FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Unfair advantage
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The main problem around the Brexit talks seems to be that the EU are worried that if the UK leaves without following EU rules they will have an unfair trading advantage. So the question is, if we had never joined in the first place, would we have had this advantage all along and been more successful? " Interesting question indeed, why would a little insignificant country (Remainers view) like the UK have an advantage over a mighty trading block of 27 countries who all have so many common values.! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The main problem around the Brexit talks seems to be that the EU are worried that if the UK leaves without following EU rules they will have an unfair trading advantage. So the question is, if we had never joined in the first place, would we have had this advantage all along and been more successful? " The advantage lays in both of market access and free trade AND the none conformation of market rules. The advantage lays in having all 3. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The main problem around the Brexit talks seems to be that the EU are worried that if the UK leaves without following EU rules they will have an unfair trading advantage. So the question is, if we had never joined in the first place, would we have had this advantage all along and been more successful? Interesting question indeed, why would a little insignificant country (Remainers view) like the UK have an advantage over a mighty trading block of 27 countries who all have so many common values.!" Just answered it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The main problem around the Brexit talks seems to be that the EU are worried that if the UK leaves without following EU rules they will have an unfair trading advantage. So the question is, if we had never joined in the first place, would we have had this advantage all along and been more successful? Interesting question indeed, why would a little insignificant country (Remainers view) like the UK have an advantage over a mighty trading block of 27 countries who all have so many common values.! Just answered it " You wasn't quick enough | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The main problem around the Brexit talks seems to be that the EU are worried that if the UK leaves without following EU rules they will have an unfair trading advantage. So the question is, if we had never joined in the first place, would we have had this advantage all along and been more successful? Interesting question indeed, why would a little insignificant country (Remainers view) like the UK have an advantage over a mighty trading block of 27 countries who all have so many common values.! Just answered it You wasn't quick enough " Sorry | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking?" Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lol" If they walked away they would blame the eu They are trying to sort a deal and its still their fault. It's what happens when you have a gmnt which considers account ability a foreign concept. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lol" It is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lolIt is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. " Get help Seriously. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I saw a report last week, that a "no deal" puts 700000 jobs at risk in the EU. " So 2,000,000 less than will be at risk in the uk then . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I saw a report last week, that a "no deal" puts 700000 jobs at risk in the EU. " Saw that too, given its estimated to be about a 300,000 hit here and the other costs it's simply common sense to find compromise and get a deal sorted.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking?" Many said the UK would have no choice but to roll over and sign to whatever the EU demands. If that was true they would have stopped negotiations ages ago and just said take it or leave it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Many said the UK would have no choice but to roll over and sign to whatever the EU demands. If that was true they would have stopped negotiations ages ago and just said take it or leave it" Exactly this it’s always the one with the biggest stick that gets it’s own way well this time it’s not working | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Many said the UK would have no choice but to roll over and sign to whatever the EU demands. If that was true they would have stopped negotiations ages ago and just said take it or leave it" I could have sworn it was the brexiteers who were crowing about how easy the deal will be. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking?" I think they have now realised that we hold all the cards and they need us more than we need them | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Many said the UK would have no choice but to roll over and sign to whatever the EU demands. If that was true they would have stopped negotiations ages ago and just said take it or leave it" I never heard any of the leaders of the EU ever saying that ? They have always wanted to get some kind of deal | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Many said the UK would have no choice but to roll over and sign to whatever the EU demands. If that was true they would have stopped negotiations ages ago and just said take it or leave it I never heard any of the leaders of the EU ever saying that ? They have always wanted to get some kind of deal" Of corse they want some kind of deal it’s just not what the U.K. wants! Because it means following their rules even after the fact. So if the EU changes something they expect the U.K. to follow or suffer some kind of sanctions. So we would be no different from staying in which again is not what was voted for. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Many said the UK would have no choice but to roll over and sign to whatever the EU demands. If that was true they would have stopped negotiations ages ago and just said take it or leave it I never heard any of the leaders of the EU ever saying that ? They have always wanted to get some kind of deal Of corse they want some kind of deal it’s just not what the U.K. wants! Because it means following their rules even after the fact. So if the EU changes something they expect the U.K. to follow or suffer some kind of sanctions. So we would be no different from staying in which again is not what was voted for. " Their rules that we signed up and agreed too? So basically we should be allowed to continue to trade with the eu but not have to abide by the rules? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Many said the UK would have no choice but to roll over and sign to whatever the EU demands. If that was true they would have stopped negotiations ages ago and just said take it or leave it I never heard any of the leaders of the EU ever saying that ? They have always wanted to get some kind of deal" They don't seem to recognise the opposite argument. If the eu is such a burden, why are we desperate trying to get a deal? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Many said the UK would have no choice but to roll over and sign to whatever the EU demands. If that was true they would have stopped negotiations ages ago and just said take it or leave it I never heard any of the leaders of the EU ever saying that ? They have always wanted to get some kind of deal Of corse they want some kind of deal it’s just not what the U.K. wants! Because it means following their rules even after the fact. So if the EU changes something they expect the U.K. to follow or suffer some kind of sanctions. So we would be no different from staying in which again is not what was voted for. Their rules that we signed up and agreed too? So basically we should be allowed to continue to trade with the eu but not have to abide by the rules?" No because we are out of the club and so renegotiating a deal but the EU still want the U.K. to carry on as before which would hold the U.K. back from making a success for itself. Even wit the argument over fishing rights is uneven and not a level field also they would stop the U.K. from being competitive in the open market place as they expect no competition from us. Just like any big corporation they want to control the market and hold back any of independent country. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Many said the UK would have no choice but to roll over and sign to whatever the EU demands. If that was true they would have stopped negotiations ages ago and just said take it or leave it I never heard any of the leaders of the EU ever saying that ? They have always wanted to get some kind of deal Of corse they want some kind of deal it’s just not what the U.K. wants! Because it means following their rules even after the fact. So if the EU changes something they expect the U.K. to follow or suffer some kind of sanctions. So we would be no different from staying in which again is not what was voted for. Their rules that we signed up and agreed too? So basically we should be allowed to continue to trade with the eu but not have to abide by the rules? No because we are out of the club and so renegotiating a deal but the EU still want the U.K. to carry on as before which would hold the U.K. back from making a success for itself. Even wit the argument over fishing rights is uneven and not a level field also they would stop the U.K. from being competitive in the open market place as they expect no competition from us. Just like any big corporation they want to control the market and hold back any of independent country. " So post brexit we will not be doing any trade deals with europe whatsoever? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Many said the UK would have no choice but to roll over and sign to whatever the EU demands. If that was true they would have stopped negotiations ages ago and just said take it or leave it I never heard any of the leaders of the EU ever saying that ? They have always wanted to get some kind of deal Of corse they want some kind of deal it’s just not what the U.K. wants! Because it means following their rules even after the fact. So if the EU changes something they expect the U.K. to follow or suffer some kind of sanctions. So we would be no different from staying in which again is not what was voted for. Their rules that we signed up and agreed too? So basically we should be allowed to continue to trade with the eu but not have to abide by the rules? No because we are out of the club and so renegotiating a deal but the EU still want the U.K. to carry on as before which would hold the U.K. back from making a success for itself. Even wit the argument over fishing rights is uneven and not a level field also they would stop the U.K. from being competitive in the open market place as they expect no competition from us. Just like any big corporation they want to control the market and hold back any of independent country. So post brexit we will not be doing any trade deals with europe whatsoever?" Of core the U.K. will just not the deal they want to force the U.K. into maybe the U.K. will do a deal or it will rely on tariffs. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lolIt is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. " That is your opinion | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Many said the UK would have no choice but to roll over and sign to whatever the EU demands. If that was true they would have stopped negotiations ages ago and just said take it or leave it I never heard any of the leaders of the EU ever saying that ? They have always wanted to get some kind of deal Of corse they want some kind of deal it’s just not what the U.K. wants! Because it means following their rules even after the fact. So if the EU changes something they expect the U.K. to follow or suffer some kind of sanctions. So we would be no different from staying in which again is not what was voted for. " Unfortunately nobody can be sure what was voted for because there are so many different versions of Brexit . Some brexiteers claim a no deal is the best option, others what a Canada deal etc etc | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lolIt is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion " What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Many said the UK would have no choice but to roll over and sign to whatever the EU demands. If that was true they would have stopped negotiations ages ago and just said take it or leave it I never heard any of the leaders of the EU ever saying that ? They have always wanted to get some kind of deal Of corse they want some kind of deal it’s just not what the U.K. wants! Because it means following their rules even after the fact. So if the EU changes something they expect the U.K. to follow or suffer some kind of sanctions. So we would be no different from staying in which again is not what was voted for. Their rules that we signed up and agreed too? So basically we should be allowed to continue to trade with the eu but not have to abide by the rules? No because we are out of the club and so renegotiating a deal but the EU still want the U.K. to carry on as before which would hold the U.K. back from making a success for itself. Even wit the argument over fishing rights is uneven and not a level field also they would stop the U.K. from being competitive in the open market place as they expect no competition from us. Just like any big corporation they want to control the market and hold back any of independent country. So post brexit we will not be doing any trade deals with europe whatsoever? Of core the U.K. will just not the deal they want to force the U.K. into maybe the U.K. will do a deal or it will rely on tariffs. " So once again..you expect us to be able to trade with europe..but not be subject to their regulations. I think I can spot a tiny flaw in that plan? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lolIt is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. " Thise pesky court of human rights | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Many said the UK would have no choice but to roll over and sign to whatever the EU demands. If that was true they would have stopped negotiations ages ago and just said take it or leave it I never heard any of the leaders of the EU ever saying that ? They have always wanted to get some kind of deal Of corse they want some kind of deal it’s just not what the U.K. wants! Because it means following their rules even after the fact. So if the EU changes something they expect the U.K. to follow or suffer some kind of sanctions. So we would be no different from staying in which again is not what was voted for. Their rules that we signed up and agreed too? So basically we should be allowed to continue to trade with the eu but not have to abide by the rules? No because we are out of the club and so renegotiating a deal but the EU still want the U.K. to carry on as before which would hold the U.K. back from making a success for itself. Even wit the argument over fishing rights is uneven and not a level field also they would stop the U.K. from being competitive in the open market place as they expect no competition from us. Just like any big corporation they want to control the market and hold back any of independent country. So post brexit we will not be doing any trade deals with europe whatsoever? Of core the U.K. will just not the deal they want to force the U.K. into maybe the U.K. will do a deal or it will rely on tariffs. So once again..you expect us to be able to trade with europe..but not be subject to their regulations. I think I can spot a tiny flaw in that plan?" What flaw? Who else follows 'their' regulations? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Many said the UK would have no choice but to roll over and sign to whatever the EU demands. If that was true they would have stopped negotiations ages ago and just said take it or leave it I never heard any of the leaders of the EU ever saying that ? They have always wanted to get some kind of deal Of corse they want some kind of deal it’s just not what the U.K. wants! Because it means following their rules even after the fact. So if the EU changes something they expect the U.K. to follow or suffer some kind of sanctions. So we would be no different from staying in which again is not what was voted for. Their rules that we signed up and agreed too? So basically we should be allowed to continue to trade with the eu but not have to abide by the rules? No because we are out of the club and so renegotiating a deal but the EU still want the U.K. to carry on as before which would hold the U.K. back from making a success for itself. Even wit the argument over fishing rights is uneven and not a level field also they would stop the U.K. from being competitive in the open market place as they expect no competition from us. Just like any big corporation they want to control the market and hold back any of independent country. So post brexit we will not be doing any trade deals with europe whatsoever? Of core the U.K. will just not the deal they want to force the U.K. into maybe the U.K. will do a deal or it will rely on tariffs. So once again..you expect us to be able to trade with europe..but not be subject to their regulations. I think I can spot a tiny flaw in that plan? What flaw? Who else follows 'their' regulations? " No one else has to apparently because they are not on their doorstep.Once you are out of an imaginary eu line (nobody knows where it is ) you dont have to. ffs you couldnt make it up. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lolIt is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. Thise pesky court of human rights " What’s the ECHR got to do with the EU? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lolIt is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. Thise pesky court of human rights What’s the ECHR got to do with the EU? " I'm assuming that's what Costa mean when he talked about the EU judiciary? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lolIt is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. Thise pesky court of human rights What’s the ECHR got to do with the EU? " Dont you know he gets confused. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lolIt is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. Thise pesky court of human rights What’s the ECHR got to do with the EU? I'm assuming that's what Costa mean when he talked about the EU judiciary?" you assumed wrong again. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lolIt is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. Thise pesky court of human rights What’s the ECHR got to do with the EU? I'm assuming that's what Costa mean when he talked about the EU judiciary?" I'm assuming that would be the ECJ | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lolIt is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. Thise pesky court of human rights What’s the ECHR got to do with the EU? I'm assuming that's what Costa mean when he talked about the EU judiciary? I'm assuming that would be the ECJ " correct 10 points to you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lolIt is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. Thise pesky court of human rights What’s the ECHR got to do with the EU? I'm assuming that's what Costa mean when he talked about the EU judiciary? I'm assuming that would be the ECJ " So we are staying in the ecj? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lolIt is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. Thise pesky court of human rights What’s the ECHR got to do with the EU? I'm assuming that's what Costa mean when he talked about the EU judiciary? I'm assuming that would be the ECJ correct 10 points to you." So you dont have an issue with the ecj? That's nothing to do with the eu judiciary? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lolIt is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. Thise pesky court of human rights What’s the ECHR got to do with the EU? I'm assuming that's what Costa mean when he talked about the EU judiciary? I'm assuming that would be the ECJ correct 10 points to you. So you dont have an issue with the ecj? That's nothing to do with the eu judiciary?" Are you d*unk ? read what i wrote and answer me why if they are not trying to create a federal state we need any of them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lolIt is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. Thise pesky court of human rights What’s the ECHR got to do with the EU? I'm assuming that's what Costa mean when he talked about the EU judiciary? I'm assuming that would be the ECJ correct 10 points to you. So you dont have an issue with the ecj? That's nothing to do with the eu judiciary?Are you d*unk ? read what i wrote and answer me why if they are not trying to create a federal state we need any of them." You said they were creating their own judiciary I simply asked you to clarify this point. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lolIt is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. Thise pesky court of human rights What’s the ECHR got to do with the EU? I'm assuming that's what Costa mean when he talked about the EU judiciary? I'm assuming that would be the ECJ correct 10 points to you. So you dont have an issue with the ecj? That's nothing to do with the eu judiciary?Are you d*unk ? read what i wrote and answer me why if they are not trying to create a federal state we need any of them. You said they were creating their own judiciary I simply asked you to clarify this point." who created the ecj , who pays for it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They do not want the Uk to do well once we have left the EU because they know others will want to follow suit and vote out too. They will be hit equally hard, Germany for instance if they can no longer sell all their cars here ( we buy more than any other nation). The French and Dutch fishing industry will be screwed. If we had had a PM who hadn’t taken no deal off the table like May did at the beginning then a decent deal would have been done by now. She took off our only bargaining tool. They believed they could bully us into whatever they wanted us to do. Now they are thinking we may actually walk without a deal things have changed. " Where exactly did you get this information from? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lolIt is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. Thise pesky court of human rights What’s the ECHR got to do with the EU? I'm assuming that's what Costa mean when he talked about the EU judiciary? I'm assuming that would be the ECJ correct 10 points to you. So you dont have an issue with the ecj? That's nothing to do with the eu judiciary?Are you d*unk ? read what i wrote and answer me why if they are not trying to create a federal state we need any of them. You said they were creating their own judiciary I simply asked you to clarify this point.who created the ecj , who pays for it?" Right..so I ask you a to clarify something and you ask me two questions? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They do not want the Uk to do well once we have left the EU because they know others will want to follow suit and vote out too. They will be hit equally hard, Germany for instance if they can no longer sell all their cars here ( we buy more than any other nation). The French and Dutch fishing industry will be screwed. If we had had a PM who hadn’t taken no deal off the table like May did at the beginning then a decent deal would have been done by now. She took off our only bargaining tool. They believed they could bully us into whatever they wanted us to do. Now they are thinking we may actually walk without a deal things have changed. " So we are going to get a great deal then? The EU are going to buckle and meet our demands? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lolIt is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. Thise pesky court of human rights What’s the ECHR got to do with the EU? I'm assuming that's what Costa mean when he talked about the EU judiciary? I'm assuming that would be the ECJ correct 10 points to you. So you dont have an issue with the ecj? That's nothing to do with the eu judiciary?Are you d*unk ? read what i wrote and answer me why if they are not trying to create a federal state we need any of them. You said they were creating their own judiciary I simply asked you to clarify this point." So you dont disagree they are trying to create a federal europe its just the ecj you disagree with. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lolIt is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. Thise pesky court of human rights What’s the ECHR got to do with the EU? I'm assuming that's what Costa mean when he talked about the EU judiciary? I'm assuming that would be the ECJ correct 10 points to you. So you dont have an issue with the ecj? That's nothing to do with the eu judiciary?Are you d*unk ? read what i wrote and answer me why if they are not trying to create a federal state we need any of them. You said they were creating their own judiciary I simply asked you to clarify this point.So you dont disagree they are trying to create a federal europe its just the ecj you disagree with." You seem to be evading this issue around the judiciary? You think have a European court of justice is a bad thing? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lolIt is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. Thise pesky court of human rights What’s the ECHR got to do with the EU? I'm assuming that's what Costa mean when he talked about the EU judiciary? I'm assuming that would be the ECJ correct 10 points to you. So you dont have an issue with the ecj? That's nothing to do with the eu judiciary?Are you d*unk ? read what i wrote and answer me why if they are not trying to create a federal state we need any of them. You said they were creating their own judiciary I simply asked you to clarify this point.who created the ecj , who pays for it? Right..so I ask you a to clarify something and you ask me two questions?" if you can answer the questions in your head you will then have the answer. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lolIt is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. Thise pesky court of human rights What’s the ECHR got to do with the EU? I'm assuming that's what Costa mean when he talked about the EU judiciary? I'm assuming that would be the ECJ correct 10 points to you. So you dont have an issue with the ecj? That's nothing to do with the eu judiciary?Are you d*unk ? read what i wrote and answer me why if they are not trying to create a federal state we need any of them. You said they were creating their own judiciary I simply asked you to clarify this point.So you dont disagree they are trying to create a federal europe its just the ecj you disagree with. You seem to be evading this issue around the judiciary? You think have a European court of justice is a bad thing?" No im not saying that at all its necessary in a fedral europe that is my point. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lolIt is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. Thise pesky court of human rights What’s the ECHR got to do with the EU? I'm assuming that's what Costa mean when he talked about the EU judiciary? I'm assuming that would be the ECJ correct 10 points to you. So you dont have an issue with the ecj? That's nothing to do with the eu judiciary?Are you d*unk ? read what i wrote and answer me why if they are not trying to create a federal state we need any of them. You said they were creating their own judiciary I simply asked you to clarify this point.So you dont disagree they are trying to create a federal europe its just the ecj you disagree with. You seem to be evading this issue around the judiciary? You think have a European court of justice is a bad thing?No im not saying that at all its necessary in a fedral europe that is my point." Is the eu a federal state now? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lolIt is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. Thise pesky court of human rights What’s the ECHR got to do with the EU? I'm assuming that's what Costa mean when he talked about the EU judiciary? I'm assuming that would be the ECJ correct 10 points to you. So you dont have an issue with the ecj? That's nothing to do with the eu judiciary?Are you d*unk ? read what i wrote and answer me why if they are not trying to create a federal state we need any of them. You said they were creating their own judiciary I simply asked you to clarify this point.So you dont disagree they are trying to create a federal europe its just the ecj you disagree with. You seem to be evading this issue around the judiciary? You think have a European court of justice is a bad thing?No im not saying that at all its necessary in a fedral europe that is my point. Is the eu a federal state now?" ffs read what i wrote | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lolIt is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. Thise pesky court of human rights What’s the ECHR got to do with the EU? I'm assuming that's what Costa mean when he talked about the EU judiciary? I'm assuming that would be the ECJ correct 10 points to you. So you dont have an issue with the ecj? That's nothing to do with the eu judiciary?Are you d*unk ? read what i wrote and answer me why if they are not trying to create a federal state we need any of them. You said they were creating their own judiciary I simply asked you to clarify this point.So you dont disagree they are trying to create a federal europe its just the ecj you disagree with. You seem to be evading this issue around the judiciary? You think have a European court of justice is a bad thing?No im not saying that at all its necessary in a fedral europe that is my point. Is the eu a federal state now?ffs read what i wrote " Which bit..the bit about Germany and France conquering Europe? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No I think there will be no deal now. I hope there is not now. I wanted one in the beginning but not now not at this stage. It will Be bumpy road initially but We will be fine" I think you will be right. I don’t understand why Brexit voters want a deal with the EU anyway, the only ‘true Brexit ‘ is a no deal , | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lolIt is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. Thise pesky court of human rights What’s the ECHR got to do with the EU? I'm assuming that's what Costa mean when he talked about the EU judiciary? I'm assuming that would be the ECJ correct 10 points to you. So you dont have an issue with the ecj? That's nothing to do with the eu judiciary?Are you d*unk ? read what i wrote and answer me why if they are not trying to create a federal state we need any of them. You said they were creating their own judiciary I simply asked you to clarify this point.So you dont disagree they are trying to create a federal europe its just the ecj you disagree with. You seem to be evading this issue around the judiciary? You think have a European court of justice is a bad thing?No im not saying that at all its necessary in a fedral europe that is my point. Is the eu a federal state now?ffs read what i wrote Which bit..the bit about Germany and France conquering Europe?" no What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. Care to answer that? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lolIt is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. Thise pesky court of human rights What’s the ECHR got to do with the EU? I'm assuming that's what Costa mean when he talked about the EU judiciary? I'm assuming that would be the ECJ correct 10 points to you. So you dont have an issue with the ecj? That's nothing to do with the eu judiciary?Are you d*unk ? read what i wrote and answer me why if they are not trying to create a federal state we need any of them. You said they were creating their own judiciary I simply asked you to clarify this point.So you dont disagree they are trying to create a federal europe its just the ecj you disagree with. You seem to be evading this issue around the judiciary? You think have a European court of justice is a bad thing?No im not saying that at all its necessary in a fedral europe that is my point. Is the eu a federal state now?ffs read what i wrote Which bit..the bit about Germany and France conquering Europe?no What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. Care to answer that?" Surely if you have a collection of 27 countries you need some sort of political process? Because I'm guessing if you dont brexiteers will be screaming about a dictatorship. As for the judiciary..as far as I'm aware we still make our own laws in this country and have our own courts etc. You seem to not have a problem with the ecj protecting peoples human rights. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lolIt is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. Thise pesky court of human rights What’s the ECHR got to do with the EU? I'm assuming that's what Costa mean when he talked about the EU judiciary? I'm assuming that would be the ECJ correct 10 points to you. So you dont have an issue with the ecj? That's nothing to do with the eu judiciary?Are you d*unk ? read what i wrote and answer me why if they are not trying to create a federal state we need any of them. You said they were creating their own judiciary I simply asked you to clarify this point.So you dont disagree they are trying to create a federal europe its just the ecj you disagree with. You seem to be evading this issue around the judiciary? You think have a European court of justice is a bad thing?No im not saying that at all its necessary in a fedral europe that is my point. Is the eu a federal state now?ffs read what i wrote Which bit..the bit about Germany and France conquering Europe?no What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. Care to answer that? Surely if you have a collection of 27 countries you need some sort of political process? Because I'm guessing if you dont brexiteers will be screaming about a dictatorship. As for the judiciary..as far as I'm aware we still make our own laws in this country and have our own courts etc. You seem to not have a problem with the ecj protecting peoples human rights." so why does every other country outside the eu manage to have trade deals but dont need all that baggage? .I will answer that for you because they just want to trade nothing else and it seems to work perfectly well. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lol It is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. " We all know it's more than just trade, it always has been and you don't need to act as if no-one knows and your the only one to break the news lol The methods and rationale are of course just your opinions. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lolIt is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. Thise pesky court of human rights What’s the ECHR got to do with the EU? I'm assuming that's what Costa mean when he talked about the EU judiciary? I'm assuming that would be the ECJ correct 10 points to you. So you dont have an issue with the ecj? That's nothing to do with the eu judiciary?Are you d*unk ? read what i wrote and answer me why if they are not trying to create a federal state we need any of them. You said they were creating their own judiciary I simply asked you to clarify this point.So you dont disagree they are trying to create a federal europe its just the ecj you disagree with. You seem to be evading this issue around the judiciary? You think have a European court of justice is a bad thing?No im not saying that at all its necessary in a fedral europe that is my point. Is the eu a federal state now?ffs read what i wrote Which bit..the bit about Germany and France conquering Europe?no What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. Care to answer that? Surely if you have a collection of 27 countries you need some sort of political process? Because I'm guessing if you dont brexiteers will be screaming about a dictatorship. As for the judiciary..as far as I'm aware we still make our own laws in this country and have our own courts etc. You seem to not have a problem with the ecj protecting peoples human rights.so why does every other country outside the eu manage to have trade deals but dont need all that baggage? .I will answer that for you because they just want to trade nothing else and it seems to work perfectly well." So a trade block which contains 27 countries..with more wanting to join And has been in existence for over 40 years..is..according to you.. a failure.? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lolIt is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. Thise pesky court of human rights What’s the ECHR got to do with the EU? I'm assuming that's what Costa mean when he talked about the EU judiciary? I'm assuming that would be the ECJ correct 10 points to you. So you dont have an issue with the ecj? That's nothing to do with the eu judiciary?Are you d*unk ? read what i wrote and answer me why if they are not trying to create a federal state we need any of them. You said they were creating their own judiciary I simply asked you to clarify this point.So you dont disagree they are trying to create a federal europe its just the ecj you disagree with. You seem to be evading this issue around the judiciary? You think have a European court of justice is a bad thing?No im not saying that at all its necessary in a fedral europe that is my point. Is the eu a federal state now? ffs read what i wrote " Nigel Farage has really done a scare job on you mate | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lolIt is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. Thise pesky court of human rights What’s the ECHR got to do with the EU? I'm assuming that's what Costa mean when he talked about the EU judiciary? I'm assuming that would be the ECJ correct 10 points to you. So you dont have an issue with the ecj? That's nothing to do with the eu judiciary?Are you d*unk ? read what i wrote and answer me why if they are not trying to create a federal state we need any of them. You said they were creating their own judiciary I simply asked you to clarify this point.So you dont disagree they are trying to create a federal europe its just the ecj you disagree with. You seem to be evading this issue around the judiciary? You think have a European court of justice is a bad thing?No im not saying that at all its necessary in a fedral europe that is my point. Is the eu a federal state now?ffs read what i wrote Which bit..the bit about Germany and France conquering Europe?no What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. Care to answer that? Surely if you have a collection of 27 countries you need some sort of political process? Because I'm guessing if you dont brexiteers will be screaming about a dictatorship. As for the judiciary..as far as I'm aware we still make our own laws in this country and have our own courts etc. You seem to not have a problem with the ecj protecting peoples human rights.so why does every other country outside the eu manage to have trade deals but dont need all that baggage? .I will answer that for you because they just want to trade nothing else and it seems to work perfectly well. So a trade block which contains 27 countries..with more wanting to join And has been in existence for over 40 years..is..according to you.. a failure.?" Taps fingers! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lol It is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. We all know it's more than just trade, it always has been and you don't need to act as if no-one knows and your the only one to break the news lol The methods and rationale are of course just your opinions. " Of course they are my opinions nothing more but just wait now the uk has left a european army will be the next proposal.Macron is already making noises in that direction saying the eu cannot rely on the usa anymore. As france is now the biggest military power in the eu he will be wanting the eu to pay their way,so the next step is an eu army where all the countries commit a % of gdp to it .Just my opinion but watch this space. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lolIt is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. Thise pesky court of human rights What’s the ECHR got to do with the EU? I'm assuming that's what Costa mean when he talked about the EU judiciary? I'm assuming that would be the ECJ correct 10 points to you. So you dont have an issue with the ecj? That's nothing to do with the eu judiciary?Are you d*unk ? read what i wrote and answer me why if they are not trying to create a federal state we need any of them. You said they were creating their own judiciary I simply asked you to clarify this point.So you dont disagree they are trying to create a federal europe its just the ecj you disagree with. You seem to be evading this issue around the judiciary? You think have a European court of justice is a bad thing?No im not saying that at all its necessary in a fedral europe that is my point. Is the eu a federal state now? ffs read what i wrote Nigel Farage has really done a scare job on you mate " I dont need farage mate i have a brain for myself. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5078157/amp/EU-army-moves-step-closer-23-nations-sign-pact.html Gospel Obvs " Try you favourite source Merkel joins Macron in calling for a 'real, true European army ... www.theguardian.com › world › nov › merkel-joins-m... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5078157/amp/EU-army-moves-step-closer-23-nations-sign-pact.html Gospel Obvs Try you favourite source Merkel joins Macron in calling for a 'real, true European army ... www.theguardian.com › world › nov › merkel-joins-m... " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5078157/amp/EU-army-moves-step-closer-23-nations-sign-pact.html Gospel Obvs Try you favourite source Merkel joins Macron in calling for a 'real, true European army ... www.theguardian.com › world › nov › merkel-joins-m... " I thought it wasnt a reliable source? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5078157/amp/EU-army-moves-step-closer-23-nations-sign-pact.html Gospel Obvs Try you favourite source Merkel joins Macron in calling for a 'real, true European army ... www.theguardian.com › world › nov › merkel-joins-m... " So you agree then thats the next step. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5078157/amp/EU-army-moves-step-closer-23-nations-sign-pact.html Gospel Obvs " For someone who says he doesn't read the mail you seem very good at finding links to use. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Many said the UK would have no choice but to roll over and sign to whatever the EU demands. If that was true they would have stopped negotiations ages ago and just said take it or leave it I never heard any of the leaders of the EU ever saying that ? They have always wanted to get some kind of deal Of corse they want some kind of deal it’s just not what the U.K. wants! Because it means following their rules even after the fact. So if the EU changes something they expect the U.K. to follow or suffer some kind of sanctions. So we would be no different from staying in which again is not what was voted for. Their rules that we signed up and agreed too? So basically we should be allowed to continue to trade with the eu but not have to abide by the rules? No because we are out of the club and so renegotiating a deal but the EU still want the U.K. to carry on as before which would hold the U.K. back from making a success for itself. Even wit the argument over fishing rights is uneven and not a level field also they would stop the U.K. from being competitive in the open market place as they expect no competition from us. Just like any big corporation they want to control the market and hold back any of independent country. So post brexit we will not be doing any trade deals with europe whatsoever? Of core the U.K. will just not the deal they want to force the U.K. into maybe the U.K. will do a deal or it will rely on tariffs. So once again..you expect us to be able to trade with europe..but not be subject to their regulations. I think I can spot a tiny flaw in that plan?" No flaw they either deal with us or they don’t if not then we just look elsewhere and spend U.K. money in other countries | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But you can see them both making speeches on you tube if you want straight from the horses mouth. " I saw a talking dog on YouTube, it was amazing, not sure it was real though | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why are Brexit voters so concerned about getting a deal with the EU? Surely the best option is a no deal, I haven’t got a clue why Boris (we hold all the cards, they need us more than we need them ) hasn’t just walked away, what is to gained by getting a deal ? " It’s just another finger in the pie, they would prefer some kind of deal but if the EU want too much for the deal then we look elsewhere It’s plain to see the EU want too much so we will probably walk away | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But you can see them both making speeches on you tube if you want straight from the horses mouth. I saw a talking dog on YouTube, it was amazing, not sure it was real though " so someone has posed as them and the world media has fallen for it ,are you one of these covid conspiracy theory believer too. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5078157/amp/EU-army-moves-step-closer-23-nations-sign-pact.html Gospel Obvs Try you favourite source Merkel joins Macron in calling for a 'real, true European army ... www.theguardian.com › world › nov › merkel-joins-m... So you agree then thats the next step." Ive no idea. What I do know that the eu has brought peace to eurpe for the first time in centuries. A fact brexiteers conveniently seem to overlook | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why are Brexit voters so concerned about getting a deal with the EU? Surely the best option is a no deal, I haven’t got a clue why Boris (we hold all the cards, they need us more than we need them ) hasn’t just walked away, what is to gained by getting a deal ? It’s just another finger in the pie, they would prefer some kind of deal but if the EU want too much for the deal then we look elsewhere It’s plain to see the EU want too much so we will probably walk away " I find it hilrous that every tiny thing is The EU'sfault..they are bullying us.. they want too much..we want out sovereignty. The fact that we have a pm who literally makes it up as he goes along and lies through his teeth on a daily basis.. is presumably of no consequence. It's almost like people believe what they read in the right wing rags | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Anyway shouldn't all you worried remainers be out panic buying like the other idiots before the 31st instead of being on here." Tried..I need to get the popcorn in whilst I watch boris try to worm himself of his latest disaster. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Anyway shouldn't all you worried remainers be out panic buying like the other idiots before the 31st instead of being on here." Why, what is happening on the 31st? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5078157/amp/EU-army-moves-step-closer-23-nations-sign-pact.html Gospel Obvs Try you favourite source Merkel joins Macron in calling for a 'real, true European army ... www.theguardian.com › world › nov › merkel-joins-m... So you agree then thats the next step. Ive no idea. What I do know that the eu has brought peace to eurpe for the first time in centuries. A fact brexiteers conveniently seem to overlook " Tell that to the people of Kosovo. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5078157/amp/EU-army-moves-step-closer-23-nations-sign-pact.html Gospel Obvs Try you favourite source Merkel joins Macron in calling for a 'real, true European army ... www.theguardian.com › world › nov › merkel-joins-m... So you agree then thats the next step. Ive no idea. What I do know that the eu has brought peace to eurpe for the first time in centuries. A fact brexiteers conveniently seem to overlook Tell that to the people of Kosovo." And when did they join the eu again? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5078157/amp/EU-army-moves-step-closer-23-nations-sign-pact.html Gospel Obvs Try you favourite source Merkel joins Macron in calling for a 'real, true European army ... www.theguardian.com › world › nov › merkel-joins-m... So you agree then thats the next step. Ive no idea. What I do know that the eu has brought peace to eurpe for the first time in centuries. A fact brexiteers conveniently seem to overlook Tell that to the people of Kosovo." They are trying to join the EU at the moment doesn't look like they blame the EU! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why are Brexit voters so concerned about getting a deal with the EU? Surely the best option is a no deal, I haven’t got a clue why Boris (we hold all the cards, they need us more than we need them ) hasn’t just walked away, what is to gained by getting a deal ? It’s just another finger in the pie, they would prefer some kind of deal but if the EU want too much for the deal then we look elsewhere It’s plain to see the EU want too much so we will probably walk away I find it hilrous that every tiny thing is The EU'sfault..they are bullying us.. they want too much..we want out sovereignty. The fact that we have a pm who literally makes it up as he goes along and lies through his teeth on a daily basis.. is presumably of no consequence. It's almost like people believe what they read in the right wing rags" Where have I said the EU is bullying us ? I have just said they are asking too much for us to have any kind of deal so as I would in real life just walk away and look elsewhere. I’m self employed and work on price so if the customer wants to pay less I don’t deal wit them simple | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why are Brexit voters so concerned about getting a deal with the EU? Surely the best option is a no deal, I haven’t got a clue why Boris (we hold all the cards, they need us more than we need them ) hasn’t just walked away, what is to gained by getting a deal ? It’s just another finger in the pie, they would prefer some kind of deal but if the EU want too much for the deal then we look elsewhere It’s plain to see the EU want too much so we will probably walk away I find it hilrous that every tiny thing is The EU'sfault..they are bullying us.. they want too much..we want out sovereignty. The fact that we have a pm who literally makes it up as he goes along and lies through his teeth on a daily basis.. is presumably of no consequence. It's almost like people believe what they read in the right wing rags Where have I said the EU is bullying us ? I have just said they are asking too much for us to have any kind of deal so as I would in real life just walk away and look elsewhere. I’m self employed and work on price so if the customer wants to pay less I don’t deal wit them simple " Promising all benefits and no drawbacks was always going to lead to this sort of situation. What if the customer had used you for years, said they weren't going to use you and went another worker then expected you to still do maintenance for free? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Many said the UK would have no choice but to roll over and sign to whatever the EU demands. If that was true they would have stopped negotiations ages ago and just said take it or leave it I never heard any of the leaders of the EU ever saying that ? They have always wanted to get some kind of deal" I maybe should have been clearer I was referring to people on the forums | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why are Brexit voters so concerned about getting a deal with the EU? Surely the best option is a no deal, I haven’t got a clue why Boris (we hold all the cards, they need us more than we need them ) hasn’t just walked away, what is to gained by getting a deal ? It’s just another finger in the pie, they would prefer some kind of deal but if the EU want too much for the deal then we look elsewhere It’s plain to see the EU want too much so we will probably walk away I find it hilrous that every tiny thing is The EU'sfault..they are bullying us.. they want too much..we want out sovereignty. The fact that we have a pm who literally makes it up as he goes along and lies through his teeth on a daily basis.. is presumably of no consequence. It's almost like people believe what they read in the right wing rags Where have I said the EU is bullying us ? I have just said they are asking too much for us to have any kind of deal so as I would in real life just walk away and look elsewhere. I’m self employed and work on price so if the customer wants to pay less I don’t deal wit them simple Promising all benefits and no drawbacks was always going to lead to this sort of situation. What if the customer had used you for years, said they weren't going to use you and went another worker then expected you to still do maintenance for free?" A bit like France expecting the same rights for fishing as before even if we are not in the club | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why are Brexit voters so concerned about getting a deal with the EU? Surely the best option is a no deal, I haven’t got a clue why Boris (we hold all the cards, they need us more than we need them ) hasn’t just walked away, what is to gained by getting a deal ? It’s just another finger in the pie, they would prefer some kind of deal but if the EU want too much for the deal then we look elsewhere It’s plain to see the EU want too much so we will probably walk away I find it hilrous that every tiny thing is The EU'sfault..they are bullying us.. they want too much..we want out sovereignty. The fact that we have a pm who literally makes it up as he goes along and lies through his teeth on a daily basis.. is presumably of no consequence. It's almost like people believe what they read in the right wing rags Where have I said the EU is bullying us ? I have just said they are asking too much for us to have any kind of deal so as I would in real life just walk away and look elsewhere. I’m self employed and work on price so if the customer wants to pay less I don’t deal wit them simple Promising all benefits and no drawbacks was always going to lead to this sort of situation. What if the customer had used you for years, said they weren't going to use you and went another worker then expected you to still do maintenance for free? A bit like France expecting the same rights for fishing as before even if we are not in the club " Maybe because they were sold the fishing rights! But do you care to answer the original question? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5078157/amp/EU-army-moves-step-closer-23-nations-sign-pact.html Gospel Obvs Try you favourite source Merkel joins Macron in calling for a 'real, true European army ... www.theguardian.com › world › nov › merkel-joins-m... So you agree then thats the next step. Ive no idea. What I do know that the eu has brought peace to eurpe for the first time in centuries. A fact brexiteers conveniently seem to overlook Tell that to the people of Kosovo. And when did they join the eu again?" Your words are Lionel: 'What I do know that the eu has brought peace to eurpe for the first time in centuries.' You said peace in eurpe. As Kosovo is in Europe I'm highlighting you statement is wrong Lionel. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why are Brexit voters so concerned about getting a deal with the EU? Surely the best option is a no deal, I haven’t got a clue why Boris (we hold all the cards, they need us more than we need them ) hasn’t just walked away, what is to gained by getting a deal ? It’s just another finger in the pie, they would prefer some kind of deal but if the EU want too much for the deal then we look elsewhere It’s plain to see the EU want too much so we will probably walk away I find it hilrous that every tiny thing is The EU'sfault..they are bullying us.. they want too much..we want out sovereignty. The fact that we have a pm who literally makes it up as he goes along and lies through his teeth on a daily basis.. is presumably of no consequence. It's almost like people believe what they read in the right wing rags Where have I said the EU is bullying us ? I have just said they are asking too much for us to have any kind of deal so as I would in real life just walk away and look elsewhere. I’m self employed and work on price so if the customer wants to pay less I don’t deal wit them simple " There is a common theme that they are bullying us. The media have been stirring it for ages like its 26 countries ganging up on Britain..its pathetic. Instead of pointing the finger of blame at each other. Or trying to save "face'..maybe we act like grown ups and get a deal done. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5078157/amp/EU-army-moves-step-closer-23-nations-sign-pact.html Gospel Obvs Try you favourite source Merkel joins Macron in calling for a 'real, true European army ... www.theguardian.com › world › nov › merkel-joins-m... So you agree then thats the next step. Ive no idea. What I do know that the eu has brought peace to eurpe for the first time in centuries. A fact brexiteers conveniently seem to overlook Tell that to the people of Kosovo. And when did they join the eu again? Your words are Lionel: 'What I do know that the eu has brought peace to eurpe for the first time in centuries.' You said peace in eurpe. As Kosovo is in Europe I'm highlighting you statement is wrong Lionel. " So despite the fact that I specifically said the eu.in a thread wholly about the eu.you are trying to score a rather pitiful point..well done. Would you say the eu has not contributed to peace amongst its member states? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why are Brexit voters so concerned about getting a deal with the EU? Surely the best option is a no deal, I haven’t got a clue why Boris (we hold all the cards, they need us more than we need them ) hasn’t just walked away, what is to gained by getting a deal ? It’s just another finger in the pie, they would prefer some kind of deal but if the EU want too much for the deal then we look elsewhere It’s plain to see the EU want too much so we will probably walk away I find it hilrous that every tiny thing is The EU'sfault..they are bullying us.. they want too much..we want out sovereignty. The fact that we have a pm who literally makes it up as he goes along and lies through his teeth on a daily basis.. is presumably of no consequence. It's almost like people believe what they read in the right wing rags Where have I said the EU is bullying us ? I have just said they are asking too much for us to have any kind of deal so as I would in real life just walk away and look elsewhere. I’m self employed and work on price so if the customer wants to pay less I don’t deal wit them simple There is a common theme that they are bullying us. The media have been stirring it for ages like its 26 countries ganging up on Britain..its pathetic. Instead of pointing the finger of blame at each other. Or trying to save "face'..maybe we act like grown ups and get a deal done." Because the U.K. and EU cannot find common ground the EU wants more than the U.K. is offering | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking?" Boris is scared of facing a no deal more like it. Why does he keep going on all the time he comes up with these deadlines. He his shit scared. He had a oven ready deal. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why are Brexit voters so concerned about getting a deal with the EU? Surely the best option is a no deal, I haven’t got a clue why Boris (we hold all the cards, they need us more than we need them ) hasn’t just walked away, what is to gained by getting a deal ? It’s just another finger in the pie, they would prefer some kind of deal but if the EU want too much for the deal then we look elsewhere It’s plain to see the EU want too much so we will probably walk away I find it hilrous that every tiny thing is The EU'sfault..they are bullying us.. they want too much..we want out sovereignty. The fact that we have a pm who literally makes it up as he goes along and lies through his teeth on a daily basis.. is presumably of no consequence. It's almost like people believe what they read in the right wing rags Where have I said the EU is bullying us ? I have just said they are asking too much for us to have any kind of deal so as I would in real life just walk away and look elsewhere. I’m self employed and work on price so if the customer wants to pay less I don’t deal wit them simple There is a common theme that they are bullying us. The media have been stirring it for ages like its 26 countries ganging up on Britain..its pathetic. Instead of pointing the finger of blame at each other. Or trying to save "face'..maybe we act like grown ups and get a deal done." A deal is there to be done if the EU recognises the UK is now an independent nation. Free to make its own laws and trade with whoever they want. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why are Brexit voters so concerned about getting a deal with the EU? Surely the best option is a no deal, I haven’t got a clue why Boris (we hold all the cards, they need us more than we need them ) hasn’t just walked away, what is to gained by getting a deal ? It’s just another finger in the pie, they would prefer some kind of deal but if the EU want too much for the deal then we look elsewhere It’s plain to see the EU want too much so we will probably walk away I find it hilrous that every tiny thing is The EU'sfault..they are bullying us.. they want too much..we want out sovereignty. The fact that we have a pm who literally makes it up as he goes along and lies through his teeth on a daily basis.. is presumably of no consequence. It's almost like people believe what they read in the right wing rags Where have I said the EU is bullying us ? I have just said they are asking too much for us to have any kind of deal so as I would in real life just walk away and look elsewhere. I’m self employed and work on price so if the customer wants to pay less I don’t deal wit them simple There is a common theme that they are bullying us. The media have been stirring it for ages like its 26 countries ganging up on Britain..its pathetic. Instead of pointing the finger of blame at each other. Or trying to save "face'..maybe we act like grown ups and get a deal done. Because the U.K. and EU cannot find common ground the EU wants more than the U.K. is offering " Who's choice was it to leave? Who made the promises in 2016? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why are Brexit voters so concerned about getting a deal with the EU? Surely the best option is a no deal, I haven’t got a clue why Boris (we hold all the cards, they need us more than we need them ) hasn’t just walked away, what is to gained by getting a deal ? It’s just another finger in the pie, they would prefer some kind of deal but if the EU want too much for the deal then we look elsewhere It’s plain to see the EU want too much so we will probably walk away I find it hilrous that every tiny thing is The EU'sfault..they are bullying us.. they want too much..we want out sovereignty. The fact that we have a pm who literally makes it up as he goes along and lies through his teeth on a daily basis.. is presumably of no consequence. It's almost like people believe what they read in the right wing rags Where have I said the EU is bullying us ? I have just said they are asking too much for us to have any kind of deal so as I would in real life just walk away and look elsewhere. I’m self employed and work on price so if the customer wants to pay less I don’t deal wit them simple There is a common theme that they are bullying us. The media have been stirring it for ages like its 26 countries ganging up on Britain..its pathetic. Instead of pointing the finger of blame at each other. Or trying to save "face'..maybe we act like grown ups and get a deal done. Because the U.K. and EU cannot find common ground the EU wants more than the U.K. is offering " So why did boris repeatedly say the deal was "even ready? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why are Brexit voters so concerned about getting a deal with the EU? Surely the best option is a no deal, I haven’t got a clue why Boris (we hold all the cards, they need us more than we need them ) hasn’t just walked away, what is to gained by getting a deal ? It’s just another finger in the pie, they would prefer some kind of deal but if the EU want too much for the deal then we look elsewhere It’s plain to see the EU want too much so we will probably walk away I find it hilrous that every tiny thing is The EU'sfault..they are bullying us.. they want too much..we want out sovereignty. The fact that we have a pm who literally makes it up as he goes along and lies through his teeth on a daily basis.. is presumably of no consequence. It's almost like people believe what they read in the right wing rags Where have I said the EU is bullying us ? I have just said they are asking too much for us to have any kind of deal so as I would in real life just walk away and look elsewhere. I’m self employed and work on price so if the customer wants to pay less I don’t deal wit them simple There is a common theme that they are bullying us. The media have been stirring it for ages like its 26 countries ganging up on Britain..its pathetic. Instead of pointing the finger of blame at each other. Or trying to save "face'..maybe we act like grown ups and get a deal done. A deal is there to be done if the EU recognises the UK is now an independent nation. Free to make its own laws and trade with whoever they want. " Thank you for proving my point rather conclusively. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why are Brexit voters so concerned about getting a deal with the EU? Surely the best option is a no deal, I haven’t got a clue why Boris (we hold all the cards, they need us more than we need them ) hasn’t just walked away, what is to gained by getting a deal ? It’s just another finger in the pie, they would prefer some kind of deal but if the EU want too much for the deal then we look elsewhere It’s plain to see the EU want too much so we will probably walk away I find it hilrous that every tiny thing is The EU'sfault..they are bullying us.. they want too much..we want out sovereignty. The fact that we have a pm who literally makes it up as he goes along and lies through his teeth on a daily basis.. is presumably of no consequence. It's almost like people believe what they read in the right wing rags Where have I said the EU is bullying us ? I have just said they are asking too much for us to have any kind of deal so as I would in real life just walk away and look elsewhere. I’m self employed and work on price so if the customer wants to pay less I don’t deal wit them simple There is a common theme that they are bullying us. The media have been stirring it for ages like its 26 countries ganging up on Britain..its pathetic. Instead of pointing the finger of blame at each other. Or trying to save "face'..maybe we act like grown ups and get a deal done. A deal is there to be done if the EU recognises the UK is now an independent nation. Free to make its own laws and trade with whoever they want. " Boris said the deal was done. Repeatedly. Over and over again | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5078157/amp/EU-army-moves-step-closer-23-nations-sign-pact.html Gospel Obvs Try you favourite source Merkel joins Macron in calling for a 'real, true European army ... www.theguardian.com › world › nov › merkel-joins-m... So you agree then thats the next step. Ive no idea. What I do know that the eu has brought peace to eurpe for the first time in centuries. A fact brexiteers conveniently seem to overlook Tell that to the people of Kosovo. And when did they join the eu again? Your words are Lionel: 'What I do know that the eu has brought peace to eurpe for the first time in centuries.' You said peace in eurpe. As Kosovo is in Europe I'm highlighting you statement is wrong Lionel. So despite the fact that I specifically said the eu.in a thread wholly about the eu.you are trying to score a rather pitiful point..well done. Would you say the eu has not contributed to peace amongst its member states?" If you had first said the EU member states and not imply the EU is the saviour of Europe you would have been more correct. However, when you look at French fishing boats ramming UK fishing boats and the way Greece was stitched up I wouldn't say it is all milk and honey in the EU. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5078157/amp/EU-army-moves-step-closer-23-nations-sign-pact.html Gospel Obvs Try you favourite source Merkel joins Macron in calling for a 'real, true European army ... www.theguardian.com › world › nov › merkel-joins-m... So you agree then thats the next step. Ive no idea. What I do know that the eu has brought peace to eurpe for the first time in centuries. A fact brexiteers conveniently seem to overlook Tell that to the people of Kosovo. And when did they join the eu again? Your words are Lionel: 'What I do know that the eu has brought peace to eurpe for the first time in centuries.' You said peace in eurpe. As Kosovo is in Europe I'm highlighting you statement is wrong Lionel. So despite the fact that I specifically said the eu.in a thread wholly about the eu.you are trying to score a rather pitiful point..well done. Would you say the eu has not contributed to peace amongst its member states? If you had first said the EU member states and not imply the EU is the saviour of Europe you would have been more correct. However, when you look at French fishing boats ramming UK fishing boats and the way Greece was stitched up I wouldn't say it is all milk and honey in the EU." The last century saw two world wars with millions dead. So your comparison with 1 fishing boat ramming another is perfectly valid. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why are Brexit voters so concerned about getting a deal with the EU? Surely the best option is a no deal, I haven’t got a clue why Boris (we hold all the cards, they need us more than we need them ) hasn’t just walked away, what is to gained by getting a deal ? It’s just another finger in the pie, they would prefer some kind of deal but if the EU want too much for the deal then we look elsewhere It’s plain to see the EU want too much so we will probably walk away I find it hilrous that every tiny thing is The EU'sfault..they are bullying us.. they want too much..we want out sovereignty. The fact that we have a pm who literally makes it up as he goes along and lies through his teeth on a daily basis.. is presumably of no consequence. It's almost like people believe what they read in the right wing rags Where have I said the EU is bullying us ? I have just said they are asking too much for us to have any kind of deal so as I would in real life just walk away and look elsewhere. I’m self employed and work on price so if the customer wants to pay less I don’t deal wit them simple There is a common theme that they are bullying us. The media have been stirring it for ages like its 26 countries ganging up on Britain..its pathetic. Instead of pointing the finger of blame at each other. Or trying to save "face'..maybe we act like grown ups and get a deal done. Because the U.K. and EU cannot find common ground the EU wants more than the U.K. is offering So why did boris repeatedly say the deal was "even ready?" That was when the withdrawal agreement said they would respect uk sovereignty they have since changed the goalposts you cant blame him for that. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why are Brexit voters so concerned about getting a deal with the EU? Surely the best option is a no deal, I haven’t got a clue why Boris (we hold all the cards, they need us more than we need them ) hasn’t just walked away, what is to gained by getting a deal ? It’s just another finger in the pie, they would prefer some kind of deal but if the EU want too much for the deal then we look elsewhere It’s plain to see the EU want too much so we will probably walk away I find it hilrous that every tiny thing is The EU'sfault..they are bullying us.. they want too much..we want out sovereignty. The fact that we have a pm who literally makes it up as he goes along and lies through his teeth on a daily basis.. is presumably of no consequence. It's almost like people believe what they read in the right wing rags Where have I said the EU is bullying us ? I have just said they are asking too much for us to have any kind of deal so as I would in real life just walk away and look elsewhere. I’m self employed and work on price so if the customer wants to pay less I don’t deal wit them simple There is a common theme that they are bullying us. The media have been stirring it for ages like its 26 countries ganging up on Britain..its pathetic. Instead of pointing the finger of blame at each other. Or trying to save "face'..maybe we act like grown ups and get a deal done. Because the U.K. and EU cannot find common ground the EU wants more than the U.K. is offering So why did boris repeatedly say the deal was "even ready?That was when the withdrawal agreement said they would respect uk sovereignty they have since changed the goalposts you cant blame him for that." Can you provide evidence of this goal post moving? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why are Brexit voters so concerned about getting a deal with the EU? Surely the best option is a no deal, I haven’t got a clue why Boris (we hold all the cards, they need us more than we need them ) hasn’t just walked away, what is to gained by getting a deal ? It’s just another finger in the pie, they would prefer some kind of deal but if the EU want too much for the deal then we look elsewhere It’s plain to see the EU want too much so we will probably walk away I find it hilrous that every tiny thing is The EU'sfault..they are bullying us.. they want too much..we want out sovereignty. The fact that we have a pm who literally makes it up as he goes along and lies through his teeth on a daily basis.. is presumably of no consequence. It's almost like people believe what they read in the right wing rags Where have I said the EU is bullying us ? I have just said they are asking too much for us to have any kind of deal so as I would in real life just walk away and look elsewhere. I’m self employed and work on price so if the customer wants to pay less I don’t deal wit them simple There is a common theme that they are bullying us. The media have been stirring it for ages like its 26 countries ganging up on Britain..its pathetic. Instead of pointing the finger of blame at each other. Or trying to save "face'..maybe we act like grown ups and get a deal done. Because the U.K. and EU cannot find common ground the EU wants more than the U.K. is offering So why did boris repeatedly say the deal was "even ready?That was when the withdrawal agreement said they would respect uk sovereignty they have since changed the goalposts you cant blame him for that. Can you provide evidence of this goal post moving?" Apparently its the so called ratchet clause but no i can only go on what we are told as not privi to the trade agreement. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why are Brexit voters so concerned about getting a deal with the EU? Surely the best option is a no deal, I haven’t got a clue why Boris (we hold all the cards, they need us more than we need them ) hasn’t just walked away, what is to gained by getting a deal ? It’s just another finger in the pie, they would prefer some kind of deal but if the EU want too much for the deal then we look elsewhere It’s plain to see the EU want too much so we will probably walk away I find it hilrous that every tiny thing is The EU'sfault..they are bullying us.. they want too much..we want out sovereignty. The fact that we have a pm who literally makes it up as he goes along and lies through his teeth on a daily basis.. is presumably of no consequence. It's almost like people believe what they read in the right wing rags Where have I said the EU is bullying us ? I have just said they are asking too much for us to have any kind of deal so as I would in real life just walk away and look elsewhere. I’m self employed and work on price so if the customer wants to pay less I don’t deal wit them simple There is a common theme that they are bullying us. The media have been stirring it for ages like its 26 countries ganging up on Britain..its pathetic. Instead of pointing the finger of blame at each other. Or trying to save "face'..maybe we act like grown ups and get a deal done. Because the U.K. and EU cannot find common ground the EU wants more than the U.K. is offering So why did boris repeatedly say the deal was "even ready?That was when the withdrawal agreement said they would respect uk sovereignty they have since changed the goalposts you cant blame him for that. Can you provide evidence of this goal post moving?Apparently its the so called ratchet clause but no i can only go on what we are told as not privi to the trade agreement." Why are some leave voters such snowflakes, the EU are being so unfair , we deserve a Canada deal, why are they picking on us, you won, get on with it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Its total bollox saying the eu has stopped further wars in europe, after the last one there has been no appertite for war Germany was demilitarized and europe was more worried about Russia, that threat bought Europe closer together.There is no proof that the eu has stopped another war in europe." Apart from the fact that before this century..there were countless wars and since the eu began there has not been solitary conflict between 2 member states? Yeah you could be onto something there | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why are Brexit voters so concerned about getting a deal with the EU? Surely the best option is a no deal, I haven’t got a clue why Boris (we hold all the cards, they need us more than we need them ) hasn’t just walked away, what is to gained by getting a deal ? It’s just another finger in the pie, they would prefer some kind of deal but if the EU want too much for the deal then we look elsewhere It’s plain to see the EU want too much so we will probably walk away I find it hilrous that every tiny thing is The EU'sfault..they are bullying us.. they want too much..we want out sovereignty. The fact that we have a pm who literally makes it up as he goes along and lies through his teeth on a daily basis.. is presumably of no consequence. It's almost like people believe what they read in the right wing rags Where have I said the EU is bullying us ? I have just said they are asking too much for us to have any kind of deal so as I would in real life just walk away and look elsewhere. I’m self employed and work on price so if the customer wants to pay less I don’t deal wit them simple There is a common theme that they are bullying us. The media have been stirring it for ages like its 26 countries ganging up on Britain..its pathetic. Instead of pointing the finger of blame at each other. Or trying to save "face'..maybe we act like grown ups and get a deal done. Because the U.K. and EU cannot find common ground the EU wants more than the U.K. is offering So why did boris repeatedly say the deal was "even ready?That was when the withdrawal agreement said they would respect uk sovereignty they have since changed the goalposts you cant blame him for that. Can you provide evidence of this goal post moving?Apparently its the so called ratchet clause but no i can only go on what we are told as not privi to the trade agreement. Why are some leave voters such snowflakes, the EU are being so unfair , we deserve a Canada deal, why are they picking on us, you won, get on with it " I'll take that as a no | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The main problem around the Brexit talks seems to be that the EU are worried that if the UK leaves without following EU rules they will have an unfair trading advantage. So the question is, if we had never joined in the first place, would we have had this advantage all along and been more successful? " If we had never joined we would have been far better off,we would have had free trade like the Swiss most likely and got on with life. Joining was the biggest mistake this country has made in centuries | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The main problem around the Brexit talks seems to be that the EU are worried that if the UK leaves without following EU rules they will have an unfair trading advantage. So the question is, if we had never joined in the first place, would we have had this advantage all along and been more successful? If we had never joined we would have been far better off,we would have had free trade like the Swiss most likely and got on with life. Joining was the biggest mistake this country has made in centuries" Yeah fuck the likes of Germany and france we could be living off cuckoo clocks and tolberolme | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The main problem around the Brexit talks seems to be that the EU are worried that if the UK leaves without following EU rules they will have an unfair trading advantage. So the question is, if we had never joined in the first place, would we have had this advantage all along and been more successful? If we had never joined we would have been far better off,we would have had free trade like the Swiss most likely and got on with life. Joining was the biggest mistake this country has made in centuries" We joined because of the first referendum, you can’t deny democracy | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The main problem around the Brexit talks seems to be that the EU are worried that if the UK leaves without following EU rules they will have an unfair trading advantage. So the question is, if we had never joined in the first place, would we have had this advantage all along and been more successful? If we had never joined we would have been far better off,we would have had free trade like the Swiss most likely and got on with life. Joining was the biggest mistake this country has made in centuries We joined because of the first referendum, you can’t deny democracy " It appears some have been spitting mad for over forty years.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The main problem around the Brexit talks seems to be that the EU are worried that if the UK leaves without following EU rules they will have an unfair trading advantage. So the question is, if we had never joined in the first place, would we have had this advantage all along and been more successful? " Yes I’m sure we would have appreciated unsafe cars, truck drivers falling asleep after driving a hundred hours a week in their polluting trucks and factory workers getting no protection from their £2.50 an hour jobs so could be sacked on site as in America. Consumer rights ?. Non existent mate you take your chance. Our rivers and beaches would be full of rubbish and pollution but we would have a Singapore style economy competing offshore with the EU. We were the sick man of Europe and the EU helped and made us get our arse in gear. Next year a lot of low incomes families will be playing Russian roulette on holiday as 25% of tourist today don’t take out holiday insurance. Next year they will be paying for all their medical care if a deal isn’t agreed. But to deregulate and go it alone is good isn’t it. Remember that queuing in the “other passport” queue too. Oh what fun we can have together in those airports explaining why we are there and can we afford to stay. (students beware) Don’t forget proof of your flight home. Don’t stay too long mind even if you do have a villa in Spain. Btw exporters haven’t had so much paperwork and costs in 40 years so the claim to do away with red tape ?. What a joke! Spoke again with HMRC on Friday regarding procedures on customs and to quote” sorry we don’t know yet” DEFRA had the same answer on Thursday regarding certification. But it’s ok business has two weeks to get ready. Oh hang on ready for what exactly. Shambolic government at its finest. Boris sadly believes his own bullshit. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The main problem around the Brexit talks seems to be that the EU are worried that if the UK leaves without following EU rules they will have an unfair trading advantage. So the question is, if we had never joined in the first place, would we have had this advantage all along and been more successful? Yes I’m sure we would have appreciated unsafe cars, truck drivers falling asleep after driving a hundred hours a week in their polluting trucks and factory workers getting no protection from their £2.50 an hour jobs so could be sacked on site as in America. Consumer rights ?. Non existent mate you take your chance. Our rivers and beaches would be full of rubbish and pollution but we would have a Singapore style economy competing offshore with the EU. We were the sick man of Europe and the EU helped and made us get our arse in gear. Next year a lot of low incomes families will be playing Russian roulette on holiday as 25% of tourist today don’t take out holiday insurance. Next year they will be paying for all their medical care if a deal isn’t agreed. But to deregulate and go it alone is good isn’t it. Remember that queuing in the “other passport” queue too. Oh what fun we can have together in those airports explaining why we are there and can we afford to stay. (students beware) Don’t forget proof of your flight home. Don’t stay too long mind even if you do have a villa in Spain. Btw exporters haven’t had so much paperwork and costs in 40 years so the claim to do away with red tape ?. What a joke! Spoke again with HMRC on Friday regarding procedures on customs and to quote” sorry we don’t know yet” DEFRA had the same answer on Thursday regarding certification. But it’s ok business has two weeks to get ready. Oh hang on ready for what exactly. Shambolic government at its finest. Boris sadly believes his own bullshit. " He was at it again today saying they were fully prepared. A fella was on five 5 yesterday saying everytime they ring up for advice they are told the same thing.. we don't know. Who would have thought having a compulsive liar running the country would create problems.? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The main problem around the Brexit talks seems to be that the EU are worried that if the UK leaves without following EU rules they will have an unfair trading advantage. So the question is, if we had never joined in the first place, would we have had this advantage all along and been more successful? If we had never joined we would have been far better off,we would have had free trade like the Swiss most likely and got on with life. Joining was the biggest mistake this country has made in centuries We joined because of the first referendum, you can’t deny democracy " Actually that is incorrect. The UK joined the common market ( EC) on the 1st Jan 1973. The first referendum took place in June 1975 as a result of the Labour Party manifesto in the 1974 general election. It may surprise some of the younger element on here to note that Labour’s manifesto ( under Michael Foot) for the 1983 general election pledge withdrawal from the EC, so had Thatcher not won, the current arguments would most likely have been irrelevant. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The main problem around the Brexit talks seems to be that the EU are worried that if the UK leaves without following EU rules they will have an unfair trading advantage. So the question is, if we had never joined in the first place, would we have had this advantage all along and been more successful? If we had never joined we would have been far better off,we would have had free trade like the Swiss most likely and got on with life. Joining was the biggest mistake this country has made in centuries We joined because of the first referendum, you can’t deny democracy Actually that is incorrect. The UK joined the common market ( EC) on the 1st Jan 1973. The first referendum took place in June 1975 as a result of the Labour Party manifesto in the 1974 general election. It may surprise some of the younger element on here to note that Labour’s manifesto ( under Michael Foot) for the 1983 general election pledge withdrawal from the EC, so had Thatcher not won, the current arguments would most likely have been irrelevant. " If , buts and maybes . The first referendum was to remain in the EC, which was agreed by 67% of voters, democracy | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The main problem around the Brexit talks seems to be that the EU are worried that if the UK leaves without following EU rules they will have an unfair trading advantage. So the question is, if we had never joined in the first place, would we have had this advantage all along and been more successful? If we had never joined we would have been far better off,we would have had free trade like the Swiss most likely and got on with life. Joining was the biggest mistake this country has made in centuries We joined because of the first referendum, you can’t deny democracy Actually that is incorrect. The UK joined the common market ( EC) on the 1st Jan 1973. The first referendum took place in June 1975 as a result of the Labour Party manifesto in the 1974 general election. It may surprise some of the younger element on here to note that Labour’s manifesto ( under Michael Foot) for the 1983 general election pledge withdrawal from the EC, so had Thatcher not won, the current arguments would most likely have been irrelevant. If , buts and maybes . The first referendum was to remain in the EC, which was agreed by 67% of voters, democracy " Yeah but we didn’t join because of it which is what you state. No if buts or maybe’s, your initial post was incorrect., | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The main problem around the Brexit talks seems to be that the EU are worried that if the UK leaves without following EU rules they will have an unfair trading advantage. So the question is, if we had never joined in the first place, would we have had this advantage all along and been more successful? If we had never joined we would have been far better off,we would have had free trade like the Swiss most likely and got on with life. Joining was the biggest mistake this country has made in centuries We joined because of the first referendum, you can’t deny democracy Actually that is incorrect. The UK joined the common market ( EC) on the 1st Jan 1973. The first referendum took place in June 1975 as a result of the Labour Party manifesto in the 1974 general election. It may surprise some of the younger element on here to note that Labour’s manifesto ( under Michael Foot) for the 1983 general election pledge withdrawal from the EC, so had Thatcher not won, the current arguments would most likely have been irrelevant. If , buts and maybes . The first referendum was to remain in the EC, which was agreed by 67% of voters, democracy Yeah but we didn’t join because of it which is what you state. No if buts or maybe’s, your initial post was incorrect., " Yes it was, did we have a vote to stay or leave the EC? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The main problem around the Brexit talks seems to be that the EU are worried that if the UK leaves without following EU rules they will have an unfair trading advantage. So the question is, if we had never joined in the first place, would we have had this advantage all along and been more successful? If we had never joined we would have been far better off,we would have had free trade like the Swiss most likely and got on with life. Joining was the biggest mistake this country has made in centuries We joined because of the first referendum, you can’t deny democracy Actually that is incorrect. The UK joined the common market ( EC) on the 1st Jan 1973. The first referendum took place in June 1975 as a result of the Labour Party manifesto in the 1974 general election. It may surprise some of the younger element on here to note that Labour’s manifesto ( under Michael Foot) for the 1983 general election pledge withdrawal from the EC, so had Thatcher not won, the current arguments would most likely have been irrelevant. If , buts and maybes . The first referendum was to remain in the EC, which was agreed by 67% of voters, democracy Yeah but we didn’t join because of it which is what you state. No if buts or maybe’s, your initial post was incorrect., Yes it was, did we have a vote to stay or leave the EC? " Read your post. You said we joined because of the first referendum. We didn’t, we joined two and a half years earlier. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The main problem around the Brexit talks seems to be that the EU are worried that if the UK leaves without following EU rules they will have an unfair trading advantage. So the question is, if we had never joined in the first place, would we have had this advantage all along and been more successful? If we had never joined we would have been far better off,we would have had free trade like the Swiss most likely and got on with life. Joining was the biggest mistake this country has made in centuries We joined because of the first referendum, you can’t deny democracy Actually that is incorrect. The UK joined the common market ( EC) on the 1st Jan 1973. The first referendum took place in June 1975 as a result of the Labour Party manifesto in the 1974 general election. It may surprise some of the younger element on here to note that Labour’s manifesto ( under Michael Foot) for the 1983 general election pledge withdrawal from the EC, so had Thatcher not won, the current arguments would most likely have been irrelevant. If , buts and maybes . The first referendum was to remain in the EC, which was agreed by 67% of voters, democracy Yeah but we didn’t join because of it which is what you state. No if buts or maybe’s, your initial post was incorrect., Yes it was, did we have a vote to stay or leave the EC? Read your post. You said we joined because of the first referendum. We didn’t, we joined two and a half years earlier. " Yes , I made a mistake , did we vote to remain in the EC? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The main problem around the Brexit talks seems to be that the EU are worried that if the UK leaves without following EU rules they will have an unfair trading advantage. So the question is, if we had never joined in the first place, would we have had this advantage all along and been more successful? If we had never joined we would have been far better off,we would have had free trade like the Swiss most likely and got on with life. Joining was the biggest mistake this country has made in centuries We joined because of the first referendum, you can’t deny democracy Actually that is incorrect. The UK joined the common market ( EC) on the 1st Jan 1973. The first referendum took place in June 1975 as a result of the Labour Party manifesto in the 1974 general election. It may surprise some of the younger element on here to note that Labour’s manifesto ( under Michael Foot) for the 1983 general election pledge withdrawal from the EC, so had Thatcher not won, the current arguments would most likely have been irrelevant. If , buts and maybes . The first referendum was to remain in the EC, which was agreed by 67% of voters, democracy Yeah but we didn’t join because of it which is what you state. No if buts or maybe’s, your initial post was incorrect., Yes it was, did we have a vote to stay or leave the EC? Read your post. You said we joined because of the first referendum. We didn’t, we joined two and a half years earlier. Yes , I made a mistake , did we vote to remain in the EC? " I think I answered that in my OP | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The main problem around the Brexit talks seems to be that the EU are worried that if the UK leaves without following EU rules they will have an unfair trading advantage. So the question is, if we had never joined in the first place, would we have had this advantage all along and been more successful? If we had never joined we would have been far better off,we would have had free trade like the Swiss most likely and got on with life. Joining was the biggest mistake this country has made in centuries We joined because of the first referendum, you can’t deny democracy Actually that is incorrect. The UK joined the common market ( EC) on the 1st Jan 1973. The first referendum took place in June 1975 as a result of the Labour Party manifesto in the 1974 general election. It may surprise some of the younger element on here to note that Labour’s manifesto ( under Michael Foot) for the 1983 general election pledge withdrawal from the EC, so had Thatcher not won, the current arguments would most likely have been irrelevant. If , buts and maybes . The first referendum was to remain in the EC, which was agreed by 67% of voters, democracy Yeah but we didn’t join because of it which is what you state. No if buts or maybe’s, your initial post was incorrect., Yes it was, did we have a vote to stay or leave the EC? Read your post. You said we joined because of the first referendum. We didn’t, we joined two and a half years earlier. Yes , I made a mistake , did we vote to remain in the EC? I think I answered that in my OP" And what this a democratic decision voted by the people of the UK? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The main problem around the Brexit talks seems to be that the EU are worried that if the UK leaves without following EU rules they will have an unfair trading advantage. So the question is, if we had never joined in the first place, would we have had this advantage all along and been more successful? If we had never joined we would have been far better off,we would have had free trade like the Swiss most likely and got on with life. Joining was the biggest mistake this country has made in centuries We joined because of the first referendum, you can’t deny democracy Actually that is incorrect. The UK joined the common market ( EC) on the 1st Jan 1973. The first referendum took place in June 1975 as a result of the Labour Party manifesto in the 1974 general election. It may surprise some of the younger element on here to note that Labour’s manifesto ( under Michael Foot) for the 1983 general election pledge withdrawal from the EC, so had Thatcher not won, the current arguments would most likely have been irrelevant. If , buts and maybes . The first referendum was to remain in the EC, which was agreed by 67% of voters, democracy Yeah but we didn’t join because of it which is what you state. No if buts or maybe’s, your initial post was incorrect., Yes it was, did we have a vote to stay or leave the EC? Read your post. You said we joined because of the first referendum. We didn’t, we joined two and a half years earlier. Yes , I made a mistake , did we vote to remain in the EC? I think I answered that in my OP And what this a democratic decision voted by the people of the UK? " Is anyone arguing that it’s not? I pointed out your statement was incorrect. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The main problem around the Brexit talks seems to be that the EU are worried that if the UK leaves without following EU rules they will have an unfair trading advantage. So the question is, if we had never joined in the first place, would we have had this advantage all along and been more successful? If we had never joined we would have been far better off,we would have had free trade like the Swiss most likely and got on with life. Joining was the biggest mistake this country has made in centuries We joined because of the first referendum, you can’t deny democracy Actually that is incorrect. The UK joined the common market ( EC) on the 1st Jan 1973. The first referendum took place in June 1975 as a result of the Labour Party manifesto in the 1974 general election. It may surprise some of the younger element on here to note that Labour’s manifesto ( under Michael Foot) for the 1983 general election pledge withdrawal from the EC, so had Thatcher not won, the current arguments would most likely have been irrelevant. If , buts and maybes . The first referendum was to remain in the EC, which was agreed by 67% of voters, democracy Yeah but we didn’t join because of it which is what you state. No if buts or maybe’s, your initial post was incorrect., Yes it was, did we have a vote to stay or leave the EC? Read your post. You said we joined because of the first referendum. We didn’t, we joined two and a half years earlier. Yes , I made a mistake , did we vote to remain in the EC? I think I answered that in my OP And what this a democratic decision voted by the people of the UK? " Was | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The main problem around the Brexit talks seems to be that the EU are worried that if the UK leaves without following EU rules they will have an unfair trading advantage. So the question is, if we had never joined in the first place, would we have had this advantage all along and been more successful? If we had never joined we would have been far better off,we would have had free trade like the Swiss most likely and got on with life. Joining was the biggest mistake this country has made in centuries We joined because of the first referendum, you can’t deny democracy Actually that is incorrect. The UK joined the common market ( EC) on the 1st Jan 1973. The first referendum took place in June 1975 as a result of the Labour Party manifesto in the 1974 general election. It may surprise some of the younger element on here to note that Labour’s manifesto ( under Michael Foot) for the 1983 general election pledge withdrawal from the EC, so had Thatcher not won, the current arguments would most likely have been irrelevant. If , buts and maybes . The first referendum was to remain in the EC, which was agreed by 67% of voters, democracy Yeah but we didn’t join because of it which is what you state. No if buts or maybe’s, your initial post was incorrect., Yes it was, did we have a vote to stay or leave the EC? Read your post. You said we joined because of the first referendum. We didn’t, we joined two and a half years earlier. Yes , I made a mistake , did we vote to remain in the EC? I think I answered that in my OP And what this a democratic decision voted by the people of the UK? Is anyone arguing that it’s not? I pointed out your statement was incorrect." Thanks, it was incorrect, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The main problem around the Brexit talks seems to be that the EU are worried that if the UK leaves without following EU rules they will have an unfair trading advantage. So the question is, if we had never joined in the first place, would we have had this advantage all along and been more successful? If we had never joined we would have been far better off,we would have had free trade like the Swiss most likely and got on with life. Joining was the biggest mistake this country has made in centuries We joined because of the first referendum, you can’t deny democracy Actually that is incorrect. The UK joined the common market ( EC) on the 1st Jan 1973. The first referendum took place in June 1975 as a result of the Labour Party manifesto in the 1974 general election. It may surprise some of the younger element on here to note that Labour’s manifesto ( under Michael Foot) for the 1983 general election pledge withdrawal from the EC, so had Thatcher not won, the current arguments would most likely have been irrelevant. If , buts and maybes . The first referendum was to remain in the EC, which was agreed by 67% of voters, democracy Yeah but we didn’t join because of it which is what you state. No if buts or maybe’s, your initial post was incorrect., Yes it was, did we have a vote to stay or leave the EC? Read your post. You said we joined because of the first referendum. We didn’t, we joined two and a half years earlier. Yes , I made a mistake , did we vote to remain in the EC? I think I answered that in my OP And what this a democratic decision voted by the people of the UK? Is anyone arguing that it’s not? I pointed out your statement was incorrect. Thanks, it was incorrect, " You’re welcome. I know how strongly people feel about ‘facts’ on here. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The main problem around the Brexit talks seems to be that the EU are worried that if the UK leaves without following EU rules they will have an unfair trading advantage. So the question is, if we had never joined in the first place, would we have had this advantage all along and been more successful? If we had never joined we would have been far better off,we would have had free trade like the Swiss most likely and got on with life. Joining was the biggest mistake this country has made in centuries We joined because of the first referendum, you can’t deny democracy Actually that is incorrect. The UK joined the common market ( EC) on the 1st Jan 1973. The first referendum took place in June 1975 as a result of the Labour Party manifesto in the 1974 general election. It may surprise some of the younger element on here to note that Labour’s manifesto ( under Michael Foot) for the 1983 general election pledge withdrawal from the EC, so had Thatcher not won, the current arguments would most likely have been irrelevant. If , buts and maybes . The first referendum was to remain in the EC, which was agreed by 67% of voters, democracy Yeah but we didn’t join because of it which is what you state. No if buts or maybe’s, your initial post was incorrect., Yes it was, did we have a vote to stay or leave the EC? Read your post. You said we joined because of the first referendum. We didn’t, we joined two and a half years earlier. Yes , I made a mistake , did we vote to remain in the EC? I think I answered that in my OP And what this a democratic decision voted by the people of the UK? Is anyone arguing that it’s not? I pointed out your statement was incorrect. Thanks, it was incorrect, You’re welcome. I know how strongly people feel about ‘facts’ on here." There is nothing more deceptive than an obvious fact | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The main problem around the Brexit talks seems to be that the EU are worried that if the UK leaves without following EU rules they will have an unfair trading advantage. So the question is, if we had never joined in the first place, would we have had this advantage all along and been more successful? If we had never joined we would have been far better off,we would have had free trade like the Swiss most likely and got on with life. Joining was the biggest mistake this country has made in centuries We joined because of the first referendum, you can’t deny democracy Actually that is incorrect. The UK joined the common market ( EC) on the 1st Jan 1973. The first referendum took place in June 1975 as a result of the Labour Party manifesto in the 1974 general election. It may surprise some of the younger element on here to note that Labour’s manifesto ( under Michael Foot) for the 1983 general election pledge withdrawal from the EC, so had Thatcher not won, the current arguments would most likely have been irrelevant. If , buts and maybes . The first referendum was to remain in the EC, which was agreed by 67% of voters, democracy Yeah but we didn’t join because of it which is what you state. No if buts or maybe’s, your initial post was incorrect., Yes it was, did we have a vote to stay or leave the EC? Read your post. You said we joined because of the first referendum. We didn’t, we joined two and a half years earlier. Yes , I made a mistake , did we vote to remain in the EC? I think I answered that in my OP And what this a democratic decision voted by the people of the UK? Is anyone arguing that it’s not? I pointed out your statement was incorrect. Thanks, it was incorrect, You’re welcome. I know how strongly people feel about ‘facts’ on here. There is nothing more deceptive than an obvious fact " No shit Sherlock! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The main problem around the Brexit talks seems to be that the EU are worried that if the UK leaves without following EU rules they will have an unfair trading advantage. So the question is, if we had never joined in the first place, would we have had this advantage all along and been more successful? If we had never joined we would have been far better off,we would have had free trade like the Swiss most likely and got on with life. Joining was the biggest mistake this country has made in centuries We joined because of the first referendum, you can’t deny democracy Actually that is incorrect. The UK joined the common market ( EC) on the 1st Jan 1973. The first referendum took place in June 1975 as a result of the Labour Party manifesto in the 1974 general election. It may surprise some of the younger element on here to note that Labour’s manifesto ( under Michael Foot) for the 1983 general election pledge withdrawal from the EC, so had Thatcher not won, the current arguments would most likely have been irrelevant. If , buts and maybes . The first referendum was to remain in the EC, which was agreed by 67% of voters, democracy Yeah but we didn’t join because of it which is what you state. No if buts or maybe’s, your initial post was incorrect., Yes it was, did we have a vote to stay or leave the EC? Read your post. You said we joined because of the first referendum. We didn’t, we joined two and a half years earlier. Yes , I made a mistake , did we vote to remain in the EC? I think I answered that in my OP And what this a democratic decision voted by the people of the UK? Is anyone arguing that it’s not? I pointed out your statement was incorrect. Thanks, it was incorrect, You’re welcome. I know how strongly people feel about ‘facts’ on here. There is nothing more deceptive than an obvious fact No shit Sherlock!" The main five facts in human life are five , birth , food, sleep , love and death . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Its total bollox saying the eu has stopped further wars in europe, after the last one there has been no appertite for war Germany was demilitarized and europe was more worried about Russia, that threat bought Europe closer together.There is no proof that the eu has stopped another war in europe. Apart from the fact that before this century..there were countless wars and since the eu began there has not been solitary conflict between 2 member states? Yeah you could be onto something there " As you are so often saying "proof" what proof do you have that countries within the eu would have gone to war if they had not been in it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Its total bollox saying the eu has stopped further wars in europe, after the last one there has been no appertite for war Germany was demilitarized and europe was more worried about Russia, that threat bought Europe closer together.There is no proof that the eu has stopped another war in europe. Apart from the fact that before this century..there were countless wars and since the eu began there has not been solitary conflict between 2 member states? Yeah you could be onto something there As you are so often saying "proof" what proof do you have that countries within the eu would have gone to war if they had not been in it?" The proof is there hasn't been a war. Why would you go to war with someone who makes you money? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Its total bollox saying the eu has stopped further wars in europe, after the last one there has been no appertite for war Germany was demilitarized and europe was more worried about Russia, that threat bought Europe closer together.There is no proof that the eu has stopped another war in europe. Apart from the fact that before this century..there were countless wars and since the eu began there has not been solitary conflict between 2 member states? Yeah you could be onto something there As you are so often saying "proof" what proof do you have that countries within the eu would have gone to war if they had not been in it?" Surely the proof is that something hasn’t happened? Up until the EU was formed, wars were commonplace in Europe, so it is pretty reasonable to say the EU has been a significant factor in reducing tensions and ultimately war. The challenge with proof is that it isn’t possible to prove that Brexit will be good for us until 10 years plus down the line. On empirical evidence so far it is not looking good. Project Fear looks to have underestimated the impacts and our Politicians are clearly way out of their depth. Gambling on this scale is ludicrous - the upside is minimal, the downside is huge. Many people are going to lose out big time, but a small number will rake it in big time, as usual. This country has been duped big time | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"How come there are still military constraints on Germany? It's almost like they can't be trusted " Have they threatened to break international law recently? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Its total bollox saying the eu has stopped further wars in europe, after the last one there has been no appertite for war Germany was demilitarized and europe was more worried about Russia, that threat bought Europe closer together.There is no proof that the eu has stopped another war in europe. Apart from the fact that before this century..there were countless wars and since the eu began there has not been solitary conflict between 2 member states? Yeah you could be onto something there As you are so often saying "proof" what proof do you have that countries within the eu would have gone to war if they had not been in it? Surely the proof is that something hasn’t happened? Up until the EU was formed, wars were commonplace in Europe, so it is pretty reasonable to say the EU has been a significant factor in reducing tensions and ultimately war. The challenge with proof is that it isn’t possible to prove that Brexit will be good for us until 10 years plus down the line. On empirical evidence so far it is not looking good. Project Fear looks to have underestimated the impacts and our Politicians are clearly way out of their depth. Gambling on this scale is ludicrous - the upside is minimal, the downside is huge. Many people are going to lose out big time, but a small number will rake it in big time, as usual. This country has been duped big time " What a load of codswallop. The United Nations and NATO are the reason why there have been no large scale wars in Europe. As I stated before there was the war in Kosovo (which is in Europe) and it was the UN that took action not the EU. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Its total bollox saying the eu has stopped further wars in europe, after the last one there has been no appertite for war Germany was demilitarized and europe was more worried about Russia, that threat bought Europe closer together.There is no proof that the eu has stopped another war in europe. Apart from the fact that before this century..there were countless wars and since the eu began there has not been solitary conflict between 2 member states? Yeah you could be onto something there As you are so often saying "proof" what proof do you have that countries within the eu would have gone to war if they had not been in it? Surely the proof is that something hasn’t happened? Up until the EU was formed, wars were commonplace in Europe, so it is pretty reasonable to say the EU has been a significant factor in reducing tensions and ultimately war. The challenge with proof is that it isn’t possible to prove that Brexit will be good for us until 10 years plus down the line. On empirical evidence so far it is not looking good. Project Fear looks to have underestimated the impacts and our Politicians are clearly way out of their depth. Gambling on this scale is ludicrous - the upside is minimal, the downside is huge. Many people are going to lose out big time, but a small number will rake it in big time, as usual. This country has been duped big time What a load of codswallop. The United Nations and NATO are the reason why there have been no large scale wars in Europe. As I stated before there was the war in Kosovo (which is in Europe) and it was the UN that took action not the EU. " You realise the eu do not have a military presence? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Its total bollox saying the eu has stopped further wars in europe, after the last one there has been no appertite for war Germany was demilitarized and europe was more worried about Russia, that threat bought Europe closer together.There is no proof that the eu has stopped another war in europe. Apart from the fact that before this century..there were countless wars and since the eu began there has not been solitary conflict between 2 member states? Yeah you could be onto something there As you are so often saying "proof" what proof do you have that countries within the eu would have gone to war if they had not been in it? Surely the proof is that something hasn’t happened? Up until the EU was formed, wars were commonplace in Europe, so it is pretty reasonable to say the EU has been a significant factor in reducing tensions and ultimately war. The challenge with proof is that it isn’t possible to prove that Brexit will be good for us until 10 years plus down the line. On empirical evidence so far it is not looking good. Project Fear looks to have underestimated the impacts and our Politicians are clearly way out of their depth. Gambling on this scale is ludicrous - the upside is minimal, the downside is huge. Many people are going to lose out big time, but a small number will rake it in big time, as usual. This country has been duped big time What a load of codswallop. The United Nations and NATO are the reason why there have been no large scale wars in Europe. As I stated before there was the war in Kosovo (which is in Europe) and it was the UN that took action not the EU. You realise the eu do not have a military presence? " Not yet but they are on course to getting one. But that begs the question as to why does a trading block need an army? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Its total bollox saying the eu has stopped further wars in europe, after the last one there has been no appertite for war Germany was demilitarized and europe was more worried about Russia, that threat bought Europe closer together.There is no proof that the eu has stopped another war in europe. Apart from the fact that before this century..there were countless wars and since the eu began there has not been solitary conflict between 2 member states? Yeah you could be onto something there As you are so often saying "proof" what proof do you have that countries within the eu would have gone to war if they had not been in it? Surely the proof is that something hasn’t happened? Up until the EU was formed, wars were commonplace in Europe, so it is pretty reasonable to say the EU has been a significant factor in reducing tensions and ultimately war. The challenge with proof is that it isn’t possible to prove that Brexit will be good for us until 10 years plus down the line. On empirical evidence so far it is not looking good. Project Fear looks to have underestimated the impacts and our Politicians are clearly way out of their depth. Gambling on this scale is ludicrous - the upside is minimal, the downside is huge. Many people are going to lose out big time, but a small number will rake it in big time, as usual. This country has been duped big time What a load of codswallop. The United Nations and NATO are the reason why there have been no large scale wars in Europe. As I stated before there was the war in Kosovo (which is in Europe) and it was the UN that took action not the EU. You realise the eu do not have a military presence? Not yet but they are on course to getting one. But that begs the question as to why does a trading block need an army?" World domination? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Its total bollox saying the eu has stopped further wars in europe, after the last one there has been no appertite for war Germany was demilitarized and europe was more worried about Russia, that threat bought Europe closer together.There is no proof that the eu has stopped another war in europe. Apart from the fact that before this century..there were countless wars and since the eu began there has not been solitary conflict between 2 member states? Yeah you could be onto something there As you are so often saying "proof" what proof do you have that countries within the eu would have gone to war if they had not been in it? Surely the proof is that something hasn’t happened? Up until the EU was formed, wars were commonplace in Europe, so it is pretty reasonable to say the EU has been a significant factor in reducing tensions and ultimately war. The challenge with proof is that it isn’t possible to prove that Brexit will be good for us until 10 years plus down the line. On empirical evidence so far it is not looking good. Project Fear looks to have underestimated the impacts and our Politicians are clearly way out of their depth. Gambling on this scale is ludicrous - the upside is minimal, the downside is huge. Many people are going to lose out big time, but a small number will rake it in big time, as usual. This country has been duped big time " What planet are you living on ? Just because it has not happened is not proof that it would have without the eu.I would go away and have a think about how your logic works. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Its total bollox saying the eu has stopped further wars in europe, after the last one there has been no appertite for war Germany was demilitarized and europe was more worried about Russia, that threat bought Europe closer together.There is no proof that the eu has stopped another war in europe. Apart from the fact that before this century..there were countless wars and since the eu began there has not been solitary conflict between 2 member states? Yeah you could be onto something there As you are so often saying "proof" what proof do you have that countries within the eu would have gone to war if they had not been in it? Surely the proof is that something hasn’t happened? Up until the EU was formed, wars were commonplace in Europe, so it is pretty reasonable to say the EU has been a significant factor in reducing tensions and ultimately war. The challenge with proof is that it isn’t possible to prove that Brexit will be good for us until 10 years plus down the line. On empirical evidence so far it is not looking good. Project Fear looks to have underestimated the impacts and our Politicians are clearly way out of their depth. Gambling on this scale is ludicrous - the upside is minimal, the downside is huge. Many people are going to lose out big time, but a small number will rake it in big time, as usual. This country has been duped big time What planet are you living on ? Just because it has not happened is not proof that it would have without the eu.I would go away and have a think about how your logic works. " because it hasn't happened, it isnt proof? Ha ha .absolutely fucking superb | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why are Brexit voters so concerned about getting a deal with the EU? Surely the best option is a no deal, I haven’t got a clue why Boris (we hold all the cards, they need us more than we need them ) hasn’t just walked away, what is to gained by getting a deal ? It’s just another finger in the pie, they would prefer some kind of deal but if the EU want too much for the deal then we look elsewhere It’s plain to see the EU want too much so we will probably walk away I find it hilrous that every tiny thing is The EU'sfault..they are bullying us.. they want too much..we want out sovereignty. The fact that we have a pm who literally makes it up as he goes along and lies through his teeth on a daily basis.. is presumably of no consequence. It's almost like people believe what they read in the right wing rags Where have I said the EU is bullying us ? I have just said they are asking too much for us to have any kind of deal so as I would in real life just walk away and look elsewhere. I’m self employed and work on price so if the customer wants to pay less I don’t deal wit them simple There is a common theme that they are bullying us. The media have been stirring it for ages like its 26 countries ganging up on Britain..its pathetic. Instead of pointing the finger of blame at each other. Or trying to save "face'..maybe we act like grown ups and get a deal done. Because the U.K. and EU cannot find common ground the EU wants more than the U.K. is offering So why did boris repeatedly say the deal was "even ready?That was when the withdrawal agreement said they would respect uk sovereignty they have since changed the goalposts you cant blame him for that. Can you provide evidence of this goal post moving?Apparently its the so called ratchet clause but no i can only go on what we are told as not privi to the trade agreement." I can understand why you couldn't source this without looking silly, the EU haven't moved the goal posts on this, they have offered a different solution to the level playing field, that if they deem goods not to meet standards tariffs will be applied, I the withdrawal act both side agreed to negotiate the level playing field. How is this moving the goal post? If Boris doesn't plan on lowering standards how is it an issue either? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why are Brexit voters so concerned about getting a deal with the EU? Surely the best option is a no deal, I haven’t got a clue why Boris (we hold all the cards, they need us more than we need them ) hasn’t just walked away, what is to gained by getting a deal ? It’s just another finger in the pie, they would prefer some kind of deal but if the EU want too much for the deal then we look elsewhere It’s plain to see the EU want too much so we will probably walk away I find it hilrous that every tiny thing is The EU'sfault..they are bullying us.. they want too much..we want out sovereignty. The fact that we have a pm who literally makes it up as he goes along and lies through his teeth on a daily basis.. is presumably of no consequence. It's almost like people believe what they read in the right wing rags Where have I said the EU is bullying us ? I have just said they are asking too much for us to have any kind of deal so as I would in real life just walk away and look elsewhere. I’m self employed and work on price so if the customer wants to pay less I don’t deal wit them simple There is a common theme that they are bullying us. The media have been stirring it for ages like its 26 countries ganging up on Britain..its pathetic. Instead of pointing the finger of blame at each other. Or trying to save "face'..maybe we act like grown ups and get a deal done. Because the U.K. and EU cannot find common ground the EU wants more than the U.K. is offering So why did boris repeatedly say the deal was "even ready?That was when the withdrawal agreement said they would respect uk sovereignty they have since changed the goalposts you cant blame him for that. Can you provide evidence of this goal post moving?Apparently its the so called ratchet clause but no i can only go on what we are told as not privi to the trade agreement. I can understand why you couldn't source this without looking silly, the EU haven't moved the goal posts on this, they have offered a different solution to the level playing field, that if they deem goods not to meet standards tariffs will be applied, I the withdrawal act both side agreed to negotiate the level playing field. How is this moving the goal post? If Boris doesn't plan on lowering standards how is it an issue either? " There is a QC in Twitter who has detailed exactly how the eu have not moved the goalposts at all. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lol It is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. We all know it's more than just trade, it always has been and you don't need to act as if no-one knows and your the only one to break the news lol The methods and rationale are of course just your opinions. Of course they are my opinions nothing more but just wait now the uk has left a european army will be the next proposal.Macron is already making noises in that direction saying the eu cannot rely on the usa anymore. As france is now the biggest military power in the eu he will be wanting the eu to pay their way,so the next step is an eu army where all the countries commit a % of gdp to it .Just my opinion but watch this space." This has been explained to death. Yes some in the EU want to create an EU reaction force much like NATO but just for the protection of EU member states. NATO is predominantly America and look how that's gone for us over the years getting dragged into America's conflicts. An EU reaction force could only become into existence if every member state approved it and that included the UK. When the UK takes part in NATO operations we surrender certain controls to the NATO command structure. An EU reaction force would be the same with the benefit of direct protection within the EU by the EU "which we were part of". I've never understood why... A: People didn't and still don't understand that an EU reaction force could only be created if every member state voted for it. B: Why giving strategic command to possibly a General command structure that may or may not have General's from the UK just like NATO is so frightening. The only local answer is that Nigel Farage told you to be frightened about it and so you believed him. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lol It is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. We all know it's more than just trade, it always has been and you don't need to act as if no-one knows and your the only one to break the news lol The methods and rationale are of course just your opinions. Of course they are my opinions nothing more but just wait now the uk has left a european army will be the next proposal.Macron is already making noises in that direction saying the eu cannot rely on the usa anymore. As france is now the biggest military power in the eu he will be wanting the eu to pay their way,so the next step is an eu army where all the countries commit a % of gdp to it .Just my opinion but watch this space. This has been explained to death. Yes some in the EU want to create an EU reaction force much like NATO but just for the protection of EU member states. NATO is predominantly America and look how that's gone for us over the years getting dragged into America's conflicts. An EU reaction force could only become into existence if every member state approved it and that included the UK. When the UK takes part in NATO operations we surrender certain controls to the NATO command structure. An EU reaction force would be the same with the benefit of direct protection within the EU by the EU "which we were part of". I've never understood why... A: People didn't and still don't understand that an EU reaction force could only be created if every member state voted for it. B: Why giving strategic command to possibly a General command structure that may or may not have General's from the UK just like NATO is so frightening. The only local answer is that Nigel Farage told you to be frightened about it and so you believed him. " Protection from who? Russia? China? The USA? Or would it be about EU expansionism? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lol It is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. We all know it's more than just trade, it always has been and you don't need to act as if no-one knows and your the only one to break the news lol The methods and rationale are of course just your opinions. Of course they are my opinions nothing more but just wait now the uk has left a european army will be the next proposal.Macron is already making noises in that direction saying the eu cannot rely on the usa anymore. As france is now the biggest military power in the eu he will be wanting the eu to pay their way,so the next step is an eu army where all the countries commit a % of gdp to it .Just my opinion but watch this space. This has been explained to death. Yes some in the EU want to create an EU reaction force much like NATO but just for the protection of EU member states. NATO is predominantly America and look how that's gone for us over the years getting dragged into America's conflicts. An EU reaction force could only become into existence if every member state approved it and that included the UK. When the UK takes part in NATO operations we surrender certain controls to the NATO command structure. An EU reaction force would be the same with the benefit of direct protection within the EU by the EU "which we were part of". I've never understood why... A: People didn't and still don't understand that an EU reaction force could only be created if every member state voted for it. B: Why giving strategic command to possibly a General command structure that may or may not have General's from the UK just like NATO is so frightening. The only local answer is that Nigel Farage told you to be frightened about it and so you believed him. Protection from who? Russia? China? The USA? Or would it be about EU expansionism? " Protection from who? Why do we the UK have an Army, Navy, Air force? Who are we protecting ourselves from? WALES? , Scotland? , Ireland? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lol It is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. We all know it's more than just trade, it always has been and you don't need to act as if no-one knows and your the only one to break the news lol The methods and rationale are of course just your opinions. Of course they are my opinions nothing more but just wait now the uk has left a european army will be the next proposal.Macron is already making noises in that direction saying the eu cannot rely on the usa anymore. As france is now the biggest military power in the eu he will be wanting the eu to pay their way,so the next step is an eu army where all the countries commit a % of gdp to it .Just my opinion but watch this space. This has been explained to death. Yes some in the EU want to create an EU reaction force much like NATO but just for the protection of EU member states. NATO is predominantly America and look how that's gone for us over the years getting dragged into America's conflicts. An EU reaction force could only become into existence if every member state approved it and that included the UK. When the UK takes part in NATO operations we surrender certain controls to the NATO command structure. An EU reaction force would be the same with the benefit of direct protection within the EU by the EU "which we were part of". I've never understood why... A: People didn't and still don't understand that an EU reaction force could only be created if every member state voted for it. B: Why giving strategic command to possibly a General command structure that may or may not have General's from the UK just like NATO is so frightening. The only local answer is that Nigel Farage told you to be frightened about it and so you believed him. Protection from who? Russia? China? The USA? Or would it be about EU expansionism? Protection from who? Why do we the UK have an Army, Navy, Air force? Who are we protecting ourselves from? WALES? , Scotland? , Ireland? " Yes protection from who if we already have an army, navy, air force and are part of NATO? Protection from the USA? Or would it be used for EU expansionist? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Brexiteers having a nightmare again. Let's leave a trading bloc because of something that could potentially.. maybe..at some point..possibly happen at some point in the future.. which may not may not be bad. " We're not leaving a 'trading block' though are we? We're leaving the European Union. If you don't know the difference what hope is there | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Brexiteers having a nightmare again. Let's leave a trading bloc because of something that could potentially.. maybe..at some point..possibly happen at some point in the future.. which may not may not be bad. We're not leaving a 'trading block' though are we? We're leaving the European Union. If you don't know the difference what hope is there" And that makes a world of difference? You want us to leave something because of something that potentially may not may not happen? Genius. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lol It is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. We all know it's more than just trade, it always has been and you don't need to act as if no-one knows and your the only one to break the news lol The methods and rationale are of course just your opinions. Of course they are my opinions nothing more but just wait now the uk has left a european army will be the next proposal.Macron is already making noises in that direction saying the eu cannot rely on the usa anymore. As france is now the biggest military power in the eu he will be wanting the eu to pay their way,so the next step is an eu army where all the countries commit a % of gdp to it .Just my opinion but watch this space. This has been explained to death. Yes some in the EU want to create an EU reaction force much like NATO but just for the protection of EU member states. NATO is predominantly America and look how that's gone for us over the years getting dragged into America's conflicts. An EU reaction force could only become into existence if every member state approved it and that included the UK. When the UK takes part in NATO operations we surrender certain controls to the NATO command structure. An EU reaction force would be the same with the benefit of direct protection within the EU by the EU "which we were part of". I've never understood why... A: People didn't and still don't understand that an EU reaction force could only be created if every member state voted for it. B: Why giving strategic command to possibly a General command structure that may or may not have General's from the UK just like NATO is so frightening. The only local answer is that Nigel Farage told you to be frightened about it and so you believed him. " NATO - North Atlantic Alliance, is an intergovernmental military alliance between 30 European and North American countries. The organization implements the North Atlantic Treaty that was signed on 4 April 1949.[3][4] NATO constitutes a system of collective defence whereby its independent member states agree to mutual defence in response to an attack by any external party. You don't need an EU reaction force (Army) if the EU is a trading block. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Brexiteers having a nightmare again. Let's leave a trading bloc because of something that could potentially.. maybe..at some point..possibly happen at some point in the future.. which may not may not be bad. We're not leaving a 'trading block' though are we? We're leaving the European Union. If you don't know the difference what hope is there And that makes a world of difference? You want us to leave something because of something that potentially may not may not happen? Genius." Political Union has already happened. That is what I wanted out of. Staying in a trading bloc would have been fine | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lol It is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. We all know it's more than just trade, it always has been and you don't need to act as if no-one knows and your the only one to break the news lol The methods and rationale are of course just your opinions. Of course they are my opinions nothing more but just wait now the uk has left a european army will be the next proposal.Macron is already making noises in that direction saying the eu cannot rely on the usa anymore. As france is now the biggest military power in the eu he will be wanting the eu to pay their way,so the next step is an eu army where all the countries commit a % of gdp to it .Just my opinion but watch this space. This has been explained to death. Yes some in the EU want to create an EU reaction force much like NATO but just for the protection of EU member states. NATO is predominantly America and look how that's gone for us over the years getting dragged into America's conflicts. An EU reaction force could only become into existence if every member state approved it and that included the UK. When the UK takes part in NATO operations we surrender certain controls to the NATO command structure. An EU reaction force would be the same with the benefit of direct protection within the EU by the EU "which we were part of". I've never understood why... A: People didn't and still don't understand that an EU reaction force could only be created if every member state voted for it. B: Why giving strategic command to possibly a General command structure that may or may not have General's from the UK just like NATO is so frightening. The only local answer is that Nigel Farage told you to be frightened about it and so you believed him. " We were trying to get out of NATO america first remember. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lol It is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. We all know it's more than just trade, it always has been and you don't need to act as if no-one knows and your the only one to break the news lol The methods and rationale are of course just your opinions. Of course they are my opinions nothing more but just wait now the uk has left a european army will be the next proposal.Macron is already making noises in that direction saying the eu cannot rely on the usa anymore. As france is now the biggest military power in the eu he will be wanting the eu to pay their way,so the next step is an eu army where all the countries commit a % of gdp to it .Just my opinion but watch this space. This has been explained to death. Yes some in the EU want to create an EU reaction force much like NATO but just for the protection of EU member states. NATO is predominantly America and look how that's gone for us over the years getting dragged into America's conflicts. An EU reaction force could only become into existence if every member state approved it and that included the UK. When the UK takes part in NATO operations we surrender certain controls to the NATO command structure. An EU reaction force would be the same with the benefit of direct protection within the EU by the EU "which we were part of". I've never understood why... A: People didn't and still don't understand that an EU reaction force could only be created if every member state voted for it. B: Why giving strategic command to possibly a General command structure that may or may not have General's from the UK just like NATO is so frightening. The only local answer is that Nigel Farage told you to be frightened about it and so you believed him. Protection from who? Russia? China? The USA? Or would it be about EU expansionism? Protection from who? Why do we the UK have an Army, Navy, Air force? Who are we protecting ourselves from? WALES? , Scotland? , Ireland? Yes protection from who if we already have an army, navy, air force and are part of NATO? Protection from the USA? Or would it be used for EU expansionist? " Do you really believe the EU will be parking their yet to be arranged Army tanks on the frontiers of outsider states threatening them into joining the EU? Wow | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Beats me that if the eu thinks we are so fucked why do they want to keep talking? Maybe they are trying to minimise the damage Brexit will inflict across the EU while negotiating the best possible outcome for the EU because they ultimately know Brexit is far far more damaging for the UK than the effects spread across 27 EU individual states. I believe the so called unpatriotic remoaners have been explaining this since 2016 but it's always fallen on deaf ears lol It is going to hit some countries in the eu much harder than others but they dont seem to have a voice in this.But as long as the eu comes out of it with its political ideology in tack they dont give a fuck.They will lend them more money get their countries further indebted to them until they will be so happy when germany and france propose a federal europe they will roll over.The conquest of europe without a shot fired. That is your opinion What other explanation is there for creating presidents a parliament and judiciary? it certainly isn't just to trade as the rest of the world manage perfectly well to trad without any of those. We all know it's more than just trade, it always has been and you don't need to act as if no-one knows and your the only one to break the news lol The methods and rationale are of course just your opinions. Of course they are my opinions nothing more but just wait now the uk has left a european army will be the next proposal.Macron is already making noises in that direction saying the eu cannot rely on the usa anymore. As france is now the biggest military power in the eu he will be wanting the eu to pay their way,so the next step is an eu army where all the countries commit a % of gdp to it .Just my opinion but watch this space. This has been explained to death. Yes some in the EU want to create an EU reaction force much like NATO but just for the protection of EU member states. NATO is predominantly America and look how that's gone for us over the years getting dragged into America's conflicts. An EU reaction force could only become into existence if every member state approved it and that included the UK. When the UK takes part in NATO operations we surrender certain controls to the NATO command structure. An EU reaction force would be the same with the benefit of direct protection within the EU by the EU "which we were part of". I've never understood why... A: People didn't and still don't understand that an EU reaction force could only be created if every member state voted for it. B: Why giving strategic command to possibly a General command structure that may or may not have General's from the UK just like NATO is so frightening. The only local answer is that Nigel Farage told you to be frightened about it and so you believed him. Protection from who? Russia? China? The USA? Or would it be about EU expansionism? Protection from who? Why do we the UK have an Army, Navy, Air force? Who are we protecting ourselves from? WALES? , Scotland? , Ireland? Yes protection from who if we already have an army, navy, air force and are part of NATO? Protection from the USA? Or would it be used for EU expansionist? Do you really believe the EU will be parking their yet to be arranged Army tanks on the frontiers of outsider states threatening them into joining the EU? Wow " So protection from who? No. But they would like to be able to if Russia started parking their tanks to prevent the Ukraine for example from becoming EU members | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If eu countries had paid what they were supposed to do on defense then NATO would have sufficed but it seems only the uk and poland fulfilled their commitment thats why the usa got the hump. " you can’t blame the USA nato is a joke now | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If eu countries had paid what they were supposed to do on defense then NATO would have sufficed but it seems only the uk and poland fulfilled their commitment thats why the usa got the hump. you can’t blame the USA nato is a joke now " Im not blaming the usa in fact i can see their point why should they spend 3.6% of gdp protecting others when they dont meet even their 2% of gdp that is required. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If eu countries had paid what they were supposed to do on defense then NATO would have sufficed but it seems only the uk and poland fulfilled their commitment thats why the usa got the hump. you can’t blame the USA nato is a joke now Im not blaming the usa in fact i can see their point why should they spend 3.6% of gdp protecting others when they dont meet even their 2% of gdp that is required." You do know the 2% target is for 2024 right? So it not a requirement at the moment! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If eu countries had paid what they were supposed to do on defense then NATO would have sufficed but it seems only the uk and poland fulfilled their commitment thats why the usa got the hump. you can’t blame the USA nato is a joke now Im not blaming the usa in fact i can see their point why should they spend 3.6% of gdp protecting others when they dont meet even their 2% of gdp that is required." Also, a sovereign country should not be told how to spend it's money should it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Its total bollox saying the eu has stopped further wars in europe, after the last one there has been no appertite for war Germany was demilitarized and europe was more worried about Russia, that threat bought Europe closer together.There is no proof that the eu has stopped another war in europe. Apart from the fact that before this century..there were countless wars and since the eu began there has not been solitary conflict between 2 member states? Yeah you could be onto something there As you are so often saying "proof" what proof do you have that countries within the eu would have gone to war if they had not been in it? Surely the proof is that something hasn’t happened? Up until the EU was formed, wars were commonplace in Europe, so it is pretty reasonable to say the EU has been a significant factor in reducing tensions and ultimately war. The challenge with proof is that it isn’t possible to prove that Brexit will be good for us until 10 years plus down the line. On empirical evidence so far it is not looking good. Project Fear looks to have underestimated the impacts and our Politicians are clearly way out of their depth. Gambling on this scale is ludicrous - the upside is minimal, the downside is huge. Many people are going to lose out big time, but a small number will rake it in big time, as usual. This country has been duped big time What planet are you living on ? Just because it has not happened is not proof that it would have without the eu.I would go away and have a think about how your logic works. because it hasn't happened, it isnt proof? Ha ha .absolutely fucking superb " I agree | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Its total bollox saying the eu has stopped further wars in europe, after the last one there has been no appertite for war Germany was demilitarized and europe was more worried about Russia, that threat bought Europe closer together.There is no proof that the eu has stopped another war in europe. Apart from the fact that before this century..there were countless wars and since the eu began there has not been solitary conflict between 2 member states? Yeah you could be onto something there As you are so often saying "proof" what proof do you have that countries within the eu would have gone to war if they had not been in it? Surely the proof is that something hasn’t happened? Up until the EU was formed, wars were commonplace in Europe, so it is pretty reasonable to say the EU has been a significant factor in reducing tensions and ultimately war. The challenge with proof is that it isn’t possible to prove that Brexit will be good for us until 10 years plus down the line. On empirical evidence so far it is not looking good. Project Fear looks to have underestimated the impacts and our Politicians are clearly way out of their depth. Gambling on this scale is ludicrous - the upside is minimal, the downside is huge. Many people are going to lose out big time, but a small number will rake it in big time, as usual. This country has been duped big time What planet are you living on ? Just because it has not happened is not proof that it would have without the eu.I would go away and have a think about how your logic works. because it hasn't happened, it isnt proof? Ha ha .absolutely fucking superb I agree " you must be really stupid where is the proof europe would have been at war without the eu? .Your misquoting of me just proves you cant. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Its total bollox saying the eu has stopped further wars in europe, after the last one there has been no appertite for war Germany was demilitarized and europe was more worried about Russia, that threat bought Europe closer together.There is no proof that the eu has stopped another war in europe. Apart from the fact that before this century..there were countless wars and since the eu began there has not been solitary conflict between 2 member states? Yeah you could be onto something there As you are so often saying "proof" what proof do you have that countries within the eu would have gone to war if they had not been in it? Surely the proof is that something hasn’t happened? Up until the EU was formed, wars were commonplace in Europe, so it is pretty reasonable to say the EU has been a significant factor in reducing tensions and ultimately war. The challenge with proof is that it isn’t possible to prove that Brexit will be good for us until 10 years plus down the line. On empirical evidence so far it is not looking good. Project Fear looks to have underestimated the impacts and our Politicians are clearly way out of their depth. Gambling on this scale is ludicrous - the upside is minimal, the downside is huge. Many people are going to lose out big time, but a small number will rake it in big time, as usual. This country has been duped big time What planet are you living on ? Just because it has not happened is not proof that it would have without the eu.I would go away and have a think about how your logic works. because it hasn't happened, it isnt proof? Ha ha .absolutely fucking superb I agree you must be really stupid where is the proof europe would have been at war without the eu? .Your misquoting of me just proves you cant. " The one time you managed to use caps lock and you use the wrong "Your" anyhow watch the insults there are plenty of sensitive souls on here that don't like being called stupid! Are you seriously saying that greater unity doesn't lessen the chances of conflict? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Its total bollox saying the eu has stopped further wars in europe, after the last one there has been no appertite for war Germany was demilitarized and europe was more worried about Russia, that threat bought Europe closer together.There is no proof that the eu has stopped another war in europe. Apart from the fact that before this century..there were countless wars and since the eu began there has not been solitary conflict between 2 member states? Yeah you could be onto something there As you are so often saying "proof" what proof do you have that countries within the eu would have gone to war if they had not been in it? Surely the proof is that something hasn’t happened? Up until the EU was formed, wars were commonplace in Europe, so it is pretty reasonable to say the EU has been a significant factor in reducing tensions and ultimately war. The challenge with proof is that it isn’t possible to prove that Brexit will be good for us until 10 years plus down the line. On empirical evidence so far it is not looking good. Project Fear looks to have underestimated the impacts and our Politicians are clearly way out of their depth. Gambling on this scale is ludicrous - the upside is minimal, the downside is huge. Many people are going to lose out big time, but a small number will rake it in big time, as usual. This country has been duped big time What planet are you living on ? Just because it has not happened is not proof that it would have without the eu.I would go away and have a think about how your logic works. because it hasn't happened, it isnt proof? Ha ha .absolutely fucking superb I agree you must be really stupid where is the proof europe would have been at war without the eu? .Your misquoting of me just proves you cant. " This is what happens when the daily mail gets its claws into you. Dont do it kids. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Its total bollox saying the eu has stopped further wars in europe, after the last one there has been no appertite for war Germany was demilitarized and europe was more worried about Russia, that threat bought Europe closer together.There is no proof that the eu has stopped another war in europe. Apart from the fact that before this century..there were countless wars and since the eu began there has not been solitary conflict between 2 member states? Yeah you could be onto something there As you are so often saying "proof" what proof do you have that countries within the eu would have gone to war if they had not been in it? Surely the proof is that something hasn’t happened? Up until the EU was formed, wars were commonplace in Europe, so it is pretty reasonable to say the EU has been a significant factor in reducing tensions and ultimately war. The challenge with proof is that it isn’t possible to prove that Brexit will be good for us until 10 years plus down the line. On empirical evidence so far it is not looking good. Project Fear looks to have underestimated the impacts and our Politicians are clearly way out of their depth. Gambling on this scale is ludicrous - the upside is minimal, the downside is huge. Many people are going to lose out big time, but a small number will rake it in big time, as usual. This country has been duped big time What planet are you living on ? Just because it has not happened is not proof that it would have without the eu.I would go away and have a think about how your logic works. because it hasn't happened, it isnt proof? Ha ha .absolutely fucking superb I agree you must be really stupid where is the proof europe would have been at war without the eu? .Your misquoting of me just proves you cant. The one time you managed to use caps lock and you use the wrong "Your" anyhow watch the insults there are plenty of sensitive souls on here that don't like being called stupid! Are you seriously saying that greater unity doesn't lessen the chances of conflict? " yeah i think when we had this convo before, i pointed out to you that some people are dyslexic and calling peoples spelling out on line could make you look like a total dickhead and bully. No im not im saying there is no proof that there would have been another war without the eu.Now you are the one who said that the eu had stopped war in europe now show me the proof. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Its total bollox saying the eu has stopped further wars in europe, after the last one there has been no appertite for war Germany was demilitarized and europe was more worried about Russia, that threat bought Europe closer together.There is no proof that the eu has stopped another war in europe. Apart from the fact that before this century..there were countless wars and since the eu began there has not been solitary conflict between 2 member states? Yeah you could be onto something there As you are so often saying "proof" what proof do you have that countries within the eu would have gone to war if they had not been in it? Surely the proof is that something hasn’t happened? Up until the EU was formed, wars were commonplace in Europe, so it is pretty reasonable to say the EU has been a significant factor in reducing tensions and ultimately war. The challenge with proof is that it isn’t possible to prove that Brexit will be good for us until 10 years plus down the line. On empirical evidence so far it is not looking good. Project Fear looks to have underestimated the impacts and our Politicians are clearly way out of their depth. Gambling on this scale is ludicrous - the upside is minimal, the downside is huge. Many people are going to lose out big time, but a small number will rake it in big time, as usual. This country has been duped big time What planet are you living on ? Just because it has not happened is not proof that it would have without the eu.I would go away and have a think about how your logic works. because it hasn't happened, it isnt proof? Ha ha .absolutely fucking superb I agree you must be really stupid where is the proof europe would have been at war without the eu? .Your misquoting of me just proves you cant. The one time you managed to use caps lock and you use the wrong "Your" anyhow watch the insults there are plenty of sensitive souls on here that don't like being called stupid! Are you seriously saying that greater unity doesn't lessen the chances of conflict? yeah i think when we had this convo before, i pointed out to you that some people are dyslexic and calling peoples spelling out on line could make you look like a total dickhead and bully. No im not im saying there is no proof that there would have been another war without the eu.Now you are the one who said that the eu had stopped war in europe now show me the proof." You are asking a question that relies on the the EU and it's previous forms not existing, do you see the problem? I'm not calling out your spelling, I'm calling out your use of words and inability to capitalise anything. You seem a bit of a snowflake on this subject. When you are quite happy to call people stupid. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Its total bollox saying the eu has stopped further wars in europe, after the last one there has been no appertite for war Germany was demilitarized and europe was more worried about Russia, that threat bought Europe closer together.There is no proof that the eu has stopped another war in europe. Apart from the fact that before this century..there were countless wars and since the eu began there has not been solitary conflict between 2 member states? Yeah you could be onto something there As you are so often saying "proof" what proof do you have that countries within the eu would have gone to war if they had not been in it? Surely the proof is that something hasn’t happened? Up until the EU was formed, wars were commonplace in Europe, so it is pretty reasonable to say the EU has been a significant factor in reducing tensions and ultimately war. The challenge with proof is that it isn’t possible to prove that Brexit will be good for us until 10 years plus down the line. On empirical evidence so far it is not looking good. Project Fear looks to have underestimated the impacts and our Politicians are clearly way out of their depth. Gambling on this scale is ludicrous - the upside is minimal, the downside is huge. Many people are going to lose out big time, but a small number will rake it in big time, as usual. This country has been duped big time What planet are you living on ? Just because it has not happened is not proof that it would have without the eu.I would go away and have a think about how your logic works. because it hasn't happened, it isnt proof? Ha ha .absolutely fucking superb I agree you must be really stupid where is the proof europe would have been at war without the eu? .Your misquoting of me just proves you cant. The one time you managed to use caps lock and you use the wrong "Your" anyhow watch the insults there are plenty of sensitive souls on here that don't like being called stupid! Are you seriously saying that greater unity doesn't lessen the chances of conflict? yeah i think when we had this convo before, i pointed out to you that some people are dyslexic and calling peoples spelling out on line could make you look like a total dickhead and bully. No im not im saying there is no proof that there would have been another war without the eu.Now you are the one who said that the eu had stopped war in europe now show me the proof." Another thing is, you haven't pointed anything like that out to me. If you think you have reference it! Hercule Poirot you are not son. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Its total bollox saying the eu has stopped further wars in europe, after the last one there has been no appertite for war Germany was demilitarized and europe was more worried about Russia, that threat bought Europe closer together.There is no proof that the eu has stopped another war in europe. Apart from the fact that before this century..there were countless wars and since the eu began there has not been solitary conflict between 2 member states? Yeah you could be onto something there As you are so often saying "proof" what proof do you have that countries within the eu would have gone to war if they had not been in it? Surely the proof is that something hasn’t happened? Up until the EU was formed, wars were commonplace in Europe, so it is pretty reasonable to say the EU has been a significant factor in reducing tensions and ultimately war. The challenge with proof is that it isn’t possible to prove that Brexit will be good for us until 10 years plus down the line. On empirical evidence so far it is not looking good. Project Fear looks to have underestimated the impacts and our Politicians are clearly way out of their depth. Gambling on this scale is ludicrous - the upside is minimal, the downside is huge. Many people are going to lose out big time, but a small number will rake it in big time, as usual. This country has been duped big time What planet are you living on ? Just because it has not happened is not proof that it would have without the eu.I would go away and have a think about how your logic works. because it hasn't happened, it isnt proof? Ha ha .absolutely fucking superb I agree you must be really stupid where is the proof europe would have been at war without the eu? .Your misquoting of me just proves you cant. The one time you managed to use caps lock and you use the wrong "Your" anyhow watch the insults there are plenty of sensitive souls on here that don't like being called stupid! Are you seriously saying that greater unity doesn't lessen the chances of conflict? yeah i think when we had this convo before, i pointed out to you that some people are dyslexic and calling peoples spelling out on line could make you look like a total dickhead and bully. No im not im saying there is no proof that there would have been another war without the eu.Now you are the one who said that the eu had stopped war in europe now show me the proof. Another thing is, you haven't pointed anything like that out to me. If you think you have reference it! Hercule Poirot you are not son." son? im old enough to be your dad. you seem to be getting a bit rattled i would say your secret is safe with me but its not as others have noticed too. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Its total bollox saying the eu has stopped further wars in europe, after the last one there has been no appertite for war Germany was demilitarized and europe was more worried about Russia, that threat bought Europe closer together.There is no proof that the eu has stopped another war in europe. Apart from the fact that before this century..there were countless wars and since the eu began there has not been solitary conflict between 2 member states? Yeah you could be onto something there As you are so often saying "proof" what proof do you have that countries within the eu would have gone to war if they had not been in it? Surely the proof is that something hasn’t happened? Up until the EU was formed, wars were commonplace in Europe, so it is pretty reasonable to say the EU has been a significant factor in reducing tensions and ultimately war. The challenge with proof is that it isn’t possible to prove that Brexit will be good for us until 10 years plus down the line. On empirical evidence so far it is not looking good. Project Fear looks to have underestimated the impacts and our Politicians are clearly way out of their depth. Gambling on this scale is ludicrous - the upside is minimal, the downside is huge. Many people are going to lose out big time, but a small number will rake it in big time, as usual. This country has been duped big time What planet are you living on ? Just because it has not happened is not proof that it would have without the eu.I would go away and have a think about how your logic works. because it hasn't happened, it isnt proof? Ha ha .absolutely fucking superb I agree you must be really stupid where is the proof europe would have been at war without the eu? .Your misquoting of me just proves you cant. The one time you managed to use caps lock and you use the wrong "Your" anyhow watch the insults there are plenty of sensitive souls on here that don't like being called stupid! Are you seriously saying that greater unity doesn't lessen the chances of conflict? yeah i think when we had this convo before, i pointed out to you that some people are dyslexic and calling peoples spelling out on line could make you look like a total dickhead and bully. No im not im saying there is no proof that there would have been another war without the eu.Now you are the one who said that the eu had stopped war in europe now show me the proof. Another thing is, you haven't pointed anything like that out to me. If you think you have reference it! Hercule Poirot you are not son. son? im old enough to be your dad. you seem to be getting a bit rattled i would say your secret is safe with me but its not as others have noticed too. " You got that evidence? I'm not the one crying about being bullied! just for reference the caps lock key is on the left of the keyboard near the tab key. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |