FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Brussels runs out of money
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low." Shocking . His credibility rating has plummeted like the pound did after the EU referendum | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low." Makes a change from the mail Its been said before but if Brexit is such a success. You cant help thinking why they are still obsessed about eurpe | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low. Shocking . His credibility rating has plummeted like the pound did after the EU referendum " I've enjoyed his micro currency fluctuation celebrations. But copy and pasting from the daily express, who quote Robert Oulds from the Bruges Group is a new low. -700 credibility points. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low." Any more newspapers people cant read? its usually the mail and the sun i will add the express to that list. Pretty soon the guardian will be the only news source allowed on here. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low. Makes a change from the mail Its been said before but if Brexit is such a success. You cant help thinking why they are still obsessed about eurpe " Because Brexit can only be a ‘success’ if the EU fails | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low.Any more newspapers people cant read? its usually the mail and the sun i will add the express to that list. Pretty soon the guardian will be the only news source allowed on here. " Read whatever you like. People who copy and paste from the Mail/Express/Beano are inviting questions. Surely it's important to understand your information sources, and the agenda of the publications? Or should be blindly believe anything we read? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It may have been reported in the Express but there are direct quotes there. And it wasn't an Express interview. You guys really need to do better." Quoting Robert Oulds though. Which is like quoting Ronald McDonald on vegan food and pretending it's fact. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It may have been reported in the Express but there are direct quotes there. And it wasn't an Express interview. You guys really need to do better." Can I ask you a question Brexit is done now isnt it? Done and dusted..sunny uplands etc So genuine question..why do you think so many people are utterly obsessed with the eu? Thet swore blind they didnt want to see the eu collapse but nearly every day there are various stories, invariably in the nail and Express sbout the eu imploding Why do you think that is? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low.Any more newspapers people cant read? its usually the mail and the sun i will add the express to that list. Pretty soon the guardian will be the only news source allowed on here. Read whatever you like. People who copy and paste from the Mail/Express/Beano are inviting questions. Surely it's important to understand your information sources, and the agenda of the publications? Or should be blindly believe anything we read?" No offence but don’t compare the brilliance of the Beano with the Mail and Express. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low.Any more newspapers people cant read? its usually the mail and the sun i will add the express to that list. Pretty soon the guardian will be the only news source allowed on here. Read whatever you like. People who copy and paste from the Mail/Express/Beano are inviting questions. Surely it's important to understand your information sources, and the agenda of the publications? Or should be blindly believe anything we read?" Surely the people who issue the statements are the important source if they are direct quotes nothing more. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low. Makes a change from the mail Its been said before but if Brexit is such a success. You cant help thinking why they are still obsessed about eurpe Because Brexit can only be a ‘success’ if the EU fails" Seems that way Or they are somehow not confident in what they voted for. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It may have been reported in the Express but there are direct quotes there. And it wasn't an Express interview. You guys really need to do better. Quoting Robert Oulds though. Which is like quoting Ronald McDonald on vegan food and pretending it's fact. " You're 'complaint' wasn't that Oulds was quoted, it was about the Express being the new low. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It may have been reported in the Express but there are direct quotes there. And it wasn't an Express interview. You guys really need to do better. Can I ask you a question Brexit is done now isnt it? Done and dusted..sunny uplands etc So genuine question..why do you think so many people are utterly obsessed with the eu? Thet swore blind they didnt want to see the eu collapse but nearly every day there are various stories, invariably in the nail and Express sbout the eu imploding Why do you think that is?" This will be the standard answers It’s news Aren’t we allowed to talk about the EU | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It may have been reported in the Express but there are direct quotes there. And it wasn't an Express interview. You guys really need to do better. Can I ask you a question Brexit is done now isnt it? Done and dusted..sunny uplands etc So genuine question..why do you think so many people are utterly obsessed with the eu? Thet swore blind they didnt want to see the eu collapse but nearly every day there are various stories, invariably in the nail and Express sbout the eu imploding Why do you think that is?" You can ask a question, yes. Not three though | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It may have been reported in the Express but there are direct quotes there. And it wasn't an Express interview. You guys really need to do better." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It may have been reported in the Express but there are direct quotes there. And it wasn't an Express interview. You guys really need to do better. Can I ask you a question Brexit is done now isnt it? Done and dusted..sunny uplands etc So genuine question..why do you think so many people are utterly obsessed with the eu? Thet swore blind they didnt want to see the eu collapse but nearly every day there are various stories, invariably in the nail and Express sbout the eu imploding Why do you think that is? You can ask a question, yes. Not three though " Just the last one will do. I'm genuinely curious. They got what they wanted Shouldnt they be focusing on the uk? Instead any tiny problem the eu has is pounced upon. Sounds like insecurity to me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It may have been reported in the Express but there are direct quotes there. And it wasn't an Express interview. You guys really need to do better. Quoting Robert Oulds though. Which is like quoting Ronald McDonald on vegan food and pretending it's fact. You're 'complaint' wasn't that Oulds was quoted, it was about the Express being the new low." Yes. Look at who their quoting. How reliable is Robert Oulds, how does his fit the agenda of this news paper? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It may have been reported in the Express but there are direct quotes there. And it wasn't an Express interview. You guys really need to do better. Quoting Robert Oulds though. Which is like quoting Ronald McDonald on vegan food and pretending it's fact. You're 'complaint' wasn't that Oulds was quoted, it was about the Express being the new low. Yes. Look at who their quoting. How reliable is Robert Oulds, how does his fit the agenda of this news paper? " Is the EU facing a financial crisis? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It may have been reported in the Express but there are direct quotes there. And it wasn't an Express interview. You guys really need to do better. Can I ask you a question Brexit is done now isnt it? Done and dusted..sunny uplands etc So genuine question..why do you think so many people are utterly obsessed with the eu? Thet swore blind they didnt want to see the eu collapse but nearly every day there are various stories, invariably in the nail and Express sbout the eu imploding Why do you think that is? You can ask a question, yes. Not three though Just the last one will do. I'm genuinely curious. They got what they wanted Shouldnt they be focusing on the uk? Instead any tiny problem the eu has is pounced upon. Sounds like insecurity to me." I wouldn't even begin to claim I think I know why those papers print those stories. Is it any different to any other world news that we're shown? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It may have been reported in the Express but there are direct quotes there. And it wasn't an Express interview. You guys really need to do better. Quoting Robert Oulds though. Which is like quoting Ronald McDonald on vegan food and pretending it's fact. " I take it you dont rate the guy then? I personally had never heard of him before today, what has he said before to make you post that statement. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So does the EU have an upcoming financial crisis or not? " Sadly I have predicted a financial crisis for the EU yes. The tottering tower of corruption can only stay standing for so long. The distant hope is that as Brussels collapses, a new order is established in Europe that can learn from Brexit and become strong and good customers of our new Empire. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It may have been reported in the Express but there are direct quotes there. And it wasn't an Express interview. You guys really need to do better. Quoting Robert Oulds though. Which is like quoting Ronald McDonald on vegan food and pretending it's fact. You're 'complaint' wasn't that Oulds was quoted, it was about the Express being the new low. Yes. Look at who their quoting. How reliable is Robert Oulds, how does his fit the agenda of this news paper? " I don't care too much for the paper or the commenter but make your mind up what it is you have a problem with. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So does the EU have an upcoming financial crisis or not? Sadly I have predicted a financial crisis for the EU yes. The tottering tower of corruption can only stay standing for so long. The distant hope is that as Brussels collapses, a new order is established in Europe that can learn from Brexit and become strong and good customers of our new Empire." Epic, I keep forgetting your not being serious, top notch trolling | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It may have been reported in the Express but there are direct quotes there. And it wasn't an Express interview. You guys really need to do better. Can I ask you a question Brexit is done now isnt it? Done and dusted..sunny uplands etc So genuine question..why do you think so many people are utterly obsessed with the eu? Thet swore blind they didnt want to see the eu collapse but nearly every day there are various stories, invariably in the nail and Express sbout the eu imploding Why do you think that is? You can ask a question, yes. Not three though Just the last one will do. I'm genuinely curious. They got what they wanted Shouldnt they be focusing on the uk? Instead any tiny problem the eu has is pounced upon. Sounds like insecurity to me. I wouldn't even begin to claim I think I know why those papers print those stories. Is it any different to any other world news that we're shown?" I guess if you have been reading the daily mail for the last 30 years,blaming the eu for everything in the world is 2nd Nature. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So does the EU have an upcoming financial crisis or not? Sadly I have predicted a financial crisis for the EU yes. The tottering tower of corruption can only stay standing for so long. The distant hope is that as Brussels collapses, a new order is established in Europe that can learn from Brexit and become strong and good customers of our new Empire." I think we should allow Spain, Greece and Italy to become a part of our Empire though and not just customers | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It may have been reported in the Express but there are direct quotes there. And it wasn't an Express interview. You guys really need to do better. Can I ask you a question Brexit is done now isnt it? Done and dusted..sunny uplands etc So genuine question..why do you think so many people are utterly obsessed with the eu? Thet swore blind they didnt want to see the eu collapse but nearly every day there are various stories, invariably in the nail and Express sbout the eu imploding Why do you think that is? You can ask a question, yes. Not three though Just the last one will do. I'm genuinely curious. They got what they wanted Shouldnt they be focusing on the uk? Instead any tiny problem the eu has is pounced upon. Sounds like insecurity to me. I wouldn't even begin to claim I think I know why those papers print those stories. Is it any different to any other world news that we're shown? I guess if you have been reading the daily mail for the last 30 years,blaming the eu for everything in the world is 2nd Nature." Where have you seen anyone blaming the EU for world problems? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So does the EU have an upcoming financial crisis or not? Sadly I have predicted a financial crisis for the EU yes. The tottering tower of corruption can only stay standing for so long. The distant hope is that as Brussels collapses, a new order is established in Europe that can learn from Brexit and become strong and good customers of our new Empire. I think we should allow Spain, Greece and Italy to become a part of our Empire though and not just customers " The Empire was created by taking land not an invite! Chris wants empire but think we may need a few more gunboats. Also will we be paying off the debt a hundred years later like the sl4ve trade when we back track? TUI and JET2 will be minted with all the compensation. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Quite ironic that remainers are branded as remoaners but its the leavers who cant stop whinging about an institution we have left." It is sad to see. After 45 years of struggles, hardship and of wanting to leave the EU I would have hoped that they could have found some peace and comfort in their final years . Tragic | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Quite ironic that remainers are branded as remoaners but its the leavers who cant stop whinging about an institution we have left." Not whinging at all. Just pointing out why leaving a failing organisation was the right thing to do | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Quite ironic that remainers are branded as remoaners but its the leavers who cant stop whinging about an institution we have left. It is sad to see. After 45 years of struggles, hardship and of wanting to leave the EU I would have hoped that they could have found some peace and comfort in their final years . Tragic " I know. My heart goes out to them They were told all our problems would be over once we left,and I think the penny Is slowly dropping. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Quite ironic that remainers are branded as remoaners but its the leavers who cant stop whinging about an institution we have left. It is sad to see. After 45 years of struggles, hardship and of wanting to leave the EU I would have hoped that they could have found some peace and comfort in their final years . Tragic I know. My heart goes out to them They were told all our problems would be over once we left,and I think the penny Is slowly dropping." So sad. Imagine living such a terrible life for all those years and then getting your dream come true and not being able to enjoy it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It may have been reported in the Express but there are direct quotes there. And it wasn't an Express interview. You guys really need to do better. Quoting Robert Oulds though. Which is like quoting Ronald McDonald on vegan food and pretending it's fact. You're 'complaint' wasn't that Oulds was quoted, it was about the Express being the new low. Yes. Look at who their quoting. How reliable is Robert Oulds, how does his fit the agenda of this news paper? Is the EU facing a financial crisis? " Just like us the contributors are reeling from Covid and the drop in GDP which is related to payments. I’m sure all countries are feeling the Covid squeeze. So down true but not as down as us. We’re the leaders in dropped GDP . The Netherlands and Germany will be ok though as they’ve got our tax revenues from the money moved due to Brexit. Oh and we’ve haven’t stopped paying into the EU for a few years yet so I’m sure they are sleeping just fine. Bit like paying finance on a car someone else drives. Express spinning selective facts again now there’s a surprise. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It may have been reported in the Express but there are direct quotes there. And it wasn't an Express interview. You guys really need to do better. Quoting Robert Oulds though. Which is like quoting Ronald McDonald on vegan food and pretending it's fact. You're 'complaint' wasn't that Oulds was quoted, it was about the Express being the new low. Yes. Look at who their quoting. How reliable is Robert Oulds, how does his fit the agenda of this news paper? Is the EU facing a financial crisis? Just like us the contributors are reeling from Covid and the drop in GDP which is related to payments. I’m sure all countries are feeling the Covid squeeze. So down true but not as down as us. We’re the leaders in dropped GDP . The Netherlands and Germany will be ok though as they’ve got our tax revenues from the money moved due to Brexit. Oh and we’ve haven’t stopped paying into the EU for a few years yet so I’m sure they are sleeping just fine. Bit like paying finance on a car someone else drives. Express spinning selective facts again now there’s a surprise. " We are paying them £340,000 an hour | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It may have been reported in the Express but there are direct quotes there. And it wasn't an Express interview. You guys really need to do better. Quoting Robert Oulds though. Which is like quoting Ronald McDonald on vegan food and pretending it's fact. You're 'complaint' wasn't that Oulds was quoted, it was about the Express being the new low. Yes. Look at who their quoting. How reliable is Robert Oulds, how does his fit the agenda of this news paper? Is the EU facing a financial crisis? Just like us the contributors are reeling from Covid and the drop in GDP which is related to payments. I’m sure all countries are feeling the Covid squeeze. So down true but not as down as us. We’re the leaders in dropped GDP . The Netherlands and Germany will be ok though as they’ve got our tax revenues from the money moved due to Brexit. Oh and we’ve haven’t stopped paying into the EU for a few years yet so I’m sure they are sleeping just fine. Bit like paying finance on a car someone else drives. Express spinning selective facts again now there’s a surprise. " I thought it had already been explained how countries measured GDP differently? The UK is poised to bounce back far faster than the rest of the EU post covid. And even without covid the EU was facing a financial crisis anyway, nothing to do with our contributions, though that doesn't help | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It may have been reported in the Express but there are direct quotes there. And it wasn't an Express interview. You guys really need to do better. Quoting Robert Oulds though. Which is like quoting Ronald McDonald on vegan food and pretending it's fact. You're 'complaint' wasn't that Oulds was quoted, it was about the Express being the new low. Yes. Look at who their quoting. How reliable is Robert Oulds, how does his fit the agenda of this news paper? Is the EU facing a financial crisis? Just like us the contributors are reeling from Covid and the drop in GDP which is related to payments. I’m sure all countries are feeling the Covid squeeze. So down true but not as down as us. We’re the leaders in dropped GDP . The Netherlands and Germany will be ok though as they’ve got our tax revenues from the money moved due to Brexit. Oh and we’ve haven’t stopped paying into the EU for a few years yet so I’m sure they are sleeping just fine. Bit like paying finance on a car someone else drives. Express spinning selective facts again now there’s a surprise. We are paying them £340,000 an hour " Now where's that tired emoji?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All this talk of the Empire and taking land etc. Chris has said he wants a New Empire using Soft Power. This is a quite different concept to what was before " Taking over another country is taking over another country so what’s your point? Would you be happy if China continue to grow their investments and eventually own everything in the U.K. ? The EU is a cuddly toy in comparison. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All this talk of the Empire and taking land etc. Chris has said he wants a New Empire using Soft Power. This is a quite different concept to what was before Taking over another country is taking over another country so what’s your point? Would you be happy if China continue to grow their investments and eventually own everything in the U.K. ? The EU is a cuddly toy in comparison. " In politics, soft power is the ability to attract and co-opt, rather than coerce. In other words, soft power involves shaping the preferences of others through appeal and attraction. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All quite sad really, would be good if Europe could perform better then we could export to them as well. Looks like we will do increasing trade with the rest of the world instead for a few years: “The loss of the UK's financial power has sparked an economic crisis inside the EU, according to one leading European political expert. Robert Oulds, who is the director of the Bruges Group, said that Brexit had blown a huge hole through EU finances and Brussels may not survive another economic crisis. Britain's departure has already left a £65billion (€75bn) hole in the EU budget.”" " Brussels runs out of money" Then I'd suggest Belgium looks at how they fund the regional municipalities. As for the body of your post then it makes no sense at all compared to your thread title. Confusion reigns strong with you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It may have been reported in the Express but there are direct quotes there. And it wasn't an Express interview. You guys really need to do better. Quoting Robert Oulds though. Which is like quoting Ronald McDonald on vegan food and pretending it's fact. You're 'complaint' wasn't that Oulds was quoted, it was about the Express being the new low. Yes. Look at who their quoting. How reliable is Robert Oulds, how does his fit the agenda of this news paper? Is the EU facing a financial crisis? Just like us the contributors are reeling from Covid and the drop in GDP which is related to payments. I’m sure all countries are feeling the Covid squeeze. So down true but not as down as us. We’re the leaders in dropped GDP . The Netherlands and Germany will be ok though as they’ve got our tax revenues from the money moved due to Brexit. Oh and we’ve haven’t stopped paying into the EU for a few years yet so I’m sure they are sleeping just fine. Bit like paying finance on a car someone else drives. Express spinning selective facts again now there’s a surprise. We are paying them £340,000 an hour Now where's that tired emoji??" Actually, we have just paid them £28,000 in the last 5 minutes | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It may have been reported in the Express but there are direct quotes there. And it wasn't an Express interview. You guys really need to do better. Quoting Robert Oulds though. Which is like quoting Ronald McDonald on vegan food and pretending it's fact. I take it you dont rate the guy then? I personally had never heard of him before today, what has he said before to make you post that statement." Feel free to Google him and the Bruges group and make up your own mind if they're a credible, unbias source of information. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It may have been reported in the Express but there are direct quotes there. And it wasn't an Express interview. You guys really need to do better. Quoting Robert Oulds though. Which is like quoting Ronald McDonald on vegan food and pretending it's fact. You're 'complaint' wasn't that Oulds was quoted, it was about the Express being the new low. Yes. Look at who their quoting. How reliable is Robert Oulds, how does his fit the agenda of this news paper? Is the EU facing a financial crisis? Just like us the contributors are reeling from Covid and the drop in GDP which is related to payments. I’m sure all countries are feeling the Covid squeeze. So down true but not as down as us. We’re the leaders in dropped GDP . The Netherlands and Germany will be ok though as they’ve got our tax revenues from the money moved due to Brexit. Oh and we’ve haven’t stopped paying into the EU for a few years yet so I’m sure they are sleeping just fine. Bit like paying finance on a car someone else drives. Express spinning selective facts again now there’s a surprise. I thought it had already been explained how countries measured GDP differently? The UK is poised to bounce back far faster than the rest of the EU post covid. And even without covid the EU was facing a financial crisis anyway, nothing to do with our contributions, though that doesn't help " So 27 countries are deceiving us with GDP calculations? Our own government agree we will grow quicker but having fallen further it will be from a lower beginning so still not catch up overall. Every Brexit scenario published by the U.K. government shows a loss for the U.K. and we will be worse off. What are you trying to celebrate? Also remember GDP isn’t profit it’s turnover. So like the Japanese deal our turnover with Japan will increase marginally but the profit so wealth will go more towards Japan as a result. So Japan better off whereas we just turn over more. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It may have been reported in the Express but there are direct quotes there. And it wasn't an Express interview. You guys really need to do better. Quoting Robert Oulds though. Which is like quoting Ronald McDonald on vegan food and pretending it's fact. You're 'complaint' wasn't that Oulds was quoted, it was about the Express being the new low. Yes. Look at who their quoting. How reliable is Robert Oulds, how does his fit the agenda of this news paper? Is the EU facing a financial crisis? Just like us the contributors are reeling from Covid and the drop in GDP which is related to payments. I’m sure all countries are feeling the Covid squeeze. So down true but not as down as us. We’re the leaders in dropped GDP . The Netherlands and Germany will be ok though as they’ve got our tax revenues from the money moved due to Brexit. Oh and we’ve haven’t stopped paying into the EU for a few years yet so I’m sure they are sleeping just fine. Bit like paying finance on a car someone else drives. Express spinning selective facts again now there’s a surprise. We are paying them £340,000 an hour Now where's that tired emoji?? Actually, we have just paid them £28,000 in the last 5 minutes " You're figures are wrong | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It may have been reported in the Express but there are direct quotes there. And it wasn't an Express interview. You guys really need to do better. Quoting Robert Oulds though. Which is like quoting Ronald McDonald on vegan food and pretending it's fact. You're 'complaint' wasn't that Oulds was quoted, it was about the Express being the new low. Yes. Look at who their quoting. How reliable is Robert Oulds, how does his fit the agenda of this news paper? Is the EU facing a financial crisis? Just like us the contributors are reeling from Covid and the drop in GDP which is related to payments. I’m sure all countries are feeling the Covid squeeze. So down true but not as down as us. We’re the leaders in dropped GDP . The Netherlands and Germany will be ok though as they’ve got our tax revenues from the money moved due to Brexit. Oh and we’ve haven’t stopped paying into the EU for a few years yet so I’m sure they are sleeping just fine. Bit like paying finance on a car someone else drives. Express spinning selective facts again now there’s a surprise. We are paying them £340,000 an hour Now where's that tired emoji?? Actually, we have just paid them £28,000 in the last 5 minutes You're figures are wrong " Are they ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So does the EU have an upcoming financial crisis or not? Sadly I have predicted a financial crisis for the EU yes. The tottering tower of corruption can only stay standing for so long. The distant hope is that as Brussels collapses, a new order is established in Europe that can learn from Brexit and become strong and good customers of our new Empire. I think we should allow Spain, Greece and Italy to become a part of our Empire though and not just customers " If we consider the number of Spanish Greek and Italian youngsters who have fled to The UK for a job, they kind of already are. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All this talk of the Empire and taking land etc. Chris has said he wants a New Empire using Soft Power. This is a quite different concept to what was before Taking over another country is taking over another country so what’s your point? Would you be happy if China continue to grow their investments and eventually own everything in the U.K. ? The EU is a cuddly toy in comparison. In politics, soft power is the ability to attract and co-opt, rather than coerce. In other words, soft power involves shaping the preferences of others through appeal and attraction." So you’re happy with the China model ok you run with that as a good thing. If it’s preferable trading that’s what we did in the EU. Strange how things turn out. We didn’t have any gunboats rocking up to join the EU. Let’s see how much we can softly coerce the Chinese and Americans as that’s what I keep being told is our target market. Remember we have 45% of our market to find if the EU is going to go up in a puff of smoke next week . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I'm genuinely curious. They got what they wanted Shouldnt they be focusing on the uk? Instead any tiny problem the eu has is pounced upon. Sounds like insecurity to me." There's nothing positive that's happening because of Brexit for leavers to boast about so leavers only have the option left of picking out problems within the EU to justify their reason for voting to leave because they've shit & bust massively on their main points of Brexit. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It may have been reported in the Express but there are direct quotes there. And it wasn't an Express interview. You guys really need to do better. Quoting Robert Oulds though. Which is like quoting Ronald McDonald on vegan food and pretending it's fact. I take it you dont rate the guy then? I personally had never heard of him before today, what has he said before to make you post that statement. Feel free to Google him and the Bruges group and make up your own mind if they're a credible, unbias source of information." yeah i know just wanted to know why you were comparing him to ronald mc donald. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All this talk of the Empire and taking land etc. Chris has said he wants a New Empire using Soft Power. This is a quite different concept to what was before Taking over another country is taking over another country so what’s your point? Would you be happy if China continue to grow their investments and eventually own everything in the U.K. ? The EU is a cuddly toy in comparison. In politics, soft power is the ability to attract and co-opt, rather than coerce. In other words, soft power involves shaping the preferences of others through appeal and attraction. So you’re happy with the China model ok you run with that as a good thing. If it’s preferable trading that’s what we did in the EU. Strange how things turn out. We didn’t have any gunboats rocking up to join the EU. Let’s see how much we can softly coerce the Chinese and Americans as that’s what I keep being told is our target market. Remember we have 45% of our market to find if the EU is going to go up in a puff of smoke next week . " I never once said I was happy with the China model. I was merely pointing out that Chris has never said he wants an Empire through hard power, in fact, he says the complete opposite. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It may have been reported in the Express but there are direct quotes there. And it wasn't an Express interview. You guys really need to do better. Quoting Robert Oulds though. Which is like quoting Ronald McDonald on vegan food and pretending it's fact. You're 'complaint' wasn't that Oulds was quoted, it was about the Express being the new low. Yes. Look at who their quoting. How reliable is Robert Oulds, how does his fit the agenda of this news paper? Is the EU facing a financial crisis? Just like us the contributors are reeling from Covid and the drop in GDP which is related to payments. I’m sure all countries are feeling the Covid squeeze. So down true but not as down as us. We’re the leaders in dropped GDP . The Netherlands and Germany will be ok though as they’ve got our tax revenues from the money moved due to Brexit. Oh and we’ve haven’t stopped paying into the EU for a few years yet so I’m sure they are sleeping just fine. Bit like paying finance on a car someone else drives. Express spinning selective facts again now there’s a surprise. We are paying them £340,000 an hour Now where's that tired emoji?? Actually, we have just paid them £28,000 in the last 5 minutes You're figures are wrong Are they ? " You keep quoting these “paying in” figures as if they are either true or that they even support your remoaner argument. Baffling. Cold, hard reality is hurtling towards Brussels like Barnier to the whisky cabinet, and they really are gonna need the UK and the IMF to prop them up. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It may have been reported in the Express but there are direct quotes there. And it wasn't an Express interview. You guys really need to do better. Quoting Robert Oulds though. Which is like quoting Ronald McDonald on vegan food and pretending it's fact. You're 'complaint' wasn't that Oulds was quoted, it was about the Express being the new low. Yes. Look at who their quoting. How reliable is Robert Oulds, how does his fit the agenda of this news paper? Is the EU facing a financial crisis? Just like us the contributors are reeling from Covid and the drop in GDP which is related to payments. I’m sure all countries are feeling the Covid squeeze. So down true but not as down as us. We’re the leaders in dropped GDP . The Netherlands and Germany will be ok though as they’ve got our tax revenues from the money moved due to Brexit. Oh and we’ve haven’t stopped paying into the EU for a few years yet so I’m sure they are sleeping just fine. Bit like paying finance on a car someone else drives. Express spinning selective facts again now there’s a surprise. We are paying them £340,000 an hour Now where's that tired emoji?? Actually, we have just paid them £28,000 in the last 5 minutes You're figures are wrong Are they ? You keep quoting these “paying in” figures as if they are either true or that they even support your remoaner argument. Baffling. Cold, hard reality is hurtling towards Brussels like Barnier to the whisky cabinet, and they really are gonna need the UK and the IMF to prop them up. " £340,000 an hour Chris | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All this talk of the Empire and taking land etc. Chris has said he wants a New Empire using Soft Power. This is a quite different concept to what was before Taking over another country is taking over another country so what’s your point? Would you be happy if China continue to grow their investments and eventually own everything in the U.K. ? The EU is a cuddly toy in comparison. In politics, soft power is the ability to attract and co-opt, rather than coerce. In other words, soft power involves shaping the preferences of others through appeal and attraction. So you’re happy with the China model ok you run with that as a good thing. If it’s preferable trading that’s what we did in the EU. Strange how things turn out. We didn’t have any gunboats rocking up to join the EU. Let’s see how much we can softly coerce the Chinese and Americans as that’s what I keep being told is our target market. Remember we have 45% of our market to find if the EU is going to go up in a puff of smoke next week . " That market would still be there and would be even stronger without the incompetent protectionist EU commission running things | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All this talk of the Empire and taking land etc. Chris has said he wants a New Empire using Soft Power. This is a quite different concept to what was before Taking over another country is taking over another country so what’s your point? Would you be happy if China continue to grow their investments and eventually own everything in the U.K. ? The EU is a cuddly toy in comparison. In politics, soft power is the ability to attract and co-opt, rather than coerce. In other words, soft power involves shaping the preferences of others through appeal and attraction. So you’re happy with the China model ok you run with that as a good thing. If it’s preferable trading that’s what we did in the EU. Strange how things turn out. We didn’t have any gunboats rocking up to join the EU. Let’s see how much we can softly coerce the Chinese and Americans as that’s what I keep being told is our target market. Remember we have 45% of our market to find if the EU is going to go up in a puff of smoke next week . I never once said I was happy with the China model. I was merely pointing out that Chris has never said he wants an Empire through hard power, in fact, he says the complete opposite." This plan to reinstate the British Empire is a little light on details. Could you guys elaborate on what you're advocating here? Maybe that will alleviate some of the negative responses to this proposal. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All this talk of the Empire and taking land etc. Chris has said he wants a New Empire using Soft Power. This is a quite different concept to what was before Taking over another country is taking over another country so what’s your point? Would you be happy if China continue to grow their investments and eventually own everything in the U.K. ? The EU is a cuddly toy in comparison. In politics, soft power is the ability to attract and co-opt, rather than coerce. In other words, soft power involves shaping the preferences of others through appeal and attraction. So you’re happy with the China model ok you run with that as a good thing. If it’s preferable trading that’s what we did in the EU. Strange how things turn out. We didn’t have any gunboats rocking up to join the EU. Let’s see how much we can softly coerce the Chinese and Americans as that’s what I keep being told is our target market. Remember we have 45% of our market to find if the EU is going to go up in a puff of smoke next week . I never once said I was happy with the China model. I was merely pointing out that Chris has never said he wants an Empire through hard power, in fact, he says the complete opposite. This plan to reinstate the British Empire is a little light on details. Could you guys elaborate on what you're advocating here? Maybe that will alleviate some of the negative responses to this proposal." Who is advocating it? Chris speaks of it but actually he speaks of it much less than those opposing it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All this talk of the Empire and taking land etc. Chris has said he wants a New Empire using Soft Power. This is a quite different concept to what was before Taking over another country is taking over another country so what’s your point? Would you be happy if China continue to grow their investments and eventually own everything in the U.K. ? The EU is a cuddly toy in comparison. In politics, soft power is the ability to attract and co-opt, rather than coerce. In other words, soft power involves shaping the preferences of others through appeal and attraction. So you’re happy with the China model ok you run with that as a good thing. If it’s preferable trading that’s what we did in the EU. Strange how things turn out. We didn’t have any gunboats rocking up to join the EU. Let’s see how much we can softly coerce the Chinese and Americans as that’s what I keep being told is our target market. Remember we have 45% of our market to find if the EU is going to go up in a puff of smoke next week . That market would still be there and would be even stronger without the incompetent protectionist EU commission running things " So they are doing better than us and they are the incompetent ones . Interesting reasoning. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All this talk of the Empire and taking land etc. Chris has said he wants a New Empire using Soft Power. This is a quite different concept to what was before Taking over another country is taking over another country so what’s your point? Would you be happy if China continue to grow their investments and eventually own everything in the U.K. ? The EU is a cuddly toy in comparison. In politics, soft power is the ability to attract and co-opt, rather than coerce. In other words, soft power involves shaping the preferences of others through appeal and attraction. So you’re happy with the China model ok you run with that as a good thing. If it’s preferable trading that’s what we did in the EU. Strange how things turn out. We didn’t have any gunboats rocking up to join the EU. Let’s see how much we can softly coerce the Chinese and Americans as that’s what I keep being told is our target market. Remember we have 45% of our market to find if the EU is going to go up in a puff of smoke next week . I never once said I was happy with the China model. I was merely pointing out that Chris has never said he wants an Empire through hard power, in fact, he says the complete opposite. This plan to reinstate the British Empire is a little light on details. Could you guys elaborate on what you're advocating here? Maybe that will alleviate some of the negative responses to this proposal. Who is advocating it? Chris speaks of it but actually he speaks of it much less than those opposing it " Because his idea is low on details, and he never elaborates on how he wants to achieve this, what this return to the empire means, or why he thinks it's a good idea. Why would anyone throw this out there so much, if you don't want to talk about it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All this talk of the Empire and taking land etc. Chris has said he wants a New Empire using Soft Power. This is a quite different concept to what was before Taking over another country is taking over another country so what’s your point? Would you be happy if China continue to grow their investments and eventually own everything in the U.K. ? The EU is a cuddly toy in comparison. In politics, soft power is the ability to attract and co-opt, rather than coerce. In other words, soft power involves shaping the preferences of others through appeal and attraction. So you’re happy with the China model ok you run with that as a good thing. If it’s preferable trading that’s what we did in the EU. Strange how things turn out. We didn’t have any gunboats rocking up to join the EU. Let’s see how much we can softly coerce the Chinese and Americans as that’s what I keep being told is our target market. Remember we have 45% of our market to find if the EU is going to go up in a puff of smoke next week . I never once said I was happy with the China model. I was merely pointing out that Chris has never said he wants an Empire through hard power, in fact, he says the complete opposite. This plan to reinstate the British Empire is a little light on details. Could you guys elaborate on what you're advocating here? Maybe that will alleviate some of the negative responses to this proposal. Who is advocating it? Chris speaks of it but actually he speaks of it much less than those opposing it Because his idea is low on details, and he never elaborates on how he wants to achieve this, what this return to the empire means, or why he thinks it's a good idea. Why would anyone throw this out there so much, if you don't want to talk about it? " Well that's a question for him isn't it. Who is advocating it other than Chris? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All this talk of the Empire and taking land etc. Chris has said he wants a New Empire using Soft Power. This is a quite different concept to what was before Taking over another country is taking over another country so what’s your point? Would you be happy if China continue to grow their investments and eventually own everything in the U.K. ? The EU is a cuddly toy in comparison. In politics, soft power is the ability to attract and co-opt, rather than coerce. In other words, soft power involves shaping the preferences of others through appeal and attraction. So you’re happy with the China model ok you run with that as a good thing. If it’s preferable trading that’s what we did in the EU. Strange how things turn out. We didn’t have any gunboats rocking up to join the EU. Let’s see how much we can softly coerce the Chinese and Americans as that’s what I keep being told is our target market. Remember we have 45% of our market to find if the EU is going to go up in a puff of smoke next week . I never once said I was happy with the China model. I was merely pointing out that Chris has never said he wants an Empire through hard power, in fact, he says the complete opposite. This plan to reinstate the British Empire is a little light on details. Could you guys elaborate on what you're advocating here? Maybe that will alleviate some of the negative responses to this proposal. Who is advocating it? Chris speaks of it but actually he speaks of it much less than those opposing it Because his idea is low on details, and he never elaborates on how he wants to achieve this, what this return to the empire means, or why he thinks it's a good idea. Why would anyone throw this out there so much, if you don't want to talk about it? Well that's a question for him isn't it. Who is advocating it other than Chris?" Few people seemed supportive. I don't know. I'm just asking a few basic level questions. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All this talk of the Empire and taking land etc. Chris has said he wants a New Empire using Soft Power. This is a quite different concept to what was before Taking over another country is taking over another country so what’s your point? Would you be happy if China continue to grow their investments and eventually own everything in the U.K. ? The EU is a cuddly toy in comparison. In politics, soft power is the ability to attract and co-opt, rather than coerce. In other words, soft power involves shaping the preferences of others through appeal and attraction. So you’re happy with the China model ok you run with that as a good thing. If it’s preferable trading that’s what we did in the EU. Strange how things turn out. We didn’t have any gunboats rocking up to join the EU. Let’s see how much we can softly coerce the Chinese and Americans as that’s what I keep being told is our target market. Remember we have 45% of our market to find if the EU is going to go up in a puff of smoke next week . That market would still be there and would be even stronger without the incompetent protectionist EU commission running things So they are doing better than us and they are the incompetent ones . Interesting reasoning. " Err, no they are not. Did you miss the vaccine 'fiasco'? Have you never seen unemployment levels across the EU? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All this talk of the Empire and taking land etc. Chris has said he wants a New Empire using Soft Power. This is a quite different concept to what was before Taking over another country is taking over another country so what’s your point? Would you be happy if China continue to grow their investments and eventually own everything in the U.K. ? The EU is a cuddly toy in comparison. In politics, soft power is the ability to attract and co-opt, rather than coerce. In other words, soft power involves shaping the preferences of others through appeal and attraction. So you’re happy with the China model ok you run with that as a good thing. If it’s preferable trading that’s what we did in the EU. Strange how things turn out. We didn’t have any gunboats rocking up to join the EU. Let’s see how much we can softly coerce the Chinese and Americans as that’s what I keep being told is our target market. Remember we have 45% of our market to find if the EU is going to go up in a puff of smoke next week . I never once said I was happy with the China model. I was merely pointing out that Chris has never said he wants an Empire through hard power, in fact, he says the complete opposite. This plan to reinstate the British Empire is a little light on details. Could you guys elaborate on what you're advocating here? Maybe that will alleviate some of the negative responses to this proposal. Who is advocating it? Chris speaks of it but actually he speaks of it much less than those opposing it Because his idea is low on details, and he never elaborates on how he wants to achieve this, what this return to the empire means, or why he thinks it's a good idea. Why would anyone throw this out there so much, if you don't want to talk about it? Well that's a question for him isn't it. Who is advocating it other than Chris? Few people seemed supportive. I don't know. I'm just asking a few basic level questions." You're the one who said 'you guys'. Surely you must know who you were directing that at | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All this talk of the Empire and taking land etc. Chris has said he wants a New Empire using Soft Power. This is a quite different concept to what was before Taking over another country is taking over another country so what’s your point? Would you be happy if China continue to grow their investments and eventually own everything in the U.K. ? The EU is a cuddly toy in comparison. In politics, soft power is the ability to attract and co-opt, rather than coerce. In other words, soft power involves shaping the preferences of others through appeal and attraction. So you’re happy with the China model ok you run with that as a good thing. If it’s preferable trading that’s what we did in the EU. Strange how things turn out. We didn’t have any gunboats rocking up to join the EU. Let’s see how much we can softly coerce the Chinese and Americans as that’s what I keep being told is our target market. Remember we have 45% of our market to find if the EU is going to go up in a puff of smoke next week . I never once said I was happy with the China model. I was merely pointing out that Chris has never said he wants an Empire through hard power, in fact, he says the complete opposite. This plan to reinstate the British Empire is a little light on details. Could you guys elaborate on what you're advocating here? Maybe that will alleviate some of the negative responses to this proposal. Who is advocating it? Chris speaks of it but actually he speaks of it much less than those opposing it Because his idea is low on details, and he never elaborates on how he wants to achieve this, what this return to the empire means, or why he thinks it's a good idea. Why would anyone throw this out there so much, if you don't want to talk about it? Well that's a question for him isn't it. Who is advocating it other than Chris? Few people seemed supportive. I don't know. I'm just asking a few basic level questions. You're the one who said 'you guys'. Surely you must know who you were directing that at " I'll leave that open to anyone who has been supportive of this idea to return to the days of the Empire. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All this talk of the Empire and taking land etc. Chris has said he wants a New Empire using Soft Power. This is a quite different concept to what was before Taking over another country is taking over another country so what’s your point? Would you be happy if China continue to grow their investments and eventually own everything in the U.K. ? The EU is a cuddly toy in comparison. In politics, soft power is the ability to attract and co-opt, rather than coerce. In other words, soft power involves shaping the preferences of others through appeal and attraction. So you’re happy with the China model ok you run with that as a good thing. If it’s preferable trading that’s what we did in the EU. Strange how things turn out. We didn’t have any gunboats rocking up to join the EU. Let’s see how much we can softly coerce the Chinese and Americans as that’s what I keep being told is our target market. Remember we have 45% of our market to find if the EU is going to go up in a puff of smoke next week . I never once said I was happy with the China model. I was merely pointing out that Chris has never said he wants an Empire through hard power, in fact, he says the complete opposite. This plan to reinstate the British Empire is a little light on details. Could you guys elaborate on what you're advocating here? Maybe that will alleviate some of the negative responses to this proposal. Who is advocating it? Chris speaks of it but actually he speaks of it much less than those opposing it Because his idea is low on details, and he never elaborates on how he wants to achieve this, what this return to the empire means, or why he thinks it's a good idea. Why would anyone throw this out there so much, if you don't want to talk about it? Well that's a question for him isn't it. Who is advocating it other than Chris? Few people seemed supportive. I don't know. I'm just asking a few basic level questions. You're the one who said 'you guys'. Surely you must know who you were directing that at I'll leave that open to anyone who has been supportive of this idea to return to the days of the Empire." Thought as much | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All this talk of the Empire and taking land etc. Chris has said he wants a New Empire using Soft Power. This is a quite different concept to what was before Taking over another country is taking over another country so what’s your point? Would you be happy if China continue to grow their investments and eventually own everything in the U.K. ? The EU is a cuddly toy in comparison. In politics, soft power is the ability to attract and co-opt, rather than coerce. In other words, soft power involves shaping the preferences of others through appeal and attraction. So you’re happy with the China model ok you run with that as a good thing. If it’s preferable trading that’s what we did in the EU. Strange how things turn out. We didn’t have any gunboats rocking up to join the EU. Let’s see how much we can softly coerce the Chinese and Americans as that’s what I keep being told is our target market. Remember we have 45% of our market to find if the EU is going to go up in a puff of smoke next week . I never once said I was happy with the China model. I was merely pointing out that Chris has never said he wants an Empire through hard power, in fact, he says the complete opposite. This plan to reinstate the British Empire is a little light on details. Could you guys elaborate on what you're advocating here? Maybe that will alleviate some of the negative responses to this proposal. Who is advocating it? Chris speaks of it but actually he speaks of it much less than those opposing it Because his idea is low on details, and he never elaborates on how he wants to achieve this, what this return to the empire means, or why he thinks it's a good idea. Why would anyone throw this out there so much, if you don't want to talk about it? " There will be many cornerstones to the New British Empire. For a start, the Brexit Festival will be accessible to all the countries of the world, particularly to the Europeans, so they can admire, appreciate and be educated in the British Spirit and Way of Life - a life of relentless “can do” and positivity. An inclusive society where all are welcome to use the British template of modesty, institution and history to further their own ambitions. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All this talk of the Empire and taking land etc. Chris has said he wants a New Empire using Soft Power. This is a quite different concept to what was before Taking over another country is taking over another country so what’s your point? Would you be happy if China continue to grow their investments and eventually own everything in the U.K. ? The EU is a cuddly toy in comparison. In politics, soft power is the ability to attract and co-opt, rather than coerce. In other words, soft power involves shaping the preferences of others through appeal and attraction. So you’re happy with the China model ok you run with that as a good thing. If it’s preferable trading that’s what we did in the EU. Strange how things turn out. We didn’t have any gunboats rocking up to join the EU. Let’s see how much we can softly coerce the Chinese and Americans as that’s what I keep being told is our target market. Remember we have 45% of our market to find if the EU is going to go up in a puff of smoke next week . I never once said I was happy with the China model. I was merely pointing out that Chris has never said he wants an Empire through hard power, in fact, he says the complete opposite. This plan to reinstate the British Empire is a little light on details. Could you guys elaborate on what you're advocating here? Maybe that will alleviate some of the negative responses to this proposal. Who is advocating it? Chris speaks of it but actually he speaks of it much less than those opposing it Because his idea is low on details, and he never elaborates on how he wants to achieve this, what this return to the empire means, or why he thinks it's a good idea. Why would anyone throw this out there so much, if you don't want to talk about it? There will be many cornerstones to the New British Empire. For a start, the Brexit Festival will be accessible to all the countries of the world, particularly to the Europeans, so they can admire, appreciate and be educated in the British Spirit and Way of Life - a life of relentless “can do” and positivity. An inclusive society where all are welcome to use the British template of modesty, institution and history to further their own ambitions." Where are they hosting the ‘Brexit Festival ‘ ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All this talk of the Empire and taking land etc. Chris has said he wants a New Empire using Soft Power. This is a quite different concept to what was before Taking over another country is taking over another country so what’s your point? Would you be happy if China continue to grow their investments and eventually own everything in the U.K. ? The EU is a cuddly toy in comparison. In politics, soft power is the ability to attract and co-opt, rather than coerce. In other words, soft power involves shaping the preferences of others through appeal and attraction. So you’re happy with the China model ok you run with that as a good thing. If it’s preferable trading that’s what we did in the EU. Strange how things turn out. We didn’t have any gunboats rocking up to join the EU. Let’s see how much we can softly coerce the Chinese and Americans as that’s what I keep being told is our target market. Remember we have 45% of our market to find if the EU is going to go up in a puff of smoke next week . I never once said I was happy with the China model. I was merely pointing out that Chris has never said he wants an Empire through hard power, in fact, he says the complete opposite. This plan to reinstate the British Empire is a little light on details. Could you guys elaborate on what you're advocating here? Maybe that will alleviate some of the negative responses to this proposal. Who is advocating it? Chris speaks of it but actually he speaks of it much less than those opposing it Because his idea is low on details, and he never elaborates on how he wants to achieve this, what this return to the empire means, or why he thinks it's a good idea. Why would anyone throw this out there so much, if you don't want to talk about it? There will be many cornerstones to the New British Empire. For a start, the Brexit Festival will be accessible to all the countries of the world, particularly to the Europeans, so they can admire, appreciate and be educated in the British Spirit and Way of Life - a life of relentless “can do” and positivity. An inclusive society where all are welcome to use the British template of modesty, institution and history to further their own ambitions." Anything else? Because it doesn't sound like an empire so far. A crap festival that only leave voters are welcome at, and a divided society for the world to look at. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All this talk of the Empire and taking land etc. Chris has said he wants a New Empire using Soft Power. This is a quite different concept to what was before Taking over another country is taking over another country so what’s your point? Would you be happy if China continue to grow their investments and eventually own everything in the U.K. ? The EU is a cuddly toy in comparison. In politics, soft power is the ability to attract and co-opt, rather than coerce. In other words, soft power involves shaping the preferences of others through appeal and attraction. So you’re happy with the China model ok you run with that as a good thing. If it’s preferable trading that’s what we did in the EU. Strange how things turn out. We didn’t have any gunboats rocking up to join the EU. Let’s see how much we can softly coerce the Chinese and Americans as that’s what I keep being told is our target market. Remember we have 45% of our market to find if the EU is going to go up in a puff of smoke next week . I never once said I was happy with the China model. I was merely pointing out that Chris has never said he wants an Empire through hard power, in fact, he says the complete opposite. This plan to reinstate the British Empire is a little light on details. Could you guys elaborate on what you're advocating here? Maybe that will alleviate some of the negative responses to this proposal. Who is advocating it? Chris speaks of it but actually he speaks of it much less than those opposing it Because his idea is low on details, and he never elaborates on how he wants to achieve this, what this return to the empire means, or why he thinks it's a good idea. Why would anyone throw this out there so much, if you don't want to talk about it? There will be many cornerstones to the New British Empire. For a start, the Brexit Festival will be accessible to all the countries of the world, particularly to the Europeans, so they can admire, appreciate and be educated in the British Spirit and Way of Life - a life of relentless “can do” and positivity. An inclusive society where all are welcome to use the British template of modesty, institution and history to further their own ambitions." So thousands of years of European culture and success is beneath our own! Interesting. I know you’ve been to Germany once . Have you been anywhere else? I wonder because your apparent ignorance in your statement of the so called lesser countries seems to show a complete lack of knowledge on European success and culture. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All this talk of the Empire and taking land etc. Chris has said he wants a New Empire using Soft Power. This is a quite different concept to what was before Taking over another country is taking over another country so what’s your point? Would you be happy if China continue to grow their investments and eventually own everything in the U.K. ? The EU is a cuddly toy in comparison. In politics, soft power is the ability to attract and co-opt, rather than coerce. In other words, soft power involves shaping the preferences of others through appeal and attraction. So you’re happy with the China model ok you run with that as a good thing. If it’s preferable trading that’s what we did in the EU. Strange how things turn out. We didn’t have any gunboats rocking up to join the EU. Let’s see how much we can softly coerce the Chinese and Americans as that’s what I keep being told is our target market. Remember we have 45% of our market to find if the EU is going to go up in a puff of smoke next week . I never once said I was happy with the China model. I was merely pointing out that Chris has never said he wants an Empire through hard power, in fact, he says the complete opposite. This plan to reinstate the British Empire is a little light on details. Could you guys elaborate on what you're advocating here? Maybe that will alleviate some of the negative responses to this proposal. Who is advocating it? Chris speaks of it but actually he speaks of it much less than those opposing it Because his idea is low on details, and he never elaborates on how he wants to achieve this, what this return to the empire means, or why he thinks it's a good idea. Why would anyone throw this out there so much, if you don't want to talk about it? There will be many cornerstones to the New British Empire. For a start, the Brexit Festival will be accessible to all the countries of the world, particularly to the Europeans, so they can admire, appreciate and be educated in the British Spirit and Way of Life - a life of relentless “can do” and positivity. An inclusive society where all are welcome to use the British template of modesty, institution and history to further their own ambitions. Anything else? Because it doesn't sound like an empire so far. A crap festival that only leave voters are welcome at, and a divided society for the world to look at. " Only divided in the minds of people who have refused to accept the result of the referendum and post about it online. I don't find any divisions in the real world and day to day life and neither I imagine do the 5 million EU citizens who have chosen to make this UK society their home | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All quite sad really, would be good if Europe could perform better then we could export to them as well. Looks like we will do increasing trade with the rest of the world instead for a few years: “The loss of the UK's financial power has sparked an economic crisis inside the EU, according to one leading European political expert. Robert Oulds, who is the director of the Bruges Group, said that Brexit had blown a huge hole through EU finances and Brussels may not survive another economic crisis. Britain's departure has already left a £65billion (€75bn) hole in the EU budget.”" Europe was heading for bankrupsy anyway that is why it was so important we got out. They EU structure is expensive cumbersome and ineficient.It is a crazy structure that cannot survive long term | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All quite sad really, would be good if Europe could perform better then we could export to them as well. Looks like we will do increasing trade with the rest of the world instead for a few years: “The loss of the UK's financial power has sparked an economic crisis inside the EU, according to one leading European political expert. Robert Oulds, who is the director of the Bruges Group, said that Brexit had blown a huge hole through EU finances and Brussels may not survive another economic crisis. Britain's departure has already left a £65billion (€75bn) hole in the EU budget.”Europe was heading for bankrupsy anyway that is why it was so important we got out. They EU structure is expensive cumbersome and ineficient.It is a crazy structure that cannot survive long term" Yep it's only be going for nearly 5 decades . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All quite sad really, would be good if Europe could perform better then we could export to them as well. Looks like we will do increasing trade with the rest of the world instead for a few years: “The loss of the UK's financial power has sparked an economic crisis inside the EU, according to one leading European political expert. Robert Oulds, who is the director of the Bruges Group, said that Brexit had blown a huge hole through EU finances and Brussels may not survive another economic crisis. Britain's departure has already left a £65billion (€75bn) hole in the EU budget.”Europe was heading for bankrupsy anyway that is why it was so important we got out. They EU structure is expensive cumbersome and ineficient.It is a crazy structure that cannot survive long term Yep it's only be going for nearly 5 decades . " 1993 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Didnt we join the eec in 1973?" The EEC is not the EU though. Hence the whole argument to leave | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Didnt we join the eec in 1973?" Yes. Not the EU. The people weren't given a say on EU membership. You can blame the Tories for that | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Didnt we join the eec in 1973? The EEC is not the EU though. Hence the whole argument to leave " But it was a precusor to the eu was it not? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All quite sad really, would be good if Europe could perform better then we could export to them as well. Looks like we will do increasing trade with the rest of the world instead for a few years: “The loss of the UK's financial power has sparked an economic crisis inside the EU, according to one leading European political expert. Robert Oulds, who is the director of the Bruges Group, said that Brexit had blown a huge hole through EU finances and Brussels may not survive another economic crisis. Britain's departure has already left a £65billion (€75bn) hole in the EU budget.”Europe was heading for bankrupsy anyway that is why it was so important we got out. They EU structure is expensive cumbersome and ineficient.It is a crazy structure that cannot survive long term" Have you looked at our fabulous government set up lately? The EU is a positive bargain compared to our money squandering incompetent bunch. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why was there not a referendum in 93?" Because the Tories knew the people would vote against it. Even the Labour Party voted against the Maastricht Treaty | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Didnt we join the eec in 1973? The EEC is not the EU though. Hence the whole argument to leave But it was a precusor to the eu was it not? " The EU was created with the Maastricht treaty. So in effect the EEC was not a precursor as it changed with that agreement. Maybe you should check the definition of precursor | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why was there not a referendum in 93? Because the Tories knew the people would vote against it. Even the Labour Party voted against the Maastricht Treaty" How did they know the people would vote against it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All this talk of the Empire and taking land etc. Chris has said he wants a New Empire using Soft Power. This is a quite different concept to what was before Taking over another country is taking over another country so what’s your point? Would you be happy if China continue to grow their investments and eventually own everything in the U.K. ? The EU is a cuddly toy in comparison. In politics, soft power is the ability to attract and co-opt, rather than coerce. In other words, soft power involves shaping the preferences of others through appeal and attraction. So you’re happy with the China model ok you run with that as a good thing. If it’s preferable trading that’s what we did in the EU. Strange how things turn out. We didn’t have any gunboats rocking up to join the EU. Let’s see how much we can softly coerce the Chinese and Americans as that’s what I keep being told is our target market. Remember we have 45% of our market to find if the EU is going to go up in a puff of smoke next week . I never once said I was happy with the China model. I was merely pointing out that Chris has never said he wants an Empire through hard power, in fact, he says the complete opposite. This plan to reinstate the British Empire is a little light on details. Could you guys elaborate on what you're advocating here? Maybe that will alleviate some of the negative responses to this proposal. Who is advocating it? Chris speaks of it but actually he speaks of it much less than those opposing it Because his idea is low on details, and he never elaborates on how he wants to achieve this, what this return to the empire means, or why he thinks it's a good idea. Why would anyone throw this out there so much, if you don't want to talk about it? There will be many cornerstones to the New British Empire. For a start, the Brexit Festival will be accessible to all the countries of the world, particularly to the Europeans, so they can admire, appreciate and be educated in the British Spirit and Way of Life - a life of relentless “can do” and positivity. An inclusive society where all are welcome to use the British template of modesty, institution and history to further their own ambitions. Anything else? Because it doesn't sound like an empire so far. A crap festival that only leave voters are welcome at, and a divided society for the world to look at. " Anything else you say? Tons of things, but as I’ve never seen you make a positive post about anything, we both know it would be pointless to expound further with you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why was there not a referendum in 93? Because the Tories knew the people would vote against it. Even the Labour Party voted against the Maastricht Treaty How did they know the people would vote against it?" Mind readers | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why was there not a referendum in 93? Because the Tories knew the people would vote against it. Even the Labour Party voted against the Maastricht Treaty How did they know the people would vote against it?" Because the majority of people aren't rich or stupid. And the Tories got kicked out at the next election for signing us up to it. That and because Blair promised to hold a referendum on it if elected, which of course he reneged on | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why was there not a referendum in 93? Because the Tories knew the people would vote against it. Even the Labour Party voted against the Maastricht Treaty How did they know the people would vote against it? Because the majority of people aren't rich or stupid. And the Tories got kicked out at the next election for signing us up to it. That and because Blair promised to hold a referendum on it if elected, which of course he reneged on" The tories got kicked out because people were sick of years of tory rule. Fuck all to do with europe | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why was there not a referendum in 93? Because the Tories knew the people would vote against it. Even the Labour Party voted against the Maastricht Treaty How did they know the people would vote against it? Because the majority of people aren't rich or stupid. And the Tories got kicked out at the next election for signing us up to it. That and because Blair promised to hold a referendum on it if elected, which of course he reneged on The tories got kicked out because people were sick of years of tory rule. Fuck all to do with europe " Are you sure about that? Do you actually claim to know why people voted? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why was there not a referendum in 93? Because the Tories knew the people would vote against it. Even the Labour Party voted against the Maastricht Treaty How did they know the people would vote against it? Because the majority of people aren't rich or stupid. And the Tories got kicked out at the next election for signing us up to it. That and because Blair promised to hold a referendum on it if elected, which of course he reneged on The tories got kicked out because people were sick of years of tory rule. Fuck all to do with europe Are you sure about that? Do you actually claim to know why people voted?" Was the no 1 labour manifesto of the 1997 election to leave the eu? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why was there not a referendum in 93? Because the Tories knew the people would vote against it. Even the Labour Party voted against the Maastricht Treaty How did they know the people would vote against it? Because the majority of people aren't rich or stupid. And the Tories got kicked out at the next election for signing us up to it. That and because Blair promised to hold a referendum on it if elected, which of course he reneged on The tories got kicked out because people were sick of years of tory rule. Fuck all to do with europe Are you sure about that? Do you actually claim to know why people voted? Was the no 1 labour manifesto of the 1997 election to leave the eu?" Did the Tories take us into the EU and were all about Europe? They paid the price for that. Labour didn't even need a manifesto | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why was there not a referendum in 93? Because the Tories knew the people would vote against it. Even the Labour Party voted against the Maastricht Treaty How did they know the people would vote against it? Because the majority of people aren't rich or stupid. And the Tories got kicked out at the next election for signing us up to it. That and because Blair promised to hold a referendum on it if elected, which of course he reneged on The tories got kicked out because people were sick of years of tory rule. Fuck all to do with europe Are you sure about that? Do you actually claim to know why people voted? Was the no 1 labour manifesto of the 1997 election to leave the eu?" No. Did it need to be? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why was there not a referendum in 93? Because the Tories knew the people would vote against it. Even the Labour Party voted against the Maastricht Treaty How did they know the people would vote against it? Because the majority of people aren't rich or stupid. And the Tories got kicked out at the next election for signing us up to it. That and because Blair promised to hold a referendum on it if elected, which of course he reneged on The tories got kicked out because people were sick of years of tory rule. Fuck all to do with europe Are you sure about that? Do you actually claim to know why people voted? Was the no 1 labour manifesto of the 1997 election to leave the eu? Did the Tories take us into the EU and were all about Europe? They paid the price for that. Labour didn't even need a manifesto " Did labour win.the 97 election on the basis of talking us out of Europe? Yes or no? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why was there not a referendum in 93? Because the Tories knew the people would vote against it. Even the Labour Party voted against the Maastricht Treaty How did they know the people would vote against it? Because the majority of people aren't rich or stupid. And the Tories got kicked out at the next election for signing us up to it. That and because Blair promised to hold a referendum on it if elected, which of course he reneged on The tories got kicked out because people were sick of years of tory rule. Fuck all to do with europe Are you sure about that? Do you actually claim to know why people voted? Was the no 1 labour manifesto of the 1997 election to leave the eu? No. Did it need to be?" The claim was made that the tories lost the election because we were in europe. Logic dictates therefore that labour won the election on Tue basis of taking is out | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"When labour came to power Tony blaor was seen as the most pro European pm since Edward heath and new labour was committed to the eu Source oxford academic." Pmsl Have you never heard of John Major? You've surely posted that for a laugh? Tony Blair only became an MP in the first place because of his campaigns in the North East against the Eec | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"When labour came to power Tony blaor was seen as the most pro European pm since Edward heath and new labour was committed to the eu Source oxford academic. Pmsl Have you never heard of John Major? You've surely posted that for a laugh? Tony Blair only became an MP in the first place because of his campaigns in the North East against the Eec " So new labour were anti eu? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"When labour came to power Tony blaor was seen as the most pro European pm since Edward heath and new labour was committed to the eu Source oxford academic. Pmsl Have you never heard of John Major? You've surely posted that for a laugh? Tony Blair only became an MP in the first place because of his campaigns in the North East against the Eec So new labour were anti eu?" No, they were wankers who went back on their word and principles once they got into power | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why was there not a referendum in 93? Because the Tories knew the people would vote against it. Even the Labour Party voted against the Maastricht Treaty How did they know the people would vote against it? Because the majority of people aren't rich or stupid. And the Tories got kicked out at the next election for signing us up to it. That and because Blair promised to hold a referendum on it if elected, which of course he reneged on The tories got kicked out because people were sick of years of tory rule. Fuck all to do with europe Are you sure about that? Do you actually claim to know why people voted? Was the no 1 labour manifesto of the 1997 election to leave the eu? No. Did it need to be? The claim was made that the tories lost the election because we were in europe. Logic dictates therefore that labour won the election on Tue basis of taking is out" The claim was made that Blair promised a referendum | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"When labour came to power Tony blaor was seen as the most pro European pm since Edward heath and new labour was committed to the eu Source oxford academic. Pmsl Have you never heard of John Major? You've surely posted that for a laugh? Tony Blair only became an MP in the first place because of his campaigns in the North East against the Eec So new labour were anti eu? No, they were wankers who went back on their word and principles once they got into power " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"When labour came to power Tony blaor was seen as the most pro European pm since Edward heath and new labour was committed to the eu Source oxford academic. Pmsl Have you never heard of John Major? You've surely posted that for a laugh? Tony Blair only became an MP in the first place because of his campaigns in the North East against the Eec So new labour were anti eu? No, they were wankers who went back on their word and principles once they got into power " I'm sure you've even described new labour as Tories yourself | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"When labour came to power Tony blaor was seen as the most pro European pm since Edward heath and new labour was committed to the eu Source oxford academic. Pmsl Have you never heard of John Major? You've surely posted that for a laugh? Tony Blair only became an MP in the first place because of his campaigns in the North East against the Eec So new labour were anti eu? No, they were wankers who went back on their word and principles once they got into power I'm sure you've even described new labour as Tories yourself " I'm not defending new labour. Im saying the argument that the reason the tories were kicked out of power in 97 was because of europe is bollocks. The 97 manifesto barely mentions europe aoart from saying not being at the table would be disastrous No one was arsed about eueope in 97 apart from the daily mail readership. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why was there not a referendum in 93? Because the Tories knew the people would vote against it. Even the Labour Party voted against the Maastricht Treaty How did they know the people would vote against it? Because the majority of people aren't rich or stupid. And the Tories got kicked out at the next election for signing us up to it. That and because Blair promised to hold a referendum on it if elected, which of course he reneged on The tories got kicked out because people were sick of years of tory rule. Fuck all to do with europe Are you sure about that? Do you actually claim to know why people voted? Was the no 1 labour manifesto of the 1997 election to leave the eu? No. Did it need to be? The claim was made that the tories lost the election because we were in europe. Logic dictates therefore that labour won the election on Tue basis of taking is out The claim was made that Blair promised a referendum" Why did he get re-elected twice then ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why was there not a referendum in 93? Because the Tories knew the people would vote against it. Even the Labour Party voted against the Maastricht Treaty How did they know the people would vote against it? Because the majority of people aren't rich or stupid. And the Tories got kicked out at the next election for signing us up to it. That and because Blair promised to hold a referendum on it if elected, which of course he reneged on The tories got kicked out because people were sick of years of tory rule. Fuck all to do with europe Are you sure about that? Do you actually claim to know why people voted? Was the no 1 labour manifesto of the 1997 election to leave the eu? No. Did it need to be? The claim was made that the tories lost the election because we were in europe. Logic dictates therefore that labour won the election on Tue basis of taking is out The claim was made that Blair promised a referendum Why did he get re-elected twice then ? " How would I know? I've said time and time again I don't claim to know why people cast their votes | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"When labour came to power Tony blaor was seen as the most pro European pm since Edward heath and new labour was committed to the eu Source oxford academic. Pmsl Have you never heard of John Major? You've surely posted that for a laugh? Tony Blair only became an MP in the first place because of his campaigns in the North East against the Eec So new labour were anti eu? No, they were wankers who went back on their word and principles once they got into power I'm sure you've even described new labour as Tories yourself I'm not defending new labour. Im saying the argument that the reason the tories were kicked out of power in 97 was because of europe is bollocks. The 97 manifesto barely mentions europe aoart from saying not being at the table would be disastrous No one was arsed about eueope in 97 apart from the daily mail readership. " So why did Blair say he would hold a referendum if elected? Nobody was arsed about Europe then? Just because you don't remember discussions around the Euro etc doesn't mean nobody else was interested | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why was there not a referendum in 93? Because the Tories knew the people would vote against it. Even the Labour Party voted against the Maastricht Treaty How did they know the people would vote against it? Because the majority of people aren't rich or stupid. And the Tories got kicked out at the next election for signing us up to it. That and because Blair promised to hold a referendum on it if elected, which of course he reneged on The tories got kicked out because people were sick of years of tory rule. Fuck all to do with europe Are you sure about that? Do you actually claim to know why people voted? Was the no 1 labour manifesto of the 1997 election to leave the eu? No. Did it need to be? The claim was made that the tories lost the election because we were in europe. Logic dictates therefore that labour won the election on Tue basis of taking is out The claim was made that Blair promised a referendum Why did he get re-elected twice then ? How would I know? I've said time and time again I don't claim to know why people cast their votes" Exactly, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All this talk of the Empire and taking land etc. Chris has said he wants a New Empire using Soft Power. This is a quite different concept to what was before Taking over another country is taking over another country so what’s your point? Would you be happy if China continue to grow their investments and eventually own everything in the U.K. ? The EU is a cuddly toy in comparison. In politics, soft power is the ability to attract and co-opt, rather than coerce. In other words, soft power involves shaping the preferences of others through appeal and attraction. So you’re happy with the China model ok you run with that as a good thing. If it’s preferable trading that’s what we did in the EU. Strange how things turn out. We didn’t have any gunboats rocking up to join the EU. Let’s see how much we can softly coerce the Chinese and Americans as that’s what I keep being told is our target market. Remember we have 45% of our market to find if the EU is going to go up in a puff of smoke next week . I never once said I was happy with the China model. I was merely pointing out that Chris has never said he wants an Empire through hard power, in fact, he says the complete opposite. This plan to reinstate the British Empire is a little light on details. Could you guys elaborate on what you're advocating here? Maybe that will alleviate some of the negative responses to this proposal. Who is advocating it? Chris speaks of it but actually he speaks of it much less than those opposing it Because his idea is low on details, and he never elaborates on how he wants to achieve this, what this return to the empire means, or why he thinks it's a good idea. Why would anyone throw this out there so much, if you don't want to talk about it? There will be many cornerstones to the New British Empire. For a start, the Brexit Festival will be accessible to all the countries of the world, particularly to the Europeans, so they can admire, appreciate and be educated in the British Spirit and Way of Life - a life of relentless “can do” and positivity. An inclusive society where all are welcome to use the British template of modesty, institution and history to further their own ambitions. Anything else? Because it doesn't sound like an empire so far. A crap festival that only leave voters are welcome at, and a divided society for the world to look at. Anything else you say? Tons of things, but as I’ve never seen you make a positive post about anything, we both know it would be pointless to expound further with you. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why was there not a referendum in 93? Because the Tories knew the people would vote against it. Even the Labour Party voted against the Maastricht Treaty How did they know the people would vote against it? Because the majority of people aren't rich or stupid. And the Tories got kicked out at the next election for signing us up to it. That and because Blair promised to hold a referendum on it if elected, which of course he reneged on The tories got kicked out because people were sick of years of tory rule. Fuck all to do with europe Are you sure about that? Do you actually claim to know why people voted? Was the no 1 labour manifesto of the 1997 election to leave the eu? No. Did it need to be? The claim was made that the tories lost the election because we were in europe. Logic dictates therefore that labour won the election on Tue basis of taking is out The claim was made that Blair promised a referendum Why did he get re-elected twice then ? How would I know? I've said time and time again I don't claim to know why people cast their votes Exactly, " What are you on about? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"When labour came to power Tony blaor was seen as the most pro European pm since Edward heath and new labour was committed to the eu Source oxford academic. Pmsl Have you never heard of John Major? You've surely posted that for a laugh? Tony Blair only became an MP in the first place because of his campaigns in the North East against the Eec So new labour were anti eu? No, they were wankers who went back on their word and principles once they got into power I'm sure you've even described new labour as Tories yourself I'm not defending new labour. Im saying the argument that the reason the tories were kicked out of power in 97 was because of europe is bollocks. The 97 manifesto barely mentions europe aoart from saying not being at the table would be disastrous No one was arsed about eueope in 97 apart from the daily mail readership. So why did Blair say he would hold a referendum if elected? Nobody was arsed about Europe then? Just because you don't remember discussions around the Euro etc doesn't mean nobody else was interested " Probably something to do with the fact that his manifesto was pro eu | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why was there not a referendum in 93? Because the Tories knew the people would vote against it. Even the Labour Party voted against the Maastricht Treaty How did they know the people would vote against it? Because the majority of people aren't rich or stupid. And the Tories got kicked out at the next election for signing us up to it. That and because Blair promised to hold a referendum on it if elected, which of course he reneged on The tories got kicked out because people were sick of years of tory rule. Fuck all to do with europe Are you sure about that? Do you actually claim to know why people voted? Was the no 1 labour manifesto of the 1997 election to leave the eu? No. Did it need to be? The claim was made that the tories lost the election because we were in europe. Logic dictates therefore that labour won the election on Tue basis of taking is out The claim was made that Blair promised a referendum Why did he get re-elected twice then ? How would I know? I've said time and time again I don't claim to know why people cast their votes Exactly, What are you on about? " Nobody knows for certain why people voted for labour in the 1997 GE? Those who state it was because Blair promised a referendum are guessing , don’t you agree? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why was there not a referendum in 93? Because the Tories knew the people would vote against it. Even the Labour Party voted against the Maastricht Treaty How did they know the people would vote against it? Because the majority of people aren't rich or stupid. And the Tories got kicked out at the next election for signing us up to it. That and because Blair promised to hold a referendum on it if elected, which of course he reneged on The tories got kicked out because people were sick of years of tory rule. Fuck all to do with europe Are you sure about that? Do you actually claim to know why people voted? Was the no 1 labour manifesto of the 1997 election to leave the eu? No. Did it need to be? The claim was made that the tories lost the election because we were in europe. Logic dictates therefore that labour won the election on Tue basis of taking is out The claim was made that Blair promised a referendum Why did he get re-elected twice then ? How would I know? I've said time and time again I don't claim to know why people cast their votes Exactly, What are you on about? Nobody knows for certain why people voted for labour in the 1997 GE? Those who state it was because Blair promised a referendum are guessing , don’t you agree? " Yes I agree. I never said anything to the contrary | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why was there not a referendum in 93? Because the Tories knew the people would vote against it. Even the Labour Party voted against the Maastricht Treaty How did they know the people would vote against it? Because the majority of people aren't rich or stupid. And the Tories got kicked out at the next election for signing us up to it. That and because Blair promised to hold a referendum on it if elected, which of course he reneged on The tories got kicked out because people were sick of years of tory rule. Fuck all to do with europe Are you sure about that? Do you actually claim to know why people voted? Was the no 1 labour manifesto of the 1997 election to leave the eu? No. Did it need to be? The claim was made that the tories lost the election because we were in europe. Logic dictates therefore that labour won the election on Tue basis of taking is out The claim was made that Blair promised a referendum Why did he get re-elected twice then ? How would I know? I've said time and time again I don't claim to know why people cast their votes Exactly, What are you on about? Nobody knows for certain why people voted for labour in the 1997 GE? Those who state it was because Blair promised a referendum are guessing , don’t you agree? Yes I agree. I never said anything to the contrary" Does this theory also apply to the 2016 EU referendum? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why was there not a referendum in 93? Because the Tories knew the people would vote against it. Even the Labour Party voted against the Maastricht Treaty How did they know the people would vote against it? Because the majority of people aren't rich or stupid. And the Tories got kicked out at the next election for signing us up to it. That and because Blair promised to hold a referendum on it if elected, which of course he reneged on The tories got kicked out because people were sick of years of tory rule. Fuck all to do with europe Are you sure about that? Do you actually claim to know why people voted? Was the no 1 labour manifesto of the 1997 election to leave the eu? No. Did it need to be? The claim was made that the tories lost the election because we were in europe. Logic dictates therefore that labour won the election on Tue basis of taking is out The claim was made that Blair promised a referendum Why did he get re-elected twice then ? How would I know? I've said time and time again I don't claim to know why people cast their votes Exactly, What are you on about? Nobody knows for certain why people voted for labour in the 1997 GE? Those who state it was because Blair promised a referendum are guessing , don’t you agree? Yes I agree. I never said anything to the contrary Does this theory also apply to the 2016 EU referendum? " The theory applies to almost anything. Unless someone explicitly tells you a reason for them doing something then you don't know. Far too many people making assumptions and thinking they know what other people are doing, why they are doing it or what they're thinking. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"P.S if Europe wasn't an issue, why did Blair also promise a referendum on the EU constitution in 2004? And didn't Cameron promise to hold a referendum if he got into power? And what happened? " For the 2nd time. By the fact that it was barely mentioned in the manifesto and when it was, it was seen as a positive, is a bit of a give away. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"P.S if Europe wasn't an issue, why did Blair also promise a referendum on the EU constitution in 2004? And didn't Cameron promise to hold a referendum if he got into power? And what happened? For the 2nd time. By the fact that it was barely mentioned in the manifesto and when it was, it was seen as a positive, is a bit of a give away." I don't understand what you're saying there but the outcome was that after 23 years of pissin about and denying a democratic vote the people finally got what they wanted and we left the EU | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All this talk of the Empire and taking land etc. Chris has said he wants a New Empire using Soft Power. This is a quite different concept to what was before Taking over another country is taking over another country so what’s your point? Would you be happy if China continue to grow their investments and eventually own everything in the U.K. ? The EU is a cuddly toy in comparison. In politics, soft power is the ability to attract and co-opt, rather than coerce. In other words, soft power involves shaping the preferences of others through appeal and attraction. So you’re happy with the China model ok you run with that as a good thing. If it’s preferable trading that’s what we did in the EU. Strange how things turn out. We didn’t have any gunboats rocking up to join the EU. Let’s see how much we can softly coerce the Chinese and Americans as that’s what I keep being told is our target market. Remember we have 45% of our market to find if the EU is going to go up in a puff of smoke next week . I never once said I was happy with the China model. I was merely pointing out that Chris has never said he wants an Empire through hard power, in fact, he says the complete opposite. This plan to reinstate the British Empire is a little light on details. Could you guys elaborate on what you're advocating here? Maybe that will alleviate some of the negative responses to this proposal. Who is advocating it? Chris speaks of it but actually he speaks of it much less than those opposing it Because his idea is low on details, and he never elaborates on how he wants to achieve this, what this return to the empire means, or why he thinks it's a good idea. Why would anyone throw this out there so much, if you don't want to talk about it? There will be many cornerstones to the New British Empire. For a start, the Brexit Festival will be accessible to all the countries of the world, particularly to the Europeans, so they can admire, appreciate and be educated in the British Spirit and Way of Life - a life of relentless “can do” and positivity. An inclusive society where all are welcome to use the British template of modesty, institution and history to further their own ambitions. Anything else? Because it doesn't sound like an empire so far. A crap festival that only leave voters are welcome at, and a divided society for the world to look at. Anything else you say? Tons of things, but as I’ve never seen you make a positive post about anything, we both know it would be pointless to expound further with you. " Your two strongest points are weak, have nothing to do with an empire, and don't really make sense. So I should imagine your next tier answers would be interesting to hear. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All this talk of the Empire and taking land etc. Chris has said he wants a New Empire using Soft Power. This is a quite different concept to what was before Taking over another country is taking over another country so what’s your point? Would you be happy if China continue to grow their investments and eventually own everything in the U.K. ? The EU is a cuddly toy in comparison. In politics, soft power is the ability to attract and co-opt, rather than coerce. In other words, soft power involves shaping the preferences of others through appeal and attraction. So you’re happy with the China model ok you run with that as a good thing. If it’s preferable trading that’s what we did in the EU. Strange how things turn out. We didn’t have any gunboats rocking up to join the EU. Let’s see how much we can softly coerce the Chinese and Americans as that’s what I keep being told is our target market. Remember we have 45% of our market to find if the EU is going to go up in a puff of smoke next week . I never once said I was happy with the China model. I was merely pointing out that Chris has never said he wants an Empire through hard power, in fact, he says the complete opposite. This plan to reinstate the British Empire is a little light on details. Could you guys elaborate on what you're advocating here? Maybe that will alleviate some of the negative responses to this proposal. Who is advocating it? Chris speaks of it but actually he speaks of it much less than those opposing it Because his idea is low on details, and he never elaborates on how he wants to achieve this, what this return to the empire means, or why he thinks it's a good idea. Why would anyone throw this out there so much, if you don't want to talk about it? There will be many cornerstones to the New British Empire. For a start, the Brexit Festival will be accessible to all the countries of the world, particularly to the Europeans, so they can admire, appreciate and be educated in the British Spirit and Way of Life - a life of relentless “can do” and positivity. An inclusive society where all are welcome to use the British template of modesty, institution and history to further their own ambitions. Anything else? Because it doesn't sound like an empire so far. A crap festival that only leave voters are welcome at, and a divided society for the world to look at. Anything else you say? Tons of things, but as I’ve never seen you make a positive post about anything, we both know it would be pointless to expound further with you. Your two strongest points are weak, have nothing to do with an empire, and don't really make sense. So I should imagine your next tier answers would be interesting to hear. " Yep proves my point, superb | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All this talk of the Empire and taking land etc. Chris has said he wants a New Empire using Soft Power. This is a quite different concept to what was before Taking over another country is taking over another country so what’s your point? Would you be happy if China continue to grow their investments and eventually own everything in the U.K. ? The EU is a cuddly toy in comparison. In politics, soft power is the ability to attract and co-opt, rather than coerce. In other words, soft power involves shaping the preferences of others through appeal and attraction. So you’re happy with the China model ok you run with that as a good thing. If it’s preferable trading that’s what we did in the EU. Strange how things turn out. We didn’t have any gunboats rocking up to join the EU. Let’s see how much we can softly coerce the Chinese and Americans as that’s what I keep being told is our target market. Remember we have 45% of our market to find if the EU is going to go up in a puff of smoke next week . I never once said I was happy with the China model. I was merely pointing out that Chris has never said he wants an Empire through hard power, in fact, he says the complete opposite. This plan to reinstate the British Empire is a little light on details. Could you guys elaborate on what you're advocating here? Maybe that will alleviate some of the negative responses to this proposal. Who is advocating it? Chris speaks of it but actually he speaks of it much less than those opposing it Because his idea is low on details, and he never elaborates on how he wants to achieve this, what this return to the empire means, or why he thinks it's a good idea. Why would anyone throw this out there so much, if you don't want to talk about it? There will be many cornerstones to the New British Empire. For a start, the Brexit Festival will be accessible to all the countries of the world, particularly to the Europeans, so they can admire, appreciate and be educated in the British Spirit and Way of Life - a life of relentless “can do” and positivity. An inclusive society where all are welcome to use the British template of modesty, institution and history to further their own ambitions. Anything else? Because it doesn't sound like an empire so far. A crap festival that only leave voters are welcome at, and a divided society for the world to look at. Anything else you say? Tons of things, but as I’ve never seen you make a positive post about anything, we both know it would be pointless to expound further with you. Your two strongest points are weak, have nothing to do with an empire, and don't really make sense. So I should imagine your next tier answers would be interesting to hear. Yep proves my point, superb " So we're still non-the-wiser what you want to return to the days of the empire for, how you suggest we do it, and why that would be a good thing. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low." Then fancy it being on a news source that most other new agencies pay to get their news from. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-budget-idUKKBN20D2V0 Shocking indeed. - Not. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As today the number of single vaccinations administered in the U.K. passes the notable figure of 17.4 million perhaps this is an opportune moment to say “thank you” to all those who have made it possible. " Well done to the Gmnt! For taking an early punt on securing those vaccines. Also the 12 week gamble. Long May she reign. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low. Then fancy it being on a news source that most other new agencies pay to get their news from. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-budget-idUKKBN20D2V0 Shocking indeed. - Not." Mmhmm I was commenting on the OPs choice of news sources. It explains a lot. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low. Then fancy it being on a news source that most other new agencies pay to get their news from. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-budget-idUKKBN20D2V0 Shocking indeed. - Not. Mmhmm I was commenting on the OPs choice of news sources. It explains a lot. " But the story is TRUE. DM or nay. And the story was what the OP posted after all. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Gruniad is too full of elitist and rich lefties that return their castles in the evening. Morning Star darlinks !!!" Just say no kids | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low. Then fancy it being on a news source that most other new agencies pay to get their news from. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-budget-idUKKBN20D2V0 Shocking indeed. - Not. Mmhmm I was commenting on the OPs choice of news sources. It explains a lot. But the story is TRUE. DM or nay. And the story was what the OP posted after all." I wouldn't bother wasting your time. Been there already today | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Gruniad is too full of elitist and rich lefties that return their castles in the evening. Morning Star darlinks !!!" okay. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low. Then fancy it being on a news source that most other new agencies pay to get their news from. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-budget-idUKKBN20D2V0 Shocking indeed. - Not. Mmhmm I was commenting on the OPs choice of news sources. It explains a lot. But the story is TRUE. DM or nay. And the story was what the OP posted after all." The story is true but it’s contents are bollocks | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low. Then fancy it being on a news source that most other new agencies pay to get their news from. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-budget-idUKKBN20D2V0 Shocking indeed. - Not. Mmhmm I was commenting on the OPs choice of news sources. It explains a lot. But the story is TRUE. DM or nay. And the story was what the OP posted after all. The story is true but it’s contents are bollocks " But you've already rubbished the type and the person who said it. Are you now saying he didn't tell lies? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low. Then fancy it being on a news source that most other new agencies pay to get their news from. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-budget-idUKKBN20D2V0 Shocking indeed. - Not. Mmhmm I was commenting on the OPs choice of news sources. It explains a lot. But the story is TRUE. DM or nay. And the story was what the OP posted after all." The story is about Robert Ould. The Express love him. The story is, "Person who hates the EU says some stuff about the EU." It's not even vaguely interesting. But the OP has some pretty out there ideas, so it's interesting to see he reads the Daily Mail and Express, which goes some way to explaining some of theit bizarre notions. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As today the number of single vaccinations administered in the U.K. passes the notable figure of 17.4 million perhaps this is an opportune moment to say “thank you” to all those who have made it possible. Well done to the Gmnt! For taking an early punt on securing those vaccines. Also the 12 week gamble. Long May she reign. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low. Then fancy it being on a news source that most other new agencies pay to get their news from. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-budget-idUKKBN20D2V0 Shocking indeed. - Not. Mmhmm I was commenting on the OPs choice of news sources. It explains a lot. But the story is TRUE. DM or nay. And the story was what the OP posted after all. The story is true but it’s contents are bollocks " So. How can it be true but bollocks? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low. Then fancy it being on a news source that most other new agencies pay to get their news from. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-budget-idUKKBN20D2V0 Shocking indeed. - Not. Mmhmm I was commenting on the OPs choice of news sources. It explains a lot. But the story is TRUE. DM or nay. And the story was what the OP posted after all. The story is true but it’s contents are bollocks But you've already rubbished the type and the person who said it. Are you now saying he didn't tell lies?" The type and the person who said it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low. Then fancy it being on a news source that most other new agencies pay to get their news from. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-budget-idUKKBN20D2V0 Shocking indeed. - Not. Mmhmm I was commenting on the OPs choice of news sources. It explains a lot. But the story is TRUE. DM or nay. And the story was what the OP posted after all. The story is true but it’s contents are bollocks But you've already rubbished the type and the person who said it. Are you now saying he didn't tell lies? The type and the person who said it? " Was it another lowlife? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low. Then fancy it being on a news source that most other new agencies pay to get their news from. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-budget-idUKKBN20D2V0 Shocking indeed. - Not. Mmhmm I was commenting on the OPs choice of news sources. It explains a lot. But the story is TRUE. DM or nay. And the story was what the OP posted after all. The story is true but it’s contents are bollocks So. How can it be true but bollocks? " I shall rephrase. The story exists but it’s contents are bollocks, a bit like something from the stories and fantasies section on here | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low. Then fancy it being on a news source that most other new agencies pay to get their news from. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-budget-idUKKBN20D2V0 Shocking indeed. - Not. Mmhmm I was commenting on the OPs choice of news sources. It explains a lot. But the story is TRUE. DM or nay. And the story was what the OP posted after all. The story is true but it’s contents are bollocks But you've already rubbished the type and the person who said it. Are you now saying he didn't tell lies? The type and the person who said it? " My bad, it wasn't you. Apologies | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low. Then fancy it being on a news source that most other new agencies pay to get their news from. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-budget-idUKKBN20D2V0 Shocking indeed. - Not. Mmhmm I was commenting on the OPs choice of news sources. It explains a lot. But the story is TRUE. DM or nay. And the story was what the OP posted after all. The story is true but it’s contents are bollocks But you've already rubbished the type and the person who said it. Are you now saying he didn't tell lies? The type and the person who said it? Was it another lowlife?" Was it? I haven't called anyone a lowlife | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low. Then fancy it being on a news source that most other new agencies pay to get their news from. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-budget-idUKKBN20D2V0 Shocking indeed. - Not. Mmhmm I was commenting on the OPs choice of news sources. It explains a lot. But the story is TRUE. DM or nay. And the story was what the OP posted after all. The story is true but it’s contents are bollocks But you've already rubbished the type and the person who said it. Are you now saying he didn't tell lies? The type and the person who said it? Was it another lowlife? Was it? I haven't called anyone a lowlife" Dont think I said you did | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All quite sad really, would be good if Europe could perform better then we could export to them as well. Looks like we will do increasing trade with the rest of the world instead for a few years: “The loss of the UK's financial power has sparked an economic crisis inside the EU, according to one leading European political expert. Robert Oulds, who is the director of the Bruges Group, said that Brexit had blown a huge hole through EU finances and Brussels may not survive another economic crisis. Britain's departure has already left a £65billion (€75bn) hole in the EU budget.”Europe was heading for bankrupsy anyway that is why it was so important we got out. They EU structure is expensive cumbersome and ineficient.It is a crazy structure that cannot survive long term Yep it's only be going for nearly 5 decades . " Not in its present form | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low. Then fancy it being on a news source that most other new agencies pay to get their news from. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-budget-idUKKBN20D2V0 Shocking indeed. - Not. Mmhmm I was commenting on the OPs choice of news sources. It explains a lot. But the story is TRUE. DM or nay. And the story was what the OP posted after all. The story is true but it’s contents are bollocks But you've already rubbished the type and the person who said it. Are you now saying he didn't tell lies? The type and the person who said it? Was it another lowlife? Was it? I haven't called anyone a lowlife Dont think I said you did" You quoted my text so I would assume you're asking me if it was 'another lowlife'. Being that I haven't called anyone a lowlife, how can there possibly be 'another'? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All quite sad really, would be good if Europe could perform better then we could export to them as well. Looks like we will do increasing trade with the rest of the world instead for a few years: “The loss of the UK's financial power has sparked an economic crisis inside the EU, according to one leading European political expert. Robert Oulds, who is the director of the Bruges Group, said that Brexit had blown a huge hole through EU finances and Brussels may not survive another economic crisis. Britain's departure has already left a £65billion (€75bn) hole in the EU budget.”Europe was heading for bankrupsy anyway that is why it was so important we got out. They EU structure is expensive cumbersome and ineficient.It is a crazy structure that cannot survive long term Yep it's only be going for nearly 5 decades . Not in its present form" 27 years | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low. Then fancy it being on a news source that most other new agencies pay to get their news from. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-budget-idUKKBN20D2V0 Shocking indeed. - Not. Mmhmm I was commenting on the OPs choice of news sources. It explains a lot. But the story is TRUE. DM or nay. And the story was what the OP posted after all. The story is true but it’s contents are bollocks But you've already rubbished the type and the person who said it. Are you now saying he didn't tell lies? The type and the person who said it? Was it another lowlife? Was it? I haven't called anyone a lowlife Dont think I said you did You quoted my text so I would assume you're asking me if it was 'another lowlife'. Being that I haven't called anyone a lowlife, how can there possibly be 'another'?" Nope it wasmt aimed at you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low. Then fancy it being on a news source that most other new agencies pay to get their news from. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-budget-idUKKBN20D2V0 Shocking indeed. - Not. Mmhmm I was commenting on the OPs choice of news sources. It explains a lot. But the story is TRUE. DM or nay. And the story was what the OP posted after all. The story is true but it’s contents are bollocks But you've already rubbished the type and the person who said it. Are you now saying he didn't tell lies? The type and the person who said it? Was it another lowlife? Was it? I haven't called anyone a lowlife Dont think I said you did You quoted my text so I would assume you're asking me if it was 'another lowlife'. Being that I haven't called anyone a lowlife, how can there possibly be 'another'? Nope it wasmt aimed at you." But you quoted my comment, hence the confusion. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low. Then fancy it being on a news source that most other new agencies pay to get their news from. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-budget-idUKKBN20D2V0 Shocking indeed. - Not. Mmhmm I was commenting on the OPs choice of news sources. It explains a lot. But the story is TRUE. DM or nay. And the story was what the OP posted after all. The story is true but it’s contents are bollocks So. How can it be true but bollocks? I shall rephrase. The story exists but it’s contents are bollocks, a bit like something from the stories and fantasies section on here " So. Really it's just your opinion of the person who said it - not believing that they have it right? But not really the DM who got it wrong? So. perhaps you could have just said - I don't believe the person who's story it is. Not 'a new low for posting it from the DM? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low. Then fancy it being on a news source that most other new agencies pay to get their news from. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-budget-idUKKBN20D2V0 Shocking indeed. - Not. Mmhmm I was commenting on the OPs choice of news sources. It explains a lot. But the story is TRUE. DM or nay. And the story was what the OP posted after all. The story is true but it’s contents are bollocks So. How can it be true but bollocks? I shall rephrase. The story exists but it’s contents are bollocks, a bit like something from the stories and fantasies section on here So. Really it's just your opinion of the person who said it - not believing that they have it right? But not really the DM who got it wrong? So. perhaps you could have just said - I don't believe the person who's story it is. Not 'a new low for posting it from the DM? " It was the Daily Express , | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low. Then fancy it being on a news source that most other new agencies pay to get their news from. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-budget-idUKKBN20D2V0 Shocking indeed. - Not. Mmhmm I was commenting on the OPs choice of news sources. It explains a lot. But the story is TRUE. DM or nay. And the story was what the OP posted after all. The story is true but it’s contents are bollocks So. How can it be true but bollocks? I shall rephrase. The story exists but it’s contents are bollocks, a bit like something from the stories and fantasies section on here So. Really it's just your opinion of the person who said it - not believing that they have it right? But not really the DM who got it wrong? So. perhaps you could have just said - I don't believe the person who's story it is. Not 'a new low for posting it from the DM? It was the Daily Express , " Wrong it was - Robert Oulds. The DM and several other news outlets reported what he said. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As today the number of single vaccinations administered in the U.K. passes the notable figure of 17.4 million perhaps this is an opportune moment to say “thank you” to all those who have made it possible. Well done to the Gmnt! For taking an early punt on securing those vaccines. Also the 12 week gamble. Long May she reign. " Yes well done to all involved from top to bottom. Also as mentioned above the 12 gap seems to be the most effective. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As today the number of single vaccinations administered in the U.K. passes the notable figure of 17.4 million perhaps this is an opportune moment to say “thank you” to all those who have made it possible. Well done to the Gmnt! For taking an early punt on securing those vaccines. Also the 12 week gamble. Long May she reign. " Yes well done to all involved from top to bottom. Also as mentioned above the 12 gap seems to be the most effective route | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low. Then fancy it being on a news source that most other new agencies pay to get their news from. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-budget-idUKKBN20D2V0 Shocking indeed. - Not. Mmhmm I was commenting on the OPs choice of news sources. It explains a lot. But the story is TRUE. DM or nay. And the story was what the OP posted after all. The story is true but it’s contents are bollocks So. How can it be true but bollocks? I shall rephrase. The story exists but it’s contents are bollocks, a bit like something from the stories and fantasies section on here So. Really it's just your opinion of the person who said it - not believing that they have it right? But not really the DM who got it wrong? So. perhaps you could have just said - I don't believe the person who's story it is. Not 'a new low for posting it from the DM? It was the Daily Express , Wrong it was - Robert Oulds. The DM and several other news outlets reported what he said." Mind you it’s even worse than that. Rubbishing any and every source if it’s a story they don’t like, and not a single substantive response as to why Robert Oulds is wrong. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low. Then fancy it being on a news source that most other new agencies pay to get their news from. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-budget-idUKKBN20D2V0 Shocking indeed. - Not. Mmhmm I was commenting on the OPs choice of news sources. It explains a lot. But the story is TRUE. DM or nay. And the story was what the OP posted after all. The story is true but it’s contents are bollocks So. How can it be true but bollocks? I shall rephrase. The story exists but it’s contents are bollocks, a bit like something from the stories and fantasies section on here So. Really it's just your opinion of the person who said it - not believing that they have it right? But not really the DM who got it wrong? So. perhaps you could have just said - I don't believe the person who's story it is. Not 'a new low for posting it from the DM? It was the Daily Express , Wrong it was - Robert Oulds. The DM and several other news outlets reported what he said. Mind you it’s even worse than that. Rubbishing any and every source if it’s a story they don’t like, and not a single substantive response as to why Robert Oulds is wrong." Precisely. It would be good to have discussion/debate on the Politics board for a change. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low. Then fancy it being on a news source that most other new agencies pay to get their news from. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-budget-idUKKBN20D2V0 Shocking indeed. - Not. Mmhmm I was commenting on the OPs choice of news sources. It explains a lot. But the story is TRUE. DM or nay. And the story was what the OP posted after all. The story is true but it’s contents are bollocks So. How can it be true but bollocks? I shall rephrase. The story exists but it’s contents are bollocks, a bit like something from the stories and fantasies section on here So. Really it's just your opinion of the person who said it - not believing that they have it right? But not really the DM who got it wrong? So. perhaps you could have just said - I don't believe the person who's story it is. Not 'a new low for posting it from the DM? It was the Daily Express , Wrong it was - Robert Oulds. The DM and several other news outlets reported what he said. Mind you it’s even worse than that. Rubbishing any and every source if it’s a story they don’t like, and not a single substantive response as to why Robert Oulds is wrong." Nothing to do with the source reporting something we don't like. It's about critical thinking, and understanding the agenda in which the story is published. And in this case the agenda of the person and organisation they're quoting. The story itself is utterly inane. It's not worth debating. The interesting point here is that you read and trust the Daily Express. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low. Then fancy it being on a news source that most other new agencies pay to get their news from. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-budget-idUKKBN20D2V0 Shocking indeed. - Not. Mmhmm I was commenting on the OPs choice of news sources. It explains a lot. But the story is TRUE. DM or nay. And the story was what the OP posted after all. The story is true but it’s contents are bollocks So. How can it be true but bollocks? I shall rephrase. The story exists but it’s contents are bollocks, a bit like something from the stories and fantasies section on here So. Really it's just your opinion of the person who said it - not believing that they have it right? But not really the DM who got it wrong? So. perhaps you could have just said - I don't believe the person who's story it is. Not 'a new low for posting it from the DM? It was the Daily Express , Wrong it was - Robert Oulds. The DM and several other news outlets reported what he said. Mind you it’s even worse than that. Rubbishing any and every source if it’s a story they don’t like, and not a single substantive response as to why Robert Oulds is wrong. Nothing to do with the source reporting something we don't like. It's about critical thinking, and understanding the agenda in which the story is published. And in this case the agenda of the person and organisation they're quoting. The story itself is utterly inane. It's not worth debating. The interesting point here is that you read and trust the Daily Express. " I'm actually astonished that you care more for what newspaper someone reads than you are about the actual news. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low. Then fancy it being on a news source that most other new agencies pay to get their news from. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-budget-idUKKBN20D2V0 Shocking indeed. - Not. Mmhmm I was commenting on the OPs choice of news sources. It explains a lot. But the story is TRUE. DM or nay. And the story was what the OP posted after all. The story is true but it’s contents are bollocks So. How can it be true but bollocks? I shall rephrase. The story exists but it’s contents are bollocks, a bit like something from the stories and fantasies section on here So. Really it's just your opinion of the person who said it - not believing that they have it right? But not really the DM who got it wrong? So. perhaps you could have just said - I don't believe the person who's story it is. Not 'a new low for posting it from the DM? It was the Daily Express , Wrong it was - Robert Oulds. The DM and several other news outlets reported what he said. Mind you it’s even worse than that. Rubbishing any and every source if it’s a story they don’t like, and not a single substantive response as to why Robert Oulds is wrong. Nothing to do with the source reporting something we don't like. It's about critical thinking, and understanding the agenda in which the story is published. And in this case the agenda of the person and organisation they're quoting. The story itself is utterly inane. It's not worth debating. The interesting point here is that you read and trust the Daily Express. " Are you saying the story is false or that you don't like the fact its been reported? To you it may not be worth debating which of course is fine but to others they may want to debate it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low. Then fancy it being on a news source that most other new agencies pay to get their news from. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-budget-idUKKBN20D2V0 Shocking indeed. - Not. Mmhmm I was commenting on the OPs choice of news sources. It explains a lot. But the story is TRUE. DM or nay. And the story was what the OP posted after all. The story is true but it’s contents are bollocks So. How can it be true but bollocks? I shall rephrase. The story exists but it’s contents are bollocks, a bit like something from the stories and fantasies section on here So. Really it's just your opinion of the person who said it - not believing that they have it right? But not really the DM who got it wrong? So. perhaps you could have just said - I don't believe the person who's story it is. Not 'a new low for posting it from the DM? It was the Daily Express , Wrong it was - Robert Oulds. The DM and several other news outlets reported what he said. Mind you it’s even worse than that. Rubbishing any and every source if it’s a story they don’t like, and not a single substantive response as to why Robert Oulds is wrong. Nothing to do with the source reporting something we don't like. It's about critical thinking, and understanding the agenda in which the story is published. And in this case the agenda of the person and organisation they're quoting. The story itself is utterly inane. It's not worth debating. The interesting point here is that you read and trust the Daily Express. " Third biggest net contributor leaves the EU.... 10 billion Euro hole in finances... Equals inane? Just lol. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This was copied and pasted from the Daily Express website. A new low. Then fancy it being on a news source that most other new agencies pay to get their news from. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-budget-idUKKBN20D2V0 Shocking indeed. - Not. Mmhmm I was commenting on the OPs choice of news sources. It explains a lot. But the story is TRUE. DM or nay. And the story was what the OP posted after all. The story is true but it’s contents are bollocks So. How can it be true but bollocks? I shall rephrase. The story exists but it’s contents are bollocks, a bit like something from the stories and fantasies section on here So. Really it's just your opinion of the person who said it - not believing that they have it right? But not really the DM who got it wrong? So. perhaps you could have just said - I don't believe the person who's story it is. Not 'a new low for posting it from the DM? It was the Daily Express , Wrong it was - Robert Oulds. The DM and several other news outlets reported what he said. Mind you it’s even worse than that. Rubbishing any and every source if it’s a story they don’t like, and not a single substantive response as to why Robert Oulds is wrong. Nothing to do with the source reporting something we don't like. It's about critical thinking, and understanding the agenda in which the story is published. And in this case the agenda of the person and organisation they're quoting. The story itself is utterly inane. It's not worth debating. The interesting point here is that you read and trust the Daily Express. Third biggest net contributor leaves the EU.... 10 billion Euro hole in finances... Equals inane? Just lol. " I'm sure the other bid players will prop it up as it would like we got out just in time the likes of Grease is going to need help shit if we now have an extra deat is 400 billion due to covid I'm glad we are not thrown more money in the kitty. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All quite sad really, would be good if Europe could perform better then we could export to them as well. Looks like we will do increasing trade with the rest of the world instead for a few years: “The loss of the UK's financial power has sparked an economic crisis inside the EU, according to one leading European political expert. Robert Oulds, who is the director of the Bruges Group, said that Brexit had blown a huge hole through EU finances and Brussels may not survive another economic crisis. Britain's departure has already left a £65billion (€75bn) hole in the EU budget.”" Just to be clear, the EU Budget Cycle is for 7 years, so it would have cost the UK less than £10bn a year - interesting how low this is compared to the £18.2bn a year Boris claimed (£350m a week). | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All quite sad really, would be good if Europe could perform better then we could export to them as well. Looks like we will do increasing trade with the rest of the world instead for a few years: “The loss of the UK's financial power has sparked an economic crisis inside the EU, according to one leading European political expert. Robert Oulds, who is the director of the Bruges Group, said that Brexit had blown a huge hole through EU finances and Brussels may not survive another economic crisis. Britain's departure has already left a £65billion (€75bn) hole in the EU budget.” Just to be clear, the EU Budget Cycle is for 7 years, so it would have cost the UK less than £10bn a year - interesting how low this is compared to the £18.2bn a year Boris claimed (£350m a week). " In my experience, it’s usually remainers who struggle with the concept of gross and net contributions. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All quite sad really, would be good if Europe could perform better then we could export to them as well. Looks like we will do increasing trade with the rest of the world instead for a few years: “The loss of the UK's financial power has sparked an economic crisis inside the EU, according to one leading European political expert. Robert Oulds, who is the director of the Bruges Group, said that Brexit had blown a huge hole through EU finances and Brussels may not survive another economic crisis. Britain's departure has already left a £65billion (€75bn) hole in the EU budget.” Just to be clear, the EU Budget Cycle is for 7 years, so it would have cost the UK less than £10bn a year - interesting how low this is compared to the £18.2bn a year Boris claimed (£350m a week). " Yet bless him no Mps are good with numbers | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All quite sad really, would be good if Europe could perform better then we could export to them as well. Looks like we will do increasing trade with the rest of the world instead for a few years: “The loss of the UK's financial power has sparked an economic crisis inside the EU, according to one leading European political expert. Robert Oulds, who is the director of the Bruges Group, said that Brexit had blown a huge hole through EU finances and Brussels may not survive another economic crisis. Britain's departure has already left a £65billion (€75bn) hole in the EU budget.” Just to be clear, the EU Budget Cycle is for 7 years, so it would have cost the UK less than £10bn a year - interesting how low this is compared to the £18.2bn a year Boris claimed (£350m a week). In my experience, it’s usually remainers who struggle with the concept of gross and net contributions." You didn’t mention which it was? But the facts are still the facts - Boris lied about an extra £350m a week for the NHS | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All quite sad really, would be good if Europe could perform better then we could export to them as well. Looks like we will do increasing trade with the rest of the world instead for a few years: “The loss of the UK's financial power has sparked an economic crisis inside the EU, according to one leading European political expert. Robert Oulds, who is the director of the Bruges Group, said that Brexit had blown a huge hole through EU finances and Brussels may not survive another economic crisis. Britain's departure has already left a £65billion (€75bn) hole in the EU budget.” Just to be clear, the EU Budget Cycle is for 7 years, so it would have cost the UK less than £10bn a year - interesting how low this is compared to the £18.2bn a year Boris claimed (£350m a week). In my experience, it’s usually remainers who struggle with the concept of gross and net contributions. You didn’t mention which it was? But the facts are still the facts - Boris lied about an extra £350m a week for the NHS " How much would it have cost the uk putting in to the eu covid recovery fund ? france reckons it will be 40 billion out of pocket. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All quite sad really, would be good if Europe could perform better then we could export to them as well. Looks like we will do increasing trade with the rest of the world instead for a few years: “The loss of the UK's financial power has sparked an economic crisis inside the EU, according to one leading European political expert. Robert Oulds, who is the director of the Bruges Group, said that Brexit had blown a huge hole through EU finances and Brussels may not survive another economic crisis. Britain's departure has already left a £65billion (€75bn) hole in the EU budget.” Just to be clear, the EU Budget Cycle is for 7 years, so it would have cost the UK less than £10bn a year - interesting how low this is compared to the £18.2bn a year Boris claimed (£350m a week). In my experience, it’s usually remainers who struggle with the concept of gross and net contributions. You didn’t mention which it was? But the facts are still the facts - Boris lied about an extra £350m a week for the NHS How much would it have cost the uk putting in to the eu covid recovery fund ? france reckons it will be 40 billion out of pocket." I think we are a lot more than that out of pocket, I am continually astounded by the the ‘Emperors followers’ who still think he has beautiful clothes - Brexit is naked & ugly. Give up trying to pretend otherwise | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All quite sad really, would be good if Europe could perform better then we could export to them as well. Looks like we will do increasing trade with the rest of the world instead for a few years: “The loss of the UK's financial power has sparked an economic crisis inside the EU, according to one leading European political expert. Robert Oulds, who is the director of the Bruges Group, said that Brexit had blown a huge hole through EU finances and Brussels may not survive another economic crisis. Britain's departure has already left a £65billion (€75bn) hole in the EU budget.” Just to be clear, the EU Budget Cycle is for 7 years, so it would have cost the UK less than £10bn a year - interesting how low this is compared to the £18.2bn a year Boris claimed (£350m a week). In my experience, it’s usually remainers who struggle with the concept of gross and net contributions. You didn’t mention which it was? But the facts are still the facts - Boris lied about an extra £350m a week for the NHS How much would it have cost the uk putting in to the eu covid recovery fund ? france reckons it will be 40 billion out of pocket. I think we are a lot more than that out of pocket, I am continually astounded by the the ‘Emperors followers’ who still think he has beautiful clothes - Brexit is naked & ugly. Give up trying to pretend otherwise " So are they thats just the money they have to give to other eu countries that is on top of sorting their own shit out. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All quite sad really, would be good if Europe could perform better then we could export to them as well. Looks like we will do increasing trade with the rest of the world instead for a few years: “The loss of the UK's financial power has sparked an economic crisis inside the EU, according to one leading European political expert. Robert Oulds, who is the director of the Bruges Group, said that Brexit had blown a huge hole through EU finances and Brussels may not survive another economic crisis. Britain's departure has already left a £65billion (€75bn) hole in the EU budget.” Just to be clear, the EU Budget Cycle is for 7 years, so it would have cost the UK less than £10bn a year - interesting how low this is compared to the £18.2bn a year Boris claimed (£350m a week). In my experience, it’s usually remainers who struggle with the concept of gross and net contributions. You didn’t mention which it was? But the facts are still the facts - Boris lied about an extra £350m a week for the NHS How much would it have cost the uk putting in to the eu covid recovery fund ? france reckons it will be 40 billion out of pocket. I think we are a lot more than that out of pocket, I am continually astounded by the the ‘Emperors followers’ who still think he has beautiful clothes - Brexit is naked & ugly. Give up trying to pretend otherwise So are they thats just the money they have to give to other eu countries that is on top of sorting their own shit out." I’m pretty sure that with Covid and Brexit, we are a damn site worse off than if we had still been in the EU. I think ‘Track & Trace’ will end up costing £40bn, especially when Dido takes her cut | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All quite sad really, would be good if Europe could perform better then we could export to them as well. Looks like we will do increasing trade with the rest of the world instead for a few years: “The loss of the UK's financial power has sparked an economic crisis inside the EU, according to one leading European political expert. Robert Oulds, who is the director of the Bruges Group, said that Brexit had blown a huge hole through EU finances and Brussels may not survive another economic crisis. Britain's departure has already left a £65billion (€75bn) hole in the EU budget.” Just to be clear, the EU Budget Cycle is for 7 years, so it would have cost the UK less than £10bn a year - interesting how low this is compared to the £18.2bn a year Boris claimed (£350m a week). In my experience, it’s usually remainers who struggle with the concept of gross and net contributions. You didn’t mention which it was? But the facts are still the facts - Boris lied about an extra £350m a week for the NHS How much would it have cost the uk putting in to the eu covid recovery fund ? france reckons it will be 40 billion out of pocket. I think we are a lot more than that out of pocket, I am continually astounded by the the ‘Emperors followers’ who still think he has beautiful clothes - Brexit is naked & ugly. Give up trying to pretend otherwise So are they thats just the money they have to give to other eu countries that is on top of sorting their own shit out. I’m pretty sure that with Covid and Brexit, we are a damn site worse off than if we had still been in the EU. I think ‘Track & Trace’ will end up costing £40bn, especially when Dido takes her cut " As i said before that is the money they have to give to other countries they still have their track and trace to pay for along with all the other help they are dishing out.Or are you saying that the uk is a lot more generous in helping out their citizens? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All quite sad really, would be good if Europe could perform better then we could export to them as well. Looks like we will do increasing trade with the rest of the world instead for a few years: “The loss of the UK's financial power has sparked an economic crisis inside the EU, according to one leading European political expert. Robert Oulds, who is the director of the Bruges Group, said that Brexit had blown a huge hole through EU finances and Brussels may not survive another economic crisis. Britain's departure has already left a £65billion (€75bn) hole in the EU budget.” Just to be clear, the EU Budget Cycle is for 7 years, so it would have cost the UK less than £10bn a year - interesting how low this is compared to the £18.2bn a year Boris claimed (£350m a week). In my experience, it’s usually remainers who struggle with the concept of gross and net contributions. You didn’t mention which it was? But the facts are still the facts - Boris lied about an extra £350m a week for the NHS " ...just answering you OP. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |