FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Campaign to rejoin the EU - results
Campaign to rejoin the EU - results
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"London Mayoral election, candidate Richard Jewison - 22,000 votes. Less than 1%. His prediction I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that he wouldn't win... Came true. Not even worth your salty tears that result is it...." He had no chance, he was up against Sadiq Kahn, great Mayor , good to see him get re ejected, easy win | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It seems MOST people are over Brexit and want to continue living their lives free of bitterness. "What has that got to do with the London Mayor election results? Sadiq Kahn was the outstanding candidate, no one else stood a chance . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It seems MOST people are over Brexit and want to continue living their lives free of bitterness.
What has that got to do with the London Mayor election results? Sadiq Kahn was the outstanding candidate, no one else stood a chance . "Read the op.  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It seems MOST people are over Brexit and want to continue living their lives free of bitterness.
What has that got to do with the London Mayor election results? Sadiq Kahn was the outstanding candidate, no one else stood a chance . Read the op. "I did, I know Jim is fishing but I can’t see the relevance of his post .  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It seems MOST people are over Brexit and want to continue living their lives free of bitterness.
What has that got to do with the London Mayor election results? Sadiq Kahn was the outstanding candidate, no one else stood a chance . Read the op.
I did, I know Jim is fishing but I can’t see the relevance of his post . "Why not just ignore it then? instead of doing the usual and trying to derail it with some meaningless comment. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"London Mayoral election, candidate Richard Jewison - 22,000 votes. Less than 1%. His prediction I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that he wouldn't win... Came true. Not even worth your salty tears that result is it.... He had no chance, he was up against Sadiq Kahn, great Mayor , good to see him get re ejected, easy win " Sadiq is labour... Were labour leave or remain? Genuine question, I don't know, the electorate didn't seem to know either. Do you know oh wise one? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"London Mayoral election, candidate Richard Jewison - 22,000 votes. Less than 1%. His prediction I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that he wouldn't win... Came true. Not even worth your salty tears that result is it.... He had no chance, he was up against Sadiq Kahn, great Mayor , good to see him get re ejected, easy win Sadiq is labour... Were labour leave or remain? Genuine question, I don't know, the electorate didn't seem to know either. Do you know oh wise one? " No idea, all I know is that Sadiq Kahn was re elected, great mayor, easy win | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It seems MOST people are over Brexit and want to continue living their lives free of bitterness.
What has that got to do with the London Mayor election results? Sadiq Kahn was the outstanding candidate, no one else stood a chance . Read the op.
I did, I know Jim is fishing but I can’t see the relevance of his post . Why not just ignore it then? instead of doing the usual and trying to derail it with some meaningless comment. "Sorry about that, shall I ask for your permission next time? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"London Mayoral election, candidate Richard Jewison - 22,000 votes. Less than 1%. His prediction I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that he wouldn't win... Came true. Not even worth your salty tears that result is it.... He had no chance, he was up against Sadiq Kahn, great Mayor , good to see him get re ejected, easy win Sadiq is labour... Were labour leave or remain? Genuine question, I don't know, the electorate didn't seem to know either. Do you know oh wise one? No idea, all I know is that Sadiq Kahn was re elected, great mayor, easy win "Didn't notice you listing any of his achievements must have missed that post... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"London Mayoral election, candidate Richard Jewison - 22,000 votes. Less than 1%. His prediction I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that he wouldn't win... Came true. Not even worth your salty tears that result is it.... He had no chance, he was up against Sadiq Kahn, great Mayor , good to see him get re ejected, easy win Sadiq is labour... Were labour leave or remain? Genuine question, I don't know, the electorate didn't seem to know either. Do you know oh wise one? No idea, all I know is that Sadiq Kahn was re elected, great mayor, easy win
Didn't notice you listing any of his achievements must have missed that post... "He is a winner, the people of London voted him as mayor, his ‘list of achievements ‘ are irrelevant, isn’t that how it works ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"London Mayoral election, candidate Richard Jewison - 22,000 votes. Less than 1%. His prediction I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that he wouldn't win... Came true. Not even worth your salty tears that result is it...." Is there a point to your post? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It seems MOST people are over Brexit and want to continue living their lives free of bitterness.
What has that got to do with the London Mayor election results? Sadiq Kahn was the outstanding candidate, no one else stood a chance . Read the op.
I did, I know Jim is fishing but I can’t see the relevance of his post . Why not just ignore it then? instead of doing the usual and trying to derail it with some meaningless comment.
Sorry about that, shall I ask for your permission next time? "No, im asking you a question if you dont want to talk about the op why engage in the thread? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It seems MOST people are over Brexit and want to continue living their lives free of bitterness.
What has that got to do with the London Mayor election results? Sadiq Kahn was the outstanding candidate, no one else stood a chance . Read the op.
I did, I know Jim is fishing but I can’t see the relevance of his post . Why not just ignore it then? instead of doing the usual and trying to derail it with some meaningless comment.
Sorry about that, shall I ask for your permission next time? No, im asking you a question if you dont want to talk about the op why engage in the thread?"I did talk about the OP, the candidate that Jim mentioned didn’t stand a chance of winning because he was up against Sadiq Kahn. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It seems MOST people are over Brexit and want to continue living their lives free of bitterness.
What has that got to do with the London Mayor election results? Sadiq Kahn was the outstanding candidate, no one else stood a chance . Read the op.
I did, I know Jim is fishing but I can’t see the relevance of his post . Why not just ignore it then? instead of doing the usual and trying to derail it with some meaningless comment.
Sorry about that, shall I ask for your permission next time? No, im asking you a question if you dont want to talk about the op why engage in the thread?
I did talk about the OP, the candidate that Jim mentioned didn’t stand a chance of winning because he was up against Sadiq Kahn. "ok sorry thats not how i read I did, I know Jim is fishing but I can’t see the relevance of his post | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It seems MOST people are over Brexit and want to continue living their lives free of bitterness.
What has that got to do with the London Mayor election results? Sadiq Kahn was the outstanding candidate, no one else stood a chance . Read the op.
I did, I know Jim is fishing but I can’t see the relevance of his post . Why not just ignore it then? instead of doing the usual and trying to derail it with some meaningless comment.
Sorry about that, shall I ask for your permission next time? No, im asking you a question if you dont want to talk about the op why engage in the thread?
I did talk about the OP, the candidate that Jim mentioned didn’t stand a chance of winning because he was up against Sadiq Kahn. "Seems I'm right, you have no more salty tears, that's good, let's all move forward together as a proud, free nation | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It seems MOST people are over Brexit and want to continue living their lives free of bitterness.
What has that got to do with the London Mayor election results? Sadiq Kahn was the outstanding candidate, no one else stood a chance . Read the op.
I did, I know Jim is fishing but I can’t see the relevance of his post . Why not just ignore it then? instead of doing the usual and trying to derail it with some meaningless comment.
Sorry about that, shall I ask for your permission next time? No, im asking you a question if you dont want to talk about the op why engage in the thread?
I did talk about the OP, the candidate that Jim mentioned didn’t stand a chance of winning because he was up against Sadiq Kahn. ok sorry thats not how i read
I did, I know Jim is fishing but I can’t see the relevance of his post "Fair enough, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"London Mayoral election, candidate Richard Jewison - 22,000 votes. Less than 1%. His prediction I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that he wouldn't win... Came true. Not even worth your salty tears that result is it.... Is there a point to your post?" I think the point is the guy who wants to re join the eu got next to nothing votes and people are over the eu and the thought of re-joining. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It seems MOST people are over Brexit and want to continue living their lives free of bitterness.
What has that got to do with the London Mayor election results? Sadiq Kahn was the outstanding candidate, no one else stood a chance . Read the op.
I did, I know Jim is fishing but I can’t see the relevance of his post . Why not just ignore it then? instead of doing the usual and trying to derail it with some meaningless comment.
Sorry about that, shall I ask for your permission next time? No, im asking you a question if you dont want to talk about the op why engage in the thread?
I did talk about the OP, the candidate that Jim mentioned didn’t stand a chance of winning because he was up against Sadiq Kahn.
Seems I'm right, you have no more salty tears, that's good, let's all move forward together as a proud, free nation "What do you mean? No tears here . I am delighted for the people of London that Sadiq Kahn was re elected, great mayor | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It seems MOST people are over Brexit and want to continue living their lives free of bitterness. "Unlike the OP  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It seems MOST people are over Brexit and want to continue living their lives free of bitterness.
Unlike the OP
" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"London Mayoral election, candidate Richard Jewison - 22,000 votes. Less than 1%. His prediction I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that he wouldn't win... Came true. Not even worth your salty tears that result is it.... Is there a point to your post? I think the point is the guy who wants to re join the eu got next to nothing votes and people are over the eu and the thought of re-joining." It's a totally irrelevant point though isn't it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"London Mayoral election, candidate Richard Jewison - 22,000 votes. Less than 1%. His prediction I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that he wouldn't win... Came true. Not even worth your salty tears that result is it.... Is there a point to your post? I think the point is the guy who wants to re join the eu got next to nothing votes and people are over the eu and the thought of re-joining. It's a totally irrelevant point though isn't it. " Not really, it's a prelude to the interesting question of why so many vocal remainers actually won't vote to rejoin the EU. I conclude it's because the EU has been thoroughly exposed and remainers are having a hard time accepting they were lied to. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"London Mayoral election, candidate Richard Jewison - 22,000 votes. Less than 1%. His prediction I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that he wouldn't win... Came true. Not even worth your salty tears that result is it.... Is there a point to your post? I think the point is the guy who wants to re join the eu got next to nothing votes and people are over the eu and the thought of re-joining. It's a totally irrelevant point though isn't it. " Tbh, it is far to early to think about rejoining the EU , it took leavewhingers years and years of moaning and crying before they got a referendum | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"London Mayoral election, candidate Richard Jewison - 22,000 votes. Less than 1%. His prediction I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that he wouldn't win... Came true. Not even worth your salty tears that result is it.... Is there a point to your post? I think the point is the guy who wants to re join the eu got next to nothing votes and people are over the eu and the thought of re-joining. It's a totally irrelevant point though isn't it. Not really, it's a prelude to the interesting question of why so many vocal remainers actually won't vote to rejoin the EU. I conclude it's because the EU has been thoroughly exposed and remainers are having a hard time accepting they were lied to. " It look leave voters over 20 years of moaning , whining and crying, re joining the EU will take time | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"London Mayoral election, candidate Richard Jewison - 22,000 votes. Less than 1%. His prediction I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that he wouldn't win... Came true. Not even worth your salty tears that result is it.... Is there a point to your post? I think the point is the guy who wants to re join the eu got next to nothing votes and people are over the eu and the thought of re-joining. It's a totally irrelevant point though isn't it. " Not really mate if you have spent much time in this forum you will know how the brexit debate is brought up all the time.As i said before i think the point being made is nobody gives a toss about brexit anymore and have moved on. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"London Mayoral election, candidate Richard Jewison - 22,000 votes. Less than 1%. His prediction I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that he wouldn't win... Came true. Not even worth your salty tears that result is it.... Is there a point to your post? I think the point is the guy who wants to re join the eu got next to nothing votes and people are over the eu and the thought of re-joining. It's a totally irrelevant point though isn't it. Not really mate if you have spent much time in this forum you will know how the brexit debate is brought up all the time.As i said before i think the point being made is nobody gives a toss about brexit anymore and have moved on." I would be more worried about all the corruption and failed deals going on in your own country than worrying about some idiot who created a party as a protest. He never expected to win so what is the point of the post? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"London Mayoral election, candidate Richard Jewison - 22,000 votes. Less than 1%. His prediction I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that he wouldn't win... Came true. Not even worth your salty tears that result is it.... Is there a point to your post? I think the point is the guy who wants to re join the eu got next to nothing votes and people are over the eu and the thought of re-joining. It's a totally irrelevant point though isn't it. Not really mate if you have spent much time in this forum you will know how the brexit debate is brought up all the time.As i said before i think the point being made is nobody gives a toss about brexit anymore and have moved on. I would be more worried about all the corruption and failed deals going on in your own country than worrying about some idiot who created a party as a protest. He never expected to win so what is the point of the post?" I think you should read back for the answer to that.Of course the eu never has any failed deals because they go on for 20+ years Hows the mercosur deal going by the way? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"London Mayoral election, candidate Richard Jewison - 22,000 votes. Less than 1%. His prediction I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that he wouldn't win... Came true. Not even worth your salty tears that result is it.... Is there a point to your post? I think the point is the guy who wants to re join the eu got next to nothing votes and people are over the eu and the thought of re-joining. It's a totally irrelevant point though isn't it. Not really mate if you have spent much time in this forum you will know how the brexit debate is brought up all the time.As i said before i think the point being made is nobody gives a toss about brexit anymore and have moved on. I would be more worried about all the corruption and failed deals going on in your own country than worrying about some idiot who created a party as a protest. He never expected to win so what is the point of the post?" He didn’t create the party. Lord Adonis staunch labour grandee created the party. Is he an idiot as well? You seem to have a low opinion of many of your crew. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It seems MOST people are over Brexit and want to continue living their lives free of bitterness.
What has that got to do with the London Mayor election results? Sadiq Kahn was the outstanding candidate, no one else stood a chance . Read the op.
I did, I know Jim is fishing but I can’t see the relevance of his post . Why not just ignore it then? instead of doing the usual and trying to derail it with some meaningless comment.
Sorry about that, shall I ask for your permission next time? No, im asking you a question if you dont want to talk about the op why engage in the thread?
I did talk about the OP, the candidate that Jim mentioned didn’t stand a chance of winning because he was up against Sadiq Kahn.
Seems I'm right, you have no more salty tears, that's good, let's all move forward together as a proud, free nation
What do you mean? No tears here . I am delighted for the people of London that Sadiq Kahn was re elected, great mayor "So sadiq got reelected and is a great mayor so by that measure boris was a great mayor,after all he got elected twice in a labour city. What has sadiq done in his term that is so great ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"London Mayoral election, candidate Richard Jewison - 22,000 votes. Less than 1%. His prediction I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that he wouldn't win... Came true. Not even worth your salty tears that result is it.... Is there a point to your post? I think the point is the guy who wants to re join the eu got next to nothing votes and people are over the eu and the thought of re-joining. It's a totally irrelevant point though isn't it. Not really mate if you have spent much time in this forum you will know how the brexit debate is brought up all the time.As i said before i think the point being made is nobody gives a toss about brexit anymore and have moved on. I would be more worried about all the corruption and failed deals going on in your own country than worrying about some idiot who created a party as a protest. He never expected to win so what is the point of the post? He didn’t create the party. Lord Adonis staunch labour grandee created the party. Is he an idiot as well? You seem to have a low opinion of many of your crew." Small things please small minds but as long as you are happy | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It seems MOST people are over Brexit and want to continue living their lives free of bitterness.
What has that got to do with the London Mayor election results? Sadiq Kahn was the outstanding candidate, no one else stood a chance . Read the op.
I did, I know Jim is fishing but I can’t see the relevance of his post . Why not just ignore it then? instead of doing the usual and trying to derail it with some meaningless comment.
Sorry about that, shall I ask for your permission next time? No, im asking you a question if you dont want to talk about the op why engage in the thread?
I did talk about the OP, the candidate that Jim mentioned didn’t stand a chance of winning because he was up against Sadiq Kahn.
Seems I'm right, you have no more salty tears, that's good, let's all move forward together as a proud, free nation
What do you mean? No tears here . I am delighted for the people of London that Sadiq Kahn was re elected, great mayor
So sadiq got reelected and is a great mayor so by that measure boris was a great mayor,after all he got elected twice in a labour city.
What has sadiq done in his term that is so great ? "Does it matter? , he won the election, that is all that matters, apparently | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"London Mayoral election, candidate Richard Jewison - 22,000 votes. Less than 1%. His prediction I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that he wouldn't win... Came true. Not even worth your salty tears that result is it.... Is there a point to your post? I think the point is the guy who wants to re join the eu got next to nothing votes and people are over the eu and the thought of re-joining. It's a totally irrelevant point though isn't it. Not really mate if you have spent much time in this forum you will know how the brexit debate is brought up all the time.As i said before i think the point being made is nobody gives a toss about brexit anymore and have moved on. I would be more worried about all the corruption and failed deals going on in your own country than worrying about some idiot who created a party as a protest. He never expected to win so what is the point of the post? He didn’t create the party. Lord Adonis staunch labour grandee created the party. Is he an idiot as well? You seem to have a low opinion of many of your crew." It is early days. ‘Your crew’ spent 30 years crying, moaning and whining, it takes time | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"London Mayoral election, candidate Richard Jewison - 22,000 votes. Less than 1%. His prediction I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that he wouldn't win... Came true. Not even worth your salty tears that result is it.... Is there a point to your post? I think the point is the guy who wants to re join the eu got next to nothing votes and people are over the eu and the thought of re-joining. It's a totally irrelevant point though isn't it. Not really mate if you have spent much time in this forum you will know how the brexit debate is brought up all the time.As i said before i think the point being made is nobody gives a toss about brexit anymore and have moved on. I would be more worried about all the corruption and failed deals going on in your own country than worrying about some idiot who created a party as a protest. He never expected to win so what is the point of the post? He didn’t create the party. Lord Adonis staunch labour grandee created the party. Is he an idiot as well? You seem to have a low opinion of many of your crew. Small things please small minds but as long as you are happy" You raised a small point and I corrected you. I’m keen on forensic attention to detail. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"London Mayoral election, candidate Richard Jewison - 22,000 votes. Less than 1%. His prediction I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that he wouldn't win... Came true. Not even worth your salty tears that result is it.... Is there a point to your post? I think the point is the guy who wants to re join the eu got next to nothing votes and people are over the eu and the thought of re-joining. It's a totally irrelevant point though isn't it. Not really mate if you have spent much time in this forum you will know how the brexit debate is brought up all the time.As i said before i think the point being made is nobody gives a toss about brexit anymore and have moved on. I would be more worried about all the corruption and failed deals going on in your own country than worrying about some idiot who created a party as a protest. He never expected to win so what is the point of the post? He didn’t create the party. Lord Adonis staunch labour grandee created the party. Is he an idiot as well? You seem to have a low opinion of many of your crew. Small things please small minds but as long as you are happy You raised a small point and I corrected you. I’m keen on forensic attention to detail." Rejoin EU, Richard Hewison 28,012 votes 01.1% Forensic attention to detail? PMSL | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"London Mayoral election, candidate Richard Jewison - 22,000 votes. Less than 1%. His prediction I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that he wouldn't win... Came true. Not even worth your salty tears that result is it.... Is there a point to your post? I think the point is the guy who wants to re join the eu got next to nothing votes and people are over the eu and the thought of re-joining. It's a totally irrelevant point though isn't it. Not really mate if you have spent much time in this forum you will know how the brexit debate is brought up all the time.As i said before i think the point being made is nobody gives a toss about brexit anymore and have moved on. I would be more worried about all the corruption and failed deals going on in your own country than worrying about some idiot who created a party as a protest. He never expected to win so what is the point of the post? He didn’t create the party. Lord Adonis staunch labour grandee created the party. Is he an idiot as well? You seem to have a low opinion of many of your crew. Small things please small minds but as long as you are happy You raised a small point and I corrected you. I’m keen on forensic attention to detail. Rejoin EU, Richard Hewison 28,012 votes 01.1% Forensic attention to detail? PMSL "I don't recall my OP exactly but my point remains valid. Also I didn't want to go down the usual remainer rabbit hole of claiming whether it was 1% of the votes or of the electorate. But since you insist Turnout 43%. Therefore remainers got 0.4%. Cheers | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"London Mayoral election, candidate Richard Jewison - 22,000 votes. Less than 1%. His prediction I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that he wouldn't win... Came true. Not even worth your salty tears that result is it.... Is there a point to your post? I think the point is the guy who wants to re join the eu got next to nothing votes and people are over the eu and the thought of re-joining. It's a totally irrelevant point though isn't it. Not really mate if you have spent much time in this forum you will know how the brexit debate is brought up all the time.As i said before i think the point being made is nobody gives a toss about brexit anymore and have moved on. I would be more worried about all the corruption and failed deals going on in your own country than worrying about some idiot who created a party as a protest. He never expected to win so what is the point of the post? He didn’t create the party. Lord Adonis staunch labour grandee created the party. Is he an idiot as well? You seem to have a low opinion of many of your crew. Small things please small minds but as long as you are happy You raised a small point and I corrected you. I’m keen on forensic attention to detail. Rejoin EU, Richard Hewison 28,012 votes 01.1% Forensic attention to detail? PMSL
I don't recall my OP exactly but my point remains valid.
Also I didn't want to go down the usual remainer rabbit hole of claiming whether it was 1% of the votes or of the electorate.
But since you insist
Turnout 43%.
Therefore remainers got 0.4%.
Cheers "Forensic attention to detail ?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It seems MOST people are over Brexit and want to continue living their lives free of bitterness.
What has that got to do with the London Mayor election results? Sadiq Kahn was the outstanding candidate, no one else stood a chance . Read the op.
I did, I know Jim is fishing but I can’t see the relevance of his post . Why not just ignore it then? instead of doing the usual and trying to derail it with some meaningless comment.
Sorry about that, shall I ask for your permission next time? No, im asking you a question if you dont want to talk about the op why engage in the thread?
I did talk about the OP, the candidate that Jim mentioned didn’t stand a chance of winning because he was up against Sadiq Kahn.
Seems I'm right, you have no more salty tears, that's good, let's all move forward together as a proud, free nation
What do you mean? No tears here . I am delighted for the people of London that Sadiq Kahn was re elected, great mayor
So sadiq got reelected and is a great mayor so by that measure boris was a great mayor,after all he got elected twice in a labour city.
What has sadiq done in his term that is so great ?
Does it matter? , he won the election, that is all that matters, apparently "exactly same as Ben hutchin winning again as mayor of Teesside | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It seems MOST people are over Brexit and want to continue living their lives free of bitterness.
What has that got to do with the London Mayor election results? Sadiq Kahn was the outstanding candidate, no one else stood a chance . Read the op.
I did, I know Jim is fishing but I can’t see the relevance of his post . Why not just ignore it then? instead of doing the usual and trying to derail it with some meaningless comment.
Sorry about that, shall I ask for your permission next time? No, im asking you a question if you dont want to talk about the op why engage in the thread?
I did talk about the OP, the candidate that Jim mentioned didn’t stand a chance of winning because he was up against Sadiq Kahn.
Seems I'm right, you have no more salty tears, that's good, let's all move forward together as a proud, free nation
What do you mean? No tears here . I am delighted for the people of London that Sadiq Kahn was re elected, great mayor
So sadiq got reelected and is a great mayor so by that measure boris was a great mayor,after all he got elected twice in a labour city.
What has sadiq done in his term that is so great ?
Does it matter? , he won the election, that is all that matters, apparently exactly same as Ben hutchin winning again as mayor of Teesside "Exactly the same, just like Andy Burnham and all the other Mayors | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It seems MOST people are over Brexit and want to continue living their lives free of bitterness.
What has that got to do with the London Mayor election results? Sadiq Kahn was the outstanding candidate, no one else stood a chance . Read the op.
I did, I know Jim is fishing but I can’t see the relevance of his post . Why not just ignore it then? instead of doing the usual and trying to derail it with some meaningless comment.
Sorry about that, shall I ask for your permission next time? No, im asking you a question if you dont want to talk about the op why engage in the thread?
I did talk about the OP, the candidate that Jim mentioned didn’t stand a chance of winning because he was up against Sadiq Kahn.
Seems I'm right, you have no more salty tears, that's good, let's all move forward together as a proud, free nation
What do you mean? No tears here . I am delighted for the people of London that Sadiq Kahn was re elected, great mayor
So sadiq got reelected and is a great mayor so by that measure boris was a great mayor,after all he got elected twice in a labour city.
What has sadiq done in his term that is so great ?
Does it matter? , he won the election, that is all that matters, apparently exactly same as Ben hutchin winning again as mayor of Teesside
Exactly the same, just like Andy Burnham and all the other Mayors "Oh dear old Andy On 27 November 2019 he said he would campaign to leave in a second referendum
I may have implied yesterday he was a clueless dullard who's never had a proper job, I now realise he's a lot cleverer than he looks
Consider me a fan | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It seems MOST people are over Brexit and want to continue living their lives free of bitterness.
What has that got to do with the London Mayor election results? Sadiq Kahn was the outstanding candidate, no one else stood a chance . Read the op.
I did, I know Jim is fishing but I can’t see the relevance of his post . Why not just ignore it then? instead of doing the usual and trying to derail it with some meaningless comment.
Sorry about that, shall I ask for your permission next time? No, im asking you a question if you dont want to talk about the op why engage in the thread?
I did talk about the OP, the candidate that Jim mentioned didn’t stand a chance of winning because he was up against Sadiq Kahn.
Seems I'm right, you have no more salty tears, that's good, let's all move forward together as a proud, free nation
What do you mean? No tears here . I am delighted for the people of London that Sadiq Kahn was re elected, great mayor
So sadiq got reelected and is a great mayor so by that measure boris was a great mayor,after all he got elected twice in a labour city.
What has sadiq done in his term that is so great ?
Does it matter? , he won the election, that is all that matters, apparently exactly same as Ben hutchin winning again as mayor of Teesside
Exactly the same, just like Andy Burnham and all the other Mayors
Oh dear old Andy
On 27 November 2019 he said he would campaign to leave in a second referendum
I may have implied yesterday he was a clueless dullard who's never had a proper job, I now realise he's a lot cleverer than he looks
Consider me a fan "I have just spoken to a maths professor who states that 22,000 is definitely not the same as 28,012 and 1.1 % is definitely more than 1 %. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Laughable praises about the London Mayor by people he doesn't represent. As someone who gets to vote on who is London Mayor I can safely say he is not a Great London Mayor. Cross rail is 4 years behind schedule and the budget has gone through the roof because of it under Sadiq Khan. TFL finance's are in a complete mess under Sadiq Khan. Partly due to the fact that Sadiq Khan froze fair prices during his first term. And as for an easy win no it wasn't as Sean Bailey was only 120K votes behind on the 1st preference votes and 107k on the second preference votes." Those figures are incorrect | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"London Mayoral election, candidate Richard Jewison - 22,000 votes. Less than 1%. His prediction I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that he wouldn't win... Came true. Not even worth your salty tears that result is it.... He had no chance, he was up against Sadiq Kahn, great Mayor , good to see him get re ejected, easy win Sadiq is labour... Were labour leave or remain? Genuine question, I don't know, the electorate didn't seem to know either. Do you know oh wise one? No idea, all I know is that Sadiq Kahn was re elected, great mayor, easy win "I'm just puzzled as to on what measure was/is he a "great" mayor? Maybe I could be enlightened?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"London Mayoral election, candidate Richard Jewison - 22,000 votes. Less than 1%. His prediction I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that he wouldn't win... Came true. Not even worth your salty tears that result is it.... He had no chance, he was up against Sadiq Kahn, great Mayor , good to see him get re ejected, easy win Sadiq is labour... Were labour leave or remain? Genuine question, I don't know, the electorate didn't seem to know either. Do you know oh wise one? No idea, all I know is that Sadiq Kahn was re elected, great mayor, easy win
I'm just puzzled as to on what measure was/is he a "great" mayor? Maybe I could be enlightened??"He got re-elected, the electorate must think he is great and that’s all that matters, apparently | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Laughable praises about the London Mayor by people he doesn't represent. As someone who gets to vote on who is London Mayor I can safely say he is not a Great London Mayor. Cross rail is 4 years behind schedule and the budget has gone through the roof because of it under Sadiq Khan. TFL finance's are in a complete mess under Sadiq Khan. Partly due to the fact that Sadiq Khan froze fair prices during his first term. And as for an easy win no it wasn't as Sean Bailey was only 120K votes behind on the 1st preference votes and 107k on the second preference votes. Those figures are incorrect " No they are not. They are most definitely correct. Knife crime is up under Sadiq Khan. Rape prosecutions are down under Sadiq Khan. Sadiq Khan said on a radio interview London is not a safe place for women. He is the Mayor, it has been his responsibility for the last 5 years to make it a safe place | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Laughable praises about the London Mayor by people he doesn't represent. As someone who gets to vote on who is London Mayor I can safely say he is not a Great London Mayor. Cross rail is 4 years behind schedule and the budget has gone through the roof because of it under Sadiq Khan. TFL finance's are in a complete mess under Sadiq Khan. Partly due to the fact that Sadiq Khan froze fair prices during his first term. And as for an easy win no it wasn't as Sean Bailey was only 120K votes behind on the 1st preference votes and 107k on the second preference votes. Those figures are incorrect No they are not. They are most definitely correct. Knife crime is up under Sadiq Khan. Rape prosecutions are down under Sadiq Khan. Sadiq Khan said on a radio interview London is not a safe place for women. He is the Mayor, it has been his responsibility for the last 5 years to make it a safe place" Definitely incorrect 2nd round Kahn 1.206,034 Bailey 977,602 That 228,433 behind . The people have London have spoken , if you criticise your mayor then you don’t love your city, apparently | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Laughable praises about the London Mayor by people he doesn't represent. As someone who gets to vote on who is London Mayor I can safely say he is not a Great London Mayor. Cross rail is 4 years behind schedule and the budget has gone through the roof because of it under Sadiq Khan. TFL finance's are in a complete mess under Sadiq Khan. Partly due to the fact that Sadiq Khan froze fair prices during his first term. And as for an easy win no it wasn't as Sean Bailey was only 120K votes behind on the 1st preference votes and 107k on the second preference votes. Those figures are incorrect No they are not. They are most definitely correct. Knife crime is up under Sadiq Khan. Rape prosecutions are down under Sadiq Khan. Sadiq Khan said on a radio interview London is not a safe place for women. He is the Mayor, it has been his responsibility for the last 5 years to make it a safe place Definitely incorrect 2nd round Kahn 1.206,034 Bailey 977,602 That 228,433 behind . The people have London have spoken , if you criticise your mayor then you don’t love your city, apparently " Do you still think Andy is great now he's a leaver? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Laughable praises about the London Mayor by people he doesn't represent. As someone who gets to vote on who is London Mayor I can safely say he is not a Great London Mayor. Cross rail is 4 years behind schedule and the budget has gone through the roof because of it under Sadiq Khan. TFL finance's are in a complete mess under Sadiq Khan. Partly due to the fact that Sadiq Khan froze fair prices during his first term. And as for an easy win no it wasn't as Sean Bailey was only 120K votes behind on the 1st preference votes and 107k on the second preference votes. Those figures are incorrect No they are not. They are most definitely correct. Knife crime is up under Sadiq Khan. Rape prosecutions are down under Sadiq Khan. Sadiq Khan said on a radio interview London is not a safe place for women. He is the Mayor, it has been his responsibility for the last 5 years to make it a safe place Definitely incorrect 2nd round Kahn 1.206,034 Bailey 977,602 That 228,433 behind . The people have London have spoken , if you criticise your mayor then you don’t love your city, apparently Do you still think Andy is great now he's a leaver? "Who is a leaver | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Laughable praises about the London Mayor by people he doesn't represent. As someone who gets to vote on who is London Mayor I can safely say he is not a Great London Mayor. Cross rail is 4 years behind schedule and the budget has gone through the roof because of it under Sadiq Khan. TFL finance's are in a complete mess under Sadiq Khan. Partly due to the fact that Sadiq Khan froze fair prices during his first term. And as for an easy win no it wasn't as Sean Bailey was only 120K votes behind on the 1st preference votes and 107k on the second preference votes. Those figures are incorrect No they are not. They are most definitely correct. Knife crime is up under Sadiq Khan. Rape prosecutions are down under Sadiq Khan. Sadiq Khan said on a radio interview London is not a safe place for women. He is the Mayor, it has been his responsibility for the last 5 years to make it a safe place Definitely incorrect 2nd round Kahn 1.206,034 Bailey 977,602 That 228,433 behind . The people have London have spoken , if you criticise your mayor then you don’t love your city, apparently " So you don't understand how the voting worked. Understandable as you live up North and had nothing to do with you. My figures show the 1st and second preferences on the ballot papers of the people who did vote. Your figures are the total vote which does not give the true picture of how close it was. Sex offences, domestic abuse, violence against women, child abuse and sexual exploitation are all up in numbers under Sadiq Khan. Crime has gone up 6% under Sadiq Khan. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Laughable praises about the London Mayor by people he doesn't represent. As someone who gets to vote on who is London Mayor I can safely say he is not a Great London Mayor. Cross rail is 4 years behind schedule and the budget has gone through the roof because of it under Sadiq Khan. TFL finance's are in a complete mess under Sadiq Khan. Partly due to the fact that Sadiq Khan froze fair prices during his first term. And as for an easy win no it wasn't as Sean Bailey was only 120K votes behind on the 1st preference votes and 107k on the second preference votes. Those figures are incorrect No they are not. They are most definitely correct. Knife crime is up under Sadiq Khan. Rape prosecutions are down under Sadiq Khan. Sadiq Khan said on a radio interview London is not a safe place for women. He is the Mayor, it has been his responsibility for the last 5 years to make it a safe place Definitely incorrect 2nd round Kahn 1.206,034 Bailey 977,602 That 228,433 behind . The people have London have spoken , if you criticise your mayor then you don’t love your city, apparently So you don't understand how the voting worked. Understandable as you live up North and had nothing to do with you. My figures show the 1st and second preferences on the ballot papers of the people who did vote. Your figures are the total vote which does not give the true picture of how close it was. Sex offences, domestic abuse, violence against women, child abuse and sexual exploitation are all up in numbers under Sadiq Khan. Crime has gone up 6% under Sadiq Khan." 233,000 behind on the 2nd vote, Kahn got 10% more of the vote than Bailey , not even close . If Kahn is so bad when did he thrash his nearest competitor? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Laughable praises about the London Mayor by people he doesn't represent. As someone who gets to vote on who is London Mayor I can safely say he is not a Great London Mayor. Cross rail is 4 years behind schedule and the budget has gone through the roof because of it under Sadiq Khan. TFL finance's are in a complete mess under Sadiq Khan. Partly due to the fact that Sadiq Khan froze fair prices during his first term. And as for an easy win no it wasn't as Sean Bailey was only 120K votes behind on the 1st preference votes and 107k on the second preference votes. Those figures are incorrect No they are not. They are most definitely correct. Knife crime is up under Sadiq Khan. Rape prosecutions are down under Sadiq Khan. Sadiq Khan said on a radio interview London is not a safe place for women. He is the Mayor, it has been his responsibility for the last 5 years to make it a safe place Definitely incorrect 2nd round Kahn 1.206,034 Bailey 977,602 That 228,433 behind . The people have London have spoken , if you criticise your mayor then you don’t love your city, apparently So you don't understand how the voting worked. Understandable as you live up North and had nothing to do with you. My figures show the 1st and second preferences on the ballot papers of the people who did vote. Your figures are the total vote which does not give the true picture of how close it was. Sex offences, domestic abuse, violence against women, child abuse and sexual exploitation are all up in numbers under Sadiq Khan. Crime has gone up 6% under Sadiq Khan." You missed out gun crime too. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Laughable praises about the London Mayor by people he doesn't represent. As someone who gets to vote on who is London Mayor I can safely say he is not a Great London Mayor. Cross rail is 4 years behind schedule and the budget has gone through the roof because of it under Sadiq Khan. TFL finance's are in a complete mess under Sadiq Khan. Partly due to the fact that Sadiq Khan froze fair prices during his first term. And as for an easy win no it wasn't as Sean Bailey was only 120K votes behind on the 1st preference votes and 107k on the second preference votes. Those figures are incorrect No they are not. They are most definitely correct. Knife crime is up under Sadiq Khan. Rape prosecutions are down under Sadiq Khan. Sadiq Khan said on a radio interview London is not a safe place for women. He is the Mayor, it has been his responsibility for the last 5 years to make it a safe place Definitely incorrect 2nd round Kahn 1.206,034 Bailey 977,602 That 228,433 behind . The people have London have spoken , if you criticise your mayor then you don’t love your city, apparently So you don't understand how the voting worked. Understandable as you live up North and had nothing to do with you. My figures show the 1st and second preferences on the ballot papers of the people who did vote. Your figures are the total vote which does not give the true picture of how close it was. Sex offences, domestic abuse, violence against women, child abuse and sexual exploitation are all up in numbers under Sadiq Khan. Crime has gone up 6% under Sadiq Khan. You missed out gun crime too. "I know, it’s bad, and he still won, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Laughable praises about the London Mayor by people he doesn't represent. As someone who gets to vote on who is London Mayor I can safely say he is not a Great London Mayor. Cross rail is 4 years behind schedule and the budget has gone through the roof because of it under Sadiq Khan. TFL finance's are in a complete mess under Sadiq Khan. Partly due to the fact that Sadiq Khan froze fair prices during his first term. And as for an easy win no it wasn't as Sean Bailey was only 120K votes behind on the 1st preference votes and 107k on the second preference votes. Those figures are incorrect No they are not. They are most definitely correct. Knife crime is up under Sadiq Khan. Rape prosecutions are down under Sadiq Khan. Sadiq Khan said on a radio interview London is not a safe place for women. He is the Mayor, it has been his responsibility for the last 5 years to make it a safe place Definitely incorrect 2nd round Kahn 1.206,034 Bailey 977,602 That 228,433 behind . The people have London have spoken , if you criticise your mayor then you don’t love your city, apparently So you don't understand how the voting worked. Understandable as you live up North and had nothing to do with you. My figures show the 1st and second preferences on the ballot papers of the people who did vote. Your figures are the total vote which does not give the true picture of how close it was. Sex offences, domestic abuse, violence against women, child abuse and sexual exploitation are all up in numbers under Sadiq Khan. Crime has gone up 6% under Sadiq Khan. You missed out gun crime too.
I know, it’s bad, and he still won, "It's well known there's a lot of voter fraud in London  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Laughable praises about the London Mayor by people he doesn't represent. As someone who gets to vote on who is London Mayor I can safely say he is not a Great London Mayor. Cross rail is 4 years behind schedule and the budget has gone through the roof because of it under Sadiq Khan. TFL finance's are in a complete mess under Sadiq Khan. Partly due to the fact that Sadiq Khan froze fair prices during his first term. And as for an easy win no it wasn't as Sean Bailey was only 120K votes behind on the 1st preference votes and 107k on the second preference votes. Those figures are incorrect No they are not. They are most definitely correct. Knife crime is up under Sadiq Khan. Rape prosecutions are down under Sadiq Khan. Sadiq Khan said on a radio interview London is not a safe place for women. He is the Mayor, it has been his responsibility for the last 5 years to make it a safe place Definitely incorrect 2nd round Kahn 1.206,034 Bailey 977,602 That 228,433 behind . The people have London have spoken , if you criticise your mayor then you don’t love your city, apparently So you don't understand how the voting worked. Understandable as you live up North and had nothing to do with you. My figures show the 1st and second preferences on the ballot papers of the people who did vote. Your figures are the total vote which does not give the true picture of how close it was. Sex offences, domestic abuse, violence against women, child abuse and sexual exploitation are all up in numbers under Sadiq Khan. Crime has gone up 6% under Sadiq Khan. 233,000 behind on the 2nd vote, Kahn got 10% more of the vote than Bailey , not even close . If Kahn is so bad when did he thrash his nearest competitor? " The was no second vote, there was 1st preference and 2nd preference on the ballot paper. Like I pointed out above Sean Bailey was only 120k votes behind on people's 1st choice of being London Mayor. Sadiq Khan condemned the Mets handling of the Ms Evergard vigil but the Police Watchdog backed the Met and denounced the people who criticised their actions. Let's not forget Sadiq Khan constantly causes devision in London by continually saying London voted to remain in the EU. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Laughable praises about the London Mayor by people he doesn't represent. As someone who gets to vote on who is London Mayor I can safely say he is not a Great London Mayor. Cross rail is 4 years behind schedule and the budget has gone through the roof because of it under Sadiq Khan. TFL finance's are in a complete mess under Sadiq Khan. Partly due to the fact that Sadiq Khan froze fair prices during his first term. And as for an easy win no it wasn't as Sean Bailey was only 120K votes behind on the 1st preference votes and 107k on the second preference votes. Those figures are incorrect No they are not. They are most definitely correct. Knife crime is up under Sadiq Khan. Rape prosecutions are down under Sadiq Khan. Sadiq Khan said on a radio interview London is not a safe place for women. He is the Mayor, it has been his responsibility for the last 5 years to make it a safe place Definitely incorrect 2nd round Kahn 1.206,034 Bailey 977,602 That 228,433 behind . The people have London have spoken , if you criticise your mayor then you don’t love your city, apparently So you don't understand how the voting worked. Understandable as you live up North and had nothing to do with you. My figures show the 1st and second preferences on the ballot papers of the people who did vote. Your figures are the total vote which does not give the true picture of how close it was. Sex offences, domestic abuse, violence against women, child abuse and sexual exploitation are all up in numbers under Sadiq Khan. Crime has gone up 6% under Sadiq Khan. 233,000 behind on the 2nd vote, Kahn got 10% more of the vote than Bailey , not even close . If Kahn is so bad when did he thrash his nearest competitor? The was no second vote, there was 1st preference and 2nd preference on the ballot paper. Like I pointed out above Sean Bailey was only 120k votes behind on people's 1st choice of being London Mayor. Sadiq Khan condemned the Mets handling of the Ms Evergard vigil but the Police Watchdog backed the Met and denounced the people who criticised their actions. Let's not forget Sadiq Khan constantly causes devision in London by continually saying London voted to remain in the EU. " He still won though, why is that ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Laughable praises about the London Mayor by people he doesn't represent. As someone who gets to vote on who is London Mayor I can safely say he is not a Great London Mayor. Cross rail is 4 years behind schedule and the budget has gone through the roof because of it under Sadiq Khan. TFL finance's are in a complete mess under Sadiq Khan. Partly due to the fact that Sadiq Khan froze fair prices during his first term. And as for an easy win no it wasn't as Sean Bailey was only 120K votes behind on the 1st preference votes and 107k on the second preference votes. Those figures are incorrect No they are not. They are most definitely correct. Knife crime is up under Sadiq Khan. Rape prosecutions are down under Sadiq Khan. Sadiq Khan said on a radio interview London is not a safe place for women. He is the Mayor, it has been his responsibility for the last 5 years to make it a safe place Definitely incorrect 2nd round Kahn 1.206,034 Bailey 977,602 That 228,433 behind . The people have London have spoken , if you criticise your mayor then you don’t love your city, apparently So you don't understand how the voting worked. Understandable as you live up North and had nothing to do with you. My figures show the 1st and second preferences on the ballot papers of the people who did vote. Your figures are the total vote which does not give the true picture of how close it was. Sex offences, domestic abuse, violence against women, child abuse and sexual exploitation are all up in numbers under Sadiq Khan. Crime has gone up 6% under Sadiq Khan. You missed out gun crime too.
I know, it’s bad, and he still won,
It's well known there's a lot of voter fraud in London "‘Well known fact’ can you back that up with evidence? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Laughable praises about the London Mayor by people he doesn't represent. As someone who gets to vote on who is London Mayor I can safely say he is not a Great London Mayor. Cross rail is 4 years behind schedule and the budget has gone through the roof because of it under Sadiq Khan. TFL finance's are in a complete mess under Sadiq Khan. Partly due to the fact that Sadiq Khan froze fair prices during his first term. And as for an easy win no it wasn't as Sean Bailey was only 120K votes behind on the 1st preference votes and 107k on the second preference votes. Those figures are incorrect No they are not. They are most definitely correct. Knife crime is up under Sadiq Khan. Rape prosecutions are down under Sadiq Khan. Sadiq Khan said on a radio interview London is not a safe place for women. He is the Mayor, it has been his responsibility for the last 5 years to make it a safe place Definitely incorrect 2nd round Kahn 1.206,034 Bailey 977,602 That 228,433 behind . The people have London have spoken , if you criticise your mayor then you don’t love your city, apparently So you don't understand how the voting worked. Understandable as you live up North and had nothing to do with you. My figures show the 1st and second preferences on the ballot papers of the people who did vote. Your figures are the total vote which does not give the true picture of how close it was. Sex offences, domestic abuse, violence against women, child abuse and sexual exploitation are all up in numbers under Sadiq Khan. Crime has gone up 6% under Sadiq Khan. You missed out gun crime too.
I know, it’s bad, and he still won,
It's well known there's a lot of voter fraud in London
‘Well known fact’ can you back that up with evidence? "Seriously? Lutfur Rahman ring a bell? : "Detectives from the Special Enquiry Team (SET) are investigating complaints, including ballot tampering, postal vote fraud and false voter registration, regarding elections held in Shadwell and Lansbury wards on February 7. In Shadwell, Harun Miah swooped to victory for Aspire – a party started by the disgraced former mayor Lutfur Rahman last year. Mr Rahman was banned from standing for office for five years in 2015 after being found guilty of electoral fraud. A report by Det Chief Supt Sue Williams, released this week, revealed that police had passed 14 allegations onto the SET." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Laughable praises about the London Mayor by people he doesn't represent. As someone who gets to vote on who is London Mayor I can safely say he is not a Great London Mayor. Cross rail is 4 years behind schedule and the budget has gone through the roof because of it under Sadiq Khan. TFL finance's are in a complete mess under Sadiq Khan. Partly due to the fact that Sadiq Khan froze fair prices during his first term. And as for an easy win no it wasn't as Sean Bailey was only 120K votes behind on the 1st preference votes and 107k on the second preference votes. Those figures are incorrect No they are not. They are most definitely correct. Knife crime is up under Sadiq Khan. Rape prosecutions are down under Sadiq Khan. Sadiq Khan said on a radio interview London is not a safe place for women. He is the Mayor, it has been his responsibility for the last 5 years to make it a safe place Definitely incorrect 2nd round Kahn 1.206,034 Bailey 977,602 That 228,433 behind . The people have London have spoken , if you criticise your mayor then you don’t love your city, apparently So you don't understand how the voting worked. Understandable as you live up North and had nothing to do with you. My figures show the 1st and second preferences on the ballot papers of the people who did vote. Your figures are the total vote which does not give the true picture of how close it was. Sex offences, domestic abuse, violence against women, child abuse and sexual exploitation are all up in numbers under Sadiq Khan. Crime has gone up 6% under Sadiq Khan. You missed out gun crime too.
I know, it’s bad, and he still won,
It's well known there's a lot of voter fraud in London
‘Well known fact’ can you back that up with evidence?
Seriously? Lutfur Rahman ring a bell? :
"Detectives from the Special Enquiry Team (SET) are investigating complaints, including ballot tampering, postal vote fraud and false voter registration, regarding elections held in Shadwell and Lansbury wards on February 7.
In Shadwell, Harun Miah swooped to victory for Aspire – a party started by the disgraced former mayor Lutfur Rahman last year.
Mr Rahman was banned from standing for office for five years in 2015 after being found guilty of electoral fraud.
A report by Det Chief Supt Sue Williams, released this week, revealed that police had passed 14 allegations onto the SET." "Is that all you have ? Any evidence for the 2021 election? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Laughable praises about the London Mayor by people he doesn't represent. As someone who gets to vote on who is London Mayor I can safely say he is not a Great London Mayor. Cross rail is 4 years behind schedule and the budget has gone through the roof because of it under Sadiq Khan. TFL finance's are in a complete mess under Sadiq Khan. Partly due to the fact that Sadiq Khan froze fair prices during his first term. And as for an easy win no it wasn't as Sean Bailey was only 120K votes behind on the 1st preference votes and 107k on the second preference votes. Those figures are incorrect No they are not. They are most definitely correct. Knife crime is up under Sadiq Khan. Rape prosecutions are down under Sadiq Khan. Sadiq Khan said on a radio interview London is not a safe place for women. He is the Mayor, it has been his responsibility for the last 5 years to make it a safe place Definitely incorrect 2nd round Kahn 1.206,034 Bailey 977,602 That 228,433 behind . The people have London have spoken , if you criticise your mayor then you don’t love your city, apparently So you don't understand how the voting worked. Understandable as you live up North and had nothing to do with you. My figures show the 1st and second preferences on the ballot papers of the people who did vote. Your figures are the total vote which does not give the true picture of how close it was. Sex offences, domestic abuse, violence against women, child abuse and sexual exploitation are all up in numbers under Sadiq Khan. Crime has gone up 6% under Sadiq Khan. You missed out gun crime too.
I know, it’s bad, and he still won,
It's well known there's a lot of voter fraud in London
‘Well known fact’ can you back that up with evidence?
Seriously? Lutfur Rahman ring a bell? :
"Detectives from the Special Enquiry Team (SET) are investigating complaints, including ballot tampering, postal vote fraud and false voter registration, regarding elections held in Shadwell and Lansbury wards on February 7.
In Shadwell, Harun Miah swooped to victory for Aspire – a party started by the disgraced former mayor Lutfur Rahman last year.
Mr Rahman was banned from standing for office for five years in 2015 after being found guilty of electoral fraud.
A report by Det Chief Supt Sue Williams, released this week, revealed that police had passed 14 allegations onto the SET."
Is that all you have ? Any evidence for the 2021 election? "Yep, Rahman is back campaigning, and Mr Chaudhhary Mohammed Iqbal was jailed in January for election fraud. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Laughable praises about the London Mayor by people he doesn't represent. As someone who gets to vote on who is London Mayor I can safely say he is not a Great London Mayor. Cross rail is 4 years behind schedule and the budget has gone through the roof because of it under Sadiq Khan. TFL finance's are in a complete mess under Sadiq Khan. Partly due to the fact that Sadiq Khan froze fair prices during his first term. And as for an easy win no it wasn't as Sean Bailey was only 120K votes behind on the 1st preference votes and 107k on the second preference votes. Those figures are incorrect No they are not. They are most definitely correct. Knife crime is up under Sadiq Khan. Rape prosecutions are down under Sadiq Khan. Sadiq Khan said on a radio interview London is not a safe place for women. He is the Mayor, it has been his responsibility for the last 5 years to make it a safe place Definitely incorrect 2nd round Kahn 1.206,034 Bailey 977,602 That 228,433 behind . The people have London have spoken , if you criticise your mayor then you don’t love your city, apparently So you don't understand how the voting worked. Understandable as you live up North and had nothing to do with you. My figures show the 1st and second preferences on the ballot papers of the people who did vote. Your figures are the total vote which does not give the true picture of how close it was. Sex offences, domestic abuse, violence against women, child abuse and sexual exploitation are all up in numbers under Sadiq Khan. Crime has gone up 6% under Sadiq Khan. You missed out gun crime too.
I know, it’s bad, and he still won,
It's well known there's a lot of voter fraud in London
‘Well known fact’ can you back that up with evidence?
Seriously? Lutfur Rahman ring a bell? :
"Detectives from the Special Enquiry Team (SET) are investigating complaints, including ballot tampering, postal vote fraud and false voter registration, regarding elections held in Shadwell and Lansbury wards on February 7.
In Shadwell, Harun Miah swooped to victory for Aspire – a party started by the disgraced former mayor Lutfur Rahman last year.
Mr Rahman was banned from standing for office for five years in 2015 after being found guilty of electoral fraud.
A report by Det Chief Supt Sue Williams, released this week, revealed that police had passed 14 allegations onto the SET."
Is that all you have ? Any evidence for the 2021 election?
Yep, Rahman is back campaigning, and Mr Chaudhhary Mohammed Iqbal was jailed in January for election fraud. "Poor effort, come back when you have evidence that the 2021 London mayoral election was a victim of fraud | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
""A former councillor has been jailed and ordered to pay more than £28,000 back to Redbridge Council after committing electoral fraud. Chaudhary Mohammed Iqbal, who was a Labour councillor for Loxford for more than two years, admitted in October that he gave a false address when applying to be councillor and later lied to the police." Easy to find. " Nothing to do with 2021 London mayoral election, good effort though | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
""A former councillor has been jailed and ordered to pay more than £28,000 back to Redbridge Council after committing electoral fraud. Chaudhary Mohammed Iqbal, who was a Labour councillor for Loxford for more than two years, admitted in October that he gave a false address when applying to be councillor and later lied to the police." Easy to find. Nothing to do with 2021 London mayoral election, good effort though " Who said I was talking to you? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Who said I was taking to you ? " Because you quoted my post.  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Let’s just congratulate Sadie Khan for getting re elected as London mayor, it was an easy and well deserved victory " Yep the man who told London on a Radio interview that London is not a safe place for women. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Let’s just congratulate Sadie Khan for getting re elected as London mayor, it was an easy and well deserved victory Yep the man who told London on a Radio interview that London is not a safe place for women. " Did he? Obviously the people of London don’t care what he said? He still won , and winning elections is all that matters, apparently | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"London Mayoral election, candidate Richard Jewison - 22,000 votes. Less than 1%. His prediction I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that he wouldn't win... Came true. Not even worth your salty tears that result is it.... Is there a point to your post? I think the point is the guy who wants to re join the eu got next to nothing votes and people are over the eu and the thought of re-joining. It's a totally irrelevant point though isn't it. Not really, it's a prelude to the interesting question of why so many vocal remainers actually won't vote to rejoin the EU. I conclude it's because the EU has been thoroughly exposed and remainers are having a hard time accepting they were lied to. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Let’s just congratulate Sadie Khan for getting re elected as London mayor, it was an easy and well deserved victory Yep the man who told London on a Radio interview that London is not a safe place for women. " Well, he's been given another three years to tackle that issue. I'm not a huge fan of Khan but he was the best of a weak bunch. Out of curiosity, who did you vote for? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"London Mayoral election, candidate Richard Jewison - 22,000 votes. Less than 1%. His prediction I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that he wouldn't win... Came true. Not even worth your salty tears that result is it.... Is there a point to your post? I think the point is the guy who wants to re join the eu got next to nothing votes and people are over the eu and the thought of re-joining. It's a totally irrelevant point though isn't it. Not really, it's a prelude to the interesting question of why so many vocal remainers actually won't vote to rejoin the EU. I conclude it's because the EU has been thoroughly exposed and remainers are having a hard time accepting they were lied to. " When was there a vote held to rejoin the EU then? I'll give you a hint, there hasn't been one. Are you always this confused? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"London Mayoral election, candidate Richard Jewison - 22,000 votes. Less than 1%. His prediction I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that he wouldn't win... Came true. Not even worth your salty tears that result is it.... Is there a point to your post? I think the point is the guy who wants to re join the eu got next to nothing votes and people are over the eu and the thought of re-joining. It's a totally irrelevant point though isn't it. Not really mate if you have spent much time in this forum you will know how the brexit debate is brought up all the time.As i said before i think the point being made is nobody gives a toss about brexit anymore and have moved on." What I mean is the London mayor election was to decide who takes on the role & responsibilities of the Mayor of London and has nothing to do with what the people standing for election think about a totally unrelated issue such as rejoining the EU. Just pointless cheap childish attempts at point scoring to be honest | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"London Mayoral election, candidate Richard Jewison - 22,000 votes. Less than 1%. His prediction I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that he wouldn't win... Came true. Not even worth your salty tears that result is it.... Is there a point to your post? I think the point is the guy who wants to re join the eu got next to nothing votes and people are over the eu and the thought of re-joining. It's a totally irrelevant point though isn't it. Not really mate if you have spent much time in this forum you will know how the brexit debate is brought up all the time.As i said before i think the point being made is nobody gives a toss about brexit anymore and have moved on. What I mean is the London mayor election was to decide who takes on the role & responsibilities of the Mayor of London and has nothing to do with what the people standing for election think about a totally unrelated issue such as rejoining the EU. Just pointless cheap childish attempts at point scoring to be honest "The post is about as relevant as UKIPs result in the 2016 London mayoral election | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"London Mayoral election, candidate Richard Jewison - 22,000 votes. Less than 1%. His prediction I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that he wouldn't win... Came true. Not even worth your salty tears that result is it.... Is there a point to your post? I think the point is the guy who wants to re join the eu got next to nothing votes and people are over the eu and the thought of re-joining. It's a totally irrelevant point though isn't it. Not really mate if you have spent much time in this forum you will know how the brexit debate is brought up all the time.As i said before i think the point being made is nobody gives a toss about brexit anymore and have moved on. What I mean is the London mayor election was to decide who takes on the role & responsibilities of the Mayor of London and has nothing to do with what the people standing for election think about a totally unrelated issue such as rejoining the EU. Just pointless cheap childish attempts at point scoring to be honest "Pretty much. Interesting way to spin a story. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"London Mayoral election, candidate Richard Jewison - 22,000 votes. Less than 1%. His prediction I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that he wouldn't win... Came true. Not even worth your salty tears that result is it.... He had no chance, he was up against Sadiq Kahn, great Mayor , good to see him get re ejected, easy win Sadiq is labour... Were labour leave or remain? Genuine question, I don't know, the electorate didn't seem to know either. Do you know oh wise one? No idea, all I know is that Sadiq Kahn was re elected, great mayor, easy win "Do you live in London as well as Cheshire? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Laughable praises about the London Mayor by people he doesn't represent. As someone who gets to vote on who is London Mayor I can safely say he is not a Great London Mayor. Cross rail is 4 years behind schedule and the budget has gone through the roof because of it under Sadiq Khan. TFL finance's are in a complete mess under Sadiq Khan. Partly due to the fact that Sadiq Khan froze fair prices during his first term. And as for an easy win no it wasn't as Sean Bailey was only 120K votes behind on the 1st preference votes and 107k on the second preference votes. Those figures are incorrect No they are not. They are most definitely correct. Knife crime is up under Sadiq Khan. Rape prosecutions are down under Sadiq Khan. Sadiq Khan said on a radio interview London is not a safe place for women. He is the Mayor, it has been his responsibility for the last 5 years to make it a safe place Definitely incorrect 2nd round Kahn 1.206,034 Bailey 977,602 That 228,433 behind . The people have London have spoken , if you criticise your mayor then you don’t love your city, apparently So you don't understand how the voting worked. Understandable as you live up North and had nothing to do with you. My figures show the 1st and second preferences on the ballot papers of the people who did vote. Your figures are the total vote which does not give the true picture of how close it was. Sex offences, domestic abuse, violence against women, child abuse and sexual exploitation are all up in numbers under Sadiq Khan. Crime has gone up 6% under Sadiq Khan. 233,000 behind on the 2nd vote, Kahn got 10% more of the vote than Bailey , not even close . If Kahn is so bad when did he thrash his neare st competitor? " And if he is so good, why do you spell his name wrong ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Laughable praises about the London Mayor by people he doesn't represent. As someone who gets to vote on who is London Mayor I can safely say he is not a Great London Mayor. Cross rail is 4 years behind schedule and the budget has gone through the roof because of it under Sadiq Khan. TFL finance's are in a complete mess under Sadiq Khan. Partly due to the fact that Sadiq Khan froze fair prices during his first term. And as for an easy win no it wasn't as Sean Bailey was only 120K votes behind on the 1st preference votes and 107k on the second preference votes. Those figures are incorrect No they are not. They are most definitely correct. Knife crime is up under Sadiq Khan. Rape prosecutions are down under Sadiq Khan. Sadiq Khan said on a radio interview London is not a safe place for women. He is the Mayor, it has been his responsibility for the last 5 years to make it a safe place Definitely incorrect 2nd round Kahn 1.206,034 Bailey 977,602 That 228,433 behind . The people have London have spoken , if you criticise your mayor then you don’t love your city, apparently So you don't understand how the voting worked. Understandable as you live up North and had nothing to do with you. My figures show the 1st and second preferences on the ballot papers of the people who did vote. Your figures are the total vote which does not give the true picture of how close it was. Sex offences, domestic abuse, violence against women, child abuse and sexual exploitation are all up in numbers under Sadiq Khan. Crime has gone up 6% under Sadiq Khan. 233,000 behind on the 2nd vote, Kahn got 10% more of the vote than Bailey , not even close . If Kahn is so bad when did he thrash his neare st competitor? And if he is so good, why do you spell his name wrong ? "To wind you up?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"London Mayoral election, candidate Richard Jewison - 22,000 votes. Less than 1%. His prediction I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that he wouldn't win... Came true. Not even worth your salty tears that result is it.... He had no chance, he was up against Sadiq Kahn, great Mayor , good to see him get re ejected, easy win Sadiq is labour... Were labour leave or remain? Genuine question, I don't know, the electorate didn't seem to know either. Do you know oh wise one? No idea, all I know is that Sadiq Kahn was re elected, great mayor, easy win
Do you live in London as well as Cheshire?"No | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"it does seem to have taken some people way too long to accept the result of the Brexit referendum " Some people never accepted the first referendum. Tbh. I accepted the result ages ago, the Brexit debate will never end | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"it does seem to have taken some people way too long to accept the result of the Brexit referendum " Result was accepted the day it was called, acceptance of the result does not mean a person automatically then changes their opinions on why they voted the other way.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"it does seem to have taken some people way too long to accept the result of the Brexit referendum " Some are still to come to terms with it, maybe they never will | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"it does seem to have taken some people way too long to accept the result of the Brexit referendum Some are still to come to terms with it, maybe they never will" Some people never came to terms about being in the EU, poor Chris has been waiting since he was 13 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"so chris as been waiting 8 years "No, since 1987, apparently | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The worse thing that could happen is to rejoin something that people voted to leave from. (Again regardless if people like it or not). Even if by the slightest of chance this country decided to rejoin the EU, its almost certain that we wont get the same conditions we had before we left which means its likely we have to join the Euro for example which Im sure most people dont want to do" Why wouldn't people want to join the euro? I agree with lots of this though. Rejoining the EU wouldn't magically undo the damage done. All those £ billions of wasted public money are never coming back. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The worse thing that could happen is to rejoin something that people voted to leave from. (Again regardless if people like it or not). Even if by the slightest of chance this country decided to rejoin the EU, its almost certain that we wont get the same conditions we had before we left which means its likely we have to join the Euro for example which Im sure most people dont want to do Why wouldn't people want to join the euro? I agree with lots of this though. Rejoining the EU wouldn't magically undo the damage done. All those £ billions of wasted public money are never coming back." I am clearly someone who wanted to remain and have been very vocal in my criticism of Brexit. I would not want to join the Euro. We would be subject to too much fiscal control (Greece for example). As above poster says, we will never get back the sweet deal we had. Ironically rejoining would actually end up realising some of the false arguments the Leave camp spouted around control by the EU. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The worse thing that could happen is to rejoin something that people voted to leave from. (Again regardless if people like it or not). Even if by the slightest of chance this country decided to rejoin the EU, its almost certain that we wont get the same conditions we had before we left which means its likely we have to join the Euro for example which Im sure most people dont want to do Why wouldn't people want to join the euro? I agree with lots of this though. Rejoining the EU wouldn't magically undo the damage done. All those £ billions of wasted public money are never coming back. I am clearly someone who wanted to remain and have been very vocal in my criticism of Brexit. I would not want to join the Euro. We would be subject to too much fiscal control (Greece for example). As above poster says, we will never get back the sweet deal we had. Ironically rejoining would actually end up realising some of the false arguments the Leave camp spouted around control by the EU." I lived in Eurozone countries most of my adult life. Was no problems for me, plus saved a fortune in exchange fees over the years. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The worse thing that could happen is to rejoin something that people voted to leave from. (Again regardless if people like it or not). Even if by the slightest of chance this country decided to rejoin the EU, its almost certain that we wont get the same conditions we had before we left which means its likely we have to join the Euro for example which Im sure most people dont want to do Why wouldn't people want to join the euro? I agree with lots of this though. Rejoining the EU wouldn't magically undo the damage done. All those £ billions of wasted public money are never coming back. I am clearly someone who wanted to remain and have been very vocal in my criticism of Brexit. I would not want to join the Euro. We would be subject to too much fiscal control (Greece for example). As above poster says, we will never get back the sweet deal we had. Ironically rejoining would actually end up realising some of the false arguments the Leave camp spouted around control by the EU. I lived in Eurozone countries most of my adult life. Was no problems for me, plus saved a fortune in exchange fees over the years. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Out of interest, are people saying membership of the EU is only worth it if we had the deal we previously had?. Other members of the EU seem to make it work without the deal the UK had. What's so bad about standard EU membership" Depends! Some of us will lament having a lesser deal than we had before. Having to abide by rules, standards and regulations we no longer have involvement in designing and setting is highly reductive and simply a huge pity. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Out of interest, are people saying membership of the EU is only worth it if we had the deal we previously had?. Other members of the EU seem to make it work without the deal the UK had. What's so bad about standard EU membership" Membership of the EU is still extremely desirable. Just look at all the countries trying to join. Maybe some people thought it would be okay to leave and rejoin. I don't know. Maybe it's part of highlighting that the brexit damage can never be fully undone. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Out of interest, are people saying membership of the EU is only worth it if we had the deal we previously had?. Other members of the EU seem to make it work without the deal the UK had. What's so bad about standard EU membership Membership of the EU is still extremely desirable. Just look at all the countries trying to join. Maybe some people thought it would be okay to leave and rejoin. I don't know. Maybe it's part of highlighting that the brexit damage can never be fully undone. " It's desirable for the net recepient If you genuinely think that the "damage"can't be undone, why not stop harping on about it and make the best of things? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Out of interest, are people saying membership of the EU is only worth it if we had the deal we previously had?. Other members of the EU seem to make it work without the deal the UK had. What's so bad about standard EU membership Membership of the EU is still extremely desirable. Just look at all the countries trying to join. Maybe some people thought it would be okay to leave and rejoin. I don't know. Maybe it's part of highlighting that the brexit damage can never be fully undone. " I know our economy isn't what it was but you can hardly compare it to the countries trying to join... Turkey (since 1999), North Macedonia (2005), Montenegro (2010), Serbia (2012), Albania (2014), Moldova (2022), Ukraine (2022), and Bosnia and Herzegovina (2022) I haven't checked but idbhazard a guess that none of those are close to us, even with the UK being as bad as it is. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Out of interest, are people saying membership of the EU is only worth it if we had the deal we previously had?. Other members of the EU seem to make it work without the deal the UK had. What's so bad about standard EU membership Membership of the EU is still extremely desirable. Just look at all the countries trying to join. Maybe some people thought it would be okay to leave and rejoin. I don't know. Maybe it's part of highlighting that the brexit damage can never be fully undone. It's desirable for the net recepient If you genuinely think that the "damage"can't be undone, why not stop harping on about it and make the best of things? " How can we make the best of things when the government and a percentage of the population are still pretending it was a good idea? Fucking ridiculous situation. We need to face up to the reality of brexit and figure out how to mitigate against it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Out of interest, are people saying membership of the EU is only worth it if we had the deal we previously had?. Other members of the EU seem to make it work without the deal the UK had. What's so bad about standard EU membership Membership of the EU is still extremely desirable. Just look at all the countries trying to join. Maybe some people thought it would be okay to leave and rejoin. I don't know. Maybe it's part of highlighting that the brexit damage can never be fully undone. I know our economy isn't what it was but you can hardly compare it to the countries trying to join... Turkey (since 1999), North Macedonia (2005), Montenegro (2010), Serbia (2012), Albania (2014), Moldova (2022), Ukraine (2022), and Bosnia and Herzegovina (2022) I haven't checked but idbhazard a guess that none of those are close to us, even with the UK being as bad as it is." I didn't compare. Just showing that joining the EU is extremely desirable | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Out of interest, are people saying membership of the EU is only worth it if we had the deal we previously had?. Other members of the EU seem to make it work without the deal the UK had. What's so bad about standard EU membership Membership of the EU is still extremely desirable. Just look at all the countries trying to join. Maybe some people thought it would be okay to leave and rejoin. I don't know. Maybe it's part of highlighting that the brexit damage can never be fully undone. It's desirable for the net recepient If you genuinely think that the "damage"can't be undone, why not stop harping on about it and make the best of things? How can we make the best of things when the government and a percentage of the population are still pretending it was a good idea? Fucking ridiculous situation. We need to face up to the reality of brexit and figure out how to mitigate against it. " In your minority opinion...and that's the rub isn't, you're in the mouthy minority | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Out of interest, are people saying membership of the EU is only worth it if we had the deal we previously had?. Other members of the EU seem to make it work without the deal the UK had. What's so bad about standard EU membership Membership of the EU is still extremely desirable. Just look at all the countries trying to join. Maybe some people thought it would be okay to leave and rejoin. I don't know. Maybe it's part of highlighting that the brexit damage can never be fully undone. It's desirable for the net recepient If you genuinely think that the "damage"can't be undone, why not stop harping on about it and make the best of things? How can we make the best of things when the government and a percentage of the population are still pretending it was a good idea? Fucking ridiculous situation. We need to face up to the reality of brexit and figure out how to mitigate against it. In your minority opinion...and that's the rub isn't, you're in the mouthy minority " What are you on about? Recent survey from yougov showed that 30 ish % of people think brexit was a good idea. Which is ridiculous to think that many people are still hanging on to the dream. But opinions aside. Brexit is shit for Britain, and shit for British people. By every possible measure. But here we are stuck in brexit bullshit limbo. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Out of interest, are people saying membership of the EU is only worth it if we had the deal we previously had?. Other members of the EU seem to make it work without the deal the UK had. What's so bad about standard EU membership Membership of the EU is still extremely desirable. Just look at all the countries trying to join. Maybe some people thought it would be okay to leave and rejoin. I don't know. Maybe it's part of highlighting that the brexit damage can never be fully undone. It's desirable for the net recepient If you genuinely think that the "damage"can't be undone, why not stop harping on about it and make the best of things? How can we make the best of things when the government and a percentage of the population are still pretending it was a good idea? Fucking ridiculous situation. We need to face up to the reality of brexit and figure out how to mitigate against it. In your minority opinion...and that's the rub isn't, you're in the mouthy minority What are you on about? Recent survey from yougov showed that 30 ish % of people think brexit was a good idea. Which is ridiculous to think that many people are still hanging on to the dream. But opinions aside. Brexit is shit for Britain, and shit for British people. By every possible measure. But here we are stuck in brexit bullshit limbo." that's your opinion is it.fair enough,it don't count for much to be honest,only to you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Out of interest, are people saying membership of the EU is only worth it if we had the deal we previously had?. Other members of the EU seem to make it work without the deal the UK had. What's so bad about standard EU membership Membership of the EU is still extremely desirable. Just look at all the countries trying to join. Maybe some people thought it would be okay to leave and rejoin. I don't know. Maybe it's part of highlighting that the brexit damage can never be fully undone. I know our economy isn't what it was but you can hardly compare it to the countries trying to join... Turkey (since 1999), North Macedonia (2005), Montenegro (2010), Serbia (2012), Albania (2014), Moldova (2022), Ukraine (2022), and Bosnia and Herzegovina (2022) I haven't checked but idbhazard a guess that none of those are close to us, even with the UK being as bad as it is. I didn't compare. Just showing that joining the EU is extremely desirable " For some maybe. I wouldn't say its 'extremely desirable' for the UK in the here and now. Give me the common market and I all for it. I'd sign up to join tomorrow | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Out of interest, are people saying membership of the EU is only worth it if we had the deal we previously had?. Other members of the EU seem to make it work without the deal the UK had. What's so bad about standard EU membership Membership of the EU is still extremely desirable. Just look at all the countries trying to join. Maybe some people thought it would be okay to leave and rejoin. I don't know. Maybe it's part of highlighting that the brexit damage can never be fully undone. It's desirable for the net recepient If you genuinely think that the "damage"can't be undone, why not stop harping on about it and make the best of things? How can we make the best of things when the government and a percentage of the population are still pretending it was a good idea? Fucking ridiculous situation. We need to face up to the reality of brexit and figure out how to mitigate against it. In your minority opinion...and that's the rub isn't, you're in the mouthy minority What are you on about? Recent survey from yougov showed that 30 ish % of people think brexit was a good idea. Which is ridiculous to think that many people are still hanging on to the dream. But opinions aside. Brexit is shit for Britain, and shit for British people. By every possible measure. But here we are stuck in brexit bullshit limbo." The majority voted for it, I suggest you spend less time whining about it and deal with it. Keep smiling sunshine | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Out of interest, are people saying membership of the EU is only worth it if we had the deal we previously had?. Other members of the EU seem to make it work without the deal the UK had. What's so bad about standard EU membership Membership of the EU is still extremely desirable. Just look at all the countries trying to join. Maybe some people thought it would be okay to leave and rejoin. I don't know. Maybe it's part of highlighting that the brexit damage can never be fully undone. It's desirable for the net recepient If you genuinely think that the "damage"can't be undone, why not stop harping on about it and make the best of things? How can we make the best of things when the government and a percentage of the population are still pretending it was a good idea? Fucking ridiculous situation. We need to face up to the reality of brexit and figure out how to mitigate against it. In your minority opinion...and that's the rub isn't, you're in the mouthy minority What are you on about? Recent survey from yougov showed that 30 ish % of people think brexit was a good idea. Which is ridiculous to think that many people are still hanging on to the dream. But opinions aside. Brexit is shit for Britain, and shit for British people. By every possible measure. But here we are stuck in brexit bullshit limbo. that's your opinion is it.fair enough,it don't count for much to be honest,only to you" What? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Out of interest, are people saying membership of the EU is only worth it if we had the deal we previously had?. Other members of the EU seem to make it work without the deal the UK had. What's so bad about standard EU membership Membership of the EU is still extremely desirable. Just look at all the countries trying to join. Maybe some people thought it would be okay to leave and rejoin. I don't know. Maybe it's part of highlighting that the brexit damage can never be fully undone. It's desirable for the net recepient If you genuinely think that the "damage"can't be undone, why not stop harping on about it and make the best of things? How can we make the best of things when the government and a percentage of the population are still pretending it was a good idea? Fucking ridiculous situation. We need to face up to the reality of brexit and figure out how to mitigate against it. In your minority opinion...and that's the rub isn't, you're in the mouthy minority What are you on about? Recent survey from yougov showed that 30 ish % of people think brexit was a good idea. Which is ridiculous to think that many people are still hanging on to the dream. But opinions aside. Brexit is shit for Britain, and shit for British people. By every possible measure. But here we are stuck in brexit bullshit limbo. The majority voted for it, I suggest you spend less time whining about it and deal with it. Keep smiling sunshine " Does the number of people voting for something mean it's good? Is that what you're saying? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Out of interest, are people saying membership of the EU is only worth it if we had the deal we previously had?. Other members of the EU seem to make it work without the deal the UK had. What's so bad about standard EU membership Membership of the EU is still extremely desirable. Just look at all the countries trying to join. Maybe some people thought it would be okay to leave and rejoin. I don't know. Maybe it's part of highlighting that the brexit damage can never be fully undone. It's desirable for the net recepient If you genuinely think that the "damage"can't be undone, why not stop harping on about it and make the best of things? How can we make the best of things when the government and a percentage of the population are still pretending it was a good idea? Fucking ridiculous situation. We need to face up to the reality of brexit and figure out how to mitigate against it. In your minority opinion...and that's the rub isn't, you're in the mouthy minority What are you on about? Recent survey from yougov showed that 30 ish % of people think brexit was a good idea. Which is ridiculous to think that many people are still hanging on to the dream. But opinions aside. Brexit is shit for Britain, and shit for British people. By every possible measure. But here we are stuck in brexit bullshit limbo. The majority voted for it, I suggest you spend less time whining about it and deal with it. Keep smiling sunshine Does the number of people voting for something mean it's good? Is that what you're saying?" It's a democracy  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Out of interest, are people saying membership of the EU is only worth it if we had the deal we previously had?. Other members of the EU seem to make it work without the deal the UK had. What's so bad about standard EU membership Membership of the EU is still extremely desirable. Just look at all the countries trying to join. Maybe some people thought it would be okay to leave and rejoin. I don't know. Maybe it's part of highlighting that the brexit damage can never be fully undone. It's desirable for the net recepient If you genuinely think that the "damage"can't be undone, why not stop harping on about it and make the best of things? How can we make the best of things when the government and a percentage of the population are still pretending it was a good idea? Fucking ridiculous situation. We need to face up to the reality of brexit and figure out how to mitigate against it. In your minority opinion...and that's the rub isn't, you're in the mouthy minority What are you on about? Recent survey from yougov showed that 30 ish % of people think brexit was a good idea. Which is ridiculous to think that many people are still hanging on to the dream. But opinions aside. Brexit is shit for Britain, and shit for British people. By every possible measure. But here we are stuck in brexit bullshit limbo. The majority voted for it, I suggest you spend less time whining about it and deal with it. Keep smiling sunshine Does the number of people voting for something mean it's good? Is that what you're saying? It's a democracy "What? Just to be clear. You're saying that because a small majority of people voted for brexit, that brexit is not shit, no matter how badly it impacts British people? That reality is not real, simply because of a small majority in a vote? I have to say, of all the brexit bullshit I have ever read, anywhere, this takes the biscuit. Well done. This hyper surreal pro brexit argument is my new favourite! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Out of interest, are people saying membership of the EU is only worth it if we had the deal we previously had?. Other members of the EU seem to make it work without the deal the UK had. What's so bad about standard EU membership Membership of the EU is still extremely desirable. Just look at all the countries trying to join. Maybe some people thought it would be okay to leave and rejoin. I don't know. Maybe it's part of highlighting that the brexit damage can never be fully undone. It's desirable for the net recepient If you genuinely think that the "damage"can't be undone, why not stop harping on about it and make the best of things? How can we make the best of things when the government and a percentage of the population are still pretending it was a good idea? Fucking ridiculous situation. We need to face up to the reality of brexit and figure out how to mitigate against it. In your minority opinion...and that's the rub isn't, you're in the mouthy minority What are you on about? Recent survey from yougov showed that 30 ish % of people think brexit was a good idea. Which is ridiculous to think that many people are still hanging on to the dream. But opinions aside. Brexit is shit for Britain, and shit for British people. By every possible measure. But here we are stuck in brexit bullshit limbo. The majority voted for it, I suggest you spend less time whining about it and deal with it. Keep smiling sunshine Does the number of people voting for something mean it's good? Is that what you're saying? It's a democracy
What?
Just to be clear. You're saying that because a small majority of people voted for brexit, that brexit is not shit, no matter how badly it impacts British people?
That reality is not real, simply because of a small majority in a vote?
I have to say, of all the brexit bullshit I have ever read, anywhere, this takes the biscuit. Well done.
This hyper surreal pro brexit argument is my new favourite! "You voted Remain in 2016. We get the message. Thanks for sharing. I voted Conservative in 2010. I don't feel the need to drone on about it multiple times every day. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Out of interest, are people saying membership of the EU is only worth it if we had the deal we previously had?. Other members of the EU seem to make it work without the deal the UK had. What's so bad about standard EU membership Membership of the EU is still extremely desirable. Just look at all the countries trying to join. Maybe some people thought it would be okay to leave and rejoin. I don't know. Maybe it's part of highlighting that the brexit damage can never be fully undone. It's desirable for the net recepient If you genuinely think that the "damage"can't be undone, why not stop harping on about it and make the best of things? How can we make the best of things when the government and a percentage of the population are still pretending it was a good idea? Fucking ridiculous situation. We need to face up to the reality of brexit and figure out how to mitigate against it. In your minority opinion...and that's the rub isn't, you're in the mouthy minority What are you on about? Recent survey from yougov showed that 30 ish % of people think brexit was a good idea. Which is ridiculous to think that many people are still hanging on to the dream. But opinions aside. Brexit is shit for Britain, and shit for British people. By every possible measure. But here we are stuck in brexit bullshit limbo. The majority voted for it, I suggest you spend less time whining about it and deal with it. Keep smiling sunshine Does the number of people voting for something mean it's good? Is that what you're saying? It's a democracy
What?
Just to be clear. You're saying that because a small majority of people voted for brexit, that brexit is not shit, no matter how badly it impacts British people?
That reality is not real, simply because of a small majority in a vote?
I have to say, of all the brexit bullshit I have ever read, anywhere, this takes the biscuit. Well done.
This hyper surreal pro brexit argument is my new favourite! "I'm so glad you are getting wound up. Now you know how the majority feel listening to your nonsense for the past 3 years. Is Brexit shit? Yes! Because it hasn't been implemented properly. Will your ilk get it reversed? No! So stop whining about it and move on FFS. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Out of interest, are people saying membership of the EU is only worth it if we had the deal we previously had?. Other members of the EU seem to make it work without the deal the UK had. What's so bad about standard EU membership Membership of the EU is still extremely desirable. Just look at all the countries trying to join. Maybe some people thought it would be okay to leave and rejoin. I don't know. Maybe it's part of highlighting that the brexit damage can never be fully undone. It's desirable for the net recepient If you genuinely think that the "damage"can't be undone, why not stop harping on about it and make the best of things? How can we make the best of things when the government and a percentage of the population are still pretending it was a good idea? Fucking ridiculous situation. We need to face up to the reality of brexit and figure out how to mitigate against it. In your minority opinion...and that's the rub isn't, you're in the mouthy minority What are you on about? Recent survey from yougov showed that 30 ish % of people think brexit was a good idea. Which is ridiculous to think that many people are still hanging on to the dream. But opinions aside. Brexit is shit for Britain, and shit for British people. By every possible measure. But here we are stuck in brexit bullshit limbo. The majority voted for it, I suggest you spend less time whining about it and deal with it. Keep smiling sunshine Does the number of people voting for something mean it's good? Is that what you're saying? It's a democracy
What?
Just to be clear. You're saying that because a small majority of people voted for brexit, that brexit is not shit, no matter how badly it impacts British people?
That reality is not real, simply because of a small majority in a vote?
I have to say, of all the brexit bullshit I have ever read, anywhere, this takes the biscuit. Well done.
This hyper surreal pro brexit argument is my new favourite!
I'm so glad you are getting wound up. Now you know how the majority feel listening to your nonsense for the past 3 years.
Is Brexit shit? Yes! Because it hasn't been implemented properly. Will your ilk get it reversed? No! So stop whining about it and move on FFS. "Good to see we finally agree that Brexit is shit. If only the government and opposition could get there too, maybe we could start moving forward. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Out of interest, are people saying membership of the EU is only worth it if we had the deal we previously had?. Other members of the EU seem to make it work without the deal the UK had. What's so bad about standard EU membership Membership of the EU is still extremely desirable. Just look at all the countries trying to join. Maybe some people thought it would be okay to leave and rejoin. I don't know. Maybe it's part of highlighting that the brexit damage can never be fully undone. It's desirable for the net recepient If you genuinely think that the "damage"can't be undone, why not stop harping on about it and make the best of things? How can we make the best of things when the government and a percentage of the population are still pretending it was a good idea? Fucking ridiculous situation. We need to face up to the reality of brexit and figure out how to mitigate against it. In your minority opinion...and that's the rub isn't, you're in the mouthy minority What are you on about? Recent survey from yougov showed that 30 ish % of people think brexit was a good idea. Which is ridiculous to think that many people are still hanging on to the dream. But opinions aside. Brexit is shit for Britain, and shit for British people. By every possible measure. But here we are stuck in brexit bullshit limbo. The majority voted for it, I suggest you spend less time whining about it and deal with it. Keep smiling sunshine Does the number of people voting for something mean it's good? Is that what you're saying? It's a democracy
What?
Just to be clear. You're saying that because a small majority of people voted for brexit, that brexit is not shit, no matter how badly it impacts British people?
That reality is not real, simply because of a small majority in a vote?
I have to say, of all the brexit bullshit I have ever read, anywhere, this takes the biscuit. Well done.
This hyper surreal pro brexit argument is my new favourite!
I'm so glad you are getting wound up. Now you know how the majority feel listening to your nonsense for the past 3 years.
Is Brexit shit? Yes! Because it hasn't been implemented properly. Will your ilk get it reversed? No! So stop whining about it and move on FFS.
Good to see we finally agree that Brexit is shit.
If only the government and opposition could get there too, maybe we could start moving forward. "What, making the best of the situation? Or whining like a baby until you hope to get back into the failing EU?????? I shouldn't be so trumpy but frankly you remainers get on my tits | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Out of interest, are people saying membership of the EU is only worth it if we had the deal we previously had?. Other members of the EU seem to make it work without the deal the UK had. What's so bad about standard EU membership Membership of the EU is still extremely desirable. Just look at all the countries trying to join. Maybe some people thought it would be okay to leave and rejoin. I don't know. Maybe it's part of highlighting that the brexit damage can never be fully undone. It's desirable for the net recepient If you genuinely think that the "damage"can't be undone, why not stop harping on about it and make the best of things? How can we make the best of things when the government and a percentage of the population are still pretending it was a good idea? Fucking ridiculous situation. We need to face up to the reality of brexit and figure out how to mitigate against it. In your minority opinion...and that's the rub isn't, you're in the mouthy minority What are you on about? Recent survey from yougov showed that 30 ish % of people think brexit was a good idea. Which is ridiculous to think that many people are still hanging on to the dream. But opinions aside. Brexit is shit for Britain, and shit for British people. By every possible measure. But here we are stuck in brexit bullshit limbo. The majority voted for it, I suggest you spend less time whining about it and deal with it. Keep smiling sunshine Does the number of people voting for something mean it's good? Is that what you're saying? It's a democracy
What?
Just to be clear. You're saying that because a small majority of people voted for brexit, that brexit is not shit, no matter how badly it impacts British people?
That reality is not real, simply because of a small majority in a vote?
I have to say, of all the brexit bullshit I have ever read, anywhere, this takes the biscuit. Well done.
This hyper surreal pro brexit argument is my new favourite!
I'm so glad you are getting wound up. Now you know how the majority feel listening to your nonsense for the past 3 years.
Is Brexit shit? Yes! Because it hasn't been implemented properly. Will your ilk get it reversed? No! So stop whining about it and move on FFS.
Good to see we finally agree that Brexit is shit.
If only the government and opposition could get there too, maybe we could start moving forward.
What, making the best of the situation? Or whining like a baby until you hope to get back into the failing EU?????? I shouldn't be so trumpy but frankly you remainers get on my tits "Lol the whining sounds familiar after people voted. Years later. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Out of interest, are people saying membership of the EU is only worth it if we had the deal we previously had?. Other members of the EU seem to make it work without the deal the UK had. What's so bad about standard EU membership Membership of the EU is still extremely desirable. Just look at all the countries trying to join. Maybe some people thought it would be okay to leave and rejoin. I don't know. Maybe it's part of highlighting that the brexit damage can never be fully undone. It's desirable for the net recepient If you genuinely think that the "damage"can't be undone, why not stop harping on about it and make the best of things? How can we make the best of things when the government and a percentage of the population are still pretending it was a good idea? Fucking ridiculous situation. We need to face up to the reality of brexit and figure out how to mitigate against it. In your minority opinion...and that's the rub isn't, you're in the mouthy minority What are you on about? Recent survey from yougov showed that 30 ish % of people think brexit was a good idea. Which is ridiculous to think that many people are still hanging on to the dream. But opinions aside. Brexit is shit for Britain, and shit for British people. By every possible measure. But here we are stuck in brexit bullshit limbo. The majority voted for it, I suggest you spend less time whining about it and deal with it. Keep smiling sunshine Does the number of people voting for something mean it's good? Is that what you're saying? It's a democracy
What?
Just to be clear. You're saying that because a small majority of people voted for brexit, that brexit is not shit, no matter how badly it impacts British people?
That reality is not real, simply because of a small majority in a vote?
I have to say, of all the brexit bullshit I have ever read, anywhere, this takes the biscuit. Well done.
This hyper surreal pro brexit argument is my new favourite!
I'm so glad you are getting wound up. Now you know how the majority feel listening to your nonsense for the past 3 years.
Is Brexit shit? Yes! Because it hasn't been implemented properly. Will your ilk get it reversed? No! So stop whining about it and move on FFS.
Good to see we finally agree that Brexit is shit.
If only the government and opposition could get there too, maybe we could start moving forward.
What, making the best of the situation? Or whining like a baby until you hope to get back into the failing EU?????? I shouldn't be so trumpy but frankly you remainers get on my tits "No need for that. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Out of interest, are people saying membership of the EU is only worth it if we had the deal we previously had?. Other members of the EU seem to make it work without the deal the UK had. What's so bad about standard EU membership Membership of the EU is still extremely desirable. Just look at all the countries trying to join. Maybe some people thought it would be okay to leave and rejoin. I don't know. Maybe it's part of highlighting that the brexit damage can never be fully undone. It's desirable for the net recepient If you genuinely think that the "damage"can't be undone, why not stop harping on about it and make the best of things? How can we make the best of things when the government and a percentage of the population are still pretending it was a good idea? Fucking ridiculous situation. We need to face up to the reality of brexit and figure out how to mitigate against it. In your minority opinion...and that's the rub isn't, you're in the mouthy minority What are you on about? Recent survey from yougov showed that 30 ish % of people think brexit was a good idea. Which is ridiculous to think that many people are still hanging on to the dream. But opinions aside. Brexit is shit for Britain, and shit for British people. By every possible measure. But here we are stuck in brexit bullshit limbo. The majority voted for it, I suggest you spend less time whining about it and deal with it. Keep smiling sunshine Does the number of people voting for something mean it's good? Is that what you're saying? It's a democracy
What?
Just to be clear. You're saying that because a small majority of people voted for brexit, that brexit is not shit, no matter how badly it impacts British people?
That reality is not real, simply because of a small majority in a vote?
I have to say, of all the brexit bullshit I have ever read, anywhere, this takes the biscuit. Well done.
This hyper surreal pro brexit argument is my new favourite!
I'm so glad you are getting wound up. Now you know how the majority feel listening to your nonsense for the past 3 years.
Is Brexit shit? Yes! Because it hasn't been implemented properly. Will your ilk get it reversed? No! So stop whining about it and move on FFS.
Good to see we finally agree that Brexit is shit.
If only the government and opposition could get there too, maybe we could start moving forward.
What, making the best of the situation? Or whining like a baby until you hope to get back into the failing EU?????? I shouldn't be so trumpy but frankly you remainers get on my tits
No need for that."Then perhaps you guys should wind your necks in, accept the reality and put a positive spin on life | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It seems MOST people are over Brexit and want to continue living their lives free of bitterness.
What has that got to do with the London Mayor election results? Sadiq Kahn was the outstanding candidate, no one else stood a chance . Read the op.
I did, I know Jim is fishing but I can’t see the relevance of his post . Why not just ignore it then? instead of doing the usual and trying to derail it with some meaningless comment.
Sorry about that, shall I ask for your permission next time? No, im asking you a question if you dont want to talk about the op why engage in the thread?
I did talk about the OP, the candidate that Jim mentioned didn’t stand a chance of winning because he was up against Sadiq Kahn.
Seems I'm right, you have no more salty tears, that's good, let's all move forward together as a proud, free nation
What do you mean? No tears here . I am delighted for the people of London that Sadiq Kahn was re elected, great mayor
So sadiq got reelected and is a great mayor so by that measure boris was a great mayor,after all he got elected twice in a labour city.
What has sadiq done in his term that is so great ? "Comedy gold, Khan is a great Mayor! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yes. You would know about that too well. huh? Bearing in mind you do it all the time." You might as well talk to a wall rather than try and engage in a sensible discussion! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Out of interest, are people saying membership of the EU is only worth it if we had the deal we previously had?. Other members of the EU seem to make it work without the deal the UK had. What's so bad about standard EU membership Membership of the EU is still extremely desirable. Just look at all the countries trying to join. Maybe some people thought it would be okay to leave and rejoin. I don't know. Maybe it's part of highlighting that the brexit damage can never be fully undone. It's desirable for the net recepient If you genuinely think that the "damage"can't be undone, why not stop harping on about it and make the best of things? How can we make the best of things when the government and a percentage of the population are still pretending it was a good idea? Fucking ridiculous situation. We need to face up to the reality of brexit and figure out how to mitigate against it. In your minority opinion...and that's the rub isn't, you're in the mouthy minority What are you on about? Recent survey from yougov showed that 30 ish % of people think brexit was a good idea. Which is ridiculous to think that many people are still hanging on to the dream. But opinions aside. Brexit is shit for Britain, and shit for British people. By every possible measure. But here we are stuck in brexit bullshit limbo. The majority voted for it, I suggest you spend less time whining about it and deal with it. Keep smiling sunshine Does the number of people voting for something mean it's good? Is that what you're saying? It's a democracy
What?
Just to be clear. You're saying that because a small majority of people voted for brexit, that brexit is not shit, no matter how badly it impacts British people?
That reality is not real, simply because of a small majority in a vote?
I have to say, of all the brexit bullshit I have ever read, anywhere, this takes the biscuit. Well done.
This hyper surreal pro brexit argument is my new favourite!
I'm so glad you are getting wound up. Now you know how the majority feel listening to your nonsense for the past 3 years.
Is Brexit shit? Yes! Because it hasn't been implemented properly. Will your ilk get it reversed? No! So stop whining about it and move on FFS.
Good to see we finally agree that Brexit is shit.
If only the government and opposition could get there too, maybe we could start moving forward.
What, making the best of the situation? Or whining like a baby until you hope to get back into the failing EU?????? I shouldn't be so trumpy but frankly you remainers get on my tits "Why? You won, leavers don’t get on my tits, some I laugh at, some I feel sorry for and the rest I am ambiguous | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"it does seem to have taken some people way too long to accept the result of the Brexit referendum " Oh god you will awake the remoaners | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Out of interest, are people saying membership of the EU is only worth it if we had the deal we previously had?. Other members of the EU seem to make it work without the deal the UK had. What's so bad about standard EU membership Membership of the EU is still extremely desirable. Just look at all the countries trying to join. Maybe some people thought it would be okay to leave and rejoin. I don't know. Maybe it's part of highlighting that the brexit damage can never be fully undone. It's desirable for the net recepient If you genuinely think that the "damage"can't be undone, why not stop harping on about it and make the best of things? How can we make the best of things when the government and a percentage of the population are still pretending it was a good idea? Fucking ridiculous situation. We need to face up to the reality of brexit and figure out how to mitigate against it. In your minority opinion...and that's the rub isn't, you're in the mouthy minority What are you on about? Recent survey from yougov showed that 30 ish % of people think brexit was a good idea. Which is ridiculous to think that many people are still hanging on to the dream. But opinions aside. Brexit is shit for Britain, and shit for British people. By every possible measure. But here we are stuck in brexit bullshit limbo. The majority voted for it, I suggest you spend less time whining about it and deal with it. Keep smiling sunshine Does the number of people voting for something mean it's good? Is that what you're saying? It's a democracy
What?
Just to be clear. You're saying that because a small majority of people voted for brexit, that brexit is not shit, no matter how badly it impacts British people?
That reality is not real, simply because of a small majority in a vote?
I have to say, of all the brexit bullshit I have ever read, anywhere, this takes the biscuit. Well done.
This hyper surreal pro brexit argument is my new favourite!
I'm so glad you are getting wound up. Now you know how the majority feel listening to your nonsense for the past 3 years.
Is Brexit shit? Yes! Because it hasn't been implemented properly. Will your ilk get it reversed? No! So stop whining about it and move on FFS. "Hold on, it has been implemented, Brexit is done, this is what you voted for | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Out of interest, are people saying membership of the EU is only worth it if we had the deal we previously had?. Other members of the EU seem to make it work without the deal the UK had. What's so bad about standard EU membership Membership of the EU is still extremely desirable. Just look at all the countries trying to join. Maybe some people thought it would be okay to leave and rejoin. I don't know. Maybe it's part of highlighting that the brexit damage can never be fully undone. It's desirable for the net recepient If you genuinely think that the "damage"can't be undone, why not stop harping on about it and make the best of things? " Because they like to feel important and moan about it every day......It’s brilliant how they still go on day after day | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Out of interest, are people saying membership of the EU is only worth it if we had the deal we previously had?. Other members of the EU seem to make it work without the deal the UK had. What's so bad about standard EU membership Membership of the EU is still extremely desirable. Just look at all the countries trying to join. Maybe some people thought it would be okay to leave and rejoin. I don't know. Maybe it's part of highlighting that the brexit damage can never be fully undone. It's desirable for the net recepient If you genuinely think that the "damage"can't be undone, why not stop harping on about it and make the best of things? How can we make the best of things when the government and a percentage of the population are still pretending it was a good idea? Fucking ridiculous situation. We need to face up to the reality of brexit and figure out how to mitigate against it. In your minority opinion...and that's the rub isn't, you're in the mouthy minority " Brilliant..... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Being a outsider Brexit was a good idea. Less control from foreign governments. Then the pandemic hit. People there lost their minds not understanding the repercussions of not keeping a economy alive. The tax coffers are running on empty. Then Putin invades at the most opportunistic time. Makes it even worse . Basically a self inflicted economic disaster. Brexit was a great idea the situations that followed it failed the enactment of it." The British spirit of crack on faded. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Being a outsider Brexit was a good idea. Less control from foreign governments. Then the pandemic hit. People there lost their minds not understanding the repercussions of not keeping an economy alive. The tax coffers are running on empty. Then Putin invades at the most opportunistic time. Makes it even worse . Basically a self inflicted economic disaster. Brexit was a great idea the situations that followed it failed the enactment of it." Brexit was ‘done’ in 2019, before covid and putin invaded the Ukraine | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Out of interest, are people saying membership of the EU is only worth it if we had the deal we previously had?. Other members of the EU seem to make it work without the deal the UK had. What's so bad about standard EU membership Membership of the EU is still extremely desirable. Just look at all the countries trying to join. Maybe some people thought it would be okay to leave and rejoin. I don't know. Maybe it's part of highlighting that the brexit damage can never be fully undone. It's desirable for the net recepient If you genuinely think that the "damage"can't be undone, why not stop harping on about it and make the best of things? How can we make the best of things when the government and a percentage of the population are still pretending it was a good idea? Fucking ridiculous situation. We need to face up to the reality of brexit and figure out how to mitigate against it. In your minority opinion...and that's the rub isn't, you're in the mouthy minority What are you on about? Recent survey from yougov showed that 30 ish % of people think brexit was a good idea. Which is ridiculous to think that many people are still hanging on to the dream. But opinions aside. Brexit is shit for Britain, and shit for British people. By every possible measure. But here we are stuck in brexit bullshit limbo. The majority voted for it, I suggest you spend less time whining about it and deal with it. Keep smiling sunshine Does the number of people voting for something mean it's good? Is that what you're saying? It's a democracy
What?
Just to be clear. You're saying that because a small majority of people voted for brexit, that brexit is not shit, no matter how badly it impacts British people?
That reality is not real, simply because of a small majority in a vote?
I have to say, of all the brexit bullshit I have ever read, anywhere, this takes the biscuit. Well done.
This hyper surreal pro brexit argument is my new favourite!
You voted Remain in 2016. We get the message. Thanks for sharing.
I voted Conservative in 2010. I don't feel the need to drone on about it multiple times every day."With all his anger and pent up rage he will probably go on about it even more after this thread! Years and years down the line watching these remainers having tantrums is priceless | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Being a outsider Brexit was a good idea. Less control from foreign governments. Then the pandemic hit. People there lost their minds not understanding the repercussions of not keeping an economy alive. The tax coffers are running on empty. Then Putin invades at the most opportunistic time. Makes it even worse . Basically a self inflicted economic disaster. Brexit was a great idea the situations that followed it failed the enactment of it. Brexit was ‘done’ in 2019, before covid and putin invaded the Ukraine "Correction, it was done early feb 2020 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Being a outsider Brexit was a good idea. Less control from foreign governments. Then the pandemic hit. People there lost their minds not understanding the repercussions of not keeping an economy alive. The tax coffers are running on empty. Then Putin invades at the most opportunistic time. Makes it even worse . Basically a self inflicted economic disaster. Brexit was a great idea the situations that followed it failed the enactment of it. Brexit was ‘done’ in 2019, before covid and putin invaded the Ukraine
Correction, it was done early feb 2020 "The votes passed years prior did they not ? It's not instant as you assume. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Being a outsider Brexit was a good idea. Less control from foreign governments. Then the pandemic hit. People there lost their minds not understanding the repercussions of not keeping an economy alive. The tax coffers are running on empty. Then Putin invades at the most opportunistic time. Makes it even worse . Basically a self inflicted economic disaster. Brexit was a great idea the situations that followed it failed the enactment of it. Brexit was ‘done’ in 2019, before covid and putin invaded the Ukraine
Correction, it was done early feb 2020 The votes passed years prior did they not ? It's not instant as you assume."Boris promised us it was oven ready, it must have been implemented because he went on to claim that Brexit was the reason for the UKs ‘award winning’ vaccine programme | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Being a outsider Brexit was a good idea. Less control from foreign governments. Then the pandemic hit. People there lost their minds not understanding the repercussions of not keeping an economy alive. The tax coffers are running on empty. Then Putin invades at the most opportunistic time. Makes it even worse . Basically a self inflicted economic disaster. Brexit was a great idea the situations that followed it failed the enactment of it. Brexit was ‘done’ in 2019, before covid and putin invaded the Ukraine
Correction, it was done early feb 2020 The votes passed years prior did they not ? It's not instant as you assume."Seriously you are reaping what you sow from a society that puts total faith in government. I am here trying to understand the plus side of that . All I see is failure. It's just my opinion. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Being a outsider Brexit was a good idea. Less control from foreign governments. Then the pandemic hit. People there lost their minds not understanding the repercussions of not keeping an economy alive. The tax coffers are running on empty. Then Putin invades at the most opportunistic time. Makes it even worse . Basically a self inflicted economic disaster. Brexit was a great idea the situations that followed it failed the enactment of it. Brexit was ‘done’ in 2019, before covid and putin invaded the Ukraine
Correction, it was done early feb 2020 The votes passed years prior did they not ? It's not instant as you assume. Seriously you are reaping what you sow from a society that puts total faith in government. I am here trying to understand the plus side of that . All I see is failure. It's just my opinion. "Eh? Boris won a 90 seat majority on a mandate that included getting Brexit done, it was an oven ready deal and was implemented on 31st January 2020 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Out of interest, are people saying membership of the EU is only worth it if we had the deal we previously had?. Other members of the EU seem to make it work without the deal the UK had. What's so bad about standard EU membership Membership of the EU is still extremely desirable. Just look at all the countries trying to join. Maybe some people thought it would be okay to leave and rejoin. I don't know. Maybe it's part of highlighting that the brexit damage can never be fully undone. It's desirable for the net recepient If you genuinely think that the "damage"can't be undone, why not stop harping on about it and make the best of things? How can we make the best of things when the government and a percentage of the population are still pretending it was a good idea? Fucking ridiculous situation. We need to face up to the reality of brexit and figure out how to mitigate against it. In your minority opinion...and that's the rub isn't, you're in the mouthy minority What are you on about? Recent survey from yougov showed that 30 ish % of people think brexit was a good idea. Which is ridiculous to think that many people are still hanging on to the dream. But opinions aside. Brexit is shit for Britain, and shit for British people. By every possible measure. But here we are stuck in brexit bullshit limbo. The majority voted for it, I suggest you spend less time whining about it and deal with it. Keep smiling sunshine Does the number of people voting for something mean it's good? Is that what you're saying? It's a democracy
What?
Just to be clear. You're saying that because a small majority of people voted for brexit, that brexit is not shit, no matter how badly it impacts British people?
That reality is not real, simply because of a small majority in a vote?
I have to say, of all the brexit bullshit I have ever read, anywhere, this takes the biscuit. Well done.
This hyper surreal pro brexit argument is my new favourite!
You voted Remain in 2016. We get the message. Thanks for sharing.
I voted Conservative in 2010. I don't feel the need to drone on about it multiple times every day.
With all his anger and pent up rage he will probably go on about it even more after this thread!
Years and years down the line watching these remainers having tantrums is priceless "Who are these remainers? There are no remainers anymore. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Out of interest, are people saying membership of the EU is only worth it if we had the deal we previously had?. Other members of the EU seem to make it work without the deal the UK had. What's so bad about standard EU membership Membership of the EU is still extremely desirable. Just look at all the countries trying to join. Maybe some people thought it would be okay to leave and rejoin. I don't know. Maybe it's part of highlighting that the brexit damage can never be fully undone. It's desirable for the net recepient If you genuinely think that the "damage"can't be undone, why not stop harping on about it and make the best of things? How can we make the best of things when the government and a percentage of the population are still pretending it was a good idea? Fucking ridiculous situation. We need to face up to the reality of brexit and figure out how to mitigate against it. In your minority opinion...and that's the rub isn't, you're in the mouthy minority What are you on about? Recent survey from yougov showed that 30 ish % of people think brexit was a good idea. Which is ridiculous to think that many people are still hanging on to the dream. But opinions aside. Brexit is shit for Britain, and shit for British people. By every possible measure. But here we are stuck in brexit bullshit limbo. The majority voted for it, I suggest you spend less time whining about it and deal with it. Keep smiling sunshine Does the number of people voting for something mean it's good? Is that what you're saying? It's a democracy
What?
Just to be clear. You're saying that because a small majority of people voted for brexit, that brexit is not shit, no matter how badly it impacts British people?
That reality is not real, simply because of a small majority in a vote?
I have to say, of all the brexit bullshit I have ever read, anywhere, this takes the biscuit. Well done.
This hyper surreal pro brexit argument is my new favourite!
You voted Remain in 2016. We get the message. Thanks for sharing.
I voted Conservative in 2010. I don't feel the need to drone on about it multiple times every day.
With all his anger and pent up rage he will probably go on about it even more after this thread!
Years and years down the line watching these remainers having tantrums is priceless
Who are these remainers? There are no remainers anymore."True, we are all leavers, living in sunlit uplands | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Out of interest, are people saying membership of the EU is only worth it if we had the deal we previously had?. Other members of the EU seem to make it work without the deal the UK had. What's so bad about standard EU membership Membership of the EU is still extremely desirable. Just look at all the countries trying to join. Maybe some people thought it would be okay to leave and rejoin. I don't know. Maybe it's part of highlighting that the brexit damage can never be fully undone. It's desirable for the net recepient If you genuinely think that the "damage"can't be undone, why not stop harping on about it and make the best of things? How can we make the best of things when the government and a percentage of the population are still pretending it was a good idea? Fucking ridiculous situation. We need to face up to the reality of brexit and figure out how to mitigate against it. In your minority opinion...and that's the rub isn't, you're in the mouthy minority What are you on about? Recent survey from yougov showed that 30 ish % of people think brexit was a good idea. Which is ridiculous to think that many people are still hanging on to the dream. But opinions aside. Brexit is shit for Britain, and shit for British people. By every possible measure. But here we are stuck in brexit bullshit limbo. The majority voted for it, I suggest you spend less time whining about it and deal with it. Keep smiling sunshine Does the number of people voting for something mean it's good? Is that what you're saying? It's a democracy
What?
Just to be clear. You're saying that because a small majority of people voted for brexit, that brexit is not shit, no matter how badly it impacts British people?
That reality is not real, simply because of a small majority in a vote?
I have to say, of all the brexit bullshit I have ever read, anywhere, this takes the biscuit. Well done.
This hyper surreal pro brexit argument is my new favourite!
I'm so glad you are getting wound up. Now you know how the majority feel listening to your nonsense for the past 3 years.
Is Brexit shit? Yes! Because it hasn't been implemented properly. Will your ilk get it reversed? No! So stop whining about it and move on FFS.
Good to see we finally agree that Brexit is shit.
If only the government and opposition could get there too, maybe we could start moving forward.
What, making the best of the situation? Or whining like a baby until you hope to get back into the failing EU?????? I shouldn't be so trumpy but frankly you remainers get on my tits
No need for that.
Then perhaps you guys should wind your necks in, accept the reality and put a positive spin on life "Is this because you don't like being reminded you were conned into voting for brexit which is shit? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Lol I love how the ones that whine about Brexit are similar to Trumpism. They can't accept the people's vote. Shocking analogy but true. They then cry about trumpism. Before you try and call me out.. Desantis 2024. The people voted I moved on. It's easy instead of obsessing. Daily. " Who isn't accepting Brexit won the vote? Every1 accepts that. The issue is that it's shit. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Lol I love how the ones that whine about Brexit are similar to Trumpism. They can't accept the people's vote. Shocking analogy but true. They then cry about trumpism. Before you try and call me out.. Desantis 2024. The people voted I moved on. It's easy instead of obsessing. Daily. " Who hasn't accepted the vote on brexit? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Lol I love how the ones that whine about Brexit are similar to Trumpism. They can't accept the people's vote. Shocking analogy but true. They then cry about trumpism. Before you try and call me out.. Desantis 2024. The people voted I moved on. It's easy instead of obsessing. Daily. Who isn't accepting Brexit won the vote? Every1 accepts that. The issue is that it's shit." This | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Lol I love how the ones that whine about Brexit are similar to Trumpism. They can't accept the people's vote. Shocking analogy but true. They then cry about trumpism. Before you try and call me out.. Desantis 2024. The people voted I moved on. It's easy instead of obsessing. Daily. Who isn't accepting Brexit won the vote? Every1 accepts that. The issue is that it's shit." Welcome to the shit just like our shit the difference is I accepted the shit. Crack on don't you agree? I do until changes are enacted by the people. It's not that hard. No party has been in charge forever both here and there. Clearly. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Lol I love how the ones that whine about Brexit are similar to Trumpism. They can't accept the people's vote. Shocking analogy but true. They then cry about trumpism. Before you try and call me out.. Desantis 2024. The people voted I moved on. It's easy instead of obsessing. Daily. Who isn't accepting Brexit won the vote? Every1 accepts that. The issue is that it's shit. Welcome to the shit just like our shit the difference is I accepted the shit. Crack on don't you agree? I do until changes are enacted by the people. It's not that hard. No party has been in charge forever both here and there. Clearly." Except the monarchy maybe that's a option again. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Lol I love how the ones that whine about Brexit are similar to Trumpism. They can't accept the people's vote. Shocking analogy but true. They then cry about trumpism. Before you try and call me out.. Desantis 2024. The people voted I moved on. It's easy instead of obsessing. Daily. Who isn't accepting Brexit won the vote? Every1 accepts that. The issue is that it's shit. Welcome to the shit just like our shit the difference is I accepted the shit. Crack on don't you agree? I do until changes are enacted by the people. It's not that hard. No party has been in charge forever both here and there. Clearly. Except the monarchy maybe that's a option again." Oh God imagine a vote on the monarchy ruling us openly again now. That'd really top shit mountain. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"(There's also the issue the leave campaign broke the law + there seems to have been Russian interference in Brexit. But who cares about such trivial issues, right?)" seems... How did our Russian collusion go? No where. Lies | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"(There's also the issue the leave campaign broke the law + there seems to have been Russian interference in Brexit. But who cares about such trivial issues, right?) seems... How did our Russian collusion go? No where. Lies" Read up on facts. There was Russian interference in that Trump election. Mueller concluded that Russian interference was "sweeping and systematic" and "violated U.S. criminal law", and he indicted twenty-six Russian citizens and three Russian organizations. The investigation also led to indictments and convictions of Trump campaign officials and associated Americans, on unrelated charges. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Lol I love how the ones that whine about Brexit are similar to Trumpism. They can't accept the people's vote. Shocking analogy but true. They then cry about trumpism. Before you try and call me out.. Desantis 2024. The people voted I moved on. It's easy instead of obsessing. Daily. Who isn't accepting Brexit won the vote? Every1 accepts that. The issue is that it's shit. Welcome to the shit just like our shit the difference is I accepted the shit. Crack on don't you agree? I do until changes are enacted by the people. It's not that hard. No party has been in charge forever both here and there. Clearly." Do you really believe that the population should be compliant and show no dissent? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Lol I love how the ones that whine about Brexit are similar to Trumpism. They can't accept the people's vote. Shocking analogy but true. They then cry about trumpism. Before you try and call me out.. Desantis 2024. The people voted I moved on. It's easy instead of obsessing. Daily. Who isn't accepting Brexit won the vote? Every1 accepts that. The issue is that it's shit. Welcome to the shit just like our shit the difference is I accepted the shit. Crack on don't you agree? I do until changes are enacted by the people. It's not that hard. No party has been in charge forever both here and there. Clearly. Do you really believe that the population should be compliant and show no dissent?" Can you back up the dissent if it comes down to authoritarianism? We differ. Different cultures. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"(There's also the issue the leave campaign broke the law + there seems to have been Russian interference in Brexit. But who cares about such trivial issues, right?) seems... How did our Russian collusion go? No where. Lies Read up on facts. There was Russian interference in that Trump election. Mueller concluded that Russian interference was "sweeping and systematic" and "violated U.S. criminal law", and he indicted twenty-six Russian citizens and three Russian organizations. The investigation also led to indictments and convictions of Trump campaign officials and associated Americans, on unrelated charges." To be fair Russian influence runs deep, so deep it probably has influenced you and everyone on this forum. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"(There's also the issue the leave campaign broke the law + there seems to have been Russian interference in Brexit. But who cares about such trivial issues, right?) seems... How did our Russian collusion go? No where. Lies Read up on facts. There was Russian interference in that Trump election. Mueller concluded that Russian interference was "sweeping and systematic" and "violated U.S. criminal law", and he indicted twenty-six Russian citizens and three Russian organizations. The investigation also led to indictments and convictions of Trump campaign officials and associated Americans, on unrelated charges. To be fair Russian influence runs deep, so deep it probably has influenced you and everyone on this forum." Internet & all that. And yes we're influenced by what we experience in any way. That hardly excuses the US or us doing too little to curtail Russian influence in our elections/votes. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"(There's also the issue the leave campaign broke the law + there seems to have been Russian interference in Brexit. But who cares about such trivial issues, right?) seems... How did our Russian collusion go? No where. Lies Read up on facts. There was Russian interference in that Trump election. Mueller concluded that Russian interference was "sweeping and systematic" and "violated U.S. criminal law", and he indicted twenty-six Russian citizens and three Russian organizations. The investigation also led to indictments and convictions of Trump campaign officials and associated Americans, on unrelated charges. To be fair Russian influence runs deep, so deep it probably has influenced you and everyone on this forum." How is Russia doing in Ukraine? What nation is supporting Ukraine the most? We not as dumb as you think. If it was so effective we wouldn't be supporting the anilation of Putin's military . It's for the greater good. Yea collusion was so effective. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"(There's also the issue the leave campaign broke the law + there seems to have been Russian interference in Brexit. But who cares about such trivial issues, right?) seems... How did our Russian collusion go? No where. Lies Read up on facts. There was Russian interference in that Trump election. Mueller concluded that Russian interference was "sweeping and systematic" and "violated U.S. criminal law", and he indicted twenty-six Russian citizens and three Russian organizations. The investigation also led to indictments and convictions of Trump campaign officials and associated Americans, on unrelated charges. To be fair Russian influence runs deep, so deep it probably has influenced you and everyone on this forum. Internet & all that. And yes we're influenced by what we experience in any way. That hardly excuses the US or us doing too little to curtail Russian influence in our elections/votes." Which tells me clearly you do not undrstand the influence or mechanics of influence that the Russians and others have on the public. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"(There's also the issue the leave campaign broke the law + there seems to have been Russian interference in Brexit. But who cares about such trivial issues, right?) seems... How did our Russian collusion go? No where. Lies Read up on facts. There was Russian interference in that Trump election. Mueller concluded that Russian interference was "sweeping and systematic" and "violated U.S. criminal law", and he indicted twenty-six Russian citizens and three Russian organizations. The investigation also led to indictments and convictions of Trump campaign officials and associated Americans, on unrelated charges. To be fair Russian influence runs deep, so deep it probably has influenced you and everyone on this forum. How is Russia doing in Ukraine? What nation is supporting Ukraine the most? We not as dumb as you think. If it was so effective we wouldn't be supporting the anilation of Putin's military . It's for the greater good. Yea collusion was so effective." this is 2 way street, the Russians are not the only players | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"(There's also the issue the leave campaign broke the law + there seems to have been Russian interference in Brexit. But who cares about such trivial issues, right?) seems... How did our Russian collusion go? No where. Lies Read up on facts. There was Russian interference in that Trump election. Mueller concluded that Russian interference was "sweeping and systematic" and "violated U.S. criminal law", and he indicted twenty-six Russian citizens and three Russian organizations. The investigation also led to indictments and convictions of Trump campaign officials and associated Americans, on unrelated charges. To be fair Russian influence runs deep, so deep it probably has influenced you and everyone on this forum. How is Russia doing in Ukraine? What nation is supporting Ukraine the most? We not as dumb as you think. If it was so effective we wouldn't be supporting the anilation of Putin's military . It's for the greater good. Yea collusion was so effective." The only 1 talking collusion here is you. While you also claim it didn't happen. It's a v strange double stance you're taking. I simply pointed out there was clearly Russian interference in that election. It's v well documented. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"(There's also the issue the leave campaign broke the law + there seems to have been Russian interference in Brexit. But who cares about such trivial issues, right?) seems... How did our Russian collusion go? No where. Lies Read up on facts. There was Russian interference in that Trump election. Mueller concluded that Russian interference was "sweeping and systematic" and "violated U.S. criminal law", and he indicted twenty-six Russian citizens and three Russian organizations. The investigation also led to indictments and convictions of Trump campaign officials and associated Americans, on unrelated charges. To be fair Russian influence runs deep, so deep it probably has influenced you and everyone on this forum. Internet & all that. And yes we're influenced by what we experience in any way. That hardly excuses the US or us doing too little to curtail Russian influence in our elections/votes. Which tells me clearly you do not undrstand the influence or mechanics of influence that the Russians and others have on the public." I think I know the gist of what you were implying. But think whatever you want. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"(There's also the issue the leave campaign broke the law + there seems to have been Russian interference in Brexit. But who cares about such trivial issues, right?) seems... How did our Russian collusion go? No where. Lies Read up on facts. There was Russian interference in that Trump election. Mueller concluded that Russian interference was "sweeping and systematic" and "violated U.S. criminal law", and he indicted twenty-six Russian citizens and three Russian organizations. The investigation also led to indictments and convictions of Trump campaign officials and associated Americans, on unrelated charges. To be fair Russian influence runs deep, so deep it probably has influenced you and everyone on this forum. Internet & all that. And yes we're influenced by what we experience in any way. That hardly excuses the US or us doing too little to curtail Russian influence in our elections/votes. Which tells me clearly you do not undrstand the influence or mechanics of influence that the Russians and others have on the public. I think I know the gist of what you were implying. But think whatever you want. " Ok forget the me being in the US you saying Brexit was Russian total influenced? This is interesting. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"(There's also the issue the leave campaign broke the law + there seems to have been Russian interference in Brexit. But who cares about such trivial issues, right?) seems... How did our Russian collusion go? No where. Lies Read up on facts. There was Russian interference in that Trump election. Mueller concluded that Russian interference was "sweeping and systematic" and "violated U.S. criminal law", and he indicted twenty-six Russian citizens and three Russian organizations. The investigation also led to indictments and convictions of Trump campaign officials and associated Americans, on unrelated charges. To be fair Russian influence runs deep, so deep it probably has influenced you and everyone on this forum. Internet & all that. And yes we're influenced by what we experience in any way. That hardly excuses the US or us doing too little to curtail Russian influence in our elections/votes. Which tells me clearly you do not undrstand the influence or mechanics of influence that the Russians and others have on the public. I think I know the gist of what you were implying. But think whatever you want. " The gist is simple, influence from bad actors is everywhere, it is and has been a battle ground for decades. Undermine government and stir up unrest has never been so easy. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"(There's also the issue the leave campaign broke the law + there seems to have been Russian interference in Brexit. But who cares about such trivial issues, right?) seems... How did our Russian collusion go? No where. Lies Read up on facts. There was Russian interference in that Trump election. Mueller concluded that Russian interference was "sweeping and systematic" and "violated U.S. criminal law", and he indicted twenty-six Russian citizens and three Russian organizations. The investigation also led to indictments and convictions of Trump campaign officials and associated Americans, on unrelated charges. To be fair Russian influence runs deep, so deep it probably has influenced you and everyone on this forum. Internet & all that. And yes we're influenced by what we experience in any way. That hardly excuses the US or us doing too little to curtail Russian influence in our elections/votes. Which tells me clearly you do not undrstand the influence or mechanics of influence that the Russians and others have on the public. I think I know the gist of what you were implying. But think whatever you want. Ok forget the me being in the US you saying Brexit was Russian total influenced? This is interesting." Nope I never said total. You said that, not me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"(There's also the issue the leave campaign broke the law + there seems to have been Russian interference in Brexit. But who cares about such trivial issues, right?) seems... How did our Russian collusion go? No where. Lies Read up on facts. There was Russian interference in that Trump election. Mueller concluded that Russian interference was "sweeping and systematic" and "violated U.S. criminal law", and he indicted twenty-six Russian citizens and three Russian organizations. The investigation also led to indictments and convictions of Trump campaign officials and associated Americans, on unrelated charges. To be fair Russian influence runs deep, so deep it probably has influenced you and everyone on this forum. Internet & all that. And yes we're influenced by what we experience in any way. That hardly excuses the US or us doing too little to curtail Russian influence in our elections/votes. Which tells me clearly you do not undrstand the influence or mechanics of influence that the Russians and others have on the public. I think I know the gist of what you were implying. But think whatever you want. The gist is simple, influence from bad actors is everywhere, it is and has been a battle ground for decades. Undermine government and stir up unrest has never been so easy. " Most of it now seems to be done via the internet. And I said above: internet. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"(There's also the issue the leave campaign broke the law + there seems to have been Russian interference in Brexit. But who cares about such trivial issues, right?) seems... How did our Russian collusion go? No where. Lies Read up on facts. There was Russian interference in that Trump election. Mueller concluded that Russian interference was "sweeping and systematic" and "violated U.S. criminal law", and he indicted twenty-six Russian citizens and three Russian organizations. The investigation also led to indictments and convictions of Trump campaign officials and associated Americans, on unrelated charges. To be fair Russian influence runs deep, so deep it probably has influenced you and everyone on this forum. Internet & all that. And yes we're influenced by what we experience in any way. That hardly excuses the US or us doing too little to curtail Russian influence in our elections/votes. Which tells me clearly you do not undrstand the influence or mechanics of influence that the Russians and others have on the public. I think I know the gist of what you were implying. But think whatever you want. The gist is simple, influence from bad actors is everywhere, it is and has been a battle ground for decades. Undermine government and stir up unrest has never been so easy. Most of it now seems to be done via the internet. And I said above: internet." Iceberg and tip springs to mind | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"(There's also the issue the leave campaign broke the law + there seems to have been Russian interference in Brexit. But who cares about such trivial issues, right?) seems... How did our Russian collusion go? No where. Lies Read up on facts. There was Russian interference in that Trump election. Mueller concluded that Russian interference was "sweeping and systematic" and "violated U.S. criminal law", and he indicted twenty-six Russian citizens and three Russian organizations. The investigation also led to indictments and convictions of Trump campaign officials and associated Americans, on unrelated charges. To be fair Russian influence runs deep, so deep it probably has influenced you and everyone on this forum. Internet & all that. And yes we're influenced by what we experience in any way. That hardly excuses the US or us doing too little to curtail Russian influence in our elections/votes. Which tells me clearly you do not undrstand the influence or mechanics of influence that the Russians and others have on the public. I think I know the gist of what you were implying. But think whatever you want. The gist is simple, influence from bad actors is everywhere, it is and has been a battle ground for decades. Undermine government and stir up unrest has never been so easy. Most of it now seems to be done via the internet. And I said above: internet. Iceberg and tip springs to mind" Um... ok | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"(There's also the issue the leave campaign broke the law + there seems to have been Russian interference in Brexit. But who cares about such trivial issues, right?) seems... How did our Russian collusion go? No where. Lies Read up on facts. There was Russian interference in that Trump election. Mueller concluded that Russian interference was "sweeping and systematic" and "violated U.S. criminal law", and he indicted twenty-six Russian citizens and three Russian organizations. The investigation also led to indictments and convictions of Trump campaign officials and associated Americans, on unrelated charges. To be fair Russian influence runs deep, so deep it probably has influenced you and everyone on this forum. Internet & all that. And yes we're influenced by what we experience in any way. That hardly excuses the US or us doing too little to curtail Russian influence in our elections/votes. Which tells me clearly you do not undrstand the influence or mechanics of influence that the Russians and others have on the public. I think I know the gist of what you were implying. But think whatever you want. The gist is simple, influence from bad actors is everywhere, it is and has been a battle ground for decades. Undermine government and stir up unrest has never been so easy. Most of it now seems to be done via the internet. And I said above: internet. Iceberg and tip springs to mind Um... ok" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"(There's also the issue the leave campaign broke the law + there seems to have been Russian interference in Brexit. But who cares about such trivial issues, right?) seems... How did our Russian collusion go? No where. Lies Read up on facts. There was Russian interference in that Trump election. Mueller concluded that Russian interference was "sweeping and systematic" and "violated U.S. criminal law", and he indicted twenty-six Russian citizens and three Russian organizations. The investigation also led to indictments and convictions of Trump campaign officials and associated Americans, on unrelated charges. To be fair Russian influence runs deep, so deep it probably has influenced you and everyone on this forum. Internet & all that. And yes we're influenced by what we experience in any way. That hardly excuses the US or us doing too little to curtail Russian influence in our elections/votes. Which tells me clearly you do not undrstand the influence or mechanics of influence that the Russians and others have on the public. I think I know the gist of what you were implying. But think whatever you want. The gist is simple, influence from bad actors is everywhere, it is and has been a battle ground for decades. Undermine government and stir up unrest has never been so easy. Most of it now seems to be done via the internet. And I said above: internet. Iceberg and tip springs to mind Um... ok" idk if you aware or not . That Gamble by Putin didn't pay off the Russian collusion " was a fantasy. Otherwise Ukraine wot not exit now. He didn't gain anything political across numerous nations. The left needs to come up with a better excuse. It's always someone else's fault instead of their own | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"(There's also the issue the leave campaign broke the law + there seems to have been Russian interference in Brexit. But who cares about such trivial issues, right?) seems... How did our Russian collusion go? No where. Lies Read up on facts. There was Russian interference in that Trump election. Mueller concluded that Russian interference was "sweeping and systematic" and "violated U.S. criminal law", and he indicted twenty-six Russian citizens and three Russian organizations. The investigation also led to indictments and convictions of Trump campaign officials and associated Americans, on unrelated charges. To be fair Russian influence runs deep, so deep it probably has influenced you and everyone on this forum. Internet & all that. And yes we're influenced by what we experience in any way. That hardly excuses the US or us doing too little to curtail Russian influence in our elections/votes. Which tells me clearly you do not undrstand the influence or mechanics of influence that the Russians and others have on the public. I think I know the gist of what you were implying. But think whatever you want. The gist is simple, influence from bad actors is everywhere, it is and has been a battle ground for decades. Undermine government and stir up unrest has never been so easy. Most of it now seems to be done via the internet. And I said above: internet. Iceberg and tip springs to mind Um... ok idk if you aware or not . That Gamble by Putin didn't pay off the Russian collusion " was a fantasy. Otherwise Ukraine wot not exit now. He didn't gain anything political across numerous nations. The left needs to come up with a better excuse. It's always someone else's fault instead of their own" Gonna say it again. You're the 1 who keeps saying collusion here. Not me. I just said there was clearly Russian interference in the US election Trump won. it's v well documented. It's not my fault if you won't admit reality. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Lol I love how the ones that whine about Brexit are similar to Trumpism. They can't accept the people's vote. Shocking analogy but true. They then cry about trumpism. Before you try and call me out.. Desantis 2024. The people voted I moved on. It's easy instead of obsessing. Daily." "Who hasn't accepted the vote on brexit?" "There's also the issue the leave campaign broke the law + there seems to have been Russian interference in Brexit." You've answered your own question, you are the man who hasn't accepted the vote on Brexit. You keep going on about Russian interference, and illegal campaign funding, and lies being told by one side, because you're still in the denial stage of the grief process. Hopefully one day you'll move on and realise that you can't make things better by crying over spilt milk. We are where we are, and the way to get to a better place is to decide the path to the future, rather than argue that we should be starting from somewhere else. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Lol I love how the ones that whine about Brexit are similar to Trumpism. They can't accept the people's vote. Shocking analogy but true. They then cry about trumpism. Before you try and call me out.. Desantis 2024. The people voted I moved on. It's easy instead of obsessing. Daily. Who hasn't accepted the vote on brexit? There's also the issue the leave campaign broke the law + there seems to have been Russian interference in Brexit. You've answered your own question, you are the man who hasn't accepted the vote on Brexit. You keep going on about Russian interference, and illegal campaign funding, and lies being told by one side, because you're still in the denial stage of the grief process. Hopefully one day you'll move on and realise that you can't make things better by crying over spilt milk. We are where we are, and the way to get to a better place is to decide the path to the future, rather than argue that we should be starting from somewhere else." They will never move on, the petulant remain voters will keep having tantrums and stamping their feet until someone listens to them.... It’s fabulous to watch them implode | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
