FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Tory Herd Immunity Denial
Tory Herd Immunity Denial
Jump to: Newest in thread
"According to Priti on the Andrew Marr show
The Tories didnt want to
Go that route .
Be interesting to see what Whatsapp messages
get released this week
Dominic Who ?
 "
Talking out of her big fat arse again? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By *ostafunMan
over a year ago
near ipswich |
"According to Priti on the Andrew Marr show
The Tories didnt want to
Go that route .
Be interesting to see what Whatsapp messages
get released this week
Dominic Who ?
Talking out of her big fat arse again?"
I think that is wrong on so many levels  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"According to Priti on the Andrew Marr show
The Tories didnt want to
Go that route .
Be interesting to see what Whatsapp messages
get released this week
Dominic Who ?
Talking out of her big fat arse again? I think that is wrong on so many levels "
Agreed, Dominic doesnt have a big fat arse !
Back to the denial .
I wonder what day she will have to backtrack
This week tuesday or wednesday .
Maybe The American bloke will do it in PMQ's
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"According to Priti on the Andrew Marr show
The Tories didnt want to
Go that route .
Be interesting to see what Whatsapp messages
get released this week
Dominic Who ?
Talking out of her big fat arse again? I think that is wrong on so many levels
Agreed, Dominic doesnt have a big fat arse !
Back to the denial .
I wonder what day she will have to backtrack
This week tuesday or wednesday .
Maybe The American bloke will do it in PMQ's
"
I'm going to hold fire until sky tell me if its important or not
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ostafunMan
over a year ago
near ipswich |
"According to Priti on the Andrew Marr show
The Tories didnt want to
Go that route .
Be interesting to see what Whatsapp messages
get released this week
Dominic Who ?
Talking out of her big fat arse again?"
Misogyny at its worse. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"According to Priti on the Andrew Marr show
The Tories didnt want to
Go that route .
Be interesting to see what Whatsapp messages
get released this week
Dominic Who ?
Talking out of her big fat arse again? Misogyny at its worse."
Nah it’s body shaming. It’s a point scoring exercise from yesterday where some other remarks were made on the same level.
We are supposed to be adults. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ostafunMan
over a year ago
near ipswich |
"According to Priti on the Andrew Marr show
The Tories didnt want to
Go that route .
Be interesting to see what Whatsapp messages
get released this week
Dominic Who ?
Talking out of her big fat arse again? Misogyny at its worse.
Nah it’s body shaming. It’s a point scoring exercise from yesterday where some other remarks were made on the same level.
We are supposed to be adults. "
Yes you are right ive just looked up the actual definition but body shaming is just as bad. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Ha ha ha ha
For the record folks this exact comment was made about diane Abbott yesterday.
Not 1 of the usual suspects cared to mention it.
When I stated it was mysoginistic,I got slated.
Yet I state it today and I'm a mysogonist
It's in the egypt thread of anyone wants to read
Utterly embarrassing
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Ha ha ha ha
For the record folks this exact comment was made about diane Abbott yesterday.
Not 1 of the usual suspects cared to mention it.
When I stated it was mysoginistic,I got slated.
Yet I state it today and I'm a mysogonist
It's in the egypt thread of anyone wants to read
Utterly embarrassing
"
This would hold water if you would have got slated by those who slated you yesterday.
But you shot your bolt too soon.
It’s childish and embarrassing you are correct. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Ha ha ha ha
For the record folks this exact comment was made about diane Abbott yesterday.
Not 1 of the usual suspects cared to mention it.
When I stated it was mysoginistic,I got slated.
Yet I state it today and I'm a mysogonist
It's in the egypt thread of anyone wants to read
Utterly embarrassing
This would hold water if you would have got slated by those who slated you yesterday.
But you shot your bolt too soon.
It’s childish and embarrassing you are correct. "
Well as you were one of the ones who said absolutely nothing at the time...shrugs |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ostafunMan
over a year ago
near ipswich |
"Ha ha ha ha
For the record folks this exact comment was made about diane Abbott yesterday.
Not 1 of the usual suspects cared to mention it.
When I stated it was mysoginistic,I got slated.
Yet I state it today and I'm a mysogonist
It's in the egypt thread of anyone wants to read
Utterly embarrassing
"
not by me mate take a look back. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I wont mention it again
It's there for everyone to see
A horrible remark was made and none of the little brigade chose to mention it,instead I got ripped into instead.
Think my point about hypocrisy is well and truly proven.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Ha ha ha ha
For the record folks this exact comment was made about diane Abbott yesterday.
Not 1 of the usual suspects cared to mention it.
When I stated it was mysoginistic,I got slated.
Yet I state it today and I'm a mysogonist
It's in the egypt thread of anyone wants to read
Utterly embarrassing
This would hold water if you would have got slated by those who slated you yesterday.
But you shot your bolt too soon.
It’s childish and embarrassing you are correct.
Well as you were one of the ones who said absolutely nothing at the time...shrugs "
Aside from the comment I said shall we stop the body shaming and get on with the thread.
Which I stand by today. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I wont mention it again
It's there for everyone to see
A horrible remark was made and none of the little brigade chose to mention it,instead I got ripped into instead.
Think my point about hypocrisy is well and truly proven.
"
But you haven’t proven anything as I called out both misogynistic remarks yesterday and Costa wasn’t even included.
You shot your bolt too soon in an attempt to point score. Would that be called embarrassing?
But I won’t divert the thread any further. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I wont mention it again
It's there for everyone to see
A horrible remark was made and none of the little brigade chose to mention it,instead I got ripped into instead.
Think my point about hypocrisy is well and truly proven.
"
bit like Hamas eh. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ostafunMan
over a year ago
near ipswich |
"I wont mention it again
It's there for everyone to see
A horrible remark was made and none of the little brigade chose to mention it,instead I got ripped into instead.
Think my point about hypocrisy is well and truly proven.
bit like Hamas eh."
Dont go there we still haven't got an answer on that one either.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"According to Priti on the Andrew Marr show
The Tories didnt want to
Go that route .
Be interesting to see what Whatsapp messages
get released this week
Dominic Who ?
"
Getting back on track. I can well believe what he (DC) has said about the government being chaotic. It would make the Thick of it seem like a documentary. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I wont mention it again
It's there for everyone to see
A horrible remark was made and none of the little brigade chose to mention it,instead I got ripped into instead.
Think my point about hypocrisy is well and truly proven.
bit like Hamas eh.Dont go there we still haven't got an answer on that one either. "
True... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I wont mention it again
It's there for everyone to see
A horrible remark was made and none of the little brigade chose to mention it,instead I got ripped into instead.
Think my point about hypocrisy is well and truly proven.
But you haven’t proven anything as I called out both misogynistic remarks yesterday and Costa wasn’t even included.
You shot your bolt too soon in an attempt to point score. Would that be called embarrassing?
But I won’t divert the thread any further. "
Despite saying you wanted to carry on with the thread?
And you are getting pulled up there..when the remark not one of you said an utter thing.
Not one.Not one person said anything to the poster that is a fact and it's there for everyone to see.
When I said it was mysoginistoc I got jumped on.
So stop making stuff you.
You have been found out again
Just accept it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I wont mention it again
It's there for everyone to see
A horrible remark was made and none of the little brigade chose to mention it,instead I got ripped into instead.
Think my point about hypocrisy is well and truly proven.
bit like Hamas eh."
Erm...is this thread about Palestine |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I wont mention it again
It's there for everyone to see
A horrible remark was made and none of the little brigade chose to mention it,instead I got ripped into instead.
Think my point about hypocrisy is well and truly proven.
bit like Hamas eh.Dont go there we still haven't got an answer on that one either. "
No response on calling 1 person a mysogonost and saying nothing to another..after saying exactly the same thing? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ostafunMan
over a year ago
near ipswich |
"I wont mention it again
It's there for everyone to see
A horrible remark was made and none of the little brigade chose to mention it,instead I got ripped into instead.
Think my point about hypocrisy is well and truly proven.
But you haven’t proven anything as I called out both misogynistic remarks yesterday and Costa wasn’t even included.
You shot your bolt too soon in an attempt to point score. Would that be called embarrassing?
But I won’t divert the thread any further.
Despite saying you wanted to carry on with the thread?
And you are getting pulled up there..when the remark not one of you said an utter thing.
Not one.Not one person said anything to the poster that is a fact and it's there for everyone to see.
When I said it was mysoginistoc I got jumped on.
So stop making stuff you.
You have been found out again
Just accept it."
Is it compulsory to comment on every thread, is it possible that some people just ignore ignorant remarks and try to move on with the thread? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I wont mention it again
It's there for everyone to see
A horrible remark was made and none of the little brigade chose to mention it,instead I got ripped into instead.
Think my point about hypocrisy is well and truly proven.
But you haven’t proven anything as I called out both misogynistic remarks yesterday and Costa wasn’t even included.
You shot your bolt too soon in an attempt to point score. Would that be called embarrassing?
But I won’t divert the thread any further.
Despite saying you wanted to carry on with the thread?
And you are getting pulled up there..when the remark not one of you said an utter thing.
Not one.Not one person said anything to the poster that is a fact and it's there for everyone to see.
When I said it was mysoginistoc I got jumped on.
So stop making stuff you.
You have been found out again
Just accept it.Is it compulsory to comment on every thread, is it possible that some people just ignore ignorant remarks and try to move on with the thread? "
Superlols..is that the Best you can come up? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I wont mention it again
It's there for everyone to see
A horrible remark was made and none of the little brigade chose to mention it,instead I got ripped into instead.
Think my point about hypocrisy is well and truly proven.
But you haven’t proven anything as I called out both misogynistic remarks yesterday and Costa wasn’t even included.
You shot your bolt too soon in an attempt to point score. Would that be called embarrassing?
But I won’t divert the thread any further.
Despite saying you wanted to carry on with the thread?
And you are getting pulled up there..when the remark not one of you said an utter thing.
Not one.Not one person said anything to the poster that is a fact and it's there for everyone to see.
When I said it was mysoginistoc I got jumped on.
So stop making stuff you.
You have been found out again
Just accept it."
Lol you were not jumped on by me. And if people can skip down to the thread in question and read my remarks saying there is no place for misogyny and also stop the body shaming then it will be you who is found out again. The only thing I’m guilty of in your mind is not jumping in quickly.
This is too easy.
Anyone in two minds can scroll down and check it out in its glory.
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I wont mention it again
It's there for everyone to see
A horrible remark was made and none of the little brigade chose to mention it,instead I got ripped into instead.
Think my point about hypocrisy is well and truly proven.
But you haven’t proven anything as I called out both misogynistic remarks yesterday and Costa wasn’t even included.
You shot your bolt too soon in an attempt to point score. Would that be called embarrassing?
But I won’t divert the thread any further.
Despite saying you wanted to carry on with the thread?
And you are getting pulled up there..when the remark not one of you said an utter thing.
Not one.Not one person said anything to the poster that is a fact and it's there for everyone to see.
When I said it was mysoginistoc I got jumped on.
So stop making stuff you.
You have been found out again
Just accept it.
Lol you were not jumped on by me. And if people can skip down to the thread in question and read my remarks saying there is no place for misogyny and also stop the body shaming then it will be you who is found out again. The only thing I’m guilty of in your mind is not jumping in quickly.
This is too easy.
Anyone in two minds can scroll down and check it out in its glory.
"
You said absolutely nothing to the poster
Fact |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I wont mention it again
It's there for everyone to see
A horrible remark was made and none of the little brigade chose to mention it,instead I got ripped into instead.
Think my point about hypocrisy is well and truly proven.
But you haven’t proven anything as I called out both misogynistic remarks yesterday and Costa wasn’t even included.
You shot your bolt too soon in an attempt to point score. Would that be called embarrassing?
But I won’t divert the thread any further.
Despite saying you wanted to carry on with the thread?
And you are getting pulled up there..when the remark not one of you said an utter thing.
Not one.Not one person said anything to the poster that is a fact and it's there for everyone to see.
When I said it was mysoginistoc I got jumped on.
So stop making stuff you.
You have been found out again
Just accept it.
Lol you were not jumped on by me. And if people can skip down to the thread in question and read my remarks saying there is no place for misogyny and also stop the body shaming then it will be you who is found out again. The only thing I’m guilty of in your mind is not jumping in quickly.
This is too easy.
Anyone in two minds can scroll down and check it out in its glory.
You said absolutely nothing to the poster
Fact"
I said stop the body shaming and on with the thread. Sorry that’s not good enough for you if you were feeling put upon by the whole experience.
A thousands apologies for not leaping in soon enough. I hope you are ok. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Ha ha ha ha
For the record folks this exact comment was made about diane Abbott yesterday.
Not 1 of the usual suspects cared to mention it.
When I stated it was mysoginistic,I got slated.
Yet I state it today and I'm a mysogonist
It's in the egypt thread of anyone wants to read
Utterly embarrassing
"
Lol. You say "this exact comment" was made in the Egypt thread, what I actually said was "fat ass", not "big fat arse". If you're going to lie for exaggerated effect, at least do it when nobody can find out your exaggerated lie in a few clicks. By the way, who said the following about Priti Patel?:-
"She will probally eat you afterwards."
"Maybe that's why she needed the dietician"
"She probslly eats you after mating"
You have previous form my friend  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"There is obvs a huge difference in saying big ass and huge big ass
fat ass & huge fat arse. How many times do you need to be told the same information before you absorb it? I'm intrigued as to how someone can lose that direct info so quickly!"
The word huge makes it mysogonostic
Please stop digging my friend
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"There is obvs a huge difference in saying big ass and huge big ass
fat ass & huge fat arse. How many times do you need to be told the same information before you absorb it? I'm intrigued as to how someone can lose that direct info so quickly!
The word huge makes it mysogonostic
Please stop digging my friend
"
Ok, I'm not really comfortable discussing something with someone whose mind wanders so easily. I'll leave you be now. Have a restful night |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Ha ha ha ha
For the record folks this exact comment was made about diane Abbott yesterday.
Not 1 of the usual suspects cared to mention it.
When I stated it was mysoginistic,I got slated.
Yet I state it today and I'm a mysogonist
It's in the egypt thread of anyone wants to read
Utterly embarrassing
"
Yes but the Racist Righties are allowed to be Bigots .
The left needs to be thrown in jail
For the merest hint of a slur . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Ha ha ha ha
For the record folks this exact comment was made about diane Abbott yesterday.
Not 1 of the usual suspects cared to mention it.
When I stated it was mysoginistic,I got slated.
Yet I state it today and I'm a mysogonist
It's in the egypt thread of anyone wants to read
Utterly embarrassing
Yes but the Racist Righties are allowed to be Bigots .
The left needs to be thrown in jail
For the merest hint of a slur ."
Apparently if you didnt vote for isreal in the Eurovision you are a massive racist
Superb
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Ha ha ha ha
For the record folks this exact comment was made about diane Abbott yesterday.
Not 1 of the usual suspects cared to mention it.
When I stated it was mysoginistic,I got slated.
Yet I state it today and I'm a mysogonist
It's in the egypt thread of anyone wants to read
Utterly embarrassing
Yes but the Racist Righties are allowed to be Bigots .
The left needs to be thrown in jail
For the merest hint of a slur .
Apparently if you didnt vote for isreal in the Eurovision you are a massive racist
Superb
"
I have a question about Israel .
Do you think they are Happy with the 6th & 8th
commandments specifically with regards to Palestine ?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"There is obvs a huge difference in saying big ass and huge big ass
fat ass & huge fat arse. How many times do you need to be told the same information before you absorb it? I'm intrigued as to how someone can lose that direct info so quickly!
The word huge makes it mysogonostic
Please stop digging my friend
Ok, I'm not really comfortable discussing something with someone whose mind wanders so easily. I'll leave you be now. Have a restful night "
Thread Careful,one or two here like to spit their dummies out...as in get fourm bans issued |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"There is obvs a huge difference in saying big ass and huge big ass
fat ass & huge fat arse. How many times do you need to be told the same information before you absorb it? I'm intrigued as to how someone can lose that direct info so quickly!
The word huge makes it mysogonostic
Please stop digging my friend
Ok, I'm not really comfortable discussing something with someone whose mind wanders so easily. I'll leave you be now. Have a restful night Thread Careful,one or two here like to spit their dummies out...as in get fourm bans issued "
Erm.
Once again I suggest you read the rules
Hate to see you getting in trouble
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"There is obvs a huge difference in saying big ass and huge big ass
fat ass & huge fat arse. How many times do you need to be told the same information before you absorb it? I'm intrigued as to how someone can lose that direct info so quickly!
The word huge makes it mysogonostic
Please stop digging my friend
Ok, I'm not really comfortable discussing something with someone whose mind wanders so easily. I'll leave you be now. Have a restful night Thread Careful,one or two here like to spit their dummies out...as in get fourm bans issued "
You Only get banned if you break a rule dont you ?
Imagine if Peter Sutcliffe went to court & moaned ...
Careful 1 or 2 here like to spit there dummies out &
Get Jail sentences issued .
Is that what you were trying to impart in your warning ?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"There is obvs a huge difference in saying big ass and huge big ass
fat ass & huge fat arse. How many times do you need to be told the same information before you absorb it? I'm intrigued as to how someone can lose that direct info so quickly!
The word huge makes it mysogonostic
Please stop digging my friend
Ok, I'm not really comfortable discussing something with someone whose mind wanders so easily. I'll leave you be now. Have a restful night Thread Careful,one or two here like to spit their dummies out...as in get fourm bans issued
You Only get banned if you break a rule dont you ?
Imagine if Peter Sutcliffe went to court & moaned ...
Careful 1 or 2 here like to spit there dummies out &
Get Jail sentences issued .
Is that what you were trying to impart in your warning ?
"
No I'm an adult if someone says something to me on the fourms i take it on the chin and carry on...i don't go running to admin to fight my battles...you know being an adult and all that. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"There is obvs a huge difference in saying big ass and huge big ass
fat ass & huge fat arse. How many times do you need to be told the same information before you absorb it? I'm intrigued as to how someone can lose that direct info so quickly!
The word huge makes it mysogonostic
Please stop digging my friend
Ok, I'm not really comfortable discussing something with someone whose mind wanders so easily. I'll leave you be now. Have a restful night Thread Careful,one or two here like to spit their dummies out...as in get fourm bans issued
You Only get banned if you break a rule dont you ?
Imagine if Peter Sutcliffe went to court & moaned ...
Careful 1 or 2 here like to spit there dummies out &
Get Jail sentences issued .
Is that what you were trying to impart in your warning ?
No I'm an adult if someone says something to me on the fourms i take it on the chin and carry on...i don't go running to admin to fight my battles...you know being an adult and all that."
Then surely you have a problem with admin only ?
As if you are claiming not to have broken any rules
Then you must be being mistreated by the dominant
authority which is admin ?
I cant see how else, anyone would be able to
Get you banned, without there being some rule breaking
On your part |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Oh dear
"
Its like complaining about the big gang
having bigger missiles than the little gang &
Thinking the little gang have been hard done by
Its almost akin to Admin being Israel & Hamas being the banned
You might say .
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Oh dear
Its like complaining about the big gang
having bigger missiles than the little gang &
Thinking the little gang have been hard done by
Its almost akin to Admin being Israel & Hamas being the banned
You might say .
"
Or calling people racists for not agreeing with them?
But thank goodness that doesnt happen on here. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Oh dear
Its like complaining about the big gang
having bigger missiles than the little gang &
Thinking the little gang have been hard done by
Its almost akin to Admin being Israel & Hamas being the banned
You might say .
Or calling people racists for not agreeing with them?
But thank goodness that doesnt happen on here."
At least Admin didnt break the 6th or 8th commandment
While making there point about ultimate power known |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"According to Priti on the Andrew Marr show
The Tories didnt want to
Go that route .
Be interesting to see what Whatsapp messages
get released this week
Dominic Who ?
"
Any rational government discusses all the options and then acts accordingly. . It is much better to be rational and make decisions after discussions. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Oh dear
Its like complaining about the big gang
having bigger missiles than the little gang &
Thinking the little gang have been hard done by
Its almost akin to Admin being Israel & Hamas being the banned
You might say .
Or calling people racists for not agreeing with them?
But thank goodness that doesnt happen on here."
I don't think anyone referred to you as a racist...maybe your problem is the existence off the state off Israel... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Oh dear
Its like complaining about the big gang
having bigger missiles than the little gang &
Thinking the little gang have been hard done by
Its almost akin to Admin being Israel & Hamas being the banned
You might say .
Or calling people racists for not agreeing with them?
But thank goodness that doesnt happen on here.I don't think anyone referred to you as a racist...maybe your problem is the existence off the state off Israel..."
Is Israel a Race ?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Oh dear
Its like complaining about the big gang
having bigger missiles than the little gang &
Thinking the little gang have been hard done by
Its almost akin to Admin being Israel & Hamas being the banned
You might say .
Or calling people racists for not agreeing with them?
But thank goodness that doesnt happen on here.I don't think anyone referred to you as a racist...maybe your problem is the existence off the state off Israel...
Is Israel a Race ?
"
So your issue is with Jews then |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Oh dear
Its like complaining about the big gang
having bigger missiles than the little gang &
Thinking the little gang have been hard done by
Its almost akin to Admin being Israel & Hamas being the banned
You might say .
Or calling people racists for not agreeing with them?
But thank goodness that doesnt happen on here.I don't think anyone referred to you as a racist...maybe your problem is the existence off the state off Israel...
Is Israel a Race ?
So your issue is with Jews then"
I think you may be confusing
Israel & Judaism
Most of the Jewish people i have met
In my Life have been Wonderful people .
74.2 % of Israels population is Jewish
17.8 % of Israels population is Muslim
2% of Israels Population is Christian
1.6 % of Israels population is Druze
4.4 % follow other religions
So again is Israel a race ?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Oh dear
Its like complaining about the big gang
having bigger missiles than the little gang &
Thinking the little gang have been hard done by
Its almost akin to Admin being Israel & Hamas being the banned
You might say .
Or calling people racists for not agreeing with them?
But thank goodness that doesnt happen on here.I don't think anyone referred to you as a racist...maybe your problem is the existence off the state off Israel...
Is Israel a Race ?
So your issue is with Jews then
I think you may be confusing
Israel & Judaism
Most of the Jewish people i have met
In my Life have been Wonderful people .
74.2 % of Israels population is Jewish
17.8 % of Israels population is Muslim
2% of Israels Population is Christian
1.6 % of Israels population is Druze
4.4 % follow other religions
So again is Israel a race ?
"
As you know Israel is a country....so you have no problem with Jews,therefore the existence off the state off Israel....the Jewish homeland is OK in your eyes  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Oh dear
Its like complaining about the big gang
having bigger missiles than the little gang &
Thinking the little gang have been hard done by
Its almost akin to Admin being Israel & Hamas being the banned
You might say .
Or calling people racists for not agreeing with them?
But thank goodness that doesnt happen on here.I don't think anyone referred to you as a racist...maybe your problem is the existence off the state off Israel...
Is Israel a Race ?
So your issue is with Jews then
I think you may be confusing
Israel & Judaism
Most of the Jewish people i have met
In my Life have been Wonderful people .
74.2 % of Israels population is Jewish
17.8 % of Israels population is Muslim
2% of Israels Population is Christian
1.6 % of Israels population is Druze
4.4 % follow other religions
So again is Israel a race ?
As you know Israel is a country....so you have no problem with Jews,therefore the existence off the state off Israel....the Jewish homeland is OK in your eyes "
This thread is about Herd Immunity
You decided to enter the discussion with
Hamas being mentioned & later talked of
Being upset with being given a time out or
" ban " as you called it .
I think you must be a little angry over this .
A Jewish Homeland is a Jewish Homeland .
Israel A Nation State is a Home for all 3
Abrahamic Faiths .
Christian world population 2.32 billion people
Muslim World Population is 1.8 billion
Jewish Population is 15-20 million .
Why would i have a problem with a Nation State ,
Other than when it allows its government to
Regularly murder Children & Innocent people .
Anyway
Back to Herd Immunity under the Tory Party .
It will be intersting this week in Westminster .
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Oh dear
Its like complaining about the big gang
having bigger missiles than the little gang &
Thinking the little gang have been hard done by
Its almost akin to Admin being Israel & Hamas being the banned
You might say .
Or calling people racists for not agreeing with them?
But thank goodness that doesnt happen on here.I don't think anyone referred to you as a racist...maybe your problem is the existence off the state off Israel...
Is Israel a Race ?
So your issue is with Jews then
I think you may be confusing
Israel & Judaism
Most of the Jewish people i have met
In my Life have been Wonderful people .
74.2 % of Israels population is Jewish
17.8 % of Israels population is Muslim
2% of Israels Population is Christian
1.6 % of Israels population is Druze
4.4 % follow other religions
So again is Israel a race ?
As you know Israel is a country....so you have no problem with Jews,therefore the existence off the state off Israel....the Jewish homeland is OK in your eyes
This thread is about Herd Immunity
You decided to enter the discussion with
Hamas being mentioned & later talked of
Being upset with being given a time out or
" ban " as you called it .
I think you must be a little angry over this .
A Jewish Homeland is a Jewish Homeland .
Israel A Nation State is a Home for all 3
Abrahamic Faiths .
Christian world population 2.32 billion people
Muslim World Population is 1.8 billion
Jewish Population is 15-20 million .
Why would i have a problem with a Nation State ,
Other than when it allows its government to
Regularly murder Children & Innocent people .
Anyway
Back to Herd Immunity under the Tory Party .
It will be intersting this week in Westminster .
"
but your OK with said nation state's people being murdered..OK got you now. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Oh dear
Its like complaining about the big gang
having bigger missiles than the little gang &
Thinking the little gang have been hard done by
Its almost akin to Admin being Israel & Hamas being the banned
You might say .
Or calling people racists for not agreeing with them?
But thank goodness that doesnt happen on here.I don't think anyone referred to you as a racist...maybe your problem is the existence off the state off Israel...
Is Israel a Race ?
So your issue is with Jews then
I think you may be confusing
Israel & Judaism
Most of the Jewish people i have met
In my Life have been Wonderful people .
74.2 % of Israels population is Jewish
17.8 % of Israels population is Muslim
2% of Israels Population is Christian
1.6 % of Israels population is Druze
4.4 % follow other religions
So again is Israel a race ?
As you know Israel is a country....so you have no problem with Jews,therefore the existence off the state off Israel....the Jewish homeland is OK in your eyes
This thread is about Herd Immunity
You decided to enter the discussion with
Hamas being mentioned & later talked of
Being upset with being given a time out or
" ban " as you called it .
I think you must be a little angry over this .
A Jewish Homeland is a Jewish Homeland .
Israel A Nation State is a Home for all 3
Abrahamic Faiths .
Christian world population 2.32 billion people
Muslim World Population is 1.8 billion
Jewish Population is 15-20 million .
Why would i have a problem with a Nation State ,
Other than when it allows its government to
Regularly murder Children & Innocent people .
Anyway
Back to Herd Immunity under the Tory Party .
It will be intersting this week in Westminster .
but your OK with said nation state's people being murdered..OK got you now."
Youve got nothing .
You seem to be Happy that a Country is trying to
Commit Genocide though .
I deplore taking of life in any form .
As the Torah states
Thou Shalt Not Kill (6)
Thou Shalt Not Steal (8) |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Oh dear
Its like complaining about the big gang
having bigger missiles than the little gang &
Thinking the little gang have been hard done by
Its almost akin to Admin being Israel & Hamas being the banned
You might say .
Or calling people racists for not agreeing with them?
But thank goodness that doesnt happen on here.I don't think anyone referred to you as a racist...maybe your problem is the existence off the state off Israel...
Is Israel a Race ?
So your issue is with Jews then
I think you may be confusing
Israel & Judaism
Most of the Jewish people i have met
In my Life have been Wonderful people .
74.2 % of Israels population is Jewish
17.8 % of Israels population is Muslim
2% of Israels Population is Christian
1.6 % of Israels population is Druze
4.4 % follow other religions
So again is Israel a race ?
As you know Israel is a country....so you have no problem with Jews,therefore the existence off the state off Israel....the Jewish homeland is OK in your eyes
This thread is about Herd Immunity
You decided to enter the discussion with
Hamas being mentioned & later talked of
Being upset with being given a time out or
" ban " as you called it .
I think you must be a little angry over this .
A Jewish Homeland is a Jewish Homeland .
Israel A Nation State is a Home for all 3
Abrahamic Faiths .
Christian world population 2.32 billion people
Muslim World Population is 1.8 billion
Jewish Population is 15-20 million .
Why would i have a problem with a Nation State ,
Other than when it allows its government to
Regularly murder Children & Innocent people .
Anyway
Back to Herd Immunity under the Tory Party .
It will be intersting this week in Westminster .
but your OK with said nation state's people being murdered..OK got you now.
Youve got nothing .
You seem to be Happy that a Country is trying to
Commit Genocide though .
I deplore taking of life in any form .
As the Torah states
Thou Shalt Not Kill (6)
Thou Shalt Not Steal (8)"
The Palestinian answer to peace with Israel...1947 UN Partition NO...1967 The Khartoum Resolution NO....2000 Camp David NO...2001 Taba NO...2008 Olmert offer NO...2009 Bar-ilan initiative NO....2016 John Kerry plan NO...2020 us peace plan response by Mahmoud Abbas 'we say 1000 times no no no '.....so who's really committing genocide. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Oh dear
Its like complaining about the big gang
having bigger missiles than the little gang &
Thinking the little gang have been hard done by
Its almost akin to Admin being Israel & Hamas being the banned
You might say .
Or calling people racists for not agreeing with them?
But thank goodness that doesnt happen on here.I don't think anyone referred to you as a racist...maybe your problem is the existence off the state off Israel..."
So I made up being called a racist and then you question I'm a racist?
Oh dear
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ostafunMan
over a year ago
near ipswich |
"Again back to A thread about Priti
The Tories & Herd immunity .
Sorry for the Bot who keeps trying to
Take it in a completely different direction .
"
Lets see what is said on Wednesday there will then be something to debate. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Oh dear
Its like complaining about the big gang
having bigger missiles than the little gang &
Thinking the little gang have been hard done by
Its almost akin to Admin being Israel & Hamas being the banned
You might say .
Or calling people racists for not agreeing with them?
But thank goodness that doesnt happen on here.I don't think anyone referred to you as a racist...maybe your problem is the existence off the state off Israel...
Is Israel a Race ?
So your issue is with Jews then
I think you may be confusing
Israel & Judaism
Most of the Jewish people i have met
In my Life have been Wonderful people .
74.2 % of Israels population is Jewish
17.8 % of Israels population is Muslim
2% of Israels Population is Christian
1.6 % of Israels population is Druze
4.4 % follow other religions
So again is Israel a race ?
As you know Israel is a country....so you have no problem with Jews,therefore the existence off the state off Israel....the Jewish homeland is OK in your eyes
This thread is about Herd Immunity
You decided to enter the discussion with
Hamas being mentioned & later talked of
Being upset with being given a time out or
" ban " as you called it .
I think you must be a little angry over this .
A Jewish Homeland is a Jewish Homeland .
Israel A Nation State is a Home for all 3
Abrahamic Faiths .
Christian world population 2.32 billion people
Muslim World Population is 1.8 billion
Jewish Population is 15-20 million .
Why would i have a problem with a Nation State ,
Other than when it allows its government to
Regularly murder Children & Innocent people .
Anyway
Back to Herd Immunity under the Tory Party .
It will be intersting this week in Westminster .
but your OK with said nation state's people being murdered..OK got you now.
Youve got nothing .
You seem to be Happy that a Country is trying to
Commit Genocide though .
I deplore taking of life in any form .
As the Torah states
Thou Shalt Not Kill (6)
Thou Shalt Not Steal (8)The Palestinian answer to peace with Israel...1947 UN Partition NO...1967 The Khartoum Resolution NO....2000 Camp David NO...2001 Taba NO...2008 Olmert offer NO...2009 Bar-ilan initiative NO....2016 John Kerry plan NO...2020 us peace plan response by Mahmoud Abbas 'we say 1000 times no no no '.....so who's really committing genocide."
Watch this John Pilger documentary from years ago .
How Israel is trapped in its aggressive role
https://youtu.be/AYF0td7Ykus
Remember your Commandments People
Thou shalt not bare false witness
Thou shalt not Kill
Thou shalt not steal .
Again Back to Cummings v Priti & her rejection of
His claims .
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Oh dear
Its like complaining about the big gang
having bigger missiles than the little gang &
Thinking the little gang have been hard done by
Its almost akin to Admin being Israel & Hamas being the banned
You might say .
Or calling people racists for not agreeing with them?
But thank goodness that doesnt happen on here.I don't think anyone referred to you as a racist...maybe your problem is the existence off the state off Israel...
Is Israel a Race ?
So your issue is with Jews then"
You really haven't got the hang of these rules have you? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Again back to A thread about Priti
The Tories & Herd immunity .
Sorry for the Bot who keeps trying to
Take it in a completely different direction .
"
I think there are quite a few on here obsessed with calling people racists for objecting to see entire families being wiped out
The fact that they have Tommy Robinson on their side seems to have escaped their attention. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ostafunMan
over a year ago
near ipswich |
"According to Priti on the Andrew Marr show
The Tories didnt want to
Go that route .
Be interesting to see what Whatsapp messages
get released this week
Dominic Who ?
"
I would have thought that as we didnt go down that route she is right. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Again back to A thread about Priti
The Tories & Herd immunity .
Sorry for the Bot who keeps trying to
Take it in a completely different direction .
I think there are quite a few on here obsessed with calling people racists for objecting to see entire families being wiped out
The fact that they have Tommy Robinson on their side seems to have escaped their attention."
OOOOhhhh tommy tommy is a just in it for the cash .
He should just be ignored .
Plus he has no relevance to Cummings & Priti
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"According to Priti on the Andrew Marr show
The Tories didnt want to
Go that route .
Be interesting to see what Whatsapp messages
get released this week
Dominic Who ?
I would have thought that as we didnt go down that route she is right. "
We havent got to PMQ's & we arent on a Quiet newsday .
Im sure it will pop up once again .
Priti will probably escape any climb down as it will
Be some other tool on the Marr show making excuses |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ostafunMan
over a year ago
near ipswich |
"According to Priti on the Andrew Marr show
The Tories didnt want to
Go that route .
Be interesting to see what Whatsapp messages
get released this week
Dominic Who ?
I would have thought that as we didnt go down that route she is right.
We havent got to PMQ's & we arent on a Quiet newsday .
Im sure it will pop up once again .
Priti will probably escape any climb down as it will
Be some other tool on the Marr show making excuses"
Did you watch it ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"According to Priti on the Andrew Marr show
The Tories didnt want to
Go that route .
Be interesting to see what Whatsapp messages
get released this week
Dominic Who ?
I would have thought that as we didnt go down that route she is right.
We havent got to PMQ's & we arent on a Quiet newsday .
Im sure it will pop up once again .
Priti will probably escape any climb down as it will
Be some other tool on the Marr show making excusesDid you watch it ?"
No i followed it throught the tea
leaves i keep in my teapot .
Did I watch it .
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ostafunMan
over a year ago
near ipswich |
"According to Priti on the Andrew Marr show
The Tories didnt want to
Go that route .
Be interesting to see what Whatsapp messages
get released this week
Dominic Who ?
I would have thought that as we didnt go down that route she is right.
We havent got to PMQ's & we arent on a Quiet newsday .
Im sure it will pop up once again .
Priti will probably escape any climb down as it will
Be some other tool on the Marr show making excusesDid you watch it ?
No i followed it throught the tea
leaves i keep in my teapot .
Did I watch it .
"
well then you will know what the question was that she responded to i will say no more. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"According to Priti on the Andrew Marr show
The Tories didnt want to
Go that route .
Be interesting to see what Whatsapp messages
get released this week
Dominic Who ?
I would have thought that as we didnt go down that route she is right.
We havent got to PMQ's & we arent on a Quiet newsday .
Im sure it will pop up once again .
Priti will probably escape any climb down as it will
Be some other tool on the Marr show making excusesDid you watch it ?
No i followed it throught the tea
leaves i keep in my teapot .
Did I watch it .
well then you will know what the question was that she responded to i will say no more."
Its obvious she disagreed with cummings
Marr responded with cummings said all the graphs & meetings showed Herd immunity , she then said
Im not going to comment further on what Mr Cummings Said
( she used to call him Dominic  )
Then some waffle about closing down & brave decision by
Buggered it up Boris .
It will ramp up a bit im sure
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ostafunMan
over a year ago
near ipswich |
"According to Priti on the Andrew Marr show
The Tories didnt want to
Go that route .
Be interesting to see what Whatsapp messages
get released this week
Dominic Who ?
I would have thought that as we didnt go down that route she is right.
We havent got to PMQ's & we arent on a Quiet newsday .
Im sure it will pop up once again .
Priti will probably escape any climb down as it will
Be some other tool on the Marr show making excusesDid you watch it ?
No i followed it throught the tea
leaves i keep in my teapot .
Did I watch it .
well then you will know what the question was that she responded to i will say no more.
Its obvious she disagreed with cummings
Marr responded with cummings said all the graphs & meetings showed Herd immunity , she then said
Im not going to comment further on what Mr Cummings Said
( she used to call him Dominic )
Then some waffle about closing down & brave decision by
Buggered it up Boris .
It will ramp up a bit im sure
"
Im sure it will and cummins will come out with stuff about the tories wanting to go down the herd immunity route, which im in no doubt that they would have considered it along with a lot of other things. I may be wrong but i thought your post was trying to imply that pritti patel had somehow said something that cummins will prove as a lie on wednesday. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"According to Priti on the Andrew Marr show
The Tories didnt want to
Go that route .
Be interesting to see what Whatsapp messages
get released this week
Dominic Who ?
I would have thought that as we didnt go down that route she is right.
We havent got to PMQ's & we arent on a Quiet newsday .
Im sure it will pop up once again .
Priti will probably escape any climb down as it will
Be some other tool on the Marr show making excusesDid you watch it ?
No i followed it throught the tea
leaves i keep in my teapot .
Did I watch it .
well then you will know what the question was that she responded to i will say no more.
Its obvious she disagreed with cummings
Marr responded with cummings said all the graphs & meetings showed Herd immunity , she then said
Im not going to comment further on what Mr Cummings Said
( she used to call him Dominic )
Then some waffle about closing down & brave decision by
Buggered it up Boris .
It will ramp up a bit im sure
Im sure it will and cummins will come out with stuff about the tories wanting to go down the herd immunity route, which im in no doubt that they would have considered it along with a lot of other things. I may be wrong but i thought your post was trying to imply that pritti patel had somehow said something that cummins will prove as a lie on wednesday."
She claims
The government at no time said
Herd immunity blah blah blah
Cummings said they did .
Last March Robert Peston
Reported that the government wanted hurd immunity
https://www.itv.com/news/2020-03-12/british-government-wants-uk-to-acquire-coronavirus-herd-immunity-writes-robert-peston
Or from the New Statesman
" On 12 March Boris Johnson warned the country that, as a result of Covid-19, “families are going to lose loved ones before their time”, yet took little immediate action to stop the virus spreading. Four days later, on 16 March, his tone was far more urgent, as the prime minister requested everyone “to stop non-essential contact with others and to stop all unnecessary travel”. The most vulnerable, especially those over 70, were told to prepare to stay home for up to 12 weeks. After that, the measures escalated; the economy was effectively shut down and all but the most essential activities prohibited. ".
https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2020/04/real-reason-uk-government-pursued-herd-immunity-and-why-it-was-abandoned
The Independent Newspaper goes further after the Marr show interview
" Priti Patel appears to have a short memory
when it comes to the government’s ‘herd immunity’ strategy ".
https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/letters/herd-immunity-government-covid-strategy-priti-patel-andrew-marr-b1852453.html
Im guessing you didnt read or watch
alot of these things from last year.
Oh well Google is our friend .
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"According to Priti on the Andrew Marr show
The Tories didnt want to
Go that route .
Be interesting to see what Whatsapp messages
get released this week
Dominic Who ?
I would have thought that as we didnt go down that route she is right.
We havent got to PMQ's & we arent on a Quiet newsday .
Im sure it will pop up once again .
Priti will probably escape any climb down as it will
Be some other tool on the Marr show making excusesDid you watch it ?
No i followed it throught the tea
leaves i keep in my teapot .
Did I watch it .
well then you will know what the question was that she responded to i will say no more.
Its obvious she disagreed with cummings
Marr responded with cummings said all the graphs & meetings showed Herd immunity , she then said
Im not going to comment further on what Mr Cummings Said
( she used to call him Dominic )
Then some waffle about closing down & brave decision by
Buggered it up Boris .
It will ramp up a bit im sure
Im sure it will and cummins will come out with stuff about the tories wanting to go down the herd immunity route, which im in no doubt that they would have considered it along with a lot of other things. I may be wrong but i thought your post was trying to imply that pritti patel had somehow said something that cummins will prove as a lie on wednesday.
She claims
The government at no time said
Herd immunity blah blah blah
Cummings said they did .
Last March Robert Peston
Reported that the government wanted hurd immunity
https://www.itv.com/news/2020-03-12/british-government-wants-uk-to-acquire-coronavirus-herd-immunity-writes-robert-peston
Or from the New Statesman
" On 12 March Boris Johnson warned the country that, as a result of Covid-19, “families are going to lose loved ones before their time”, yet took little immediate action to stop the virus spreading. Four days later, on 16 March, his tone was far more urgent, as the prime minister requested everyone “to stop non-essential contact with others and to stop all unnecessary travel”. The most vulnerable, especially those over 70, were told to prepare to stay home for up to 12 weeks. After that, the measures escalated; the economy was effectively shut down and all but the most essential activities prohibited. ".
https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2020/04/real-reason-uk-government-pursued-herd-immunity-and-why-it-was-abandoned
The Independent Newspaper goes further after the Marr show interview
" Priti Patel appears to have a short memory
when it comes to the government’s ‘herd immunity’ strategy ".
https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/letters/herd-immunity-government-covid-strategy-priti-patel-andrew-marr-b1852453.html
Im guessing you didnt read or watch
alot of these things from last year.
Oh well Google is our friend .
"
It will make absolutely no difference
We are talking about a man who allegedly said he would rather see bodies piled high on the streets than see another lockdown and people didnt bat an eye lid |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
".
It will make absolutely no difference
We are talking about a man who allegedly said he would rather see bodies piled high on the streets than see another lockdown and people didnt bat an eye lid "
There you go again!!! When did he say that? Where is the proof that he said that?
Why has that disappeared from the Press? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
".
It will make absolutely no difference
We are talking about a man who allegedly said he would rather see bodies piled high on the streets than see another lockdown and people didnt bat an eye lid
There you go again!!! When did he say that? Where is the proof that he said that?
Why has that disappeared from the Press?"
Super lols
I suggest you go up and look up the word allegedly
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
".
It will make absolutely no difference
We are talking about a man who allegedly said he would rather see bodies piled high on the streets than see another lockdown and people didnt bat an eye lid
There you go again!!! When did he say that? Where is the proof that he said that?
Why has that disappeared from the Press?
Super lols
I suggest you go up and look up the word allegedly
"
So why say it then? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ostafunMan
over a year ago
near ipswich |
The key parts you are missing is marr asked if it was gov policy to let the virus LET RIP through the community to achieve herd immunity to which she replied absolutely not. This is why i ask you earlier if you actually watched it and your peston link seems to back it up "quote"
The strategy of the British government in minimising the impact of Covid-19 is to allow the virus to pass through the entire population so that we acquire herd immunity, but at a much delayed speed so that those who suffer the most acute symptoms are able to receive the medical support they need, and such that the health service is not overwhelmed and crushed by the sheer number of cases it has to treat at any one time.
Bearing in mind there was no vaccine or even a hope of one at the time what other alternative was there in your opinion? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
".
It will make absolutely no difference
We are talking about a man who allegedly said he would rather see bodies piled high on the streets than see another lockdown and people didnt bat an eye lid
There you go again!!! When did he say that? Where is the proof that he said that?
Why has that disappeared from the Press?
Super lols
I suggest you go up and look up the word allegedly
So why say it then? "
Right.. so if 3 people accuse someone of saying something and he denies it..we are not allowed to discuss it?
Gotcha
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
".
It will make absolutely no difference
We are talking about a man who allegedly said he would rather see bodies piled high on the streets than see another lockdown and people didnt bat an eye lid
There you go again!!! When did he say that? Where is the proof that he said that?
Why has that disappeared from the Press?
Super lols
I suggest you go up and look up the word allegedly
So why say it then?
Right.. so if 3 people accuse someone of saying something and he denies it..we are not allowed to discuss it?
Gotcha
"
We all discussed it at the time - and since then it has died a complete death in the press simply because not one person came forward to substantiate it and no journalist found proof.
Yet you keep persisting in saying it as if somehow it was ever true.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
".
It will make absolutely no difference
We are talking about a man who allegedly said he would rather see bodies piled high on the streets than see another lockdown and people didnt bat an eye lid
There you go again!!! When did he say that? Where is the proof that he said that?
Why has that disappeared from the Press?"
Again we can call on Pestoj for this
As quoted below
"1) the charge that the prime minister said he would rather see "bodies pile high in their thousands" than order a third lockdown (as reported in the Daily Mail);2) the cabinet secretary Simon Case still believes Cummings may be the "Chatty Rat" who leaked details about November's lockdown (see this morning's Times);3) the refurbishment of the prime minister's flat was originally to be funded by Tory party donors, even though on Friday the prime minister said he had been paying for it.To be clear, Downing Street has issued a straight denial that the prime minister ranted in that extreme way about how there would never be a third lockdown (which of course there has been).That said, I am told he shouted it in his study just after he agreed to the second lockdown "in a rage". The doors to the Cabinet room and outer office were allegedly open and supposedly a number of people heard. I am bothering to repeat this assertion about what the prime minister said because two eyewitnesses - or perhaps I should say "ear witnesses" - have corroborated the Daily Mail's account to me."
https://www.itv.com/news/2021-04-26/robert-peston-boris-johnson-did-make-bodies-pile-high-in-their-thousands-comment
Click the link
Pestoj states it on itv News video clip .
If the govt felt strongly im sure they could get the lawyers involved couldnt they |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The key parts you are missing is marr asked if it was gov policy to let the virus LET RIP through the community to achieve herd immunity to which she replied absolutely not. This is why i ask you earlier if you actually watched it and your peston link seems to back it up "quote"
The strategy of the British government in minimising the impact of Covid-19 is to allow the virus to pass through the entire population so that we acquire herd immunity, but at a much delayed speed so that those who suffer the most acute symptoms are able to receive the medical support they need, and such that the health service is not overwhelmed and crushed by the sheer number of cases it has to treat at any one time.
Bearing in mind there was no vaccine or even a hope of one at the time what other alternative was there in your opinion?"
So you are saying it was government policy ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
".
It will make absolutely no difference
We are talking about a man who allegedly said he would rather see bodies piled high on the streets than see another lockdown and people didnt bat an eye lid
There you go again!!! When did he say that? Where is the proof that he said that?
Why has that disappeared from the Press?
Again we can call on Pestoj for this
As quoted below
"1) the charge that the prime minister said he would rather see "bodies pile high in their thousands" than order a third lockdown (as reported in the Daily Mail);2) the cabinet secretary Simon Case still believes Cummings may be the "Chatty Rat" who leaked details about November's lockdown (see this morning's Times);3) the refurbishment of the prime minister's flat was originally to be funded by Tory party donors, even though on Friday the prime minister said he had been paying for it.To be clear, Downing Street has issued a straight denial that the prime minister ranted in that extreme way about how there would never be a third lockdown (which of course there has been).That said, I am told he shouted it in his study just after he agreed to the second lockdown "in a rage". The doors to the Cabinet room and outer office were allegedly open and supposedly a number of people heard. I am bothering to repeat this assertion about what the prime minister said because two eyewitnesses - or perhaps I should say "ear witnesses" - have corroborated the Daily Mail's account to me."
https://www.itv.com/news/2021-04-26/robert-peston-boris-johnson-did-make-bodies-pile-high-in-their-thousands-comment
Click the link
Pestoj states it on itv News video clip .
If the govt felt strongly im sure they could get the lawyers involved couldnt they "
Johnson said he didnt say it
I find it quite quite worrying you dont seem to believe him. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
".
It will make absolutely no difference
We are talking about a man who allegedly said he would rather see bodies piled high on the streets than see another lockdown and people didnt bat an eye lid
There you go again!!! When did he say that? Where is the proof that he said that?
Why has that disappeared from the Press?"
Its not gone away .
Its slowly building brick by brick
& then Durham Dom will blow the wall down &
The little piggy well hell have to move home . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
".
It will make absolutely no difference
We are talking about a man who allegedly said he would rather see bodies piled high on the streets than see another lockdown and people didnt bat an eye lid
There you go again!!! When did he say that? Where is the proof that he said that?
Why has that disappeared from the Press?
Again we can call on Pestoj for this
As quoted below
"1) the charge that the prime minister said he would rather see "bodies pile high in their thousands" than order a third lockdown (as reported in the Daily Mail);2) the cabinet secretary Simon Case still believes Cummings may be the "Chatty Rat" who leaked details about November's lockdown (see this morning's Times);3) the refurbishment of the prime minister's flat was originally to be funded by Tory party donors, even though on Friday the prime minister said he had been paying for it.To be clear, Downing Street has issued a straight denial that the prime minister ranted in that extreme way about how there would never be a third lockdown (which of course there has been).That said, I am told he shouted it in his study just after he agreed to the second lockdown "in a rage". The doors to the Cabinet room and outer office were allegedly open and supposedly a number of people heard. I am bothering to repeat this assertion about what the prime minister said because two eyewitnesses - or perhaps I should say "ear witnesses" - have corroborated the Daily Mail's account to me."
https://www.itv.com/news/2021-04-26/robert-peston-boris-johnson-did-make-bodies-pile-high-in-their-thousands-comment
Click the link
Pestoj states it on itv News video clip .
If the govt felt strongly im sure they could get the lawyers involved couldnt they
Johnson said he didnt say it
I find it quite quite worrying you dont seem to believe him."
Johnson said ge didnt say hed help darius beat someone up
Got sacked didnt he
Boris said he didnt use cocaine but Paxman absolutely destroys in him in that interview that left him pfaffing about .
Im sure there are other lies
I seem to remember 1 lie to an OAP he goes to visit in her home
Once a week about something a while ago |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
".
It will make absolutely no difference
We are talking about a man who allegedly said he would rather see bodies piled high on the streets than see another lockdown and people didnt bat an eye lid
There you go again!!! When did he say that? Where is the proof that he said that?
Why has that disappeared from the Press?
Again we can call on Pestoj for this
As quoted below
"1) the charge that the prime minister said he would rather see "bodies pile high in their thousands" than order a third lockdown (as reported in the Daily Mail);2) the cabinet secretary Simon Case still believes Cummings may be the "Chatty Rat" who leaked details about November's lockdown (see this morning's Times);3) the refurbishment of the prime minister's flat was originally to be funded by Tory party donors, even though on Friday the prime minister said he had been paying for it.To be clear, Downing Street has issued a straight denial that the prime minister ranted in that extreme way about how there would never be a third lockdown (which of course there has been).That said, I am told he shouted it in his study just after he agreed to the second lockdown "in a rage". The doors to the Cabinet room and outer office were allegedly open and supposedly a number of people heard. I am bothering to repeat this assertion about what the prime minister said because two eyewitnesses - or perhaps I should say "ear witnesses" - have corroborated the Daily Mail's account to me."
https://www.itv.com/news/2021-04-26/robert-peston-boris-johnson-did-make-bodies-pile-high-in-their-thousands-comment
Click the link
Pestoj states it on itv News video clip .
If the govt felt strongly im sure they could get the lawyers involved couldnt they
Johnson said he didnt say it
I find it quite quite worrying you dont seem to believe him.
Johnson said ge didnt say hed help darius beat someone up
Got sacked didnt he
Boris said he didnt use cocaine but Paxman absolutely destroys in him in that interview that left him pfaffing about .
Im sure there are other lies
I seem to remember 1 lie to an OAP he goes to visit in her home
Once a week about something a while ago "
I was being facetious tbf |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
".
It will make absolutely no difference
We are talking about a man who allegedly said he would rather see bodies piled high on the streets than see another lockdown and people didnt bat an eye lid
There you go again!!! When did he say that? Where is the proof that he said that?
Why has that disappeared from the Press?
Again we can call on Pestoj for this
As quoted below
"1) the charge that the prime minister said he would rather see "bodies pile high in their thousands" than order a third lockdown (as reported in the Daily Mail);2) the cabinet secretary Simon Case still believes Cummings may be the "Chatty Rat" who leaked details about November's lockdown (see this morning's Times);3) the refurbishment of the prime minister's flat was originally to be funded by Tory party donors, even though on Friday the prime minister said he had been paying for it.To be clear, Downing Street has issued a straight denial that the prime minister ranted in that extreme way about how there would never be a third lockdown (which of course there has been).That said, I am told he shouted it in his study just after he agreed to the second lockdown "in a rage". The doors to the Cabinet room and outer office were allegedly open and supposedly a number of people heard. I am bothering to repeat this assertion about what the prime minister said because two eyewitnesses - or perhaps I should say "ear witnesses" - have corroborated the Daily Mail's account to me."
https://www.itv.com/news/2021-04-26/robert-peston-boris-johnson-did-make-bodies-pile-high-in-their-thousands-comment
Click the link
Pestoj states it on itv News video clip .
If the govt felt strongly im sure they could get the lawyers involved couldnt they
Johnson said he didnt say it
I find it quite quite worrying you dont seem to believe him.
Johnson said ge didnt say hed help darius beat someone up
Got sacked didnt he
Boris said he didnt use cocaine but Paxman absolutely destroys in him in that interview that left him pfaffing about .
Im sure there are other lies
I seem to remember 1 lie to an OAP he goes to visit in her home
Once a week about something a while ago
I was being facetious tbf"
I know
I was playing along as the others seem to have given up
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ostafunMan
over a year ago
near ipswich |
"The key parts you are missing is marr asked if it was gov policy to let the virus LET RIP through the community to achieve herd immunity to which she replied absolutely not. This is why i ask you earlier if you actually watched it and your peston link seems to back it up "quote"
The strategy of the British government in minimising the impact of Covid-19 is to allow the virus to pass through the entire population so that we acquire herd immunity, but at a much delayed speed so that those who suffer the most acute symptoms are able to receive the medical support they need, and such that the health service is not overwhelmed and crushed by the sheer number of cases it has to treat at any one time.
Bearing in mind there was no vaccine or even a hope of one at the time what other alternative was there in your opinion?
So you are saying it was government policy ?"
Im am saying if you watched it marr ask if it was policy to let it rip through the community to which she replied certainly not and your peston report backs that up wasnt that the point of your op to ask if she was lying to marr? as thats the way i read it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The key parts you are missing is marr asked if it was gov policy to let the virus LET RIP through the community to achieve herd immunity to which she replied absolutely not. This is why i ask you earlier if you actually watched it and your peston link seems to back it up "quote"
The strategy of the British government in minimising the impact of Covid-19 is to allow the virus to pass through the entire population so that we acquire herd immunity, but at a much delayed speed so that those who suffer the most acute symptoms are able to receive the medical support they need, and such that the health service is not overwhelmed and crushed by the sheer number of cases it has to treat at any one time.
Bearing in mind there was no vaccine or even a hope of one at the time what other alternative was there in your opinion?
So you are saying it was government policy ?Im am saying if you watched it marr ask if it was policy to let it rip through the community to which she replied certainly not and your peston report backs that up wasnt that the point of your op to ask if she was lying to marr? as thats the way i read it."
Nope as it was indeed quite clear
They were trying to le5 it go through people .
Peston plus the other 2 links
The New Statesman & the independent show quite claerly
She was being economical with the truth .
But then thats a Tory Trait we are all used to .
The Belgrano was sailing away from the ships
All Tories :- No it wasnt thats why we sunk it .
Only to actually have been proved it had been sailing away .
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The key parts you are missing is marr asked if it was gov policy to let the virus LET RIP through the community to achieve herd immunity to which she replied absolutely not. This is why i ask you earlier if you actually watched it and your peston link seems to back it up "quote"
The strategy of the British government in minimising the impact of Covid-19 is to allow the virus to pass through the entire population so that we acquire herd immunity, but at a much delayed speed so that those who suffer the most acute symptoms are able to receive the medical support they need, and such that the health service is not overwhelmed and crushed by the sheer number of cases it has to treat at any one time.
Bearing in mind there was no vaccine or even a hope of one at the time what other alternative was there in your opinion?
So you are saying it was government policy ?Im am saying if you watched it marr ask if it was policy to let it rip through the community to which she replied certainly not and your peston report backs that up wasnt that the point of your op to ask if she was lying to marr? as thats the way i read it.
Nope as it was indeed quite clear
They were trying to le5 it go through people .
Peston plus the other 2 links
The New Statesman & the independent show quite claerly
She was being economical with the truth .
But then thats a Tory Trait we are all used to .
The Belgrano was sailing away from the ships
All Tories :- No it wasnt thats why we sunk it .
Only to actually have been proved it had been sailing away .
"
Wasnt the lovely ms patel sacked from a previous post.? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ostafunMan
over a year ago
near ipswich |
"The key parts you are missing is marr asked if it was gov policy to let the virus LET RIP through the community to achieve herd immunity to which she replied absolutely not. This is why i ask you earlier if you actually watched it and your peston link seems to back it up "quote"
The strategy of the British government in minimising the impact of Covid-19 is to allow the virus to pass through the entire population so that we acquire herd immunity, but at a much delayed speed so that those who suffer the most acute symptoms are able to receive the medical support they need, and such that the health service is not overwhelmed and crushed by the sheer number of cases it has to treat at any one time.
Bearing in mind there was no vaccine or even a hope of one at the time what other alternative was there in your opinion?
So you are saying it was government policy ?Im am saying if you watched it marr ask if it was policy to let it rip through the community to which she replied certainly not and your peston report backs that up wasnt that the point of your op to ask if she was lying to marr? as thats the way i read it.
Nope as it was indeed quite clear
They were trying to le5 it go through people .
Peston plus the other 2 links
The New Statesman & the independent show quite claerly
She was being economical with the truth .
But then thats a Tory Trait we are all used to .
The Belgrano was sailing away from the ships
All Tories :- No it wasnt thats why we sunk it .
Only to actually have been proved it had been sailing away .
"
Its not economical with the truth, how is in a controlled manner the same as letting it rip through the community?
As for the belgrano i wouldn't have given a toss if it was in port, it was a threat to British lives and its sinking kept their entire navy out of the fight. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The key parts you are missing is marr asked if it was gov policy to let the virus LET RIP through the community to achieve herd immunity to which she replied absolutely not. This is why i ask you earlier if you actually watched it and your peston link seems to back it up "quote"
The strategy of the British government in minimising the impact of Covid-19 is to allow the virus to pass through the entire population so that we acquire herd immunity, but at a much delayed speed so that those who suffer the most acute symptoms are able to receive the medical support they need, and such that the health service is not overwhelmed and crushed by the sheer number of cases it has to treat at any one time.
Bearing in mind there was no vaccine or even a hope of one at the time what other alternative was there in your opinion?
So you are saying it was government policy ?Im am saying if you watched it marr ask if it was policy to let it rip through the community to which she replied certainly not and your peston report backs that up wasnt that the point of your op to ask if she was lying to marr? as thats the way i read it.
Nope as it was indeed quite clear
They were trying to le5 it go through people .
Peston plus the other 2 links
The New Statesman & the independent show quite claerly
She was being economical with the truth .
But then thats a Tory Trait we are all used to .
The Belgrano was sailing away from the ships
All Tories :- No it wasnt thats why we sunk it .
Only to actually have been proved it had been sailing away .
Its not economical with the truth, how is in a controlled manner the same as letting it rip through the community?
As for the belgrano i wouldn't have given a toss if it was in port, it was a threat to British lives and its sinking kept their entire navy out of the fight."
A controlled manner would have stopped the Initial
Spurt through to 60 k dead .
S8milar to how Germany dealt with it 1st time around .
Are we going to have to go through the whole of the last
18 months just for you to realise
I am correct ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ostafunMan
over a year ago
near ipswich |
"The key parts you are missing is marr asked if it was gov policy to let the virus LET RIP through the community to achieve herd immunity to which she replied absolutely not. This is why i ask you earlier if you actually watched it and your peston link seems to back it up "quote"
The strategy of the British government in minimising the impact of Covid-19 is to allow the virus to pass through the entire population so that we acquire herd immunity, but at a much delayed speed so that those who suffer the most acute symptoms are able to receive the medical support they need, and such that the health service is not overwhelmed and crushed by the sheer number of cases it has to treat at any one time.
Bearing in mind there was no vaccine or even a hope of one at the time what other alternative was there in your opinion?
So you are saying it was government policy ?Im am saying if you watched it marr ask if it was policy to let it rip through the community to which she replied certainly not and your peston report backs that up wasnt that the point of your op to ask if she was lying to marr? as thats the way i read it.
Nope as it was indeed quite clear
They were trying to le5 it go through people .
Peston plus the other 2 links
The New Statesman & the independent show quite claerly
She was being economical with the truth .
But then thats a Tory Trait we are all used to .
The Belgrano was sailing away from the ships
All Tories :- No it wasnt thats why we sunk it .
Only to actually have been proved it had been sailing away .
Its not economical with the truth, how is in a controlled manner the same as letting it rip through the community?
As for the belgrano i wouldn't have given a toss if it was in port, it was a threat to British lives and its sinking kept their entire navy out of the fight.
A controlled manner would have stopped the Initial
Spurt through to 60 k dead .
S8milar to how Germany dealt with it 1st time around .
Are we going to have to go through the whole of the last
18 months just for you to realise
I am correct ?"
We really don't need to as it about the same outcome for most of Europe whatever they did.oh and germany is not the example you want them to be as the counting method is different. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The key parts you are missing is marr asked if it was gov policy to let the virus LET RIP through the community to achieve herd immunity to which she replied absolutely not. This is why i ask you earlier if you actually watched it and your peston link seems to back it up "quote"
The strategy of the British government in minimising the impact of Covid-19 is to allow the virus to pass through the entire population so that we acquire herd immunity, but at a much delayed speed so that those who suffer the most acute symptoms are able to receive the medical support they need, and such that the health service is not overwhelmed and crushed by the sheer number of cases it has to treat at any one time.
Bearing in mind there was no vaccine or even a hope of one at the time what other alternative was there in your opinion?
So you are saying it was government policy ?Im am saying if you watched it marr ask if it was policy to let it rip through the community to which she replied certainly not and your peston report backs that up wasnt that the point of your op to ask if she was lying to marr? as thats the way i read it.
Nope as it was indeed quite clear
They were trying to le5 it go through people .
Peston plus the other 2 links
The New Statesman & the independent show quite claerly
She was being economical with the truth .
But then thats a Tory Trait we are all used to .
The Belgrano was sailing away from the ships
All Tories :- No it wasnt thats why we sunk it .
Only to actually have been proved it had been sailing away .
Its not economical with the truth, how is in a controlled manner the same as letting it rip through the community?
As for the belgrano i wouldn't have given a toss if it was in port, it was a threat to British lives and its sinking kept their entire navy out of the fight.
A controlled manner would have stopped the Initial
Spurt through to 60 k dead .
S8milar to how Germany dealt with it 1st time around .
Are we going to have to go through the whole of the last
18 months just for you to realise
I am correct ?We really don't need to as it about the same outcome for most of Europe whatever they did.oh and germany is not the example you want them to be as the counting method is different. "
Different ?
Like when the Uk had 48,000 dead & were behind Italy
Then went to 51,000 dead the next week .
When it got to 60,000 it somehow magically went down to 50,000 .
But i guess we dont want to talk about that now do we ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ostafunMan
over a year ago
near ipswich |
"The key parts you are missing is marr asked if it was gov policy to let the virus LET RIP through the community to achieve herd immunity to which she replied absolutely not. This is why i ask you earlier if you actually watched it and your peston link seems to back it up "quote"
The strategy of the British government in minimising the impact of Covid-19 is to allow the virus to pass through the entire population so that we acquire herd immunity, but at a much delayed speed so that those who suffer the most acute symptoms are able to receive the medical support they need, and such that the health service is not overwhelmed and crushed by the sheer number of cases it has to treat at any one time.
Bearing in mind there was no vaccine or even a hope of one at the time what other alternative was there in your opinion?
So you are saying it was government policy ?Im am saying if you watched it marr ask if it was policy to let it rip through the community to which she replied certainly not and your peston report backs that up wasnt that the point of your op to ask if she was lying to marr? as thats the way i read it.
Nope as it was indeed quite clear
They were trying to le5 it go through people .
Peston plus the other 2 links
The New Statesman & the independent show quite claerly
She was being economical with the truth .
But then thats a Tory Trait we are all used to .
The Belgrano was sailing away from the ships
All Tories :- No it wasnt thats why we sunk it .
Only to actually have been proved it had been sailing away .
Its not economical with the truth, how is in a controlled manner the same as letting it rip through the community?
As for the belgrano i wouldn't have given a toss if it was in port, it was a threat to British lives and its sinking kept their entire navy out of the fight.
A controlled manner would have stopped the Initial
Spurt through to 60 k dead .
S8milar to how Germany dealt with it 1st time around .
Are we going to have to go through the whole of the last
18 months just for you to realise
I am correct ?We really don't need to as it about the same outcome for most of Europe whatever they did.oh and germany is not the example you want them to be as the counting method is different.
Different ?
Like when the Uk had 48,000 dead & were behind Italy
Then went to 51,000 dead the next week .
When it got to 60,000 it somehow magically went down to 50,000 .
But i guess we dont want to talk about that now do we ?"
Im happy to talk about anything you like so dont make assumptions that i wont what would you like to discuss? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The key parts you are missing is marr asked if it was gov policy to let the virus LET RIP through the community to achieve herd immunity to which she replied absolutely not. This is why i ask you earlier if you actually watched it and your peston link seems to back it up "quote"
The strategy of the British government in minimising the impact of Covid-19 is to allow the virus to pass through the entire population so that we acquire herd immunity, but at a much delayed speed so that those who suffer the most acute symptoms are able to receive the medical support they need, and such that the health service is not overwhelmed and crushed by the sheer number of cases it has to treat at any one time.
Bearing in mind there was no vaccine or even a hope of one at the time what other alternative was there in your opinion?
So you are saying it was government policy ?Im am saying if you watched it marr ask if it was policy to let it rip through the community to which she replied certainly not and your peston report backs that up wasnt that the point of your op to ask if she was lying to marr? as thats the way i read it.
Nope as it was indeed quite clear
They were trying to le5 it go through people .
Peston plus the other 2 links
The New Statesman & the independent show quite claerly
She was being economical with the truth .
But then thats a Tory Trait we are all used to .
The Belgrano was sailing away from the ships
All Tories :- No it wasnt thats why we sunk it .
Only to actually have been proved it had been sailing away .
Its not economical with the truth, how is in a controlled manner the same as letting it rip through the community?
As for the belgrano i wouldn't have given a toss if it was in port, it was a threat to British lives and its sinking kept their entire navy out of the fight.
A controlled manner would have stopped the Initial
Spurt through to 60 k dead .
S8milar to how Germany dealt with it 1st time around .
Are we going to have to go through the whole of the last
18 months just for you to realise
I am correct ?We really don't need to as it about the same outcome for most of Europe whatever they did.oh and germany is not the example you want them to be as the counting method is different.
Different ?
Like when the Uk had 48,000 dead & were behind Italy
Then went to 51,000 dead the next week .
When it got to 60,000 it somehow magically went down to 50,000 .
But i guess we dont want to talk about that now do we ?Im happy to talk about anything you like so dont make assumptions that i wont what would you like to discuss?"
The missing number of thousands please
Can we start there ?
Remember they use to have the
We arent the worst in Europe scores on the board .
Then we were the worst in Europe & even by making
10,000 deaths dissapear we were still the worst in Europe .
How many nore thousands havent been included .
It has been mentioned on some political podcasts
By political heavyweights in Journalism
That the real death toll is 150,000 + . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
