FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Let the bodies pile high in their thousands...
Let the bodies pile high in their thousands...
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Allegedly said by Boris Johnson as a statement of intent to never order another lockdown - prior to ordering the latest lockdown in December. Did he say it? Didn’t he say it? Let’s be clear - Jeremy Corbyn is not to blame and this is a wholly internal Conservative Part issue lol. Is this all the political workings of expert political assassin Michael Gove? Or are other forces in play?" Depends who has got Durham Dom on the team really i guess | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sadly nothing will come of this. A good portion of people will be absolutely fine with him saying that. " This.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If he said it, what was the context? Please let us have the minutes of the whole meeting, thanks "I am just reiterating the headline from a newspaper most favoured by those who are supportive of the Conservative Party. The Daily Mail is generally on the money when it comes to the goings-on in the Conservative Party and therefore it is fairly reasonable to assume one of two things: 1) Dead cat on the table - therefore look elsewhere for the real story OR 2) Time is up for Johnson and this is the start of a battle between Johnson and (probably) Gove to "save" the country (again) from a disastrous Conservative Leader. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yes but who is the source, not where was it published? " In the Daily Mail of course. Nuff said there then. Another playground story for the children who would rather snigger in the stairwells than get a proper education.  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If he said it, what was the context? Please let us have the minutes of the whole meeting, thanks
I am just reiterating the headline from a newspaper most favoured by those who are supportive of the Conservative Party. The Daily Mail is generally on the money when it comes to the goings-on in the Conservative Party and therefore it is fairly reasonable to assume one of two things:
1) Dead cat on the table - therefore look elsewhere for the real story OR
2) Time is up for Johnson and this is the start of a battle between Johnson and (probably) Gove to "save" the country (again) from a disastrous Conservative Leader."Daily Mail?????? Yikes Thought we'd all agreed not to quote the DM? That your crowd wouldn't take it seriously? If that agreement no longer stands please advise and I will feel free to quote Gemma Collins views on the trans Pacific trade deal | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yes but who is the source, not where was it published? " Cummings.who else | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sadly nothing will come of this. A good portion of people will be absolutely fine with him saying that. " Tories ripping shreds out of each other. Win/win. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yes but who is the source, not where was it published? Cummings.who else" Friends with Gove who is like a slimy snake waiting to pounce.. Goves wife is a journalist with the DM.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sadly nothing will come of this. A good portion of people will be absolutely fine with him saying that. Tories ripping shreds out of each other. Win/win." The battle of the lying shits. My money is on Cummings winning | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sadly nothing will come of this. A good portion of people will be absolutely fine with him saying that. Tories ripping shreds out of each other. Win/win. The battle of the lying shits. My money is on Cummings winning " Looks like the mail has finally had enough of the blundering idiot. I wonder how quickly its gospel status will vanish on here. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sadly nothing will come of this. A good portion of people will be absolutely fine with him saying that. Tories ripping shreds out of each other. Win/win. The battle of the lying shits. My money is on Cummings winning Looks like the mail has finally had enough of the blundering idiot. I wonder how quickly its gospel status will vanish on here." Never. People here have defended everything the Tories have done, no matter how self serving and corrupt. This will be the same, even if their Bible falters. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Sadly nothing will come of this. A good portion of people will be absolutely fine with him saying that. Tories ripping shreds out of each other. Win/win. The battle of the lying shits. My money is on Cummings winning Looks like the mail has finally had enough of the blundering idiot. I wonder how quickly its gospel status will vanish on here." It’s already happening, Boris is fucked  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Allegedly said by Boris Johnson as a statement of intent to never order another lockdown - prior to ordering the latest lockdown in December. Did he say it? Didn’t he say it? Let’s be clear - Jeremy Corbyn is not to blame and this is a wholly internal Conservative Part issue lol. Is this all the political workings of expert political assassin Michael Gove? Or are other forces in play?" Can you tell us who it is who said he said this? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Straws. Clutching." In what way? The daily mail has been quoted endlessly on here as a source. Why is its integrity now being questioned.? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Straws. Clutching." The Daily Mail?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Straws. Clutching. The Daily Mail??" Wouldn't know, I don't read it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Straws. Clutching. In what way? The daily mail has been quoted endlessly on here as a source. Why is its integrity now being questioned.?" I've never quoted the daily mail as a source. I don't read it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Straws. Clutching. In what way? The daily mail has been quoted endlessly on here as a source. Why is its integrity now being questioned.? I've never quoted the daily mail as a source. I don't read it." You do realise the OP has come from the Daily Mail? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Allegedly said by Boris Johnson as a statement of intent to never order another lockdown - prior to ordering the latest lockdown in December. Did he say it? Didn’t he say it? Let’s be clear - Jeremy Corbyn is not to blame and this is a wholly internal Conservative Part issue lol. Is this all the political workings of expert political assassin Michael Gove? Or are other forces in play?" This whole thing is stupid tittle tattle and is for morons to absorb and is irrevilent. The Mail is totally anti Boris more so than the Guardian and is a childs comic these days, What matters is are we are getting in top of covid is the vaccine roll out well organised and good answer is yes to these things. Sure Boris is no angel and at the start of covid did much wrong and has learned more than the moron leaders of the sad EU. All this will come to nothing and Starmer wanting big enquiries into flat payments etc is digging a hole for homself as in the grand scheme of things is so small. He is meant to be putting forward good policies and not just critisising for the sake of it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Straws. Clutching. In what way? The daily mail has been quoted endlessly on here as a source. Why is its integrity now being questioned.? I've never quoted the daily mail as a source. I don't read it. You do realise the OP has come from the Daily Mail? " Do I realise the op has come from the daily mail? Do you realise I don't care, I don't read it. Thought I'd explained that? Did I say that the daily mail was clutching at straws? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Allegedly said by Boris Johnson as a statement of intent to never order another lockdown - prior to ordering the latest lockdown in December. Did he say it? Didn’t he say it? Let’s be clear - Jeremy Corbyn is not to blame and this is a wholly internal Conservative Part issue lol. Is this all the political workings of expert political assassin Michael Gove? Or are other forces in play?This whole thing is stupid tittle tattle and is for morons to absorb and is irrevilent. The Mail is totally anti Boris more so than the Guardian and is a childs comic these days, What matters is are we are getting in top of covid is the vaccine roll out well organised and good answer is yes to these things. Sure Boris is no angel and at the start of covid did much wrong and has learned more than the moron leaders of the sad EU. All this will come to nothing and Starmer wanting big enquiries into flat payments etc is digging a hole for homself as in the grand scheme of things is so small. He is meant to be putting forward good policies and not just critisising for the sake of it. " Boris is finished, the sooner you realise and accept this the better. These stories are only the start, there is plenty more where they came from, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Straws. Clutching. In what way? The daily mail has been quoted endlessly on here as a source. Why is its integrity now being questioned.? I've never quoted the daily mail as a source. I don't read it. You do realise the OP has come from the Daily Mail? Do I realise the op has come from the daily mail? Do you realise I don't care, I don't read it. Thought I'd explained that? Did I say that the daily mail was clutching at straws? " Who is clutching at straws then? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Straws. Clutching. In what way? The daily mail has been quoted endlessly on here as a source. Why is its integrity now being questioned.? I've never quoted the daily mail as a source. I don't read it. You do realise the OP has come from the Daily Mail? Do I realise the op has come from the daily mail? Do you realise I don't care, I don't read it. Thought I'd explained that? Did I say that the daily mail was clutching at straws? Who is clutching at straws then? " You don't know? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Having not read the daily mail for years can someone who has please tell me who actually said that Boris said this? The op stated it wasnt corbyn but never said who it was." Does it matter? It’s probably made up, that isn’t the issue, the problem for Boris is the fact that the Daily Mail has decided to run this as a headline story . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Having not read the daily mail for years can someone who has please tell me who actually said that Boris said this? The op stated it wasnt corbyn but never said who it was. Does it matter? It’s probably made up, that isn’t the issue, the problem for Boris is the fact that the Daily Mail has decided to run this as a headline story . " The daily mail An impeccable source to a lying rag in the blink of an eye. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Straws. Clutching. In what way? The daily mail has been quoted endlessly on here as a source. Why is its integrity now being questioned.? I've never quoted the daily mail as a source. I don't read it. You do realise the OP has come from the Daily Mail? Do I realise the op has come from the daily mail? Do you realise I don't care, I don't read it. Thought I'd explained that? Did I say that the daily mail was clutching at straws? Who is clutching at straws then? You don't know? " The only person I can see clutching at straws right now is you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Having not read the daily mail for years can someone who has please tell me who actually said that Boris said this? The op stated it wasnt corbyn but never said who it was. Does it matter? It’s probably made up, that isn’t the issue, the problem for Boris is the fact that the Daily Mail has decided to run this as a headline story . " Well yes it does matter to a lot of people, if he said that its a disgusting thing to say for anyone let alone a PM and if true he should be kicked out immediately. Seems to me you and others hold the mail in higher esteem than us tories. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Having not read the daily mail for years can someone who has please tell me who actually said that Boris said this? The op stated it wasnt corbyn but never said who it was. Does it matter? It’s probably made up, that isn’t the issue, the problem for Boris is the fact that the Daily Mail has decided to run this as a headline story . Well yes it does matter to a lot of people, if he said that its a disgusting thing to say for anyone let alone a PM and if true he should be kicked out immediately. Seems to me you and others hold the mail in higher esteem than us tories. "I don’t, the story is probably bull shit, like I said, that isn’t the problem for Boris and I can assure you there will be other stories to follow. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Having not read the daily mail for years can someone who has please tell me who actually said that Boris said this? The op stated it wasnt corbyn but never said who it was. Does it matter? It’s probably made up, that isn’t the issue, the problem for Boris is the fact that the Daily Mail has decided to run this as a headline story . " Oh I see It's a discussion about the power of the corrupt media or something Got it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Having not read the daily mail for years can someone who has please tell me who actually said that Boris said this? The op stated it wasnt corbyn but never said who it was. Does it matter? It’s probably made up, that isn’t the issue, the problem for Boris is the fact that the Daily Mail has decided to run this as a headline story . Oh I see It's a discussion about the power of the corrupt media or something Got it "It’s about Boris being fucked, the likes of the daily mail made him and they will now destroy him, you reap what you sow | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Having not read the daily mail for years can someone who has please tell me who actually said that Boris said this? The op stated it wasnt corbyn but never said who it was. Does it matter? It’s probably made up, that isn’t the issue, the problem for Boris is the fact that the Daily Mail has decided to run this as a headline story . Oh I see It's a discussion about the power of the corrupt media or something Got it
It’s about Boris being fucked, the likes of the daily mail made him and they will now destroy him, you reap what you sow "So you going to revise your prediction yet again? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Having not read the daily mail for years can someone who has please tell me who actually said that Boris said this? The op stated it wasnt corbyn but never said who it was. Does it matter? It’s probably made up, that isn’t the issue, the problem for Boris is the fact that the Daily Mail has decided to run this as a headline story . Oh I see It's a discussion about the power of the corrupt media or something Got it
It’s about Boris being fucked, the likes of the daily mail made him and they will now destroy him, you reap what you sow "Utter nonsense | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Having not read the daily mail for years can someone who has please tell me who actually said that Boris said this? The op stated it wasnt corbyn but never said who it was. Does it matter? It’s probably made up, that isn’t the issue, the problem for Boris is the fact that the Daily Mail has decided to run this as a headline story . Oh I see It's a discussion about the power of the corrupt media or something Got it
It’s about Boris being fucked, the likes of the daily mail made him and they will now destroy him, you reap what you sow "I suspect cummings has got much more dirt on him. Its like rats turning on each other. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Having not read the daily mail for years can someone who has please tell me who actually said that Boris said this? The op stated it wasnt corbyn but never said who it was. Does it matter? It’s probably made up, that isn’t the issue, the problem for Boris is the fact that the Daily Mail has decided to run this as a headline story . Oh I see It's a discussion about the power of the corrupt media or something Got it
It’s about Boris being fucked, the likes of the daily mail made him and they will now destroy him, you reap what you sow
I suspect cummings has got much more dirt on him.
Its like rats turning on each other."The... Public.... Don't.... Care... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Seems cummins is a big hero to some now what a fickle bunch. "Cummings is a wanker, Boris is a wanker, wanker turns on wanker, such glorious entertainment | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Having not read the daily mail for years can someone who has please tell me who actually said that Boris said this? The op stated it wasnt corbyn but never said who it was. Does it matter? It’s probably made up, that isn’t the issue, the problem for Boris is the fact that the Daily Mail has decided to run this as a headline story . Oh I see It's a discussion about the power of the corrupt media or something Got it
It’s about Boris being fucked, the likes of the daily mail made him and they will now destroy him, you reap what you sow
I suspect cummings has got much more dirt on him.
Its like rats turning on each other.
The... Public.... Don't.... Care... "The ... Tory... party ... Cares... .they will get him sacked, not the public. Boris is toast | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Having not read the daily mail for years can someone who has please tell me who actually said that Boris said this? The op stated it wasnt corbyn but never said who it was. Does it matter? It’s probably made up, that isn’t the issue, the problem for Boris is the fact that the Daily Mail has decided to run this as a headline story . Oh I see It's a discussion about the power of the corrupt media or something Got it
It’s about Boris being fucked, the likes of the daily mail made him and they will now destroy him, you reap what you sow
I suspect cummings has got much more dirt on him.
Its like rats turning on each other.
The... Public.... Don't.... Care... "I agree. The state of the country now. The electorate don't give a fuck about how much contempt the Tories show us. We are literally expendable to them. And people still don't care. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Straws. Clutching. In what way? The daily mail has been quoted endlessly on here as a source. Why is its integrity now being questioned.? I've never quoted the daily mail as a source. I don't read it. You do realise the OP has come from the Daily Mail? Do I realise the op has come from the daily mail? Do you realise I don't care, I don't read it. Thought I'd explained that? Did I say that the daily mail was clutching at straws? Who is clutching at straws then? You don't know? The only person I can see clutching at straws right now is you " I'm just doing exactly what you do. Can you see me? I'll wave. If you can, you'll see it's not me. I thought you were intelligent? Surely you can work it out? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Having not read the daily mail for years can someone who has please tell me who actually said that Boris said this? The op stated it wasnt corbyn but never said who it was. Does it matter? It’s probably made up, that isn’t the issue, the problem for Boris is the fact that the Daily Mail has decided to run this as a headline story . Oh I see It's a discussion about the power of the corrupt media or something Got it
It’s about Boris being fucked, the likes of the daily mail made him and they will now destroy him, you reap what you sow
Utter nonsense "It’s happening Chris, suck it up and accept it, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Straws. Clutching. In what way? The daily mail has been quoted endlessly on here as a source. Why is its integrity now being questioned.? I've never quoted the daily mail as a source. I don't read it. You do realise the OP has come from the Daily Mail? Do I realise the op has come from the daily mail? Do you realise I don't care, I don't read it. Thought I'd explained that? Did I say that the daily mail was clutching at straws? Who is clutching at straws then? You don't know? The only person I can see clutching at straws right now is you I'm just doing exactly what you do. Can you see me? I'll wave. If you can, you'll see it's not me. I thought you were intelligent? Surely you can work it out? " Is this a riddle ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Straws. Clutching. In what way? The daily mail has been quoted endlessly on here as a source. Why is its integrity now being questioned.? I've never quoted the daily mail as a source. I don't read it. You do realise the OP has come from the Daily Mail? Do I realise the op has come from the daily mail? Do you realise I don't care, I don't read it. Thought I'd explained that? Did I say that the daily mail was clutching at straws? Who is clutching at straws then? You don't know? The only person I can see clutching at straws right now is you I'm just doing exactly what you do. Can you see me? I'll wave. If you can, you'll see it's not me. I thought you were intelligent? Surely you can work it out? Is this a riddle ? " Is it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Having not read the daily mail for years can someone who has please tell me who actually said that Boris said this? The op stated it wasnt corbyn but never said who it was. Does it matter? It’s probably made up, that isn’t the issue, the problem for Boris is the fact that the Daily Mail has decided to run this as a headline story . Oh I see It's a discussion about the power of the corrupt media or something Got it
It’s about Boris being fucked, the likes of the daily mail made him and they will now destroy him, you reap what you sow
I suspect cummings has got much more dirt on him.
Its like rats turning on each other.
The... Public.... Don't.... Care... "They dont but at some point the tory movers and shakers will recognise the damage the bumbling idiot is doing in their name Meanwhile it's quite fun to watch 2 amoral shysters rip each other to shreds whilst their fan club dont know which way to turn. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Having not read the daily mail for years can someone who has please tell me who actually said that Boris said this? The op stated it wasnt corbyn but never said who it was. Does it matter? It’s probably made up, that isn’t the issue, the problem for Boris is the fact that the Daily Mail has decided to run this as a headline story . Oh I see It's a discussion about the power of the corrupt media or something Got it
It’s about Boris being fucked, the likes of the daily mail made him and they will now destroy him, you reap what you sow
I suspect cummings has got much more dirt on him.
Its like rats turning on each other.
The... Public.... Don't.... Care...
They dont but at some point the tory movers and shakers will recognise the damage the bumbling idiot is doing in their name
Meanwhile it's quite fun to watch 2 amoral shysters rip each other to shreds whilst their fan club dont know which way to turn."And replace Boris with the Tory party's version of Ed Milliband? Never going to happen | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Having not read the daily mail for years can someone who has please tell me who actually said that Boris said this? The op stated it wasnt corbyn but never said who it was. Does it matter? It’s probably made up, that isn’t the issue, the problem for Boris is the fact that the Daily Mail has decided to run this as a headline story . Oh I see It's a discussion about the power of the corrupt media or something Got it
It’s about Boris being fucked, the likes of the daily mail made him and they will now destroy him, you reap what you sow
I suspect cummings has got much more dirt on him.
Its like rats turning on each other.
The... Public.... Don't.... Care...
They dont but at some point the tory movers and shakers will recognise the damage the bumbling idiot is doing in their name
Meanwhile it's quite fun to watch 2 amoral shysters rip each other to shreds whilst their fan club dont know which way to turn.
And replace Boris with the Tory party's version of Ed Milliband?
Never going to happen "We will see | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Having not read the daily mail for years can someone who has please tell me who actually said that Boris said this? The op stated it wasnt corbyn but never said who it was. Does it matter? It’s probably made up, that isn’t the issue, the problem for Boris is the fact that the Daily Mail has decided to run this as a headline story . Oh I see It's a discussion about the power of the corrupt media or something Got it
It’s about Boris being fucked, the likes of the daily mail made him and they will now destroy him, you reap what you sow
I suspect cummings has got much more dirt on him.
Its like rats turning on each other.
The... Public.... Don't.... Care...
They dont but at some point the tory movers and shakers will recognise the damage the bumbling idiot is doing in their name
Meanwhile it's quite fun to watch 2 amoral shysters rip each other to shreds whilst their fan club dont know which way to turn.
And replace Boris with the Tory party's version of Ed Milliband?
Never going to happen "Gove? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Straws. Clutching. In what way? The daily mail has been quoted endlessly on here as a source. Why is its integrity now being questioned.? I've never quoted the daily mail as a source. I don't read it. You do realise the OP has come from the Daily Mail? Do I realise the op has come from the daily mail? Do you realise I don't care, I don't read it. Thought I'd explained that? Did I say that the daily mail was clutching at straws? Who is clutching at straws then? You don't know? The only person I can see clutching at straws right now is you I'm just doing exactly what you do. Can you see me? I'll wave. If you can, you'll see it's not me. I thought you were intelligent? Surely you can work it out? Is this a riddle ? Is it? " What droops, but never slither? What's neither there, nor hither? What squares the circle, but never circles the square? What is righteous, but never fair? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Straws. Clutching. In what way? The daily mail has been quoted endlessly on here as a source. Why is its integrity now being questioned.? I've never quoted the daily mail as a source. I don't read it. You do realise the OP has come from the Daily Mail? Do I realise the op has come from the daily mail? Do you realise I don't care, I don't read it. Thought I'd explained that? Did I say that the daily mail was clutching at straws? Who is clutching at straws then? You don't know? The only person I can see clutching at straws right now is you I'm just doing exactly what you do. Can you see me? I'll wave. If you can, you'll see it's not me. I thought you were intelligent? Surely you can work it out? Is this a riddle ? Is it? What droops, but never slither? What's neither there, nor hither? What squares the circle, but never circles the square? What is righteous, but never fair? " I thought you were supposed to be busy doing all the new truck export paperwork or is that all sorted now no problem | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Having not read the daily mail for years can someone who has please tell me who actually said that Boris said this? The op stated it wasnt corbyn but never said who it was. Does it matter? It’s probably made up, that isn’t the issue, the problem for Boris is the fact that the Daily Mail has decided to run this as a headline story . Oh I see It's a discussion about the power of the corrupt media or something Got it
It’s about Boris being fucked, the likes of the daily mail made him and they will now destroy him, you reap what you sow
I suspect cummings has got much more dirt on him.
Its like rats turning on each other.
The... Public.... Don't.... Care...
They dont but at some point the tory movers and shakers will recognise the damage the bumbling idiot is doing in their name
Meanwhile it's quite fun to watch 2 amoral shysters rip each other to shreds whilst their fan club dont know which way to turn.
And replace Boris with the Tory party's version of Ed Milliband?
Never going to happen
Gove? "Yep, and who the heck else have they or any party got that remotely has the electoral stardust of Boris? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Straws. Clutching. In what way? The daily mail has been quoted endlessly on here as a source. Why is its integrity now being questioned.? I've never quoted the daily mail as a source. I don't read it. You do realise the OP has come from the Daily Mail? Do I realise the op has come from the daily mail? Do you realise I don't care, I don't read it. Thought I'd explained that? Did I say that the daily mail was clutching at straws? Who is clutching at straws then? You don't know? The only person I can see clutching at straws right now is you I'm just doing exactly what you do. Can you see me? I'll wave. If you can, you'll see it's not me. I thought you were intelligent? Surely you can work it out? Is this a riddle ? Is it? What droops, but never slither? What's neither there, nor hither? What squares the circle, but never circles the square? What is righteous, but never fair? I thought you were supposed to be busy doing all the new truck export paperwork or is that all sorted now no problem "Truck export? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Straws. Clutching. In what way? The daily mail has been quoted endlessly on here as a source. Why is its integrity now being questioned.? I've never quoted the daily mail as a source. I don't read it. You do realise the OP has come from the Daily Mail? Do I realise the op has come from the daily mail? Do you realise I don't care, I don't read it. Thought I'd explained that? Did I say that the daily mail was clutching at straws? Who is clutching at straws then? You don't know? The only person I can see clutching at straws right now is you I'm just doing exactly what you do. Can you see me? I'll wave. If you can, you'll see it's not me. I thought you were intelligent? Surely you can work it out? Is this a riddle ? Is it? What droops, but never slither? What's neither there, nor hither? What squares the circle, but never circles the square? What is righteous, but never fair? " There you go. You've just proved it! You always talk in riddles!!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Straws. Clutching. In what way? The daily mail has been quoted endlessly on here as a source. Why is its integrity now being questioned.? I've never quoted the daily mail as a source. I don't read it. You do realise the OP has come from the Daily Mail? Do I realise the op has come from the daily mail? Do you realise I don't care, I don't read it. Thought I'd explained that? Did I say that the daily mail was clutching at straws? Who is clutching at straws then? You don't know? The only person I can see clutching at straws right now is you I'm just doing exactly what you do. Can you see me? I'll wave. If you can, you'll see it's not me. I thought you were intelligent? Surely you can work it out? Is this a riddle ? Is it? What droops, but never slither? What's neither there, nor hither? What squares the circle, but never circles the square? What is righteous, but never fair? There you go. You've just proved it! You always talk in riddles!!! "That was a riddle, thanks | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Straws. Clutching. In what way? The daily mail has been quoted endlessly on here as a source. Why is its integrity now being questioned.? I've never quoted the daily mail as a source. I don't read it. You do realise the OP has come from the Daily Mail? Do I realise the op has come from the daily mail? Do you realise I don't care, I don't read it. Thought I'd explained that? Did I say that the daily mail was clutching at straws? Who is clutching at straws then? You don't know? The only person I can see clutching at straws right now is you I'm just doing exactly what you do. Can you see me? I'll wave. If you can, you'll see it's not me. I thought you were intelligent? Surely you can work it out? Is this a riddle ? Is it? What droops, but never slither? What's neither there, nor hither? What squares the circle, but never circles the square? What is righteous, but never fair? I thought you were supposed to be busy doing all the new truck export paperwork or is that all sorted now no problem
Truck export? "Oh yeah that was the other one | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Straws. Clutching. In what way? The daily mail has been quoted endlessly on here as a source. Why is its integrity now being questioned.? I've never quoted the daily mail as a source. I don't read it. You do realise the OP has come from the Daily Mail? Do I realise the op has come from the daily mail? Do you realise I don't care, I don't read it. Thought I'd explained that? Did I say that the daily mail was clutching at straws? Who is clutching at straws then? You don't know? The only person I can see clutching at straws right now is you I'm just doing exactly what you do. Can you see me? I'll wave. If you can, you'll see it's not me. I thought you were intelligent? Surely you can work it out? Is this a riddle ? Is it? What droops, but never slither? What's neither there, nor hither? What squares the circle, but never circles the square? What is righteous, but never fair? I thought you were supposed to be busy doing all the new truck export paperwork or is that all sorted now no problem
Truck export?
Oh yeah that was the other one "1 schizophrenics conversation with himself ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Straws. Clutching. In what way? The daily mail has been quoted endlessly on here as a source. Why is its integrity now being questioned.? I've never quoted the daily mail as a source. I don't read it. You do realise the OP has come from the Daily Mail? Do I realise the op has come from the daily mail? Do you realise I don't care, I don't read it. Thought I'd explained that? Did I say that the daily mail was clutching at straws? Who is clutching at straws then? You don't know? The only person I can see clutching at straws right now is you I'm just doing exactly what you do. Can you see me? I'll wave. If you can, you'll see it's not me. I thought you were intelligent? Surely you can work it out? Is this a riddle ? Is it? What droops, but never slither? What's neither there, nor hither? What squares the circle, but never circles the square? What is righteous, but never fair? I thought you were supposed to be busy doing all the new truck export paperwork or is that all sorted now no problem
Truck export?
Oh yeah that was the other one "If you are mistaking me for Jackal then I am honoured, he is a very respected expert on here, you could learn from him Chris | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Straws. Clutching. In what way? The daily mail has been quoted endlessly on here as a source. Why is its integrity now being questioned.? I've never quoted the daily mail as a source. I don't read it. You do realise the OP has come from the Daily Mail? Do I realise the op has come from the daily mail? Do you realise I don't care, I don't read it. Thought I'd explained that? Did I say that the daily mail was clutching at straws? Who is clutching at straws then? You don't know? The only person I can see clutching at straws right now is you I'm just doing exactly what you do. Can you see me? I'll wave. If you can, you'll see it's not me. I thought you were intelligent? Surely you can work it out? Is this a riddle ? Is it? What droops, but never slither? What's neither there, nor hither? What squares the circle, but never circles the square? What is righteous, but never fair? I thought you were supposed to be busy doing all the new truck export paperwork or is that all sorted now no problem
Truck export?
Oh yeah that was the other one
If you are mistaking me for Jackal then I am honoured, he is a very respected expert on here, you could learn from him Chris "Respected by who? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Straws. Clutching. In what way? The daily mail has been quoted endlessly on here as a source. Why is its integrity now being questioned.? I've never quoted the daily mail as a source. I don't read it. You do realise the OP has come from the Daily Mail? Do I realise the op has come from the daily mail? Do you realise I don't care, I don't read it. Thought I'd explained that? Did I say that the daily mail was clutching at straws? Who is clutching at straws then? You don't know? The only person I can see clutching at straws right now is you I'm just doing exactly what you do. Can you see me? I'll wave. If you can, you'll see it's not me. I thought you were intelligent? Surely you can work it out? Is this a riddle ? Is it? What droops, but never slither? What's neither there, nor hither? What squares the circle, but never circles the square? What is righteous, but never fair? I thought you were supposed to be busy doing all the new truck export paperwork or is that all sorted now no problem
Truck export?
Oh yeah that was the other one
If you are mistaking me for Jackal then I am honoured, he is a very respected expert on here, you could learn from him Chris
Respected by who? "Me | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It might be an interesting comment which attracts attention. It seems that people are unable to fault the current government or able to offer constructive advice . Private conversations should be just that. With a world leading vaccination programme I cannot see anyone being in the slightest bothered by gossip. People are judged by what they do and achievement , not by what they say. All the merchants of doom and gloom were proved wrong in December 2019. For now it is onwards and upwards. Even the economic predictions are now proving very positive. " Wake up Pat, Boris is finished, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So we have some people asking who reported it, others saying no-one cares and yet others doing their best to deflect. Let’s summarise.... The Daily Mail is the Conservatives “working class” media outlet. The Mail is often used to “leak” Government ideas as a sounding station. It does not matter if this is a lie or if it is reporting the truth. What matters is that the Daily Mail has turned on Johnson and this is highly likely because they have information on something even worse than this that will discredit the entire Government. The Mail is doing its Conservative duty and stepping up pressure on Johnson to go quickly as a damage limitation exercise. As an aside, the Speaker of the House is considering an “all” Opposition Party request for the house to debate questionable statements made by Johnson to the House. This would be total humiliation for him if it were to be granted." It's quite simple. When the daily mail is on one of his daily anti eu/jeremy corbyn stories, its word is taken as gospel. However it's now printed a story that paints Johnson as a callous fool,they are very confused,and are questioning its integrity. My advice Is to sit back and enjoy them twisting themselves in knots. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So we have some people asking who reported it, others saying no-one cares and yet others doing their best to deflect. Let’s summarise.... The Daily Mail is the Conservatives “working class” media outlet. The Mail is often used to “leak” Government ideas as a sounding station. It does not matter if this is a lie or if it is reporting the truth. What matters is that the Daily Mail has turned on Johnson and this is highly likely because they have information on something even worse than this that will discredit the entire Government. The Mail is doing its Conservative duty and stepping up pressure on Johnson to go quickly as a damage limitation exercise. As an aside, the Speaker of the House is considering an “all” Opposition Party request for the house to debate questionable statements made by Johnson to the House. This would be total humiliation for him if it were to be granted." Re the last part, its about when he lied at the dispatch box. The bbc have been asked on several occasions why it hasn't been shown. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So we have some people asking who reported it, others saying no-one cares and yet others doing their best to deflect. Let’s summarise.... The Daily Mail is the Conservatives “working class” media outlet. The Mail is often used to “leak” Government ideas as a sounding station. It does not matter if this is a lie or if it is reporting the truth. What matters is that the Daily Mail has turned on Johnson and this is highly likely because they have information on something even worse than this that will discredit the entire Government. The Mail is doing its Conservative duty and stepping up pressure on Johnson to go quickly as a damage limitation exercise. As an aside, the Speaker of the House is considering an “all” Opposition Party request for the house to debate questionable statements made by Johnson to the House. This would be total humiliation for him if it were to be granted. Re the last part, its about when he lied at the dispatch box. The bbc have been asked on several occasions why it hasn't been shown." He'd have to go some to match Starmers whoppers a couple of months ago re EU medicine approvals | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"More likely that Cummings feels hard done by and the Mail is hardly going to turn down the exclusive. " So Cummings is a liar? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So we have some people asking who reported it, others saying no-one cares and yet others doing their best to deflect. Let’s summarise.... The Daily Mail is the Conservatives “working class” media outlet. The Mail is often used to “leak” Government ideas as a sounding station. It does not matter if this is a lie or if it is reporting the truth. What matters is that the Daily Mail has turned on Johnson and this is highly likely because they have information on something even worse than this that will discredit the entire Government. The Mail is doing its Conservative duty and stepping up pressure on Johnson to go quickly as a damage limitation exercise. As an aside, the Speaker of the House is considering an “all” Opposition Party request for the house to debate questionable statements made by Johnson to the House. This would be total humiliation for him if it were to be granted. Re the last part, its about when he lied at the dispatch box. The bbc have been asked on several occasions why it hasn't been shown. He'd have to go some to match Starmers whoppers a couple of months ago re EU medicine approvals " Goes and checks if this thread is about kier starmer... (And presumably you mean the occasion on which he apologized?) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So we have some people asking who reported it, others saying no-one cares and yet others doing their best to deflect. Let’s summarise.... The Daily Mail is the Conservatives “working class” media outlet. The Mail is often used to “leak” Government ideas as a sounding station. It does not matter if this is a lie or if it is reporting the truth. What matters is that the Daily Mail has turned on Johnson and this is highly likely because they have information on something even worse than this that will discredit the entire Government. The Mail is doing its Conservative duty and stepping up pressure on Johnson to go quickly as a damage limitation exercise. As an aside, the Speaker of the House is considering an “all” Opposition Party request for the house to debate questionable statements made by Johnson to the House. This would be total humiliation for him if it were to be granted. Re the last part, its about when he lied at the dispatch box. The bbc have been asked on several occasions why it hasn't been shown." Alistair Campbell was interviewed on the BBC last week and he asked the interviewer why a widely shared (12m+ views) compilation video of Johnson's lies was being ignored by the BBC. The interviewer replied that they didn't think people were interested in it. In that one moment, the BBC admitted that they were ignoring fact based news reporting in favour of opinion. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"More likely that Cummings feels hard done by and the Mail is hardly going to turn down the exclusive. So Cummings is a liar? " Everybody lies, you're not that naive surely? Facts haven't mattered for many years. Spin matters. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So we have some people asking who reported it, others saying no-one cares and yet others doing their best to deflect. Let’s summarise.... The Daily Mail is the Conservatives “working class” media outlet. The Mail is often used to “leak” Government ideas as a sounding station. It does not matter if this is a lie or if it is reporting the truth. What matters is that the Daily Mail has turned on Johnson and this is highly likely because they have information on something even worse than this that will discredit the entire Government. The Mail is doing its Conservative duty and stepping up pressure on Johnson to go quickly as a damage limitation exercise. As an aside, the Speaker of the House is considering an “all” Opposition Party request for the house to debate questionable statements made by Johnson to the House. This would be total humiliation for him if it were to be granted. Re the last part, its about when he lied at the dispatch box. The bbc have been asked on several occasions why it hasn't been shown. He'd have to go some to match Starmers whoppers a couple of months ago re EU medicine approvals Goes and checks if this thread is about kier starmer... (And presumably you mean the occasion on which he apologized?)" Boris lies every day, Starmer lied once (and apologised) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"More likely that Cummings feels hard done by and the Mail is hardly going to turn down the exclusive. So Cummings is a liar? Everybody lies, you're not that naive surely? Facts haven't mattered for many years. Spin matters. " So Cummings is a liar? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"More likely that Cummings feels hard done by and the Mail is hardly going to turn down the exclusive. So Cummings is a liar? Everybody lies, you're not that naive surely? Facts haven't mattered for many years. Spin matters. " I realise ‘facts ‘ don’t matter to you, after all, you voted for Brexit | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"More likely that Cummings feels hard done by and the Mail is hardly going to turn down the exclusive. So Cummings is a liar? Everybody lies, you're not that naive surely? Facts haven't mattered for many years. Spin matters. So Cummings is a liar? " Like everyone else, thats what I said, 10/10 for reading comprehension | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"More likely that Cummings feels hard done by and the Mail is hardly going to turn down the exclusive. So Cummings is a liar? Everybody lies, you're not that naive surely? Facts haven't mattered for many years. Spin matters. So Cummings is a liar? Like everyone else, thats what I said, 10/10 for reading comprehension "He certainly orchestrated some whopping lies in 2016, I am far to intelligent to fall for them though | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So we have some people asking who reported it, others saying no-one cares and yet others doing their best to deflect. Let’s summarise.... The Daily Mail is the Conservatives “working class” media outlet. The Mail is often used to “leak” Government ideas as a sounding station. It does not matter if this is a lie or if it is reporting the truth. What matters is that the Daily Mail has turned on Johnson and this is highly likely because they have information on something even worse than this that will discredit the entire Government. The Mail is doing its Conservative duty and stepping up pressure on Johnson to go quickly as a damage limitation exercise. As an aside, the Speaker of the House is considering an “all” Opposition Party request for the house to debate questionable statements made by Johnson to the House. This would be total humiliation for him if it were to be granted. Re the last part, its about when he lied at the dispatch box. The bbc have been asked on several occasions why it hasn't been shown. Alistair Campbell was interviewed on the BBC last week and he asked the interviewer why a widely shared (12m+ views) compilation video of Johnson's lies was being ignored by the BBC. The interviewer replied that they didn't think people were interested in it. In that one moment, the BBC admitted that they were ignoring fact based news reporting in favour of opinion." They have a point tbf Big chunks of the country are quite happy to let a habitual liar run the country. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"More likely that Cummings feels hard done by and the Mail is hardly going to turn down the exclusive. So Cummings is a liar? Everybody lies, you're not that naive surely? Facts haven't mattered for many years. Spin matters. So Cummings is a liar? " Got to say I’m not convinced by his Barnard Castle story. If both told me it was raining I would open a window and check. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"More likely that Cummings feels hard done by and the Mail is hardly going to turn down the exclusive. So Cummings is a liar? Everybody lies, you're not that naive surely? Facts haven't mattered for many years. Spin matters. So Cummings is a liar? Got to say I’m not convinced by his Barnard Castle story. If both told me it was raining I would open a window and check. " They are both liars, Cummings has nothing to lose though, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"More likely that Cummings feels hard done by and the Mail is hardly going to turn down the exclusive. So Cummings is a liar? Everybody lies, you're not that naive surely? Facts haven't mattered for many years. Spin matters. So Cummings is a liar? Got to say I’m not convinced by his Barnard Castle story. If both told me it was raining I would open a window and check. They are both liars, Cummings has nothing to lose though, " Bet he’s got a banging book planned. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"More likely that Cummings feels hard done by and the Mail is hardly going to turn down the exclusive. So Cummings is a liar? Everybody lies, you're not that naive surely? Facts haven't mattered for many years. Spin matters. So Cummings is a liar? Got to say I’m not convinced by his Barnard Castle story. If both told me it was raining I would open a window and check. They are both liars, Cummings has nothing to lose though, Bet he’s got a banging book planned. " Probably, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"More likely that Cummings feels hard done by and the Mail is hardly going to turn down the exclusive. So Cummings is a liar? Everybody lies, you're not that naive surely? Facts haven't mattered for many years. Spin matters. " Sums up your posts really... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56890714 It looks like he did say it, "Well your crew said the thread was about the Daily Mail's agenda rather than whether it was true? Which is it just so we know what we are supposed to be replying to? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56890714 It looks like he did say it,
Well your crew said the thread was about the Daily Mail's agenda rather than whether it was true?
Which is it just so we know what we are supposed to be replying to? "I would prefer it if you didn’t reply to any, try reading and make up your own mind | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56890714 It looks like he did say it,
Well your crew said the thread was about the Daily Mail's agenda rather than whether it was true?
Which is it just so we know what we are supposed to be replying to?
I would prefer it if you didn’t reply to any, try reading and make up your own mind "OK, if you don't want my intellectual clarity brought to bear, I shall recuse myself from this thread | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56890714 It looks like he did say it,
Well your crew said the thread was about the Daily Mail's agenda rather than whether it was true?
Which is it just so we know what we are supposed to be replying to?
I would prefer it if you didn’t reply to any, try reading and make up your own mind
OK, if you don't want my intellectual clarity brought to bear, I shall recuse myself from this thread "Thanks Chris | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56890714 It looks like he did say it,
Well your crew said the thread was about the Daily Mail's agenda rather than whether it was true?
Which is it just so we know what we are supposed to be replying to?
I would prefer it if you didn’t reply to any, try reading and make up your own mind
OK, if you don't want my intellectual clarity brought to bear, I shall recuse myself from this thread
Thanks Chris "No problem
If you need me give me a shout | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If he said it, what was the context? Please let us have the minutes of the whole meeting, thanks "Jeezus help us | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56890714 It looks like he did say it, "The defence for this is going to be highly amusing. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56890714 It looks like he did say it,
The defence for this is going to be highly amusing.
"It will be 1 He said it in jest 2 What is the context 3 He was doing a parody 4 Corbyns fault 5 The EUs fault 6 It doesn’t matter he has an 80 seat majority 7 People are over reacting and being ‘woke’ | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56890714 It looks like he did say it,
The defence for this is going to be highly amusing.
It will be
1 He said it in jest
2 What is the context
3 He was doing a parody
4 Corbyns fault
5 The EUs fault
6 It doesn’t matter he has an 80 seat majority
7 People are over reacting and being ‘woke’
"My money is on jezza Or maybe it's the bbc,in league with the mail and Cummings in a fiendish plot to make boris look like a callous ####. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56890714 It looks like he did say it,
The defence for this is going to be highly amusing.
"if he said it there is no defence | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56890714 It looks like he did say it,
The defence for this is going to be highly amusing.
"I'm not allowed to answer unfortunately  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56890714 It looks like he did say it,
The defence for this is going to be highly amusing.
It will be
1 He said it in jest
2 What is the context
3 He was doing a parody
4 Corbyns fault
5 The EUs fault
6 It doesn’t matter he has an 80 seat majority
7 People are over reacting and being ‘woke’
"Or just a shrug of the shoulders. Is anyone is even 1% surprised that Boris would let people die in order for the Tories and their buddies/donors to get rich from the pandemic? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56890714 It looks like he did say it,
The defence for this is going to be highly amusing.
"Is "amusing" the word you were looking for? blimey
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56890714 It looks like he did say it,
The defence for this is going to be highly amusing.
I'm not allowed to answer unfortunately "Sorry Chris, maybe another time ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56890714 It looks like he did say it, "Doesn't add anything to what the Mail said. Not even a whole sentence, how can you go along with this nonsense? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56890714 It looks like he did say it,
The defence for this is going to be highly amusing.
It will be
1 He said it in jest
2 What is the context
3 He was doing a parody
4 Corbyns fault
5 The EUs fault
6 It doesn’t matter he has an 80 seat majority
7 People are over reacting and being ‘woke’
Or just a shrug of the shoulders. Is anyone is even 1% surprised that Boris would let people die in order for the Tories and their buddies/donors to get rich from the pandemic?"I am not surprised, your not surprised, some of his fanboys don’t care but the Daily Mail is ‘offended’ , Boris is toast | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56890714 It looks like he did say it,
The defence for this is going to be highly amusing.
if he said it there is no defence "Unlikely to deter anyone from voting for him and the Tories though. As someone said above, or in another thread. People don't care about facts, only spin. You'll see it happening now. Plus a whole bunch of distraction. The next week or two will have some new outrage about immigrants in boats, about Corbyn, about some Labour MP they've been saving dirt up on. Standard Tories. And the wheel keeps on rolling. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56890714 It looks like he did say it,
Doesn't add anything to what the Mail said. Not even a whole sentence, how can you go along with this nonsense? "Still replying Chris? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56890714 It looks like he did say it,
The defence for this is going to be highly amusing.
if he said it there is no defence "He said it, but don’t worry, his defenders will be in here soon enough | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56890714 It looks like he did say it,
The defence for this is going to be highly amusing.
It will be
1 He said it in jest
2 What is the context
3 He was doing a parody
4 Corbyns fault
5 The EUs fault
6 It doesn’t matter he has an 80 seat majority
7 People are over reacting and being ‘woke’
Or just a shrug of the shoulders. Is anyone is even 1% surprised that Boris would let people die in order for the Tories and their buddies/donors to get rich from the pandemic?
I am not surprised, your not surprised, some of his fanboys don’t care but the Daily Mail is ‘offended’ , Boris is toast "Obviously I'm not going to give them the as revenue, so I don't know what they've said. But I can't imagine that anyone won't vote Tory on the back of this. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56890714 It looks like he did say it,
The defence for this is going to be highly amusing.
It will be
1 He said it in jest
2 What is the context
3 He was doing a parody
4 Corbyns fault
5 The EUs fault
6 It doesn’t matter he has an 80 seat majority
7 People are over reacting and being ‘woke’
Or just a shrug of the shoulders. Is anyone is even 1% surprised that Boris would let people die in order for the Tories and their buddies/donors to get rich from the pandemic?"Just like operation last gasp. It is quite funny watching them turn on each other. Who to believe..the lying shyster ot the clown who is an habitual liar? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56890714 It looks like he did say it,
The defence for this is going to be highly amusing.
It will be
1 He said it in jest
2 What is the context
3 He was doing a parody
4 Corbyns fault
5 The EUs fault
6 It doesn’t matter he has an 80 seat majority
7 People are over reacting and being ‘woke’
Or just a shrug of the shoulders. Is anyone is even 1% surprised that Boris would let people die in order for the Tories and their buddies/donors to get rich from the pandemic?
I am not surprised, your not surprised, some of his fanboys don’t care but the Daily Mail is ‘offended’ , Boris is toast
Obviously I'm not going to give them the as revenue, so I don't know what they've said. But I can't imagine that anyone won't vote Tory on the back of this."They will vote Tory but it won’t be Boris at the healm, who knows what shite will come next but I honestly think even Gove would be a better PM | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Straws. Clutching. In what way? The daily mail has been quoted endlessly on here as a source. Why is its integrity now being questioned.? I've never quoted the daily mail as a source. I don't read it. You do realise the OP has come from the Daily Mail? Do I realise the op has come from the daily mail? Do you realise I don't care, I don't read it. Thought I'd explained that? Did I say that the daily mail was clutching at straws? Who is clutching at straws then? You don't know? The only person I can see clutching at straws right now is you I'm just doing exactly what you do. Can you see me? I'll wave. If you can, you'll see it's not me. I thought you were intelligent? Surely you can work it out? Is this a riddle ? Is it? What droops, but never slither? What's neither there, nor hither? What squares the circle, but never circles the square? What is righteous, but never fair? There you go. You've just proved it! You always talk in riddles!!! "No thumbs Sandy?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56890714 It looks like he did say it,
The defence for this is going to be highly amusing.
It will be
1 He said it in jest
2 What is the context
3 He was doing a parody
4 Corbyns fault
5 The EUs fault
6 It doesn’t matter he has an 80 seat majority
7 People are over reacting and being ‘woke’
Or just a shrug of the shoulders. Is anyone is even 1% surprised that Boris would let people die in order for the Tories and their buddies/donors to get rich from the pandemic?
I am not surprised, your not surprised, some of his fanboys don’t care but the Daily Mail is ‘offended’ , Boris is toast
Obviously I'm not going to give them the as revenue, so I don't know what they've said. But I can't imagine that anyone won't vote Tory on the back of this.
They will vote Tory but it won’t be Boris at the healm, who knows what shite will come next but I honestly think even Gove would be a better PM "Blimey!  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56890714 It looks like he did say it,
The defence for this is going to be highly amusing.
It will be
1 He said it in jest
2 What is the context
3 He was doing a parody
4 Corbyns fault
5 The EUs fault
6 It doesn’t matter he has an 80 seat majority
7 People are over reacting and being ‘woke’
Or just a shrug of the shoulders. Is anyone is even 1% surprised that Boris would let people die in order for the Tories and their buddies/donors to get rich from the pandemic?
I am not surprised, your not surprised, some of his fanboys don’t care but the Daily Mail is ‘offended’ , Boris is toast
Obviously I'm not going to give them the as revenue, so I don't know what they've said. But I can't imagine that anyone won't vote Tory on the back of this.
They will vote Tory but it won’t be Boris at the healm, who knows what shite will come next but I honestly think even Gove would be a better PM "Gove who said himself he didn't have the charisma to be PM? Thread has got very weird, I'm out | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56890714 It looks like he did say it,
The defence for this is going to be highly amusing.
It will be
1 He said it in jest
2 What is the context
3 He was doing a parody
4 Corbyns fault
5 The EUs fault
6 It doesn’t matter he has an 80 seat majority
7 People are over reacting and being ‘woke’
Or just a shrug of the shoulders. Is anyone is even 1% surprised that Boris would let people die in order for the Tories and their buddies/donors to get rich from the pandemic?
I am not surprised, your not surprised, some of his fanboys don’t care but the Daily Mail is ‘offended’ , Boris is toast
Obviously I'm not going to give them the as revenue, so I don't know what they've said. But I can't imagine that anyone won't vote Tory on the back of this.
They will vote Tory but it won’t be Boris at the healm, who knows what shite will come next but I honestly think even Gove would be a better PM
Gove who said himself he didn't have the charisma to be PM?
Thread has got very weird, I'm out "Seeya | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56890714 It looks like he did say it,
The defence for this is going to be highly amusing.
It will be
1 He said it in jest
2 What is the context
3 He was doing a parody
4 Corbyns fault
5 The EUs fault
6 It doesn’t matter he has an 80 seat majority
7 People are over reacting and being ‘woke’
Or just a shrug of the shoulders. Is anyone is even 1% surprised that Boris would let people die in order for the Tories and their buddies/donors to get rich from the pandemic?
I am not surprised, your not surprised, some of his fanboys don’t care but the Daily Mail is ‘offended’ , Boris is toast
Obviously I'm not going to give them the as revenue, so I don't know what they've said. But I can't imagine that anyone won't vote Tory on the back of this.
They will vote Tory but it won’t be Boris at the healm, who knows what shite will come next but I honestly think even Gove would be a better PM
Blimey! "Controversial, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Hartlepool going to be a litmus test for feeling. " Not sure you can read too much into it when the labour candidate is a sex pest and the previous MP is in Court for sexual harassment next month. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Gove quizzed on PM saying he'd rather see 'bodies pile high' than order a third lockdown Back in Westminster and Michael Gove has defended the prime minister in the House of Commons. SNP's Alison Thewliss raised the prime minister's reported comment that he would rather see "the bodies pile high in their thousands" than order a third lockdown. The Daily Mail reported that Boris Johnson had made the comment in Downing Street last November – an allegation Mr Johnson today denied. Ms Thewliss said the comment was "despicable, cruel and callous" and "not befitting the office of prime minister". In response, Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove said: "[Ms Thewliss] repeats a line from a newspaper but she ignores the fact that the prime minister not only instituted a second but a third lockdown to keep us safe." He accused Ms Thewliss of trying to "score political points in a way, sadly, which causes regret". _____________________________________ Thewliss (SNP) - A Daily Mail Story. You really don't need to know anything else. Next. "Is this the story for all this furore? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Gove quizzed on PM saying he'd rather see 'bodies pile high' than order a third lockdown Back in Westminster and Michael Gove has defended the prime minister in the House of Commons. SNP's Alison Thewliss raised the prime minister's reported comment that he would rather see "the bodies pile high in their thousands" than order a third lockdown. The Daily Mail reported that Boris Johnson had made the comment in Downing Street last November – an allegation Mr Johnson today denied. Ms Thewliss said the comment was "despicable, cruel and callous" and "not befitting the office of prime minister". In response, Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove said: "[Ms Thewliss] repeats a line from a newspaper but she ignores the fact that the prime minister not only instituted a second but a third lockdown to keep us safe." He accused Ms Thewliss of trying to "score political points in a way, sadly, which causes regret". _____________________________________ Thewliss (SNP) - A Daily Mail Story. You really don't need to know anything else. Next.
Is this the story for all this furore?"Yup. Sad ain't it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Gove quizzed on PM saying he'd rather see 'bodies pile high' than order a third lockdown Back in Westminster and Michael Gove has defended the prime minister in the House of Commons. SNP's Alison Thewliss raised the prime minister's reported comment that he would rather see "the bodies pile high in their thousands" than order a third lockdown. The Daily Mail reported that Boris Johnson had made the comment in Downing Street last November – an allegation Mr Johnson today denied. Ms Thewliss said the comment was "despicable, cruel and callous" and "not befitting the office of prime minister". In response, Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove said: "[Ms Thewliss] repeats a line from a newspaper but she ignores the fact that the prime minister not only instituted a second but a third lockdown to keep us safe." He accused Ms Thewliss of trying to "score political points in a way, sadly, which causes regret". _____________________________________ Thewliss (SNP) - A Daily Mail Story. You really don't need to know anything else. Next.
Is this the story for all this furore?"I realise you don’t care what he said, at what point would you condemn him? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Gove quizzed on PM saying he'd rather see 'bodies pile high' than order a third lockdown Back in Westminster and Michael Gove has defended the prime minister in the House of Commons. SNP's Alison Thewliss raised the prime minister's reported comment that he would rather see "the bodies pile high in their thousands" than order a third lockdown. The Daily Mail reported that Boris Johnson had made the comment in Downing Street last November – an allegation Mr Johnson today denied. Ms Thewliss said the comment was "despicable, cruel and callous" and "not befitting the office of prime minister". In response, Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove said: "[Ms Thewliss] repeats a line from a newspaper but she ignores the fact that the prime minister not only instituted a second but a third lockdown to keep us safe." He accused Ms Thewliss of trying to "score political points in a way, sadly, which causes regret". _____________________________________ Thewliss (SNP) - A Daily Mail Story. You really don't need to know anything else. Next.
Is this the story for all this furore?
Yup. Sad ain't it? "I really don't know what to say | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Gove quizzed on PM saying he'd rather see 'bodies pile high' than order a third lockdown Back in Westminster and Michael Gove has defended the prime minister in the House of Commons. SNP's Alison Thewliss raised the prime minister's reported comment that he would rather see "the bodies pile high in their thousands" than order a third lockdown. The Daily Mail reported that Boris Johnson had made the comment in Downing Street last November – an allegation Mr Johnson today denied. Ms Thewliss said the comment was "despicable, cruel and callous" and "not befitting the office of prime minister". In response, Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove said: "[Ms Thewliss] repeats a line from a newspaper but she ignores the fact that the prime minister not only instituted a second but a third lockdown to keep us safe." He accused Ms Thewliss of trying to "score political points in a way, sadly, which causes regret". _____________________________________ Thewliss (SNP) - A Daily Mail Story. You really don't need to know anything else. Next.
Is this the story for all this furore?
Yup. Sad ain't it? "Yet here you are, commenting on it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Gove quizzed on PM saying he'd rather see 'bodies pile high' than order a third lockdown Back in Westminster and Michael Gove has defended the prime minister in the House of Commons. SNP's Alison Thewliss raised the prime minister's reported comment that he would rather see "the bodies pile high in their thousands" than order a third lockdown. The Daily Mail reported that Boris Johnson had made the comment in Downing Street last November – an allegation Mr Johnson today denied. Ms Thewliss said the comment was "despicable, cruel and callous" and "not befitting the office of prime minister". In response, Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove said: "[Ms Thewliss] repeats a line from a newspaper but she ignores the fact that the prime minister not only instituted a second but a third lockdown to keep us safe." He accused Ms Thewliss of trying to "score political points in a way, sadly, which causes regret". _____________________________________ Thewliss (SNP) - A Daily Mail Story. You really don't need to know anything else. Next.
Is this the story for all this furore?
I realise you don’t care what he said, at what point would you condemn him? "You realise nothing and if that is the article then no one knows what he said. One MP has said something about another. Massive story that | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Gove quizzed on PM saying he'd rather see 'bodies pile high' than order a third lockdown Back in Westminster and Michael Gove has defended the prime minister in the House of Commons. SNP's Alison Thewliss raised the prime minister's reported comment that he would rather see "the bodies pile high in their thousands" than order a third lockdown. The Daily Mail reported that Boris Johnson had made the comment in Downing Street last November – an allegation Mr Johnson today denied. Ms Thewliss said the comment was "despicable, cruel and callous" and "not befitting the office of prime minister". In response, Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove said: "[Ms Thewliss] repeats a line from a newspaper but she ignores the fact that the prime minister not only instituted a second but a third lockdown to keep us safe." He accused Ms Thewliss of trying to "score political points in a way, sadly, which causes regret". _____________________________________ Thewliss (SNP) - A Daily Mail Story. You really don't need to know anything else. Next. "Hilarious, and you think this is the end of the matter? There is plenty more of that to come , | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Gove quizzed on PM saying he'd rather see 'bodies pile high' than order a third lockdown Back in Westminster and Michael Gove has defended the prime minister in the House of Commons. SNP's Alison Thewliss raised the prime minister's reported comment that he would rather see "the bodies pile high in their thousands" than order a third lockdown. The Daily Mail reported that Boris Johnson had made the comment in Downing Street last November – an allegation Mr Johnson today denied. Ms Thewliss said the comment was "despicable, cruel and callous" and "not befitting the office of prime minister". In response, Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove said: "[Ms Thewliss] repeats a line from a newspaper but she ignores the fact that the prime minister not only instituted a second but a third lockdown to keep us safe." He accused Ms Thewliss of trying to "score political points in a way, sadly, which causes regret". _____________________________________ Thewliss (SNP) - A Daily Mail Story. You really don't need to know anything else. Next.
Is this the story for all this furore?
I realise you don’t care what he said, at what point would you condemn him?
You realise nothing and if that is the article then no one knows what he said. One MP has said something about another. Massive story that"So you say | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Gove quizzed on PM saying he'd rather see 'bodies pile high' than order a third lockdown Back in Westminster and Michael Gove has defended the prime minister in the House of Commons. SNP's Alison Thewliss raised the prime minister's reported comment that he would rather see "the bodies pile high in their thousands" than order a third lockdown. The Daily Mail reported that Boris Johnson had made the comment in Downing Street last November – an allegation Mr Johnson today denied. Ms Thewliss said the comment was "despicable, cruel and callous" and "not befitting the office of prime minister". In response, Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove said: "[Ms Thewliss] repeats a line from a newspaper but she ignores the fact that the prime minister not only instituted a second but a third lockdown to keep us safe." He accused Ms Thewliss of trying to "score political points in a way, sadly, which causes regret". _____________________________________ Thewliss (SNP) - A Daily Mail Story. You really don't need to know anything else. Next.
Is this the story for all this furore?
I realise you don’t care what he said, at what point would you condemn him?
You realise nothing and if that is the article then no one knows what he said. One MP has said something about another. Massive story that
So you say "Believe what you like, that's your right but I'd rather deal in facts. I don't see any fact here. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Gove quizzed on PM saying he'd rather see 'bodies pile high' than order a third lockdown Back in Westminster and Michael Gove has defended the prime minister in the House of Commons. SNP's Alison Thewliss raised the prime minister's reported comment that he would rather see "the bodies pile high in their thousands" than order a third lockdown. The Daily Mail reported that Boris Johnson had made the comment in Downing Street last November – an allegation Mr Johnson today denied. Ms Thewliss said the comment was "despicable, cruel and callous" and "not befitting the office of prime minister". In response, Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove said: "[Ms Thewliss] repeats a line from a newspaper but she ignores the fact that the prime minister not only instituted a second but a third lockdown to keep us safe." He accused Ms Thewliss of trying to "score political points in a way, sadly, which causes regret". _____________________________________ Thewliss (SNP) - A Daily Mail Story. You really don't need to know anything else. Next.
Is this the story for all this furore?
I realise you don’t care what he said, at what point would you condemn him?
You realise nothing and if that is the article then no one knows what he said. One MP has said something about another. Massive story that
So you say
Believe what you like, that's your right but I'd rather deal in facts. I don't see any fact here."In your opinion | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Gove quizzed on PM saying he'd rather see 'bodies pile high' than order a third lockdown Back in Westminster and Michael Gove has defended the prime minister in the House of Commons. SNP's Alison Thewliss raised the prime minister's reported comment that he would rather see "the bodies pile high in their thousands" than order a third lockdown. The Daily Mail reported that Boris Johnson had made the comment in Downing Street last November – an allegation Mr Johnson today denied. Ms Thewliss said the comment was "despicable, cruel and callous" and "not befitting the office of prime minister". In response, Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove said: "[Ms Thewliss] repeats a line from a newspaper but she ignores the fact that the prime minister not only instituted a second but a third lockdown to keep us safe." He accused Ms Thewliss of trying to "score political points in a way, sadly, which causes regret". _____________________________________ Thewliss (SNP) - A Daily Mail Story. You really don't need to know anything else. Next.
Is this the story for all this furore?
I realise you don’t care what he said, at what point would you condemn him?
You realise nothing and if that is the article then no one knows what he said. One MP has said something about another. Massive story that
So you say
Believe what you like, that's your right but I'd rather deal in facts. I don't see any fact here.
In your opinion "Lost the debate and have to resort to playground retorts
I've told you about this before, if you wanna play with he big kids, you're gonna have to do better | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I realise you don’t care what he said, at what point would you condemn him? " I realise you don't care if it's the truth or not. You just assume it is and off you go. So far NOT one person is backing this story up except the Miserabilists. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Gove quizzed on PM saying he'd rather see 'bodies pile high' than order a third lockdown Back in Westminster and Michael Gove has defended the prime minister in the House of Commons. SNP's Alison Thewliss raised the prime minister's reported comment that he would rather see "the bodies pile high in their thousands" than order a third lockdown. The Daily Mail reported that Boris Johnson had made the comment in Downing Street last November – an allegation Mr Johnson today denied. Ms Thewliss said the comment was "despicable, cruel and callous" and "not befitting the office of prime minister". In response, Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove said: "[Ms Thewliss] repeats a line from a newspaper but she ignores the fact that the prime minister not only instituted a second but a third lockdown to keep us safe." He accused Ms Thewliss of trying to "score political points in a way, sadly, which causes regret". _____________________________________ Thewliss (SNP) - A Daily Mail Story. You really don't need to know anything else. Next.
Is this the story for all this furore?
I realise you don’t care what he said, at what point would you condemn him?
You realise nothing and if that is the article then no one knows what he said. One MP has said something about another. Massive story that
So you say
Believe what you like, that's your right but I'd rather deal in facts. I don't see any fact here.
In your opinion
Lost the debate and have to resort to playground retorts
I've told you about this before, if you wanna play with he big kids, you're gonna have to do better"What ‘facts ‘ do you actually need, to be present at the time? Video evidence? Wether you believe this story or not it is the beginning of the end for Bojo, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Gove quizzed on PM saying he'd rather see 'bodies pile high' than order a third lockdown Back in Westminster and Michael Gove has defended the prime minister in the House of Commons. SNP's Alison Thewliss raised the prime minister's reported comment that he would rather see "the bodies pile high in their thousands" than order a third lockdown. The Daily Mail reported that Boris Johnson had made the comment in Downing Street last November – an allegation Mr Johnson today denied. Ms Thewliss said the comment was "despicable, cruel and callous" and "not befitting the office of prime minister". In response, Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove said: "[Ms Thewliss] repeats a line from a newspaper but she ignores the fact that the prime minister not only instituted a second but a third lockdown to keep us safe." He accused Ms Thewliss of trying to "score political points in a way, sadly, which causes regret". _____________________________________ Thewliss (SNP) - A Daily Mail Story. You really don't need to know anything else. Next.
Is this the story for all this furore?
I realise you don’t care what he said, at what point would you condemn him?
You realise nothing and if that is the article then no one knows what he said. One MP has said something about another. Massive story that
So you say
Believe what you like, that's your right but I'd rather deal in facts. I don't see any fact here.
In your opinion
Lost the debate and have to resort to playground retorts
I've told you about this before, if you wanna play with he big kids, you're gonna have to do better
What ‘facts ‘ do you actually need, to be present at the time? Video evidence? Wether you believe this story or not it is the beginning of the end for Bojo, "Facts are needed as evidence before condemning someone. Thats how its supposed to work in a civilised world. Or do we just condemn everyone and anyone who has an accusation levelled at them? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Yet here you are, commenting on it " Poor defence that one. But I can comment on anything I like. I am commenting on the fact that lots like you will just accept 'a story' as truth with NOT ONE other person holding it out to be the truth except a daily mail journo' oh and you and the miserabilists. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Yet here you are, commenting on it Poor defence that one. But I can comment on anything I like. I am commenting on the fact that lots like you will just accept 'a story' as truth with NOT ONE other person holding it out to be the truth except a daily mail journo' oh and you and the miserabilists." The fact that you don’t believe it is irrelevant, the BBC believe it, the daily mail believes it , they have huge audiences you have no one. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Gove quizzed on PM saying he'd rather see 'bodies pile high' than order a third lockdown Back in Westminster and Michael Gove has defended the prime minister in the House of Commons. SNP's Alison Thewliss raised the prime minister's reported comment that he would rather see "the bodies pile high in their thousands" than order a third lockdown. The Daily Mail reported that Boris Johnson had made the comment in Downing Street last November – an allegation Mr Johnson today denied. Ms Thewliss said the comment was "despicable, cruel and callous" and "not befitting the office of prime minister". In response, Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove said: "[Ms Thewliss] repeats a line from a newspaper but she ignores the fact that the prime minister not only instituted a second but a third lockdown to keep us safe." He accused Ms Thewliss of trying to "score political points in a way, sadly, which causes regret". _____________________________________ Thewliss (SNP) - A Daily Mail Story. You really don't need to know anything else. Next.
Is this the story for all this furore?
I realise you don’t care what he said, at what point would you condemn him?
You realise nothing and if that is the article then no one knows what he said. One MP has said something about another. Massive story that
So you say
Believe what you like, that's your right but I'd rather deal in facts. I don't see any fact here.
In your opinion
Lost the debate and have to resort to playground retorts
I've told you about this before, if you wanna play with he big kids, you're gonna have to do better
What ‘facts ‘ do you actually need, to be present at the time? Video evidence? Wether you believe this story or not it is the beginning of the end for Bojo,
Facts are needed as evidence before condemning someone. Thats how its supposed to work in a civilised world.
Or do we just condemn everyone and anyone
who has an accusation levelled at them?"My opinion is irrelevant, your opinion is irrelevant, the Daily Mail (shit newspaper) and the BBCs opinion matters . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Gove quizzed on PM saying he'd rather see 'bodies pile high' than order a third lockdown Back in Westminster and Michael Gove has defended the prime minister in the House of Commons. SNP's Alison Thewliss raised the prime minister's reported comment that he would rather see "the bodies pile high in their thousands" than order a third lockdown. The Daily Mail reported that Boris Johnson had made the comment in Downing Street last November – an allegation Mr Johnson today denied. Ms Thewliss said the comment was "despicable, cruel and callous" and "not befitting the office of prime minister". In response, Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove said: "[Ms Thewliss] repeats a line from a newspaper but she ignores the fact that the prime minister not only instituted a second but a third lockdown to keep us safe." He accused Ms Thewliss of trying to "score political points in a way, sadly, which causes regret". _____________________________________ Thewliss (SNP) - A Daily Mail Story. You really don't need to know anything else. Next.
Is this the story for all this furore?
I realise you don’t care what he said, at what point would you condemn him?
You realise nothing and if that is the article then no one knows what he said. One MP has said something about another. Massive story that
So you say
Believe what you like, that's your right but I'd rather deal in facts. I don't see any fact here.
In your opinion
Lost the debate and have to resort to playground retorts
I've told you about this before, if you wanna play with he big kids, you're gonna have to do better
What ‘facts ‘ do you actually need, to be present at the time? Video evidence? Wether you believe this story or not it is the beginning of the end for Bojo,
Facts are needed as evidence before condemning someone. Thats how its supposed to work in a civilised world.
Or do we just condemn everyone and anyone
who has an accusation levelled at them?
My opinion is irrelevant, your opinion is irrelevant, the Daily Mail (shit newspaper) and the BBCs opinion matters . "Well I read them both from time to time but that doesn't mean I believe everything they write. I'd say the same goes for probably half of their audiences. You really do xive the press to much credit and your fellow human nowhere near enough | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Yet here you are, commenting on it Poor defence that one. But I can comment on anything I like. I am commenting on the fact that lots like you will just accept 'a story' as truth with NOT ONE other person holding it out to be the truth except a daily mail journo' oh and you and the miserabilists. The fact that you don’t believe it is irrelevant, the BBC believe it, the daily mail believes it , they have huge audiences you have no one. "I'm not selling newspapers. Now you show me JUST one person in real life has said it is true, because they heard him say it? Go on JUST ONE will do. Only One? Schoolboy sniggering and gossip. Sad state you have lowered yourself too. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Gove quizzed on PM saying he'd rather see 'bodies pile high' than order a third lockdown Back in Westminster and Michael Gove has defended the prime minister in the House of Commons. SNP's Alison Thewliss raised the prime minister's reported comment that he would rather see "the bodies pile high in their thousands" than order a third lockdown. The Daily Mail reported that Boris Johnson had made the comment in Downing Street last November – an allegation Mr Johnson today denied. Ms Thewliss said the comment was "despicable, cruel and callous" and "not befitting the office of prime minister". In response, Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove said: "[Ms Thewliss] repeats a line from a newspaper but she ignores the fact that the prime minister not only instituted a second but a third lockdown to keep us safe." He accused Ms Thewliss of trying to "score political points in a way, sadly, which causes regret". _____________________________________ Thewliss (SNP) - A Daily Mail Story. You really don't need to know anything else. Next.
Is this the story for all this furore?
I realise you don’t care what he said, at what point would you condemn him?
You realise nothing and if that is the article then no one knows what he said. One MP has said something about another. Massive story that
So you say
Believe what you like, that's your right but I'd rather deal in facts. I don't see any fact here.
In your opinion
Lost the debate and have to resort to playground retorts
I've told you about this before, if you wanna play with he big kids, you're gonna have to do better
What ‘facts ‘ do you actually need, to be present at the time? Video evidence? Wether you believe this story or not it is the beginning of the end for Bojo,
Facts are needed as evidence before condemning someone. Thats how its supposed to work in a civilised world.
Or do we just condemn everyone and anyone
who has an accusation levelled at them?
My opinion is irrelevant, your opinion is irrelevant, the Daily Mail (shit newspaper) and the BBCs opinion matters .
Well I read them both from time to time but that doesn't mean I believe everything they write. I'd say the same goes for probably half of their audiences. You really do xive the press to much credit and your fellow human nowhere near enough"Like I said, nobody cares what you or I think, Bojo is finished. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Yet here you are, commenting on it Poor defence that one. But I can comment on anything I like. I am commenting on the fact that lots like you will just accept 'a story' as truth with NOT ONE other person holding it out to be the truth except a daily mail journo' oh and you and the miserabilists. The fact that you don’t believe it is irrelevant, the BBC believe it, the daily mail believes it , they have huge audiences you have no one.
I'm not selling newspapers. Now you show me JUST one person in real life has said it is true, because they heard him say it? Go on JUST ONE will do. Only One? Schoolboy sniggering and gossip.
Sad state you have lowered yourself too.
"Literally nobody cares what you or I think, if the story is true then he has to go , if it isn’t true then he will still go because this is just the start . Bojo is finished | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Yet here you are, commenting on it Poor defence that one. But I can comment on anything I like. I am commenting on the fact that lots like you will just accept 'a story' as truth with NOT ONE other person holding it out to be the truth except a daily mail journo' oh and you and the miserabilists. The fact that you don’t believe it is irrelevant, the BBC believe it, the daily mail believes it , they have huge audiences you have no one.
I'm not selling newspapers. Now you show me JUST one person in real life has said it is true, because they heard him say it? Go on JUST ONE will do. Only One? Schoolboy sniggering and gossip.
Sad state you have lowered yourself too.
" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Gove quizzed on PM saying he'd rather see 'bodies pile high' than order a third lockdown Back in Westminster and Michael Gove has defended the prime minister in the House of Commons. SNP's Alison Thewliss raised the prime minister's reported comment that he would rather see "the bodies pile high in their thousands" than order a third lockdown. The Daily Mail reported that Boris Johnson had made the comment in Downing Street last November – an allegation Mr Johnson today denied. Ms Thewliss said the comment was "despicable, cruel and callous" and "not befitting the office of prime minister". In response, Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove said: "[Ms Thewliss] repeats a line from a newspaper but she ignores the fact that the prime minister not only instituted a second but a third lockdown to keep us safe." He accused Ms Thewliss of trying to "score political points in a way, sadly, which causes regret". _____________________________________ Thewliss (SNP) - A Daily Mail Story. You really don't need to know anything else. Next.
Is this the story for all this furore?
I realise you don’t care what he said, at what point would you condemn him?
You realise nothing and if that is the article then no one knows what he said. One MP has said something about another. Massive story that
So you say
Believe what you like, that's your right but I'd rather deal in facts. I don't see any fact here.
In your opinion
Lost the debate and have to resort to playground retorts
I've told you about this before, if you wanna play with he big kids, you're gonna have to do better
What ‘facts ‘ do you actually need, to be present at the time? Video evidence? Wether you believe this story or not it is the beginning of the end for Bojo,
Facts are needed as evidence before condemning someone. Thats how its supposed to work in a civilised world.
Or do we just condemn everyone and anyone
who has an accusation levelled at them?
My opinion is irrelevant, your opinion is irrelevant, the Daily Mail (shit newspaper) and the BBCs opinion matters .
Well I read them both from time to time but that doesn't mean I believe everything they write. I'd say the same goes for probably half of their audiences. You really do xive the press to much credit and your fellow human nowhere near enough
Like I said, nobody cares what you or I think, Bojo is finished. "If nobody cares why are you already having that party in your head about BoJo being on his way. Must mean you care somewhat. BTW, I couldn't care less if he leads the conservatives or not. Ill judge each party as I always do when it comes to election time, regardless of leader. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Like I said, nobody cares what you or I think, Bojo is finished. If nobody cares why are you already having that party in your head about BoJo being on his way. Must mean you care somewhat. " Party in your head. lol. I'm stealing that. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Like I said, nobody cares what you or I think, Bojo is finished. If nobody cares why are you already having that party in your head about BoJo being on his way. Must mean you care somewhat. Party in your head. lol. I'm stealing that. "Its a common theme. Youll see it at least once a day | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Like I said, nobody cares what you or I think, Bojo is finished. If nobody cares why are you already having that party in your head about BoJo being on his way. Must mean you care somewhat. Party in your head. lol. I'm stealing that.
Its a common theme. Youll see it at least once a day"lol. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Gove quizzed on PM saying he'd rather see 'bodies pile high' than order a third lockdown Back in Westminster and Michael Gove has defended the prime minister in the House of Commons. SNP's Alison Thewliss raised the prime minister's reported comment that he would rather see "the bodies pile high in their thousands" than order a third lockdown. The Daily Mail reported that Boris Johnson had made the comment in Downing Street last November – an allegation Mr Johnson today denied. Ms Thewliss said the comment was "despicable, cruel and callous" and "not befitting the office of prime minister". In response, Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove said: "[Ms Thewliss] repeats a line from a newspaper but she ignores the fact that the prime minister not only instituted a second but a third lockdown to keep us safe." He accused Ms Thewliss of trying to "score political points in a way, sadly, which causes regret". _____________________________________ Thewliss (SNP) - A Daily Mail Story. You really don't need to know anything else. Next.
Is this the story for all this furore?
I realise you don’t care what he said, at what point would you condemn him?
You realise nothing and if that is the article then no one knows what he said. One MP has said something about another. Massive story that
So you say
Believe what you like, that's your right but I'd rather deal in facts. I don't see any fact here.
In your opinion
Lost the debate and have to resort to playground retorts
I've told you about this before, if you wanna play with he big kids, you're gonna have to do better
What ‘facts ‘ do you actually need, to be present at the time? Video evidence? Wether you believe this story or not it is the beginning of the end for Bojo,
Facts are needed as evidence before condemning someone. Thats how its supposed to work in a civilised world.
Or do we just condemn everyone and anyone
who has an accusation levelled at them?
My opinion is irrelevant, your opinion is irrelevant, the Daily Mail (shit newspaper) and the BBCs opinion matters .
Well I read them both from time to time but that doesn't mean I believe everything they write. I'd say the same goes for probably half of their audiences. You really do xive the press to much credit and your fellow human nowhere near enough
Like I said, nobody cares what you or I think, Bojo is finished.
If nobody cares why are you already having that party in your head about BoJo being on his way. Must mean you care somewhat.
BTW, I couldn't care less if he leads the conservatives or not. Ill judge each party as I always do when it comes to election time, regardless of leader."Because the Daily Mail are going for him, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Yet here you are, commenting on it Poor defence that one. But I can comment on anything I like. I am commenting on the fact that lots like you will just accept 'a story' as truth with NOT ONE other person holding it out to be the truth except a daily mail journo' oh and you and the miserabilists. The fact that you don’t believe it is irrelevant, the BBC believe it, the daily mail believes it , they have huge audiences you have no one.
I'm not selling newspapers. Now you show me JUST one person in real life has said it is true, because they heard him say it? Go on JUST ONE will do. Only One? Schoolboy sniggering and gossip.
Sad state you have lowered yourself too.
"4 thumbs this time, impressive | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Gove quizzed on PM saying he'd rather see 'bodies pile high' than order a third lockdown Back in Westminster and Michael Gove has defended the prime minister in the House of Commons. SNP's Alison Thewliss raised the prime minister's reported comment that he would rather see "the bodies pile high in their thousands" than order a third lockdown. The Daily Mail reported that Boris Johnson had made the comment in Downing Street last November – an allegation Mr Johnson today denied. Ms Thewliss said the comment was "despicable, cruel and callous" and "not befitting the office of prime minister". In response, Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove said: "[Ms Thewliss] repeats a line from a newspaper but she ignores the fact that the prime minister not only instituted a second but a third lockdown to keep us safe." He accused Ms Thewliss of trying to "score political points in a way, sadly, which causes regret". _____________________________________ Thewliss (SNP) - A Daily Mail Story. You really don't need to know anything else. Next.
Is this the story for all this furore?
I realise you don’t care what he said, at what point would you condemn him?
You realise nothing and if that is the article then no one knows what he said. One MP has said something about another. Massive story that
So you say
Believe what you like, that's your right but I'd rather deal in facts. I don't see any fact here.
In your opinion
Lost the debate and have to resort to playground retorts
I've told you about this before, if you wanna play with he big kids, you're gonna have to do better
What ‘facts ‘ do you actually need, to be present at the time? Video evidence? Wether you believe this story or not it is the beginning of the end for Bojo,
Facts are needed as evidence before condemning someone. Thats how its supposed to work in a civilised world.
Or do we just condemn everyone and anyone
who has an accusation levelled at them?
My opinion is irrelevant, your opinion is irrelevant, the Daily Mail (shit newspaper) and the BBCs opinion matters .
Well I read them both from time to time but that doesn't mean I believe everything they write. I'd say the same goes for probably half of their audiences. You really do xive the press to much credit and your fellow human nowhere near enough
Like I said, nobody cares what you or I think, Bojo is finished.
If nobody cares why are you already having that party in your head about BoJo being on his way. Must mean you care somewhat.
BTW, I couldn't care less if he leads the conservatives or not. Ill judge each party as I always do when it comes to election time, regardless of leader.
Because the Daily Mail are going for him, "Its amazing how you can go from absolutely despise to absolutely love them in one article. And you accuse brexit voters of being influenced by the media | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Straws. Clutching. Still. Daily mail. Lol. BBC. Lol " Some bloke on fab . Lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Straws. Clutching. In what way? The daily mail has been quoted endlessly on here as a source. Why is its integrity now being questioned.?" That goes both ways though, the anti Tory crew always claimed the stories were bullshit, why are we supposed to believe them now? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Straws. Clutching. Still. Daily mail. Lol. BBC. Lol " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Straws. Clutching. Still. Daily mail. Lol. BBC. Lol Some bloke on fab . Lol " You. lol. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Straws. Clutching. Still. Daily mail. Lol. BBC. Lol Some bloke on fab . Lol " Exactly. That bloke on fab tends to get the biggest lols! I wonder which one? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Gove quizzed on PM saying he'd rather see 'bodies pile high' than order a third lockdown Back in Westminster and Michael Gove has defended the prime minister in the House of Commons. SNP's Alison Thewliss raised the prime minister's reported comment that he would rather see "the bodies pile high in their thousands" than order a third lockdown. The Daily Mail reported that Boris Johnson had made the comment in Downing Street last November – an allegation Mr Johnson today denied. Ms Thewliss said the comment was "despicable, cruel and callous" and "not befitting the office of prime minister". In response, Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove said: "[Ms Thewliss] repeats a line from a newspaper but she ignores the fact that the prime minister not only instituted a second but a third lockdown to keep us safe." He accused Ms Thewliss of trying to "score political points in a way, sadly, which causes regret". _____________________________________ Thewliss (SNP) - A Daily Mail Story. You really don't need to know anything else. Next.
Is this the story for all this furore?
I realise you don’t care what he said, at what point would you condemn him?
You realise nothing and if that is the article then no one knows what he said. One MP has said something about another. Massive story that
So you say
Believe what you like, that's your right but I'd rather deal in facts. I don't see any fact here.
In your opinion
Lost the debate and have to resort to playground retorts
I've told you about this before, if you wanna play with he big kids, you're gonna have to do better
What ‘facts ‘ do you actually need, to be present at the time? Video evidence? Wether you believe this story or not it is the beginning of the end for Bojo,
Facts are needed as evidence before condemning someone. Thats how its supposed to work in a civilised world.
Or do we just condemn everyone and anyone
who has an accusation levelled at them?
My opinion is irrelevant, your opinion is irrelevant, the Daily Mail (shit newspaper) and the BBCs opinion matters .
Well I read them both from time to time but that doesn't mean I believe everything they write. I'd say the same goes for probably half of their audiences. You really do xive the press to much credit and your fellow human nowhere near enough
Like I said, nobody cares what you or I think, Bojo is finished.
If nobody cares why are you already having that party in your head about BoJo being on his way. Must mean you care somewhat.
BTW, I couldn't care less if he leads the conservatives or not. Ill judge each party as I always do when it comes to election time, regardless of leader.
Because the Daily Mail are going for him,
Its amazing how you can go from absolutely despise to absolutely love them in one article. And you accuse brexit voters of being influenced by the media "I hate the daily mail, I can’t stand them, if you can’t see the significance of them running this story then you have your head in the sand . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Straws. Clutching. Still. Daily mail. Lol. BBC. Lol Some bloke on fab . Lol Exactly. That bloke on fab tends to get the biggest lols! I wonder which one? " It’s a sex site forum, do you honestly think I care what people think on here ? I am glad your taking the time to read all my posts though, thanks | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Gove quizzed on PM saying he'd rather see 'bodies pile high' than order a third lockdown Back in Westminster and Michael Gove has defended the prime minister in the House of Commons. SNP's Alison Thewliss raised the prime minister's reported comment that he would rather see "the bodies pile high in their thousands" than order a third lockdown. The Daily Mail reported that Boris Johnson had made the comment in Downing Street last November – an allegation Mr Johnson today denied. Ms Thewliss said the comment was "despicable, cruel and callous" and "not befitting the office of prime minister". In response, Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove said: "[Ms Thewliss] repeats a line from a newspaper but she ignores the fact that the prime minister not only instituted a second but a third lockdown to keep us safe." He accused Ms Thewliss of trying to "score political points in a way, sadly, which causes regret". _____________________________________ Thewliss (SNP) - A Daily Mail Story. You really don't need to know anything else. Next.
Is this the story for all this furore?
I realise you don’t care what he said, at what point would you condemn him?
You realise nothing and if that is the article then no one knows what he said. One MP has said something about another. Massive story that
So you say
Believe what you like, that's your right but I'd rather deal in facts. I don't see any fact here.
In your opinion
Lost the debate and have to resort to playground retorts
I've told you about this before, if you wanna play with he big kids, you're gonna have to do better
What ‘facts ‘ do you actually need, to be present at the time? Video evidence? Wether you believe this story or not it is the beginning of the end for Bojo,
Facts are needed as evidence before condemning someone. Thats how its supposed to work in a civilised world.
Or do we just condemn everyone and anyone
who has an accusation levelled at them?
My opinion is irrelevant, your opinion is irrelevant, the Daily Mail (shit newspaper) and the BBCs opinion matters .
Well I read them both from time to time but that doesn't mean I believe everything they write. I'd say the same goes for probably half of their audiences. You really do xive the press to much credit and your fellow human nowhere near enough
Like I said, nobody cares what you or I think, Bojo is finished.
If nobody cares why are you already having that party in your head about BoJo being on his way. Must mean you care somewhat.
BTW, I couldn't care less if he leads the conservatives or not. Ill judge each party as I always do when it comes to election time, regardless of leader.
Because the Daily Mail are going for him,
Its amazing how you can go from absolutely despise to absolutely love them in one article. And you accuse brexit voters of being influenced by the media
I hate the daily mail, I can’t stand them, if you can’t see the significance of them running this story then you have your head in the sand . "My head is firmly above the water and sand. There is zero significance in this story because its just that, a story. Are you still giving BoJo out of office predictions? Would you care to revise it now this story has appeared? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Gove quizzed on PM saying he'd rather see 'bodies pile high' than order a third lockdown Back in Westminster and Michael Gove has defended the prime minister in the House of Commons. SNP's Alison Thewliss raised the prime minister's reported comment that he would rather see "the bodies pile high in their thousands" than order a third lockdown. The Daily Mail reported that Boris Johnson had made the comment in Downing Street last November – an allegation Mr Johnson today denied. Ms Thewliss said the comment was "despicable, cruel and callous" and "not befitting the office of prime minister". In response, Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove said: "[Ms Thewliss] repeats a line from a newspaper but she ignores the fact that the prime minister not only instituted a second but a third lockdown to keep us safe." He accused Ms Thewliss of trying to "score political points in a way, sadly, which causes regret". _____________________________________ Thewliss (SNP) - A Daily Mail Story. You really don't need to know anything else. Next.
Is this the story for all this furore?
I realise you don’t care what he said, at what point would you condemn him?
You realise nothing and if that is the article then no one knows what he said. One MP has said something about another. Massive story that
So you say
Believe what you like, that's your right but I'd rather deal in facts. I don't see any fact here.
In your opinion
Lost the debate and have to resort to playground retorts
I've told you about this before, if you wanna play with he big kids, you're gonna have to do better
What ‘facts ‘ do you actually need, to be present at the time? Video evidence? Wether you believe this story or not it is the beginning of the end for Bojo,
Facts are needed as evidence before condemning someone. Thats how its supposed to work in a civilised world.
Or do we just condemn everyone and anyone
who has an accusation levelled at them?
My opinion is irrelevant, your opinion is irrelevant, the Daily Mail (shit newspaper) and the BBCs opinion matters .
Well I read them both from time to time but that doesn't mean I believe everything they write. I'd say the same goes for probably half of their audiences. You really do xive the press to much credit and your fellow human nowhere near enough
Like I said, nobody cares what you or I think, Bojo is finished.
If nobody cares why are you already having that party in your head about BoJo being on his way. Must mean you care somewhat.
BTW, I couldn't care less if he leads the conservatives or not. Ill judge each party as I always do when it comes to election time, regardless of leader.
Because the Daily Mail are going for him,
Its amazing how you can go from absolutely despise to absolutely love them in one article. And you accuse brexit voters of being influenced by the media
I hate the daily mail, I can’t stand them, if you can’t see the significance of them running this story then you have your head in the sand .
My head is firmly above the water and sand. There is zero significance in this story because its just that, a story.
Are you still giving BoJo out of office predictions? Would you care to revise it now this story has appeared?"Funny how he demands evidence for positive stories but jumps firmly on the guilty bandwagon with this story without a shred of evidence. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Gove quizzed on PM saying he'd rather see 'bodies pile high' than order a third lockdown Back in Westminster and Michael Gove has defended the prime minister in the House of Commons. SNP's Alison Thewliss raised the prime minister's reported comment that he would rather see "the bodies pile high in their thousands" than order a third lockdown. The Daily Mail reported that Boris Johnson had made the comment in Downing Street last November – an allegation Mr Johnson today denied. Ms Thewliss said the comment was "despicable, cruel and callous" and "not befitting the office of prime minister". In response, Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove said: "[Ms Thewliss] repeats a line from a newspaper but she ignores the fact that the prime minister not only instituted a second but a third lockdown to keep us safe." He accused Ms Thewliss of trying to "score political points in a way, sadly, which causes regret". _____________________________________ Thewliss (SNP) - A Daily Mail Story. You really don't need to know anything else. Next.
Is this the story for all this furore?
I realise you don’t care what he said, at what point would you condemn him?
You realise nothing and if that is the article then no one knows what he said. One MP has said something about another. Massive story that
So you say
Believe what you like, that's your right but I'd rather deal in facts. I don't see any fact here.
In your opinion
Lost the debate and have to resort to playground retorts
I've told you about this before, if you wanna play with he big kids, you're gonna have to do better
What ‘facts ‘ do you actually need, to be present at the time? Video evidence? Wether you believe this story or not it is the beginning of the end for Bojo,
Facts are needed as evidence before condemning someone. Thats how its supposed to work in a civilised world.
Or do we just condemn everyone and anyone
who has an accusation levelled at them?
My opinion is irrelevant, your opinion is irrelevant, the Daily Mail (shit newspaper) and the BBCs opinion matters .
Well I read them both from time to time but that doesn't mean I believe everything they write. I'd say the same goes for probably half of their audiences. You really do xive the press to much credit and your fellow human nowhere near enough
Like I said, nobody cares what you or I think, Bojo is finished.
If nobody cares why are you already having that party in your head about BoJo being on his way. Must mean you care somewhat.
BTW, I couldn't care less if he leads the conservatives or not. Ill judge each party as I always do when it comes to election time, regardless of leader.
Because the Daily Mail are going for him,
Its amazing how you can go from absolutely despise to absolutely love them in one article. And you accuse brexit voters of being influenced by the media
I hate the daily mail, I can’t stand them, if you can’t see the significance of them running this story then you have your head in the sand .
My head is firmly above the water and sand. There is zero significance in this story because its just that, a story.
Are you still giving BoJo out of office predictions? Would you care to revise it now this story has appeared?
Funny how he demands evidence for positive stories but jumps firmly on the guilty bandwagon with this story without a shred of evidence. "Ok, I will hold my hands up, Boris didn’t say those things, they were made up, it was someone else’s opinion let’s just stick to irrefutable facts from now on, no forecasts, guesses, opinions etc . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Gove quizzed on PM saying he'd rather see 'bodies pile high' than order a third lockdown Back in Westminster and Michael Gove has defended the prime minister in the House of Commons. SNP's Alison Thewliss raised the prime minister's reported comment that he would rather see "the bodies pile high in their thousands" than order a third lockdown. The Daily Mail reported that Boris Johnson had made the comment in Downing Street last November – an allegation Mr Johnson today denied. Ms Thewliss said the comment was "despicable, cruel and callous" and "not befitting the office of prime minister". In response, Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove said: "[Ms Thewliss] repeats a line from a newspaper but she ignores the fact that the prime minister not only instituted a second but a third lockdown to keep us safe." He accused Ms Thewliss of trying to "score political points in a way, sadly, which causes regret". _____________________________________ Thewliss (SNP) - A Daily Mail Story. You really don't need to know anything else. Next.
Is this the story for all this furore?
I realise you don’t care what he said, at what point would you condemn him?
You realise nothing and if that is the article then no one knows what he said. One MP has said something about another. Massive story that
So you say
Believe what you like, that's your right but I'd rather deal in facts. I don't see any fact here.
In your opinion
Lost the debate and have to resort to playground retorts
I've told you about this before, if you wanna play with he big kids, you're gonna have to do better
What ‘facts ‘ do you actually need, to be present at the time? Video evidence? Wether you believe this story or not it is the beginning of the end for Bojo,
Facts are needed as evidence before condemning someone. Thats how its supposed to work in a civilised world.
Or do we just condemn everyone and anyone
who has an accusation levelled at them?
My opinion is irrelevant, your opinion is irrelevant, the Daily Mail (shit newspaper) and the BBCs opinion matters .
Well I read them both from time to time but that doesn't mean I believe everything they write. I'd say the same goes for probably half of their audiences. You really do xive the press to much credit and your fellow human nowhere near enough
Like I said, nobody cares what you or I think, Bojo is finished.
If nobody cares why are you already having that party in your head about BoJo being on his way. Must mean you care somewhat.
BTW, I couldn't care less if he leads the conservatives or not. Ill judge each party as I always do when it comes to election time, regardless of leader.
Because the Daily Mail are going for him,
Its amazing how you can go from absolutely despise to absolutely love them in one article. And you accuse brexit voters of being influenced by the media
I hate the daily mail, I can’t stand them, if you can’t see the significance of them running this story then you have your head in the sand .
My head is firmly above the water and sand. There is zero significance in this story because its just that, a story.
Are you still giving BoJo out of office predictions? Would you care to revise it now this story has appeared?
Funny how he demands evidence for positive stories but jumps firmly on the guilty bandwagon with this story without a shred of evidence.
Ok, I will hold my hands up, Boris didn’t say those things, they were made up, it was someone else’s opinion let’s just stick to irrefutable facts from now on, no forecasts, guesses, opinions etc . "I never said they were made up, but at the moment they are just allegations. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Straws. Clutching. Still. Daily mail. Lol. BBC. Lol Some bloke on fab . Lol Exactly. That bloke on fab tends to get the biggest lols! I wonder which one? It’s a sex site forum, do you honestly think I care what people think on here ? I am glad your taking the time to read all my posts though, thanks " Well you must do. You keep trying to defend yourself! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Straws. Clutching. Still. Daily mail. Lol. BBC. Lol Some bloke on fab . Lol Exactly. That bloke on fab tends to get the biggest lols! I wonder which one? It’s a sex site forum, do you honestly think I care what people think on here ? I am glad your taking the time to read all my posts though, thanks Well you must do. You keep trying to defend yourself! " Don’t be daft, it’s just banter, there are a small number of people whose opinion (on both sides of the argument ) I respect on here , the rest I honestly couldn’t care less, why would I get upset about what a person on a sex site forum thinks about what I write | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Gove quizzed on PM saying he'd rather see 'bodies pile high' than order a third lockdown Back in Westminster and Michael Gove has defended the prime minister in the House of Commons. SNP's Alison Thewliss raised the prime minister's reported comment that he would rather see "the bodies pile high in their thousands" than order a third lockdown. The Daily Mail reported that Boris Johnson had made the comment in Downing Street last November – an allegation Mr Johnson today denied. Ms Thewliss said the comment was "despicable, cruel and callous" and "not befitting the office of prime minister". In response, Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove said: "[Ms Thewliss] repeats a line from a newspaper but she ignores the fact that the prime minister not only instituted a second but a third lockdown to keep us safe." He accused Ms Thewliss of trying to "score political points in a way, sadly, which causes regret". _____________________________________ Thewliss (SNP) - A Daily Mail Story. You really don't need to know anything else. Next.
Is this the story for all this furore?
I realise you don’t care what he said, at what point would you condemn him?
You realise nothing and if that is the article then no one knows what he said. One MP has said something about another. Massive story that
So you say
Believe what you like, that's your right but I'd rather deal in facts. I don't see any fact here.
In your opinion
Lost the debate and have to resort to playground retorts
I've told you about this before, if you wanna play with he big kids, you're gonna have to do better
What ‘facts ‘ do you actually need, to be present at the time? Video evidence? Wether you believe this story or not it is the beginning of the end for Bojo,
Facts are needed as evidence before condemning someone. Thats how its supposed to work in a civilised world.
Or do we just condemn everyone and anyone
who has an accusation levelled at them?
My opinion is irrelevant, your opinion is irrelevant, the Daily Mail (shit newspaper) and the BBCs opinion matters .
Well I read them both from time to time but that doesn't mean I believe everything they write. I'd say the same goes for probably half of their audiences. You really do xive the press to much credit and your fellow human nowhere near enough
Like I said, nobody cares what you or I think, Bojo is finished.
If nobody cares why are you already having that party in your head about BoJo being on his way. Must mean you care somewhat.
BTW, I couldn't care less if he leads the conservatives or not. Ill judge each party as I always do when it comes to election time, regardless of leader.
Because the Daily Mail are going for him,
Its amazing how you can go from absolutely despise to absolutely love them in one article. And you accuse brexit voters of being influenced by the media
I hate the daily mail, I can’t stand them, if you can’t see the significance of them running this story then you have your head in the sand .
My head is firmly above the water and sand. There is zero significance in this story because its just that, a story.
Are you still giving BoJo out of office predictions? Would you care to revise it now this story has appeared?
Funny how he demands evidence for positive stories but jumps firmly on the guilty bandwagon with this story without a shred of evidence.
Ok, I will hold my hands up, Boris didn’t say those things, they were made up, it was someone else’s opinion let’s just stick to irrefutable facts from now on, no forecasts, guesses, opinions etc .
I never said they were made up, but at the moment they are just allegations."Fair enough. Until it is 100% proven then I shall assume it’s a lie | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Gove quizzed on PM saying he'd rather see 'bodies pile high' than order a third lockdown Back in Westminster and Michael Gove has defended the prime minister in the House of Commons. SNP's Alison Thewliss raised the prime minister's reported comment that he would rather see "the bodies pile high in their thousands" than order a third lockdown. The Daily Mail reported that Boris Johnson had made the comment in Downing Street last November – an allegation Mr Johnson today denied. Ms Thewliss said the comment was "despicable, cruel and callous" and "not befitting the office of prime minister". In response, Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove said: "[Ms Thewliss] repeats a line from a newspaper but she ignores the fact that the prime minister not only instituted a second but a third lockdown to keep us safe." He accused Ms Thewliss of trying to "score political points in a way, sadly, which causes regret". _____________________________________ Thewliss (SNP) - A Daily Mail Story. You really don't need to know anything else. Next.
Is this the story for all this furore?
I realise you don’t care what he said, at what point would you condemn him?
You realise nothing and if that is the article then no one knows what he said. One MP has said something about another. Massive story that
So you say
Believe what you like, that's your right but I'd rather deal in facts. I don't see any fact here.
In your opinion
Lost the debate and have to resort to playground retorts
I've told you about this before, if you wanna play with he big kids, you're gonna have to do better
What ‘facts ‘ do you actually need, to be present at the time? Video evidence? Wether you believe this story or not it is the beginning of the end for Bojo,
Facts are needed as evidence before condemning someone. Thats how its supposed to work in a civilised world.
Or do we just condemn everyone and anyone
who has an accusation levelled at them?
My opinion is irrelevant, your opinion is irrelevant, the Daily Mail (shit newspaper) and the BBCs opinion matters .
Well I read them both from time to time but that doesn't mean I believe everything they write. I'd say the same goes for probably half of their audiences. You really do xive the press to much credit and your fellow human nowhere near enough
Like I said, nobody cares what you or I think, Bojo is finished.
If nobody cares why are you already having that party in your head about BoJo being on his way. Must mean you care somewhat.
BTW, I couldn't care less if he leads the conservatives or not. Ill judge each party as I always do when it comes to election time, regardless of leader.
Because the Daily Mail are going for him,
Its amazing how you can go from absolutely despise to absolutely love them in one article. And you accuse brexit voters of being influenced by the media
I hate the daily mail, I can’t stand them, if you can’t see the significance of them running this story then you have your head in the sand .
My head is firmly above the water and sand. There is zero significance in this story because its just that, a story.
Are you still giving BoJo out of office predictions? Would you care to revise it now this story has appeared?
Funny how he demands evidence for positive stories but jumps firmly on the guilty bandwagon with this story without a shred of evidence.
Ok, I will hold my hands up, Boris didn’t say those things, they were made up, it was someone else’s opinion let’s just stick to irrefutable facts from now on, no forecasts, guesses, opinions etc .
I never said they were made up, but at the moment they are just allegations.
Fair enough. Until it is 100% proven then I shall assume it’s a lie "  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Straws. Clutching. Still. Daily mail. Lol. BBC. Lol Some bloke on fab . Lol Exactly. That bloke on fab tends to get the biggest lols! I wonder which one? It’s a sex site forum, do you honestly think I care what people think on here ? I am glad your taking the time to read all my posts though, thanks Well you must do. You keep trying to defend yourself! Don’t be daft, it’s just banter, there are a small number of people whose opinion (on both sides of the argument ) I respect on here , the rest I honestly couldn’t care less, why would I get upset about what a person on a sex site forum thinks about what I write "Likewise! We can agree on something!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Gove quizzed on PM saying he'd rather see 'bodies pile high' than order a third lockdown Back in Westminster and Michael Gove has defended the prime minister in the House of Commons. SNP's Alison Thewliss raised the prime minister's reported comment that he would rather see "the bodies pile high in their thousands" than order a third lockdown. The Daily Mail reported that Boris Johnson had made the comment in Downing Street last November – an allegation Mr Johnson today denied. Ms Thewliss said the comment was "despicable, cruel and callous" and "not befitting the office of prime minister". In response, Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove said: "[Ms Thewliss] repeats a line from a newspaper but she ignores the fact that the prime minister not only instituted a second but a third lockdown to keep us safe." He accused Ms Thewliss of trying to "score political points in a way, sadly, which causes regret". _____________________________________ Thewliss (SNP) - A Daily Mail Story. You really don't need to know anything else. Next.
Is this the story for all this furore?
I realise you don’t care what he said, at what point would you condemn him?
You realise nothing and if that is the article then no one knows what he said. One MP has said something about another. Massive story that
So you say
Believe what you like, that's your right but I'd rather deal in facts. I don't see any fact here.
In your opinion
Lost the debate and have to resort to playground retorts
I've told you about this before, if you wanna play with he big kids, you're gonna have to do better
What ‘facts ‘ do you actually need, to be present at the time? Video evidence? Wether you believe this story or not it is the beginning of the end for Bojo,
Facts are needed as evidence before condemning someone. Thats how its supposed to work in a civilised world.
Or do we just condemn everyone and anyone
who has an accusation levelled at them?
My opinion is irrelevant, your opinion is irrelevant, the Daily Mail (shit newspaper) and the BBCs opinion matters . "Funny isn't it? Every ridiculous bullshit lie about Corbyn was treated on here like gospel but an allegation about the buffoon is derided, and the very rag which was venerated on here is no derided. Its classic | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Yet here you are, commenting on it Poor defence that one. But I can comment on anything I like. I am commenting on the fact that lots like you will just accept 'a story' as truth with NOT ONE other person holding it out to be the truth except a daily mail journo' oh and you and the miserabilists. The fact that you don’t believe it is irrelevant, the BBC believe it, the daily mail believes it , they have huge audiences you have no one.
I'm not selling newspapers. Now you show me JUST one person in real life has said it is true, because they heard him say it? Go on JUST ONE will do. Only One? Schoolboy sniggering and gossip.
Sad state you have lowered yourself too.
4 thumbs this time, impressive " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Gove quizzed on PM saying he'd rather see 'bodies pile high' than order a third lockdown Back in Westminster and Michael Gove has defended the prime minister in the House of Commons. SNP's Alison Thewliss raised the prime minister's reported comment that he would rather see "the bodies pile high in their thousands" than order a third lockdown. The Daily Mail reported that Boris Johnson had made the comment in Downing Street last November – an allegation Mr Johnson today denied. Ms Thewliss said the comment was "despicable, cruel and callous" and "not befitting the office of prime minister". In response, Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove said: "[Ms Thewliss] repeats a line from a newspaper but she ignores the fact that the prime minister not only instituted a second but a third lockdown to keep us safe." He accused Ms Thewliss of trying to "score political points in a way, sadly, which causes regret". _____________________________________ Thewliss (SNP) - A Daily Mail Story. You really don't need to know anything else. Next.
Is this the story for all this furore?
I realise you don’t care what he said, at what point would you condemn him?
You realise nothing and if that is the article then no one knows what he said. One MP has said something about another. Massive story that
So you say
Believe what you like, that's your right but I'd rather deal in facts. I don't see any fact here.
In your opinion
Lost the debate and have to resort to playground retorts
I've told you about this before, if you wanna play with he big kids, you're gonna have to do better
What ‘facts ‘ do you actually need, to be present at the time? Video evidence? Wether you believe this story or not it is the beginning of the end for Bojo,
Facts are needed as evidence before condemning someone. Thats how its supposed to work in a civilised world.
Or do we just condemn everyone and anyone
who has an accusation levelled at them?
My opinion is irrelevant, your opinion is irrelevant, the Daily Mail (shit newspaper) and the BBCs opinion matters .
Funny isn't it?
Every ridiculous bullshit lie about Corbyn was treated on here like gospel but an allegation about the buffoon is derided, and the very rag which was
venerated on here is no derided.
Its classic "It also goes both ways. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Gove quizzed on PM saying he'd rather see 'bodies pile high' than order a third lockdown Back in Westminster and Michael Gove has defended the prime minister in the House of Commons. SNP's Alison Thewliss raised the prime minister's reported comment that he would rather see "the bodies pile high in their thousands" than order a third lockdown. The Daily Mail reported that Boris Johnson had made the comment in Downing Street last November – an allegation Mr Johnson today denied. Ms Thewliss said the comment was "despicable, cruel and callous" and "not befitting the office of prime minister". In response, Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove said: "[Ms Thewliss] repeats a line from a newspaper but she ignores the fact that the prime minister not only instituted a second but a third lockdown to keep us safe." He accused Ms Thewliss of trying to "score political points in a way, sadly, which causes regret". _____________________________________ Thewliss (SNP) - A Daily Mail Story. You really don't need to know anything else. Next.
Is this the story for all this furore?
I realise you don’t care what he said, at what point would you condemn him?
You realise nothing and if that is the article then no one knows what he said. One MP has said something about another. Massive story that
So you say
Believe what you like, that's your right but I'd rather deal in facts. I don't see any fact here.
In your opinion
Lost the debate and have to resort to playground retorts
I've told you about this before, if you wanna play with he big kids, you're gonna have to do better
What ‘facts ‘ do you actually need, to be present at the time? Video evidence? Wether you believe this story or not it is the beginning of the end for Bojo,
Facts are needed as evidence before condemning someone. Thats how its supposed to work in a civilised world.
Or do we just condemn everyone and anyone
who has an accusation levelled at them?
My opinion is irrelevant, your opinion is irrelevant, the Daily Mail (shit newspaper) and the BBCs opinion matters .
Funny isn't it?
Every ridiculous bullshit lie about Corbyn was treated on here like gospel but an allegation about the buffoon is derided, and the very rag which was
venerated on here is no derided.
Its classic "Treated as gospel
Youre always banging on about people bringing Corbyn into it, yet I've seen you do it twice already today | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
