not worth stressing over | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It’s amazing how strongly people care about these things yet as people have said these politicians are usually incompetent, self serving people. Politics goes in cycles big government, small government, big government, etc. . It’s spend, spend, spend or cut, cut, cut. Don’t know why you’d rule out almost half the country because they don’t vote the same as you. It’s not very inclusive. Sometimes you learn the most and have the best experiences when you don’t live in an echo chamber. Exactly this Are politics really that important to miss out on what could be the greatest thing to ever happen? I know that’s easier to say as someone who wouldn’t vote for any of the cunts they are all corrupt lying worthless sacks of shit regardless of what party they belong and there is nothing we can do to change it so not worth stressing over " Well..we have said we'd s**g them | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"How narrow minded and shallow to let politics decide a relationship.Notice how it's the inclusivity and equality brigade(the left) that are anything but,except Daily Mirror journalist Nigel Nelson,of the left and a remoaner who is happily married to a Conservative Brexiteer.If you are sad enough to let politics get in the way,then you know the price of everything and the value of nothing.You are clearly one of the people you are complaining about,happy in your echo chamber,no challenge,no debate,just trained seals clapping each others matching 'opinion'." He wasn't just talking about the politics though, he was talking about the wider views represented through a political stance that would make them incompatible. I'm actually impressed that you used all those provocative buzzwords while still completely missing his point | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's actually quite a fun game we do at the tory party meetings. We trawl social media and dating sites for the common people who proclaim "no tories" ... and then we have sex with them and don't ever tell them. Ha ha brilliant sport. Almost as good as fox hunting. " Tally Ho Tally Ho..... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"How narrow minded and shallow to let politics decide a relationship.Notice how it's the inclusivity and equality brigade(the left) that are anything but,except Daily Mirror journalist Nigel Nelson,of the left and a remoaner who is happily married to a Conservative Brexiteer.If you are sad enough to let politics get in the way,then you know the price of everything and the value of nothing.You are clearly one of the people you are complaining about,happy in your echo chamber,no challenge,no debate,just trained seals clapping each others matching 'opinion'. He wasn't just talking about the politics though, he was talking about the wider views represented through a political stance that would make them incompatible. I'm actually impressed that you used all those provocative buzzwords while still completely missing his point " I wasn't just replying to the OP,but to the thread in general,making a point in general.Not surprised you missed that point.No comment on Nigel and his wife being "incompatible'.Not surprised you've jumped into this thread to contradict and have a (laugh) "go" at what I posted.How predictable.YAWN.Jolly good,well done,you win a cookie. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"How narrow minded and shallow to let politics decide a relationship.Notice how it's the inclusivity and equality brigade(the left) that are anything but,except Daily Mirror journalist Nigel Nelson,of the left and a remoaner who is happily married to a Conservative Brexiteer.If you are sad enough to let politics get in the way,then you know the price of everything and the value of nothing.You are clearly one of the people you are complaining about,happy in your echo chamber,no challenge,no debate,just trained seals clapping each others matching 'opinion'. He wasn't just talking about the politics though, he was talking about the wider views represented through a political stance that would make them incompatible. I'm actually impressed that you used all those provocative buzzwords while still completely missing his point I wasn't just replying to the OP,but to the thread in general,making a point in general.Not surprised you missed that point.No comment on Nigel and his wife being "incompatible'.Not surprised you've jumped into this thread to contradict and have a (laugh) "go" at what I posted.How predictable.YAWN.Jolly good,well done,you win a cookie." What's incompatible for some, isn't for other. Humans are strange like that you see so not all of us have that same line drawn in the sand. Oh, and addressing the thread as a whole includes the OP but thank you for the cookie | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"How narrow minded and shallow to let politics decide a relationship.Notice how it's the inclusivity and equality brigade(the left) that are anything but,except Daily Mirror journalist Nigel Nelson,of the left and a remoaner who is happily married to a Conservative Brexiteer.If you are sad enough to let politics get in the way,then you know the price of everything and the value of nothing.You are clearly one of the people you are complaining about,happy in your echo chamber,no challenge,no debate,just trained seals clapping each others matching 'opinion'." I’m happy to debate anything and everything with anyone. Someone’s political view potentially wouldn’t make me not date them. But their views on human rights, humanitarian issues and charitable issues would. I don’t care if someone voted labour or conservative in the last election but I care for their views on “stopping the boats”, racism and international peace. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If we're opposite on political issues then it suggests there is a fundamental missmatch in values. Doesn't sound like a good pairing to me." Exactly. I can agree to disagree on pizza toppings, as the saying/ meme goes, not core values. Politics to me isn't a sports game, it's a reflection of the things I think are most important in life. It's unlikely I'll find myself very close to someone who disagrees in serious ways about that. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I would never sleep with anyone that disagreed with my stance on the plight/ experience of Black people, and actually on a great deal of other social issues (misogyny, homophobia, transphobia, classism, etc). There are plenty of Labour voters that I disagree with on these things about and wouldn’t be in a relationship with them either. " Yeah, it's amazing that people think that "empathy with swathes of humanity and a shared sense of common decency" is trivial or shallow. I'll fuck people with brown eyes and blue eyes, and people who like fig on pizza and not, but people whose fundamental views on society are repugnant? dafuq no | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"For me personally, I couldn't fuck or be in a relationship with a Tory. I have to atleast respect the person to give them any form of my time. I also find many of the morals and ethics that often come with the right wing to be unattractive stances. That being said, if others can do it, more power to them! " Yeah it always makes me laugh when "no blacks" or "only blacks" is "personal preference is sacrosanct in sex" and "no Tories" isn't allowed because reasons | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"For me personally, I couldn't fuck or be in a relationship with a Tory. I have to atleast respect the person to give them any form of my time. I also find many of the morals and ethics that often come with the right wing to be unattractive stances. That being said, if others can do it, more power to them! " word. Like more power to you but that couldn’t be me | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If we're opposite on political issues then it suggests there is a fundamental missmatch in values. Doesn't sound like a good pairing to me. Exactly. I can agree to disagree on pizza toppings, as the saying/ meme goes, not core values. Politics to me isn't a sports game, it's a reflection of the things I think are most important in life. It's unlikely I'll find myself very close to someone who disagrees in serious ways about that." It really is treated like sports teams which is just insane to me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If we're opposite on political issues then it suggests there is a fundamental missmatch in values. Doesn't sound like a good pairing to me. Exactly. I can agree to disagree on pizza toppings, as the saying/ meme goes, not core values. Politics to me isn't a sports game, it's a reflection of the things I think are most important in life. It's unlikely I'll find myself very close to someone who disagrees in serious ways about that. It really is treated like sports teams which is just insane to me. " Agreed | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"……… You don't benefit from any of the perks of socialism such as the nhs then?" . Are you asking about ‘benefiting from’ or actually using it? It’s possible that some people don’t use the NHS or state schools but still contribute taxes towards it. On top of that, they contribute VAT on certain non-treatment items during a hospital stay or doctor’s visit. There is also a tax on private health insurance. Labour wants to introduce VAT on private school fees, which seems ridiculous seeing as the students are already helping the state by not using valuable resources within the state school system. I’m ready for the lambasting that will follow the stating of an opinion that doesn’t tally with the collective rhetoric here. M | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I would never sleep with anyone that disagreed with my stance on the plight/ experience of Black people, and actually on a great deal of other social issues (misogyny, homophobia, transphobia, classism, etc). There are plenty of Labour voters that I disagree with on these things about and wouldn’t be in a relationship with them either. Yeah, it's amazing that people think that "empathy with swathes of humanity and a shared sense of common decency" is trivial or shallow. I'll fuck people with brown eyes and blue eyes, and people who like fig on pizza and not, but people whose fundamental views on society are repugnant? dafuq no" There is a difference between one's moral views and what party they vote for. Practically speaking, we pretty much have a two party system here. Majority of people in the country(or any other country for that matter) are moderates who do not pledge their lives to one party. Most people here have voted for Tories at least once in their life. These people make their voting choices based on the circumstances. I know of some remainers who voted Tory last time because they were just pissed of with the way the process was dragged out. Which party someone voted for in the last election doesn't say anything about the person's views on racism, homophobia or anything. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I would never sleep with anyone that disagreed with my stance on the plight/ experience of Black people, and actually on a great deal of other social issues (misogyny, homophobia, transphobia, classism, etc). There are plenty of Labour voters that I disagree with on these things about and wouldn’t be in a relationship with them either. Yeah, it's amazing that people think that "empathy with swathes of humanity and a shared sense of common decency" is trivial or shallow. I'll fuck people with brown eyes and blue eyes, and people who like fig on pizza and not, but people whose fundamental views on society are repugnant? dafuq no There is a difference between one's moral views and what party they vote for. Practically speaking, we pretty much have a two party system here. Majority of people in the country(or any other country for that matter) are moderates who do not pledge their lives to one party. Most people here have voted for Tories at least once in their life. These people make their voting choices based on the circumstances. I know of some remainers who voted Tory last time because they were just pissed of with the way the process was dragged out. Which party someone voted for in the last election doesn't say anything about the person's views on racism, homophobia or anything." Good point Tory/labour voters vary so much that it’s silly to disregard someone based on how they vote with a 2 party system You’d probably have better success by using an IQ test. Generally those loudest a lot politics are the ones that know the least For me, anyone so deeply involved in politics that want to know you vote before they even know what your favourite music or food is are almost always insufferable to be around | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I would never sleep with anyone that disagreed with my stance on the plight/ experience of Black people, and actually on a great deal of other social issues (misogyny, homophobia, transphobia, classism, etc). There are plenty of Labour voters that I disagree with on these things about and wouldn’t be in a relationship with them either. Yeah, it's amazing that people think that "empathy with swathes of humanity and a shared sense of common decency" is trivial or shallow. I'll fuck people with brown eyes and blue eyes, and people who like fig on pizza and not, but people whose fundamental views on society are repugnant? dafuq no There is a difference between one's moral views and what party they vote for. Practically speaking, we pretty much have a two party system here. Majority of people in the country(or any other country for that matter) are moderates who do not pledge their lives to one party. Most people here have voted for Tories at least once in their life. These people make their voting choices based on the circumstances. I know of some remainers who voted Tory last time because they were just pissed of with the way the process was dragged out. Which party someone voted for in the last election doesn't say anything about the person's views on racism, homophobia or anything." I'm sorry if you think anything I said has anything to do with what political party one does or doesn't vote for. I don't care - although if you have values I consider non repugnant and you vote Tory, I'd wonder why the fuck and if you needed a doctor. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I have known couples back in India who vote for opposite parties everytime. It depends on multiple factors tbh. How serious are you about the politics?Most people in my family and friends are strong believers that politicians are just power hungry scumbags who use ideologies as tools to achieve power. So most of them including me believe that it's stupid to let political parties play a role in your relationships. Do you want to shape political views of your children? For most moderates, their goal is just to give a decent life for their children. They aren't fussed much about shaping their political views. They just teach the basic moral principles that children are supposed to know - don't beat others, don't lie, don't cheat, learn to look after yourself, etc. They expect the child to build political views from their own experiences. But if one of the parents wants to shape the political views of their children too, that will be a massive cause of conflict. So yes, it depends a lot on individuals. I am lucky to have a friend circle with political views from all bands of the spectrum. We are all respectful to each other and have great debates on political matters. " Loved this bit : power hungry scumbags who use ideologies as tools to achieve power. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I have known couples back in India who vote for opposite parties everytime. It depends on multiple factors tbh. How serious are you about the politics?Most people in my family and friends are strong believers that politicians are just power hungry scumbags who use ideologies as tools to achieve power. So most of them including me believe that it's stupid to let political parties play a role in your relationships. Do you want to shape political views of your children? For most moderates, their goal is just to give a decent life for their children. They aren't fussed much about shaping their political views. They just teach the basic moral principles that children are supposed to know - don't beat others, don't lie, don't cheat, learn to look after yourself, etc. They expect the child to build political views from their own experiences. But if one of the parents wants to shape the political views of their children too, that will be a massive cause of conflict. So yes, it depends a lot on individuals. I am lucky to have a friend circle with political views from all bands of the spectrum. We are all respectful to each other and have great debates on political matters. Loved this bit : power hungry scumbags who use ideologies as tools to achieve power." Thanks. If you watch politics around the world, you would be surprised by number of times politicians have changed their ideologies just for the sake of votes. They never cared about those ideologies in the first place. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"……… You don't benefit from any of the perks of socialism such as the nhs then? . Are you asking about ‘benefiting from’ or actually using it? It’s possible that some people don’t use the NHS or state schools but still contribute taxes towards it. On top of that, they contribute VAT on certain non-treatment items during a hospital stay or doctor’s visit. There is also a tax on private health insurance. Labour wants to introduce VAT on private school fees, which seems ridiculous seeing as the students are already helping the state by not using valuable resources within the state school system. I’m ready for the lambasting that will follow the stating of an opinion that doesn’t tally with the collective rhetoric here. M" My only point, M, will be that one may not use the NHS now, but if one is hit by the proverbial bus, one WILL be collected by a state funded ambulance to a state hospital and placed in a state funded ward until such a time as one is fit to be transported to the private hospital of choosing. There are very few private hospitals with intestive or critical care facilities so anyone needing such care will end up in the NHS system, more likely than not. I understand some people do successfully avoid the NHS and state education for the majority of the time, but it's never a cert. The state is there, picking up the pieces of the most complex and unpredictable aspects of healthcare - emergency and trauma medicine. That also happens to be one of the most expensive areas too. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I would never sleep with anyone that disagreed with my stance on the plight/ experience of Black people, and actually on a great deal of other social issues (misogyny, homophobia, transphobia, classism, etc). There are plenty of Labour voters that I disagree with on these things about and wouldn’t be in a relationship with them either. Yeah, it's amazing that people think that "empathy with swathes of humanity and a shared sense of common decency" is trivial or shallow. I'll fuck people with brown eyes and blue eyes, and people who like fig on pizza and not, but people whose fundamental views on society are repugnant? dafuq no There is a difference between one's moral views and what party they vote for. Practically speaking, we pretty much have a two party system here. Majority of people in the country(or any other country for that matter) are moderates who do not pledge their lives to one party. Most people here have voted for Tories at least once in their life. These people make their voting choices based on the circumstances. I know of some remainers who voted Tory last time because they were just pissed of with the way the process was dragged out. Which party someone voted for in the last election doesn't say anything about the person's views on racism, homophobia or anything. I'm sorry if you think anything I said has anything to do with what political party one does or doesn't vote for. I don't care - although if you have values I consider non repugnant and you vote Tory, I'd wonder why the fuck and if you needed a doctor." I get that part when it comes to relationships. If your fundamental moral views are so radically different, there is a good chance you don't get on with each other long term. As for not having morally repugnant views ad voting tories, people do it because they know that political parties don't have any inherent value system. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I would never sleep with anyone that disagreed with my stance on the plight/ experience of Black people, and actually on a great deal of other social issues (misogyny, homophobia, transphobia, classism, etc). There are plenty of Labour voters that I disagree with on these things about and wouldn’t be in a relationship with them either. Yeah, it's amazing that people think that "empathy with swathes of humanity and a shared sense of common decency" is trivial or shallow. I'll fuck people with brown eyes and blue eyes, and people who like fig on pizza and not, but people whose fundamental views on society are repugnant? dafuq no There is a difference between one's moral views and what party they vote for. Practically speaking, we pretty much have a two party system here. Majority of people in the country(or any other country for that matter) are moderates who do not pledge their lives to one party. Most people here have voted for Tories at least once in their life. These people make their voting choices based on the circumstances. I know of some remainers who voted Tory last time because they were just pissed of with the way the process was dragged out. Which party someone voted for in the last election doesn't say anything about the person's views on racism, homophobia or anything. I'm sorry if you think anything I said has anything to do with what political party one does or doesn't vote for. I don't care - although if you have values I consider non repugnant and you vote Tory, I'd wonder why the fuck and if you needed a doctor. I get that part when it comes to relationships. If your fundamental moral views are so radically different, there is a good chance you don't get on with each other long term. As for not having morally repugnant views ad voting tories, people do it because they know that political parties don't have any inherent value system." So because people know parties don't have value systems, they vote for people who promise to do things that are against their values? That seems as productive as shooting yourself in the face to improve your appearance. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I would never sleep with anyone that disagreed with my stance on the plight/ experience of Black people, and actually on a great deal of other social issues (misogyny, homophobia, transphobia, classism, etc). There are plenty of Labour voters that I disagree with on these things about and wouldn’t be in a relationship with them either. Yeah, it's amazing that people think that "empathy with swathes of humanity and a shared sense of common decency" is trivial or shallow. I'll fuck people with brown eyes and blue eyes, and people who like fig on pizza and not, but people whose fundamental views on society are repugnant? dafuq no There is a difference between one's moral views and what party they vote for. Practically speaking, we pretty much have a two party system here. Majority of people in the country(or any other country for that matter) are moderates who do not pledge their lives to one party. Most people here have voted for Tories at least once in their life. These people make their voting choices based on the circumstances. I know of some remainers who voted Tory last time because they were just pissed of with the way the process was dragged out. Which party someone voted for in the last election doesn't say anything about the person's views on racism, homophobia or anything. Good point Tory/labour voters vary so much that it’s silly to disregard someone based on how they vote with a 2 party system You’d probably have better success by using an IQ test. Generally those loudest a lot politics are the ones that know the least For me, anyone so deeply involved in politics that want to know you vote before they even know what your favourite music or food is are almost always insufferable to be around " There are right libertarians who align with Tories on economic views and Labour on social views. There are left wing authoritarians who are the exact opposite. They obviously don't have a strong political party in UK. And people's views usually fall into a spectrum. In Pakistan, homosexuality theoretically has death penalty(though it's not applied in practice), but trans people can self identify. Lot of people I know here are happy to support legalisation of gay marriage, but aren't supportive of self identification of trans people. Are these people tories or labour category? If someone sees the world in terms if Tories/Labour, it just shows they are immature and haven't had much interaction with people outside their own circle with same political views. We were having a nice time at an office party. Out of nowhere, one person went on a rant about how brexiters are stupid. She basically assumed that everyone around her are remainers. But there was one leave voter and it killed the vibe for everyone. This is one of those insufferable people you are talking about. Bringing political topics in a conversation respectfully is one thing. Randomly throwing insults without even knowing what the other people's political views is a whole different thing. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I would never sleep with anyone that disagreed with my stance on the plight/ experience of Black people, and actually on a great deal of other social issues (misogyny, homophobia, transphobia, classism, etc). There are plenty of Labour voters that I disagree with on these things about and wouldn’t be in a relationship with them either. Yeah, it's amazing that people think that "empathy with swathes of humanity and a shared sense of common decency" is trivial or shallow. I'll fuck people with brown eyes and blue eyes, and people who like fig on pizza and not, but people whose fundamental views on society are repugnant? dafuq no There is a difference between one's moral views and what party they vote for. Practically speaking, we pretty much have a two party system here. Majority of people in the country(or any other country for that matter) are moderates who do not pledge their lives to one party. Most people here have voted for Tories at least once in their life. These people make their voting choices based on the circumstances. I know of some remainers who voted Tory last time because they were just pissed of with the way the process was dragged out. Which party someone voted for in the last election doesn't say anything about the person's views on racism, homophobia or anything. Good point Tory/labour voters vary so much that it’s silly to disregard someone based on how they vote with a 2 party system You’d probably have better success by using an IQ test. Generally those loudest a lot politics are the ones that know the least For me, anyone so deeply involved in politics that want to know you vote before they even know what your favourite music or food is are almost always insufferable to be around There are right libertarians who align with Tories on economic views and Labour on social views. There are left wing authoritarians who are the exact opposite. They obviously don't have a strong political party in UK. And people's views usually fall into a spectrum. In Pakistan, homosexuality theoretically has death penalty(though it's not applied in practice), but trans people can self identify. Lot of people I know here are happy to support legalisation of gay marriage, but aren't supportive of self identification of trans people. Are these people tories or labour category? If someone sees the world in terms if Tories/Labour, it just shows they are immature and haven't had much interaction with people outside their own circle with same political views. We were having a nice time at an office party. Out of nowhere, one person went on a rant about how brexiters are stupid. She basically assumed that everyone around her are remainers. But there was one leave voter and it killed the vibe for everyone. This is one of those insufferable people you are talking about. Bringing political topics in a conversation respectfully is one thing. Randomly throwing insults without even knowing what the other people's political views is a whole different thing." Sorry, I’ve just realised how terribly I worded thaf I meant that Tory’s vary so much amongst themselves, so do labour, so do any voters To try to categorise any group of people as “Tory voters” or “labour voters” is pointless because they vary so much | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I would never sleep with anyone that disagreed with my stance on the plight/ experience of Black people, and actually on a great deal of other social issues (misogyny, homophobia, transphobia, classism, etc). There are plenty of Labour voters that I disagree with on these things about and wouldn’t be in a relationship with them either. Yeah, it's amazing that people think that "empathy with swathes of humanity and a shared sense of common decency" is trivial or shallow. I'll fuck people with brown eyes and blue eyes, and people who like fig on pizza and not, but people whose fundamental views on society are repugnant? dafuq no There is a difference between one's moral views and what party they vote for. Practically speaking, we pretty much have a two party system here. Majority of people in the country(or any other country for that matter) are moderates who do not pledge their lives to one party. Most people here have voted for Tories at least once in their life. These people make their voting choices based on the circumstances. I know of some remainers who voted Tory last time because they were just pissed of with the way the process was dragged out. Which party someone voted for in the last election doesn't say anything about the person's views on racism, homophobia or anything. I'm sorry if you think anything I said has anything to do with what political party one does or doesn't vote for. I don't care - although if you have values I consider non repugnant and you vote Tory, I'd wonder why the fuck and if you needed a doctor. I get that part when it comes to relationships. If your fundamental moral views are so radically different, there is a good chance you don't get on with each other long term. As for not having morally repugnant views ad voting tories, people do it because they know that political parties don't have any inherent value system. So because people know parties don't have value systems, they vote for people who promise to do things that are against their values? That seems as productive as shooting yourself in the face to improve your appearance." It's not binary. Political parties have a long list of items in their manifesto. I rarely come across anyone who is supportive of every item that's listed on a single party's manifesto. You win some, you lose some. People vote based on what they find to be the pressing issue even if they lose out on other issues they care about. Most people voted Tories last election because they did not want Brexit dragging out anymore and that for them, was the pressing issue at that time. Rightfully, the voter base has swung towards Labour as Brexit isn't a pressing issue anymore. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Opposite sport teams, it’s a much more difficult situation " Lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I would never sleep with anyone that disagreed with my stance on the plight/ experience of Black people, and actually on a great deal of other social issues (misogyny, homophobia, transphobia, classism, etc). There are plenty of Labour voters that I disagree with on these things about and wouldn’t be in a relationship with them either. Yeah, it's amazing that people think that "empathy with swathes of humanity and a shared sense of common decency" is trivial or shallow. I'll fuck people with brown eyes and blue eyes, and people who like fig on pizza and not, but people whose fundamental views on society are repugnant? dafuq no There is a difference between one's moral views and what party they vote for. Practically speaking, we pretty much have a two party system here. Majority of people in the country(or any other country for that matter) are moderates who do not pledge their lives to one party. Most people here have voted for Tories at least once in their life. These people make their voting choices based on the circumstances. I know of some remainers who voted Tory last time because they were just pissed of with the way the process was dragged out. Which party someone voted for in the last election doesn't say anything about the person's views on racism, homophobia or anything. Good point Tory/labour voters vary so much that it’s silly to disregard someone based on how they vote with a 2 party system You’d probably have better success by using an IQ test. Generally those loudest a lot politics are the ones that know the least For me, anyone so deeply involved in politics that want to know you vote before they even know what your favourite music or food is are almost always insufferable to be around There are right libertarians who align with Tories on economic views and Labour on social views. There are left wing authoritarians who are the exact opposite. They obviously don't have a strong political party in UK. And people's views usually fall into a spectrum. In Pakistan, homosexuality theoretically has death penalty(though it's not applied in practice), but trans people can self identify. Lot of people I know here are happy to support legalisation of gay marriage, but aren't supportive of self identification of trans people. Are these people tories or labour category? If someone sees the world in terms if Tories/Labour, it just shows they are immature and haven't had much interaction with people outside their own circle with same political views. We were having a nice time at an office party. Out of nowhere, one person went on a rant about how brexiters are stupid. She basically assumed that everyone around her are remainers. But there was one leave voter and it killed the vibe for everyone. This is one of those insufferable people you are talking about. Bringing political topics in a conversation respectfully is one thing. Randomly throwing insults without even knowing what the other people's political views is a whole different thing. Sorry, I’ve just realised how terribly I worded thaf I meant that Tory’s vary so much amongst themselves, so do labour, so do any voters To try to categorise any group of people as “Tory voters” or “labour voters” is pointless because they vary so much" Agreed | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Had a discussion with some friends about this the other day sparked from the fact in our wider friendship group there is a woman who apparently has a thing for me but I don't reciprocate it. One of the major factors of this for me is she's rather right wing, a habitual Tory voter no matter what the issue, who's in charge, the current policies or anything, from a rich family and basically grew up doing as her father told her and nowadays the daily mail. The discussion got quite heated amongst a few people about if you could be in a healthy relationship with someone with very opposing political views. My stance is if there's two people who vote differently but neither of them are very political, they just vote and choose a side, or have views that don't always align but usually do, then maybe... But two people who feel very strongly about politics with diametrically opposing viewpoints in terms of politicals and ideology surely can't be a good match for eachother as their feelings about the world and wider issues would never be in sync. Basic values would be different. This does also get into the realm of it being difficult to have a relationship when only one person cares about politics. I know there's no black/white to this and everyone's situation is different and people do also change, but I'm curious about other people's experiences regarding this question/situation." It is horrible. When core values don't align at all, it's tough. Not just discussions between yourselves, but pushing their ideals down your kids' throat and not being allowed to voice your own opinion, being shouted down or they walk away from you...... I hate it. It's not a nice environment to be in, especially if you feel like your walking on egg shells, can't watch even the news as you know that'll set them off. Anything slightly contentious happens, you don't talk about it, or even things that you didn't even think were things, you find out the hard way, you can't talk about it. If politics and core values don't align it's not good. Especially if it's something that develops independently and world events increase that divide. You knew you had slight differences, but boy you find out you have massive differences. So in short, if one of you can't talk rationally if not passionately at times about an opposing view and instead your aggressive and blinkard in your own opinions, from experience, it really really isn't a nice place to be. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I would never sleep with anyone that disagreed with my stance on the plight/ experience of Black people, and actually on a great deal of other social issues (misogyny, homophobia, transphobia, classism, etc). There are plenty of Labour voters that I disagree with on these things about and wouldn’t be in a relationship with them either. Yeah, it's amazing that people think that "empathy with swathes of humanity and a shared sense of common decency" is trivial or shallow. I'll fuck people with brown eyes and blue eyes, and people who like fig on pizza and not, but people whose fundamental views on society are repugnant? dafuq no There is a difference between one's moral views and what party they vote for. Practically speaking, we pretty much have a two party system here. Majority of people in the country(or any other country for that matter) are moderates who do not pledge their lives to one party. Most people here have voted for Tories at least once in their life. These people make their voting choices based on the circumstances. I know of some remainers who voted Tory last time because they were just pissed of with the way the process was dragged out. Which party someone voted for in the last election doesn't say anything about the person's views on racism, homophobia or anything. I'm sorry if you think anything I said has anything to do with what political party one does or doesn't vote for. I don't care - although if you have values I consider non repugnant and you vote Tory, I'd wonder why the fuck and if you needed a doctor. I get that part when it comes to relationships. If your fundamental moral views are so radically different, there is a good chance you don't get on with each other long term. As for not having morally repugnant views ad voting tories, people do it because they know that political parties don't have any inherent value system. So because people know parties don't have value systems, they vote for people who promise to do things that are against their values? That seems as productive as shooting yourself in the face to improve your appearance. It's not binary. Political parties have a long list of items in their manifesto. I rarely come across anyone who is supportive of every item that's listed on a single party's manifesto. You win some, you lose some. People vote based on what they find to be the pressing issue even if they lose out on other issues they care about. Most people voted Tories last election because they did not want Brexit dragging out anymore and that for them, was the pressing issue at that time. Rightfully, the voter base has swung towards Labour as Brexit isn't a pressing issue anymore." I never said it was binary. I'm not the one making it about a political party. The values I consider foundational, and one that I value in anyone close to me, don't tend to align with the Tory party. I don't care if they're the Tories or the potatoes or the elephants. People who promise to do things like X don't align with those values. I look for people who align with values ABC. The Tories, in the main, tend to promise stuff that's bad for ABC. While I don't give a fuck who someone votes for, it would perplex me if someone voted for a party promising stuff that's bad for ABC if they're in favour of ABC. If the Tories changed tomorrow and became in favour of more stuff that was closer to ABC, then I'd change my position on whether or not someone with values like mine could vote for them and be morally consistent. (And it's ok if someone isn't morally consistent, but I just don't see why anyone would do something so harmful to themselves - when starting from the position of "values consistent with mine") | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"politics dont get in the way of relationships,, " Tory voters vote for policies that have directly led to the loss of many lives. In my eyes they have blood on their hand and are undoubtedly dreadful, selfish people. That would deffo get in the way of my wanting to have sex with them, let alone enter into some form of ongoing relationship with them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"politics dont get in the way of relationships,, Tory voters vote for policies that have directly led to the loss of many lives. In my eyes they have blood on their hand and are undoubtedly dreadful, selfish people. That would deffo get in the way of my wanting to have sex with them, let alone enter into some form of ongoing relationship with them. " Do you think Labour hasn't done anything that hasn't resulted in bloodshed? Tony Blair walks into the room. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"politics dont get in the way of relationships,, Tory voters vote for policies that have directly led to the loss of many lives. In my eyes they have blood on their hand and are undoubtedly dreadful, selfish people. That would deffo get in the way of my wanting to have sex with them, let alone enter into some form of ongoing relationship with them. Do you think Labour hasn't done anything that hasn't resulted in bloodshed? Tony Blair walks into the room." Are you aware that there are policies and value positions that aren't Tory or Labour? Trying to refute "Tories have been in favour with bad things" with "well so have Labour" is like trying to refute "kale is disgusting" with "well so are all other vegetables, spinach" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"politics dont get in the way of relationships,, Tory voters vote for policies that have directly led to the loss of many lives. In my eyes they have blood on their hand and are undoubtedly dreadful, selfish people. That would deffo get in the way of my wanting to have sex with them, let alone enter into some form of ongoing relationship with them. Do you think Labour hasn't done anything that hasn't resulted in bloodshed? Tony Blair walks into the room. Are you aware that there are policies and value positions that aren't Tory or Labour? Trying to refute "Tories have been in favour with bad things" with "well so have Labour" is like trying to refute "kale is disgusting" with "well so are all other vegetables, spinach"" Did you see me refute the fact that Tories are bad? Both have done equally bad things. Both have had policies that have led to bloodshed, which is what makes the idea of judging someone entirely based on who they voted for totally absurd. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"politics dont get in the way of relationships,, Tory voters vote for policies that have directly led to the loss of many lives. In my eyes they have blood on their hand and are undoubtedly dreadful, selfish people. That would deffo get in the way of my wanting to have sex with them, let alone enter into some form of ongoing relationship with them. Do you think Labour hasn't done anything that hasn't resulted in bloodshed? Tony Blair walks into the room. Are you aware that there are policies and value positions that aren't Tory or Labour? Trying to refute "Tories have been in favour with bad things" with "well so have Labour" is like trying to refute "kale is disgusting" with "well so are all other vegetables, spinach" Did you see me refute the fact that Tories are bad? Both have done equally bad things. Both have had policies that have led to bloodshed, which is what makes the idea of judging someone entirely based on who they voted for totally absurd." And yet you're talking about politics as "parties people vote for" again, and I've only ever talked about politics in terms of societal values. Did you know that parties exist other than the Tories and the Labour party, that people can vote for other people or not at all? Did you know that judgement exists in degrees, so that I can judge a Tory voter as further from my values than a Labour voter, even if neither party is totally within line with my values? If it came out that someone voted for the modern iteration of the Nazi party, would you say that you can't judge them by the party they vote for? (Note I am not calling Tories Nazis, just saying that saying you can't judge someone by their voting record is absurd) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What do we know about people who have never voted tho. " I reckon a fair amount. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What do we know about people who have never voted tho. " Lots. Ask them what they think about certain issues. I don't consider politics to be even primarily about a political party, it's about values one works towards. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" And yet you're talking about politics as "parties people vote for" again, and I've only ever talked about politics in terms of societal values. " I was replying to a post that which mentioned something about Tories causing bloodshed and people who voted for it. " Did you know that parties exist other than the Tories and the Labour party, that people can vote for other people or not at all? " Yes and they are useless in an FPTP system. If any party promises proportional representation, I would vote for them the next election. This way, I have less compromises to make in the future elections. " Did you know that judgement exists in degrees, so that I can judge a Tory voter as further from my values than a Labour voter, even if neither party is totally within line with my values? " You have the right to make the decision. But I would say that you won't get the expected outcome you are looking for. People vote for so many reasons. Election manifestos are huge and someone would have voted for a party for various reasons. A better way would be to keep an open mind and ask the individual why they voted Tory, if it matters so much for you. You will be surprised. I know of a gay person from Turkey who voted Tory. He says that his existence in Turkey is now under threat because of immigration from countries where people think death penalty is the right punishment for homosexuals and he doesn't want that to happen in UK too. He is well aware of anti LGBT rhetoric by Tories. But he believes the other problem to be a bigger threat. So it's a compromise he made. If you talk to people with an open mind, you will be surprised by how complex every individual is and what drives their voting choices. " If it came out that someone voted for the modern iteration of the Nazi party, would you say that you can't judge them by the party they vote for? (Note I am not calling Tories Nazis, just saying that saying you can't judge someone by their voting record is absurd)" That's simple. A nazi party's manifesto would be so extreme. So someone voting for that party wouldn't have any argument to fall back on. For the same reason why I wouldn't trust anyone voting for the modern version of Stalin or Mao too. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" And yet you're talking about politics as "parties people vote for" again, and I've only ever talked about politics in terms of societal values. I was replying to a post that which mentioned something about Tories causing bloodshed and people who voted for it. Did you know that parties exist other than the Tories and the Labour party, that people can vote for other people or not at all? Yes and they are useless in an FPTP system. If any party promises proportional representation, I would vote for them the next election. This way, I have less compromises to make in the future elections. Did you know that judgement exists in degrees, so that I can judge a Tory voter as further from my values than a Labour voter, even if neither party is totally within line with my values? You have the right to make the decision. But I would say that you won't get the expected outcome you are looking for. People vote for so many reasons. Election manifestos are huge and someone would have voted for a party for various reasons. A better way would be to keep an open mind and ask the individual why they voted Tory, if it matters so much for you. You will be surprised. I know of a gay person from Turkey who voted Tory. He says that his existence in Turkey is now under threat because of immigration from countries where people think death penalty is the right punishment for homosexuals and he doesn't want that to happen in UK too. He is well aware of anti LGBT rhetoric by Tories. But he believes the other problem to be a bigger threat. So it's a compromise he made. If you talk to people with an open mind, you will be surprised by how complex every individual is and what drives their voting choices. If it came out that someone voted for the modern iteration of the Nazi party, would you say that you can't judge them by the party they vote for? (Note I am not calling Tories Nazis, just saying that saying you can't judge someone by their voting record is absurd) That's simple. A nazi party's manifesto would be so extreme. So someone voting for that party wouldn't have any argument to fall back on. For the same reason why I wouldn't trust anyone voting for the modern version of Stalin or Mao too." I find Tory policies extreme, and have yet to find any argument that would make voting for them compatible with being close to me. ... so you do think that someone voting for a political party is a reason not to be close to them, as long as it's stuff you disagree with? what the what | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" And yet you're talking about politics as "parties people vote for" again, and I've only ever talked about politics in terms of societal values. I was replying to a post that which mentioned something about Tories causing bloodshed and people who voted for it. Did you know that parties exist other than the Tories and the Labour party, that people can vote for other people or not at all? Yes and they are useless in an FPTP system. If any party promises proportional representation, I would vote for them the next election. This way, I have less compromises to make in the future elections. Did you know that judgement exists in degrees, so that I can judge a Tory voter as further from my values than a Labour voter, even if neither party is totally within line with my values? You have the right to make the decision. But I would say that you won't get the expected outcome you are looking for. People vote for so many reasons. Election manifestos are huge and someone would have voted for a party for various reasons. A better way would be to keep an open mind and ask the individual why they voted Tory, if it matters so much for you. You will be surprised. I know of a gay person from Turkey who voted Tory. He says that his existence in Turkey is now under threat because of immigration from countries where people think death penalty is the right punishment for homosexuals and he doesn't want that to happen in UK too. He is well aware of anti LGBT rhetoric by Tories. But he believes the other problem to be a bigger threat. So it's a compromise he made. If you talk to people with an open mind, you will be surprised by how complex every individual is and what drives their voting choices. If it came out that someone voted for the modern iteration of the Nazi party, would you say that you can't judge them by the party they vote for? (Note I am not calling Tories Nazis, just saying that saying you can't judge someone by their voting record is absurd) That's simple. A nazi party's manifesto would be so extreme. So someone voting for that party wouldn't have any argument to fall back on. For the same reason why I wouldn't trust anyone voting for the modern version of Stalin or Mao too. I find Tory policies extreme, and have yet to find any argument that would make voting for them compatible with being close to me. ... so you do think that someone voting for a political party is a reason not to be close to them, as long as it's stuff you disagree with? what the what " Way to gaslight! I explained my stance clearly about an election manifesto not leaving any room for justification. You created a caricature party which is actually extremist in every aspect which goes against my original argument of how a manifesto is usually a mixed bag. Having said that, as long as we are making up imaginary situations, let's assume there are only two parties in the country, one being a replica of Nazism and the other being a replica of Maoism... One could actually be excused for voting of either of these parties. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm going into either the NHS or the Military. If I met a Tory, I'd probably hate them as they are voting for the party that activity wishes to destroy my work place and leave me without a job I'd be happy in. I could never befriend never mind date a Tory, I genuinely hold them to the same level of hate and vitriol that I hold cheaters, nonces and murderers to." …not really my daughter | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" And yet you're talking about politics as "parties people vote for" again, and I've only ever talked about politics in terms of societal values. I was replying to a post that which mentioned something about Tories causing bloodshed and people who voted for it. Did you know that parties exist other than the Tories and the Labour party, that people can vote for other people or not at all? Yes and they are useless in an FPTP system. If any party promises proportional representation, I would vote for them the next election. This way, I have less compromises to make in the future elections. Did you know that judgement exists in degrees, so that I can judge a Tory voter as further from my values than a Labour voter, even if neither party is totally within line with my values? You have the right to make the decision. But I would say that you won't get the expected outcome you are looking for. People vote for so many reasons. Election manifestos are huge and someone would have voted for a party for various reasons. A better way would be to keep an open mind and ask the individual why they voted Tory, if it matters so much for you. You will be surprised. I know of a gay person from Turkey who voted Tory. He says that his existence in Turkey is now under threat because of immigration from countries where people think death penalty is the right punishment for homosexuals and he doesn't want that to happen in UK too. He is well aware of anti LGBT rhetoric by Tories. But he believes the other problem to be a bigger threat. So it's a compromise he made. If you talk to people with an open mind, you will be surprised by how complex every individual is and what drives their voting choices. If it came out that someone voted for the modern iteration of the Nazi party, would you say that you can't judge them by the party they vote for? (Note I am not calling Tories Nazis, just saying that saying you can't judge someone by their voting record is absurd) That's simple. A nazi party's manifesto would be so extreme. So someone voting for that party wouldn't have any argument to fall back on. For the same reason why I wouldn't trust anyone voting for the modern version of Stalin or Mao too. I find Tory policies extreme, and have yet to find any argument that would make voting for them compatible with being close to me. ... so you do think that someone voting for a political party is a reason not to be close to them, as long as it's stuff you disagree with? what the what Way to gaslight! I explained my stance clearly about an election manifesto not leaving any room for justification. You created a caricature party which is actually extremist in every aspect which goes against my original argument of how a manifesto is usually a mixed bag. Having said that, as long as we are making up imaginary situations, let's assume there are only two parties in the country, one being a replica of Nazism and the other being a replica of Maoism... One could actually be excused for voting of either of these parties. " It's not a strawman. You said it's not rational to judge by what party one votes for, then said that you'd judge if someone voted for a political party. That's hypocritical. And one could be excused for voting for any one party, be it the Nazis, the Tories, the Elephants or the Everyone Gets Everything Party. I don't have to excuse it. My life, my choice. I can choose to be friends or lovers on the basis of anything I want to. One of my criteria is values. If someone has similar values to me and they vote Tory, they don't understand politics at all. Unfortunately for them, another criterion of mine is basic common sense, and with my values, that would be fucking deranged. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"... One of the major factors of this for me is she's rather right wing, a habitual Tory voter no matter what the issue, who's in charge, the current policies or anything, from a rich family and basically grew up doing as her father told her and nowadays the daily mail..." This is bizarre, how can the OP possibly know all these lazy stereotypes about her? It's almost as if he's made it up But, hey, for the sake of balance One of the major factors of this for me is he's rather left wing, a habitual Labour voter no matter what the issue, who's in charge, the current policies or anything, from a poor family and basically grew up doing as his father told him and nowadays the daily mirror | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"... One of the major factors of this for me is she's rather right wing, a habitual Tory voter no matter what the issue, who's in charge, the current policies or anything, from a rich family and basically grew up doing as her father told her and nowadays the daily mail... This is bizarre, how can the OP possibly know all these lazy stereotypes about her? It's almost as if he's made it up But, hey, for the sake of balance One of the major factors of this for me is he's rather left wing, a habitual Labour voter no matter what the issue, who's in charge, the current policies or anything, from a poor family and basically grew up doing as his father told him and nowadays the daily mirror" Someone would be perfectly entitled to not be in a relationship with someone if what's listed here is not in line with their values. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Way to gaslight! I explained my stance clearly about an election manifesto not leaving any room for justification. You created a caricature party which is actually extremist in every aspect which goes against my original argument of how a manifesto is usually a mixed bag. Having said that, as long as we are making up imaginary situations, let's assume there are only two parties in the country, one being a replica of Nazism and the other being a replica of Maoism... One could actually be excused for voting of either of these parties. It's not a strawman. You said it's not rational to judge by what party one votes for, then said that you'd judge if someone voted for a political party. That's hypocritical. And one could be excused for voting for any one party, be it the Nazis, the Tories, the Elephants or the Everyone Gets Everything Party. I don't have to excuse it. My life, my choice. I can choose to be friends or lovers on the basis of anything I want to. " In most modern democracies, it doesn't make sense to judge someone based on the party they vote because there aren't any extreme parties like that. That's why backed my argument by explaining how election manifesto is huge and there could be reasons for people to vote for these parties. But you used an example of a party which doesn't have any room for such excuse which doesn't fit into the explanation I gave, which is a strawman. " One of my criteria is values. If someone has similar values to me and they vote Tory, they don't understand politics at all. Unfortunately for them, another criterion of mine is basic common sense, and with my values, that would be fucking deranged. " Calling someone deranged just because they have similar values to you but vote for Tories is a bit arrogant, to be honest. I just gave an example of why a gay person voted for Tory. I also gave examples of how the uncertainty around Brexit pushed many liberals to vote for Tories. None of them are deranged. Hell even liberal values have changed over time. Freedom of speech was a core tenet of liberalism in the past. Modern liberals on the other hand aren't particularly pro-freedom of speech. If values of individuals and even an ideology can change so rapidly, and politicians and change their own views like a chameleons, a person who shares your views but voting for Tories isn't as deranged as you think. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm going into either the NHS or the Military. If I met a Tory, I'd probably hate them as they are voting for the party that activity wishes to destroy my work place and leave me without a job I'd be happy in. I could never befriend never mind date a Tory, I genuinely hold them to the same level of hate and vitriol that I hold cheaters, nonces and murderers to." Absolute nonsense | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Way to gaslight! I explained my stance clearly about an election manifesto not leaving any room for justification. You created a caricature party which is actually extremist in every aspect which goes against my original argument of how a manifesto is usually a mixed bag. Having said that, as long as we are making up imaginary situations, let's assume there are only two parties in the country, one being a replica of Nazism and the other being a replica of Maoism... One could actually be excused for voting of either of these parties. It's not a strawman. You said it's not rational to judge by what party one votes for, then said that you'd judge if someone voted for a political party. That's hypocritical. And one could be excused for voting for any one party, be it the Nazis, the Tories, the Elephants or the Everyone Gets Everything Party. I don't have to excuse it. My life, my choice. I can choose to be friends or lovers on the basis of anything I want to. In most modern democracies, it doesn't make sense to judge someone based on the party they vote because there aren't any extreme parties like that. That's why backed my argument by explaining how election manifesto is huge and there could be reasons for people to vote for these parties. But you used an example of a party which doesn't have any room for such excuse which doesn't fit into the explanation I gave, which is a strawman. One of my criteria is values. If someone has similar values to me and they vote Tory, they don't understand politics at all. Unfortunately for them, another criterion of mine is basic common sense, and with my values, that would be fucking deranged. Calling someone deranged just because they have similar values to you but vote for Tories is a bit arrogant, to be honest. I just gave an example of why a gay person voted for Tory. I also gave examples of how the uncertainty around Brexit pushed many liberals to vote for Tories. None of them are deranged. Hell even liberal values have changed over time. Freedom of speech was a core tenet of liberalism in the past. Modern liberals on the other hand aren't particularly pro-freedom of speech. If values of individuals and even an ideology can change so rapidly, and politicians and change their own views like a chameleons, a person who shares your views but voting for Tories isn't as deranged as you think." Are there no extreme parties? I would have thought the Overton window moves and continues to move, and therefore judging "modern parties" as not extreme is just saying that the new normal is not extreme. The fact that you've had to redefine your position to try to claim that you're correct is just desperate. I said anyone with *my values* voting for a Tory is deranged, not all Tory voters are deranged. From the position of X, "voting Tory" is profoundly illogical to the point of derangement. Your Turkish person voting Tory is showing themselves being Tory. I've immigrated, now it's inconvenient to me for others to get what I've had. I've got mine, so fuck you. Like any Tory, it's as sexually attractive to me as a fetid turd. It also ignores that being illiberal on immigration is to some extent a cross party issue now. I'm glad you can twist yourself into a pretzel to claim some sort of moral victory though. I don't think it'll get any more Tories laid, though. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm going into either the NHS or the Military. If I met a Tory, I'd probably hate them as they are voting for the party that activity wishes to destroy my work place and leave me without a job I'd be happy in. I could never befriend never mind date a Tory, I genuinely hold them to the same level of hate and vitriol that I hold cheaters, nonces and murderers to. Absolute nonsense " Got any points for that or just giving a pointless statement? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm going into either the NHS or the Military. If I met a Tory, I'd probably hate them as they are voting for the party that activity wishes to destroy my work place and leave me without a job I'd be happy in. I could never befriend never mind date a Tory, I genuinely hold them to the same level of hate and vitriol that I hold cheaters, nonces and murderers to. Absolute nonsense Got any points for that or just giving a pointless statement?" I do love how everyone is entitled to anything when it comes to sex - except not fucking a Tory. No blacks no dogs no Irish but the poor Tories etc *shrug* | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm going into either the NHS or the Military. If I met a Tory, I'd probably hate them as they are voting for the party that activity wishes to destroy my work place and leave me without a job I'd be happy in. I could never befriend never mind date a Tory, I genuinely hold them to the same level of hate and vitriol that I hold cheaters, nonces and murderers to." Good luck.. I predict a pretty short career in either if you don't learn to wind your neck in.. Do wish you well though.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm going into either the NHS or the Military. If I met a Tory, I'd probably hate them as they are voting for the party that activity wishes to destroy my work place and leave me without a job I'd be happy in. I could never befriend never mind date a Tory, I genuinely hold them to the same level of hate and vitriol that I hold cheaters, nonces and murderers to." You hate cheaters as much as nonces and murderers? That's extreme either way it's interpreted | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm going into either the NHS or the Military. If I met a Tory, I'd probably hate them as they are voting for the party that activity wishes to destroy my work place and leave me without a job I'd be happy in. I could never befriend never mind date a Tory, I genuinely hold them to the same level of hate and vitriol that I hold cheaters, nonces and murderers to. You hate cheaters as much as nonces and murderers? That's extreme either way it's interpreted" Yes, I do hate people that enjoy causing long term psychological pain to children. Got cheated on by a nonce when I was 15 so I kind of learnt that they're both just groups of pure evil. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm going into either the NHS or the Military. If I met a Tory, I'd probably hate them as they are voting for the party that activity wishes to destroy my work place and leave me without a job I'd be happy in. I could never befriend never mind date a Tory, I genuinely hold them to the same level of hate and vitriol that I hold cheaters, nonces and murderers to. Absolute nonsense Got any points for that or just giving a pointless statement?" Oh where to start: If you’re planning on a career in either of those areas at some point you’ll be (albeit indirectly) under the control of a Tory government; I appreciate you’ve swallowed the narrative that the NHS is at threat from a Tory government, however I’ve no idea where you’ve arrived at the assumption the Military will be defunct too; The chances are you already know plenty of Tory voters, they just probably don’t talk politics with someone who is so closed minded. Lose the hate, it’s really not a good look | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm going into either the NHS or the Military. If I met a Tory, I'd probably hate them as they are voting for the party that activity wishes to destroy my work place and leave me without a job I'd be happy in. I could never befriend never mind date a Tory, I genuinely hold them to the same level of hate and vitriol that I hold cheaters, nonces and murderers to. Good luck.. I predict a pretty short career in either if you don't learn to wind your neck in.. Do wish you well though.." Oh no, my real life career is going to end quickly because I say random shit that hurts noone on an online form. What ever will I do. This is the internet, not real life. Noone cares what we say on here. It ain't that deep. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm going into either the NHS or the Military. If I met a Tory, I'd probably hate them as they are voting for the party that activity wishes to destroy my work place and leave me without a job I'd be happy in. I could never befriend never mind date a Tory, I genuinely hold them to the same level of hate and vitriol that I hold cheaters, nonces and murderers to. Good luck.. I predict a pretty short career in either if you don't learn to wind your neck in.. Do wish you well though.. Oh no, my real life career is going to end quickly because I say random shit that hurts noone on an online form. What ever will I do. This is the internet, not real life. Noone cares what we say on here. It ain't that deep." Go for the army. You’ll have a great time with the lads in there | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm going into either the NHS or the Military. If I met a Tory, I'd probably hate them as they are voting for the party that activity wishes to destroy my work place and leave me without a job I'd be happy in. I could never befriend never mind date a Tory, I genuinely hold them to the same level of hate and vitriol that I hold cheaters, nonces and murderers to. You hate cheaters as much as nonces and murderers? That's extreme either way it's interpreted Yes, I do hate people that enjoy causing long term psychological pain to children. Got cheated on by a nonce when I was 15 so I kind of learnt that they're both just groups of pure evil. " Remind me never to play Monopoly with you, I usually slip a couple of quid from the bank when no one's looking | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm going into either the NHS or the Military. If I met a Tory, I'd probably hate them as they are voting for the party that activity wishes to destroy my work place and leave me without a job I'd be happy in. I could never befriend never mind date a Tory, I genuinely hold them to the same level of hate and vitriol that I hold cheaters, nonces and murderers to. Absolute nonsense Got any points for that or just giving a pointless statement? Oh where to start: If you’re planning on a career in either of those areas at some point you’ll be (albeit indirectly) under the control of a Tory government; I appreciate you’ve swallowed the narrative that the NHS is at threat from a Tory government, however I’ve no idea where you’ve arrived at the assumption the Military will be defunct too; The chances are you already know plenty of Tory voters, they just probably don’t talk politics with someone who is so closed minded. Lose the hate, it’s really not a good look " Read the news, the Tories don't seem to like either institution honestly. As for the hate, I've seen the Tory government destroy this nation, I have every right to hate them. They have actively made my life worse. Maybe it's fine for you because your generation never had struggles like those before you or after you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I would never sleep with anyone that disagreed with my stance on the plight/ experience of Black people, and actually on a great deal of other social issues (misogyny, homophobia, transphobia, classism, etc). There are plenty of Labour voters that I disagree with on these things about and wouldn’t be in a relationship with them either. Yeah, it's amazing that people think that "empathy with swathes of humanity and a shared sense of common decency" is trivial or shallow. I'll fuck people with brown eyes and blue eyes, and people who like fig on pizza and not, but people whose fundamental views on society are repugnant? dafuq no There is a difference between one's moral views and what party they vote for. Practically speaking, we pretty much have a two party system here. Majority of people in the country(or any other country for that matter) are moderates who do not pledge their lives to one party. Most people here have voted for Tories at least once in their life. These people make their voting choices based on the circumstances. I know of some remainers who voted Tory last time because they were just pissed of with the way the process was dragged out. Which party someone voted for in the last election doesn't say anything about the person's views on racism, homophobia or anything." This is a great point. I'll extend my "I wouldn't fuck a Tory" and include "I wouldn't fuck people who voted Tory to get things like Brexit done"... the Tories stand against far too many progressive issues, I just couldn't fuck someone who was willing to throw many under the bus. I mean, imagine standing against Homophobia, Islamophobia, Classism etc but still opting to help bring a Tory gov back in because they just wanted Brexit done as fast as possible. For me though, Tory isn't just a political position, its a mindset. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Are there no extreme parties? I would have thought the Overton window moves and continues to move, and therefore judging "modern parties" as not extreme is just saying that the new normal is not extreme. " There are limits on both the left and right. Overton window moving doesn't change that. As long as the window remains well within the bounds, it is not mandatory to have extremist parties. " The fact that you've had to redefine your position to try to claim that you're correct is just desperate. " I did not have to redefine my position. I posted my explanation about the manifesto long back. " I said anyone with *my values* voting for a Tory is deranged, not all Tory voters are deranged. From the position of X, "voting Tory" is profoundly illogical to the point of derangement. " I also said the same thing about people having your values voting Tories. The voter swing last election was a clear example. Corbyn wasn't making a clear stance and many people who would never vote Tories voted for them simply because they were tired of back and forth with Brexit. " Your Turkish person voting Tory is showing themselves being Tory. I've immigrated, now it's inconvenient to me for others to get what I've had. I've got mine, so fuck you. " Rushing into a judgement like this is exactly what I call arrogance. Europeans have never faced the effect of living next to religious extremists. Turkey used to be very liberal for years. But they are losing it now because Erdogan takes lots of immigrants who threaten gay rights in the country. Sure one can follow deontology and claim that the outcome doesn't matter and it's the act that is moral or immoral. But others believe in consequentialism where the outcome is all that matters, which is what he did. He wanted to protect his right to live as a gay person. " It also ignores that being illiberal on immigration is to some extent a cross party issue now. " Which is exactly my point too. Some people say Starmer is more right wing than Tories. Tories oversaw highest immigration ever in UK. So maybe, in the next election, Labour is more far away from your values than Tories? " I'm glad you can twist yourself into a pretzel to claim some sort of moral victory though. I don't think it'll get any more Tories laid, though." I don't think this is a war and I don't claim victories. I just pointed out my experience of talking to people without rushing into conclusion about their character. As for Tories getting laid, I am pretty sure they don't have any problems with that. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Opposite sport teams, it’s a much more difficult situation " Thankfully, none of the women I've dated have been into sport. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm going into either the NHS or the Military. If I met a Tory, I'd probably hate them as they are voting for the party that activity wishes to destroy my work place and leave me without a job I'd be happy in. I could never befriend never mind date a Tory, I genuinely hold them to the same level of hate and vitriol that I hold cheaters, nonces and murderers to." I understand NHS. Curious to know what happened with the military. Have probably missed the news around that. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I said anyone with *my values* voting for a Tory is deranged, not all Tory voters are deranged. From the position of X, "voting Tory" is profoundly illogical to the point of derangement. I also said the same thing about people having your values voting Tories. The voter swing last election was a clear example. Corbyn wasn't making a clear stance and many people who would never vote Tories voted for them simply because they were tired of back and forth with Brexit. " Cute that you assume that "my values" are the Labour party or anything approaching it. I'm not tied to a political party at all, and I certainly wouldn't vote for a proven liar buffoon because his party had fucked something up, so his party can resolve the fucking up. " Rushing into a judgement like this is exactly what I call arrogance. Europeans have never faced the effect of living next to religious extremists. Turkey used to be very liberal for years. But they are losing it now because Erdogan takes lots of immigrants who threaten gay rights in the country. Sure one can follow deontology and claim that the outcome doesn't matter and it's the act that is moral or immoral. But others believe in consequentialism where the outcome is all that matters, which is what he did. He wanted to protect his right to live as a gay person. " Yes yes, I can do big words too. What's the difference between "consequentialism" and "I've got mine, so fuck you" in this example, please? And why do we accept that Europeans are allowed to feel compassion and have higher values and people from other countries (I'm not European fwiw) are allowed to be selfish shitstains? Further, do we not look back and see what causes the rise of religious and other extremism, and see European meddling in the area and repression of people resulting in a rebound of extremism? Will we deal with that? Will we fuck. We'll just say it's ok for refugees to drown. I've got mine! Fuck you! " Which is exactly my point too. Some people say Starmer is more right wing than Tories. Tories oversaw highest immigration ever in UK. So maybe, in the next election, Labour is more far away from your values than Tories?" So the Tories have been incompetent in their stated goals about immigration, Labour might have a shred of competence in doing something I disagree with, therefore I should move more Tory? Christ almighty I would be embarrassed by this attempt at political analysis when I was in primary school. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And this isn't in the political forum because..." ... because it should be in 'Swingers chat' where a high proportion of 'The Lounge' posts really belong. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Cute that you assume that "my values" are the Labour party or anything approaching it. I'm not tied to a political party at all, and I certainly wouldn't vote for a proven liar buffoon because his party had fucked something up, so his party can resolve the fucking up. " That would be error on my part. I respect the reason why you wouldn't vote Tories. Some people believe that the uncertainty caused by Brexit would be much more damaging to the country than just getting it done and focus on the future. Economic outcomes are impossible to predict in the longer run. People do their best. You win some, you lose some. " Yes yes, I can do big words too. What's the difference between "consequentialism" and "I've got mine, so fuck you" in this example, please? " Deontology - Opening borders to anyone who shows up is the right act, irrespective of the outcome. Consequentialism - Taking more people who view that death penalty is the right punishment for gays would cause erosion of gay rights, which is a bad consequence. So we have to be careful with such immigration if we want to protect gay rights. " And why do we accept that Europeans are allowed to feel compassion and have higher values and people from other countries (I'm not European fwiw) are allowed to be selfish shitstains? " A guy who had to run away from his hometown because he was surrounded by people who openly talked about stoning gay people to death is a selfish shitstain? Way to be empathetic. You talk like this because you have never first hand experienced this situation. He would gladly support immigration for fellow people from LGBT community by the way. " Further, do we not look back and see what causes the rise of religious and other extremism, and see European meddling in the area and repression of people resulting in a rebound of extremism? Will we deal with that? Will we fuck. We'll just say it's ok for refugees to drown. I've got mine! Fuck you! " You mean the meddling done by Blair in the middle east? Sure we can do it by making sure we don't let new versions of Blair win. " So the Tories have been incompetent in their stated goals about immigration, Labour might have a shred of competence in doing something I disagree with, therefore I should move more Tory? Christ almighty I would be embarrassed by this attempt at political analysis when I was in primary school. " Strawman again. I did not say you should move more Tory. You say that controlling immigration is something you disagree with. If Labour also are doing the same thing and also follow Tory blue print in most other issues, doesn't that mean you should stop dating Labour voters too? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm going into either the NHS or the Military. If I met a Tory, I'd probably hate them as they are voting for the party that activity wishes to destroy my work place and leave me without a job I'd be happy in. I could never befriend never mind date a Tory, I genuinely hold them to the same level of hate and vitriol that I hold cheaters, nonces and murderers to. Good luck.. I predict a pretty short career in either if you don't learn to wind your neck in.. Do wish you well though.. Oh no, my real life career is going to end quickly because I say random shit that hurts noone on an online form. What ever will I do. This is the internet, not real life. Noone cares what we say on here. It ain't that deep." My point being that if you go into one and spout the same nonsense as this you'll very quickly be sat on your arse by someone.. In the other you'll probably get a residential course to explore your inner thoughts.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Way to gaslight! I explained my stance clearly about an election manifesto not leaving any room for justification. You created a caricature party which is actually extremist in every aspect which goes against my original argument of how a manifesto is usually a mixed bag. Having said that, as long as we are making up imaginary situations, let's assume there are only two parties in the country, one being a replica of Nazism and the other being a replica of Maoism... One could actually be excused for voting of either of these parties. It's not a strawman. You said it's not rational to judge by what party one votes for, then said that you'd judge if someone voted for a political party. That's hypocritical. And one could be excused for voting for any one party, be it the Nazis, the Tories, the Elephants or the Everyone Gets Everything Party. I don't have to excuse it. My life, my choice. I can choose to be friends or lovers on the basis of anything I want to. In most modern democracies, it doesn't make sense to judge someone based on the party they vote because there aren't any extreme parties like that. That's why backed my argument by explaining how election manifesto is huge and there could be reasons for people to vote for these parties. But you used an example of a party which doesn't have any room for such excuse which doesn't fit into the explanation I gave, which is a strawman. One of my criteria is values. If someone has similar values to me and they vote Tory, they don't understand politics at all. Unfortunately for them, another criterion of mine is basic common sense, and with my values, that would be fucking deranged. Calling someone deranged just because they have similar values to you but vote for Tories is a bit arrogant, to be honest. I just gave an example of why a gay person voted for Tory. I also gave examples of how the uncertainty around Brexit pushed many liberals to vote for Tories. None of them are deranged. Hell even liberal values have changed over time. Freedom of speech was a core tenet of liberalism in the past. Modern liberals on the other hand aren't particularly pro-freedom of speech. If values of individuals and even an ideology can change so rapidly, and politicians and change their own views like a chameleons, a person who shares your views but voting for Tories isn't as deranged as you think." You're wasting your time with 'far left' posters. As you've said already, there are no mainstream 'extreme' parties in the UK, although plenty will try to convince you Tories and Reform are extreme parties. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm going into either the NHS or the Military. If I met a Tory, I'd probably hate them as they are voting for the party that activity wishes to destroy my work place and leave me without a job I'd be happy in. I could never befriend never mind date a Tory, I genuinely hold them to the same level of hate and vitriol that I hold cheaters, nonces and murderers to. Good luck.. I predict a pretty short career in either if you don't learn to wind your neck in.. Do wish you well though.. Oh no, my real life career is going to end quickly because I say random shit that hurts noone on an online form. What ever will I do. This is the internet, not real life. Noone cares what we say on here. It ain't that deep. My point being that if you go into one and spout the same nonsense as this you'll very quickly be sat on your arse by someone.. In the other you'll probably get a residential course to explore your inner thoughts.." You're talking as if you're my parent or something. This is the internet, we can be edgy here. That's like...the entire point. Its a fun place to just say your inner intrusive thoughts. Like yeah, removing a few billion from the population would probably be beneficial for the species but would you catch me saying that IRL? Fuck no, I'm dumb but I'm not that dumb. And trust me, if it comes to it, I'll simply play the trans card...or any other appropriate minority card and boom...zero consequences. Also, what nonsense? I'm simply saying that I dislike the conservative government, adulterers and nonces. I don't see why anyone would resort to physical violence because of that. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And trust me, if it comes to it, I'll simply play the trans card...or any other appropriate minority card and boom...zero consequences. " Everything that is wrong with today's society | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And trust me, if it comes to it, I'll simply play the trans card...or any other appropriate minority card and boom...zero consequences. Everything that is wrong with today's society " Haha exactly, crazy how throwing a different pronoun on someone can yield such different results. But shit, as we must embrace the new social norms. I for one will happily embrace them! I mean, it gets me free shit so I'm not complaining. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And trust me, if it comes to it, I'll simply play the trans card...or any other appropriate minority card and boom...zero consequences. Everything that is wrong with today's society " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And trust me, if it comes to it, I'll simply play the trans card...or any other appropriate minority card and boom...zero consequences. Everything that is wrong with today's society Haha exactly, crazy how throwing a different pronoun on someone can yield such different results. But shit, as we must embrace the new social norms. I for one will happily embrace them! I mean, it gets me free shit so I'm not complaining." It wouldn't get different results from the majority of people. Judging by your comments on this thread so far, I can only but say... Good luck to you in the real world. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And trust me, if it comes to it, I'll simply play the trans card...or any other appropriate minority card and boom...zero consequences. Everything that is wrong with today's society Haha exactly, crazy how throwing a different pronoun on someone can yield such different results. But shit, as we must embrace the new social norms. I for one will happily embrace them! I mean, it gets me free shit so I'm not complaining." Only works on those who actually faux care. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And trust me, if it comes to it, I'll simply play the trans card...or any other appropriate minority card and boom...zero consequences. Everything that is wrong with today's society Haha exactly, crazy how throwing a different pronoun on someone can yield such different results. But shit, as we must embrace the new social norms. I for one will happily embrace them! I mean, it gets me free shit so I'm not complaining. It wouldn't get different results from the majority of people. Judging by your comments on this thread so far, I can only but say... Good luck to you in the real world. " Ah but it would get different results from the people that matter! Well, like everyone else my age on the internet. Real world me and Internet me are 2 very different people! People 30+ always treat the internet like an extension of reality or some shit and take it so seriously. People my age and younger treat this for what it was created for! A place to be a different person! You'll actually find it is great for removing stress! As for the real world. Thank you! I've been on it for 22 years now and I've done a pretty damn good job, all my heavily racist remarks and edgy comments havn't really effected my real life funnily enough. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"……… My only point, M, will be that one may not use the NHS now, but if one is hit by the proverbial bus, one WILL be collected by a state funded ambulance to a state hospital and placed in a state funded ward until such a time as one is fit to be transported to the private hospital of choosing. There are very few private hospitals with intestive or critical care facilities so anyone needing such care will end up in the NHS system, more likely than not. I understand some people do successfully avoid the NHS and state education for the majority of the time, but it's never a cert. The state is there, picking up the pieces of the most complex and unpredictable aspects of healthcare - emergency and trauma medicine. That also happens to be one of the most expensive areas too. " . A foreigner, without having contributed a penny in taxes to the UK, can step off a plane for the first time on British shores, injured himself at the airport and be treated the same way as your scenario. It has nothing to do with whether a person is a citizen. It’s universal for everyone within our borders. They are treated to the same degree and then transferred to private healthcare paid for by their travel insurance. Even in America and other nations without universal healthcare, in an accident or emergency, they are duty bound to save a victim, if possible. Therefore, I can’t see how the scenario posed is a matter of whether someone benefits from the ‘socialist ideal’ such as the NHS. M | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"……… My only point, M, will be that one may not use the NHS now, but if one is hit by the proverbial bus, one WILL be collected by a state funded ambulance to a state hospital and placed in a state funded ward until such a time as one is fit to be transported to the private hospital of choosing. There are very few private hospitals with intestive or critical care facilities so anyone needing such care will end up in the NHS system, more likely than not. I understand some people do successfully avoid the NHS and state education for the majority of the time, but it's never a cert. The state is there, picking up the pieces of the most complex and unpredictable aspects of healthcare - emergency and trauma medicine. That also happens to be one of the most expensive areas too. . A foreigner, without having contributed a penny in taxes to the UK, can step off a plane for the first time on British shores, injured himself at the airport and be treated the same way as your scenario. It has nothing to do with whether a person is a citizen. It’s universal for everyone within our borders. They are treated to the same degree and then transferred to private healthcare paid for by their travel insurance. Even in America and other nations without universal healthcare, in an accident or emergency, they are duty bound to save a victim, if possible. Therefore, I can’t see how the scenario posed is a matter of whether someone benefits from the ‘socialist ideal’ such as the NHS. M" I was just countering your comment that some people don't cost the NHS anything, because they effectively "opt out". They might opt out for the majority of the time, but if it ever comes to it, all of us have the safety net of a socialist healthcare system behind us. No questions asked. Questions ARE asked of people arriving on these shores. True life saving treatment is "free", yes. We don't charge back for the essentials to save life. But we do for anything else. An NHS surcharge is added to every visa granted, different amounts depending on the visa type and whether dependents are included. This gives variable access to NHS services. There is a lot more revenue recouping going on in the NHS nowadays, of people who have come from abroad for various reasons. Anyone here as a visitor for less than 6 months stay has to pay in full for NHS services, charged at 150% of NHS rate. https://www.nhs.uk/nhs-services/visiting-or-moving-to-england/how-to-access-nhs-services-in-england-if-you-are-visiting-from-abroad/ | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"……… I was just countering your comment that some people don't cost the NHS anything, because they effectively "opt out". They might opt out for the majority of the time, but if it ever comes to it, all of us have the safety net of a socialist healthcare system behind us. No questions asked. Questions ARE asked of people arriving on these shores. True life saving treatment is "free", yes. We don't charge back for the essentials to save life. But we do for anything else. An NHS surcharge is added to every visa granted, different amounts depending on the visa type and whether dependents are included. This gives variable access to NHS services. There is a lot more revenue recouping going on in the NHS nowadays, of people who have come from abroad for various reasons. Anyone here as a visitor for less than 6 months stay has to pay in full for NHS services, charged at 150% of NHS rate. https://www.nhs.uk/nhs-services/visiting-or-moving-to-england/how-to-access-nhs-services-in-england-if-you-are-visiting-from-abroad/" . By the same regard, if the NHS can recoup from foreigners, then the same can be done with private healthcare patients and their insurance here. The reason private healthcare may not have emergency departments to the same degree as a large NHS hospital is BECAUSE we have the NHS, which is covered by everyone’s taxes, including people who choose to ‘opt-out’ of their regular services. Without the NHS, there would be a system where some large private hospitals would have emergency departments and the costs would be recouped from private health insurance. M | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"……… I was just countering your comment that some people don't cost the NHS anything, because they effectively "opt out". They might opt out for the majority of the time, but if it ever comes to it, all of us have the safety net of a socialist healthcare system behind us. No questions asked. Questions ARE asked of people arriving on these shores. True life saving treatment is "free", yes. We don't charge back for the essentials to save life. But we do for anything else. An NHS surcharge is added to every visa granted, different amounts depending on the visa type and whether dependents are included. This gives variable access to NHS services. There is a lot more revenue recouping going on in the NHS nowadays, of people who have come from abroad for various reasons. Anyone here as a visitor for less than 6 months stay has to pay in full for NHS services, charged at 150% of NHS rate. https://www.nhs.uk/nhs-services/visiting-or-moving-to-england/how-to-access-nhs-services-in-england-if-you-are-visiting-from-abroad/ . By the same regard, if the NHS can recoup from foreigners, then the same can be done with private healthcare patients and their insurance here. The reason private healthcare may not have emergency departments to the same degree as a large NHS hospital is BECAUSE we have the NHS, which is covered by everyone’s taxes, including people who choose to ‘opt-out’ of their regular services. Without the NHS, there would be a system where some large private hospitals would have emergency departments and the costs would be recouped from private health insurance. M" Some of us are completely uninsurable, M. I can't even get life insurance. Private healthcare would mean me dying or being dead already. The copays required in places like the USA would have us bankrupt. We don't all have the privilege of having had private healthcare from the word go. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
". These threads do make me laugh. So fucking dramatic. Luckily they’re not usually in the lounge. Shouldn’t this be somewhere else? " Nora.. Tom has never heard you swear before... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"……… Some of us are completely uninsurable, M. I can't even get life insurance. Private healthcare would mean me dying or being dead already. The copays required in places like the USA would have us bankrupt. We don't all have the privilege of having had private healthcare from the word go. " . I understand the predicament of the uninsurable. However, the question posed was ‘"………You don't benefit from any of the perks of socialism such as the nhs then?" To that end, in an accident, it isn’t a victim’s choice as to how and where he is taken. As per my previous post, the system is set up to be a NHS hospital is the only place available. However, in terms of cost, it could be recouped from a private health insurance. The reason it isn’t, for a citizen, is because of the taxes we all contribute, whether we choose to ‘opt-out’ or not. M | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
". These threads do make me laugh. So fucking dramatic. Luckily they’re not usually in the lounge. Shouldn’t this be somewhere else? Nora.. Tom has never heard you swear before... " That’s because the thread has been moved to Politics and she doesn’t think anyone will see it. M | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
". These threads do make me laugh. So fucking dramatic. Luckily they’re not usually in the lounge. Shouldn’t this be somewhere else? Nora.. Tom has never heard you swear before... That’s because the thread has been moved to Politics and she doesn’t think anyone will see it. M" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is "a Tory" anyway? If it's a party member, then perhaps it's understandable that people wouldn't date/sleep with them (there are ~100-150k of them or roughly 2.5% of the UK, mostly over 50). But plenty of people vote conservative for whatever reason - perhaps it's for pensions or to prevent Jeremy Corbyn gaining power, even though said people might hold Labour values dearer. Students might vote Labour because they want their fees lowered. Labour voters might support Brexit and Tory voters might support immigration. Surely what most people who say "no socialists" or "no Tories" mean is "no arseholes", which can only be ascertained through dialogue. How people vote may not reflect the perceived values of said party. Each to their own, but narrowing the pool of individuals with unique and diverse beliefs with such a crude mechanic seems... bigoted? Unless you have such a steady stream of suitors that you need to cull fast, the pity is for those narrow minded ones." It has always been a thing of the left to do, declare a hatred for tories, it is a badge of honour. Dated, misguided and goes mostly against the social warrior beliefs but hey ho | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is "a Tory" anyway? If it's a party member, then perhaps it's understandable that people wouldn't date/sleep with them (there are ~100-150k of them or roughly 2.5% of the UK, mostly over 50). But plenty of people vote conservative for whatever reason - perhaps it's for pensions or to prevent Jeremy Corbyn gaining power, even though said people might hold Labour values dearer. Students might vote Labour because they want their fees lowered. Labour voters might support Brexit and Tory voters might support immigration. Surely what most people who say "no socialists" or "no Tories" mean is "no arseholes", which can only be ascertained through dialogue. How people vote may not reflect the perceived values of said party. Each to their own, but narrowing the pool of individuals with unique and diverse beliefs with such a crude mechanic seems... bigoted? Unless you have such a steady stream of suitors that you need to cull fast, the pity is for those narrow minded ones." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I could fuck a Tory but I definitely couldn’t be in a relationship one." This . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’ve genuinely never met one that wasn’t, in one form or another, a cvnt" Is your opening question to everyone you meet related to their political affiliation? You must be the life and soul of a party | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"……… Some of us are completely uninsurable, M. I can't even get life insurance. Private healthcare would mean me dying or being dead already. The copays required in places like the USA would have us bankrupt. We don't all have the privilege of having had private healthcare from the word go. . I understand the predicament of the uninsurable. However, the question posed was ‘"………You don't benefit from any of the perks of socialism such as the nhs then?" To that end, in an accident, it isn’t a victim’s choice as to how and where he is taken. As per my previous post, the system is set up to be a NHS hospital is the only place available. However, in terms of cost, it could be recouped from a private health insurance. The reason it isn’t, for a citizen, is because of the taxes we all contribute, whether we choose to ‘opt-out’ or not. M " It's not just for accidents, M. If you go for pre planned surgery in a private hospital, paid for by insurance or your own pocket, and you suddenly take a bad turn and require intensive care, you will be shipped out to the nearest NHS intensive care unit, as soon as possible. In the days when the NHS was farming orthopaedic surgery out to private hospitals, my Dad was sent to one to see about a knee replacement. They declined to do it, as they felt his risk of bleeding or having a stroke was too high and they sent him back to the NHS hospital. I just don't want anyone thinking they will avoid using the NHS entirely, by having private health insurance. Because there's a few (very expensive) bits that private care does not cover. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is "a Tory" anyway? ..." I've always wondered why they have to take a capital 'T'. Certainly shouldn't when used as an adjective. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"……… It's not just for accidents, M.……….. private care does not cover. " . I understand what you are saying. However, it merely serves to highlight my point that the system is set up where the NHS do the heavy work BECAUSE we all contribute our taxes to it. There is no point for private hospitals to take on that work BECAUSE we have a system where our medical students and senior surgeons work for the NHS as well as private practice. Without the NHS, we needn’t contribute taxes to a universal care system, hence large private hospitals would take on the work that you have used as an example. The system would still be the same as it is now, where smaller private hospitals would rely on the big ones to do this type of medical service, except it wouldn’t be called the NHS nor be a ‘socialist ideal’ but all managed under a private healthcare system. I’m not debating the merits of each system nor individual experiences. I’m answering the original question posed, which alluded to the fact that we must have the NHS because we all benefit from it. My point is that we all benefit from it because the NHS exists. If it didn’t, we would have an alternative system. Therefore, to dismiss someone’s view that opposes ‘socialism’ by asking "You don't benefit from any of the perks of socialism such as the nhs then?" is a moot point. Again, I reiterate; we benefit from it BECAUSE it’s in place, not because we choose to rely on this ‘perk of socialism’ without suggesting that a better model may exist. M | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It would be interesting to see how people would react to a potential partner who does like your football team or has a different religion. Does that make them incompatible with your life views. Politics is a rainbow and for all the time I’ve been alive I don’t remember things being much better for the average person, Labour or Tory. They promise the world but they deliver very little change because the country is like an oil tanker which takes ages to change direction. You shouldn’t be so embedded in one particular view point. You need to embrace diversity and understand why people behave/vote the way they do. Dating someone of an opposite opinion might not be such a bad thing. Opposites can attract. " I feel that embracing tories/their ideals would be quite the opposite of embracing diversity tbh | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It would be interesting to see how people would react to a potential partner who does like your football team or has a different religion. Does that make them incompatible with your life views. Politics is a rainbow and for all the time I’ve been alive I don’t remember things being much better for the average person, Labour or Tory. They promise the world but they deliver very little change because the country is like an oil tanker which takes ages to change direction. You shouldn’t be so embedded in one particular view point. You need to embrace diversity and understand why people behave/vote the way they do. Dating someone of an opposite opinion might not be such a bad thing. Opposites can attract. I feel that embracing tories/their ideals would be quite the opposite of embracing diversity tbh" And yet by not embracing you are in fact the opposite of embracing diversity | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's a kind of stereotype that the all inclusive left play too. There always has to be a scapegoat to blame and they always perceive a Tory to be a fat, white, male, middle aged, gout ridden, port drinking, privately educated, cigar smoking imperialist. This accounts for less than half of the party. Most people who voted conservative picked the lesser of two evils to keep the deluded Jeremy Corbyn as far away from power as possible.. If that makes them a Tory then Tom is a Dutchman's Uncle " But someone who intended to vote Tory in the next General Election - that's quite different isn't it? Starmer has been the Labour Leader since 2020. Voting Conservative now isn't because of Corbyn. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It would be interesting to see how people would react to a potential partner who does like your football team or has a different religion. Does that make them incompatible with your life views. Politics is a rainbow and for all the time I’ve been alive I don’t remember things being much better for the average person, Labour or Tory. They promise the world but they deliver very little change because the country is like an oil tanker which takes ages to change direction. You shouldn’t be so embedded in one particular view point. You need to embrace diversity and understand why people behave/vote the way they do. Dating someone of an opposite opinion might not be such a bad thing. Opposites can attract. I feel that embracing tories/their ideals would be quite the opposite of embracing diversity tbh And yet by not embracing you are in fact the opposite of embracing diversity " My opposing Tories turfing Jamaican descendants that have been here their entire lives, or opposing burning ethnic minorities in tower blocks to save a few quid on cladding are better signifiers of my general stance on diversity than whether or not I’d hug someone who votes pig corpse head fkers into the highest position in the land. And then the sentient scarecrow that is Johnson. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It would be interesting to see how people would react to a potential partner who does like your football team or has a different religion. Does that make them incompatible with your life views. Politics is a rainbow and for all the time I’ve been alive I don’t remember things being much better for the average person, Labour or Tory. They promise the world but they deliver very little change because the country is like an oil tanker which takes ages to change direction. You shouldn’t be so embedded in one particular view point. You need to embrace diversity and understand why people behave/vote the way they do. Dating someone of an opposite opinion might not be such a bad thing. Opposites can attract. I feel that embracing tories/their ideals would be quite the opposite of embracing diversity tbh And yet by not embracing you are in fact the opposite of embracing diversity My opposing Tories turfing Jamaican descendants that have been here their entire lives, or opposing burning ethnic minorities in tower blocks to save a few quid on cladding are better signifiers of my general stance on diversity than whether or not I’d hug someone who votes pig corpse head fkers into the highest position in the land. And then the sentient scarecrow that is Johnson. " I couldn't taken you seriously for a minute then. Until you blamed Govt for a manufacturer/building control officer issue. Try loving, it's much easier than hating and division. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm going into either the NHS or the Military. If I met a Tory, I'd probably hate them as they are voting for the party that activity wishes to destroy my work place and leave me without a job I'd be happy in. I could never befriend never mind date a Tory, I genuinely hold them to the same level of hate and vitriol that I hold cheaters, nonces and murderers to." What a pathetic, disgusting response… grow up for fucks sake | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"How does a Tory voter not see the irony in telling anyone to ‘try loving’ when they vote for the dogs whose policies see mentally ill people dying emaciated in their beds. The party who wanted Covid to slice through our grannies like a hot knife through butter. ‘Love Is…murdering the weak & the infirm’" You're the second person today to put me in the wrong box. Try harder | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"How does a Tory voter not see the irony in telling anyone to ‘try loving’ when they vote for the dogs whose policies see mentally ill people dying emaciated in their beds. The party who wanted Covid to slice through our grannies like a hot knife through butter. ‘Love Is…murdering the weak & the infirm’ You're the second person today to put me in the wrong box. Try harder " If it looks like a duck…. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"How does a Tory voter not see the irony in telling anyone to ‘try loving’ when they vote for the dogs whose policies see mentally ill people dying emaciated in their beds. The party who wanted Covid to slice through our grannies like a hot knife through butter. ‘Love Is…murdering the weak & the infirm’" The Tories literally pissed half a trillion quid down the drain on lockdowns, furlough, and “saving the NHS”. How much more should they have spent? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"How does a Tory voter not see the irony in telling anyone to ‘try loving’ when they vote for the dogs whose policies see mentally ill people dying emaciated in their beds. The party who wanted Covid to slice through our grannies like a hot knife through butter. ‘Love Is…murdering the weak & the infirm’ The Tories literally pissed half a trillion quid down the drain on lockdowns, furlough, and “saving the NHS”. How much more should they have spent?" So once they realised they couldn't just let a virus ravage the country, the Tories reluctantly budgeted to keep people alive and healthy - which you apparently think was a waste of money - so we should what? Congratulate them for their profound sense of humanity? Send them a thank you card for doing some of what was required, however late and incompetently, instead of watching passively as even more people died? On the question of how much more they should have spent, let's start with enough to keep infected people quarantined in hospital instead of sending them into care homes. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm going into either the NHS or the Military. If I met a Tory, I'd probably hate them as they are voting for the party that activity wishes to destroy my work place and leave me without a job I'd be happy in. I could never befriend never mind date a Tory, I genuinely hold them to the same level of hate and vitriol that I hold cheaters, nonces and murderers to. What a pathetic, disgusting response… grow up for fucks sake " And how is it disgusting? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"How does a Tory voter not see the irony in telling anyone to ‘try loving’ when they vote for the dogs whose policies see mentally ill people dying emaciated in their beds. The party who wanted Covid to slice through our grannies like a hot knife through butter. ‘Love Is…murdering the weak & the infirm’ The Tories literally pissed half a trillion quid down the drain on lockdowns, furlough, and “saving the NHS”. How much more should they have spent?" I hope you’re proud of your grubby little disingenuous statement. Maybe the difference between Tory voters and compassionate human beings is that it would genuinely weigh heavy on my mind leaving that kind of wilfully ignorant statement up on a public forum ¯\__/¯ | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"How does a Tory voter not see the irony in telling anyone to ‘try loving’ when they vote for the dogs whose policies see mentally ill people dying emaciated in their beds. The party who wanted Covid to slice through our grannies like a hot knife through butter. ‘Love Is…murdering the weak & the infirm’ You're the second person today to put me in the wrong box. Try harder If it looks like a duck…." Can you point to one statement I've made on this thread that makes me a Tory? I doubt you can... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"How does a Tory voter not see the irony in telling anyone to ‘try loving’ when they vote for the dogs whose policies see mentally ill people dying emaciated in their beds. The party who wanted Covid to slice through our grannies like a hot knife through butter. ‘Love Is…murdering the weak & the infirm’ You're the second person today to put me in the wrong box. Try harder If it looks like a duck…. Can you point to one statement I've made on this thread that makes me a Tory? I doubt you can..." It's weird you think anyone can be arsed with deciphering your secret belief system instead of just taking your posts at face value like everyone else's. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is "a Tory" anyway? ... I've always wondered why they have to take a capital 'T'. Certainly shouldn't when used as an adjective." Same reason we have Wanker and Cunt Calm down at the back. That genuinely is a joke! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm going into either the NHS or the Military. If I met a Tory, I'd probably hate them as they are voting for the party that activity wishes to destroy my work place and leave me without a job I'd be happy in. I could never befriend never mind date a Tory, I genuinely hold them to the same level of hate and vitriol that I hold cheaters, nonces and murderers to. What a pathetic, disgusting response… grow up for fucks sake And how is it disgusting?" If you cant see why your more stupid than I initially thought you were… | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"How does a Tory voter not see the irony in telling anyone to ‘try loving’ when they vote for the dogs whose policies see mentally ill people dying emaciated in their beds. The party who wanted Covid to slice through our grannies like a hot knife through butter. ‘Love Is…murdering the weak & the infirm’ You're the second person today to put me in the wrong box. Try harder If it looks like a duck…. Can you point to one statement I've made on this thread that makes me a Tory? I doubt you can... It's weird you think anyone can be arsed with deciphering your secret belief system instead of just taking your posts at face value like everyone else's." Can't be arsed but happy to jump into a conversation that doesn't concern you? Can you point to one statement on this thread that implies I'm a Tory? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm going into either the NHS or the Military. If I met a Tory, I'd probably hate them as they are voting for the party that activity wishes to destroy my work place and leave me without a job I'd be happy in. I could never befriend never mind date a Tory, I genuinely hold them to the same level of hate and vitriol that I hold cheaters, nonces and murderers to. What a pathetic, disgusting response… grow up for fucks sake And how is it disgusting? If you cant see why your more stupid than I initially thought you were…" And why is it left wingers are so hateful?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm going into either the NHS or the Military. If I met a Tory, I'd probably hate them as they are voting for the party that activity wishes to destroy my work place and leave me without a job I'd be happy in. I could never befriend never mind date a Tory, I genuinely hold them to the same level of hate and vitriol that I hold cheaters, nonces and murderers to. What a pathetic, disgusting response… grow up for fucks sake And how is it disgusting? If you cant see why your more stupid than I initially thought you were… And why is it left wingers are so hateful?? " They preach love and inclusively but behave in the opposite manner. Its part of their make up. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |