FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Anyone changed their mind yet about Brussels?
Anyone changed their mind yet about Brussels?
Jump to: Newest in thread
"Any remainers want to get enormous credit with me and others and say that they now believe in Brexit?
That they have caused a vaccine catastrophe in the EU and we escaped it? "
nicola sturgen has, not in words but actions, thats why she never offered any eu country a share of scottish vaccines!  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By *oo hotCouple
over a year ago
North West |
"Any remainers want to get enormous credit with me and others and say that they now believe in Brexit?
That they have caused a vaccine catastrophe in the EU and we escaped it? "
Answering the Topic... Mo Brussels is a great city well worth a weekend away.
Moving on to the disconnected content... EU member states are sovereign nations who clearly are able to make their own decisions.
As we we were.
Conclusion... The topic and the written content are confused... to say the least. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Any remainers want to get enormous credit with me and others and say that they now believe in Brexit?
That they have caused a vaccine catastrophe in the EU and we escaped it?
Answering the Topic... Mo Brussels is a great city well worth a weekend away.
Moving on to the disconnected content... EU member states are sovereign nations who clearly are able to make their own decisions.
As we we were.
Conclusion... The topic and the written content are confused... to say the least."
Well if by making their own decisions, you mean breaking EU rules, then yes, yes they can.
Have you changed your mind about leaving? Would do you enormous credit with me,  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Any remainers want to get enormous credit with me and others and say that they now believe in Brexit?
That they have caused a vaccine catastrophe in the EU and we escaped it? "
Aside from the extreme confusion about terms here. And the fact that everyone believes that Brexit has happened. Because it has happened. I'll answer what I believe your question to be.
Brexit is panning out as expected. Extra red tape. Job losses. Huge hit to the economy. British businesses suffering. Farmers suffering. Fishermen suffering. More expensive imports. Massive reduction in trade with EU countries. Loss of freedom of movement within the EU for British citizens. Continuing to adhere to EU regulations while losing our seat at the decision making table.
This is what we knew would happen. This is what happened.
If you thought the above was worth it, so a few rich people could make millions. Then you're still going to think Brexit was a good idea. If not, you are likely to still think Brexit is a bad idea. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Any remainers want to get enormous credit with me and others and say that they now believe in Brexit?
That they have caused a vaccine catastrophe in the EU and we escaped it?
Aside from the extreme confusion about terms here. And the fact that everyone believes that Brexit has happened. Because it has happened. I'll answer what I believe your question to be.
Brexit is panning out as expected. Extra red tape. Job losses. Huge hit to the economy. British businesses suffering. Farmers suffering. Fishermen suffering. More expensive imports. Massive reduction in trade with EU countries. Loss of freedom of movement within the EU for British citizens. Continuing to adhere to EU regulations while losing our seat at the decision making table.
This is what we knew would happen. This is what happened.
If you thought the above was worth it, so a few rich people could make millions. Then you're still going to think Brexit was a good idea. If not, you are likely to still think Brexit is a bad idea."
So you don’t want to do yourself enormous credit with me either?
No doubts at all about the efficiency, maturity, and effectiveness of Brussels decision making? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Any remainers want to get enormous credit with me and others and say that they now believe in Brexit?
That they have caused a vaccine catastrophe in the EU and we escaped it?
Aside from the extreme confusion about terms here. And the fact that everyone believes that Brexit has happened. Because it has happened. I'll answer what I believe your question to be.
Brexit is panning out as expected. Extra red tape. Job losses. Huge hit to the economy. British businesses suffering. Farmers suffering. Fishermen suffering. More expensive imports. Massive reduction in trade with EU countries. Loss of freedom of movement within the EU for British citizens. Continuing to adhere to EU regulations while losing our seat at the decision making table.
This is what we knew would happen. This is what happened.
If you thought the above was worth it, so a few rich people could make millions. Then you're still going to think Brexit was a good idea. If not, you are likely to still think Brexit is a bad idea.
So you don’t want to do yourself enormous credit with me either?
No doubts at all about the efficiency, maturity, and effectiveness of Brussels decision making?"
I have no strong opinions on the city of Brussels. I was there once. Nice place.
The EU make decisions that impact the UK. But we no longer have any say in these decisions. This is not a positive.
But to answer your first question. No, I don't want to ignore the reality of the world around me, pretend everything is dandy, just so that you give me "enormous credit".
Hope this helps.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Any remainers want to get enormous credit with me and others and say that they now believe in Brexit?
That they have caused a vaccine catastrophe in the EU and we escaped it? "
Typical leaver post that has had the facts painstakingly explained to them over and over again yet they relentlessly repeat the same utter nonsense and stupid statements because it doesn't fit their narrow minded narrative to accept the truth.
I've always believed in Brexit, believed in the effects, problems and costs that Brexit would bring which so far I've been 100% accurate 
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Any remainers want to get enormous credit with me and others and say that they now believe in Brexit?
That they have caused a vaccine catastrophe in the EU and we escaped it?
Typical leaver post that has had the facts painstakingly explained to them over and over again yet they relentlessly repeat the same utter nonsense and stupid statements because it doesn't fit their narrow minded narrative to accept the truth.
I've always believed in Brexit, believed in the effects, problems and costs that Brexit would bring which so far I've been 100% accurate
"
Ok, you also don’t wish to get credit with me, your choice |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Any remainers want to get enormous credit with me and others and say that they now believe in Brexit?
That they have caused a vaccine catastrophe in the EU and we escaped it?
Typical leaver post that has had the facts painstakingly explained to them over and over again yet they relentlessly repeat the same utter nonsense and stupid statements because it doesn't fit their narrow minded narrative to accept the truth.
I've always believed in Brexit, believed in the effects, problems and costs that Brexit would bring which so far I've been 100% accurate
Ok, you also don’t wish to get credit with me, your choice "
Why do you think people would be seeking to gain credit from you?
Especially if it meant believing that Brexit is a good idea. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Any remainers want to get enormous credit with me and others and say that they now believe in Brexit?
That they have caused a vaccine catastrophe in the EU and we escaped it?
Typical leaver post that has had the facts painstakingly explained to them over and over again yet they relentlessly repeat the same utter nonsense and stupid statements because it doesn't fit their narrow minded narrative to accept the truth.
I've always believed in Brexit, believed in the effects, problems and costs that Brexit would bring which so far I've been 100% accurate
Ok, you also don’t wish to get credit with me, your choice
Why do you think people would be seeking to gain credit from you?
Especially if it meant believing that Brexit is a good idea."
Cos I’m kind of a big deal around here |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
Especially if it meant believing that Brexit is a good idea.
Oddly enough though. Most people did believe it was a good idea. 
52% to 48 % .. yes most people  "
And are those people excited to gain credit from the OP?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
Especially if it meant believing that Brexit is a good idea.
Oddly enough though. Most people did believe it was a good idea.
52% to 48 % .. yes most people "
52‰ of those who voted. Only 37% of the people. Not "most people" |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I find it hard to believe no remainers haven’t had a scintilla of doubt flicker across their consciousness as they’ve watched Ursula and Macron and Merkel botch the whole thing so completely?
And tragically the story has a long way to run yet. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oi_LucyCouple
over a year ago
Barbados |
"Any remainers want to get enormous credit with me and others and say that they now believe in Brexit?
That they have caused a vaccine catastrophe in the EU and we escaped it?
Typical leaver post that has had the facts painstakingly explained to them over and over again yet they relentlessly repeat the same utter nonsense and stupid statements because it doesn't fit their narrow minded narrative to accept the truth.
I've always believed in Brexit, believed in the effects, problems and costs that Brexit would bring which so far I've been 100% accurate
Ok, you also don’t wish to get credit with me, your choice
Why do you think people would be seeking to gain credit from you?
Especially if it meant believing that Brexit is a good idea.
Cos I’m kind of a big deal around here "
Why? Are you Ronnie Pickering?
-Matt |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Any remainers want to get enormous credit with me and others and say that they now believe in Brexit?
That they have caused a vaccine catastrophe in the EU and we escaped it?
Typical leaver post that has had the facts painstakingly explained to them over and over again yet they relentlessly repeat the same utter nonsense and stupid statements because it doesn't fit their narrow minded narrative to accept the truth.
I've always believed in Brexit, believed in the effects, problems and costs that Brexit would bring which so far I've been 100% accurate
Ok, you also don’t wish to get credit with me, your choice
Why do you think people would be seeking to gain credit from you?
Especially if it meant believing that Brexit is a good idea.
Cos I’m kind of a big deal around here
Why? Are you Ronnie Pickering?
-Matt"
Ron Burgundy |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
In the words of donald
The French produce a very good champagne but so does california lol
There's nothing so great it can't be found elsewhere, french cock, Spanish cock English cock, its all cock lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"In the words of donald
The French produce a very good champagne but so does california lol
There's nothing so great it can't be found elsewhere, french cock, Spanish cock English cock, its all cock lol "
Try to stay on topic.
Belgium cock?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Any remainers want to get enormous credit with me and others and say that they now believe in Brexit?
That they have caused a vaccine catastrophe in the EU and we escaped it? "
I thank the Labour Party of 1946 for creating the NHS. I thank the nurses and doctors and nhs staff who have delivered through the pandemic and provided the backbone of the largest vaccine drive in modern UK history. I thank the scientists who created the vaccines.
Who I don’t thank is the Tory government who ignored the warnings at the start of the pandemic, who drove through Brexit which has now caused a crisis with the delivery of vaccines to the UK, the people who profiteered off the the pandemic to make money off government contracts, the government who stood by let over 120,000 people die, so please don’t think for second this was any kind of success by the architects of Brexit. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Haven’t mentioned our success
Thread is about the utter failure of Brussels "
What success is 120,000 dead? Huh? absolutely sickening view to talk about success in such a Blasé way, people have died families grieve, and all the Brexiteers say is because we left we won. That is disgusting. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oo hotCouple
over a year ago
North West |
"Almost sounding as if remainers expected Brussels to botch this vaccine roll out.
Do remainers understand the scale of this? The numbers that will die because of Ursula and co ?"
How many vaccines have been exported from U.K. manufacturers to the rest of the world (including our Eu neighbours)?
How many vaccines have been exported from Eu based manufacturers to the rest of the world (including the uK)?
Considering that Boris Johnson committed to vaccinating British citizens before allowing exports, is it a bad thing for other countries to go the same by enforcing contract conditions? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ostafunMan
over a year ago
near ipswich |
"Almost sounding as if remainers expected Brussels to botch this vaccine roll out.
Do remainers understand the scale of this? The numbers that will die because of Ursula and co ?
How many vaccines have been exported from U.K. manufacturers to the rest of the world (including our Eu neighbours)?
How many vaccines have been exported from Eu based manufacturers to the rest of the world (including the uK)?
Considering that Boris Johnson committed to vaccinating British citizens before allowing exports, is it a bad thing for other countries to go the same by enforcing contract conditions?"
how many more times do you need reminding? the oxford vaccine (which the uk paid a large amount of money to develop) is being distributed in the eu by astrazenica factories in Belgium and Holland so in fact Britain is supplying them even though its not coming from the uk factory.The reason biontech are exporting to the uk is because they dont have any production in the uk.The eu is begining to act like a dictatorship (or at least VDL ) interfearing in legaly binding contracts,not a good look. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Almost sounding as if remainers expected Brussels to botch this vaccine roll out.
Do remainers understand the scale of this? The numbers that will die because of Ursula and co ?
How many vaccines have been exported from U.K. manufacturers to the rest of the world (including our Eu neighbours)?
How many vaccines have been exported from Eu based manufacturers to the rest of the world (including the uK)?
Considering that Boris Johnson committed to vaccinating British citizens before allowing exports, is it a bad thing for other countries to go the same by enforcing contract conditions?"
Well if that's true its not working is it? Individual countries of the EU scrabbling around for any old rubbish vaccine, breaking all the centralised Brussels procurement rules, even today in Germany vaccine centres sat empty....
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Almost sounding as if remainers expected Brussels to botch this vaccine roll out.
Do remainers understand the scale of this? The numbers that will die because of Ursula and co ?
How many vaccines have been exported from U.K. manufacturers to the rest of the world (including our Eu neighbours)?
How many vaccines have been exported from Eu based manufacturers to the rest of the world (including the uK)?
Considering that Boris Johnson committed to vaccinating British citizens before allowing exports, is it a bad thing for other countries to go the same by enforcing contract conditions?
Well if that's true its not working is it? Individual countries of the EU scrabbling around for any old rubbish vaccine, breaking all the centralised Brussels procurement rules, even today in Germany vaccine centres sat empty....
"
Can you name these ‘rubbish vaccines’ |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Almost sounding as if remainers expected Brussels to botch this vaccine roll out.
Do remainers understand the scale of this? The numbers that will die because of Ursula and co ?
How many vaccines have been exported from U.K. manufacturers to the rest of the world (including our Eu neighbours)?
How many vaccines have been exported from Eu based manufacturers to the rest of the world (including the uK)?
Considering that Boris Johnson committed to vaccinating British citizens before allowing exports, is it a bad thing for other countries to go the same by enforcing contract conditions?
Well if that's true its not working is it? Individual countries of the EU scrabbling around for any old rubbish vaccine, breaking all the centralised Brussels procurement rules, even today in Germany vaccine centres sat empty....
Can you name these ‘rubbish vaccines’ "
Brussels words, not mine, EU unapproved vaccines being sourced by Poland, Spain etc |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Almost sounding as if remainers expected Brussels to botch this vaccine roll out.
Do remainers understand the scale of this? The numbers that will die because of Ursula and co ?
How many vaccines have been exported from U.K. manufacturers to the rest of the world (including our Eu neighbours)?
How many vaccines have been exported from Eu based manufacturers to the rest of the world (including the uK)?
Considering that Boris Johnson committed to vaccinating British citizens before allowing exports, is it a bad thing for other countries to go the same by enforcing contract conditions?
Well if that's true its not working is it? Individual countries of the EU scrabbling around for any old rubbish vaccine, breaking all the centralised Brussels procurement rules, even today in Germany vaccine centres sat empty....
Can you name these ‘rubbish vaccines’
Brussels words, not mine, EU unapproved vaccines being sourced by Poland, Spain etc "
So member states can use any vaccine they want? It doesn’t have to be approved by the EU? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Almost sounding as if remainers expected Brussels to botch this vaccine roll out.
Do remainers understand the scale of this? The numbers that will die because of Ursula and co ?
How many vaccines have been exported from U.K. manufacturers to the rest of the world (including our Eu neighbours)?
How many vaccines have been exported from Eu based manufacturers to the rest of the world (including the uK)?
Considering that Boris Johnson committed to vaccinating British citizens before allowing exports, is it a bad thing for other countries to go the same by enforcing contract conditions?
Well if that's true its not working is it? Individual countries of the EU scrabbling around for any old rubbish vaccine, breaking all the centralised Brussels procurement rules, even today in Germany vaccine centres sat empty....
Can you name these ‘rubbish vaccines’
Brussels words, not mine, EU unapproved vaccines being sourced by Poland, Spain etc
So member states can use any vaccine they want? It doesn’t have to be approved by the EU? "
Brussels words, not mine, all vaccines must be approved centrally. Members must not source the own. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Individual EU Countries signed an agreement to source collectively - each country chose to do this, they were not forced by the EU.
Since then some EU Countries have also sourced independently.
I’m not sure what this has got to do with changing my mind about Brussels? Each country had a choice to go alone & still does. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
Especially if it meant believing that Brexit is a good idea.
Oddly enough though. Most people did believe it was a good idea.
52% to 48 % .. yes most people
52‰ of those who voted. Only 37% of the people. Not "most people" "
So 34% voted against. Not taking a side...just putting stats in context.... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
Especially if it meant believing that Brexit is a good idea.
Oddly enough though. Most people did believe it was a good idea.
52% to 48 % .. yes most people
52‰ of those who voted. Only 37% of the people. Not "most people"
So 34% voted against. Not taking a side...just putting stats in context...."
Closer to 33% |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
Especially if it meant believing that Brexit is a good idea.
Oddly enough though. Most people did believe it was a good idea.
52% to 48 % .. yes most people
52‰ of those who voted. Only 37% of the people. Not "most people"
So 34% voted against. Not taking a side...just putting stats in context....
Closer to 33% "
So no clear majority in any direction then? Why are we wasting £billions and haemorrhaging jobs & businesses on a vanity project that you've just agreed only a minority of people said yes to? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
Especially if it meant believing that Brexit is a good idea.
Oddly enough though. Most people did believe it was a good idea.
52% to 48 % .. yes most people
52‰ of those who voted. Only 37% of the people. Not "most people"
So 34% voted against. Not taking a side...just putting stats in context....
Closer to 33%
So no clear majority in any direction then? Why are we wasting £billions and haemorrhaging jobs & businesses on a vanity project that you've just agreed only a minority of people said yes to? "
Let me double check....
Oh there was a clear majority apparently.
Democracy eh can't beat it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Almost sounding as if remainers expected Brussels to botch this vaccine roll out.
Do remainers understand the scale of this? The numbers that will die because of Ursula and co ?
How many vaccines have been exported from U.K. manufacturers to the rest of the world (including our Eu neighbours)?
How many vaccines have been exported from Eu based manufacturers to the rest of the world (including the uK)?
Considering that Boris Johnson committed to vaccinating British citizens before allowing exports, is it a bad thing for other countries to go the same by enforcing contract conditions?
Well if that's true its not working is it? Individual countries of the EU scrabbling around for any old rubbish vaccine, breaking all the centralised Brussels procurement rules, even today in Germany vaccine centres sat empty....
Can you name these ‘rubbish vaccines’
Brussels words, not mine, EU unapproved vaccines being sourced by Poland, Spain etc
So member states can use any vaccine they want? It doesn’t have to be approved by the EU?
Brussels words, not mine, all vaccines must be approved centrally. Members must not source the own. "
So your contradicting yourself , |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Almost sounding as if remainers expected Brussels to botch this vaccine roll out.
Do remainers understand the scale of this? The numbers that will die because of Ursula and co ?
How many vaccines have been exported from U.K. manufacturers to the rest of the world (including our Eu neighbours)?
How many vaccines have been exported from Eu based manufacturers to the rest of the world (including the uK)?
Considering that Boris Johnson committed to vaccinating British citizens before allowing exports, is it a bad thing for other countries to go the same by enforcing contract conditions?
Well if that's true its not working is it? Individual countries of the EU scrabbling around for any old rubbish vaccine, breaking all the centralised Brussels procurement rules, even today in Germany vaccine centres sat empty....
Can you name these ‘rubbish vaccines’
Brussels words, not mine, EU unapproved vaccines being sourced by Poland, Spain etc
So member states can use any vaccine they want? It doesn’t have to be approved by the EU?
Brussels words, not mine, all vaccines must be approved centrally. Members must not source the own.
So your contradicting yourself , "
Nope, maybe have a reread, any particular words you need assistance with just shout |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"No doubts about Brussels when they rubbished the Oxford vaccine without foundation and without science?
They didn’t,
Oof some would say but of a porky pie there lol"
Is everything ok? The EU have never rubbished the Astra Zeneca vaccine , |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ovebjsMan
over a year ago
Bristol |
"No doubts about Brussels when they rubbished the Oxford vaccine without foundation and without science?
They didn’t,
Oof some would say but of a porky pie there lol"
To be fair they did not actually rubbish the AZ vaccine, but they did cast enough doubt on it to cause many of their member states to put a hold on it until they could make the magnanimous statement they it was ok to use  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"No doubts about Brussels when they rubbished the Oxford vaccine without foundation and without science?
They didn’t,
Oof some would say but of a porky pie there lol
To be fair they did not actually rubbish the AZ vaccine, but they did cast enough doubt on it to cause many of their member states to put a hold on it until they could make the magnanimous statement they it was ok to use "
How did they ‘cast doubt’? Some EU nations are using it, others stopped using it ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ovebjsMan
over a year ago
Bristol |
"No doubts about Brussels when they rubbished the Oxford vaccine without foundation and without science?
They didn’t,
Oof some would say but of a porky pie there lol
To be fair they did not actually rubbish the AZ vaccine, but they did cast enough doubt on it to cause many of their member states to put a hold on it until they could make the magnanimous statement they it was ok to use
How did they ‘cast doubt’? Some EU nations are using it, others stopped using it ? "
So you are saying that von der layen did not cast doubt on the safety of the AZ vaccine with her speech then ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"No doubts about Brussels when they rubbished the Oxford vaccine without foundation and without science?
They didn’t,
Oof some would say but of a porky pie there lol
To be fair they did not actually rubbish the AZ vaccine, but they did cast enough doubt on it to cause many of their member states to put a hold on it until they could make the magnanimous statement they it was ok to use
How did they ‘cast doubt’? Some EU nations are using it, others stopped using it ?
So you are saying that von der layen did not cast doubt on the safety of the AZ vaccine with her speech then ? "
Which speech? EMA were far too slow to approve the vaccine but they have never stated it was unsafe |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ovebjsMan
over a year ago
Bristol |
"No doubts about Brussels when they rubbished the Oxford vaccine without foundation and without science?
They didn’t,
Oof some would say but of a porky pie there lol
To be fair they did not actually rubbish the AZ vaccine, but they did cast enough doubt on it to cause many of their member states to put a hold on it until they could make the magnanimous statement they it was ok to use
How did they ‘cast doubt’? Some EU nations are using it, others stopped using it ?
So you are saying that von der layen did not cast doubt on the safety of the AZ vaccine with her speech then ?
Which speech? EMA were far too slow to approve the vaccine but they have never stated it was unsafe "
Not stated just implied |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"No doubts about Brussels when they rubbished the Oxford vaccine without foundation and without science?
They didn’t,
Oof some would say but of a porky pie there lol
Is everything ok? The EU have never rubbished the Astra Zeneca vaccine , "
Mrs Emer Cooke head of the EMA said the blood clot events were "a serious concern" needing "serious and detailed scientific evaluation"
Which any sentient human knows is complete rubbish there never was any genuine concern. They are pissing about and its costing many, many lives. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"No doubts about Brussels when they rubbished the Oxford vaccine without foundation and without science?
They didn’t,
Oof some would say but of a porky pie there lol
To be fair they did not actually rubbish the AZ vaccine, but they did cast enough doubt on it to cause many of their member states to put a hold on it until they could make the magnanimous statement they it was ok to use
How did they ‘cast doubt’? Some EU nations are using it, others stopped using it ?
So you are saying that von der layen did not cast doubt on the safety of the AZ vaccine with her speech then ?
Which speech? EMA were far too slow to approve the vaccine but they have never stated it was unsafe
Not stated just implied "
‘Implied’ ? A bit vague. The US have only just approved the AZ vaccine, does that mean that they ‘implied’ it was unsafe aswell? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"No doubts about Brussels when they rubbished the Oxford vaccine without foundation and without science?
They didn’t,
Oof some would say but of a porky pie there lol
Is everything ok? The EU have never rubbished the Astra Zeneca vaccine ,
Mrs Emer Cooke head of the EMA said the blood clot events were "a serious concern" needing "serious and detailed scientific evaluation"
Which any sentient human knows is complete rubbish there never was any genuine concern. They are pissing about and its costing many, many lives. "
‘Pissing about’? Is that a scientific term? EMA told its member states to continue using the AZ vaccine , |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"No doubts about Brussels when they rubbished the Oxford vaccine without foundation and without science?
They didn’t,
Oof some would say but of a porky pie there lol
To be fair they did not actually rubbish the AZ vaccine, but they did cast enough doubt on it to cause many of their member states to put a hold on it until they could make the magnanimous statement they it was ok to use
How did they ‘cast doubt’? Some EU nations are using it, others stopped using it ?
So you are saying that von der layen did not cast doubt on the safety of the AZ vaccine with her speech then ?
Which speech? EMA were far too slow to approve the vaccine but they have never stated it was unsafe
Not stated just implied
‘Implied’ ? A bit vague. The US have only just approved the AZ vaccine, does that mean that they ‘implied’ it was unsafe aswell? "
Terrible example, the US vaccine programme appears to be proceeding on a par with ours.
Utterly ridiculous for the EU to make any comment at all that's open to interpretation on vaccine approval processes. Naive, corrupt, naive. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"No doubts about Brussels when they rubbished the Oxford vaccine without foundation and without science?
They didn’t,
Oof some would say but of a porky pie there lol
To be fair they did not actually rubbish the AZ vaccine, but they did cast enough doubt on it to cause many of their member states to put a hold on it until they could make the magnanimous statement they it was ok to use
How did they ‘cast doubt’? Some EU nations are using it, others stopped using it ?
So you are saying that von der layen did not cast doubt on the safety of the AZ vaccine with her speech then ?
Which speech? EMA were far too slow to approve the vaccine but they have never stated it was unsafe
Not stated just implied
‘Implied’ ? A bit vague. The US have only just approved the AZ vaccine, does that mean that they ‘implied’ it was unsafe aswell?
Terrible example, the US vaccine programme appears to be proceeding on a par with ours.
Utterly ridiculous for the EU to make any comment at all that's open to interpretation on vaccine approval processes. Naive, corrupt, naive."
‘Open to interpretation’ ? Maybe you don’t understand scientific text ? Can you highlight where EMA has stated that the AZ vaccine is unsafe to use ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"No doubts about Brussels when they rubbished the Oxford vaccine without foundation and without science?
They didn’t,
Oof some would say but of a porky pie there lol
To be fair they did not actually rubbish the AZ vaccine, but they did cast enough doubt on it to cause many of their member states to put a hold on it until they could make the magnanimous statement they it was ok to use
How did they ‘cast doubt’? Some EU nations are using it, others stopped using it ?
So you are saying that von der layen did not cast doubt on the safety of the AZ vaccine with her speech then ?
Which speech? EMA were far too slow to approve the vaccine but they have never stated it was unsafe
Not stated just implied
‘Implied’ ? A bit vague. The US have only just approved the AZ vaccine, does that mean that they ‘implied’ it was unsafe aswell?
Terrible example, the US vaccine programme appears to be proceeding on a par with ours.
Utterly ridiculous for the EU to make any comment at all that's open to interpretation on vaccine approval processes. Naive, corrupt, naive.
‘Open to interpretation’ ? Maybe you don’t understand scientific text ? Can you highlight where EMA has stated that the AZ vaccine is unsafe to use ? "
One example I quoted above:
"blood clot events were a serious concern needing serious and detailed scientific evaluation"
Grossly inappropriate language |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"No doubts about Brussels when they rubbished the Oxford vaccine without foundation and without science?
They didn’t,
Oof some would say but of a porky pie there lol
To be fair they did not actually rubbish the AZ vaccine, but they did cast enough doubt on it to cause many of their member states to put a hold on it until they could make the magnanimous statement they it was ok to use
How did they ‘cast doubt’? Some EU nations are using it, others stopped using it ?
So you are saying that von der layen did not cast doubt on the safety of the AZ vaccine with her speech then ?
Which speech? EMA were far too slow to approve the vaccine but they have never stated it was unsafe
Not stated just implied
‘Implied’ ? A bit vague. The US have only just approved the AZ vaccine, does that mean that they ‘implied’ it was unsafe aswell?
Terrible example, the US vaccine programme appears to be proceeding on a par with ours.
Utterly ridiculous for the EU to make any comment at all that's open to interpretation on vaccine approval processes. Naive, corrupt, naive.
‘Open to interpretation’ ? Maybe you don’t understand scientific text ? Can you highlight where EMA has stated that the AZ vaccine is unsafe to use ?
One example I quoted above:
"blood clot events were a serious concern needing serious and detailed scientific evaluation"
Grossly inappropriate language "
You don’t understand scientific text, try again, when has EMA stated that it is unsafe to use the AZ vaccine? Why have the US only just approved the AZ vaccine after conducting their own extensive trials? Don’t they trust the original AZ data ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"No doubts about Brussels when they rubbished the Oxford vaccine without foundation and without science?
They didn’t,
Oof some would say but of a porky pie there lol
To be fair they did not actually rubbish the AZ vaccine, but they did cast enough doubt on it to cause many of their member states to put a hold on it until they could make the magnanimous statement they it was ok to use
How did they ‘cast doubt’? Some EU nations are using it, others stopped using it ?
So you are saying that von der layen did not cast doubt on the safety of the AZ vaccine with her speech then ?
Which speech? EMA were far too slow to approve the vaccine but they have never stated it was unsafe
Not stated just implied
‘Implied’ ? A bit vague. The US have only just approved the AZ vaccine, does that mean that they ‘implied’ it was unsafe aswell?
Terrible example, the US vaccine programme appears to be proceeding on a par with ours.
Utterly ridiculous for the EU to make any comment at all that's open to interpretation on vaccine approval processes. Naive, corrupt, naive.
‘Open to interpretation’ ? Maybe you don’t understand scientific text ? Can you highlight where EMA has stated that the AZ vaccine is unsafe to use ?
One example I quoted above:
"blood clot events were a serious concern needing serious and detailed scientific evaluation"
Grossly inappropriate language
You don’t understand scientific text, try again, when has EMA stated that it is unsafe to use the AZ vaccine? Why have the US only just approved the AZ vaccine after conducting their own extensive trials? Don’t they trust the original AZ data ? "
Because there are less educated remain voters who will interpret the language used as meaning unsafe. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"No doubts about Brussels when they rubbished the Oxford vaccine without foundation and without science?
They didn’t,
Oof some would say but of a porky pie there lol
To be fair they did not actually rubbish the AZ vaccine, but they did cast enough doubt on it to cause many of their member states to put a hold on it until they could make the magnanimous statement they it was ok to use
How did they ‘cast doubt’? Some EU nations are using it, others stopped using it ?
So you are saying that von der layen did not cast doubt on the safety of the AZ vaccine with her speech then ?
Which speech? EMA were far too slow to approve the vaccine but they have never stated it was unsafe
Not stated just implied
‘Implied’ ? A bit vague. The US have only just approved the AZ vaccine, does that mean that they ‘implied’ it was unsafe aswell?
Terrible example, the US vaccine programme appears to be proceeding on a par with ours.
Utterly ridiculous for the EU to make any comment at all that's open to interpretation on vaccine approval processes. Naive, corrupt, naive.
‘Open to interpretation’ ? Maybe you don’t understand scientific text ? Can you highlight where EMA has stated that the AZ vaccine is unsafe to use ?
One example I quoted above:
"blood clot events were a serious concern needing serious and detailed scientific evaluation"
Grossly inappropriate language
You don’t understand scientific text, try again, when has EMA stated that it is unsafe to use the AZ vaccine? Why have the US only just approved the AZ vaccine after conducting their own extensive trials? Don’t they trust the original AZ data ?
Because there are less educated remain voters who will interpret the language used as meaning unsafe. "
Leave voters are less educated, this is a fact , your threads and posts are not helping your cause |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"No doubts about Brussels when they rubbished the Oxford vaccine without foundation and without science?
They didn’t,
Oof some would say but of a porky pie there lol
To be fair they did not actually rubbish the AZ vaccine, but they did cast enough doubt on it to cause many of their member states to put a hold on it until they could make the magnanimous statement they it was ok to use
How did they ‘cast doubt’? Some EU nations are using it, others stopped using it ?
So you are saying that von der layen did not cast doubt on the safety of the AZ vaccine with her speech then ?
Which speech? EMA were far too slow to approve the vaccine but they have never stated it was unsafe
Not stated just implied
‘Implied’ ? A bit vague. The US have only just approved the AZ vaccine, does that mean that they ‘implied’ it was unsafe aswell?
Terrible example, the US vaccine programme appears to be proceeding on a par with ours.
Utterly ridiculous for the EU to make any comment at all that's open to interpretation on vaccine approval processes. Naive, corrupt, naive.
‘Open to interpretation’ ? Maybe you don’t understand scientific text ? Can you highlight where EMA has stated that the AZ vaccine is unsafe to use ?
One example I quoted above:
"blood clot events were a serious concern needing serious and detailed scientific evaluation"
Grossly inappropriate language
You don’t understand scientific text, try again, when has EMA stated that it is unsafe to use the AZ vaccine? Why have the US only just approved the AZ vaccine after conducting their own extensive trials? Don’t they trust the original AZ data ?
Because there are less educated remain voters who will interpret the language used as meaning unsafe.
Leave voters are less educated, this is a fact , your threads and posts are not helping your cause "
Communism was also more popular among the higher educated as well, how did that work out? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"No doubts about Brussels when they rubbished the Oxford vaccine without foundation and without science?
They didn’t,
Oof some would say but of a porky pie there lol
To be fair they did not actually rubbish the AZ vaccine, but they did cast enough doubt on it to cause many of their member states to put a hold on it until they could make the magnanimous statement they it was ok to use
How did they ‘cast doubt’? Some EU nations are using it, others stopped using it ?
So you are saying that von der layen did not cast doubt on the safety of the AZ vaccine with her speech then ?
Which speech? EMA were far too slow to approve the vaccine but they have never stated it was unsafe
Not stated just implied
‘Implied’ ? A bit vague. The US have only just approved the AZ vaccine, does that mean that they ‘implied’ it was unsafe aswell?
Terrible example, the US vaccine programme appears to be proceeding on a par with ours.
Utterly ridiculous for the EU to make any comment at all that's open to interpretation on vaccine approval processes. Naive, corrupt, naive.
‘Open to interpretation’ ? Maybe you don’t understand scientific text ? Can you highlight where EMA has stated that the AZ vaccine is unsafe to use ?
One example I quoted above:
"blood clot events were a serious concern needing serious and detailed scientific evaluation"
Grossly inappropriate language
You don’t understand scientific text, try again, when has EMA stated that it is unsafe to use the AZ vaccine? Why have the US only just approved the AZ vaccine after conducting their own extensive trials? Don’t they trust the original AZ data ?
Because there are less educated remain voters who will interpret the language used as meaning unsafe.
Leave voters are less educated, this is a fact , your threads and posts are not helping your cause
Communism was also more popular among the higher educated as well, how did that work out? "
Deflection, stick to the facts regarding Brexit voters . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"No doubts about Brussels when they rubbished the Oxford vaccine without foundation and without science?
They didn’t,
Oof some would say but of a porky pie there lol
To be fair they did not actually rubbish the AZ vaccine, but they did cast enough doubt on it to cause many of their member states to put a hold on it until they could make the magnanimous statement they it was ok to use
How did they ‘cast doubt’? Some EU nations are using it, others stopped using it ?
So you are saying that von der layen did not cast doubt on the safety of the AZ vaccine with her speech then ?
Which speech? EMA were far too slow to approve the vaccine but they have never stated it was unsafe
Not stated just implied
‘Implied’ ? A bit vague. The US have only just approved the AZ vaccine, does that mean that they ‘implied’ it was unsafe aswell?
Terrible example, the US vaccine programme appears to be proceeding on a par with ours.
Utterly ridiculous for the EU to make any comment at all that's open to interpretation on vaccine approval processes. Naive, corrupt, naive.
‘Open to interpretation’ ? Maybe you don’t understand scientific text ? Can you highlight where EMA has stated that the AZ vaccine is unsafe to use ?
One example I quoted above:
"blood clot events were a serious concern needing serious and detailed scientific evaluation"
Grossly inappropriate language
You don’t understand scientific text, try again, when has EMA stated that it is unsafe to use the AZ vaccine? Why have the US only just approved the AZ vaccine after conducting their own extensive trials? Don’t they trust the original AZ data ?
Because there are less educated remain voters who will interpret the language used as meaning unsafe.
Leave voters are less educated, this is a fact , your threads and posts are not helping your cause
Communism was also more popular among the higher educated as well, how did that work out?
Deflection, stick to the facts regarding Brexit voters . "
You raised "education levels" so I'm wondering what they are an indication of.
One of the most highly decorated physics professors I knew couldn't work out an overhead projector.
I will take smart over educated. That would be the smart choice. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"No doubts about Brussels when they rubbished the Oxford vaccine without foundation and without science?
They didn’t,
Oof some would say but of a porky pie there lol
To be fair they did not actually rubbish the AZ vaccine, but they did cast enough doubt on it to cause many of their member states to put a hold on it until they could make the magnanimous statement they it was ok to use
How did they ‘cast doubt’? Some EU nations are using it, others stopped using it ?
So you are saying that von der layen did not cast doubt on the safety of the AZ vaccine with her speech then ?
Which speech? EMA were far too slow to approve the vaccine but they have never stated it was unsafe
Not stated just implied
‘Implied’ ? A bit vague. The US have only just approved the AZ vaccine, does that mean that they ‘implied’ it was unsafe aswell?
Terrible example, the US vaccine programme appears to be proceeding on a par with ours.
Utterly ridiculous for the EU to make any comment at all that's open to interpretation on vaccine approval processes. Naive, corrupt, naive.
‘Open to interpretation’ ? Maybe you don’t understand scientific text ? Can you highlight where EMA has stated that the AZ vaccine is unsafe to use ?
One example I quoted above:
"blood clot events were a serious concern needing serious and detailed scientific evaluation"
Grossly inappropriate language
You don’t understand scientific text, try again, when has EMA stated that it is unsafe to use the AZ vaccine? Why have the US only just approved the AZ vaccine after conducting their own extensive trials? Don’t they trust the original AZ data ?
Because there are less educated remain voters who will interpret the language used as meaning unsafe.
Leave voters are less educated, this is a fact , your threads and posts are not helping your cause
Communism was also more popular among the higher educated as well, how did that work out?
Deflection, stick to the facts regarding Brexit voters .
You raised "education levels" so I'm wondering what they are an indication of.
One of the most highly decorated physics professors I knew couldn't work out an overhead projector.
I will take smart over educated. That would be the smart choice. "
You don’t know any highly decorated physics professors |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"No doubts about Brussels when they rubbished the Oxford vaccine without foundation and without science?
They didn’t,
Oof some would say but of a porky pie there lol
To be fair they did not actually rubbish the AZ vaccine, but they did cast enough doubt on it to cause many of their member states to put a hold on it until they could make the magnanimous statement they it was ok to use
How did they ‘cast doubt’? Some EU nations are using it, others stopped using it ?
So you are saying that von der layen did not cast doubt on the safety of the AZ vaccine with her speech then ?
Which speech? EMA were far too slow to approve the vaccine but they have never stated it was unsafe
Not stated just implied
‘Implied’ ? A bit vague. The US have only just approved the AZ vaccine, does that mean that they ‘implied’ it was unsafe aswell?
Terrible example, the US vaccine programme appears to be proceeding on a par with ours.
Utterly ridiculous for the EU to make any comment at all that's open to interpretation on vaccine approval processes. Naive, corrupt, naive.
‘Open to interpretation’ ? Maybe you don’t understand scientific text ? Can you highlight where EMA has stated that the AZ vaccine is unsafe to use ?
One example I quoted above:
"blood clot events were a serious concern needing serious and detailed scientific evaluation"
Grossly inappropriate language
You don’t understand scientific text, try again, when has EMA stated that it is unsafe to use the AZ vaccine? Why have the US only just approved the AZ vaccine after conducting their own extensive trials? Don’t they trust the original AZ data ?
Because there are less educated remain voters who will interpret the language used as meaning unsafe.
Leave voters are less educated, this is a fact , your threads and posts are not helping your cause
Communism was also more popular among the higher educated as well, how did that work out?
Deflection, stick to the facts regarding Brexit voters .
You raised "education levels" so I'm wondering what they are an indication of.
One of the most highly decorated physics professors I knew couldn't work out an overhead projector.
I will take smart over educated. That would be the smart choice.
You don’t know any highly decorated physics professors "
I do, and if you are honest with yourself wou will acknowledge if you meet highly educated people there level of education tends to run in inverse proportion to their common sense. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"No doubts about Brussels when they rubbished the Oxford vaccine without foundation and without science?
They didn’t,
Oof some would say but of a porky pie there lol
To be fair they did not actually rubbish the AZ vaccine, but they did cast enough doubt on it to cause many of their member states to put a hold on it until they could make the magnanimous statement they it was ok to use
How did they ‘cast doubt’? Some EU nations are using it, others stopped using it ?
So you are saying that von der layen did not cast doubt on the safety of the AZ vaccine with her speech then ?
Which speech? EMA were far too slow to approve the vaccine but they have never stated it was unsafe
Not stated just implied
‘Implied’ ? A bit vague. The US have only just approved the AZ vaccine, does that mean that they ‘implied’ it was unsafe aswell?
Terrible example, the US vaccine programme appears to be proceeding on a par with ours.
Utterly ridiculous for the EU to make any comment at all that's open to interpretation on vaccine approval processes. Naive, corrupt, naive.
‘Open to interpretation’ ? Maybe you don’t understand scientific text ? Can you highlight where EMA has stated that the AZ vaccine is unsafe to use ?
One example I quoted above:
"blood clot events were a serious concern needing serious and detailed scientific evaluation"
Grossly inappropriate language
You don’t understand scientific text, try again, when has EMA stated that it is unsafe to use the AZ vaccine? Why have the US only just approved the AZ vaccine after conducting their own extensive trials? Don’t they trust the original AZ data ?
Because there are less educated remain voters who will interpret the language used as meaning unsafe.
Leave voters are less educated, this is a fact , your threads and posts are not helping your cause
Communism was also more popular among the higher educated as well, how did that work out?
Deflection, stick to the facts regarding Brexit voters .
You raised "education levels" so I'm wondering what they are an indication of.
One of the most highly decorated physics professors I knew couldn't work out an overhead projector.
I will take smart over educated. That would be the smart choice.
You don’t know any highly decorated physics professors
I do, and if you are honest with yourself wou will acknowledge if you meet highly educated people there level of education tends to run in inverse proportion to their common sense. "
No you don’t |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"No doubts about Brussels when they rubbished the Oxford vaccine without foundation and without science?
They didn’t,
Oof some would say but of a porky pie there lol
To be fair they did not actually rubbish the AZ vaccine, but they did cast enough doubt on it to cause many of their member states to put a hold on it until they could make the magnanimous statement they it was ok to use
How did they ‘cast doubt’? Some EU nations are using it, others stopped using it ?
So you are saying that von der layen did not cast doubt on the safety of the AZ vaccine with her speech then ?
Which speech? EMA were far too slow to approve the vaccine but they have never stated it was unsafe
Not stated just implied
‘Implied’ ? A bit vague. The US have only just approved the AZ vaccine, does that mean that they ‘implied’ it was unsafe aswell?
Terrible example, the US vaccine programme appears to be proceeding on a par with ours.
Utterly ridiculous for the EU to make any comment at all that's open to interpretation on vaccine approval processes. Naive, corrupt, naive.
‘Open to interpretation’ ? Maybe you don’t understand scientific text ? Can you highlight where EMA has stated that the AZ vaccine is unsafe to use ?
One example I quoted above:
"blood clot events were a serious concern needing serious and detailed scientific evaluation"
Grossly inappropriate language
You don’t understand scientific text, try again, when has EMA stated that it is unsafe to use the AZ vaccine? Why have the US only just approved the AZ vaccine after conducting their own extensive trials? Don’t they trust the original AZ data ?
Because there are less educated remain voters who will interpret the language used as meaning unsafe.
Leave voters are less educated, this is a fact , your threads and posts are not helping your cause
Communism was also more popular among the higher educated as well, how did that work out?
Deflection, stick to the facts regarding Brexit voters .
You raised "education levels" so I'm wondering what they are an indication of.
One of the most highly decorated physics professors I knew couldn't work out an overhead projector.
I will take smart over educated. That would be the smart choice.
You don’t know any highly decorated physics professors
I do, and if you are honest with yourself wou will acknowledge if you meet highly educated people there level of education tends to run in inverse proportion to their common sense.
No you don’t "
Have you ever met highly educated people? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"No doubts about Brussels when they rubbished the Oxford vaccine without foundation and without science?
They didn’t,
Oof some would say but of a porky pie there lol
To be fair they did not actually rubbish the AZ vaccine, but they did cast enough doubt on it to cause many of their member states to put a hold on it until they could make the magnanimous statement they it was ok to use
How did they ‘cast doubt’? Some EU nations are using it, others stopped using it ?
So you are saying that von der layen did not cast doubt on the safety of the AZ vaccine with her speech then ?
Which speech? EMA were far too slow to approve the vaccine but they have never stated it was unsafe
Not stated just implied
‘Implied’ ? A bit vague. The US have only just approved the AZ vaccine, does that mean that they ‘implied’ it was unsafe aswell?
Terrible example, the US vaccine programme appears to be proceeding on a par with ours.
Utterly ridiculous for the EU to make any comment at all that's open to interpretation on vaccine approval processes. Naive, corrupt, naive.
‘Open to interpretation’ ? Maybe you don’t understand scientific text ? Can you highlight where EMA has stated that the AZ vaccine is unsafe to use ?
One example I quoted above:
"blood clot events were a serious concern needing serious and detailed scientific evaluation"
Grossly inappropriate language
You don’t understand scientific text, try again, when has EMA stated that it is unsafe to use the AZ vaccine? Why have the US only just approved the AZ vaccine after conducting their own extensive trials? Don’t they trust the original AZ data ?
Because there are less educated remain voters who will interpret the language used as meaning unsafe.
Leave voters are less educated, this is a fact , your threads and posts are not helping your cause
Communism was also more popular among the higher educated as well, how did that work out?
Deflection, stick to the facts regarding Brexit voters .
You raised "education levels" so I'm wondering what they are an indication of.
One of the most highly decorated physics professors I knew couldn't work out an overhead projector.
I will take smart over educated. That would be the smart choice.
You don’t know any highly decorated physics professors
I do, and if you are honest with yourself wou will acknowledge if you meet highly educated people there level of education tends to run in inverse proportion to their common sense.
No you don’t
Have you ever met highly educated people? "
Yes, have you ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"No doubts about Brussels when they rubbished the Oxford vaccine without foundation and without science?
They didn’t,
Oof some would say but of a porky pie there lol
To be fair they did not actually rubbish the AZ vaccine, but they did cast enough doubt on it to cause many of their member states to put a hold on it until they could make the magnanimous statement they it was ok to use
How did they ‘cast doubt’? Some EU nations are using it, others stopped using it ?
So you are saying that von der layen did not cast doubt on the safety of the AZ vaccine with her speech then ?
Which speech? EMA were far too slow to approve the vaccine but they have never stated it was unsafe
Not stated just implied
‘Implied’ ? A bit vague. The US have only just approved the AZ vaccine, does that mean that they ‘implied’ it was unsafe aswell?
Terrible example, the US vaccine programme appears to be proceeding on a par with ours.
Utterly ridiculous for the EU to make any comment at all that's open to interpretation on vaccine approval processes. Naive, corrupt, naive.
‘Open to interpretation’ ? Maybe you don’t understand scientific text ? Can you highlight where EMA has stated that the AZ vaccine is unsafe to use ?
One example I quoted above:
"blood clot events were a serious concern needing serious and detailed scientific evaluation"
Grossly inappropriate language
You don’t understand scientific text, try again, when has EMA stated that it is unsafe to use the AZ vaccine? Why have the US only just approved the AZ vaccine after conducting their own extensive trials? Don’t they trust the original AZ data ?
Because there are less educated remain voters who will interpret the language used as meaning unsafe.
Leave voters are less educated, this is a fact , your threads and posts are not helping your cause
Communism was also more popular among the higher educated as well, how did that work out?
Deflection, stick to the facts regarding Brexit voters .
You raised "education levels" so I'm wondering what they are an indication of.
One of the most highly decorated physics professors I knew couldn't work out an overhead projector.
I will take smart over educated. That would be the smart choice.
You don’t know any highly decorated physics professors
I do, and if you are honest with yourself wou will acknowledge if you meet highly educated people there level of education tends to run in inverse proportion to their common sense.
No you don’t
Have you ever met highly educated people?
Yes, have you ? "
Would you consider yourself an observent person? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"No doubts about Brussels when they rubbished the Oxford vaccine without foundation and without science?
They didn’t,
Oof some would say but of a porky pie there lol
To be fair they did not actually rubbish the AZ vaccine, but they did cast enough doubt on it to cause many of their member states to put a hold on it until they could make the magnanimous statement they it was ok to use
How did they ‘cast doubt’? Some EU nations are using it, others stopped using it ?
So you are saying that von der layen did not cast doubt on the safety of the AZ vaccine with her speech then ?
Which speech? EMA were far too slow to approve the vaccine but they have never stated it was unsafe
Not stated just implied
‘Implied’ ? A bit vague. The US have only just approved the AZ vaccine, does that mean that they ‘implied’ it was unsafe aswell?
Terrible example, the US vaccine programme appears to be proceeding on a par with ours.
Utterly ridiculous for the EU to make any comment at all that's open to interpretation on vaccine approval processes. Naive, corrupt, naive.
‘Open to interpretation’ ? Maybe you don’t understand scientific text ? Can you highlight where EMA has stated that the AZ vaccine is unsafe to use ?
One example I quoted above:
"blood clot events were a serious concern needing serious and detailed scientific evaluation"
Grossly inappropriate language
You don’t understand scientific text, try again, when has EMA stated that it is unsafe to use the AZ vaccine? Why have the US only just approved the AZ vaccine after conducting their own extensive trials? Don’t they trust the original AZ data ?
Because there are less educated remain voters who will interpret the language used as meaning unsafe.
Leave voters are less educated, this is a fact , your threads and posts are not helping your cause
Communism was also more popular among the higher educated as well, how did that work out?
Deflection, stick to the facts regarding Brexit voters .
You raised "education levels" so I'm wondering what they are an indication of.
One of the most highly decorated physics professors I knew couldn't work out an overhead projector.
I will take smart over educated. That would be the smart choice.
You don’t know any highly decorated physics professors
I do, and if you are honest with yourself wou will acknowledge if you meet highly educated people there level of education tends to run in inverse proportion to their common sense.
No you don’t
Have you ever met highly educated people?
Yes, have you ?
Would you consider yourself an observent person? "
Very, one of the best on here, highly regarded professors have commented on how observant I am , top 0.01% Chris , you can’t argue with that |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"No doubts about Brussels when they rubbished the Oxford vaccine without foundation and without science?
They didn’t,
Oof some would say but of a porky pie there lol
To be fair they did not actually rubbish the AZ vaccine, but they did cast enough doubt on it to cause many of their member states to put a hold on it until they could make the magnanimous statement they it was ok to use
How did they ‘cast doubt’? Some EU nations are using it, others stopped using it ?
So you are saying that von der layen did not cast doubt on the safety of the AZ vaccine with her speech then ?
Which speech? EMA were far too slow to approve the vaccine but they have never stated it was unsafe
Not stated just implied
‘Implied’ ? A bit vague. The US have only just approved the AZ vaccine, does that mean that they ‘implied’ it was unsafe aswell?
Terrible example, the US vaccine programme appears to be proceeding on a par with ours.
Utterly ridiculous for the EU to make any comment at all that's open to interpretation on vaccine approval processes. Naive, corrupt, naive.
‘Open to interpretation’ ? Maybe you don’t understand scientific text ? Can you highlight where EMA has stated that the AZ vaccine is unsafe to use ?
One example I quoted above:
"blood clot events were a serious concern needing serious and detailed scientific evaluation"
Grossly inappropriate language
You don’t understand scientific text, try again, when has EMA stated that it is unsafe to use the AZ vaccine? Why have the US only just approved the AZ vaccine after conducting their own extensive trials? Don’t they trust the original AZ data ?
Because there are less educated remain voters who will interpret the language used as meaning unsafe.
Leave voters are less educated, this is a fact , your threads and posts are not helping your cause
Communism was also more popular among the higher educated as well, how did that work out?
Deflection, stick to the facts regarding Brexit voters .
You raised "education levels" so I'm wondering what they are an indication of.
One of the most highly decorated physics professors I knew couldn't work out an overhead projector.
I will take smart over educated. That would be the smart choice.
You don’t know any highly decorated physics professors
I do, and if you are honest with yourself wou will acknowledge if you meet highly educated people there level of education tends to run in inverse proportion to their common sense.
No you don’t
Have you ever met highly educated people?
Yes, have you ?
Would you consider yourself an observent person?
Very, one of the best on here, highly regarded professors have commented on how observant I am , top 0.01% Chris , you can’t argue with that "
Banter! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"No doubts about Brussels when they rubbished the Oxford vaccine without foundation and without science?
They didn’t,
Oof some would say but of a porky pie there lol
To be fair they did not actually rubbish the AZ vaccine, but they did cast enough doubt on it to cause many of their member states to put a hold on it until they could make the magnanimous statement they it was ok to use
How did they ‘cast doubt’? Some EU nations are using it, others stopped using it ?
So you are saying that von der layen did not cast doubt on the safety of the AZ vaccine with her speech then ?
Which speech? EMA were far too slow to approve the vaccine but they have never stated it was unsafe
Not stated just implied
‘Implied’ ? A bit vague. The US have only just approved the AZ vaccine, does that mean that they ‘implied’ it was unsafe aswell?
Terrible example, the US vaccine programme appears to be proceeding on a par with ours.
Utterly ridiculous for the EU to make any comment at all that's open to interpretation on vaccine approval processes. Naive, corrupt, naive.
‘Open to interpretation’ ? Maybe you don’t understand scientific text ? Can you highlight where EMA has stated that the AZ vaccine is unsafe to use ?
One example I quoted above:
"blood clot events were a serious concern needing serious and detailed scientific evaluation"
Grossly inappropriate language
You don’t understand scientific text, try again, when has EMA stated that it is unsafe to use the AZ vaccine? Why have the US only just approved the AZ vaccine after conducting their own extensive trials? Don’t they trust the original AZ data ?
Because there are less educated remain voters who will interpret the language used as meaning unsafe.
Leave voters are less educated, this is a fact , your threads and posts are not helping your cause
Communism was also more popular among the higher educated as well, how did that work out?
Deflection, stick to the facts regarding Brexit voters .
You raised "education levels" so I'm wondering what they are an indication of.
One of the most highly decorated physics professors I knew couldn't work out an overhead projector.
I will take smart over educated. That would be the smart choice.
You don’t know any highly decorated physics professors
I do, and if you are honest with yourself wou will acknowledge if you meet highly educated people there level of education tends to run in inverse proportion to their common sense.
No you don’t
Have you ever met highly educated people?
Yes, have you ?
Would you consider yourself an observent person?
Very, one of the best on here, highly regarded professors have commented on how observant I am , top 0.01% Chris , you can’t argue with that
Banter! "
Happy to credit original banter
Which this isn’t  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
thats what i was saying, ref champagne... ive had no eu cock since brexit, none, in a complete failure of brussels policy, its shameful, thankfully there are great british cocks to plug their failure lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"thats what i was saying, ref champagne... ive had no eu cock since brexit, none, in a complete failure of brussels policy, its shameful, thankfully there are great british cocks to plug their failure lol "
Do we need cock checks at the borders?
Let in the biggest and best Euro cock?
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"No doubts about Brussels when they rubbished the Oxford vaccine without foundation and without science?
They didn’t,
Oof some would say but of a porky pie there lol
To be fair they did not actually rubbish the AZ vaccine, but they did cast enough doubt on it to cause many of their member states to put a hold on it until they could make the magnanimous statement they it was ok to use
How did they ‘cast doubt’? Some EU nations are using it, others stopped using it ?
So you are saying that von der layen did not cast doubt on the safety of the AZ vaccine with her speech then ?
Which speech? EMA were far too slow to approve the vaccine but they have never stated it was unsafe
Not stated just implied
‘Implied’ ? A bit vague. The US have only just approved the AZ vaccine, does that mean that they ‘implied’ it was unsafe aswell?
Terrible example, the US vaccine programme appears to be proceeding on a par with ours.
Utterly ridiculous for the EU to make any comment at all that's open to interpretation on vaccine approval processes. Naive, corrupt, naive.
‘Open to interpretation’ ? Maybe you don’t understand scientific text ? Can you highlight where EMA has stated that the AZ vaccine is unsafe to use ?
One example I quoted above:
"blood clot events were a serious concern needing serious and detailed scientific evaluation"
Grossly inappropriate language
You don’t understand scientific text, try again, when has EMA stated that it is unsafe to use the AZ vaccine? Why have the US only just approved the AZ vaccine after conducting their own extensive trials? Don’t they trust the original AZ data ?
Because there are less educated remain voters who will interpret the language used as meaning unsafe.
Leave voters are less educated, this is a fact , your threads and posts are not helping your cause
Communism was also more popular among the higher educated as well, how did that work out?
Deflection, stick to the facts regarding Brexit voters .
You raised "education levels" so I'm wondering what they are an indication of.
One of the most highly decorated physics professors I knew couldn't work out an overhead projector.
I will take smart over educated. That would be the smart choice.
You don’t know any highly decorated physics professors
I do, and if you are honest with yourself wou will acknowledge if you meet highly educated people there level of education tends to run in inverse proportion to their common sense.
No you don’t
Have you ever met highly educated people?
Yes, have you ?
Would you consider yourself an observent person?
Very, one of the best on here, highly regarded professors have commented on how observant I am , top 0.01% Chris , you can’t argue with that
Banter!
Happy to credit original banter
Which this isn’t "
It's funny. All that matters. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"No doubts about Brussels when they rubbished the Oxford vaccine without foundation and without science?
They didn’t,
Oof some would say but of a porky pie there lol
To be fair they did not actually rubbish the AZ vaccine, but they did cast enough doubt on it to cause many of their member states to put a hold on it until they could make the magnanimous statement they it was ok to use
How did they ‘cast doubt’? Some EU nations are using it, others stopped using it ?
So you are saying that von der layen did not cast doubt on the safety of the AZ vaccine with her speech then ?
Which speech? EMA were far too slow to approve the vaccine but they have never stated it was unsafe
Not stated just implied
‘Implied’ ? A bit vague. The US have only just approved the AZ vaccine, does that mean that they ‘implied’ it was unsafe aswell?
Terrible example, the US vaccine programme appears to be proceeding on a par with ours.
Utterly ridiculous for the EU to make any comment at all that's open to interpretation on vaccine approval processes. Naive, corrupt, naive.
‘Open to interpretation’ ? Maybe you don’t understand scientific text ? Can you highlight where EMA has stated that the AZ vaccine is unsafe to use ?
One example I quoted above:
"blood clot events were a serious concern needing serious and detailed scientific evaluation"
Grossly inappropriate language
You don’t understand scientific text, try again, when has EMA stated that it is unsafe to use the AZ vaccine? Why have the US only just approved the AZ vaccine after conducting their own extensive trials? Don’t they trust the original AZ data ?
Because there are less educated remain voters who will interpret the language used as meaning unsafe.
Leave voters are less educated, this is a fact , your threads and posts are not helping your cause
Communism was also more popular among the higher educated as well, how did that work out?
Deflection, stick to the facts regarding Brexit voters .
You raised "education levels" so I'm wondering what they are an indication of.
One of the most highly decorated physics professors I knew couldn't work out an overhead projector.
I will take smart over educated. That would be the smart choice.
You don’t know any highly decorated physics professors
I do, and if you are honest with yourself wou will acknowledge if you meet highly educated people there level of education tends to run in inverse proportion to their common sense.
No you don’t
Have you ever met highly educated people?
Yes, have you ?
Would you consider yourself an observent person?
Very, one of the best on here, highly regarded professors have commented on how observant I am , top 0.01% Chris , you can’t argue with that
Banter!
Happy to credit original banter
Which this isn’t "
100% original banter, |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"No doubts about Brussels when they rubbished the Oxford vaccine without foundation and without science?
They didn’t,
Oof some would say but of a porky pie there lol
To be fair they did not actually rubbish the AZ vaccine, but they did cast enough doubt on it to cause many of their member states to put a hold on it until they could make the magnanimous statement they it was ok to use
How did they ‘cast doubt’? Some EU nations are using it, others stopped using it ?
So you are saying that von der layen did not cast doubt on the safety of the AZ vaccine with her speech then ?
Which speech? EMA were far too slow to approve the vaccine but they have never stated it was unsafe
Not stated just implied
‘Implied’ ? A bit vague. The US have only just approved the AZ vaccine, does that mean that they ‘implied’ it was unsafe aswell?
Terrible example, the US vaccine programme appears to be proceeding on a par with ours.
Utterly ridiculous for the EU to make any comment at all that's open to interpretation on vaccine approval processes. Naive, corrupt, naive.
‘Open to interpretation’ ? Maybe you don’t understand scientific text ? Can you highlight where EMA has stated that the AZ vaccine is unsafe to use ?
One example I quoted above:
"blood clot events were a serious concern needing serious and detailed scientific evaluation"
Grossly inappropriate language
You don’t understand scientific text, try again, when has EMA stated that it is unsafe to use the AZ vaccine? Why have the US only just approved the AZ vaccine after conducting their own extensive trials? Don’t they trust the original AZ data ?
Because there are less educated remain voters who will interpret the language used as meaning unsafe.
Leave voters are less educated, this is a fact , your threads and posts are not helping your cause
Communism was also more popular among the higher educated as well, how did that work out?
Deflection, stick to the facts regarding Brexit voters .
You raised "education levels" so I'm wondering what they are an indication of.
One of the most highly decorated physics professors I knew couldn't work out an overhead projector.
I will take smart over educated. That would be the smart choice.
You don’t know any highly decorated physics professors
I do, and if you are honest with yourself wou will acknowledge if you meet highly educated people there level of education tends to run in inverse proportion to their common sense.
No you don’t
Have you ever met highly educated people?
Yes, have you ?
Would you consider yourself an observent person?
Very, one of the best on here, highly regarded professors have commented on how observant I am , top 0.01% Chris , you can’t argue with that
Banter!
Happy to credit original banter
Which this isn’t
It's funny. All that matters."
It’s an unfunny rip off of my dazzling repartee.
Like watching a six year old butcher Vivaldi on the violin. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"No doubts about Brussels when they rubbished the Oxford vaccine without foundation and without science?
They didn’t,
Oof some would say but of a porky pie there lol
To be fair they did not actually rubbish the AZ vaccine, but they did cast enough doubt on it to cause many of their member states to put a hold on it until they could make the magnanimous statement they it was ok to use
How did they ‘cast doubt’? Some EU nations are using it, others stopped using it ?
So you are saying that von der layen did not cast doubt on the safety of the AZ vaccine with her speech then ?
Which speech? EMA were far too slow to approve the vaccine but they have never stated it was unsafe
Not stated just implied
‘Implied’ ? A bit vague. The US have only just approved the AZ vaccine, does that mean that they ‘implied’ it was unsafe aswell?
Terrible example, the US vaccine programme appears to be proceeding on a par with ours.
Utterly ridiculous for the EU to make any comment at all that's open to interpretation on vaccine approval processes. Naive, corrupt, naive.
‘Open to interpretation’ ? Maybe you don’t understand scientific text ? Can you highlight where EMA has stated that the AZ vaccine is unsafe to use ?
One example I quoted above:
"blood clot events were a serious concern needing serious and detailed scientific evaluation"
Grossly inappropriate language
You don’t understand scientific text, try again, when has EMA stated that it is unsafe to use the AZ vaccine? Why have the US only just approved the AZ vaccine after conducting their own extensive trials? Don’t they trust the original AZ data ?
Because there are less educated remain voters who will interpret the language used as meaning unsafe.
Leave voters are less educated, this is a fact , your threads and posts are not helping your cause
Communism was also more popular among the higher educated as well, how did that work out?
Deflection, stick to the facts regarding Brexit voters .
You raised "education levels" so I'm wondering what they are an indication of.
One of the most highly decorated physics professors I knew couldn't work out an overhead projector.
I will take smart over educated. That would be the smart choice.
You don’t know any highly decorated physics professors
I do, and if you are honest with yourself wou will acknowledge if you meet highly educated people there level of education tends to run in inverse proportion to their common sense.
No you don’t
Have you ever met highly educated people?
Yes, have you ?
Would you consider yourself an observent person?
Very, one of the best on here, highly regarded professors have commented on how observant I am , top 0.01% Chris , you can’t argue with that
Banter!
Happy to credit original banter
Which this isn’t
It's funny. All that matters.
It’s an unfunny rip off of my dazzling repartee.
Like watching a six year old butcher Vivaldi on the violin."
You're right. "Dazzling repartee" That's funnier! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"thats what i was saying, ref champagne... ive had no eu cock since brexit, none, in a complete failure of brussels policy, its shameful, thankfully there are great british cocks to plug their failure lol
Do we need cock checks at the borders?
Let in the biggest and best Euro cock?
"
ive been checking euro cock for years in illicit boarder checks and roaming beach checks, way before you ever heard of brexit, the europeans never complained! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
