FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > The Scottish
The Scottish
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A lot of ifs in this post. What if a giant nuclear evolved dinosaur death rays Edinburgh, would England get the free school meals Scotland no longer wants?" They might be a bit overcooked.  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"No, she has proposed a date but needs agreement from the UK government to hold the referendum. Boris has already said he won't agree to it." I'm English, and I say fuck the English rule over them. It's stupid that we can essentially veto Scotland trying to leave us. Should we really be holding them prisoner? It's unfair and in older days would be the sort of thing that set off civil wars. If we want Scotland to stay, we should be making it somewhere they 'want' to stay, not forcing them in it. We aren't fucking Russia! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"No, she has proposed a date but needs agreement from the UK government to hold the referendum. Boris has already said he won't agree to it." Fingers crossed she doesnt i for one am sick of hearing about referendums, the people voted in 2014, no then no now | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"No, she has proposed a date but needs agreement from the UK government to hold the referendum. Boris has already said he won't agree to it. I'm English, and I say fuck the English rule over them. It's stupid that we can essentially veto Scotland trying to leave us. Should we really be holding them prisoner? It's unfair and in older days would be the sort of thing that set off civil wars. If we want Scotland to stay, we should be making it somewhere they 'want' to stay, not forcing them in it. We aren't fucking Russia! " The last referendum was in favour of staying united. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Fingers crossed she doesnt i for one am sick of hearing about referendums, the people voted in 2014, no then no now" Opinions change. I doubt Brexit would get the slim majority now! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"No, she has proposed a date but needs agreement from the UK government to hold the referendum. Boris has already said he won't agree to it. I'm English, and I say fuck the English rule over them. It's stupid that we can essentially veto Scotland trying to leave us. Should we really be holding them prisoner? It's unfair and in older days would be the sort of thing that set off civil wars. If we want Scotland to stay, we should be making it somewhere they 'want' to stay, not forcing them in it. We aren't fucking Russia! " Its not england but its the uk which we are all part of, and the majority of scots voted only 8 years ago to remain | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I live there . Most like many can’t even fill their cars up . And watch Boris and the constant Tory sh1t show and will still want to remain in the Union only for tribal reasons . " This is the thing. When I lived there I’d have voted against independence. After the absolute shitshow since the last referendum I want to move back there and leave. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I live there . Most like many can’t even fill their cars up . And watch Boris and the constant Tory sh1t show and will still want to remain in the Union only for tribal reasons . "  This, get us tae fuck | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"No, she has proposed a date but needs agreement from the UK government to hold the referendum. Boris has already said he won't agree to it. I'm English, and I say fuck the English rule over them. It's stupid that we can essentially veto Scotland trying to leave us. Should we really be holding them prisoner? It's unfair and in older days would be the sort of thing that set off civil wars. If we want Scotland to stay, we should be making it somewhere they 'want' to stay, not forcing them in it. We aren't fucking Russia! Its not england but its the uk which we are all part of, and the majority of scots voted only 8 years ago to remain " The 1st vote should have been held after the Brexit vote - it might have been a different result then. I’m all for independence - I wonder what colour passport I can get??? J x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Good luck. Rebuild Hadrians wall." You know where that is right?  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"No, she has proposed a date but needs agreement from the UK government to hold the referendum. Boris has already said he won't agree to it. I'm English, and I say fuck the English rule over them. It's stupid that we can essentially veto Scotland trying to leave us. Should we really be holding them prisoner? It's unfair and in older days would be the sort of thing that set off civil wars. If we want Scotland to stay, we should be making it somewhere they 'want' to stay, not forcing them in it. We aren't fucking Russia! Its not england but its the uk which we are all part of, and the majority of scots voted only 8 years ago to remain The 1st vote should have been held after the Brexit vote - it might have been a different result then. I’m all for independence - I wonder what colour passport I can get??? J x" Whatever colour you want you can even pick if its felt tip pen or crayon you colour it in with | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"No, she has proposed a date but needs agreement from the UK government to hold the referendum. Boris has already said he won't agree to it. Fingers crossed she doesnt i for one am sick of hearing about referendums, the people voted in 2014, no then no now" So am I, many Scottish friends think the woman is insane as there are so many other problems for her to sort first. Many of them her own making. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"No, she has proposed a date but needs agreement from the UK government to hold the referendum. Boris has already said he won't agree to it. Fingers crossed she doesnt i for one am sick of hearing about referendums, the people voted in 2014, no then no now So am I, many Scottish friends think the woman is insane as there are so many other problems for her to sort first. Many of them her own making. " Goes on daily about food banks but will gladly spend millions on a referndum that the majority voted no for 1st time around.. womans mental | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If Scotland get to vote and they vote to leave the bonus would be she wouldn't be soiling my tele as much.. so just for that I hope you get your independence. " Try being scottish and have the rest of the planet think we all love her..  Please dont wish that on us  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Let the English vote too..... Then we'll never have to hear from or deal with her again, gone! "Let the English vote on Scottish affairs…? there’s the issue right there | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Let the English vote too..... Then we'll never have to hear from or deal with her again, gone! "What about the sane Scots who dont want to hear about her aswell? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Let the English vote too..... Then we'll never have to hear from or deal with her again, gone!
What about the sane Scots who dont want to hear about her aswell?"Your ballots go in the box alongside the rest of us. Which has kept the SNP in power for 15 years with independence in their campaign. Speaks volumes | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"No, she has proposed a date but needs agreement from the UK government to hold the referendum. Boris has already said he won't agree to it. I'm English, and I say fuck the English rule over them. It's stupid that we can essentially veto Scotland trying to leave us. Should we really be holding them prisoner? It's unfair and in older days would be the sort of thing that set off civil wars. If we want Scotland to stay, we should be making it somewhere they 'want' to stay, not forcing them in it. We aren't fucking Russia! The last referendum was in favour of staying united." Yes, but things change. They voted to stay united with us whilst we were part of the EU, then we decided to leave the EU despite Scotland wanting to remain. As we have changed the landscape, they should be able to have another say on if they still want to remain. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"For me this is so much more complicated than yes or no and the zealots that try and bang their drum the loudest. Its a chance to get away from westminster and the Tories and an embarrassingly impotent Labour opposition who have forgot or shied away from their union roots. However I'd also much prefer a Scotland that wasn't ruled by the SNP and their toxic supporters. I feel a sense of guilt for the working class English people we could leave behind who have been continually let down by a political system thats only function seems to be siphoning public money into private companies and offshore accounts (see reasons behind the current rail strikes as an example and the media manipulation that goes hand in hand). Brexit has hurt me professionally and personally, friends have left the UK who had settled here. I also feel England seems to be swinging more and more to the right (no pun intended) in areas that should never be voting conservative. An independent Scotland would be continually sabotaged financially by a bitter westminster (see current brexit situation NI protocol etc). Its a big mess, some like me are apathetic as nothing seems to stop the poor getting poorer and the rich getting richer, all we seem to vote for is who is going to fuck us up more. I dont know how or if I will vote if it comes to that, its going to take a lot to filter the idiots on both sides. But I'm tired of politics. "If Scotland were independent, how could Westminster sabotage them? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"For me this is so much more complicated than yes or no and the zealots that try and bang their drum the loudest. Its a chance to get away from westminster and the Tories and an embarrassingly impotent Labour opposition who have forgot or shied away from their union roots. However I'd also much prefer a Scotland that wasn't ruled by the SNP and their toxic supporters. I feel a sense of guilt for the working class English people we could leave behind who have been continually let down by a political system thats only function seems to be siphoning public money into private companies and offshore accounts (see reasons behind the current rail strikes as an example and the media manipulation that goes hand in hand). Brexit has hurt me professionally and personally, friends have left the UK who had settled here. I also feel England seems to be swinging more and more to the right (no pun intended) in areas that should never be voting conservative. An independent Scotland would be continually sabotaged financially by a bitter westminster (see current brexit situation NI protocol etc). Its a big mess, some like me are apathetic as nothing seems to stop the poor getting poorer and the rich getting richer, all we seem to vote for is who is going to fuck us up more. I dont know how or if I will vote if it comes to that, its going to take a lot to filter the idiots on both sides. But I'm tired of politics.
If Scotland were independent, how could Westminster sabotage them?"What percentage of trade from Scotland goes to the UK? This wouldn’t end if they went independent, but uk could/would add tariffs, could effect lots of Scottish businesses | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" If Scotland were independent, how could Westminster sabotage them?" Can't drum up every scenario, but could foresee agreements being broken from any potential separation that suddenly didn't suit them. Again, looking specifically at how they've behaved during brexit as a recent case in point. Ministers up in arms over the details of deals they negotiated. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Let the English vote too..... Then we'll never have to hear from or deal with her again, gone!
What about the sane Scots who dont want to hear about her aswell?"sane Scott’s ? Have U watched the Tory sh1t show or have y had yer head in the sand ? The fella and party down sth are an abomination hen | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"No, she has proposed a date but needs agreement from the UK government to hold the referendum. Boris has already said he won't agree to it." Nicola is going to the Supreme Court. If they agree to it, then she can hold a referendum. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Tom, there is a politics forum, please use it for politic subjects" Oops sorry .. will do in future. It's just that the lounge has much nicer people than the other fora.  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Perhaps there should be a referendum in the rest of the UK to decide if Scotland can stay part of the Union." totally agree | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Perhaps there should be a referendum in the rest of the UK to decide if Scotland can stay part of the Union. totally agree " In the way the rest of the European countries got a vote in Brexit? Oh wait no they didn’t | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"No, she has proposed a date but needs agreement from the UK government to hold the referendum. Boris has already said he won't agree to it. I'm English, and I say fuck the English rule over them. It's stupid that we can essentially veto Scotland trying to leave us. Should we really be holding them prisoner? It's unfair and in older days would be the sort of thing that set off civil wars. If we want Scotland to stay, we should be making it somewhere they 'want' to stay, not forcing them in it. We aren't fucking Russia! " So much common sense in one post | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The population of Scotland is just over 5 million and spread over a huge area, the population of London is over 9 million, condensed. Scotland may find it hard to fund a split successfully, leading to a a very shaky independence, with no guarantee of ever joining the EU in the next 25 years. The idea that Scotland voted to stay in the EU so therefore should be independent, is the same as saying all of the towns and cities in England that had voted positively to stay in the EU should also be independent.. What next Manchester, Newcastle, Leeds a north, south split.... we are small island." I think the arguement isn't - "Scotland voted to stay in the EU so therefore should be independent". It's, things have changed a lot since the last referendum. And there are different implications and opportunities for an independent or non-indepenedent Scotland, than there were before. They think that the prospect of rejoining the EU, even if it is a longshot, might persuade more people to vote for independence. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The population of Scotland is just over 5 million and spread over a huge area, the population of London is over 9 million, condensed. Scotland may find it hard to fund a split successfully, leading to a a very shaky independence, with no guarantee of ever joining the EU in the next 25 years. The idea that Scotland voted to stay in the EU so therefore should be independent, is the same as saying all of the towns and cities in England that had voted positively to stay in the EU should also be independent.. What next Manchester, Newcastle, Leeds a north, south split.... we are small island. I think the arguement isn't - "Scotland voted to stay in the EU so therefore should be independent". It's, things have changed a lot since the last referendum. And there are different implications and opportunities for an independent or non-indepenedent Scotland, than there were before. They think that the prospect of rejoining the EU, even if it is a longshot, might persuade more people to vote for independence." From the BBC "Ms Sturgeon called for another referendum - "indyref2" - immediately after the UK as a whole voted to leave the EU in the 2016 Brexit referendum. Scottish voters backed remain by 62% by 38%." I agree she will use that 62% as a leverage to get her over the line. My question is, what would be the cost to the Scottish people if Scotland became independent? We learnt from Brexit, that numbers and facts get thrown around like confetti, and are worth about as much. The egos drive to succeed comes at a price and I would not like to see the population of Scotland vote on such an important life changing event, stoked up on stories of joining the EU and becoming X times more wealthy, without the most stringent scrutiny being applied. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The population of Scotland is just over 5 million and spread over a huge area, the population of London is over 9 million, condensed. Scotland may find it hard to fund a split successfully, leading to a a very shaky independence, with no guarantee of ever joining the EU in the next 25 years. The idea that Scotland voted to stay in the EU so therefore should be independent, is the same as saying all of the towns and cities in England that had voted positively to stay in the EU should also be independent.. What next Manchester, Newcastle, Leeds a north, south split.... we are small island. I think the arguement isn't - "Scotland voted to stay in the EU so therefore should be independent". It's, things have changed a lot since the last referendum. And there are different implications and opportunities for an independent or non-indepenedent Scotland, than there were before. They think that the prospect of rejoining the EU, even if it is a longshot, might persuade more people to vote for independence. From the BBC "Ms Sturgeon called for another referendum - "indyref2" - immediately after the UK as a whole voted to leave the EU in the 2016 Brexit referendum. Scottish voters backed remain by 62% by 38%." I agree she will use that 62% as a leverage to get her over the line. My question is, what would be the cost to the Scottish people if Scotland became independent? We learnt from Brexit, that numbers and facts get thrown around like confetti, and are worth about as much. The egos drive to succeed comes at a price and I would not like to see the population of Scotland vote on such an important life changing event, stoked up on stories of joining the EU and becoming X times more wealthy, without the most stringent scrutiny being applied. " It all hinges on how likely they will be able to join the EU as an independent Scotland. If the SNP can demonstrate that it's possible and likely. Then it could be great for Scotland. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Let the English vote too..... Then we'll never have to hear from or deal with her again, gone!
What about the sane Scots who dont want to hear about her aswell?
Your ballots go in the box alongside the rest of us. Which has kept the SNP in power for 15 years with independence in their campaign. Speaks volumes "The same ballot boxes we voted for a no independance? Seems she only cares for independance rather than her voters | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Let the English vote too..... Then we'll never have to hear from or deal with her again, gone!
What about the sane Scots who dont want to hear about her aswell? sane Scott’s ? Have U watched the Tory sh1t show or have y had yer head in the sand ? The fella and party down sth are an abomination hen "Scots** and please dont patronise me calling me hen! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Let the English vote too..... Then we'll never have to hear from or deal with her again, gone!
What about the sane Scots who dont want to hear about her aswell?
Your ballots go in the box alongside the rest of us. Which has kept the SNP in power for 15 years with independence in their campaign. Speaks volumes
The same ballot boxes we voted for a no independance? Seems she only cares for independance rather than her voters"Which then changed as we were dragged out the EU against our will? Next | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Let the English vote too..... Then we'll never have to hear from or deal with her again, gone!
What about the sane Scots who dont want to hear about her aswell?
Your ballots go in the box alongside the rest of us. Which has kept the SNP in power for 15 years with independence in their campaign. Speaks volumes
The same ballot boxes we voted for a no independance? Seems she only cares for independance rather than her voters
Which then changed as we were dragged out the EU against our will? Next"Bit dramtaic pal, next, seriously get a grip we are allowed an opinion i dont like yours you dont like mine.. typical of the snp to tear this country, families and friends apart just like they done in 2014. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Let the English vote too..... Then we'll never have to hear from or deal with her again, gone!
What about the sane Scots who dont want to hear about her aswell?
Your ballots go in the box alongside the rest of us. Which has kept the SNP in power for 15 years with independence in their campaign. Speaks volumes
The same ballot boxes we voted for a no independance? Seems she only cares for independance rather than her voters
Which then changed as we were dragged out the EU against our will? Next
Bit dramtaic pal, next, seriously get a grip we are allowed an opinion i dont like yours you dont like mine.. typical of the snp to tear this country, families and friends apart just like they done in 2014.
"Dramatic Dramatic was the 62% of Scotland who voted to stay in the EU and weren’t listened to. It’s not that I don’t like your opinion it’s that I don’t understand it
Peace  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Let the English vote too..... Then we'll never have to hear from or deal with her again, gone!
What about the sane Scots who dont want to hear about her aswell?
Your ballots go in the box alongside the rest of us. Which has kept the SNP in power for 15 years with independence in their campaign. Speaks volumes
The same ballot boxes we voted for a no independance? Seems she only cares for independance rather than her voters
Which then changed as we were dragged out the EU against our will? Next
Bit dramtaic pal, next, seriously get a grip we are allowed an opinion i dont like yours you dont like mine.. typical of the snp to tear this country, families and friends apart just like they done in 2014.
"Oh and don’t patronise me with “pal” | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Let the English vote too..... Then we'll never have to hear from or deal with her again, gone!
What about the sane Scots who dont want to hear about her aswell?
Your ballots go in the box alongside the rest of us. Which has kept the SNP in power for 15 years with independence in their campaign. Speaks volumes
The same ballot boxes we voted for a no independance? Seems she only cares for independance rather than her voters
Which then changed as we were dragged out the EU against our will? Next
Bit dramtaic pal, next, seriously get a grip we are allowed an opinion i dont like yours you dont like mine.. typical of the snp to tear this country, families and friends apart just like they done in 2014.
"Never seen any families or friends torn apart you should stop listening to tory and labour propaganda  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Let the English vote too..... Then we'll never have to hear from or deal with her again, gone!
What about the sane Scots who dont want to hear about her aswell?
Your ballots go in the box alongside the rest of us. Which has kept the SNP in power for 15 years with independence in their campaign. Speaks volumes
The same ballot boxes we voted for a no independance? Seems she only cares for independance rather than her voters
Which then changed as we were dragged out the EU against our will? Next
Bit dramtaic pal, next, seriously get a grip we are allowed an opinion i dont like yours you dont like mine.. typical of the snp to tear this country, families and friends apart just like they done in 2014.
Dramatic Dramatic was the 62% of Scotland who voted to stay in the EU and weren’t listened to. It’s not that I don’t like your opinion it’s that I don’t understand it
Peace "Like the 54% who voted no and not being listened to? Democracy is a joke in scotland | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Let the English vote too..... Then we'll never have to hear from or deal with her again, gone!
What about the sane Scots who dont want to hear about her aswell?
Your ballots go in the box alongside the rest of us. Which has kept the SNP in power for 15 years with independence in their campaign. Speaks volumes
The same ballot boxes we voted for a no independance? Seems she only cares for independance rather than her voters
Which then changed as we were dragged out the EU against our will? Next
Bit dramtaic pal, next, seriously get a grip we are allowed an opinion i dont like yours you dont like mine.. typical of the snp to tear this country, families and friends apart just like they done in 2014.
Never seen any families or friends torn apart you should stop listening to tory and labour propaganda "I dont listen to news or politics for that fact i know personally families who have been torn apart for not liking snp or voting no | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Let the English vote too..... Then we'll never have to hear from or deal with her again, gone!
What about the sane Scots who dont want to hear about her aswell?
Your ballots go in the box alongside the rest of us. Which has kept the SNP in power for 15 years with independence in their campaign. Speaks volumes
The same ballot boxes we voted for a no independance? Seems she only cares for independance rather than her voters
Which then changed as we were dragged out the EU against our will? Next
Bit dramtaic pal, next, seriously get a grip we are allowed an opinion i dont like yours you dont like mine.. typical of the snp to tear this country, families and friends apart just like they done in 2014.
Oh and don’t patronise me with “pal” "And its started haha | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Scots** and please dont patronise me calling me hen! " Yep I started it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The population of Scotland is just over 5 million and spread over a huge area, the population of London is over 9 million, condensed. Scotland may find it hard to fund a split successfully, leading to a a very shaky independence, with no guarantee of ever joining the EU in the next 25 years. The idea that Scotland voted to stay in the EU so therefore should be independent, is the same as saying all of the towns and cities in England that had voted positively to stay in the EU should also be independent.. What next Manchester, Newcastle, Leeds a north, south split.... we are small island. I think the arguement isn't - "Scotland voted to stay in the EU so therefore should be independent". It's, things have changed a lot since the last referendum. And there are different implications and opportunities for an independent or non-indepenedent Scotland, than there were before. They think that the prospect of rejoining the EU, even if it is a longshot, might persuade more people to vote for independence. From the BBC "Ms Sturgeon called for another referendum - "indyref2" - immediately after the UK as a whole voted to leave the EU in the 2016 Brexit referendum. Scottish voters backed remain by 62% by 38%." I agree she will use that 62% as a leverage to get her over the line. My question is, what would be the cost to the Scottish people if Scotland became independent? We learnt from Brexit, that numbers and facts get thrown around like confetti, and are worth about as much. The egos drive to succeed comes at a price and I would not like to see the population of Scotland vote on such an important life changing event, stoked up on stories of joining the EU and becoming X times more wealthy, without the most stringent scrutiny being applied. It all hinges on how likely they will be able to join the EU as an independent Scotland. If the SNP can demonstrate that it's possible and likely. Then it could be great for Scotland. " Agree with that, but I think the only way to demonstrate it is possible for Scotland to join the EU is to have an independent body apply the criteria for entry and show the likelihood of success based on the results and an EU response. Anything short of that would be guess work and propaganda aimed a cajoling the voting public. I wouldn't wish another Brexit style mess on the people of Scotland, they deserve the truth on the outcome to allow them to make an informed decision for their future. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Scots** and please dont patronise me calling me hen! Yep I started it "Pal and hen are completely different ways to address someone, calling me hen is very patronising i thought pal was more sincere?? Plus that wasnt quoted at yourself, so technically you did start it in our discussion. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The population of Scotland is just over 5 million and spread over a huge area, the population of London is over 9 million, condensed. Scotland may find it hard to fund a split successfully, leading to a a very shaky independence, with no guarantee of ever joining the EU in the next 25 years. The idea that Scotland voted to stay in the EU so therefore should be independent, is the same as saying all of the towns and cities in England that had voted positively to stay in the EU should also be independent.. What next Manchester, Newcastle, Leeds a north, south split.... we are small island. I think the arguement isn't - "Scotland voted to stay in the EU so therefore should be independent". It's, things have changed a lot since the last referendum. And there are different implications and opportunities for an independent or non-indepenedent Scotland, than there were before. They think that the prospect of rejoining the EU, even if it is a longshot, might persuade more people to vote for independence. From the BBC "Ms Sturgeon called for another referendum - "indyref2" - immediately after the UK as a whole voted to leave the EU in the 2016 Brexit referendum. Scottish voters backed remain by 62% by 38%." I agree she will use that 62% as a leverage to get her over the line. My question is, what would be the cost to the Scottish people if Scotland became independent? We learnt from Brexit, that numbers and facts get thrown around like confetti, and are worth about as much. The egos drive to succeed comes at a price and I would not like to see the population of Scotland vote on such an important life changing event, stoked up on stories of joining the EU and becoming X times more wealthy, without the most stringent scrutiny being applied. It all hinges on how likely they will be able to join the EU as an independent Scotland. If the SNP can demonstrate that it's possible and likely. Then it could be great for Scotland. Agree with that, but I think the only way to demonstrate it is possible for Scotland to join the EU is to have an independent body apply the criteria for entry and show the likelihood of success based on the results and an EU response. Anything short of that would be guess work and propaganda aimed a cajoling the voting public. I wouldn't wish another Brexit style mess on the people of Scotland, they deserve the truth on the outcome to allow them to make an informed decision for their future. "
Agree with all that. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Nobody is mentioning the two elephants in the corner!" Dumbo and Mrs Jumbo? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Let the English vote too..... Then we'll never have to hear from or deal with her again, gone!
What about the sane Scots who dont want to hear about her aswell?
Your ballots go in the box alongside the rest of us. Which has kept the SNP in power for 15 years with independence in their campaign. Speaks volumes
The same ballot boxes we voted for a no independance? Seems she only cares for independance rather than her voters
Which then changed as we were dragged out the EU against our will? Next
Bit dramtaic pal, next, seriously get a grip we are allowed an opinion i dont like yours you dont like mine.. typical of the snp to tear this country, families and friends apart just like they done in 2014.
Never seen any families or friends torn apart you should stop listening to tory and labour propaganda
I dont listen to news or politics for that fact i know personally families who have been torn apart for not liking snp or voting no "Or the other way like liking snp and voting yes | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Nobody is mentioning the two elephants in the corner! Dumbo and Mrs Jumbo? " When Tom was at school they had rubbers as we innocently called them but apparently they are now called pencil erasers. The jumbo was large and pink. Not sure why it was not called a pig rubber. It should have been grey | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Nobody is mentioning the two elephants in the corner! Dumbo and Mrs Jumbo? When Tom was at school they had rubbers as we innocently called them but apparently they are now called pencil erasers. The jumbo was large and pink. Not sure why it was not called a pig rubber. It should have been grey " Why would it be called a pig rubber? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Nobody is mentioning the two elephants in the corner! Dumbo and Mrs Jumbo? When Tom was at school they had rubbers as we innocently called them but apparently they are now called pencil erasers. The jumbo was large and pink. Not sure why it was not called a pig rubber. It should have been grey Why would it be called a pig rubber? " It was pink | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Nobody is mentioning the two elephants in the corner! Dumbo and Mrs Jumbo? When Tom was at school they had rubbers as we innocently called them but apparently they are now called pencil erasers. The jumbo was large and pink. Not sure why it was not called a pig rubber. It should have been grey Why would it be called a pig rubber? It was pink" Ah, not all pigs are pink though, why should it have been grey? What is that all about? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I have to say I am perplexed by the SNP's proposition. As I understand their beef is that Scotland is not well served by an out of touch government in London (270 miles from Gretna) where they have 47 seats out of 650 and a permanent seat at the cabinet (Scottish Secretary). The solution to this is to replace it with government in Brussels where there are 6 seats out of 705 (and counting) and no permanent representation on the Commission. shurely shome mishtake as Private Eye would say? Just as an aside the average time a country has taken to accede to the EU is 6 years. That is 6 years hanging in the wind. " This isn't how the EU works. No wonder we ended up with brexit. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I have to say I am perplexed by the SNP's proposition. [snip]... This isn't how the EU works. No wonder we ended up with brexit." Well please enlighten us, It is not clear if you are saying: 1. It doesn't take 6 years on average to accede to the EU; or 2. An independent Scotland will be only a small 1 of 27+ members and have less control over its own destiny inside the EU? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Nobody is mentioning the two elephants in the corner! Dumbo and Mrs Jumbo? When Tom was at school they had rubbers as we innocently called them but apparently they are now called pencil erasers. The jumbo was large and pink. Not sure why it was not called a pig rubber. It should have been grey Why would it be called a pig rubber? It was pink Ah, not all pigs are pink though, why should it have been grey? What is that all about? " Elephants are grey.. keep up.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Nobody is mentioning the two elephants in the corner! Dumbo and Mrs Jumbo? When Tom was at school they had rubbers as we innocently called them but apparently they are now called pencil erasers. The jumbo was large and pink. Not sure why it was not called a pig rubber. It should have been grey Why would it be called a pig rubber? It was pink Ah, not all pigs are pink though, why should it have been grey? What is that all about? Elephants are grey.. keep up.. " Why aren't all jumbo jets grey then? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Never going to happen. The English and Welsh took us out by a very small majority. " 4% of 60 million is a lot of votes to be fair | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I have to say I am perplexed by the SNP's proposition. [snip]... This isn't how the EU works. No wonder we ended up with brexit. Well please enlighten us, It is not clear if you are saying: 1. It doesn't take 6 years on average to accede to the EU; or 2. An independent Scotland will be only a small 1 of 27+ members and have less control over its own destiny inside the EU?" Sorry, I was referring to "The solution to this is to replace it with government in Brussels" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Some are saying that if England rejoined the EU they would be worse off than when they were in.. Who knows.. If they rerun the referendum tomorrow then England would still be out.. " Who says this? England wouldn't be able to rejoin with with rest of the UK. The rest is nonsensical based on the above. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Some are saying that if England rejoined the EU they would be worse off than when they were in.. Who knows.. If they rerun the referendum tomorrow then England would still be out.. " We were one of the founding countries and as such had extra privileges not given to other countries. If we rejoin, we will not be in that position and the other members would all remember us as 'the spliters' and trust in us would be lesser, so it stands to reason that we wouldn't get it as good as we had it. OK, we can't be certain about that, we could do an amazing job of negotiating it... but that doesn't seem something the government is exactly great at. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Some are saying that if England rejoined the EU they would be worse off than when they were in.. Who knows.. If they rerun the referendum tomorrow then England would still be out.. We were one of the founding countries and as such had extra privileges not given to other countries. If we rejoin, we will not be in that position and the other members would all remember us as 'the spliters' and trust in us would be lesser, so it stands to reason that we wouldn't get it as good as we had it. OK, we can't be certain about that, we could do an amazing job of negotiating it... but that doesn't seem something the government is exactly great at. " The UK was not one of the founding countries. The Treaty of Rome which was the basis of the EEC as it was in those days was signed in 1957. Britain's membership was vetoed in 1961 by the French and we finally joined in 1973, at the same time as Denmark and Ireland. The 'extra' privileges were negotiated by Thatcher and Major. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Some are saying that if England rejoined the EU they would be worse off than when they were in.. Who knows.. If they rerun the referendum tomorrow then England would still be out.. We were one of the founding countries and as such had extra privileges not given to other countries. If we rejoin, we will not be in that position and the other members would all remember us as 'the spliters' and trust in us would be lesser, so it stands to reason that we wouldn't get it as good as we had it. OK, we can't be certain about that, we could do an amazing job of negotiating it... but that doesn't seem something the government is exactly great at. The UK was not one of the founding countries. The Treaty of Rome which was the basis of the EEC as it was in those days was signed in 1957. Britain's membership was vetoed in 1961 by the French and we finally joined in 1973, at the same time as Denmark and Ireland. The 'extra' privileges were negotiated by Thatcher and Major." Do the French vetoed us in 1961. That's says a lot to me. They were up to their old tricks even then... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Some are saying that if England rejoined the EU they would be worse off than when they were in.. Who knows.. If they rerun the referendum tomorrow then England would still be out.. " Yes I agree, the EU would be worse off | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I voted yes last time but this time its a big NO " No to leave or No to stay? What are the reasons for the no? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I voted yes last time but this time its a big NO No to leave or No to stay? What are the reasons for the no?" No to independence reasons SNP are bad for Scotland, the divisions here are getting wider and I fear we will end up like NI from the 70/80s People need to stop watching braveheart and wake up I would give her the vote as it will be a resounding NO | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I voted yes last time but this time its a big NO No to leave or No to stay? What are the reasons for the no? No to independence reasons SNP are bad for Scotland, the divisions here are getting wider and I fear we will end up like NI from the 70/80s People need to stop watching braveheart and wake up I would give her the vote as it will be a resounding NO " They said that about the Brexit referendum. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think some people are missing part of the story. Should Scotland gain independence wee Nicola would not be in charge of the country, she is leader of the devolved parliament which would have no jurisdiction over the new independent state. There would need to be a general election, in which the SNP would struggle as their main policy would cease to exist. Personality and party/personal hatreds should not be a guiding issue in a debate as important as this." No way she is giving up power they would rebrand themselves | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I have to say I am perplexed by the SNP's proposition. As I understand their beef is that Scotland is not well served by an out of touch government in London (270 miles from Gretna) where they have 47 seats out of 650 and a permanent seat at the cabinet (Scottish Secretary). The solution to this is to replace it with government in Brussels where there are 6 seats out of 705 (and counting) and no permanent representation on the Commission. shurely shome mishtake as Private Eye would say? Just as an aside the average time a country has taken to accede to the EU is 6 years. That is 6 years hanging in the wind. " If you want an idea as to how Scotland will cope as an independent nation - take a look at Norway. They could join EFTA immediately and allow EU accession to take its course. Scotland will be a high tax economy just like the Scandi states. And just like the Scandi states, it will probably be a very nice place to live. It is only in imbecilic countries like the USA and England where Governnents can get their populations to accept that taxing the lowest paid to the hilt is much more economically advantageous to them than taxing the the massively wealthy a bit more. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I have to say I am perplexed by the SNP's proposition. As I understand their beef is that Scotland is not well served by an out of touch government in London (270 miles from Gretna) where they have 47 seats out of 650 and a permanent seat at the cabinet (Scottish Secretary). The solution to this is to replace it with government in Brussels where there are 6 seats out of 705 (and counting) and no permanent representation on the Commission. shurely shome mishtake as Private Eye would say? Just as an aside the average time a country has taken to accede to the EU is 6 years. That is 6 years hanging in the wind. If you want an idea as to how Scotland will cope as an independent nation - take a look at Norway. They could join EFTA immediately and allow EU accession to take its course. Scotland will be a high tax economy just like the Scandi states. And just like the Scandi states, it will probably be a very nice place to live. It is only in imbecilic countries like the USA and England where Governnents can get their populations to accept that taxing the lowest paid to the hilt is much more economically advantageous to them than taxing the the massively wealthy a bit more." That certainly sounds an obvious plan. Have they said that they intend to join EFTA. Are all the other countries that are awaiting to join the EU also in EFTA. I assume the Scottish people will be warned that their taxes are to be increased | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I have to say I am perplexed by the SNP's proposition. As I understand their beef is that Scotland is not well served by an out of touch government in London (270 miles from Gretna) where they have 47 seats out of 650 and a permanent seat at the cabinet (Scottish Secretary). The solution to this is to replace it with government in Brussels where there are 6 seats out of 705 (and counting) and no permanent representation on the Commission. shurely shome mishtake as Private Eye would say? Just as an aside the average time a country has taken to accede to the EU is 6 years. That is 6 years hanging in the wind. If you want an idea as to how Scotland will cope as an independent nation - take a look at Norway. They could join EFTA immediately and allow EU accession to take its course. Scotland will be a high tax economy just like the Scandi states. And just like the Scandi states, it will probably be a very nice place to live. It is only in imbecilic countries like the USA and England where Governnents can get their populations to accept that taxing the lowest paid to the hilt is much more economically advantageous to them than taxing the the massively wealthy a bit more. That certainly sounds an obvious plan. Have they said that they intend to join EFTA. Are all the other countries that are awaiting to join the EU also in EFTA. I assume the Scottish people will be warned that their taxes are to be increased" Why do they need warning? It’s obvious to anyone with a crumb of common sense that taxes need to rise significantly right now across the whole of the United Kingdom. You will probably find that like the Scandi states that their taxes will be progressive and hit the wealthiest the most. Did you know that in the last 12 years of Conservative Government billionaire wealth in the U.K. has increased by 300% to a total of more than £600 billion pounds. There were more billionaires created in 2020 than in any other of the last 12 years - that was the time when we were all in it together if you remember. This kind of obscene wealth should be punitively taxed by the state to support the infrastructure of the country where that wealth was generated. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I have to say I am perplexed by the SNP's proposition. As I understand their beef is that Scotland is not well served by an out of touch government in London (270 miles from Gretna) where they have 47 seats out of 650 and a permanent seat at the cabinet (Scottish Secretary). The solution to this is to replace it with government in Brussels where there are 6 seats out of 705 (and counting) and no permanent representation on the Commission. shurely shome mishtake as Private Eye would say? Just as an aside the average time a country has taken to accede to the EU is 6 years. That is 6 years hanging in the wind. If you want an idea as to how Scotland will cope as an independent nation - take a look at Norway. They could join EFTA immediately and allow EU accession to take its course. Scotland will be a high tax economy just like the Scandi states. And just like the Scandi states, it will probably be a very nice place to live. It is only in imbecilic countries like the USA and England where Governnents can get their populations to accept that taxing the lowest paid to the hilt is much more economically advantageous to them than taxing the the massively wealthy a bit more. That certainly sounds an obvious plan. Have they said that they intend to join EFTA. Are all the other countries that are awaiting to join the EU also in EFTA. I assume the Scottish people will be warned that their taxes are to be increased Why do they need warning? It’s obvious to anyone with a crumb of common sense that taxes need to rise significantly right now across the whole of the United Kingdom. You will probably find that like the Scandi states that their taxes will be progressive and hit the wealthiest the most. Did you know that in the last 12 years of Conservative Government billionaire wealth in the U.K. has increased by 300% to a total of more than £600 billion pounds. There were more billionaires created in 2020 than in any other of the last 12 years - that was the time when we were all in it together if you remember. This kind of obscene wealth should be punitively taxed by the state to support the infrastructure of the country where that wealth was generated. " I think that if they want to go for the Scandinavian model then they should say so and be honest. If it means higher taxes then I think they should be told. Put it out there loud and clear so there is no doubt. I fully support their right for another vote and deciding their own future. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I have to say I am perplexed by the SNP's proposition. As I understand their beef is that Scotland is not well served by an out of touch government in London (270 miles from Gretna) where they have 47 seats out of 650 and a permanent seat at the cabinet (Scottish Secretary). The solution to this is to replace it with government in Brussels where there are 6 seats out of 705 (and counting) and no permanent representation on the Commission. shurely shome mishtake as Private Eye would say? Just as an aside the average time a country has taken to accede to the EU is 6 years. That is 6 years hanging in the wind. If you want an idea as to how Scotland will cope as an independent nation - take a look at Norway. They could join EFTA immediately and allow EU accession to take its course. Scotland will be a high tax economy just like the Scandi states. And just like the Scandi states, it will probably be a very nice place to live. It is only in imbecilic countries like the USA and England where Governnents can get their populations to accept that taxing the lowest paid to the hilt is much more economically advantageous to them than taxing the the massively wealthy a bit more. That certainly sounds an obvious plan. Have they said that they intend to join EFTA. Are all the other countries that are awaiting to join the EU also in EFTA. I assume the Scottish people will be warned that their taxes are to be increased Why do they need warning? It’s obvious to anyone with a crumb of common sense that taxes need to rise significantly right now across the whole of the United Kingdom. You will probably find that like the Scandi states that their taxes will be progressive and hit the wealthiest the most. Did you know that in the last 12 years of Conservative Government billionaire wealth in the U.K. has increased by 300% to a total of more than £600 billion pounds. There were more billionaires created in 2020 than in any other of the last 12 years - that was the time when we were all in it together if you remember. This kind of obscene wealth should be punitively taxed by the state to support the infrastructure of the country where that wealth was generated. I think that if they want to go for the Scandinavian model then they should say so and be honest. If it means higher taxes then I think they should be told. Put it out there loud and clear so there is no doubt. I fully support their right for another vote and deciding their own future." I’d support the whole of the U.K. adopting the Scandi model. It’s time to put people first. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If the Scottish people want to be independent, so be it...but they won't vote for it " How do you know we wont vote for it ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Tartansplainers: people from outwith Scotland who claim to understand Scotland, it's politics and what is best for Scotland. As usual all we are reading is many 'Tartansplainers' on this post just regurgitating the lines they have read in what is a very pro union media or making anecdotal regurgitations of a conversation they have had with someone who is "Scottish". The simple fact is people in Scotland have voted for SNP as main party since 2007 and not without good reason. That is despite the constant barrage of mud slung at them by the pro-union media. The fact is large swathes of the Scottish population are and have been politically astute enough to go and research and debunk much of the mud slung by the media. Last years Scottish election resulted in the majority of seats going parties (SNP / Green) which had Indy Ref 2 at the heart of their manifestos. The promise to hold a 2nd referendum should be upheld that is simple democracy. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Look at what she and the Nats have done to Scotland with the considerable power they already have. " Aye doing a great job on the limited money we get back from westminister,we pay nearly 80billion and get 36billion back thats just taxes,we can do a lot more if we keep it all | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think after Brexit, the Scottish people are wary of the bullshit promises that independence would bring, Sturgeon is so focused on independence, just like the eurosceptics were about brexit, she’d bring scotland down a path of ruin. Scottish independence is a settled matter. Just like remainers had to come to peace with Brexit, the SNP need to come to peace with the result of their referendum. If she wants to replay it again and neglect public services and actual government of Scotland, then she is a populist leader who is just as bad as the slob in charge." Seems you dont know what nationalist means,and independence is not a settled matter as after 2014 the parties agreed through the smith commision that if there was material change the scottish ppl would have the right to have another referendum | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"2014. A democratic referendum, "a once in a generation chance" (SNP's words). Scotland decided against Independence. Less than a few years later, the SNP are calling for "democracy to be respected" "Where in law or any document is that written?,it is written in the smith commision any material change the scottish ppl can have another indyref | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"2014. A democratic referendum, "a once in a generation chance" (SNP's words). Scotland decided against Independence. Less than a few years later, the SNP are calling for "democracy to be respected" "still waiting for boris to be found in a ditch (his words) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Scottish independence is a settled matter." I often wonder the point of comments like this, much the same as the often repeated "one in a generation" argument. They hold no water and are demonstrable false. Any argument otherwise is picked apart easily and quickly, so why do people keep making these comments? Do you genuinely believe this to be true inspite of the evidence showing it to be nonsense, or is it a case of repeating a lie often enough until it becomes the truth? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If everyone went for the skandi model, can we leave out the high alcohol taxes that they have please? I'd have to go back to making my own booze again "Skandi model is the mutts mutts. One of the highest standards of living in the developed world. No bigger than Scotland, less resources. Far more socially balanced and minimal poverty due to a well structured and inclusive welfare system. Alcohol is high through taxation to help curb addiction, same as 2nd car taxes to reduce pollution. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Scottish independence is a settled matter. I often wonder the point of comments like this, much the same as the often repeated "one in a generation" argument. They hold no water and are demonstrable false. Any argument otherwise is picked apart easily and quickly, so why do people keep making these comments? Do you genuinely believe this to be true inspite of the evidence showing it to be nonsense, or is it a case of repeating a lie often enough until it becomes the truth? " She not ruled out 3rd vote, we can't keep doing this until they get a win The country is so diveded over this and at some point we need to move on I would give them vote but if lose no more talk of it for 30 years I voted yes last time this time will be a no as the country is a mess | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I voted yes last time this time will be a no as the country is a mess " The state of the country at the moment is the very reason I think independence is needed now more than ever. Our hands are tied on so many matters that every other county in the world takes for granted and we don't have the autonomy to fix the problems we can. I don't follow the comment about a 3rd vote? Democracy doesn't ever "end". Political parties don't down tools as soon as a general election is over, they continue to believe what they believe in and work towards putting forward a positive case at the next election. Independence is no different than any other political topic and as long as the SNP keep getting overwhelmingly elected to power in Scotland that will be on their agenda. Its their entire reason for existing. I agree that refenrums and politics in general can be devisive, but cutting through the slogans and lies and deception is everyone's repaonsibility. The question on the ballot will be "Should Scotland be an independent country?" The question nobody can answer with any real authority or fact is "Why SHOULDNT Scotland be an independent country?" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I voted yes last time this time will be a no as the country is a mess The state of the country at the moment is the very reason I think independence is needed now more than ever. Our hands are tied on so many matters that every other county in the world takes for granted and we don't have the autonomy to fix the problems we can. I don't follow the comment about a 3rd vote? Democracy doesn't ever "end". Political parties don't down tools as soon as a general election is over, they continue to believe what they believe in and work towards putting forward a positive case at the next election. Independence is no different than any other political topic and as long as the SNP keep getting overwhelmingly elected to power in Scotland that will be on their agenda. Its their entire reason for existing. I agree that refenrums and politics in general can be devisive, but cutting through the slogans and lies and deception is everyone's repaonsibility. The question on the ballot will be "Should Scotland be an independent country?" The question nobody can answer with any real authority or fact is "Why SHOULDNT Scotland be an independent country?" " There is plenty things they have complete powers over and they can't even deal with those, the country is more divided than ever and is going backwards under them I know plenty of people who are turning away from them so I think it will be a resounding NO if it does happen which I don't think it will | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" This toxic Independent shite is the last thing this country needs right now. " Id argue there are other things the country could do without right now, like the need for food banks, bedroom taxes, political sleaze in the heart of government, having our boarders controlled by another country... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I voted yes last time this time will be a no as the country is a mess " I'm guessing you thought Scotland should be in charge of all of its own affairs in 2014, but now you think Westminster is doing a better job that we can do on our own. Can I ask what is is you've seen in the last 8 years than makes you No now? It's a genuine and honest question, I dont want that to come across as cheeky or combative but I reckon understanding others viewpoints is the best way to handle the topic. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I voted yes last time this time will be a no as the country is a mess I'm guessing you thought Scotland should be in charge of all of its own affairs in 2014, but now you think Westminster is doing a better job that we can do on our own. Can I ask what is is you've seen in the last 8 years than makes you No now? It's a genuine and honest question, I dont want that to come across as cheeky or combative but I reckon understanding others viewpoints is the best way to handle the topic. " not Scottish. Didn't vote But eight years ago I could see there was some logic in the plan. Sure it had some huge leaps of faith on being fast tracked to the EU given the situation and currency. But could have been worth gamble. The EU story feels less plausible. Scotland isn't starting from being on the EU. And its not clear how Scotland will square off the rUK not being in the EU/CU with getting back into the EU. And no way will the EU fast track Scotland in if the border isnt sorted. Properly. So imo 8 years ago you could vote yes to a Scotland in the hope I'd being part of the EU and benefiting from that. Today, you are voting for a completely deunionised Scotland. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I voted yes last time this time will be a no as the country is a mess I'm guessing you thought Scotland should be in charge of all of its own affairs in 2014, but now you think Westminster is doing a better job that we can do on our own. Can I ask what is is you've seen in the last 8 years than makes you No now? It's a genuine and honest question, I dont want that to come across as cheeky or combative but I reckon understanding others viewpoints is the best way to handle the topic. " I didn't day Westminster was doing a better job, I have no confidence in the SNP or whoever gets contol in running our country based on the last 8 years Last time I voted with my heart but not now | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" not Scottish. Didn't vote But eight years ago I could see there was some logic in the plan. Sure it had some huge leaps of faith on being fast tracked to the EU given the situation and currency. But could have been worth gamble. The EU story feels less plausible. Scotland isn't starting from being on the EU. And its not clear how Scotland will square off the rUK not being in the EU/CU with getting back into the EU. And no way will the EU fast track Scotland in if the border isnt sorted. Properly. So imo 8 years ago you could vote yes to a Scotland in the hope I'd being part of the EU and benefiting from that. Today, you are voting for a completely deunionised Scotland. " Its an interesting point. Scottish independence and EU membership are totally different matters and a lot of people do conflate the two. Those who think independence is the first step to re-joining the EU and those that think an independent Scotland would be "at the back of the queue" (to borrow a nonsense statement). The most important part of it is that at the moment it really doesn't matter what the people of Scotland want in terms of future EU membership. Its a conversation and a decision being undertaken (or not) by another country and we have no real voice in the matter. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Some are saying that if England rejoined the EU they would be worse off than when they were in.. Who knows.. If they rerun the referendum tomorrow then England would still be out.. We were one of the founding countries and as such had extra privileges not given to other countries. If we rejoin, we will not be in that position and the other members would all remember us as 'the spliters' and trust in us would be lesser, so it stands to reason that we wouldn't get it as good as we had it. OK, we can't be certain about that, we could do an amazing job of negotiating it... but that doesn't seem something the government is exactly great at. The UK was not one of the founding countries. The Treaty of Rome which was the basis of the EEC as it was in those days was signed in 1957. Britain's membership was vetoed in 1961 by the French and we finally joined in 1973, at the same time as Denmark and Ireland. The 'extra' privileges were negotiated by Thatcher and Major. Do the French vetoed us in 1961. That's says a lot to me. They were up to their old tricks even then... " And they got extra privileges when we joined, which the rest of the EU at time didn't like. Those privileges are still in force today. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Some are saying that if England rejoined the EU they would be worse off than when they were in.. Who knows.. If they rerun the referendum tomorrow then England would still be out.. We were one of the founding countries and as such had extra privileges not given to other countries. If we rejoin, we will not be in that position and the other members would all remember us as 'the spliters' and trust in us would be lesser, so it stands to reason that we wouldn't get it as good as we had it. OK, we can't be certain about that, we could do an amazing job of negotiating it... but that doesn't seem something the government is exactly great at. The UK was not one of the founding countries. The Treaty of Rome which was the basis of the EEC as it was in those days was signed in 1957. Britain's membership was vetoed in 1961 by the French and we finally joined in 1973, at the same time as Denmark and Ireland. The 'extra' privileges were negotiated by Thatcher and Major. Do the French vetoed us in 1961. That's says a lot to me. They were up to their old tricks even then... And they got extra privileges when we joined, which the rest of the EU at time didn't like. Those privileges are still in force today. " What extra privileges? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I voted yes last time this time will be a no as the country is a mess I'm guessing you thought Scotland should be in charge of all of its own affairs in 2014, but now you think Westminster is doing a better job that we can do on our own. Can I ask what is is you've seen in the last 8 years than makes you No now? It's a genuine and honest question, I dont want that to come across as cheeky or combative but I reckon understanding others viewpoints is the best way to handle the topic. I didn't day Westminster was doing a better job, I have no confidence in the SNP or whoever gets contol in running our country based on the last 8 years Last time I voted with my heart but not now " 100 percent spot on The problem last time and sure to be repeated again, those for and against lie, snp, Labour you name all lies. So I'm the absence of facts to make an informed opinion the default position I got smacked over the head with was " its worth a punt..." erm..no. It's not a line at the bookies here. I fundamental believe the English,Scott's, Welsh and Irish are the very best of people and the arse holes our countries are saddled with should not allow us to be divided. We don't need to split a working team, we need parties that work for the people and are not corrupt and self serving. So. Stay united ,elect better officials. Stay safe people and enjoy your weekend. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Stay united ,elect better officials. " This is what anyone who wants to be independent wants, but can't currently do. If this is genuinely what you also want then voting No guarantees the exact opposite. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Stay united ,elect better officials. This is what anyone who wants to be independent wants, but can't currently do. If this is genuinely what you also want then voting No guarantees the exact opposite." I disagree buddy, The United Kingdom needs better public servants or are you seriously suggesting the snp have provided a great service since they have been in power? They have had just as many scandals as the other showers of shite
I have a simple wish list, live well,live in peace and bother no one.
A party that has common sense and not self serving.
I have yet to see it.
Anyways, I'm going to bow out of this chat and wish all well as it degenerates eventually and don't wish to go down that rabbit hole again, Best mate of 33 years ,best man at my wedding hasn't spoken to me since the last vote as I dared to vote no, I am " a traitor to my people" apparently... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Stay united ,elect better officials. This is what anyone who wants to be independent wants, but can't currently do. If this is genuinely what you also want then voting No guarantees the exact opposite. I disagree buddy, The United Kingdom needs better public servants or are you seriously suggesting the snp have provided a great service since they have been in power? They have had just as many scandals as the other showers of shite
I have a simple wish list, live well,live in peace and bother no one.
A party that has common sense and not self serving.
I have yet to see it.
Anyways, I'm going to bow out of this chat and wish all well as it degenerates eventually and don't wish to go down that rabbit hole again, Best mate of 33 years ,best man at my wedding hasn't spoken to me since the last vote as I dared to vote no, I am " a traitor to my people" apparently..."It's a vote that has split families and communities.. your vote is private for a reason.. tell nobody how you vote.. just vote and stay silent | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Stay united ,elect better officials. This is what anyone who wants to be independent wants, but can't currently do. If this is genuinely what you also want then voting No guarantees the exact opposite. I disagree buddy, The United Kingdom needs better public servants or are you seriously suggesting the snp have provided a great service since they have been in power? They have had just as many scandals as the other showers of shite
I have a simple wish list, live well,live in peace and bother no one.
A party that has common sense and not self serving.
I have yet to see it.
Anyways, I'm going to bow out of this chat and wish all well as it degenerates eventually and don't wish to go down that rabbit hole again, Best mate of 33 years ,best man at my wedding hasn't spoken to me since the last vote as I dared to vote no, I am " a traitor to my people" apparently..."Wanting to be independent isn't a vote for the SNP. Day 1 of an independant Scotland you'll still have a vote to elect whatever party you want, but the difference will be that Scotland gets the government it votes for instead of being overshadowed by its neighbours who hold considerable power over it. You want to live well and so does everyone, but because of callous tory polices forced on Scotland by a party it hasn't voted for in over half a century, many aren't so lucky. Maybe you're happy with the status quo and thats fine, good for you, but using your power to strive for better for those less fortunate than yourself seems to be a no brainer for me. Its unfortunate you've fallen out with your friends over it all, truly, but I don't know how much time I'd want to spend with someone who's happy to just accept things they way they are just so long as their alright. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Stay united ,elect better officials. This is what anyone who wants to be independent wants, but can't currently do. If this is genuinely what you also want then voting No guarantees the exact opposite. I disagree buddy, The United Kingdom needs better public servants or are you seriously suggesting the snp have provided a great service since they have been in power? They have had just as many scandals as the other showers of shite
I have a simple wish list, live well,live in peace and bother no one.
A party that has common sense and not self serving.
I have yet to see it.
Anyways, I'm going to bow out of this chat and wish all well as it degenerates eventually and don't wish to go down that rabbit hole again, Best mate of 33 years ,best man at my wedding hasn't spoken to me since the last vote as I dared to vote no, I am " a traitor to my people" apparently...
It's a vote that has split families and communities.. your vote is private for a reason.. tell nobody how you vote.. just vote and stay silent"It is horrible how this country has become, the west of Scotland is this worst I have ever known it, we will end up like NI in the 70/80s when they don't get their way | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Stay united ,elect better officials. This is what anyone who wants to be independent wants, but can't currently do. If this is genuinely what you also want then voting No guarantees the exact opposite. I disagree buddy, The United Kingdom needs better public servants or are you seriously suggesting the snp have provided a great service since they have been in power? They have had just as many scandals as the other showers of shite
I have a simple wish list, live well,live in peace and bother no one.
A party that has common sense and not self serving.
I have yet to see it.
Anyways, I'm going to bow out of this chat and wish all well as it degenerates eventually and don't wish to go down that rabbit hole again, Best mate of 33 years ,best man at my wedding hasn't spoken to me since the last vote as I dared to vote no, I am " a traitor to my people" apparently...
It's a vote that has split families and communities.. your vote is private for a reason.. tell nobody how you vote.. just vote and stay silent
It is horrible how this country has become, the west of Scotland is this worst I have ever known it, we will end up like NI in the 70/80s when they don't get their way "Yep. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Stay united ,elect better officials. This is what anyone who wants to be independent wants, but can't currently do. If this is genuinely what you also want then voting No guarantees the exact opposite. I disagree buddy, The United Kingdom needs better public servants or are you seriously suggesting the snp have provided a great service since they have been in power? They have had just as many scandals as the other showers of shite
I have a simple wish list, live well,live in peace and bother no one.
A party that has common sense and not self serving.
I have yet to see it.
Anyways, I'm going to bow out of this chat and wish all well as it degenerates eventually and don't wish to go down that rabbit hole again, Best mate of 33 years ,best man at my wedding hasn't spoken to me since the last vote as I dared to vote no, I am " a traitor to my people" apparently...
Wanting to be independent isn't a vote for the SNP.
Day 1 of an independant Scotland you'll still have a vote to elect whatever party you want, but the difference will be that Scotland gets the government it votes for instead of being overshadowed by its neighbours who hold considerable power over it.
You want to live well and so does everyone, but because of callous tory polices forced on Scotland by a party it hasn't voted for in over half a century, many aren't so lucky.
Maybe you're happy with the status quo and thats fine, good for you, but using your power to strive for better for those less fortunate than yourself seems to be a no brainer for me.
Its unfortunate you've fallen out with your friends over it all, truly, but I don't know how much time I'd want to spend with someone who's happy to just accept things they way they are just so long as their alright.
"I need to answer this one. You haven't understood or I haven't put across the point well enough. It's not a case of " fuck you,I am alright" , if you actually knew me you'd know I'm not like that. My point is people had so many lies thrown at them from all sides,both for and against splitting, all based on " facts" , so it was not possible to really have a balanced view to make an INFORMED decision, there for many voted with heart vrs head , myself I voted to keep things as they are as I won't decide my kids future on a punt . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Stay united ,elect better officials. This is what anyone who wants to be independent wants, but can't currently do. If this is genuinely what you also want then voting No guarantees the exact opposite. I disagree buddy, The United Kingdom needs better public servants or are you seriously suggesting the snp have provided a great service since they have been in power? They have had just as many scandals as the other showers of shite
I have a simple wish list, live well,live in peace and bother no one.
A party that has common sense and not self serving.
I have yet to see it.
Anyways, I'm going to bow out of this chat and wish all well as it degenerates eventually and don't wish to go down that rabbit hole again, Best mate of 33 years ,best man at my wedding hasn't spoken to me since the last vote as I dared to vote no, I am " a traitor to my people" apparently...
Wanting to be independent isn't a vote for the SNP.
Day 1 of an independant Scotland you'll still have a vote to elect whatever party you want, but the difference will be that Scotland gets the government it votes for instead of being overshadowed by its neighbours who hold considerable power over it.
You want to live well and so does everyone, but because of callous tory polices forced on Scotland by a party it hasn't voted for in over half a century, many aren't so lucky.
Maybe you're happy with the status quo and thats fine, good for you, but using your power to strive for better for those less fortunate than yourself seems to be a no brainer for me.
Its unfortunate you've fallen out with your friends over it all, truly, but I don't know how much time I'd want to spend with someone who's happy to just accept things they way they are just so long as their alright.
I need to answer this one.
You haven't understood or I haven't put across the point well enough.
It's not a case of " fuck you,I am alright" , if you actually knew me you'd know I'm not like that.
My point is people had so many lies thrown at them from all sides,both for and against splitting, all based on " facts" , so it was not possible to really have a balanced view to make an INFORMED decision, there for many voted with heart vrs head , myself I voted to keep things as they are as I won't decide my kids future on a punt ."It does come across as very "im alright jack". There are food banks all over the country, why not take a positive step to help solve the issue? I agree there is misinformation all over the place, as well as people passing off conjecture and opinion as fact, but its nobodies job but your own to educate yourself. The people that want you to stay ignorant of the possibilities have far to much to lose to go without a fight and will spread lies and slander whatever the cost. There isnt anywhere else in the world that lives with the resources Scotland has and hands them off to a neighbour to piss up the wall while getting a pittance back. Where else in the world relies on a barnett formula to tell them how much money they're allowed to spend to run their county!!?? Its lunacy, but because its the norm people assume the alternative must be worse, when in actual fact its us that are living in a bizarre situation. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Stay united ,elect better officials. This is what anyone who wants to be independent wants, but can't currently do. If this is genuinely what you also want then voting No guarantees the exact opposite. I disagree buddy, The United Kingdom needs better public servants or are you seriously suggesting the snp have provided a great service since they have been in power? They have had just as many scandals as the other showers of shite
I have a simple wish list, live well,live in peace and bother no one.
A party that has common sense and not self serving.
I have yet to see it.
Anyways, I'm going to bow out of this chat and wish all well as it degenerates eventually and don't wish to go down that rabbit hole again, Best mate of 33 years ,best man at my wedding hasn't spoken to me since the last vote as I dared to vote no, I am " a traitor to my people" apparently...
Wanting to be independent isn't a vote for the SNP.
Day 1 of an independant Scotland you'll still have a vote to elect whatever party you want, but the difference will be that Scotland gets the government it votes for instead of being overshadowed by its neighbours who hold considerable power over it.
You want to live well and so does everyone, but because of callous tory polices forced on Scotland by a party it hasn't voted for in over half a century, many aren't so lucky.
Maybe you're happy with the status quo and thats fine, good for you, but using your power to strive for better for those less fortunate than yourself seems to be a no brainer for me.
Its unfortunate you've fallen out with your friends over it all, truly, but I don't know how much time I'd want to spend with someone who's happy to just accept things they way they are just so long as their alright.
I need to answer this one.
You haven't understood or I haven't put across the point well enough.
It's not a case of " fuck you,I am alright" , if you actually knew me you'd know I'm not like that.
My point is people had so many lies thrown at them from all sides,both for and against splitting, all based on " facts" , so it was not possible to really have a balanced view to make an INFORMED decision, there for many voted with heart vrs head , myself I voted to keep things as they are as I won't decide my kids future on a punt .
It does come across as very "im alright jack". There are food banks all over the country, why not take a positive step to help solve the issue?
I agree there is misinformation all over the place, as well as people passing off conjecture and opinion as fact, but its nobodies job but your own to educate yourself. The people that want you to stay ignorant of the possibilities have far to much to lose to go without a fight and will spread lies and slander whatever the cost.
There isnt anywhere else in the world that lives with the resources Scotland has and hands them off to a neighbour to piss up the wall while getting a pittance back. Where else in the world relies on a barnett formula to tell them how much money they're allowed to spend to run their county!!?? Its lunacy, but because its the norm people assume the alternative must be worse, when in actual fact its us that are living in a bizarre situation.
"What resources? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Stay united ,elect better officials. This is what anyone who wants to be independent wants, but can't currently do. If this is genuinely what you also want then voting No guarantees the exact opposite. I disagree buddy, The United Kingdom needs better public servants or are you seriously suggesting the snp have provided a great service since they have been in power? They have had just as many scandals as the other showers of shite
I have a simple wish list, live well,live in peace and bother no one.
A party that has common sense and not self serving.
I have yet to see it.
Anyways, I'm going to bow out of this chat and wish all well as it degenerates eventually and don't wish to go down that rabbit hole again, Best mate of 33 years ,best man at my wedding hasn't spoken to me since the last vote as I dared to vote no, I am " a traitor to my people" apparently...
Wanting to be independent isn't a vote for the SNP.
Day 1 of an independant Scotland you'll still have a vote to elect whatever party you want, but the difference will be that Scotland gets the government it votes for instead of being overshadowed by its neighbours who hold considerable power over it.
You want to live well and so does everyone, but because of callous tory polices forced on Scotland by a party it hasn't voted for in over half a century, many aren't so lucky.
Maybe you're happy with the status quo and thats fine, good for you, but using your power to strive for better for those less fortunate than yourself seems to be a no brainer for me.
Its unfortunate you've fallen out with your friends over it all, truly, but I don't know how much time I'd want to spend with someone who's happy to just accept things they way they are just so long as their alright.
I need to answer this one.
You haven't understood or I haven't put across the point well enough.
It's not a case of " fuck you,I am alright" , if you actually knew me you'd know I'm not like that.
My point is people had so many lies thrown at them from all sides,both for and against splitting, all based on " facts" , so it was not possible to really have a balanced view to make an INFORMED decision, there for many voted with heart vrs head , myself I voted to keep things as they are as I won't decide my kids future on a punt .
It does come across as very "im alright jack". There are food banks all over the country, why not take a positive step to help solve the issue?
I agree there is misinformation all over the place, as well as people passing off conjecture and opinion as fact, but its nobodies job but your own to educate yourself. The people that want you to stay ignorant of the possibilities have far to much to lose to go without a fight and will spread lies and slander whatever the cost.
There isnt anywhere else in the world that lives with the resources Scotland has and hands them off to a neighbour to piss up the wall while getting a pittance back. Where else in the world relies on a barnett formula to tell them how much money they're allowed to spend to run their county!!?? Its lunacy, but because its the norm people assume the alternative must be worse, when in actual fact its us that are living in a bizarre situation.
"Not sure how it can come across as I am all right Jack when I say in the absence of data I will stay with the safer option that is known. I do check the facts ,always. Unfortunately there is printed and written facts you could pluck out the air to justify both positions. You feel you have enough Information to make your choice,that's fine. I am not ripping into you ,or anyone else who chooses to vote how they vote. This is NOT the case if anyone dares to vote no they get torn into with venom and generally looked at by the no voters as if they have some sort of mental illness. It's crazy, to go throw all this devisive hatred again no thanks. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Stay united ,elect better officials. This is what anyone who wants to be independent wants, but can't currently do. If this is genuinely what you also want then voting No guarantees the exact opposite. I disagree buddy, The United Kingdom needs better public servants or are you seriously suggesting the snp have provided a great service since they have been in power? They have had just as many scandals as the other showers of shite
I have a simple wish list, live well,live in peace and bother no one.
A party that has common sense and not self serving.
I have yet to see it.
Anyways, I'm going to bow out of this chat and wish all well as it degenerates eventually and don't wish to go down that rabbit hole again, Best mate of 33 years ,best man at my wedding hasn't spoken to me since the last vote as I dared to vote no, I am " a traitor to my people" apparently...
Wanting to be independent isn't a vote for the SNP.
Day 1 of an independant Scotland you'll still have a vote to elect whatever party you want, but the difference will be that Scotland gets the government it votes for instead of being overshadowed by its neighbours who hold considerable power over it.
You want to live well and so does everyone, but because of callous tory polices forced on Scotland by a party it hasn't voted for in over half a century, many aren't so lucky.
Maybe you're happy with the status quo and thats fine, good for you, but using your power to strive for better for those less fortunate than yourself seems to be a no brainer for me.
Its unfortunate you've fallen out with your friends over it all, truly, but I don't know how much time I'd want to spend with someone who's happy to just accept things they way they are just so long as their alright.
I need to answer this one.
You haven't understood or I haven't put across the point well enough.
It's not a case of " fuck you,I am alright" , if you actually knew me you'd know I'm not like that.
My point is people had so many lies thrown at them from all sides,both for and against splitting, all based on " facts" , so it was not possible to really have a balanced view to make an INFORMED decision, there for many voted with heart vrs head , myself I voted to keep things as they are as I won't decide my kids future on a punt .
It does come across as very "im alright jack". There are food banks all over the country, why not take a positive step to help solve the issue?
I agree there is misinformation all over the place, as well as people passing off conjecture and opinion as fact, but its nobodies job but your own to educate yourself. The people that want you to stay ignorant of the possibilities have far to much to lose to go without a fight and will spread lies and slander whatever the cost.
There isnt anywhere else in the world that lives with the resources Scotland has and hands them off to a neighbour to piss up the wall while getting a pittance back. Where else in the world relies on a barnett formula to tell them how much money they're allowed to spend to run their county!!?? Its lunacy, but because its the norm people assume the alternative must be worse, when in actual fact its us that are living in a bizarre situation.
Not sure how it can come across as I am all right Jack when I say in the absence of data I will stay with the safer option that is known.
I do check the facts ,always.
Unfortunately there is printed and written facts you could pluck out the air to justify both positions.
You feel you have enough Information to make your choice,that's fine.
I am not ripping into you ,or anyone else who chooses to vote how they vote.
This is NOT the case if anyone dares to vote no they get torn into with venom and generally looked at by the no voters as if they have some sort of mental illness.
It's crazy, to go throw all this devisive hatred again no thanks.
"Inaction is a choice. Choosing to do nothing because it feels "safe" is still choosing. Theres a reason not a single other country in the world hands their resources to someone else to manage. Westminster know that the Scottish vote is so small it doeant matter, Scotland cant change whos in power so they're free to take the piss as they do and spend your children's money on themselves. A Scottish government would be answerable to the Scottish people, like nearly every other nation on earth and would be able to act exclusively in Scotlands interests. Thats what its all about. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Stay united ,elect better officials. This is what anyone who wants to be independent wants, but can't currently do. If this is genuinely what you also want then voting No guarantees the exact opposite. I disagree buddy, The United Kingdom needs better public servants or are you seriously suggesting the snp have provided a great service since they have been in power? They have had just as many scandals as the other showers of shite
I have a simple wish list, live well,live in peace and bother no one.
A party that has common sense and not self serving.
I have yet to see it.
Anyways, I'm going to bow out of this chat and wish all well as it degenerates eventually and don't wish to go down that rabbit hole again, Best mate of 33 years ,best man at my wedding hasn't spoken to me since the last vote as I dared to vote no, I am " a traitor to my people" apparently...
Wanting to be independent isn't a vote for the SNP.
Day 1 of an independant Scotland you'll still have a vote to elect whatever party you want, but the difference will be that Scotland gets the government it votes for instead of being overshadowed by its neighbours who hold considerable power over it.
You want to live well and so does everyone, but because of callous tory polices forced on Scotland by a party it hasn't voted for in over half a century, many aren't so lucky.
Maybe you're happy with the status quo and thats fine, good for you, but using your power to strive for better for those less fortunate than yourself seems to be a no brainer for me.
Its unfortunate you've fallen out with your friends over it all, truly, but I don't know how much time I'd want to spend with someone who's happy to just accept things they way they are just so long as their alright.
I need to answer this one.
You haven't understood or I haven't put across the point well enough.
It's not a case of " fuck you,I am alright" , if you actually knew me you'd know I'm not like that.
My point is people had so many lies thrown at them from all sides,both for and against splitting, all based on " facts" , so it was not possible to really have a balanced view to make an INFORMED decision, there for many voted with heart vrs head , myself I voted to keep things as they are as I won't decide my kids future on a punt .
It does come across as very "im alright jack". There are food banks all over the country, why not take a positive step to help solve the issue?
I agree there is misinformation all over the place, as well as people passing off conjecture and opinion as fact, but its nobodies job but your own to educate yourself. The people that want you to stay ignorant of the possibilities have far to much to lose to go without a fight and will spread lies and slander whatever the cost.
There isnt anywhere else in the world that lives with the resources Scotland has and hands them off to a neighbour to piss up the wall while getting a pittance back. Where else in the world relies on a barnett formula to tell them how much money they're allowed to spend to run their county!!?? Its lunacy, but because its the norm people assume the alternative must be worse, when in actual fact its us that are living in a bizarre situation.
Not sure how it can come across as I am all right Jack when I say in the absence of data I will stay with the safer option that is known.
I do check the facts ,always.
Unfortunately there is printed and written facts you could pluck out the air to justify both positions.
You feel you have enough Information to make your choice,that's fine.
I am not ripping into you ,or anyone else who chooses to vote how they vote.
This is NOT the case if anyone dares to vote no they get torn into with venom and generally looked at by the no voters as if they have some sort of mental illness.
It's crazy, to go throw all this devisive hatred again no thanks.
Inaction is a choice.
Choosing to do nothing because it feels "safe" is still choosing.
Theres a reason not a single other country in the world hands their resources to someone else to manage. Westminster know that the Scottish vote is so small it doeant matter, Scotland cant change whos in power so they're free to take the piss as they do and spend your children's money on themselves. A Scottish government would be answerable to the Scottish people, like nearly every other nation on earth and would be able to act exclusively in Scotlands interests.
Thats what its all about.
"And we all know how difficult it is to remove governments It is ok to say NO plenty did the first time and I can guarantee plenty more will the next time The SNP cannot be trusted with this they have divided our country so much | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" A Scottish government would be answerable to the Scottish people, like nearly every other nation on earth and would be able to act exclusively in Scotlands interests. Thats what its all about." Big building at the bottom of the Royal Mile! Making a complete hash of the country - education, health, transport They run the show …. They are answerable to the Scottish people ! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Och ie the knew.. What does this mean?" “Och aye the noo!” This is one of those Scottish phrases that can be heard in countless parodies aimed at poking fun at the Scots' dialect and accent. Its direct English translation is “Oh yes, just now”. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" And we all know how difficult it is to remove governments It is ok to say NO plenty did the first time and I can guarantee plenty more will the next time The SNP cannot be trusted with this they have divided our country so much " Its very easy, there's a built in system specifically designed to remove govermnets, its called a general election and they happen at regular intervals. As soon as enough people want to be governed by someone else then the SNP won't be in power. Its the simplest form of democracy there is and it cant be gamed or cheated. At the moment the people who make decisions on Scotlands behalf are for the most part based in Westminster, who historically dont get voted for by Scotland because we are so underrepresented. Having our own parliament in charge of our own decisions let's Scotland decide who's best to make those decision. That is literally as simple as it gets. Choosing not be because "SNP Bad" seems like you genuinely don't understand the systems involved. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" A Scottish government would be answerable to the Scottish people, like nearly every other nation on earth and would be able to act exclusively in Scotlands interests. Thats what its all about. Big building at the bottom of the Royal Mile! Making a complete hash of the country - education, health, transport They run the show …. They are answerable to the Scottish people ! " Most sensible post this evening | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" And we all know how difficult it is to remove governments It is ok to say NO plenty did the first time and I can guarantee plenty more will the next time The SNP cannot be trusted with this they have divided our country so much Its very easy, there's a built in system specifically designed to remove govermnets, its called a general election and they happen at regular intervals. As soon as enough people want to be governed by someone else then the SNP won't be in power. Its the simplest form of democracy there is and it cant be gamed or cheated. At the moment the people who make decisions on Scotlands behalf are for the most part based in Westminster, who historically dont get voted for by Scotland because we are so underrepresented. Having our own parliament in charge of our own decisions let's Scotland decide who's best to make those decision. That is literally as simple as it gets. Choosing not be because "SNP Bad" seems like you genuinely don't understand the systems involved. " Thanks for educating me on general elections and voting | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" A Scottish government would be answerable to the Scottish people, like nearly every other nation on earth and would be able to act exclusively in Scotlands interests. Thats what its all about. Big building at the bottom of the Royal Mile! Making a complete hash of the country - education, health, transport They run the show …. They are answerable to the Scottish people ! " Happy to hear some examples. If its that bad prove it. Things can definitely be better, nobody's arguing that, but why Rob yourself of the chance to try and fix them? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" And we all know how difficult it is to remove governments It is ok to say NO plenty did the first time and I can guarantee plenty more will the next time The SNP cannot be trusted with this they have divided our country so much Its very easy, there's a built in system specifically designed to remove govermnets, its called a general election and they happen at regular intervals. As soon as enough people want to be governed by someone else then the SNP won't be in power. Its the simplest form of democracy there is and it cant be gamed or cheated. At the moment the people who make decisions on Scotlands behalf are for the most part based in Westminster, who historically dont get voted for by Scotland because we are so underrepresented. Having our own parliament in charge of our own decisions let's Scotland decide who's best to make those decision. That is literally as simple as it gets. Choosing not be because "SNP Bad" seems like you genuinely don't understand the systems involved. Thanks for educating me on general elections and voting "If you know how it works then why ask the question?  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" And we all know how difficult it is to remove governments It is ok to say NO plenty did the first time and I can guarantee plenty more will the next time The SNP cannot be trusted with this they have divided our country so much Its very easy, there's a built in system specifically designed to remove govermnets, its called a general election and they happen at regular intervals. As soon as enough people want to be governed by someone else then the SNP won't be in power. Its the simplest form of democracy there is and it cant be gamed or cheated. At the moment the people who make decisions on Scotlands behalf are for the most part based in Westminster, who historically dont get voted for by Scotland because we are so underrepresented. Having our own parliament in charge of our own decisions let's Scotland decide who's best to make those decision. That is literally as simple as it gets. Choosing not be because "SNP Bad" seems like you genuinely don't understand the systems involved. Thanks for educating me on general elections and voting
If you know how it works then why ask the question?
"You knew what I meant ie sturgeon last year with vote of no confidence and boris this year, it's difficult to remove when in power and 5 years is a long time its like a generaton in SNP minds Don't try and belittle me | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" And we all know how difficult it is to remove governments It is ok to say NO plenty did the first time and I can guarantee plenty more will the next time The SNP cannot be trusted with this they have divided our country so much Its very easy, there's a built in system specifically designed to remove govermnets, its called a general election and they happen at regular intervals. As soon as enough people want to be governed by someone else then the SNP won't be in power. Its the simplest form of democracy there is and it cant be gamed or cheated. At the moment the people who make decisions on Scotlands behalf are for the most part based in Westminster, who historically dont get voted for by Scotland because we are so underrepresented. Having our own parliament in charge of our own decisions let's Scotland decide who's best to make those decision. That is literally as simple as it gets. Choosing not be because "SNP Bad" seems like you genuinely don't understand the systems involved. Thanks for educating me on general elections and voting
If you know how it works then why ask the question?
You knew what I meant ie sturgeon last year with vote of no confidence and boris this year, it's difficult to remove when in power and 5 years is a long time its like a generaton in SNP minds
Don't try and belittle me
"I genuinely didn't. A vote of no confidence doesn't remove a government, its only the actual leader it effects, thats why its only the party that vote internally. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" And we all know how difficult it is to remove governments It is ok to say NO plenty did the first time and I can guarantee plenty more will the next time The SNP cannot be trusted with this they have divided our country so much Its very easy, there's a built in system specifically designed to remove govermnets, its called a general election and they happen at regular intervals. As soon as enough people want to be governed by someone else then the SNP won't be in power. Its the simplest form of democracy there is and it cant be gamed or cheated. At the moment the people who make decisions on Scotlands behalf are for the most part based in Westminster, who historically dont get voted for by Scotland because we are so underrepresented. Having our own parliament in charge of our own decisions let's Scotland decide who's best to make those decision. That is literally as simple as it gets. Choosing not be because "SNP Bad" seems like you genuinely don't understand the systems involved. Thanks for educating me on general elections and voting
If you know how it works then why ask the question?
You knew what I meant ie sturgeon last year with vote of no confidence and boris this year, it's difficult to remove when in power and 5 years is a long time its like a generaton in SNP minds
Don't try and belittle me
I genuinely didn't.
A vote of no confidence doesn't remove a government, its only the actual leader it effects, thats why its only the party that vote internally."It can bring a government down tho | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" And we all know how difficult it is to remove governments It is ok to say NO plenty did the first time and I can guarantee plenty more will the next time The SNP cannot be trusted with this they have divided our country so much Its very easy, there's a built in system specifically designed to remove govermnets, its called a general election and they happen at regular intervals. As soon as enough people want to be governed by someone else then the SNP won't be in power. Its the simplest form of democracy there is and it cant be gamed or cheated. At the moment the people who make decisions on Scotlands behalf are for the most part based in Westminster, who historically dont get voted for by Scotland because we are so underrepresented. Having our own parliament in charge of our own decisions let's Scotland decide who's best to make those decision. That is literally as simple as it gets. Choosing not be because "SNP Bad" seems like you genuinely don't understand the systems involved. Thanks for educating me on general elections and voting
If you know how it works then why ask the question?
You knew what I meant ie sturgeon last year with vote of no confidence and boris this year, it's difficult to remove when in power and 5 years is a long time its like a generaton in SNP minds
Don't try and belittle me
I genuinely didn't.
A vote of no confidence doesn't remove a government, its only the actual leader it effects, thats why its only the party that vote internally.
It can bring a government down tho "It literally can't. It can only change the leadership. A general election is the only way to change a government at Westminster or holyrood. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Stay united ,elect better officials. This is what anyone who wants to be independent wants, but can't currently do. If this is genuinely what you also want then voting No guarantees the exact opposite. I disagree buddy, The United Kingdom needs better public servants or are you seriously suggesting the snp have provided a great service since they have been in power? They have had just as many scandals as the other showers of shite
I have a simple wish list, live well,live in peace and bother no one.
A party that has common sense and not self serving.
I have yet to see it.
Anyways, I'm going to bow out of this chat and wish all well as it degenerates eventually and don't wish to go down that rabbit hole again, Best mate of 33 years ,best man at my wedding hasn't spoken to me since the last vote as I dared to vote no, I am " a traitor to my people" apparently...
Wanting to be independent isn't a vote for the SNP.
Day 1 of an independant Scotland you'll still have a vote to elect whatever party you want, but the difference will be that Scotland gets the government it votes for instead of being overshadowed by its neighbours who hold considerable power over it.
You want to live well and so does everyone, but because of callous tory polices forced on Scotland by a party it hasn't voted for in over half a century, many aren't so lucky.
Maybe you're happy with the status quo and thats fine, good for you, but using your power to strive for better for those less fortunate than yourself seems to be a no brainer for me.
Its unfortunate you've fallen out with your friends over it all, truly, but I don't know how much time I'd want to spend with someone who's happy to just accept things they way they are just so long as their alright.
I need to answer this one.
You haven't understood or I haven't put across the point well enough.
It's not a case of " fuck you,I am alright" , if you actually knew me you'd know I'm not like that.
My point is people had so many lies thrown at them from all sides,both for and against splitting, all based on " facts" , so it was not possible to really have a balanced view to make an INFORMED decision, there for many voted with heart vrs head , myself I voted to keep things as they are as I won't decide my kids future on a punt .
It does come across as very "im alright jack". There are food banks all over the country, why not take a positive step to help solve the issue?
I agree there is misinformation all over the place, as well as people passing off conjecture and opinion as fact, but its nobodies job but your own to educate yourself. The people that want you to stay ignorant of the possibilities have far to much to lose to go without a fight and will spread lies and slander whatever the cost.
There isnt anywhere else in the world that lives with the resources Scotland has and hands them off to a neighbour to piss up the wall while getting a pittance back. Where else in the world relies on a barnett formula to tell them how much money they're allowed to spend to run their county!!?? Its lunacy, but because its the norm people assume the alternative must be worse, when in actual fact its us that are living in a bizarre situation.
Not sure how it can come across as I am all right Jack when I say in the absence of data I will stay with the safer option that is known.
I do check the facts ,always.
Unfortunately there is printed and written facts you could pluck out the air to justify both positions.
You feel you have enough Information to make your choice,that's fine.
I am not ripping into you ,or anyone else who chooses to vote how they vote.
This is NOT the case if anyone dares to vote no they get torn into with venom and generally looked at by the no voters as if they have some sort of mental illness.
It's crazy, to go throw all this devisive hatred again no thanks.
Inaction is a choice.
Choosing to do nothing because it feels "safe" is still choosing.
Theres a reason not a single other country in the world hands their resources to someone else to manage. Westminster know that the Scottish vote is so small it doeant matter, Scotland cant change whos in power so they're free to take the piss as they do and spend your children's money on themselves. A Scottish government would be answerable to the Scottish people, like nearly every other nation on earth and would be able to act exclusively in Scotlands interests.
Thats what its all about.
"I get the sovereignty argument. Would you be okay to accept independence even if it meant higher taxes and lower spending ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" And we all know how difficult it is to remove governments It is ok to say NO plenty did the first time and I can guarantee plenty more will the next time The SNP cannot be trusted with this they have divided our country so much Its very easy, there's a built in system specifically designed to remove govermnets, its called a general election and they happen at regular intervals. As soon as enough people want to be governed by someone else then the SNP won't be in power. Its the simplest form of democracy there is and it cant be gamed or cheated. At the moment the people who make decisions on Scotlands behalf are for the most part based in Westminster, who historically dont get voted for by Scotland because we are so underrepresented. Having our own parliament in charge of our own decisions let's Scotland decide who's best to make those decision. That is literally as simple as it gets. Choosing not be because "SNP Bad" seems like you genuinely don't understand the systems involved. Thanks for educating me on general elections and voting
If you know how it works then why ask the question?
You knew what I meant ie sturgeon last year with vote of no confidence and boris this year, it's difficult to remove when in power and 5 years is a long time its like a generaton in SNP minds
Don't try and belittle me
I genuinely didn't.
A vote of no confidence doesn't remove a government, its only the actual leader it effects, thats why its only the party that vote internally.
It can bring a government down tho
It literally can't. It can only change the leadership.
A general election is the only way to change a government at Westminster or holyrood.
"It can force a general election | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Stay united ,elect better officials. This is what anyone who wants to be independent wants, but can't currently do. If this is genuinely what you also want then voting No guarantees the exact opposite. I disagree buddy, The United Kingdom needs better public servants or are you seriously suggesting the snp have provided a great service since they have been in power? They have had just as many scandals as the other showers of shite
I have a simple wish list, live well,live in peace and bother no one.
A party that has common sense and not self serving.
I have yet to see it.
Anyways, I'm going to bow out of this chat and wish all well as it degenerates eventually and don't wish to go down that rabbit hole again, Best mate of 33 years ,best man at my wedding hasn't spoken to me since the last vote as I dared to vote no, I am " a traitor to my people" apparently...
Wanting to be independent isn't a vote for the SNP.
Day 1 of an independant Scotland you'll still have a vote to elect whatever party you want, but the difference will be that Scotland gets the government it votes for instead of being overshadowed by its neighbours who hold considerable power over it.
You want to live well and so does everyone, but because of callous tory polices forced on Scotland by a party it hasn't voted for in over half a century, many aren't so lucky.
Maybe you're happy with the status quo and thats fine, good for you, but using your power to strive for better for those less fortunate than yourself seems to be a no brainer for me.
Its unfortunate you've fallen out with your friends over it all, truly, but I don't know how much time I'd want to spend with someone who's happy to just accept things they way they are just so long as their alright.
I need to answer this one.
You haven't understood or I haven't put across the point well enough.
It's not a case of " fuck you,I am alright" , if you actually knew me you'd know I'm not like that.
My point is people had so many lies thrown at them from all sides,both for and against splitting, all based on " facts" , so it was not possible to really have a balanced view to make an INFORMED decision, there for many voted with heart vrs head , myself I voted to keep things as they are as I won't decide my kids future on a punt .
It does come across as very "im alright jack". There are food banks all over the country, why not take a positive step to help solve the issue?
I agree there is misinformation all over the place, as well as people passing off conjecture and opinion as fact, but its nobodies job but your own to educate yourself. The people that want you to stay ignorant of the possibilities have far to much to lose to go without a fight and will spread lies and slander whatever the cost.
There isnt anywhere else in the world that lives with the resources Scotland has and hands them off to a neighbour to piss up the wall while getting a pittance back. Where else in the world relies on a barnett formula to tell them how much money they're allowed to spend to run their county!!?? Its lunacy, but because its the norm people assume the alternative must be worse, when in actual fact its us that are living in a bizarre situation.
Not sure how it can come across as I am all right Jack when I say in the absence of data I will stay with the safer option that is known.
I do check the facts ,always.
Unfortunately there is printed and written facts you could pluck out the air to justify both positions.
You feel you have enough Information to make your choice,that's fine.
I am not ripping into you ,or anyone else who chooses to vote how they vote.
This is NOT the case if anyone dares to vote no they get torn into with venom and generally looked at by the no voters as if they have some sort of mental illness.
It's crazy, to go throw all this devisive hatred again no thanks.
Inaction is a choice.
Choosing to do nothing because it feels "safe" is still choosing.
Theres a reason not a single other country in the world hands their resources to someone else to manage. Westminster know that the Scottish vote is so small it doeant matter, Scotland cant change whos in power so they're free to take the piss as they do and spend your children's money on themselves. A Scottish government would be answerable to the Scottish people, like nearly every other nation on earth and would be able to act exclusively in Scotlands interests.
Thats what its all about.
I get the sovereignty argument. Would you be okay to accept independence even if it meant higher taxes and lower spending ? "Yes they would as independence is all that matters | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" And we all know how difficult it is to remove governments It is ok to say NO plenty did the first time and I can guarantee plenty more will the next time The SNP cannot be trusted with this they have divided our country so much Its very easy, there's a built in system specifically designed to remove govermnets, its called a general election and they happen at regular intervals. As soon as enough people want to be governed by someone else then the SNP won't be in power. Its the simplest form of democracy there is and it cant be gamed or cheated. At the moment the people who make decisions on Scotlands behalf are for the most part based in Westminster, who historically dont get voted for by Scotland because we are so underrepresented. Having our own parliament in charge of our own decisions let's Scotland decide who's best to make those decision. That is literally as simple as it gets. Choosing not be because "SNP Bad" seems like you genuinely don't understand the systems involved. Thanks for educating me on general elections and voting
If you know how it works then why ask the question?
You knew what I meant ie sturgeon last year with vote of no confidence and boris this year, it's difficult to remove when in power and 5 years is a long time its like a generaton in SNP minds
Don't try and belittle me
I genuinely didn't.
A vote of no confidence doesn't remove a government, its only the actual leader it effects, thats why its only the party that vote internally.
It can bring a government down tho
It literally can't. It can only change the leadership.
A general election is the only way to change a government at Westminster or holyrood.
It can force a general election "Again, it categorically can't. It can only change leadership within a party. The government can call for a general election at any time they want like Theresa May did, but a confidence vote cant change the government under any circumstances. I dont say this to be offensive, i don't want to be rude at all, but this is elementary stuff. I cant recommend enough that you do a bit of reading on these things. Learning is never ever a bad thing and it feels like there's some pieces in how things work that youre maybe not 100% clear on. It feels like you're going to take that as me being patronising, but I promise you it isn't meant thay way. Its advice and youre free to take it or leave it, but no bad can come from understand how this stuff works. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Stay united ,elect better officials. This is what anyone who wants to be independent wants, but can't currently do. If this is genuinely what you also want then voting No guarantees the exact opposite. I disagree buddy, The United Kingdom needs better public servants or are you seriously suggesting the snp have provided a great service since they have been in power? They have had just as many scandals as the other showers of shite
I have a simple wish list, live well,live in peace and bother no one.
A party that has common sense and not self serving.
I have yet to see it.
Anyways, I'm going to bow out of this chat and wish all well as it degenerates eventually and don't wish to go down that rabbit hole again, Best mate of 33 years ,best man at my wedding hasn't spoken to me since the last vote as I dared to vote no, I am " a traitor to my people" apparently...
Wanting to be independent isn't a vote for the SNP.
Day 1 of an independant Scotland you'll still have a vote to elect whatever party you want, but the difference will be that Scotland gets the government it votes for instead of being overshadowed by its neighbours who hold considerable power over it.
You want to live well and so does everyone, but because of callous tory polices forced on Scotland by a party it hasn't voted for in over half a century, many aren't so lucky.
Maybe you're happy with the status quo and thats fine, good for you, but using your power to strive for better for those less fortunate than yourself seems to be a no brainer for me.
Its unfortunate you've fallen out with your friends over it all, truly, but I don't know how much time I'd want to spend with someone who's happy to just accept things they way they are just so long as their alright.
I need to answer this one.
You haven't understood or I haven't put across the point well enough.
It's not a case of " fuck you,I am alright" , if you actually knew me you'd know I'm not like that.
My point is people had so many lies thrown at them from all sides,both for and against splitting, all based on " facts" , so it was not possible to really have a balanced view to make an INFORMED decision, there for many voted with heart vrs head , myself I voted to keep things as they are as I won't decide my kids future on a punt .
It does come across as very "im alright jack". There are food banks all over the country, why not take a positive step to help solve the issue?
I agree there is misinformation all over the place, as well as people passing off conjecture and opinion as fact, but its nobodies job but your own to educate yourself. The people that want you to stay ignorant of the possibilities have far to much to lose to go without a fight and will spread lies and slander whatever the cost.
There isnt anywhere else in the world that lives with the resources Scotland has and hands them off to a neighbour to piss up the wall while getting a pittance back. Where else in the world relies on a barnett formula to tell them how much money they're allowed to spend to run their county!!?? Its lunacy, but because its the norm people assume the alternative must be worse, when in actual fact its us that are living in a bizarre situation.
Not sure how it can come across as I am all right Jack when I say in the absence of data I will stay with the safer option that is known.
I do check the facts ,always.
Unfortunately there is printed and written facts you could pluck out the air to justify both positions.
You feel you have enough Information to make your choice,that's fine.
I am not ripping into you ,or anyone else who chooses to vote how they vote.
This is NOT the case if anyone dares to vote no they get torn into with venom and generally looked at by the no voters as if they have some sort of mental illness.
It's crazy, to go throw all this devisive hatred again no thanks.
Inaction is a choice.
Choosing to do nothing because it feels "safe" is still choosing.
Theres a reason not a single other country in the world hands their resources to someone else to manage. Westminster know that the Scottish vote is so small it doeant matter, Scotland cant change whos in power so they're free to take the piss as they do and spend your children's money on themselves. A Scottish government would be answerable to the Scottish people, like nearly every other nation on earth and would be able to act exclusively in Scotlands interests.
Thats what its all about.
I get the sovereignty argument. Would you be okay to accept independence even if it meant higher taxes and lower spending ?
Yes they would as independence is all that matters "A fair Scotland that works for everyone is "all that matters". We don't have that at the moment and we achieve that through independence. Theres no real basis to assume that there would be higher tax and lower spending. The abolition of the barnett formula puts Scotland in a better position financially than it currently is, but again its all down which government Scotland chooses for themselves how those factors would actually play out. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" And we all know how difficult it is to remove governments It is ok to say NO plenty did the first time and I can guarantee plenty more will the next time The SNP cannot be trusted with this they have divided our country so much Its very easy, there's a built in system specifically designed to remove govermnets, its called a general election and they happen at regular intervals. As soon as enough people want to be governed by someone else then the SNP won't be in power. Its the simplest form of democracy there is and it cant be gamed or cheated. At the moment the people who make decisions on Scotlands behalf are for the most part based in Westminster, who historically dont get voted for by Scotland because we are so underrepresented. Having our own parliament in charge of our own decisions let's Scotland decide who's best to make those decision. That is literally as simple as it gets. Choosing not be because "SNP Bad" seems like you genuinely don't understand the systems involved. Thanks for educating me on general elections and voting
If you know how it works then why ask the question?
You knew what I meant ie sturgeon last year with vote of no confidence and boris this year, it's difficult to remove when in power and 5 years is a long time its like a generaton in SNP minds
Don't try and belittle me
I genuinely didn't.
A vote of no confidence doesn't remove a government, its only the actual leader it effects, thats why its only the party that vote internally.
It can bring a government down tho
It literally can't. It can only change the leadership.
A general election is the only way to change a government at Westminster or holyrood.
It can force a general election
Again, it categorically can't. It can only change leadership within a party. The government can call for a general election at any time they want like Theresa May did, but a confidence vote cant change the government under any circumstances.
I dont say this to be offensive, i don't want to be rude at all, but this is elementary stuff. I cant recommend enough that you do a bit of reading on these things. Learning is never ever a bad thing and it feels like there's some pieces in how things work that youre maybe not 100% clear on.
It feels like you're going to take that as me being patronising, but I promise you it isn't meant thay way. Its advice and youre free to take it or leave it, but no bad can come from understand how this stuff works. "Wow listen to you I bow to your intelligence
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" And we all know how difficult it is to remove governments It is ok to say NO plenty did the first time and I can guarantee plenty more will the next time The SNP cannot be trusted with this they have divided our country so much Its very easy, there's a built in system specifically designed to remove govermnets, its called a general election and they happen at regular intervals. As soon as enough people want to be governed by someone else then the SNP won't be in power. Its the simplest form of democracy there is and it cant be gamed or cheated. At the moment the people who make decisions on Scotlands behalf are for the most part based in Westminster, who historically dont get voted for by Scotland because we are so underrepresented. Having our own parliament in charge of our own decisions let's Scotland decide who's best to make those decision. That is literally as simple as it gets. Choosing not be because "SNP Bad" seems like you genuinely don't understand the systems involved. Thanks for educating me on general elections and voting
If you know how it works then why ask the question?
You knew what I meant ie sturgeon last year with vote of no confidence and boris this year, it's difficult to remove when in power and 5 years is a long time its like a generaton in SNP minds
Don't try and belittle me
I genuinely didn't.
A vote of no confidence doesn't remove a government, its only the actual leader it effects, thats why its only the party that vote internally.
It can bring a government down tho
It literally can't. It can only change the leadership.
A general election is the only way to change a government at Westminster or holyrood.
It can force a general election
Again, it categorically can't. It can only change leadership within a party. The government can call for a general election at any time they want like Theresa May did, but a confidence vote cant change the government under any circumstances.
I dont say this to be offensive, i don't want to be rude at all, but this is elementary stuff. I cant recommend enough that you do a bit of reading on these things. Learning is never ever a bad thing and it feels like there's some pieces in how things work that youre maybe not 100% clear on.
It feels like you're going to take that as me being patronising, but I promise you it isn't meant thay way. Its advice and youre free to take it or leave it, but no bad can come from understand how this stuff works.
Wow listen to you I bow to your intelligence
"I dont pretend I'm any more or less intelligent than anyone else, but getting really basic things like that wrong again and again suggest you aren't as armed with the facts as you could be. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" And we all know how difficult it is to remove governments It is ok to say NO plenty did the first time and I can guarantee plenty more will the next time The SNP cannot be trusted with this they have divided our country so much Its very easy, there's a built in system specifically designed to remove govermnets, its called a general election and they happen at regular intervals. As soon as enough people want to be governed by someone else then the SNP won't be in power. Its the simplest form of democracy there is and it cant be gamed or cheated. At the moment the people who make decisions on Scotlands behalf are for the most part based in Westminster, who historically dont get voted for by Scotland because we are so underrepresented. Having our own parliament in charge of our own decisions let's Scotland decide who's best to make those decision. That is literally as simple as it gets. Choosing not be because "SNP Bad" seems like you genuinely don't understand the systems involved. Thanks for educating me on general elections and voting
If you know how it works then why ask the question?
You knew what I meant ie sturgeon last year with vote of no confidence and boris this year, it's difficult to remove when in power and 5 years is a long time its like a generaton in SNP minds
Don't try and belittle me
I genuinely didn't.
A vote of no confidence doesn't remove a government, its only the actual leader it effects, thats why its only the party that vote internally.
It can bring a government down tho
It literally can't. It can only change the leadership.
A general election is the only way to change a government at Westminster or holyrood.
It can force a general election
Again, it categorically can't. It can only change leadership within a party. The government can call for a general election at any time they want like Theresa May did, but a confidence vote cant change the government under any circumstances.
I dont say this to be offensive, i don't want to be rude at all, but this is elementary stuff. I cant recommend enough that you do a bit of reading on these things. Learning is never ever a bad thing and it feels like there's some pieces in how things work that youre maybe not 100% clear on.
It feels like you're going to take that as me being patronising, but I promise you it isn't meant thay way. Its advice and youre free to take it or leave it, but no bad can come from understand how this stuff works.
Wow listen to you I bow to your intelligence
I dont pretend I'm any more or less intelligent than anyone else, but getting really basic things like that wrong again and again suggest you aren't as armed with the facts as you could be.
"Wow | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" And we all know how difficult it is to remove governments It is ok to say NO plenty did the first time and I can guarantee plenty more will the next time The SNP cannot be trusted with this they have divided our country so much Its very easy, there's a built in system specifically designed to remove govermnets, its called a general election and they happen at regular intervals. As soon as enough people want to be governed by someone else then the SNP won't be in power. Its the simplest form of democracy there is and it cant be gamed or cheated. At the moment the people who make decisions on Scotlands behalf are for the most part based in Westminster, who historically dont get voted for by Scotland because we are so underrepresented. Having our own parliament in charge of our own decisions let's Scotland decide who's best to make those decision. That is literally as simple as it gets. Choosing not be because "SNP Bad" seems like you genuinely don't understand the systems involved. Thanks for educating me on general elections and voting
If you know how it works then why ask the question?
You knew what I meant ie sturgeon last year with vote of no confidence and boris this year, it's difficult to remove when in power and 5 years is a long time its like a generaton in SNP minds
Don't try and belittle me
I genuinely didn't.
A vote of no confidence doesn't remove a government, its only the actual leader it effects, thats why its only the party that vote internally.
It can bring a government down tho
It literally can't. It can only change the leadership.
A general election is the only way to change a government at Westminster or holyrood.
It can force a general election
Again, it categorically can't. It can only change leadership within a party. The government can call for a general election at any time they want like Theresa May did, but a confidence vote cant change the government under any circumstances.
I dont say this to be offensive, i don't want to be rude at all, but this is elementary stuff. I cant recommend enough that you do a bit of reading on these things. Learning is never ever a bad thing and it feels like there's some pieces in how things work that youre maybe not 100% clear on.
It feels like you're going to take that as me being patronising, but I promise you it isn't meant thay way. Its advice and youre free to take it or leave it, but no bad can come from understand how this stuff works.
Wow listen to you I bow to your intelligence
I dont pretend I'm any more or less intelligent than anyone else, but getting really basic things like that wrong again and again suggest you aren't as armed with the facts as you could be.
Your just an anti English hating bigot, typical SNP supporter
The SNP the party of who have destroyed Scotland
You crave independence for the wrong reasons"Not anti-english at all. Ill happily let you point to a single anti-english thing ive said here or a anywhere else? Im opposed to Westminster rule, but ive nothing against anyone based on where they were born. I want independence so the right decisions for Scotland can be made in Scotland. I wonder what the "right" reasons are in your opinion? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"No, she has proposed a date but needs agreement from the UK government to hold the referendum. Boris has already said he won't agree to it." And that is exactly why we need to leave this "union of equals" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Have heard she is a rug muncher as well" a secret french lover,, so your correct.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"No, she has proposed a date but needs agreement from the UK government to hold the referendum. Boris has already said he won't agree to it. Fingers crossed she doesnt i for one am sick of hearing about referendums, the people voted in 2014, no then no now" This all day long | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"United we stand,divided we fall. Simple.Surely we are not stupid.Are we? " I thought Ireland was already divided. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
