FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Lest we forget 21/11/20

Lest we forget 21/11/20

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By *aid back OP   Man  over a year ago

by a lake with my rod out

21st of November 1920 the British army opened fire on spectators at a football match in Dublin killing adults and children.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-54908852

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *aid back OP   Man  over a year ago

by a lake with my rod out

Some of those killed had served in ww1 in the British army.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *eddy and legsCouple  over a year ago

the wetlands

And I'm sure you'll join in remembering the thousands of civilians callously murdered by the IRA

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *exy7Man  over a year ago

Bristol

Exactly why I wear a white poppy and not a red poppy.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

The first 2 killed were an 10 and 12 year old who were shot on a wall watching the game

One was a player shot while playing the game his name was Micheal Hogan

Another was shot whilst kneeling giving the act of contrition to a dying Hogan

Another was shot whilst helping people to get over a wall,he was ex British Army and wearing his service jacket

Nearly all were shot in the back

The oldest was 55

Over a 100 were injured and 14 were innocent civilians were murdered whilst watching a Gaelic Football game

No-one was ever investigated or convicted of any crime by the British Authorities

We remember them all this weekend in Ireland

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *eddy and legsCouple  over a year ago

the wetlands


"The first 2 killed were an 10 and 12 year old who were shot on a wall watching the game

One was a player shot while playing the game his name was Micheal Hogan

Another was shot whilst kneeling giving the act of contrition to a dying Hogan

Another was shot whilst helping people to get over a wall,he was ex British Army and wearing his service jacket

Nearly all were shot in the back

The oldest was 55

Over a 100 were injured and 14 were innocent civilians were murdered whilst watching a Gaelic Football game

No-one was ever investigated or convicted of any crime by the British Authorities

We remember them all this weekend in Ireland

"

The innocent slaughtered by the IRA didn't even get a chance to run and be shot in the back.

Please condemn that too

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 21/11/20 11:32:09]

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ercuryMan  over a year ago

Grantham

There were 14 people murdered by the IRA in Dublin earlier that day.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"The first 2 killed were an 10 and 12 year old who were shot on a wall watching the game

One was a player shot while playing the game his name was Micheal Hogan

Another was shot whilst kneeling giving the act of contrition to a dying Hogan

Another was shot whilst helping people to get over a wall,he was ex British Army and wearing his service jacket

Nearly all were shot in the back

The oldest was 55

Over a 100 were injured and 14 were innocent civilians were murdered whilst watching a Gaelic Football game

No-one was ever investigated or convicted of any crime by the British Authorities

We remember them all this weekend in Ireland

The innocent slaughtered by the IRA didn't even get a chance to run and be shot in the back.

Please condemn that too "

The fact that you are blind to the atrocities carried out by the British in Ireland says a lot about you

We will be commentating this event in Ireland regardless of your ilk

I won’t be addressing any more comments from you

What about away all you want

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple  over a year ago

in Lancashire

It was part of a time when as with any internal civil war there were wrongs committed on all sides and like any historical hindsight it should be looked at in the whole..

The peace there is now in all of the counties of the island notwithstanding the minorities intent on furthering more division is not to be taken for granted..

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ichael McCarthyMan  over a year ago

Lucan

[Removed by poster at 21/11/20 11:54:16]

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ichael McCarthyMan  over a year ago

Lucan


"It was part of a time when as with any internal civil war there were wrongs committed on all sides and like any historical hindsight it should be looked at in the whole..

The peace there is now in all of the counties of the island notwithstanding the minorities intent on furthering more division is not to be taken for granted.."

Sorry, what? How was it "an internal civil war"?

It was a war fought between Irish people, the vast majority of whom had voted for SF in the election of 1918 and for their policy of forming an independent Republic, and the British army of occupation who were there to suppress the democratic wishes of the Irish people.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ichael McCarthyMan  over a year ago

Lucan


"There were 14 people murdered by the IRA in Dublin earlier that day. "

How does the British military deal with spies in wartime?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple  over a year ago

in Lancashire


"It was part of a time when as with any internal civil war there were wrongs committed on all sides and like any historical hindsight it should be looked at in the whole..

The peace there is now in all of the counties of the island notwithstanding the minorities intent on furthering more division is not to be taken for granted..

Sorry, what? How was it "an internal civil war"?

It was a war fought between Irish people, the vast majority of whom had voted for SF in the election of 1918 and for their policy of forming an independent Republic, and the British army of occupation who were there to suppress the democratic wishes of the Irish people. "

Good point, my use of the word internal wasn't intended to deny the involvement of the British government on one side of the war..

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ichael McCarthyMan  over a year ago

Lucan


"It was part of a time when as with any internal civil war there were wrongs committed on all sides and like any historical hindsight it should be looked at in the whole..

The peace there is now in all of the counties of the island notwithstanding the minorities intent on furthering more division is not to be taken for granted..

Sorry, what? How was it "an internal civil war"?

It was a war fought between Irish people, the vast majority of whom had voted for SF in the election of 1918 and for their policy of forming an independent Republic, and the British army of occupation who were there to suppress the democratic wishes of the Irish people.

Good point, my use of the word internal wasn't intended to deny the involvement of the British government on one side of the war..

"

Both internal and civil were incorrect in the context of the time. Wars are not pretty though and that's fair enough.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple  over a year ago

in Lancashire


"It was part of a time when as with any internal civil war there were wrongs committed on all sides and like any historical hindsight it should be looked at in the whole..

The peace there is now in all of the counties of the island notwithstanding the minorities intent on furthering more division is not to be taken for granted..

Sorry, what? How was it "an internal civil war"?

It was a war fought between Irish people, the vast majority of whom had voted for SF in the election of 1918 and for their policy of forming an independent Republic, and the British army of occupation who were there to suppress the democratic wishes of the Irish people.

Good point, my use of the word internal wasn't intended to deny the involvement of the British government on one side of the war..

Both internal and civil were incorrect in the context of the time. Wars are not pretty though and that's fair enough. "

Agreed..

As with many such things some people on all sides will use the cause to settle scores and further their own personal aims..

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *exy7Man  over a year ago

Bristol

[Removed by poster at 21/11/20 12:12:33]

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *exy7Man  over a year ago

Bristol

I knew it would kick off here.

Instead of beating around the bush, call the troubles and all the conflicts between the two sides the way it should be called: a war. And once you call it a war, everything falls into place.

End of.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ovebjsMan  over a year ago

Bristol

What about the disappeared ? You know the ones who were dragged out of their beds in the night taken away beaten half to death and then shot and got rid of ?

What about the explosions that killed and maimed in the name of self appointed toy soldiers

1920 how far do you want to keep on going back ? How about them Romans eh!

It’s about time everyone stopped living in the past and started concentrating on the future.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple  over a year ago

in Lancashire


"What about the disappeared ? You know the ones who were dragged out of their beds in the night taken away beaten half to death and then shot and got rid of ?

What about the explosions that killed and maimed in the name of self appointed toy soldiers

1920 how far do you want to keep on going back ? How about them Romans eh!

It’s about time everyone stopped living in the past and started concentrating on the future.

"

We either learn the mistakes of the past or we just keep on making them..

Acknowledgments of the wrongs done is a far better position to be in than just shrugging shoulders and saying oh well..

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ovebjsMan  over a year ago

Bristol


"What about the disappeared ? You know the ones who were dragged out of their beds in the night taken away beaten half to death and then shot and got rid of ?

What about the explosions that killed and maimed in the name of self appointed toy soldiers

1920 how far do you want to keep on going back ? How about them Romans eh!

It’s about time everyone stopped living in the past and started concentrating on the future.

We either learn the mistakes of the past or we just keep on making them..

Acknowledgments of the wrongs done is a far better position to be in than just shrugging shoulders and saying oh well..

"

Problem is there are a lot that will never learn

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ichael McCarthyMan  over a year ago

Lucan


"What about the disappeared ? You know the ones who were dragged out of their beds in the night taken away beaten half to death and then shot and got rid of ?

What about the explosions that killed and maimed in the name of self appointed toy soldiers

1920 how far do you want to keep on going back ? How about them Romans eh!

It’s about time everyone stopped living in the past and started concentrating on the future.

"

The Romans didn't invade Ireland.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ichael McCarthyMan  over a year ago

Lucan


"What about the disappeared ? You know the ones who were dragged out of their beds in the night taken away beaten half to death and then shot and got rid of ?

What about the explosions that killed and maimed in the name of self appointed toy soldiers

1920 how far do you want to keep on going back ? How about them Romans eh!

It’s about time everyone stopped living in the past and started concentrating on the future.

We either learn the mistakes of the past or we just keep on making them..

Acknowledgments of the wrongs done is a far better position to be in than just shrugging shoulders and saying oh well..

Problem is there are a lot that will never learn "

British governments being chief among them.

In the period we're talking about here they suppressed democracy leading to war breaking out.

In later years they put down a peaceful campaign for civil rights which led to what we now call "the troubles".

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 21/11/20 13:06:27]

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple  over a year ago

in Lancashire


"What about the disappeared ? You know the ones who were dragged out of their beds in the night taken away beaten half to death and then shot and got rid of ?

What about the explosions that killed and maimed in the name of self appointed toy soldiers

1920 how far do you want to keep on going back ? How about them Romans eh!

It’s about time everyone stopped living in the past and started concentrating on the future.

We either learn the mistakes of the past or we just keep on making them..

Acknowledgments of the wrongs done is a far better position to be in than just shrugging shoulders and saying oh well..

Problem is there are a lot that will never learn

British governments being chief among them.

In the period we're talking about here they suppressed democracy leading to war breaking out.

In later years they put down a peaceful campaign for civil rights which led to what we now call "the troubles". "

Am fully aware having served there that there were many wrongs done on all sides, it was a knock on from other post war interferences in other countries and the phrase 'dirty' does not do it justice..

It won't come clear, not in our lifetimes just how dirty it was..

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"What about the disappeared ? You know the ones who were dragged out of their beds in the night taken away beaten half to death and then shot and got rid of ?

What about the explosions that killed and maimed in the name of self appointed toy soldiers

1920 how far do you want to keep on going back ? How about them Romans eh!

It’s about time everyone stopped living in the past and started concentrating on the future.

"

“1920,how far do you want to keep on going back”

So no British Remembrance Sunday then next year?

Or mention of the Somme?

Well done on starting your first 2 sentences with what about

We can discuss the disappeared if you want

There’s the Centenary this week of the priest taken in the middle of the night by the British army and murdered

Or

The 2 innocent farm laborers,brothers who were taken also taken by the British army

Tortured

Burnt alive

And then shot and dumped

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ovebjsMan  over a year ago

Bristol


"What about the disappeared ? You know the ones who were dragged out of their beds in the night taken away beaten half to death and then shot and got rid of ?

What about the explosions that killed and maimed in the name of self appointed toy soldiers

1920 how far do you want to keep on going back ? How about them Romans eh!

It’s about time everyone stopped living in the past and started concentrating on the future.

“1920,how far do you want to keep on going back”

So no British Remembrance Sunday then next year?

Or mention of the Somme?

Well done on starting your first 2 sentences with what about

We can discuss the disappeared if you want

There’s the Centenary this week of the priest taken in the middle of the night by the British army and murdered

Or

The 2 innocent farm laborers,brothers who were taken also taken by the British army

Tortured

Burnt alive

And then shot and dumped

"

Again a 100 year’s ago but there are some who will never progress and look ahead.

Yes there were major problems but then look throughout history people have done unspeakable things but a lot of people have grown and moved on it’s just a small minority who want to keep re emerging the old ways.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *oggoneMan  over a year ago

Derry


"There were 14 people murdered by the IRA in Dublin earlier that day. "

Lies of omission are still lies. The 14 you refer to were assassins, no different from those that Saudi Arabia sent to Turkey to kill a journalist they didn't like, or the pair of assassins that Putin sent to Salisbury.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ercuryMan  over a year ago

Grantham


"There were 14 people murdered by the IRA in Dublin earlier that day.

Lies of omission are still lies. The 14 you refer to were assassins, no different from those that Saudi Arabia sent to Turkey to kill a journalist they didn't like, or the pair of assassins that Putin sent to Salisbury."

2 if the murdered were civilians, 2 were auxiliary soldiers and 1 was a policeman.

If you feel the need to tell lies to reinforce a viewpoint, then thats down to you, and no one else.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *oggoneMan  over a year ago

Derry


"There were 14 people murdered by the IRA in Dublin earlier that day.

Lies of omission are still lies. The 14 you refer to were assassins, no different from those that Saudi Arabia sent to Turkey to kill a journalist they didn't like, or the pair of assassins that Putin sent to Salisbury.

2 if the murdered were civilians, 2 were auxiliary soldiers and 1 was a policeman.

If you feel the need to tell lies to reinforce a viewpoint, then thats down to you, and no one else. "

So you knew they weren't civilians and omitted to say.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *eddy and legsCouple  over a year ago

the wetlands


"The first 2 killed were an 10 and 12 year old who were shot on a wall watching the game

One was a player shot while playing the game his name was Micheal Hogan

Another was shot whilst kneeling giving the act of contrition to a dying Hogan

Another was shot whilst helping people to get over a wall,he was ex British Army and wearing his service jacket

Nearly all were shot in the back

The oldest was 55

Over a 100 were injured and 14 were innocent civilians were murdered whilst watching a Gaelic Football game

No-one was ever investigated or convicted of any crime by the British Authorities

We remember them all this weekend in Ireland

The innocent slaughtered by the IRA didn't even get a chance to run and be shot in the back.

Please condemn that too

The fact that you are blind to the atrocities carried out by the British in Ireland says a lot about you

We will be commentating this event in Ireland regardless of your ilk

I won’t be addressing any more comments from you

What about away all you want "

I have no issues with you commemorating anything you see fit and for the record I completely condemn any atrocities committed by any party on the island of Ireland or anywhere else be it British, IRA or any of the unionist paramilitaries.

Shame you can only offer selective condemnation.

I neither expect or need a reply.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *exy couple128Couple  over a year ago

Scarborough

Just shows violence at football matches is nothing new!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *eddy and legsCouple  over a year ago

the wetlands

And the same 4 provincial finalists as 100 years ago ...

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ust RachelTV/TS  over a year ago

Horsham

What about Johnathan Ball & Tim Parry, a 3 year old and 12 year old that got murdered in Warrington.

Lets not forget the 6 children and a pregnant woman who was carry twins, that got killed by the IRA in Omagh.

Will you be remembering those souls as well?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 24/11/20 03:00:38]

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"What about Johnathan Ball & Tim Parry, a 3 year old and 12 year old that got murdered in Warrington.

Will you be remembering those souls as well?"

You do know what Colin Parry has done dont you ?

The lengths he went to after his son was killed ?

the foundation for Peace

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/dad-warrington-bomb-victim-reacts-12772105.amp

Have a look there is a photo of Martin McGuinnes

At the Peace Centre with Colin Parry.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ovebjsMan  over a year ago

Bristol


"What about Johnathan Ball & Tim Parry, a 3 year old and 12 year old that got murdered in Warrington.

Will you be remembering those souls as well?

You do know what Colin Parry has done dont you ?

The lengths he went to after his son was killed ?

the foundation for Peace

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/dad-warrington-bomb-victim-reacts-12772105.amp

Have a look there is a photo of Martin McGuinnes

At the Peace Centre with Colin Parry.

"

Martin McGuinnes Literally got away with Murder! and even got a free pass to get on with his life along with that scumbag Gerry Adams!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"What about Johnathan Ball & Tim Parry, a 3 year old and 12 year old that got murdered in Warrington.

Lets not forget the 6 children and a pregnant woman who was carry twins, that got killed by the IRA in Omagh.

Will you be remembering those souls as well?"

Acknowledge the terrible wrongs the British did in Ireland without resorting to whataboutery

There’s a good lad

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ichael McCarthyMan  over a year ago

Lucan


"What about Johnathan Ball & Tim Parry, a 3 year old and 12 year old that got murdered in Warrington.

Lets not forget the 6 children and a pregnant woman who was carry twins, that got killed by the IRA in Omagh.

Will you be remembering those souls as well?"

On their anniversaries, yes.

On the anniversary of the murders in Croke Park we remembered the 14 people murdered by British forces in Croke Park.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *hilledOutGuy1Man  over a year ago

Not far away


"21st of November 1920 the British army opened fire on spectators at a football match in Dublin killing adults and children.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-54908852"

what was the score at the time?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *eddy and legsCouple  over a year ago

the wetlands


"What about Johnathan Ball & Tim Parry, a 3 year old and 12 year old that got murdered in Warrington.

Lets not forget the 6 children and a pregnant woman who was carry twins, that got killed by the IRA in Omagh.

Will you be remembering those souls as well?

On their anniversaries, yes.

On the anniversary of the murders in Croke Park we remembered the 14 people murdered by British forces in Croke Park. "

Strangely I don't recall anything here about the remembrance Sunday massacre of 12 people, the anniversary was earlier this month.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ichael McCarthyMan  over a year ago

Lucan


"What about Johnathan Ball & Tim Parry, a 3 year old and 12 year old that got murdered in Warrington.

Lets not forget the 6 children and a pregnant woman who was carry twins, that got killed by the IRA in Omagh.

Will you be remembering those souls as well?

On their anniversaries, yes.

On the anniversary of the murders in Croke Park we remembered the 14 people murdered by British forces in Croke Park.

Strangely I don't recall anything here about the remembrance Sunday massacre of 12 people, the anniversary was earlier this month."

You obviously weren't particularly interested in remembering them or you'd have posted something yourself about it.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple  over a year ago

in Lancashire


"What about Johnathan Ball & Tim Parry, a 3 year old and 12 year old that got murdered in Warrington.

Lets not forget the 6 children and a pregnant woman who was carry twins, that got killed by the IRA in Omagh.

Will you be remembering those souls as well?

Acknowledge the terrible wrongs the British did in Ireland without resorting to whataboutery

There’s a good lad "

It's not whataboutery to accept and acknowledge that wrongs were done on all sides..

If we are ever to move forward and learn the lessons that revenge and counter revenge are not the way forward that is..

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"What about Johnathan Ball & Tim Parry, a 3 year old and 12 year old that got murdered in Warrington.

Lets not forget the 6 children and a pregnant woman who was carry twins, that got killed by the IRA in Omagh.

Will you be remembering those souls as well?

Acknowledge the terrible wrongs the British did in Ireland without resorting to whataboutery

There’s a good lad

It's not whataboutery to accept and acknowledge that wrongs were done on all sides..

If we are ever to move forward and learn the lessons that revenge and counter revenge are not the way forward that is..

"

But you didn’t acknowledge what happened in Croke Park

What about was the first word you typed

But then again

Your not on your own there

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple  over a year ago

in Lancashire


"What about Johnathan Ball & Tim Parry, a 3 year old and 12 year old that got murdered in Warrington.

Lets not forget the 6 children and a pregnant woman who was carry twins, that got killed by the IRA in Omagh.

Will you be remembering those souls as well?

Acknowledge the terrible wrongs the British did in Ireland without resorting to whataboutery

There’s a good lad

It's not whataboutery to accept and acknowledge that wrongs were done on all sides..

If we are ever to move forward and learn the lessons that revenge and counter revenge are not the way forward that is..

But you didn’t acknowledge what happened in Croke Park

What about was the first word you typed

But then again

Your not on your own there "

You've got the wrong person re croke park..

On record as stating all wrongs are just that, trying to out trump someone on whose wrong was worse is pointless..

As I said if we are to move forward..

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"21st of November 1920 the British army opened fire on spectators at a football match in Dublin killing adults and children.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-54908852"

Thanks for posting op..I never knew about that.

As had been mentioned before there were atrocities committed by both sides.

Presumably the whataboutery posters mourn the German losses aswell on remembrance day.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"21st of November 1920 the British army opened fire on spectators at a football match in Dublin killing adults and children.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-54908852

what was the score at the time?"

Side splitting

Presumably you crack 'jokes' when we have a terrorist attack here?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *eddy and legsCouple  over a year ago

the wetlands


"What about Johnathan Ball & Tim Parry, a 3 year old and 12 year old that got murdered in Warrington.

Lets not forget the 6 children and a pregnant woman who was carry twins, that got killed by the IRA in Omagh.

Will you be remembering those souls as well?

On their anniversaries, yes.

On the anniversary of the murders in Croke Park we remembered the 14 people murdered by British forces in Croke Park.

Strangely I don't recall anything here about the remembrance Sunday massacre of 12 people, the anniversary was earlier this month.

You obviously weren't particularly interested in remembering them or you'd have posted something yourself about it. "

I did, in an appropriate way, in a appriate place not one where I felt it would be poking a stick at people. and certainly not on a swinger forum.

I suppose we all have different interpretations of respectful remembrance.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *hilledOutGuy1Man  over a year ago

Not far away


"21st of November 1920 the British army opened fire on spectators at a football match in Dublin killing adults and children.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-54908852

what was the score at the time?

Side splitting

Presumably you crack 'jokes' when we have a terrorist attack here?

"

you can presume whatever you want big boy

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ud and BryanCouple  over a year ago

Boston, Lincolnshire


"

As had been mentioned before there were atrocities committed by both sides.

Presumably the whataboutery posters mourn the German losses aswell on remembrance day."

As it happens, yes, some of us do mourn the axis losses as well as the allied ones - after all, most of the Germans killed had no choice, much like many of ours guys.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"

As had been mentioned before there were atrocities committed by both sides.

Presumably the whataboutery posters mourn the German losses aswell on remembrance day.

As it happens, yes, some of us do mourn the axis losses as well as the allied ones - after all, most of the Germans killed had no choice, much like many of ours guys."

I bet not many do though.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"What about Johnathan Ball & Tim Parry, a 3 year old and 12 year old that got murdered in Warrington.

Will you be remembering those souls as well?

You do know what Colin Parry has done dont you ?

The lengths he went to after his son was killed ?

the foundation for Peace

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/dad-warrington-bomb-victim-reacts-12772105.amp

Have a look there is a photo of Martin McGuinnes

At the Peace Centre with Colin Parry.

Martin McGuinnes Literally got away with Murder! and even got a free pass to get on with his life along with that scumbag Gerry Adams!"

Both Elected to governments .

Can we therefore say the same ahout Churchill

For his wanton Starvation to the death

of a Million+ innocents in India in the 1940's ?

As Colin Parry said on the death of Martin McGuiness

I cant forgive him , but he was Sincere about making peace.

I remember when Blair apologised for the treatment of Irish people by the Uk becuase of what happened between

1845-1849 , the British press & many knuckle draggers

Slaughterd him with , How dare he apologise to them .

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ust RachelTV/TS  over a year ago

Horsham


"What about Johnathan Ball & Tim Parry, a 3 year old and 12 year old that got murdered in Warrington.

Lets not forget the 6 children and a pregnant woman who was carry twins, that got killed by the IRA in Omagh.

Will you be remembering those souls as well?

Acknowledge the terrible wrongs the British did in Ireland without resorting to whataboutery

There’s a good lad "

Why when you don't accept the atrocities caused by yoir terrorists?

You can't ask for people to accept something, when you are ignoring things.

Approximately 60% of the dead were killed by republicans, 30% by loyalists and 10% by British security forces.

I am sure you will harp on about the 10%

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 25/11/20 23:09:50]

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"What about Johnathan Ball & Tim Parry, a 3 year old and 12 year old that got murdered in Warrington.

Lets not forget the 6 children and a pregnant woman who was carry twins, that got killed by the IRA in Omagh.

Will you be remembering those souls as well?

Acknowledge the terrible wrongs the British did in Ireland without resorting to whataboutery

There’s a good lad

Why when you don't accept the atrocities caused by yoir terrorists?

You can't ask for people to accept something, when you are ignoring things.

Approximately 60% of the dead were killed by republicans, 30% by loyalists and 10% by British security forces.

I am sure you will harp on about the 10%"

Shal we go back in time ?

80% of people killed in Ireland were killed

By those loyal to a

British Monarch/ Government .

If the British had left well alone the Irish

had No need to respond .

There Endeth the lesson .

go mbeannaí Dia thú ar do thuras go hIfreann

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ichael McCarthyMan  over a year ago

Lucan


"What about Johnathan Ball & Tim Parry, a 3 year old and 12 year old that got murdered in Warrington.

Lets not forget the 6 children and a pregnant woman who was carry twins, that got killed by the IRA in Omagh.

Will you be remembering those souls as well?

Acknowledge the terrible wrongs the British did in Ireland without resorting to whataboutery

There’s a good lad

Why when you don't accept the atrocities caused by yoir terrorists?

You can't ask for people to accept something, when you are ignoring things.

Approximately 60% of the dead were killed by republicans, 30% by loyalists and 10% by British security forces.

I am sure you will harp on about the 10%"

If you think the British military were only responsible for the 10% attributed to them you are either guilty of wilful ignorance or just the inability to read/remember recent history.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"What about Johnathan Ball & Tim Parry, a 3 year old and 12 year old that got murdered in Warrington.

Lets not forget the 6 children and a pregnant woman who was carry twins, that got killed by the IRA in Omagh.

Will you be remembering those souls as well?

Acknowledge the terrible wrongs the British did in Ireland without resorting to whataboutery

There’s a good lad

Why when you don't accept the atrocities caused by yoir terrorists?

You can't ask for people to accept something, when you are ignoring things.

Approximately 60% of the dead were killed by republicans, 30% by loyalists and 10% by British security forces.

I am sure you will harp on about the 10%"

Where did you get those stats from?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ust RachelTV/TS  over a year ago

Horsham

I will leave this here.

IRA Shoot to Kill Murders

There were a number of different reasons why the IRA decided to deliberately murder civilians, but a primary purpose was to achieve terror, shock and publicity. While the optics of these murders clearly showed a bias toward murdering Protestant Unionist civilians, murders of Catholic Nationalist civilians also occurred in order to similarly terrorise and to stem opposition in areas the IRA wished to control.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"I will leave this here.

IRA Shoot to Kill Murders

There were a number of different reasons why the IRA decided to deliberately murder civilians, but a primary purpose was to achieve terror, shock and publicity. While the optics of these murders clearly showed a bias toward murdering Protestant Unionist civilians, murders of Catholic Nationalist civilians also occurred in order to similarly terrorise and to stem opposition in areas the IRA wished to control."

And the loyalist paramilitaries were paragons of virtue

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ichiebigMan  over a year ago

nenagh

If the most recent IRA,know as the provincial IRA or provos for short wanted to kill civilians in England they could have slaughtered thousands, and not the dozens they did murder, they will claim that those civilians murdered were accidental, or collateral damage as the British call the thousands of civilians they killed in the middle east this century,

Anyway the massive bombs used by the provos in places like canary wharf, the Baltic exchange or Manchester, to mention a few, could have slaughtered thousands if that is what the IRA wanted to do

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *eddy and legsCouple  over a year ago

the wetlands


"If the most recent IRA,know as the provincial IRA or provos for short wanted to kill civilians in England they could have slaughtered thousands, and not the dozens they did murder, they will claim that those civilians murdered were accidental, or collateral damage as the British call the thousands of civilians they killed in the middle east this century,

Anyway the massive bombs used by the provos in places like canary wharf, the Baltic exchange or Manchester, to mention a few, could have slaughtered thousands if that is what the IRA wanted to do "

I'm sure the families of those slaughtered will be grateful that you pointed that out.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple  over a year ago

in Lancashire


"If the most recent IRA,know as the provincial IRA or provos for short wanted to kill civilians in England they could have slaughtered thousands, and not the dozens they did murder, they will claim that those civilians murdered were accidental, or collateral damage as the British call the thousands of civilians they killed in the middle east this century,

Anyway the massive bombs used by the provos in places like canary wharf, the Baltic exchange or Manchester, to mention a few, could have slaughtered thousands if that is what the IRA wanted to do "

Yes they could but they would have lost any support in carrying out such atrocities in America without which they would have been skint..

And what do you think the response would have been under such circumstances?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ichiebigMan  over a year ago

nenagh

The families of any innocent victims of terrorism, be it IRA terrorism, Islamic terrorism or British government state terrorism will not take comfort from any meaningless explanation for there loss regardless where it comes from

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool

I'm not sure anyone take any particular moral high ground on this issue.

The op pointed out an event and all the whataboutery was rather predictable and pointless.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ust RachelTV/TS  over a year ago

Horsham

25/11/74. The IRA murdered James Murdock, 55. Married with family. Post office engineer shot in indiscriminate sectarian attack, Woodvale. 23 shots fired from machine gun. 2nd man suffered multiple wounds while a 3rd fell to ground & pretended to be dead.

RIP.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *obka3Couple  over a year ago

bournemouth


"I'm not sure anyone take any particular moral high ground on this issue.

The op pointed out an event and all the whataboutery was rather predictable and pointless.

"

Says the man who did the what about the unionist paramilitaries.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I'm not sure anyone take any particular moral high ground on this issue.

The op pointed out an event and all the whataboutery was rather predictable and pointless.

Says the man who did the what about the unionist paramilitaries. "

So the Murder of Innocent Irish still being belittled 100

Years after the fact , because whattaboutery raises its

Ugly Head ?

Class, real class .

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *obka3Couple  over a year ago

bournemouth


"I'm not sure anyone take any particular moral high ground on this issue.

The op pointed out an event and all the whataboutery was rather predictable and pointless.

Says the man who did the what about the unionist paramilitaries.

So the Murder of Innocent Irish still being belittled 100

Years after the fact , because whattaboutery raises its

Ugly Head ?

Class, real class .

"

Who is belittling anything ? Can you quote the post I have said that what happened was ok ?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"I'm not sure anyone take any particular moral high ground on this issue.

The op pointed out an event and all the whataboutery was rather predictable and pointless.

Says the man who did the what about the unionist paramilitaries. "

All the whataboutery on here and you pick mine out?

Bless

I was responding to a post which implied it was just the IRA who had a shoot to kill policy.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Says the man who did the what about the unionist paramilitaries.

Who is belittling anything ? Can you quote the post I have said that what happened was ok ? "

There you go .

Just so you can see it clearly.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"What about Johnathan Ball & Tim Parry, a 3 year old and 12 year old that got murdered in Warrington.

Lets not forget the 6 children and a pregnant woman who was carry twins, that got killed by the IRA in Omagh.

Will you be remembering those souls as well?

Acknowledge the terrible wrongs the British did in Ireland without resorting to whataboutery

There’s a good lad

Why when you don't accept the atrocities caused by yoir terrorists?

You can't ask for people to accept something, when you are ignoring things.

Approximately 60% of the dead were killed by republicans, 30% by loyalists and 10% by British security forces.

I am sure you will harp on about the 10%"

It just goes to show how little you know about Irish hIstory when you are quoting figures from the troubles in Northern Ireland which began in 1969

We are discussing the massacre of innocent civilians in croke park in 1920

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *obka3Couple  over a year ago

bournemouth


"I'm not sure anyone take any particular moral high ground on this issue.

The op pointed out an event and all the whataboutery was rather predictable and pointless.

Says the man who did the what about the unionist paramilitaries.

All the whataboutery on here and you pick mine out?

Bless

I was responding to a post which implied it was just the IRA who had a shoot to kill policy."

You were the one complaining that others were going what about whatever, which is exactly what you then did.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ichiebigMan  over a year ago

nenagh

Today the 28 November is the 100 year anniversary of the kimicheal ambush in west cork, Ireland,

The active service unit of the 3rd cork brigade of the IRA, under the command of Tom Barry, attacked and wiped out a 18 strong unit of the auxiliary division,

The auxiliary division were all ex British army officers, veterans of ww2 many of them highly decorated,

They were the cutting edge of the British government policy of state terrorism and responsible for the brutal murder of dozens of innocent men women and children plus the government policy of destroying hundreds of houses, shops and factories

The annihilation of this unit cambined with the destruction of there intelligence network a week earlier in Dublin, came as a severe shock to the British administration who now realisied the had a war on there hands with a very formidable enemy in the IRA

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ust RachelTV/TS  over a year ago

Horsham

On this day in 1976 the IRA murdered Philomena Greene, 16. Returning with 2 friends from a dance in her native Lurgan when they saw light in unoccupied house owned by father of 1 of the girls. On going to investigate a bomb exploded, killing the girl & wounding a friend.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"On this day in 1976 the IRA murdered Philomena Greene, 16. Returning with 2 friends from a dance in her native Lurgan when they saw light in unoccupied house owned by father of 1 of the girls. On going to investigate a bomb exploded, killing the girl & wounding a friend."

Thinking today of the town of Ardee where innocent men women and children were beaten up by British Troops,100 years ago today

2 innocent men dragged from their homes

Tortured shot and their bodies dragged behind British army trucks until they died of their injuries

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *eddy and legsCouple  over a year ago

the wetlands


"On this day in 1976 the IRA murdered Philomena Greene, 16. Returning with 2 friends from a dance in her native Lurgan when they saw light in unoccupied house owned by father of 1 of the girls. On going to investigate a bomb exploded, killing the girl & wounding a friend.

Thinking today of the town of Ardee where innocent men women and children were beaten up by British Troops,100 years ago today

2 innocent men dragged from their homes

Tortured shot and their bodies dragged behind British army trucks until they died of their injuries

"

And remembering the two trucks of british officers murdered by the IRA in Cork.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple  over a year ago

in Lancashire

This whole thread has turned into a sad game of tit for tat past wrongs..

Very unedifying..

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *eddy and legsCouple  over a year ago

the wetlands

[Removed by poster at 29/11/20 16:40:43]

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"This whole thread has turned into a sad game of tit for tat past wrongs..

Very unedifying.."

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"This whole thread has turned into a sad game of tit for tat past wrongs..

Very unedifying.."

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"On this day in 1976 the IRA murdered Philomena Greene, 16. Returning with 2 friends from a dance in her native Lurgan when they saw light in unoccupied house owned by father of 1 of the girls. On going to investigate a bomb exploded, killing the girl & wounding a friend.

Thinking today of the town of Ardee where innocent men women and children were beaten up by British Troops,100 years ago today

2 innocent men dragged from their homes

Tortured shot and their bodies dragged behind British army trucks until they died of their injuries

And remembering the two trucks of british officers murdered by the IRA in Cork.

"

Shall we remember the 3 black & tans

Who were killed by Michael Barry, in Macroom co cork

after He avenged the ra-pe of his wife & her murder

Along with his baby daughter , when the said tans

Set fire to the farmhouse as well ?

Or the hundreds of women r-aped & killed even more civillians

Murdered by the British backed black & tans ?

https://youtu.be/nX-S-6YNpiQ

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *eddy and legsCouple  over a year ago

the wetlands

Or perhaps remember that two wrongs never made a right and remember and respect those that died in a dignified manner.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"On this day in 1976 the IRA murdered Philomena Greene, 16. Returning with 2 friends from a dance in her native Lurgan when they saw light in unoccupied house owned by father of 1 of the girls. On going to investigate a bomb exploded, killing the girl & wounding a friend.

Thinking today of the town of Ardee where innocent men women and children were beaten up by British Troops,100 years ago today

2 innocent men dragged from their homes

Tortured shot and their bodies dragged behind British army trucks until they died of their injuries

And remembering the two trucks of british officers murdered by the IRA in Cork.

"

It’s amazing to see loyalists and their British supporters not being able to see the distinction between armed combatants in a military action

And the ra-pe torture and murder of innocent men women and children by the British in Ireland in 1920

After Kilmichael the British troops went on the rampage and burnt hundreds of properties in Cork City

Tactics used in later times by the Nazis in occupied Europe

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

The British were the invaders in our country

The occupiers who had no right to be there

Who had made us serfs,starved and pillaged us

Banned our culture

It’s fairly obvious that after 100 years some can’t even bring themselves to express any hint of regret as to what happened to innocent civilians without trying to deflect by using whataboutery

I wonder if the Germans had invaded the UK,would they have judged any resistance in the same way they continue to judge the Irish?.

I doubt it

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Or perhaps remember that two wrongs never made a right and remember and respect those that died in a dignified manner.

"

Or maybe that an Oppressor was wrong to invade & control

Therefore no response would have been necessary?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *eddy and legsCouple  over a year ago

the wetlands

[Removed by poster at 30/11/20 09:25:09]

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"The British were the invaders in our country

The occupiers who had no right to be there

Who had made us serfs,starved and pillaged us

Banned our culture

It’s fairly obvious that after 100 years some can’t even bring themselves to express any hint of regret as to what happened to innocent civilians without trying to deflect by using whataboutery

I wonder if the Germans had invaded the UK,would they have judged any resistance in the same way they continue to judge the Irish?.

I doubt it

"

The British invaded and occupied a lot of countries. This history wasn't taught in my school. We studied the era between the first and second world wars.

There simply isn't enough time to go through all British history in schools. Including what happened in Ireland

People alive now weren't responsible for what happened on the British empire. We can learn about it, and it's good to understand what happened in Ireland, India, Egypt, Kenya, Rhodesia, Uganda, north America, Pakistan etc etc. But regret isn't a good thing.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"The British were the invaders in our country

The occupiers who had no right to be there

Who had made us serfs,starved and pillaged us

Banned our culture

It’s fairly obvious that after 100 years some can’t even bring themselves to express any hint of regret as to what happened to innocent civilians without trying to deflect by using whataboutery

I wonder if the Germans had invaded the UK,would they have judged any resistance in the same way they continue to judge the Irish?.

I doubt it

The British invaded and occupied a lot of countries. This history wasn't taught in my school. We studied the era between the first and second world wars.

There simply isn't enough time to go through all British history in schools. Including what happened in Ireland

People alive now weren't responsible for what happened on the British empire. We can learn about it, and it's good to understand what happened in Ireland, India, Egypt, Kenya, Rhodesia, Uganda, north America, Pakistan etc etc. But regret isn't a good thing."

No but your alive now

Does that make you responsible for the killings of innocent civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan by British Forces which are now coming to light?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"The British were the invaders in our country

The occupiers who had no right to be there

Who had made us serfs,starved and pillaged us

Banned our culture

It’s fairly obvious that after 100 years some can’t even bring themselves to express any hint of regret as to what happened to innocent civilians without trying to deflect by using whataboutery

I wonder if the Germans had invaded the UK,would they have judged any resistance in the same way they continue to judge the Irish?.

I doubt it

The British invaded and occupied a lot of countries. This history wasn't taught in my school. We studied the era between the first and second world wars.

There simply isn't enough time to go through all British history in schools. Including what happened in Ireland

People alive now weren't responsible for what happened on the British empire. We can learn about it, and it's good to understand what happened in Ireland, India, Egypt, Kenya, Rhodesia, Uganda, north America, Pakistan etc etc. But regret isn't a good thing.

No but your alive now

Does that make you responsible for the killings of innocent civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan by British Forces which are now coming to light?"

Not sure what the point is here.

Who are you suggesting is responsible?

In the context of Ireland, when you say "The British were...." You don't mean ordinary British people, who were, by and large, treated in the same way by the authorises of the time.

My argument is that people now don't have a responsibility to hold regret for actions that happened out their control and out of their lifetime.

Regarding current events. You could argue that people who voted for the governments who went to the various wars in the middle East, may hold some responsibility. But did every Labour voter in 1997 want the Iraq war, probably not. Probably a lot of them protested against it.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Not sure what the point is here.

Who are you suggesting is responsible?

In the context of Ireland, when you say "The British were...." You don't mean ordinary British people, who were, by and large, treated in the same way by the authorises of the time.

My argument is that people now don't have a responsibility to hold regret for actions that happened out their control and out of their lifetime.

"

By & large treated the same ?

Seriously ?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Not sure what the point is here.

Who are you suggesting is responsible?

In the context of Ireland, when you say "The British were...." You don't mean ordinary British people, who were, by and large, treated in the same way by the authorises of the time.

My argument is that people now don't have a responsibility to hold regret for actions that happened out their control and out of their lifetime.

By & large treated the same ?

Seriously ?

"

How was the average serf treated in England in 1200?

Probably no different than one in Ireland.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Not sure what the point is here.

Who are you suggesting is responsible?

In the context of Ireland, when you say "The British were...." You don't mean ordinary British people, who were, by and large, treated in the same way by the authorises of the time.

My argument is that people now don't have a responsibility to hold regret for actions that happened out their control and out of their lifetime.

By & large treated the same ?

Seriously ?

How was the average serf treated in England in 1200?

Probably no different than one in Ireland."

Ah we go back to the beginning when it suits you .

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Not sure what the point is here.

Who are you suggesting is responsible?

In the context of Ireland, when you say "The British were...." You don't mean ordinary British people, who were, by and large, treated in the same way by the authorises of the time.

My argument is that people now don't have a responsibility to hold regret for actions that happened out their control and out of their lifetime.

By & large treated the same ?

Seriously ?

How was the average serf treated in England in 1200?

Probably no different than one in Ireland.

Ah we go back to the beginning when it suits you .

"

Suits me, What are you getting at?

We're discussing the British occupation of Ireland. My point was that ordinary people were treated like shit by the authorities of the time.

Feel free to make a counter point.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"The British were the invaders in our country

The occupiers who had no right to be there

Who had made us serfs,starved and pillaged us

Banned our culture

It’s fairly obvious that after 100 years some can’t even bring themselves to express any hint of regret as to what happened to innocent civilians without trying to deflect by using whataboutery

I wonder if the Germans had invaded the UK,would they have judged any resistance in the same way they continue to judge the Irish?.

I doubt it

The British invaded and occupied a lot of countries. This history wasn't taught in my school. We studied the era between the first and second world wars.

There simply isn't enough time to go through all British history in schools. Including what happened in Ireland

People alive now weren't responsible for what happened on the British empire. We can learn about it, and it's good to understand what happened in Ireland, India, Egypt, Kenya, Rhodesia, Uganda, north America, Pakistan etc etc. But regret isn't a good thing.

No but your alive now

Does that make you responsible for the killings of innocent civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan by British Forces which are now coming to light?

Not sure what the point is here.

Who are you suggesting is responsible?

In the context of Ireland, when you say "The British were...." You don't mean ordinary British people, who were, by and large, treated in the same way by the authorises of the time.

My argument is that people now don't have a responsibility to hold regret for actions that happened out their control and out of their lifetime.

Regarding current events. You could argue that people who voted for the governments who went to the various wars in the middle East, may hold some responsibility. But did every Labour voter in 1997 want the Iraq war, probably not. Probably a lot of them protested against it."

You say you weren’t responsible for the British Empire,

Nothing to do with me gov

But you were alive for what’s gone on in Iraq and Afghanistan

This not your fault also?

Here a novel concept for your nation

How about you all stay the fuck at home

No country in the world has ever been bettered by British “help”

The British taxpayer will be able to save billions on these jollies and poor kids from sink estates won’t be maimed or killed.

You can instead spend the money saved on frivolous things like Hospitals or schools

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ionelhutzMan  over a year ago

liverpool


"The British were the invaders in our country

The occupiers who had no right to be there

Who had made us serfs,starved and pillaged us

Banned our culture

It’s fairly obvious that after 100 years some can’t even bring themselves to express any hint of regret as to what happened to innocent civilians without trying to deflect by using whataboutery

I wonder if the Germans had invaded the UK,would they have judged any resistance in the same way they continue to judge the Irish?.

I doubt it

The British invaded and occupied a lot of countries. This history wasn't taught in my school. We studied the era between the first and second world wars.

There simply isn't enough time to go through all British history in schools. Including what happened in Ireland

People alive now weren't responsible for what happened on the British empire. We can learn about it, and it's good to understand what happened in Ireland, India, Egypt, Kenya, Rhodesia, Uganda, north America, Pakistan etc etc. But regret isn't a good thing.

No but your alive now

Does that make you responsible for the killings of innocent civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan by British Forces which are now coming to light?

Not sure what the point is here.

Who are you suggesting is responsible?

In the context of Ireland, when you say "The British were...." You don't mean ordinary British people, who were, by and large, treated in the same way by the authorises of the time.

My argument is that people now don't have a responsibility to hold regret for actions that happened out their control and out of their lifetime.

Regarding current events. You could argue that people who voted for the governments who went to the various wars in the middle East, may hold some responsibility. But did every Labour voter in 1997 want the Iraq war, probably not. Probably a lot of them protested against it.

You say you weren’t responsible for the British Empire,

Nothing to do with me gov

But you were alive for what’s gone on in Iraq and Afghanistan

This not your fault also?

Here a novel concept for your nation

How about you all stay the fuck at home

No country in the world has ever been bettered by British “help”

The British taxpayer will be able to save billions on these jollies and poor kids from sink estates won’t be maimed or killed.

You can instead spend the money saved on frivolous things like Hospitals or schools "

The people responsible for iraq and Afghanistan were the people who decided to go to war.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Not sure what the point is here.

Who are you suggesting is responsible?

In the context of Ireland, when you say "The British were...." You don't mean ordinary British people, who were, by and large, treated in the same way by the authorises of the time.

My argument is that people now don't have a responsibility to hold regret for actions that happened out their control and out of their lifetime.

By & large treated the same ?

Seriously ?

How was the average serf treated in England in 1200?

Probably no different than one in Ireland.

Ah we go back to the beginning when it suits you .

Suits me, What are you getting at?

We're discussing the British occupation of Ireland. My point was that ordinary people were treated like shit by the authorities of the time.

Feel free to make a counter point."

Diplock courts in the 20th century

State collusion in murder in the 20rh century

Genocide of a million people in the 19th century

We can start with those 3 if you want

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"The British were the invaders in our country

The occupiers who had no right to be there

Who had made us serfs,starved and pillaged us

Banned our culture

It’s fairly obvious that after 100 years some can’t even bring themselves to express any hint of regret as to what happened to innocent civilians without trying to deflect by using whataboutery

I wonder if the Germans had invaded the UK,would they have judged any resistance in the same way they continue to judge the Irish?.

I doubt it

The British invaded and occupied a lot of countries. This history wasn't taught in my school. We studied the era between the first and second world wars.

There simply isn't enough time to go through all British history in schools. Including what happened in Ireland

People alive now weren't responsible for what happened on the British empire. We can learn about it, and it's good to understand what happened in Ireland, India, Egypt, Kenya, Rhodesia, Uganda, north America, Pakistan etc etc. But regret isn't a good thing.

No but your alive now

Does that make you responsible for the killings of innocent civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan by British Forces which are now coming to light?

Not sure what the point is here.

Who are you suggesting is responsible?

In the context of Ireland, when you say "The British were...." You don't mean ordinary British people, who were, by and large, treated in the same way by the authorises of the time.

My argument is that people now don't have a responsibility to hold regret for actions that happened out their control and out of their lifetime.

Regarding current events. You could argue that people who voted for the governments who went to the various wars in the middle East, may hold some responsibility. But did every Labour voter in 1997 want the Iraq war, probably not. Probably a lot of them protested against it.

You say you weren’t responsible for the British Empire,

Nothing to do with me gov

But you were alive for what’s gone on in Iraq and Afghanistan

This not your fault also?

Here a novel concept for your nation

How about you all stay the fuck at home

No country in the world has ever been bettered by British “help”

The British taxpayer will be able to save billions on these jollies and poor kids from sink estates won’t be maimed or killed.

You can instead spend the money saved on frivolous things like Hospitals or schools "

I'll answer your questions in order.

Yes, I am comfortable not taking responsibility for things that happened out of my control, and before I was born.

I wasn't living in the UK when the second Iraq war or the war in Afghanistan were started. I did protest against them. Not sure what else I could have done, other than moving to those countries and joining their armies.

Have to stay at home at the moment, lockdown.

I agree, I wouldn't have the British army involved in any of the wars, and I would use the money to support the NHS and to support vulnerable people in society.

I disagree with your assertion that all citizens of the country are responsible for every choice their government makes. Should the world blame you for every decision the Irish government makes. How about the water tax fiasco in 2015? I would argue that you personally aren't to blame.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Not sure what the point is here.

Who are you suggesting is responsible?

In the context of Ireland, when you say "The British were...." You don't mean ordinary British people, who were, by and large, treated in the same way by the authorises of the time.

My argument is that people now don't have a responsibility to hold regret for actions that happened out their control and out of their lifetime.

By & large treated the same ?

Seriously ?

How was the average serf treated in England in 1200?

Probably no different than one in Ireland.

Ah we go back to the beginning when it suits you .

Suits me, What are you getting at?

We're discussing the British occupation of Ireland. My point was that ordinary people were treated like shit by the authorities of the time.

Feel free to make a counter point.

Diplock courts in the 20th century

State collusion in murder in the 20rh century

Genocide of a million people in the 19th century

We can start with those 3 if you want "

You're going to have to be more specific about what these things are, or how this relates to my point about how ordinary people were treated in the UK and Ireland by the authorities, or how that relates to why you were unhappy with the time period of the example I gave, if you want me to reply.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Not sure what the point is here.

Who are you suggesting is responsible?

In the context of Ireland, when you say "The British were...." You don't mean ordinary British people, who were, by and large, treated in the same way by the authorises of the time.

My argument is that people now don't have a responsibility to hold regret for actions that happened out their control and out of their lifetime.

By & large treated the same ?

Seriously ?

How was the average serf treated in England in 1200?

Probably no different than one in Ireland.

Ah we go back to the beginning when it suits you .

Suits me, What are you getting at?

We're discussing the British occupation of Ireland. My point was that ordinary people were treated like shit by the authorities of the time.

Feel free to make a counter point.

Diplock courts in the 20th century

State collusion in murder in the 20rh century

Genocide of a million people in the 19th century

We can start with those 3 if you want

You're going to have to be more specific about what these things are, or how this relates to my point about how ordinary people were treated in the UK and Ireland by the authorities, or how that relates to why you were unhappy with the time period of the example I gave, if you want me to reply."

====

Like you ignored points i made by changing the timeline

I have done the same & given examples of how people in

Ireland & people in britain were treated differently .

If you need to look abything up ill give you a bit of time

Otherwise i can just assume you know very little about what you claim

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Not sure what the point is here.

Who are you suggesting is responsible?

In the context of Ireland, when you say "The British were...." You don't mean ordinary British people, who were, by and large, treated in the same way by the authorises of the time.

My argument is that people now don't have a responsibility to hold regret for actions that happened out their control and out of their lifetime.

By & large treated the same ?

Seriously ?

How was the average serf treated in England in 1200?

Probably no different than one in Ireland.

Ah we go back to the beginning when it suits you .

Suits me, What are you getting at?

We're discussing the British occupation of Ireland. My point was that ordinary people were treated like shit by the authorities of the time.

Feel free to make a counter point.

Diplock courts in the 20th century

State collusion in murder in the 20rh century

Genocide of a million people in the 19th century

We can start with those 3 if you want

You're going to have to be more specific about what these things are, or how this relates to my point about how ordinary people were treated in the UK and Ireland by the authorities, or how that relates to why you were unhappy with the time period of the example I gave, if you want me to reply.

====

Like you ignored points i made by changing the timeline

I have done the same & given examples of how people in

Ireland & people in britain were treated differently .

If you need to look abything up ill give you a bit of time

Otherwise i can just assume you know very little about what you claim "

I'm comfortable with you assuming whatever you want.

You're clearly out to have a go at me, or make up random stuff like "ignoring points you made" or "changing the timeline" (no clue what your on about) for some reason, instead of discussing the British occupation of Ireland.

Have a good day.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Not sure what the point is here.

Who are you suggesting is responsible?

In the context of Ireland, when you say "The British were...." You don't mean ordinary British people, who were, by and large, treated in the same way by the authorises of the time.

My argument is that people now don't have a responsibility to hold regret for actions that happened out their control and out of their lifetime.

By & large treated the same ?

Seriously ?

How was the average serf treated in England in 1200?

Probably no different than one in Ireland.

Ah we go back to the beginning when it suits you .

Suits me, What are you getting at?

We're discussing the British occupation of Ireland. My point was that ordinary people were treated like shit by the authorities of the time.

Feel free to make a counter point.

Diplock courts in the 20th century

State collusion in murder in the 20rh century

Genocide of a million people in the 19th century

We can start with those 3 if you want

You're going to have to be more specific about what these things are, or how this relates to my point about how ordinary people were treated in the UK and Ireland by the authorities, or how that relates to why you were unhappy with the time period of the example I gave, if you want me to reply.

====

Like you ignored points i made by changing the timeline

I have done the same & given examples of how people in

Ireland & people in britain were treated differently .

If you need to look abything up ill give you a bit of time

Otherwise i can just assume you know very little about what you claim

I'm comfortable with you assuming whatever you want.

You're clearly out to have a go at me, or make up random stuff like "ignoring points you made" or "changing the timeline" (no clue what your on about) for some reason, instead of discussing the British occupation of Ireland.

Have a good day."

I responded to your post that mentioned the differences of

The citizens of northern ireland & the people of Britain.

You mentioned 1997 in the post i replied to

Which i edited to not include 1997 .

As you dont know the importance of diplock courts

Or special category courts & jails etc to both

Groups in the 6 counties

Protestant & Catholic

( or if you like loyalist & nationalist)

You have no right to ask of a difference .

State collusion in murder .

Thats the easiest but you are running away from that .

Ah well, bye bye

As you are ignorant of the 19th century genocide

You have no right to discuss anything

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Just to anybody else

Personally i am happy that both sides of

the politicsl divide, are no longer murdering

each other . Long may that be so .

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Not sure what the point is here.

Who are you suggesting is responsible?

In the context of Ireland, when you say "The British were...." You don't mean ordinary British people, who were, by and large, treated in the same way by the authorises of the time.

My argument is that people now don't have a responsibility to hold regret for actions that happened out their control and out of their lifetime.

By & large treated the same ?

Seriously ?

How was the average serf treated in England in 1200?

Probably no different than one in Ireland.

Ah we go back to the beginning when it suits you .

Suits me, What are you getting at?

We're discussing the British occupation of Ireland. My point was that ordinary people were treated like shit by the authorities of the time.

Feel free to make a counter point.

Diplock courts in the 20th century

State collusion in murder in the 20rh century

Genocide of a million people in the 19th century

We can start with those 3 if you want

You're going to have to be more specific about what these things are, or how this relates to my point about how ordinary people were treated in the UK and Ireland by the authorities, or how that relates to why you were unhappy with the time period of the example I gave, if you want me to reply.

====

Like you ignored points i made by changing the timeline

I have done the same & given examples of how people in

Ireland & people in britain were treated differently .

If you need to look abything up ill give you a bit of time

Otherwise i can just assume you know very little about what you claim

I'm comfortable with you assuming whatever you want.

You're clearly out to have a go at me, or make up random stuff like "ignoring points you made" or "changing the timeline" (no clue what your on about) for some reason, instead of discussing the British occupation of Ireland.

Have a good day.

I responded to your post that mentioned the differences of

The citizens of northern ireland & the people of Britain.

You mentioned 1997 in the post i replied to

Which i edited to not include 1997 .

As you dont know the importance of diplock courts

Or special category courts & jails etc to both

Groups in the 6 counties

Protestant & Catholic

( or if you like loyalist & nationalist)

You have no right to ask of a difference .

State collusion in murder .

Thats the easiest but you are running away from that .

Ah well, bye bye

As you are ignorant of the 19th century genocide

You have no right to discuss anything "

Aight. Although you made a lot of assumptions. Then got annoyed at the assumptions. Nothing I could have done about that.

If you think there is something to discuss or knowledge impart. We can talk.

But just having a go at me because of your incorrect assumptions, when we had been having a normal conversation prior to that. Seems like something I'm not interested in.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 30/11/20 17:16:43]

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Not sure what the point is here.

Who are you suggesting is responsible?

In the context of Ireland, when you say "The British were...." You don't mean ordinary British people, who were, by and large, treated in the same way by the authorises of the time.

My argument is that people now don't have a responsibility to hold regret for actions that happened out their control and out of their lifetime.

By & large treated the same ?

Seriously ?

How was the average serf treated in England in 1200?

Probably no different than one in Ireland.

Ah we go back to the beginning when it suits you .

Suits me, What are you getting at?

We're discussing the British occupation of Ireland. My point was that ordinary people were treated like shit by the authorities of the time.

Feel free to make a counter point.

Diplock courts in the 20th century

State collusion in murder in the 20rh century

Genocide of a million people in the 19th century

We can start with those 3 if you want

You're going to have to be more specific about what these things are, or how this relates to my point about how ordinary people were treated in the UK and Ireland by the authorities, or how that relates to why you were unhappy with the time period of the example I gave, if you want me to reply.

====

Like you ignored points i made by changing the timeline

I have done the same & given examples of how people in

Ireland & people in britain were treated differently .

If you need to look abything up ill give you a bit of time

Otherwise i can just assume you know very little about what you claim

I'm comfortable with you assuming whatever you want.

You're clearly out to have a go at me, or make up random stuff like "ignoring points you made" or "changing the timeline" (no clue what your on about) for some reason, instead of discussing the British occupation of Ireland.

Have a good day.

I responded to your post that mentioned the differences of

The citizens of northern ireland & the people of Britain.

You mentioned 1997 in the post i replied to

Which i edited to not include 1997 .

As you dont know the importance of diplock courts

Or special category courts & jails etc to both

Groups in the 6 counties

Protestant & Catholic

( or if you like loyalist & nationalist)

You have no right to ask of a difference .

State collusion in murder .

Thats the easiest but you are running away from that .

Ah well, bye bye

As you are ignorant of the 19th century genocide

You have no right to discuss anything

Aight. Although you made a lot of assumptions. Then got annoyed at the assumptions. Nothing I could have done about that.

If you think there is something to discuss or knowledge impart. We can talk.

But just having a go at me because of your incorrect assumptions, when we had been having a normal conversation prior to that. Seems like something I'm not interested in."

I made no assumptions

You stated you didnt know what i meant.

What makes you think i got angry ?

I just like to explain to people with little knowledge of the 6 counties , part of the 9 county province i was born in.

Knowledge sharing is a great thing to those who know little

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Not sure what the point is here.

Who are you suggesting is responsible?

In the context of Ireland, when you say "The British were...." You don't mean ordinary British people, who were, by and large, treated in the same way by the authorises of the time.

My argument is that people now don't have a responsibility to hold regret for actions that happened out their control and out of their lifetime.

By & large treated the same ?

Seriously ?

How was the average serf treated in England in 1200?

Probably no different than one in Ireland.

Ah we go back to the beginning when it suits you .

Suits me, What are you getting at?

We're discussing the British occupation of Ireland. My point was that ordinary people were treated like shit by the authorities of the time.

Feel free to make a counter point.

Diplock courts in the 20th century

State collusion in murder in the 20rh century

Genocide of a million people in the 19th century

We can start with those 3 if you want

You're going to have to be more specific about what these things are, or how this relates to my point about how ordinary people were treated in the UK and Ireland by the authorities, or how that relates to why you were unhappy with the time period of the example I gave, if you want me to reply.

====

Like you ignored points i made by changing the timeline

I have done the same & given examples of how people in

Ireland & people in britain were treated differently .

If you need to look abything up ill give you a bit of time

Otherwise i can just assume you know very little about what you claim

I'm comfortable with you assuming whatever you want.

You're clearly out to have a go at me, or make up random stuff like "ignoring points you made" or "changing the timeline" (no clue what your on about) for some reason, instead of discussing the British occupation of Ireland.

Have a good day.

I responded to your post that mentioned the differences of

The citizens of northern ireland & the people of Britain.

You mentioned 1997 in the post i replied to

Which i edited to not include 1997 .

As you dont know the importance of diplock courts

Or special category courts & jails etc to both

Groups in the 6 counties

Protestant & Catholic

( or if you like loyalist & nationalist)

You have no right to ask of a difference .

State collusion in murder .

Thats the easiest but you are running away from that .

Ah well, bye bye

As you are ignorant of the 19th century genocide

You have no right to discuss anything

Aight. Although you made a lot of assumptions. Then got annoyed at the assumptions. Nothing I could have done about that.

If you think there is something to discuss or knowledge impart. We can talk.

But just having a go at me because of your incorrect assumptions, when we had been having a normal conversation prior to that. Seems like something I'm not interested in.

I made no assumptions

You stated you didnt know what i meant.

What makes you think i got angry ?

I just like to explain to people with little knowledge of the 6 counties , part of the 9 county province i was born in.

Knowledge sharing is a great thing to those who know little "

Right. So we can get back on track without having pops at me for nothing?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Not sure what the point is here.

Who are you suggesting is responsible?

In the context of Ireland, when you say "The British were...." You don't mean ordinary British people, who were, by and large, treated in the same way by the authorises of the time.

My argument is that people now don't have a responsibility to hold regret for actions that happened out their control and out of their lifetime.

By & large treated the same ?

Seriously ?

"

Ok

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Not sure what the point is here.

Who are you suggesting is responsible?

In the context of Ireland, when you say "The British were...." You don't mean ordinary British people, who were, by and large, treated in the same way by the authorises of the time.

My argument is that people now don't have a responsibility to hold regret for actions that happened out their control and out of their lifetime.

By & large treated the same ?

Seriously ?

Ok"

By and large. The governments and authorities of the time (as now) don't give a shit about ordinary people.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 30/11/20 18:29:10]

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Not sure what the point is here.

Who are you suggesting is responsible?

In the context of Ireland, when you say "The British were...." You don't mean ordinary British people, who were, by and large, treated in the same way by the authorises of the time.

My argument is that people now don't have a responsibility to hold regret for actions that happened out their control and out of their lifetime.

By & large treated the same ?

Seriously ?

Ok

By and large. The governments and authorities of the time (as now) don't give a shit about ordinary people.

"

yes

But the people in britain didnt face

state sponsored Genocide ( 19th century)

Diplock courts (20th Century)

State sponsored collusion to murder ( 2020)

Like there Irish counterparts did

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Not sure what the point is here.

Who are you suggesting is responsible?

In the context of Ireland, when you say "The British were...." You don't mean ordinary British people, who were, by and large, treated in the same way by the authorises of the time.

My argument is that people now don't have a responsibility to hold regret for actions that happened out their control and out of their lifetime.

By & large treated the same ?

Seriously ?

Ok

By and large. The governments and authorities of the time (as now) don't give a shit about ordinary people.

yes

But the people in britain didnt face

state sponsored Genocide ( 19th century)

Diplock courts (20th Century)

State sponsored collusion to murder ( 2020)

Like there Irish counterparts did "

I assume you're talking about the potato famine. Absolutely horrific. I don't have anything to add.

Diplock courts were in Britain. Not in Ireland. If NI should be part of Ireland or not, is a different matter.

The British state has colluded in, or directly killed lots of its own citizens. I don't believe that there is any special extra vengeance against Irish people. They have equal distain for all of us.

"Evidently, a crucial case is omitted, which is far more depraved than massacring civilians intentionally. Namely, knowing that you are massacring them but not doing so intentionally because you don’t regard them as worthy of concern. That is, you don’t even care enough about them to intend to kill them. Thus when I walk down the street, if I stop to think about it I know I’ll probably kill lots of ants, but I don’t intend to kill them, because in my mind they do not even rise to the level where it matters. " - Chomsky.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

I assume you're talking about the potato famine. Absolutely horrific. I don't have anything to add.

Diplock courts were in Britain. Not in Ireland. If NI should be part of Ireland or not, is a different matter.

The British state has colluded in, or directly killed lots of its own citizens. I don't believe that there is any special extra vengeance against Irish people. They have equal distain for all of us.

"Evidently, a crucial case is omitted, which is far more depraved than massacring civilians intentionally. Namely, knowing that you are massacring them but not doing so intentionally because you don’t regard them as worthy of concern. That is, you don’t even care enough about them to intend to kill them. Thus when I walk down the street, if I stop to think about it I know I’ll probably kill lots of ants, but I don’t intend to kill them, because in my mind they do not even rise to the level where it matters. " - Chomsky.

"

No potato famine

There was however potato blight .

( unedible)

1 Ireland was Britains biggest supplier of many vegetables & most of its live-stock , with plenty of ships leaving Irish ports to england full of food that could have saved 8/10ths of those that died.

2.

Diplock courts weren't in Northern Ireland ?

Really

3 . Show me 1 case were police officers, army officers

passed colluded with a para military colluded to kill a

british subject on british streets .

Show me a case where soldiers murdered teenagers

Going to play sport in Britain only to be shot

numerous times in the back

Just 1 example will suffice .

4 what the f*ck have ants got to do with

death ny humans anywhere

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

I assume you're talking about the potato famine. Absolutely horrific. I don't have anything to add.

Diplock courts were in Britain. Not in Ireland. If NI should be part of Ireland or not, is a different matter.

The British state has colluded in, or directly killed lots of its own citizens. I don't believe that there is any special extra vengeance against Irish people. They have equal distain for all of us.

"Evidently, a crucial case is omitted, which is far more depraved than massacring civilians intentionally. Namely, knowing that you are massacring them but not doing so intentionally because you don’t regard them as worthy of concern. That is, you don’t even care enough about them to intend to kill them. Thus when I walk down the street, if I stop to think about it I know I’ll probably kill lots of ants, but I don’t intend to kill them, because in my mind they do not even rise to the level where it matters. " - Chomsky.

No potato famine

There was however potato blight .

( unedible)

1 Ireland was Britains biggest supplier of many vegetables & most of its live-stock , with plenty of ships leaving Irish ports to england full of food that could have saved 8/10ths of those that died.

2.

Diplock courts weren't in Northern Ireland ?

Really

3 . Show me 1 case were police officers, army officers

passed colluded with a para military colluded to kill a

british subject on british streets .

Show me a case where soldiers murdered teenagers

Going to play sport in Britain only to be shot

numerous times in the back

Just 1 example will suffice .

4 what the f*ck have ants got to do with

death ny humans anywhere"

I assumed potato famine was the normal words to describe it. But will call it whatever it needs to be called.

Who said the diplock courts weren't in NI?

I don't see what this list of demands you've given me has to do with anything. I didn't claim any of the specific stuff you're asking me to prove.

You're allowed to disagree with my opinion, but try not to get so angry. Do you not understanding Chomsky's metaphor?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Who said the diplock courts weren't in NI?

You're allowed to disagree with my opinion, but try not to get so angry. Do you not understanding Chomsky's metaphor?"

You said diplock courts werent Ireland they were in Britain

Here dear chap is where your knowledge lets you down &

Any semblance of credibility you have vanishes

Britain is An isalnd

It consists of 3 countries

England Scotland & Wales .

The Island of Ireland has 2 countries

The Republic & Northern

Chomskys Metaphor isnt required when

Dealing with Stupidity .

Britain is an island of 3 not 4

The 4 is the union from the act of union

1st between Great Britian & Ireland

Then changed to between

Great Britain & Northern Ireland.

Therefore not British at all. See Facts are Facts

Where as Opinions can & often are WRONG .

Im a Fug Smucker

Always

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Who said the diplock courts weren't in NI?

You're allowed to disagree with my opinion, but try not to get so angry. Do you not understanding Chomsky's metaphor?

You said diplock courts werent Ireland they were in Britain

Here dear chap is where your knowledge lets you down &

Any semblance of credibility you have vanishes

Britain is An isalnd

It consists of 3 countries

England Scotland & Wales .

The Island of Ireland has 2 countries

The Republic & Northern

Chomskys Metaphor isnt required when

Dealing with Stupidity .

Britain is an island of 3 not 4

The 4 is the union from the act of union

1st between Great Britian & Ireland

Then changed to between

Great Britain & Northern Ireland.

Therefore not British at all. See Facts are Facts

Where as Opinions can & often are WRONG .

Im a Fug Smucker

Always "

Congratulations on your semantic victory in an internet argument that you created out of nothing.

If that's all you were interested in, you could have told me from the start.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Who said the diplock courts weren't in NI?

You're allowed to disagree with my opinion, but try not to get so angry. Do you not understanding Chomsky's metaphor?

You said diplock courts werent Ireland they were in Britain

Here dear chap is where your knowledge lets you down &

Any semblance of credibility you have vanishes

Britain is An isalnd

It consists of 3 countries

England Scotland & Wales .

The Island of Ireland has 2 countries

The Republic & Northern

Chomskys Metaphor isnt required when

Dealing with Stupidity .

Britain is an island of 3 not 4

The 4 is the union from the act of union

1st between Great Britian & Ireland

Then changed to between

Great Britain & Northern Ireland.

Therefore not British at all. See Facts are Facts

Where as Opinions can & often are WRONG .

Im a Fug Smucker

Always

Congratulations on your semantic victory in an internet argument that you created out of nothing.

If that's all you were interested in, you could have told me from the start."

Yes but as Roger Rabbit saidif i had done it then

it wouldnt have been funny

The point of pedantry is to always

perform it at the moment of greatest

comedy effect.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.2500

0