FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Tories MP’s on Parler
Tories MP’s on Parler
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
A well known Fact now, seems like these tories, nadine dorres, Michael gove, James cleverly and few more tories have been skulking around on parler before it was shut down, sharing a platform with the arsehole Katie Hopkins.
So the tories seem to take delight in sharing their views with right wing terrorists.
Is our government being led by far right terrorist sympathisers?
It looks like it, this government is becoming an autocracy via the backdoor. With the tories becoming some form of dynastic dictatorship which only exchanges of power between its own members. Tightening their grip on the democratic institutions setup to prevent tyranny of the privileged.
But as the US has shown that Democracy will prevail over right wing insurgents, we in Britain should protect our institutions hard won from those tinpot wannabe dictators!
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"That’s right release the hate, you will feel better for it later x"
I love Democracy and the rule of law, if I say what I say is only to protect it from the onslaught from those who feel they feel superior to the British people.
If you feel otherwise, then I ask you why don’t you love this country at all? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"So have they gone from being the
Nasty Party to the Nazi Party ?
"
The nazis did not just happen, it was a gradual process. Alarm bells should be ringing with those people who love this country and the hard won democracy we obtained over the years. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *eroy1000Man
over a year ago
milton keynes |
"A well known Fact now, seems like these tories, nadine dorres, Michael gove, James cleverly and few more tories have been skulking around on parler before it was shut down, sharing a platform with the arsehole Katie Hopkins.
So the tories seem to take delight in sharing their views with right wing terrorists.
Is our government being led by far right terrorist sympathisers?
It looks like it, this government is becoming an autocracy via the backdoor. With the tories becoming some form of dynastic dictatorship which only exchanges of power between its own members. Tightening their grip on the democratic institutions setup to prevent tyranny of the privileged.
But as the US has shown that Democracy will prevail over right wing insurgents, we in Britain should protect our institutions hard won from those tinpot wannabe dictators!
"
First I heard of this Platform was when the orange one got kicked of twitter. Was it strictly for far right people only or could any one join |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"So have they gone from being the
Nasty Party to the Nazi Party ?
The nazis did not just happen, it was a gradual process. Alarm bells should be ringing with those people who love this country and the hard won democracy we obtained over the years."
I posted this on another thread I hope it helps x
(The centre line in politics is still there, just because you don’t agree with something doesn’t make it right wing, & everything you agree with, doesn’t mean it’s not left wing. Tony Blair was a centralist just as the Tories are now, that’s what the Tories learnt from Blair, you need the central ground to control Westminster, partly because both parties lost the confidence of the Scottish voter to the SNP. Thatcher was to the right not far right, just as Corbyn was to the left not far left, (Micheal Foot being far more openly militant left than Corbyn) Thatcher certainly wouldn’t of been as generous as this shower have been over Covid, like you & a few others who lived in those times I remember the shit that went on well. Thatcher was a TORY if you like as Corbyn was LABOUR, most of today’s politicians are in it as a career politician driven by media opinion, & their greed for feeding in the trough, not all but most on all sides x Just my opinion mind xx)
You’ve just decided where the central line is, & if no one agrees they or it are right wing? So no need to exaggerate things & try to create a hate debate. I’m sure this is supposed to be an adult site for lovers & not haters xx |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"A well known Fact now, seems like these tories, nadine dorres, Michael gove, James cleverly and few more tories have been skulking around on parler before it was shut down, sharing a platform with the arsehole Katie Hopkins.
So the tories seem to take delight in sharing their views with right wing terrorists.
Is our government being led by far right terrorist sympathisers?
It looks like it, this government is becoming an autocracy via the backdoor. With the tories becoming some form of dynastic dictatorship which only exchanges of power between its own members. Tightening their grip on the democratic institutions setup to prevent tyranny of the privileged.
But as the US has shown that Democracy will prevail over right wing insurgents, we in Britain should protect our institutions hard won from those tinpot wannabe dictators!
First I heard of this Platform was when the orange one got kicked of twitter. Was it strictly for far right people only or could any one join"
How would you even qualify as ‘far right’ for acceptance on a social media platform? 
Like all social media, anyone could join. People just had a shit fit because those profiles banned by Twitter went to Parler instead, as they proclaimed they were for free speech above anything else. So they had a big influx of Twitter undesirables which sent the twitterati into meltdown |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *estivalMan
over a year ago
borehamwood |
last i checked qe had elections in the uk.majority must like the torys because they keep getfing voted in by a landslide. at the last election.guess it says a lot about the oppisition if they cant beat the torys who are apparently so bad.this is the thing about elections the majority wins not the ones who scream the loudest.myself i find it really funny how peeps support pilitical partys like they support football teams.none em them give a rats arse about the general public red blue or yellow |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"A well known Fact now, seems like these tories, nadine dorres, Michael gove, James cleverly and few more tories have been skulking around on parler before it was shut down, sharing a platform with the arsehole Katie Hopkins.
So the tories seem to take delight in sharing their views with right wing terrorists.
Is our government being led by far right terrorist sympathisers?
It looks like it, this government is becoming an autocracy via the backdoor. With the tories becoming some form of dynastic dictatorship which only exchanges of power between its own members. Tightening their grip on the democratic institutions setup to prevent tyranny of the privileged.
But as the US has shown that Democracy will prevail over right wing insurgents, we in Britain should protect our institutions hard won from those tinpot wannabe dictators!
First I heard of this Platform was when the orange one got kicked of twitter. Was it strictly for far right people only or could any one join"
Anyone can join. It's popular with the far right as Parlour don't remove anything to do with race hate, misogyny, transphobia, etc and they have a toleratant attitude to people calling for violence against minorities. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"last i checked qe had elections in the uk.majority must like the torys because they keep getfing voted in by a landslide. at the last election.guess it says a lot about the oppisition if they cant beat the torys who are apparently so bad.this is the thing about elections the majority wins not the ones who scream the loudest.myself i find it really funny how peeps support pilitical partys like they support football teams.none em them give a rats arse about the general public red blue or yellow"
I agree with the second half. It explains the first half of your post.
People vote for the Tories no matter how open they are with their distain for ordinary people.
I'd say the media has a huge role to play in this too. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"A well known Fact now, seems like these tories, nadine dorres, Michael gove, James cleverly and few more tories have been skulking around on parler before it was shut down, sharing a platform with the arsehole Katie Hopkins.
So the tories seem to take delight in sharing their views with right wing terrorists.
Is our government being led by far right terrorist sympathisers?
It looks like it, this government is becoming an autocracy via the backdoor. With the tories becoming some form of dynastic dictatorship which only exchanges of power between its own members. Tightening their grip on the democratic institutions setup to prevent tyranny of the privileged.
But as the US has shown that Democracy will prevail over right wing insurgents, we in Britain should protect our institutions hard won from those tinpot wannabe dictators!
First I heard of this Platform was when the orange one got kicked of twitter. Was it strictly for far right people only or could any one join
Anyone can join. It's popular with the far right as Parlour don't remove anything to do with race hate, misogyny, transphobia, etc and they have a toleratant attitude to people calling for violence against minorities. "
1st Amendment absolutists for sure. The constitutionalists love it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"last i checked qe had elections in the uk.majority must like the torys because they keep getfing voted in by a landslide. at the last election.guess it says a lot about the oppisition if they cant beat the torys who are apparently so bad.this is the thing about elections the majority wins not the ones who scream the loudest.myself i find it really funny how peeps support pilitical partys like they support football teams.none em them give a rats arse about the general public red blue or yellow
I agree with the second half. It explains the first half of your post.
People vote for the Tories no matter how open they are with their distain for ordinary people.
I'd say the media has a huge role to play in this too. "
Without a shadow of a doubt
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *estivalMan
over a year ago
borehamwood |
many on here know i dont vote aint done so for years .blaming the media is a cop out though.its just like saying biden won because of cnn and twatter.majority of peeps make there minds up about what way there voting way in advance of elections.last election the only ones voting labour were under 25s and adults who genuinely belive with live in a fair society.we dont and never have.its human nature in the majority to look out for yourself and family and freinds.most dont care what happens outside of that.i dont vite as there aint a party for me.some of my veiws would be seen as hippy dippy bullshit by some on here.and im sure others would think some of my views meen i should be labled as far right.luckiy most on here just generally amuse me |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"many on here know i dont vote aint done so for years .blaming the media is a cop out though.its just like saying biden won because of cnn and twatter.majority of peeps make there minds up about what way there voting way in advance of elections.last election the only ones voting labour were under 25s and adults who genuinely belive with live in a fair society.we dont and never have.its human nature in the majority to look out for yourself and family and freinds.most dont care what happens outside of that.i dont vite as there aint a party for me.some of my veiws would be seen as hippy dippy bullshit by some on here.and im sure others would think some of my views meen i should be labled as far right.luckiy most on here just generally amuse me"
I must agree with fest the Tories are the worst, not fit to run a fish and chip shop.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"many on here know i dont vote aint done so for years .blaming the media is a cop out though.its just like saying biden won because of cnn and twatter.majority of peeps make there minds up about what way there voting way in advance of elections.last election the only ones voting labour were under 25s and adults who genuinely belive with live in a fair society.we dont and never have.its human nature in the majority to look out for yourself and family and freinds.most dont care what happens outside of that.i dont vite as there aint a party for me.some of my veiws would be seen as hippy dippy bullshit by some on here.and im sure others would think some of my views meen i should be labled as far right.luckiy most on here just generally amuse me"
I don't agree.
Corbyn did really well in the previous election, when he wasn't expected to.
Suddenly the media, and the establishment took notice. Didn't want someone coming in who offered any kind of change, and proceeded to engage in the biggest smear campaign in years.
https://www.medialens.org/2019/the-campaign-to-stop-corbyn-smears-racism-and-censorship/
This smear campaign had a part to play in the Tories big win at the last GE. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *estivalMan
over a year ago
borehamwood |
"many on here know i dont vote aint done so for years .blaming the media is a cop out though.its just like saying biden won because of cnn and twatter.majority of peeps make there minds up about what way there voting way in advance of elections.last election the only ones voting labour were under 25s and adults who genuinely belive with live in a fair society.we dont and never have.its human nature in the majority to look out for yourself and family and freinds.most dont care what happens outside of that.i dont vite as there aint a party for me.some of my veiws would be seen as hippy dippy bullshit by some on here.and im sure others would think some of my views meen i should be labled as far right.luckiy most on here just generally amuse me
I must agree with fest the Tories are the worst, not fit to run a fish and chip shop. "
ahhh c u misunderstand me i wouldnt piss on the torys if they were on fire same way i wouldnt piss on labour if they were on fire either.i suppose anarchist is the closest i could describe myself.no goverment at all |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"many on here know i dont vote aint done so for years .blaming the media is a cop out though.its just like saying biden won because of cnn and twatter.majority of peeps make there minds up about what way there voting way in advance of elections.last election the only ones voting labour were under 25s and adults who genuinely belive with live in a fair society.we dont and never have.its human nature in the majority to look out for yourself and family and freinds.most dont care what happens outside of that.i dont vite as there aint a party for me.some of my veiws would be seen as hippy dippy bullshit by some on here.and im sure others would think some of my views meen i should be labled as far right.luckiy most on here just generally amuse me
I don't agree.
Corbyn did really well in the previous election, when he wasn't expected to.
Suddenly the media, and the establishment took notice. Didn't want someone coming in who offered any kind of change, and proceeded to engage in the biggest smear campaign in years.
https://www.medialens.org/2019/the-campaign-to-stop-corbyn-smears-racism-and-censorship/
This smear campaign had a part to play in the Tories big win at the last GE."
Corbyn did well first time because he was up against the useless May and people didn't know enough about him.
There was no smear campaign, it was simply letting people know the truth. Ask Keir Starmer |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *estivalMan
over a year ago
borehamwood |
"many on here know i dont vote aint done so for years .blaming the media is a cop out though.its just like saying biden won because of cnn and twatter.majority of peeps make there minds up about what way there voting way in advance of elections.last election the only ones voting labour were under 25s and adults who genuinely belive with live in a fair society.we dont and never have.its human nature in the majority to look out for yourself and family and freinds.most dont care what happens outside of that.i dont vite as there aint a party for me.some of my veiws would be seen as hippy dippy bullshit by some on here.and im sure others would think some of my views meen i should be labled as far right.luckiy most on here just generally amuse me
I don't agree.
Corbyn did really well in the previous election, when he wasn't expected to.
Suddenly the media, and the establishment took notice. Didn't want someone coming in who offered any kind of change, and proceeded to engage in the biggest smear campaign in years.
https://www.medialens.org/2019/the-campaign-to-stop-corbyn-smears-racism-and-censorship/
This smear campaign had a part to play in the Tories big win at the last GE."
corbyn done well previously because labour agreed to stand by the brexit vote.once starmer and others got him to change direction on that labour were toast.did they honestly belive that was a vote winner or did they see it was a way to get rid of jezza seems as the membership wouldnt vote him out???? i guess we will never know |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"many on here know i dont vote aint done so for years .blaming the media is a cop out though.its just like saying biden won because of cnn and twatter.majority of peeps make there minds up about what way there voting way in advance of elections.last election the only ones voting labour were under 25s and adults who genuinely belive with live in a fair society.we dont and never have.its human nature in the majority to look out for yourself and family and freinds.most dont care what happens outside of that.i dont vite as there aint a party for me.some of my veiws would be seen as hippy dippy bullshit by some on here.and im sure others would think some of my views meen i should be labled as far right.luckiy most on here just generally amuse me
I don't agree.
Corbyn did really well in the previous election, when he wasn't expected to.
Suddenly the media, and the establishment took notice. Didn't want someone coming in who offered any kind of change, and proceeded to engage in the biggest smear campaign in years.
https://www.medialens.org/2019/the-campaign-to-stop-corbyn-smears-racism-and-censorship/
This smear campaign had a part to play in the Tories big win at the last GE.
Corbyn did well first time because he was up against the useless May and people didn't know enough about him.
There was no smear campaign, it was simply letting people know the truth. Ask Keir Starmer "
There was no smear campaign
Why dabble in facts when you just make stuff up |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"many on here know i dont vote aint done so for years .blaming the media is a cop out though.its just like saying biden won because of cnn and twatter.majority of peeps make there minds up about what way there voting way in advance of elections.last election the only ones voting labour were under 25s and adults who genuinely belive with live in a fair society.we dont and never have.its human nature in the majority to look out for yourself and family and freinds.most dont care what happens outside of that.i dont vite as there aint a party for me.some of my veiws would be seen as hippy dippy bullshit by some on here.and im sure others would think some of my views meen i should be labled as far right.luckiy most on here just generally amuse me
I don't agree.
Corbyn did really well in the previous election, when he wasn't expected to.
Suddenly the media, and the establishment took notice. Didn't want someone coming in who offered any kind of change, and proceeded to engage in the biggest smear campaign in years.
https://www.medialens.org/2019/the-campaign-to-stop-corbyn-smears-racism-and-censorship/
This smear campaign had a part to play in the Tories big win at the last GE.
corbyn done well previously because labour agreed to stand by the brexit vote.once starmer and others got him to change direction on that labour were toast.did they honestly belive that was a vote winner or did they see it was a way to get rid of jezza seems as the membership wouldnt vote him out???? i guess we will never know"
Being wishy washy on brexit didn't help them for sure.
The medialens link gives an interesting perspective on the smear campaign. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Slightly off topic, but what worries/angers me most about the current government is the blatant lies and corruption.
They seemed to have trumped trump in just not giving a shit.
They are repeatedly caught in lies and in awarding huge contracts to mates without proper process, with no repercussuions.
I thought the last gasps of the John Major years were the benchmark for appalling behaviour by cabinet members, but this crowd are redefining the genre. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"many on here know i dont vote aint done so for years .blaming the media is a cop out though.its just like saying biden won because of cnn and twatter.majority of peeps make there minds up about what way there voting way in advance of elections.last election the only ones voting labour were under 25s and adults who genuinely belive with live in a fair society.we dont and never have.its human nature in the majority to look out for yourself and family and freinds.most dont care what happens outside of that.i dont vite as there aint a party for me.some of my veiws would be seen as hippy dippy bullshit by some on here.and im sure others would think some of my views meen i should be labled as far right.luckiy most on here just generally amuse me
I don't agree.
Corbyn did really well in the previous election, when he wasn't expected to.
Suddenly the media, and the establishment took notice. Didn't want someone coming in who offered any kind of change, and proceeded to engage in the biggest smear campaign in years.
https://www.medialens.org/2019/the-campaign-to-stop-corbyn-smears-racism-and-censorship/
This smear campaign had a part to play in the Tories big win at the last GE.
Corbyn did well first time because he was up against the useless May and people didn't know enough about him.
There was no smear campaign, it was simply letting people know the truth. Ask Keir Starmer
There was no smear campaign
Why dabble in facts when you just make stuff up"
Is the truth a smear? Even the leader of the labour party now thinks that Corbyn is not fit to be an mp never mind the electorate |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"many on here know i dont vote aint done so for years .blaming the media is a cop out though.its just like saying biden won because of cnn and twatter.majority of peeps make there minds up about what way there voting way in advance of elections.last election the only ones voting labour were under 25s and adults who genuinely belive with live in a fair society.we dont and never have.its human nature in the majority to look out for yourself and family and freinds.most dont care what happens outside of that.i dont vite as there aint a party for me.some of my veiws would be seen as hippy dippy bullshit by some on here.and im sure others would think some of my views meen i should be labled as far right.luckiy most on here just generally amuse me
I must agree with fest the Tories are the worst, not fit to run a fish and chip shop.
ahhh c u misunderstand me i wouldnt piss on the torys if they were on fire same way i wouldnt piss on labour if they were on fire either.i suppose anarchist is the closest i could describe myself.no goverment at all"
Must agree with you the total mess we're in now with the tories we'd probably be better with no government. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"many on here know i dont vote aint done so for years .blaming the media is a cop out though.its just like saying biden won because of cnn and twatter.majority of peeps make there minds up about what way there voting way in advance of elections.last election the only ones voting labour were under 25s and adults who genuinely belive with live in a fair society.we dont and never have.its human nature in the majority to look out for yourself and family and freinds.most dont care what happens outside of that.i dont vite as there aint a party for me.some of my veiws would be seen as hippy dippy bullshit by some on here.and im sure others would think some of my views meen i should be labled as far right.luckiy most on here just generally amuse me
I don't agree.
Corbyn did really well in the previous election, when he wasn't expected to.
Suddenly the media, and the establishment took notice. Didn't want someone coming in who offered any kind of change, and proceeded to engage in the biggest smear campaign in years.
https://www.medialens.org/2019/the-campaign-to-stop-corbyn-smears-racism-and-censorship/
This smear campaign had a part to play in the Tories big win at the last GE.
corbyn done well previously because labour agreed to stand by the brexit vote.once starmer and others got him to change direction on that labour were toast.did they honestly belive that was a vote winner or did they see it was a way to get rid of jezza seems as the membership wouldnt vote him out???? i guess we will never know"
I've asked this before and have not got an answer.
It's a simple question
What stance should labour have took on Brexit wgich would have won them the election? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"many on here know i dont vote aint done so for years .blaming the media is a cop out though.its just like saying biden won because of cnn and twatter.majority of peeps make there minds up about what way there voting way in advance of elections.last election the only ones voting labour were under 25s and adults who genuinely belive with live in a fair society.we dont and never have.its human nature in the majority to look out for yourself and family and freinds.most dont care what happens outside of that.i dont vite as there aint a party for me.some of my veiws would be seen as hippy dippy bullshit by some on here.and im sure others would think some of my views meen i should be labled as far right.luckiy most on here just generally amuse me
I don't agree.
Corbyn did really well in the previous election, when he wasn't expected to.
Suddenly the media, and the establishment took notice. Didn't want someone coming in who offered any kind of change, and proceeded to engage in the biggest smear campaign in years.
https://www.medialens.org/2019/the-campaign-to-stop-corbyn-smears-racism-and-censorship/
This smear campaign had a part to play in the Tories big win at the last GE.
Corbyn did well first time because he was up against the useless May and people didn't know enough about him.
There was no smear campaign, it was simply letting people know the truth. Ask Keir Starmer
There was no smear campaign
Why dabble in facts when you just make stuff up
Is the truth a smear? Even the leader of the labour party now thinks that Corbyn is not fit to be an mp never mind the electorate "
What truth? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"many on here know i dont vote aint done so for years .blaming the media is a cop out though.its just like saying biden won because of cnn and twatter.majority of peeps make there minds up about what way there voting way in advance of elections.last election the only ones voting labour were under 25s and adults who genuinely belive with live in a fair society.we dont and never have.its human nature in the majority to look out for yourself and family and freinds.most dont care what happens outside of that.i dont vite as there aint a party for me.some of my veiws would be seen as hippy dippy bullshit by some on here.and im sure others would think some of my views meen i should be labled as far right.luckiy most on here just generally amuse me
I must agree with fest the Tories are the worst, not fit to run a fish and chip shop.
ahhh c u misunderstand me i wouldnt piss on the torys if they were on fire same way i wouldnt piss on labour if they were on fire either.i suppose anarchist is the closest i could describe myself.no goverment at all
Must agree with you the total mess we're in now with the tories we'd probably be better with no government. "
100%
And I agree with the fella above with the exacerbation felt for the Tories getting away Scott free with ripping off public money even more brazenly than usual. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"way i see it if labour dont get scotland back they have no chance of winning a majority.mabey a coalition with some other party but a majority extremley unlikley"
Labour have lost Scotland
Another win for new labour. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"way i see it if labour dont get scotland back they have no chance of winning a majority.mabey a coalition with some other party but a majority extremley unlikley"
Scotland will be independent in due course are you saying england will be a one party state ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"way i see it if labour dont get scotland back they have no chance of winning a majority.mabey a coalition with some other party but a majority extremley unlikley"
I also don't see a way back for Labour. Starmer is thoroughly uninspiring. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"many on here know i dont vote aint done so for years .blaming the media is a cop out though.its just like saying biden won because of cnn and twatter.majority of peeps make there minds up about what way there voting way in advance of elections.last election the only ones voting labour were under 25s and adults who genuinely belive with live in a fair society.we dont and never have.its human nature in the majority to look out for yourself and family and freinds.most dont care what happens outside of that.i dont vite as there aint a party for me.some of my veiws would be seen as hippy dippy bullshit by some on here.and im sure others would think some of my views meen i should be labled as far right.luckiy most on here just generally amuse me
I don't agree.
Corbyn did really well in the previous election, when he wasn't expected to.
Suddenly the media, and the establishment took notice. Didn't want someone coming in who offered any kind of change, and proceeded to engage in the biggest smear campaign in years.
https://www.medialens.org/2019/the-campaign-to-stop-corbyn-smears-racism-and-censorship/
This smear campaign had a part to play in the Tories big win at the last GE.
Corbyn did well first time because he was up against the useless May and people didn't know enough about him.
There was no smear campaign, it was simply letting people know the truth. Ask Keir Starmer
There was no smear campaign
Why dabble in facts when you just make stuff up
Is the truth a smear? Even the leader of the labour party now thinks that Corbyn is not fit to be an mp never mind the electorate
What truth?"
That he is a racist terrorist supporting anti UK economically illiterate bell end. Ain't that the truth  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"many on here know i dont vote aint done so for years .blaming the media is a cop out though.its just like saying biden won because of cnn and twatter.majority of peeps make there minds up about what way there voting way in advance of elections.last election the only ones voting labour were under 25s and adults who genuinely belive with live in a fair society.we dont and never have.its human nature in the majority to look out for yourself and family and freinds.most dont care what happens outside of that.i dont vite as there aint a party for me.some of my veiws would be seen as hippy dippy bullshit by some on here.and im sure others would think some of my views meen i should be labled as far right.luckiy most on here just generally amuse me
I don't agree.
Corbyn did really well in the previous election, when he wasn't expected to.
Suddenly the media, and the establishment took notice. Didn't want someone coming in who offered any kind of change, and proceeded to engage in the biggest smear campaign in years.
https://www.medialens.org/2019/the-campaign-to-stop-corbyn-smears-racism-and-censorship/
This smear campaign had a part to play in the Tories big win at the last GE.
Corbyn did well first time because he was up against the useless May and people didn't know enough about him.
There was no smear campaign, it was simply letting people know the truth. Ask Keir Starmer
There was no smear campaign
Why dabble in facts when you just make stuff up
Is the truth a smear? Even the leader of the labour party now thinks that Corbyn is not fit to be an mp never mind the electorate
What truth?
That he is a racist terrorist supporting anti UK economically illiterate bell end. Ain't that the truth "
There you go Festival. The smear campaign worked a treat.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *estivalMan
over a year ago
borehamwood |
hey look at it this way if you want a new way of doing politics the old way needs smashing to peices.labour tories and the libs.u need to break it all before you can fix it.burn it all down wooooo hooooo |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
https://www.google.com/amp/s/metro.co.uk/2018/11/11/jeremy-corbyn-criticised-for-small-poppy-pin-and-hoodie-at-armistice-day-service-8127321/amp/
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8631473/amp/Did-Jeremy-Corbyns-Marxist-henchman-Seumas-Milne-infect-Boris-Johnson-coronavirus.html
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3236434/amp/Corbyn-attack-shadow-cabinet-Battle-Britain-heroes-refusing-sing-national-anthem-memorial-service.html
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"many on here know i dont vote aint done so for years .blaming the media is a cop out though.its just like saying biden won because of cnn and twatter.majority of peeps make there minds up about what way there voting way in advance of elections.last election the only ones voting labour were under 25s and adults who genuinely belive with live in a fair society.we dont and never have.its human nature in the majority to look out for yourself and family and freinds.most dont care what happens outside of that.i dont vite as there aint a party for me.some of my veiws would be seen as hippy dippy bullshit by some on here.and im sure others would think some of my views meen i should be labled as far right.luckiy most on here just generally amuse me
I don't agree.
Corbyn did really well in the previous election, when he wasn't expected to.
Suddenly the media, and the establishment took notice. Didn't want someone coming in who offered any kind of change, and proceeded to engage in the biggest smear campaign in years.
https://www.medialens.org/2019/the-campaign-to-stop-corbyn-smears-racism-and-censorship/
This smear campaign had a part to play in the Tories big win at the last GE.
Corbyn did well first time because he was up against the useless May and people didn't know enough about him.
There was no smear campaign, it was simply letting people know the truth. Ask Keir Starmer
There was no smear campaign
Why dabble in facts when you just make stuff up
Is the truth a smear? Even the leader of the labour party now thinks that Corbyn is not fit to be an mp never mind the electorate
What truth?
That he is a racist terrorist supporting anti UK economically illiterate bell end. Ain't that the truth
There you go Festival. The smear campaign worked a treat. "
Nope, just an observation of facts |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *estivalMan
over a year ago
borehamwood |
"many on here know i dont vote aint done so for years .blaming the media is a cop out though.its just like saying biden won because of cnn and twatter.majority of peeps make there minds up about what way there voting way in advance of elections.last election the only ones voting labour were under 25s and adults who genuinely belive with live in a fair society.we dont and never have.its human nature in the majority to look out for yourself and family and freinds.most dont care what happens outside of that.i dont vite as there aint a party for me.some of my veiws would be seen as hippy dippy bullshit by some on here.and im sure others would think some of my views meen i should be labled as far right.luckiy most on here just generally amuse me
I don't agree.
Corbyn did really well in the previous election, when he wasn't expected to.
Suddenly the media, and the establishment took notice. Didn't want someone coming in who offered any kind of change, and proceeded to engage in the biggest smear campaign in years.
https://www.medialens.org/2019/the-campaign-to-stop-corbyn-smears-racism-and-censorship/
This smear campaign had a part to play in the Tories big win at the last GE.
Corbyn did well first time because he was up against the useless May and people didn't know enough about him.
There was no smear campaign, it was simply letting people know the truth. Ask Keir Starmer
There was no smear campaign
Why dabble in facts when you just make stuff up
Is the truth a smear? Even the leader of the labour party now thinks that Corbyn is not fit to be an mp never mind the electorate
What truth?
That he is a racist terrorist supporting anti UK economically illiterate bell end. Ain't that the truth
There you go Festival. The smear campaign worked a treat. "
hahahahaha and u think the majority are that easily swayed???? if thats the case you better hope the media suddenly swing left otherwise they may aswell just give up |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"hey look at it this way if you want a new way of doing politics the old way needs smashing to peices.labour tories and the libs.u need to break it all before you can fix it.burn it all down wooooo hooooo "
I agree. But it's never going to happen.
I don't support any political party. Corbyn was interesting because he wanted to change things (if only in a relatively small way). The establishment and media destroyed him, (just look at what that Silver chap believes as an example).
Imagine anyone who wanted any real change to how the system works. They'd be gone before you could say anti-establishment. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"many on here know i dont vote aint done so for years .blaming the media is a cop out though.its just like saying biden won because of cnn and twatter.majority of peeps make there minds up about what way there voting way in advance of elections.last election the only ones voting labour were under 25s and adults who genuinely belive with live in a fair society.we dont and never have.its human nature in the majority to look out for yourself and family and freinds.most dont care what happens outside of that.i dont vite as there aint a party for me.some of my veiws would be seen as hippy dippy bullshit by some on here.and im sure others would think some of my views meen i should be labled as far right.luckiy most on here just generally amuse me
I don't agree.
Corbyn did really well in the previous election, when he wasn't expected to.
Suddenly the media, and the establishment took notice. Didn't want someone coming in who offered any kind of change, and proceeded to engage in the biggest smear campaign in years.
https://www.medialens.org/2019/the-campaign-to-stop-corbyn-smears-racism-and-censorship/
This smear campaign had a part to play in the Tories big win at the last GE.
Corbyn did well first time because he was up against the useless May and people didn't know enough about him.
There was no smear campaign, it was simply letting people know the truth. Ask Keir Starmer
There was no smear campaign
Why dabble in facts when you just make stuff up
Is the truth a smear? Even the leader of the labour party now thinks that Corbyn is not fit to be an mp never mind the electorate
What truth?
That he is a racist terrorist supporting anti UK economically illiterate bell end. Ain't that the truth
There you go Festival. The smear campaign worked a treat.
hahahahaha and u think the majority are that easily swayed???? if thats the case you better hope the media suddenly swing left otherwise they may aswell just give up"
I do. Look at the bananas shit this guy believes.
People vote the way the media tells them too. The evidence is out there. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"hey look at it this way if you want a new way of doing politics the old way needs smashing to peices.labour tories and the libs.u need to break it all before you can fix it.burn it all down wooooo hooooo
I agree. But it's never going to happen.
I don't support any political party. Corbyn was interesting because he wanted to change things (if only in a relatively small way). The establishment and media destroyed him, (just look at what that Silver chap believes as an example).
Imagine anyone who wanted any real change to how the system works. They'd be gone before you could say anti-establishment."
Spot on |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *estivalMan
over a year ago
borehamwood |
"many on here know i dont vote aint done so for years .blaming the media is a cop out though.its just like saying biden won because of cnn and twatter.majority of peeps make there minds up about what way there voting way in advance of elections.last election the only ones voting labour were under 25s and adults who genuinely belive with live in a fair society.we dont and never have.its human nature in the majority to look out for yourself and family and freinds.most dont care what happens outside of that.i dont vite as there aint a party for me.some of my veiws would be seen as hippy dippy bullshit by some on here.and im sure others would think some of my views meen i should be labled as far right.luckiy most on here just generally amuse me
I don't agree.
Corbyn did really well in the previous election, when he wasn't expected to.
Suddenly the media, and the establishment took notice. Didn't want someone coming in who offered any kind of change, and proceeded to engage in the biggest smear campaign in years.
https://www.medialens.org/2019/the-campaign-to-stop-corbyn-smears-racism-and-censorship/
This smear campaign had a part to play in the Tories big win at the last GE.
Corbyn did well first time because he was up against the useless May and people didn't know enough about him.
There was no smear campaign, it was simply letting people know the truth. Ask Keir Starmer
There was no smear campaign
Why dabble in facts when you just make stuff up
Is the truth a smear? Even the leader of the labour party now thinks that Corbyn is not fit to be an mp never mind the electorate
What truth?
That he is a racist terrorist supporting anti UK economically illiterate bell end. Ain't that the truth
There you go Festival. The smear campaign worked a treat.
hahahahaha and u think the majority are that easily swayed???? if thats the case you better hope the media suddenly swing left otherwise they may aswell just give up
I do. Look at the bananas shit this guy believes.
People vote the way the media tells them too. The evidence is out there."
so this guys the majority eh?? dunno about freinds of yours but last election half dozen of mine spoiled there ballot rather than give there vote to anyone |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"hey look at it this way if you want a new way of doing politics the old way needs smashing to peices.labour tories and the libs.u need to break it all before you can fix it.burn it all down wooooo hooooo
So joining you in the hard left is the way to go ? Become an anarchist
hard left???? no no no anarchists are apolitical the dont want any form of goverment your confusig them with blackbloc"
An anarchist.
As an anti-capitalist and libertarian socialist philosophy, anarchism is placed on the far-left of the political spectrum and much of its economics and legal philosophy reflect anti-authoritarian interpretations of left-wing politics such as communism, collectivism, syndicalism, mutualism, or participatory economics.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"many on here know i dont vote aint done so for years .blaming the media is a cop out though.its just like saying biden won because of cnn and twatter.majority of peeps make there minds up about what way there voting way in advance of elections.last election the only ones voting labour were under 25s and adults who genuinely belive with live in a fair society.we dont and never have.its human nature in the majority to look out for yourself and family and freinds.most dont care what happens outside of that.i dont vite as there aint a party for me.some of my veiws would be seen as hippy dippy bullshit by some on here.and im sure others would think some of my views meen i should be labled as far right.luckiy most on here just generally amuse me
I don't agree.
Corbyn did really well in the previous election, when he wasn't expected to.
Suddenly the media, and the establishment took notice. Didn't want someone coming in who offered any kind of change, and proceeded to engage in the biggest smear campaign in years.
https://www.medialens.org/2019/the-campaign-to-stop-corbyn-smears-racism-and-censorship/
This smear campaign had a part to play in the Tories big win at the last GE.
Corbyn did well first time because he was up against the useless May and people didn't know enough about him.
There was no smear campaign, it was simply letting people know the truth. Ask Keir Starmer
There was no smear campaign
Why dabble in facts when you just make stuff up
Is the truth a smear? Even the leader of the labour party now thinks that Corbyn is not fit to be an mp never mind the electorate
What truth?
That he is a racist terrorist supporting anti UK economically illiterate bell end. Ain't that the truth
There you go Festival. The smear campaign worked a treat.
hahahahaha and u think the majority are that easily swayed???? if thats the case you better hope the media suddenly swing left otherwise they may aswell just give up
I do. Look at the bananas shit this guy believes.
People vote the way the media tells them too. The evidence is out there.
so this guys the majority eh?? dunno about freinds of yours but last election half dozen of mine spoiled there ballot rather than give there vote to anyone"
I think there's a significant enough number of people effected by what they believe from the media to make a difference in the ballot boxes.
I didn't ask most people what they voted. Thankfully people are free to not vote, draw a cock on their ballot. Whatever they like. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *eroy1000Man
over a year ago
milton keynes |
"A well known Fact now, seems like these tories, nadine dorres, Michael gove, James cleverly and few more tories have been skulking around on parler before it was shut down, sharing a platform with the arsehole Katie Hopkins.
So the tories seem to take delight in sharing their views with right wing terrorists.
Is our government being led by far right terrorist sympathisers?
It looks like it, this government is becoming an autocracy via the backdoor. With the tories becoming some form of dynastic dictatorship which only exchanges of power between its own members. Tightening their grip on the democratic institutions setup to prevent tyranny of the privileged.
But as the US has shown that Democracy will prevail over right wing insurgents, we in Britain should protect our institutions hard won from those tinpot wannabe dictators!
First I heard of this Platform was when the orange one got kicked of twitter. Was it strictly for far right people only or could any one join
How would you even qualify as ‘far right’ for acceptance on a social media platform?
Like all social media, anyone could join. People just had a shit fit because those profiles banned by Twitter went to Parler instead, as they proclaimed they were for free speech above anything else. So they had a big influx of Twitter undesirables which sent the twitterati into meltdown "
If anyone could join whats the difference to places like twitter. Did the likes of Gove post anything racist for example. Apart from being on the same platform whats the link to the far right and Katie Hopkins ect. I was on Twitter once at the same time as the orange man, does that mean I share his views |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"hey look at it this way if you want a new way of doing politics the old way needs smashing to peices.labour tories and the libs.u need to break it all before you can fix it.burn it all down wooooo hooooo
I agree. But it's never going to happen.
I don't support any political party. Corbyn was interesting because he wanted to change things (if only in a relatively small way). The establishment and media destroyed him, (just look at what that Silver chap believes as an example).
Imagine anyone who wanted any real change to how the system works. They'd be gone before you could say anti-establishment."
You don't want change do you? You voted with the establishment to stay in the EU for a start. And if you think it was the media that destroyed Corbyn, how come he is no longer a Labour MP? The media? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"A well known Fact now, seems like these tories, nadine dorres, Michael gove, James cleverly and few more tories have been skulking around on parler before it was shut down, sharing a platform with the arsehole Katie Hopkins.
So the tories seem to take delight in sharing their views with right wing terrorists.
Is our government being led by far right terrorist sympathisers?
It looks like it, this government is becoming an autocracy via the backdoor. With the tories becoming some form of dynastic dictatorship which only exchanges of power between its own members. Tightening their grip on the democratic institutions setup to prevent tyranny of the privileged.
But as the US has shown that Democracy will prevail over right wing insurgents, we in Britain should protect our institutions hard won from those tinpot wannabe dictators!
First I heard of this Platform was when the orange one got kicked of twitter. Was it strictly for far right people only or could any one join
How would you even qualify as ‘far right’ for acceptance on a social media platform?
Like all social media, anyone could join. People just had a shit fit because those profiles banned by Twitter went to Parler instead, as they proclaimed they were for free speech above anything else. So they had a big influx of Twitter undesirables which sent the twitterati into meltdown
If anyone could join whats the difference to places like twitter. Did the likes of Gove post anything racist for example. Apart from being on the same platform whats the link to the far right and Katie Hopkins ect. I was on Twitter once at the same time as the orange man, does that mean I share his views"
An excellent point! You’d have to ask the OP to answer that. I’m with you - it’s a truly fucking ridiculous assertion to be making. If you had Twitter then you must agree with the CCP, the Ayatollah, Donald Trump and Richard Spencer.....all at the same time
Confused is the word I’m choosing for this sentiment.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"A well known Fact now, seems like these tories, nadine dorres, Michael gove, James cleverly and few more tories have been skulking around on parler before it was shut down, sharing a platform with the arsehole Katie Hopkins.
So the tories seem to take delight in sharing their views with right wing terrorists.
Is our government being led by far right terrorist sympathisers?
It looks like it, this government is becoming an autocracy via the backdoor. With the tories becoming some form of dynastic dictatorship which only exchanges of power between its own members. Tightening their grip on the democratic institutions setup to prevent tyranny of the privileged.
But as the US has shown that Democracy will prevail over right wing insurgents, we in Britain should protect our institutions hard won from those tinpot wannabe dictators!
First I heard of this Platform was when the orange one got kicked of twitter. Was it strictly for far right people only or could any one join
How would you even qualify as ‘far right’ for acceptance on a social media platform?
Like all social media, anyone could join. People just had a shit fit because those profiles banned by Twitter went to Parler instead, as they proclaimed they were for free speech above anything else. So they had a big influx of Twitter undesirables which sent the twitterati into meltdown
If anyone could join whats the difference to places like twitter. Did the likes of Gove post anything racist for example. Apart from being on the same platform whats the link to the far right and Katie Hopkins ect. I was on Twitter once at the same time as the orange man, does that mean I share his views
An excellent point! You’d have to ask the OP to answer that. I’m with you - it’s a truly fucking ridiculous assertion to be making. If you had Twitter then you must agree with the CCP, the Ayatollah, Donald Trump and Richard Spencer.....all at the same time
Confused is the word I’m choosing for this sentiment. "
Signing up to Parlour doesn't imply anything.
The only difference between the platforms is that Parlour allows hate speech. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"A well known Fact now, seems like these tories, nadine dorres, Michael gove, James cleverly and few more tories have been skulking around on parler before it was shut down, sharing a platform with the arsehole Katie Hopkins.
So the tories seem to take delight in sharing their views with right wing terrorists.
Is our government being led by far right terrorist sympathisers?
It looks like it, this government is becoming an autocracy via the backdoor. With the tories becoming some form of dynastic dictatorship which only exchanges of power between its own members. Tightening their grip on the democratic institutions setup to prevent tyranny of the privileged.
But as the US has shown that Democracy will prevail over right wing insurgents, we in Britain should protect our institutions hard won from those tinpot wannabe dictators!
First I heard of this Platform was when the orange one got kicked of twitter. Was it strictly for far right people only or could any one join
How would you even qualify as ‘far right’ for acceptance on a social media platform?
Like all social media, anyone could join. People just had a shit fit because those profiles banned by Twitter went to Parler instead, as they proclaimed they were for free speech above anything else. So they had a big influx of Twitter undesirables which sent the twitterati into meltdown
If anyone could join whats the difference to places like twitter. Did the likes of Gove post anything racist for example. Apart from being on the same platform whats the link to the far right and Katie Hopkins ect. I was on Twitter once at the same time as the orange man, does that mean I share his views
An excellent point! You’d have to ask the OP to answer that. I’m with you - it’s a truly fucking ridiculous assertion to be making. If you had Twitter then you must agree with the CCP, the Ayatollah, Donald Trump and Richard Spencer.....all at the same time
Confused is the word I’m choosing for this sentiment.
Signing up to Parlour doesn't imply anything.
The only difference between the platforms is that Parlour allows hate speech. "
And there’s no hate speech laws in the US. So if you don’t like it, don’t use it |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *estivalMan
over a year ago
borehamwood |
"hey look at it this way if you want a new way of doing politics the old way needs smashing to peices.labour tories and the libs.u need to break it all before you can fix it.burn it all down wooooo hooooo
So joining you in the hard left is the way to go ? Become an anarchist
hard left???? no no no anarchists are apolitical the dont want any form of goverment your confusig them with blackbloc An anarchist.
As an anti-capitalist and libertarian socialist philosophy, anarchism is placed on the far-left of the political spectrum and much of its economics and legal philosophy reflect anti-authoritarian interpretations of left-wing politics such as communism, collectivism, syndicalism, mutualism, or participatory economics.
"
that may be the definition of it when you actually live with these people not so much the case.like every organisation there will be those at the top and everyone else.just a different dog wagging the same tail |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"hey look at it this way if you want a new way of doing politics the old way needs smashing to peices.labour tories and the libs.u need to break it all before you can fix it.burn it all down wooooo hooooo
I agree. But it's never going to happen.
I don't support any political party. Corbyn was interesting because he wanted to change things (if only in a relatively small way). The establishment and media destroyed him, (just look at what that Silver chap believes as an example).
Imagine anyone who wanted any real change to how the system works. They'd be gone before you could say anti-establishment.
You don't want change do you? You voted with the establishment to stay in the EU for a start. And if you think it was the media that destroyed Corbyn, how come he is no longer a Labour MP? The media? "
Boris Johnson is now anti establishment..right.
Can you post a link to Corbyns expulsion please?
Cheers
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"hey look at it this way if you want a new way of doing politics the old way needs smashing to peices.labour tories and the libs.u need to break it all before you can fix it.burn it all down wooooo hooooo
So joining you in the hard left is the way to go ? Become an anarchist
hard left???? no no no anarchists are apolitical the dont want any form of goverment your confusig them with blackbloc An anarchist.
As an anti-capitalist and libertarian socialist philosophy, anarchism is placed on the far-left of the political spectrum and much of its economics and legal philosophy reflect anti-authoritarian interpretations of left-wing politics such as communism, collectivism, syndicalism, mutualism, or participatory economics.
that may be the definition of it when you actually live with these people not so much the case.like every organisation there will be those at the top and everyone else.just a different dog wagging the same tail"
Fest you're a communist. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"hey look at it this way if you want a new way of doing politics the old way needs smashing to peices.labour tories and the libs.u need to break it all before you can fix it.burn it all down wooooo hooooo
I agree. But it's never going to happen.
I don't support any political party. Corbyn was interesting because he wanted to change things (if only in a relatively small way). The establishment and media destroyed him, (just look at what that Silver chap believes as an example).
Imagine anyone who wanted any real change to how the system works. They'd be gone before you could say anti-establishment.
You don't want change do you? You voted with the establishment to stay in the EU for a start. And if you think it was the media that destroyed Corbyn, how come he is no longer a Labour MP? The media?
Boris Johnson is now anti establishment..right.
Can you post a link to Corbyns expulsion please?
Cheers
"
No, I don't post links but he is no longer a Labour MP is he? And why not? Because at the end of the day he couldn't disguise what he was and hung himself with his own words. There really was no need to smear him |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"hey look at it this way if you want a new way of doing politics the old way needs smashing to peices.labour tories and the libs.u need to break it all before you can fix it.burn it all down wooooo hooooo
I agree. But it's never going to happen.
I don't support any political party. Corbyn was interesting because he wanted to change things (if only in a relatively small way). The establishment and media destroyed him, (just look at what that Silver chap believes as an example).
Imagine anyone who wanted any real change to how the system works. They'd be gone before you could say anti-establishment.
You don't want change do you? You voted with the establishment to stay in the EU for a start. And if you think it was the media that destroyed Corbyn, how come he is no longer a Labour MP? The media?
Boris Johnson is now anti establishment..right.
Can you post a link to Corbyns expulsion please?
Cheers
"
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/nov/18/jeremy-corbyn-refused-labour-whip-despite-having-suspension-lifted
We all know you love the Guardian so here you are  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"hey look at it this way if you want a new way of doing politics the old way needs smashing to peices.labour tories and the libs.u need to break it all before you can fix it.burn it all down wooooo hooooo
I agree. But it's never going to happen.
I don't support any political party. Corbyn was interesting because he wanted to change things (if only in a relatively small way). The establishment and media destroyed him, (just look at what that Silver chap believes as an example).
Imagine anyone who wanted any real change to how the system works. They'd be gone before you could say anti-establishment.
You don't want change do you? You voted with the establishment to stay in the EU for a start. And if you think it was the media that destroyed Corbyn, how come he is no longer a Labour MP? The media?
Boris Johnson is now anti establishment..right.
Can you post a link to Corbyns expulsion please?
Cheers
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/nov/18/jeremy-corbyn-refused-labour-whip-despite-having-suspension-lifted
We all know you love the Guardian so here you are "
Suspended not expelled
Appeal pending |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"hey look at it this way if you want a new way of doing politics the old way needs smashing to peices.labour tories and the libs.u need to break it all before you can fix it.burn it all down wooooo hooooo
I agree. But it's never going to happen.
I don't support any political party. Corbyn was interesting because he wanted to change things (if only in a relatively small way). The establishment and media destroyed him, (just look at what that Silver chap believes as an example).
Imagine anyone who wanted any real change to how the system works. They'd be gone before you could say anti-establishment.
You don't want change do you? You voted with the establishment to stay in the EU for a start. And if you think it was the media that destroyed Corbyn, how come he is no longer a Labour MP? The media?
Boris Johnson is now anti establishment..right.
Can you post a link to Corbyns expulsion please?
Cheers
No, I don't post links but he is no longer a Labour MP is he? And why not? Because at the end of the day he couldn't disguise what he was and hung himself with his own words. There really was no need to smear him "
Who needs fake news? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"hey look at it this way if you want a new way of doing politics the old way needs smashing to peices.labour tories and the libs.u need to break it all before you can fix it.burn it all down wooooo hooooo
I agree. But it's never going to happen.
I don't support any political party. Corbyn was interesting because he wanted to change things (if only in a relatively small way). The establishment and media destroyed him, (just look at what that Silver chap believes as an example).
Imagine anyone who wanted any real change to how the system works. They'd be gone before you could say anti-establishment.
You don't want change do you? You voted with the establishment to stay in the EU for a start. And if you think it was the media that destroyed Corbyn, how come he is no longer a Labour MP? The media?
Boris Johnson is now anti establishment..right.
Can you post a link to Corbyns expulsion please?
Cheers
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/nov/18/jeremy-corbyn-refused-labour-whip-despite-having-suspension-lifted
We all know you love the Guardian so here you are
Suspended not expelled
Appeal pending"
Suspension was lifted actually but as leader Starmer holds the power and has refused to reinstate the whip. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"hey look at it this way if you want a new way of doing politics the old way needs smashing to peices.labour tories and the libs.u need to break it all before you can fix it.burn it all down wooooo hooooo
I agree. But it's never going to happen.
I don't support any political party. Corbyn was interesting because he wanted to change things (if only in a relatively small way). The establishment and media destroyed him, (just look at what that Silver chap believes as an example).
Imagine anyone who wanted any real change to how the system works. They'd be gone before you could say anti-establishment.
You don't want change do you? You voted with the establishment to stay in the EU for a start. And if you think it was the media that destroyed Corbyn, how come he is no longer a Labour MP? The media?
Boris Johnson is now anti establishment..right.
Can you post a link to Corbyns expulsion please?
Cheers
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/nov/18/jeremy-corbyn-refused-labour-whip-despite-having-suspension-lifted
We all know you love the Guardian so here you are
Suspended not expelled
Appeal pending
Suspension was lifted actually but as leader Starmer holds the power and has refused to reinstate the whip."
Has he been expelled from the party? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"hey look at it this way if you want a new way of doing politics the old way needs smashing to peices.labour tories and the libs.u need to break it all before you can fix it.burn it all down wooooo hooooo
I agree. But it's never going to happen.
I don't support any political party. Corbyn was interesting because he wanted to change things (if only in a relatively small way). The establishment and media destroyed him, (just look at what that Silver chap believes as an example).
Imagine anyone who wanted any real change to how the system works. They'd be gone before you could say anti-establishment.
You don't want change do you? You voted with the establishment to stay in the EU for a start. And if you think it was the media that destroyed Corbyn, how come he is no longer a Labour MP? The media?
Boris Johnson is now anti establishment..right.
Can you post a link to Corbyns expulsion please?
Cheers
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/nov/18/jeremy-corbyn-refused-labour-whip-despite-having-suspension-lifted
We all know you love the Guardian so here you are
Suspended not expelled
Appeal pending
Suspension was lifted actually but as leader Starmer holds the power and has refused to reinstate the whip.
Has he been expelled from the party?"
Who said he had been? The Labour Party is full of anti semites anyway, what difference would getting rid of one make |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"hey look at it this way if you want a new way of doing politics the old way needs smashing to peices.labour tories and the libs.u need to break it all before you can fix it.burn it all down wooooo hooooo
I agree. But it's never going to happen.
I don't support any political party. Corbyn was interesting because he wanted to change things (if only in a relatively small way). The establishment and media destroyed him, (just look at what that Silver chap believes as an example).
Imagine anyone who wanted any real change to how the system works. They'd be gone before you could say anti-establishment.
You don't want change do you? You voted with the establishment to stay in the EU for a start. And if you think it was the media that destroyed Corbyn, how come he is no longer a Labour MP? The media?
Boris Johnson is now anti establishment..right.
Can you post a link to Corbyns expulsion please?
Cheers
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/nov/18/jeremy-corbyn-refused-labour-whip-despite-having-suspension-lifted
We all know you love the Guardian so here you are
Suspended not expelled
Appeal pending
Suspension was lifted actually but as leader Starmer holds the power and has refused to reinstate the whip.
Has he been expelled from the party?"
I don't think anyone said he was expelled. He is no longer a labour MP but is a member of the Labour Party |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"There is to be a review amid many motions to restore the whip and a possible to legal.challemge.
To say he is no longer in the labour party is factually incorrect "
Don't twist words now. No one said he was no longer in the party |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"hey look at it this way if you want a new way of doing politics the old way needs smashing to peices.labour tories and the libs.u need to break it all before you can fix it.burn it all down wooooo hooooo
I agree. But it's never going to happen.
I don't support any political party. Corbyn was interesting because he wanted to change things (if only in a relatively small way). The establishment and media destroyed him, (just look at what that Silver chap believes as an example).
Imagine anyone who wanted any real change to how the system works. They'd be gone before you could say anti-establishment.
You don't want change do you? You voted with the establishment to stay in the EU for a start. And if you think it was the media that destroyed Corbyn, how come he is no longer a Labour MP? The media?
Boris Johnson is now anti establishment..right.
Can you post a link to Corbyns expulsion please?
Cheers
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/nov/18/jeremy-corbyn-refused-labour-whip-despite-having-suspension-lifted
We all know you love the Guardian so here you are
Suspended not expelled
Appeal pending
Suspension was lifted actually but as leader Starmer holds the power and has refused to reinstate the whip.
Has he been expelled from the party?
Who said he had been? The Labour Party is full of anti semites anyway, what difference would getting rid of one make "
You did.But I know fact is an alien concept to you.
Of course
Now wamma explain to me how boris,Jacob Reeves and michael Gove are anti establishment? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"There is to be a review amid many motions to restore the whip and a possible to legal.challemge.
To say he is no longer in the labour party is factually incorrect
Don't twist words now. No one said he was no longer in the party"
Silverhorn..he is no longer a mp
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"There is to be a review amid many motions to restore the whip and a possible to legal.challemge.
To say he is no longer in the labour party is factually incorrect
Don't twist words now. No one said he was no longer in the party
Silverhorn..he is no longer a mp
"
He is no longer a Labour MP which is factually correct |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *obka3Couple
over a year ago
bournemouth |
"So have they gone from being the
Nasty Party to the Nazi Party ?
The nazis did not just happen, it was a gradual process. Alarm bells should be ringing with those people who love this country and the hard won democracy we obtained over the years."
And we should be on our guard against those that want stop free speech, that's you in this case, it's the courts job and their job alone to decide who can say what, |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *estivalMan
over a year ago
borehamwood |
"hey look at it this way if you want a new way of doing politics the old way needs smashing to peices.labour tories and the libs.u need to break it all before you can fix it.burn it all down wooooo hooooo
So joining you in the hard left is the way to go ? Become an anarchist
hard left???? no no no anarchists are apolitical the dont want any form of goverment your confusig them with blackbloc An anarchist.
As an anti-capitalist and libertarian socialist philosophy, anarchism is placed on the far-left of the political spectrum and much of its economics and legal philosophy reflect anti-authoritarian interpretations of left-wing politics such as communism, collectivism, syndicalism, mutualism, or participatory economics.
that may be the definition of it when you actually live with these people not so much the case.like every organisation there will be those at the top and everyone else.just a different dog wagging the same tail
Fest you're a communist. "
communist lol nah far from it. think easiest way to drscribe me would be give everyone the same to start with and if you decide to waste what u been given then tough shit.so yea prob a bit commie but prob a bit everyman for himself so like i said no party for me.i dont have that belief that everyone should be helped if you continuiosly prove that your a fuck up then tough shit |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *obka3Couple
over a year ago
bournemouth |
"
Fest you're a communist.
communist lol nah far from it. think easiest way to drscribe me would be give everyone the same to start with and if you decide to waste what u been given then tough shit.so yea prob a bit commie but prob a bit everyman for himself so like i said no party for me.i dont have that belief that everyone should be helped if you continuiosly prove that your a fuck up then tough shit"
While there is a lot to commend that idea the problem is with human nature some will work their socks off and end up will a lot from those that sit on their arse and end up with nothing and you get those in the middle that end up between those two extremes. Then what do you do take everything off those who end up with a lot and give it to the next generation of those who wasted it all ? Do that and what's the point of working hard for your own and your kids futures. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"hey look at it this way if you want a new way of doing politics the old way needs smashing to peices.labour tories and the libs.u need to break it all before you can fix it.burn it all down wooooo hooooo
So joining you in the hard left is the way to go ? Become an anarchist
hard left???? no no no anarchists are apolitical the dont want any form of goverment your confusig them with blackbloc An anarchist.
As an anti-capitalist and libertarian socialist philosophy, anarchism is placed on the far-left of the political spectrum and much of its economics and legal philosophy reflect anti-authoritarian interpretations of left-wing politics such as communism, collectivism, syndicalism, mutualism, or participatory economics.
that may be the definition of it when you actually live with these people not so much the case.like every organisation there will be those at the top and everyone else.just a different dog wagging the same tail
Fest you're a communist.
communist lol nah far from it. think easiest way to drscribe me would be give everyone the same to start with and if you decide to waste what u been given then tough shit.so yea prob a bit commie but prob a bit everyman for himself so like i said no party for me.i dont have that belief that everyone should be helped if you continuiosly prove that your a fuck up then tough shit"
To give everyone the same? Your definitely an anachrist, very hard left, and then dog eat dog. No wonder you detest the Tories fest. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *estivalMan
over a year ago
borehamwood |
"hey look at it this way if you want a new way of doing politics the old way needs smashing to peices.labour tories and the libs.u need to break it all before you can fix it.burn it all down wooooo hooooo
So joining you in the hard left is the way to go ? Become an anarchist
hard left???? no no no anarchists are apolitical the dont want any form of goverment your confusig them with blackbloc An anarchist.
As an anti-capitalist and libertarian socialist philosophy, anarchism is placed on the far-left of the political spectrum and much of its economics and legal philosophy reflect anti-authoritarian interpretations of left-wing politics such as communism, collectivism, syndicalism, mutualism, or participatory economics.
that may be the definition of it when you actually live with these people not so much the case.like every organisation there will be those at the top and everyone else.just a different dog wagging the same tail
Fest you're a communist.
communist lol nah far from it. think easiest way to drscribe me would be give everyone the same to start with and if you decide to waste what u been given then tough shit.so yea prob a bit commie but prob a bit everyman for himself so like i said no party for me.i dont have that belief that everyone should be helped if you continuiosly prove that your a fuck up then tough shit
To give everyone the same? Your definitely an anachrist, very hard left, and then dog eat dog. No wonder you detest the Tories fest."
accordi.g to some on here the dog eat dog part would make me a tory cheerleader lol but hey ho i just ont get the peeps on here who think things have changed and at one point it was a fairer society its never been like that and never will be thats life.my own ideal would be to have enough money to set my self up to be self sufficent o. my own bit of land and fuck everyo.e else |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *estivalMan
over a year ago
borehamwood |
p.s i detest all partys equally well not teue i detest the lib dems more at least the torys and labour pick a side of the fence so thats something i guess where as the libs tend to go whatever way they think the wind is blowing |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"hey look at it this way if you want a new way of doing politics the old way needs smashing to peices.labour tories and the libs.u need to break it all before you can fix it.burn it all down wooooo hooooo
So joining you in the hard left is the way to go ? Become an anarchist
hard left???? no no no anarchists are apolitical the dont want any form of goverment your confusig them with blackbloc An anarchist.
As an anti-capitalist and libertarian socialist philosophy, anarchism is placed on the far-left of the political spectrum and much of its economics and legal philosophy reflect anti-authoritarian interpretations of left-wing politics such as communism, collectivism, syndicalism, mutualism, or participatory economics.
that may be the definition of it when you actually live with these people not so much the case.like every organisation there will be those at the top and everyone else.just a different dog wagging the same tail
Fest you're a communist.
communist lol nah far from it. think easiest way to drscribe me would be give everyone the same to start with and if you decide to waste what u been given then tough shit.so yea prob a bit commie but prob a bit everyman for himself so like i said no party for me.i dont have that belief that everyone should be helped if you continuiosly prove that your a fuck up then tough shit
To give everyone the same? Your definitely an anachrist, very hard left, and then dog eat dog. No wonder you detest the Tories fest. accordi.g to some on here the dog eat dog part would make me a tory cheerleader lol but hey ho i just ont get the peeps on here who think things have changed and at one point it was a fairer society its never been like that and never will be thats life.my own ideal would be to have enough money to set my self up to be self sufficent o. my own bit of land and fuck everyo.e else"
I suppose the argument is, that pretty much anyone aside from the Tories offers a small incremental improvement.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *estivalMan
over a year ago
borehamwood |
"hey look at it this way if you want a new way of doing politics the old way needs smashing to peices.labour tories and the libs.u need to break it all before you can fix it.burn it all down wooooo hooooo
So joining you in the hard left is the way to go ? Become an anarchist
hard left???? no no no anarchists are apolitical the dont want any form of goverment your confusig them with blackbloc An anarchist.
As an anti-capitalist and libertarian socialist philosophy, anarchism is placed on the far-left of the political spectrum and much of its economics and legal philosophy reflect anti-authoritarian interpretations of left-wing politics such as communism, collectivism, syndicalism, mutualism, or participatory economics.
that may be the definition of it when you actually live with these people not so much the case.like every organisation there will be those at the top and everyone else.just a different dog wagging the same tail
Fest you're a communist.
communist lol nah far from it. think easiest way to drscribe me would be give everyone the same to start with and if you decide to waste what u been given then tough shit.so yea prob a bit commie but prob a bit everyman for himself so like i said no party for me.i dont have that belief that everyone should be helped if you continuiosly prove that your a fuck up then tough shit
To give everyone the same? Your definitely an anachrist, very hard left, and then dog eat dog. No wonder you detest the Tories fest. accordi.g to some on here the dog eat dog part would make me a tory cheerleader lol but hey ho i just ont get the peeps on here who think things have changed and at one point it was a fairer society its never been like that and never will be thats life.my own ideal would be to have enough money to set my self up to be self sufficent o. my own bit of land and fuck everyo.e else
I suppose the argument is, that pretty much anyone aside from the Tories offers a small incremental improvement.
"
so like ive said to you before a turd or a turd rolled in glitter
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"hey look at it this way if you want a new way of doing politics the old way needs smashing to peices.labour tories and the libs.u need to break it all before you can fix it.burn it all down wooooo hooooo
So joining you in the hard left is the way to go ? Become an anarchist
hard left???? no no no anarchists are apolitical the dont want any form of goverment your confusig them with blackbloc An anarchist.
As an anti-capitalist and libertarian socialist philosophy, anarchism is placed on the far-left of the political spectrum and much of its economics and legal philosophy reflect anti-authoritarian interpretations of left-wing politics such as communism, collectivism, syndicalism, mutualism, or participatory economics.
that may be the definition of it when you actually live with these people not so much the case.like every organisation there will be those at the top and everyone else.just a different dog wagging the same tail
Fest you're a communist.
communist lol nah far from it. think easiest way to drscribe me would be give everyone the same to start with and if you decide to waste what u been given then tough shit.so yea prob a bit commie but prob a bit everyman for himself so like i said no party for me.i dont have that belief that everyone should be helped if you continuiosly prove that your a fuck up then tough shit
To give everyone the same? Your definitely an anachrist, very hard left, and then dog eat dog. No wonder you detest the Tories fest. accordi.g to some on here the dog eat dog part would make me a tory cheerleader lol but hey ho i just ont get the peeps on here who think things have changed and at one point it was a fairer society its never been like that and never will be thats life.my own ideal would be to have enough money to set my self up to be self sufficent o. my own bit of land and fuck everyo.e else
I suppose the argument is, that pretty much anyone aside from the Tories offers a small incremental improvement.
so like ive said to you before a turd or a turd rolled in glitter
"
Yeah. Basically.
As far as the main parties go anyway. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"hey look at it this way if you want a new way of doing politics the old way needs smashing to peices.labour tories and the libs.u need to break it all before you can fix it.burn it all down wooooo hooooo
So joining you in the hard left is the way to go ? Become an anarchist
hard left???? no no no anarchists are apolitical the dont want any form of goverment your confusig them with blackbloc An anarchist.
As an anti-capitalist and libertarian socialist philosophy, anarchism is placed on the far-left of the political spectrum and much of its economics and legal philosophy reflect anti-authoritarian interpretations of left-wing politics such as communism, collectivism, syndicalism, mutualism, or participatory economics.
that may be the definition of it when you actually live with these people not so much the case.like every organisation there will be those at the top and everyone else.just a different dog wagging the same tail
Fest you're a communist.
communist lol nah far from it. think easiest way to drscribe me would be give everyone the same to start with and if you decide to waste what u been given then tough shit.so yea prob a bit commie but prob a bit everyman for himself so like i said no party for me.i dont have that belief that everyone should be helped if you continuiosly prove that your a fuck up then tough shit
To give everyone the same? Your definitely an anachrist, very hard left, and then dog eat dog. No wonder you detest the Tories fest. accordi.g to some on here the dog eat dog part would make me a tory cheerleader lol but hey ho i just ont get the peeps on here who think things have changed and at one point it was a fairer society its never been like that and never will be thats life.my own ideal would be to have enough money to set my self up to be self sufficent o. my own bit of land and fuck everyo.e else
I suppose the argument is, that pretty much anyone aside from the Tories offers a small incremental improvement.
so like ive said to you before a turd or a turd rolled in glitter
"
You seem to be very confused fest, you claim to be an anarchist but u also believe in dog eat dog .  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"So have they gone from being the
Nasty Party to the Nazi Party ?
The nazis did not just happen, it was a gradual process. Alarm bells should be ringing with those people who love this country and the hard won democracy we obtained over the years."
Parddone moi ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *estivalMan
over a year ago
borehamwood |
"hey look at it this way if you want a new way of doing politics the old way needs smashing to peices.labour tories and the libs.u need to break it all before you can fix it.burn it all down wooooo hooooo
So joining you in the hard left is the way to go ? Become an anarchist
hard left???? no no no anarchists are apolitical the dont want any form of goverment your confusig them with blackbloc An anarchist.
As an anti-capitalist and libertarian socialist philosophy, anarchism is placed on the far-left of the political spectrum and much of its economics and legal philosophy reflect anti-authoritarian interpretations of left-wing politics such as communism, collectivism, syndicalism, mutualism, or participatory economics.
that may be the definition of it when you actually live with these people not so much the case.like every organisation there will be those at the top and everyone else.just a different dog wagging the same tail
Fest you're a communist.
communist lol nah far from it. think easiest way to drscribe me would be give everyone the same to start with and if you decide to waste what u been given then tough shit.so yea prob a bit commie but prob a bit everyman for himself so like i said no party for me.i dont have that belief that everyone should be helped if you continuiosly prove that your a fuck up then tough shit
To give everyone the same? Your definitely an anachrist, very hard left, and then dog eat dog. No wonder you detest the Tories fest. accordi.g to some on here the dog eat dog part would make me a tory cheerleader lol but hey ho i just ont get the peeps on here who think things have changed and at one point it was a fairer society its never been like that and never will be thats life.my own ideal would be to have enough money to set my self up to be self sufficent o. my own bit of land and fuck everyo.e else
I suppose the argument is, that pretty much anyone aside from the Tories offers a small incremental improvement.
so like ive said to you before a turd or a turd rolled in glitter
You seem to be very confused fest, you claim to be an anarchist but u also believe in dog eat dog . "
if u look further up the thread i did say some ofmy views will be seen as hippy dippy bullshit by some on here and others on here will see some of my views and call me far right prob why i feel there is no one worth my vote.i tend not to have just one view of the world.openminded or schizophrenic you decide mate personaly i dont pay much attention to what others think of me |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"hey look at it this way if you want a new way of doing politics the old way needs smashing to peices.labour tories and the libs.u need to break it all before you can fix it.burn it all down wooooo hooooo
So joining you in the hard left is the way to go ? Become an anarchist
hard left???? no no no anarchists are apolitical the dont want any form of goverment your confusig them with blackbloc An anarchist.
As an anti-capitalist and libertarian socialist philosophy, anarchism is placed on the far-left of the political spectrum and much of its economics and legal philosophy reflect anti-authoritarian interpretations of left-wing politics such as communism, collectivism, syndicalism, mutualism, or participatory economics.
that may be the definition of it when you actually live with these people not so much the case.like every organisation there will be those at the top and everyone else.just a different dog wagging the same tail
Fest you're a communist.
communist lol nah far from it. think easiest way to drscribe me would be give everyone the same to start with and if you decide to waste what u been given then tough shit.so yea prob a bit commie but prob a bit everyman for himself so like i said no party for me.i dont have that belief that everyone should be helped if you continuiosly prove that your a fuck up then tough shit
To give everyone the same? Your definitely an anachrist, very hard left, and then dog eat dog. No wonder you detest the Tories fest. accordi.g to some on here the dog eat dog part would make me a tory cheerleader lol but hey ho i just ont get the peeps on here who think things have changed and at one point it was a fairer society its never been like that and never will be thats life.my own ideal would be to have enough money to set my self up to be self sufficent o. my own bit of land and fuck everyo.e else
I suppose the argument is, that pretty much anyone aside from the Tories offers a small incremental improvement.
so like ive said to you before a turd or a turd rolled in glitter
You seem to be very confused fest, you claim to be an anarchist but u also believe in dog eat dog .
if u look further up the thread i did say some ofmy views will be seen as hippy dippy bullshit by some on here and others on here will see some of my views and call me far right prob why i feel there is no one worth my vote.i tend not to have just one view of the world.openminded or schizophrenic you decide mate personaly i dont pay much attention to what others think of me "
Well good luck buying the farm but don't think its happening under the tories. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *estivalMan
over a year ago
borehamwood |
"hey look at it this way if you want a new way of doing politics the old way needs smashing to peices.labour tories and the libs.u need to break it all before you can fix it.burn it all down wooooo hooooo
So joining you in the hard left is the way to go ? Become an anarchist
hard left???? no no no anarchists are apolitical the dont want any form of goverment your confusig them with blackbloc An anarchist.
As an anti-capitalist and libertarian socialist philosophy, anarchism is placed on the far-left of the political spectrum and much of its economics and legal philosophy reflect anti-authoritarian interpretations of left-wing politics such as communism, collectivism, syndicalism, mutualism, or participatory economics.
that may be the definition of it when you actually live with these people not so much the case.like every organisation there will be those at the top and everyone else.just a different dog wagging the same tail
Fest you're a communist.
communist lol nah far from it. think easiest way to drscribe me would be give everyone the same to start with and if you decide to waste what u been given then tough shit.so yea prob a bit commie but prob a bit everyman for himself so like i said no party for me.i dont have that belief that everyone should be helped if you continuiosly prove that your a fuck up then tough shit
To give everyone the same? Your definitely an anachrist, very hard left, and then dog eat dog. No wonder you detest the Tories fest. accordi.g to some on here the dog eat dog part would make me a tory cheerleader lol but hey ho i just ont get the peeps on here who think things have changed and at one point it was a fairer society its never been like that and never will be thats life.my own ideal would be to have enough money to set my self up to be self sufficent o. my own bit of land and fuck everyo.e else
I suppose the argument is, that pretty much anyone aside from the Tories offers a small incremental improvement.
so like ive said to you before a turd or a turd rolled in glitter
You seem to be very confused fest, you claim to be an anarchist but u also believe in dog eat dog .
if u look further up the thread i did say some ofmy views will be seen as hippy dippy bullshit by some on here and others on here will see some of my views and call me far right prob why i feel there is no one worth my vote.i tend not to have just one view of the world.openminded or schizophrenic you decide mate personaly i dont pay much attention to what others think of me
Well good luck buying the farm but don't think its happening under the tories. "
doubt it would happen under labour or the libs either.goverments dont tend to like it if u go off and do your own thing makes it harder for them to rinse cash out of you |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"hey look at it this way if you want a new way of doing politics the old way needs smashing to peices.labour tories and the libs.u need to break it all before you can fix it.burn it all down wooooo hooooo
So joining you in the hard left is the way to go ? Become an anarchist
hard left???? no no no anarchists are apolitical the dont want any form of goverment your confusig them with blackbloc An anarchist.
As an anti-capitalist and libertarian socialist philosophy, anarchism is placed on the far-left of the political spectrum and much of its economics and legal philosophy reflect anti-authoritarian interpretations of left-wing politics such as communism, collectivism, syndicalism, mutualism, or participatory economics.
that may be the definition of it when you actually live with these people not so much the case.like every organisation there will be those at the top and everyone else.just a different dog wagging the same tail
Fest you're a communist.
communist lol nah far from it. think easiest way to drscribe me would be give everyone the same to start with and if you decide to waste what u been given then tough shit.so yea prob a bit commie but prob a bit everyman for himself so like i said no party for me.i dont have that belief that everyone should be helped if you continuiosly prove that your a fuck up then tough shit
To give everyone the same? Your definitely an anachrist, very hard left, and then dog eat dog. No wonder you detest the Tories fest. accordi.g to some on here the dog eat dog part would make me a tory cheerleader lol but hey ho i just ont get the peeps on here who think things have changed and at one point it was a fairer society its never been like that and never will be thats life.my own ideal would be to have enough money to set my self up to be self sufficent o. my own bit of land and fuck everyo.e else
I suppose the argument is, that pretty much anyone aside from the Tories offers a small incremental improvement.
so like ive said to you before a turd or a turd rolled in glitter
You seem to be very confused fest, you claim to be an anarchist but u also believe in dog eat dog .
if u look further up the thread i did say some ofmy views will be seen as hippy dippy bullshit by some on here and others on here will see some of my views and call me far right prob why i feel there is no one worth my vote.i tend not to have just one view of the world.openminded or schizophrenic you decide mate personaly i dont pay much attention to what others think of me
Well good luck buying the farm but don't think its happening under the tories.
doubt it would happen under labour or the libs either.goverments dont tend to like it if u go off and do your own thing makes it harder for them to rinse cash out of you "
Well after being squeezed to the limits for 13 years by the current shysters dont blame u for hating them fest. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *estivalMan
over a year ago
borehamwood |
"yea hate all politicians. anyone who chooses to do that for a job should not be trusted
Billy Connolly - the desire to be a politician should stop you from ever being one "
billy is a wise funny man |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"yea hate all politicians. anyone who chooses to do that for a job should not be trusted "
Spoken like a true anarchist fest, lock up those tory shysters for the way they've fcuked us all. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *estivalMan
over a year ago
borehamwood |
"yea hate all politicians. anyone who chooses to do that for a job should not be trusted
Spoken like a true anarchist fest, lock up those tory shysters for the way they've fcuked us all. "
lock em all up tory labpur libs and the snp or only the torys??? u dont support a political party do you???? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *eroy1000Man
over a year ago
milton keynes |
"A well known Fact now, seems like these tories, nadine dorres, Michael gove, James cleverly and few more tories have been skulking around on parler before it was shut down, sharing a platform with the arsehole Katie Hopkins.
So the tories seem to take delight in sharing their views with right wing terrorists.
Is our government being led by far right terrorist sympathisers?
It looks like it, this government is becoming an autocracy via the backdoor. With the tories becoming some form of dynastic dictatorship which only exchanges of power between its own members. Tightening their grip on the democratic institutions setup to prevent tyranny of the privileged.
But as the US has shown that Democracy will prevail over right wing insurgents, we in Britain should protect our institutions hard won from those tinpot wannabe dictators!
First I heard of this Platform was when the orange one got kicked of twitter. Was it strictly for far right people only or could any one join
How would you even qualify as ‘far right’ for acceptance on a social media platform?
Like all social media, anyone could join. People just had a shit fit because those profiles banned by Twitter went to Parler instead, as they proclaimed they were for free speech above anything else. So they had a big influx of Twitter undesirables which sent the twitterati into meltdown
If anyone could join whats the difference to places like twitter. Did the likes of Gove post anything racist for example. Apart from being on the same platform whats the link to the far right and Katie Hopkins ect. I was on Twitter once at the same time as the orange man, does that mean I share his views
An excellent point! You’d have to ask the OP to answer that. I’m with you - it’s a truly fucking ridiculous assertion to be making. If you had Twitter then you must agree with the CCP, the Ayatollah, Donald Trump and Richard Spencer.....all at the same time
Confused is the word I’m choosing for this sentiment.
Signing up to Parlour doesn't imply anything.
The only difference between the platforms is that Parlour allows hate speech. "
Yeah I could not see how it implies anything either which makes the post all the stranger |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"A well known Fact now, seems like these tories, nadine dorres, Michael gove, James cleverly and few more tories have been skulking around on parler before it was shut down, sharing a platform with the arsehole Katie Hopkins.
So the tories seem to take delight in sharing their views with right wing terrorists.
Is our government being led by far right terrorist sympathisers?
It looks like it, this government is becoming an autocracy via the backdoor. With the tories becoming some form of dynastic dictatorship which only exchanges of power between its own members. Tightening their grip on the democratic institutions setup to prevent tyranny of the privileged.
But as the US has shown that Democracy will prevail over right wing insurgents, we in Britain should protect our institutions hard won from those tinpot wannabe dictators!
First I heard of this Platform was when the orange one got kicked of twitter. Was it strictly for far right people only or could any one join
How would you even qualify as ‘far right’ for acceptance on a social media platform?
Like all social media, anyone could join. People just had a shit fit because those profiles banned by Twitter went to Parler instead, as they proclaimed they were for free speech above anything else. So they had a big influx of Twitter undesirables which sent the twitterati into meltdown
If anyone could join whats the difference to places like twitter. Did the likes of Gove post anything racist for example. Apart from being on the same platform whats the link to the far right and Katie Hopkins ect. I was on Twitter once at the same time as the orange man, does that mean I share his views"
Who knows, it’s not about you though is it? It’s about elected officials using a platform which has known far right member who incite terrorist actions.
Back in the day hatred was uncover with secret societies who promoted hatred. Now they are blatant because they know they can say anything and get away with anything which demonstrates that far right supremacist attitudes cast a long shadow over the Tory party.
It just shows the tories have a lot to blame for the situation the UK and the further rise of the Far right movement. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"A well known Fact now, seems like these tories, nadine dorres, Michael gove, James cleverly and few more tories have been skulking around on parler before it was shut down, sharing a platform with the arsehole Katie Hopkins.
So the tories seem to take delight in sharing their views with right wing terrorists.
Is our government being led by far right terrorist sympathisers?
It looks like it, this government is becoming an autocracy via the backdoor. With the tories becoming some form of dynastic dictatorship which only exchanges of power between its own members. Tightening their grip on the democratic institutions setup to prevent tyranny of the privileged.
But as the US has shown that Democracy will prevail over right wing insurgents, we in Britain should protect our institutions hard won from those tinpot wannabe dictators!
First I heard of this Platform was when the orange one got kicked of twitter. Was it strictly for far right people only or could any one join
How would you even qualify as ‘far right’ for acceptance on a social media platform?
Like all social media, anyone could join. People just had a shit fit because those profiles banned by Twitter went to Parler instead, as they proclaimed they were for free speech above anything else. So they had a big influx of Twitter undesirables which sent the twitterati into meltdown
If anyone could join whats the difference to places like twitter. Did the likes of Gove post anything racist for example. Apart from being on the same platform whats the link to the far right and Katie Hopkins ect. I was on Twitter once at the same time as the orange man, does that mean I share his views
An excellent point! You’d have to ask the OP to answer that. I’m with you - it’s a truly fucking ridiculous assertion to be making. If you had Twitter then you must agree with the CCP, the Ayatollah, Donald Trump and Richard Spencer.....all at the same time
Confused is the word I’m choosing for this sentiment.
Signing up to Parlour doesn't imply anything.
The only difference between the platforms is that Parlour allows hate speech.
Yeah I could not see how it implies anything either which makes the post all the stranger"
Of course it does, but taking that logical leap maybe too far for some.
It would be naive to assume that nothing happened, because you either have two narratives
Either
A) they were stupid and therefore they have no good sense of judgement, which therefore makes them unfit for office.
Or
B) they went there with the sole intent to spread further dissent among right wing supporters to encourage violent terrorist actions. Therefore, making them unfit for office.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *mmabluTV/TS
over a year ago
upton wirral |
"A well known Fact now, seems like these tories, nadine dorres, Michael gove, James cleverly and few more tories have been skulking around on parler before it was shut down, sharing a platform with the arsehole Katie Hopkins.
So the tories seem to take delight in sharing their views with right wing terrorists.
Is our government being led by far right terrorist sympathisers?
It looks like it, this government is becoming an autocracy via the backdoor. With the tories becoming some form of dynastic dictatorship which only exchanges of power between its own members. Tightening their grip on the democratic institutions setup to prevent tyranny of the privileged.
But as the US has shown that Democracy will prevail over right wing insurgents, we in Britain should protect our institutions hard won from those tinpot wannabe dictators!
"
Lockdown is making you crazy be carefull |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *mmabluTV/TS
over a year ago
upton wirral |
"That’s right release the hate, you will feel better for it later x
I love Democracy and the rule of law, if I say what I say is only to protect it from the onslaught from those who feel they feel superior to the British people.
If you feel otherwise, then I ask you why don’t you love this country at all?"
Itb is you that does not love this country |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *mmabluTV/TS
over a year ago
upton wirral |
"last i checked qe had elections in the uk.majority must like the torys because they keep getfing voted in by a landslide. at the last election.guess it says a lot about the oppisition if they cant beat the torys who are apparently so bad.this is the thing about elections the majority wins not the ones who scream the loudest.myself i find it really funny how peeps support pilitical partys like they support football teams.none em them give a rats arse about the general public red blue or yellow"
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"A well known Fact now, seems like these tories, nadine dorres, Michael gove, James cleverly and few more tories have been skulking around on parler before it was shut down, sharing a platform with the arsehole Katie Hopkins.
So the tories seem to take delight in sharing their views with right wing terrorists.
Is our government being led by far right terrorist sympathisers?
It looks like it, this government is becoming an autocracy via the backdoor. With the tories becoming some form of dynastic dictatorship which only exchanges of power between its own members. Tightening their grip on the democratic institutions setup to prevent tyranny of the privileged.
But as the US has shown that Democracy will prevail over right wing insurgents, we in Britain should protect our institutions hard won from those tinpot wannabe dictators!
Lockdown is making you crazy be carefull"
Doubtful you will see the problem, Mercury poisoning and all. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"That’s right release the hate, you will feel better for it later x
I love Democracy and the rule of law, if I say what I say is only to protect it from the onslaught from those who feel they feel superior to the British people.
If you feel otherwise, then I ask you why don’t you love this country at all?Itb is you that does not love this country"
Pray explain your jaundiced view? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *eroy1000Man
over a year ago
milton keynes |
"A well known Fact now, seems like these tories, nadine dorres, Michael gove, James cleverly and few more tories have been skulking around on parler before it was shut down, sharing a platform with the arsehole Katie Hopkins.
So the tories seem to take delight in sharing their views with right wing terrorists.
Is our government being led by far right terrorist sympathisers?
It looks like it, this government is becoming an autocracy via the backdoor. With the tories becoming some form of dynastic dictatorship which only exchanges of power between its own members. Tightening their grip on the democratic institutions setup to prevent tyranny of the privileged.
But as the US has shown that Democracy will prevail over right wing insurgents, we in Britain should protect our institutions hard won from those tinpot wannabe dictators!
First I heard of this Platform was when the orange one got kicked of twitter. Was it strictly for far right people only or could any one join
How would you even qualify as ‘far right’ for acceptance on a social media platform?
Like all social media, anyone could join. People just had a shit fit because those profiles banned by Twitter went to Parler instead, as they proclaimed they were for free speech above anything else. So they had a big influx of Twitter undesirables which sent the twitterati into meltdown
If anyone could join whats the difference to places like twitter. Did the likes of Gove post anything racist for example. Apart from being on the same platform whats the link to the far right and Katie Hopkins ect. I was on Twitter once at the same time as the orange man, does that mean I share his views
An excellent point! You’d have to ask the OP to answer that. I’m with you - it’s a truly fucking ridiculous assertion to be making. If you had Twitter then you must agree with the CCP, the Ayatollah, Donald Trump and Richard Spencer.....all at the same time
Confused is the word I’m choosing for this sentiment.
Signing up to Parlour doesn't imply anything.
The only difference between the platforms is that Parlour allows hate speech.
Yeah I could not see how it implies anything either which makes the post all the stranger
Of course it does, but taking that logical leap maybe too far for some.
It would be naive to assume that nothing happened, because you either have two narratives
Either
A) they were stupid and therefore they have no good sense of judgement, which therefore makes them unfit for office.
Or
B) they went there with the sole intent to spread further dissent among right wing supporters to encourage violent terrorist actions. Therefore, making them unfit for office.
"
Is it at all possible they used the platform just like any other and did not spread racist material or incite violence. If they posted anything like that then yes not fit for office but has that actually happened? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
regardless of what they posted i certainly would no longer give creedence to anything anybody said if they had live accounts and posted on any known far right, alt-right, nuevo right etc social media, forum, website etc. i feel that including themselves in that sort of extreme demographic looses them any and all gravitas and anything that they say publically should be disregarded as populist nonsense and false information. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *obka3Couple
over a year ago
bournemouth |
"regardless of what they posted i certainly would no longer give creedence to anything anybody said if they had live accounts and posted on any known far right, alt-right, nuevo right etc social media, forum, website etc. i feel that including themselves in that sort of extreme demographic looses them any and all gravitas and anything that they say publically should be disregarded as populist nonsense and false information."
Ah the intolerance of the tolerant. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Ah the intolerance of the tolerant.
hi. thanks for your post, however it makes no sense. please could you elucidate the point you have attempted to make."
I'm gonna take a wild guess and say if you know a word such as elucidate then you know exactly what he/she means |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I'm gonna take a wild guess and say if you know a word such as elucidate then you know exactly what he/she means"
there is no logic in your statement. my grasp of diction reflects the illogic of the poster how exactly? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'm gonna take a wild guess and say if you know a word such as elucidate then you know exactly what he/she means
there is no logic in your statement. my grasp of diction reflects the illogic of the poster how exactly?"
Let me break it down for you.
Parler is a a platform which is tolerant to a wide range of views. You seem intolerant to Parler existing.
In short, you do not like the fact that he/she goes against your own views.
The statement makes perfect sense |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Let me break it down for you.
Parler is a a platform which is tolerant to a wide range of views. You seem intolerant to Parler existing.
In short, you do not like the fact that he/she goes against your own views.
The statement makes perfect sense "
it would have been preferable for you to answer the question. i'll think i'll leave you to your trolling. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Let me break it down for you.
Parler is a a platform which is tolerant to a wide range of views. You seem intolerant to Parler existing.
In short, you do not like the fact that he/she goes against your own views.
The statement makes perfect sense
it would have been preferable for you to answer the question. i'll think i'll leave you to your trolling."
I neither started a quarrel, nor did I post inflammatory comments or go off topic.
Therefore, I'm not a troll.
I see this all the time. People are called trolls just because someone doesn't like what they've said. Thanks for your time |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"A well known Fact now, seems like these tories, nadine dorres, Michael gove, James cleverly and few more tories have been skulking around on parler before it was shut down, sharing a platform with the arsehole Katie Hopkins.
So the tories seem to take delight in sharing their views with right wing terrorists.
Is our government being led by far right terrorist sympathisers?
It looks like it, this government is becoming an autocracy via the backdoor. With the tories becoming some form of dynastic dictatorship which only exchanges of power between its own members. Tightening their grip on the democratic institutions setup to prevent tyranny of the privileged.
But as the US has shown that Democracy will prevail over right wing insurgents, we in Britain should protect our institutions hard won from those tinpot wannabe dictators!
First I heard of this Platform was when the orange one got kicked of twitter. Was it strictly for far right people only or could any one join
How would you even qualify as ‘far right’ for acceptance on a social media platform?
Like all social media, anyone could join. People just had a shit fit because those profiles banned by Twitter went to Parler instead, as they proclaimed they were for free speech above anything else. So they had a big influx of Twitter undesirables which sent the twitterati into meltdown
If anyone could join whats the difference to places like twitter. Did the likes of Gove post anything racist for example. Apart from being on the same platform whats the link to the far right and Katie Hopkins ect. I was on Twitter once at the same time as the orange man, does that mean I share his views
An excellent point! You’d have to ask the OP to answer that. I’m with you - it’s a truly fucking ridiculous assertion to be making. If you had Twitter then you must agree with the CCP, the Ayatollah, Donald Trump and Richard Spencer.....all at the same time
Confused is the word I’m choosing for this sentiment.
Signing up to Parlour doesn't imply anything.
The only difference between the platforms is that Parlour allows hate speech.
Yeah I could not see how it implies anything either which makes the post all the stranger
Of course it does, but taking that logical leap maybe too far for some.
It would be naive to assume that nothing happened, because you either have two narratives
Either
A) they were stupid and therefore they have no good sense of judgement, which therefore makes them unfit for office.
Or
B) they went there with the sole intent to spread further dissent among right wing supporters to encourage violent terrorist actions. Therefore, making them unfit for office.
Is it at all possible they used the platform just like any other and did not spread racist material or incite violence. If they posted anything like that then yes not fit for office but has that actually happened?"
As a platform which is used by the far right anything could be used as a justification to support their causes, so having Tory MP’s using the application could provide ample justification to those far right individuals that they have “friend” in the upper echelons of foreign governments whom are sympathetic to their views.
It’s smacks of irresponsible behaviour. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Same arguments over and over again I see.
‘Anyone I don’t like is Hitler’ is all in reading here.
Ridiculous thread with ridiculous assertions. There’s some horrendous shit on Twitter, r@pe and death threats to the likes of JK Rowling ffs. But nobody seems to care about being associated with such hateful content on that platform do they?  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Same arguments over and over again I see.
‘Anyone I don’t like is Hitler’ is all in reading here.
Ridiculous thread with ridiculous assertions. There’s some horrendous shit on Twitter, r@pe and death threats to the likes of JK Rowling ffs. But nobody seems to care about being associated with such hateful content on that platform do they? "
Yeah there are people who care! Not disagreeing with that statement, and yes they require moderation. Social media such as have become echo chambers which have intensified hate speech. Feeding poison, providing latent psychopaths with a platform which pushes a sick agenda.
The only thing is to call it out and highlight it, because those who hide in the shadows and don’t like the spotlight shone on them will attempt to dismiss it and try to detract from their crimes. Which is now happening on a regular basis. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
