 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
He's back on twitter I think, he tweeted he wasn't going to appear at the inauguration.
I think he should be at least stripped of his presidential perks as I see him as being responsible for those 5 deaths.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"He's back on twitter I think, he tweeted he wasn't going to appear at the inauguration.
I think he should be at least stripped of his presidential perks as I see him as being responsible for those 5 deaths.
"
Nope, he's off Twitter now 
BBC News - Twitter permanently suspends Trump's account
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-55597840 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Hopefully in a the next few months he’ll discover those that enabled him throughout his presidency, only did it (like himself) to further their own ambitions and wealth.
I pray he’ll become a pariah within the residences he has, from New York to Mar a Largo. Melania divorces him and all that’s left of this pathetic old man child, is a sad individual who craves those rallies he once had.
Five people are dead due to his childish and pathetic inability to accept he lost a fair election. Never mind all those who have died throughout his mismanagement of the pandemic, he has blood not just on his hands he’s well up to his elbows by now.
Rot you pathetic prick and take the rest of your administration with you, into the hell you deserve
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
The BBC news report comparing Trump's speech on Wednesday inciting the crowd to his speech on Thursday using bigly words he doesn't understand, was wonderful.
Twitter shouldn't have to reign him in, his party should have done it a long time ago. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
The only downside to the orange pleb being booted from Twitter is that we cannot see the read his tweets about his absolute meltdown about being booted from Twitter
The man is a very dangerous man, personally think that he should of been removed a long time ago, from Twitter and office, I just wonder if they will have the balls to go after him and his family for the absolute chaos they have caused whilst in office |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"The only downside to the orange pleb being booted from Twitter is that we cannot see the read his tweets about his absolute meltdown about being booted from Twitter
The man is a very dangerous man, personally think that he should of been removed a long time ago, from Twitter and office, I just wonder if they will have the balls to go after him and his family for the absolute chaos they have caused whilst in office "
Part of me will quite miss the outlandish tweets and reaction to them, I mean he really kicked up a stir on social media, possibly for all the wrong reasons  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The only downside to the orange pleb being booted from Twitter is that we cannot see the read his tweets about his absolute meltdown about being booted from Twitter
The man is a very dangerous man, personally think that he should of been removed a long time ago, from Twitter and office, I just wonder if they will have the balls to go after him and his family for the absolute chaos they have caused whilst in office
Part of me will quite miss the outlandish tweets and reaction to them, I mean he really kicked up a stir on social media, possibly for all the wrong reasons "
The dismantling of American democracy as he tries to turn it into a fascist state is a pretty hefty price to pay for laughing at words like covfefe. Are you it wouldn't be better to just watch some Michael McIntyre? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *inaTitzTV/TS
over a year ago
Titz Towers, North Notts |
I'd love to have seen just one more tweet of him doing his nut about the bad. It's funny how many right wing Americans are suddenly complaining about free market companies making their own decisions.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Russel Brand did an interesting analysis of this on YT. The sad fact is that, regardless of politics, the wealthy few are still gaining riches at a disparagingly alarming rate and all recent presidents (since Reagan) have enabled this.
Trump promised to “drain the swamp” of course, he didn’t, he just enriched a different group of already super wealthy. Trump is a symptom of public dissatisfaction at this status quo and unfortunately has further divided people, but it is the division of the masses that has enabled the wealthy to continue to amass and subjugate.
I look at the world now and see not much has changed in terms of the distribution of power and wealth since Victorian times and that is a sadness. In over 100 years of social we have still to acknowledge the common cause of humanity.
Should Trump have been silenced? Yes (in my opinion) as he words threatened to bring about a civil war. However do we need society to change? And if so, how do we bring that about, without sacrifice? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Russel Brand did an interesting analysis of this on YT. The sad fact is that, regardless of politics, the wealthy few are still gaining riches at a disparagingly alarming rate and all recent presidents (since Reagan) have enabled this.
Trump promised to “drain the swamp” of course, he didn’t, he just enriched a different group of already super wealthy. Trump is a symptom of public dissatisfaction at this status quo and unfortunately has further divided people, but it is the division of the masses that has enabled the wealthy to continue to amass and subjugate.
I look at the world now and see not much has changed in terms of the distribution of power and wealth since Victorian times and that is a sadness. In over 100 years of social we have still to acknowledge the common cause of humanity.
Should Trump have been silenced? Yes (in my opinion) as he words threatened to bring about a civil war. However do we need society to change? And if so, how do we bring that about, without sacrifice? "
  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ocbigMan
over a year ago
Birmingham |
Well they would ban him wouldn’t they? Proving the point, ‘they ‘ are out to get him. Silence him. Deny democracy.
I could go on....but I want to make sure it is. Clear that I am being sarcastic whilst spoofing what he is actually banging into his dead keyboard. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Well they would ban him wouldn’t they? Proving the point, ‘they ‘ are out to get him. Silence him. Deny democracy.
I could go on....but I want to make sure it is. Clear that I am being sarcastic whilst spoofing what he is actually banging into his dead keyboard."
Consequences. Oh no! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Russel Brand did an interesting analysis of this on YT. The sad fact is that, regardless of politics, the wealthy few are still gaining riches at a disparagingly alarming rate and all recent presidents (since Reagan) have enabled this.
Trump promised to “drain the swamp” of course, he didn’t, he just enriched a different group of already super wealthy. Trump is a symptom of public dissatisfaction at this status quo and unfortunately has further divided people, but it is the division of the masses that has enabled the wealthy to continue to amass and subjugate.
I look at the world now and see not much has changed in terms of the distribution of power and wealth since Victorian times and that is a sadness. In over 100 years of social we have still to acknowledge the common cause of humanity.
Should Trump have been silenced? Yes (in my opinion) as he words threatened to bring about a civil war. However do we need society to change? And if so, how do we bring that about, without sacrifice? "
That last question is the same one exorcising me. Where will we find the leadership that will integrate and unite this fragmented divided world for the betterment of humankind and the entire planet.
How do we fill the vacuum with something other than more Trumps, BoJos and lining the pockets of media moguls, disaster capitalists and oligarchs? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Russel Brand did an interesting analysis of this on YT. The sad fact is that, regardless of politics, the wealthy few are still gaining riches at a disparagingly alarming rate and all recent presidents (since Reagan) have enabled this.
Trump promised to “drain the swamp” of course, he didn’t, he just enriched a different group of already super wealthy. Trump is a symptom of public dissatisfaction at this status quo and unfortunately has further divided people, but it is the division of the masses that has enabled the wealthy to continue to amass and subjugate.
I look at the world now and see not much has changed in terms of the distribution of power and wealth since Victorian times and that is a sadness. In over 100 years of social we have still to acknowledge the common cause of humanity.
Should Trump have been silenced? Yes (in my opinion) as he words threatened to bring about a civil war. However do we need society to change? And if so, how do we bring that about, without sacrifice? "
Russell Brand.. is he a champagne socialist? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *phroditeWoman
over a year ago
(She/ her) in Sensualityland |
"Russel Brand did an interesting analysis of this on YT. The sad fact is that, regardless of politics, the wealthy few are still gaining riches at a disparagingly alarming rate and all recent presidents (since Reagan) have enabled this.
Trump promised to “drain the swamp” of course, he didn’t, he just enriched a different group of already super wealthy. Trump is a symptom of public dissatisfaction at this status quo and unfortunately has further divided people, but it is the division of the masses that has enabled the wealthy to continue to amass and subjugate.
I look at the world now and see not much has changed in terms of the distribution of power and wealth since Victorian times and that is a sadness. In over 100 years of social we have still to acknowledge the common cause of humanity.
Should Trump have been silenced? Yes (in my opinion) as he words threatened to bring about a civil war. However do we need society to change? And if so, how do we bring that about, without sacrifice?
That last question is the same one exorcising me. Where will we find the leadership that will integrate and unite this fragmented divided world for the betterment of humankind and the entire planet.
How do we fill the vacuum with something other than more Trumps, BoJos and lining the pockets of media moguls, disaster capitalists and oligarchs?"
Seconded. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Russel Brand did an interesting analysis of this on YT. The sad fact is that, regardless of politics, the wealthy few are still gaining riches at a disparagingly alarming rate and all recent presidents (since Reagan) have enabled this.
Trump promised to “drain the swamp” of course, he didn’t, he just enriched a different group of already super wealthy. Trump is a symptom of public dissatisfaction at this status quo and unfortunately has further divided people, but it is the division of the masses that has enabled the wealthy to continue to amass and subjugate.
I look at the world now and see not much has changed in terms of the distribution of power and wealth since Victorian times and that is a sadness. In over 100 years of social we have still to acknowledge the common cause of humanity.
Should Trump have been silenced? Yes (in my opinion) as he words threatened to bring about a civil war. However do we need society to change? And if so, how do we bring that about, without sacrifice?
Russell Brand.. is he a champagne socialist?"
I don’t think it matters who asks the questions do you? Is that important? As I said he posted an “interesting” analysis, I didn’t say I agreed with it, but as an open-minded individual I will consider all discourse on the state of society. Again by “categorising” someone as a “this” or “that” you seem to enable the divide and rule status quo. Surely in a balance society all discourse should be judged on its message and not its messenger? Or has the cult of personality disabled our ability to consider words on their merit? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ocbigMan
over a year ago
Birmingham |
"Russel Brand did an interesting analysis of this on YT. The sad fact is that, regardless of politics, the wealthy few are still gaining riches at a disparagingly alarming rate and all recent presidents (since Reagan) have enabled this.
Trump promised to “drain the swamp” of course, he didn’t, he just enriched a different group of already super wealthy. Trump is a symptom of public dissatisfaction at this status quo and unfortunately has further divided people, but it is the division of the masses that has enabled the wealthy to continue to amass and subjugate.
I look at the world now and see not much has changed in terms of the distribution of power and wealth since Victorian times and that is a sadness. In over 100 years of social we have still to acknowledge the common cause of humanity.
Should Trump have been silenced? Yes (in my opinion) as he words threatened to bring about a civil war. However do we need society to change? And if so, how do we bring that about, without sacrifice?
Russell Brand.. is he a champagne socialist?"
As opposed to a sack cloth & ashes one? Message is the same, I haven’t read it so will not comment on content. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
*
