FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Venezuelans Eat Dogs Because They Have No Guns
Venezuelans Eat Dogs Because They Have No Guns
Jump to: Newest in thread
Republican United States Representative for Colorado's 3rd congressional district Lauren Boebert gave an interview where she expressed concern that responsible gun ownership would lead to bad dog grooming and eventually dogs being eaten which she claims is taking place in Venezuela.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzpQqJxVhdI |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By *otMe66Man
over a year ago
Terra Firma |
"Republican United States Representative for Colorado's 3rd congressional district Lauren Boebert gave an interview where she expressed concern that responsible gun ownership would lead to bad dog grooming and eventually dogs being eaten which she claims is taking place in Venezuela.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzpQqJxVhdI"
I watched this clip and the summary you have given is very misleading..
The woman being interviewed was saying that gun ownership gave citizens power within the country, that power allows them influence and enjoy freedoms. Her argument went on to say, Venezuela where there are no firearms, meant they could not rise up against a tyrannical government, leaving them in a position of starvation.
It was a bad analogy of saying firearms affords freedoms such as dog ownership, no firearms and those dogs become food, due to starvation.
But my oh my, I can see how conspiracy theories fly, if this is the level of twist or lack of being able to understand an analogy that leads to a completely different story than the one told. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Republican United States Representative for Colorado's 3rd congressional district Lauren Boebert gave an interview where she expressed concern that responsible gun ownership would lead to bad dog grooming and eventually dogs being eaten which she claims is taking place in Venezuela.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzpQqJxVhdI
I watched this clip and the summary you have given is very misleading..
The woman being interviewed was saying that gun ownership gave citizens power within the country, that power allows them influence and enjoy freedoms. Her argument went on to say, Venezuela where there are no firearms, meant they could not rise up against a tyrannical government, leaving them in a position of starvation.
It was a bad analogy of saying firearms affords freedoms such as dog ownership, no firearms and those dogs become food, due to starvation.
But my oh my, I can see how conspiracy theories fly, if this is the level of twist or lack of being able to understand an analogy that leads to a completely different story than the one told."
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Republican United States Representative for Colorado's 3rd congressional district Lauren Boebert gave an interview where she expressed concern that responsible gun ownership would lead to bad dog grooming and eventually dogs being eaten which she claims is taking place in Venezuela.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzpQqJxVhdI
I watched this clip and the summary you have given is very misleading..
The woman being interviewed was saying that gun ownership gave citizens power within the country, that power allows them influence and enjoy freedoms. Her argument went on to say, Venezuela where there are no firearms, meant they could not rise up against a tyrannical government, leaving them in a position of starvation.
It was a bad analogy of saying firearms affords freedoms such as dog ownership, no firearms and those dogs become food, due to starvation.
But my oh my, I can see how conspiracy theories fly, if this is the level of twist or lack of being able to understand an analogy that leads to a completely different story than the one told."
So...
She said it, you just don't like that I said she said it? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Republican United States Representative for Colorado's 3rd congressional district Lauren Boebert gave an interview where she expressed concern that responsible gun ownership would lead to bad dog grooming and eventually dogs being eaten which she claims is taking place in Venezuela.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzpQqJxVhdI
I watched this clip and the summary you have given is very misleading..
The woman being interviewed was saying that gun ownership gave citizens power within the country, that power allows them influence and enjoy freedoms. Her argument went on to say, Venezuela where there are no firearms, meant they could not rise up against a tyrannical government, leaving them in a position of starvation.
It was a bad analogy of saying firearms affords freedoms such as dog ownership, no firearms and those dogs become food, due to starvation.
But my oh my, I can see how conspiracy theories fly, if this is the level of twist or lack of being able to understand an analogy that leads to a completely different story than the one told."
Agree it's the issue here people just twist something that is said for their benefit. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Republican United States Representative for Colorado's 3rd congressional district Lauren Boebert gave an interview where she expressed concern that responsible gun ownership would lead to bad dog grooming and eventually dogs being eaten which she claims is taking place in Venezuela.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzpQqJxVhdI
I watched this clip and the summary you have given is very misleading..
The woman being interviewed was saying that gun ownership gave citizens power within the country, that power allows them influence and enjoy freedoms. Her argument went on to say, Venezuela where there are no firearms, meant they could not rise up against a tyrannical government, leaving them in a position of starvation.
It was a bad analogy of saying firearms affords freedoms such as dog ownership, no firearms and those dogs become food, due to starvation.
But my oh my, I can see how conspiracy theories fly, if this is the level of twist or lack of being able to understand an analogy that leads to a completely different story than the one told.
Agree it's the issue here people just twist something that is said for their benefit."
Did she mean to say it like that? Probably not
Did she say it like that? Yes, she did.
Was it schadenfreude to watch? Yes it was. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Republican United States Representative for Colorado's 3rd congressional district Lauren Boebert gave an interview where she expressed concern that responsible gun ownership would lead to bad dog grooming and eventually dogs being eaten which she claims is taking place in Venezuela.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzpQqJxVhdI
I watched this clip and the summary you have given is very misleading..
The woman being interviewed was saying that gun ownership gave citizens power within the country, that power allows them influence and enjoy freedoms. Her argument went on to say, Venezuela where there are no firearms, meant they could not rise up against a tyrannical government, leaving them in a position of starvation.
It was a bad analogy of saying firearms affords freedoms such as dog ownership, no firearms and those dogs become food, due to starvation.
But my oh my, I can see how conspiracy theories fly, if this is the level of twist or lack of being able to understand an analogy that leads to a completely different story than the one told.
Agree it's the issue here people just twist something that is said for their benefit.
Did she mean to say it like that? Probably not
Did she say it like that? Yes, she did.
Was it schadenfreude to watch? Yes it was."
Boebert is just the republican version of democrat AOC. They both say pretty dumb analogies. Nothing new. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Republican United States Representative for Colorado's 3rd congressional district Lauren Boebert gave an interview where she expressed concern that responsible gun ownership would lead to bad dog grooming and eventually dogs being eaten which she claims is taking place in Venezuela.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzpQqJxVhdI
I watched this clip and the summary you have given is very misleading..
The woman being interviewed was saying that gun ownership gave citizens power within the country, that power allows them influence and enjoy freedoms. Her argument went on to say, Venezuela where there are no firearms, meant they could not rise up against a tyrannical government, leaving them in a position of starvation.
It was a bad analogy of saying firearms affords freedoms such as dog ownership, no firearms and those dogs become food, due to starvation.
But my oh my, I can see how conspiracy theories fly, if this is the level of twist or lack of being able to understand an analogy that leads to a completely different story than the one told.
Agree it's the issue here people just twist something that is said for their benefit.
Did she mean to say it like that? Probably not
Did she say it like that? Yes, she did.
Was it schadenfreude to watch? Yes it was.
Boebert is just the republican version of democrat AOC. They both say pretty dumb analogies. Nothing new."
Good one LOL 
AOC is the same as Boebert LOL |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *otMe66Man
over a year ago
Terra Firma |
"Republican United States Representative for Colorado's 3rd congressional district Lauren Boebert gave an interview where she expressed concern that responsible gun ownership would lead to bad dog grooming and eventually dogs being eaten which she claims is taking place in Venezuela.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzpQqJxVhdI
I watched this clip and the summary you have given is very misleading..
The woman being interviewed was saying that gun ownership gave citizens power within the country, that power allows them influence and enjoy freedoms. Her argument went on to say, Venezuela where there are no firearms, meant they could not rise up against a tyrannical government, leaving them in a position of starvation.
It was a bad analogy of saying firearms affords freedoms such as dog ownership, no firearms and those dogs become food, due to starvation.
But my oh my, I can see how conspiracy theories fly, if this is the level of twist or lack of being able to understand an analogy that leads to a completely different story than the one told.
So...
She said it, you just don't like that I said she said it?"
She didn't say it, the person hosting the clip said that, he took her words and presented them back in a different order.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Republican United States Representative for Colorado's 3rd congressional district Lauren Boebert gave an interview where she expressed concern that responsible gun ownership would lead to bad dog grooming and eventually dogs being eaten which she claims is taking place in Venezuela.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzpQqJxVhdI
I watched this clip and the summary you have given is very misleading..
The woman being interviewed was saying that gun ownership gave citizens power within the country, that power allows them influence and enjoy freedoms. Her argument went on to say, Venezuela where there are no firearms, meant they could not rise up against a tyrannical government, leaving them in a position of starvation.
It was a bad analogy of saying firearms affords freedoms such as dog ownership, no firearms and those dogs become food, due to starvation.
But my oh my, I can see how conspiracy theories fly, if this is the level of twist or lack of being able to understand an analogy that leads to a completely different story than the one told.
So...
She said it, you just don't like that I said she said it?
She didn't say it, the person hosting the clip said that, he took her words and presented them back in a different order.
"
"Well in Venezuela they eat the dogs and it started because they don't have firearms."
sounds like she said it to me |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *otMe66Man
over a year ago
Terra Firma |
"Republican United States Representative for Colorado's 3rd congressional district Lauren Boebert gave an interview where she expressed concern that responsible gun ownership would lead to bad dog grooming and eventually dogs being eaten which she claims is taking place in Venezuela.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzpQqJxVhdI
I watched this clip and the summary you have given is very misleading..
The woman being interviewed was saying that gun ownership gave citizens power within the country, that power allows them influence and enjoy freedoms. Her argument went on to say, Venezuela where there are no firearms, meant they could not rise up against a tyrannical government, leaving them in a position of starvation.
It was a bad analogy of saying firearms affords freedoms such as dog ownership, no firearms and those dogs become food, due to starvation.
But my oh my, I can see how conspiracy theories fly, if this is the level of twist or lack of being able to understand an analogy that leads to a completely different story than the one told.
So...
She said it, you just don't like that I said she said it?
She didn't say it, the person hosting the clip said that, he took her words and presented them back in a different order.
"Well in Venezuela they eat the dogs and it started because they don't have firearms."
sounds like she said it to me"
To clear this up as you kindly offered up the clip:
He said: "So get this, radical right-wing extremist Lauren Boebert said that the reasons she opposes responsible gun ownership is because we have good dog groomers in America and good dog treats and responsible gun ownership would lead us to eating dogs, which she says is happening in Venezuela, What! watch this clip."
What she said: "If the citizenry in America is disarmed, then we are no longer citizens, we are subjects. You know here in America we have gourmet treats for puppies, we have these amazing groomers for our dogs. Well in Venezuela they eat the dogs and it started because they don't have firearms, they do not have a way protect themselves, defend themselves against a tyrannical government"
The youtube presenter clearly is spinning the shit out of this.... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Republican United States Representative for Colorado's 3rd congressional district Lauren Boebert gave an interview where she expressed concern that responsible gun ownership would lead to bad dog grooming and eventually dogs being eaten which she claims is taking place in Venezuela.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzpQqJxVhdI
I watched this clip and the summary you have given is very misleading..
The woman being interviewed was saying that gun ownership gave citizens power within the country, that power allows them influence and enjoy freedoms. Her argument went on to say, Venezuela where there are no firearms, meant they could not rise up against a tyrannical government, leaving them in a position of starvation.
It was a bad analogy of saying firearms affords freedoms such as dog ownership, no firearms and those dogs become food, due to starvation.
But my oh my, I can see how conspiracy theories fly, if this is the level of twist or lack of being able to understand an analogy that leads to a completely different story than the one told.
So...
She said it, you just don't like that I said she said it?
She didn't say it, the person hosting the clip said that, he took her words and presented them back in a different order.
"Well in Venezuela they eat the dogs and it started because they don't have firearms."
sounds like she said it to me
To clear this up as you kindly offered up the clip:
He said: "So get this, radical right-wing extremist Lauren Boebert said that the reasons she opposes responsible gun ownership is because we have good dog groomers in America and good dog treats and responsible gun ownership would lead us to eating dogs, which she says is happening in Venezuela, What! watch this clip."
What she said: "If the citizenry in America is disarmed, then we are no longer citizens, we are subjects. You know here in America we have gourmet treats for puppies, we have these amazing groomers for our dogs. Well in Venezuela they eat the dogs and it started because they don't have firearms, they do not have a way protect themselves, defend themselves against a tyrannical government"
The youtube presenter clearly is spinning the shit out of this.... "
I don't know what your argument is..?
Her words equate not having gun ownership to ending up eating dogs. Or maybe my English is poor. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Republican United States Representative for Colorado's 3rd congressional district Lauren Boebert gave an interview where she expressed concern that responsible gun ownership would lead to bad dog grooming and eventually dogs being eaten which she claims is taking place in Venezuela.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzpQqJxVhdI
I watched this clip and the summary you have given is very misleading..
The woman being interviewed was saying that gun ownership gave citizens power within the country, that power allows them influence and enjoy freedoms. Her argument went on to say, Venezuela where there are no firearms, meant they could not rise up against a tyrannical government, leaving them in a position of starvation.
It was a bad analogy of saying firearms affords freedoms such as dog ownership, no firearms and those dogs become food, due to starvation.
But my oh my, I can see how conspiracy theories fly, if this is the level of twist or lack of being able to understand an analogy that leads to a completely different story than the one told.
So...
She said it, you just don't like that I said she said it?
She didn't say it, the person hosting the clip said that, he took her words and presented them back in a different order.
"Well in Venezuela they eat the dogs and it started because they don't have firearms."
sounds like she said it to me
To clear this up as you kindly offered up the clip:
He said: "So get this, radical right-wing extremist Lauren Boebert said that the reasons she opposes responsible gun ownership is because we have good dog groomers in America and good dog treats and responsible gun ownership would lead us to eating dogs, which she says is happening in Venezuela, What! watch this clip."
What she said: "If the citizenry in America is disarmed, then we are no longer citizens, we are subjects. You know here in America we have gourmet treats for puppies, we have these amazing groomers for our dogs. Well in Venezuela they eat the dogs and it started because they don't have firearms, they do not have a way protect themselves, defend themselves against a tyrannical government"
The youtube presenter clearly is spinning the shit out of this.... "
Thank you for conceding, they did indeed say the same core thing, with different words. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *otMe66Man
over a year ago
Terra Firma |
"Republican United States Representative for Colorado's 3rd congressional district Lauren Boebert gave an interview where she expressed concern that responsible gun ownership would lead to bad dog grooming and eventually dogs being eaten which she claims is taking place in Venezuela.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzpQqJxVhdI
I watched this clip and the summary you have given is very misleading..
The woman being interviewed was saying that gun ownership gave citizens power within the country, that power allows them influence and enjoy freedoms. Her argument went on to say, Venezuela where there are no firearms, meant they could not rise up against a tyrannical government, leaving them in a position of starvation.
It was a bad analogy of saying firearms affords freedoms such as dog ownership, no firearms and those dogs become food, due to starvation.
But my oh my, I can see how conspiracy theories fly, if this is the level of twist or lack of being able to understand an analogy that leads to a completely different story than the one told.
So...
She said it, you just don't like that I said she said it?
She didn't say it, the person hosting the clip said that, he took her words and presented them back in a different order.
"Well in Venezuela they eat the dogs and it started because they don't have firearms."
sounds like she said it to me
To clear this up as you kindly offered up the clip:
He said: "So get this, radical right-wing extremist Lauren Boebert said that the reasons she opposes responsible gun ownership is because we have good dog groomers in America and good dog treats and responsible gun ownership would lead us to eating dogs, which she says is happening in Venezuela, What! watch this clip."
What she said: "If the citizenry in America is disarmed, then we are no longer citizens, we are subjects. You know here in America we have gourmet treats for puppies, we have these amazing groomers for our dogs. Well in Venezuela they eat the dogs and it started because they don't have firearms, they do not have a way protect themselves, defend themselves against a tyrannical government"
The youtube presenter clearly is spinning the shit out of this....
Thank you for conceding, they did indeed say the same core thing, with different words."
You are proving to me that critical thinking is probably not a strong point for you.... You have rubbished the way The Mail twists things to suit their agenda, this is exactly what you have done here. 2 options, keep saying your quote here is correct and actually what was said.
"Republican United States Representative for Colorado's 3rd congressional district Lauren Boebert gave an interview where she expressed concern that responsible gun ownership would lead to bad dog grooming and eventually dogs being eaten which she claims is taking place in Venezuela."
Or do the right thing and admit you may have got it wrong, I mean even the guy on youtube didn't utter bad dog grooming |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Republican United States Representative for Colorado's 3rd congressional district Lauren Boebert gave an interview where she expressed concern that responsible gun ownership would lead to bad dog grooming and eventually dogs being eaten which she claims is taking place in Venezuela.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzpQqJxVhdI
I watched this clip and the summary you have given is very misleading..
The woman being interviewed was saying that gun ownership gave citizens power within the country, that power allows them influence and enjoy freedoms. Her argument went on to say, Venezuela where there are no firearms, meant they could not rise up against a tyrannical government, leaving them in a position of starvation.
It was a bad analogy of saying firearms affords freedoms such as dog ownership, no firearms and those dogs become food, due to starvation.
But my oh my, I can see how conspiracy theories fly, if this is the level of twist or lack of being able to understand an analogy that leads to a completely different story than the one told.
So...
She said it, you just don't like that I said she said it?
She didn't say it, the person hosting the clip said that, he took her words and presented them back in a different order.
"Well in Venezuela they eat the dogs and it started because they don't have firearms."
sounds like she said it to me
To clear this up as you kindly offered up the clip:
He said: "So get this, radical right-wing extremist Lauren Boebert said that the reasons she opposes responsible gun ownership is because we have good dog groomers in America and good dog treats and responsible gun ownership would lead us to eating dogs, which she says is happening in Venezuela, What! watch this clip."
What she said: "If the citizenry in America is disarmed, then we are no longer citizens, we are subjects. You know here in America we have gourmet treats for puppies, we have these amazing groomers for our dogs. Well in Venezuela they eat the dogs and it started because they don't have firearms, they do not have a way protect themselves, defend themselves against a tyrannical government"
The youtube presenter clearly is spinning the shit out of this....
Thank you for conceding, they did indeed say the same core thing, with different words.
You are proving to me that critical thinking is probably not a strong point for you.... You have rubbished the way The Mail twists things to suit their agenda, this is exactly what you have done here. 2 options, keep saying your quote here is correct and actually what was said.
"Republican United States Representative for Colorado's 3rd congressional district Lauren Boebert gave an interview where she expressed concern that responsible gun ownership would lead to bad dog grooming and eventually dogs being eaten which she claims is taking place in Venezuela."
Or do the right thing and admit you may have got it wrong, I mean even the guy on youtube didn't utter bad dog grooming "
Ok Buddy whatever you say! If you want to think they said different things, you can do that! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Ok Buddy whatever you say! If you want to think they said different things, you can do that!"
He's not talking about what they said, he's talking about what you said.
In your original post you said "Lauren Boebert ... expressed concern that responsible gun ownership would lead to bad dog grooming ...".
Do you really think that's what she said? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Ok Buddy whatever you say! If you want to think they said different things, you can do that!
He's not talking about what they said, he's talking about what you said.
In your original post you said "Lauren Boebert ... expressed concern that responsible gun ownership would lead to bad dog grooming ...".
Do you really think that's what she said?"
I copy and pasted the Youtube description. (except I put her full job title at the beginning) |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Ok Buddy whatever you say! If you want to think they said different things, you can do that!"
"He's not talking about what they said, he's talking about what you said.
In your original post you said "Lauren Boebert ... expressed concern that responsible gun ownership would lead to bad dog grooming ...".
Do you really think that's what she said?"
"I copy and pasted the Youtube description. (except I put her full job title at the beginning)"
Oh, so now you're claiming that it was someone else that said it, so it's not your fault.
But that doesn't answer my question. Do you think that the words "Lauren Boebert ... expressed concern that responsible gun ownership would lead to bad dog grooming ...", from your original post, accurately reflect what Boebert said? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Ok Buddy whatever you say! If you want to think they said different things, you can do that!
He's not talking about what they said, he's talking about what you said.
In your original post you said "Lauren Boebert ... expressed concern that responsible gun ownership would lead to bad dog grooming ...".
Do you really think that's what she said?
I copy and pasted the Youtube description. (except I put her full job title at the beginning)
Oh, so now you're claiming that it was someone else that said it, so it's not your fault.
But that doesn't answer my question. Do you think that the words "Lauren Boebert ... expressed concern that responsible gun ownership would lead to bad dog grooming ...", from your original post, accurately reflect what Boebert said?"
I do find it funny just how much parsing of individual words you have to do to argue this. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I do find it funny just how much parsing of individual words you have to do to argue this.
I find it funny how much you are trying to avoid answering."
I think it is a reasonable conclusion for the layperson watching the video to think it is accurate.
Happy now? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I do find it funny just how much parsing of individual words you have to do to argue this.
I find it funny how much you are trying to avoid answering.
I think it is a reasonable conclusion for the layperson watching the video to think it is accurate.
Happy now?"
Being a American there is stupid on both sides of the political spectrum. You just have to out the stupidity and come to your own conclusions.No need to get angry over something so trivial. It's just showmanship. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I do find it funny just how much parsing of individual words you have to do to argue this.
I find it funny how much you are trying to avoid answering.
I think it is a reasonable conclusion for the layperson watching the video to think it is accurate.
Happy now?
Being a American there is stupid on both sides of the political spectrum. You just have to out the stupidity and come to your own conclusions.No need to get angry over something so trivial. It's just showmanship."
Who is angry? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I do find it funny just how much parsing of individual words you have to do to argue this.
I find it funny how much you are trying to avoid answering.
I think it is a reasonable conclusion for the layperson watching the video to think it is accurate.
Happy now?
Being a American there is stupid on both sides of the political spectrum. You just have to out the stupidity and come to your own conclusions.No need to get angry over something so trivial. It's just showmanship.
Who is angry?"
lol not you |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *otMe66Man
over a year ago
Terra Firma |
"I do find it funny just how much parsing of individual words you have to do to argue this.
I find it funny how much you are trying to avoid answering.
I think it is a reasonable conclusion for the layperson watching the video to think it is accurate.
Happy now?"
You have misquoted, that is a given, 100%.
What does interest me more is you doubled down on the story, maybe or maybe not knowing it was a poor analogy by the gun lobby person, that has been spun by a Youtuber.
You have now said "I do find it funny just how much parsing of individual words you have to do to argue this"
Which is exactly what you have done from the very first post, not a good day in the office |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I do find it funny just how much parsing of individual words you have to do to argue this.
I find it funny how much you are trying to avoid answering.
I think it is a reasonable conclusion for the layperson watching the video to think it is accurate.
Happy now?
You have misquoted, that is a given, 100%.
What does interest me more is you doubled down on the story, maybe or maybe not knowing it was a poor analogy by the gun lobby person, that has been spun by a Youtuber.
You have now said "I do find it funny just how much parsing of individual words you have to do to argue this"
Which is exactly what you have done from the very first post, not a good day in the office "
We pretty much all have guns.sooo.. her perceptions.. albeit was kinda stupid but she correct on the "issue". |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
