FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > corbyn v starmer
corbyn v starmer
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Hope so and the pair of them sent into oblivion along with the labour party so that a new party that actually understands the needs and wants of the electorate can be formed  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"will this tear the labour party apart now corbyn has decided to start legal action against him? "
I doubt it, I think they will come to a compromise , time will tell though |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Corbyn is just showing how little he actually cares about the Country or the Labour Party. He was in charge when Labour was found to be anti-semitic, the Independent Review pointed out what was wrong and needed to be changed. Starmer said Labour would adopt the recommendations and then Corbyn says it is just hyperbole and media over statement. He could have accepted the problem, he could have remained silent but instead he acts like a complete tit. Nobody should be standing up for him  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Corbyn is just showing how little he actually cares about the Country or the Labour Party. He was in charge when Labour was found to be anti-semitic, the Independent Review pointed out what was wrong and needed to be changed. Starmer said Labour would adopt the recommendations and then Corbyn says it is just hyperbole and media over statement. He could have accepted the problem, he could have remained silent but instead he acts like a complete tit. Nobody should be standing up for him "
He said the level of anti semitism was exaggerated and the fact that he was reinstated by the plp proves the was right.
2 people were found to be guilty of anti semitism..last time I looked there was more than 2 people in the labour party. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Corbyn is just showing how little he actually cares about the Country or the Labour Party. He was in charge when Labour was found to be anti-semitic, the Independent Review pointed out what was wrong and needed to be changed. Starmer said Labour would adopt the recommendations and then Corbyn says it is just hyperbole and media over statement. He could have accepted the problem, he could have remained silent but instead he acts like a complete tit. Nobody should be standing up for him
He said the level of anti semitism was exaggerated and the fact that he was reinstated by the plp proves the was right.
2 people were found to be guilty of anti semitism..last time I looked there was more than 2 people in the labour party."
Corbyn was the leader, it wasn’t exaggerated, it was Independently reviewed. He takes the rap as he could have stopped it whilst he was leader. He is being a weasel now. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
It's all an absolute mess tbh.
Ks said he wants to unite the party. This is clearly nonsense..he wants to move the party to the centre.
The left have actually been quite conciliatory, but he seems intent on getting his own way
If there is a split and just 1 big union walks away,they will be fucked.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Corbyn is just showing how little he actually cares about the Country or the Labour Party. He was in charge when Labour was found to be anti-semitic, the Independent Review pointed out what was wrong and needed to be changed. Starmer said Labour would adopt the recommendations and then Corbyn says it is just hyperbole and media over statement. He could have accepted the problem, he could have remained silent but instead he acts like a complete tit. Nobody should be standing up for him
He said the level of anti semitism was exaggerated and the fact that he was reinstated by the plp proves the was right.
2 people were found to be guilty of anti semitism..last time I looked there was more than 2 people in the labour party.
Corbyn was the leader, it wasn’t exaggerated, it was Independently reviewed. He takes the rap as he could have stopped it whilst he was leader. He is being a weasel now. "
Simon heffer..corbyn wants to reopen the gates of Auschwitz
Not exaggerated |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Corbyn is just showing how little he actually cares about the Country or the Labour Party. He was in charge when Labour was found to be anti-semitic, the Independent Review pointed out what was wrong and needed to be changed. Starmer said Labour would adopt the recommendations and then Corbyn says it is just hyperbole and media over statement. He could have accepted the problem, he could have remained silent but instead he acts like a complete tit. Nobody should be standing up for him
He said the level of anti semitism was exaggerated and the fact that he was reinstated by the plp proves the was right.
2 people were found to be guilty of anti semitism..last time I looked there was more than 2 people in the labour party.
Corbyn was the leader, it wasn’t exaggerated, it was Independently reviewed. He takes the rap as he could have stopped it whilst he was leader. He is being a weasel now.
Simon heffer..corbyn wants to reopen the gates of Auschwitz
Not exaggerated "
Corbyn was in charge. Denied the report was valid. He is a weasel and should have listened to people over the past 3 years. He cannot, nor can his supporters pretend they are surprised now. He needs to grow a pair and accept he let everyone down. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Quite surprised there hasn’t been a split up to now. For what it’s worth, I was always quite impressed that a slightly older maverick like Corbin put himself up for election, became leader, gave some good speeches, captured the mood etc.
Events like PMQs in particular must be incredibly stressful and I admired his fortitude.
Why couldn’t he have just come out and be crystal clear when MPs like Luciana Berger were being targeted with abuse. Labour Party members needing police escorts to attend their own conference, the “optics” don’t get any worse really. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Corbyn is just showing how little he actually cares about the Country or the Labour Party. He was in charge when Labour was found to be anti-semitic, the Independent Review pointed out what was wrong and needed to be changed. Starmer said Labour would adopt the recommendations and then Corbyn says it is just hyperbole and media over statement. He could have accepted the problem, he could have remained silent but instead he acts like a complete tit. Nobody should be standing up for him
He said the level of anti semitism was exaggerated and the fact that he was reinstated by the plp proves the was right.
2 people were found to be guilty of anti semitism..last time I looked there was more than 2 people in the labour party.
Corbyn was the leader, it wasn’t exaggerated, it was Independently reviewed. He takes the rap as he could have stopped it whilst he was leader. He is being a weasel now.
Simon heffer..corbyn wants to reopen the gates of Auschwitz
Not exaggerated
Corbyn was in charge. Denied the report was valid. He is a weasel and should have listened to people over the past 3 years. He cannot, nor can his supporters pretend they are surprised now. He needs to grow a pair and accept he let everyone down. "
You said it wasnt exaggerated
I have just provided an exact quote which compared 2 people to expelled to the final solution. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Corbyn is an anti semitic prick but Starmer is no better, he stood alongside him and supported him throughout all the allegations so he is either complicit or just thick. MPs with better judgement and higher principles turned down jobs on the front bench to the detriment of their own careers because they simply couldn't work with Corbyn. And now Starmer tries to come across all high and mighty, he's an opportunistic chancer but he always gets it wrong. He was as much to blame for the election loss as Corbyn over his calls for a second referendum because he thought that was the way the wind was blowing. Wrong. And he won't be forgiven for that. And he thought he was being clever the day he 'took the knee'. Wrong again. He basically lost the next election there |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Corbyn is an anti semitic prick but Starmer is no better, he stood alongside him and supported him throughout all the allegations so he is either complicit or just thick. MPs with better judgement and higher principles turned down jobs on the front bench to the detriment of their own careers because they simply couldn't work with Corbyn. And now Starmer tries to come across all high and mighty, he's an opportunistic chancer but he always gets it wrong. He was as much to blame for the election loss as Corbyn over his calls for a second referendum because he thought that was the way the wind was blowing. Wrong. And he won't be forgiven for that. And he thought he was being clever the day he 'took the knee'. Wrong again. He basically lost the next election there"
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick' |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *mmabluTV/TS
over a year ago
upton wirral |
Corbyn is selfish and nasty he is basically Donald Trump in red if you support Corbyn you support Trump makes you a very nasty creature.
All corbyn wants is an old fashioned police dictatorship with himself on power
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Corbyn is selfish and nasty he is basically Donald Trump in red if you support Corbyn you support Trump makes you a very nasty creature.
All corbyn wants is an old fashioned police dictatorship with himself on power
"
I don’t remember reading that in his manifesto?  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Corbyn is an anti semitic prick but Starmer is no better, he stood alongside him and supported him throughout all the allegations so he is either complicit or just thick. MPs with better judgement and higher principles turned down jobs on the front bench to the detriment of their own careers because they simply couldn't work with Corbyn. And now Starmer tries to come across all high and mighty, he's an opportunistic chancer but he always gets it wrong. He was as much to blame for the election loss as Corbyn over his calls for a second referendum because he thought that was the way the wind was blowing. Wrong. And he won't be forgiven for that. And he thought he was being clever the day he 'took the knee'. Wrong again. He basically lost the next election there
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick'"
Margaret Hodge served on Islington Borough Council from 1982 to 1992 and is a Labour MP and has called Corbyn an anti semites and racist. Do you know him better than her? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Corbyn is selfish and nasty he is basically Donald Trump in red if you support Corbyn you support Trump makes you a very nasty creature.
All corbyn wants is an old fashioned police dictatorship with himself on power
"
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"will this tear the labour party apart now corbyn has decided to start legal action against him? "
Such a dickhead move by an arrogant prick. Kick the asshole out the party and his militant far left lunatics now.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Time they drew a line under Corbyn he just hangs around like a bad smell like his fan boys.
Get some winners. "
What do they need to do to win?
Blair won by basically being a Tory. Pointless, in my opinion. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Time they drew a line under Corbyn he just hangs around like a bad smell like his fan boys.
Get some winners.
What do they need to do to win?
Blair won by basically being a Tory. Pointless, in my opinion."
First they should start looking like winners and actually have a bit about them. Corbyn couldn’t even nail his Brexit colours to the mask that dithering about doomed him along with his other dithering.
Kiers a step back toward the centre it’s true but I believe he can do it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Time they drew a line under Corbyn he just hangs around like a bad smell like his fan boys.
Get some winners.
What do they need to do to win?
Blair won by basically being a Tory. Pointless, in my opinion."
Tony Blair
The only labour leader The press never went after.
Wonder why? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Time they drew a line under Corbyn he just hangs around like a bad smell like his fan boys.
Get some winners.
What do they need to do to win?
Blair won by basically being a Tory. Pointless, in my opinion.
First they should start looking like winners and actually have a bit about them. Corbyn couldn’t even nail his Brexit colours to the mask that dithering about doomed him along with his other dithering.
Kiers a step back toward the centre it’s true but I believe he can do it. "
Brown and Miliband were centrists
Were they winners? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Time they drew a line under Corbyn he just hangs around like a bad smell like his fan boys.
Get some winners.
What do they need to do to win?
Blair won by basically being a Tory. Pointless, in my opinion.
First they should start looking like winners and actually have a bit about them. Corbyn couldn’t even nail his Brexit colours to the mask that dithering about doomed him along with his other dithering.
Kiers a step back toward the centre it’s true but I believe he can do it.
Brown and Miliband were centrists
Were they winners?"
Dreary with nothing about them. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Time they drew a line under Corbyn he just hangs around like a bad smell like his fan boys.
Get some winners.
What do they need to do to win?
Blair won by basically being a Tory. Pointless, in my opinion.
First they should start looking like winners and actually have a bit about them. Corbyn couldn’t even nail his Brexit colours to the mask that dithering about doomed him along with his other dithering.
Kiers a step back toward the centre it’s true but I believe he can do it.
Brown and Miliband were centrists
Were they winners?
Dreary with nothing about them. "
But surely all labour need to do is move to the centre? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Time they drew a line under Corbyn he just hangs around like a bad smell like his fan boys.
Get some winners.
What do they need to do to win?
Blair won by basically being a Tory. Pointless, in my opinion.
First they should start looking like winners and actually have a bit about them. Corbyn couldn’t even nail his Brexit colours to the mask that dithering about doomed him along with his other dithering.
Kiers a step back toward the centre it’s true but I believe he can do it.
Brown and Miliband were centrists
Were they winners?
Dreary with nothing about them.
But surely all labour need to do is move to the centre?"
you seeing things again? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Corbyn is an anti semitic prick but Starmer is no better, he stood alongside him and supported him throughout all the allegations so he is either complicit or just thick. MPs with better judgement and higher principles turned down jobs on the front bench to the detriment of their own careers because they simply couldn't work with Corbyn. And now Starmer tries to come across all high and mighty, he's an opportunistic chancer but he always gets it wrong. He was as much to blame for the election loss as Corbyn over his calls for a second referendum because he thought that was the way the wind was blowing. Wrong. And he won't be forgiven for that. And he thought he was being clever the day he 'took the knee'. Wrong again. He basically lost the next election there
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick'"
Certain communities would vote Labour even if Jimmy Saville or Gary Glitter was their MP. Tottenham is an example with Diane Abbott as their mouthpiece. Just because Islington voted Corbyn in doesn't make him a decent MP. He's a protestor, not a leader and the Labour party would be a better opposition without the likes of Corbyn & Abbott in their ranks. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Time they drew a line under Corbyn he just hangs around like a bad smell like his fan boys.
Get some winners.
What do they need to do to win?
Blair won by basically being a Tory. Pointless, in my opinion.
First they should start looking like winners and actually have a bit about them. Corbyn couldn’t even nail his Brexit colours to the mask that dithering about doomed him along with his other dithering.
Kiers a step back toward the centre it’s true but I believe he can do it.
Brown and Miliband were centrists
Were they winners?
Dreary with nothing about them.
But surely all labour need to do is move to the centre? you seeing things again?"
No
I just find it quite amusing when people say all labour need to do is move to the centre.
They were at the centre under these 2 and failed miserablly |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Time they drew a line under Corbyn he just hangs around like a bad smell like his fan boys.
Get some winners.
What do they need to do to win?
Blair won by basically being a Tory. Pointless, in my opinion.
First they should start looking like winners and actually have a bit about them. Corbyn couldn’t even nail his Brexit colours to the mask that dithering about doomed him along with his other dithering.
Kiers a step back toward the centre it’s true but I believe he can do it. "
It's more about personality than policy? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Corbyn is an anti semitic prick but Starmer is no better, he stood alongside him and supported him throughout all the allegations so he is either complicit or just thick. MPs with better judgement and higher principles turned down jobs on the front bench to the detriment of their own careers because they simply couldn't work with Corbyn. And now Starmer tries to come across all high and mighty, he's an opportunistic chancer but he always gets it wrong. He was as much to blame for the election loss as Corbyn over his calls for a second referendum because he thought that was the way the wind was blowing. Wrong. And he won't be forgiven for that. And he thought he was being clever the day he 'took the knee'. Wrong again. He basically lost the next election there
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick'
Certain communities would vote Labour even if Jimmy Saville or Gary Glitter was their MP. Tottenham is an example with Diane Abbott as their mouthpiece. Just because Islington voted Corbyn in doesn't make him a decent MP. He's a protestor, not a leader and the Labour party would be a better opposition without the likes of Corbyn & Abbott in their ranks."
Do you have any actual evidence that people would vote in a known paedophile? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Time they drew a line under Corbyn he just hangs around like a bad smell like his fan boys.
Get some winners.
What do they need to do to win?
Blair won by basically being a Tory. Pointless, in my opinion.
First they should start looking like winners and actually have a bit about them. Corbyn couldn’t even nail his Brexit colours to the mask that dithering about doomed him along with his other dithering.
Kiers a step back toward the centre it’s true but I believe he can do it.
Brown and Miliband were centrists
Were they winners?
Dreary with nothing about them.
But surely all labour need to do is move to the centre? you seeing things again?
No
I just find it quite amusing when people say all labour need to do is move to the centre.
They were at the centre under these 2 and failed miserablly"
where did I say that they need to move to the centre  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Corbyn is an anti semitic prick but Starmer is no better, he stood alongside him and supported him throughout all the allegations so he is either complicit or just thick. MPs with better judgement and higher principles turned down jobs on the front bench to the detriment of their own careers because they simply couldn't work with Corbyn. And now Starmer tries to come across all high and mighty, he's an opportunistic chancer but he always gets it wrong. He was as much to blame for the election loss as Corbyn over his calls for a second referendum because he thought that was the way the wind was blowing. Wrong. And he won't be forgiven for that. And he thought he was being clever the day he 'took the knee'. Wrong again. He basically lost the next election there
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick'
Certain communities would vote Labour even if Jimmy Saville or Gary Glitter was their MP. Tottenham is an example with Diane Abbott as their mouthpiece. Just because Islington voted Corbyn in doesn't make him a decent MP. He's a protestor, not a leader and the Labour party would be a better opposition without the likes of Corbyn & Abbott in their ranks.
Do you have any actual evidence that people would vote in a known paedophile?"
USA  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Corbyn is an anti semitic prick but Starmer is no better, he stood alongside him and supported him throughout all the allegations so he is either complicit or just thick. MPs with better judgement and higher principles turned down jobs on the front bench to the detriment of their own careers because they simply couldn't work with Corbyn. And now Starmer tries to come across all high and mighty, he's an opportunistic chancer but he always gets it wrong. He was as much to blame for the election loss as Corbyn over his calls for a second referendum because he thought that was the way the wind was blowing. Wrong. And he won't be forgiven for that. And he thought he was being clever the day he 'took the knee'. Wrong again. He basically lost the next election there
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick'
Certain communities would vote Labour even if Jimmy Saville or Gary Glitter was their MP. Tottenham is an example with Diane Abbott as their mouthpiece. Just because Islington voted Corbyn in doesn't make him a decent MP. He's a protestor, not a leader and the Labour party would be a better opposition without the likes of Corbyn & Abbott in their ranks.
Do you have any actual evidence that people would vote in a known paedophile?"
It's an analogy, the fact that Diane Abbott is voted in is proof of the stupidity and lemming type followers of Labour rather than the individual candidate |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Wasn’t Corbyn the most disloyal labour MP ever, voted against his party over 400 times in 3 Parliaments...!!!!
How was he allowed to keep standing under a manifesto and for a party he continually undermined..?? Bizarre.. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Corbyn is an anti semitic prick but Starmer is no better, he stood alongside him and supported him throughout all the allegations so he is either complicit or just thick. MPs with better judgement and higher principles turned down jobs on the front bench to the detriment of their own careers because they simply couldn't work with Corbyn. And now Starmer tries to come across all high and mighty, he's an opportunistic chancer but he always gets it wrong. He was as much to blame for the election loss as Corbyn over his calls for a second referendum because he thought that was the way the wind was blowing. Wrong. And he won't be forgiven for that. And he thought he was being clever the day he 'took the knee'. Wrong again. He basically lost the next election there
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick'
Certain communities would vote Labour even if Jimmy Saville or Gary Glitter was their MP. Tottenham is an example with Diane Abbott as their mouthpiece. Just because Islington voted Corbyn in doesn't make him a decent MP. He's a protestor, not a leader and the Labour party would be a better opposition without the likes of Corbyn & Abbott in their ranks.
Do you have any actual evidence that people would vote in a known paedophile?
It's an analogy, the fact that Diane Abbott is voted in is proof of the stupidity and lemming type followers of Labour rather than the individual candidate"
2 words.
Christopher. Grayling. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Wasn’t Corbyn the most disloyal labour MP ever, voted against his party over 400 times in 3 Parliaments...!!!!
How was he allowed to keep standing under a manifesto and for a party he continually undermined..?? Bizarre.."
Probally because we live in something called a democracy?
He voted against the iraq war..was he wrong? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Wasn’t Corbyn the most disloyal labour MP ever, voted against his party over 400 times in 3 Parliaments...!!!!
How was he allowed to keep standing under a manifesto and for a party he continually undermined..?? Bizarre..
Probally because we live in something called a democracy?
He voted against the iraq war..was he wrong?"
Think it was a tad more than a war he voted against.
Democracy indeed, the point is disloyalty, if he felt so strongly why did he not form his own party and get elected rather than fraudulently jump on the labour ticket... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Wasn’t Corbyn the most disloyal labour MP ever, voted against his party over 400 times in 3 Parliaments...!!!!
How was he allowed to keep standing under a manifesto and for a party he continually undermined..?? Bizarre..
Probally because we live in something called a democracy?
He voted against the iraq war..was he wrong?
Think it was a tad more than a war he voted against.
Democracy indeed, the point is disloyalty, if he felt so strongly why did he not form his own party and get elected rather than fraudulently jump on the labour ticket..."
So you are saying you are not allowed to disagree with your own party? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Wasn’t Corbyn the most disloyal labour MP ever, voted against his party over 400 times in 3 Parliaments...!!!!
How was he allowed to keep standing under a manifesto and for a party he continually undermined..?? Bizarre..
Probally because we live in something called a democracy?
He voted against the iraq war..was he wrong?
Think it was a tad more than a war he voted against.
Democracy indeed, the point is disloyalty, if he felt so strongly why did he not form his own party and get elected rather than fraudulently jump on the labour ticket...
So you are saying you are not allowed to disagree with your own party?"
Whose quote.....
400 + times is not a disagreement its a fundamental polar opposition to a party under whose banner you were elected..
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Wasn’t Corbyn the most disloyal labour MP ever, voted against his party over 400 times in 3 Parliaments...!!!!
How was he allowed to keep standing under a manifesto and for a party he continually undermined..?? Bizarre..
Probally because we live in something called a democracy?
He voted against the iraq war..was he wrong?
Think it was a tad more than a war he voted against.
Democracy indeed, the point is disloyalty, if he felt so strongly why did he not form his own party and get elected rather than fraudulently jump on the labour ticket...
So you are saying you are not allowed to disagree with your own party?
Whose quote.....
400 + times is not a disagreement its a fundamental polar opposition to a party under whose banner you were elected..
"
For a start he has been a politician for nearly 40
During that time the party moved to the centre..corbyn is a socialist.
His constituents dont seem to.bothered as he has a whopping majority.
It's a rather bizarre argument
If you are going to criticise a politician, shouldnt it be on his policies or what he stands for? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Wasn’t Corbyn the most disloyal labour MP ever, voted against his party over 400 times in 3 Parliaments...!!!!
How was he allowed to keep standing under a manifesto and for a party he continually undermined..?? Bizarre..
Probally because we live in something called a democracy?
He voted against the iraq war..was he wrong?
Think it was a tad more than a war he voted against.
Democracy indeed, the point is disloyalty, if he felt so strongly why did he not form his own party and get elected rather than fraudulently jump on the labour ticket...
So you are saying you are not allowed to disagree with your own party?
Whose quote.....
400 + times is not a disagreement its a fundamental polar opposition to a party under whose banner you were elected..
For a start he has been a politician for nearly 40
During that time the party moved to the centre..corbyn is a socialist.
His constituents dont seem to.bothered as he has a whopping majority.
It's a rather bizarre argument
If you are going to criticise a politician, shouldnt it be on his policies or what he stands for?"
For most of it in opposition, so his acts of disloyalty are not a matter of public record as they are in government.
Before policy comes the person, disloyalty is not something I respects in anyone regardless of his policies.
What is bizarre about highlighting somebodies disloyalty on 400+ occasions..??
Your loyalty to someone so disloyal is an admiral quality he lacks...
Disloyalty is the only point I raised... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Wasn’t Corbyn the most disloyal labour MP ever, voted against his party over 400 times in 3 Parliaments...!!!!
How was he allowed to keep standing under a manifesto and for a party he continually undermined..?? Bizarre..
Probally because we live in something called a democracy?
He voted against the iraq war..was he wrong?
Think it was a tad more than a war he voted against.
Democracy indeed, the point is disloyalty, if he felt so strongly why did he not form his own party and get elected rather than fraudulently jump on the labour ticket...
So you are saying you are not allowed to disagree with your own party?
Whose quote.....
400 + times is not a disagreement its a fundamental polar opposition to a party under whose banner you were elected..
For a start he has been a politician for nearly 40
During that time the party moved to the centre..corbyn is a socialist.
His constituents dont seem to.bothered as he has a whopping majority.
It's a rather bizarre argument
If you are going to criticise a politician, shouldnt it be on his policies or what he stands for?
For most of it in opposition, so his acts of disloyalty are not a matter of public record as they are in government.
Before policy comes the person, disloyalty is not something I respects in anyone regardless of his policies.
What is bizarre about highlighting somebodies disloyalty on 400+ occasions..??
Your loyalty to someone so disloyal is an admiral quality he lacks...
Disloyalty is the only point I raised..."
So what you are saying is..everyone should vote with their party?
Which begs the question..why have 600 odd mps?isnt it rather pointless? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Wasn’t Corbyn the most disloyal labour MP ever, voted against his party over 400 times in 3 Parliaments...!!!!
How was he allowed to keep standing under a manifesto and for a party he continually undermined..?? Bizarre..
Probally because we live in something called a democracy?
He voted against the iraq war..was he wrong?
Think it was a tad more than a war he voted against.
Democracy indeed, the point is disloyalty, if he felt so strongly why did he not form his own party and get elected rather than fraudulently jump on the labour ticket...
So you are saying you are not allowed to disagree with your own party?
Whose quote.....
400 + times is not a disagreement its a fundamental polar opposition to a party under whose banner you were elected..
For a start he has been a politician for nearly 40
During that time the party moved to the centre..corbyn is a socialist.
His constituents dont seem to.bothered as he has a whopping majority.
It's a rather bizarre argument
If you are going to criticise a politician, shouldnt it be on his policies or what he stands for?
For most of it in opposition, so his acts of disloyalty are not a matter of public record as they are in government.
Before policy comes the person, disloyalty is not something I respects in anyone regardless of his policies.
What is bizarre about highlighting somebodies disloyalty on 400+ occasions..??
Your loyalty to someone so disloyal is an admiral quality he lacks...
Disloyalty is the only point I raised..."
I'll ask again and you seem to have slated over it?
Was he wrong to vote against the Iraq war? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Wasn’t Corbyn the most disloyal labour MP ever, voted against his party over 400 times in 3 Parliaments...!!!!
How was he allowed to keep standing under a manifesto and for a party he continually undermined..?? Bizarre..
Probally because we live in something called a democracy?
He voted against the iraq war..was he wrong?
Think it was a tad more than a war he voted against.
Democracy indeed, the point is disloyalty, if he felt so strongly why did he not form his own party and get elected rather than fraudulently jump on the labour ticket...
So you are saying you are not allowed to disagree with your own party?
Whose quote.....
400 + times is not a disagreement its a fundamental polar opposition to a party under whose banner you were elected..
For a start he has been a politician for nearly 40
During that time the party moved to the centre..corbyn is a socialist.
His constituents dont seem to.bothered as he has a whopping majority.
It's a rather bizarre argument
If you are going to criticise a politician, shouldnt it be on his policies or what he stands for?
For most of it in opposition, so his acts of disloyalty are not a matter of public record as they are in government.
Before policy comes the person, disloyalty is not something I respects in anyone regardless of his policies.
What is bizarre about highlighting somebodies disloyalty on 400+ occasions..??
Your loyalty to someone so disloyal is an admiral quality he lacks...
Disloyalty is the only point I raised...
So what you are saying is..everyone should vote with their party?
Which begs the question..why have 600 odd mps?isnt it rather pointless?"
Please don’t keep telling me what I am saying...
I have raised no other argument or opinion other than his disloyalty to his party on 400+ occasions.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Wasn’t Corbyn the most disloyal labour MP ever, voted against his party over 400 times in 3 Parliaments...!!!!
How was he allowed to keep standing under a manifesto and for a party he continually undermined..?? Bizarre..
Probally because we live in something called a democracy?
He voted against the iraq war..was he wrong?
Think it was a tad more than a war he voted against.
Democracy indeed, the point is disloyalty, if he felt so strongly why did he not form his own party and get elected rather than fraudulently jump on the labour ticket...
So you are saying you are not allowed to disagree with your own party?
Whose quote.....
400 + times is not a disagreement its a fundamental polar opposition to a party under whose banner you were elected..
For a start he has been a politician for nearly 40
During that time the party moved to the centre..corbyn is a socialist.
His constituents dont seem to.bothered as he has a whopping majority.
It's a rather bizarre argument
If you are going to criticise a politician, shouldnt it be on his policies or what he stands for?
For most of it in opposition, so his acts of disloyalty are not a matter of public record as they are in government.
Before policy comes the person, disloyalty is not something I respects in anyone regardless of his policies.
What is bizarre about highlighting somebodies disloyalty on 400+ occasions..??
Your loyalty to someone so disloyal is an admiral quality he lacks...
Disloyalty is the only point I raised...
So what you are saying is..everyone should vote with their party?
Which begs the question..why have 600 odd mps?isnt it rather pointless?
Please don’t keep telling me what I am saying...
I have raised no other argument or opinion other than his disloyalty to his party on 400+ occasions.
"
Isnt politics about belief and ideals not loyalty? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Wasn’t Corbyn the most disloyal labour MP ever, voted against his party over 400 times in 3 Parliaments...!!!!
How was he allowed to keep standing under a manifesto and for a party he continually undermined..?? Bizarre..
Probally because we live in something called a democracy?
He voted against the iraq war..was he wrong?
Think it was a tad more than a war he voted against.
Democracy indeed, the point is disloyalty, if he felt so strongly why did he not form his own party and get elected rather than fraudulently jump on the labour ticket...
So you are saying you are not allowed to disagree with your own party?
Whose quote.....
400 + times is not a disagreement its a fundamental polar opposition to a party under whose banner you were elected..
For a start he has been a politician for nearly 40
During that time the party moved to the centre..corbyn is a socialist.
His constituents dont seem to.bothered as he has a whopping majority.
It's a rather bizarre argument
If you are going to criticise a politician, shouldnt it be on his policies or what he stands for?
For most of it in opposition, so his acts of disloyalty are not a matter of public record as they are in government.
Before policy comes the person, disloyalty is not something I respects in anyone regardless of his policies.
What is bizarre about highlighting somebodies disloyalty on 400+ occasions..??
Your loyalty to someone so disloyal is an admiral quality he lacks...
Disloyalty is the only point I raised...
So what you are saying is..everyone should vote with their party?
Which begs the question..why have 600 odd mps?isnt it rather pointless?
Please don’t keep telling me what I am saying...
I have raised no other argument or opinion other than his disloyalty to his party on 400+ occasions.
Isnt politics about belief and ideals not loyalty?"
So why didn't he join the Communist Party?... Or Sinn Fein?... Or Hamas? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ostafun OP Man
over a year ago
near ipswich |
"Wasn’t Corbyn the most disloyal labour MP ever, voted against his party over 400 times in 3 Parliaments...!!!!
How was he allowed to keep standing under a manifesto and for a party he continually undermined..?? Bizarre..
Probally because we live in something called a democracy?
He voted against the iraq war..was he wrong?
Think it was a tad more than a war he voted against.
Democracy indeed, the point is disloyalty, if he felt so strongly why did he not form his own party and get elected rather than fraudulently jump on the labour ticket...
So you are saying you are not allowed to disagree with your own party?
Whose quote.....
400 + times is not a disagreement its a fundamental polar opposition to a party under whose banner you were elected..
For a start he has been a politician for nearly 40
During that time the party moved to the centre..corbyn is a socialist.
His constituents dont seem to.bothered as he has a whopping majority.
It's a rather bizarre argument
If you are going to criticise a politician, shouldnt it be on his policies or what he stands for?
For most of it in opposition, so his acts of disloyalty are not a matter of public record as they are in government.
Before policy comes the person, disloyalty is not something I respects in anyone regardless of his policies.
What is bizarre about highlighting somebodies disloyalty on 400+ occasions..??
Your loyalty to someone so disloyal is an admiral quality he lacks...
Disloyalty is the only point I raised...
So what you are saying is..everyone should vote with their party?
Which begs the question..why have 600 odd mps?isnt it rather pointless?
Please don’t keep telling me what I am saying...
I have raised no other argument or opinion other than his disloyalty to his party on 400+ occasions.
Isnt politics about belief and ideals not loyalty?"
very true mate thats why the tories devastated labour in the last election. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Wasn’t Corbyn the most disloyal labour MP ever, voted against his party over 400 times in 3 Parliaments...!!!!
How was he allowed to keep standing under a manifesto and for a party he continually undermined..?? Bizarre..
Probally because we live in something called a democracy?
He voted against the iraq war..was he wrong?
Think it was a tad more than a war he voted against.
Democracy indeed, the point is disloyalty, if he felt so strongly why did he not form his own party and get elected rather than fraudulently jump on the labour ticket...
So you are saying you are not allowed to disagree with your own party?
Whose quote.....
400 + times is not a disagreement its a fundamental polar opposition to a party under whose banner you were elected..
For a start he has been a politician for nearly 40
During that time the party moved to the centre..corbyn is a socialist.
His constituents dont seem to.bothered as he has a whopping majority.
It's a rather bizarre argument
If you are going to criticise a politician, shouldnt it be on his policies or what he stands for?
For most of it in opposition, so his acts of disloyalty are not a matter of public record as they are in government.
Before policy comes the person, disloyalty is not something I respects in anyone regardless of his policies.
What is bizarre about highlighting somebodies disloyalty on 400+ occasions..??
Your loyalty to someone so disloyal is an admiral quality he lacks...
Disloyalty is the only point I raised...
So what you are saying is..everyone should vote with their party?
Which begs the question..why have 600 odd mps?isnt it rather pointless?
Please don’t keep telling me what I am saying...
I have raised no other argument or opinion other than his disloyalty to his party on 400+ occasions.
Isnt politics about belief and ideals not loyalty? very true mate thats why the tories devastated labour in the last election."
Yes boris that man of principle |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Wasn’t Corbyn the most disloyal labour MP ever, voted against his party over 400 times in 3 Parliaments...!!!!
How was he allowed to keep standing under a manifesto and for a party he continually undermined..?? Bizarre..
Probally because we live in something called a democracy?
He voted against the iraq war..was he wrong?
Think it was a tad more than a war he voted against.
Democracy indeed, the point is disloyalty, if he felt so strongly why did he not form his own party and get elected rather than fraudulently jump on the labour ticket...
So you are saying you are not allowed to disagree with your own party?
Whose quote.....
400 + times is not a disagreement its a fundamental polar opposition to a party under whose banner you were elected..
For a start he has been a politician for nearly 40
During that time the party moved to the centre..corbyn is a socialist.
His constituents dont seem to.bothered as he has a whopping majority.
It's a rather bizarre argument
If you are going to criticise a politician, shouldnt it be on his policies or what he stands for?
For most of it in opposition, so his acts of disloyalty are not a matter of public record as they are in government.
Before policy comes the person, disloyalty is not something I respects in anyone regardless of his policies.
What is bizarre about highlighting somebodies disloyalty on 400+ occasions..??
Your loyalty to someone so disloyal is an admiral quality he lacks...
Disloyalty is the only point I raised...
So what you are saying is..everyone should vote with their party?
Which begs the question..why have 600 odd mps?isnt it rather pointless?
Please don’t keep telling me what I am saying...
I have raised no other argument or opinion other than his disloyalty to his party on 400+ occasions.
Isnt politics about belief and ideals not loyalty?"
Before the policy comes the person...
DISLOYAL....
It’s a democracy ( apparently) and that is my opinion..
It is on record Mr Corbyn is the most disloyal MP ever.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Corbyn is an anti semitic prick but Starmer is no better, he stood alongside him and supported him throughout all the allegations so he is either complicit or just thick. MPs with better judgement and higher principles turned down jobs on the front bench to the detriment of their own careers because they simply couldn't work with Corbyn. And now Starmer tries to come across all high and mighty, he's an opportunistic chancer but he always gets it wrong. He was as much to blame for the election loss as Corbyn over his calls for a second referendum because he thought that was the way the wind was blowing. Wrong. And he won't be forgiven for that. And he thought he was being clever the day he 'took the knee'. Wrong again. He basically lost the next election there
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick'
Margaret Hodge served on Islington Borough Council from 1982 to 1992 and is a Labour MP and has called Corbyn an anti semites and racist. Do you know him better than her? "
It is rare we agree, but I agree with you here. Corbyn et al are just being factional to distract from his failure. He isn’t even yesterday’s man now. If he had admitted he made a mistake I would have given him some rexpect, but just doubling down on his failure in leadership is sad, but inevitable given his character  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Corbyn is an anti semitic prick but Starmer is no better, he stood alongside him and supported him throughout all the allegations so he is either complicit or just thick. MPs with better judgement and higher principles turned down jobs on the front bench to the detriment of their own careers because they simply couldn't work with Corbyn. And now Starmer tries to come across all high and mighty, he's an opportunistic chancer but he always gets it wrong. He was as much to blame for the election loss as Corbyn over his calls for a second referendum because he thought that was the way the wind was blowing. Wrong. And he won't be forgiven for that. And he thought he was being clever the day he 'took the knee'. Wrong again. He basically lost the next election there
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick'
Margaret Hodge served on Islington Borough Council from 1982 to 1992 and is a Labour MP and has called Corbyn an anti semites and racist. Do you know him better than her?
It is rare we agree, but I agree with you here. Corbyn et al are just being factional to distract from his failure. He isn’t even yesterday’s man now. If he had admitted he made a mistake I would have given him some rexpect, but just doubling down on his failure in leadership is sad, but inevitable given his character "
Blimey |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Give Lionel his due though, as someone has said at least he's loyal even if blinkered and misguided. I bet this time last year there were quite a few on here who were supporting him and couldn't see or ignored the type of man he is and are now knocking him. Hindsight I suppose |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Corbyn is an anti semitic prick but Starmer is no better, he stood alongside him and supported him throughout all the allegations so he is either complicit or just thick. MPs with better judgement and higher principles turned down jobs on the front bench to the detriment of their own careers because they simply couldn't work with Corbyn. And now Starmer tries to come across all high and mighty, he's an opportunistic chancer but he always gets it wrong. He was as much to blame for the election loss as Corbyn over his calls for a second referendum because he thought that was the way the wind was blowing. Wrong. And he won't be forgiven for that. And he thought he was being clever the day he 'took the knee'. Wrong again. He basically lost the next election there
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick'
Margaret Hodge served on Islington Borough Council from 1982 to 1992 and is a Labour MP and has called Corbyn an anti semites and racist. Do you know him better than her?
It is rare we agree, but I agree with you here. Corbyn et al are just being factional to distract from his failure. He isn’t even yesterday’s man now. If he had admitted he made a mistake I would have given him some rexpect, but just doubling down on his failure in leadership is sad, but inevitable given his character "
Love the way people just ignore you when they are proved wrong. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Wasn’t Corbyn the most disloyal labour MP ever, voted against his party over 400 times in 3 Parliaments...!!!!
How was he allowed to keep standing under a manifesto and for a party he continually undermined..?? Bizarre..
Probally because we live in something called a democracy?
He voted against the iraq war..was he wrong?
Think it was a tad more than a war he voted against.
Democracy indeed, the point is disloyalty, if he felt so strongly why did he not form his own party and get elected rather than fraudulently jump on the labour ticket...
So you are saying you are not allowed to disagree with your own party?
Whose quote.....
400 + times is not a disagreement its a fundamental polar opposition to a party under whose banner you were elected..
For a start he has been a politician for nearly 40
During that time the party moved to the centre..corbyn is a socialist.
His constituents dont seem to.bothered as he has a whopping majority.
It's a rather bizarre argument
If you are going to criticise a politician, shouldnt it be on his policies or what he stands for?
For most of it in opposition, so his acts of disloyalty are not a matter of public record as they are in government.
Before policy comes the person, disloyalty is not something I respects in anyone regardless of his policies.
What is bizarre about highlighting somebodies disloyalty on 400+ occasions..??
Your loyalty to someone so disloyal is an admiral quality he lacks...
Disloyalty is the only point I raised...
So what you are saying is..everyone should vote with their party?
Which begs the question..why have 600 odd mps?isnt it rather pointless?
Please don’t keep telling me what I am saying...
I have raised no other argument or opinion other than his disloyalty to his party on 400+ occasions.
Isnt politics about belief and ideals not loyalty?
Before the policy comes the person...
DISLOYAL....
It’s a democracy ( apparently) and that is my opinion..
It is on record Mr Corbyn is the most disloyal MP ever.
"
It's a democracy but you camt disagree with your party. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Wasn’t Corbyn the most disloyal labour MP ever, voted against his party over 400 times in 3 Parliaments...!!!!
How was he allowed to keep standing under a manifesto and for a party he continually undermined..?? Bizarre..
Probally because we live in something called a democracy?
He voted against the iraq war..was he wrong?
Think it was a tad more than a war he voted against.
Democracy indeed, the point is disloyalty, if he felt so strongly why did he not form his own party and get elected rather than fraudulently jump on the labour ticket...
So you are saying you are not allowed to disagree with your own party?
Whose quote.....
400 + times is not a disagreement its a fundamental polar opposition to a party under whose banner you were elected..
For a start he has been a politician for nearly 40
During that time the party moved to the centre..corbyn is a socialist.
His constituents dont seem to.bothered as he has a whopping majority.
It's a rather bizarre argument
If you are going to criticise a politician, shouldnt it be on his policies or what he stands for?
For most of it in opposition, so his acts of disloyalty are not a matter of public record as they are in government.
Before policy comes the person, disloyalty is not something I respects in anyone regardless of his policies.
What is bizarre about highlighting somebodies disloyalty on 400+ occasions..??
Your loyalty to someone so disloyal is an admiral quality he lacks...
Disloyalty is the only point I raised...
So what you are saying is..everyone should vote with their party?
Which begs the question..why have 600 odd mps?isnt it rather pointless?
Please don’t keep telling me what I am saying...
I have raised no other argument or opinion other than his disloyalty to his party on 400+ occasions.
Isnt politics about belief and ideals not loyalty?
Before the policy comes the person...
DISLOYAL....
It’s a democracy ( apparently) and that is my opinion..
It is on record Mr Corbyn is the most disloyal MP ever.
It's a democracy but you camt disagree with your party."
If you think 400 times is a trait of loyalty that is an opinion you are entitled to... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-politics-44875908
The totally impartial Margaret hodge
Did she mention she accused Corbyn of attending an event where holocaust deniers were there,somehow forgetting she was also in attendance? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Wasn’t Corbyn the most disloyal labour MP ever, voted against his party over 400 times in 3 Parliaments...!!!!
How was he allowed to keep standing under a manifesto and for a party he continually undermined..?? Bizarre..
Probally because we live in something called a democracy?
He voted against the iraq war..was he wrong?
Think it was a tad more than a war he voted against.
Democracy indeed, the point is disloyalty, if he felt so strongly why did he not form his own party and get elected rather than fraudulently jump on the labour ticket...
So you are saying you are not allowed to disagree with your own party?
Whose quote.....
400 + times is not a disagreement its a fundamental polar opposition to a party under whose banner you were elected..
For a start he has been a politician for nearly 40
During that time the party moved to the centre..corbyn is a socialist.
His constituents dont seem to.bothered as he has a whopping majority.
It's a rather bizarre argument
If you are going to criticise a politician, shouldnt it be on his policies or what he stands for?
For most of it in opposition, so his acts of disloyalty are not a matter of public record as they are in government.
Before policy comes the person, disloyalty is not something I respects in anyone regardless of his policies.
What is bizarre about highlighting somebodies disloyalty on 400+ occasions..??
Your loyalty to someone so disloyal is an admiral quality he lacks...
Disloyalty is the only point I raised...
So what you are saying is..everyone should vote with their party?
Which begs the question..why have 600 odd mps?isnt it rather pointless?
Please don’t keep telling me what I am saying...
I have raised no other argument or opinion other than his disloyalty to his party on 400+ occasions.
Isnt politics about belief and ideals not loyalty?
Before the policy comes the person...
DISLOYAL....
It’s a democracy ( apparently) and that is my opinion..
It is on record Mr Corbyn is the most disloyal MP ever.
It's a democracy but you camt disagree with your party.
If you think 400 times is a trait of loyalty that is an opinion you are entitled to..."
I wont bother asking about the iraq war again |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Corbyn is an anti semitic prick but Starmer is no better, he stood alongside him and supported him throughout all the allegations so he is either complicit or just thick. MPs with better judgement and higher principles turned down jobs on the front bench to the detriment of their own careers because they simply couldn't work with Corbyn. And now Starmer tries to come across all high and mighty, he's an opportunistic chancer but he always gets it wrong. He was as much to blame for the election loss as Corbyn over his calls for a second referendum because he thought that was the way the wind was blowing. Wrong. And he won't be forgiven for that. And he thought he was being clever the day he 'took the knee'. Wrong again. He basically lost the next election there
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick'
Margaret Hodge served on Islington Borough Council from 1982 to 1992 and is a Labour MP and has called Corbyn an anti semites and racist. Do you know him better than her?
It is rare we agree, but I agree with you here. Corbyn et al are just being factional to distract from his failure. He isn’t even yesterday’s man now. If he had admitted he made a mistake I would have given him some rexpect, but just doubling down on his failure in leadership is sad, but inevitable given his character
Love the way people just ignore you when they are proved wrong."
Do you know Corbyn better than Margaret Hodge?  do you know something about him that she doesn't? After all she's only worked with him for 28 years |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Corbyn is an anti semitic prick but Starmer is no better, he stood alongside him and supported him throughout all the allegations so he is either complicit or just thick. MPs with better judgement and higher principles turned down jobs on the front bench to the detriment of their own careers because they simply couldn't work with Corbyn. And now Starmer tries to come across all high and mighty, he's an opportunistic chancer but he always gets it wrong. He was as much to blame for the election loss as Corbyn over his calls for a second referendum because he thought that was the way the wind was blowing. Wrong. And he won't be forgiven for that. And he thought he was being clever the day he 'took the knee'. Wrong again. He basically lost the next election there
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick'
Margaret Hodge served on Islington Borough Council from 1982 to 1992 and is a Labour MP and has called Corbyn an anti semites and racist. Do you know him better than her?
It is rare we agree, but I agree with you here. Corbyn et al are just being factional to distract from his failure. He isn’t even yesterday’s man now. If he had admitted he made a mistake I would have given him some rexpect, but just doubling down on his failure in leadership is sad, but inevitable given his character
Love the way people just ignore you when they are proved wrong.
Do you know Corbyn better than Margaret Hodge? do you know something about him that she doesn't? After all she's only worked with him for 28 years "
I'm presuming you are unaware of what's actually happened in the labour party? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Wasn’t Corbyn the most disloyal labour MP ever, voted against his party over 400 times in 3 Parliaments...!!!!
How was he allowed to keep standing under a manifesto and for a party he continually undermined..?? Bizarre..
Probally because we live in something called a democracy?
He voted against the iraq war..was he wrong?
Think it was a tad more than a war he voted against.
Democracy indeed, the point is disloyalty, if he felt so strongly why did he not form his own party and get elected rather than fraudulently jump on the labour ticket...
So you are saying you are not allowed to disagree with your own party?
Whose quote.....
400 + times is not a disagreement its a fundamental polar opposition to a party under whose banner you were elected..
For a start he has been a politician for nearly 40
During that time the party moved to the centre..corbyn is a socialist.
His constituents dont seem to.bothered as he has a whopping majority.
It's a rather bizarre argument
If you are going to criticise a politician, shouldnt it be on his policies or what he stands for?
For most of it in opposition, so his acts of disloyalty are not a matter of public record as they are in government.
Before policy comes the person, disloyalty is not something I respects in anyone regardless of his policies.
What is bizarre about highlighting somebodies disloyalty on 400+ occasions..??
Your loyalty to someone so disloyal is an admiral quality he lacks...
Disloyalty is the only point I raised...
So what you are saying is..everyone should vote with their party?
Which begs the question..why have 600 odd mps?isnt it rather pointless?
Please don’t keep telling me what I am saying...
I have raised no other argument or opinion other than his disloyalty to his party on 400+ occasions.
Isnt politics about belief and ideals not loyalty?
Before the policy comes the person...
DISLOYAL....
It’s a democracy ( apparently) and that is my opinion..
It is on record Mr Corbyn is the most disloyal MP ever.
It's a democracy but you camt disagree with your party.
If you think 400 times is a trait of loyalty that is an opinion you are entitled to...
I wont bother asking about the iraq war again "
And I won’t bother stating again that the only point I raised was his spectacular displays of disloyalty.
Not trying to change the subject because I may be right are you..??
No doubt you’ll want the last word
Good night... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Corbyn is an anti semitic prick but Starmer is no better, he stood alongside him and supported him throughout all the allegations so he is either complicit or just thick. MPs with better judgement and higher principles turned down jobs on the front bench to the detriment of their own careers because they simply couldn't work with Corbyn. And now Starmer tries to come across all high and mighty, he's an opportunistic chancer but he always gets it wrong. He was as much to blame for the election loss as Corbyn over his calls for a second referendum because he thought that was the way the wind was blowing. Wrong. And he won't be forgiven for that. And he thought he was being clever the day he 'took the knee'. Wrong again. He basically lost the next election there
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick'
Margaret Hodge served on Islington Borough Council from 1982 to 1992 and is a Labour MP and has called Corbyn an anti semites and racist. Do you know him better than her?
It is rare we agree, but I agree with you here. Corbyn et al are just being factional to distract from his failure. He isn’t even yesterday’s man now. If he had admitted he made a mistake I would have given him some rexpect, but just doubling down on his failure in leadership is sad, but inevitable given his character
Love the way people just ignore you when they are proved wrong.
Do you know Corbyn better than Margaret Hodge? do you know something about him that she doesn't? After all she's only worked with him for 28 years
I'm presuming you are unaware of what's actually happened in the labour party?"
So she is saying these things because she is Jewish? That what you're saying? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Corbyn is an anti semitic prick but Starmer is no better, he stood alongside him and supported him throughout all the allegations so he is either complicit or just thick. MPs with better judgement and higher principles turned down jobs on the front bench to the detriment of their own careers because they simply couldn't work with Corbyn. And now Starmer tries to come across all high and mighty, he's an opportunistic chancer but he always gets it wrong. He was as much to blame for the election loss as Corbyn over his calls for a second referendum because he thought that was the way the wind was blowing. Wrong. And he won't be forgiven for that. And he thought he was being clever the day he 'took the knee'. Wrong again. He basically lost the next election there
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick'
Margaret Hodge served on Islington Borough Council from 1982 to 1992 and is a Labour MP and has called Corbyn an anti semites and racist. Do you know him better than her?
It is rare we agree, but I agree with you here. Corbyn et al are just being factional to distract from his failure. He isn’t even yesterday’s man now. If he had admitted he made a mistake I would have given him some rexpect, but just doubling down on his failure in leadership is sad, but inevitable given his character
Love the way people just ignore you when they are proved wrong.
Do you know Corbyn better than Margaret Hodge? do you know something about him that she doesn't? After all she's only worked with him for 28 years
I'm presuming you are unaware of what's actually happened in the labour party?
So she is saying these things because she is Jewish? That what you're saying? "
I don't know exactly what's gone on between then
I do know that if you Google maragtet hodge/Jeremy Corbyn you get 1 side of the story |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Corbyn is an anti semitic prick but Starmer is no better, he stood alongside him and supported him throughout all the allegations so he is either complicit or just thick. MPs with better judgement and higher principles turned down jobs on the front bench to the detriment of their own careers because they simply couldn't work with Corbyn. And now Starmer tries to come across all high and mighty, he's an opportunistic chancer but he always gets it wrong. He was as much to blame for the election loss as Corbyn over his calls for a second referendum because he thought that was the way the wind was blowing. Wrong. And he won't be forgiven for that. And he thought he was being clever the day he 'took the knee'. Wrong again. He basically lost the next election there
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick'
Margaret Hodge served on Islington Borough Council from 1982 to 1992 and is a Labour MP and has called Corbyn an anti semites and racist. Do you know him better than her?
It is rare we agree, but I agree with you here. Corbyn et al are just being factional to distract from his failure. He isn’t even yesterday’s man now. If he had admitted he made a mistake I would have given him some rexpect, but just doubling down on his failure in leadership is sad, but inevitable given his character
Love the way people just ignore you when they are proved wrong.
Do you know Corbyn better than Margaret Hodge? do you know something about him that she doesn't? After all she's only worked with him for 28 years
I'm presuming you are unaware of what's actually happened in the labour party?
So she is saying these things because she is Jewish? That what you're saying?
I don't know exactly what's gone on between then
I do know that if you Google maragtet hodge/Jeremy Corbyn you get 1 side of the story"
Well maybe because there is only one in the wrong |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Corbyn is an anti semitic prick but Starmer is no better, he stood alongside him and supported him throughout all the allegations so he is either complicit or just thick. MPs with better judgement and higher principles turned down jobs on the front bench to the detriment of their own careers because they simply couldn't work with Corbyn. And now Starmer tries to come across all high and mighty, he's an opportunistic chancer but he always gets it wrong. He was as much to blame for the election loss as Corbyn over his calls for a second referendum because he thought that was the way the wind was blowing. Wrong. And he won't be forgiven for that. And he thought he was being clever the day he 'took the knee'. Wrong again. He basically lost the next election there
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick'
Margaret Hodge served on Islington Borough Council from 1982 to 1992 and is a Labour MP and has called Corbyn an anti semites and racist. Do you know him better than her?
It is rare we agree, but I agree with you here. Corbyn et al are just being factional to distract from his failure. He isn’t even yesterday’s man now. If he had admitted he made a mistake I would have given him some rexpect, but just doubling down on his failure in leadership is sad, but inevitable given his character
Love the way people just ignore you when they are proved wrong.
Do you know Corbyn better than Margaret Hodge? do you know something about him that she doesn't? After all she's only worked with him for 28 years
I'm presuming you are unaware of what's actually happened in the labour party?
So she is saying these things because she is Jewish? That what you're saying?
I don't know exactly what's gone on between then
I do know that if you Google maragtet hodge/Jeremy Corbyn you get 1 side of the story
Well maybe because there is only one in the wrong "
Yeah and I'm sure the woman who publically attacked him and lied about him.is completely impartial.
There are 2 sides to every story.
Corbyn isnt perfect
But if anyone seriously believes he is a pacifist racist terrorist sympathiser you are beyond help. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Corbyn is an anti semitic prick but Starmer is no better, he stood alongside him and supported him throughout all the allegations so he is either complicit or just thick. MPs with better judgement and higher principles turned down jobs on the front bench to the detriment of their own careers because they simply couldn't work with Corbyn. And now Starmer tries to come across all high and mighty, he's an opportunistic chancer but he always gets it wrong. He was as much to blame for the election loss as Corbyn over his calls for a second referendum because he thought that was the way the wind was blowing. Wrong. And he won't be forgiven for that. And he thought he was being clever the day he 'took the knee'. Wrong again. He basically lost the next election there
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick'
Margaret Hodge served on Islington Borough Council from 1982 to 1992 and is a Labour MP and has called Corbyn an anti semites and racist. Do you know him better than her?
It is rare we agree, but I agree with you here. Corbyn et al are just being factional to distract from his failure. He isn’t even yesterday’s man now. If he had admitted he made a mistake I would have given him some rexpect, but just doubling down on his failure in leadership is sad, but inevitable given his character
Love the way people just ignore you when they are proved wrong.
Do you know Corbyn better than Margaret Hodge? do you know something about him that she doesn't? After all she's only worked with him for 28 years
I'm presuming you are unaware of what's actually happened in the labour party?
So she is saying these things because she is Jewish? That what you're saying?
I don't know exactly what's gone on between then
I do know that if you Google maragtet hodge/Jeremy Corbyn you get 1 side of the story
Well maybe because there is only one in the wrong
Yeah and I'm sure the woman who publically attacked him and lied about him.is completely impartial.
There are 2 sides to every story.
Corbyn isnt perfect
But if anyone seriously believes he is a pacifist racist terrorist sympathiser you are beyond help."
Your words again no one else’s.... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Corbyn is an anti semitic prick but Starmer is no better, he stood alongside him and supported him throughout all the allegations so he is either complicit or just thick. MPs with better judgement and higher principles turned down jobs on the front bench to the detriment of their own careers because they simply couldn't work with Corbyn. And now Starmer tries to come across all high and mighty, he's an opportunistic chancer but he always gets it wrong. He was as much to blame for the election loss as Corbyn over his calls for a second referendum because he thought that was the way the wind was blowing. Wrong. And he won't be forgiven for that. And he thought he was being clever the day he 'took the knee'. Wrong again. He basically lost the next election there
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick'
Margaret Hodge served on Islington Borough Council from 1982 to 1992 and is a Labour MP and has called Corbyn an anti semites and racist. Do you know him better than her?
It is rare we agree, but I agree with you here. Corbyn et al are just being factional to distract from his failure. He isn’t even yesterday’s man now. If he had admitted he made a mistake I would have given him some rexpect, but just doubling down on his failure in leadership is sad, but inevitable given his character
Love the way people just ignore you when they are proved wrong.
Do you know Corbyn better than Margaret Hodge? do you know something about him that she doesn't? After all she's only worked with him for 28 years
I'm presuming you are unaware of what's actually happened in the labour party?
So she is saying these things because she is Jewish? That what you're saying?
I don't know exactly what's gone on between then
I do know that if you Google maragtet hodge/Jeremy Corbyn you get 1 side of the story
Well maybe because there is only one in the wrong
Yeah and I'm sure the woman who publically attacked him and lied about him.is completely impartial.
There are 2 sides to every story.
Corbyn isnt perfect
But if anyone seriously believes he is a pacifist racist terrorist sympathiser you are beyond help.
Your words again no one else’s...."
Who's other words would they be? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Just thought you may be misquoting someone else again.... as i didn’t recall seeing anyone suggest he was any of those things in this thread..
He has been called them in the past and more"
Thought I was right.... again.. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Just thought you may be misquoting someone else again.... as i didn’t recall seeing anyone suggest he was any of those things in this thread..
He has been called them in the past and more
Thought I was right.... again.."
What are you in about?
In this thread alone he has been called an 'anti semitic 'prick with references to Irish and Palestinian terrorists. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Corbyn is an anti semitic prick but Starmer is no better, he stood alongside him and supported him throughout all the allegations so he is either complicit or just thick. MPs with better judgement and higher principles turned down jobs on the front bench to the detriment of their own careers because they simply couldn't work with Corbyn. And now Starmer tries to come across all high and mighty, he's an opportunistic chancer but he always gets it wrong. He was as much to blame for the election loss as Corbyn over his calls for a second referendum because he thought that was the way the wind was blowing. Wrong. And he won't be forgiven for that. And he thought he was being clever the day he 'took the knee'. Wrong again. He basically lost the next election there
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick'
Margaret Hodge served on Islington Borough Council from 1982 to 1992 and is a Labour MP and has called Corbyn an anti semites and racist. Do you know him better than her?
It is rare we agree, but I agree with you here. Corbyn et al are just being factional to distract from his failure. He isn’t even yesterday’s man now. If he had admitted he made a mistake I would have given him some rexpect, but just doubling down on his failure in leadership is sad, but inevitable given his character
Love the way people just ignore you when they are proved wrong."
You are so right - Corbyn has failed in his leadership by both allowing & not stopping anti semitism in the Labour Party. So stop having a go at Starmer and look at the focus of the problem. Corbyn failed, the Independent Review reflected that and Starmer agreed to enact all of the recommendations. Corbyn is informed of this before Starmer goes public. Instead of supporting Starmer and endorsing the report, Corbyn tries to belittle the report and minimise his guilty. It is time for Corbyn supporters to wakeup to his failures. It is he that has caused the problems |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"No mention of racist, pacifist or terrorist sympathiser though, again the interpretation you chose to put on peoples words....
That’s what I’m on about."
Anti semitic prick
Gates of Auschwitz
Not racist?
2 links to terrorist organisations.. not terrorist?
Yep I'm done |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Anti Semitic and racism are totally different issues...
Are you suggesting Sinn Fein is a terrorist organisation?
Are you stating Hamas is a terror organisation...?
Again your interpretation.... no one else’s..... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Corbyn is an anti semitic prick but Starmer is no better, he stood alongside him and supported him throughout all the allegations so he is either complicit or just thick. MPs with better judgement and higher principles turned down jobs on the front bench to the detriment of their own careers because they simply couldn't work with Corbyn. And now Starmer tries to come across all high and mighty, he's an opportunistic chancer but he always gets it wrong. He was as much to blame for the election loss as Corbyn over his calls for a second referendum because he thought that was the way the wind was blowing. Wrong. And he won't be forgiven for that. And he thought he was being clever the day he 'took the knee'. Wrong again. He basically lost the next election there
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick'
Margaret Hodge served on Islington Borough Council from 1982 to 1992 and is a Labour MP and has called Corbyn an anti semites and racist. Do you know him better than her?
It is rare we agree, but I agree with you here. Corbyn et al are just being factional to distract from his failure. He isn’t even yesterday’s man now. If he had admitted he made a mistake I would have given him some rexpect, but just doubling down on his failure in leadership is sad, but inevitable given his character
Love the way people just ignore you when they are proved wrong.
You are so right - Corbyn has failed in his leadership by both allowing & not stopping anti semitism in the Labour Party. So stop having a go at Starmer and look at the focus of the problem. Corbyn failed, the Independent Review reflected that and Starmer agreed to enact all of the recommendations. Corbyn is informed of this before Starmer goes public. Instead of supporting Starmer and endorsing the report, Corbyn tries to belittle the report and minimise his guilty. It is time for Corbyn supporters to wakeup to his failures. It is he that has caused the problems "
Perhaps you should have actually read the report.
The report indicated that there should be no political interference in the democratic process.He then proceeds to suspend Corbyn thos breaking the reports findings.
Corbyn said The media exaggerated the issue.
I have provided an example and since you have just ignored it twice, once more ,I'm done. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Anti Semitic and racism are totally different issues...
Are you suggesting Sinn Fein is a terrorist organisation?
Are you stating Hamas is a terror organisation...?
Again your interpretation.... no one else’s....."
These...
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Corbyn is an anti semitic prick but Starmer is no better, he stood alongside him and supported him throughout all the allegations so he is either complicit or just thick. MPs with better judgement and higher principles turned down jobs on the front bench to the detriment of their own careers because they simply couldn't work with Corbyn. And now Starmer tries to come across all high and mighty, he's an opportunistic chancer but he always gets it wrong. He was as much to blame for the election loss as Corbyn over his calls for a second referendum because he thought that was the way the wind was blowing. Wrong. And he won't be forgiven for that. And he thought he was being clever the day he 'took the knee'. Wrong again. He basically lost the next election there
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick'"
why do you defend him let him go Lionel |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ostafun OP Man
over a year ago
near ipswich |
"Corbyn is an anti semitic prick but Starmer is no better, he stood alongside him and supported him throughout all the allegations so he is either complicit or just thick. MPs with better judgement and higher principles turned down jobs on the front bench to the detriment of their own careers because they simply couldn't work with Corbyn. And now Starmer tries to come across all high and mighty, he's an opportunistic chancer but he always gets it wrong. He was as much to blame for the election loss as Corbyn over his calls for a second referendum because he thought that was the way the wind was blowing. Wrong. And he won't be forgiven for that. And he thought he was being clever the day he 'took the knee'. Wrong again. He basically lost the next election there
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick' why do you defend him let him go Lionel "
Its similar to a cult. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Corbyn is an anti semitic prick but Starmer is no better, he stood alongside him and supported him throughout all the allegations so he is either complicit or just thick. MPs with better judgement and higher principles turned down jobs on the front bench to the detriment of their own careers because they simply couldn't work with Corbyn. And now Starmer tries to come across all high and mighty, he's an opportunistic chancer but he always gets it wrong. He was as much to blame for the election loss as Corbyn over his calls for a second referendum because he thought that was the way the wind was blowing. Wrong. And he won't be forgiven for that. And he thought he was being clever the day he 'took the knee'. Wrong again. He basically lost the next election there
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick' why do you defend him let him go Lionel Its similar to a cult. "
You’ve been dying to say that admit it |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Anti Semitic and racism are totally different issues...
Are you suggesting Sinn Fein is a terrorist organisation?
Are you stating Hamas is a terror organisation...?
Again your interpretation.... no one else’s.....
These...
"
I've literally no idea what the fuck you are on about.
Are you saying corbyn.hasmt been called a terrorist sympathiser?
Simple question |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Corbyn is an anti semitic prick but Starmer is no better, he stood alongside him and supported him throughout all the allegations so he is either complicit or just thick. MPs with better judgement and higher principles turned down jobs on the front bench to the detriment of their own careers because they simply couldn't work with Corbyn. And now Starmer tries to come across all high and mighty, he's an opportunistic chancer but he always gets it wrong. He was as much to blame for the election loss as Corbyn over his calls for a second referendum because he thought that was the way the wind was blowing. Wrong. And he won't be forgiven for that. And he thought he was being clever the day he 'took the knee'. Wrong again. He basically lost the next election there
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick' why do you defend him let him go Lionel Its similar to a cult. "
From the person who ismt obsessed with the eu in any way. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ax777Man
over a year ago
Not here |
" blah, blah, blah
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick'"
The total population of Islington is about 240K and from what I can find, the Jewish Population comprises from between 1 and 1.7%, so if every member of the Jewish community lived in Islington North and were old enough to vote, that would be a maximum of about 4000 votes. So your comments are really quite pointless! BTW, Corbin lost over 6000 votes in 2019, so he could well have lost any Jewish vote that he previously held. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ax777Man
over a year ago
Not here |
" blah, blah, blah
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick'
The total population of Islington is about 240K and from what I can find, the Jewish Population comprises from between 1 and 1.7%, so if every member of the Jewish community lived in Islington North and were old enough to vote, that would be a maximum of about 4000 votes. So your comments are really quite pointless! BTW, Corbin lost over 6000 votes in 2019, so he could well have lost any Jewish vote that he previously held."
And I know it’s spelt Corbin but I know it grinds your gears ?? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ax777Man
over a year ago
Not here |
" blah, blah, blah
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick'
The total population of Islington is about 240K and from what I can find, the Jewish Population comprises from between 1 and 1.7%, so if every member of the Jewish community lived in Islington North and were old enough to vote, that would be a maximum of about 4000 votes. So your comments are really quite pointless! BTW, Corbin lost over 6000 votes in 2019, so he could well have lost any Jewish vote that he previously held.
And I know it’s spelt Corbin but I know it grinds your gears ??"
Ah bugger, my spellchecker overruled me ! ?? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *mmabluTV/TS
over a year ago
upton wirral |
"Time they drew a line under Corbyn he just hangs around like a bad smell like his fan boys.
Get some winners.
What do they need to do to win?
Blair won by basically being a Tory. Pointless, in my opinion.
First they should start looking like winners and actually have a bit about them. Corbyn couldn’t even nail his Brexit colours to the mask that dithering about doomed him along with his other dithering.
Kiers a step back toward the centre it’s true but I believe he can do it.
Brown and Miliband were centrists
Were they winners?"
No and niether was Corbyn backing the left is backing losers |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Time they drew a line under Corbyn he just hangs around like a bad smell like his fan boys.
Get some winners.
What do they need to do to win?
Blair won by basically being a Tory. Pointless, in my opinion.
First they should start looking like winners and actually have a bit about them. Corbyn couldn’t even nail his Brexit colours to the mask that dithering about doomed him along with his other dithering.
Kiers a step back toward the centre it’s true but I believe he can do it.
Brown and Miliband were centrists
Were they winners?No and niether was Corbyn backing the left is backing losers"
Didn't you say that Johnson was a leftist before? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
" blah, blah, blah
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick'
The total population of Islington is about 240K and from what I can find, the Jewish Population comprises from between 1 and 1.7%, so if every member of the Jewish community lived in Islington North and were old enough to vote, that would be a maximum of about 4000 votes. So your comments are really quite pointless! BTW, Corbin lost over 6000 votes in 2019, so he could well have lost any Jewish vote that he previously held."
You have researched the jewish population in islington to try and prove he doesnt have much support?
And I'm obsessed?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
" blah, blah, blah
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick'
The total population of Islington is about 240K and from what I can find, the Jewish Population comprises from between 1 and 1.7%, so if every member of the Jewish community lived in Islington North and were old enough to vote, that would be a maximum of about 4000 votes. So your comments are really quite pointless! BTW, Corbin lost over 6000 votes in 2019, so he could well have lost any Jewish vote that he previously held.
You have researched the jewish population in islington to try and prove he doesnt have much support?
And I'm obsessed?
"
lionel forget the old man I’ll be ya man crush instead just don’t get obsessed I’m not popping down to pool to see ya lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ax777Man
over a year ago
Not here |
" blah, blah, blah
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick'
The total population of Islington is about 240K and from what I can find, the Jewish Population comprises from between 1 and 1.7%, so if every member of the Jewish community lived in Islington North and were old enough to vote, that would be a maximum of about 4000 votes. So your comments are really quite pointless! BTW, Corbin lost over 6000 votes in 2019, so he could well have lost any Jewish vote that he previously held.
You have researched the jewish population in islington to try and prove he doesnt have much support?
And I'm obsessed?
"
I’ve never said you were obsessed. It took me about 30 seconds on Islington Councils website. Maybe you should do a little research before spouting bollocks? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
" blah, blah, blah
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick'
The total population of Islington is about 240K and from what I can find, the Jewish Population comprises from between 1 and 1.7%, so if every member of the Jewish community lived in Islington North and were old enough to vote, that would be a maximum of about 4000 votes. So your comments are really quite pointless! BTW, Corbin lost over 6000 votes in 2019, so he could well have lost any Jewish vote that he previously held.
You have researched the jewish population in islington to try and prove he doesnt have much support?
And I'm obsessed?
I’ve never said you were obsessed. It took me about 30 seconds on Islington Councils website. Maybe you should do a little research before spouting bollocks?"
He does that. He sees things that were never there |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
" blah, blah, blah
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick'
The total population of Islington is about 240K and from what I can find, the Jewish Population comprises from between 1 and 1.7%, so if every member of the Jewish community lived in Islington North and were old enough to vote, that would be a maximum of about 4000 votes. So your comments are really quite pointless! BTW, Corbin lost over 6000 votes in 2019, so he could well have lost any Jewish vote that he previously held.
You have researched the jewish population in islington to try and prove he doesnt have much support?
And I'm obsessed?
I’ve never said you were obsessed. It took me about 30 seconds on Islington Councils website. Maybe you should do a little research before spouting bollocks?"
My words
London is an area with a large jewish population
Pray tell what is the 'bollocks 'bit? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ax777Man
over a year ago
Not here |
" blah, blah, blah
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick'
The total population of Islington is about 240K and from what I can find, the Jewish Population comprises from between 1 and 1.7%, so if every member of the Jewish community lived in Islington North and were old enough to vote, that would be a maximum of about 4000 votes. So your comments are really quite pointless! BTW, Corbin lost over 6000 votes in 2019, so he could well have lost any Jewish vote that he previously held.
You have researched the jewish population in islington to try and prove he doesnt have much support?
And I'm obsessed?
I’ve never said you were obsessed. It took me about 30 seconds on Islington Councils website. Maybe you should do a little research before spouting bollocks?
My words
London is an area with a large jewish population
Pray tell what is the 'bollocks 'bit?"
Ha ha ha. Nice try. Still bollocks though |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
" blah, blah, blah
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick'
The total population of Islington is about 240K and from what I can find, the Jewish Population comprises from between 1 and 1.7%, so if every member of the Jewish community lived in Islington North and were old enough to vote, that would be a maximum of about 4000 votes. So your comments are really quite pointless! BTW, Corbin lost over 6000 votes in 2019, so he could well have lost any Jewish vote that he previously held.
You have researched the jewish population in islington to try and prove he doesnt have much support?
And I'm obsessed?
I’ve never said you were obsessed. It took me about 30 seconds on Islington Councils website. Maybe you should do a little research before spouting bollocks?
My words
London is an area with a large jewish population
Pray tell what is the 'bollocks 'bit?
Ha ha ha. Nice try. Still bollocks though "
What repeating back what I exactly said?
The bit which is there in black and white? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ax777Man
over a year ago
Not here |
" blah, blah, blah
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick'
The total population of Islington is about 240K and from what I can find, the Jewish Population comprises from between 1 and 1.7%, so if every member of the Jewish community lived in Islington North and were old enough to vote, that would be a maximum of about 4000 votes. So your comments are really quite pointless! BTW, Corbin lost over 6000 votes in 2019, so he could well have lost any Jewish vote that he previously held.
You have researched the jewish population in islington to try and prove he doesnt have much support?
And I'm obsessed?
I’ve never said you were obsessed. It took me about 30 seconds on Islington Councils website. Maybe you should do a little research before spouting bollocks?
My words
London is an area with a large jewish population
Pray tell what is the 'bollocks 'bit?
Ha ha ha. Nice try. Still bollocks though
What repeating back what I exactly said?
The bit which is there in black and white?"
Keep digging Linus, it’s quite entertaining |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Corbyn is an anti semitic prick but Starmer is no better, he stood alongside him and supported him throughout all the allegations so he is either complicit or just thick. MPs with better judgement and higher principles turned down jobs on the front bench to the detriment of their own careers because they simply couldn't work with Corbyn. And now Starmer tries to come across all high and mighty, he's an opportunistic chancer but he always gets it wrong. He was as much to blame for the election loss as Corbyn over his calls for a second referendum because he thought that was the way the wind was blowing. Wrong. And he won't be forgiven for that. And he thought he was being clever the day he 'took the knee'. Wrong again. He basically lost the next election there
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick'
Margaret Hodge served on Islington Borough Council from 1982 to 1992 and is a Labour MP and has called Corbyn an anti semites and racist. Do you know him better than her?
It is rare we agree, but I agree with you here. Corbyn et al are just being factional to distract from his failure. He isn’t even yesterday’s man now. If he had admitted he made a mistake I would have given him some rexpect, but just doubling down on his failure in leadership is sad, but inevitable given his character
Love the way people just ignore you when they are proved wrong.
You are so right - Corbyn has failed in his leadership by both allowing & not stopping anti semitism in the Labour Party. So stop having a go at Starmer and look at the focus of the problem. Corbyn failed, the Independent Review reflected that and Starmer agreed to enact all of the recommendations. Corbyn is informed of this before Starmer goes public. Instead of supporting Starmer and endorsing the report, Corbyn tries to belittle the report and minimise his guilty. It is time for Corbyn supporters to wakeup to his failures. It is he that has caused the problems
Perhaps you should have actually read the report.
The report indicated that there should be no political interference in the democratic process.He then proceeds to suspend Corbyn thos breaking the reports findings.
Corbyn said The media exaggerated the issue.
I have provided an example and since you have just ignored it twice, once more ,I'm done."
...so Corbyn said Media exaggerated the issue, as opposed to saying the issue should be resolved? He has had so many chances to correct his failures, but still Corbynista’s don’t see his flaws... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Corbyn is an anti semitic prick but Starmer is no better, he stood alongside him and supported him throughout all the allegations so he is either complicit or just thick. MPs with better judgement and higher principles turned down jobs on the front bench to the detriment of their own careers because they simply couldn't work with Corbyn. And now Starmer tries to come across all high and mighty, he's an opportunistic chancer but he always gets it wrong. He was as much to blame for the election loss as Corbyn over his calls for a second referendum because he thought that was the way the wind was blowing. Wrong. And he won't be forgiven for that. And he thought he was being clever the day he 'took the knee'. Wrong again. He basically lost the next election there
He has been an mp in islington in london since 1982.
London is an area with a large Jewish population.
Yet despite this,his constituency have voted him in with a 20,000 majority.
But of course they are all mistaken as you must know him much better as he is an 'an anti semitic prick'
Margaret Hodge served on Islington Borough Council from 1982 to 1992 and is a Labour MP and has called Corbyn an anti semites and racist. Do you know him better than her?
It is rare we agree, but I agree with you here. Corbyn et al are just being factional to distract from his failure. He isn’t even yesterday’s man now. If he had admitted he made a mistake I would have given him some rexpect, but just doubling down on his failure in leadership is sad, but inevitable given his character
Love the way people just ignore you when they are proved wrong.
You are so right - Corbyn has failed in his leadership by both allowing & not stopping anti semitism in the Labour Party. So stop having a go at Starmer and look at the focus of the problem. Corbyn failed, the Independent Review reflected that and Starmer agreed to enact all of the recommendations. Corbyn is informed of this before Starmer goes public. Instead of supporting Starmer and endorsing the report, Corbyn tries to belittle the report and minimise his guilty. It is time for Corbyn supporters to wakeup to his failures. It is he that has caused the problems
Perhaps you should have actually read the report.
The report indicated that there should be no political interference in the democratic process.He then proceeds to suspend Corbyn thos breaking the reports findings.
Corbyn said The media exaggerated the issue.
I have provided an example and since you have just ignored it twice, once more ,I'm done.
...so Corbyn said Media exaggerated the issue, as opposed to saying the issue should be resolved? He has had so many chances to correct his failures, but still Corbynista’s don’t see his flaws... "
Improvements had been made since he took over.
You will find that in the reports findings.
But dont let facts get in.tue way eh? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I have read the report.
The quote Lionel makes regarding political interference in the democratic process refers explicitly to the receipt by the party of a complaint of anti Semitic nature and that no political interference in the investigation of the complaint should take place.
It has jack all to do with the disciplinary processes t
he party are now undertaking re Corbyn and the Labour Party has not therefore breached those guidelines...
That is an example of the bollocks you spout... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I have read the report.
The quote Lionel makes regarding political interference in the democratic process refers explicitly to the receipt by the party of a complaint of anti Semitic nature and that no political interference in the investigation of the complaint should take place.
It has jack all to do with the disciplinary processes t
he party are now undertaking re Corbyn and the Labour Party has not therefore breached those guidelines...
That is an example of the bollocks you spout..."
So why was he reinstated? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I have read the report.
The quote Lionel makes regarding political interference in the democratic process refers explicitly to the receipt by the party of a complaint of anti Semitic nature and that no political interference in the investigation of the complaint should take place.
It has jack all to do with the disciplinary processes t
he party are now undertaking re Corbyn and the Labour Party has not therefore breached those guidelines...
That is an example of the bollocks you spout...
So why was he reinstated?"
Do you think he shouldn’t have been? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Again more bollocks he was re instated by the Labour Party national executive not the parliamentary Labour Party as you stated...
I think you will find the national executive is still weighted in his favour and he has not be re
Instated as a Labour MP
Get your facts right or call a cab... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I have read the report.
The quote Lionel makes regarding political interference in the democratic process refers explicitly to the receipt by the party of a complaint of anti Semitic nature and that no political interference in the investigation of the complaint should take place.
It has jack all to do with the disciplinary processes t
he party are now undertaking re Corbyn and the Labour Party has not therefore breached those guidelines...
That is an example of the bollocks you spout...
So why was he reinstated?
Do you think he shouldn’t have been?"
Well 1st of all the reasons for his suspension weren't particularly clear.
However whilst Corbyn was right about the exaggeration his response wasnt The best.
Starmer later claimed he didnt make the decision to suspend himself..so.its insure who did.
There was a full investigation and the plp decided that the suspension is unwarranted but then starmer decides to withdraw the whip.
It's a fucking mess. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Again more bollocks he was re instated by the Labour Party national executive not the parliamentary Labour Party as you stated...
I think you will find the national executive is still weighted in his favour and he has not be re
Instated as a Labour MP
Get your facts right or call a cab..."
Sorry you are right
It was the plp
How is it weighted in his favour exactly? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Again more bollocks he was re instated by the Labour Party national executive not the parliamentary Labour Party as you stated...
I think you will find the national executive is still weighted in his favour and he has not be re
Instated as a Labour MP
Get your facts right or call a cab..."
The party line is if he is apologised he would be reinstated
Try getting your facts right. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
No the National executive re instated him as a Labour Party member.
The Parliamentry Labour Party has said nothing of the sort....
Get the facts right......
And again you failed to mention the incorrect fact I highlighted about the disciplinary processes..... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"No the National executive re instated him as a Labour Party member.
The Parliamentry Labour Party has said nothing of the sort....
Get the facts right......
And again you failed to mention the incorrect fact I highlighted about the disciplinary processes....."
The inconsistencies of the disciplinary process are highlighted here
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/politics/2020/nov/18/corbyn-row-illustrates-flaws-of-labours-current-disciplinary-process |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Suggest you google national executive and check pro and anti Corbyn numbers...
Bottom line is he’s a loser backed by losers and whatever you think it ain’t gonna change.... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Stop hiding behind process. He was theLeader, it was a screw up on his watch. Since then he has just doubled down on it. If this was BJ you’d be all over it. It is time to accept Corbyn is fallible and their is no point trying to defend the indefensible |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Suggest you google national executive and check pro and anti Corbyn numbers...
Bottom line is he’s a loser backed by losers and whatever you think it ain’t gonna change...."
I'm not even sure what that 1st paragraph means
An argument used by the Donald
Bravo. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
And the flaws in disciplinary procedures in the Labour Party document you direct me to are just that and jack all to do with the anti Semitic report,
Totally different reports about different issues.... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Stop hiding behind process. He was theLeader, it was a screw up on his watch. Since then he has just doubled down on it. If this was BJ you’d be all over it. It is time to accept Corbyn is fallible and their is no point trying to defend the indefensible "
Where did I say he was infallible? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Stop hiding behind process. He was theLeader, it was a screw up on his watch. Since then he has just doubled down on it. If this was BJ you’d be all over it. It is time to accept Corbyn is fallible and their is no point trying to defend the indefensible
Where did I say he was infallible?"
How about accepting he is in the wrong then? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"And the flaws in disciplinary procedures in the Labour Party document you direct me to are just that and jack all to do with the anti Semitic report,
Totally different reports about different issues...."
The article makes a clear comparison with the disciplinary procedure and the report
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Stop hiding behind process. He was theLeader, it was a screw up on his watch. Since then he has just doubled down on it. If this was BJ you’d be all over it. It is time to accept Corbyn is fallible and their is no point trying to defend the indefensible
Where did I say he was infallible?
How about accepting he is in the wrong then? "
Wrong about what? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"And the flaws in disciplinary procedures in the Labour Party document you direct me to are just that and jack all to do with the anti Semitic report,
Totally different reports about different issues....
The article makes a clear comparison with the disciplinary procedure and the report
"
Yes a comparison of political interference but you state the anti semite report was breached... no it wasn’t. The second report merely highlights similar interference..
Get your facts right.. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Stop hiding behind process. He was theLeader, it was a screw up on his watch. Since then he has just doubled down on it. If this was BJ you’d be all over it. It is time to accept Corbyn is fallible and their is no point trying to defend the indefensible
Where did I say he was infallible?
How about accepting he is in the wrong then?
Wrong about what?"
You are sounding a lot like Trump... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Stop hiding behind process. He was theLeader, it was a screw up on his watch. Since then he has just doubled down on it. If this was BJ you’d be all over it. It is time to accept Corbyn is fallible and their is no point trying to defend the indefensible
Where did I say he was infallible?
How about accepting he is in the wrong then?
Wrong about what?
You are sounding a lot like Trump... "
You said accept he was wrong
I simply asked you to point out what about what? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Stop hiding behind process. He was theLeader, it was a screw up on his watch. Since then he has just doubled down on it. If this was BJ you’d be all over it. It is time to accept Corbyn is fallible and their is no point trying to defend the indefensible
Where did I say he was infallible?
How about accepting he is in the wrong then?
Wrong about what?
You are sounding a lot like Trump...
You said accept he was wrong
I simply asked you to point out what about what?"
Letting anti semitism run rife in Labour under his leadership. Ffs how can you not see it!? It shouldn’t need being fed to you on a plate... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Stop hiding behind process. He was theLeader, it was a screw up on his watch. Since then he has just doubled down on it. If this was BJ you’d be all over it. It is time to accept Corbyn is fallible and their is no point trying to defend the indefensible
Where did I say he was infallible?
How about accepting he is in the wrong then?
Wrong about what?
You are sounding a lot like Trump...
You said accept he was wrong
I simply asked you to point out what about what?
Letting anti semitism run rife in Labour under his leadership. Ffs how can you not see it!? It shouldn’t need being fed to you on a plate... "
2 people were expelled
The report found 14,I think borderline cases of anti semitism
That to you is 'run rife? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Read the report man and get your figures right
Everyone is entitled to an opinion but don’t keep spouting it as fact, everything you say is inaccurate... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Stop hiding behind process. He was theLeader, it was a screw up on his watch. Since then he has just doubled down on it. If this was BJ you’d be all over it. It is time to accept Corbyn is fallible and their is no point trying to defend the indefensible
Where did I say he was infallible?
How about accepting he is in the wrong then?
Wrong about what?
You are sounding a lot like Trump...
You said accept he was wrong
I simply asked you to point out what about what?
Letting anti semitism run rife in Labour under his leadership. Ffs how can you not see it!? It shouldn’t need being fed to you on a plate...
2 people were expelled
The report found 14,I think borderline cases of anti semitism
That to you is 'run rife?"
& I imagine you think Trump won in Georgia as well. If it looks like a cow & smells like a cow, 99.99% of times it will be a cow... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Read the report man and get your figures right
Everyone is entitled to an opinion but don’t keep spouting it as fact, everything you say is inaccurate..."
You really do have a bee in your bonnet dont you? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Stop hiding behind process. He was theLeader, it was a screw up on his watch. Since then he has just doubled down on it. If this was BJ you’d be all over it. It is time to accept Corbyn is fallible and their is no point trying to defend the indefensible
Where did I say he was infallible?
How about accepting he is in the wrong then?
Wrong about what?
You are sounding a lot like Trump...
You said accept he was wrong
I simply asked you to point out what about what?
Letting anti semitism run rife in Labour under his leadership. Ffs how can you not see it!? It shouldn’t need being fed to you on a plate...
2 people were expelled
The report found 14,I think borderline cases of anti semitism
That to you is 'run rife?
& I imagine you think Trump won in Georgia as well. If it looks like a cow & smells like a cow, 99.99% of times it will be a cow..."
Answer the question above..its a simple question |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I have only responded to you, you decided to attack my original post about disloyalty...
Yet again you turn facts on their head to your own end,.......
If I’ve got a bee you’ve got a hornets nest.....
#Corbyn is a loser.... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I have only responded to you, you decided to attack my original post about disloyalty...
Yet again you turn facts on their head to your own end,.......
If I’ve got a bee you’ve got a hornets nest.....
#Corbyn is a loser...."
Stinging criticism |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I have only responded to you, you decided to attack my original post about disloyalty...
Yet again you turn facts on their head to your own end,.......
If I’ve got a bee you’ve got a hornets nest.....
#Corbyn is a loser....
Stinging criticism "
If your stung quote facts not opinion as fact.. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I have only responded to you, you decided to attack my original post about disloyalty...
Yet again you turn facts on their head to your own end,.......
If I’ve got a bee you’ve got a hornets nest.....
#Corbyn is a loser....
Stinging criticism
If your stung quote facts not opinion as fact.."
guess he got in the cab after all! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I have only responded to you, you decided to attack my original post about disloyalty...
Yet again you turn facts on their head to your own end,.......
If I’ve got a bee you’ve got a hornets nest.....
#Corbyn is a loser....
Stinging criticism
If your stung quote facts not opinion as fact..
guess he got in the cab after all! "
You are rather weirdly obsessed with me arent you?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Read the report man and get your figures right
Everyone is entitled to an opinion but don’t keep spouting it as fact, everything you say is inaccurate...
never a truer word spoken! "
I think the day I get approval from you is the day I give up tbh |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I have only responded to you, you decided to attack my original post about disloyalty...
Yet again you turn facts on their head to your own end,.......
If I’ve got a bee you’ve got a hornets nest.....
#Corbyn is a loser....
Stinging criticism
If your stung quote facts not opinion as fact..
guess he got in the cab after all!
You are rather weirdly obsessed with me arent you?
"
oh you poor lonely man, have you tried asking for help with your issues? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I have only responded to you, you decided to attack my original post about disloyalty...
Yet again you turn facts on their head to your own end,.......
If I’ve got a bee you’ve got a hornets nest.....
#Corbyn is a loser....
Stinging criticism
If your stung quote facts not opinion as fact..
guess he got in the cab after all!
You are rather weirdly obsessed with me arent you?
oh you poor lonely man, have you tried asking for help with your issues?"
Serously
There are other people on here.
Perhaps try making a contribution rather than stalking men you dont know on an internet forum
Its creeping me out |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Stop hiding behind process. He was theLeader, it was a screw up on his watch. Since then he has just doubled down on it. If this was BJ you’d be all over it. It is time to accept Corbyn is fallible and their is no point trying to defend the indefensible
Where did I say he was infallible?
How about accepting he is in the wrong then?
Wrong about what?
You are sounding a lot like Trump...
You said accept he was wrong
I simply asked you to point out what about what?
Letting anti semitism run rife in Labour under his leadership. Ffs how can you not see it!? It shouldn’t need being fed to you on a plate...
2 people were expelled
The report found 14,I think borderline cases of anti semitism
That to you is 'run rife?
& I imagine you think Trump won in Georgia as well. If it looks like a cow & smells like a cow, 99.99% of times it will be a cow...
Answer the question above..its a simple question "
Answer to question: Anti Semitism was an issue in the Labour Party under Corbyn. It was evident to an observer, it was recognised by the Independent Review and it was denied by Corbyn. He is indefensible. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Stop hiding behind process. He was theLeader, it was a screw up on his watch. Since then he has just doubled down on it. If this was BJ you’d be all over it. It is time to accept Corbyn is fallible and their is no point trying to defend the indefensible
Where did I say he was infallible?
How about accepting he is in the wrong then?
Wrong about what?
You are sounding a lot like Trump...
You said accept he was wrong
I simply asked you to point out what about what?
Letting anti semitism run rife in Labour under his leadership. Ffs how can you not see it!? It shouldn’t need being fed to you on a plate...
2 people were expelled
The report found 14,I think borderline cases of anti semitism
That to you is 'run rife?
& I imagine you think Trump won in Georgia as well. If it looks like a cow & smells like a cow, 99.99% of times it will be a cow...
Answer the question above..its a simple question
Answer to question: Anti Semitism was an issue in the Labour Party under Corbyn. It was evident to an observer, it was recognised by the Independent Review and it was denied by Corbyn. He is indefensible."
Please give me a quote where Corbyn specifically denied the existence of anti semitism |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Stop hiding behind process. He was theLeader, it was a screw up on his watch. Since then he has just doubled down on it. If this was BJ you’d be all over it. It is time to accept Corbyn is fallible and their is no point trying to defend the indefensible
Where did I say he was infallible?
How about accepting he is in the wrong then?
Wrong about what?
You are sounding a lot like Trump...
You said accept he was wrong
I simply asked you to point out what about what?
Letting anti semitism run rife in Labour under his leadership. Ffs how can you not see it!? It shouldn’t need being fed to you on a plate...
2 people were expelled
The report found 14,I think borderline cases of anti semitism
That to you is 'run rife?
& I imagine you think Trump won in Georgia as well. If it looks like a cow & smells like a cow, 99.99% of times it will be a cow...
Answer the question above..its a simple question
Answer to question: Anti Semitism was an issue in the Labour Party under Corbyn. It was evident to an observer, it was recognised by the Independent Review and it was denied by Corbyn. He is indefensible."
totally agree |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Stop hiding behind process. He was theLeader, it was a screw up on his watch. Since then he has just doubled down on it. If this was BJ you’d be all over it. It is time to accept Corbyn is fallible and their is no point trying to defend the indefensible
Where did I say he was infallible?
How about accepting he is in the wrong then?
Wrong about what?
You are sounding a lot like Trump...
You said accept he was wrong
I simply asked you to point out what about what?
Letting anti semitism run rife in Labour under his leadership. Ffs how can you not see it!? It shouldn’t need being fed to you on a plate...
2 people were expelled
The report found 14,I think borderline cases of anti semitism
That to you is 'run rife?
& I imagine you think Trump won in Georgia as well. If it looks like a cow & smells like a cow, 99.99% of times it will be a cow...
Answer the question above..its a simple question
Answer to question: Anti Semitism was an issue in the Labour Party under Corbyn. It was evident to an observer, it was recognised by the Independent Review and it was denied by Corbyn. He is indefensible.
Please give me a quote where Corbyn specifically denied the existence of anti semitism "
You are so blind on this issue. You know he never admitted its existence. He failed on this issue big time |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Stop hiding behind process. He was theLeader, it was a screw up on his watch. Since then he has just doubled down on it. If this was BJ you’d be all over it. It is time to accept Corbyn is fallible and their is no point trying to defend the indefensible
Where did I say he was infallible?
How about accepting he is in the wrong then?
Wrong about what?
You are sounding a lot like Trump...
You said accept he was wrong
I simply asked you to point out what about what?
Letting anti semitism run rife in Labour under his leadership. Ffs how can you not see it!? It shouldn’t need being fed to you on a plate...
2 people were expelled
The report found 14,I think borderline cases of anti semitism
That to you is 'run rife?
& I imagine you think Trump won in Georgia as well. If it looks like a cow & smells like a cow, 99.99% of times it will be a cow...
Answer the question above..its a simple question
Answer to question: Anti Semitism was an issue in the Labour Party under Corbyn. It was evident to an observer, it was recognised by the Independent Review and it was denied by Corbyn. He is indefensible.
Please give me a quote where Corbyn specifically denied the existence of anti semitism
You are so blind on this issue. You know he never admitted its existence. He failed on this issue big time "
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/jeremy-corbyn-labour-party-antisemitism-jewish-people-ihra-margaret-hodge-row-israel-a8476711.html%3famp |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Stop hiding behind process. He was theLeader, it was a screw up on his watch. Since then he has just doubled down on it. If this was BJ you’d be all over it. It is time to accept Corbyn is fallible and their is no point trying to defend the indefensible
Where did I say he was infallible?
How about accepting he is in the wrong then?
Wrong about what?
You are sounding a lot like Trump...
You said accept he was wrong
I simply asked you to point out what about what?
Letting anti semitism run rife in Labour under his leadership. Ffs how can you not see it!? It shouldn’t need being fed to you on a plate...
2 people were expelled
The report found 14,I think borderline cases of anti semitism
That to you is 'run rife?
& I imagine you think Trump won in Georgia as well. If it looks like a cow & smells like a cow, 99.99% of times it will be a cow...
Answer the question above..its a simple question
Answer to question: Anti Semitism was an issue in the Labour Party under Corbyn. It was evident to an observer, it was recognised by the Independent Review and it was denied by Corbyn. He is indefensible.
Please give me a quote where Corbyn specifically denied the existence of anti semitism
You are so blind on this issue. You know he never admitted its existence. He failed on this issue big time
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/jeremy-corbyn-labour-party-antisemitism-jewish-people-ihra-margaret-hodge-row-israel-a8476711.html%3famp"
As we know from his action, he did not follow through on his words. Starmer is matching his words with actions. Corbyn is yesterdays man who has let the Tory’s get away with potentially destroying the integrity of the UK. He has no legacy worth protecting, let alone remembering. He failed his Party, he failed Jewish Labour, he failed all of Labour. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Stop hiding behind process. He was theLeader, it was a screw up on his watch. Since then he has just doubled down on it. If this was BJ you’d be all over it. It is time to accept Corbyn is fallible and their is no point trying to defend the indefensible
Where did I say he was infallible?
How about accepting he is in the wrong then?
Wrong about what?
You are sounding a lot like Trump...
You said accept he was wrong
I simply asked you to point out what about what?
Letting anti semitism run rife in Labour under his leadership. Ffs how can you not see it!? It shouldn’t need being fed to you on a plate...
2 people were expelled
The report found 14,I think borderline cases of anti semitism
That to you is 'run rife?
& I imagine you think Trump won in Georgia as well. If it looks like a cow & smells like a cow, 99.99% of times it will be a cow...
Answer the question above..its a simple question
Answer to question: Anti Semitism was an issue in the Labour Party under Corbyn. It was evident to an observer, it was recognised by the Independent Review and it was denied by Corbyn. He is indefensible.
Please give me a quote where Corbyn specifically denied the existence of anti semitism
You are so blind on this issue. You know he never admitted its existence. He failed on this issue big time
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/jeremy-corbyn-labour-party-antisemitism-jewish-people-ihra-margaret-hodge-row-israel-a8476711.html%3famp
As we know from his action, he did not follow through on his words. Starmer is matching his words with actions. Corbyn is yesterdays man who has let the Tory’s get away with potentially destroying the integrity of the UK. He has no legacy worth protecting, let alone remembering. He failed his Party, he failed Jewish Labour, he failed all of Labour."
You literally just said he denied its existence
I provided a link disproving this statement.
I'm presuming you are aware who was corbyn invited The report to be done. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
You highlighting someone providing an inaccurate statement....
Classic, absolute classic, the master of the art.
#Corrbyn is a loser ...
Get back in your cab... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
There is no party in the UK that appeals to progression. Not anymore. I hope it will change. But it seems faaaaar away from now. Some light at the end of the tunnel surely. This way of politics/life is not sustainable.
These forums are cancer, really really terrible. I would say worse than Facebook. So many boomers. It's sad. Opinions are irrelevant, facts and actions are relevant. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"There is no party in the UK that appeals to progression. Not anymore. I hope it will change. But it seems faaaaar away from now. Some light at the end of the tunnel surely. This way of politics/life is not sustainable.
These forums are cancer, really really terrible. I would say worse than Facebook. So many boomers. It's sad. Opinions are irrelevant, facts and actions are relevant. "
It depends what you mean by progression.
The political system we have here is archaic..look at that utterly ridiculous charade at parliament. Its playground stuff.
The whole system needs resetting.. everything..The lords,peereges,advisory positions etc etc. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"There is no party in the UK that appeals to progression. Not anymore. I hope it will change. But it seems faaaaar away from now. Some light at the end of the tunnel surely. This way of politics/life is not sustainable.
These forums are cancer, really really terrible. I would say worse than Facebook. So many boomers. It's sad. Opinions are irrelevant, facts and actions are relevant. "
It’s sad opinions are irrelevant ....
Like the ones you give throughout your post you mean...??? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
