FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Misogyny law?
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ive been watch Stella Creasy? talking about this. Will it work or could it make things worse? Eg generation of resentment in misogynistic men rather than getting to root causes and re education. " Are they trying to make misogeny illegal? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ive been watch Stella Creasy? talking about this. Will it work or could it make things worse? Eg generation of resentment in misogynistic men rather than getting to root causes and re education. Are they trying to make misogeny illegal?" To make it a hate crime. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If it makes people think twice about their behaviour then I’m for a carefully thought out law. " Agree but in relation to the issue, it has to be more than just legislation that's left to the police to enforce.. It needs massive societal, cultural changes in all areas and walks of life, we still decades after the fair pay act have women in some areas of the workplace paid less.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think it has to be framed into Law somehow. The level of Misogyny just on this Politics forum is appalling at times. Comments like 'time of the month is it' are Neanderthal at least and dangerous at best. It's teaches a language of behaviour that should have been extinct a century ago. It should be taught at primary school too. How to frame a law around it is perhaps a lot more difficult however." Totally agree with you. It clearly exists and is more prevalent than we would hope. Can you criminalise it, I hope so but it requires a societal change which we all need to embrace. Sadly too many will yell snowflake or woke when they should be supporting change | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think it has to be framed into Law somehow. The level of Misogyny just on this Politics forum is appalling at times. Comments like 'time of the month is it' are Neanderthal at least and dangerous at best. It's teaches a language of behaviour that should have been extinct a century ago. It should be taught at primary school too. How to frame a law around it is perhaps a lot more difficult however. Totally agree with you. It clearly exists and is more prevalent than we would hope. Can you criminalise it, I hope so but it requires a societal change which we all need to embrace. Sadly too many will yell snowflake or woke when they should be supporting change " I agree, it's something that needs a lot more than a quick fix | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ive been watch Stella Creasy? talking about this. Will it work or could it make things worse? Eg generation of resentment in misogynistic men rather than getting to root causes and re education. " A load of modern day crap. We are all human and men and women are often ruled by there sexual urges and you cannot educate against what is natural to you. If a man or woman cannot control themselves they should be locked up but you cannot educate against who and what we are. Examples Gay people,lesbians,tranvestites etc. Sadly we are all human and nothing will change that well maybe a lobotomy Ok hard and nasty but most of you hate the truth I know.We are not civlised we are generations from being so. Yes teach people to be good and have high moral compass and right from wrong but it will not make the problem go away | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ive been watch Stella Creasy? talking about this. Will it work or could it make things worse? Eg generation of resentment in misogynistic men rather than getting to root causes and re education. A load of modern day crap. We are all human and men and women are often ruled by there sexual urges and you cannot educate against what is natural to you. If a man or woman cannot control themselves they should be locked up but you cannot educate against who and what we are. Examples Gay people,lesbians,tranvestites etc. Sadly we are all human and nothing will change that well maybe a lobotomy Ok hard and nasty but most of you hate the truth I know.We are not civlised we are generations from being so. Yes teach people to be good and have high moral compass and right from wrong but it will not make the problem go away " Apologist, men cause these problems. End of story. It is never a womans fault that she is murdered. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ive been watch Stella Creasy? talking about this. Will it work or could it make things worse? Eg generation of resentment in misogynistic men rather than getting to root causes and re education. A load of modern day crap. We are all human and men and women are often ruled by there sexual urges and you cannot educate against what is natural to you. If a man or woman cannot control themselves they should be locked up but you cannot educate against who and what we are. Examples Gay people,lesbians,tranvestites etc. Sadly we are all human and nothing will change that well maybe a lobotomy Ok hard and nasty but most of you hate the truth I know.We are not civlised we are generations from being so. Yes teach people to be good and have high moral compass and right from wrong but it will not make the problem go away " Not sure you speak for anyone tbh with views like that just be quiet perhaps..? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ive been watch Stella Creasy? talking about this. Will it work or could it make things worse? Eg generation of resentment in misogynistic men rather than getting to root causes and re education. A load of modern day crap. We are all human and men and women are often ruled by there sexual urges and you cannot educate against what is natural to you. If a man or woman cannot control themselves they should be locked up but you cannot educate against who and what we are. Examples Gay people,lesbians,tranvestites etc. Sadly we are all human and nothing will change that well maybe a lobotomy Ok hard and nasty but most of you hate the truth I know.We are not civlised we are generations from being so. Yes teach people to be good and have high moral compass and right from wrong but it will not make the problem go away " Yes you can educate against this type of thinking and behaviour - I notice you didn't use the word Racism in your short list of things that can't be educated against. What a shallow way of thinking. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ive been watch Stella Creasy? talking about this. Will it work or could it make things worse? Eg generation of resentment in misogynistic men rather than getting to root causes and re education. A load of modern day crap. We are all human and men and women are often ruled by there sexual urges and you cannot educate against what is natural to you. If a man or woman cannot control themselves they should be locked up but you cannot educate against who and what we are. Examples Gay people,lesbians,tranvestites etc. Sadly we are all human and nothing will change that well maybe a lobotomy Ok hard and nasty but most of you hate the truth I know.We are not civlised we are generations from being so. Yes teach people to be good and have high moral compass and right from wrong but it will not make the problem go away Apologist, men cause these problems. End of story. It is never a womans fault that she is murdered." Or abused. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ive been watch Stella Creasy? talking about this. Will it work or could it make things worse? Eg generation of resentment in misogynistic men rather than getting to root causes and re education. A load of modern day crap. We are all human and men and women are often ruled by there sexual urges and you cannot educate against what is natural to you. If a man or woman cannot control themselves they should be locked up but you cannot educate against who and what we are. Examples Gay people,lesbians,tranvestites etc. Sadly we are all human and nothing will change that well maybe a lobotomy Ok hard and nasty but most of you hate the truth I know.We are not civlised we are generations from being so. Yes teach people to be good and have high moral compass and right from wrong but it will not make the problem go away Apologist, men cause these problems. End of story. It is never a womans fault that she is murdered. Or abused. " I find this is quite odd. And call em whatever you like but it's also never a mans fault or a transgenders fault that they are murdered or abused. That's not me saying that some men aren't misogynistic but blanket statements will never help. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ive been watch Stella Creasy? talking about this. Will it work or could it make things worse? Eg generation of resentment in misogynistic men rather than getting to root causes and re education. A load of modern day crap. We are all human and men and women are often ruled by there sexual urges and you cannot educate against what is natural to you. If a man or woman cannot control themselves they should be locked up but you cannot educate against who and what we are. Examples Gay people,lesbians,tranvestites etc. Sadly we are all human and nothing will change that well maybe a lobotomy Ok hard and nasty but most of you hate the truth I know.We are not civlised we are generations from being so. Yes teach people to be good and have high moral compass and right from wrong but it will not make the problem go away Apologist, men cause these problems. End of story. It is never a womans fault that she is murdered. Or abused. I find this is quite odd. And call em whatever you like but it's also never a mans fault or a transgenders fault that they are murdered or abused. That's not me saying that some men aren't misogynistic but blanket statements will never help." Given that the vast majority of murders and assaults are carried out by men, it is fair for those that get murdered and assaulted to ask for some degree of protection. Pretending that men are in any equivalence here is pathetic. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ive been watch Stella Creasy? talking about this. Will it work or could it make things worse? Eg generation of resentment in misogynistic men rather than getting to root causes and re education. A load of modern day crap. We are all human and men and women are often ruled by there sexual urges and you cannot educate against what is natural to you. If a man or woman cannot control themselves they should be locked up but you cannot educate against who and what we are. Examples Gay people,lesbians,tranvestites etc. Sadly we are all human and nothing will change that well maybe a lobotomy Ok hard and nasty but most of you hate the truth I know.We are not civlised we are generations from being so. Yes teach people to be good and have high moral compass and right from wrong but it will not make the problem go away Apologist, men cause these problems. End of story. It is never a womans fault that she is murdered." I take it you did not understand what I was saying | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ive been watch Stella Creasy? talking about this. Will it work or could it make things worse? Eg generation of resentment in misogynistic men rather than getting to root causes and re education. A load of modern day crap. We are all human and men and women are often ruled by there sexual urges and you cannot educate against what is natural to you. If a man or woman cannot control themselves they should be locked up but you cannot educate against who and what we are. Examples Gay people,lesbians,tranvestites etc. Sadly we are all human and nothing will change that well maybe a lobotomy Ok hard and nasty but most of you hate the truth I know.We are not civlised we are generations from being so. Yes teach people to be good and have high moral compass and right from wrong but it will not make the problem go away Apologist, men cause these problems. End of story. It is never a womans fault that she is murdered. Or abused. I find this is quite odd. And call em whatever you like but it's also never a mans fault or a transgenders fault that they are murdered or abused. That's not me saying that some men aren't misogynistic but blanket statements will never help. Given that the vast majority of murders and assaults are carried out by men, it is fair for those that get murdered and assaulted to ask for some degree of protection. Pretending that men are in any equivalence here is pathetic. " But yet UK women are afraid to take the matter into thier own hands to provide self defense. Ironic. If you think men are going to change. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ive been watch Stella Creasy? talking about this. Will it work or could it make things worse? Eg generation of resentment in misogynistic men rather than getting to root causes and re education. A load of modern day crap. We are all human and men and women are often ruled by there sexual urges and you cannot educate against what is natural to you. If a man or woman cannot control themselves they should be locked up but you cannot educate against who and what we are. Examples Gay people,lesbians,tranvestites etc. Sadly we are all human and nothing will change that well maybe a lobotomy Ok hard and nasty but most of you hate the truth I know.We are not civlised we are generations from being so. Yes teach people to be good and have high moral compass and right from wrong but it will not make the problem go away Apologist, men cause these problems. End of story. It is never a womans fault that she is murdered.I take it you did not understand what I was saying" Explain, if I didn’t get it then perhaps many didn’t also. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ive been watch Stella Creasy? talking about this. Will it work or could it make things worse? Eg generation of resentment in misogynistic men rather than getting to root causes and re education. A load of modern day crap. We are all human and men and women are often ruled by there sexual urges and you cannot educate against what is natural to you. If a man or woman cannot control themselves they should be locked up but you cannot educate against who and what we are. Examples Gay people,lesbians,tranvestites etc. Sadly we are all human and nothing will change that well maybe a lobotomy Ok hard and nasty but most of you hate the truth I know.We are not civlised we are generations from being so. Yes teach people to be good and have high moral compass and right from wrong but it will not make the problem go away " It's not just sexual though. One example being a woman on the tube calling her mum in a station, saying she wasn't happy with non mask wearers, a guy followed her and shouted insults, he was an aggressive tosser who could easily have beat her up | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ive been watch Stella Creasy? talking about this. Will it work or could it make things worse? Eg generation of resentment in misogynistic men rather than getting to root causes and re education. A load of modern day crap. We are all human and men and women are often ruled by there sexual urges and you cannot educate against what is natural to you. If a man or woman cannot control themselves they should be locked up but you cannot educate against who and what we are. Examples Gay people,lesbians,tranvestites etc. Sadly we are all human and nothing will change that well maybe a lobotomy Ok hard and nasty but most of you hate the truth I know.We are not civlised we are generations from being so. Yes teach people to be good and have high moral compass and right from wrong but it will not make the problem go away Apologist, men cause these problems. End of story. It is never a womans fault that she is murdered. Or abused. I find this is quite odd. And call em whatever you like but it's also never a mans fault or a transgenders fault that they are murdered or abused. That's not me saying that some men aren't misogynistic but blanket statements will never help. Given that the vast majority of murders and assaults are carried out by men, it is fair for those that get murdered and assaulted to ask for some degree of protection. Pretending that men are in any equivalence here is pathetic. " Who is pretending? Men, women and transgender are all murdered by men in the majority. But according to this it's only women who should feel protected. Anyone saying anything to the contrary is misogynistic and dismissed. BTW, just because people don't agree on certain things doesn't automatically make them wrong. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" But yet UK women are afraid to take the matter into thier own hands to provide self defense. Ironic. If you think men are going to change. " Unlike america we don't take to the notion that if we don't like or it threatens us we should buy a gun and shoot it or walk around in swat gear pretending we are extras from a Death Wish movie. Our Democracy is much more mature than that. We deserve to be and want to be 'passive' about our protections against some men not behaving in the way that they do and that the people we pay to protect us do it properly and compassionately. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"the met will clearly need to sack the vast majority of the force then." Why? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" But yet UK women are afraid to take the matter into thier own hands to provide self defense. Ironic. If you think men are going to change. Unlike america we don't take to the notion that if we don't like or it threatens us we should buy a gun and shoot it or walk around in swat gear pretending we are extras from a Death Wish movie. Our Democracy is much more mature than that. We deserve to be and want to be 'passive' about our protections against some men not behaving in the way that they do and that the people we pay to protect us do it properly and compassionately. " You always assume gun. Mace and pepper spray.If Sarah had some the outcome might be different. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"the met will clearly need to sack the vast majority of the force then." Yes I’m sure the gangs would just love that one | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" But yet UK women are afraid to take the matter into thier own hands to provide self defense. Ironic. If you think men are going to change. Unlike america we don't take to the notion that if we don't like or it threatens us we should buy a gun and shoot it or walk around in swat gear pretending we are extras from a Death Wish movie. Our Democracy is much more mature than that. We deserve to be and want to be 'passive' about our protections against some men not behaving in the way that they do and that the people we pay to protect us do it properly and compassionately. You always assume gun. Mace and pepper spray.If Sarah had some the outcome might be different. " Are both illegal in this country. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" But yet UK women are afraid to take the matter into thier own hands to provide self defense. Ironic. If you think men are going to change. Unlike america we don't take to the notion that if we don't like or it threatens us we should buy a gun and shoot it or walk around in swat gear pretending we are extras from a Death Wish movie. Our Democracy is much more mature than that. We deserve to be and want to be 'passive' about our protections against some men not behaving in the way that they do and that the people we pay to protect us do it properly and compassionately. You always assume gun. Mace and pepper spray.If Sarah had some the outcome might be different. " You realise she was allegedly killed by a policeman? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" But yet UK women are afraid to take the matter into thier own hands to provide self defense. Ironic. If you think men are going to change. Unlike america we don't take to the notion that if we don't like or it threatens us we should buy a gun and shoot it or walk around in swat gear pretending we are extras from a Death Wish movie. Our Democracy is much more mature than that. We deserve to be and want to be 'passive' about our protections against some men not behaving in the way that they do and that the people we pay to protect us do it properly and compassionately. You always assume gun. Mace and pepper spray.If Sarah had some the outcome might be different. You realise she was allegedly killed by a policeman?" She would probably not have known that, because the accused was not in uniform at the time. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" But yet UK women are afraid to take the matter into thier own hands to provide self defense. Ironic. If you think men are going to change. Unlike america we don't take to the notion that if we don't like or it threatens us we should buy a gun and shoot it or walk around in swat gear pretending we are extras from a Death Wish movie. Our Democracy is much more mature than that. We deserve to be and want to be 'passive' about our protections against some men not behaving in the way that they do and that the people we pay to protect us do it properly and compassionately. You always assume gun. Mace and pepper spray.If Sarah had some the outcome might be different. You realise she was allegedly killed by a policeman? She would probably not have known that, because the accused was not in uniform at the time. " Not 'on duty', much will come out and whilst there will only be his version etc there may well be forensic and other evidence which might give a broader picture of how, when and where etc.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" But yet UK women are afraid to take the matter into thier own hands to provide self defense. Ironic. If you think men are going to change. Unlike america we don't take to the notion that if we don't like or it threatens us we should buy a gun and shoot it or walk around in swat gear pretending we are extras from a Death Wish movie. Our Democracy is much more mature than that. We deserve to be and want to be 'passive' about our protections against some men not behaving in the way that they do and that the people we pay to protect us do it properly and compassionately. You always assume gun. Mace and pepper spray.If Sarah had some the outcome might be different. You realise she was allegedly killed by a policeman? She would probably not have known that, because the accused was not in uniform at the time. Not 'on duty', much will come out and whilst there will only be his version etc there may well be forensic and other evidence which might give a broader picture of how, when and where etc.." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" But yet UK women are afraid to take the matter into thier own hands to provide self defense. Ironic. If you think men are going to change. Unlike america we don't take to the notion that if we don't like or it threatens us we should buy a gun and shoot it or walk around in swat gear pretending we are extras from a Death Wish movie. Our Democracy is much more mature than that. We deserve to be and want to be 'passive' about our protections against some men not behaving in the way that they do and that the people we pay to protect us do it properly and compassionately. You always assume gun. Mace and pepper spray.If Sarah had some the outcome might be different. You realise she was allegedly killed by a policeman? She would probably not have known that, because the accused was not in uniform at the time. " We dont know the circumstances He may have told her he was a policeman to feel safe? What I am trying to say is the that using mace or whatever is not the solution to every problem | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" But yet UK women are afraid to take the matter into thier own hands to provide self defense. Ironic. If you think men are going to change. Unlike america we don't take to the notion that if we don't like or it threatens us we should buy a gun and shoot it or walk around in swat gear pretending we are extras from a Death Wish movie. Our Democracy is much more mature than that. We deserve to be and want to be 'passive' about our protections against some men not behaving in the way that they do and that the people we pay to protect us do it properly and compassionately. You always assume gun. Mace and pepper spray.If Sarah had some the outcome might be different. You realise she was allegedly killed by a policeman? She would probably not have known that, because the accused was not in uniform at the time. We dont know the circumstances He may have told her he was a policeman to feel safe? What I am trying to say is the that using mace or whatever is not the solution to every problem " You are not worried about a law when you are taking your last breath from a evil individual now are you ? You are fighting to stay alive. He did not care about murder laws. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" But yet UK women are afraid to take the matter into thier own hands to provide self defense. Ironic. If you think men are going to change. Unlike america we don't take to the notion that if we don't like or it threatens us we should buy a gun and shoot it or walk around in swat gear pretending we are extras from a Death Wish movie. Our Democracy is much more mature than that. We deserve to be and want to be 'passive' about our protections against some men not behaving in the way that they do and that the people we pay to protect us do it properly and compassionately. You always assume gun. Mace and pepper spray.If Sarah had some the outcome might be different. You realise she was allegedly killed by a policeman? She would probably not have known that, because the accused was not in uniform at the time. We dont know the circumstances He may have told her he was a policeman to feel safe? What I am trying to say is the that using mace or whatever is not the solution to every problem You are not worried about a law when you are taking your last breath from a evil individual now are you ? You are fighting to stay alive. He did not care about murder laws." Completely missing my point. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" But yet UK women are afraid to take the matter into thier own hands to provide self defense. Ironic. If you think men are going to change. Unlike america we don't take to the notion that if we don't like or it threatens us we should buy a gun and shoot it or walk around in swat gear pretending we are extras from a Death Wish movie. Our Democracy is much more mature than that. We deserve to be and want to be 'passive' about our protections against some men not behaving in the way that they do and that the people we pay to protect us do it properly and compassionately. You always assume gun. Mace and pepper spray.If Sarah had some the outcome might be different. You realise she was allegedly killed by a policeman? She would probably not have known that, because the accused was not in uniform at the time. We dont know the circumstances He may have told her he was a policeman to feel safe? What I am trying to say is the that using mace or whatever is not the solution to every problem You are not worried about a law when you are taking your last breath from a evil individual now are you ? You are fighting to stay alive. He did not care about murder laws. Completely missing my point." Mace not a solution enacting change with education and efficient laws. Is your point. Was he a police officer. Yes he was. Was he educated on the law ? then again yes he was. So tell me how educating and laws apply to this poor woman's death ? If she had a glimmer of hope from some type of personal protection wouldn't that be more prudent ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" But yet UK women are afraid to take the matter into thier own hands to provide self defense. Ironic. If you think men are going to change. Unlike america we don't take to the notion that if we don't like or it threatens us we should buy a gun and shoot it or walk around in swat gear pretending we are extras from a Death Wish movie. Our Democracy is much more mature than that. We deserve to be and want to be 'passive' about our protections against some men not behaving in the way that they do and that the people we pay to protect us do it properly and compassionately. You always assume gun. Mace and pepper spray.If Sarah had some the outcome might be different. You realise she was allegedly killed by a policeman? She would probably not have known that, because the accused was not in uniform at the time. We dont know the circumstances He may have told her he was a policeman to feel safe? What I am trying to say is the that using mace or whatever is not the solution to every problem You are not worried about a law when you are taking your last breath from a evil individual now are you ? You are fighting to stay alive. He did not care about murder laws. Completely missing my point. Mace not a solution enacting change with education and efficient laws. Is your point. Was he a police officer. Yes he was. Was he educated on the law ? then again yes he was. So tell me how educating and laws apply to this poor woman's death ? If she had a glimmer of hope from some type of personal protection wouldn't that be more prudent ?" Its hard to say without knowing the full details but if he did tell he was plod,then she wouldn't have thought herself any danger. Not every situation a woman finds herself in,can be resolved by a spray of mace. Inappropriate comments for example. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" But yet UK women are afraid to take the matter into thier own hands to provide self defense. Ironic. If you think men are going to change. Unlike america we don't take to the notion that if we don't like or it threatens us we should buy a gun and shoot it or walk around in swat gear pretending we are extras from a Death Wish movie. Our Democracy is much more mature than that. We deserve to be and want to be 'passive' about our protections against some men not behaving in the way that they do and that the people we pay to protect us do it properly and compassionately. You always assume gun. Mace and pepper spray.If Sarah had some the outcome might be different. You realise she was allegedly killed by a policeman? She would probably not have known that, because the accused was not in uniform at the time. We dont know the circumstances He may have told her he was a policeman to feel safe? What I am trying to say is the that using mace or whatever is not the solution to every problem You are not worried about a law when you are taking your last breath from a evil individual now are you ? You are fighting to stay alive. He did not care about murder laws. Completely missing my point. Mace not a solution enacting change with education and efficient laws. Is your point. Was he a police officer. Yes he was. Was he educated on the law ? then again yes he was. So tell me how educating and laws apply to this poor woman's death ? If she had a glimmer of hope from some type of personal protection wouldn't that be more prudent ? Its hard to say without knowing the full details but if he did tell he was plod,then she wouldn't have thought herself any danger. Not every situation a woman finds herself in,can be resolved by a spray of mace. Inappropriate comments for example. " I agree with you 100% not every situation warrants use. I do not use mine just for comments. But threats are totally different. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" But yet UK women are afraid to take the matter into thier own hands to provide self defense. Ironic. If you think men are going to change. Unlike america we don't take to the notion that if we don't like or it threatens us we should buy a gun and shoot it or walk around in swat gear pretending we are extras from a Death Wish movie. Our Democracy is much more mature than that. We deserve to be and want to be 'passive' about our protections against some men not behaving in the way that they do and that the people we pay to protect us do it properly and compassionately. You always assume gun. Mace and pepper spray.If Sarah had some the outcome might be different. You realise she was allegedly killed by a policeman? She would probably not have known that, because the accused was not in uniform at the time. We dont know the circumstances He may have told her he was a policeman to feel safe? What I am trying to say is the that using mace or whatever is not the solution to every problem You are not worried about a law when you are taking your last breath from a evil individual now are you ? You are fighting to stay alive. He did not care about murder laws. Completely missing my point. Mace not a solution enacting change with education and efficient laws. Is your point. Was he a police officer. Yes he was. Was he educated on the law ? then again yes he was. So tell me how educating and laws apply to this poor woman's death ? If she had a glimmer of hope from some type of personal protection wouldn't that be more prudent ?" Doesn't seem to matter just how many times this is said to you . . . "Mace and Pepper Spray is illegal in the UK." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" But yet UK women are afraid to take the matter into thier own hands to provide self defense. Ironic. If you think men are going to change. Unlike america we don't take to the notion that if we don't like or it threatens us we should buy a gun and shoot it or walk around in swat gear pretending we are extras from a Death Wish movie. Our Democracy is much more mature than that. We deserve to be and want to be 'passive' about our protections against some men not behaving in the way that they do and that the people we pay to protect us do it properly and compassionately. You always assume gun. Mace and pepper spray.If Sarah had some the outcome might be different. You realise she was allegedly killed by a policeman? She would probably not have known that, because the accused was not in uniform at the time. We dont know the circumstances He may have told her he was a policeman to feel safe? What I am trying to say is the that using mace or whatever is not the solution to every problem You are not worried about a law when you are taking your last breath from a evil individual now are you ? You are fighting to stay alive. He did not care about murder laws. Completely missing my point. Mace not a solution enacting change with education and efficient laws. Is your point. Was he a police officer. Yes he was. Was he educated on the law ? then again yes he was. So tell me how educating and laws apply to this poor woman's death ? If she had a glimmer of hope from some type of personal protection wouldn't that be more prudent ? Doesn't seem to matter just how many times this is said to you . . . "Mace and Pepper Spray is illegal in the UK." " No it doesn't the law should be changed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Doesn't seem to matter just how many times this is said to you . . . "Mace and Pepper Spray is illegal in the UK." No it doesn't the law should be changed." We seem to like our passive democracy to keep within the bounds of legally declared conflict however. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Doesn't seem to matter just how many times this is said to you . . . "Mace and Pepper Spray is illegal in the UK." No it doesn't the law should be changed. We seem to like our passive democracy to keep within the bounds of legally declared conflict however." So a woman protecting herself is a big no. Just trying to wrap my head around the concept. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" But yet UK women are afraid to take the matter into thier own hands to provide self defense. Ironic. If you think men are going to change. Unlike america we don't take to the notion that if we don't like or it threatens us we should buy a gun and shoot it or walk around in swat gear pretending we are extras from a Death Wish movie. Our Democracy is much more mature than that. We deserve to be and want to be 'passive' about our protections against some men not behaving in the way that they do and that the people we pay to protect us do it properly and compassionately. You always assume gun. Mace and pepper spray.If Sarah had some the outcome might be different. You realise she was allegedly killed by a policeman? She would probably not have known that, because the accused was not in uniform at the time. We dont know the circumstances He may have told her he was a policeman to feel safe? What I am trying to say is the that using mace or whatever is not the solution to every problem You are not worried about a law when you are taking your last breath from a evil individual now are you ? You are fighting to stay alive. He did not care about murder laws. Completely missing my point. Mace not a solution enacting change with education and efficient laws. Is your point. Was he a police officer. Yes he was. Was he educated on the law ? then again yes he was. So tell me how educating and laws apply to this poor woman's death ? If she had a glimmer of hope from some type of personal protection wouldn't that be more prudent ? Doesn't seem to matter just how many times this is said to you . . . "Mace and Pepper Spray is illegal in the UK." No it doesn't the law should be changed." Do women get attacked in the states? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" But yet UK women are afraid to take the matter into thier own hands to provide self defense. Ironic. If you think men are going to change. Unlike america we don't take to the notion that if we don't like or it threatens us we should buy a gun and shoot it or walk around in swat gear pretending we are extras from a Death Wish movie. Our Democracy is much more mature than that. We deserve to be and want to be 'passive' about our protections against some men not behaving in the way that they do and that the people we pay to protect us do it properly and compassionately. You always assume gun. Mace and pepper spray.If Sarah had some the outcome might be different. You realise she was allegedly killed by a policeman? She would probably not have known that, because the accused was not in uniform at the time. We dont know the circumstances He may have told her he was a policeman to feel safe? What I am trying to say is the that using mace or whatever is not the solution to every problem You are not worried about a law when you are taking your last breath from a evil individual now are you ? You are fighting to stay alive. He did not care about murder laws. Completely missing my point. Mace not a solution enacting change with education and efficient laws. Is your point. Was he a police officer. Yes he was. Was he educated on the law ? then again yes he was. So tell me how educating and laws apply to this poor woman's death ? If she had a glimmer of hope from some type of personal protection wouldn't that be more prudent ? Doesn't seem to matter just how many times this is said to you . . . "Mace and Pepper Spray is illegal in the UK." No it doesn't the law should be changed. Do women get attacked in the states?" Of course they do are all women armed of course they are not. We have those options if we want to pursue them. It's a choice not mandatory. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" But yet UK women are afraid to take the matter into thier own hands to provide self defense. Ironic. If you think men are going to change. Unlike america we don't take to the notion that if we don't like or it threatens us we should buy a gun and shoot it or walk around in swat gear pretending we are extras from a Death Wish movie. Our Democracy is much more mature than that. We deserve to be and want to be 'passive' about our protections against some men not behaving in the way that they do and that the people we pay to protect us do it properly and compassionately. You always assume gun. Mace and pepper spray.If Sarah had some the outcome might be different. You realise she was allegedly killed by a policeman? She would probably not have known that, because the accused was not in uniform at the time. We dont know the circumstances He may have told her he was a policeman to feel safe? What I am trying to say is the that using mace or whatever is not the solution to every problem You are not worried about a law when you are taking your last breath from a evil individual now are you ? You are fighting to stay alive. He did not care about murder laws. Completely missing my point. Mace not a solution enacting change with education and efficient laws. Is your point. Was he a police officer. Yes he was. Was he educated on the law ? then again yes he was. So tell me how educating and laws apply to this poor woman's death ? If she had a glimmer of hope from some type of personal protection wouldn't that be more prudent ? Doesn't seem to matter just how many times this is said to you . . . "Mace and Pepper Spray is illegal in the UK." No it doesn't the law should be changed. Do women get attacked in the states? Of course they do are all women armed of course they are not. We have those options if we want to pursue them. It's a choice not mandatory." So it doesnt really stop it then? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" But yet UK women are afraid to take the matter into thier own hands to provide self defense. Ironic. If you think men are going to change. Unlike america we don't take to the notion that if we don't like or it threatens us we should buy a gun and shoot it or walk around in swat gear pretending we are extras from a Death Wish movie. Our Democracy is much more mature than that. We deserve to be and want to be 'passive' about our protections against some men not behaving in the way that they do and that the people we pay to protect us do it properly and compassionately. You always assume gun. Mace and pepper spray.If Sarah had some the outcome might be different. You realise she was allegedly killed by a policeman? She would probably not have known that, because the accused was not in uniform at the time. We dont know the circumstances He may have told her he was a policeman to feel safe? What I am trying to say is the that using mace or whatever is not the solution to every problem You are not worried about a law when you are taking your last breath from a evil individual now are you ? You are fighting to stay alive. He did not care about murder laws. Completely missing my point. Mace not a solution enacting change with education and efficient laws. Is your point. Was he a police officer. Yes he was. Was he educated on the law ? then again yes he was. So tell me how educating and laws apply to this poor woman's death ? If she had a glimmer of hope from some type of personal protection wouldn't that be more prudent ? Doesn't seem to matter just how many times this is said to you . . . "Mace and Pepper Spray is illegal in the UK." No it doesn't the law should be changed. Do women get attacked in the states? Of course they do are all women armed of course they are not. We have those options if we want to pursue them. It's a choice not mandatory. So it doesnt really stop it then?" And it is not going to now is it? Criminals will be criminals. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" But yet UK women are afraid to take the matter into thier own hands to provide self defense. Ironic. If you think men are going to change. Unlike america we don't take to the notion that if we don't like or it threatens us we should buy a gun and shoot it or walk around in swat gear pretending we are extras from a Death Wish movie. Our Democracy is much more mature than that. We deserve to be and want to be 'passive' about our protections against some men not behaving in the way that they do and that the people we pay to protect us do it properly and compassionately. You always assume gun. Mace and pepper spray.If Sarah had some the outcome might be different. You realise she was allegedly killed by a policeman? She would probably not have known that, because the accused was not in uniform at the time. We dont know the circumstances He may have told her he was a policeman to feel safe? What I am trying to say is the that using mace or whatever is not the solution to every problem You are not worried about a law when you are taking your last breath from a evil individual now are you ? You are fighting to stay alive. He did not care about murder laws. Completely missing my point. Mace not a solution enacting change with education and efficient laws. Is your point. Was he a police officer. Yes he was. Was he educated on the law ? then again yes he was. So tell me how educating and laws apply to this poor woman's death ? If she had a glimmer of hope from some type of personal protection wouldn't that be more prudent ? Doesn't seem to matter just how many times this is said to you . . . "Mace and Pepper Spray is illegal in the UK." No it doesn't the law should be changed. Do women get attacked in the states? Of course they do are all women armed of course they are not. We have those options if we want to pursue them. It's a choice not mandatory. So it doesnt really stop it then? And it is not going to now is it? Criminals will be criminals." But once again you are missing the point. It's not just about violent attacks...its about a whole range of behaviours. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" But yet UK women are afraid to take the matter into thier own hands to provide self defense. Ironic. If you think men are going to change. Unlike america we don't take to the notion that if we don't like or it threatens us we should buy a gun and shoot it or walk around in swat gear pretending we are extras from a Death Wish movie. Our Democracy is much more mature than that. We deserve to be and want to be 'passive' about our protections against some men not behaving in the way that they do and that the people we pay to protect us do it properly and compassionately. You always assume gun. Mace and pepper spray.If Sarah had some the outcome might be different. You realise she was allegedly killed by a policeman? She would probably not have known that, because the accused was not in uniform at the time. We dont know the circumstances He may have told her he was a policeman to feel safe? What I am trying to say is the that using mace or whatever is not the solution to every problem You are not worried about a law when you are taking your last breath from a evil individual now are you ? You are fighting to stay alive. He did not care about murder laws. Completely missing my point. Mace not a solution enacting change with education and efficient laws. Is your point. Was he a police officer. Yes he was. Was he educated on the law ? then again yes he was. So tell me how educating and laws apply to this poor woman's death ? If she had a glimmer of hope from some type of personal protection wouldn't that be more prudent ? Doesn't seem to matter just how many times this is said to you . . . "Mace and Pepper Spray is illegal in the UK." No it doesn't the law should be changed. Do women get attacked in the states? Of course they do are all women armed of course they are not. We have those options if we want to pursue them. It's a choice not mandatory. So it doesnt really stop it then? And it is not going to now is it? Criminals will be criminals. But once again you are missing the point. It's not just about violent attacks...its about a whole range of behaviours. " Once again I agree. But like I said so what is the solution. Leave self defense out. How does a society change that behavior knowing there will be always criminal elements. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" But yet UK women are afraid to take the matter into thier own hands to provide self defense. Ironic. If you think men are going to change. Unlike america we don't take to the notion that if we don't like or it threatens us we should buy a gun and shoot it or walk around in swat gear pretending we are extras from a Death Wish movie. Our Democracy is much more mature than that. We deserve to be and want to be 'passive' about our protections against some men not behaving in the way that they do and that the people we pay to protect us do it properly and compassionately. You always assume gun. Mace and pepper spray.If Sarah had some the outcome might be different. You realise she was allegedly killed by a policeman? She would probably not have known that, because the accused was not in uniform at the time. We dont know the circumstances He may have told her he was a policeman to feel safe? What I am trying to say is the that using mace or whatever is not the solution to every problem You are not worried about a law when you are taking your last breath from a evil individual now are you ? You are fighting to stay alive. He did not care about murder laws. Completely missing my point. Mace not a solution enacting change with education and efficient laws. Is your point. Was he a police officer. Yes he was. Was he educated on the law ? then again yes he was. So tell me how educating and laws apply to this poor woman's death ? If she had a glimmer of hope from some type of personal protection wouldn't that be more prudent ? Doesn't seem to matter just how many times this is said to you . . . "Mace and Pepper Spray is illegal in the UK." No it doesn't the law should be changed. Do women get attacked in the states? Of course they do are all women armed of course they are not. We have those options if we want to pursue them. It's a choice not mandatory. So it doesnt really stop it then? And it is not going to now is it? Criminals will be criminals. But once again you are missing the point. It's not just about violent attacks...its about a whole range of behaviours. Once again I agree. But like I said so what is the solution. Leave self defense out. How does a society change that behavior knowing there will be always criminal elements." Education | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" But yet UK women are afraid to take the matter into thier own hands to provide self defense. Ironic. If you think men are going to change. Unlike america we don't take to the notion that if we don't like or it threatens us we should buy a gun and shoot it or walk around in swat gear pretending we are extras from a Death Wish movie. Our Democracy is much more mature than that. We deserve to be and want to be 'passive' about our protections against some men not behaving in the way that they do and that the people we pay to protect us do it properly and compassionately. You always assume gun. Mace and pepper spray.If Sarah had some the outcome might be different. You realise she was allegedly killed by a policeman? She would probably not have known that, because the accused was not in uniform at the time. We dont know the circumstances He may have told her he was a policeman to feel safe? What I am trying to say is the that using mace or whatever is not the solution to every problem You are not worried about a law when you are taking your last breath from a evil individual now are you ? You are fighting to stay alive. He did not care about murder laws. Completely missing my point. Mace not a solution enacting change with education and efficient laws. Is your point. Was he a police officer. Yes he was. Was he educated on the law ? then again yes he was. So tell me how educating and laws apply to this poor woman's death ? If she had a glimmer of hope from some type of personal protection wouldn't that be more prudent ? Doesn't seem to matter just how many times this is said to you . . . "Mace and Pepper Spray is illegal in the UK." No it doesn't the law should be changed. Do women get attacked in the states? Of course they do are all women armed of course they are not. We have those options if we want to pursue them. It's a choice not mandatory. So it doesnt really stop it then? And it is not going to now is it? Criminals will be criminals. But once again you are missing the point. It's not just about violent attacks...its about a whole range of behaviours. Once again I agree. But like I said so what is the solution. Leave self defense out. How does a society change that behavior knowing there will be always criminal elements. Education " You can educate all you want to but certain individuals are still going to choose the latter. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Doesn't seem to matter just how many times this is said to you . . . "Mace and Pepper Spray is illegal in the UK." No it doesn't the law should be changed. We seem to like our passive democracy to keep within the bounds of legally declared conflict however. So a woman protecting herself is a big no. Just trying to wrap my head around the concept." A woman can do but not with the two items quoted.. To say it's a big no is simply not true.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Education You can educate all you want to but certain individuals are still going to choose the latter." So we seek to frame a Law that makes women safer using a détente. Like I said. Mature Democracy. Not Cowboys and Indians. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Personally I see a pattern of women that can't have any form of personal protection. But hey you can use the crayons you are so astute on using for me and draw rainbows and butterflies if it makes you feel better." If your understanding of the UK is that women just need to be violent in response to violence then you really do need to go back right to the start of your thinking. This Democracy doesn't work that way. We seek to protect ourselves from within an umbrella of protective Law, not with guns, pepper spray, or wearing clothes that we 'shouldn't be wearing in the opinion of men' because it invites them to attack us and sexually assault us. Arms yourself to the teeth and pretend it helps - which it doesn't - and we will go the way of Protective Law. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" But yet UK women are afraid to take the matter into thier own hands to provide self defense. Ironic. If you think men are going to change. Unlike america we don't take to the notion that if we don't like or it threatens us we should buy a gun and shoot it or walk around in swat gear pretending we are extras from a Death Wish movie. Our Democracy is much more mature than that. We deserve to be and want to be 'passive' about our protections against some men not behaving in the way that they do and that the people we pay to protect us do it properly and compassionately. You always assume gun. Mace and pepper spray.If Sarah had some the outcome might be different. You realise she was allegedly killed by a policeman? She would probably not have known that, because the accused was not in uniform at the time. We dont know the circumstances He may have told her he was a policeman to feel safe? What I am trying to say is the that using mace or whatever is not the solution to every problem You are not worried about a law when you are taking your last breath from a evil individual now are you ? You are fighting to stay alive. He did not care about murder laws. Completely missing my point. Mace not a solution enacting change with education and efficient laws. Is your point. Was he a police officer. Yes he was. Was he educated on the law ? then again yes he was. So tell me how educating and laws apply to this poor woman's death ? If she had a glimmer of hope from some type of personal protection wouldn't that be more prudent ? Doesn't seem to matter just how many times this is said to you . . . "Mace and Pepper Spray is illegal in the UK." No it doesn't the law should be changed. Do women get attacked in the states? Of course they do are all women armed of course they are not. We have those options if we want to pursue them. It's a choice not mandatory. So it doesnt really stop it then? And it is not going to now is it? Criminals will be criminals. But once again you are missing the point. It's not just about violent attacks...its about a whole range of behaviours. Once again I agree. But like I said so what is the solution. Leave self defense out. How does a society change that behavior knowing there will be always criminal elements. Education " can you educate someone evil lol how’s that work then | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Personally I see a pattern of women that can't have any form of personal protection. But hey you can use the crayons you are so astute on using for me and draw rainbows and butterflies if it makes you feel better. If your understanding of the UK is that women just need to be violent in response to violence then you really do need to go back right to the start of your thinking. This Democracy doesn't work that way. We seek to protect ourselves from within an umbrella of protective Law, not with guns, pepper spray, or wearing clothes that we 'shouldn't be wearing in the opinion of men' because it invites them to attack us and sexually assault us. Arms yourself to the teeth and pretend it helps - which it doesn't - and we will go the way of Protective Law." Believe what you want I am all for the perfect society. My protection saved me twice already. We are 2 different cultures. Just trying to get the general idea and the solution. They want to ban guns here but who is going to have them . The criminal element. Different societies I am just trying to wrap my head around the thought process. I do not have the type of empathy twords certain criminal behavior UK women have. I was raised to protect yourself at all costs. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Or maybe you could be one of those Americans who won't have a gun and actively seek change in the Law, so you don't need one. " I will keep my current options until those changes are made and have the desired effect. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Misogyny.... a feeling of hate towards women. Very badly used word bandied about to describe all sorts of sexism. There are issues to be sorted out in society but i don't know how easy it would be to establish 'hatred' in a court of law" my thoughts exactly! I had a female friend who was always banging on about men being potential rapists/etc etc anyway she had a little boy and came into work one day really pissed off because at playgroup he had lifted a girls skirt and been banned for a week. She was mad as hell about how he was just curious and all kids.... people want to be very careful where they take this | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Misogyny.... a feeling of hate towards women. Very badly used word bandied about to describe all sorts of sexism. There are issues to be sorted out in society but i don't know how easy it would be to establish 'hatred' in a court of law my thoughts exactly! I had a female friend who was always banging on about men being potential rapists/etc etc anyway she had a little boy and came into work one day really pissed off because at playgroup he had lifted a girls skirt and been banned for a week. She was mad as hell about how he was just curious and all kids.... people want to be very careful where they take this " Thats where they went wrong in my opinion instead of sending him home it should have been explained to him that this is wrong and the parent informed to maybe back up with kindness the reasons why it wes wrong. boys and girls are curious at that age and are learning how to behave | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What I'm not happy about is the more knee jerk populist attitude to applying new laws. One example being the new law on vandalism to a statue, max prison sentence of 10 years Minium prison sentence for r@pe is 5 years. In theory, you could get more than a r@pist if you lob off the head of Maggie thatchers statue like what happened a few years ago. I would say carefully consider laws and education. " Custodial sentences are passed down by Judges using sentencing guidelines. Comparing minimum against maximum is pretty pointless. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"the whole idea of a law wanting to control how you think about an issue is wrong, isnt that why its no longer against the law to be gay? " Exactly. I hope some careful thought is ueed when considering new laws | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What I'm not happy about is the more knee jerk populist attitude to applying new laws. One example being the new law on vandalism to a statue, max prison sentence of 10 years Minium prison sentence for r@pe is 5 years. In theory, you could get more than a r@pist if you lob off the head of Maggie thatchers statue like what happened a few years ago. I would say carefully consider laws and education. Custodial sentences are passed down by Judges using sentencing guidelines. Comparing minimum against maximum is pretty pointless. " Not when it could happen | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What I'm not happy about is the more knee jerk populist attitude to applying new laws. One example being the new law on vandalism to a statue, max prison sentence of 10 years Minium prison sentence for r@pe is 5 years. In theory, you could get more than a r@pist if you lob off the head of Maggie thatchers statue like what happened a few years ago. I would say carefully consider laws and education. Custodial sentences are passed down by Judges using sentencing guidelines. Comparing minimum against maximum is pretty pointless. Not when it could happen " The maximum sentence for R*pe is life imprisonment. Its upto the judiciary to decide the tariff, case by case. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ive been watch Stella Creasy? talking about this. Will it work or could it make things worse? Eg generation of resentment in misogynistic men rather than getting to root causes and re education. A load of modern day crap. We are all human and men and women are often ruled by there sexual urges and you cannot educate against what is natural to you. If a man or woman cannot control themselves they should be locked up but you cannot educate against who and what we are. Examples Gay people,lesbians,tranvestites etc. Sadly we are all human and nothing will change that well maybe a lobotomy Ok hard and nasty but most of you hate the truth I know.We are not civlised we are generations from being so. Yes teach people to be good and have high moral compass and right from wrong but it will not make the problem go away Apologist, men cause these problems. End of story. It is never a womans fault that she is murdered. Or abused. I find this is quite odd. And call em whatever you like but it's also never a mans fault or a transgenders fault that they are murdered or abused. That's not me saying that some men aren't misogynistic but blanket statements will never help. Given that the vast majority of murders and assaults are carried out by men, it is fair for those that get murdered and assaulted to ask for some degree of protection. Pretending that men are in any equivalence here is pathetic. But yet UK women are afraid to take the matter into thier own hands to provide self defense. Ironic. If you think men are going to change. " yes, strong powerful independent women... equal to men in every way.. as a relatively small person ive had to man up lol to deal with guys twice my size and yes, ive had women try and physically intimidate me to... yes men commit more crime full stop, they also commit suicide more and are more likely to be the victim of violence! Seems to me there are victims and perpetrators NOT men vs women or gay vs straight or black vs white or.... how are liberals even thinking of taking that view point? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What I'm not happy about is the more knee jerk populist attitude to applying new laws. One example being the new law on vandalism to a statue, max prison sentence of 10 years Minium prison sentence for r@pe is 5 years. In theory, you could get more than a r@pist if you lob off the head of Maggie thatchers statue like what happened a few years ago. I would say carefully consider laws and education. Custodial sentences are passed down by Judges using sentencing guidelines. Comparing minimum against maximum is pretty pointless. Not when it could happen The maximum sentence for R*pe is life imprisonment. Its upto the judiciary to decide the tariff, case by case. " Yes but based on min-max sentencing. I think it's crazy to have a maximum sentence set more than the minimum sentence for something much more serious | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ive been watch Stella Creasy? talking about this. Will it work or could it make things worse? Eg generation of resentment in misogynistic men rather than getting to root causes and re education. A load of modern day crap. We are all human and men and women are often ruled by there sexual urges and you cannot educate against what is natural to you. If a man or woman cannot control themselves they should be locked up but you cannot educate against who and what we are. Examples Gay people,lesbians,tranvestites etc. Sadly we are all human and nothing will change that well maybe a lobotomy Ok hard and nasty but most of you hate the truth I know.We are not civlised we are generations from being so. Yes teach people to be good and have high moral compass and right from wrong but it will not make the problem go away Apologist, men cause these problems. End of story. It is never a womans fault that she is murdered. Or abused. I find this is quite odd. And call em whatever you like but it's also never a mans fault or a transgenders fault that they are murdered or abused. That's not me saying that some men aren't misogynistic but blanket statements will never help. Given that the vast majority of murders and assaults are carried out by men, it is fair for those that get murdered and assaulted to ask for some degree of protection. Pretending that men are in any equivalence here is pathetic. But yet UK women are afraid to take the matter into thier own hands to provide self defense. Ironic. If you think men are going to change. yes, strong powerful independent women... equal to men in every way.. as a relatively small person ive had to man up lol to deal with guys twice my size and yes, ive had women try and physically intimidate me to... yes men commit more crime full stop, they also commit suicide more and are more likely to be the victim of violence! Seems to me there are victims and perpetrators NOT men vs women or gay vs straight or black vs white or.... how are liberals even thinking of taking that view point? " Popularism is my guess. I think existing laws would cover it, just needs enforcement | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ive been watch Stella Creasy? talking about this. Will it work or could it make things worse? Eg generation of resentment in misogynistic men rather than getting to root causes and re education. A load of modern day crap. We are all human and men and women are often ruled by there sexual urges and you cannot educate against what is natural to you. If a man or woman cannot control themselves they should be locked up but you cannot educate against who and what we are. Examples Gay people,lesbians,tranvestites etc. Sadly we are all human and nothing will change that well maybe a lobotomy Ok hard and nasty but most of you hate the truth I know.We are not civlised we are generations from being so. Yes teach people to be good and have high moral compass and right from wrong but it will not make the problem go away Apologist, men cause these problems. End of story. It is never a womans fault that she is murdered. Or abused. I find this is quite odd. And call em whatever you like but it's also never a mans fault or a transgenders fault that they are murdered or abused. That's not me saying that some men aren't misogynistic but blanket statements will never help. Given that the vast majority of murders and assaults are carried out by men, it is fair for those that get murdered and assaulted to ask for some degree of protection. Pretending that men are in any equivalence here is pathetic. But yet UK women are afraid to take the matter into thier own hands to provide self defense. Ironic. If you think men are going to change. yes, strong powerful independent women... equal to men in every way.. as a relatively small person ive had to man up lol to deal with guys twice my size and yes, ive had women try and physically intimidate me to... yes men commit more crime full stop, they also commit suicide more and are more likely to be the victim of violence! Seems to me there are victims and perpetrators NOT men vs women or gay vs straight or black vs white or.... how are liberals even thinking of taking that view point? " Btw.. Good for you standing up to people luke that! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Personally I see a pattern of women that can't have any form of personal protection. But hey you can use the crayons you are so astute on using for me and draw rainbows and butterflies if it makes you feel better. If your understanding of the UK is that women just need to be violent in response to violence then you really do need to go back right to the start of your thinking. This Democracy doesn't work that way. We seek to protect ourselves from within an umbrella of protective Law, not with guns, pepper spray, or wearing clothes that we 'shouldn't be wearing in the opinion of men' because it invites them to attack us and sexually assault us. Arms yourself to the teeth and pretend it helps - which it doesn't - and we will go the way of Protective Law. Believe what you want I am all for the perfect society. My protection saved me twice already. We are 2 different cultures. Just trying to get the general idea and the solution. They want to ban guns here but who is going to have them . The criminal element. Different societies I am just trying to wrap my head around the thought process. I do not have the type of empathy twords certain criminal behavior UK women have. I was raised to protect yourself at all costs. " Yes but you live in a loony bin | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Statistics - sexual violence Key statistics about r*pe and sexual violence in England and Wales. In the year to the end of March 2017, the Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) estimated: 20% of women and 4% of men have experienced some type of sexual assault since the age of 16, equivalent to 3.4 million female and 631,000 male victims 3.1% of women (510,000) and 0.8% of men (138,000) aged 16 to 59 had experienced a sexual assault in the last year. In January 2013, An Overview of Sexual Offending in England and Wales, the first ever joint official statistics bulletin on sexual violence released by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), Office for National Statistics (ONS) and Home Office, revealed: Approximately 85,000 women and 12,000 men (aged 16 - 59) experience r*pe, attempted r*pe or sexual assault by penetration in England and Wales alone every year; that's roughly 11 of the most serious sexual offences (of adults alone) every hour. Only around 15% of those who experience sexual violence report to the police Approximately 90% of those who are r*ped know the perpetrator prior to the offence I have put this in to remind some people on here that Women suffer a lot more than men through r*pe and sexual assault. Attempting to present an equivalence oreven to suggest that because men kill more men than women it isn’t an issue is just ludicrous. Sarah Everard was sadly one of far too many women who have been let down by men. " Yes women need better protection but is violence monopolised by men.? There are studies that women perpetrate domestic abuse at almost the same level as men but men being stoic and masculine tend not to report. Men predominantly use there fists women use weapons or implements. I myself have been the victim of three violent attacks by women and have never laid a hand on a woman. I am not unusual amongst my peers and friends who have shared experiences. Women kill children in the family at greater numbers than men . Demonising a whole gender because of the actions of a very few is folly. Should we condemn women because of Ruth Ellis, myra Hindley, Rose West, Maggie thatcher. This very upsetting incident is being used as a stick to beat men with . A nasty and orchestrated campaign to undermine men and there roles in society , ironically to the detriment of women. There are so many myths and misconceptions regarding the gender roles and dynamics. Men protect women . Its an anthropological prerequisite for survival. We do the dirty dangerous jobs and die in much greater numbers in the work place. We account for 78 per cent of suicides. We are much more likely to suffer a violent attack. Women do two thirds less jail time for the same offences. Women have far more favourable outcomes in divorce settlements and alimony arrangements. Women have equality despite the mythology surrounding alleged gender pay gaps and yet still demand traditionalism when it suits them. I.e. the guy opening doors changing your tyre , paying the bill , swimming while you get in the lifeboat. Going to war and dying to protect you. I don't make these points to diminish women or to undermine women at all , only to point out that patriarchy and masculinity are generally good and neccesary and not toxic. Men now are rejecting marriage and relationships..why? We have catapulted ourselves out of the dark ages because of a cooperation between the genders and an appreciation of each other. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Statistics - sexual violence Key statistics about r*pe and sexual violence in England and Wales. In the year to the end of March 2017, the Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) estimated: 20% of women and 4% of men have experienced some type of sexual assault since the age of 16, equivalent to 3.4 million female and 631,000 male victims 3.1% of women (510,000) and 0.8% of men (138,000) aged 16 to 59 had experienced a sexual assault in the last year. In January 2013, An Overview of Sexual Offending in England and Wales, the first ever joint official statistics bulletin on sexual violence released by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), Office for National Statistics (ONS) and Home Office, revealed: Approximately 85,000 women and 12,000 men (aged 16 - 59) experience r*pe, attempted r*pe or sexual assault by penetration in England and Wales alone every year; that's roughly 11 of the most serious sexual offences (of adults alone) every hour. Only around 15% of those who experience sexual violence report to the police Approximately 90% of those who are r*ped know the perpetrator prior to the offence I have put this in to remind some people on here that Women suffer a lot more than men through r*pe and sexual assault. Attempting to present an equivalence oreven to suggest that because men kill more men than women it isn’t an issue is just ludicrous. Sarah Everard was sadly one of far too many women who have been let down by men. Yes women need better protection but is violence monopolised by men.? There are studies that women perpetrate domestic abuse at almost the same level as men but men being stoic and masculine tend not to report. Men predominantly use there fists women use weapons or implements. I myself have been the victim of three violent attacks by women and have never laid a hand on a woman. I am not unusual amongst my peers and friends who have shared experiences. Women kill children in the family at greater numbers than men . Demonising a whole gender because of the actions of a very few is folly. Should we condemn women because of Ruth Ellis, myra Hindley, Rose West, Maggie thatcher. This very upsetting incident is being used as a stick to beat men with . A nasty and orchestrated campaign to undermine men and there roles in society , ironically to the detriment of women. There are so many myths and misconceptions regarding the gender roles and dynamics. Men protect women . Its an anthropological prerequisite for survival. We do the dirty dangerous jobs and die in much greater numbers in the work place. We account for 78 per cent of suicides. We are much more likely to suffer a violent attack. Women do two thirds less jail time for the same offences. Women have far more favourable outcomes in divorce settlements and alimony arrangements. Women have equality despite the mythology surrounding alleged gender pay gaps and yet still demand traditionalism when it suits them. I.e. the guy opening doors changing your tyre , paying the bill , swimming while you get in the lifeboat. Going to war and dying to protect you. I don't make these points to diminish women or to undermine women at all , only to point out that patriarchy and masculinity are generally good and neccesary and not toxic. Men now are rejecting marriage and relationships..why? We have catapulted ourselves out of the dark ages because of a cooperation between the genders and an appreciation of each other. " Interesting views. So the fact that 20% of women have been sexually assaulted is the act of a few? I think you need to take a step back and do some research. Hint - it isn’t women that are doing the sexual assaults... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Statistics - sexual violence Key statistics about r*pe and sexual violence in England and Wales. In the year to the end of March 2017, the Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) estimated: 20% of women and 4% of men have experienced some type of sexual assault since the age of 16, equivalent to 3.4 million female and 631,000 male victims 3.1% of women (510,000) and 0.8% of men (138,000) aged 16 to 59 had experienced a sexual assault in the last year. In January 2013, An Overview of Sexual Offending in England and Wales, the first ever joint official statistics bulletin on sexual violence released by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), Office for National Statistics (ONS) and Home Office, revealed: Approximately 85,000 women and 12,000 men (aged 16 - 59) experience r*pe, attempted r*pe or sexual assault by penetration in England and Wales alone every year; that's roughly 11 of the most serious sexual offences (of adults alone) every hour. Only around 15% of those who experience sexual violence report to the police Approximately 90% of those who are r*ped know the perpetrator prior to the offence I have put this in to remind some people on here that Women suffer a lot more than men through r*pe and sexual assault. Attempting to present an equivalence oreven to suggest that because men kill more men than women it isn’t an issue is just ludicrous. Sarah Everard was sadly one of far too many women who have been let down by men. Yes women need better protection but is violence monopolised by men.? There are studies that women perpetrate domestic abuse at almost the same level as men but men being stoic and masculine tend not to report. Men predominantly use there fists women use weapons or implements. I myself have been the victim of three violent attacks by women and have never laid a hand on a woman. I am not unusual amongst my peers and friends who have shared experiences. Women kill children in the family at greater numbers than men . Demonising a whole gender because of the actions of a very few is folly. Should we condemn women because of Ruth Ellis, myra Hindley, Rose West, Maggie thatcher. This very upsetting incident is being used as a stick to beat men with . A nasty and orchestrated campaign to undermine men and there roles in society , ironically to the detriment of women. There are so many myths and misconceptions regarding the gender roles and dynamics. Men protect women . Its an anthropological prerequisite for survival. We do the dirty dangerous jobs and die in much greater numbers in the work place. We account for 78 per cent of suicides. We are much more likely to suffer a violent attack. Women do two thirds less jail time for the same offences. Women have far more favourable outcomes in divorce settlements and alimony arrangements. Women have equality despite the mythology surrounding alleged gender pay gaps and yet still demand traditionalism when it suits them. I.e. the guy opening doors changing your tyre , paying the bill , swimming while you get in the lifeboat. Going to war and dying to protect you. I don't make these points to diminish women or to undermine women at all , only to point out that patriarchy and masculinity are generally good and neccesary and not toxic. Men now are rejecting marriage and relationships..why? We have catapulted ourselves out of the dark ages because of a cooperation between the genders and an appreciation of each other. Interesting views. So the fact that 20% of women have been sexually assaulted is the act of a few? I think you need to take a step back and do some research. Hint - it isn’t women that are doing the sexual assaults..." Less than 2 per cent of men commit crime or violent acts | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Statistics - sexual violence Key statistics about r*pe and sexual violence in England and Wales. In the year to the end of March 2017, the Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) estimated: 20% of women and 4% of men have experienced some type of sexual assault since the age of 16, equivalent to 3.4 million female and 631,000 male victims 3.1% of women (510,000) and 0.8% of men (138,000) aged 16 to 59 had experienced a sexual assault in the last year. In January 2013, An Overview of Sexual Offending in England and Wales, the first ever joint official statistics bulletin on sexual violence released by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), Office for National Statistics (ONS) and Home Office, revealed: Approximately 85,000 women and 12,000 men (aged 16 - 59) experience r*pe, attempted r*pe or sexual assault by penetration in England and Wales alone every year; that's roughly 11 of the most serious sexual offences (of adults alone) every hour. Only around 15% of those who experience sexual violence report to the police Approximately 90% of those who are r*ped know the perpetrator prior to the offence I have put this in to remind some people on here that Women suffer a lot more than men through r*pe and sexual assault. Attempting to present an equivalence oreven to suggest that because men kill more men than women it isn’t an issue is just ludicrous. Sarah Everard was sadly one of far too many women who have been let down by men. Yes women need better protection but is violence monopolised by men.? There are studies that women perpetrate domestic abuse at almost the same level as men but men being stoic and masculine tend not to report. Men predominantly use there fists women use weapons or implements. I myself have been the victim of three violent attacks by women and have never laid a hand on a woman. I am not unusual amongst my peers and friends who have shared experiences. Women kill children in the family at greater numbers than men . Demonising a whole gender because of the actions of a very few is folly. Should we condemn women because of Ruth Ellis, myra Hindley, Rose West, Maggie thatcher. This very upsetting incident is being used as a stick to beat men with . A nasty and orchestrated campaign to undermine men and there roles in society , ironically to the detriment of women. There are so many myths and misconceptions regarding the gender roles and dynamics. Men protect women . Its an anthropological prerequisite for survival. We do the dirty dangerous jobs and die in much greater numbers in the work place. We account for 78 per cent of suicides. We are much more likely to suffer a violent attack. Women do two thirds less jail time for the same offences. Women have far more favourable outcomes in divorce settlements and alimony arrangements. Women have equality despite the mythology surrounding alleged gender pay gaps and yet still demand traditionalism when it suits them. I.e. the guy opening doors changing your tyre , paying the bill , swimming while you get in the lifeboat. Going to war and dying to protect you. I don't make these points to diminish women or to undermine women at all , only to point out that patriarchy and masculinity are generally good and neccesary and not toxic. Men now are rejecting marriage and relationships..why? We have catapulted ourselves out of the dark ages because of a cooperation between the genders and an appreciation of each other. Interesting views. So the fact that 20% of women have been sexually assaulted is the act of a few? I think you need to take a step back and do some research. Hint - it isn’t women that are doing the sexual assaults...Less than 2 per cent of men commit crime or violent acts" Well if these numbers are correct then each one of them are attacking a lot of women! Methinks a lot of men are excluded from these numbers... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think it has to be framed into Law somehow. The level of Misogyny just on this Politics forum is appalling at times. Comments like 'time of the month is it' are Neanderthal at least and dangerous at best. It's teaches a language of behaviour that should have been extinct a century ago. It should be taught at primary school too. How to frame a law around it is perhaps a lot more difficult however." I totally agree with your comments re arming women with mace and pepper spray. It opens a can of worms. However lets call out mysandry as well as mysogyny. Have you ever looked at some of the profiles women post on this site? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think it is time men accepted that it is more dangerous being a woman in this country than a man. It is by no means all men, but it is way more than 2% (see above). Lets try to get all murders and violence reduced, but remember most of it happens to women." No it isn't.. far more men are murdered than women. Men account for far more workplace deaths than women . Ilts far more dangerous to be a man ..fact. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think it is time men accepted that it is more dangerous being a woman in this country than a man. It is by no means all men, but it is way more than 2% (see above). Lets try to get all murders and violence reduced, but remember most of it happens to women." Everyone is entitled to there own opinion..no one is entitled to there own facts. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It is great to see that the Govt have been forced by the House of Lords to have the Police record Misogyny as a Hate Crime. “Misogyny is set to be recorded by police as a “hate crime” after the government bowed to pressure in the House of Lords to toughen the law on protecting women.” Hopefully it will reduce its incidence and increase both reporting and prosecution " I agree mysogyny should be a hate crime but what about mysandry? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It is great to see that the Govt have been forced by the House of Lords to have the Police record Misogyny as a Hate Crime. “Misogyny is set to be recorded by police as a “hate crime” after the government bowed to pressure in the House of Lords to toughen the law on protecting women.” Hopefully it will reduce its incidence and increase both reporting and prosecution I agree mysogyny should be a hate crime but what about mysandry?" Persuade the Govt that the numbers you are suggesting are as widespread as the effect on women (by the way wtf have work place deaths got to do with this!) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It is great to see that the Govt have been forced by the House of Lords to have the Police record Misogyny as a Hate Crime. “Misogyny is set to be recorded by police as a “hate crime” after the government bowed to pressure in the House of Lords to toughen the law on protecting women.” Hopefully it will reduce its incidence and increase both reporting and prosecution I agree mysogyny should be a hate crime but what about mysandry? Persuade the Govt that the numbers you are suggesting are as widespread as the effect on women (by the way wtf have work place deaths got to do with this!)" You said its more dangerous being a woman . Your wrong and I stated why . One of the reasons being men dying in far greater numbers at work. Im trying to be monosyllabic so as you understand. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It is great to see that the Govt have been forced by the House of Lords to have the Police record Misogyny as a Hate Crime. “Misogyny is set to be recorded by police as a “hate crime” after the government bowed to pressure in the House of Lords to toughen the law on protecting women.” Hopefully it will reduce its incidence and increase both reporting and prosecution I agree mysogyny should be a hate crime but what about mysandry? Persuade the Govt that the numbers you are suggesting are as widespread as the effect on women (by the way wtf have work place deaths got to do with this!) You said its more dangerous being a woman . Your wrong and I stated why . One of the reasons being men dying in far greater numbers at work. Im trying to be monosyllabic so as you understand. " You’re so kind. Fortunately everyone else seems to agree that women are attacked way more often than men. As most of the attacks on men are also by men, perhaps you could start a movement to protest against man on man assaults. Probably more constructive than complaining that women don’t really suffer. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Double amount of men killed, more commit suicide and men are in less danger than women? Strange graph! " What is it that you dislike about women? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Double amount of men killed, more commit suicide and men are in less danger than women? Strange graph! What is it that you dislike about women?" I like men and women, and the truth, its you with the warped view of truth, but I know from past posts trying to actually discuss anything with you is pointless so I won't. You're already accusing me of disliking women,sort of prove the point why there shouldn't be a law for women like you to misuse | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Double amount of men killed, more commit suicide and men are in less danger than women? Strange graph! What is it that you dislike about women? I like men and women, and the truth, its you with the warped view of truth, but I know from past posts trying to actually discuss anything with you is pointless so I won't. You're already accusing me of disliking women,sort of prove the point why there shouldn't be a law for women like you to misuse " In a pst about misogyny, all you want to do is deny it. It seems odd at the very least | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It is great to see that the Govt have been forced by the House of Lords to have the Police record Misogyny as a Hate Crime. “Misogyny is set to be recorded by police as a “hate crime” after the government bowed to pressure in the House of Lords to toughen the law on protecting women.” Hopefully it will reduce its incidence and increase both reporting and prosecution I agree mysogyny should be a hate crime but what about mysandry? Persuade the Govt that the numbers you are suggesting are as widespread as the effect on women (by the way wtf have work place deaths got to do with this!) You said its more dangerous being a woman . Your wrong and I stated why . One of the reasons being men dying in far greater numbers at work. Im trying to be monosyllabic so as you understand. You’re so kind. Fortunately everyone else seems to agree that women are attacked way more often than men. As most of the attacks on men are also by men, perhaps you could start a movement to protest against man on man assaults. Probably more constructive than complaining that women don’t really suffer." Who agrees that women are attacked more than men? Only you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Post!" This is a bit like discussing theology with a creationist or cosmology with a flat earther..utterly pointless having a dialogue with someone so blinkered | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Post!This is a bit like discussing theology with a creationist or cosmology with a flat earther..utterly pointless having a dialogue with someone so blinkered" And yet you stated women shouldn't have the right to defend themselves. Because it opens a whole other option. We are by natural selection physically inferior to the majority of men. So what is your theoretical solution? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Post!This is a bit like discussing theology with a creationist or cosmology with a flat earther..utterly pointless having a dialogue with someone so blinkered And yet you stated women shouldn't have the right to defend themselves. Because it opens a whole other option. We are by natural selection physically inferior to the majority of men. So what is your theoretical solution? " 50% of population is physically weaker than other 50%, has to be! but large man who is disabled cant beat smaller but fit female? Small man vs female shot putt champion? armed vs unarmed.... Yet you seem to want to make a clear line, men strong vs women weak? and legislate on that basis, purely on sex, and that would be discriminatory in anyway? really? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Post!This is a bit like discussing theology with a creationist or cosmology with a flat earther..utterly pointless having a dialogue with someone so blinkered And yet you stated women shouldn't have the right to defend themselves. Because it opens a whole other option. We are by natural selection physically inferior to the majority of men. So what is your theoretical solution? 50% of population is physically weaker than other 50%, has to be! but large man who is disabled cant beat smaller but fit female? Small man vs female shot putt champion? armed vs unarmed.... Yet you seem to want to make a clear line, men strong vs women weak? and legislate on that basis, purely on sex, and that would be discriminatory in anyway? really? " opps, should say would not be, typo! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Post!This is a bit like discussing theology with a creationist or cosmology with a flat earther..utterly pointless having a dialogue with someone so blinkered And yet you stated women shouldn't have the right to defend themselves. Because it opens a whole other option. We are by natural selection physically inferior to the majority of men. So what is your theoretical solution? 50% of population is physically weaker than other 50%, has to be! but large man who is disabled cant beat smaller but fit female? Small man vs female shot putt champion? armed vs unarmed.... Yet you seem to want to make a clear line, men strong vs women weak? and legislate on that basis, purely on sex, and that would be discriminatory in anyway? really? opps, should say would not be, typo!" And yet you can clearly kick my ass. So where is the defense options on my part? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Post!This is a bit like discussing theology with a creationist or cosmology with a flat earther..utterly pointless having a dialogue with someone so blinkered And yet you stated women shouldn't have the right to defend themselves. Because it opens a whole other option. We are by natural selection physically inferior to the majority of men. So what is your theoretical solution? " Where did I state women shouldn't have the right to defend themselves? I stated my opposition to arming women with mace and pepper spray. That would escalate things and next thing you know we would all carry guns and there would ensue carnage as has happened in the u.s. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Post!This is a bit like discussing theology with a creationist or cosmology with a flat earther..utterly pointless having a dialogue with someone so blinkered" Quite the opposite. All the facts support what I am saying, if anything it is you who is the flat earther. As misogyny is now going to be recorded as a hate crime, which one of us is wrong? You just don’t seem to accept the fact that men are the agressors, women are the agressed. I gave you the stats to support this and you ignore them. Fine, you stick with your opinion, I will stick with the facts. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Post!This is a bit like discussing theology with a creationist or cosmology with a flat earther..utterly pointless having a dialogue with someone so blinkered And yet you stated women shouldn't have the right to defend themselves. Because it opens a whole other option. We are by natural selection physically inferior to the majority of men. So what is your theoretical solution? 50% of population is physically weaker than other 50%, has to be! but large man who is disabled cant beat smaller but fit female? Small man vs female shot putt champion? armed vs unarmed.... Yet you seem to want to make a clear line, men strong vs women weak? and legislate on that basis, purely on sex, and that would be discriminatory in anyway? really? opps, should say would not be, typo! And yet you can clearly kick my ass. So where is the defense options on my part?" There are laws and a police force, it is there for everyone! But you could certainly out run me when I'm in my heels lol how can I defend myself from you when I'm in heels and a bardot dress? And your in jeans and doc martens? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Post!This is a bit like discussing theology with a creationist or cosmology with a flat earther..utterly pointless having a dialogue with someone so blinkered And yet you stated women shouldn't have the right to defend themselves. Because it opens a whole other option. We are by natural selection physically inferior to the majority of men. So what is your theoretical solution? 50% of population is physically weaker than other 50%, has to be! but large man who is disabled cant beat smaller but fit female? Small man vs female shot putt champion? armed vs unarmed.... Yet you seem to want to make a clear line, men strong vs women weak? and legislate on that basis, purely on sex, and that would be discriminatory in anyway? really? opps, should say would not be, typo! And yet you can clearly kick my ass. So where is the defense options on my part? There are laws and a police force, it is there for everyone! But you could certainly out run me when I'm in my heels lol how can I defend myself from you when I'm in heels and a bardot dress? And your in jeans and doc martens? " Lol love ya. That image made my morning. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Post!This is a bit like discussing theology with a creationist or cosmology with a flat earther..utterly pointless having a dialogue with someone so blinkered Quite the opposite. All the facts support what I am saying, if anything it is you who is the flat earther. As misogyny is now going to be recorded as a hate crime, which one of us is wrong? You just don’t seem to accept the fact that men are the agressors, women are the agressed. I gave you the stats to support this and you ignore them. Fine, you stick with your opinion, I will stick with the facts." Agressed isn't a word . Show me a stat that says its more dangerous to be a woman than a man. You are wrong . Men get attacked and murdered at a greater rate than women . Yes men r..e women at a greater rate than the other way around and are more likely to be the victims of harassment and domestic abuse however the disparity is not as the media society and feminists would have you believe. Please read my original post. Confront me on something that you consider wrong. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Post!This is a bit like discussing theology with a creationist or cosmology with a flat earther..utterly pointless having a dialogue with someone so blinkered Quite the opposite. All the facts support what I am saying, if anything it is you who is the flat earther. As misogyny is now going to be recorded as a hate crime, which one of us is wrong? You just don’t seem to accept the fact that men are the agressors, women are the agressed. I gave you the stats to support this and you ignore them. Fine, you stick with your opinion, I will stick with the facts." Whats the problems that keep surfacing, surrounding some women and some of the trans community? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Post!This is a bit like discussing theology with a creationist or cosmology with a flat earther..utterly pointless having a dialogue with someone so blinkered Quite the opposite. All the facts support what I am saying, if anything it is you who is the flat earther. As misogyny is now going to be recorded as a hate crime, which one of us is wrong? You just don’t seem to accept the fact that men are the agressors, women are the agressed. I gave you the stats to support this and you ignore them. Fine, you stick with your opinion, I will stick with the facts.Agressed isn't a word . Show me a stat that says its more dangerous to be a woman than a man. You are wrong . Men get attacked and murdered at a greater rate than women . Yes men r..e women at a greater rate than the other way around and are more likely to be the victims of harassment and domestic abuse however the disparity is not as the media society and feminists would have you believe. Please read my original post. Confront me on something that you consider wrong." From UN Women: “Globally, 35 per cent of women have ever experienced physical and/or sexual intimate partner violence, or sexual violence by a non-partner. This figure does not include sexual harassment. Some national studies show that the number can be as high as 70 per cent of women, and that rates of depression, having an abortion, and acquiring HIV are higher in women who have experienced this type of violence compared to women who have not.” From my post earlier, 20% of UK women say they have been sexually assaulted vs 4% of men. Given the population is roughly equal between women and men, it is at least 5x more dangerous to be a woman in the UK. But I don’t think facts actually matter to you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"most whores are women therefore all women are likely to become whores! most crimes are committed by men therefore all men are potential criminals! over 2500 dog bite attacks on post men/women, muzzle all dogs now.. do i need to go on? lol over simplifying any situation is frankly over simplifying it! " ...so correct me if I’ve misunderstood. You think misogyny is not an issue? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"most whores are women therefore all women are likely to become whores! most crimes are committed by men therefore all men are potential criminals! over 2500 dog bite attacks on post men/women, muzzle all dogs now.. do i need to go on? lol over simplifying any situation is frankly over simplifying it! ...so correct me if I’ve misunderstood. You think misogyny is not an issue? " do i want to talk to you, is there any point? no one is dismissing crime against women BUT they shouldnt dismiss it against men either! or trans or... of course some men are out of order in how they behave, and some women and some trans and..... these people, are criminals and should be dealt with by the courts, for the crimes they commit. But I dont believe we should say the majority of whores are women so treat all women in a certain way, and i dont believe we should say the majority of sex offenders are men so treat all men in a certain way.... etc etc that is discrimination for starters and very likely counter productive | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"most whores are women therefore all women are likely to become whores! most crimes are committed by men therefore all men are potential criminals! over 2500 dog bite attacks on post men/women, muzzle all dogs now.. do i need to go on? lol over simplifying any situation is frankly over simplifying it! ...so correct me if I’ve misunderstood. You think misogyny is not an issue? do i want to talk to you, is there any point? no one is dismissing crime against women BUT they shouldnt dismiss it against men either! or trans or... of course some men are out of order in how they behave, and some women and some trans and..... these people, are criminals and should be dealt with by the courts, for the crimes they commit. But I dont believe we should say the majority of whores are women so treat all women in a certain way, and i dont believe we should say the majority of sex offenders are men so treat all men in a certain way.... etc etc that is discrimination for starters and very likely counter productive " I still want you to Chase me tho | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"most whores are women therefore all women are likely to become whores! most crimes are committed by men therefore all men are potential criminals! over 2500 dog bite attacks on post men/women, muzzle all dogs now.. do i need to go on? lol over simplifying any situation is frankly over simplifying it! ...so correct me if I’ve misunderstood. You think misogyny is not an issue? do i want to talk to you, is there any point? no one is dismissing crime against women BUT they shouldnt dismiss it against men either! or trans or... of course some men are out of order in how they behave, and some women and some trans and..... these people, are criminals and should be dealt with by the courts, for the crimes they commit. But I dont believe we should say the majority of whores are women so treat all women in a certain way, and i dont believe we should say the majority of sex offenders are men so treat all men in a certain way.... etc etc that is discrimination for starters and very likely counter productive " Oh I’m sorry, this thread is about Misogyny, not denying it... Maybe open a new one for your strange ideas. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"most whores are women therefore all women are likely to become whores! most crimes are committed by men therefore all men are potential criminals! over 2500 dog bite attacks on post men/women, muzzle all dogs now.. do i need to go on? lol over simplifying any situation is frankly over simplifying it! ...so correct me if I’ve misunderstood. You think misogyny is not an issue? do i want to talk to you, is there any point? no one is dismissing crime against women BUT they shouldnt dismiss it against men either! or trans or... of course some men are out of order in how they behave, and some women and some trans and..... these people, are criminals and should be dealt with by the courts, for the crimes they commit. But I dont believe we should say the majority of whores are women so treat all women in a certain way, and i dont believe we should say the majority of sex offenders are men so treat all men in a certain way.... etc etc that is discrimination for starters and very likely counter productive I still want you to Chase me tho " i cant darling, not in these heels! well not very fast lol unless theres a make up counter involved lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"most whores are women therefore all women are likely to become whores! most crimes are committed by men therefore all men are potential criminals! over 2500 dog bite attacks on post men/women, muzzle all dogs now.. do i need to go on? lol over simplifying any situation is frankly over simplifying it! ...so correct me if I’ve misunderstood. You think misogyny is not an issue? do i want to talk to you, is there any point? no one is dismissing crime against women BUT they shouldnt dismiss it against men either! or trans or... of course some men are out of order in how they behave, and some women and some trans and..... these people, are criminals and should be dealt with by the courts, for the crimes they commit. But I dont believe we should say the majority of whores are women so treat all women in a certain way, and i dont believe we should say the majority of sex offenders are men so treat all men in a certain way.... etc etc that is discrimination for starters and very likely counter productive I still want you to Chase me tho i cant darling, not in these heels! well not very fast lol unless theres a make up counter involved lol " I would trip you if it's a cat von d counter | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"most whores are women therefore all women are likely to become whores! most crimes are committed by men therefore all men are potential criminals! over 2500 dog bite attacks on post men/women, muzzle all dogs now.. do i need to go on? lol over simplifying any situation is frankly over simplifying it! ...so correct me if I’ve misunderstood. You think misogyny is not an issue? do i want to talk to you, is there any point? no one is dismissing crime against women BUT they shouldnt dismiss it against men either! or trans or... of course some men are out of order in how they behave, and some women and some trans and..... these people, are criminals and should be dealt with by the courts, for the crimes they commit. But I dont believe we should say the majority of whores are women so treat all women in a certain way, and i dont believe we should say the majority of sex offenders are men so treat all men in a certain way.... etc etc that is discrimination for starters and very likely counter productive I still want you to Chase me tho i cant darling, not in these heels! well not very fast lol unless theres a make up counter involved lol I would trip you if it's a cat von d counter " no way, elbows out hun, uh, that will never suit your skin tone, mine mine mine! lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Post!This is a bit like discussing theology with a creationist or cosmology with a flat earther..utterly pointless having a dialogue with someone so blinkered Quite the opposite. All the facts support what I am saying, if anything it is you who is the flat earther. As misogyny is now going to be recorded as a hate crime, which one of us is wrong? You just don’t seem to accept the fact that men are the agressors, women are the agressed. I gave you the stats to support this and you ignore them. Fine, you stick with your opinion, I will stick with the facts.Agressed isn't a word . Show me a stat that says its more dangerous to be a woman than a man. You are wrong . Men get attacked and murdered at a greater rate than women . Yes men r..e women at a greater rate than the other way around and are more likely to be the victims of harassment and domestic abuse however the disparity is not as the media society and feminists would have you believe. Please read my original post. Confront me on something that you consider wrong. From UN Women: “Globally, 35 per cent of women have ever experienced physical and/or sexual intimate partner violence, or sexual violence by a non-partner. This figure does not include sexual harassment. Some national studies show that the number can be as high as 70 per cent of women, and that rates of depression, having an abortion, and acquiring HIV are higher in women who have experienced this type of violence compared to women who have not.” From my post earlier, 20% of UK women say they have been sexually assaulted vs 4% of men. Given the population is roughly equal between women and men, it is at least 5x more dangerous to be a woman in the UK. But I don’t think facts actually matter to you. " Pointless ..I have stated that women suffer more sexual violence and murder from men than the other way around but for the last time men are more likely to be murdered or attacked than women, therefore its more dangerous being a man ...FACT | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Post!This is a bit like discussing theology with a creationist or cosmology with a flat earther..utterly pointless having a dialogue with someone so blinkered Quite the opposite. All the facts support what I am saying, if anything it is you who is the flat earther. As misogyny is now going to be recorded as a hate crime, which one of us is wrong? You just don’t seem to accept the fact that men are the agressors, women are the agressed. I gave you the stats to support this and you ignore them. Fine, you stick with your opinion, I will stick with the facts.Agressed isn't a word . Show me a stat that says its more dangerous to be a woman than a man. You are wrong . Men get attacked and murdered at a greater rate than women . Yes men r..e women at a greater rate than the other way around and are more likely to be the victims of harassment and domestic abuse however the disparity is not as the media society and feminists would have you believe. Please read my original post. Confront me on something that you consider wrong. From UN Women: “Globally, 35 per cent of women have ever experienced physical and/or sexual intimate partner violence, or sexual violence by a non-partner. This figure does not include sexual harassment. Some national studies show that the number can be as high as 70 per cent of women, and that rates of depression, having an abortion, and acquiring HIV are higher in women who have experienced this type of violence compared to women who have not.” From my post earlier, 20% of UK women say they have been sexually assaulted vs 4% of men. Given the population is roughly equal between women and men, it is at least 5x more dangerous to be a woman in the UK. But I don’t think facts actually matter to you. Pointless ..I have stated that women suffer more sexual violence and murder from men than the other way around but for the last time men are more likely to be murdered or attacked than women, therefore its more dangerous being a man ...FACT " You realise those attackers will most likely be men? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"most whores are women therefore all women are likely to become whores! most crimes are committed by men therefore all men are potential criminals! over 2500 dog bite attacks on post men/women, muzzle all dogs now.. do i need to go on? lol over simplifying any situation is frankly over simplifying it! " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Post!This is a bit like discussing theology with a creationist or cosmology with a flat earther..utterly pointless having a dialogue with someone so blinkered Quite the opposite. All the facts support what I am saying, if anything it is you who is the flat earther. As misogyny is now going to be recorded as a hate crime, which one of us is wrong? You just don’t seem to accept the fact that men are the agressors, women are the agressed. I gave you the stats to support this and you ignore them. Fine, you stick with your opinion, I will stick with the facts.Agressed isn't a word . Show me a stat that says its more dangerous to be a woman than a man. You are wrong . Men get attacked and murdered at a greater rate than women . Yes men r..e women at a greater rate than the other way around and are more likely to be the victims of harassment and domestic abuse however the disparity is not as the media society and feminists would have you believe. Please read my original post. Confront me on something that you consider wrong. From UN Women: “Globally, 35 per cent of women have ever experienced physical and/or sexual intimate partner violence, or sexual violence by a non-partner. This figure does not include sexual harassment. Some national studies show that the number can be as high as 70 per cent of women, and that rates of depression, having an abortion, and acquiring HIV are higher in women who have experienced this type of violence compared to women who have not.” From my post earlier, 20% of UK women say they have been sexually assaulted vs 4% of men. Given the population is roughly equal between women and men, it is at least 5x more dangerous to be a woman in the UK. But I don’t think facts actually matter to you. Pointless ..I have stated that women suffer more sexual violence and murder from men than the other way around but for the last time men are more likely to be murdered or attacked than women, therefore its more dangerous being a man ...FACT You realise those attackers will most likely be men? " I think the problem is they are fixated ontheir first thought and cannot cope with facts coming in to create deviation. Men attack, assault and kill most people. Men kill less women than men, but much more than the other way round Men assault (both sexual and non sexual) way more women than men But relying on these facts does not automatically help them to the obvious conclusion - men are the problem. No, interestingly men are the victims... & on a post about misogyny | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"76.8% of murder victims are male, men need more protection and im not talking condoms, as women are less likely to die, they should protect men more! " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Debate with no opposing view is not a debate! " Master debate then | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Debate with no opposing view is not a debate! " Ok, what is your view? You just deny what I say. Have a look at the Monty Python sketch on arguments, this is more of a contradiction & I paid for an argument! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"most whores are women therefore all women are likely to become whores! most crimes are committed by men therefore all men are potential criminals! over 2500 dog bite attacks on post men/women, muzzle all dogs now.. do i need to go on? lol over simplifying any situation is frankly over simplifying it! ...so correct me if I’ve misunderstood. You think misogyny is not an issue? do i want to talk to you, is there any point? no one is dismissing crime against women BUT they shouldnt dismiss it against men either! or trans or... of course some men are out of order in how they behave, and some women and some trans and..... these people, are criminals and should be dealt with by the courts, for the crimes they commit. But I dont believe we should say the majority of whores are women so treat all women in a certain way, and i dont believe we should say the majority of sex offenders are men so treat all men in a certain way.... etc etc that is discrimination for starters and very likely counter productive " thats my base line! Everytime i go on a night out some d*unken lad will approach for a dance with a t-gurl and try to grab one of us, we could live in the police station reporting young d*unken lads who grab bottoms to impress their mates lol yes its a serious subject like 78% of murder victims being men is!But you cant legislate for every aspect of life! There are laws already. Im old enough that gentlemen used to stand when a lady wanted a seat or theyd hold the door open... certain groups of women didnt want that, they wanted to drink pints, be boxers and piss in street, like men, which is fine, but guess what, men stopped being gentlemen! There is a balance in place, careful what you wish for. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"most whores are women therefore all women are likely to become whores! most crimes are committed by men therefore all men are potential criminals! over 2500 dog bite attacks on post men/women, muzzle all dogs now.. do i need to go on? lol over simplifying any situation is frankly over simplifying it! ...so correct me if I’ve misunderstood. You think misogyny is not an issue? do i want to talk to you, is there any point? no one is dismissing crime against women BUT they shouldnt dismiss it against men either! or trans or... of course some men are out of order in how they behave, and some women and some trans and..... these people, are criminals and should be dealt with by the courts, for the crimes they commit. But I dont believe we should say the majority of whores are women so treat all women in a certain way, and i dont believe we should say the majority of sex offenders are men so treat all men in a certain way.... etc etc that is discrimination for starters and very likely counter productive thats my base line! Everytime i go on a night out some d*unken lad will approach for a dance with a t-gurl and try to grab one of us, we could live in the police station reporting young d*unken lads who grab bottoms to impress their mates lol yes its a serious subject like 78% of murder victims being men is!But you cant legislate for every aspect of life! There are laws already. Im old enough that gentlemen used to stand when a lady wanted a seat or theyd hold the door open... certain groups of women didnt want that, they wanted to drink pints, be boxers and piss in street, like men, which is fine, but guess what, men stopped being gentlemen! There is a balance in place, careful what you wish for. " Guess I am old school it was one of the attributes that I love about hubby. The putting of women on a pedestal. Gentlemanly the majority of the men my age here are videogame fanatics and 0 gentleman attitude twords women. They treat you like a man with a vagina. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"most whores are women therefore all women are likely to become whores! most crimes are committed by men therefore all men are potential criminals! over 2500 dog bite attacks on post men/women, muzzle all dogs now.. do i need to go on? lol over simplifying any situation is frankly over simplifying it! ...so correct me if I’ve misunderstood. You think misogyny is not an issue? do i want to talk to you, is there any point? no one is dismissing crime against women BUT they shouldnt dismiss it against men either! or trans or... of course some men are out of order in how they behave, and some women and some trans and..... these people, are criminals and should be dealt with by the courts, for the crimes they commit. But I dont believe we should say the majority of whores are women so treat all women in a certain way, and i dont believe we should say the majority of sex offenders are men so treat all men in a certain way.... etc etc that is discrimination for starters and very likely counter productive thats my base line! Everytime i go on a night out some d*unken lad will approach for a dance with a t-gurl and try to grab one of us, we could live in the police station reporting young d*unken lads who grab bottoms to impress their mates lol yes its a serious subject like 78% of murder victims being men is!But you cant legislate for every aspect of life! There are laws already. Im old enough that gentlemen used to stand when a lady wanted a seat or theyd hold the door open... certain groups of women didnt want that, they wanted to drink pints, be boxers and piss in street, like men, which is fine, but guess what, men stopped being gentlemen! There is a balance in place, careful what you wish for. " But going by your reasoning, why shouldn’t you stand for them? Why should they be gentlemen if you don’t want to be? You certainly aren’t looking through an equality lens | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"most whores are women therefore all women are likely to become whores! most crimes are committed by men therefore all men are potential criminals! over 2500 dog bite attacks on post men/women, muzzle all dogs now.. do i need to go on? lol over simplifying any situation is frankly over simplifying it! ...so correct me if I’ve misunderstood. You think misogyny is not an issue? do i want to talk to you, is there any point? no one is dismissing crime against women BUT they shouldnt dismiss it against men either! or trans or... of course some men are out of order in how they behave, and some women and some trans and..... these people, are criminals and should be dealt with by the courts, for the crimes they commit. But I dont believe we should say the majority of whores are women so treat all women in a certain way, and i dont believe we should say the majority of sex offenders are men so treat all men in a certain way.... etc etc that is discrimination for starters and very likely counter productive thats my base line! Everytime i go on a night out some d*unken lad will approach for a dance with a t-gurl and try to grab one of us, we could live in the police station reporting young d*unken lads who grab bottoms to impress their mates lol yes its a serious subject like 78% of murder victims being men is!But you cant legislate for every aspect of life! There are laws already. Im old enough that gentlemen used to stand when a lady wanted a seat or theyd hold the door open... certain groups of women didnt want that, they wanted to drink pints, be boxers and piss in street, like men, which is fine, but guess what, men stopped being gentlemen! There is a balance in place, careful what you wish for. But going by your reasoning, why shouldn’t you stand for them? Why should they be gentlemen if you don’t want to be? You certainly aren’t looking through an equality lens " Husband opened door for a woman. Women got angry. Called him names. Fast forward few weeks later same woman same store carrying packages Husband just watched her she got angry because he wouldn't open door. Lesson it was hilarious but is it really such a big deal with some people if a man is being a gentleman. Some people take "equality" to special limits. So who is in the wrong. He gets berated for being one then when same thing happens because it was convenient for her it's ok. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"most whores are women therefore all women are likely to become whores! most crimes are committed by men therefore all men are potential criminals! over 2500 dog bite attacks on post men/women, muzzle all dogs now.. do i need to go on? lol over simplifying any situation is frankly over simplifying it! ...so correct me if I’ve misunderstood. You think misogyny is not an issue? do i want to talk to you, is there any point? no one is dismissing crime against women BUT they shouldnt dismiss it against men either! or trans or... of course some men are out of order in how they behave, and some women and some trans and..... these people, are criminals and should be dealt with by the courts, for the crimes they commit. But I dont believe we should say the majority of whores are women so treat all women in a certain way, and i dont believe we should say the majority of sex offenders are men so treat all men in a certain way.... etc etc that is discrimination for starters and very likely counter productive thats my base line! Everytime i go on a night out some d*unken lad will approach for a dance with a t-gurl and try to grab one of us, we could live in the police station reporting young d*unken lads who grab bottoms to impress their mates lol yes its a serious subject like 78% of murder victims being men is!But you cant legislate for every aspect of life! There are laws already. Im old enough that gentlemen used to stand when a lady wanted a seat or theyd hold the door open... certain groups of women didnt want that, they wanted to drink pints, be boxers and piss in street, like men, which is fine, but guess what, men stopped being gentlemen! There is a balance in place, careful what you wish for. Guess I am old school it was one of the attributes that I love about hubby. The putting of women on a pedestal. Gentlemanly the majority of the men my age here are videogame fanatics and 0 gentleman attitude twords women. They treat you like a man with a vagina." exactly! some wanted to be a man with a vagina! they got it! personally im very lady like when i go out dressed, i dont drink pints or act a slut, even though i am one lol and men treat me pretty good, they have offered to let me sit and buy me a drink... or avoid me as a freak lol im not everyones cup of tea! but society should accept differences between otehrs, including men and women! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"most whores are women therefore all women are likely to become whores! most crimes are committed by men therefore all men are potential criminals! over 2500 dog bite attacks on post men/women, muzzle all dogs now.. do i need to go on? lol over simplifying any situation is frankly over simplifying it! ...so correct me if I’ve misunderstood. You think misogyny is not an issue? do i want to talk to you, is there any point? no one is dismissing crime against women BUT they shouldnt dismiss it against men either! or trans or... of course some men are out of order in how they behave, and some women and some trans and..... these people, are criminals and should be dealt with by the courts, for the crimes they commit. But I dont believe we should say the majority of whores are women so treat all women in a certain way, and i dont believe we should say the majority of sex offenders are men so treat all men in a certain way.... etc etc that is discrimination for starters and very likely counter productive thats my base line! Everytime i go on a night out some d*unken lad will approach for a dance with a t-gurl and try to grab one of us, we could live in the police station reporting young d*unken lads who grab bottoms to impress their mates lol yes its a serious subject like 78% of murder victims being men is!But you cant legislate for every aspect of life! There are laws already. Im old enough that gentlemen used to stand when a lady wanted a seat or theyd hold the door open... certain groups of women didnt want that, they wanted to drink pints, be boxers and piss in street, like men, which is fine, but guess what, men stopped being gentlemen! There is a balance in place, careful what you wish for. But going by your reasoning, why shouldn’t you stand for them? Why should they be gentlemen if you don’t want to be? You certainly aren’t looking through an equality lens " why cant women defend themselves then? why do they need special girl/women laws? its you that doesnt want totally equality. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"most whores are women therefore all women are likely to become whores! most crimes are committed by men therefore all men are potential criminals! over 2500 dog bite attacks on post men/women, muzzle all dogs now.. do i need to go on? lol over simplifying any situation is frankly over simplifying it! ...so correct me if I’ve misunderstood. You think misogyny is not an issue? do i want to talk to you, is there any point? no one is dismissing crime against women BUT they shouldnt dismiss it against men either! or trans or... of course some men are out of order in how they behave, and some women and some trans and..... these people, are criminals and should be dealt with by the courts, for the crimes they commit. But I dont believe we should say the majority of whores are women so treat all women in a certain way, and i dont believe we should say the majority of sex offenders are men so treat all men in a certain way.... etc etc that is discrimination for starters and very likely counter productive thats my base line! Everytime i go on a night out some d*unken lad will approach for a dance with a t-gurl and try to grab one of us, we could live in the police station reporting young d*unken lads who grab bottoms to impress their mates lol yes its a serious subject like 78% of murder victims being men is!But you cant legislate for every aspect of life! There are laws already. Im old enough that gentlemen used to stand when a lady wanted a seat or theyd hold the door open... certain groups of women didnt want that, they wanted to drink pints, be boxers and piss in street, like men, which is fine, but guess what, men stopped being gentlemen! There is a balance in place, careful what you wish for. But going by your reasoning, why shouldn’t you stand for them? Why should they be gentlemen if you don’t want to be? You certainly aren’t looking through an equality lens Husband opened door for a woman. Women got angry. Called him names. Fast forward few weeks later same woman same store carrying packages Husband just watched her she got angry because he wouldn't open door. Lesson it was hilarious but is it really such a big deal with some people if a man is being a gentleman. Some people take "equality" to special limits. So who is in the wrong. He gets berated for being one then when same thing happens because it was convenient for her it's ok." exactly! are you following me under cover lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Biggest problem would be defining misogyny in any kind of legal framework that could actually stand up in court. Heard the other day that holding a door open is mysogynystic...! WTF??" Who actually said that? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Biggest problem would be defining misogyny in any kind of legal framework that could actually stand up in court. Heard the other day that holding a door open is mysogynystic...! WTF?? Who actually said that?" Lol here it was I witnessed it. Hateful woman. Idk about there. But men can be just as ignorant. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Biggest problem would be defining misogyny in any kind of legal framework that could actually stand up in court. Heard the other day that holding a door open is mysogynystic...! WTF?? Who actually said that? Lol here it was I witnessed it. Hateful woman. Idk about there. But men can be just as ignorant." On this thread? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i worked with a nice guy who got a warning for saying morning ladies, i kid you not, and that was a long long time ago... im not sure what some people are actually trying to achieve? " Happens here too. It can be threatening to both men/women. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"We go to Heat which is a gay nightclub. They have awesome drag shows. Made alot of friends they do not feel threatened by anyone alot carry personal protection. It just a observation for me. I thought is was fantastic that they care about their own general well being. Grant it I agrued self protection till I was ready to smash my phone . But I have comfort knowing some people are not going to be a victim. Taught some helped them pick thier own . Yes you can accessorize to match outfits. All different colors." Nothing say wtf when a trans pulls out a 9mm with Cheetah print it matched the outfit. I was laughing so hard. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"We go to Heat which is a gay nightclub. They have awesome drag shows. Made alot of friends they do not feel threatened by anyone alot carry personal protection. It just a observation for me. I thought is was fantastic that they care about their own general well being. Grant it I agrued self protection till I was ready to smash my phone . But I have comfort knowing some people are not going to be a victim. Taught some helped them pick thier own . Yes you can accessorize to match outfits. All different colors. Nothing say wtf when a trans pulls out a 9mm with Cheetah print it matched the outfit. I was laughing so hard." lol that is so funny, have you seen brockmire? the baseball guy drama? where his daughter goes out all night and is walking home mid morning with some drag queens tits on the outside of her shirt, hair a mess and some guy fucks with her so she pulls out a revolver in middle of street, very funny lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"We go to Heat which is a gay nightclub. They have awesome drag shows. Made alot of friends they do not feel threatened by anyone alot carry personal protection. It just a observation for me. I thought is was fantastic that they care about their own general well being. Grant it I agrued self protection till I was ready to smash my phone . But I have comfort knowing some people are not going to be a victim. Taught some helped them pick thier own . Yes you can accessorize to match outfits. All different colors. Nothing say wtf when a trans pulls out a 9mm with Cheetah print it matched the outfit. I was laughing so hard. lol that is so funny, have you seen brockmire? the baseball guy drama? where his daughter goes out all night and is walking home mid morning with some drag queens tits on the outside of her shirt, hair a mess and some guy fucks with her so she pulls out a revolver in middle of street, very funny lol " We had to go to different gun stores because some were not fabulous enough. The cheetah one was hilarious. Nothing says back up when you are threatened all dolled up in your best and you totally match . The aggressor probably be confused. Thought I would share this story. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i worked with a nice guy who got a warning for saying morning ladies, i kid you not, and that was a long long time ago... im not sure what some people are actually trying to achieve? Happens here too. It can be threatening to both men/women." its the new forming of bullying, there is never a reason for violence, smile, but we can be as nasty and underhand as we like, smile and yes both directions male/female, gay mafia trans whatever! its not making the world a nicer place | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i worked with a nice guy who got a warning for saying morning ladies, i kid you not, and that was a long long time ago... im not sure what some people are actually trying to achieve? Happens here too. It can be threatening to both men/women. its the new forming of bullying, there is never a reason for violence, smile, but we can be as nasty and underhand as we like, smile and yes both directions male/female, gay mafia trans whatever! its not making the world a nicer place " Exactly. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What a sad attempt to avoid discussing misogyny. Guns Very few (if any) TV/TS get beaten up, sexually assaulted or murdered by women. It is men who cause problems. By all means defend them, but from my female perspective I like the idea that it is getting harder for some men to remain neanderthal (many of the rest have already got it). Swinging is about being able to say no, gently, not have to run to shelter, or to scream, or to put up with it. I am anyones equal and I don’t need to be patronised by idiot men (for clarity, this does not happen with women)." Discuss away I have my safety not stopping you from your opinion. Clearly your options are superior. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What a sad attempt to avoid discussing misogyny. Guns Very few (if any) TV/TS get beaten up, sexually assaulted or murdered by women. It is men who cause problems. By all means defend them, but from my female perspective I like the idea that it is getting harder for some men to remain neanderthal (many of the rest have already got it). Swinging is about being able to say no, gently, not have to run to shelter, or to scream, or to put up with it. I am anyones equal and I don’t need to be patronised by idiot men (for clarity, this does not happen with women)." And some men will not stop being neanderthals. So apply a law for being a neanderthal. Not going to stop but it's a great start if that what it takes try the I need more equality experiment. Increase jail times for inappropriate behavior, fines, education ect... Not against it. If it works it works but you cannot do that if you cannot apply the same law to women. Equality right ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"We go to Heat which is a gay nightclub. They have awesome drag shows. Made alot of friends they do not feel threatened by anyone alot carry personal protection. It just a observation for me. I thought is was fantastic that they care about their own general well being. Grant it I agrued self protection till I was ready to smash my phone . But I have comfort knowing some people are not going to be a victim. Taught some helped them pick thier own . Yes you can accessorize to match outfits. All different colors. Nothing say wtf when a trans pulls out a 9mm with Cheetah print it matched the outfit. I was laughing so hard. lol that is so funny, have you seen brockmire? the baseball guy drama? where his daughter goes out all night and is walking home mid morning with some drag queens tits on the outside of her shirt, hair a mess and some guy fucks with her so she pulls out a revolver in middle of street, very funny lol We had to go to different gun stores because some were not fabulous enough. The cheetah one was hilarious. Nothing says back up when you are threatened all dolled up in your best and you totally match . The aggressor probably be confused. Thought I would share this story. " that is so true! like a beautiful viper! You dont have to be physically large to command respect | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"We go to Heat which is a gay nightclub. They have awesome drag shows. Made alot of friends they do not feel threatened by anyone alot carry personal protection. It just a observation for me. I thought is was fantastic that they care about their own general well being. Grant it I agrued self protection till I was ready to smash my phone . But I have comfort knowing some people are not going to be a victim. Taught some helped them pick thier own . Yes you can accessorize to match outfits. All different colors. Nothing say wtf when a trans pulls out a 9mm with Cheetah print it matched the outfit. I was laughing so hard. lol that is so funny, have you seen brockmire? the baseball guy drama? where his daughter goes out all night and is walking home mid morning with some drag queens tits on the outside of her shirt, hair a mess and some guy fucks with her so she pulls out a revolver in middle of street, very funny lol We had to go to different gun stores because some were not fabulous enough. The cheetah one was hilarious. Nothing says back up when you are threatened all dolled up in your best and you totally match . The aggressor probably be confused. Thought I would share this story. that is so true! like a beautiful viper! You dont have to be physically large to command respect " Last thing running thru your mind is a law when you getting blugeoned. Scream the statutes all you want on equality it will not deter. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"We go to Heat which is a gay nightclub. They have awesome drag shows. Made alot of friends they do not feel threatened by anyone alot carry personal protection. It just a observation for me. I thought is was fantastic that they care about their own general well being. Grant it I agrued self protection till I was ready to smash my phone . But I have comfort knowing some people are not going to be a victim. Taught some helped them pick thier own . Yes you can accessorize to match outfits. All different colors. Nothing say wtf when a trans pulls out a 9mm with Cheetah print it matched the outfit. I was laughing so hard. lol that is so funny, have you seen brockmire? the baseball guy drama? where his daughter goes out all night and is walking home mid morning with some drag queens tits on the outside of her shirt, hair a mess and some guy fucks with her so she pulls out a revolver in middle of street, very funny lol We had to go to different gun stores because some were not fabulous enough. The cheetah one was hilarious. Nothing says back up when you are threatened all dolled up in your best and you totally match . The aggressor probably be confused. Thought I would share this story. that is so true! like a beautiful viper! You dont have to be physically large to command respect Last thing running thru your mind is a law when you getting blugeoned. Scream the statutes all you want on equality it will not deter. " there was a comedy show over here where they did that, there would be a prisoner of war or gangsters or... and the guy would act like a teenager saying that it wasnt fair and that they were breaking all the rules and hed report them.., he was normally tied to a chair or hanging from a ceiling while saying it as the other guy was sharpening his knife or loading a gun... lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And a policeman gets a 7pm to 7pm curfew for assaulting and beating up a woman in the Midlands. The CPS even decided originally they weren’t going to prosecute. It is time the Law started protecting women." Are they all like you in cardiff? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And a policeman gets a 7pm to 7pm curfew for assaulting and beating up a woman in the Midlands. The CPS even decided originally they weren’t going to prosecute. It is time the Law started protecting women.Are they all like you in cardiff?" shes a lost case, a drum banger, think they are liberal but actually totally the opposite! remember the bitch off celebrity big brother, accused that guy of punching her repeatedly, it was all on camera and she still tried to insist hed beat her... and people wonder why we need proper laws and due diligence! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And a policeman gets a 7pm to 7pm curfew for assaulting and beating up a woman in the Midlands. The CPS even decided originally they weren’t going to prosecute. It is time the Law started protecting women.Are they all like you in cardiff? shes a lost case, a drum banger, think they are liberal but actually totally the opposite! remember the bitch off celebrity big brother, accused that guy of punching her repeatedly, it was all on camera and she still tried to insist hed beat her... and people wonder why we need proper laws and due diligence! " I still trying to figure out how a law like this would work. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And a policeman gets a 7pm to 7pm curfew for assaulting and beating up a woman in the Midlands. The CPS even decided originally they weren’t going to prosecute. It is time the Law started protecting women.Are they all like you in cardiff?" Are they all like you in Barnet? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And a policeman gets a 7pm to 7pm curfew for assaulting and beating up a woman in the Midlands. The CPS even decided originally they weren’t going to prosecute. It is time the Law started protecting women.Are they all like you in cardiff? shes a lost case, a drum banger, think they are liberal but actually totally the opposite! remember the bitch off celebrity big brother, accused that guy of punching her repeatedly, it was all on camera and she still tried to insist hed beat her... and people wonder why we need proper laws and due diligence! " How is your tin whistle these days? You have no idea what Liberal means, your comments are reactionary, misogynistic, sexist and rude. Just because you wear a dress doesn’t mean you know what it is like to be a woman. Try recognising we are different, it doesn’t mean we can’t all be equal though. Also you still don’t know how to debate, you just contradict. & before you respond back, yes you do! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"most whores are women therefore all women are likely to become whores! most crimes are committed by men therefore all men are potential criminals! over 2500 dog bite attacks on post men/women, muzzle all dogs now.. do i need to go on? lol over simplifying any situation is frankly over simplifying it! ...so correct me if I’ve misunderstood. You think misogyny is not an issue? do i want to talk to you, is there any point? no one is dismissing crime against women BUT they shouldnt dismiss it against men either! or trans or... of course some men are out of order in how they behave, and some women and some trans and..... these people, are criminals and should be dealt with by the courts, for the crimes they commit. But I dont believe we should say the majority of whores are women so treat all women in a certain way, and i dont believe we should say the majority of sex offenders are men so treat all men in a certain way.... etc etc that is discrimination for starters and very likely counter productive thats my base line! Everytime i go on a night out some d*unken lad will approach for a dance with a t-gurl and try to grab one of us, we could live in the police station reporting young d*unken lads who grab bottoms to impress their mates lol yes its a serious subject like 78% of murder victims being men is!But you cant legislate for every aspect of life! There are laws already. Im old enough that gentlemen used to stand when a lady wanted a seat or theyd hold the door open... certain groups of women didnt want that, they wanted to drink pints, be boxers and piss in street, like men, which is fine, but guess what, men stopped being gentlemen! There is a balance in place, careful what you wish for. But going by your reasoning, why shouldn’t you stand for them? Why should they be gentlemen if you don’t want to be? You certainly aren’t looking through an equality lens Husband opened door for a woman. Women got angry. Called him names. Fast forward few weeks later same woman same store carrying packages Husband just watched her she got angry because he wouldn't open door. Lesson it was hilarious but is it really such a big deal with some people if a man is being a gentleman. Some people take "equality" to special limits. So who is in the wrong. He gets berated for being one then when same thing happens because it was convenient for her it's ok." as previously acknowledged there is criminal behavior that should be tackled but you are asking for the law to be weighted in favour of a particular group.that isnt equality! However, I want a trans law, youve already accused me of "just wearing a dress"! I could well be crammed full of female hormones for all you know... so how liberal was your comment? kettle pot! You just concentrate on one side of the equation, your side, hope you dont have any sons to be on the receiving end of what you seem to want. There are laws in place FOR ALL, if the judge fails to act on them the judge needs looking at not the law | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"most whores are women therefore all women are likely to become whores! most crimes are committed by men therefore all men are potential criminals! over 2500 dog bite attacks on post men/women, muzzle all dogs now.. do i need to go on? lol over simplifying any situation is frankly over simplifying it! ...so correct me if I’ve misunderstood. You think misogyny is not an issue? do i want to talk to you, is there any point? no one is dismissing crime against women BUT they shouldnt dismiss it against men either! or trans or... of course some men are out of order in how they behave, and some women and some trans and..... these people, are criminals and should be dealt with by the courts, for the crimes they commit. But I dont believe we should say the majority of whores are women so treat all women in a certain way, and i dont believe we should say the majority of sex offenders are men so treat all men in a certain way.... etc etc that is discrimination for starters and very likely counter productive thats my base line! Everytime i go on a night out some d*unken lad will approach for a dance with a t-gurl and try to grab one of us, we could live in the police station reporting young d*unken lads who grab bottoms to impress their mates lol yes its a serious subject like 78% of murder victims being men is!But you cant legislate for every aspect of life! There are laws already. Im old enough that gentlemen used to stand when a lady wanted a seat or theyd hold the door open... certain groups of women didnt want that, they wanted to drink pints, be boxers and piss in street, like men, which is fine, but guess what, men stopped being gentlemen! There is a balance in place, careful what you wish for. But going by your reasoning, why shouldn’t you stand for them? Why should they be gentlemen if you don’t want to be? You certainly aren’t looking through an equality lens Husband opened door for a woman. Women got angry. Called him names. Fast forward few weeks later same woman same store carrying packages Husband just watched her she got angry because he wouldn't open door. Lesson it was hilarious but is it really such a big deal with some people if a man is being a gentleman. Some people take "equality" to special limits. So who is in the wrong. He gets berated for being one then when same thing happens because it was convenient for her it's ok. as previously acknowledged there is criminal behavior that should be tackled but you are asking for the law to be weighted in favour of a particular group.that isnt equality! However, I want a trans law, youve already accused me of "just wearing a dress"! I could well be crammed full of female hormones for all you know... so how liberal was your comment? kettle pot! You just concentrate on one side of the equation, your side, hope you dont have any sons to be on the receiving end of what you seem to want. There are laws in place FOR ALL, if the judge fails to act on them the judge needs looking at not the law " As many have pointed out the Law is currently skewed in favour of Men. I would like it equalised, why is that a bad thing to ask for? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"most whores are women therefore all women are likely to become whores! most crimes are committed by men therefore all men are potential criminals! over 2500 dog bite attacks on post men/women, muzzle all dogs now.. do i need to go on? lol over simplifying any situation is frankly over simplifying it! ...so correct me if I’ve misunderstood. You think misogyny is not an issue? do i want to talk to you, is there any point? no one is dismissing crime against women BUT they shouldnt dismiss it against men either! or trans or... of course some men are out of order in how they behave, and some women and some trans and..... these people, are criminals and should be dealt with by the courts, for the crimes they commit. But I dont believe we should say the majority of whores are women so treat all women in a certain way, and i dont believe we should say the majority of sex offenders are men so treat all men in a certain way.... etc etc that is discrimination for starters and very likely counter productive thats my base line! Everytime i go on a night out some d*unken lad will approach for a dance with a t-gurl and try to grab one of us, we could live in the police station reporting young d*unken lads who grab bottoms to impress their mates lol yes its a serious subject like 78% of murder victims being men is!But you cant legislate for every aspect of life! There are laws already. Im old enough that gentlemen used to stand when a lady wanted a seat or theyd hold the door open... certain groups of women didnt want that, they wanted to drink pints, be boxers and piss in street, like men, which is fine, but guess what, men stopped being gentlemen! There is a balance in place, careful what you wish for. But going by your reasoning, why shouldn’t you stand for them? Why should they be gentlemen if you don’t want to be? You certainly aren’t looking through an equality lens Husband opened door for a woman. Women got angry. Called him names. Fast forward few weeks later same woman same store carrying packages Husband just watched her she got angry because he wouldn't open door. Lesson it was hilarious but is it really such a big deal with some people if a man is being a gentleman. Some people take "equality" to special limits. So who is in the wrong. He gets berated for being one then when same thing happens because it was convenient for her it's ok. as previously acknowledged there is criminal behavior that should be tackled but you are asking for the law to be weighted in favour of a particular group.that isnt equality! However, I want a trans law, youve already accused me of "just wearing a dress"! I could well be crammed full of female hormones for all you know... so how liberal was your comment? kettle pot! You just concentrate on one side of the equation, your side, hope you dont have any sons to be on the receiving end of what you seem to want. There are laws in place FOR ALL, if the judge fails to act on them the judge needs looking at not the law As many have pointed out the Law is currently skewed in favour of Men. I would like it equalised, why is that a bad thing to ask for? " Well it hopefully addresses the current problem of women being attacked, harassed snd hopefully brings perpetrators under the radar of the justice system earlier so their behaviour can be addressed before they do anything worse | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"most whores are women therefore all women are likely to become whores! most crimes are committed by men therefore all men are potential criminals! over 2500 dog bite attacks on post men/women, muzzle all dogs now.. do i need to go on? lol over simplifying any situation is frankly over simplifying it! ...so correct me if I’ve misunderstood. You think misogyny is not an issue? do i want to talk to you, is there any point? no one is dismissing crime against women BUT they shouldnt dismiss it against men either! or trans or... of course some men are out of order in how they behave, and some women and some trans and..... these people, are criminals and should be dealt with by the courts, for the crimes they commit. But I dont believe we should say the majority of whores are women so treat all women in a certain way, and i dont believe we should say the majority of sex offenders are men so treat all men in a certain way.... etc etc that is discrimination for starters and very likely counter productive thats my base line! Everytime i go on a night out some d*unken lad will approach for a dance with a t-gurl and try to grab one of us, we could live in the police station reporting young d*unken lads who grab bottoms to impress their mates lol yes its a serious subject like 78% of murder victims being men is!But you cant legislate for every aspect of life! There are laws already. Im old enough that gentlemen used to stand when a lady wanted a seat or theyd hold the door open... certain groups of women didnt want that, they wanted to drink pints, be boxers and piss in street, like men, which is fine, but guess what, men stopped being gentlemen! There is a balance in place, careful what you wish for. But going by your reasoning, why shouldn’t you stand for them? Why should they be gentlemen if you don’t want to be? You certainly aren’t looking through an equality lens Husband opened door for a woman. Women got angry. Called him names. Fast forward few weeks later same woman same store carrying packages Husband just watched her she got angry because he wouldn't open door. Lesson it was hilarious but is it really such a big deal with some people if a man is being a gentleman. Some people take "equality" to special limits. So who is in the wrong. He gets berated for being one then when same thing happens because it was convenient for her it's ok. as previously acknowledged there is criminal behavior that should be tackled but you are asking for the law to be weighted in favour of a particular group.that isnt equality! However, I want a trans law, youve already accused me of "just wearing a dress"! I could well be crammed full of female hormones for all you know... so how liberal was your comment? kettle pot! You just concentrate on one side of the equation, your side, hope you dont have any sons to be on the receiving end of what you seem to want. There are laws in place FOR ALL, if the judge fails to act on them the judge needs looking at not the law As many have pointed out the Law is currently skewed in favour of Men. I would like it equalised, why is that a bad thing to ask for? " as many have pointed out, it isnt! I see the law as equal, how is the law skewed in favour of men? Dont just give court cases, explain how its bias? the jury (if it goes that far) is made up of men & women who judge the facts or are they all bias to! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"most whores are women therefore all women are likely to become whores! most crimes are committed by men therefore all men are potential criminals! over 2500 dog bite attacks on post men/women, muzzle all dogs now.. do i need to go on? lol over simplifying any situation is frankly over simplifying it! ...so correct me if I’ve misunderstood. You think misogyny is not an issue? do i want to talk to you, is there any point? no one is dismissing crime against women BUT they shouldnt dismiss it against men either! or trans or... of course some men are out of order in how they behave, and some women and some trans and..... these people, are criminals and should be dealt with by the courts, for the crimes they commit. But I dont believe we should say the majority of whores are women so treat all women in a certain way, and i dont believe we should say the majority of sex offenders are men so treat all men in a certain way.... etc etc that is discrimination for starters and very likely counter productive thats my base line! Everytime i go on a night out some d*unken lad will approach for a dance with a t-gurl and try to grab one of us, we could live in the police station reporting young d*unken lads who grab bottoms to impress their mates lol yes its a serious subject like 78% of murder victims being men is!But you cant legislate for every aspect of life! There are laws already. Im old enough that gentlemen used to stand when a lady wanted a seat or theyd hold the door open... certain groups of women didnt want that, they wanted to drink pints, be boxers and piss in street, like men, which is fine, but guess what, men stopped being gentlemen! There is a balance in place, careful what you wish for. But going by your reasoning, why shouldn’t you stand for them? Why should they be gentlemen if you don’t want to be? You certainly aren’t looking through an equality lens Husband opened door for a woman. Women got angry. Called him names. Fast forward few weeks later same woman same store carrying packages Husband just watched her she got angry because he wouldn't open door. Lesson it was hilarious but is it really such a big deal with some people if a man is being a gentleman. Some people take "equality" to special limits. So who is in the wrong. He gets berated for being one then when same thing happens because it was convenient for her it's ok. as previously acknowledged there is criminal behavior that should be tackled but you are asking for the law to be weighted in favour of a particular group.that isnt equality! However, I want a trans law, youve already accused me of "just wearing a dress"! I could well be crammed full of female hormones for all you know... so how liberal was your comment? kettle pot! You just concentrate on one side of the equation, your side, hope you dont have any sons to be on the receiving end of what you seem to want. There are laws in place FOR ALL, if the judge fails to act on them the judge needs looking at not the law As many have pointed out the Law is currently skewed in favour of Men. I would like it equalised, why is that a bad thing to ask for? as many have pointed out, it isnt! I see the law as equal, how is the law skewed in favour of men? Dont just give court cases, explain how its bias? the jury (if it goes that far) is made up of men & women who judge the facts or are they all bias to! " Every single stat points to women being disadvantaged by the Law. The fact that you are blind to it doesn’t mean its not there. It just means you have a blindspot to it. You have shown zero evidence that I am wrong, you just deny it and say more men get murdered. 50% of the population are disadvantaged, attitudes like yours keep it that way. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"most whores are women therefore all women are likely to become whores! most crimes are committed by men therefore all men are potential criminals! over 2500 dog bite attacks on post men/women, muzzle all dogs now.. do i need to go on? lol over simplifying any situation is frankly over simplifying it! ...so correct me if I’ve misunderstood. You think misogyny is not an issue? do i want to talk to you, is there any point? no one is dismissing crime against women BUT they shouldnt dismiss it against men either! or trans or... of course some men are out of order in how they behave, and some women and some trans and..... these people, are criminals and should be dealt with by the courts, for the crimes they commit. But I dont believe we should say the majority of whores are women so treat all women in a certain way, and i dont believe we should say the majority of sex offenders are men so treat all men in a certain way.... etc etc that is discrimination for starters and very likely counter productive thats my base line! Everytime i go on a night out some d*unken lad will approach for a dance with a t-gurl and try to grab one of us, we could live in the police station reporting young d*unken lads who grab bottoms to impress their mates lol yes its a serious subject like 78% of murder victims being men is!But you cant legislate for every aspect of life! There are laws already. Im old enough that gentlemen used to stand when a lady wanted a seat or theyd hold the door open... certain groups of women didnt want that, they wanted to drink pints, be boxers and piss in street, like men, which is fine, but guess what, men stopped being gentlemen! There is a balance in place, careful what you wish for. But going by your reasoning, why shouldn’t you stand for them? Why should they be gentlemen if you don’t want to be? You certainly aren’t looking through an equality lens Husband opened door for a woman. Women got angry. Called him names. Fast forward few weeks later same woman same store carrying packages Husband just watched her she got angry because he wouldn't open door. Lesson it was hilarious but is it really such a big deal with some people if a man is being a gentleman. Some people take "equality" to special limits. So who is in the wrong. He gets berated for being one then when same thing happens because it was convenient for her it's ok. as previously acknowledged there is criminal behavior that should be tackled but you are asking for the law to be weighted in favour of a particular group.that isnt equality! However, I want a trans law, youve already accused me of "just wearing a dress"! I could well be crammed full of female hormones for all you know... so how liberal was your comment? kettle pot! You just concentrate on one side of the equation, your side, hope you dont have any sons to be on the receiving end of what you seem to want. There are laws in place FOR ALL, if the judge fails to act on them the judge needs looking at not the law As many have pointed out the Law is currently skewed in favour of Men. I would like it equalised, why is that a bad thing to ask for? as many have pointed out, it isnt! I see the law as equal, how is the law skewed in favour of men? Dont just give court cases, explain how its bias? the jury (if it goes that far) is made up of men & women who judge the facts or are they all bias to! Every single stat points to women being disadvantaged by the Law. The fact that you are blind to it doesn’t mean its not there. It just means you have a blindspot to it. You have shown zero evidence that I am wrong, you just deny it and say more men get murdered. 50% of the population are disadvantaged, attitudes like yours keep it that way." every single stat like the fact more men are murdered! So how are men safer? Explain? You cant! because they arent. How do the juries not reach the right decision in your view? male/females both present? cant answer that either can you. seems to me there are a group of people who just want to blame men for the worlds troubles and ignore all the other facts. 50% of the population will always be less capable in any situation! BUT they are all protected by the same laws. Personally i want the men on side and the women and the trans... i dont wish to go to war with them. Yes better street lighting, more police, encouraging people to come forward and speak out BUT not weighting the law in one direction. Basically you want to knobble the court procedure in favour of the outcomes you want! because women never lie! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Again you bring up ‘more men are murdered’ - it is true, by men! However, they also domestically abuse, sexually abuse, r*pe and murder women. R*pe and assault cases are high, but convictions are low and going down to 2.5%! If the law was applied equally, more men would be convicted. This is not a tirade against men, it is a factual representation of the world we live in. The law favours me. It needs to change. Currently it favours me - apparently, it is more important that a Police Officer isn’t sent to jail for assaulting a woman because he’d have a hard time! " so being murdered isnt as bad as being sexually assaulted? is that your point? you mention stats but then want to ignore the murder stats because if youre murdered by someone of the same gender it doesnt count? Can you see why i question your logic? yes there is a low rate of r*pe convictions BUT you are ASSUMING that means guilty men have gotten off, when perhaps they werent guilty! and the female involved was lying or.... but the jury weighed up the evidence (better than me or you can, we werent there) and decided that, a jury of men and women. But you say they are just wrong coz the percentage rate isnt high enough! So again I struggle to see the flaw in the procedure. Convictions for many crimes are not good | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Again you bring up ‘more men are murdered’ - it is true, by men! However, they also domestically abuse, sexually abuse, r*pe and murder women. R*pe and assault cases are high, but convictions are low and going down to 2.5%! If the law was applied equally, more men would be convicted. This is not a tirade against men, it is a factual representation of the world we live in. The law favours me. It needs to change. Currently it favours me - apparently, it is more important that a Police Officer isn’t sent to jail for assaulting a woman because he’d have a hard time! so being murdered isnt as bad as being sexually assaulted? is that your point? you mention stats but then want to ignore the murder stats because if youre murdered by someone of the same gender it doesnt count? Can you see why i question your logic? yes there is a low rate of r*pe convictions BUT you are ASSUMING that means guilty men have gotten off, when perhaps they werent guilty! and the female involved was lying or.... but the jury weighed up the evidence (better than me or you can, we werent there) and decided that, a jury of men and women. But you say they are just wrong coz the percentage rate isnt high enough! So again I struggle to see the flaw in the procedure. Convictions for many crimes are not good " So you think that men are the victime here? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Again you bring up ‘more men are murdered’ - it is true, by men! However, they also domestically abuse, sexually abuse, r*pe and murder women. R*pe and assault cases are high, but convictions are low and going down to 2.5%! If the law was applied equally, more men would be convicted. This is not a tirade against men, it is a factual representation of the world we live in. The law favours me. It needs to change. Currently it favours me - apparently, it is more important that a Police Officer isn’t sent to jail for assaulting a woman because he’d have a hard time! so being murdered isnt as bad as being sexually assaulted? is that your point? you mention stats but then want to ignore the murder stats because if youre murdered by someone of the same gender it doesnt count? Can you see why i question your logic? yes there is a low rate of r*pe convictions BUT you are ASSUMING that means guilty men have gotten off, when perhaps they werent guilty! and the female involved was lying or.... but the jury weighed up the evidence (better than me or you can, we werent there) and decided that, a jury of men and women. But you say they are just wrong coz the percentage rate isnt high enough! So again I struggle to see the flaw in the procedure. Convictions for many crimes are not good So you think that men are the victime here?" there you go again, no, i think the victims of crime are the victims! the victim might be male/female/a dog/a cat.... they are a victim, its YOU that wants to identify victims by gender, ignoring a good percentage of people who dont identify male/female. The same can be said of criminals, also less females are sent to prison, is that fair? dogs get an automatic death sentence!... cats always get off! Its easy to make statistics work in that way. I could argue straight people commit more crime than trans therefore straights are the problem.... the stats would back me up! I suggest you think about your own blind spots because laws have to protect everyone and not show bias | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |