FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Farage supporters unwillingness to get vaccinated
Farage supporters unwillingness to get vaccinated
Jump to: Newest in thread
Hardly a shock is it. Almost half of them don't want vaccine.
https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/news/farage-supporters-least-likely-to-get-covid-vaccine-among-voters-222265/?utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&utm_campaign=sfeu |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Getting desperate now. Article doesn't even say sample size lol. We discuss credibility issues quite frequently."
The article does mention the sample size. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Getting desperate now. Article doesn't even say sample size lol. We discuss credibility issues quite frequently.
The article does mention the sample size."
We discuss credibility issues, says the poster who thinks on the back of a newspaper article Germany wants to join the British empire  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Strongly dislike London Economic reporting style.
So here is a link to the news published by University of Oxford
https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2021-02-24-major-rise-public-support-covid-vaccine-oxford-study
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Getting desperate now. Article doesn't even say sample size lol. We discuss credibility issues quite frequently.
The article does mention the sample size.
We discuss credibility issues, says the poster who thinks on the back of a newspaper article Germany wants to join the British empire "
It doesn't say sample size, have another read.
For those at the back
It says 1600 total. It then says for example the SNP figure is 100%. Which strongly suggests they only asked 1 or 2 SNP voters.
And so on. No indication of how many people of each party were asked. Statistically absolutely meaningless, disgraceful journalism that preys on the vulnerable. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Getting desperate now. Article doesn't even say sample size lol. We discuss credibility issues quite frequently.
The article does mention the sample size.
We discuss credibility issues, says the poster who thinks on the back of a newspaper article Germany wants to join the British empire
It doesn't say sample size, have another read.
For those at the back
It says 1600 total. It then says for example the SNP figure is 100%. Which strongly suggests they only asked 1 or 2 SNP voters.
And so on. No indication of how many people of each party were asked. Statistically absolutely meaningless, disgraceful journalism that preys on the vulnerable. "
"The study was conducted on a sample of 1,600 UK adults – excluding Northern Ireland – with more than 1,200 respondents in a two-wave survey in October and February."
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Hardly a shock is it. Almost half of them don't want vaccine.
https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/news/farage-supporters-least-likely-to-get-covid-vaccine-among-voters-222265/?utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&utm_campaign=sfeu"
Shrugs. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Getting desperate now. Article doesn't even say sample size lol. We discuss credibility issues quite frequently.
The article does mention the sample size.
We discuss credibility issues, says the poster who thinks on the back of a newspaper article Germany wants to join the British empire
It doesn't say sample size, have another read.
For those at the back
It says 1600 total. It then says for example the SNP figure is 100%. Which strongly suggests they only asked 1 or 2 SNP voters.
And so on. No indication of how many people of each party were asked. Statistically absolutely meaningless, disgraceful journalism that preys on the vulnerable.
"The study was conducted on a sample of 1,600 UK adults – excluding Northern Ireland – with more than 1,200 respondents in a two-wave survey in October and February."
"
So if they asked 1597 labour supporters and only 3 Farage supporters you'd have full confidence in the accuracy of the story?
A newspaper for the credulous.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I’m surprised they got that many people to admit being a Farage supporter. "
His new party is based on an anti-science platform. So it makes sense.
It's kind of non-news really. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Getting desperate now. Article doesn't even say sample size lol. We discuss credibility issues quite frequently.
The article does mention the sample size.
We discuss credibility issues, says the poster who thinks on the back of a newspaper article Germany wants to join the British empire
It doesn't say sample size, have another read.
For those at the back
It says 1600 total. It then says for example the SNP figure is 100%. Which strongly suggests they only asked 1 or 2 SNP voters.
And so on. No indication of how many people of each party were asked. Statistically absolutely meaningless, disgraceful journalism that preys on the vulnerable.
"The study was conducted on a sample of 1,600 UK adults – excluding Northern Ireland – with more than 1,200 respondents in a two-wave survey in October and February."
So if they asked 1597 labour supporters and only 3 Farage supporters you'd have full confidence in the accuracy of the story?
A newspaper for the credulous. "
Says the poster who thinks Germany wants to join the British empire on the back of a newspaper article |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Getting desperate now. Article doesn't even say sample size lol. We discuss credibility issues quite frequently.
The article does mention the sample size.
We discuss credibility issues, says the poster who thinks on the back of a newspaper article Germany wants to join the British empire
It doesn't say sample size, have another read.
For those at the back
It says 1600 total. It then says for example the SNP figure is 100%. Which strongly suggests they only asked 1 or 2 SNP voters.
And so on. No indication of how many people of each party were asked. Statistically absolutely meaningless, disgraceful journalism that preys on the vulnerable.
"The study was conducted on a sample of 1,600 UK adults – excluding Northern Ireland – with more than 1,200 respondents in a two-wave survey in October and February."
So if they asked 1597 labour supporters and only 3 Farage supporters you'd have full confidence in the accuracy of the story?
A newspaper for the credulous.
Says the poster who thinks Germany wants to join the British empire on the back of a newspaper article "
And I accept that bizarrely not everyone agrees with my opinions on fab politics.
But your thread is referencing a completely spurious incorrectly conducted poll. That's not a matter of opinion. Its a fact. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Getting desperate now. Article doesn't even say sample size lol. We discuss credibility issues quite frequently.
The article does mention the sample size.
We discuss credibility issues, says the poster who thinks on the back of a newspaper article Germany wants to join the British empire
It doesn't say sample size, have another read.
For those at the back
It says 1600 total. It then says for example the SNP figure is 100%. Which strongly suggests they only asked 1 or 2 SNP voters.
And so on. No indication of how many people of each party were asked. Statistically absolutely meaningless, disgraceful journalism that preys on the vulnerable.
"The study was conducted on a sample of 1,600 UK adults – excluding Northern Ireland – with more than 1,200 respondents in a two-wave survey in October and February."
So if they asked 1597 labour supporters and only 3 Farage supporters you'd have full confidence in the accuracy of the story?
A newspaper for the credulous.
Says the poster who thinks Germany wants to join the British empire on the back of a newspaper article
And I accept that bizarrely not everyone agrees with my opinions on fab politics.
But your thread is referencing a completely spurious incorrectly conducted poll. That's not a matter of opinion. Its a fact. "
No, it's your opinion, as without access to the full data set you can't prove your theories.
You also can't prove that the data was incorrectly conducted.
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *andy 1Couple
over a year ago
northeast |
"Getting desperate now. Article doesn't even say sample size lol. We discuss credibility issues quite frequently.
The article does mention the sample size.
We discuss credibility issues, says the poster who thinks on the back of a newspaper article Germany wants to join the British empire
It doesn't say sample size, have another read.
For those at the back
It says 1600 total. It then says for example the SNP figure is 100%. Which strongly suggests they only asked 1 or 2 SNP voters.
And so on. No indication of how many people of each party were asked. Statistically absolutely meaningless, disgraceful journalism that preys on the vulnerable.
"The study was conducted on a sample of 1,600 UK adults – excluding Northern Ireland – with more than 1,200 respondents in a two-wave survey in October and February."
So if they asked 1597 labour supporters and only 3 Farage supporters you'd have full confidence in the accuracy of the story?
A newspaper for the credulous. "
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Getting desperate now. Article doesn't even say sample size lol. We discuss credibility issues quite frequently.
The article does mention the sample size.
We discuss credibility issues, says the poster who thinks on the back of a newspaper article Germany wants to join the British empire
It doesn't say sample size, have another read.
For those at the back
It says 1600 total. It then says for example the SNP figure is 100%. Which strongly suggests they only asked 1 or 2 SNP voters.
And so on. No indication of how many people of each party were asked. Statistically absolutely meaningless, disgraceful journalism that preys on the vulnerable.
"The study was conducted on a sample of 1,600 UK adults – excluding Northern Ireland – with more than 1,200 respondents in a two-wave survey in October and February."
So if they asked 1597 labour supporters and only 3 Farage supporters you'd have full confidence in the accuracy of the story?
A newspaper for the credulous.
Says the poster who thinks Germany wants to join the British empire on the back of a newspaper article
And I accept that bizarrely not everyone agrees with my opinions on fab politics.
But your thread is referencing a completely spurious incorrectly conducted poll. That's not a matter of opinion. Its a fact. "
Sutely if you support an anti lockdown party..you are more likely to be vaccine sceptic? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Getting desperate now. Article doesn't even say sample size lol. We discuss credibility issues quite frequently.
The article does mention the sample size.
We discuss credibility issues, says the poster who thinks on the back of a newspaper article Germany wants to join the British empire
It doesn't say sample size, have another read.
For those at the back
It says 1600 total. It then says for example the SNP figure is 100%. Which strongly suggests they only asked 1 or 2 SNP voters.
And so on. No indication of how many people of each party were asked. Statistically absolutely meaningless, disgraceful journalism that preys on the vulnerable.
"The study was conducted on a sample of 1,600 UK adults – excluding Northern Ireland – with more than 1,200 respondents in a two-wave survey in October and February."
So if they asked 1597 labour supporters and only 3 Farage supporters you'd have full confidence in the accuracy of the story?
A newspaper for the credulous.
Says the poster who thinks Germany wants to join the British empire on the back of a newspaper article
And I accept that bizarrely not everyone agrees with my opinions on fab politics.
But your thread is referencing a completely spurious incorrectly conducted poll. That's not a matter of opinion. Its a fact.
Sutely if you support an anti lockdown party..you are more likely to be vaccine sceptic?"
Ah I see now, so it's actually a thread about prejudice lol
I don't need to remind everyone what Sir Peter Ustinov said to me. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Getting desperate now. Article doesn't even say sample size lol. We discuss credibility issues quite frequently.
The article does mention the sample size.
We discuss credibility issues, says the poster who thinks on the back of a newspaper article Germany wants to join the British empire
It doesn't say sample size, have another read.
For those at the back
It says 1600 total. It then says for example the SNP figure is 100%. Which strongly suggests they only asked 1 or 2 SNP voters.
And so on. No indication of how many people of each party were asked. Statistically absolutely meaningless, disgraceful journalism that preys on the vulnerable.
"The study was conducted on a sample of 1,600 UK adults – excluding Northern Ireland – with more than 1,200 respondents in a two-wave survey in October and February."
So if they asked 1597 labour supporters and only 3 Farage supporters you'd have full confidence in the accuracy of the story?
A newspaper for the credulous.
Says the poster who thinks Germany wants to join the British empire on the back of a newspaper article
And I accept that bizarrely not everyone agrees with my opinions on fab politics.
But your thread is referencing a completely spurious incorrectly conducted poll. That's not a matter of opinion. Its a fact.
Sutely if you support an anti lockdown party..you are more likely to be vaccine sceptic?
Ah I see now, so it's actually a thread about prejudice lol
I don't need to remind everyone what Sir Peter Ustinov said to me. "
Prejudice about what? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Getting desperate now. Article doesn't even say sample size lol. We discuss credibility issues quite frequently.
The article does mention the sample size.
We discuss credibility issues, says the poster who thinks on the back of a newspaper article Germany wants to join the British empire
It doesn't say sample size, have another read.
For those at the back
It says 1600 total. It then says for example the SNP figure is 100%. Which strongly suggests they only asked 1 or 2 SNP voters.
And so on. No indication of how many people of each party were asked. Statistically absolutely meaningless, disgraceful journalism that preys on the vulnerable.
"The study was conducted on a sample of 1,600 UK adults – excluding Northern Ireland – with more than 1,200 respondents in a two-wave survey in October and February."
So if they asked 1597 labour supporters and only 3 Farage supporters you'd have full confidence in the accuracy of the story?
A newspaper for the credulous.
Says the poster who thinks Germany wants to join the British empire on the back of a newspaper article
And I accept that bizarrely not everyone agrees with my opinions on fab politics.
But your thread is referencing a completely spurious incorrectly conducted poll. That's not a matter of opinion. Its a fact.
No, it's your opinion, as without access to the full data set you can't prove your theories.
You also can't prove that the data was incorrectly conducted.
"
Utterly bonkers, it's for the newspaper to show that they've conducted the poll fairly. That's how it works. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Getting desperate now. Article doesn't even say sample size lol. We discuss credibility issues quite frequently.
The article does mention the sample size.
We discuss credibility issues, says the poster who thinks on the back of a newspaper article Germany wants to join the British empire
It doesn't say sample size, have another read.
For those at the back
It says 1600 total. It then says for example the SNP figure is 100%. Which strongly suggests they only asked 1 or 2 SNP voters.
And so on. No indication of how many people of each party were asked. Statistically absolutely meaningless, disgraceful journalism that preys on the vulnerable.
"The study was conducted on a sample of 1,600 UK adults – excluding Northern Ireland – with more than 1,200 respondents in a two-wave survey in October and February."
So if they asked 1597 labour supporters and only 3 Farage supporters you'd have full confidence in the accuracy of the story?
A newspaper for the credulous.
Says the poster who thinks Germany wants to join the British empire on the back of a newspaper article
And I accept that bizarrely not everyone agrees with my opinions on fab politics.
But your thread is referencing a completely spurious incorrectly conducted poll. That's not a matter of opinion. Its a fact.
Sutely if you support an anti lockdown party..you are more likely to be vaccine sceptic?"
The most scary thing is the science and scientists are dismissed
"We've had enough of experts" |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"What's the point of starting a lock down partt,when we are coming out of lockdown anyway?
Tosspot."
You'd have to ask his financial backers. Do we know if they're the same that bankrolled him at ukip for so long?
I guess this will come out at some point though. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Getting desperate now. Article doesn't even say sample size lol. We discuss credibility issues quite frequently.
The article does mention the sample size.
We discuss credibility issues, says the poster who thinks on the back of a newspaper article Germany wants to join the British empire
It doesn't say sample size, have another read.
For those at the back
It says 1600 total. It then says for example the SNP figure is 100%. Which strongly suggests they only asked 1 or 2 SNP voters.
And so on. No indication of how many people of each party were asked. Statistically absolutely meaningless, disgraceful journalism that preys on the vulnerable.
"The study was conducted on a sample of 1,600 UK adults – excluding Northern Ireland – with more than 1,200 respondents in a two-wave survey in October and February."
So if they asked 1597 labour supporters and only 3 Farage supporters you'd have full confidence in the accuracy of the story?
A newspaper for the credulous.
Says the poster who thinks Germany wants to join the British empire on the back of a newspaper article
And I accept that bizarrely not everyone agrees with my opinions on fab politics.
But your thread is referencing a completely spurious incorrectly conducted poll. That's not a matter of opinion. Its a fact.
No, it's your opinion, as without access to the full data set you can't prove your theories.
You also can't prove that the data was incorrectly conducted.
Utterly bonkers, it's for the newspaper to show that they've conducted the poll fairly. That's how it works. "
No "bonkers" is claiming that Germany wants to join the British empire on the back of a newspaper article. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Getting desperate now. Article doesn't even say sample size lol. We discuss credibility issues quite frequently.
The article does mention the sample size.
We discuss credibility issues, says the poster who thinks on the back of a newspaper article Germany wants to join the British empire
It doesn't say sample size, have another read.
For those at the back
It says 1600 total. It then says for example the SNP figure is 100%. Which strongly suggests they only asked 1 or 2 SNP voters.
And so on. No indication of how many people of each party were asked. Statistically absolutely meaningless, disgraceful journalism that preys on the vulnerable.
"The study was conducted on a sample of 1,600 UK adults – excluding Northern Ireland – with more than 1,200 respondents in a two-wave survey in October and February."
So if they asked 1597 labour supporters and only 3 Farage supporters you'd have full confidence in the accuracy of the story?
A newspaper for the credulous.
Says the poster who thinks Germany wants to join the British empire on the back of a newspaper article
And I accept that bizarrely not everyone agrees with my opinions on fab politics.
But your thread is referencing a completely spurious incorrectly conducted poll. That's not a matter of opinion. Its a fact.
Sutely if you support an anti lockdown party..you are more likely to be vaccine sceptic?
Ah I see now, so it's actually a thread about prejudice lol
I don't need to remind everyone what Sir Peter Ustinov said to me.
Prejudice about what?"
Prejudice about what Farage and his supporters believe.
I have no interest in Farages party, but you can't just go around making up polls, it's just not on. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Getting desperate now. Article doesn't even say sample size lol. We discuss credibility issues quite frequently.
The article does mention the sample size.
We discuss credibility issues, says the poster who thinks on the back of a newspaper article Germany wants to join the British empire
It doesn't say sample size, have another read.
For those at the back
It says 1600 total. It then says for example the SNP figure is 100%. Which strongly suggests they only asked 1 or 2 SNP voters.
And so on. No indication of how many people of each party were asked. Statistically absolutely meaningless, disgraceful journalism that preys on the vulnerable.
"The study was conducted on a sample of 1,600 UK adults – excluding Northern Ireland – with more than 1,200 respondents in a two-wave survey in October and February."
So if they asked 1597 labour supporters and only 3 Farage supporters you'd have full confidence in the accuracy of the story?
A newspaper for the credulous.
Says the poster who thinks Germany wants to join the British empire on the back of a newspaper article
And I accept that bizarrely not everyone agrees with my opinions on fab politics.
But your thread is referencing a completely spurious incorrectly conducted poll. That's not a matter of opinion. Its a fact.
Sutely if you support an anti lockdown party..you are more likely to be vaccine sceptic?
Ah I see now, so it's actually a thread about prejudice lol
I don't need to remind everyone what Sir Peter Ustinov said to me.
Prejudice about what?
Prejudice about what Farage and his supporters believe.
I have no interest in Farages party, but you can't just go around making up polls, it's just not on. "
What does Farage and his supporters believe?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Getting desperate now. Article doesn't even say sample size lol. We discuss credibility issues quite frequently.
The article does mention the sample size.
We discuss credibility issues, says the poster who thinks on the back of a newspaper article Germany wants to join the British empire
It doesn't say sample size, have another read.
For those at the back
It says 1600 total. It then says for example the SNP figure is 100%. Which strongly suggests they only asked 1 or 2 SNP voters.
And so on. No indication of how many people of each party were asked. Statistically absolutely meaningless, disgraceful journalism that preys on the vulnerable.
"The study was conducted on a sample of 1,600 UK adults – excluding Northern Ireland – with more than 1,200 respondents in a two-wave survey in October and February."
So if they asked 1597 labour supporters and only 3 Farage supporters you'd have full confidence in the accuracy of the story?
A newspaper for the credulous.
Says the poster who thinks Germany wants to join the British empire on the back of a newspaper article
And I accept that bizarrely not everyone agrees with my opinions on fab politics.
But your thread is referencing a completely spurious incorrectly conducted poll. That's not a matter of opinion. Its a fact.
Sutely if you support an anti lockdown party..you are more likely to be vaccine sceptic?
Ah I see now, so it's actually a thread about prejudice lol
I don't need to remind everyone what Sir Peter Ustinov said to me.
Prejudice about what?
Prejudice about what Farage and his supporters believe.
I have no interest in Farages party, but you can't just go around making up polls, it's just not on.
What does Farage and his supporters believe?
"
Two different things. Farage believes in doing whatever he gets paid to do.
His supporters, fuck knows. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I'm presuming he is going to have other things in his new parties manifesto?
Be interesting to see his immigration policy.
I'm presuming he still goes down to the coast with his binoculars to grass up any fleeing refugees. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Getting desperate now. Article doesn't even say sample size lol. We discuss credibility issues quite frequently.
The article does mention the sample size.
We discuss credibility issues, says the poster who thinks on the back of a newspaper article Germany wants to join the British empire
It doesn't say sample size, have another read.
For those at the back
It says 1600 total. It then says for example the SNP figure is 100%. Which strongly suggests they only asked 1 or 2 SNP voters.
And so on. No indication of how many people of each party were asked. Statistically absolutely meaningless, disgraceful journalism that preys on the vulnerable.
"The study was conducted on a sample of 1,600 UK adults – excluding Northern Ireland – with more than 1,200 respondents in a two-wave survey in October and February."
So if they asked 1597 labour supporters and only 3 Farage supporters you'd have full confidence in the accuracy of the story?
A newspaper for the credulous.
Says the poster who thinks Germany wants to join the British empire on the back of a newspaper article
And I accept that bizarrely not everyone agrees with my opinions on fab politics.
But your thread is referencing a completely spurious incorrectly conducted poll. That's not a matter of opinion. Its a fact.
Sutely if you support an anti lockdown party..you are more likely to be vaccine sceptic?
Ah I see now, so it's actually a thread about prejudice lol
I don't need to remind everyone what Sir Peter Ustinov said to me.
Prejudice about what?
Prejudice about what Farage and his supporters believe.
I have no interest in Farages party, but you can't just go around making up polls, it's just not on. "
So the poll is now "made up"
Just wow. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'm presuming he is going to have other things in his new parties manifesto?
Be interesting to see his immigration policy.
I'm presuming he still goes down to the coast with his binoculars to grass up any fleeing refugees. "
The reform party website is extremely light on any details.
Plenty of opportunities to donate though. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ackal1Couple
over a year ago
Manchester |
"Getting desperate now. Article doesn't even say sample size lol. We discuss credibility issues quite frequently.
The article does mention the sample size.
We discuss credibility issues, says the poster who thinks on the back of a newspaper article Germany wants to join the British empire
It doesn't say sample size, have another read.
For those at the back
It says 1600 total. It then says for example the SNP figure is 100%. Which strongly suggests they only asked 1 or 2 SNP voters.
And so on. No indication of how many people of each party were asked. Statistically absolutely meaningless, disgraceful journalism that preys on the vulnerable.
"The study was conducted on a sample of 1,600 UK adults – excluding Northern Ireland – with more than 1,200 respondents in a two-wave survey in October and February."
So if they asked 1597 labour supporters and only 3 Farage supporters you'd have full confidence in the accuracy of the story?
A newspaper for the credulous.
Says the poster who thinks Germany wants to join the British empire on the back of a newspaper article
And I accept that bizarrely not everyone agrees with my opinions on fab politics.
But your thread is referencing a completely spurious incorrectly conducted poll. That's not a matter of opinion. Its a fact.
Sutely if you support an anti lockdown party..you are more likely to be vaccine sceptic?
Ah I see now, so it's actually a thread about prejudice lol
I don't need to remind everyone what Sir Peter Ustinov said to me.
Prejudice about what?
Prejudice about what Farage and his supporters believe.
I have no interest in Farages party, but you can't just go around making up polls, it's just not on. "
Chris you are funny I’ll give you that and your creative imagined news post skills are impressive. (Genuine compliment)
But you can’t accuse people of making up facts when your posts are littered with made up numbers!
Be fair. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I'm presuming he is going to have other things in his new parties manifesto?
Be interesting to see his immigration policy.
I'm presuming he still goes down to the coast with his binoculars to grass up any fleeing refugees.
The reform party website is extremely light on any details.
Plenty of opportunities to donate though. "
The reform party and GB news
What times we live in. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ovebjsMan
over a year ago
Bristol |
"Hardly a shock is it. Almost half of them don't want vaccine.
https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/news/farage-supporters-least-likely-to-get-covid-vaccine-among-voters-222265/?utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&utm_campaign=sfeu"
What absolute crap!!! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I'm presuming he is going to have other things in his new parties manifesto?
Be interesting to see his immigration policy.
I'm presuming he still goes down to the coast with his binoculars to grass up any fleeing refugees.
The reform party website is extremely light on any details.
Plenty of opportunities to donate though.
The reform party and GB news
What times we live in."
If you want a real giggle have a look a Laurence Fox twitter feede  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I'm presuming he is going to have other things in his new parties manifesto?
Be interesting to see his immigration policy.
I'm presuming he still goes down to the coast with his binoculars to grass up any fleeing refugees.
The reform party website is extremely light on any details.
Plenty of opportunities to donate though.
The reform party and GB news
What times we live in.
If you want a real giggle have a look a Laurence Fox twitter feede "
I didn't realise he used to be married too Billie piper
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I'm presuming he is going to have other things in his new parties manifesto?
Be interesting to see his immigration policy.
I'm presuming he still goes down to the coast with his binoculars to grass up any fleeing refugees.
The reform party website is extremely light on any details.
Plenty of opportunities to donate though.
The reform party and GB news
What times we live in.
If you want a real giggle have a look a Laurence Fox twitter feede
I didn't realise he used to be married too Billie piper
"
Neither did I  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'm presuming he is going to have other things in his new parties manifesto?
Be interesting to see his immigration policy.
I'm presuming he still goes down to the coast with his binoculars to grass up any fleeing refugees.
The reform party website is extremely light on any details.
Plenty of opportunities to donate though.
The reform party and GB news
What times we live in.
If you want a real giggle have a look a Laurence Fox twitter feede "
He's the guy who was going to start a new political party because none of the existing were racist enough? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"well they never asked me if i supported nigel or if i refused vaccine, did they ask anyone else on here? lol 
I think we’ve established they asked less than 3 people "
Untrue. Please try and stick to facts. You've damaged your credibility enough for one day. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Getting desperate now. Article doesn't even say sample size lol. We discuss credibility issues quite frequently.
The article does mention the sample size.
We discuss credibility issues, says the poster who thinks on the back of a newspaper article Germany wants to join the British empire "
there ain’t no empire lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Getting desperate now. Article doesn't even say sample size lol. We discuss credibility issues quite frequently.
The article does mention the sample size.
We discuss credibility issues, says the poster who thinks on the back of a newspaper article Germany wants to join the British empire there ain’t no empire lol"
Sshhh some people are very sensitive about that area  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Getting desperate now. Article doesn't even say sample size lol. We discuss credibility issues quite frequently.
The article does mention the sample size.
We discuss credibility issues, says the poster who thinks on the back of a newspaper article Germany wants to join the British empire there ain’t no empire lol
Sshhh some people are very sensitive about that area "
it’s just wank fodder for remainers bit like the lobster shite but I guess yas need sumit tho lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *obka3Couple
over a year ago
bournemouth |
"I'm presuming he is going to have other things in his new parties manifesto?
Be interesting to see his immigration policy.
I'm presuming he still goes down to the coast with his binoculars to grass up any fleeing refugees. "
Wow are the french now fleeing the EU and claiming refugee status in the UK as the FIRST safe country they arrive in ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ostafunMan
over a year ago
near ipswich |
"I'm presuming he is going to have other things in his new parties manifesto?
Be interesting to see his immigration policy.
I'm presuming he still goes down to the coast with his binoculars to grass up any fleeing refugees.
Wow are the french now fleeing the EU and claiming refugee status in the UK as the FIRST safe country they arrive in ? "
pmsl |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I'm presuming he is going to have other things in his new parties manifesto?
Be interesting to see his immigration policy.
I'm presuming he still goes down to the coast with his binoculars to grass up any fleeing refugees.
Wow are the french now fleeing the EU and claiming refugee status in the UK as the FIRST safe country they arrive in ? "
Why was it the French who were arriving here? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *obka3Couple
over a year ago
bournemouth |
"I'm presuming he is going to have other things in his new parties manifesto?
Be interesting to see his immigration policy.
I'm presuming he still goes down to the coast with his binoculars to grass up any fleeing refugees.
Wow are the french now fleeing the EU and claiming refugee status in the UK as the FIRST safe country they arrive in ?
Why was it the French who were arriving here?"
Because as you well know refugees have you claim asylum in the first safe country they come to, therefore those crossing the channel are not refugees but economic migrants aka illegal immigrants |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I'm presuming he is going to have other things in his new parties manifesto?
Be interesting to see his immigration policy.
I'm presuming he still goes down to the coast with his binoculars to grass up any fleeing refugees.
Wow are the french now fleeing the EU and claiming refugee status in the UK as the FIRST safe country they arrive in ?
Why was it the French who were arriving here?
Because as you well know refugees have you claim asylum in the first safe country they come to, therefore those crossing the channel are not refugees but economic migrants aka illegal immigrants "
Ahh ok
So Farage is doing Sterling work? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I'm presuming he is going to have other things in his new parties manifesto?
Be interesting to see his immigration policy.
I'm presuming he still goes down to the coast with his binoculars to grass up any fleeing refugees.
Wow are the french now fleeing the EU and claiming refugee status in the UK as the FIRST safe country they arrive in ?
Why was it the French who were arriving here?
Because as you well know refugees have you claim asylum in the first safe country they come to, therefore those crossing the channel are not refugees but economic migrants aka illegal immigrants
Ahh ok
So Farage is doing Sterling work?"
Is he?
Sorry caught a dose of pointless comment itus and there's no vaccine aaahhhhh |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *atEvolutionCouple
over a year ago
atlantisEVOLUTION Swingers Club. Stoke |
Only 2% of the vote was for the Brexit Party.
43.6% was for the Conservative Party.
So actually At least 42% of these were Brexit voters.
So by definition those whose voted Conservative didn't vote for the Brexit Party.
By extrapolation of your argument that would mean that all (or at least half) of those voters would be against the vaccine as well. And we all know that's a lot of Rollox. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Only 2% of the vote was for the Brexit Party.
43.6% was for the Conservative Party.
So actually At least 42% of these were Brexit voters.
So by definition those whose voted Conservative didn't vote for the Brexit Party.
By extrapolation of your argument that would mean that all (or at least half) of those voters would be against the vaccine as well. And we all know that's a lot of Rollox."
And his new party hasn't even stood for election so by definition doesn't have any voters at all.
Nonsense thread really. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Only 2% of the vote was for the Brexit Party.
43.6% was for the Conservative Party.
So actually At least 42% of these were Brexit voters.
So by definition those whose voted Conservative didn't vote for the Brexit Party.
By extrapolation of your argument that would mean that all (or at least half) of those voters would be against the vaccine as well. And we all know that's a lot of Rollox.
And his new party hasn't even stood for election so by definition doesn't have any voters at all.
Nonsense thread really. "
It refers to voting intentions.
Can I suggest that if you are going to try and pull an article apart you read it first.
You did the same thing with sample size.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Only 2% of the vote was for the Brexit Party.
43.6% was for the Conservative Party.
So actually At least 42% of these were Brexit voters.
So by definition those whose voted Conservative didn't vote for the Brexit Party.
By extrapolation of your argument that would mean that all (or at least half) of those voters would be against the vaccine as well. And we all know that's a lot of Rollox.
And his new party hasn't even stood for election so by definition doesn't have any voters at all.
Nonsense thread really.
It refers to voting intentions.
Can I suggest that if you are going to try and pull an article apart you read it first.
You did the same thing with sample size.
"
Did you really think I wouldnt double check that claim lol:
"The research pointed to strong relationships between political attitudes and your willingness to get a vaccine – with whether you voted Leave or Remain appearing to relate strongly to vaccine acceptance.
Remain voters were around seven per cent more willing to take the jab compared to those who voted Leave or did not vote in the EU referendum in 2016."
Even the blooming title refers to how people voted, not their voting intentions....
Laughable. You have to get up pretty early to catch me out, I'm kind of a big deal on this forum. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Only 2% of the vote was for the Brexit Party.
43.6% was for the Conservative Party.
So actually At least 42% of these were Brexit voters.
So by definition those whose voted Conservative didn't vote for the Brexit Party.
By extrapolation of your argument that would mean that all (or at least half) of those voters would be against the vaccine as well. And we all know that's a lot of Rollox.
And his new party hasn't even stood for election so by definition doesn't have any voters at all.
Nonsense thread really.
It refers to voting intentions.
Can I suggest that if you are going to try and pull an article apart you read it first.
You did the same thing with sample size.
Did you really think I wouldnt double check that claim lol:
"The research pointed to strong relationships between political attitudes and your willingness to get a vaccine – with whether you voted Leave or Remain appearing to relate strongly to vaccine acceptance.
Remain voters were around seven per cent more willing to take the jab compared to those who voted Leave or did not vote in the EU referendum in 2016."
Even the blooming title refers to how people voted, not their voting intentions....
Laughable. You have to get up pretty early to catch me out, I'm kind of a big deal on this forum. "
Grow up please
"indicator of vaccine hesitancy, just 54.7 per cent of those planning to vote for Reform UK would get a jab, according to an Oxford University study." |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"From 1600 people? Oh please!
"
It's just one article. It doesn't represent more than a small slice.
But why get so upset, Farage has built his career on misinformation, and his new party is anti-lockdown. So these results aren't exactly unexpected. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"From 1600 people? Oh please!
It's just one article. It doesn't represent more than a small slice.
But why get so upset, Farage has built his career on misinformation, and his new party is anti-lockdown. So these results aren't exactly unexpected."
Yet people still out of the way to defend his supporters.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Who cares about Farage he helped achieve Brexit his importance is zero now"
That is no way to talk about Sir Nigel ‘Mr Brexit ‘ Farage, if it wasn’t for him Brexit would have have happened  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Who cares about Farage he helped achieve Brexit his importance is zero now
That is no way to talk about Sir Nigel ‘Mr Brexit ‘ Farage, if it wasn’t for him Brexit would have have happened "
Remember someone ages ago said she should be knighted |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *atEvolutionCouple
over a year ago
atlantisEVOLUTION Swingers Club. Stoke |
Read again:
It was 43.6% of the UK population that voted for the Conservative Party that allowed Brexit to happen.
I know history is too painful for some, and that they keep their defence and excuse line patrolling the untruth zone. But facts are facts are facts.
I want 5 stick Kit-Kats to come back, but it's never going to happen. Time to move on and support what we have. The pain will ease in time. Maybe one day you will wake up and smile at the sunny weather instead of reaching for your raincoat.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Read again:
It was 43.6% of the UK population that voted for the Conservative Party that allowed Brexit to happen.
I know history is too painful for some, and that they keep their defence and excuse line patrolling the untruth zone. But facts are facts are facts.
I want 5 stick Kit-Kats to come back, but it's never going to happen. Time to move on and support what we have. The pain will ease in time. Maybe one day you will wake up and smile at the sunny weather instead of reaching for your raincoat.
"
I smile every day, I am fortunate in so many ways. I was happy before the referendum and I am as equally happy now. Brexit doesn’t define me, outside of these forums I don’t even talk about it . The majority of my family & friends voted leave , that hasn’t affected my friendship with them . Why has Brexit suddenly become something to endure ? Surely it was supposed to be so much more than that |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *atEvolutionCouple
over a year ago
atlantisEVOLUTION Swingers Club. Stoke |
"Read again:
It was 43.6% of the UK population that voted for the Conservative Party that allowed Brexit to happen.
I know history is too painful for some, and that they keep their defence and excuse line patrolling the untruth zone. But facts are facts are facts.
I want 5 stick Kit-Kats to come back, but it's never going to happen. Time to move on and support what we have. The pain will ease in time. Maybe one day you will wake up and smile at the sunny weather instead of reaching for your raincoat.
I smile every day, I am fortunate in so many ways. I was happy before the referendum and I am as equally happy now. Brexit doesn’t define me, outside of these forums I don’t even talk about it . The majority of my family & friends voted leave , that hasn’t affected my friendship with them . Why has Brexit suddenly become something to endure ? Surely it was supposed to be so much more than that "
For some it is precisely something to endure, as can be seen here on these boards. But it seems the light is shining bright and sunny in your part of the world. it's good to hear and good to see . . . to 'Infinity and Beyond' (as one very famous cartoon one said).
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
attempts, notably finishing behind a bloke dressed as a dolphin I believe.
