FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Court Order against PM to be cancelled
Court Order against PM to be cancelled
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Downing Street seeking to cancel court judgement against Johnson
BBC News - No 10 seeks to cancel county court debt judgment against Boris Johnson
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57087274
Must be handy being a PM and getting your debts and court orders cancelled.
I am sure that he is totally innocent and there is a simple explanation.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ovebjsMan
over a year ago
Bristol |
"Downing Street seeking to cancel court judgement against Johnson
BBC News - No 10 seeks to cancel county court debt judgment against Boris Johnson
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57087274
Must be handy being a PM and getting your debts and court orders cancelled.
I am sure that he is totally innocent and there is a simple explanation.
"
Nobody actually knows why or what it was over so I would reserve any judgment until then
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Downing Street seeking to cancel court judgement against Johnson
BBC News - No 10 seeks to cancel county court debt judgment against Boris Johnson
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57087274
Must be handy being a PM and getting your debts and court orders cancelled.
I am sure that he is totally innocent and there is a simple explanation.
"
But he, hasn't he?  
Your stories get wilder and more reaching by the moment!
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Downing Street seeking to cancel court judgement against Johnson
BBC News - No 10 seeks to cancel county court debt judgment against Boris Johnson
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57087274
Must be handy being a PM and getting your debts and court orders cancelled.
I am sure that he is totally innocent and there is a simple explanation.
"
He has probally sorted himself out a donor |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"There you go - typical ALL name-calling and no truths.
Might rain later too. Maybe it will snow on my day off too. Bet it will. &*^&%"
Awwwww
Don't take it personally.
Johnson won't fall over such a trivial matter.
Don't worry. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"There you go - typical ALL name-calling and no truths.
Might rain later too. Maybe it will snow on my day off too. Bet it will. &*^&%
Awwwww
Don't take it personally.
Johnson won't fall over such a trivial matter.
Don't worry."
He Is also busy with his numerous other investigations tbf.
It mustnt be easy to consistently not tell the truth. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
There is NOTHING anywhere on this board that I could ever take personally. But TY for your concern. In the last two minutes I think I have just found your Happy Place. Keep going. Keep going. you can do it lol.
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ostafunMan
over a year ago
near ipswich |
"Downing Street seeking to cancel court judgement against Johnson
BBC News - No 10 seeks to cancel county court debt judgment against Boris Johnson
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57087274
Must be handy being a PM and getting your debts and court orders cancelled.
I am sure that he is totally innocent and there is a simple explanation.
"
The title is misleading, he is seeking to get it cancelled which anyone is entitled to do if they dont owe the money.Why not see how it goes who it is and what he owes it for before accusing him of getting favouritism because he is pm. British justice the press, the opposition and the general public would never let that happen anyway. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *mmabluTV/TS
over a year ago
upton wirral |
"Downing Street seeking to cancel court judgement against Johnson
BBC News - No 10 seeks to cancel county court debt judgment against Boris Johnson
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57087274
Must be handy being a PM and getting your debts and court orders cancelled.
I am sure that he is totally innocent and there is a simple explanation.
"
Embarresing for Boris but he has had a lot on his plate recently |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oo hotCouple
over a year ago
North West |
"Downing Street seeking to cancel court judgement against Johnson
BBC News - No 10 seeks to cancel county court debt judgment against Boris Johnson
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57087274
Must be handy being a PM and getting your debts and court orders cancelled.
I am sure that he is totally innocent and there is a simple explanation.
The title is misleading, he is seeking to get it cancelled which anyone is entitled to do if they dont owe the money.Why not see how it goes who it is and what he owes it for before accusing him of getting favouritism because he is pm. British justice the press, the opposition and the general public would never let that happen anyway."
If he doesn’t owe the money , the time to challenge the demand was before October 2020.
If that judgement is actually for real, then he would have had multiple reminders snd opportunities to resolve this up until (and on the day) the Court hearing that issued the CCJ.
They don’t just come out of nowhere. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Downing Street seeking to cancel court judgement against Johnson
BBC News - No 10 seeks to cancel county court debt judgment against Boris Johnson
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57087274
Must be handy being a PM and getting your debts and court orders cancelled.
I am sure that he is totally innocent and there is a simple explanation.
Embarresing for Boris but he has had a lot on his plate recently"
Has he met a new dancer who needs a Grant? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ostafunMan
over a year ago
near ipswich |
"Downing Street seeking to cancel court judgement against Johnson
BBC News - No 10 seeks to cancel county court debt judgment against Boris Johnson
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57087274
Must be handy being a PM and getting your debts and court orders cancelled.
I am sure that he is totally innocent and there is a simple explanation.
The title is misleading, he is seeking to get it cancelled which anyone is entitled to do if they dont owe the money.Why not see how it goes who it is and what he owes it for before accusing him of getting favouritism because he is pm. British justice the press, the opposition and the general public would never let that happen anyway.
If he doesn’t owe the money , the time to challenge the demand was before October 2020.
If that judgement is actually for real, then he would have had multiple reminders snd opportunities to resolve this up until (and on the day) the Court hearing that issued the CCJ.
They don’t just come out of nowhere."
Not so.
Anyone who has had a county court judgement (CCJ) against them can apply for it to be cancelled - or "set aside" in the legal language - but they must convince the court that there is a good reason for this to happen and they have also acted promptly in launching their challenge.
That could include the judgement having been issued in error - perhaps because the debt had actually been paid, or because there was never a debt in the first place.
Sometimes, people seek to have a CCJ cancelled because they genuinely did not know about it - or they can show the court that it has acted incorrectly in making the order. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oo hotCouple
over a year ago
North West |
"Downing Street seeking to cancel court judgement against Johnson
BBC News - No 10 seeks to cancel county court debt judgment against Boris Johnson
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57087274
Must be handy being a PM and getting your debts and court orders cancelled.
I am sure that he is totally innocent and there is a simple explanation.
The title is misleading, he is seeking to get it cancelled which anyone is entitled to do if they dont owe the money.Why not see how it goes who it is and what he owes it for before accusing him of getting favouritism because he is pm. British justice the press, the opposition and the general public would never let that happen anyway.
If he doesn’t owe the money , the time to challenge the demand was before October 2020.
If that judgement is actually for real, then he would have had multiple reminders snd opportunities to resolve this up until (and on the day) the Court hearing that issued the CCJ.
They don’t just come out of nowhere.Not so.
Anyone who has had a county court judgement (CCJ) against them can apply for it to be cancelled - or "set aside" in the legal language - but they must convince the court that there is a good reason for this to happen and they have also acted promptly in launching their challenge.
That could include the judgement having been issued in error - perhaps because the debt had actually been paid, or because there was never a debt in the first place.
Sometimes, people seek to have a CCJ cancelled because they genuinely did not know about it - or they can show the court that it has acted incorrectly in making the order."
You are right. Anyone can apply.
However, failing to respond to the Claimants multiple evidenced demands, failing to attend Court and then waiting 8 months to try to set it aside is unlikely to be viewed in the best light.
You or I would not get away with it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Downing Street seeking to cancel court judgement against Johnson
BBC News - No 10 seeks to cancel county court debt judgment against Boris Johnson
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57087274
Must be handy being a PM and getting your debts and court orders cancelled.
I am sure that he is totally innocent and there is a simple explanation.
Nobody actually knows why or what it was over so I would reserve any judgment until then
"
He probably still owes from the flat decoration. One of his doners must not have paid up. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Downing Street seeking to cancel court judgement against Johnson
BBC News - No 10 seeks to cancel county court debt judgment against Boris Johnson
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57087274
Must be handy being a PM and getting your debts and court orders cancelled.
I am sure that he is totally innocent and there is a simple explanation.
Nobody actually knows why or what it was over so I would reserve any judgment until then
He probably still owes from the flat decoration. One of his doners must not have paid up. "
Or maybe his nursery dough? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Downing Street seeking to cancel court judgement against Johnson
BBC News - No 10 seeks to cancel county court debt judgment against Boris Johnson
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57087274
Must be handy being a PM and getting your debts and court orders cancelled.
I am sure that he is totally innocent and there is a simple explanation.
"
Probably a complete non story or someone attempting to seek publicity. Should be fairly easy to get it set aside. I am assuming only someone with a grudge or an axe to grind would take the Prime Minister to court. The Plaintiffs name or service provided do not appear to be publicised. Anyone can go online and issue an invalid county court summons . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ackal1Couple
over a year ago
Manchester |
Whilst anyone can apply for a CCJ, for a CCJ to be issued and judged on there must be credible evidence of an unpaid debt. They are not issued like flyers through your door.
He may have eventually paid the debt so wants it settled . It’s embarrassing so denials like the bodies piled high comment will be thick and fast. He’s not afraid to lie as he knows he gets away with it.
Just another example of the buffoon we have in charge. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Whilst anyone can apply for a CCJ, for a CCJ to be issued and judged on there must be credible evidence of an unpaid debt. They are not issued like flyers through your door.
He may have eventually paid the debt so wants it settled . It’s embarrassing so denials like the bodies piled high comment will be thick and fast. He’s not afraid to lie as he knows he gets away with it.
Just another example of the buffoon we have in charge. "
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Downing Street seeking to cancel court judgement against Johnson
BBC News - No 10 seeks to cancel county court debt judgment against Boris Johnson
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57087274
Must be handy being a PM and getting your debts and court orders cancelled.
I am sure that he is totally innocent and there is a simple explanation.
The title is misleading, he is seeking to get it cancelled which anyone is entitled to do if they dont owe the money.Why not see how it goes who it is and what he owes it for before accusing him of getting favouritism because he is pm. British justice the press, the opposition and the general public would never let that happen anyway.
If he doesn’t owe the money , the time to challenge the demand was before October 2020.
If that judgement is actually for real, then he would have had multiple reminders snd opportunities to resolve this up until (and on the day) the Court hearing that issued the CCJ.
They don’t just come out of nowhere."
Maybe he forgot to give them his change of address  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Downing Street seeking to cancel court judgement against Johnson
BBC News - No 10 seeks to cancel county court debt judgment against Boris Johnson
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57087274
Must be handy being a PM and getting your debts and court orders cancelled.
I am sure that he is totally innocent and there is a simple explanation.
The title is misleading, he is seeking to get it cancelled which anyone is entitled to do if they dont owe the money.Why not see how it goes who it is and what he owes it for before accusing him of getting favouritism because he is pm. British justice the press, the opposition and the general public would never let that happen anyway.
If he doesn’t owe the money , the time to challenge the demand was before October 2020.
If that judgement is actually for real, then he would have had multiple reminders snd opportunities to resolve this up until (and on the day) the Court hearing that issued the CCJ.
They don’t just come out of nowhere.Not so.
Anyone who has had a county court judgement (CCJ) against them can apply for it to be cancelled - or "set aside" in the legal language - but they must convince the court that there is a good reason for this to happen and they have also acted promptly in launching their challenge.
That could include the judgement having been issued in error - perhaps because the debt had actually been paid, or because there was never a debt in the first place.
Sometimes, people seek to have a CCJ cancelled because they genuinely did not know about it - or they can show the court that it has acted incorrectly in making the order.
You are right. Anyone can apply.
However, failing to respond to the Claimants multiple evidenced demands, failing to attend Court and then waiting 8 months to try to set it aside is unlikely to be viewed in the best light.
You or I would not get away with it. "
On that we agree....
A CCJ doesn’t just happen. It happens if you ignore multiple pieces of correspondence from the claimant and the court,
Which I can completely believe about Boris. Good story though. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ostafunMan
over a year ago
near ipswich |
"Downing Street seeking to cancel court judgement against Johnson
BBC News - No 10 seeks to cancel county court debt judgment against Boris Johnson
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57087274
Must be handy being a PM and getting your debts and court orders cancelled.
I am sure that he is totally innocent and there is a simple explanation.
Nobody actually knows why or what it was over so I would reserve any judgment until then
He probably still owes from the flat decoration. One of his doners must not have paid up. "
I read on the bbc website it was for deformation. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Just read about the instigator of the legal action.
I don’t think Boris needs to lose sleep over this.
Seems plenty people are losing it though.
Oh! The Drama lol.
"
People lose sight of the real issues. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ostafunMan
over a year ago
near ipswich |
"Just read about the instigator of the legal action.
I don’t think Boris needs to lose sleep over this.
Seems plenty people are losing it though. "
They sure are, all jumping on the bandwagon about his flat renovation and if the bbc are to be believed it has nothing to do with it.I guess it sells newspapers though.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *lan157Man
over a year ago
a village near Haywards Heath in East Sussex |
We don't know the full story yet but if it's a personal debt (arising out of his personal life or other business interests) I hope tax payers money is not being used to support his legal advice and strike off process ( reference help from no 10). It also irritates me that senior politicians ( in any party) seem to need wealthy friends to pay for their holidays whereas the rest of us only spend what we can afford but that's probably another thread. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Just read about the instigator of the legal action.
I don’t think Boris needs to lose sleep over this.
Seems plenty people are losing it though. "
It's a media exaggerated stunt and as usual, plenty of people have fallen for it mainly because they hate the PM. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Just read about the instigator of the legal action.
I don’t think Boris needs to lose sleep over this.
Seems plenty people are losing it though.
It's a media exaggerated stunt and as usual, plenty of people have fallen for it mainly because they hate the PM."
It would be good if HM Courts could make an example in this case and prosecute the plaintiff for deliberately making a false statement on a County Court summons. In a event you cannot use the small claims procedure for defamation.
Which members of the court staff ( in any ) reviewed the claim before allowing the judgement to be registered.
Claims such as this make a mockery of the judicial process .
It must be an embarrassment for the Courts service.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Just read about the instigator of the legal action.
I don’t think Boris needs to lose sleep over this.
Seems plenty people are losing it though.
It's a media exaggerated stunt and as usual, plenty of people have fallen for it mainly because they hate the PM. It would be good if HM Courts could make an example in this case and prosecute the plaintiff for deliberately making a false statement on a County Court summons. In a event you cannot use the small claims procedure for defamation.
Which members of the court staff ( in any ) reviewed the claim before allowing the judgement to be registered.
Claims such as this make a mockery of the judicial process .
It must be an embarrassment for the Courts service.
"
The details have yet to be made public and you want someone prosecuted?
Please pat if you ever get a jury summons, decline it ..
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ostafunMan
over a year ago
near ipswich |
"Just read about the instigator of the legal action.
I don’t think Boris needs to lose sleep over this.
Seems plenty people are losing it though.
It's a media exaggerated stunt and as usual, plenty of people have fallen for it mainly because they hate the PM. It would be good if HM Courts could make an example in this case and prosecute the plaintiff for deliberately making a false statement on a County Court summons. In a event you cannot use the small claims procedure for defamation.
Which members of the court staff ( in any ) reviewed the claim before allowing the judgement to be registered.
Claims such as this make a mockery of the judicial process .
It must be an embarrassment for the Courts service.
"
I wondered about that and it seemed a very small amount for defamation maybe the BBC got it wrong.it seems very strange to me that the media dont know what its for or who bought the claim against him which makes me think its just another stunt. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Just read about the instigator of the legal action.
I don’t think Boris needs to lose sleep over this.
Seems plenty people are losing it though.
It's a media exaggerated stunt and as usual, plenty of people have fallen for it mainly because they hate the PM. It would be good if HM Courts could make an example in this case and prosecute the plaintiff for deliberately making a false statement on a County Court summons. In a event you cannot use the small claims procedure for defamation.
Which members of the court staff ( in any ) reviewed the claim before allowing the judgement to be registered.
Claims such as this make a mockery of the judicial process .
It must be an embarrassment for the Courts service.
The details have yet to be made public and you want someone prosecuted?
Please pat if you ever get a jury summons, decline it ..
"
. Hello. The outline details are published in the press today.
The plaintiff has a long history of issuing spurious claims which is a gross abuse of the process.
Anyone can issue a claim online regardless of whether it is true or false. You simply enter the details and pay the fee. There is no verification process . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Just read about the instigator of the legal action.
I don’t think Boris needs to lose sleep over this.
Seems plenty people are losing it though.
It's a media exaggerated stunt and as usual, plenty of people have fallen for it mainly because they hate the PM. It would be good if HM Courts could make an example in this case and prosecute the plaintiff for deliberately making a false statement on a County Court summons. In a event you cannot use the small claims procedure for defamation.
Which members of the court staff ( in any ) reviewed the claim before allowing the judgement to be registered.
Claims such as this make a mockery of the judicial process .
It must be an embarrassment for the Courts service.
The details have yet to be made public and you want someone prosecuted?
Please pat if you ever get a jury summons, decline it ..
"
As far as I am aware it is a criminal offence to issue false details on a County Court summons ignoring the fact that the small claims procedure cannot be used for a defamation claim. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Just read about the instigator of the legal action.
I don’t think Boris needs to lose sleep over this.
Seems plenty people are losing it though.
It's a media exaggerated stunt and as usual, plenty of people have fallen for it mainly because they hate the PM. It would be good if HM Courts could make an example in this case and prosecute the plaintiff for deliberately making a false statement on a County Court summons. In a event you cannot use the small claims procedure for defamation.
Which members of the court staff ( in any ) reviewed the claim before allowing the judgement to be registered.
Claims such as this make a mockery of the judicial process .
It must be an embarrassment for the Courts service.
The details have yet to be made public and you want someone prosecuted?
Please pat if you ever get a jury summons, decline it ..
"
Once again
If this was a labour politician something tells me the 'nothing to see here'attitude wouldnt be just as prevalent.
Embarassing. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Just read about the instigator of the legal action.
I don’t think Boris needs to lose sleep over this.
Seems plenty people are losing it though.
It's a media exaggerated stunt and as usual, plenty of people have fallen for it mainly because they hate the PM. It would be good if HM Courts could make an example in this case and prosecute the plaintiff for deliberately making a false statement on a County Court summons. In a event you cannot use the small claims procedure for defamation.
Which members of the court staff ( in any ) reviewed the claim before allowing the judgement to be registered.
Claims such as this make a mockery of the judicial process .
It must be an embarrassment for the Courts service.
The details have yet to be made public and you want someone prosecuted?
Please pat if you ever get a jury summons, decline it ..
Once again
If this was a labour politician something tells me the 'nothing to see here'attitude wouldnt be just as prevalent.
Embarassing."
. The only embarrassment in this case is for the plaintiff. It is a criminal offence to make a false statement on county court summons. ( this ignores the fact that the small claims procedure cannot be used for a defamation claim) |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Just read about the instigator of the legal action.
I don’t think Boris needs to lose sleep over this.
Seems plenty people are losing it though.
It's a media exaggerated stunt and as usual, plenty of people have fallen for it mainly because they hate the PM. It would be good if HM Courts could make an example in this case and prosecute the plaintiff for deliberately making a false statement on a County Court summons. In a event you cannot use the small claims procedure for defamation.
Which members of the court staff ( in any ) reviewed the claim before allowing the judgement to be registered.
Claims such as this make a mockery of the judicial process .
It must be an embarrassment for the Courts service.
I wondered about that and it seemed a very small amount for defamation maybe the BBC got it wrong.it seems very strange to me that the media dont know what its for or who bought the claim against him which makes me think its just another stunt. "
Had the plaintiff used the correct procedure she would either have sought legal advice or used the correct forms .
Any solicitor would have simply laughed at her for even considering issuing procedures against the prime minister .
Her other option would have been to use the correct forms which is a more expensive and time consuming process.
Did she send a letter to Boris first advising as to why she thought she was defamed and how she calculated the amount owing. Such a letter would be sent recorded delivery. She would also need to prepare pleadings. Her action would simply have been struck off at the first stage as an abuse of the process and she might have ended up with a costs order against her . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
We don't know any of that...
Seems more likely she has claimed for something related but not actually defamation which would have been struck out as said.
Maybe she claimed for stress, time off work, legal advice, something like that. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ostafunMan
over a year ago
near ipswich |
"Just read about the instigator of the legal action.
I don’t think Boris needs to lose sleep over this.
Seems plenty people are losing it though.
It's a media exaggerated stunt and as usual, plenty of people have fallen for it mainly because they hate the PM. It would be good if HM Courts could make an example in this case and prosecute the plaintiff for deliberately making a false statement on a County Court summons. In a event you cannot use the small claims procedure for defamation.
Which members of the court staff ( in any ) reviewed the claim before allowing the judgement to be registered.
Claims such as this make a mockery of the judicial process .
It must be an embarrassment for the Courts service.
The details have yet to be made public and you want someone prosecuted?
Please pat if you ever get a jury summons, decline it ..
Once again
If this was a labour politician something tells me the 'nothing to see here'attitude wouldnt be just as prevalent.
Embarassing."
What do you base that statement on the conversations going on in your head or actual facts? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ostafunMan
over a year ago
near ipswich |
This says it all.
Following yesterday’s news of Boris being hit with a County Court Judgement for £535 of unpaid debt, it’s now emerged the claimant is actually a Covid conspiracy theorist called Yvonne Hobbs, who’s used the Online Civil Money Claims service to accuse the PM of “repeated defamation”. She has also previously made legal claims against Rishi Sunak, Marks and Spencer, and Royal Mail. “I’m taking on the government”, she boasts on social media… |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"This says it all.
Following yesterday’s news of Boris being hit with a County Court Judgement for £535 of unpaid debt, it’s now emerged the claimant is actually a Covid conspiracy theorist called Yvonne Hobbs, who’s used the Online Civil Money Claims service to accuse the PM of “repeated defamation”. She has also previously made legal claims against Rishi Sunak, Marks and Spencer, and Royal Mail. “I’m taking on the government”, she boasts on social media…"
. There will always be a few cranks who abuse the process. I think someone also tried to get a judgement against Theresa May. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Just read about the instigator of the legal action.
I don’t think Boris needs to lose sleep over this.
Seems plenty people are losing it though.
It's a media exaggerated stunt and as usual, plenty of people have fallen for it mainly because they hate the PM. It would be good if HM Courts could make an example in this case and prosecute the plaintiff for deliberately making a false statement on a County Court summons. In a event you cannot use the small claims procedure for defamation.
Which members of the court staff ( in any ) reviewed the claim before allowing the judgement to be registered.
Claims such as this make a mockery of the judicial process .
It must be an embarrassment for the Courts service.
The details have yet to be made public and you want someone prosecuted?
Please pat if you ever get a jury summons, decline it ..
"
Hello. The details were made public yesterday. The case is a gross abuse of the small claims process . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Just read about the instigator of the legal action.
I don’t think Boris needs to lose sleep over this.
Seems plenty people are losing it though.
It's a media exaggerated stunt and as usual, plenty of people have fallen for it mainly because they hate the PM. It would be good if HM Courts could make an example in this case and prosecute the plaintiff for deliberately making a false statement on a County Court summons. In a event you cannot use the small claims procedure for defamation.
Which members of the court staff ( in any ) reviewed the claim before allowing the judgement to be registered.
Claims such as this make a mockery of the judicial process .
It must be an embarrassment for the Courts service.
The details have yet to be made public and you want someone prosecuted?
Please pat if you ever get a jury summons, decline it ..
Hello. The details were made public yesterday. The case is a gross abuse of the small claims process . "
Going by your input, you didn't know this when you posted?
Else you would have said.. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Just read about the instigator of the legal action.
I don’t think Boris needs to lose sleep over this.
Seems plenty people are losing it though.
It's a media exaggerated stunt and as usual, plenty of people have fallen for it mainly because they hate the PM. It would be good if HM Courts could make an example in this case and prosecute the plaintiff for deliberately making a false statement on a County Court summons. In a event you cannot use the small claims procedure for defamation.
Which members of the court staff ( in any ) reviewed the claim before allowing the judgement to be registered.
Claims such as this make a mockery of the judicial process .
It must be an embarrassment for the Courts service.
The details have yet to be made public and you want someone prosecuted?
Please pat if you ever get a jury summons, decline it ..
Hello. The details were made public yesterday. The case is a gross abuse of the small claims process .
Going by your input, you didn't know this when you posted?
Else you would have said.."
Even when you posted 13 hours ago you were unaware.. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Downing Street seeking to cancel court judgement against Johnson
BBC News - No 10 seeks to cancel county court debt judgment against Boris Johnson
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57087274
Must be handy being a PM and getting your debts and court orders cancelled.
I am sure that he is totally innocent and there is a simple explanation.
The title is misleading, he is seeking to get it cancelled which anyone is entitled to do if they dont owe the money.Why not see how it goes who it is and what he owes it for before accusing him of getting favouritism because he is pm. British justice the press, the opposition and the general public would never let that happen anyway."
Indeed.
I know from personal experience how you can get a CCJ against you for something you didn't owe or even know about.
It took a couple of months to sort out but I got it removed from the court actions and my credit history.
Pain in the arse but I suppose its just one of them things that can happen to anyone if enough people fuck up enough |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
And the final result is . . .
"Boris Johnson no longer has a county court judgement against him after his lawyers sought to strike out a claim for a £535 debt for alleged defamation.
Downing Street said the claim against the prime minister had been "totally without merit" and "vexatious".
The PM's lawyers lodged an application to have the judgement struck out.
A court official confirmed a CCJ was no longer present in the case after applications were considered by District Judge Hammond."
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
She will now have a costs order against her . Let's hope it is enforced. Most senior government ministers have received court court summons from her.
In this case a criminal prosecution would be fully justified for making false claims. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
She could wind up as a Vexatious litigant hopefully. As whilst it’s quite amusing Boris ended up in this situation. He had the full weight of number 10 to extricate himself.
If the lady does it to others as much as they say it’s not a nice thing to do and not as easy to extricate yourself from as a normal person I should imagine. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
