FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Operation Red Meat Pt2 - Navy to "defend" us against immigrants
Operation Red Meat Pt2 - Navy to "defend" us against immigrants
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By *asyuk OP Man
over a year ago
West London |
So, as the next stage in distracting the population from being rubbish, BoJo wants to use the Royal Navy to protect is from immigrants.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-60021252
A proud battle honour to add? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"So, as the next stage in distracting the population from being rubbish, BoJo wants to use the Royal Navy to protect is from immigrants.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-60021252
A proud battle honour to add?"
Well if the border Agency do FA then yes, it’s the right thing to do! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Is there a part 1?
BBC license fee freeze (by Tweet), due to the "cost of living crisis" rather than a Tory party one and its abolition before an alternative has been considered."
If it was up to me, I’d get rid of the BBC altogether. The general public should not be held hostage to the licence fee at all. Let them have a subscription service or they can go commercial. Enough of this left wing propaganda |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ackal1Couple
over a year ago
Manchester |
"So, as the next stage in distracting the population from being rubbish, BoJo wants to use the Royal Navy to protect is from immigrants.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-60021252
A proud battle honour to add?
Well if the border Agency do FA then yes, it’s the right thing to do! "
The border agency controlled by Pritti Patel you mean? So she’s doing FA . Good you noticed how incompetent she is.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ackal1Couple
over a year ago
Manchester |
The Royal Navy river class boats have been helping border force on and off for years due to border force having so few ships. So unless they are planning on using frigates and destroyers or maybe the odd aircraft carrier it’s not news at all. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"So, as the next stage in distracting the population from being rubbish, BoJo wants to use the Royal Navy to protect is from immigrants.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-60021252
A proud battle honour to add?"
I also saw that it means nothing if the royal navy are deployed as the rules concerning asylum seekers remain the same, so yes another deflection from Boris who should of resigned last Wednesday, but looks to carry on regardless. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The navy are not going to let people drown so if it’s a choice they will be bringing the home just like the present system., it’s just more save Boris bullshit like the BBC bashing, "
like iv said before I’f the useless french done there job the Royal Navy wouldn’t need to help
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *atEvolutionCouple
over a year ago
atlantisEVOLUTION Swingers Club. Stoke |
"So, as the next stage in distracting the population from being rubbish, BoJo wants to use the Royal Navy to protect is from immigrants.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-60021252
A proud battle honour to add?"
Nowhere in that article is this idea slanted as 'DEFEND us FROM' or it being seen as a 'Battle Honour'
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"So, as the next stage in distracting the population from being rubbish, BoJo wants to use the Royal Navy to protect is from immigrants.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-60021252
A proud battle honour to add?
Nowhere in that article is this idea slanted as 'DEFEND us FROM' or it being seen as a 'Battle Honour'
"
he never lets fact get in the way of a good story tho specially if he can put a racism slant on it |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *asyuk OP Man
over a year ago
West London |
"The navy are not going to let people drown so if it’s a choice they will be bringing the home just like the present system., it’s just more save Boris bullshit like the BBC bashing, like iv said before I’f the useless french done there job the Royal Navy wouldn’t need to help "
The "useless" French are doing whatever they do. You actually have no idea what that may be.
They can choose to defend our borders or not to whatever extent I guess. We cannot compel them to do anything.
They seem to be doing something though;
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/02/life-death-and-limbo-in-the-calais-jungle-five-years-after-its-demolition
Do you approve? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *asyuk OP Man
over a year ago
West London |
"So, as the next stage in distracting the population from being rubbish, BoJo wants to use the Royal Navy to protect is from immigrants.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-60021252
A proud battle honour to add?
Nowhere in that article is this idea slanted as 'DEFEND us FROM' or it being seen as a 'Battle Honour'
"
I didn't emphasise any of those words.
However, that's what the Royal Navy does as a military force. They defend and protect our interests or they help those in need.
So we must need defending from immigrants to have to get them involved.
It's not as if our armed forces have all of the staff and equipment that they need and are sitting around getting bored.
Why else would you publicise deploying military forces unless there was some sort of a crisis? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *atEvolutionCouple
over a year ago
atlantisEVOLUTION Swingers Club. Stoke |
Wrong.
I didn't say you did emphasize the words - but it is clear that you made a connection with those (your) words to make them a part of the article.
You may as well have added 'sausages are cheaper today' too as that had nothing to do with the article either.
The Military of this country has been used many many many times as a Humanitarian Force.
The Military of this country has also been used many times to supplement persons and equipment in other areas of public need and shortfall.
Reporting a story as-is is patently more useful than adding something that isn't.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Is there a part 1?
BBC license fee freeze (by Tweet), due to the "cost of living crisis" rather than a Tory party one and its abolition before an alternative has been considered.
If it was up to me, I’d get rid of the BBC altogether. The general public should not be held hostage to the licence fee at all. Let them have a subscription service or they can go commercial. Enough of this left wing propaganda "
Lolz
There's always some good comedy on here. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ercuryMan
over a year ago
Grantham |
All thats proposed, is the Royal Navy take command of the migrant crossing issue.
They have better intelligence and communication assets, and they will coordinate all the other assets currently being used. (coastguard, border force, RNLI)
Do not expect to see a carrier force in the Channel! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"All thats proposed, is the Royal Navy take command of the migrant crossing issue.
They have better intelligence and communication assets, and they will coordinate all the other assets currently being used. (coastguard, border force, RNLI)
Do not expect to see a carrier force in the Channel! "
And what is the plan when they encounter these migrants crossing the channel |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Wrong.
I didn't say you did emphasize the words - but it is clear that you made a connection with those (your) words to make them a part of the article.
You may as well have added 'sausages are cheaper today' too as that had nothing to do with the article either.
The Military of this country has been used many many many times as a Humanitarian Force.
The Military of this country has also been used many times to supplement persons and equipment in other areas of public need and shortfall.
Reporting a story as-is is patently more useful than adding something that isn't.
"
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *asyuk OP Man
over a year ago
West London |
"Wrong.
I didn't say you did emphasize the words - but it is clear that you made a connection with those (your) words to make them a part of the article.
You may as well have added 'sausages are cheaper today' too as that had nothing to do with the article either.
The Military of this country has been used many many many times as a Humanitarian Force.
The Military of this country has also been used many times to supplement persons and equipment in other areas of public need and shortfall.
Reporting a story as-is is patently more useful than adding something that isn't.
"
Perhaps the obviously sarcastic tone was hard to pick up? I don't have to report the story "as is" because it is written "as is".
No idea why you choose to continually get so upset by the "tone" of everything I write, but it is of no concern to me.
The point is the announcement is just to distract from BoJo's problems.
Just like the BBC tweet.
There is a portion of the electorate that gets very excited about this sort of posturing.
Why is the government bothering to make this anouncement at all? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"All thats proposed, is the Royal Navy take command of the migrant crossing issue.
They have better intelligence and communication assets, and they will coordinate all the other assets currently being used. (coastguard, border force, RNLI)
Do not expect to see a carrier force in the Channel!
And what is the plan when they encounter these migrants crossing the channel "
Need to stop them setting out. Boris will
propose a ‘task force’ (that always sounds good) to land and occupy the beaches. Only need about one thousand squaddies - approx 20 per mile of beach. Easy stuff. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"All thats proposed, is the Royal Navy take command of the migrant crossing issue.
They have better intelligence and communication assets, and they will coordinate all the other assets currently being used. (coastguard, border force, RNLI)
Do not expect to see a carrier force in the Channel!
And what is the plan when they encounter these migrants crossing the channel
Need to stop them setting out. Boris will
propose a ‘task force’ (that always sounds good) to land and occupy the beaches. Only need about one thousand squaddies - approx 20 per mile of beach. Easy stuff. "
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"All thats proposed, is the Royal Navy take command of the migrant crossing issue.
They have better intelligence and communication assets, and they will coordinate all the other assets currently being used. (coastguard, border force, RNLI)
Do not expect to see a carrier force in the Channel!
And what is the plan when they encounter these migrants crossing the channel
Need to stop them setting out. Boris will
propose a ‘task force’ (that always sounds good) to land and occupy the beaches. Only need about one thousand squaddies - approx 20 per mile of beach. Easy stuff. "
a dozen would be enough how hard can it be |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"All thats proposed, is the Royal Navy take command of the migrant crossing issue.
They have better intelligence and communication assets, and they will coordinate all the other assets currently being used. (coastguard, border force, RNLI)
Do not expect to see a carrier force in the Channel!
And what is the plan when they encounter these migrants crossing the channel
Need to stop them setting out. Boris will
propose a ‘task force’ (that always sounds good) to land and occupy the beaches. Only need about one thousand squaddies - approx 20 per mile of beach. Easy stuff. a dozen would be enough how hard can it be "
How hard can it be to do what? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"All thats proposed, is the Royal Navy take command of the migrant crossing issue.
They have better intelligence and communication assets, and they will coordinate all the other assets currently being used. (coastguard, border force, RNLI)
Do not expect to see a carrier force in the Channel!
And what is the plan when they encounter these migrants crossing the channel
Need to stop them setting out. Boris will
propose a ‘task force’ (that always sounds good) to land and occupy the beaches. Only need about one thousand squaddies - approx 20 per mile of beach. Easy stuff. a dozen would be enough how hard can it be
How hard can it be to do what? "
stop them setting out into the channel mate |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"All thats proposed, is the Royal Navy take command of the migrant crossing issue.
They have better intelligence and communication assets, and they will coordinate all the other assets currently being used. (coastguard, border force, RNLI)
Do not expect to see a carrier force in the Channel!
And what is the plan when they encounter these migrants crossing the channel
Need to stop them setting out. Boris will
propose a ‘task force’ (that always sounds good) to land and occupy the beaches. Only need about one thousand squaddies - approx 20 per mile of beach. Easy stuff. a dozen would be enough how hard can it be
How hard can it be to do what? stop them setting out into the channel mate "
Ah, that is nothing to do with the Royal Navy, they have no powers on foreign soil |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"All thats proposed, is the Royal Navy take command of the migrant crossing issue.
They have better intelligence and communication assets, and they will coordinate all the other assets currently being used. (coastguard, border force, RNLI)
Do not expect to see a carrier force in the Channel!
And what is the plan when they encounter these migrants crossing the channel
Need to stop them setting out. Boris will
propose a ‘task force’ (that always sounds good) to land and occupy the beaches. Only need about one thousand squaddies - approx 20 per mile of beach. Easy stuff. a dozen would be enough how hard can it be
How hard can it be to do what? stop them setting out into the channel mate
Ah, that is nothing to do with the Royal Navy, they have no powers on foreign soil "
I know mate I was replying to the post about the thousand squaddies there army not navy |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"All thats proposed, is the Royal Navy take command of the migrant crossing issue.
They have better intelligence and communication assets, and they will coordinate all the other assets currently being used. (coastguard, border force, RNLI)
Do not expect to see a carrier force in the Channel!
And what is the plan when they encounter these migrants crossing the channel
Need to stop them setting out. Boris will
propose a ‘task force’ (that always sounds good) to land and occupy the beaches. Only need about one thousand squaddies - approx 20 per mile of beach. Easy stuff. a dozen would be enough how hard can it be
How hard can it be to do what? stop them setting out into the channel mate
Ah, that is nothing to do with the Royal Navy, they have no powers on foreign soil I know mate I was replying to the post about the thousand squaddies there army not navy "
Ah ok, The British army have no powers on foreign soil |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"So, as the next stage in distracting the population from being rubbish, BoJo wants to use the Royal Navy to protect is from immigrants.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-60021252
A proud battle honour to add?"
If it stops them then why not? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ackal1Couple
over a year ago
Manchester |
" a dozen would be enough how hard can it be
You would think. Gotta' have torches too though.  "
Well that’s fucked it because there’s no money in the budget for torches !!.
Actually I’ve heard rumours Macron is buying up all the torches in Western Europe. The evil mastermind is at it again in his lair!! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
" a dozen would be enough how hard can it be
You would think. Gotta' have torches too though.
Well that’s fucked it because there’s no money in the budget for torches !!.
Actually I’ve heard rumours Macron is buying up all the torches in Western Europe. The evil mastermind is at it again in his lair!! "
will have to make our own then lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"All thats proposed, is the Royal Navy take command of the migrant crossing issue.
They have better intelligence and communication assets, and they will coordinate all the other assets currently being used. (coastguard, border force, RNLI)
Do not expect to see a carrier force in the Channel!
And what is the plan when they encounter these migrants crossing the channel
Need to stop them setting out. Boris will
propose a ‘task force’ (that always sounds good) to land and occupy the beaches. Only need about one thousand squaddies - approx 20 per mile of beach. Easy stuff. a dozen would be enough how hard can it be
How hard can it be to do what? stop them setting out into the channel mate
Ah, that is nothing to do with the Royal Navy, they have no powers on foreign soil "
Boris has told them to ‘just assume powers’.
Sorted. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Tbh I am glad the navy are getting involved, they can help make sure these poor people can get here safely "
Does it not worry you that this would just encourage more people to make the perilous journey through Europe, often at the mercy of nasty gangster traffickers who have no regard for safety or lives? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Tbh I am glad the navy are getting involved, they can help make sure these poor people can get here safely
Does it not worry you that this would just encourage more people to make the perilous journey through Europe, often at the mercy of nasty gangster traffickers who have no regard for safety or lives? "
No, does it worry you? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Tbh I am glad the navy are getting involved, they can help make sure these poor people can get here safely
Does it not worry you that this would just encourage more people to make the perilous journey through Europe, often at the mercy of nasty gangster traffickers who have no regard for safety or lives?
No, does it worry you? "
Absolutely! Are you the head of a people trafficking operation? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Tbh I am glad the navy are getting involved, they can help make sure these poor people can get here safely
Does it not worry you that this would just encourage more people to make the perilous journey through Europe, often at the mercy of nasty gangster traffickers who have no regard for safety or lives?
No, does it worry you?
Absolutely! Are you the head of a people trafficking operation? "
No, |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Tbh I am glad the navy are getting involved, they can help make sure these poor people can get here safely
Does it not worry you that this would just encourage more people to make the perilous journey through Europe, often at the mercy of nasty gangster traffickers who have no regard for safety or lives?
No, does it worry you?
Absolutely! Are you the head of a people trafficking operation?
No, "
I thought you would say that. Let me put it to you another way. You are the head of a people trafficking operation. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Tbh I am glad the navy are getting involved, they can help make sure these poor people can get here safely
Does it not worry you that this would just encourage more people to make the perilous journey through Europe, often at the mercy of nasty gangster traffickers who have no regard for safety or lives?
No, does it worry you?
Absolutely! Are you the head of a people trafficking operation?
No,
I thought you would say that. Let me put it to you another way. You are the head of a people trafficking operation. "
No , I am not the head of a people trafficking operation |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Tbh I am glad the navy are getting involved, they can help make sure these poor people can get here safely
Does it not worry you that this would just encourage more people to make the perilous journey through Europe, often at the mercy of nasty gangster traffickers who have no regard for safety or lives?
No, does it worry you?
Absolutely! Are you the head of a people trafficking operation?
No,
I thought you would say that. Let me put it to you another way. You are the head of a people trafficking operation.
No , I am not the head of a people trafficking operation "
Aha. No more questions. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Tbh I am glad the navy are getting involved, they can help make sure these poor people can get here safely
Does it not worry you that this would just encourage more people to make the perilous journey through Europe, often at the mercy of nasty gangster traffickers who have no regard for safety or lives?
No, does it worry you?
Absolutely! Are you the head of a people trafficking operation?
No,
I thought you would say that. Let me put it to you another way. You are the head of a people trafficking operation.
No , I am not the head of a people trafficking operation
Aha. No more questions."
No problem, that was great banter, really enjoyed it |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Tbh I am glad the navy are getting involved, they can help make sure these poor people can get here safely
Does it not worry you that this would just encourage more people to make the perilous journey through Europe, often at the mercy of nasty gangster traffickers who have no regard for safety or lives?
No, does it worry you?
Absolutely! Are you the head of a people trafficking operation?
No,
I thought you would say that. Let me put it to you another way. You are the head of a people trafficking operation.
No , I am not the head of a people trafficking operation
Aha. No more questions.
No problem, that was great banter, really enjoyed it "
Likewise. A serious issue of course, one that won’t be solved debating on a swingers site. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Tbh I am glad the navy are getting involved, they can help make sure these poor people can get here safely
Does it not worry you that this would just encourage more people to make the perilous journey through Europe, often at the mercy of nasty gangster traffickers who have no regard for safety or lives?
No, does it worry you?
Absolutely! Are you the head of a people trafficking operation?
No,
I thought you would say that. Let me put it to you another way. You are the head of a people trafficking operation.
No , I am not the head of a people trafficking operation
Aha. No more questions.
No problem, that was great banter, really enjoyed it
Likewise. A serious issue of course, one that won’t be solved debating on a swingers site."
Of course not, it’s all good fun though |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Tbh I am glad the navy are getting involved, they can help make sure these poor people can get here safely "
yes and if the french navy got of there useless arse they could help stop these poor people from risking there lives in the first place mate even YOU can’t deny that’s safer for them and stops there money slipping into criminals hands
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Ah, that is nothing to do with the Royal Navy, they have no powers on foreign soil I know mate I was replying to the post about the thousand squaddies there army not navy "
royal marine squaddies? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Ah, that is nothing to do with the Royal Navy, they have no powers on foreign soil I know mate I was replying to the post about the thousand squaddies there army not navy
royal marine squaddies? "
haha there’ll do even the scouts could do better than the french lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Tbh I am glad the navy are getting involved, they can help make sure these poor people can get here safely yes and if the french navy got of there useless arse they could help stop these poor people from risking there lives in the first place mate even YOU can’t deny that’s safer for them and stops there money slipping into criminals hands "
You want the french to help control our own borders? That doesn’t sound like taking back control |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *rniepieMan
over a year ago
Liverpool |
" ffs the government actually getting on and doing what they are supposed to do govern and all labour want to do is talk about parties and accuse them of deflection you really couldn’t make it up  "
An insightful response
I cant wait for your next fascinating post
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Tbh I am glad the navy are getting involved, they can help make sure these poor people can get here safely yes and if the french navy got of there useless arse they could help stop these poor people from risking there lives in the first place mate even YOU can’t deny that’s safer for them and stops there money slipping into criminals hands
You want the french to help control our own borders? That doesn’t sound like taking back control "
no to control there own borders |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Tbh I am glad the navy are getting involved, they can help make sure these poor people can get here safely yes and if the french navy got of there useless arse they could help stop these poor people from risking there lives in the first place mate even YOU can’t deny that’s safer for them and stops there money slipping into criminals hands
You want the french to help control our own borders? That doesn’t sound like taking back control no to control there own borders "
They are doing that, btw, what are the Royal Navy going to do to stop these crossings? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Tbh I am glad the navy are getting involved, they can help make sure these poor people can get here safely yes and if the french navy got of there useless arse they could help stop these poor people from risking there lives in the first place mate even YOU can’t deny that’s safer for them and stops there money slipping into criminals hands
You want the french to help control our own borders? That doesn’t sound like taking back control no to control there own borders
They are doing that, btw, what are the Royal Navy going to do to stop these crossings? "
they arnt and you know that there beaches are there’s and they are allowing poor buggers to risk there lives to get rid of them btw I never mentioned the Royal Navy that was someone else |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Tbh I am glad the navy are getting involved, they can help make sure these poor people can get here safely yes and if the french navy got of there useless arse they could help stop these poor people from risking there lives in the first place mate even YOU can’t deny that’s safer for them and stops there money slipping into criminals hands
You want the french to help control our own borders? That doesn’t sound like taking back control no to control there own borders
They are doing that, btw, what are the Royal Navy going to do to stop these crossings? they arnt and you know that there beaches are there’s and they are allowing poor buggers to risk there lives to get rid of them btw I never mentioned the Royal Navy that was someone else "
The thread is about the Royal Navy |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Tbh I am glad the navy are getting involved, they can help make sure these poor people can get here safely yes and if the french navy got of there useless arse they could help stop these poor people from risking there lives in the first place mate even YOU can’t deny that’s safer for them and stops there money slipping into criminals hands
You want the french to help control our own borders? That doesn’t sound like taking back control no to control there own borders
They are doing that, btw, what are the Royal Navy going to do to stop these crossings? they arnt and you know that there beaches are there’s and they are allowing poor buggers to risk there lives to get rid of them btw I never mentioned the Royal Navy that was someone else
The thread is about the Royal Navy "
like I said the boys scouts could even do a better job than the french but you seem to think it’s ok for the french to allow these poor buggers to risk there lives in the channel and it’s all the uk fault |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *asyuk OP Man
over a year ago
West London |
"Tbh I am glad the navy are getting involved, they can help make sure these poor people can get here safely yes and if the french navy got of there useless arse they could help stop these poor people from risking there lives in the first place mate even YOU can’t deny that’s safer for them and stops there money slipping into criminals hands
You want the french to help control our own borders? That doesn’t sound like taking back control no to control there own borders
They are doing that, btw, what are the Royal Navy going to do to stop these crossings? they arnt and you know that there beaches are there’s and they are allowing poor buggers to risk there lives to get rid of them btw I never mentioned the Royal Navy that was someone else
The thread is about the Royal Navy like I said the boys scouts could even do a better job than the french but you seem to think it’s ok for the french to allow these poor buggers to risk there lives in the channel and it’s all the uk fault "
Why was an announcement made about deploying the Royal Navy?
What will they actually do to help prevent this?
Why involve the military at all? Will it really make any difference? Is it a permanent redeployment?
Is it just deflection from BJs problems because immigration gets a certain part of the electorate animated and using the armed forces implies a significant change? It implies something more forceful even if it doesn't happen, doesn't it? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ostafunMan
over a year ago
near ipswich |
"Tbh I am glad the navy are getting involved, they can help make sure these poor people can get here safely yes and if the french navy got of there useless arse they could help stop these poor people from risking there lives in the first place mate even YOU can’t deny that’s safer for them and stops there money slipping into criminals hands
You want the french to help control our own borders? That doesn’t sound like taking back control no to control there own borders
They are doing that, btw, what are the Royal Navy going to do to stop these crossings? they arnt and you know that there beaches are there’s and they are allowing poor buggers to risk there lives to get rid of them btw I never mentioned the Royal Navy that was someone else
The thread is about the Royal Navy like I said the boys scouts could even do a better job than the french but you seem to think it’s ok for the french to allow these poor buggers to risk there lives in the channel and it’s all the uk fault
Why was an announcement made about deploying the Royal Navy?
What will they actually do to help prevent this?
Why involve the military at all? Will it really make any difference? Is it a permanent redeployment?
Is it just deflection from BJs problems because immigration gets a certain part of the electorate animated and using the armed forces implies a significant change? It implies something more forceful even if it doesn't happen, doesn't it?"
What would you rather them do deploy them and not say anything? that would really give you something to bitch about. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Tbh I am glad the navy are getting involved, they can help make sure these poor people can get here safely yes and if the french navy got of there useless arse they could help stop these poor people from risking there lives in the first place mate even YOU can’t deny that’s safer for them and stops there money slipping into criminals hands
You want the french to help control our own borders? That doesn’t sound like taking back control no to control there own borders
They are doing that, btw, what are the Royal Navy going to do to stop these crossings? they arnt and you know that there beaches are there’s and they are allowing poor buggers to risk there lives to get rid of them btw I never mentioned the Royal Navy that was someone else
The thread is about the Royal Navy like I said the boys scouts could even do a better job than the french but you seem to think it’s ok for the french to allow these poor buggers to risk there lives in the channel and it’s all the uk fault
Why was an announcement made about deploying the Royal Navy?
What will they actually do to help prevent this?
Why involve the military at all? Will it really make any difference? Is it a permanent redeployment?
Is it just deflection from BJs problems because immigration gets a certain part of the electorate animated and using the armed forces implies a significant change? It implies something more forceful even if it doesn't happen, doesn't it?What would you rather them do deploy them and not say anything? that would really give you something to bitch about."
Do you know what the plan is for the Royal Navy ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ostafunMan
over a year ago
near ipswich |
"Tbh I am glad the navy are getting involved, they can help make sure these poor people can get here safely yes and if the french navy got of there useless arse they could help stop these poor people from risking there lives in the first place mate even YOU can’t deny that’s safer for them and stops there money slipping into criminals hands
You want the french to help control our own borders? That doesn’t sound like taking back control no to control there own borders
They are doing that, btw, what are the Royal Navy going to do to stop these crossings? they arnt and you know that there beaches are there’s and they are allowing poor buggers to risk there lives to get rid of them btw I never mentioned the Royal Navy that was someone else
The thread is about the Royal Navy like I said the boys scouts could even do a better job than the french but you seem to think it’s ok for the french to allow these poor buggers to risk there lives in the channel and it’s all the uk fault
Why was an announcement made about deploying the Royal Navy?
What will they actually do to help prevent this?
Why involve the military at all? Will it really make any difference? Is it a permanent redeployment?
Is it just deflection from BJs problems because immigration gets a certain part of the electorate animated and using the armed forces implies a significant change? It implies something more forceful even if it doesn't happen, doesn't it?What would you rather them do deploy them and not say anything? that would really give you something to bitch about.
Do you know what the plan is for the Royal Navy ? "
Nope |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Tbh I am glad the navy are getting involved, they can help make sure these poor people can get here safely yes and if the french navy got of there useless arse they could help stop these poor people from risking there lives in the first place mate even YOU can’t deny that’s safer for them and stops there money slipping into criminals hands
You want the french to help control our own borders? That doesn’t sound like taking back control no to control there own borders
They are doing that, btw, what are the Royal Navy going to do to stop these crossings? they arnt and you know that there beaches are there’s and they are allowing poor buggers to risk there lives to get rid of them btw I never mentioned the Royal Navy that was someone else
The thread is about the Royal Navy like I said the boys scouts could even do a better job than the french but you seem to think it’s ok for the french to allow these poor buggers to risk there lives in the channel and it’s all the uk fault
Why was an announcement made about deploying the Royal Navy?
What will they actually do to help prevent this?
Why involve the military at all? Will it really make any difference? Is it a permanent redeployment?
Is it just deflection from BJs problems because immigration gets a certain part of the electorate animated and using the armed forces implies a significant change? It implies something more forceful even if it doesn't happen, doesn't it?What would you rather them do deploy them and not say anything? that would really give you something to bitch about.
Do you know what the plan is for the Royal Navy ? Nope "
Neither do I, maybe they are just making shit up ?  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Tbh I am glad the navy are getting involved, they can help make sure these poor people can get here safely yes and if the french navy got of there useless arse they could help stop these poor people from risking there lives in the first place mate even YOU can’t deny that’s safer for them and stops there money slipping into criminals hands
You want the french to help control our own borders? That doesn’t sound like taking back control no to control there own borders
They are doing that, btw, what are the Royal Navy going to do to stop these crossings? they arnt and you know that there beaches are there’s and they are allowing poor buggers to risk there lives to get rid of them btw I never mentioned the Royal Navy that was someone else
The thread is about the Royal Navy like I said the boys scouts could even do a better job than the french but you seem to think it’s ok for the french to allow these poor buggers to risk there lives in the channel and it’s all the uk fault
Why was an announcement made about deploying the Royal Navy?
What will they actually do to help prevent this?
Why involve the military at all? Will it really make any difference? Is it a permanent redeployment?
Is it just deflection from BJs problems because immigration gets a certain part of the electorate animated and using the armed forces implies a significant change? It implies something more forceful even if it doesn't happen, doesn't it?"
yet it’s you who started this thread it got you animated lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
He’s throwing out a bone to us peasants. Like when he was London Mayor “I’ll ban all cars and lorries from London”. Brexit “the NHS will benefit from an extra 350 million per week.
What can the navy do? Supply better dinghies? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *asyuk OP Man
over a year ago
West London |
"Tbh I am glad the navy are getting involved, they can help make sure these poor people can get here safely yes and if the french navy got of there useless arse they could help stop these poor people from risking there lives in the first place mate even YOU can’t deny that’s safer for them and stops there money slipping into criminals hands
You want the french to help control our own borders? That doesn’t sound like taking back control no to control there own borders
They are doing that, btw, what are the Royal Navy going to do to stop these crossings? they arnt and you know that there beaches are there’s and they are allowing poor buggers to risk there lives to get rid of them btw I never mentioned the Royal Navy that was someone else
The thread is about the Royal Navy like I said the boys scouts could even do a better job than the french but you seem to think it’s ok for the french to allow these poor buggers to risk there lives in the channel and it’s all the uk fault
Why was an announcement made about deploying the Royal Navy?
What will they actually do to help prevent this?
Why involve the military at all? Will it really make any difference? Is it a permanent redeployment?
Is it just deflection from BJs problems because immigration gets a certain part of the electorate animated and using the armed forces implies a significant change? It implies something more forceful even if it doesn't happen, doesn't it?What would you rather them do deploy them and not say anything? that would really give you something to bitch about."
Why say they are deploying them now? To do what and how?
Seems like they just want to get "Royal Navy" and "immigrants" in the same sentence.
You didn't actually address any of the points or the OP?
Is it just another distraction? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Tbh I am glad the navy are getting involved, they can help make sure these poor people can get here safely yes and if the french navy got of there useless arse they could help stop these poor people from risking there lives in the first place mate even YOU can’t deny that’s safer for them and stops there money slipping into criminals hands
You want the french to help control our own borders? That doesn’t sound like taking back control no to control there own borders
They are doing that, btw, what are the Royal Navy going to do to stop these crossings? they arnt and you know that there beaches are there’s and they are allowing poor buggers to risk there lives to get rid of them btw I never mentioned the Royal Navy that was someone else
The thread is about the Royal Navy like I said the boys scouts could even do a better job than the french but you seem to think it’s ok for the french to allow these poor buggers to risk there lives in the channel and it’s all the uk fault
Why was an announcement made about deploying the Royal Navy?
What will they actually do to help prevent this?
Why involve the military at all? Will it really make any difference? Is it a permanent redeployment?
Is it just deflection from BJs problems because immigration gets a certain part of the electorate animated and using the armed forces implies a significant change? It implies something more forceful even if it doesn't happen, doesn't it?What would you rather them do deploy them and not say anything? that would really give you something to bitch about.
Why say they are deploying them now? To do what and how?
Seems like they just want to get "Royal Navy" and "immigrants" in the same sentence.
You didn't actually address any of the points or the OP?
Is it just another distraction?"
seems you wanted to get Royal Navy and immigrants onto a thread wonder why that is you do this a lot tho |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *asyuk OP Man
over a year ago
West London |
"Tbh I am glad the navy are getting involved, they can help make sure these poor people can get here safely yes and if the french navy got of there useless arse they could help stop these poor people from risking there lives in the first place mate even YOU can’t deny that’s safer for them and stops there money slipping into criminals hands
You want the french to help control our own borders? That doesn’t sound like taking back control no to control there own borders
They are doing that, btw, what are the Royal Navy going to do to stop these crossings? they arnt and you know that there beaches are there’s and they are allowing poor buggers to risk there lives to get rid of them btw I never mentioned the Royal Navy that was someone else
The thread is about the Royal Navy like I said the boys scouts could even do a better job than the french but you seem to think it’s ok for the french to allow these poor buggers to risk there lives in the channel and it’s all the uk fault
Why was an announcement made about deploying the Royal Navy?
What will they actually do to help prevent this?
Why involve the military at all? Will it really make any difference? Is it a permanent redeployment?
Is it just deflection from BJs problems because immigration gets a certain part of the electorate animated and using the armed forces implies a significant change? It implies something more forceful even if it doesn't happen, doesn't it?What would you rather them do deploy them and not say anything? that would really give you something to bitch about.
Why say they are deploying them now? To do what and how?
Seems like they just want to get "Royal Navy" and "immigrants" in the same sentence.
You didn't actually address any of the points or the OP?
Is it just another distraction? seems you wanted to get Royal Navy and immigrants onto a thread wonder why that is you do this a lot tho "
I did it to ask of it was just a BoJo distraction. You read that, right?
You haven't managed to answer. Still. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Tbh I am glad the navy are getting involved, they can help make sure these poor people can get here safely yes and if the french navy got of there useless arse they could help stop these poor people from risking there lives in the first place mate even YOU can’t deny that’s safer for them and stops there money slipping into criminals hands
You want the french to help control our own borders? That doesn’t sound like taking back control no to control there own borders
They are doing that, btw, what are the Royal Navy going to do to stop these crossings? they arnt and you know that there beaches are there’s and they are allowing poor buggers to risk there lives to get rid of them btw I never mentioned the Royal Navy that was someone else
The thread is about the Royal Navy like I said the boys scouts could even do a better job than the french but you seem to think it’s ok for the french to allow these poor buggers to risk there lives in the channel and it’s all the uk fault
Why was an announcement made about deploying the Royal Navy?
What will they actually do to help prevent this?
Why involve the military at all? Will it really make any difference? Is it a permanent redeployment?
Is it just deflection from BJs problems because immigration gets a certain part of the electorate animated and using the armed forces implies a significant change? It implies something more forceful even if it doesn't happen, doesn't it?What would you rather them do deploy them and not say anything? that would really give you something to bitch about.
Why say they are deploying them now? To do what and how?
Seems like they just want to get "Royal Navy" and "immigrants" in the same sentence.
You didn't actually address any of the points or the OP?
Is it just another distraction? seems you wanted to get Royal Navy and immigrants onto a thread wonder why that is you do this a lot tho
I did it to ask of it was just a BoJo distraction. You read that, right?
You haven't managed to answer. Still."
I’m sure it’s a distraction or just another typical Boris empty pledge / waffle. Populist nonsense from a bluffing buffoon. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
