FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Refugees arriving via approved route to UK to be given indefinite leave to remain
Refugees arriving via approved route to UK to be given indefinite leave to remain
Jump to: Newest in thread
"Ironically when we were in the eu ,there was an agreement in place where ,if necessary they could have been shipped back to the 1st safe country they landed in."
True but still breaking the Geneva Convention  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By *atEvolution OP Couple
over a year ago
atlantisEVOLUTION Swingers Club. Stoke |
There is no agreement anywhere including the Geneva Convention that refugees have to claim asylum in the first country they land in.
So there would be no agreement informal or otherwise to remove them to the country that they first landed in as this would set a Legal imperative on the country that they were returned to.
All refugees that land in this country are either accepted or rejected and returned to their country origin (if rejected) as long as the Law on return fits the Geneva Convention with regard to persecution (et al rules). |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *atEvolution OP Couple
over a year ago
atlantisEVOLUTION Swingers Club. Stoke |
"An eu law called Dublin 3 allows asylum seekers to be tramsferred to the 1st member state they were proven to have entered "
That says allows - it doesn't say it was agreed that they would be. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"An eu law called Dublin 3 allows asylum seekers to be tramsferred to the 1st member state they were proven to have entered
That says allows - it doesn't say it was agreed that they would be."
I apologise..I got confused when you said no agreement existed. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"There is no agreement anywhere including the Geneva Convention that refugees have to claim asylum in the first country they land in.
So there would be no agreement informal or otherwise to remove them to the country that they first landed in as this would set a Legal imperative on the country that they were returned to.
All refugees that land in this country are either accepted or rejected and returned to their country origin (if rejected) as long as the Law on return fits the Geneva Convention with regard to persecution (et al rules)."
1st point, I never said there was 
Second point is what our esteemed government is planning on doing goes against the Geneva Convention. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
