"Apparently would mean you get a longer sentence for damaging a statue than the starting point for r###
Labour have now decided to vote against it.
"
Statues are part of our glorious heritage and are important.
I will donate money for a statue of myself in my will. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The bill was drafted long befor this weekend so could not possibly include the current situation,starmer is not showing any common sense more damage to Labour"
"the new bill the way the bill is drafted has raised concerns about sweeping and vague wording, with the main focus of criticism being the criminalisation of making “noise” and causing “serious annoyance”. "
So if in the opinion of a policeperson, you are being noisy in your protesting, then they can lift you.
"The bill gives the police the power to impose conditions on “processions” and public assemblies if “the noise generated by persons taking part ... may result in serious disruption to the activities of an organisation which are carried out in the vicinity”.
"It also widens the definition of a “public nuisance”, which is an offence if caused “intentionally or recklessly”, to include acts or omissions which cause someone to suffer “serious annoyance, serious inconvenience or serious loss of amenity”. The penalty for this offence includes jail sentences of up to 10 years."
sweepimg or what? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"home secretary Pretty Repellent appears to have just cut'n'pasted this crap from Hong Kong's new national security legislation. how very stalinist of the tory party."
For which we extended an open invite to 3 million people to escape said legislation. They're in for a surprise when they arrive! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The bill was drafted long befor this weekend so could not possibly include the current situation,starmer is not showing any common sense more damage to Labour
"the new bill the way the bill is drafted has raised concerns about sweeping and vague wording, with the main focus of criticism being the criminalisation of making “noise” and causing “serious annoyance”. "
So if in the opinion of a policeperson, you are being noisy in your protesting, then they can lift you.
"The bill gives the police the power to impose conditions on “processions” and public assemblies if “the noise generated by persons taking part ... may result in serious disruption to the activities of an organisation which are carried out in the vicinity”.
"It also widens the definition of a “public nuisance”, which is an offence if caused “intentionally or recklessly”, to include acts or omissions which cause someone to suffer “serious annoyance, serious inconvenience or serious loss of amenity”. The penalty for this offence includes jail sentences of up to 10 years."
sweepimg or what?"
Think Boris has finally got sick of Steve Bray yelling Stoooooooop Brexit! outside Parliament. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The trouble with Labour voters is that they just won't vote their party into power and take the responsibly of leadership."
You are aware Tony Blair won 3 elections,?
A repressive legislation is brought in by the tories and it's still labours fault
Absolute genius. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The trouble with Labour voters is that they just won't vote their party into power and take the responsibly of leadership.
You are aware Tony Blair won 3 elections,?
A repressive legislation is brought in by the tories and it's still labours fault
Absolute genius."
Wow. Three? lmao. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Whilst the gmnt are making noises about protecting women..the new bill contains sections on protecting monuments.a section on protecting parliament.. just trying to find the section on protecting women..sure it's in there somewhere.. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
