FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > The R9X Missile

The R9X Missile

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By *heNerdyFemby OP   Woman  over a year ago

Eastbourne (she/they)

What are the high-tech precision missiles used to kill al Qaeda's most wanted?

1) Remotely manned drones with sophisticated cameras and carrying missile flies over the target.

2) R9X missile, fitted with lasers, dropped to hit target.

3) Just before impact, six blades deploy out of the side of the missile, there is no explosive blast.

Al-Qaeda, like Ayman al-Zawahiri, are being targeted individually and killed while they sleep by... a Sword Missile.

I think this technology is fascinating and terrifying.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"What are the high-tech precision missiles used to kill al Qaeda's most wanted?

1) Remotely manned drones with sophisticated cameras and carrying missile flies over the target.

2) R9X missile, fitted with lasers, dropped to hit target.

3) Just before impact, six blades deploy out of the side of the missile, there is no explosive blast.

Al-Qaeda, like Ayman al-Zawahiri, are being targeted individually and killed while they sleep by... a Sword Missile.

I think this technology is fascinating and terrifying."

He was the target of a flying food processor.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *rFunBoyMan  over a year ago

Longridge

He sure got minced..

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *wisted999Man  over a year ago

North Bucks

Imagine the surprise he pops out on his balcony and hears a whistling sound coming ever closer……

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *rFunBoyMan  over a year ago

Longridge

He'd have heard nothing, seen nothing and felt nothing.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Sounds a great bit of kit but personally I'd have blasted the shite out of it woman kids take them all out.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ackal1Couple  over a year ago

Manchester


"He'd have heard nothing, seen nothing and felt nothing."

Shame that because the poor innocent buggers he killed on 9/11 had lots of time to contemplate they were going to die.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *isandhers691127Couple  over a year ago

Bournemouth


"Sounds a great bit of kit but personally I'd have blasted the shite out of it woman kids take them all out."

Killing women and kids, yeh very macho.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ackal1Couple  over a year ago

Manchester

[Removed by poster at 03/08/22 18:06:12]

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ackal1Couple  over a year ago

Manchester


"Sounds a great bit of kit but personally I'd have blasted the shite out of it woman kids take them all out."

And in doing that you are just as bad as him because you claim the right to kill the jihadi but you’re saying if the innocents die so what!!

Do you think it’s ok to kill Russian and Ukrainian civilians too?

Remember his wife was probably told she was marrying him and his kids had nothing to do with any of it if they were young.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ebjonnsonMan  over a year ago

Maldon


"He'd have heard nothing, seen nothing and felt nothing."

No time to shit himself or repent his sins?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *rFunBoyMan  over a year ago

Longridge


"He'd have heard nothing, seen nothing and felt nothing.

No time to shit himself or repent his sins? "

Which is kind of a shame as he's caused many agonising deaths and long term suffering.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *rDiscretionXXXMan  over a year ago

Gilfach


"2) R9X missile, fitted with lasers, dropped to hit target."

I'm not sure why you mentioned lasers. My CD player is fitted with lasers, but that doesn't make it dangerous.


"3) Just before impact, six blades deploy out of the side of the missile, there is no explosive blast."

There would have been a bit of an explosion. The US can't let their tracking systems be collected up by the enemy, so there would have been enough explosive to destroy that bit of the missile.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan  over a year ago

golden fields


"Sounds a great bit of kit but personally I'd have blasted the shite out of it woman kids take them all out.

Killing women and kids, yeh very macho. "

What a charmer.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *heNerdyFemby OP   Woman  over a year ago

Eastbourne (she/they)


"2) R9X missile, fitted with lasers, dropped to hit target.

I'm not sure why you mentioned lasers. My CD player is fitted with lasers, but that doesn't make it dangerous.

3) Just before impact, six blades deploy out of the side of the missile, there is no explosive blast.

There would have been a bit of an explosion. The US can't let their tracking systems be collected up by the enemy, so there would have been enough explosive to destroy that bit of the missile."

I dunno why the lasers were on the description of the process either, my guess is its something to do with guidance and how accurate they are?

I did specifically write it as an explosive blast, as in away from the missile. an internal one would not be the same thing.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"2) R9X missile, fitted with lasers, dropped to hit target.

I'm not sure why you mentioned lasers. My CD player is fitted with lasers, but that doesn't make it dangerous.

3) Just before impact, six blades deploy out of the side of the missile, there is no explosive blast.

There would have been a bit of an explosion. The US can't let their tracking systems be collected up by the enemy, so there would have been enough explosive to destroy that bit of the missile.

I dunno why the lasers were on the description of the process either, my guess is its something to do with guidance and how accurate they are?

I did specifically write it as an explosive blast, as in away from the missile. an internal one would not be the same thing."

You are partially right. It does have a laser seeker guidance system. The drone "paints " the target with a coded laser pulse. The seeker homes in on that laser pulse.Its just a hellfire with no explosive charge. It just has ninja blades that uses kinetic energy as the primary means.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"2) R9X missile, fitted with lasers, dropped to hit target.

I'm not sure why you mentioned lasers. My CD player is fitted with lasers, but that doesn't make it dangerous.

3) Just before impact, six blades deploy out of the side of the missile, there is no explosive blast.

There would have been a bit of an explosion. The US can't let their tracking systems be collected up by the enemy, so there would have been enough explosive to destroy that bit of the missile.

I dunno why the lasers were on the description of the process either, my guess is its something to do with guidance and how accurate they are?

I did specifically write it as an explosive blast, as in away from the missile. an internal one would not be the same thing.

You are partially right. It does have a laser seeker guidance system. The drone "paints " the target with a coded laser pulse. The seeker homes in on that laser pulse.Its just a hellfire with no explosive charge. It just has ninja blades that uses kinetic energy as the primary means."

5 foot ninja blades deployed at 995 mph. That's scary.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"2) R9X missile, fitted with lasers, dropped to hit target.

I'm not sure why you mentioned lasers. My CD player is fitted with lasers, but that doesn't make it dangerous.

3) Just before impact, six blades deploy out of the side of the missile, there is no explosive blast.

There would have been a bit of an explosion. The US can't let their tracking systems be collected up by the enemy, so there would have been enough explosive to destroy that bit of the missile."

The tracking system has been out since the 80s it was designed for the Apache. Pretty sure there is nothing secretive about it.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *rFunBoyMan  over a year ago

Longridge

In a few years it will be reported as an airborne laser that did the job.

Saves leaving spent Uranium all over the place.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ild_oatsMan  over a year ago

the land of saints & sinners

Something the size of a Hellfire missile traveling at the best part of 1000 mph hitting you is going to smart a bit the next day… Even without an explosive charge or blades…

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

DARPA unveiled the gambit RDE program recently. That's insane.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *rDiscretionXXXMan  over a year ago

Gilfach


"DARPA unveiled the gambit RDE program recently. That's insane."

If not heard of RDE before. That's a genius idea.

Thanks for clueing me in.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By *olly_chromaticTV/TS  over a year ago

Stockport


"2) R9X missile, fitted with lasers, dropped to hit target.

I'm not sure why you mentioned lasers. My CD player is fitted with lasers, but that doesn't make it dangerous.

3) Just before impact, six blades deploy out of the side of the missile, there is no explosive blast.

There would have been a bit of an explosion. The US can't let their tracking systems be collected up by the enemy, so there would have been enough explosive to destroy that bit of the missile.

I dunno why the lasers were on the description of the process either, my guess is its something to do with guidance and how accurate they are?

I did specifically write it as an explosive blast, as in away from the missile. an internal one would not be the same thing.

You are partially right. It does have a laser seeker guidance system. The drone "paints " the target with a coded laser pulse. The seeker homes in on that laser pulse.Its just a hellfire with no explosive charge. It just has ninja blades that uses kinetic energy as the primary means."

Yes. As a very simplified description, the missile has a camera, the drone that launches it has a laser pointer. The drone operator points the (infra)red dot at the target, the missile flies towards wherever the dot is. A variation is that the laser pointer can be on a second drone that is nearer to the target, or even pointed by a man on the ground. So that the missile can be fired from a distance, but the aim can be better than trying to keep the laser dot in the right place from a long way away.

I make no judgement about whether using these type of weapons is right or wrong, but do note that what was military state of the art a few years ago is now something that most anyone with a few quid could knock together using bits from Radio Shack...

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.0155

0.0156