FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > There are rumours that boris will return as pm.
There are rumours that boris will return as pm.
Jump to: Newest in thread
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I dont like the tories, but apparently there are rumours that boris will return as pm. I watched sky mews talking about it, what do you think about it? I think that it is a good idea. I also find him to be fun. I mean which pm get stuck on a zip wire lol. Here is my message to liz, it is nothing wrong to have high ambitions like wanting to be a pm, but sometimes it is not meant to be as it is just out of ones dept "He won’t be coming back, do you remember why he left in the first place | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I dont like the tories, but apparently there are rumours that boris will return as pm. I watched sky mews talking about it, what do you think about it? I think that it is a good idea. I also find him to be fun. I mean which pm get stuck on a zip wire lol. Here is my message to liz, it is nothing wrong to have high ambitions like wanting to be a pm, but sometimes it is not meant to be as it is just out of ones dept "I didn't find his racism all that fun. Didn't find it all that fun when he said he didn't care how many elderly people died of covid. Didn't find him that fun when partied hard while British people died alone in hospital beds. And he wasn't fun when lied to cover up sex pest Chris Pincher. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I dont like the tories, but apparently there are rumours that boris will return as pm. I watched sky mews talking about it, what do you think about it? I think that it is a good idea. I also find him to be fun. I mean which pm get stuck on a zip wire lol. Here is my message to liz, it is nothing wrong to have high ambitions like wanting to be a pm, but sometimes it is not meant to be as it is just out of ones dept
I didn't find his racism all that fun. Didn't find it all that fun when he said he didn't care how many elderly people died of covid. Didn't find him that fun when partied hard while British people died alone in hospital beds. And he wasn't fun when lied to cover up sex pest Chris Pincher."Yeah but, the hair and the zip wire thing must overshadow his faults  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up." Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati , | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I dont like the tories, but apparently there are rumours that boris will return as pm. I watched sky mews talking about it, what do you think about it? I think that it is a good idea. I also find him to be fun. I mean which pm get stuck on a zip wire lol.i certainly hope so ..very good pm ..got the country through covid and since we lost him we lost the queen the economy and arsenal top of the table ..truss is a bloody cutse ..come back boris Here is my message to liz, it is nothing wrong to have high ambitions like wanting to be a pm, but sometimes it is not meant to be as it is just out of ones dept " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati , "That is a perfect example. Ideologically they are unable to fund the Police effectively and they are unable to put in place a fair, but firm immigration system with legitimate asylum application centres around the world. Instead , Bravernan now, and Patel before her simply launch attacks on “the enemy within” simply to distract from their own hopelessness. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati , "Ghoul? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Here is my message to liz, it is nothing wrong to have high ambitions like wanting to be a pm, but sometimes it is not meant to be as it is just out of ones dept "That should have been the message to Boris as well. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Here is my message to liz, it is nothing wrong to have high ambitions like wanting to be a pm, but sometimes it is not meant to be as it is just out of ones dept
That should have been the message to Boris as well."And May and Cameron. It all started with Cameron who shit his pants over UKIP instead of just swatting them away. If he had stayed (well become) strong we would never have had that stupid advisory binary choice referendum on membership of the EU that then became a weird cultish uniformed sacrosanct decision! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Boris will make more doing the circuit than going back to that job "It’s all about money then? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul? "Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning "No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Boris will make more doing the circuit than going back to that job
It’s all about money then? "Yep | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning
No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording."I was being neither, just a bit of friendly advice, why is the word a strange choice , I am looking forward to your answer | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning
No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording.
I was being neither, just a bit of friendly advice, why is the word a strange choice , I am looking forward to your answer "What ‘ghoulish’ actions or attributes has she shown for you to use such a term? Or is it simply you don’t like her because “she’s a fucking Tory” | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning
No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording.
I was being neither, just a bit of friendly advice, why is the word a strange choice , I am looking forward to your answer
What ‘ghoulish’ actions or attributes has she shown for you to use such a term? Or is it simply you don’t like her because “she’s a fucking Tory”"I don’t like her because she is out of her depth, has no empathy and is clearly playing to right wing racists, what do you think of her? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Boris will make more doing the circuit than going back to that job
It’s all about money then?
Yep"and ambition/ego | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning
No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording.
I was being neither, just a bit of friendly advice, why is the word a strange choice , I am looking forward to your answer
What ‘ghoulish’ actions or attributes has she shown for you to use such a term? Or is it simply you don’t like her because “she’s a fucking Tory”
I don’t like her because she is out of her depth, has no empathy and is clearly playing to right wing racists, what do you think of her? "Mind made up then. I don’t know enough about her to be honest as it’s all a bit ‘conveyer beltish’ at the moment. Let’s see - give her a chance. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning
No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording.
I was being neither, just a bit of friendly advice, why is the word a strange choice , I am looking forward to your answer
What ‘ghoulish’ actions or attributes has she shown for you to use such a term? Or is it simply you don’t like her because “she’s a fucking Tory”
I don’t like her because she is out of her depth, has no empathy and is clearly playing to right wing racists, what do you think of her?
Mind made up then. I don’t know enough about her to be honest as it’s all a bit ‘conveyer beltish’ at the moment. Let’s see - give her a chance. "Yep, my mind is made up, she won’t get a chance, she will be gone soon | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning
No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording.
I was being neither, just a bit of friendly advice, why is the word a strange choice , I am looking forward to your answer
What ‘ghoulish’ actions or attributes has she shown for you to use such a term? Or is it simply you don’t like her because “she’s a fucking Tory”
I don’t like her because she is out of her depth, has no empathy and is clearly playing to right wing racists, what do you think of her? "Nothing there to label her a ‘ghoul’ though. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning
No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording.
I was being neither, just a bit of friendly advice, why is the word a strange choice , I am looking forward to your answer
What ‘ghoulish’ actions or attributes has she shown for you to use such a term? Or is it simply you don’t like her because “she’s a fucking Tory”
I don’t like her because she is out of her depth, has no empathy and is clearly playing to right wing racists, what do you think of her?
Nothing there to label her a ‘ghoul’ though."She is a ghoul, are your offended by the word? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning
No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording.
I was being neither, just a bit of friendly advice, why is the word a strange choice , I am looking forward to your answer
What ‘ghoulish’ actions or attributes has she shown for you to use such a term? Or is it simply you don’t like her because “she’s a fucking Tory”
I don’t like her because she is out of her depth, has no empathy and is clearly playing to right wing racists, what do you think of her?
Mind made up then. I don’t know enough about her to be honest as it’s all a bit ‘conveyer beltish’ at the moment. Let’s see - give her a chance. "Her campaign to become PM was funded by BP, she worked for Shell. First thing she did was to crack on with fracking. On one hand, fair play, she isn't even pretending to give a fuck about British people, and is open about her role serving her, and the Tory party backers. On the other hand. Would be nice if we had a PM that worked for us instead. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning
No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording.
I was being neither, just a bit of friendly advice, why is the word a strange choice , I am looking forward to your answer
What ‘ghoulish’ actions or attributes has she shown for you to use such a term? Or is it simply you don’t like her because “she’s a fucking Tory”
I don’t like her because she is out of her depth, has no empathy and is clearly playing to right wing racists, what do you think of her?
Nothing there to label her a ‘ghoul’ though.
She is a ghoul, are your offended by the word? "Not offended at all. Baffled. Mind you, I’ve never met a ghoul. Would you shag her? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning
No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording.
I was being neither, just a bit of friendly advice, why is the word a strange choice , I am looking forward to your answer
What ‘ghoulish’ actions or attributes has she shown for you to use such a term? Or is it simply you don’t like her because “she’s a fucking Tory”
I don’t like her because she is out of her depth, has no empathy and is clearly playing to right wing racists, what do you think of her?
Nothing there to label her a ‘ghoul’ though.
She is a ghoul, are your offended by the word?
Not offended at all. Baffled. Mind you, I’ve never met a ghoul. Would you shag her? "No, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning
No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording.
I was being neither, just a bit of friendly advice, why is the word a strange choice , I am looking forward to your answer
What ‘ghoulish’ actions or attributes has she shown for you to use such a term? Or is it simply you don’t like her because “she’s a fucking Tory”
I don’t like her because she is out of her depth, has no empathy and is clearly playing to right wing racists, what do you think of her?
Mind made up then. I don’t know enough about her to be honest as it’s all a bit ‘conveyer beltish’ at the moment. Let’s see - give her a chance.
Her campaign to become PM was funded by BP, she worked for Shell. First thing she did was to crack on with fracking.
On one hand, fair play, she isn't even pretending to give a fuck about British people, and is open about her role serving her, and the Tory party backers.
On the other hand. Would be nice if we had a PM that worked for us instead. "Are these typical ‘ghoulish’ traits? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning
No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording.
I was being neither, just a bit of friendly advice, why is the word a strange choice , I am looking forward to your answer
What ‘ghoulish’ actions or attributes has she shown for you to use such a term? Or is it simply you don’t like her because “she’s a fucking Tory”
I don’t like her because she is out of her depth, has no empathy and is clearly playing to right wing racists, what do you think of her?
Mind made up then. I don’t know enough about her to be honest as it’s all a bit ‘conveyer beltish’ at the moment. Let’s see - give her a chance.
Her campaign to become PM was funded by BP, she worked for Shell. First thing she did was to crack on with fracking.
On one hand, fair play, she isn't even pretending to give a fuck about British people, and is open about her role serving her, and the Tory party backers.
On the other hand. Would be nice if we had a PM that worked for us instead.
Are these typical ‘ghoulish’ traits? "Ghoul ‘ A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’ , I hope this helps with your confusion | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I also find him to be fun. I mean which pm get stuck on a zip wire lol. " This is the problem and why some people elected him and not because they thought he could run a country without lying 
We don't need a man who makes a fool of himself on zip wires to run a country. We need a competent leader who can do the job | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning
No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording.
I was being neither, just a bit of friendly advice, why is the word a strange choice , I am looking forward to your answer
What ‘ghoulish’ actions or attributes has she shown for you to use such a term? Or is it simply you don’t like her because “she’s a fucking Tory”
I don’t like her because she is out of her depth, has no empathy and is clearly playing to right wing racists, what do you think of her?
Mind made up then. I don’t know enough about her to be honest as it’s all a bit ‘conveyer beltish’ at the moment. Let’s see - give her a chance.
Her campaign to become PM was funded by BP, she worked for Shell. First thing she did was to crack on with fracking.
On one hand, fair play, she isn't even pretending to give a fuck about British people, and is open about her role serving her, and the Tory party backers.
On the other hand. Would be nice if we had a PM that worked for us instead.
Are these typical ‘ghoulish’ traits? "Fuck knows. I was replying to "Let’s see - give her a chance. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I also find him to be fun. I mean which pm get stuck on a zip wire lol. This is the problem and why some people elected him and not because they thought he could run a country without lying
We don't need a man who makes a fool of himself on zip wires to run a country. We need a competent leader who can do the job "Crazy talk! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning
No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording.
I was being neither, just a bit of friendly advice, why is the word a strange choice , I am looking forward to your answer
What ‘ghoulish’ actions or attributes has she shown for you to use such a term? Or is it simply you don’t like her because “she’s a fucking Tory”
I don’t like her because she is out of her depth, has no empathy and is clearly playing to right wing racists, what do you think of her?
Mind made up then. I don’t know enough about her to be honest as it’s all a bit ‘conveyer beltish’ at the moment. Let’s see - give her a chance.
Her campaign to become PM was funded by BP, she worked for Shell. First thing she did was to crack on with fracking.
On one hand, fair play, she isn't even pretending to give a fuck about British people, and is open about her role serving her, and the Tory party backers.
On the other hand. Would be nice if we had a PM that worked for us instead.
Are these typical ‘ghoulish’ traits?
Ghoul ‘ A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’ , I hope this helps with your confusion "Very good. Fabricate by name, fabricate by nature. In the words of Freddie “don’t stop me now”. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning
No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording.
I was being neither, just a bit of friendly advice, why is the word a strange choice , I am looking forward to your answer
What ‘ghoulish’ actions or attributes has she shown for you to use such a term? Or is it simply you don’t like her because “she’s a fucking Tory”
I don’t like her because she is out of her depth, has no empathy and is clearly playing to right wing racists, what do you think of her?
Mind made up then. I don’t know enough about her to be honest as it’s all a bit ‘conveyer beltish’ at the moment. Let’s see - give her a chance.
Her campaign to become PM was funded by BP, she worked for Shell. First thing she did was to crack on with fracking.
On one hand, fair play, she isn't even pretending to give a fuck about British people, and is open about her role serving her, and the Tory party backers.
On the other hand. Would be nice if we had a PM that worked for us instead.
Are these typical ‘ghoulish’ traits?
Ghoul ‘ A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’ , I hope this helps with your confusion
Very good. Fabricate by name, fabricate by nature.
In the words of Freddie “don’t stop me now”."I have no idea what your on about but it’s nice that you have tried | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning
No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording.
I was being neither, just a bit of friendly advice, why is the word a strange choice , I am looking forward to your answer
What ‘ghoulish’ actions or attributes has she shown for you to use such a term? Or is it simply you don’t like her because “she’s a fucking Tory”
I don’t like her because she is out of her depth, has no empathy and is clearly playing to right wing racists, what do you think of her?
Nothing there to label her a ‘ghoul’ though.
She is a ghoul, are your offended by the word?
Not offended at all. Baffled. Mind you, I’ve never met a ghoul. Would you shag her?
No, "A quick blowie perhaps? When she’s next in Manchester lurking in the cemetery | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning
No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording.
I was being neither, just a bit of friendly advice, why is the word a strange choice , I am looking forward to your answer
What ‘ghoulish’ actions or attributes has she shown for you to use such a term? Or is it simply you don’t like her because “she’s a fucking Tory”
I don’t like her because she is out of her depth, has no empathy and is clearly playing to right wing racists, what do you think of her?
Nothing there to label her a ‘ghoul’ though.
She is a ghoul, are your offended by the word?
Not offended at all. Baffled. Mind you, I’ve never met a ghoul. Would you shag her?
No,
A quick blowie perhaps? When she’s next in Manchester lurking in the cemetery "Nah, thanks for offering on her behalf though | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning
No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording.
I was being neither, just a bit of friendly advice, why is the word a strange choice , I am looking forward to your answer
What ‘ghoulish’ actions or attributes has she shown for you to use such a term? Or is it simply you don’t like her because “she’s a fucking Tory”
I don’t like her because she is out of her depth, has no empathy and is clearly playing to right wing racists, what do you think of her?
Mind made up then. I don’t know enough about her to be honest as it’s all a bit ‘conveyer beltish’ at the moment. Let’s see - give her a chance.
Her campaign to become PM was funded by BP, she worked for Shell. First thing she did was to crack on with fracking.
On one hand, fair play, she isn't even pretending to give a fuck about British people, and is open about her role serving her, and the Tory party backers.
On the other hand. Would be nice if we had a PM that worked for us instead.
Are these typical ‘ghoulish’ traits?
Ghoul ‘ A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’ , I hope this helps with your confusion
Very good. Fabricate by name, fabricate by nature.
In the words of Freddie “don’t stop me now”.
I have no idea what your on about but it’s nice that you have tried "Odd. You could put your ‘big boy pants’ on and admit that the use of ‘ghoul’ to describe our current Home Secretary was inappropriate & simply wrong. Not holding my breath though. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning
No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording.
I was being neither, just a bit of friendly advice, why is the word a strange choice , I am looking forward to your answer
What ‘ghoulish’ actions or attributes has she shown for you to use such a term? Or is it simply you don’t like her because “she’s a fucking Tory”
I don’t like her because she is out of her depth, has no empathy and is clearly playing to right wing racists, what do you think of her?
Mind made up then. I don’t know enough about her to be honest as it’s all a bit ‘conveyer beltish’ at the moment. Let’s see - give her a chance.
Her campaign to become PM was funded by BP, she worked for Shell. First thing she did was to crack on with fracking.
On one hand, fair play, she isn't even pretending to give a fuck about British people, and is open about her role serving her, and the Tory party backers.
On the other hand. Would be nice if we had a PM that worked for us instead.
Are these typical ‘ghoulish’ traits?
Ghoul ‘ A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’ , I hope this helps with your confusion
Very good. Fabricate by name, fabricate by nature.
In the words of Freddie “don’t stop me now”.
I have no idea what your on about but it’s nice that you have tried
Odd. You could put your ‘big boy pants’ on and admit that the use of ‘ghoul’ to describe our current Home Secretary was inappropriate & simply wrong. Not holding my breath though."It’s not wrong ‘A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’, are you virtue signalling | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning
No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording.
I was being neither, just a bit of friendly advice, why is the word a strange choice , I am looking forward to your answer
What ‘ghoulish’ actions or attributes has she shown for you to use such a term? Or is it simply you don’t like her because “she’s a fucking Tory”
I don’t like her because she is out of her depth, has no empathy and is clearly playing to right wing racists, what do you think of her?
Mind made up then. I don’t know enough about her to be honest as it’s all a bit ‘conveyer beltish’ at the moment. Let’s see - give her a chance.
Her campaign to become PM was funded by BP, she worked for Shell. First thing she did was to crack on with fracking.
On one hand, fair play, she isn't even pretending to give a fuck about British people, and is open about her role serving her, and the Tory party backers.
On the other hand. Would be nice if we had a PM that worked for us instead.
Are these typical ‘ghoulish’ traits?
Ghoul ‘ A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’ , I hope this helps with your confusion
Very good. Fabricate by name, fabricate by nature.
In the words of Freddie “don’t stop me now”.
I have no idea what your on about but it’s nice that you have tried
Odd. You could put your ‘big boy pants’ on and admit that the use of ‘ghoul’ to describe our current Home Secretary was inappropriate & simply wrong. Not holding my breath though.
It’s not wrong ‘A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’, are you virtue signalling "As suspected. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning
No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording.
I was being neither, just a bit of friendly advice, why is the word a strange choice , I am looking forward to your answer
What ‘ghoulish’ actions or attributes has she shown for you to use such a term? Or is it simply you don’t like her because “she’s a fucking Tory”
I don’t like her because she is out of her depth, has no empathy and is clearly playing to right wing racists, what do you think of her?
Mind made up then. I don’t know enough about her to be honest as it’s all a bit ‘conveyer beltish’ at the moment. Let’s see - give her a chance.
Her campaign to become PM was funded by BP, she worked for Shell. First thing she did was to crack on with fracking.
On one hand, fair play, she isn't even pretending to give a fuck about British people, and is open about her role serving her, and the Tory party backers.
On the other hand. Would be nice if we had a PM that worked for us instead.
Are these typical ‘ghoulish’ traits?
Ghoul ‘ A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’ , I hope this helps with your confusion
Very good. Fabricate by name, fabricate by nature.
In the words of Freddie “don’t stop me now”.
I have no idea what your on about but it’s nice that you have tried
Odd. You could put your ‘big boy pants’ on and admit that the use of ‘ghoul’ to describe our current Home Secretary was inappropriate & simply wrong. Not holding my breath though.
It’s not wrong ‘A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’, are you virtue signalling
As suspected. "I do think it is chivalrous that you are offended on Miss Bravermans behalf, shows empathy and dare I say it , wokism | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I also find him to be fun. I mean which pm get stuck on a zip wire lol. This is the problem and why some people elected him and not because they thought he could run a country without lying
We don't need a man who makes a fool of himself on zip wires to run a country. We need a competent leader who can do the job "Yes, one of the points that he got elected was, cos he is a "funny guy" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I also find him to be fun. I mean which pm get stuck on a zip wire lol. This is the problem and why some people elected him and not because they thought he could run a country without lying
We don't need a man who makes a fool of himself on zip wires to run a country. We need a competent leader who can do the job Yes, one of the points that he got elected was, cos he is a "funny guy" "He didn’t last long though, maybe being funny isn’t important when choosing a PM? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I also find him to be fun. I mean which pm get stuck on a zip wire lol. This is the problem and why some people elected him and not because they thought he could run a country without lying
We don't need a man who makes a fool of himself on zip wires to run a country. We need a competent leader who can do the job Yes, one of the points that he got elected was, cos he is a "funny guy" "Are you saying that as if it is a good thing? As I wasn't, just to be clear | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I also find him to be fun. I mean which pm get stuck on a zip wire lol. This is the problem and why some people elected him and not because they thought he could run a country without lying
We don't need a man who makes a fool of himself on zip wires to run a country. We need a competent leader who can do the job Yes, one of the points that he got elected was, cos he is a "funny guy"
Are you saying that as if it is a good thing? As I wasn't, just to be clear"No. I am not, just that sometimes it is good to be both serious and fun | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I also find him to be fun. I mean which pm get stuck on a zip wire lol. This is the problem and why some people elected him and not because they thought he could run a country without lying
We don't need a man who makes a fool of himself on zip wires to run a country. We need a competent leader who can do the job Yes, one of the points that he got elected was, cos he is a "funny guy"
He didn’t last long though, maybe being funny isn’t important when choosing a PM? "No, he didmt last long and no it ist as important there. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I also find him to be fun. I mean which pm get stuck on a zip wire lol. This is the problem and why some people elected him and not because they thought he could run a country without lying
We don't need a man who makes a fool of himself on zip wires to run a country. We need a competent leader who can do the job Yes, one of the points that he got elected was, cos he is a "funny guy"
Are you saying that as if it is a good thing? As I wasn't, just to be clearNo. I am not, just that sometimes it is good to be both serious and fun "Or fun and competent at your job | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning
No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording.
I was being neither, just a bit of friendly advice, why is the word a strange choice , I am looking forward to your answer
What ‘ghoulish’ actions or attributes has she shown for you to use such a term? Or is it simply you don’t like her because “she’s a fucking Tory”
I don’t like her because she is out of her depth, has no empathy and is clearly playing to right wing racists, what do you think of her?
Mind made up then. I don’t know enough about her to be honest as it’s all a bit ‘conveyer beltish’ at the moment. Let’s see - give her a chance.
Her campaign to become PM was funded by BP, she worked for Shell. First thing she did was to crack on with fracking.
On one hand, fair play, she isn't even pretending to give a fuck about British people, and is open about her role serving her, and the Tory party backers.
On the other hand. Would be nice if we had a PM that worked for us instead.
Are these typical ‘ghoulish’ traits?
Ghoul ‘ A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’ , I hope this helps with your confusion
Very good. Fabricate by name, fabricate by nature.
In the words of Freddie “don’t stop me now”.
I have no idea what your on about but it’s nice that you have tried
Odd. You could put your ‘big boy pants’ on and admit that the use of ‘ghoul’ to describe our current Home Secretary was inappropriate & simply wrong. Not holding my breath though.
It’s not wrong ‘A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’, are you virtue signalling
As suspected. "And she’s gone | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning
No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording.
I was being neither, just a bit of friendly advice, why is the word a strange choice , I am looking forward to your answer
What ‘ghoulish’ actions or attributes has she shown for you to use such a term? Or is it simply you don’t like her because “she’s a fucking Tory”
I don’t like her because she is out of her depth, has no empathy and is clearly playing to right wing racists, what do you think of her?
Mind made up then. I don’t know enough about her to be honest as it’s all a bit ‘conveyer beltish’ at the moment. Let’s see - give her a chance.
Her campaign to become PM was funded by BP, she worked for Shell. First thing she did was to crack on with fracking.
On one hand, fair play, she isn't even pretending to give a fuck about British people, and is open about her role serving her, and the Tory party backers.
On the other hand. Would be nice if we had a PM that worked for us instead.
Are these typical ‘ghoulish’ traits?
Ghoul ‘ A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’ , I hope this helps with your confusion
Very good. Fabricate by name, fabricate by nature.
In the words of Freddie “don’t stop me now”.
I have no idea what your on about but it’s nice that you have tried
Odd. You could put your ‘big boy pants’ on and admit that the use of ‘ghoul’ to describe our current Home Secretary was inappropriate & simply wrong. Not holding my breath though.
It’s not wrong ‘A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’, are you virtue signalling
As suspected.
And she’s gone "Damn! Now we’ll never know how great she could have been. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning
No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording.
I was being neither, just a bit of friendly advice, why is the word a strange choice , I am looking forward to your answer
What ‘ghoulish’ actions or attributes has she shown for you to use such a term? Or is it simply you don’t like her because “she’s a fucking Tory”
I don’t like her because she is out of her depth, has no empathy and is clearly playing to right wing racists, what do you think of her?
Mind made up then. I don’t know enough about her to be honest as it’s all a bit ‘conveyer beltish’ at the moment. Let’s see - give her a chance.
Her campaign to become PM was funded by BP, she worked for Shell. First thing she did was to crack on with fracking.
On one hand, fair play, she isn't even pretending to give a fuck about British people, and is open about her role serving her, and the Tory party backers.
On the other hand. Would be nice if we had a PM that worked for us instead.
Are these typical ‘ghoulish’ traits?
Ghoul ‘ A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’ , I hope this helps with your confusion
Very good. Fabricate by name, fabricate by nature.
In the words of Freddie “don’t stop me now”.
I have no idea what your on about but it’s nice that you have tried
Odd. You could put your ‘big boy pants’ on and admit that the use of ‘ghoul’ to describe our current Home Secretary was inappropriate & simply wrong. Not holding my breath though.
It’s not wrong ‘A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’, are you virtue signalling
As suspected.
And she’s gone
Damn! Now we’ll never know how great she could have been. "Alas. She will (not) be missed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning
No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording.
I was being neither, just a bit of friendly advice, why is the word a strange choice , I am looking forward to your answer
What ‘ghoulish’ actions or attributes has she shown for you to use such a term? Or is it simply you don’t like her because “she’s a fucking Tory”
I don’t like her because she is out of her depth, has no empathy and is clearly playing to right wing racists, what do you think of her?
Mind made up then. I don’t know enough about her to be honest as it’s all a bit ‘conveyer beltish’ at the moment. Let’s see - give her a chance.
Her campaign to become PM was funded by BP, she worked for Shell. First thing she did was to crack on with fracking.
On one hand, fair play, she isn't even pretending to give a fuck about British people, and is open about her role serving her, and the Tory party backers.
On the other hand. Would be nice if we had a PM that worked for us instead.
Are these typical ‘ghoulish’ traits?
Ghoul ‘ A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’ , I hope this helps with your confusion
Very good. Fabricate by name, fabricate by nature.
In the words of Freddie “don’t stop me now”.
I have no idea what your on about but it’s nice that you have tried
Odd. You could put your ‘big boy pants’ on and admit that the use of ‘ghoul’ to describe our current Home Secretary was inappropriate & simply wrong. Not holding my breath though.
It’s not wrong ‘A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’, are you virtue signalling
As suspected.
And she’s gone
Damn! Now we’ll never know how great she could have been. "We saw how crap she was, ah well, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning
No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording.
I was being neither, just a bit of friendly advice, why is the word a strange choice , I am looking forward to your answer
What ‘ghoulish’ actions or attributes has she shown for you to use such a term? Or is it simply you don’t like her because “she’s a fucking Tory”
I don’t like her because she is out of her depth, has no empathy and is clearly playing to right wing racists, what do you think of her?
Mind made up then. I don’t know enough about her to be honest as it’s all a bit ‘conveyer beltish’ at the moment. Let’s see - give her a chance.
Her campaign to become PM was funded by BP, she worked for Shell. First thing she did was to crack on with fracking.
On one hand, fair play, she isn't even pretending to give a fuck about British people, and is open about her role serving her, and the Tory party backers.
On the other hand. Would be nice if we had a PM that worked for us instead.
Are these typical ‘ghoulish’ traits?
Ghoul ‘ A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’ , I hope this helps with your confusion
Very good. Fabricate by name, fabricate by nature.
In the words of Freddie “don’t stop me now”.
I have no idea what your on about but it’s nice that you have tried
Odd. You could put your ‘big boy pants’ on and admit that the use of ‘ghoul’ to describe our current Home Secretary was inappropriate & simply wrong. Not holding my breath though.
It’s not wrong ‘A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’, are you virtue signalling
As suspected.
And she’s gone
Damn! Now we’ll never know how great she could have been.
We saw how crap she was, ah well, "Six weeks? Given time she could have been the ‘Pep’ of politics. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning
No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording.
I was being neither, just a bit of friendly advice, why is the word a strange choice , I am looking forward to your answer
What ‘ghoulish’ actions or attributes has she shown for you to use such a term? Or is it simply you don’t like her because “she’s a fucking Tory”
I don’t like her because she is out of her depth, has no empathy and is clearly playing to right wing racists, what do you think of her?
Mind made up then. I don’t know enough about her to be honest as it’s all a bit ‘conveyer beltish’ at the moment. Let’s see - give her a chance.
Her campaign to become PM was funded by BP, she worked for Shell. First thing she did was to crack on with fracking.
On one hand, fair play, she isn't even pretending to give a fuck about British people, and is open about her role serving her, and the Tory party backers.
On the other hand. Would be nice if we had a PM that worked for us instead.
Are these typical ‘ghoulish’ traits?
Ghoul ‘ A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’ , I hope this helps with your confusion
Very good. Fabricate by name, fabricate by nature.
In the words of Freddie “don’t stop me now”.
I have no idea what your on about but it’s nice that you have tried
Odd. You could put your ‘big boy pants’ on and admit that the use of ‘ghoul’ to describe our current Home Secretary was inappropriate & simply wrong. Not holding my breath though.
It’s not wrong ‘A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’, are you virtue signalling
As suspected.
And she’s gone
Damn! Now we’ll never know how great she could have been.
We saw how crap she was, ah well,
Six weeks? Given time she could have been the ‘Pep’ of politics."Given time, she might have even deported her own parents. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning
No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording.
I was being neither, just a bit of friendly advice, why is the word a strange choice , I am looking forward to your answer
What ‘ghoulish’ actions or attributes has she shown for you to use such a term? Or is it simply you don’t like her because “she’s a fucking Tory”
I don’t like her because she is out of her depth, has no empathy and is clearly playing to right wing racists, what do you think of her?
Mind made up then. I don’t know enough about her to be honest as it’s all a bit ‘conveyer beltish’ at the moment. Let’s see - give her a chance.
Her campaign to become PM was funded by BP, she worked for Shell. First thing she did was to crack on with fracking.
On one hand, fair play, she isn't even pretending to give a fuck about British people, and is open about her role serving her, and the Tory party backers.
On the other hand. Would be nice if we had a PM that worked for us instead.
Are these typical ‘ghoulish’ traits?
Ghoul ‘ A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’ , I hope this helps with your confusion
Very good. Fabricate by name, fabricate by nature.
In the words of Freddie “don’t stop me now”.
I have no idea what your on about but it’s nice that you have tried
Odd. You could put your ‘big boy pants’ on and admit that the use of ‘ghoul’ to describe our current Home Secretary was inappropriate & simply wrong. Not holding my breath though.
It’s not wrong ‘A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’, are you virtue signalling
As suspected.
And she’s gone
Damn! Now we’ll never know how great she could have been.
We saw how crap she was, ah well,
Six weeks? Given time she could have been the ‘Pep’ of politics."Sacked for incompetence, I am sorry for your loss | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning
No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording.
I was being neither, just a bit of friendly advice, why is the word a strange choice , I am looking forward to your answer
What ‘ghoulish’ actions or attributes has she shown for you to use such a term? Or is it simply you don’t like her because “she’s a fucking Tory”
I don’t like her because she is out of her depth, has no empathy and is clearly playing to right wing racists, what do you think of her?
Mind made up then. I don’t know enough about her to be honest as it’s all a bit ‘conveyer beltish’ at the moment. Let’s see - give her a chance.
Her campaign to become PM was funded by BP, she worked for Shell. First thing she did was to crack on with fracking.
On one hand, fair play, she isn't even pretending to give a fuck about British people, and is open about her role serving her, and the Tory party backers.
On the other hand. Would be nice if we had a PM that worked for us instead.
Are these typical ‘ghoulish’ traits?
Ghoul ‘ A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’ , I hope this helps with your confusion
Very good. Fabricate by name, fabricate by nature.
In the words of Freddie “don’t stop me now”.
I have no idea what your on about but it’s nice that you have tried
Odd. You could put your ‘big boy pants’ on and admit that the use of ‘ghoul’ to describe our current Home Secretary was inappropriate & simply wrong. Not holding my breath though.
It’s not wrong ‘A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’, are you virtue signalling
As suspected.
And she’s gone
Damn! Now we’ll never know how great she could have been.
We saw how crap she was, ah well,
Six weeks? Given time she could have been the ‘Pep’ of politics.
Given time, she might have even deported her own parents."Why would she do that? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning
No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording.
I was being neither, just a bit of friendly advice, why is the word a strange choice , I am looking forward to your answer
What ‘ghoulish’ actions or attributes has she shown for you to use such a term? Or is it simply you don’t like her because “she’s a fucking Tory”
I don’t like her because she is out of her depth, has no empathy and is clearly playing to right wing racists, what do you think of her?
Mind made up then. I don’t know enough about her to be honest as it’s all a bit ‘conveyer beltish’ at the moment. Let’s see - give her a chance.
Her campaign to become PM was funded by BP, she worked for Shell. First thing she did was to crack on with fracking.
On one hand, fair play, she isn't even pretending to give a fuck about British people, and is open about her role serving her, and the Tory party backers.
On the other hand. Would be nice if we had a PM that worked for us instead.
Are these typical ‘ghoulish’ traits?
Ghoul ‘ A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’ , I hope this helps with your confusion
Very good. Fabricate by name, fabricate by nature.
In the words of Freddie “don’t stop me now”.
I have no idea what your on about but it’s nice that you have tried
Odd. You could put your ‘big boy pants’ on and admit that the use of ‘ghoul’ to describe our current Home Secretary was inappropriate & simply wrong. Not holding my breath though.
It’s not wrong ‘A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’, are you virtue signalling
As suspected.
And she’s gone
Damn! Now we’ll never know how great she could have been.
We saw how crap she was, ah well,
Six weeks? Given time she could have been the ‘Pep’ of politics.
Given time, she might have even deported her own parents.
Why would she do that? "(psst it's a joke. Because she was so mad + nasty. Get it?) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning
No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording.
I was being neither, just a bit of friendly advice, why is the word a strange choice , I am looking forward to your answer
What ‘ghoulish’ actions or attributes has she shown for you to use such a term? Or is it simply you don’t like her because “she’s a fucking Tory”
I don’t like her because she is out of her depth, has no empathy and is clearly playing to right wing racists, what do you think of her?
Mind made up then. I don’t know enough about her to be honest as it’s all a bit ‘conveyer beltish’ at the moment. Let’s see - give her a chance.
Her campaign to become PM was funded by BP, she worked for Shell. First thing she did was to crack on with fracking.
On one hand, fair play, she isn't even pretending to give a fuck about British people, and is open about her role serving her, and the Tory party backers.
On the other hand. Would be nice if we had a PM that worked for us instead.
Are these typical ‘ghoulish’ traits?
Ghoul ‘ A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’ , I hope this helps with your confusion
Very good. Fabricate by name, fabricate by nature.
In the words of Freddie “don’t stop me now”.
I have no idea what your on about but it’s nice that you have tried
Odd. You could put your ‘big boy pants’ on and admit that the use of ‘ghoul’ to describe our current Home Secretary was inappropriate & simply wrong. Not holding my breath though.
It’s not wrong ‘A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’, are you virtue signalling
As suspected.
And she’s gone
Damn! Now we’ll never know how great she could have been.
We saw how crap she was, ah well,
Six weeks? Given time she could have been the ‘Pep’ of politics.
Given time, she might have even deported her own parents.
Why would she do that?
(psst it's a joke. Because she was so mad + nasty. Get it?)"Be careful, Seb doesn’t like people insulting Braverman, they both shared the same dream, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning
No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording.
I was being neither, just a bit of friendly advice, why is the word a strange choice , I am looking forward to your answer
What ‘ghoulish’ actions or attributes has she shown for you to use such a term? Or is it simply you don’t like her because “she’s a fucking Tory”
I don’t like her because she is out of her depth, has no empathy and is clearly playing to right wing racists, what do you think of her?
Mind made up then. I don’t know enough about her to be honest as it’s all a bit ‘conveyer beltish’ at the moment. Let’s see - give her a chance.
Her campaign to become PM was funded by BP, she worked for Shell. First thing she did was to crack on with fracking.
On one hand, fair play, she isn't even pretending to give a fuck about British people, and is open about her role serving her, and the Tory party backers.
On the other hand. Would be nice if we had a PM that worked for us instead.
Are these typical ‘ghoulish’ traits?
Ghoul ‘ A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’ , I hope this helps with your confusion
Very good. Fabricate by name, fabricate by nature.
In the words of Freddie “don’t stop me now”.
I have no idea what your on about but it’s nice that you have tried
Odd. You could put your ‘big boy pants’ on and admit that the use of ‘ghoul’ to describe our current Home Secretary was inappropriate & simply wrong. Not holding my breath though.
It’s not wrong ‘A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’, are you virtue signalling
As suspected.
And she’s gone
Damn! Now we’ll never know how great she could have been.
We saw how crap she was, ah well,
Six weeks? Given time she could have been the ‘Pep’ of politics.
Given time, she might have even deported her own parents.
Why would she do that?
(psst it's a joke. Because she was so mad + nasty. Get it?)"shw didn't mean to. It was a technical mistake. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning
No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording.
I was being neither, just a bit of friendly advice, why is the word a strange choice , I am looking forward to your answer
What ‘ghoulish’ actions or attributes has she shown for you to use such a term? Or is it simply you don’t like her because “she’s a fucking Tory”
I don’t like her because she is out of her depth, has no empathy and is clearly playing to right wing racists, what do you think of her?
Mind made up then. I don’t know enough about her to be honest as it’s all a bit ‘conveyer beltish’ at the moment. Let’s see - give her a chance.
Her campaign to become PM was funded by BP, she worked for Shell. First thing she did was to crack on with fracking.
On one hand, fair play, she isn't even pretending to give a fuck about British people, and is open about her role serving her, and the Tory party backers.
On the other hand. Would be nice if we had a PM that worked for us instead.
Are these typical ‘ghoulish’ traits?
Ghoul ‘ A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’ , I hope this helps with your confusion
Very good. Fabricate by name, fabricate by nature.
In the words of Freddie “don’t stop me now”.
I have no idea what your on about but it’s nice that you have tried
Odd. You could put your ‘big boy pants’ on and admit that the use of ‘ghoul’ to describe our current Home Secretary was inappropriate & simply wrong. Not holding my breath though.
It’s not wrong ‘A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’, are you virtue signalling
As suspected.
And she’s gone
Damn! Now we’ll never know how great she could have been.
We saw how crap she was, ah well,
Six weeks? Given time she could have been the ‘Pep’ of politics.
Given time, she might have even deported her own parents.
Why would she do that?
(psst it's a joke. Because she was so mad + nasty. Get it?)"Oh right. Work on your comedy routine, jokes about deporting people, not really funny: | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning
No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording.
I was being neither, just a bit of friendly advice, why is the word a strange choice , I am looking forward to your answer
What ‘ghoulish’ actions or attributes has she shown for you to use such a term? Or is it simply you don’t like her because “she’s a fucking Tory”
I don’t like her because she is out of her depth, has no empathy and is clearly playing to right wing racists, what do you think of her?
Mind made up then. I don’t know enough about her to be honest as it’s all a bit ‘conveyer beltish’ at the moment. Let’s see - give her a chance.
Her campaign to become PM was funded by BP, she worked for Shell. First thing she did was to crack on with fracking.
On one hand, fair play, she isn't even pretending to give a fuck about British people, and is open about her role serving her, and the Tory party backers.
On the other hand. Would be nice if we had a PM that worked for us instead.
Are these typical ‘ghoulish’ traits?
Ghoul ‘ A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’ , I hope this helps with your confusion
Very good. Fabricate by name, fabricate by nature.
In the words of Freddie “don’t stop me now”.
I have no idea what your on about but it’s nice that you have tried
Odd. You could put your ‘big boy pants’ on and admit that the use of ‘ghoul’ to describe our current Home Secretary was inappropriate & simply wrong. Not holding my breath though.
It’s not wrong ‘A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’, are you virtue signalling
As suspected.
And she’s gone
Damn! Now we’ll never know how great she could have been.
We saw how crap she was, ah well,
Six weeks? Given time she could have been the ‘Pep’ of politics.
Given time, she might have even deported her own parents.
Why would she do that?
(psst it's a joke. Because she was so mad + nasty. Get it?)
Be careful, Seb doesn’t like people insulting Braverman, they both shared the same dream, "Strange comment? Not upset at all. Puzzled by some comments & daft name calling. But hey Ho, another day on ‘leftie luvvie’ Fab | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Oh right. Work on your comedy routine, jokes about deporting people, not really funny:" For one person, it is their dream to deport people - that person is (sorry was) Home Secretary until a couple of hours ago. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Oh right. Work on your comedy routine, jokes about deporting people, not really funny: For one person, it is their dream to deport people - that person is (sorry was) Home Secretary until a couple of hours ago." Was it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Was it her dream? Yes so it seems" https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/suella-braverman-rwanda-dream-obsession-b2195296.html | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I dont like the tories, but apparently there are rumours that boris will return as pm. I watched sky mews talking about it, what do you think about it? I think that it is a good idea. I also find him to be fun. I mean which pm get stuck on a zip wire lol. Here is my message to liz, it is nothing wrong to have high ambitions like wanting to be a pm, but sometimes it is not meant to be as it is just out of ones dept "I heard the main people pushing for Boris to be back at 10 Downing Street. Are the person in charge of planning parties at Downing Street and the the person who owns the nearest off licence. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I also find him to be fun. I mean which pm get stuck on a zip wire lol. This is the problem and why some people elected him and not because they thought he could run a country without lying
We don't need a man who makes a fool of himself on zip wires to run a country. We need a competent leader who can do the job "What happened to the original comment seems to have disappeared. Yes qualifications for PM, must be funny. What we need right now is the biggest child in the house of commons back at number 10. With Peppa pig as Chancellor. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Oh right. Work on your comedy routine, jokes about deporting people, not really funny: For one person, it is their dream to deport people - that person is (sorry was) Home Secretary until a couple of hours ago. Was it? " Absolutely - yes. She said at the Conservative Party conference that as Home Secretary it was her dream to see newspaper headlines of an aircraft full of asylum seekers taking off for Rwanda. Absolute ghoul. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"We are already a bit of a laughing stock on the world stage. Re-appointing Johnson would put us firmly in the same league as third-world tinpot countries. We have to accept that there is ideologically no place for Conservative politics in the short to mid-term. The debt is so great and public services so stretches that they can neither cut taxes (as we have just seen) nor can they cut public spending. There is nothing left for them to do other than adopt populist policies in the hope that their economic impotence will be overlooked because people are distracted by immigrants/flag shagging/Brexit/the BBC or whatever other populist nonsense they dream up. Did you see that ghoul Braverman blame the current problems on the tofu eating wokerati ,
Ghoul?
Yeah, Google it if you don’t understand it’s meaning
No need to be so rude and condescending. Just thought it was a strange choice of wording.
I was being neither, just a bit of friendly advice, why is the word a strange choice , I am looking forward to your answer
What ‘ghoulish’ actions or attributes has she shown for you to use such a term? Or is it simply you don’t like her because “she’s a fucking Tory”
I don’t like her because she is out of her depth, has no empathy and is clearly playing to right wing racists, what do you think of her?
Mind made up then. I don’t know enough about her to be honest as it’s all a bit ‘conveyer beltish’ at the moment. Let’s see - give her a chance.
Her campaign to become PM was funded by BP, she worked for Shell. First thing she did was to crack on with fracking.
On one hand, fair play, she isn't even pretending to give a fuck about British people, and is open about her role serving her, and the Tory party backers.
On the other hand. Would be nice if we had a PM that worked for us instead.
Are these typical ‘ghoulish’ traits?
Ghoul ‘ A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’ , I hope this helps with your confusion
Very good. Fabricate by name, fabricate by nature.
In the words of Freddie “don’t stop me now”.
I have no idea what your on about but it’s nice that you have tried
Odd. You could put your ‘big boy pants’ on and admit that the use of ‘ghoul’ to describe our current Home Secretary was inappropriate & simply wrong. Not holding my breath though.
It’s not wrong ‘A person with a callous or uncaring attitude to human life and suffering, particularly when prioritising economic concerns’, are you virtue signalling
As suspected.
And she’s gone
Damn! Now we’ll never know how great she could have been.
We saw how crap she was, ah well,
Six weeks? Given time she could have been the ‘Pep’ of politics.
Given time, she might have even deported her own parents.
Why would she do that?
(psst it's a joke. Because she was so mad + nasty. Get it?)shw didn't mean to. It was a technical mistake. "Quality satire right there. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Boris will make more doing the circuit than going back to that job
It’s all about money then? "yes | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I dont like the tories, but apparently there are rumours that boris will return as pm. I watched sky mews talking about it, what do you think about it? I think that it is a good idea. I also find him to be fun. I mean which pm get stuck on a zip wire lol. Here is my message to liz, it is nothing wrong to have high ambitions like wanting to be a pm, but sometimes it is not meant to be as it is just out of ones dept "Tory party members want him back, but they also voted for Truss over Sunak. They also supported him throughout his years of chaos including partygate. Do they make good decisions? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I dont like the tories, but apparently there are rumours that boris will return as pm. I watched sky mews talking about it, what do you think about it? I think that it is a good idea. I also find him to be fun. I mean which pm get stuck on a zip wire lol. Here is my message to liz, it is nothing wrong to have high ambitions like wanting to be a pm, but sometimes it is not meant to be as it is just out of ones dept
Tory party members want him back, but they also voted for Truss over Sunak. They also supported him throughout his years of chaos including partygate.
Do they make good decisions?"No they don't. The voting for Truss put her either 4th or 3rd until the last 2 rounds. Sunak won every round but not the final one. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Oh right. Work on your comedy routine, jokes about deporting people, not really funny: For one person, it is their dream to deport people - that person is (sorry was) Home Secretary until a couple of hours ago. Was it? Absolutely - yes. She said at the Conservative Party conference that as Home Secretary it was her dream to see newspaper headlines of an aircraft full of asylum seekers taking off for Rwanda. Absolute ghoul." Ghoul - really? You don’t like her as ‘she’s a fucking Tory’. In the same childish thinking of the occasional post on here “I could never fuck a Tory”. You never see a post from a Conservative supporter saying “I could never fuck someone that voted Labour”. I guess that makes ‘Tories’ more broad minded, better lovers, better swingers ? I’ve always thought the Rwanda thing was nonsense. It still stinks of one of Johnson’s brilliant ideas. For The Home Secretary to make her ‘dream’ statement was stupid. Hardly makes her a ‘ghoul’ that wants to deport people. It is her job to protect our borders of course, and remove those that don’t belong here. let’s hope the new team step up. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Oh right. Work on your comedy routine, jokes about deporting people, not really funny: For one person, it is their dream to deport people - that person is (sorry was) Home Secretary until a couple of hours ago. Was it? Absolutely - yes. She said at the Conservative Party conference that as Home Secretary it was her dream to see newspaper headlines of an aircraft full of asylum seekers taking off for Rwanda. Absolute ghoul. Ghoul - really? You don’t like her as ‘she’s a fucking Tory’. In the same childish thinking of the occasional post on here “I could never fuck a Tory”. You never see a post from a Conservative supporter saying “I could never fuck someone that voted Labour”. I guess that makes ‘Tories’ more broad minded, better lovers, better swingers ? I’ve always thought the Rwanda thing was nonsense. It still stinks of one of Johnson’s brilliant ideas. For The Home Secretary to make her ‘dream’ statement was stupid. Hardly makes her a ‘ghoul’ that wants to deport people. It is her job to protect our borders of course, and remove those that don’t belong here. let’s hope the new team step up." She is a ghoul, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Oh right. Work on your comedy routine, jokes about deporting people, not really funny: For one person, it is their dream to deport people - that person is (sorry was) Home Secretary until a couple of hours ago. Was it? Absolutely - yes. She said at the Conservative Party conference that as Home Secretary it was her dream to see newspaper headlines of an aircraft full of asylum seekers taking off for Rwanda. Absolute ghoul. Ghoul - really? You don’t like her as ‘she’s a fucking Tory’. In the same childish thinking of the occasional post on here “I could never fuck a Tory”. You never see a post from a Conservative supporter saying “I could never fuck someone that voted Labour”. I guess that makes ‘Tories’ more broad minded, better lovers, better swingers ? I’ve always thought the Rwanda thing was nonsense. It still stinks of one of Johnson’s brilliant ideas. For The Home Secretary to make her ‘dream’ statement was stupid. Hardly makes her a ‘ghoul’ that wants to deport people. It is her job to protect our borders of course, and remove those that don’t belong here. let’s hope the new team step up. She is a ghoul, "She was a crap lawyer (never made silk btw), a crap attorney general and a crap Home Secretary! Talentless and disengaged from humanity and reality, which let’s face it most of the current PMs cabinet members were although CHunt (PM in all but name) does seem to be wielding the long knives atm I suppose having been rejected by most of the Tory MPs for leadership he probably doesn’t need to worry about who he fucks over as it’s his only chance | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Oh right. Work on your comedy routine, jokes about deporting people, not really funny: For one person, it is their dream to deport people - that person is (sorry was) Home Secretary until a couple of hours ago. Was it? Absolutely - yes. She said at the Conservative Party conference that as Home Secretary it was her dream to see newspaper headlines of an aircraft full of asylum seekers taking off for Rwanda. Absolute ghoul. Ghoul - really? You don’t like her as ‘she’s a fucking Tory’. In the same childish thinking of the occasional post on here “I could never fuck a Tory”. You never see a post from a Conservative supporter saying “I could never fuck someone that voted Labour”. I guess that makes ‘Tories’ more broad minded, better lovers, better swingers ? I’ve always thought the Rwanda thing was nonsense. It still stinks of one of Johnson’s brilliant ideas. For The Home Secretary to make her ‘dream’ statement was stupid. Hardly makes her a ‘ghoul’ that wants to deport people. It is her job to protect our borders of course, and remove those that don’t belong here. let’s hope the new team step up. She is a ghoul, "Silly name calling still? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Oh right. Work on your comedy routine, jokes about deporting people, not really funny: For one person, it is their dream to deport people - that person is (sorry was) Home Secretary until a couple of hours ago. Was it? Absolutely - yes. She said at the Conservative Party conference that as Home Secretary it was her dream to see newspaper headlines of an aircraft full of asylum seekers taking off for Rwanda. Absolute ghoul. Ghoul - really? You don’t like her as ‘she’s a fucking Tory’. In the same childish thinking of the occasional post on here “I could never fuck a Tory”. You never see a post from a Conservative supporter saying “I could never fuck someone that voted Labour”. I guess that makes ‘Tories’ more broad minded, better lovers, better swingers ? I’ve always thought the Rwanda thing was nonsense. It still stinks of one of Johnson’s brilliant ideas. For The Home Secretary to make her ‘dream’ statement was stupid. Hardly makes her a ‘ghoul’ that wants to deport people. It is her job to protect our borders of course, and remove those that don’t belong here. let’s hope the new team step up. She is a ghoul,
Silly name calling still? "Does it offend you, or are you virtue signalling? Tbh, she isn’t a ghoul, she is an incompetent ghoul | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Oh right. Work on your comedy routine, jokes about deporting people, not really funny: For one person, it is their dream to deport people - that person is (sorry was) Home Secretary until a couple of hours ago. Was it? Absolutely - yes. She said at the Conservative Party conference that as Home Secretary it was her dream to see newspaper headlines of an aircraft full of asylum seekers taking off for Rwanda. Absolute ghoul. Ghoul - really? You don’t like her as ‘she’s a fucking Tory’. In the same childish thinking of the occasional post on here “I could never fuck a Tory”. You never see a post from a Conservative supporter saying “I could never fuck someone that voted Labour”. I guess that makes ‘Tories’ more broad minded, better lovers, better swingers ? I’ve always thought the Rwanda thing was nonsense. It still stinks of one of Johnson’s brilliant ideas. For The Home Secretary to make her ‘dream’ statement was stupid. Hardly makes her a ‘ghoul’ that wants to deport people. It is her job to protect our borders of course, and remove those that don’t belong here. let’s hope the new team step up. She is a ghoul,
Silly name calling still?
Does it offend you, or are you virtue signalling? Tbh, she isn’t a ghoul, she is an incompetent ghoul "Certainly doesn’t offend. The choice of word is puzzling. What ‘ghoulish’ action has she been involved in to upset you so? Or is it simply because ‘she’s a fucking Tory’? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Oh right. Work on your comedy routine, jokes about deporting people, not really funny: For one person, it is their dream to deport people - that person is (sorry was) Home Secretary until a couple of hours ago. Was it? Absolutely - yes. She said at the Conservative Party conference that as Home Secretary it was her dream to see newspaper headlines of an aircraft full of asylum seekers taking off for Rwanda. Absolute ghoul. Ghoul - really? You don’t like her as ‘she’s a fucking Tory’. In the same childish thinking of the occasional post on here “I could never fuck a Tory”. You never see a post from a Conservative supporter saying “I could never fuck someone that voted Labour”. I guess that makes ‘Tories’ more broad minded, better lovers, better swingers ? I’ve always thought the Rwanda thing was nonsense. It still stinks of one of Johnson’s brilliant ideas. For The Home Secretary to make her ‘dream’ statement was stupid. Hardly makes her a ‘ghoul’ that wants to deport people. It is her job to protect our borders of course, and remove those that don’t belong here. let’s hope the new team step up. She is a ghoul,
Silly name calling still?
Does it offend you, or are you virtue signalling? Tbh, she isn’t a ghoul, she is an incompetent ghoul
Certainly doesn’t offend. The choice of word is puzzling. What ‘ghoulish’ action has she been involved in to upset you so?
Or is it simply because ‘she’s a fucking Tory’? "I have already explained this, tbh, she is now irrelevant , her dreams are shattered , | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Oh right. Work on your comedy routine, jokes about deporting people, not really funny: For one person, it is their dream to deport people - that person is (sorry was) Home Secretary until a couple of hours ago. Was it? Absolutely - yes. She said at the Conservative Party conference that as Home Secretary it was her dream to see newspaper headlines of an aircraft full of asylum seekers taking off for Rwanda. Absolute ghoul. Ghoul - really? You don’t like her as ‘she’s a fucking Tory’. In the same childish thinking of the occasional post on here “I could never fuck a Tory”. You never see a post from a Conservative supporter saying “I could never fuck someone that voted Labour”. I guess that makes ‘Tories’ more broad minded, better lovers, better swingers ? I’ve always thought the Rwanda thing was nonsense. It still stinks of one of Johnson’s brilliant ideas. For The Home Secretary to make her ‘dream’ statement was stupid. Hardly makes her a ‘ghoul’ that wants to deport people. It is her job to protect our borders of course, and remove those that don’t belong here. let’s hope the new team step up. She is a ghoul,
Silly name calling still?
Does it offend you, or are you virtue signalling? Tbh, she isn’t a ghoul, she is an incompetent ghoul
Certainly doesn’t offend. The choice of word is puzzling. What ‘ghoulish’ action has she been involved in to upset you so?
Or is it simply because ‘she’s a fucking Tory’?
I have already explained this, tbh, she is now irrelevant , her dreams are shattered , "Anybody else know what this guy is going on about? Why would she be labelled a ‘ghoul’? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Oh right. Work on your comedy routine, jokes about deporting people, not really funny: For one person, it is their dream to deport people - that person is (sorry was) Home Secretary until a couple of hours ago. Was it? Absolutely - yes. She said at the Conservative Party conference that as Home Secretary it was her dream to see newspaper headlines of an aircraft full of asylum seekers taking off for Rwanda. Absolute ghoul. Ghoul - really? You don’t like her as ‘she’s a fucking Tory’. In the same childish thinking of the occasional post on here “I could never fuck a Tory”. You never see a post from a Conservative supporter saying “I could never fuck someone that voted Labour”. I guess that makes ‘Tories’ more broad minded, better lovers, better swingers ? I’ve always thought the Rwanda thing was nonsense. It still stinks of one of Johnson’s brilliant ideas. For The Home Secretary to make her ‘dream’ statement was stupid. Hardly makes her a ‘ghoul’ that wants to deport people. It is her job to protect our borders of course, and remove those that don’t belong here. let’s hope the new team step up. She is a ghoul,
Silly name calling still?
Does it offend you, or are you virtue signalling? Tbh, she isn’t a ghoul, she is an incompetent ghoul
Certainly doesn’t offend. The choice of word is puzzling. What ‘ghoulish’ action has she been involved in to upset you so?
Or is it simply because ‘she’s a fucking Tory’?
I have already explained this, tbh, she is now irrelevant , her dreams are shattered ,
Anybody else know what this guy is going on about? Why would she be labelled a ‘ghoul’? "PMSL, move on Seb, it’s freedom of speech , stop being such a snowflake about a word , | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Oh right. Work on your comedy routine, jokes about deporting people, not really funny: For one person, it is their dream to deport people - that person is (sorry was) Home Secretary until a couple of hours ago. Was it? Absolutely - yes. She said at the Conservative Party conference that as Home Secretary it was her dream to see newspaper headlines of an aircraft full of asylum seekers taking off for Rwanda. Absolute ghoul. Ghoul - really? You don’t like her as ‘she’s a fucking Tory’. In the same childish thinking of the occasional post on here “I could never fuck a Tory”. You never see a post from a Conservative supporter saying “I could never fuck someone that voted Labour”. I guess that makes ‘Tories’ more broad minded, better lovers, better swingers ? I’ve always thought the Rwanda thing was nonsense. It still stinks of one of Johnson’s brilliant ideas. For The Home Secretary to make her ‘dream’ statement was stupid. Hardly makes her a ‘ghoul’ that wants to deport people. It is her job to protect our borders of course, and remove those that don’t belong here. let’s hope the new team step up. She is a ghoul,
Silly name calling still?
Does it offend you, or are you virtue signalling? Tbh, she isn’t a ghoul, she is an incompetent ghoul
Certainly doesn’t offend. The choice of word is puzzling. What ‘ghoulish’ action has she been involved in to upset you so?
Or is it simply because ‘she’s a fucking Tory’?
I have already explained this, tbh, she is now irrelevant , her dreams are shattered , "Her comments like many others before her are to reach the ears of the majority of people in the country who are sceptical of our governments ability to control immigration. There are figure, a little dated now but they indicate that there is 25% of people who are pro-immigration and 25% of people who are anti-immigration and 50% that are sceptical about immigration. Labour's immigration policy is not concrete from what I can see it is, we should, we could do something. It isn't going to resinate with the 50% sceptical group, which can / are the group that decide what is going to be voted in. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Oh right. Work on your comedy routine, jokes about deporting people, not really funny: For one person, it is their dream to deport people - that person is (sorry was) Home Secretary until a couple of hours ago. Was it? Absolutely - yes. She said at the Conservative Party conference that as Home Secretary it was her dream to see newspaper headlines of an aircraft full of asylum seekers taking off for Rwanda. Absolute ghoul. Ghoul - really? You don’t like her as ‘she’s a fucking Tory’. In the same childish thinking of the occasional post on here “I could never fuck a Tory”. You never see a post from a Conservative supporter saying “I could never fuck someone that voted Labour”. I guess that makes ‘Tories’ more broad minded, better lovers, better swingers ? I’ve always thought the Rwanda thing was nonsense. It still stinks of one of Johnson’s brilliant ideas. For The Home Secretary to make her ‘dream’ statement was stupid. Hardly makes her a ‘ghoul’ that wants to deport people. It is her job to protect our borders of course, and remove those that don’t belong here. let’s hope the new team step up. She is a ghoul,
Silly name calling still?
Does it offend you, or are you virtue signalling? Tbh, she isn’t a ghoul, she is an incompetent ghoul
Certainly doesn’t offend. The choice of word is puzzling. What ‘ghoulish’ action has she been involved in to upset you so?
Or is it simply because ‘she’s a fucking Tory’?
I have already explained this, tbh, she is now irrelevant , her dreams are shattered ,
Her comments like many others before her are to reach the ears of the majority of people in the country who are sceptical of our governments ability to control immigration.
There are figure, a little dated now but they indicate that there is 25% of people who are pro-immigration and 25% of people who are anti-immigration and 50% that are sceptical about immigration.
Labour's immigration policy is not concrete from what I can see it is, we should, we could do something. It isn't going to resinate with the 50% sceptical group, which can / are the group that decide what is going to be voted in.
"Are you part of the 50%? If so Did you like her dream about ‘planes of refugees flying to rwanda’ ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Oh right. Work on your comedy routine, jokes about deporting people, not really funny: For one person, it is their dream to deport people - that person is (sorry was) Home Secretary until a couple of hours ago. Was it? Absolutely - yes. She said at the Conservative Party conference that as Home Secretary it was her dream to see newspaper headlines of an aircraft full of asylum seekers taking off for Rwanda. Absolute ghoul. Ghoul - really? You don’t like her as ‘she’s a fucking Tory’. In the same childish thinking of the occasional post on here “I could never fuck a Tory”. You never see a post from a Conservative supporter saying “I could never fuck someone that voted Labour”. I guess that makes ‘Tories’ more broad minded, better lovers, better swingers ? I’ve always thought the Rwanda thing was nonsense. It still stinks of one of Johnson’s brilliant ideas. For The Home Secretary to make her ‘dream’ statement was stupid. Hardly makes her a ‘ghoul’ that wants to deport people. It is her job to protect our borders of course, and remove those that don’t belong here. let’s hope the new team step up. She is a ghoul,
Silly name calling still?
Does it offend you, or are you virtue signalling? Tbh, she isn’t a ghoul, she is an incompetent ghoul
Certainly doesn’t offend. The choice of word is puzzling. What ‘ghoulish’ action has she been involved in to upset you so?
Or is it simply because ‘she’s a fucking Tory’?
I have already explained this, tbh, she is now irrelevant , her dreams are shattered ,
Her comments like many others before her are to reach the ears of the majority of people in the country who are sceptical of our governments ability to control immigration.
There are figure, a little dated now but they indicate that there is 25% of people who are pro-immigration and 25% of people who are anti-immigration and 50% that are sceptical about immigration.
Labour's immigration policy is not concrete from what I can see it is, we should, we could do something. It isn't going to resinate with the 50% sceptical group, which can / are the group that decide what is going to be voted in.
"Btw, immigration is not the biggest issue facing the country right now, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Oh right. Work on your comedy routine, jokes about deporting people, not really funny: For one person, it is their dream to deport people - that person is (sorry was) Home Secretary until a couple of hours ago. Was it? Absolutely - yes. She said at the Conservative Party conference that as Home Secretary it was her dream to see newspaper headlines of an aircraft full of asylum seekers taking off for Rwanda. Absolute ghoul. Ghoul - really? You don’t like her as ‘she’s a fucking Tory’. In the same childish thinking of the occasional post on here “I could never fuck a Tory”. You never see a post from a Conservative supporter saying “I could never fuck someone that voted Labour”. I guess that makes ‘Tories’ more broad minded, better lovers, better swingers ? I’ve always thought the Rwanda thing was nonsense. It still stinks of one of Johnson’s brilliant ideas. For The Home Secretary to make her ‘dream’ statement was stupid. Hardly makes her a ‘ghoul’ that wants to deport people. It is her job to protect our borders of course, and remove those that don’t belong here. let’s hope the new team step up. She is a ghoul,
Silly name calling still?
Does it offend you, or are you virtue signalling? Tbh, she isn’t a ghoul, she is an incompetent ghoul
Certainly doesn’t offend. The choice of word is puzzling. What ‘ghoulish’ action has she been involved in to upset you so?
Or is it simply because ‘she’s a fucking Tory’?
I have already explained this, tbh, she is now irrelevant , her dreams are shattered ,
Her comments like many others before her are to reach the ears of the majority of people in the country who are sceptical of our governments ability to control immigration.
There are figure, a little dated now but they indicate that there is 25% of people who are pro-immigration and 25% of people who are anti-immigration and 50% that are sceptical about immigration.
Labour's immigration policy is not concrete from what I can see it is, we should, we could do something. It isn't going to resinate with the 50% sceptical group, which can / are the group that decide what is going to be voted in.
Btw, immigration is not the biggest issue facing the country right now, "It's definitely a handy tool to distract people who aren't properly paying attention. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Oh right. Work on your comedy routine, jokes about deporting people, not really funny: For one person, it is their dream to deport people - that person is (sorry was) Home Secretary until a couple of hours ago. Was it? Absolutely - yes. She said at the Conservative Party conference that as Home Secretary it was her dream to see newspaper headlines of an aircraft full of asylum seekers taking off for Rwanda. Absolute ghoul. Ghoul - really? You don’t like her as ‘she’s a fucking Tory’. In the same childish thinking of the occasional post on here “I could never fuck a Tory”. You never see a post from a Conservative supporter saying “I could never fuck someone that voted Labour”. I guess that makes ‘Tories’ more broad minded, better lovers, better swingers ? I’ve always thought the Rwanda thing was nonsense. It still stinks of one of Johnson’s brilliant ideas. For The Home Secretary to make her ‘dream’ statement was stupid. Hardly makes her a ‘ghoul’ that wants to deport people. It is her job to protect our borders of course, and remove those that don’t belong here. let’s hope the new team step up. She is a ghoul,
Silly name calling still?
Does it offend you, or are you virtue signalling? Tbh, she isn’t a ghoul, she is an incompetent ghoul
Certainly doesn’t offend. The choice of word is puzzling. What ‘ghoulish’ action has she been involved in to upset you so?
Or is it simply because ‘she’s a fucking Tory’?
I have already explained this, tbh, she is now irrelevant , her dreams are shattered ,
Her comments like many others before her are to reach the ears of the majority of people in the country who are sceptical of our governments ability to control immigration.
There are figure, a little dated now but they indicate that there is 25% of people who are pro-immigration and 25% of people who are anti-immigration and 50% that are sceptical about immigration.
Labour's immigration policy is not concrete from what I can see it is, we should, we could do something. It isn't going to resinate with the 50% sceptical group, which can / are the group that decide what is going to be voted in.
Are you part of the 50%? If so Did you like her dream about ‘planes of refugees flying to rwanda’ ? "I think I do fall into the the 50% a lot of the time. I'm sceptical about the people attempting to get to our shores on small boats, some are escaping for sure, many more looking for work to provide for family back home, and sone that are coming for less righteous reasons. I'm sceptical that plans set out are viable, I'm sceptical that a Labour government would be any better at dealing with the issues. I feel you sit firmly in the 25% of pro immigration, you will not move your opinion like others here who are in the 25% anti group. Both camps will battle their corners relentlessly and offer governments no real challenge, they know how you feel and know is easy to say the right thing to either side, what they do struggle with are the 50% of people who are sceptical. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Oh right. Work on your comedy routine, jokes about deporting people, not really funny: For one person, it is their dream to deport people - that person is (sorry was) Home Secretary until a couple of hours ago. Was it? Absolutely - yes. She said at the Conservative Party conference that as Home Secretary it was her dream to see newspaper headlines of an aircraft full of asylum seekers taking off for Rwanda. Absolute ghoul. Ghoul - really? You don’t like her as ‘she’s a fucking Tory’. In the same childish thinking of the occasional post on here “I could never fuck a Tory”. You never see a post from a Conservative supporter saying “I could never fuck someone that voted Labour”. I guess that makes ‘Tories’ more broad minded, better lovers, better swingers ? I’ve always thought the Rwanda thing was nonsense. It still stinks of one of Johnson’s brilliant ideas. For The Home Secretary to make her ‘dream’ statement was stupid. Hardly makes her a ‘ghoul’ that wants to deport people. It is her job to protect our borders of course, and remove those that don’t belong here. let’s hope the new team step up. She is a ghoul,
Silly name calling still?
Does it offend you, or are you virtue signalling? Tbh, she isn’t a ghoul, she is an incompetent ghoul
Certainly doesn’t offend. The choice of word is puzzling. What ‘ghoulish’ action has she been involved in to upset you so?
Or is it simply because ‘she’s a fucking Tory’?
I have already explained this, tbh, she is now irrelevant , her dreams are shattered ,
Her comments like many others before her are to reach the ears of the majority of people in the country who are sceptical of our governments ability to control immigration.
There are figure, a little dated now but they indicate that there is 25% of people who are pro-immigration and 25% of people who are anti-immigration and 50% that are sceptical about immigration.
Labour's immigration policy is not concrete from what I can see it is, we should, we could do something. It isn't going to resinate with the 50% sceptical group, which can / are the group that decide what is going to be voted in.
Are you part of the 50%? If so Did you like her dream about ‘planes of refugees flying to rwanda’ ?
I think I do fall into the the 50% a lot of the time.
I'm sceptical about the people attempting to get to our shores on small boats, some are escaping for sure, many more looking for work to provide for family back home, and sone that are coming for less righteous reasons.
I'm sceptical that plans set out are viable, I'm sceptical that a Labour government would be any better at dealing with the issues.
I feel you sit firmly in the 25% of pro immigration, you will not move your opinion like others here who are in the 25% anti group. Both camps will battle their corners relentlessly and offer governments no real challenge, they know how you feel and know is easy to say the right thing to either side, what they do struggle with are the 50% of people who are sceptical."Did you like her dream? I can see the pros and cons of immigration but I would like anyone coming here to be treated like human beings, is that to much to ask? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Oh right. Work on your comedy routine, jokes about deporting people, not really funny: For one person, it is their dream to deport people - that person is (sorry was) Home Secretary until a couple of hours ago. Was it? Absolutely - yes. She said at the Conservative Party conference that as Home Secretary it was her dream to see newspaper headlines of an aircraft full of asylum seekers taking off for Rwanda. Absolute ghoul. Ghoul - really? You don’t like her as ‘she’s a fucking Tory’. In the same childish thinking of the occasional post on here “I could never fuck a Tory”. You never see a post from a Conservative supporter saying “I could never fuck someone that voted Labour”. I guess that makes ‘Tories’ more broad minded, better lovers, better swingers ? I’ve always thought the Rwanda thing was nonsense. It still stinks of one of Johnson’s brilliant ideas. For The Home Secretary to make her ‘dream’ statement was stupid. Hardly makes her a ‘ghoul’ that wants to deport people. It is her job to protect our borders of course, and remove those that don’t belong here. let’s hope the new team step up. She is a ghoul,
Silly name calling still?
Does it offend you, or are you virtue signalling? Tbh, she isn’t a ghoul, she is an incompetent ghoul
Certainly doesn’t offend. The choice of word is puzzling. What ‘ghoulish’ action has she been involved in to upset you so?
Or is it simply because ‘she’s a fucking Tory’?
I have already explained this, tbh, she is now irrelevant , her dreams are shattered ,
Her comments like many others before her are to reach the ears of the majority of people in the country who are sceptical of our governments ability to control immigration.
There are figure, a little dated now but they indicate that there is 25% of people who are pro-immigration and 25% of people who are anti-immigration and 50% that are sceptical about immigration.
Labour's immigration policy is not concrete from what I can see it is, we should, we could do something. It isn't going to resinate with the 50% sceptical group, which can / are the group that decide what is going to be voted in.
Are you part of the 50%? If so Did you like her dream about ‘planes of refugees flying to rwanda’ ?
I think I do fall into the the 50% a lot of the time.
I'm sceptical about the people attempting to get to our shores on small boats, some are escaping for sure, many more looking for work to provide for family back home, and sone that are coming for less righteous reasons.
I'm sceptical that plans set out are viable, I'm sceptical that a Labour government would be any better at dealing with the issues.
I feel you sit firmly in the 25% of pro immigration, you will not move your opinion like others here who are in the 25% anti group. Both camps will battle their corners relentlessly and offer governments no real challenge, they know how you feel and know is easy to say the right thing to either side, what they do struggle with are the 50% of people who are sceptical.
Did you like her dream? I can see the pros and cons of immigration but I would like anyone coming here to be treated like human beings, is that to much to ask? "If you read my post it will indicate what I think of any plans, sceptical. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Oh right. Work on your comedy routine, jokes about deporting people, not really funny: For one person, it is their dream to deport people - that person is (sorry was) Home Secretary until a couple of hours ago. Was it? Absolutely - yes. She said at the Conservative Party conference that as Home Secretary it was her dream to see newspaper headlines of an aircraft full of asylum seekers taking off for Rwanda. Absolute ghoul. Ghoul - really? You don’t like her as ‘she’s a fucking Tory’. In the same childish thinking of the occasional post on here “I could never fuck a Tory”. You never see a post from a Conservative supporter saying “I could never fuck someone that voted Labour”. I guess that makes ‘Tories’ more broad minded, better lovers, better swingers ? I’ve always thought the Rwanda thing was nonsense. It still stinks of one of Johnson’s brilliant ideas. For The Home Secretary to make her ‘dream’ statement was stupid. Hardly makes her a ‘ghoul’ that wants to deport people. It is her job to protect our borders of course, and remove those that don’t belong here. let’s hope the new team step up. She is a ghoul,
Silly name calling still?
Does it offend you, or are you virtue signalling? Tbh, she isn’t a ghoul, she is an incompetent ghoul
Certainly doesn’t offend. The choice of word is puzzling. What ‘ghoulish’ action has she been involved in to upset you so?
Or is it simply because ‘she’s a fucking Tory’?
I have already explained this, tbh, she is now irrelevant , her dreams are shattered ,
Her comments like many others before her are to reach the ears of the majority of people in the country who are sceptical of our governments ability to control immigration.
There are figure, a little dated now but they indicate that there is 25% of people who are pro-immigration and 25% of people who are anti-immigration and 50% that are sceptical about immigration.
Labour's immigration policy is not concrete from what I can see it is, we should, we could do something. It isn't going to resinate with the 50% sceptical group, which can / are the group that decide what is going to be voted in.
Are you part of the 50%? If so Did you like her dream about ‘planes of refugees flying to rwanda’ ?
I think I do fall into the the 50% a lot of the time.
I'm sceptical about the people attempting to get to our shores on small boats, some are escaping for sure, many more looking for work to provide for family back home, and sone that are coming for less righteous reasons.
I'm sceptical that plans set out are viable, I'm sceptical that a Labour government would be any better at dealing with the issues.
I feel you sit firmly in the 25% of pro immigration, you will not move your opinion like others here who are in the 25% anti group. Both camps will battle their corners relentlessly and offer governments no real challenge, they know how you feel and know is easy to say the right thing to either side, what they do struggle with are the 50% of people who are sceptical.
Did you like her dream? I can see the pros and cons of immigration but I would like anyone coming here to be treated like human beings, is that to much to ask?
If you read my post it will indicate what I think of any plans, sceptical.
"Fair enough, I am totally against her ‘dreams’ but it no longer matters, she has been sacked for being incompetent, on to the next one | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Oh right. Work on your comedy routine, jokes about deporting people, not really funny: For one person, it is their dream to deport people - that person is (sorry was) Home Secretary until a couple of hours ago. Was it? Absolutely - yes. She said at the Conservative Party conference that as Home Secretary it was her dream to see newspaper headlines of an aircraft full of asylum seekers taking off for Rwanda. Absolute ghoul. Ghoul - really? You don’t like her as ‘she’s a fucking Tory’. In the same childish thinking of the occasional post on here “I could never fuck a Tory”. You never see a post from a Conservative supporter saying “I could never fuck someone that voted Labour”. I guess that makes ‘Tories’ more broad minded, better lovers, better swingers ? I’ve always thought the Rwanda thing was nonsense. It still stinks of one of Johnson’s brilliant ideas. For The Home Secretary to make her ‘dream’ statement was stupid. Hardly makes her a ‘ghoul’ that wants to deport people. It is her job to protect our borders of course, and remove those that don’t belong here. let’s hope the new team step up. She is a ghoul,
Silly name calling still?
Does it offend you, or are you virtue signalling? Tbh, she isn’t a ghoul, she is an incompetent ghoul
Certainly doesn’t offend. The choice of word is puzzling. What ‘ghoulish’ action has she been involved in to upset you so?
Or is it simply because ‘she’s a fucking Tory’?
I have already explained this, tbh, she is now irrelevant , her dreams are shattered ,
Her comments like many others before her are to reach the ears of the majority of people in the country who are sceptical of our governments ability to control immigration.
There are figure, a little dated now but they indicate that there is 25% of people who are pro-immigration and 25% of people who are anti-immigration and 50% that are sceptical about immigration.
Labour's immigration policy is not concrete from what I can see it is, we should, we could do something. It isn't going to resinate with the 50% sceptical group, which can / are the group that decide what is going to be voted in.
Are you part of the 50%? If so Did you like her dream about ‘planes of refugees flying to rwanda’ ?
I think I do fall into the the 50% a lot of the time.
I'm sceptical about the people attempting to get to our shores on small boats, some are escaping for sure, many more looking for work to provide for family back home, and sone that are coming for less righteous reasons.
I'm sceptical that plans set out are viable, I'm sceptical that a Labour government would be any better at dealing with the issues.
I feel you sit firmly in the 25% of pro immigration, you will not move your opinion like others here who are in the 25% anti group. Both camps will battle their corners relentlessly and offer governments no real challenge, they know how you feel and know is easy to say the right thing to either side, what they do struggle with are the 50% of people who are sceptical.
Did you like her dream? I can see the pros and cons of immigration but I would like anyone coming here to be treated like human beings, is that to much to ask?
If you read my post it will indicate what I think of any plans, sceptical.
Fair enough, I am totally against her ‘dreams’ but it no longer matters, she has been sacked for being incompetent, on to the next one "I think the issue is, whoever is next will have the same dreams to try and say the right thing to those that will decide their futures, but they don't know how or what to say to them. Johnson was saying the right things at the right time, that's how he became PM, that boat left once he had delivered and he was no longer of use to those who put him there, the voter. To the OP Boris rumoured to come back as PM, I think hell would freeze over before that would happen, he is spent. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The way things are going, there will be boat's of Brits trying to escape the country going in the opposite direction to those trying to get here. I can just picture the look of bewilderment on the refugees face's as all the boat's pass them with shouts of turn back now before it's too late. With a sign on the beach on Dover facing landward saying "Will the last person to leave please turn off the lights"" You could be right. Some advice when you land in France- ask for a flat in Paris, Lyon, or perhaps the riviera as there are other Brits already there. You don’t want to stay in Calais. Ask if they will throw in a Porsche also - if you don’t ask etc. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Oh right. Work on your comedy routine, jokes about deporting people, not really funny: For one person, it is their dream to deport people - that person is (sorry was) Home Secretary until a couple of hours ago. Was it? Absolutely - yes. She said at the Conservative Party conference that as Home Secretary it was her dream to see newspaper headlines of an aircraft full of asylum seekers taking off for Rwanda. Absolute ghoul. Ghoul - really? You don’t like her as ‘she’s a fucking Tory’. In the same childish thinking of the occasional post on here “I could never fuck a Tory”. You never see a post from a Conservative supporter saying “I could never fuck someone that voted Labour”. I guess that makes ‘Tories’ more broad minded, better lovers, better swingers ? I’ve always thought the Rwanda thing was nonsense. It still stinks of one of Johnson’s brilliant ideas. For The Home Secretary to make her ‘dream’ statement was stupid. Hardly makes her a ‘ghoul’ that wants to deport people. It is her job to protect our borders of course, and remove those that don’t belong here. let’s hope the new team step up. She is a ghoul,
Silly name calling still?
Does it offend you, or are you virtue signalling? Tbh, she isn’t a ghoul, she is an incompetent ghoul
Certainly doesn’t offend. The choice of word is puzzling. What ‘ghoulish’ action has she been involved in to upset you so?
Or is it simply because ‘she’s a fucking Tory’?
I have already explained this, tbh, she is now irrelevant , her dreams are shattered ,
Her comments like many others before her are to reach the ears of the majority of people in the country who are sceptical of our governments ability to control immigration.
There are figure, a little dated now but they indicate that there is 25% of people who are pro-immigration and 25% of people who are anti-immigration and 50% that are sceptical about immigration.
Labour's immigration policy is not concrete from what I can see it is, we should, we could do something. It isn't going to resinate with the 50% sceptical group, which can / are the group that decide what is going to be voted in.
Are you part of the 50%? If so Did you like her dream about ‘planes of refugees flying to rwanda’ ?
I think I do fall into the the 50% a lot of the time.
I'm sceptical about the people attempting to get to our shores on small boats, some are escaping for sure, many more looking for work to provide for family back home, and sone that are coming for less righteous reasons.
I'm sceptical that plans set out are viable, I'm sceptical that a Labour government would be any better at dealing with the issues.
I feel you sit firmly in the 25% of pro immigration, you will not move your opinion like others here who are in the 25% anti group. Both camps will battle their corners relentlessly and offer governments no real challenge, they know how you feel and know is easy to say the right thing to either side, what they do struggle with are the 50% of people who are sceptical."I don’t know anyone that is anti immigration. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Oh right. Work on your comedy routine, jokes about deporting people, not really funny: For one person, it is their dream to deport people - that person is (sorry was) Home Secretary until a couple of hours ago. Was it? Absolutely - yes. She said at the Conservative Party conference that as Home Secretary it was her dream to see newspaper headlines of an aircraft full of asylum seekers taking off for Rwanda. Absolute ghoul. Ghoul - really? You don’t like her as ‘she’s a fucking Tory’. In the same childish thinking of the occasional post on here “I could never fuck a Tory”. You never see a post from a Conservative supporter saying “I could never fuck someone that voted Labour”. I guess that makes ‘Tories’ more broad minded, better lovers, better swingers ? I’ve always thought the Rwanda thing was nonsense. It still stinks of one of Johnson’s brilliant ideas. For The Home Secretary to make her ‘dream’ statement was stupid. Hardly makes her a ‘ghoul’ that wants to deport people. It is her job to protect our borders of course, and remove those that don’t belong here. let’s hope the new team step up. She is a ghoul,
Silly name calling still?
Does it offend you, or are you virtue signalling? Tbh, she isn’t a ghoul, she is an incompetent ghoul
Certainly doesn’t offend. The choice of word is puzzling. What ‘ghoulish’ action has she been involved in to upset you so?
Or is it simply because ‘she’s a fucking Tory’?
I have already explained this, tbh, she is now irrelevant , her dreams are shattered ,
Her comments like many others before her are to reach the ears of the majority of people in the country who are sceptical of our governments ability to control immigration.
There are figure, a little dated now but they indicate that there is 25% of people who are pro-immigration and 25% of people who are anti-immigration and 50% that are sceptical about immigration.
Labour's immigration policy is not concrete from what I can see it is, we should, we could do something. It isn't going to resinate with the 50% sceptical group, which can / are the group that decide what is going to be voted in.
Are you part of the 50%? If so Did you like her dream about ‘planes of refugees flying to rwanda’ ?
I think I do fall into the the 50% a lot of the time.
I'm sceptical about the people attempting to get to our shores on small boats, some are escaping for sure, many more looking for work to provide for family back home, and sone that are coming for less righteous reasons.
I'm sceptical that plans set out are viable, I'm sceptical that a Labour government would be any better at dealing with the issues.
I feel you sit firmly in the 25% of pro immigration, you will not move your opinion like others here who are in the 25% anti group. Both camps will battle their corners relentlessly and offer governments no real challenge, they know how you feel and know is easy to say the right thing to either side, what they do struggle with are the 50% of people who are sceptical.
I don’t know anyone that is anti immigration. "Suella Braverman Nigel Farage UKIP BNP National Front | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Oh right. Work on your comedy routine, jokes about deporting people, not really funny: For one person, it is their dream to deport people - that person is (sorry was) Home Secretary until a couple of hours ago. Was it? Absolutely - yes. She said at the Conservative Party conference that as Home Secretary it was her dream to see newspaper headlines of an aircraft full of asylum seekers taking off for Rwanda. Absolute ghoul. Ghoul - really? You don’t like her as ‘she’s a fucking Tory’. In the same childish thinking of the occasional post on here “I could never fuck a Tory”. You never see a post from a Conservative supporter saying “I could never fuck someone that voted Labour”. I guess that makes ‘Tories’ more broad minded, better lovers, better swingers ? I’ve always thought the Rwanda thing was nonsense. It still stinks of one of Johnson’s brilliant ideas. For The Home Secretary to make her ‘dream’ statement was stupid. Hardly makes her a ‘ghoul’ that wants to deport people. It is her job to protect our borders of course, and remove those that don’t belong here. let’s hope the new team step up. She is a ghoul,
Silly name calling still?
Does it offend you, or are you virtue signalling? Tbh, she isn’t a ghoul, she is an incompetent ghoul
Certainly doesn’t offend. The choice of word is puzzling. What ‘ghoulish’ action has she been involved in to upset you so?
Or is it simply because ‘she’s a fucking Tory’?
I have already explained this, tbh, she is now irrelevant , her dreams are shattered ,
Her comments like many others before her are to reach the ears of the majority of people in the country who are sceptical of our governments ability to control immigration.
There are figure, a little dated now but they indicate that there is 25% of people who are pro-immigration and 25% of people who are anti-immigration and 50% that are sceptical about immigration.
Labour's immigration policy is not concrete from what I can see it is, we should, we could do something. It isn't going to resinate with the 50% sceptical group, which can / are the group that decide what is going to be voted in.
Are you part of the 50%? If so Did you like her dream about ‘planes of refugees flying to rwanda’ ?
I think I do fall into the the 50% a lot of the time.
I'm sceptical about the people attempting to get to our shores on small boats, some are escaping for sure, many more looking for work to provide for family back home, and sone that are coming for less righteous reasons.
I'm sceptical that plans set out are viable, I'm sceptical that a Labour government would be any better at dealing with the issues.
I feel you sit firmly in the 25% of pro immigration, you will not move your opinion like others here who are in the 25% anti group. Both camps will battle their corners relentlessly and offer governments no real challenge, they know how you feel and know is easy to say the right thing to either side, what they do struggle with are the 50% of people who are sceptical.
I don’t know anyone that is anti immigration.
Suella Braverman
Nigel Farage
UKIP
BNP
National Front
"I can assure you that Braverman, aka ‘the ghoul’ (still don’t get it) Farage, UKIP, are not anti immigration. Can’t say about BNP, National Front, are they still going? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Oh right. Work on your comedy routine, jokes about deporting people, not really funny: For one person, it is their dream to deport people - that person is (sorry was) Home Secretary until a couple of hours ago. Was it? Absolutely - yes. She said at the Conservative Party conference that as Home Secretary it was her dream to see newspaper headlines of an aircraft full of asylum seekers taking off for Rwanda. Absolute ghoul. Ghoul - really? You don’t like her as ‘she’s a fucking Tory’. In the same childish thinking of the occasional post on here “I could never fuck a Tory”. You never see a post from a Conservative supporter saying “I could never fuck someone that voted Labour”. I guess that makes ‘Tories’ more broad minded, better lovers, better swingers ? I’ve always thought the Rwanda thing was nonsense. It still stinks of one of Johnson’s brilliant ideas. For The Home Secretary to make her ‘dream’ statement was stupid. Hardly makes her a ‘ghoul’ that wants to deport people. It is her job to protect our borders of course, and remove those that don’t belong here. let’s hope the new team step up. She is a ghoul,
Silly name calling still?
Does it offend you, or are you virtue signalling? Tbh, she isn’t a ghoul, she is an incompetent ghoul
Certainly doesn’t offend. The choice of word is puzzling. What ‘ghoulish’ action has she been involved in to upset you so?
Or is it simply because ‘she’s a fucking Tory’?
I have already explained this, tbh, she is now irrelevant , her dreams are shattered ,
Her comments like many others before her are to reach the ears of the majority of people in the country who are sceptical of our governments ability to control immigration.
There are figure, a little dated now but they indicate that there is 25% of people who are pro-immigration and 25% of people who are anti-immigration and 50% that are sceptical about immigration.
Labour's immigration policy is not concrete from what I can see it is, we should, we could do something. It isn't going to resinate with the 50% sceptical group, which can / are the group that decide what is going to be voted in.
Are you part of the 50%? If so Did you like her dream about ‘planes of refugees flying to rwanda’ ?
I think I do fall into the the 50% a lot of the time.
I'm sceptical about the people attempting to get to our shores on small boats, some are escaping for sure, many more looking for work to provide for family back home, and sone that are coming for less righteous reasons.
I'm sceptical that plans set out are viable, I'm sceptical that a Labour government would be any better at dealing with the issues.
I feel you sit firmly in the 25% of pro immigration, you will not move your opinion like others here who are in the 25% anti group. Both camps will battle their corners relentlessly and offer governments no real challenge, they know how you feel and know is easy to say the right thing to either side, what they do struggle with are the 50% of people who are sceptical.
I don’t know anyone that is anti immigration.
Suella Braverman
Nigel Farage
UKIP
BNP
National Front
I can assure you that Braverman, aka ‘the ghoul’ (still don’t get it) Farage, UKIP, are not anti immigration.
Can’t say about BNP, National Front, are they still going? "In my opinion they are , BNP and the national front are still going, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Oh right. Work on your comedy routine, jokes about deporting people, not really funny: For one person, it is their dream to deport people - that person is (sorry was) Home Secretary until a couple of hours ago. Was it? Absolutely - yes. She said at the Conservative Party conference that as Home Secretary it was her dream to see newspaper headlines of an aircraft full of asylum seekers taking off for Rwanda. Absolute ghoul. Ghoul - really? You don’t like her as ‘she’s a fucking Tory’. In the same childish thinking of the occasional post on here “I could never fuck a Tory”. You never see a post from a Conservative supporter saying “I could never fuck someone that voted Labour”. I guess that makes ‘Tories’ more broad minded, better lovers, better swingers ? I’ve always thought the Rwanda thing was nonsense. It still stinks of one of Johnson’s brilliant ideas. For The Home Secretary to make her ‘dream’ statement was stupid. Hardly makes her a ‘ghoul’ that wants to deport people. It is her job to protect our borders of course, and remove those that don’t belong here. let’s hope the new team step up. She is a ghoul,
Silly name calling still?
Does it offend you, or are you virtue signalling? Tbh, she isn’t a ghoul, she is an incompetent ghoul
Certainly doesn’t offend. The choice of word is puzzling. What ‘ghoulish’ action has she been involved in to upset you so?
Or is it simply because ‘she’s a fucking Tory’?
I have already explained this, tbh, she is now irrelevant , her dreams are shattered ,
Her comments like many others before her are to reach the ears of the majority of people in the country who are sceptical of our governments ability to control immigration.
There are figure, a little dated now but they indicate that there is 25% of people who are pro-immigration and 25% of people who are anti-immigration and 50% that are sceptical about immigration.
Labour's immigration policy is not concrete from what I can see it is, we should, we could do something. It isn't going to resinate with the 50% sceptical group, which can / are the group that decide what is going to be voted in.
Are you part of the 50%? If so Did you like her dream about ‘planes of refugees flying to rwanda’ ?
I think I do fall into the the 50% a lot of the time.
I'm sceptical about the people attempting to get to our shores on small boats, some are escaping for sure, many more looking for work to provide for family back home, and sone that are coming for less righteous reasons.
I'm sceptical that plans set out are viable, I'm sceptical that a Labour government would be any better at dealing with the issues.
I feel you sit firmly in the 25% of pro immigration, you will not move your opinion like others here who are in the 25% anti group. Both camps will battle their corners relentlessly and offer governments no real challenge, they know how you feel and know is easy to say the right thing to either side, what they do struggle with are the 50% of people who are sceptical.
I don’t know anyone that is anti immigration.
Suella Braverman
Nigel Farage
UKIP
BNP
National Front
I can assure you that Braverman, aka ‘the ghoul’ (still don’t get it) Farage, UKIP, are not anti immigration.
Can’t say about BNP, National Front, are they still going? "Most bizarre post of 2022. And there has been some proper weird shit this year. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Oh right. Work on your comedy routine, jokes about deporting people, not really funny: For one person, it is their dream to deport people - that person is (sorry was) Home Secretary until a couple of hours ago. Was it? Absolutely - yes. She said at the Conservative Party conference that as Home Secretary it was her dream to see newspaper headlines of an aircraft full of asylum seekers taking off for Rwanda. Absolute ghoul. Ghoul - really? You don’t like her as ‘she’s a fucking Tory’. In the same childish thinking of the occasional post on here “I could never fuck a Tory”. You never see a post from a Conservative supporter saying “I could never fuck someone that voted Labour”. I guess that makes ‘Tories’ more broad minded, better lovers, better swingers ? I’ve always thought the Rwanda thing was nonsense. It still stinks of one of Johnson’s brilliant ideas. For The Home Secretary to make her ‘dream’ statement was stupid. Hardly makes her a ‘ghoul’ that wants to deport people. It is her job to protect our borders of course, and remove those that don’t belong here. let’s hope the new team step up. She is a ghoul,
Silly name calling still?
Does it offend you, or are you virtue signalling? Tbh, she isn’t a ghoul, she is an incompetent ghoul
Certainly doesn’t offend. The choice of word is puzzling. What ‘ghoulish’ action has she been involved in to upset you so?
Or is it simply because ‘she’s a fucking Tory’?
I have already explained this, tbh, she is now irrelevant , her dreams are shattered ,
Her comments like many others before her are to reach the ears of the majority of people in the country who are sceptical of our governments ability to control immigration.
There are figure, a little dated now but they indicate that there is 25% of people who are pro-immigration and 25% of people who are anti-immigration and 50% that are sceptical about immigration.
Labour's immigration policy is not concrete from what I can see it is, we should, we could do something. It isn't going to resinate with the 50% sceptical group, which can / are the group that decide what is going to be voted in.
Are you part of the 50%? If so Did you like her dream about ‘planes of refugees flying to rwanda’ ?
I think I do fall into the the 50% a lot of the time.
I'm sceptical about the people attempting to get to our shores on small boats, some are escaping for sure, many more looking for work to provide for family back home, and sone that are coming for less righteous reasons.
I'm sceptical that plans set out are viable, I'm sceptical that a Labour government would be any better at dealing with the issues.
I feel you sit firmly in the 25% of pro immigration, you will not move your opinion like others here who are in the 25% anti group. Both camps will battle their corners relentlessly and offer governments no real challenge, they know how you feel and know is easy to say the right thing to either side, what they do struggle with are the 50% of people who are sceptical.
I don’t know anyone that is anti immigration.
Suella Braverman
Nigel Farage
UKIP
BNP
National Front
I can assure you that Braverman, aka ‘the ghoul’ (still don’t get it) Farage, UKIP, are not anti immigration.
Can’t say about BNP, National Front, are they still going?
Most bizarre post of 2022. And there has been some proper weird shit this year. "What’s bizarre? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Here is my message to liz, it is nothing wrong to have high ambitions like wanting to be a pm, but sometimes it is not meant to be as it is just out of ones dept
That should have been the message to Boris as well.
And May and Cameron.
It all started with Cameron who shit his pants over UKIP instead of just swatting them away. If he had stayed (well become) strong we would never have had that stupid advisory binary choice referendum on membership of the EU that then became a weird cultish uniformed sacrosanct decision!"Completely agree with your words. May one day time will reveal the real true /reazon behind the decision of Brexit, the corruption of the banks like City Bank and other branches with the practice of washing money  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Oh right. Work on your comedy routine, jokes about deporting people, not really funny: For one person, it is their dream to deport people - that person is (sorry was) Home Secretary until a couple of hours ago. Was it? Absolutely - yes. She said at the Conservative Party conference that as Home Secretary it was her dream to see newspaper headlines of an aircraft full of asylum seekers taking off for Rwanda. Absolute ghoul. Ghoul - really? You don’t like her as ‘she’s a fucking Tory’. In the same childish thinking of the occasional post on here “I could never fuck a Tory”. You never see a post from a Conservative supporter saying “I could never fuck someone that voted Labour”. I guess that makes ‘Tories’ more broad minded, better lovers, better swingers ? I’ve always thought the Rwanda thing was nonsense. It still stinks of one of Johnson’s brilliant ideas. For The Home Secretary to make her ‘dream’ statement was stupid. Hardly makes her a ‘ghoul’ that wants to deport people. It is her job to protect our borders of course, and remove those that don’t belong here. let’s hope the new team step up. She is a ghoul,
Silly name calling still?
Does it offend you, or are you virtue signalling? Tbh, she isn’t a ghoul, she is an incompetent ghoul
Certainly doesn’t offend. The choice of word is puzzling. What ‘ghoulish’ action has she been involved in to upset you so?
Or is it simply because ‘she’s a fucking Tory’?
I have already explained this, tbh, she is now irrelevant , her dreams are shattered ,
Her comments like many others before her are to reach the ears of the majority of people in the country who are sceptical of our governments ability to control immigration.
There are figure, a little dated now but they indicate that there is 25% of people who are pro-immigration and 25% of people who are anti-immigration and 50% that are sceptical about immigration.
Labour's immigration policy is not concrete from what I can see it is, we should, we could do something. It isn't going to resinate with the 50% sceptical group, which can / are the group that decide what is going to be voted in.
Are you part of the 50%? If so Did you like her dream about ‘planes of refugees flying to rwanda’ ?
I think I do fall into the the 50% a lot of the time.
I'm sceptical about the people attempting to get to our shores on small boats, some are escaping for sure, many more looking for work to provide for family back home, and sone that are coming for less righteous reasons.
I'm sceptical that plans set out are viable, I'm sceptical that a Labour government would be any better at dealing with the issues.
I feel you sit firmly in the 25% of pro immigration, you will not move your opinion like others here who are in the 25% anti group. Both camps will battle their corners relentlessly and offer governments no real challenge, they know how you feel and know is easy to say the right thing to either side, what they do struggle with are the 50% of people who are sceptical.
I don’t know anyone that is anti immigration.
Suella Braverman
Nigel Farage
UKIP
BNP
National Front
I can assure you that Braverman, aka ‘the ghoul’ (still don’t get it) Farage, UKIP, are not anti immigration.
Can’t say about BNP, National Front, are they still going?
Most bizarre post of 2022. And there has been some proper weird shit this year.
What’s bizarre? "we need to define what anti imigartion looks like. I suspect some may think a policy or "only let 100 millionaires in a year and that's it" is not anti immigration as only a big fat 0 counts as anti immigration. In the same may jump to any pro immigration statement as meaning "let anyone in". | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Oh right. Work on your comedy routine, jokes about deporting people, not really funny: For one person, it is their dream to deport people - that person is (sorry was) Home Secretary until a couple of hours ago. Was it? Absolutely - yes. She said at the Conservative Party conference that as Home Secretary it was her dream to see newspaper headlines of an aircraft full of asylum seekers taking off for Rwanda. Absolute ghoul. Ghoul - really? You don’t like her as ‘she’s a fucking Tory’. In the same childish thinking of the occasional post on here “I could never fuck a Tory”. You never see a post from a Conservative supporter saying “I could never fuck someone that voted Labour”. I guess that makes ‘Tories’ more broad minded, better lovers, better swingers ? I’ve always thought the Rwanda thing was nonsense. It still stinks of one of Johnson’s brilliant ideas. For The Home Secretary to make her ‘dream’ statement was stupid. Hardly makes her a ‘ghoul’ that wants to deport people. It is her job to protect our borders of course, and remove those that don’t belong here. let’s hope the new team step up. She is a ghoul,
Silly name calling still?
Does it offend you, or are you virtue signalling? Tbh, she isn’t a ghoul, she is an incompetent ghoul
Certainly doesn’t offend. The choice of word is puzzling. What ‘ghoulish’ action has she been involved in to upset you so?
Or is it simply because ‘she’s a fucking Tory’?
I have already explained this, tbh, she is now irrelevant , her dreams are shattered ,
Her comments like many others before her are to reach the ears of the majority of people in the country who are sceptical of our governments ability to control immigration.
There are figure, a little dated now but they indicate that there is 25% of people who are pro-immigration and 25% of people who are anti-immigration and 50% that are sceptical about immigration.
Labour's immigration policy is not concrete from what I can see it is, we should, we could do something. It isn't going to resinate with the 50% sceptical group, which can / are the group that decide what is going to be voted in.
Are you part of the 50%? If so Did you like her dream about ‘planes of refugees flying to rwanda’ ?
I think I do fall into the the 50% a lot of the time.
I'm sceptical about the people attempting to get to our shores on small boats, some are escaping for sure, many more looking for work to provide for family back home, and sone that are coming for less righteous reasons.
I'm sceptical that plans set out are viable, I'm sceptical that a Labour government would be any better at dealing with the issues.
I feel you sit firmly in the 25% of pro immigration, you will not move your opinion like others here who are in the 25% anti group. Both camps will battle their corners relentlessly and offer governments no real challenge, they know how you feel and know is easy to say the right thing to either side, what they do struggle with are the 50% of people who are sceptical.
I don’t know anyone that is anti immigration.
Suella Braverman
Nigel Farage
UKIP
BNP
National Front
I can assure you that Braverman, aka ‘the ghoul’ (still don’t get it) Farage, UKIP, are not anti immigration.
Can’t say about BNP, National Front, are they still going?
Most bizarre post of 2022. And there has been some proper weird shit this year.
What’s bizarre? "All of it, but especially "Farage, UKIP, are not anti immigration." Ukip are a party specifically to promote the racist/anti-immigrant agenda. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Oh right. Work on your comedy routine, jokes about deporting people, not really funny: For one person, it is their dream to deport people - that person is (sorry was) Home Secretary until a couple of hours ago. Was it? Absolutely - yes. She said at the Conservative Party conference that as Home Secretary it was her dream to see newspaper headlines of an aircraft full of asylum seekers taking off for Rwanda. Absolute ghoul. Ghoul - really? You don’t like her as ‘she’s a fucking Tory’. In the same childish thinking of the occasional post on here “I could never fuck a Tory”. You never see a post from a Conservative supporter saying “I could never fuck someone that voted Labour”. I guess that makes ‘Tories’ more broad minded, better lovers, better swingers ? I’ve always thought the Rwanda thing was nonsense. It still stinks of one of Johnson’s brilliant ideas. For The Home Secretary to make her ‘dream’ statement was stupid. Hardly makes her a ‘ghoul’ that wants to deport people. It is her job to protect our borders of course, and remove those that don’t belong here. let’s hope the new team step up. She is a ghoul,
Silly name calling still?
Does it offend you, or are you virtue signalling? Tbh, she isn’t a ghoul, she is an incompetent ghoul
Certainly doesn’t offend. The choice of word is puzzling. What ‘ghoulish’ action has she been involved in to upset you so?
Or is it simply because ‘she’s a fucking Tory’?
I have already explained this, tbh, she is now irrelevant , her dreams are shattered ,
Her comments like many others before her are to reach the ears of the majority of people in the country who are sceptical of our governments ability to control immigration.
There are figure, a little dated now but they indicate that there is 25% of people who are pro-immigration and 25% of people who are anti-immigration and 50% that are sceptical about immigration.
Labour's immigration policy is not concrete from what I can see it is, we should, we could do something. It isn't going to resinate with the 50% sceptical group, which can / are the group that decide what is going to be voted in.
Are you part of the 50%? If so Did you like her dream about ‘planes of refugees flying to rwanda’ ?
I think I do fall into the the 50% a lot of the time.
I'm sceptical about the people attempting to get to our shores on small boats, some are escaping for sure, many more looking for work to provide for family back home, and sone that are coming for less righteous reasons.
I'm sceptical that plans set out are viable, I'm sceptical that a Labour government would be any better at dealing with the issues.
I feel you sit firmly in the 25% of pro immigration, you will not move your opinion like others here who are in the 25% anti group. Both camps will battle their corners relentlessly and offer governments no real challenge, they know how you feel and know is easy to say the right thing to either side, what they do struggle with are the 50% of people who are sceptical.
I don’t know anyone that is anti immigration.
Suella Braverman
Nigel Farage
UKIP
BNP
National Front
I can assure you that Braverman, aka ‘the ghoul’ (still don’t get it) Farage, UKIP, are not anti immigration.
Can’t say about BNP, National Front, are they still going?
Most bizarre post of 2022. And there has been some proper weird shit this year.
What’s bizarre?
All of it, but especially "Farage, UKIP, are not anti immigration."
Ukip are a party specifically to promote the racist/anti-immigrant agenda."I don’t think they would gain much support with a racist agenda. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Oh right. Work on your comedy routine, jokes about deporting people, not really funny: For one person, it is their dream to deport people - that person is (sorry was) Home Secretary until a couple of hours ago. Was it? Absolutely - yes. She said at the Conservative Party conference that as Home Secretary it was her dream to see newspaper headlines of an aircraft full of asylum seekers taking off for Rwanda. Absolute ghoul. Ghoul - really? You don’t like her as ‘she’s a fucking Tory’. In the same childish thinking of the occasional post on here “I could never fuck a Tory”. You never see a post from a Conservative supporter saying “I could never fuck someone that voted Labour”. I guess that makes ‘Tories’ more broad minded, better lovers, better swingers ? I’ve always thought the Rwanda thing was nonsense. It still stinks of one of Johnson’s brilliant ideas. For The Home Secretary to make her ‘dream’ statement was stupid. Hardly makes her a ‘ghoul’ that wants to deport people. It is her job to protect our borders of course, and remove those that don’t belong here. let’s hope the new team step up. She is a ghoul,
Silly name calling still?
Does it offend you, or are you virtue signalling? Tbh, she isn’t a ghoul, she is an incompetent ghoul
Certainly doesn’t offend. The choice of word is puzzling. What ‘ghoulish’ action has she been involved in to upset you so?
Or is it simply because ‘she’s a fucking Tory’?
I have already explained this, tbh, she is now irrelevant , her dreams are shattered ,
Her comments like many others before her are to reach the ears of the majority of people in the country who are sceptical of our governments ability to control immigration.
There are figure, a little dated now but they indicate that there is 25% of people who are pro-immigration and 25% of people who are anti-immigration and 50% that are sceptical about immigration.
Labour's immigration policy is not concrete from what I can see it is, we should, we could do something. It isn't going to resinate with the 50% sceptical group, which can / are the group that decide what is going to be voted in.
Are you part of the 50%? If so Did you like her dream about ‘planes of refugees flying to rwanda’ ?
I think I do fall into the the 50% a lot of the time.
I'm sceptical about the people attempting to get to our shores on small boats, some are escaping for sure, many more looking for work to provide for family back home, and sone that are coming for less righteous reasons.
I'm sceptical that plans set out are viable, I'm sceptical that a Labour government would be any better at dealing with the issues.
I feel you sit firmly in the 25% of pro immigration, you will not move your opinion like others here who are in the 25% anti group. Both camps will battle their corners relentlessly and offer governments no real challenge, they know how you feel and know is easy to say the right thing to either side, what they do struggle with are the 50% of people who are sceptical.
I don’t know anyone that is anti immigration.
Suella Braverman
Nigel Farage
UKIP
BNP
National Front
I can assure you that Braverman, aka ‘the ghoul’ (still don’t get it) Farage, UKIP, are not anti immigration.
Can’t say about BNP, National Front, are they still going?
Most bizarre post of 2022. And there has been some proper weird shit this year.
What’s bizarre?
All of it, but especially "Farage, UKIP, are not anti immigration."
Ukip are a party specifically to promote the racist/anti-immigrant agenda.
I don’t think they would gain much support with a racist agenda. "3,881,099 people voted for them in 2015. Some would call that "much support " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Oh right. Work on your comedy routine, jokes about deporting people, not really funny: For one person, it is their dream to deport people - that person is (sorry was) Home Secretary until a couple of hours ago. Was it? Absolutely - yes. She said at the Conservative Party conference that as Home Secretary it was her dream to see newspaper headlines of an aircraft full of asylum seekers taking off for Rwanda. Absolute ghoul. Ghoul - really? You don’t like her as ‘she’s a fucking Tory’. In the same childish thinking of the occasional post on here “I could never fuck a Tory”. You never see a post from a Conservative supporter saying “I could never fuck someone that voted Labour”. I guess that makes ‘Tories’ more broad minded, better lovers, better swingers ? I’ve always thought the Rwanda thing was nonsense. It still stinks of one of Johnson’s brilliant ideas. For The Home Secretary to make her ‘dream’ statement was stupid. Hardly makes her a ‘ghoul’ that wants to deport people. It is her job to protect our borders of course, and remove those that don’t belong here. let’s hope the new team step up. She is a ghoul,
Silly name calling still?
Does it offend you, or are you virtue signalling? Tbh, she isn’t a ghoul, she is an incompetent ghoul
Certainly doesn’t offend. The choice of word is puzzling. What ‘ghoulish’ action has she been involved in to upset you so?
Or is it simply because ‘she’s a fucking Tory’?
I have already explained this, tbh, she is now irrelevant , her dreams are shattered ,
Her comments like many others before her are to reach the ears of the majority of people in the country who are sceptical of our governments ability to control immigration.
There are figure, a little dated now but they indicate that there is 25% of people who are pro-immigration and 25% of people who are anti-immigration and 50% that are sceptical about immigration.
Labour's immigration policy is not concrete from what I can see it is, we should, we could do something. It isn't going to resinate with the 50% sceptical group, which can / are the group that decide what is going to be voted in.
Are you part of the 50%? If so Did you like her dream about ‘planes of refugees flying to rwanda’ ?
I think I do fall into the the 50% a lot of the time.
I'm sceptical about the people attempting to get to our shores on small boats, some are escaping for sure, many more looking for work to provide for family back home, and sone that are coming for less righteous reasons.
I'm sceptical that plans set out are viable, I'm sceptical that a Labour government would be any better at dealing with the issues.
I feel you sit firmly in the 25% of pro immigration, you will not move your opinion like others here who are in the 25% anti group. Both camps will battle their corners relentlessly and offer governments no real challenge, they know how you feel and know is easy to say the right thing to either side, what they do struggle with are the 50% of people who are sceptical.
I don’t know anyone that is anti immigration.
Suella Braverman
Nigel Farage
UKIP
BNP
National Front
I can assure you that Braverman, aka ‘the ghoul’ (still don’t get it) Farage, UKIP, are not anti immigration.
Can’t say about BNP, National Front, are they still going?
Most bizarre post of 2022. And there has been some proper weird shit this year.
What’s bizarre?
All of it, but especially "Farage, UKIP, are not anti immigration."
Ukip are a party specifically to promote the racist/anti-immigrant agenda.
I don’t think they would gain much support with a racist agenda.
3,881,099 people voted for them in 2015. Some would call that "much support "
"Then perhaps they don’t have a racist agenda? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Boris Johnson is laid on a Carribean beach currently on holiday. Last week, he gave a 30 minute speech in the USA, and got $350000 dollars in return. Why would he want to come back to such a shit-show?" He won’t, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Oh right. Work on your comedy routine, jokes about deporting people, not really funny: For one person, it is their dream to deport people - that person is (sorry was) Home Secretary until a couple of hours ago. Was it? Absolutely - yes. She said at the Conservative Party conference that as Home Secretary it was her dream to see newspaper headlines of an aircraft full of asylum seekers taking off for Rwanda. Absolute ghoul. Ghoul - really? You don’t like her as ‘she’s a fucking Tory’. In the same childish thinking of the occasional post on here “I could never fuck a Tory”. You never see a post from a Conservative supporter saying “I could never fuck someone that voted Labour”. I guess that makes ‘Tories’ more broad minded, better lovers, better swingers ? I’ve always thought the Rwanda thing was nonsense. It still stinks of one of Johnson’s brilliant ideas. For The Home Secretary to make her ‘dream’ statement was stupid. Hardly makes her a ‘ghoul’ that wants to deport people. It is her job to protect our borders of course, and remove those that don’t belong here. let’s hope the new team step up. She is a ghoul,
Silly name calling still?
Does it offend you, or are you virtue signalling? Tbh, she isn’t a ghoul, she is an incompetent ghoul
Certainly doesn’t offend. The choice of word is puzzling. What ‘ghoulish’ action has she been involved in to upset you so?
Or is it simply because ‘she’s a fucking Tory’?
I have already explained this, tbh, she is now irrelevant , her dreams are shattered ,
Her comments like many others before her are to reach the ears of the majority of people in the country who are sceptical of our governments ability to control immigration.
There are figure, a little dated now but they indicate that there is 25% of people who are pro-immigration and 25% of people who are anti-immigration and 50% that are sceptical about immigration.
Labour's immigration policy is not concrete from what I can see it is, we should, we could do something. It isn't going to resinate with the 50% sceptical group, which can / are the group that decide what is going to be voted in.
Are you part of the 50%? If so Did you like her dream about ‘planes of refugees flying to rwanda’ ?
I think I do fall into the the 50% a lot of the time.
I'm sceptical about the people attempting to get to our shores on small boats, some are escaping for sure, many more looking for work to provide for family back home, and sone that are coming for less righteous reasons.
I'm sceptical that plans set out are viable, I'm sceptical that a Labour government would be any better at dealing with the issues.
I feel you sit firmly in the 25% of pro immigration, you will not move your opinion like others here who are in the 25% anti group. Both camps will battle their corners relentlessly and offer governments no real challenge, they know how you feel and know is easy to say the right thing to either side, what they do struggle with are the 50% of people who are sceptical.
I don’t know anyone that is anti immigration.
Suella Braverman
Nigel Farage
UKIP
BNP
National Front
I can assure you that Braverman, aka ‘the ghoul’ (still don’t get it) Farage, UKIP, are not anti immigration.
Can’t say about BNP, National Front, are they still going?
Most bizarre post of 2022. And there has been some proper weird shit this year.
What’s bizarre?
All of it, but especially "Farage, UKIP, are not anti immigration."
Ukip are a party specifically to promote the racist/anti-immigrant agenda.
I don’t think they would gain much support with a racist agenda.
3,881,099 people voted for them in 2015. Some would call that "much support "
Then perhaps they don’t have a racist agenda? "Lolz. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Apparently, if I heard it rightly, boris is nr1 as favourite to be the next pm? "Labour’s worst nightmare is coming true… | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It all started with Cameron who shit his pants over UKIP instead of just swatting them away. If he had stayed (well become) strong we would never have had that stupid advisory binary choice referendum on membership of the EU that then became a weird cultish uniformed sacrosanct decision!" Exactly this. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He's the only one with a mandate." No he well and truly lost that mandate through repeated and almost constant sleaze and scandal. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He's the only one with a mandate." .............................. But he lacks legitimacy due to his behaviours and ongoing inquiries for which he was ultimately deemed unsuitable, hence him stepping down. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Apparently, if I heard it rightly, boris is nr1 as favourite to be the next pm?
Labour’s worst nightmare is coming true… "Why is the Tories falling apart and the potential return of the sleaziest PM in our lifetime "Labour's worst nightmare"? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He's the only one with a mandate. No he well and truly lost that mandate through repeated and almost constant sleaze and scandal." I think they're referencing him being Tory leader during the last election? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Apparently, if I heard it rightly, boris is nr1 as favourite to be the next pm? "He isn’t, it’s sunak | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He's the only one with a mandate. No he well and truly lost that mandate through repeated and almost constant sleaze and scandal." But he's a politician so we don't expect anything else. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Apparently, if I heard it rightly, boris is nr1 as favourite to be the next pm?
Labour’s worst nightmare is coming true…
Why is the Tories falling apart and the potential return of the sleaziest PM in our lifetime "Labour's worst nightmare"?"Whether you like it or not, at the last GE a lot of people voted for Boris rather than the Conservative party. Right now, Tory MP'S have a simple choice. Back Rishi and probably lose your seat. Back Boris and maybe, granted it’s a big maybe save your seat | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Apparently, if I heard it rightly, boris is nr1 as favourite to be the next pm?
Labour’s worst nightmare is coming true…
Why is the Tories falling apart and the potential return of the sleaziest PM in our lifetime "Labour's worst nightmare"?
Whether you like it or not, at the last GE a lot of people voted for Boris rather than the Conservative party.
Right now, Tory MP'S have a simple choice. Back Rishi and probably lose your seat. Back Boris and maybe, granted it’s a big maybe save your seat"They voted for brexit. I agree though, if Boris was palatable in 2019, he's palatable now. He was about as corrupt, self serving and sleazy as expected. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Apparently, if I heard it rightly, boris is nr1 as favourite to be the next pm?
Labour’s worst nightmare is coming true…
Why is the Tories falling apart and the potential return of the sleaziest PM in our lifetime "Labour's worst nightmare"?
Whether you like it or not, at the last GE a lot of people voted for Boris rather than the Conservative party.
Right now, Tory MP'S have a simple choice. Back Rishi and probably lose your seat. Back Boris and maybe, granted it’s a big maybe save your seat".............................. To the Tory faithful Sunak's seen as a safe pair of hands (assuming the job interests him), having forecast the consequences of the Truss economic philosophy. Johnson's already wounded, despite his 2019 mandate his subsequent indiscretions lost him support from his core, he's a risk the blue rinse might not want to take. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Are people that thick and brainwashed that they want Boris back?!" Dorries is flicking herself to absolute nirvana just on the rumour | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Boris Johnson is laid on a Carribean beach currently on holiday. " / That just reinforces to me what a prat he is. Who would go there in the hurricane season? I always waited until after Christmas to be certain of stable dry season weather. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Boris Johnson is laid on a Carribean beach currently on holiday. / That just reinforces to me what a prat he is. Who would go there in the hurricane season? I always waited until after Christmas to be certain of stable dry season weather." It was probably a “freebie” | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Are people that thick and brainwashed that they want Boris back?! Dorries is flicking herself to absolute nirvana just on the rumour" Panting over flight tracker and will be there panting like a doe eyed spaniel to welcome him.. Poor Carrie | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Apparently, if I heard it rightly, boris is nr1 as favourite to be the next pm?
He isn’t, it’s sunak "That is good as well | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Apparently, if I heard it rightly, boris is nr1 as favourite to be the next pm?
He isn’t, it’s sunak That is good as well "The prospect of Sunak as PM is good? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I dont like the tories, but apparently there are rumours that boris will return as pm. I watched sky mews talking about it, what do you think about it? I think that it is a good idea. I also find him to be fun. I mean which pm get stuck on a zip wire lol. Here is my message to liz, it is nothing wrong to have high ambitions like wanting to be a pm, but sometimes it is not meant to be as it is just out of ones dept
He won’t be coming back, do you remember why he left in the first place "No chance he will get 100 MP’s. Wonder if Liz changed the wallpaper | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I dont like the tories, but apparently there are rumours that boris will return as pm. I watched sky mews talking about it, what do you think about it? I think that it is a good idea. I also find him to be fun. I mean which pm get stuck on a zip wire lol. Here is my message to liz, it is nothing wrong to have high ambitions like wanting to be a pm, but sometimes it is not meant to be as it is just out of ones dept
He won’t be coming back, do you remember why he left in the first place
No chance he will get 100 MP’s. Wonder if Liz changed the wallpaper "No need. I hear dorries snuck in + nicked the Johnson wallpaper. She built it into a tent where she can rub herself off while listening to garbled Johnson speeches. (At least that's the rumour I heard.) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I dont like the tories, but apparently there are rumours that boris will return as pm. I watched sky mews talking about it, what do you think about it? I think that it is a good idea. I also find him to be fun. I mean which pm get stuck on a zip wire lol. Here is my message to liz, it is nothing wrong to have high ambitions like wanting to be a pm, but sometimes it is not meant to be as it is just out of ones dept
He won’t be coming back, do you remember why he left in the first place
No chance he will get 100 MP’s. Wonder if Liz changed the wallpaper ". Nah….it’s the Tories….they prefer whitewashing | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Apparently, if I heard it rightly, boris is nr1 as favourite to be the next pm?
He isn’t, it’s sunak That is good as well
The prospect of Sunak as PM is good?"Sunak was a shit Chancellor. But because everyone else around him in Johnson’s Cabinet were even more shit, it tricked people into thinking Sunak was at least capable. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"By the way. Parliament is still sitting. Johnson is still an MP. So why is he on holiday in the Caribbean when he is supposed to be at work in Westminster? And why would you put a man who skives off from serving his constituents in charge of the wellbeing of all of us?" He has a cult following. To the cult members all your saying is irrelevant. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"By the way. Parliament is still sitting. Johnson is still an MP. So why is he on holiday in the Caribbean when he is supposed to be at work in Westminster? And why would you put a man who skives off from serving his constituents in charge of the wellbeing of all of us?" does that mean he didn't vote on fracking .... Remove the whip !!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"By the way. Parliament is still sitting. Johnson is still an MP. So why is he on holiday in the Caribbean when he is supposed to be at work in Westminster? And why would you put a man who skives off from serving his constituents in charge of the wellbeing of all of us?" Because that's just the kind of guy he is .... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Well well well, look who is back in the race, boris thats who, he said he would run for pm and all he would need I think is 100 votes, boris boris "Are you bothered by the fact he partied and lied while our loved ones died? Or are you bothered that he caused tens of thousands of extra deaths by his inaction? How about all the money he gave to cronies during the pandemic? Or the money he took from donors? Or the way he tried to rip up the rules to save a mate? Or the way he defended an apparent sex pest? etc etc etc | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Well well well, look who is back in the race, boris thats who, he said he would run for pm and all he would need I think is 100 votes, boris boris "Yes. The fucking nightmare could return. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He's flying back into the uk this morning, to get his support in place ready for monday " This perfectly sums up how seriously Johnson takes his job as a constituency MP. He has been on holiday. While Parliament is still in session. Wanker! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Then do something? The French would be out on the streets and waiting for him at the airport. That's the problem with the UK, too much bitchin and not enough action" aint that the fucking truth, all those screaming that we need to change the system dont wana take direct action themselves they would much rather the dirty work was done by others who dont have as much to lose as they do, typical middleclass mindset | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Then do something? The French would be out on the streets and waiting for him at the airport. That's the problem with the UK, too much bitchin and not enough actionaint that the fucking truth, all those screaming that we need to change the system dont wana take direct action themselves they would much rather the dirty work was done by others who dont have as much to lose as they do, typical middleclass mindset" They much prefer doomscrolling | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" That's the problem with the UK, too much bitchin and not enough actionaint that the fucking truth, all those screaming that we need to change the system dont wana take direct action themselves they would much rather the dirty work was done by others who dont have as much to lose as they do, typical middleclass mindset" Most of them are not 'middle class' anyway. They just aspire to be. That's why Boris and the tories can always rely on their support. The mugs actually believe that the manipulators really want them in the cosy club. Some chance! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" That's the problem with the UK, too much bitchin and not enough actionaint that the fucking truth, all those screaming that we need to change the system dont wana take direct action themselves they would much rather the dirty work was done by others who dont have as much to lose as they do, typical middleclass mindset Most of them are not 'middle class' anyway. They just aspire to be. That's why Boris and the tories can always rely on their support. The mugs actually believe that the manipulators really want them in the cosy club. Some chance!" you need to read that again it is mainly the middle classes screaming the system needs changing but they dont have the bollox to do anything about it look at the remain marches they resembled a spiffing day out not a protest,goverments only take notice when everything is on fire, if they not prepared to do that then they may aswell get used to the shitshow | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He's flying back into the uk this morning, to get his support in place ready for monday " He wasn't allowed on business or economy  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He's flying back into the uk this morning, to get his support in place ready for monday " Yes. I also heard about that he is flying back to the uk, it will be interesting to see what will happen | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Well well well, look who is back in the race, boris thats who, he said he would run for pm and all he would need I think is 100 votes, boris boris
Are you bothered by the fact he partied and lied while our loved ones died? Or are you bothered that he caused tens of thousands of extra deaths by his inaction? How about all the money he gave to cronies during the pandemic? Or the money he took from donors? Or the way he tried to rip up the rules to save a mate? Or the way he defended an apparent sex pest? etc etc etc"The people who support Boris fall into 3 camps. The Brexiteers, who think he got Brexit done. The ones who think anything to antagonise the left is worth any chaos. The last one is the most dangerous one. The ones that think he's one of them, a good lad and a bit off a laugh. They forgive any character flaws, misdemeanours and law breaking on these basis. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Well well well, look who is back in the race, boris thats who, he said he would run for pm and all he would need I think is 100 votes, boris boris
Are you bothered by the fact he partied and lied while our loved ones died? Or are you bothered that he caused tens of thousands of extra deaths by his inaction? How about all the money he gave to cronies during the pandemic? Or the money he took from donors? Or the way he tried to rip up the rules to save a mate? Or the way he defended an apparent sex pest? etc etc etc
The people who support Boris fall into 3 camps.
The Brexiteers, who think he got Brexit done.
The ones who think anything to antagonise the left is worth any chaos.
The last one is the most dangerous one. The ones that think he's one of them, a good lad and a bit off a laugh. They forgive any character flaws, misdemeanours and law breaking on these basis."Yep, YeP, YEP The irony of Johnson returning from holiday (while Parliament is still in session and he is still an MP who is supposed to be working for his constituents) seems to be lost on his fan club! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
