FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Gary Lineker Madness
Gary Lineker Madness
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"In fact, on the BBC News home page is a headline that the BBC are going to be having words with him" I hope it's to give him a pay rise or promotion. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Whether he has a point or not, he is employed by the BBC and so, really, he should learn to be rather more careful with the language he uses. The BBC is supposed to remain impartial, and while he's never really been bothered about keeping his views to himself, I feel that his particular choice of word could get him into some trouble on this occasion. There are a lot of people on Twitter calling on him to be sacked - expecially given that TV license payers are funding this blokes £1.3 Million salary" Which choice of word? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I mean, can anyone disagree with him?" Yes .. It's called opinion... He's a smarmy privileged git and whilst I don't agree on all the points of the new law , some I actually do .. And it's not his place to say and he should be reprimanded for it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I mean, can anyone disagree with him? Yes .. It's called opinion... He's a smarmy privileged git and whilst I don't agree on all the points of the new law , some I actually do .. And it's not his place to say and he should be reprimanded for it." I believe anyone can pass comment on government policy? Which parts of the new laws, which breach international law do you agree with? No refugee, no asylum seekers is illegal. There are almost no legal channels on to this country, one of the official channels from Afghanistan has never been used. We have 0.02% of the world's refugees coming here, less than 46000 people came on boats last year, they aren't the problem | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I mean, can anyone disagree with him? Yes .. It's called opinion... He's a smarmy privileged git and whilst I don't agree on all the points of the new law , some I actually do .. And it's not his place to say and he should be reprimanded for it." That privileged he openly houses refugees in his own home | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Regardless of his views he works for the BBC and should really know better than to post them on social media. They’re supposed to remain impartial. Rightly or wrongly so many celebrities have been sacked for sharing what can be seen as controversial views and opinions over social media. He knows that and still did it. " Apparently, he's been pulled up on this before | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I mean, can anyone disagree with him?" Not anyone with an ounce of humanity nope!! X | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I mean, can anyone disagree with him? Yes .. It's called opinion... He's a smarmy privileged git and whilst I don't agree on all the points of the new law , some I actually do .. And it's not his place to say and he should be reprimanded for it. I believe anyone can pass comment on government policy? Which parts of the new laws, which breach international law do you agree with? No refugee, no asylum seekers is illegal. There are almost no legal channels on to this country, one of the official channels from Afghanistan has never been used. We have 0.02% of the world's refugees coming here, less than 46000 people came on boats last year, they aren't the problem"   | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I mean, can anyone disagree with him? Yes .. It's called opinion... He's a smarmy privileged git and whilst I don't agree on all the points of the new law , some I actually do .. And it's not his place to say and he should be reprimanded for it. I believe anyone can pass comment on government policy? Which parts of the new laws, which breach international law do you agree with? No refugee, no asylum seekers is illegal. There are almost no legal channels on to this country, one of the official channels from Afghanistan has never been used. We have 0.02% of the world's refugees coming here, less than 46000 people came on boats last year, they aren't the problem" That’s because we are an island and have no borders with fucked up countries. If wales or Scotland started a civil war, they could come in legally by walking across a field or little mountain. I would welcome then with open arms, and legs , sine of Welsh females in here | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"What proposal has Mr Lineker put forward in order to solve the migration problem?" I think like many others he's rather keen our government recognise international law? But do we need to offer a solution, is it not enough to call the government out on what is a truly abhorrent and absolutely terrifying proposal? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"BBC right wing....? It's so self gratifying, lecturing, up itself, woke and left wing it's untrue. People are switching off in their 1000s if not millions." Do you think Gary Lineker should be sacked by the BBC? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"BBC right wing....? It's so self gratifying, lecturing, up itself, woke and left wing it's untrue. People are switching off in their 1000s if not millions." This is where we're at now. The Tory supporting BBC is considered "left wing" and "woke". What a sad state this country is in. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Regardless of his views he works for the BBC and should really know better than to post them on social media. They’re supposed to remain impartial. Rightly or wrongly so many celebrities have been sacked for sharing what can be seen as controversial views and opinions over social media. He knows that and still did it. " Because he thinks he is untouchable | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Regardless of his views he works for the BBC and should really know better than to post them on social media. They’re supposed to remain impartial. Rightly or wrongly so many celebrities have been sacked for sharing what can be seen as controversial views and opinions over social media. He knows that and still did it. Because he thinks he is untouchable " Do you want him to be sacked by the BBC? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He’s absolutely right. The dog whistle stuff is all the tories have left. But the BBC is run by tories so he’ll probably have to apologise. Funny how the right squeal about cancel culture but are all calling for him to be cancelled… " Lee Anderson has an article on his website championing free speech yet has attacked Lineker over this. Obviously espectfully commenting on the government is the wrong sort of free speech. Similarly the same people championing Clarkson's right to claim a woman should be stripped naked and paraded through the streets while people through shot at her seem to deplore people challenging our government on its policies | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's amazing how many of the far right are calling for a hard crackdown on freedom of expression and freedom of speech. Imagine demanding someone gets the sack from their job for a personal opinion expressed outside of work. " Bunch of virtue signalling snowflakes | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"BBC right wing....? It's so self gratifying, lecturing, up itself, woke and left wing it's untrue. People are switching off in their 1000s if not millions. Do you think Gary Lineker should be sacked by the BBC? " I wouldn't lose a wink of sleep if he did get the sack.. I just want him to concentrate on what's he paid very handsomely for...i.e football. If he worked for any other channel...i.e advertisers funded channels he would be told to keep his gob shut. Life is so friggin serious these days ...everybody gets offended at the mere drop of a hat. .its tedious...everything is so politicised and viewers/listeners just get sick of having politics forced down their throats and their ears bombarded. Lighten up people...we are here for a good time....and sadly only a short time. Life is for enjoying not constantly looking for something to be offended about. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's amazing how many of the far right are calling for a hard crackdown on freedom of expression and freedom of speech. Imagine demanding someone gets the sack from their job for a personal opinion expressed outside of work. Bunch of virtue signalling snowflakes " People get offended by anything these days, they just go out looking to be offended | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's amazing how many of the far right are calling for a hard crackdown on freedom of expression and freedom of speech. Imagine demanding someone gets the sack from their job for a personal opinion expressed outside of work. " Sadly I don't need to imagine it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"BBC right wing....? It's so self gratifying, lecturing, up itself, woke and left wing it's untrue. People are switching off in their 1000s if not millions. Do you think Gary Lineker should be sacked by the BBC? I wouldn't lose a wink of sleep if he did get the sack.. I just want him to concentrate on what's he paid very handsomely for...i.e football. If he worked for any other channel...i.e advertisers funded channels he would be told to keep his gob shut. Life is so friggin serious these days ...everybody gets offended at the mere drop of a hat. .its tedious...everything is so politicised and viewers/listeners just get sick of having politics forced down their throats and their ears bombarded. Lighten up people...we are here for a good time....and sadly only a short time. Life is for enjoying not constantly looking for something to be offended about. " I mean I'm pretty sure he can concentrate on his job AND have a political opinion? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"BBC right wing....? It's so self gratifying, lecturing, up itself, woke and left wing it's untrue. People are switching off in their 1000s if not millions. Do you think Gary Lineker should be sacked by the BBC? I wouldn't lose a wink of sleep if he did get the sack.. I just want him to concentrate on what's he paid very handsomely for...i.e football. If he worked for any other channel...i.e advertisers funded channels he would be told to keep his gob shut. Life is so friggin serious these days ...everybody gets offended at the mere drop of a hat. .its tedious...everything is so politicised and viewers/listeners just get sick of having politics forced down their throats and their ears bombarded. Lighten up people...we are here for a good time....and sadly only a short time. Life is for enjoying not constantly looking for something to be offended about. " So you are offended by what he said? Btw, he didn’t say it on MOTD | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He’s absolutely right. The dog whistle stuff is all the tories have left. But the BBC is run by tories so he’ll probably have to apologise. Funny how the right squeal about cancel culture but are all calling for him to be cancelled… Lee Anderson has an article on his website championing free speech yet has attacked Lineker over this. Obviously espectfully commenting on the government is the wrong sort of free speech. Similarly the same people championing Clarkson's right to claim a woman should be stripped naked and paraded through the streets while people through shot at her seem to deplore people challenging our government on its policies" Typical hypocrisy, only disagree with celebrities having an opinion if they disagree with it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"In fact, on the BBC News home page is a headline that the BBC are going to be having words with him" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'll just wave as the BBC sails away quietly down the river and disappears up its own backside and off into oblivion. Never ever take the viewing public for granted... Just my opinion....
"Do you think he should be sacked by the BBC? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"BBC right wing....? It's so self gratifying, lecturing, up itself, woke and left wing it's untrue. People are switching off in their 1000s if not millions. Do you think Gary Lineker should be sacked by the BBC? I wouldn't lose a wink of sleep if he did get the sack.. I just want him to concentrate on what's he paid very handsomely for...i.e football. If he worked for any other channel...i.e advertisers funded channels he would be told to keep his gob shut. Life is so friggin serious these days ...everybody gets offended at the mere drop of a hat. .its tedious...everything is so politicised and viewers/listeners just get sick of having politics forced down their throats and their ears bombarded. Lighten up people...we are here for a good time....and sadly only a short time. Life is for enjoying not constantly looking for something to be offended about. So you are offended by what he said? Btw, he didn’t say it on MOTD " Your missing the point, he is an employee of the BBC. The BBC is meant to be impartial. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"BBC right wing....? It's so self gratifying, lecturing, up itself, woke and left wing it's untrue. People are switching off in their 1000s if not millions. Do you think Gary Lineker should be sacked by the BBC? I wouldn't lose a wink of sleep if he did get the sack.. I just want him to concentrate on what's he paid very handsomely for...i.e football. If he worked for any other channel...i.e advertisers funded channels he would be told to keep his gob shut. Life is so friggin serious these days ...everybody gets offended at the mere drop of a hat. .its tedious...everything is so politicised and viewers/listeners just get sick of having politics forced down their throats and their ears bombarded. Lighten up people...we are here for a good time....and sadly only a short time. Life is for enjoying not constantly looking for something to be offended about. So you are offended by what he said? Btw, he didn’t say it on MOTD Your missing the point, he is an employee of the BBC. The BBC is meant to be impartial. " Do you think he should be sacked by the BBC? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'll just wave as the BBC sails away quietly down the river and disappears up its own backside and off into oblivion. Never ever take the viewing public for granted... Just my opinion....
Do you think he should be sacked by the BBC?"I think he’s safe, after all the BBC knowingly hide the biggest pedo in British history for 30 years. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'll just wave as the BBC sails away quietly down the river and disappears up its own backside and off into oblivion. Never ever take the viewing public for granted... Just my opinion....
Do you think he should be sacked by the BBC?
I think he’s safe, after all the BBC knowingly hide the biggest pedo in British history for 30 years. "Do ‘you’ think he should be sacked by the BBC? Any chance you have an opinion, I don’t think he should be sacked | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'll just wave as the BBC sails away quietly down the river and disappears up its own backside and off into oblivion. Never ever take the viewing public for granted... Just my opinion....
Do you think he should be sacked by the BBC?
I think he’s safe, after all the BBC knowingly hide the biggest pedo in British history for 30 years. "Is that the same Pedo Thatcher knighted? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Should people lose their job because politicians don't like what they've (legally) said?" Not just legally, but also respectfully. I think that's important to remember too | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Should people lose their job because politicians don't like what they've (legally) said? Not just legally, but also respectfully. I think that's important to remember too " It is. I find this all very troubling. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Should people lose their job because politicians don't like what they've (legally) said?" Absolutely not. On the same hand, should politicians lose their jobs for using imflamatory language that was probably last used by the N*zis in 1930s Germany? Personally, I think so. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I've just become very very bored of how serious the world is...and how everything and i mean everything now is so offensive to everybody... jeez.. why don't we just cancel everything ...delete anything and everything that has ever happened before today.. Life has happened folks..it all happened...its not friggin Netflix...so people stop trying tell us things didn't happen, shouldn't have happened...etc etc... Obviously too much time on their hands and they need their minds filling with stuff they think they can change ... Anyway. Back to work for me ...busy busy busy " You are being offended by people being offended? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I've just become very very bored of how serious the world is...and how everything and i mean everything now is so offensive to everybody... jeez.. why don't we just cancel everything ...delete anything and everything that has ever happened before today.. Life has happened folks..it all happened...its not friggin Netflix...so people stop trying tell us things didn't happen, shouldn't have happened...etc etc... Obviously too much time on their hands and they need their minds filling with stuff they think they can change ... Anyway. Back to work for me ...busy busy busy You are being offended by people being offended? "Getting offended  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I've just become very very bored of how serious the world is...and how everything and i mean everything now is so offensive to everybody... jeez.. why don't we just cancel everything ...delete anything and everything that has ever happened before today.. Life has happened folks..it all happened...its not friggin Netflix...so people stop trying tell us things didn't happen, shouldn't have happened...etc etc... Obviously too much time on their hands and they need their minds filling with stuff they think they can change ... Anyway. Back to work for me ...busy busy busy " Always the biggest snowflakes who whinge about it the most. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'll just wave as the BBC sails away quietly down the river and disappears up its own backside and off into oblivion. Never ever take the viewing public for granted... Just my opinion....
Do you think he should be sacked by the BBC?
I think he’s safe, after all the BBC knowingly hide the biggest pedo in British history for 30 years.
Is that the same Pedo Thatcher knighted? "Yes that’s the one, best mates with royal family as well in his time. I do disagree with people being labelled as far right/ Nazi for voicing they opinions. Especially bugs me when it socialists/leftie supporters. There have been two political parties investigated for racism in the UK the BNP and the Labour Party for it antisemite views. Strange that ???? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'm all honesty...more bored than offended... bored of being in an offended world...hence why I commented about Lineker....through sheer boredom. I actually don't get offended...maybe its down to the era and family I grew up in... We just got on with life, cracked on and worked hard... living life not offending anyone or being offended by anyone ....believe me ...it was bliss.. "Exactly, all these people getting offended by a tweet expressing an opinion made by a sports pundit. This is the world we live in. Anyone who questions the government gets hounded to shit by the media, by random offended people. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I do disagree with people being labelled as far right/ Nazi for voicing they opinions...." Yes. Truth hurts for some people, doesn't it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'll just wave as the BBC sails away quietly down the river and disappears up its own backside and off into oblivion. Never ever take the viewing public for granted... Just my opinion....
Do you think he should be sacked by the BBC?
I think he’s safe, after all the BBC knowingly hide the biggest pedo in British history for 30 years.
Is that the same Pedo Thatcher knighted?
Yes that’s the one, best mates with royal family as well in his time.
I do disagree with people being labelled as far right/ Nazi for voicing they opinions. Especially bugs me when it socialists/leftie supporters. There have been two political parties investigated for racism in the UK the BNP and the Labour Party for it antisemite views.
Strange that ????"Pedo Saville loved the tories . Gary Lineker didn’t call anyone a Nazi, are you offended by what he said? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'm all honesty...more bored than offended... bored of being in an offended world...hence why I commented about Lineker....through sheer boredom. I actually don't get offended...maybe its down to the era and family I grew up in... We just got on with life, cracked on and worked hard... living life not offending anyone or being offended by anyone ....believe me ...it was bliss.. "Yet here you are | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's amazing how many of the far right are calling for a hard crackdown on freedom of expression and freedom of speech. Imagine demanding someone gets the sack from their job for a personal opinion expressed outside of work. " That happens much more regularly than you'd like to believe. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"C'mon girls...ooops sorry.. Them, They, It, Those.... Have i missed any upto date pronouns.. I honestly can't keep up these days.. Calm it all down... why don't we all just kiss n make up ..in a very non sexualised/non offensive way. I don't want to impose a virtual kiss on anyone who may have not consented to it.. "Bizarre, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"C'mon girls...ooops sorry.. Them, They, It, Those.... Have i missed any upto date pronouns.. I honestly can't keep up these days.. Calm it all down... why don't we all just kiss n make up ..in a very non sexualised/non offensive way. I don't want to impose a virtual kiss on anyone who may have not consented to it.. "Eh? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"BBC right wing....? It's so self gratifying, lecturing, up itself, woke and left wing it's untrue. People are switching off in their 1000s if not millions. Do you think Gary Lineker should be sacked by the BBC? I wouldn't lose a wink of sleep if he did get the sack.. I just want him to concentrate on what's he paid very handsomely for...i.e football. If he worked for any other channel...i.e advertisers funded channels he would be told to keep his gob shut. Life is so friggin serious these days ...everybody gets offended at the mere drop of a hat. .its tedious...everything is so politicised and viewers/listeners just get sick of having politics forced down their throats and their ears bombarded. Lighten up people...we are here for a good time....and sadly only a short time. Life is for enjoying not constantly looking for something to be offended about. So you are offended by what he said? Btw, he didn’t say it on MOTD Your missing the point, he is an employee of the BBC. The BBC is meant to be impartial. Do you think he should be sacked by the BBC? " Well you can say that again.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'll just wave as the BBC sails away quietly down the river and disappears up its own backside and off into oblivion. Never ever take the viewing public for granted... Just my opinion....
Do you think he should be sacked by the BBC?
I think he’s safe, after all the BBC knowingly hide the biggest pedo in British history for 30 years.
Is that the same Pedo Thatcher knighted?
Yes that’s the one, best mates with royal family as well in his time.
I do disagree with people being labelled as far right/ Nazi for voicing they opinions. Especially bugs me when it socialists/leftie supporters. There have been two political parties investigated for racism in the UK the BNP and the Labour Party for it antisemite views.
Strange that ????
Pedo Saville loved the tories . Gary Lineker didn’t call anyone a Nazi, are you offended by what he said? "Lineker said the language used was similar to Germany in 1930’s regarding immigration. The Nazi were a political force in Germany between 1920 to 1945. No not offended I’m not a lefty snowflake. Thanks for caring though. X | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"#SackLinekar is currently trending on Twitter" So is bravermanisanazi , whatever does this mean | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'll just wave as the BBC sails away quietly down the river and disappears up its own backside and off into oblivion. Never ever take the viewing public for granted... Just my opinion....
Do you think he should be sacked by the BBC?
I think he’s safe, after all the BBC knowingly hide the biggest pedo in British history for 30 years.
Is that the same Pedo Thatcher knighted?
Yes that’s the one, best mates with royal family as well in his time.
I do disagree with people being labelled as far right/ Nazi for voicing they opinions. Especially bugs me when it socialists/leftie supporters. There have been two political parties investigated for racism in the UK the BNP and the Labour Party for it antisemite views.
Strange that ????"I don't think anyone had been labelled far/right or nazi for voicing an opinion? Certainly not in this debate anyway. What has happened is that our Home Secretary has quite openly admitted that she intends to break international law, has admitted her plans may be illegal and that she is happy to be in the grey area around legality. She has also used ridiculous numbers such as hundreds of millions of refugees and calmed that down to millions of refugees. As for labelling people, she's now been investigated for breaching ministerial code fir saying: "but an activist blob of left wing lawyers, civil servants and the Labour Party blocked us.” For further context much of her bill mirrors a previous bill which achieved nothing. Weve had multiple PMs, multiple Home Secretaries and multiple bills that have achieve nothing (just another tory failing over theclast 12 years) resulting in awful populist slogans and and increasing rhetoric of dehumanising and blaming asylum seekers. Lineker hasn't called anyone a nazi, he has however, and with considerable justification put a considered respectful tweet making the comparison to 1930s Germany. He is far from alone on voicing that concern. And it is entirely valid. And this isn't about an opinion, its about an illegal government policy. But "The BBC should sack Lineker for calling Braverman a nazi" is the sort of clickbait that sells papers | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'll just wave as the BBC sails away quietly down the river and disappears up its own backside and off into oblivion. Never ever take the viewing public for granted... Just my opinion....
Do you think he should be sacked by the BBC?
I think he’s safe, after all the BBC knowingly hide the biggest pedo in British history for 30 years.
Is that the same Pedo Thatcher knighted?
Yes that’s the one, best mates with royal family as well in his time.
I do disagree with people being labelled as far right/ Nazi for voicing they opinions. Especially bugs me when it socialists/leftie supporters. There have been two political parties investigated for racism in the UK the BNP and the Labour Party for it antisemite views.
Strange that ????
Pedo Saville loved the tories . Gary Lineker didn’t call anyone a Nazi, are you offended by what he said?
Lineker said the language used was similar to Germany in 1930’s regarding immigration. The Nazi were a political force in Germany between 1920 to 1945.
No not offended I’m not a lefty snowflake.
Thanks for caring though. X"Everything he said is true | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"#SackLinekar is currently trending on Twitter So is bravermanisanazi , whatever does this mean "It means there's plenty of left and right on twitter. I'd definitely say calling someone a Nazi is worse than calling for someone to be sacked. I can't imagine it's the right calling Braverman a Nazi. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"BBC right wing....? It's so self gratifying, lecturing, up itself, woke and left wing it's untrue. People are switching off in their 1000s if not millions. Do you think Gary Lineker should be sacked by the BBC? I wouldn't lose a wink of sleep if he did get the sack.. I just want him to concentrate on what's he paid very handsomely for...i.e football. If he worked for any other channel...i.e advertisers funded channels he would be told to keep his gob shut. Life is so friggin serious these days ...everybody gets offended at the mere drop of a hat. .its tedious...everything is so politicised and viewers/listeners just get sick of having politics forced down their throats and their ears bombarded. Lighten up people...we are here for a good time....and sadly only a short time. Life is for enjoying not constantly looking for something to be offended about. So you are offended by what he said? Btw, he didn’t say it on MOTD Your missing the point, he is an employee of the BBC. The BBC is meant to be impartial. Do you think he should be sacked by the BBC? Well you can say that again...." Do you think he should be sacked by the BBC? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"#SackLinekar is currently trending on Twitter So is bravermanisanazi , whatever does this mean
It means there's plenty of left and right on twitter.
I'd definitely say calling someone a Nazi is worse than calling for someone to be sacked.
I can't imagine it's the right calling Braverman a Nazi."I have no idea who is calling her a nazi | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
At this moment time it's like being sat in a school clsssroom with a migraine... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'll just wave as the BBC sails away quietly down the river and disappears up its own backside and off into oblivion. Never ever take the viewing public for granted... Just my opinion....
Do you think he should be sacked by the BBC?
I think he’s safe, after all the BBC knowingly hide the biggest pedo in British history for 30 years.
Is that the same Pedo Thatcher knighted?
Yes that’s the one, best mates with royal family as well in his time.
I do disagree with people being labelled as far right/ Nazi for voicing they opinions. Especially bugs me when it socialists/leftie supporters. There have been two political parties investigated for racism in the UK the BNP and the Labour Party for it antisemite views.
Strange that ????"Oh for goodness sake don’t call them socialist they hate and despise it ! The usual four will hunt you down | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"#SackLinekar is currently trending on Twitter So is bravermanisanazi , whatever does this mean
It means there's plenty of left and right on twitter.
I'd definitely say calling someone a Nazi is worse than calling for someone to be sacked.
I can't imagine it's the right calling Braverman a Nazi.
I have no idea who is calling her a nazi "Do you think it's OK for that statement to be trending? I mean you said it yourself 'everything Lineker said is true', you know he compared Braverman to the Nazis whether he used the word or not. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"#SackLinekar is currently trending on Twitter So is bravermanisanazi , whatever does this mean
It means there's plenty of left and right on twitter.
I'd definitely say calling someone a Nazi is worse than calling for someone to be sacked.
I can't imagine it's the right calling Braverman a Nazi.
I have no idea who is calling her a nazi
Do you think it's OK for that statement to be trending?
I mean you said it yourself 'everything Lineker said is true', you know he compared Braverman to the Nazis whether he used the word or not."Everything he said is true, I don’t think Braverman is a nazi, she just uses the same language | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Do you two live together...2 peas in a pod" Oh they won’t like that assumption! They are independent communists sorry socialists | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Lol.. I only joined fabswingers 8 years ago to swing and have fun...
At this moment time it's like being sat in a school clsssroom with a migraine... "Are you being forced to come this thread | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'll just wave as the BBC sails away quietly down the river and disappears up its own backside and off into oblivion. Never ever take the viewing public for granted... Just my opinion....
Do you think he should be sacked by the BBC?
I think he’s safe, after all the BBC knowingly hide the biggest pedo in British history for 30 years.
Is that the same Pedo Thatcher knighted?
Yes that’s the one, best mates with royal family as well in his time.
I do disagree with people being labelled as far right/ Nazi for voicing they opinions. Especially bugs me when it socialists/leftie supporters. There have been two political parties investigated for racism in the UK the BNP and the Labour Party for it antisemite views.
Strange that ????
Oh for goodness sake don’t call them socialist they hate and despise it ! The usual four will hunt you down"That's so funny ....brilliant...
I'm picturing the Fab Four all looking like Liam Neeson in Taken...
" we have a certain set of socialist/cancel culture skills."
Gotta laugh havnt ya..
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'll just wave as the BBC sails away quietly down the river and disappears up its own backside and off into oblivion. Never ever take the viewing public for granted... Just my opinion....
Do you think he should be sacked by the BBC?
I think he’s safe, after all the BBC knowingly hide the biggest pedo in British history for 30 years.
Is that the same Pedo Thatcher knighted?
Yes that’s the one, best mates with royal family as well in his time.
I do disagree with people being labelled as far right/ Nazi for voicing they opinions. Especially bugs me when it socialists/leftie supporters. There have been two political parties investigated for racism in the UK the BNP and the Labour Party for it antisemite views.
Strange that ????
Oh for goodness sake don’t call them socialist they hate and despise it ! The usual four will hunt you down
That's so funny ....brilliant...
I'm picturing the Fab Four all looking like Liam Neeson in Taken...
" we have a certain set of socialist/cancel culture skills."
Gotta laugh havnt ya..
" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"#SackLinekar is currently trending on Twitter So is bravermanisanazi , whatever does this mean
It means there's plenty of left and right on twitter.
I'd definitely say calling someone a Nazi is worse than calling for someone to be sacked.
I can't imagine it's the right calling Braverman a Nazi."Of course it’s not. It’s the tolerant left | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"#SackLinekar is currently trending on Twitter So is bravermanisanazi , whatever does this mean
It means there's plenty of left and right on twitter.
I'd definitely say calling someone a Nazi is worse than calling for someone to be sacked.
I can't imagine it's the right calling Braverman a Nazi.
I have no idea who is calling her a nazi
Do you think it's OK for that statement to be trending?
I mean you said it yourself 'everything Lineker said is true', you know he compared Braverman to the Nazis whether he used the word or not."So #sacklinekar is okay but #bravermanisanazi isn't? I have no problem with either of them. If Lineker is unhappy I'm sure he'll stop tweeting politic opinions. And if Braverman is unhappy she could stop introducing policies and voicing rhetoric that arguably mirrors 1930s Germany | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"#SackLinekar is currently trending on Twitter So is bravermanisanazi , whatever does this mean
It means there's plenty of left and right on twitter.
I'd definitely say calling someone a Nazi is worse than calling for someone to be sacked.
I can't imagine it's the right calling Braverman a Nazi.
I have no idea who is calling her a nazi
Do you think it's OK for that statement to be trending?
I mean you said it yourself 'everything Lineker said is true', you know he compared Braverman to the Nazis whether he used the word or not.
Everything he said is true, I don’t think Braverman is a nazi, she just uses the same language "OK cool | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"#SackLinekar is currently trending on Twitter So is bravermanisanazi , whatever does this mean
It means there's plenty of left and right on twitter.
I'd definitely say calling someone a Nazi is worse than calling for someone to be sacked.
I can't imagine it's the right calling Braverman a Nazi.
I have no idea who is calling her a nazi
Do you think it's OK for that statement to be trending?
I mean you said it yourself 'everything Lineker said is true', you know he compared Braverman to the Nazis whether he used the word or not.
So #sacklinekar is okay but #bravermanisanazi isn't?
I have no problem with either of them. If Lineker is unhappy I'm sure he'll stop tweeting politic opinions. And if Braverman is unhappy she could stop introducing policies and voicing rhetoric that arguably mirrors 1930s Germany"I didn't say either was OK. Do learn to read
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"#SackLinekar is currently trending on Twitter So is bravermanisanazi , whatever does this mean
It means there's plenty of left and right on twitter.
I'd definitely say calling someone a Nazi is worse than calling for someone to be sacked.
I can't imagine it's the right calling Braverman a Nazi.
I have no idea who is calling her a nazi
Do you think it's OK for that statement to be trending?
I mean you said it yourself 'everything Lineker said is true', you know he compared Braverman to the Nazis whether he used the word or not.
So #sacklinekar is okay but #bravermanisanazi isn't?
I have no problem with either of them. If Lineker is unhappy I'm sure he'll stop tweeting politic opinions. And if Braverman is unhappy she could stop introducing policies and voicing rhetoric that arguably mirrors 1930s Germany
I didn't say either was OK. Do learn to read
"Well you certainly implied it when you said: "I'd definitely say calling someone a Nazi is worse than calling for someone to be sacked" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"#SackLinekar is currently trending on Twitter So is bravermanisanazi , whatever does this mean
It means there's plenty of left and right on twitter.
I'd definitely say calling someone a Nazi is worse than calling for someone to be sacked.
I can't imagine it's the right calling Braverman a Nazi.
I have no idea who is calling her a nazi
Do you think it's OK for that statement to be trending?
I mean you said it yourself 'everything Lineker said is true', you know he compared Braverman to the Nazis whether he used the word or not.
So #sacklinekar is okay but #bravermanisanazi isn't?
I have no problem with either of them. If Lineker is unhappy I'm sure he'll stop tweeting politic opinions. And if Braverman is unhappy she could stop introducing policies and voicing rhetoric that arguably mirrors 1930s Germany
I didn't say either was OK. Do learn to read
Well you certainly implied it when you said:
"I'd definitely say calling someone a Nazi is worse than calling for someone to be sacked""I didn't imply anything. Do you disagree with my statement? Or I can ask another way. Which is worse: Calling some a nazi or calling for someone to be sacked? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'll just wave as the BBC sails away quietly down the river and disappears up its own backside and off into oblivion. Never ever take the viewing public for granted... Just my opinion....
Do you think he should be sacked by the BBC?
I think he’s safe, after all the BBC knowingly hide the biggest pedo in British history for 30 years.
Is that the same Pedo Thatcher knighted?
Yes that’s the one, best mates with royal family as well in his time.
I do disagree with people being labelled as far right/ Nazi for voicing they opinions. Especially bugs me when it socialists/leftie supporters. There have been two political parties investigated for racism in the UK the BNP and the Labour Party for it antisemite views.
Strange that ????
Oh for goodness sake don’t call them socialist they hate and despise it ! The usual four will hunt you down
That's so funny ....brilliant...
I'm picturing the Fab Four all looking like Liam Neeson in Taken...
" we have a certain set of socialist/cancel culture skills."
Gotta laugh havnt ya..
"Luckily the country keeps deciding they want nothing to do with the socialists and particular set of skills | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'll just wave as the BBC sails away quietly down the river and disappears up its own backside and off into oblivion. Never ever take the viewing public for granted... Just my opinion....
Do you think he should be sacked by the BBC?
I think he’s safe, after all the BBC knowingly hide the biggest pedo in British history for 30 years.
Is that the same Pedo Thatcher knighted?
Yes that’s the one, best mates with royal family as well in his time.
I do disagree with people being labelled as far right/ Nazi for voicing they opinions. Especially bugs me when it socialists/leftie supporters. There have been two political parties investigated for racism in the UK the BNP and the Labour Party for it antisemite views.
Strange that ????
Oh for goodness sake don’t call them socialist they hate and despise it ! The usual four will hunt you down
That's so funny ....brilliant...
I'm picturing the Fab Four all looking like Liam Neeson in Taken...
" we have a certain set of socialist/cancel culture skills."
Gotta laugh havnt ya..
Luckily the country keeps deciding they want nothing to do with the socialists and particular set of skills "Lol
Jeez...don't start with that..lol This thread will go sailing past 175 comments and need a brand new thread...  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'll just wave as the BBC sails away quietly down the river and disappears up its own backside and off into oblivion. Never ever take the viewing public for granted... Just my opinion....
Do you think he should be sacked by the BBC?
I think he’s safe, after all the BBC knowingly hide the biggest pedo in British history for 30 years.
Is that the same Pedo Thatcher knighted?
Yes that’s the one, best mates with royal family as well in his time.
I do disagree with people being labelled as far right/ Nazi for voicing they opinions. Especially bugs me when it socialists/leftie supporters. There have been two political parties investigated for racism in the UK the BNP and the Labour Party for it antisemite views.
Strange that ????
Oh for goodness sake don’t call them socialist they hate and despise it ! The usual four will hunt you down
That's so funny ....brilliant...
I'm picturing the Fab Four all looking like Liam Neeson in Taken...
" we have a certain set of socialist/cancel culture skills."
Gotta laugh havnt ya..
Luckily the country keeps deciding they want nothing to do with the socialists and particular set of skills "What have "socialists" got to do with those calling for Gary Lineker to be sacked from his job for expressing an opinion about government policy, on a platform away from his job? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'll just wave as the BBC sails away quietly down the river and disappears up its own backside and off into oblivion. Never ever take the viewing public for granted... Just my opinion....
Do you think he should be sacked by the BBC?
I think he’s safe, after all the BBC knowingly hide the biggest pedo in British history for 30 years.
Is that the same Pedo Thatcher knighted?
Yes that’s the one, best mates with royal family as well in his time.
I do disagree with people being labelled as far right/ Nazi for voicing they opinions. Especially bugs me when it socialists/leftie supporters. There have been two political parties investigated for racism in the UK the BNP and the Labour Party for it antisemite views.
Strange that ????
Oh for goodness sake don’t call them socialist they hate and despise it ! The usual four will hunt you down
That's so funny ....brilliant...
I'm picturing the Fab Four all looking like Liam Neeson in Taken...
" we have a certain set of socialist/cancel culture skills."
Gotta laugh havnt ya..
Luckily the country keeps deciding they want nothing to do with the socialists and particular set of skills
Lol
Jeez...don't start with that..lol This thread will go sailing past 175 comments and need a brand new thread... " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"#SackLinekar is currently trending on Twitter So is bravermanisanazi , whatever does this mean
It means there's plenty of left and right on twitter.
I'd definitely say calling someone a Nazi is worse than calling for someone to be sacked.
I can't imagine it's the right calling Braverman a Nazi.
I have no idea who is calling her a nazi
Do you think it's OK for that statement to be trending?
I mean you said it yourself 'everything Lineker said is true', you know he compared Braverman to the Nazis whether he used the word or not.
So #sacklinekar is okay but #bravermanisanazi isn't?
I have no problem with either of them. If Lineker is unhappy I'm sure he'll stop tweeting politic opinions. And if Braverman is unhappy she could stop introducing policies and voicing rhetoric that arguably mirrors 1930s Germany
I didn't say either was OK. Do learn to read
Well you certainly implied it when you said:
"I'd definitely say calling someone a Nazi is worse than calling for someone to be sacked"
I didn't imply anything.
Do you disagree with my statement?
Or I can ask another way.
Which is worse:
Calling some a nazi or calling for someone to be sacked?"I'm not sure why you are labouring the point you just denied making? As I've said I have no issue with either trending on Twitter, as there are very clear reasons why they are and thise narratives have been controlled by Lineker and Braverman. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'll just wave as the BBC sails away quietly down the river and disappears up its own backside and off into oblivion. Never ever take the viewing public for granted... Just my opinion....
Do you think he should be sacked by the BBC?
I think he’s safe, after all the BBC knowingly hide the biggest pedo in British history for 30 years.
Is that the same Pedo Thatcher knighted?
Yes that’s the one, best mates with royal family as well in his time.
I do disagree with people being labelled as far right/ Nazi for voicing they opinions. Especially bugs me when it socialists/leftie supporters. There have been two political parties investigated for racism in the UK the BNP and the Labour Party for it antisemite views.
Strange that ????
Oh for goodness sake don’t call them socialist they hate and despise it ! The usual four will hunt you down
That's so funny ....brilliant...
I'm picturing the Fab Four all looking like Liam Neeson in Taken...
" we have a certain set of socialist/cancel culture skills."
Gotta laugh havnt ya..
Luckily the country keeps deciding they want nothing to do with the socialists and particular set of skills
Lol
Jeez...don't start with that..lol This thread will go sailing past 175 comments and need a brand new thread... "Don’t panic the Fab Four will start another anti brexit / anti government thread very very soon | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"#SackLinekar is currently trending on Twitter So is bravermanisanazi , whatever does this mean
It means there's plenty of left and right on twitter.
I'd definitely say calling someone a Nazi is worse than calling for someone to be sacked.
I can't imagine it's the right calling Braverman a Nazi.
I have no idea who is calling her a nazi
Do you think it's OK for that statement to be trending?
I mean you said it yourself 'everything Lineker said is true', you know he compared Braverman to the Nazis whether he used the word or not.
So #sacklinekar is okay but #bravermanisanazi isn't?
I have no problem with either of them. If Lineker is unhappy I'm sure he'll stop tweeting politic opinions. And if Braverman is unhappy she could stop introducing policies and voicing rhetoric that arguably mirrors 1930s Germany"I suggest you improve your history knowledge after that ridiculous comparison | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Jeez...who decided to press 'repeat' C'mon...its nearly weekend ...move on people..." They never move on | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'll just wave as the BBC sails away quietly down the river and disappears up its own backside and off into oblivion. Never ever take the viewing public for granted... Just my opinion....
Do you think he should be sacked by the BBC?
I think he’s safe, after all the BBC knowingly hide the biggest pedo in British history for 30 years.
Is that the same Pedo Thatcher knighted?
Yes that’s the one, best mates with royal family as well in his time.
I do disagree with people being labelled as far right/ Nazi for voicing they opinions. Especially bugs me when it socialists/leftie supporters. There have been two political parties investigated for racism in the UK the BNP and the Labour Party for it antisemite views.
Strange that ????
Oh for goodness sake don’t call them socialist they hate and despise it ! The usual four will hunt you down
That's so funny ....brilliant...
I'm picturing the Fab Four all looking like Liam Neeson in Taken...
" we have a certain set of socialist/cancel culture skills."
Gotta laugh havnt ya..
Luckily the country keeps deciding they want nothing to do with the socialists and particular set of skills "You don't speak for the rest of us. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Jeez...who decided to press 'repeat' C'mon...its nearly weekend ...move on people... They never move on " Lol... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"As he's freelance and not a member of BBC staff he won't face disciplinary action from them. I wish more people would excercise their right to speak openly about government. I'd hate to live in a country where we were silenced due to our job or for any other reason. " Absolutely this. You are correct, he is freelance. He is free to say whatever he wishes. And I do wish more people would speak up and call things out (whether they are freelance or not). Far too many people and organisations rely on oppression to silence detractors who wish to highlight their bad behaviour. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"As he's freelance and not a member of BBC staff he won't face disciplinary action from them. I wish more people would excercise their right to speak openly about government. I'd hate to live in a country where we were silenced due to our job or for any other reason. Absolutely this. You are correct, he is freelance. He is free to say whatever he wishes. And I do wish more people would speak up and call things out (whether they are freelance or not). Far too many people and organisations rely on oppression to silence detractors who wish to highlight their bad behaviour." He shouldn’t be silenced by right wing snowflakes | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"#SackLinekar is currently trending on Twitter So is bravermanisanazi , whatever does this mean
It means there's plenty of left and right on twitter.
I'd definitely say calling someone a Nazi is worse than calling for someone to be sacked.
I can't imagine it's the right calling Braverman a Nazi.
I have no idea who is calling her a nazi
Do you think it's OK for that statement to be trending?
I mean you said it yourself 'everything Lineker said is true', you know he compared Braverman to the Nazis whether he used the word or not.
So #sacklinekar is okay but #bravermanisanazi isn't?
I have no problem with either of them. If Lineker is unhappy I'm sure he'll stop tweeting politic opinions. And if Braverman is unhappy she could stop introducing policies and voicing rhetoric that arguably mirrors 1930s Germany
I didn't say either was OK. Do learn to read
Well you certainly implied it when you said:
"I'd definitely say calling someone a Nazi is worse than calling for someone to be sacked"
I didn't imply anything.
Do you disagree with my statement?
Or I can ask another way.
Which is worse:
Calling some a nazi or calling for someone to be sacked?
I'm not sure why you are labouring the point you just denied making?
As I've said I have no issue with either trending on Twitter, as there are very clear reasons why they are and thise narratives have been controlled by Lineker and Braverman.
"I am not denying anything. What i said is there in black and white. I'm accusing you of twisting my words. I also notice you refuse to answer my question. That's not a problem, if you want people to make a decision without you're retort. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Still going ..lol..." Of course the not so fabulous 4 will be going for days weeks..... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"#SackLinekar is currently trending on Twitter So is bravermanisanazi , whatever does this mean
It means there's plenty of left and right on twitter.
I'd definitely say calling someone a Nazi is worse than calling for someone to be sacked.
I can't imagine it's the right calling Braverman a Nazi.
I have no idea who is calling her a nazi
Do you think it's OK for that statement to be trending?
I mean you said it yourself 'everything Lineker said is true', you know he compared Braverman to the Nazis whether he used the word or not.
So #sacklinekar is okay but #bravermanisanazi isn't?
I have no problem with either of them. If Lineker is unhappy I'm sure he'll stop tweeting politic opinions. And if Braverman is unhappy she could stop introducing policies and voicing rhetoric that arguably mirrors 1930s Germany
I didn't say either was OK. Do learn to read
Well you certainly implied it when you said:
"I'd definitely say calling someone a Nazi is worse than calling for someone to be sacked"
I didn't imply anything.
Do you disagree with my statement?
Or I can ask another way.
Which is worse:
Calling some a nazi or calling for someone to be sacked?
I'm not sure why you are labouring the point you just denied making?
As I've said I have no issue with either trending on Twitter, as there are very clear reasons why they are and thise narratives have been controlled by Lineker and Braverman.
I am not denying anything. What i said is there in black and white.
I'm accusing you of twisting my words. I also notice you refuse to answer my question. That's not a problem, if you want people to make a decision without you're retort."I've twice answered the question. I have no problem with either on the context of this debate. There are clear and demonstratable reasons why those hashtags are trending and both can be justified. Obviously it should be remembered that despite the hysterical headlines in the Mail and Telegraph, Lineker never called anyone a Nazi. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'll just wave as the BBC sails away quietly down the river and disappears up its own backside and off into oblivion. Never ever take the viewing public for granted... Just my opinion....
Do you think he should be sacked by the BBC?
I think he’s safe, after all the BBC knowingly hide the biggest pedo in British history for 30 years.
Is that the same Pedo Thatcher knighted?
Yes that’s the one, best mates with royal family as well in his time.
I do disagree with people being labelled as far right/ Nazi for voicing they opinions. Especially bugs me when it socialists/leftie supporters. There have been two political parties investigated for racism in the UK the BNP and the Labour Party for it antisemite views.
Strange that ????
Oh for goodness sake don’t call them socialist they hate and despise it ! The usual four will hunt you down
That's so funny ....brilliant...
I'm picturing the Fab Four all looking like Liam Neeson in Taken...
" we have a certain set of socialist/cancel culture skills."
Gotta laugh havnt ya..
Luckily the country keeps deciding they want nothing to do with the socialists and particular set of skills
You don't speak for the rest of us."The last four elections would say otherwise..... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Still going ..lol..." Isn’t it odd when the woke socialist left wanted Jeremy Clarkson silenced when he attacked that Markle woman but when one of their own champagne socialist lineker speaks up all is well | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"#SackLinekar is currently trending on Twitter So is bravermanisanazi , whatever does this mean
It means there's plenty of left and right on twitter.
I'd definitely say calling someone a Nazi is worse than calling for someone to be sacked.
I can't imagine it's the right calling Braverman a Nazi.
I have no idea who is calling her a nazi
Do you think it's OK for that statement to be trending?
I mean you said it yourself 'everything Lineker said is true', you know he compared Braverman to the Nazis whether he used the word or not.
So #sacklinekar is okay but #bravermanisanazi isn't?
I have no problem with either of them. If Lineker is unhappy I'm sure he'll stop tweeting politic opinions. And if Braverman is unhappy she could stop introducing policies and voicing rhetoric that arguably mirrors 1930s Germany
I didn't say either was OK. Do learn to read
Well you certainly implied it when you said:
"I'd definitely say calling someone a Nazi is worse than calling for someone to be sacked"
I didn't imply anything.
Do you disagree with my statement?
Or I can ask another way.
Which is worse:
Calling some a nazi or calling for someone to be sacked?
I'm not sure why you are labouring the point you just denied making?
As I've said I have no issue with either trending on Twitter, as there are very clear reasons why they are and thise narratives have been controlled by Lineker and Braverman.
I am not denying anything. What i said is there in black and white.
I'm accusing you of twisting my words. I also notice you refuse to answer my question. That's not a problem, if you want people to make a decision without you're retort.
I've twice answered the question. I have no problem with either on the context of this debate. There are clear and demonstratable reasons why those hashtags are trending and both can be justified.
Obviously it should be remembered that despite the hysterical headlines in the Mail and Telegraph, Lineker never called anyone a Nazi.
"You're obviously one of those who thinks they answer a question without answering a question. I simplified it for you, which one is worse? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"#SackLinekar is currently trending on Twitter So is bravermanisanazi , whatever does this mean
It means there's plenty of left and right on twitter.
I'd definitely say calling someone a Nazi is worse than calling for someone to be sacked.
I can't imagine it's the right calling Braverman a Nazi.
I have no idea who is calling her a nazi
Do you think it's OK for that statement to be trending?
I mean you said it yourself 'everything Lineker said is true', you know he compared Braverman to the Nazis whether he used the word or not.
So #sacklinekar is okay but #bravermanisanazi isn't?
I have no problem with either of them. If Lineker is unhappy I'm sure he'll stop tweeting politic opinions. And if Braverman is unhappy she could stop introducing policies and voicing rhetoric that arguably mirrors 1930s Germany
I didn't say either was OK. Do learn to read
Well you certainly implied it when you said:
"I'd definitely say calling someone a Nazi is worse than calling for someone to be sacked"
I didn't imply anything.
Do you disagree with my statement?
Or I can ask another way.
Which is worse:
Calling some a nazi or calling for someone to be sacked?
I'm not sure why you are labouring the point you just denied making?
As I've said I have no issue with either trending on Twitter, as there are very clear reasons why they are and thise narratives have been controlled by Lineker and Braverman.
I am not denying anything. What i said is there in black and white.
I'm accusing you of twisting my words. I also notice you refuse to answer my question. That's not a problem, if you want people to make a decision without you're retort.
I've twice answered the question. I have no problem with either on the context of this debate. There are clear and demonstratable reasons why those hashtags are trending and both can be justified.
Obviously it should be remembered that despite the hysterical headlines in the Mail and Telegraph, Lineker never called anyone a Nazi.
You're obviously one of those who thinks they answer a question without answering a question.
I simplified it for you, which one is worse?"In the context of these hashtags, neither. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"#SackLinekar is currently trending on Twitter So is bravermanisanazi , whatever does this mean
It means there's plenty of left and right on twitter.
I'd definitely say calling someone a Nazi is worse than calling for someone to be sacked.
I can't imagine it's the right calling Braverman a Nazi.
I have no idea who is calling her a nazi
Do you think it's OK for that statement to be trending?
I mean you said it yourself 'everything Lineker said is true', you know he compared Braverman to the Nazis whether he used the word or not.
So #sacklinekar is okay but #bravermanisanazi isn't?
I have no problem with either of them. If Lineker is unhappy I'm sure he'll stop tweeting politic opinions. And if Braverman is unhappy she could stop introducing policies and voicing rhetoric that arguably mirrors 1930s Germany
I didn't say either was OK. Do learn to read
Well you certainly implied it when you said:
"I'd definitely say calling someone a Nazi is worse than calling for someone to be sacked"
I didn't imply anything.
Do you disagree with my statement?
Or I can ask another way.
Which is worse:
Calling some a nazi or calling for someone to be sacked?
I'm not sure why you are labouring the point you just denied making?
As I've said I have no issue with either trending on Twitter, as there are very clear reasons why they are and thise narratives have been controlled by Lineker and Braverman.
I am not denying anything. What i said is there in black and white.
I'm accusing you of twisting my words. I also notice you refuse to answer my question. That's not a problem, if you want people to make a decision without you're retort.
I've twice answered the question. I have no problem with either on the context of this debate. There are clear and demonstratable reasons why those hashtags are trending and both can be justified.
Obviously it should be remembered that despite the hysterical headlines in the Mail and Telegraph, Lineker never called anyone a Nazi.
"Hashtags are trending is the perfect argument, for your bubble | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'll just wave as the BBC sails away quietly down the river and disappears up its own backside and off into oblivion. Never ever take the viewing public for granted... Just my opinion....
Do you think he should be sacked by the BBC?
I think he’s safe, after all the BBC knowingly hide the biggest pedo in British history for 30 years.
Is that the same Pedo Thatcher knighted?
Yes that’s the one, best mates with royal family as well in his time.
I do disagree with people being labelled as far right/ Nazi for voicing they opinions. Especially bugs me when it socialists/leftie supporters. There have been two political parties investigated for racism in the UK the BNP and the Labour Party for it antisemite views.
Strange that ????
Oh for goodness sake don’t call them socialist they hate and despise it ! The usual four will hunt you down
That's so funny ....brilliant...
I'm picturing the Fab Four all looking like Liam Neeson in Taken...
" we have a certain set of socialist/cancel culture skills."
Gotta laugh havnt ya..
Luckily the country keeps deciding they want nothing to do with the socialists and particular set of skills
You don't speak for the rest of us.
The last four elections would say otherwise....."When did a socialist party stand for government? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"#SackLinekar is currently trending on Twitter So is bravermanisanazi , whatever does this mean
It means there's plenty of left and right on twitter.
I'd definitely say calling someone a Nazi is worse than calling for someone to be sacked.
I can't imagine it's the right calling Braverman a Nazi.
I have no idea who is calling her a nazi
Do you think it's OK for that statement to be trending?
I mean you said it yourself 'everything Lineker said is true', you know he compared Braverman to the Nazis whether he used the word or not.
So #sacklinekar is okay but #bravermanisanazi isn't?
I have no problem with either of them. If Lineker is unhappy I'm sure he'll stop tweeting politic opinions. And if Braverman is unhappy she could stop introducing policies and voicing rhetoric that arguably mirrors 1930s Germany
I didn't say either was OK. Do learn to read
Well you certainly implied it when you said:
"I'd definitely say calling someone a Nazi is worse than calling for someone to be sacked"
I didn't imply anything.
Do you disagree with my statement?
Or I can ask another way.
Which is worse:
Calling some a nazi or calling for someone to be sacked?
I'm not sure why you are labouring the point you just denied making?
As I've said I have no issue with either trending on Twitter, as there are very clear reasons why they are and thise narratives have been controlled by Lineker and Braverman.
I am not denying anything. What i said is there in black and white.
I'm accusing you of twisting my words. I also notice you refuse to answer my question. That's not a problem, if you want people to make a decision without you're retort.
I've twice answered the question. I have no problem with either on the context of this debate. There are clear and demonstratable reasons why those hashtags are trending and both can be justified.
Obviously it should be remembered that despite the hysterical headlines in the Mail and Telegraph, Lineker never called anyone a Nazi.
You're obviously one of those who thinks they answer a question without answering a question.
I simplified it for you, which one is worse?
In the context of these hashtags, neither.
"Really? I'm certain one of them is worse but you refuse to accept it because it will burst your bubble. No problem though, it speaks volumes. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"#SackLinekar is currently trending on Twitter So is bravermanisanazi , whatever does this mean
It means there's plenty of left and right on twitter.
I'd definitely say calling someone a Nazi is worse than calling for someone to be sacked.
I can't imagine it's the right calling Braverman a Nazi.
I have no idea who is calling her a nazi
Do you think it's OK for that statement to be trending?
I mean you said it yourself 'everything Lineker said is true', you know he compared Braverman to the Nazis whether he used the word or not.
So #sacklinekar is okay but #bravermanisanazi isn't?
I have no problem with either of them. If Lineker is unhappy I'm sure he'll stop tweeting politic opinions. And if Braverman is unhappy she could stop introducing policies and voicing rhetoric that arguably mirrors 1930s Germany
I didn't say either was OK. Do learn to read
Well you certainly implied it when you said:
"I'd definitely say calling someone a Nazi is worse than calling for someone to be sacked"
I didn't imply anything.
Do you disagree with my statement?
Or I can ask another way.
Which is worse:
Calling some a nazi or calling for someone to be sacked?
I'm not sure why you are labouring the point you just denied making?
As I've said I have no issue with either trending on Twitter, as there are very clear reasons why they are and thise narratives have been controlled by Lineker and Braverman.
I am not denying anything. What i said is there in black and white.
I'm accusing you of twisting my words. I also notice you refuse to answer my question. That's not a problem, if you want people to make a decision without you're retort.
I've twice answered the question. I have no problem with either on the context of this debate. There are clear and demonstratable reasons why those hashtags are trending and both can be justified.
Obviously it should be remembered that despite the hysterical headlines in the Mail and Telegraph, Lineker never called anyone a Nazi.
Hashtags are trending is the perfect argument, for your bubble "Sorry but I genuinely have no idea whatvthat means | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"#SackLinekar is currently trending on Twitter So is bravermanisanazi , whatever does this mean
It means there's plenty of left and right on twitter.
I'd definitely say calling someone a Nazi is worse than calling for someone to be sacked.
I can't imagine it's the right calling Braverman a Nazi.
I have no idea who is calling her a nazi
Do you think it's OK for that statement to be trending?
I mean you said it yourself 'everything Lineker said is true', you know he compared Braverman to the Nazis whether he used the word or not.
So #sacklinekar is okay but #bravermanisanazi isn't?
I have no problem with either of them. If Lineker is unhappy I'm sure he'll stop tweeting politic opinions. And if Braverman is unhappy she could stop introducing policies and voicing rhetoric that arguably mirrors 1930s Germany
I didn't say either was OK. Do learn to read
Well you certainly implied it when you said:
"I'd definitely say calling someone a Nazi is worse than calling for someone to be sacked"
I didn't imply anything.
Do you disagree with my statement?
Or I can ask another way.
Which is worse:
Calling some a nazi or calling for someone to be sacked?
I'm not sure why you are labouring the point you just denied making?
As I've said I have no issue with either trending on Twitter, as there are very clear reasons why they are and thise narratives have been controlled by Lineker and Braverman.
I am not denying anything. What i said is there in black and white.
I'm accusing you of twisting my words. I also notice you refuse to answer my question. That's not a problem, if you want people to make a decision without you're retort.
I've twice answered the question. I have no problem with either on the context of this debate. There are clear and demonstratable reasons why those hashtags are trending and both can be justified.
Obviously it should be remembered that despite the hysterical headlines in the Mail and Telegraph, Lineker never called anyone a Nazi.
You're obviously one of those who thinks they answer a question without answering a question.
I simplified it for you, which one is worse?
In the context of these hashtags, neither.
Really? I'm certain one of them is worse but you refuse to accept it because it will burst your bubble.
No problem though, it speaks volumes."As I've repeatedly said, if the government choose to mimic 1930s Germany then people will make the comparison | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Still going ..lol... Isn’t it odd when the woke socialist left wanted Jeremy Clarkson silenced when he attacked that Markle woman but when one of their own champagne socialist lineker speaks up all is well " You noticed that too?! It's as though "hypocrisy" doesn't exist as a word in some peoples' dictionaries | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"#SackLinekar is currently trending on Twitter So is bravermanisanazi , whatever does this mean
It means there's plenty of left and right on twitter.
I'd definitely say calling someone a Nazi is worse than calling for someone to be sacked.
I can't imagine it's the right calling Braverman a Nazi.
I have no idea who is calling her a nazi
Do you think it's OK for that statement to be trending?
I mean you said it yourself 'everything Lineker said is true', you know he compared Braverman to the Nazis whether he used the word or not.
So #sacklinekar is okay but #bravermanisanazi isn't?
I have no problem with either of them. If Lineker is unhappy I'm sure he'll stop tweeting politic opinions. And if Braverman is unhappy she could stop introducing policies and voicing rhetoric that arguably mirrors 1930s Germany
I didn't say either was OK. Do learn to read
Well you certainly implied it when you said:
"I'd definitely say calling someone a Nazi is worse than calling for someone to be sacked"
I didn't imply anything.
Do you disagree with my statement?
Or I can ask another way.
Which is worse:
Calling some a nazi or calling for someone to be sacked?
I'm not sure why you are labouring the point you just denied making?
As I've said I have no issue with either trending on Twitter, as there are very clear reasons why they are and thise narratives have been controlled by Lineker and Braverman.
I am not denying anything. What i said is there in black and white.
I'm accusing you of twisting my words. I also notice you refuse to answer my question. That's not a problem, if you want people to make a decision without you're retort.
I've twice answered the question. I have no problem with either on the context of this debate. There are clear and demonstratable reasons why those hashtags are trending and both can be justified.
Obviously it should be remembered that despite the hysterical headlines in the Mail and Telegraph, Lineker never called anyone a Nazi.
You're obviously one of those who thinks they answer a question without answering a question.
I simplified it for you, which one is worse?
In the context of these hashtags, neither.
Really? I'm certain one of them is worse but you refuse to accept it because it will burst your bubble.
No problem though, it speaks volumes.
As I've repeatedly said, if the government choose to mimic 1930s Germany then people will make the comparison "I'm glad to see you support people being called Nazis. As I said, speaks volumes | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Still going ..lol... Isn’t it odd when the woke socialist left wanted Jeremy Clarkson silenced when he attacked that Markle woman but when one of their own champagne socialist lineker speaks up all is well You noticed that too?! It's as though "hypocrisy" doesn't exist as a word in some peoples' dictionaries "Oh it does exist, only when it suits them though | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'll just wave as the BBC sails away quietly down the river and disappears up its own backside and off into oblivion. Never ever take the viewing public for granted... Just my opinion....
Do you think he should be sacked by the BBC?
I think he’s safe, after all the BBC knowingly hide the biggest pedo in British history for 30 years.
Is that the same Pedo Thatcher knighted?
Yes that’s the one, best mates with royal family as well in his time.
I do disagree with people being labelled as far right/ Nazi for voicing they opinions. Especially bugs me when it socialists/leftie supporters. There have been two political parties investigated for racism in the UK the BNP and the Labour Party for it antisemite views.
Strange that ????
Oh for goodness sake don’t call them socialist they hate and despise it ! The usual four will hunt you down
That's so funny ....brilliant...
I'm picturing the Fab Four all looking like Liam Neeson in Taken...
" we have a certain set of socialist/cancel culture skills."
Gotta laugh havnt ya..
Luckily the country keeps deciding they want nothing to do with the socialists and particular set of skills
You don't speak for the rest of us.
The last four elections would say otherwise....."Well 2 of them required a coalition. The landslide of the last one saw a victory that should have kept Johnson as PM for years and the tories in power for at least the next 2 General elections but here we are on our third PM and front benchers resigning to avoid the humiliation of the next election. So it's not quite as simple as the last 4 elections is it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Still going ..lol... Isn’t it odd when the woke socialist left wanted Jeremy Clarkson silenced when he attacked that Markle woman but when one of their own champagne socialist lineker speaks up all is well You noticed that too?! It's as though "hypocrisy" doesn't exist as a word in some peoples' dictionaries
Oh it does exist, only when it suits them though "I mean the 2 aren't overly comparable are they? A man suggests a woman should be stripped naked, paraded through the streets while people throw shit at her simply because he hates her. Another commented on government policy. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Still going ..lol... Isn’t it odd when the woke socialist left wanted Jeremy Clarkson silenced when he attacked that Markle woman but when one of their own champagne socialist lineker speaks up all is well You noticed that too?! It's as though "hypocrisy" doesn't exist as a word in some peoples' dictionaries "It only becomes relevant when the socialist left say so.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Still going ..lol... Isn’t it odd when the woke socialist left wanted Jeremy Clarkson silenced when he attacked that Markle woman but when one of their own champagne socialist lineker speaks up all is well You noticed that too?! It's as though "hypocrisy" doesn't exist as a word in some peoples' dictionaries
Oh it does exist, only when it suits them though "Indeed | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Still going ..lol... Isn’t it odd when the woke socialist left wanted Jeremy Clarkson silenced when he attacked that Markle woman but when one of their own champagne socialist lineker speaks up all is well You noticed that too?! It's as though "hypocrisy" doesn't exist as a word in some peoples' dictionaries
It only becomes relevant when the socialist left say so.... "Challenge for you. Make a post which is: A. Relevent to the thread. B. Doesn't use the word "social" to describe someone you don't agree with. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Still going ..lol... Isn’t it odd when the woke socialist left wanted Jeremy Clarkson silenced when he attacked that Markle woman but when one of their own champagne socialist lineker speaks up all is well You noticed that too?! It's as though "hypocrisy" doesn't exist as a word in some peoples' dictionaries
It only becomes relevant when the socialist left say so....
Challenge for you.
Make a post which is:
A. Relevent to the thread.
B. Doesn't use the word "social" to describe someone you don't agree with. "*Socialist | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Still going i see... :-/ You know no one will win this argument cos both sides are sticking to their original statements....I'd save your energy " Where's the fun in that? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'll just wave as the BBC sails away quietly down the river and disappears up its own backside and off into oblivion. Never ever take the viewing public for granted... Just my opinion....
Do you think he should be sacked by the BBC?
I think he’s safe, after all the BBC knowingly hide the biggest pedo in British history for 30 years.
Is that the same Pedo Thatcher knighted?
Yes that’s the one, best mates with royal family as well in his time.
I do disagree with people being labelled as far right/ Nazi for voicing they opinions. Especially bugs me when it socialists/leftie supporters. There have been two political parties investigated for racism in the UK the BNP and the Labour Party for it antisemite views.
Strange that ????
Oh for goodness sake don’t call them socialist they hate and despise it ! The usual four will hunt you down
That's so funny ....brilliant...
I'm picturing the Fab Four all looking like Liam Neeson in Taken...
" we have a certain set of socialist/cancel culture skills."
Gotta laugh havnt ya..
Luckily the country keeps deciding they want nothing to do with the socialists and particular set of skills
You don't speak for the rest of us.
The last four elections would say otherwise.....
Well 2 of them required a coalition.
The landslide of the last one saw a victory that should have kept Johnson as PM for years and the tories in power for at least the next 2 General elections but here we are on our third PM and front benchers resigning to avoid the humiliation of the next election.
So it's not quite as simple as the last 4 elections is it?"Of course it’s that simple! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Still going i see... :-/ You know no one will win this argument cos both sides are sticking to their original statements....I'd save your energy " Yeah you are probably correct. The socialists ( some of them get triggered by this word ) think they are always correct anyway | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Still going i see... :-/ You know no one will win this argument cos both sides are sticking to their original statements....I'd save your energy Yeah you are probably correct. The socialists ( some of them get triggered by this word ) think they are always correct anyway " Challenge not accepted then. Oh well. Crack on. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Still going i see... :-/ You know no one will win this argument cos both sides are sticking to their original statements....I'd save your energy Yeah you are probably correct. The socialists ( some of them get triggered by this word ) think they are always correct anyway " Get Corbyn in ...he'll prove how successful and great Socialism is..
"Power to the People"...
Good ol Wolfie Smith ..
Google it if you're under 55...lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Still going i see... :-/ You know no one will win this argument cos both sides are sticking to their original statements....I'd save your energy Yeah you are probably correct. The socialists ( some of them get triggered by this word ) think they are always correct anyway " Better to be a proud woke socialist than a bigot! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Still going i see... :-/ You know no one will win this argument cos both sides are sticking to their original statements....I'd save your energy Yeah you are probably correct. The socialists ( some of them get triggered by this word ) think they are always correct anyway Get Corbyn in ...he'll prove how successful and great Socialism is..
"Power to the People"...
Good ol Wolfie Smith ..
Google it if you're under 55...lol"Yeah The Corbyn project that went well | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'll just wave as the BBC sails away quietly down the river and disappears up its own backside and off into oblivion. Never ever take the viewing public for granted... Just my opinion....
Do you think he should be sacked by the BBC?
I think he’s safe, after all the BBC knowingly hide the biggest pedo in British history for 30 years.
Is that the same Pedo Thatcher knighted?
Yes that’s the one, best mates with royal family as well in his time.
I do disagree with people being labelled as far right/ Nazi for voicing they opinions. Especially bugs me when it socialists/leftie supporters. There have been two political parties investigated for racism in the UK the BNP and the Labour Party for it antisemite views.
Strange that ????
Oh for goodness sake don’t call them socialist they hate and despise it ! The usual four will hunt you down
That's so funny ....brilliant...
I'm picturing the Fab Four all looking like Liam Neeson in Taken...
" we have a certain set of socialist/cancel culture skills."
Gotta laugh havnt ya..
Luckily the country keeps deciding they want nothing to do with the socialists and particular set of skills
You don't speak for the rest of us.
The last four elections would say otherwise.....
Well 2 of them required a coalition.
The landslide of the last one saw a victory that should have kept Johnson as PM for years and the tories in power for at least the next 2 General elections but here we are on our third PM and front benchers resigning to avoid the humiliation of the next election.
So it's not quite as simple as the last 4 elections is it?
Of course it’s that simple! "I guess if yiu choose a very simplistic view point it is. However ignoring your use of the word socialist claiming "the country keeps deciding they want nothing to do with the socialists" doesn't quite hold up to scrutiny does it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Still going i see... :-/ You know no one will win this argument cos both sides are sticking to their original statements....I'd save your energy Yeah you are probably correct. The socialists ( some of them get triggered by this word ) think they are always correct anyway Better to be a proud woke socialist than a bigot!" In your opinion | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Still going i see... :-/ You know no one will win this argument cos both sides are sticking to their original statements....I'd save your energy Yeah you are probably correct. The socialists ( some of them get triggered by this word ) think they are always correct anyway Better to be a proud woke socialist than a bigot! In your opinion " Is it your opinion it is better to be a bigot? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'll just wave as the BBC sails away quietly down the river and disappears up its own backside and off into oblivion. Never ever take the viewing public for granted... Just my opinion....
Do you think he should be sacked by the BBC?
I think he’s safe, after all the BBC knowingly hide the biggest pedo in British history for 30 years.
Is that the same Pedo Thatcher knighted?
Yes that’s the one, best mates with royal family as well in his time.
I do disagree with people being labelled as far right/ Nazi for voicing they opinions. Especially bugs me when it socialists/leftie supporters. There have been two political parties investigated for racism in the UK the BNP and the Labour Party for it antisemite views.
Strange that ????
Oh for goodness sake don’t call them socialist they hate and despise it ! The usual four will hunt you down
That's so funny ....brilliant...
I'm picturing the Fab Four all looking like Liam Neeson in Taken...
" we have a certain set of socialist/cancel culture skills."
Gotta laugh havnt ya..
Luckily the country keeps deciding they want nothing to do with the socialists and particular set of skills
You don't speak for the rest of us.
The last four elections would say otherwise.....
Well 2 of them required a coalition.
The landslide of the last one saw a victory that should have kept Johnson as PM for years and the tories in power for at least the next 2 General elections but here we are on our third PM and front benchers resigning to avoid the humiliation of the next election.
So it's not quite as simple as the last 4 elections is it?
Of course it’s that simple!
I guess if yiu choose a very simplistic view point it is.
However ignoring your use of the word socialist claiming "the country keeps deciding they want nothing to do with the socialists" doesn't quite hold up to scrutiny does it?
"Does it not | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'll just wave as the BBC sails away quietly down the river and disappears up its own backside and off into oblivion. Never ever take the viewing public for granted... Just my opinion....
Do you think he should be sacked by the BBC?
I think he’s safe, after all the BBC knowingly hide the biggest pedo in British history for 30 years.
Is that the same Pedo Thatcher knighted?
Yes that’s the one, best mates with royal family as well in his time.
I do disagree with people being labelled as far right/ Nazi for voicing they opinions. Especially bugs me when it socialists/leftie supporters. There have been two political parties investigated for racism in the UK the BNP and the Labour Party for it antisemite views.
Strange that ????
Oh for goodness sake don’t call them socialist they hate and despise it ! The usual four will hunt you down
That's so funny ....brilliant...
I'm picturing the Fab Four all looking like Liam Neeson in Taken...
" we have a certain set of socialist/cancel culture skills."
Gotta laugh havnt ya..
Luckily the country keeps deciding they want nothing to do with the socialists and particular set of skills
You don't speak for the rest of us.
The last four elections would say otherwise.....
Well 2 of them required a coalition.
The landslide of the last one saw a victory that should have kept Johnson as PM for years and the tories in power for at least the next 2 General elections but here we are on our third PM and front benchers resigning to avoid the humiliation of the next election.
So it's not quite as simple as the last 4 elections is it?
Of course it’s that simple!
I guess if yiu choose a very simplistic view point it is.
However ignoring your use of the word socialist claiming "the country keeps deciding they want nothing to do with the socialists" doesn't quite hold up to scrutiny does it?
Does it not "No, because no socialist party has stood for election for a long time. The last conference of the BSP was in 1920. So it's clear you either simply don't know what "socialist" means, or you're just trying to troll. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It looks like Gary Lineker has triggered the right wing gammon snowflakes " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'll just wave as the BBC sails away quietly down the river and disappears up its own backside and off into oblivion. Never ever take the viewing public for granted... Just my opinion....
Do you think he should be sacked by the BBC?
I think he’s safe, after all the BBC knowingly hide the biggest pedo in British history for 30 years.
Is that the same Pedo Thatcher knighted?
Yes that’s the one, best mates with royal family as well in his time.
I do disagree with people being labelled as far right/ Nazi for voicing they opinions. Especially bugs me when it socialists/leftie supporters. There have been two political parties investigated for racism in the UK the BNP and the Labour Party for it antisemite views.
Strange that ????
Oh for goodness sake don’t call them socialist they hate and despise it ! The usual four will hunt you down
That's so funny ....brilliant...
I'm picturing the Fab Four all looking like Liam Neeson in Taken...
" we have a certain set of socialist/cancel culture skills."
Gotta laugh havnt ya..
Luckily the country keeps deciding they want nothing to do with the socialists and particular set of skills
You don't speak for the rest of us.
The last four elections would say otherwise.....
Well 2 of them required a coalition.
The landslide of the last one saw a victory that should have kept Johnson as PM for years and the tories in power for at least the next 2 General elections but here we are on our third PM and front benchers resigning to avoid the humiliation of the next election.
So it's not quite as simple as the last 4 elections is it?
Of course it’s that simple!
I guess if yiu choose a very simplistic view point it is.
However ignoring your use of the word socialist claiming "the country keeps deciding they want nothing to do with the socialists" doesn't quite hold up to scrutiny does it?
Does it not
No, because no socialist party has stood for election for a long time. The last conference of the BSP was in 1920.
So it's clear you either simply don't know what "socialist" means, or you're just trying to troll."The poor chap thinks that anyone who criticises the government is a lefty socialist | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'll just wave as the BBC sails away quietly down the river and disappears up its own backside and off into oblivion. Never ever take the viewing public for granted... Just my opinion....
Do you think he should be sacked by the BBC?
I think he’s safe, after all the BBC knowingly hide the biggest pedo in British history for 30 years.
Is that the same Pedo Thatcher knighted?
Yes that’s the one, best mates with royal family as well in his time.
I do disagree with people being labelled as far right/ Nazi for voicing they opinions. Especially bugs me when it socialists/leftie supporters. There have been two political parties investigated for racism in the UK the BNP and the Labour Party for it antisemite views.
Strange that ????
Oh for goodness sake don’t call them socialist they hate and despise it ! The usual four will hunt you down
That's so funny ....brilliant...
I'm picturing the Fab Four all looking like Liam Neeson in Taken...
" we have a certain set of socialist/cancel culture skills."
Gotta laugh havnt ya..
Luckily the country keeps deciding they want nothing to do with the socialists and particular set of skills
You don't speak for the rest of us.
The last four elections would say otherwise.....
Well 2 of them required a coalition.
The landslide of the last one saw a victory that should have kept Johnson as PM for years and the tories in power for at least the next 2 General elections but here we are on our third PM and front benchers resigning to avoid the humiliation of the next election.
So it's not quite as simple as the last 4 elections is it?
Of course it’s that simple!
I guess if yiu choose a very simplistic view point it is.
However ignoring your use of the word socialist claiming "the country keeps deciding they want nothing to do with the socialists" doesn't quite hold up to scrutiny does it?
Does it not
No, because no socialist party has stood for election for a long time. The last conference of the BSP was in 1920.
So it's clear you either simply don't know what "socialist" means, or you're just trying to troll.
The poor chap thinks that anyone who criticises the government is a lefty socialist "What makes me laugh is he uses the terms "socialist" and "woke" as if they're an insult. You couldn't pay me a better compliment if you tried!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'll just wave as the BBC sails away quietly down the river and disappears up its own backside and off into oblivion. Never ever take the viewing public for granted... Just my opinion....
Do you think he should be sacked by the BBC?
I think he’s safe, after all the BBC knowingly hide the biggest pedo in British history for 30 years.
Is that the same Pedo Thatcher knighted?
Yes that’s the one, best mates with royal family as well in his time.
I do disagree with people being labelled as far right/ Nazi for voicing they opinions. Especially bugs me when it socialists/leftie supporters. There have been two political parties investigated for racism in the UK the BNP and the Labour Party for it antisemite views.
Strange that ????
Oh for goodness sake don’t call them socialist they hate and despise it ! The usual four will hunt you down
That's so funny ....brilliant...
I'm picturing the Fab Four all looking like Liam Neeson in Taken...
" we have a certain set of socialist/cancel culture skills."
Gotta laugh havnt ya..
Luckily the country keeps deciding they want nothing to do with the socialists and particular set of skills
You don't speak for the rest of us.
The last four elections would say otherwise.....
Well 2 of them required a coalition.
The landslide of the last one saw a victory that should have kept Johnson as PM for years and the tories in power for at least the next 2 General elections but here we are on our third PM and front benchers resigning to avoid the humiliation of the next election.
So it's not quite as simple as the last 4 elections is it?
Of course it’s that simple!
I guess if yiu choose a very simplistic view point it is.
However ignoring your use of the word socialist claiming "the country keeps deciding they want nothing to do with the socialists" doesn't quite hold up to scrutiny does it?
Does it not
No, because no socialist party has stood for election for a long time. The last conference of the BSP was in 1920.
So it's clear you either simply don't know what "socialist" means, or you're just trying to troll.
The poor chap thinks that anyone who criticises the government is a lefty socialist
What makes me laugh is he uses the terms "socialist" and "woke" as if they're an insult.
You couldn't pay me a better compliment if you tried!! "Ha, exactly, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I’m still pleasantly surprised The Beatles are posting in the Fab forums. Especially as two are dead! They really were the FAB FOUR! Linekar is freelance not an employee. Unless his contract for services has restrictive clauses in it, then he cannot be restricted for saying anything via his personal channels. If he had said it via a BBC channel then that would be different. He also didn’t actually call anyone a Nazi. Not really seeing how this is comparable to Jeremy Clarkson. " I really hope that I am part of this mysterious ‘Fab four’ though | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I’m still pleasantly surprised The Beatles are posting in the Fab forums. Especially as two are dead! They really were the FAB FOUR! Linekar is freelance not an employee. Unless his contract for services has restrictive clauses in it, then he cannot be restricted for saying anything via his personal channels. If he had said it via a BBC channel then that would be different. He also didn’t actually call anyone a Nazi. Not really seeing how this is comparable to Jeremy Clarkson. I really hope that I am part of this mysterious ‘Fab four’ though " Who would you be? I see myself as Paul, talented and a joker but really the hard worker keeping the group together. But I am probably more like Ringo (who at least looked like he had the most fun). | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I’m still pleasantly surprised The Beatles are posting in the Fab forums. Especially as two are dead! They really were the FAB FOUR! Linekar is freelance not an employee. Unless his contract for services has restrictive clauses in it, then he cannot be restricted for saying anything via his personal channels. If he had said it via a BBC channel then that would be different. He also didn’t actually call anyone a Nazi. Not really seeing how this is comparable to Jeremy Clarkson. I really hope that I am part of this mysterious ‘Fab four’ though Who would you be? I see myself as Paul, talented and a joker but really the hard worker keeping the group together. But I am probably more like Ringo (who at least looked like he had the most fun). " I am definitely Ringo, the least talented but just glad to be in the band. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I’m still pleasantly surprised The Beatles are posting in the Fab forums. Especially as two are dead! They really were the FAB FOUR! Linekar is freelance not an employee. Unless his contract for services has restrictive clauses in it, then he cannot be restricted for saying anything via his personal channels. If he had said it via a BBC channel then that would be different. He also didn’t actually call anyone a Nazi. Not really seeing how this is comparable to Jeremy Clarkson. I really hope that I am part of this mysterious ‘Fab four’ though Who would you be? I see myself as Paul, talented and a joker but really the hard worker keeping the group together. But I am probably more like Ringo (who at least looked like he had the most fun). I am definitely Ringo, the least talented but just glad to be in the band. "I'd prefer to be John; acid-tongued, sarcastic and smarmy, but still manages to silence idiots!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I’m still pleasantly surprised The Beatles are posting in the Fab forums. Especially as two are dead! They really were the FAB FOUR! Linekar is freelance not an employee. Unless his contract for services has restrictive clauses in it, then he cannot be restricted for saying anything via his personal channels. If he had said it via a BBC channel then that would be different. He also didn’t actually call anyone a Nazi. Not really seeing how this is comparable to Jeremy Clarkson. " Linekar represents the organisation and as such will be expected to tow the line in terms of opinions, FTE or freelance | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I’m still pleasantly surprised The Beatles are posting in the Fab forums. Especially as two are dead! They really were the FAB FOUR! Linekar is freelance not an employee. Unless his contract for services has restrictive clauses in it, then he cannot be restricted for saying anything via his personal channels. If he had said it via a BBC channel then that would be different. He also didn’t actually call anyone a Nazi. Not really seeing how this is comparable to Jeremy Clarkson. Linekar represents the organisation and as such will be expected to tow the line in terms of opinions, FTE or freelance " Really? He is restricted to expressing an opinions only in line with the BBC? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I’m still pleasantly surprised The Beatles are posting in the Fab forums. Especially as two are dead! They really were the FAB FOUR! Linekar is freelance not an employee. Unless his contract for services has restrictive clauses in it, then he cannot be restricted for saying anything via his personal channels. If he had said it via a BBC channel then that would be different. He also didn’t actually call anyone a Nazi. Not really seeing how this is comparable to Jeremy Clarkson. Linekar represents the organisation and as such will be expected to tow the line in terms of opinions, FTE or freelance " I think it has already been established that simply isn't the case | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I’m still pleasantly surprised The Beatles are posting in the Fab forums. Especially as two are dead! They really were the FAB FOUR! Linekar is freelance not an employee. Unless his contract for services has restrictive clauses in it, then he cannot be restricted for saying anything via his personal channels. If he had said it via a BBC channel then that would be different. He also didn’t actually call anyone a Nazi. Not really seeing how this is comparable to Jeremy Clarkson. Linekar represents the organisation and as such will be expected to tow the line in terms of opinions, FTE or freelance " Again, his position at the BBC is not as a political or news commentator. He needs to be impartial with respect to football punditry, not politics. He tows that line. He is not even giving any political opinion during broadcasting. Why does the opinion of a football commentator affect the impartiality of the BBC stance on politics delivered by a completely separate group of people? Does a Panorama expose of a Government or Opposition scandal make them biased? Should they not undertake such activities? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I’m still pleasantly surprised The Beatles are posting in the Fab forums. Especially as two are dead! They really were the FAB FOUR! Linekar is freelance not an employee. Unless his contract for services has restrictive clauses in it, then he cannot be restricted for saying anything via his personal channels. If he had said it via a BBC channel then that would be different. He also didn’t actually call anyone a Nazi. Not really seeing how this is comparable to Jeremy Clarkson. Linekar represents the organisation and as such will be expected to tow the line in terms of opinions, FTE or freelance Really? He is restricted to expressing an opinions only in line with the BBC?" I didn’t say that, he will be expected not to damage the brand or create reputation damage as he represents the BBC, keeping out of contentious subjects is the norm and will be part of his contract, hence the we wil remind him comment. In reality he can do and say whatever he wants, but he might not continue to work for the BBC if it is felt he becoming to political. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I’m still pleasantly surprised The Beatles are posting in the Fab forums. Especially as two are dead! They really were the FAB FOUR! Linekar is freelance not an employee. Unless his contract for services has restrictive clauses in it, then he cannot be restricted for saying anything via his personal channels. If he had said it via a BBC channel then that would be different. He also didn’t actually call anyone a Nazi. Not really seeing how this is comparable to Jeremy Clarkson. Linekar represents the organisation and as such will be expected to tow the line in terms of opinions, FTE or freelance Really? He is restricted to expressing an opinions only in line with the BBC? I didn’t say that, he will be expected not to damage the brand or create reputation damage as he represents the BBC, keeping out of contentious subjects is the norm and will be part of his contract, hence the we wil remind him comment. In reality he can do and say whatever he wants, but he might not continue to work for the BBC if it is felt he becoming to political. " Ah, this is taking it too far though. He shouldn't have to be silent for fear of offending some nut-jobs who already hate the BBC for being "too woke" anyway. This whole thing is ridiculous. He commented on government proposals, away from the BBC, not in work, not representing views other than his. It does not make him unsuitable to talk about footie on Saturday nights. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I’m still pleasantly surprised The Beatles are posting in the Fab forums. Especially as two are dead! They really were the FAB FOUR! Linekar is freelance not an employee. Unless his contract for services has restrictive clauses in it, then he cannot be restricted for saying anything via his personal channels. If he had said it via a BBC channel then that would be different. He also didn’t actually call anyone a Nazi. Not really seeing how this is comparable to Jeremy Clarkson. Linekar represents the organisation and as such will be expected to tow the line in terms of opinions, FTE or freelance Really? He is restricted to expressing an opinions only in line with the BBC? I didn’t say that, he will be expected not to damage the brand or create reputation damage as he represents the BBC, keeping out of contentious subjects is the norm and will be part of his contract, hence the we wil remind him comment. In reality he can do and say whatever he wants, but he might not continue to work for the BBC if it is felt he becoming to political. Ah, this is taking it too far though. He shouldn't have to be silent for fear of offending some nut-jobs who already hate the BBC for being "too woke" anyway. This whole thing is ridiculous. He commented on government proposals, away from the BBC, not in work, not representing views other than his. It does not make him unsuitable to talk about footie on Saturday nights. " I didn’t say it did, what I’m saying is he will certainly have a clause in his contract that covers off the expectation on him as he represents the BBC. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Still going ..lol... Isn’t it odd when the woke socialist left wanted Jeremy Clarkson silenced when he attacked that Markle woman but when one of their own champagne socialist lineker speaks up all is well " . ;,, "that Markle woman" happens to be the wife of the 5th in line to the throne , the wife of the Kings son , the mother to the Kings grandchildren | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I’m still pleasantly surprised The Beatles are posting in the Fab forums. Especially as two are dead! They really were the FAB FOUR! Linekar is freelance not an employee. Unless his contract for services has restrictive clauses in it, then he cannot be restricted for saying anything via his personal channels. If he had said it via a BBC channel then that would be different. He also didn’t actually call anyone a Nazi. Not really seeing how this is comparable to Jeremy Clarkson. Linekar represents the organisation and as such will be expected to tow the line in terms of opinions, FTE or freelance Really? He is restricted to expressing an opinions only in line with the BBC? I didn’t say that, he will be expected not to damage the brand or create reputation damage as he represents the BBC, keeping out of contentious subjects is the norm and will be part of his contract, hence the we wil remind him comment. In reality he can do and say whatever he wants, but he might not continue to work for the BBC if it is felt he becoming to political. " You explicitly said he has to tow the line on his opinions. That's not true, I suspect the BBC may stipulate how he expresseses those opinions but they cant tell him what he can and can't have an opinion on. As I've said more than once he expressed his opinion respectfully, he didn't call anyone a nazi, it was the right-wing press who bandied that term about. The way the right wing media have jumped in this is telling, as is the reaction of those MPs calling for him to be sacked, its a warning shot to thise with an influential social media presence not to challenge them | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I’m still pleasantly surprised The Beatles are posting in the Fab forums. Especially as two are dead! They really were the FAB FOUR! Linekar is freelance not an employee. Unless his contract for services has restrictive clauses in it, then he cannot be restricted for saying anything via his personal channels. If he had said it via a BBC channel then that would be different. He also didn’t actually call anyone a Nazi. Not really seeing how this is comparable to Jeremy Clarkson. Linekar represents the organisation and as such will be expected to tow the line in terms of opinions, FTE or freelance Really? He is restricted to expressing an opinions only in line with the BBC? I didn’t say that, he will be expected not to damage the brand or create reputation damage as he represents the BBC, keeping out of contentious subjects is the norm and will be part of his contract, hence the we wil remind him comment. In reality he can do and say whatever he wants, but he might not continue to work for the BBC if it is felt he becoming to political. Ah, this is taking it too far though. He shouldn't have to be silent for fear of offending some nut-jobs who already hate the BBC for being "too woke" anyway. This whole thing is ridiculous. He commented on government proposals, away from the BBC, not in work, not representing views other than his. It does not make him unsuitable to talk about footie on Saturday nights. I didn’t say it did, what I’m saying is he will certainly have a clause in his contract that covers off the expectation on him as he represents the BBC. " Fair enough. I have no clue what's in his contract. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I’m still pleasantly surprised The Beatles are posting in the Fab forums. Especially as two are dead! They really were the FAB FOUR! Linekar is freelance not an employee. Unless his contract for services has restrictive clauses in it, then he cannot be restricted for saying anything via his personal channels. If he had said it via a BBC channel then that would be different. He also didn’t actually call anyone a Nazi. Not really seeing how this is comparable to Jeremy Clarkson. Linekar represents the organisation and as such will be expected to tow the line in terms of opinions, FTE or freelance Really? He is restricted to expressing an opinions only in line with the BBC? I didn’t say that, he will be expected not to damage the brand or create reputation damage as he represents the BBC, keeping out of contentious subjects is the norm and will be part of his contract, hence the we wil remind him comment. In reality he can do and say whatever he wants, but he might not continue to work for the BBC if it is felt he becoming to political. Ah, this is taking it too far though. He shouldn't have to be silent for fear of offending some nut-jobs who already hate the BBC for being "too woke" anyway. This whole thing is ridiculous. He commented on government proposals, away from the BBC, not in work, not representing views other than his. It does not make him unsuitable to talk about footie on Saturday nights. I didn’t say it did, what I’m saying is he will certainly have a clause in his contract that covers off the expectation on him as he represents the BBC. Fair enough. I have no clue what's in his contract." From the BBC editorial guidelines; BBC staff and regular BBC presenters or reporters associated with news or public policy-related output may offer professional judgements rooted in evidence. "However, it is not normally appropriate for them to present or write personal view programmes and content on public policy, on matters of political or industrial controversy, or on 'controversial subjects' in any area | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I’m still pleasantly surprised The Beatles are posting in the Fab forums. Especially as two are dead! They really were the FAB FOUR! Linekar is freelance not an employee. Unless his contract for services has restrictive clauses in it, then he cannot be restricted for saying anything via his personal channels. If he had said it via a BBC channel then that would be different. He also didn’t actually call anyone a Nazi. Not really seeing how this is comparable to Jeremy Clarkson. Linekar represents the organisation and as such will be expected to tow the line in terms of opinions, FTE or freelance Really? He is restricted to expressing an opinions only in line with the BBC? I didn’t say that, he will be expected not to damage the brand or create reputation damage as he represents the BBC, keeping out of contentious subjects is the norm and will be part of his contract, hence the we wil remind him comment. In reality he can do and say whatever he wants, but he might not continue to work for the BBC if it is felt he becoming to political. Ah, this is taking it too far though. He shouldn't have to be silent for fear of offending some nut-jobs who already hate the BBC for being "too woke" anyway. This whole thing is ridiculous. He commented on government proposals, away from the BBC, not in work, not representing views other than his. It does not make him unsuitable to talk about footie on Saturday nights. I didn’t say it did, what I’m saying is he will certainly have a clause in his contract that covers off the expectation on him as he represents the BBC. Fair enough. I have no clue what's in his contract. From the BBC editorial guidelines; BBC staff and regular BBC presenters or reporters associated with news or public policy-related output may offer professional judgements rooted in evidence. "However, it is not normally appropriate for them to present or write personal view programmes and content on public policy, on matters of political or industrial controversy, or on 'controversial subjects' in any area" Is he "associated with news or public policy-related output "? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I’m still pleasantly surprised The Beatles are posting in the Fab forums. Especially as two are dead! They really were the FAB FOUR! Linekar is freelance not an employee. Unless his contract for services has restrictive clauses in it, then he cannot be restricted for saying anything via his personal channels. If he had said it via a BBC channel then that would be different. He also didn’t actually call anyone a Nazi. Not really seeing how this is comparable to Jeremy Clarkson. Linekar represents the organisation and as such will be expected to tow the line in terms of opinions, FTE or freelance Really? He is restricted to expressing an opinions only in line with the BBC? I didn’t say that, he will be expected not to damage the brand or create reputation damage as he represents the BBC, keeping out of contentious subjects is the norm and will be part of his contract, hence the we wil remind him comment. In reality he can do and say whatever he wants, but he might not continue to work for the BBC if it is felt he becoming to political. Ah, this is taking it too far though. He shouldn't have to be silent for fear of offending some nut-jobs who already hate the BBC for being "too woke" anyway. This whole thing is ridiculous. He commented on government proposals, away from the BBC, not in work, not representing views other than his. It does not make him unsuitable to talk about footie on Saturday nights. I didn’t say it did, what I’m saying is he will certainly have a clause in his contract that covers off the expectation on him as he represents the BBC. Fair enough. I have no clue what's in his contract. From the BBC editorial guidelines; BBC staff and regular BBC presenters or reporters associated with news or public policy-related output may offer professional judgements rooted in evidence. "However, it is not normally appropriate for them to present or write personal view programmes and content on public policy, on matters of political or industrial controversy, or on 'controversial subjects' in any area Is he "associated with news or public policy-related output "? " Regular BBC presenter | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
