They are a discredited rump of a party who have bankrupted us and left us adrift of our main trading partners they have also lumbered us with one disaster of a Prime Minister after another from the slimy, the incompetent, the crooked liar to the present wannabe Thatcher clone. So oblivious to her shortcomings and lack of intelligence it cost US £65 billion . So to anyone trying to point the finger or trying to defend them, shame on you |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Do you think with all the crap that gone on it could claps in on it self and do you think like me there is going to be an early G/E"
Nope. We've seen it all before. Over and over again. People get excited that finally these pricks will be voted out. But when the election comes, their PR machine kicks in and people vote accordingly. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By *9alMan
over a year ago
Bridgend |
"Do you think with all the crap that gone on it could claps in on it self and do you think like me there is going to be an early G/E"
I dont think an early G/E is lightly as anyone capable of basic arithmetic (unfortunately not the ex chancellor or Liz T ) can see that they would lose seats if they cant get legislation done with an 80 seat majority possibly the policies are wrong? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"So oblivious to her shortcomings and lack of intelligence it cost US £65 billion."
No it didn't. The BoE only spent £7bn, and it got £7bn of assets for its money.
I'm not going to argue with you about her lack of intelligence though. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Do you think with all the crap that gone on it could claps in on it self and do you think like me there is going to be an early G/E
Nope. We've seen it all before. Over and over again. People get excited that finally these pricks will be voted out. But when the election comes, their PR machine kicks in and people vote accordingly."
I suspect Trussconomics was an attempt to invest in that. A little extra to help their core voters through the next couple of years.
She just hadn't factored in screwing up the economy. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
