FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Aaron banks loses case
Aaron banks loses case
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Aaron Banks has just lost his high court libel case against Caroline Cadwallader - a victory for truth and honesty against bullying Russian stooges!"
Yep, good result  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *hoirCouple
over a year ago
Clacton/Bury St. Edmunds |
"Aaron Banks has just lost his high court libel case against Caroline Cadwallader - a victory for truth and honesty against bullying Russian stooges!"
Have you read the ruling as reported in the Guardian?
The electoral commission found no laws or rules broken by Banks but the reason she won was because that the judge said she felt she had a case at the time of the Ted Talk despite the fact we know different now.
Codswallop has a history of making things up. Her huge breakout case was found to be a major lie. Plus, if Banks was an asset then his funds would have been frozen like everyone else connected the Russian state duento the ongoing conflict.
Think critically and you would avoid the libel you posted here.
C
Source; https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/jun/13/arron-banks-loses-libel-action-against-reporter-carole-cadwalladr-guardian-defamation-brexit-russia |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Aaron Banks has just lost his high court libel case against Caroline Cadwallader - a victory for truth and honesty against bullying Russian stooges!
Have you read the ruling as reported in the Guardian?
The electoral commission found no laws or rules broken by Banks but the reason she won was because that the judge said she felt she had a case at the time of the Ted Talk despite the fact we know different now.
Codswallop has a history of making things up. Her huge breakout case was found to be a major lie. Plus, if Banks was an asset then his funds would have been frozen like everyone else connected the Russian state duento the ongoing conflict.
Think critically and you would avoid the libel you posted here.
C
Source; https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/jun/13/arron-banks-loses-libel-action-against-reporter-carole-cadwalladr-guardian-defamation-brexit-russia"
He lost the case, end off , |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *hoirCouple
over a year ago
Clacton/Bury St. Edmunds |
"
He lost the case, end off , "
So did Johnny Depp and we know the truth there now.
Sometimes the courts miss the mark and you brushing it off is alarming. He shouldn't have lost. Her work demands she provide proof and she didn't but she has been allowed to get away with it.
C |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
He lost the case, end off ,
So did Johnny Depp and we know the truth there now.
Sometimes the courts miss the mark and you brushing it off is alarming. He shouldn't have lost. Her work demands she provide proof and she didn't but she has been allowed to get away with it.
C"
Here is an undeniable fact, he lost the case . he lost , get over it  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
He lost the case, end off ,
So did Johnny Depp and we know the truth there now.
Sometimes the courts miss the mark and you brushing it off is alarming. He shouldn't have lost. Her work demands she provide proof and she didn't but she has been allowed to get away with it.
C
Here is an undeniable fact, he lost the case . he lost , get over it "
Deja vu " you lost get over it" where have I heard that before  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Aaron Banks has just lost his high court libel case against Caroline Cadwallader - a victory for truth and honesty against bullying Russian stooges!
Have you read the ruling as reported in the Guardian?
The electoral commission found no laws or rules broken by Banks but the reason she won was because that the judge said she felt she had a case at the time of the Ted Talk despite the fact we know different now.
Codswallop has a history of making things up. Her huge breakout case was found to be a major lie. Plus, if Banks was an asset then his funds would have been frozen like everyone else connected the Russian state duento the ongoing conflict.
Think critically and you would avoid the libel you posted here.
C
Source; https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/jun/13/arron-banks-loses-libel-action-against-reporter-carole-cadwalladr-guardian-defamation-brexit-russia"
I do think critically especially where Russia is involved. FYI a reliable friend of mine who works in a specialised area of banking used to act on behalf of said person but extricated himself from the arrangement as there were questions about their financial arrangements that could not easily be answered. Now I don’t think I have libelled Mr Banks if you read my words with due care and I doubt the opinion of a random person on a swinging site will be as of much interest to him as a serious and widely published journalist but I could be wrong  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ackal1Couple
over a year ago
Manchester |
The judge ruled it was definitely in the public interest to report her findings.
What was nasty about this was Banks went after her rather than her news group trying it was thought as his Oligarch friends do to intimidate the opposition into bowing out over the fear of costs.
He was being a spiteful arse allegedly.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ostafunMan
over a year ago
near ipswich |
"The judge ruled it was definitely in the public interest to report her findings.
What was nasty about this was Banks went after her rather than her news group trying it was thought as his Oligarch friends do to intimidate the opposition into bowing out over the fear of costs.
He was being a spiteful arse allegedly.
"
I maybe mistaken but wasn't part of it her twitter posting? in which case it was personal and nothing to do with the media group. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *hoirCouple
over a year ago
Clacton/Bury St. Edmunds |
"The judge ruled it was definitely in the public interest to report her findings.
What was nasty about this was Banks went after her rather than her news group trying it was thought as his Oligarch friends do to intimidate the opposition into bowing out over the fear of costs.
He was being a spiteful arse allegedly.
"
She did it on her personal Taitter and on her own personal Ted Talk. The judge admitted she defamed him but she did so in the public interest despite her having zero evidence.
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/cadwalladr-wins-libel-case-against-banks
Yet people are celebrating this as the person on the losing end is someone they dislike. Mindboggling absurdity really as they will kick and scream when it happens to them |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The judge ruled it was definitely in the public interest to report her findings.
What was nasty about this was Banks went after her rather than her news group trying it was thought as his Oligarch friends do to intimidate the opposition into bowing out over the fear of costs.
He was being a spiteful arse allegedly.
She did it on her personal Taitter and on her own personal Ted Talk. The judge admitted she defamed him but she did so in the public interest despite her having zero evidence.
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/cadwalladr-wins-libel-case-against-banks
Yet people are celebrating this as the person on the losing end is someone they dislike. Mindboggling absurdity really as they will kick and scream when it happens to them"
The zero evidence bit isn't how I've read the court notes. But I'm not a lawyer. It's an interesting read tho!
It is interested why it was the Ted talk and not the many many other articles mentioned in the evidence he took umbridge with. We will never know why. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ostafunMan
over a year ago
near ipswich |
"This news made my day, today! Her outstanding journalism is second to none. Plus his winning could have been a terrible loss to journalist freedom. A very happy outcome  "
All well and good if you are happy that people can just make up shit about you without any proof and put it out there to the public.
Lets see how you feel when someone innocent gets hounded to death because of false information put out with no proof. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"This news made my day, today! Her outstanding journalism is second to none. Plus his winning could have been a terrible loss to journalist freedom. A very happy outcome All well and good if you are happy that people can just make up shit about you without any proof and put it out there to the public.
Lets see how you feel when someone innocent gets hounded to death because of false information put out with no proof."
she had, at the time, reasonable grounds. It's wasn't just "made up" even if it was wrong. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ackal1Couple
over a year ago
Manchester |
"This news made my day, today! Her outstanding journalism is second to none. Plus his winning could have been a terrible loss to journalist freedom. A very happy outcome All well and good if you are happy that people can just make up shit about you without any proof and put it out there to the public.
Lets see how you feel when someone innocent gets hounded to death because of false information put out with no proof."
Bit like saying “illegal “ immigrant every time the Cabinet say anything about immigrants then? Those poor bastards are actually drowning and hounded as you say because we’ve closed the safe path but that’s kept quiet. They are just “illegal” which is a lie. Patel wanted to push them back with naval boats remember. Risk them being drowned rather than just open an immigration office in Calais.
People are worse off because Arron Banks knowingly funded repeated lies ( allegedly ) . So it can hardly be described as sensitive territory for him can it?
You are however correct in that the journalist agreed one element was untrue to him personally and submitted an apology before the legal action commenced .
The allegations around Russian funds within the Tory party was justified as being in the public interest. Despite requests to disclose proof otherwise in regards to the allegations of his funding this remained in the judges words “opaque”.
Here’s a quote from a commons report included in evidence. . “ Arron Banks and Andy Wigmore ( a prolific and admitted liar) have misled the Committee on the number of meetings that took place with the Russian Embassy and walked out of the Committee’s evidence session to avoid scrutiny of the content of the discussions with the Russian Embassy.”
Why hide if there’s nothing to hide? The information doesn’t have to be made public.
He also failed to deny he was using his mining interests for money laundering. He responded to these allegations under questioning by laughing saying you can’t prove that. Not “it isn’t true”. Only, “you can’t prove that”.
He claimed international reputation also damage but the court head the tweets were mostly restricted to the U.K. once they had been tracked. His existing reputation was also questioned.
In regards to the case he received an apology and correction but chose the rich man’s bullying tactic.
It failed. The actual judgment is interesting reading and it confirms the £9m he filtered through various routes to the Brexit leave campaign . He also comes over as most unpleasant as an individual in my opinion. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
