 |
By *ealthy_and_Hung OP Man
over a year ago
Princes Risborough, Luasanne, Alderney |
it appears the head of the haus hapsberg cartel has been interfering in the political process and depriving people of democracy for at least the last 50 years in order to fatten her bank balance. who'd have thought? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ackal1Couple
over a year ago
Manchester |
Think we should go for the non domiciles first. That would open a few eyes to the tax evasion in the U.K.
once the queen goes I’m all for a republic as the rest of them I don’t care for. Yes the Prince Charles trusts are very nice and Williams wife is very pretty but they tip the peak of an outdated class system which drags this country down constantly. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ealthy_and_Hung OP Man
over a year ago
Princes Risborough, Luasanne, Alderney |
nothing will happen. it never does. on the whole, people seem to be happy with rules being applied that benefit just a handful of the population. however it's also fine to ask the rhetorical question of why would anybody be disgruntled that brexit has been moulded into something that makes sure the royal family increase their wealth instead of benefiting the country as whole. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"nothing will happen. it never does. on the whole, people seem to be happy with rules being applied that benefit just a handful of the population. however it's also fine to ask the rhetorical question of why would anybody be disgruntled that brexit has been moulded into something that makes sure the royal family increase their wealth instead of benefiting the country as whole."
Blame the majority of the UK. They voted for it.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"nothing will happen. it never does. on the whole, people seem to be happy with rules being applied that benefit just a handful of the population. however it's also fine to ask the rhetorical question of why would anybody be disgruntled that brexit has been moulded into something that makes sure the royal family increase their wealth instead of benefiting the country as whole.
Blame the majority of the UK. They voted for it.
"
No no. It was a small minority |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"nothing will happen. it never does. on the whole, people seem to be happy with rules being applied that benefit just a handful of the population. however it's also fine to ask the rhetorical question of why would anybody be disgruntled that brexit has been moulded into something that makes sure the royal family increase their wealth instead of benefiting the country as whole.
Blame the majority of the UK. They voted for it.
No no. It was a small minority"
So a small minority got the majority vote 
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ealthy_and_Hung OP Man
over a year ago
Princes Risborough, Luasanne, Alderney |
considering that the queen lobbied the government to alter policy on the replacement of farm subsidies after brexit it would seem that those who are attempting to limit the occurance to have only happened in 1973 are extremely poorly briefed |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"considering that the queen lobbied the government to alter policy on the replacement of farm subsidies after brexit it would seem that those who are attempting to limit the occurance to have only happened in 1973 are extremely poorly briefed"
Ah thank you for explaining the connection.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"nothing will happen. it never does. on the whole, people seem to be happy with rules being applied that benefit just a handful of the population. however it's also fine to ask the rhetorical question of why would anybody be disgruntled that brexit has been moulded into something that makes sure the royal family increase their wealth instead of benefiting the country as whole.
Blame the majority of the UK. They voted for it.
No no. It was a small minority
So a small minority got the majority vote
"
That's what I'm frequently told by Remainers |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *andy 1Couple
over a year ago
northeast |
"now it also appears that legislation was altered in order for the monarch to take advantage of £9 billion profit from the leasing of the seabed around the coast to renewable energy generation."
it says wealthy and hung hope the rope wasnt to tight
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ercuryMan
over a year ago
Grantham |
"considering that the queen lobbied the government to alter policy on the replacement of farm subsidies after brexit it would seem that those who are attempting to limit the occurance to have only happened in 1973 are extremely poorly briefed"
Really? Have you proof of any of your claims? Care to share?
Your claim on seabed rights go back to 2004. Again, your proof that the Queen personally lobbied on this legislation? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
