FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Jezza
Jezza
Jump to: Newest in thread
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"How and why is that good news bud ?" Because he did nothing wrong? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The Labour Party, the gift that keeps on giving.... To the Tory Party "Obviously why the mail are shot scared of him | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He also did nothing right lol he’s an old has been had his day time for labour to forget about him and move on " His constituents would probably disagree | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He also did nothing right lol he’s an old has been had his day time for labour to forget about him and move on " You keep telling us that you’re Labour. What’s Labour about you exactly? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The Labour Party, the gift that keeps on giving.... To the Tory Party
Obviously why the mail are shot scared of him "I wouldn't know, but just saw a tweet saying the left and right are cheering | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The guy is that senile he cant see that he is destroying the labour party, still good news for the Tories i can see him getting a knighthood for services to the tory party. "I'd give him a knighthood for winding up the daily mail so frequently | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The Labour Party, the gift that keeps on giving.... To the Tory Party
Obviously why the mail are shot scared of him
I wouldn't know, but just saw a tweet saying the left and right are cheering"Source? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The guy is that senile he cant see that he is destroying the labour party, still good news for the Tories i can see him getting a knighthood for services to the tory party.
I'd give him a knighthood for winding up the daily mail so frequently "I wouldnt know ive not read a newspaper for years, is the morning worker still going? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He also did nothing right lol he’s an old has been had his day time for labour to forget about him and move on You keep telling us that you’re Labour. What’s Labour about you exactly? " I would say the fact they voted for Brexit makes them true Labour for a start | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"How and why is that good news bud ? Because he did nothing wrong?"  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He also did nothing right lol he’s an old has been had his day time for labour to forget about him and move on You keep telling us that you’re Labour. What’s Labour about you exactly? " so do I have to come in here calling the torries the nasty party like a daft kid every day to be labour can’t you be labour and like Corbyn like lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Nice to have a bit of good news " Very good news for Boris and the rest of the conservative party | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Nice to have a bit of good news Very good news for Boris and the rest of the conservative party" Well not really as he will still be getting embarrassed by starmer every week at pmq. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He also did nothing right lol he’s an old has been had his day time for labour to forget about him and move on You keep telling us that you’re Labour. What’s Labour about you exactly? I would say the fact they voted for Brexit makes them true Labour for a start " Why do you associate "true Labour" with suggestible and easily swayed? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Well no everyone is happy he has been reinstated. https://reaction.life/corbyn-reinstated-disaster-for-keir-starmer-and-the-labour-moderates/" That's a Tory party website. So why do they care? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He also did nothing right lol he’s an old has been had his day time for labour to forget about him and move on You keep telling us that you’re Labour. What’s Labour about you exactly? I would say the fact they voted for Brexit makes them true Labour for a start Why do you associate "true Labour" with suggestible and easily swayed?" Up until 1997 most Labour MP's would have voted for Brexit. And are you saying that the Labour MP's of 2016 who voted for Brexit were easily swayed? Really? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Well no everyone is happy he has been reinstated. https://reaction.life/corbyn-reinstated-disaster-for-keir-starmer-and-the-labour-moderates/ That's a Tory party website. So why do they care?" Probably cuz they're pissin themselves | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He also did nothing right lol he’s an old has been had his day time for labour to forget about him and move on You keep telling us that you’re Labour. What’s Labour about you exactly? I would say the fact they voted for Brexit makes them true Labour for a start Why do you associate "true Labour" with suggestible and easily swayed? Up until 1997 most Labour MP's would have voted for Brexit. And are you saying that the Labour MP's of 2016 who voted for Brexit were easily swayed? Really? " It was your comment bud. I was just asking why you thought so. But why do you want me to speculate about why some Labour MPs voted leave? What would that prove? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He also did nothing right lol he’s an old has been had his day time for labour to forget about him and move on You keep telling us that you’re Labour. What’s Labour about you exactly? I would say the fact they voted for Brexit makes them true Labour for a start Why do you associate "true Labour" with suggestible and easily swayed? Up until 1997 most Labour MP's would have voted for Brexit. And are you saying that the Labour MP's of 2016 who voted for Brexit were easily swayed? Really? It was your comment bud. I was just asking why you thought so. But why do you want me to speculate about why some Labour MPs voted leave? What would that prove?" And I answered you. I just question why you think that all Labour people who voted leave are easily swayed when you are clearly wrong | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Well no everyone is happy he has been reinstated. https://reaction.life/corbyn-reinstated-disaster-for-keir-starmer-and-the-labour-moderates/" Let me get my violin | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He also did nothing right lol he’s an old has been had his day time for labour to forget about him and move on You keep telling us that you’re Labour. What’s Labour about you exactly? I would say the fact they voted for Brexit makes them true Labour for a start Why do you associate "true Labour" with suggestible and easily swayed? Up until 1997 most Labour MP's would have voted for Brexit. And are you saying that the Labour MP's of 2016 who voted for Brexit were easily swayed? Really? " What are you basing that on exactly? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He’s ate some humble pie over it and back to being a divisive presence. He had his chance and he blew it against Boris of all people. His legacy. " So the party should sack someone because some people have a beef with him? His legacy was to drag labour away from being a tory lite party. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He also did nothing right lol he’s an old has been had his day time for labour to forget about him and move on You keep telling us that you’re Labour. What’s Labour about you exactly? I would say the fact they voted for Brexit makes them true Labour for a start Why do you associate "true Labour" with suggestible and easily swayed? Up until 1997 most Labour MP's would have voted for Brexit. And are you saying that the Labour MP's of 2016 who voted for Brexit were easily swayed? Really? It was your comment bud. I was just asking why you thought so. But why do you want me to speculate about why some Labour MPs voted leave? What would that prove? And I answered you. I just question why you think that all Labour people who voted leave are easily swayed when you are clearly wrong " You didn't answer me, you asked me to speculate on something unrelated. Then said that you had answered the question, which you hadn't answered, and then repeated the unrelated question asking me to speculate on something that I have no interest or concern over. And now it's now. So we're all up to date. Good hustle. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He’s ate some humble pie over it and back to being a divisive presence. He had his chance and he blew it against Boris of all people. His legacy. So the party should sack someone because some people have a beef with him? His legacy was to drag labour away from being a tory lite party. " Once again I find myself having to point out that I didn’t say something Lionel old chap. Where did I say he should be sacked | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He also did nothing right lol he’s an old has been had his day time for labour to forget about him and move on You keep telling us that you’re Labour. What’s Labour about you exactly? I would say the fact they voted for Brexit makes them true Labour for a start Why do you associate "true Labour" with suggestible and easily swayed? Up until 1997 most Labour MP's would have voted for Brexit. And are you saying that the Labour MP's of 2016 who voted for Brexit were easily swayed? Really? What are you basing that on exactly?" your hero jezza has been anti eu all his career and if he had got off the fence and said what he truly believed he may well have won but the silly old sod tried to be someone for everyone which made him look a total twat and thats why he got annihilated in the election. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He’s ate some humble pie over it and back to being a divisive presence. He had his chance and he blew it against Boris of all people. His legacy. So the party should sack someone because some people have a beef with him? His legacy was to drag labour away from being a tory lite party. Once again I find myself having to point out that I didn’t say something Lionel old chap. Where did I say he should be sacked "You did say he was a divisive presence though? Surely a democratic political party should be able to accommodate diversity?(the irony) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He also did nothing right lol he’s an old has been had his day time for labour to forget about him and move on You keep telling us that you’re Labour. What’s Labour about you exactly? I would say the fact they voted for Brexit makes them true Labour for a start Why do you associate "true Labour" with suggestible and easily swayed? Up until 1997 most Labour MP's would have voted for Brexit. And are you saying that the Labour MP's of 2016 who voted for Brexit were easily swayed? Really? What are you basing that on exactly?your hero jezza has been anti eu all his career and if he had got off the fence and said what he truly believed he may well have won but the silly old sod tried to be someone for everyone which made him look a total twat and thats why he got annihilated in the election. " I meant the until 1997 nonsense.. We have had this debate about labour. And what difference what he believed? Do people not have the intelligence to make a decision themselves? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He’s ate some humble pie over it and back to being a divisive presence. He had his chance and he blew it against Boris of all people. His legacy. So the party should sack someone because some people have a beef with him? His legacy was to drag labour away from being a tory lite party. Once again I find myself having to point out that I didn’t say something Lionel old chap. Where did I say he should be sacked
You did say he was a divisive presence though?
Surely a democratic political party should be able to accommodate diversity?(the irony)"Did I say he should be sacked let’s clarify that point first?
He is a divisive presence whether they accommodate him or not. Look at what’s happening across the labour Twittersphere this evening. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He also did nothing right lol he’s an old has been had his day time for labour to forget about him and move on You keep telling us that you’re Labour. What’s Labour about you exactly? I would say the fact they voted for Brexit makes them true Labour for a start Why do you associate "true Labour" with suggestible and easily swayed? Up until 1997 most Labour MP's would have voted for Brexit. And are you saying that the Labour MP's of 2016 who voted for Brexit were easily swayed? Really? What are you basing that on exactly?your hero jezza has been anti eu all his career and if he had got off the fence and said what he truly believed he may well have won but the silly old sod tried to be someone for everyone which made him look a total twat and thats why he got annihilated in the election. I meant the until 1997 nonsense.. We have had this debate about labour. And what difference what he believed? Do people not have the intelligence to make a decision themselves?" The difference is that you want to know what a party is standing for how can you vote for someone who wont tell you? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He’s ate some humble pie over it and back to being a divisive presence. He had his chance and he blew it against Boris of all people. His legacy. So the party should sack someone because some people have a beef with him? His legacy was to drag labour away from being a tory lite party. Once again I find myself having to point out that I didn’t say something Lionel old chap. Where did I say he should be sacked
You did say he was a divisive presence though?
Surely a democratic political party should be able to accommodate diversity?(the irony)
Did I say he should be sacked let’s clarify that point first?
He is a divisive presence whether they accommodate him or not. Look at what’s happening across the labour Twittersphere this evening. "But by pointing out he is divisive you are identifying him as a problem. I'd say the people who have a problem with him are divisive. And starmer has brought that in himself. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He also did nothing right lol he’s an old has been had his day time for labour to forget about him and move on You keep telling us that you’re Labour. What’s Labour about you exactly? I would say the fact they voted for Brexit makes them true Labour for a start Why do you associate "true Labour" with suggestible and easily swayed? Up until 1997 most Labour MP's would have voted for Brexit. And are you saying that the Labour MP's of 2016 who voted for Brexit were easily swayed? Really? What are you basing that on exactly?your hero jezza has been anti eu all his career and if he had got off the fence and said what he truly believed he may well have won but the silly old sod tried to be someone for everyone which made him look a total twat and thats why he got annihilated in the election. I meant the until 1997 nonsense.. We have had this debate about labour. And what difference what he believed? Do people not have the intelligence to make a decision themselves?The difference is that you want to know what a party is standing for how can you vote for someone who wont tell you?" No..the poster was talking about Corbyn. Why does anyone need to know what 1 person thinks on 1 issue before making a decision? It's insane. The party was split over Brexit..so Corbyn saying he was pro leave or remain wouldnt have made a jot of difference. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He’s ate some humble pie over it and back to being a divisive presence. He had his chance and he blew it against Boris of all people. His legacy. So the party should sack someone because some people have a beef with him? His legacy was to drag labour away from being a tory lite party. Once again I find myself having to point out that I didn’t say something Lionel old chap. Where did I say he should be sacked
You did say he was a divisive presence though?
Surely a democratic political party should be able to accommodate diversity?(the irony)
Did I say he should be sacked let’s clarify that point first?
He is a divisive presence whether they accommodate him or not. Look at what’s happening across the labour Twittersphere this evening.
But by pointing out he is divisive you are identifying him as a problem.
I'd say the people who have a problem with him are divisive.
And starmer has brought that in himself. "I’m not identifying him as a problem per se I’m simply looking objectively on what’s happening in front of me. It seems they eating themselves over him. Good to see such cohesion. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He also did nothing right lol he’s an old has been had his day time for labour to forget about him and move on You keep telling us that you’re Labour. What’s Labour about you exactly? I would say the fact they voted for Brexit makes them true Labour for a start Why do you associate "true Labour" with suggestible and easily swayed? Up until 1997 most Labour MP's would have voted for Brexit. And are you saying that the Labour MP's of 2016 who voted for Brexit were easily swayed? Really? What are you basing that on exactly?your hero jezza has been anti eu all his career and if he had got off the fence and said what he truly believed he may well have won but the silly old sod tried to be someone for everyone which made him look a total twat and thats why he got annihilated in the election. I meant the until 1997 nonsense.. We have had this debate about labour. And what difference what he believed? Do people not have the intelligence to make a decision themselves?The difference is that you want to know what a party is standing for how can you vote for someone who wont tell you? No..the poster was talking about Corbyn. Why does anyone need to know what 1 person thinks on 1 issue before making a decision? It's insane. The party was split over Brexit..so Corbyn saying he was pro leave or remain wouldnt have made a jot of difference. " Thats rubbish how many seats did the tories gain in the north? corbyn was pandering to his lovey brigade in london, he had a choice and took the wrong one. He wanted out of the eu and always has but when it come to it keeping his seat in a remain london labour constituency was more important. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He also did nothing right lol he’s an old has been had his day time for labour to forget about him and move on You keep telling us that you’re Labour. What’s Labour about you exactly? I would say the fact they voted for Brexit makes them true Labour for a start Why do you associate "true Labour" with suggestible and easily swayed? Up until 1997 most Labour MP's would have voted for Brexit. And are you saying that the Labour MP's of 2016 who voted for Brexit were easily swayed? Really? What are you basing that on exactly?your hero jezza has been anti eu all his career and if he had got off the fence and said what he truly believed he may well have won but the silly old sod tried to be someone for everyone which made him look a total twat and thats why he got annihilated in the election. I meant the until 1997 nonsense.. We have had this debate about labour. And what difference what he believed? Do people not have the intelligence to make a decision themselves?The difference is that you want to know what a party is standing for how can you vote for someone who wont tell you? No..the poster was talking about Corbyn. Why does anyone need to know what 1 person thinks on 1 issue before making a decision? It's insane. The party was split over Brexit..so Corbyn saying he was pro leave or remain wouldnt have made a jot of difference. Thats rubbish how many seats did the tories gain in the north? corbyn was pandering to his lovey brigade in london, he had a choice and took the wrong one. He wanted out of the eu and always has but when it come to it keeping his seat in a remain london labour constituency was more important." Obviously that's why he advocated a 2nd referendum. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He’s ate some humble pie over it and back to being a divisive presence. He had his chance and he blew it against Boris of all people. His legacy. So the party should sack someone because some people have a beef with him? His legacy was to drag labour away from being a tory lite party. Once again I find myself having to point out that I didn’t say something Lionel old chap. Where did I say he should be sacked
You did say he was a divisive presence though?
Surely a democratic political party should be able to accommodate diversity?(the irony)
Did I say he should be sacked let’s clarify that point first?
He is a divisive presence whether they accommodate him or not. Look at what’s happening across the labour Twittersphere this evening.
But by pointing out he is divisive you are identifying him as a problem.
I'd say the people who have a problem with him are divisive.
And starmer has brought that in himself.
I’m not identifying him as a problem per se I’m simply looking objectively on what’s happening in front of me. It seems they eating themselves over him.
Good to see such cohesion.
"I agree.The party is split. But the issue isnt down to Jeremy corybn. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He also did nothing right lol he’s an old has been had his day time for labour to forget about him and move on You keep telling us that you’re Labour. What’s Labour about you exactly? I would say the fact they voted for Brexit makes them true Labour for a start Why do you associate "true Labour" with suggestible and easily swayed? Up until 1997 most Labour MP's would have voted for Brexit. And are you saying that the Labour MP's of 2016 who voted for Brexit were easily swayed? Really? What are you basing that on exactly?your hero jezza has been anti eu all his career and if he had got off the fence and said what he truly believed he may well have won but the silly old sod tried to be someone for everyone which made him look a total twat and thats why he got annihilated in the election. I meant the until 1997 nonsense.. We have had this debate about labour. And what difference what he believed? Do people not have the intelligence to make a decision themselves?The difference is that you want to know what a party is standing for how can you vote for someone who wont tell you? No..the poster was talking about Corbyn. Why does anyone need to know what 1 person thinks on 1 issue before making a decision? It's insane. The party was split over Brexit..so Corbyn saying he was pro leave or remain wouldnt have made a jot of difference. Thats rubbish how many seats did the tories gain in the north? corbyn was pandering to his lovey brigade in london, he had a choice and took the wrong one. He wanted out of the eu and always has but when it come to it keeping his seat in a remain london labour constituency was more important. Obviously that's why he advocated a 2nd referendum. " yes he did and still would not say what side he would come down on  If you cant see this was the reason for labours humiliation in what was billed as a brexit election you are more blinkered than i thought you was. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He also did nothing right lol he’s an old has been had his day time for labour to forget about him and move on You keep telling us that you’re Labour. What’s Labour about you exactly? I would say the fact they voted for Brexit makes them true Labour for a start Why do you associate "true Labour" with suggestible and easily swayed? Up until 1997 most Labour MP's would have voted for Brexit. And are you saying that the Labour MP's of 2016 who voted for Brexit were easily swayed? Really? What are you basing that on exactly?your hero jezza has been anti eu all his career and if he had got off the fence and said what he truly believed he may well have won but the silly old sod tried to be someone for everyone which made him look a total twat and thats why he got annihilated in the election. I meant the until 1997 nonsense.. We have had this debate about labour. And what difference what he believed? Do people not have the intelligence to make a decision themselves?The difference is that you want to know what a party is standing for how can you vote for someone who wont tell you? No..the poster was talking about Corbyn. Why does anyone need to know what 1 person thinks on 1 issue before making a decision? It's insane. The party was split over Brexit..so Corbyn saying he was pro leave or remain wouldnt have made a jot of difference. " it would of made him Look like he had a pair of balls and not someone who caves under pressure Lionel he looked like a weak leader and even you know that bud | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Labour could put a vase up as their candidate in Islington and it would win" And Tories could put up pondlife like gove and people will vote them in. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He also did nothing right lol he’s an old has been had his day time for labour to forget about him and move on You keep telling us that you’re Labour. What’s Labour about you exactly? I would say the fact they voted for Brexit makes them true Labour for a start Why do you associate "true Labour" with suggestible and easily swayed? Up until 1997 most Labour MP's would have voted for Brexit. And are you saying that the Labour MP's of 2016 who voted for Brexit were easily swayed? Really? What are you basing that on exactly?your hero jezza has been anti eu all his career and if he had got off the fence and said what he truly believed he may well have won but the silly old sod tried to be someone for everyone which made him look a total twat and thats why he got annihilated in the election. I meant the until 1997 nonsense.. We have had this debate about labour. And what difference what he believed? Do people not have the intelligence to make a decision themselves?The difference is that you want to know what a party is standing for how can you vote for someone who wont tell you? No..the poster was talking about Corbyn. Why does anyone need to know what 1 person thinks on 1 issue before making a decision? It's insane. The party was split over Brexit..so Corbyn saying he was pro leave or remain wouldnt have made a jot of difference. Thats rubbish how many seats did the tories gain in the north? corbyn was pandering to his lovey brigade in london, he had a choice and took the wrong one. He wanted out of the eu and always has but when it come to it keeping his seat in a remain london labour constituency was more important. Obviously that's why he advocated a 2nd referendum. yes he did and still would not say what side he would come down on If you cant see this was the reason for labours humiliation in what was billed as a brexit election you are more blinkered than i thought you was."Why does it matter? Boris wrote 2 articles for the spectator..one for..knew against..why wasn't he vilified for this? Tell me a strategy for Brexit where labour would have won? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He also did nothing right lol he’s an old has been had his day time for labour to forget about him and move on You keep telling us that you’re Labour. What’s Labour about you exactly? I would say the fact they voted for Brexit makes them true Labour for a start Why do you associate "true Labour" with suggestible and easily swayed? Up until 1997 most Labour MP's would have voted for Brexit. And are you saying that the Labour MP's of 2016 who voted for Brexit were easily swayed? Really? What are you basing that on exactly?your hero jezza has been anti eu all his career and if he had got off the fence and said what he truly believed he may well have won but the silly old sod tried to be someone for everyone which made him look a total twat and thats why he got annihilated in the election. I meant the until 1997 nonsense.. We have had this debate about labour. And what difference what he believed? Do people not have the intelligence to make a decision themselves?The difference is that you want to know what a party is standing for how can you vote for someone who wont tell you? No..the poster was talking about Corbyn. Why does anyone need to know what 1 person thinks on 1 issue before making a decision? It's insane. The party was split over Brexit..so Corbyn saying he was pro leave or remain wouldnt have made a jot of difference. it would of made him Look like he had a pair of balls and not someone who caves under pressure Lionel he looked like a weak leader and even you know that bud " It wouldn't. If he would have backed leave he would have lost the support of most of the party. It baffles me why people cant understand that? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Has been reinstated Boom. "Starmer honeymoon is over | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He’s ate some humble pie over it and back to being a divisive presence. He had his chance and he blew it against Boris of all people. His legacy. So the party should sack someone because some people have a beef with him? His legacy was to drag labour away from being a tory lite party. Once again I find myself having to point out that I didn’t say something Lionel old chap. Where did I say he should be sacked
You did say he was a divisive presence though?
Surely a democratic political party should be able to accommodate diversity?(the irony)
Did I say he should be sacked let’s clarify that point first?
He is a divisive presence whether they accommodate him or not. Look at what’s happening across the labour Twittersphere this evening.
But by pointing out he is divisive you are identifying him as a problem.
I'd say the people who have a problem with him are divisive.
And starmer has brought that in himself.
I’m not identifying him as a problem per se I’m simply looking objectively on what’s happening in front of me. It seems they eating themselves over him.
Good to see such cohesion.
I agree.The party is split.
But the issue isnt down to Jeremy corybn.
"It was completely down to JC. The party changed dramatically under his leadership. It was a broad church before and I had many an evening having healthy and fair debates at the CLP and other such places. As soon as Corbyn took over that started to change. His supporters telling us to fuck off to the Tories, that we had no place in the Labour Party and as soon as my Jewish heritage was known, well I can tell you the antisemitism was very definitely real. I had been a Labour member since I was 16 but suddenly I was no longer welcome. I may be centrist but I believe in the ethos of the Labour Party. We believe in the same destination, just think there are different ways to get there. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He also did nothing right lol he’s an old has been had his day time for labour to forget about him and move on You keep telling us that you’re Labour. What’s Labour about you exactly? I would say the fact they voted for Brexit makes them true Labour for a start Why do you associate "true Labour" with suggestible and easily swayed? Up until 1997 most Labour MP's would have voted for Brexit. And are you saying that the Labour MP's of 2016 who voted for Brexit were easily swayed? Really? What are you basing that on exactly?" Sorry typo 1987, a time when Labour still supported democracy above all else | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He also did nothing right lol he’s an old has been had his day time for labour to forget about him and move on You keep telling us that you’re Labour. What’s Labour about you exactly? I would say the fact they voted for Brexit makes them true Labour for a start Why do you associate "true Labour" with suggestible and easily swayed? Up until 1997 most Labour MP's would have voted for Brexit. And are you saying that the Labour MP's of 2016 who voted for Brexit were easily swayed? Really? What are you basing that on exactly?your hero jezza has been anti eu all his career and if he had got off the fence and said what he truly believed he may well have won but the silly old sod tried to be someone for everyone which made him look a total twat and thats why he got annihilated in the election. I meant the until 1997 nonsense.. We have had this debate about labour. And what difference what he believed? Do people not have the intelligence to make a decision themselves?The difference is that you want to know what a party is standing for how can you vote for someone who wont tell you? No..the poster was talking about Corbyn. Why does anyone need to know what 1 person thinks on 1 issue before making a decision? It's insane. The party was split over Brexit..so Corbyn saying he was pro leave or remain wouldnt have made a jot of difference. Thats rubbish how many seats did the tories gain in the north? corbyn was pandering to his lovey brigade in london, he had a choice and took the wrong one. He wanted out of the eu and always has but when it come to it keeping his seat in a remain london labour constituency was more important. Obviously that's why he advocated a 2nd referendum. yes he did and still would not say what side he would come down on If you cant see this was the reason for labours humiliation in what was billed as a brexit election you are more blinkered than i thought you was.
Why does it matter?
Boris wrote 2 articles for the spectator..one for..knew against..why wasn't he vilified for this?
Tell me a strategy for Brexit where labour would have won?"With corbyn in charge no strategy would have won. With the current front bench and a firm 2nd referendum strategy it would have been extremely close | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He also did nothing right lol he’s an old has been had his day time for labour to forget about him and move on You keep telling us that you’re Labour. What’s Labour about you exactly? I would say the fact they voted for Brexit makes them true Labour for a start Why do you associate "true Labour" with suggestible and easily swayed? Up until 1997 most Labour MP's would have voted for Brexit. And are you saying that the Labour MP's of 2016 who voted for Brexit were easily swayed? Really? What are you basing that on exactly?your hero jezza has been anti eu all his career and if he had got off the fence and said what he truly believed he may well have won but the silly old sod tried to be someone for everyone which made him look a total twat and thats why he got annihilated in the election. I meant the until 1997 nonsense.. We have had this debate about labour. And what difference what he believed? Do people not have the intelligence to make a decision themselves?The difference is that you want to know what a party is standing for how can you vote for someone who wont tell you? No..the poster was talking about Corbyn. Why does anyone need to know what 1 person thinks on 1 issue before making a decision? It's insane. The party was split over Brexit..so Corbyn saying he was pro leave or remain wouldnt have made a jot of difference. Thats rubbish how many seats did the tories gain in the north? corbyn was pandering to his lovey brigade in london, he had a choice and took the wrong one. He wanted out of the eu and always has but when it come to it keeping his seat in a remain london labour constituency was more important. Obviously that's why he advocated a 2nd referendum. yes he did and still would not say what side he would come down on If you cant see this was the reason for labours humiliation in what was billed as a brexit election you are more blinkered than i thought you was.
Why does it matter?
Boris wrote 2 articles for the spectator..one for..knew against..why wasn't he vilified for this?
Tell me a strategy for Brexit where labour would have won?
With corbyn in charge no strategy would have won. With the current front bench and a firm 2nd referendum strategy it would have been extremely close"Therefore they were in a no win situation | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He also did nothing right lol he’s an old has been had his day time for labour to forget about him and move on You keep telling us that you’re Labour. What’s Labour about you exactly? I would say the fact they voted for Brexit makes them true Labour for a start Why do you associate "true Labour" with suggestible and easily swayed? Up until 1997 most Labour MP's would have voted for Brexit. And are you saying that the Labour MP's of 2016 who voted for Brexit were easily swayed? Really? What are you basing that on exactly? Sorry typo 1987, a time when Labour still supported democracy above all else " Why dont they now? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He’s ate some humble pie over it and back to being a divisive presence. He had his chance and he blew it against Boris of all people. His legacy. So the party should sack someone because some people have a beef with him? His legacy was to drag labour away from being a tory lite party. Once again I find myself having to point out that I didn’t say something Lionel old chap. Where did I say he should be sacked
You did say he was a divisive presence though?
Surely a democratic political party should be able to accommodate diversity?(the irony)
Did I say he should be sacked let’s clarify that point first?
He is a divisive presence whether they accommodate him or not. Look at what’s happening across the labour Twittersphere this evening.
But by pointing out he is divisive you are identifying him as a problem.
I'd say the people who have a problem with him are divisive.
And starmer has brought that in himself.
I’m not identifying him as a problem per se I’m simply looking objectively on what’s happening in front of me. It seems they eating themselves over him.
Good to see such cohesion.
I agree.The party is split.
But the issue isnt down to Jeremy corybn.
It was completely down to JC. The party changed dramatically under his leadership. It was a broad church before and I had many an evening having healthy and fair debates at the CLP and other such places. As soon as Corbyn took over that started to change. His supporters telling us to fuck off to the Tories, that we had no place in the Labour Party and as soon as my Jewish heritage was known, well I can tell you the antisemitism was very definitely real. I had been a Labour member since I was 16 but suddenly I was no longer welcome.
I may be centrist but I believe in the ethos of the Labour Party. We believe in the same destination, just think there are different ways to get there. "Very sad you went through that. To think people thought it wasn’t serious. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He’s ate some humble pie over it and back to being a divisive presence. He had his chance and he blew it against Boris of all people. His legacy. So the party should sack someone because some people have a beef with him? His legacy was to drag labour away from being a tory lite party. Once again I find myself having to point out that I didn’t say something Lionel old chap. Where did I say he should be sacked
You did say he was a divisive presence though?
Surely a democratic political party should be able to accommodate diversity?(the irony)
Did I say he should be sacked let’s clarify that point first?
He is a divisive presence whether they accommodate him or not. Look at what’s happening across the labour Twittersphere this evening.
But by pointing out he is divisive you are identifying him as a problem.
I'd say the people who have a problem with him are divisive.
And starmer has brought that in himself.
I’m not identifying him as a problem per se I’m simply looking objectively on what’s happening in front of me. It seems they eating themselves over him.
Good to see such cohesion.
I agree.The party is split.
But the issue isnt down to Jeremy corybn.
It was completely down to JC. The party changed dramatically under his leadership. It was a broad church before and I had many an evening having healthy and fair debates at the CLP and other such places. As soon as Corbyn took over that started to change. His supporters telling us to fuck off to the Tories, that we had no place in the Labour Party and as soon as my Jewish heritage was known, well I can tell you the antisemitism was very definitely real. I had been a Labour member since I was 16 but suddenly I was no longer welcome.
I may be centrist but I believe in the ethos of the Labour Party. We believe in the same destination, just think there are different ways to get there. "So why were the 2 plots to oust him then? Why has louise elman been proven to lie about him.? You are talking about 2 different issues. The party certainly moved to the left under him but that antagonism worked both ways(ie The plots against him) Anyone guilty of anti semitism should have been booted out the party, but I think its a real murky area. Corbyn is very anti Israel and this is where the problems lie But I'm not condoning what happened to you. Do you honestly believe corbyn is a racist? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"And I'm sorry I disagree about the broad church.. under Blair,brown and Miliband they moved to the centre." And thats the only way labour can win again | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"And I'm sorry I disagree about the broad church.. under Blair,brown and Miliband they moved to the centre. And thats the only way labour can win again" Well they didnt under brown or Miliband. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"And I'm sorry I disagree about the broad church.. under Blair,brown and Miliband they moved to the centre. And thats the only way labour can win again" Kier seems to be steering them inexorably that way slowly but surely. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"And I'm sorry I disagree about the broad church.. under Blair,brown and Miliband they moved to the centre. And thats the only way labour can win again Well they didnt under brown or Miliband. " Brown was never going to win with his handling of the economy and milli and was just a wet blanket, his brother would have won, sadly elections are no longer won on policies but on optics and spin | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"And I'm sorry I disagree about the broad church.. under Blair,brown and Miliband they moved to the centre. And thats the only way labour can win again Well they didnt under brown or Miliband. Brown was never going to win with his handling of the economy and milli and was just a wet blanket, his brother would have won, sadly elections are no longer won on policies but on optics and spin" And people seem to forgot how badly labour did under those 2. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Terrible decision" He didnt have a choice. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Terrible decision He didnt have a choice." Unfortunately | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He also did nothing right lol he’s an old has been had his day time for labour to forget about him and move on You keep telling us that you’re Labour. What’s Labour about you exactly? I would say the fact they voted for Brexit makes them true Labour for a start Why do you associate "true Labour" with suggestible and easily swayed? Up until 1997 most Labour MP's would have voted for Brexit. And are you saying that the Labour MP's of 2016 who voted for Brexit were easily swayed? Really? What are you basing that on exactly? Sorry typo 1987, a time when Labour still supported democracy above all else Why dont they now?" Because they are no longer Labour. Just a bunch of mostly rich or middle class twats and anti semites who don't have a clue  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He also did nothing right lol he’s an old has been had his day time for labour to forget about him and move on You keep telling us that you’re Labour. What’s Labour about you exactly? I would say the fact they voted for Brexit makes them true Labour for a start Why do you associate "true Labour" with suggestible and easily swayed? Up until 1997 most Labour MP's would have voted for Brexit. And are you saying that the Labour MP's of 2016 who voted for Brexit were easily swayed? Really? What are you basing that on exactly? Sorry typo 1987, a time when Labour still supported democracy above all else Why dont they now? Because they are no longer Labour. Just a bunch of mostly rich or middle class twats and anti semites who don't have a clue "Course they are | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Starmer can still withhold the Whip from Corbyn.. suspect he will wait until after PMQs tomorrow to make a decision on this . " .... except the Corbyn allies are arguing that admittance back into the PLP, and the return of the Whip, has by default automatic taken place. If this is the case, he can still block it. Much talk about the Tories and their failings, however it has to be said the opposition don't help themselves in appearing better than what we currently have.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He is nothing more than a horrible odious, terrorist supporting weasel " Glad you are a fan | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He is nothing more than a horrible odious, terrorist supporting weasel Glad you are a fan" I think yr his only fan on fab Lionel this is the U.K. we like to build em up then knock em down lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He is nothing more than a horrible odious, terrorist supporting weasel Glad you are a fan I think yr his only fan on fab Lionel this is the U.K. we like to build em up then knock em down lol " He has plenty of fans | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He is nothing more than a horrible odious, terrorist supporting weasel Glad you are a fan I think yr his only fan on fab Lionel this is the U.K. we like to build em up then knock em down lol He has plenty of fans "lionel mate he’s yesterday’s news sooner labour move in the better it’s no good you defending him all the time he’s an old has been | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He is nothing more than a horrible odious, terrorist supporting weasel Glad you are a fan I think yr his only fan on fab Lionel this is the U.K. we like to build em up then knock em down lol He has plenty of fans "The Labour party only been in power 3 times in last 40 years. And labour suffered its biggest defeat since the 1930’s under steptoe. Say it all really | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He is nothing more than a horrible odious, terrorist supporting weasel Glad you are a fan I think yr his only fan on fab Lionel this is the U.K. we like to build em up then knock em down lol He has plenty of fans "Well that just confirms the amount of anti semitism in the Labour Party then doesn't it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He is nothing more than a horrible odious, terrorist supporting weasel Glad you are a fan I think yr his only fan on fab Lionel this is the U.K. we like to build em up then knock em down lol He has plenty of fans
The Labour party only been in power 3 times in last 40 years. And labour suffered its biggest defeat since the 1930’s under steptoe. Say it all really "Steptoe | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He is nothing more than a horrible odious, terrorist supporting weasel Glad you are a fan I think yr his only fan on fab Lionel this is the U.K. we like to build em up then knock em down lol He has plenty of fans
The Labour party only been in power 3 times in last 40 years. And labour suffered its biggest defeat since the 1930’s under steptoe. Say it all really "You obviously appreciate what the Tories have done in the past up there | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He is nothing more than a horrible odious, terrorist supporting weasel Glad you are a fan I think yr his only fan on fab Lionel this is the U.K. we like to build em up then knock em down lol He has plenty of fans
Well that just confirms the amount of anti semitism in the Labour Party then doesn't it "You really shouldnt be making stuff up | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He is nothing more than a horrible odious, terrorist supporting weasel Glad you are a fan I think yr his only fan on fab Lionel this is the U.K. we like to build em up then knock em down lol He has plenty of fans
Well that just confirms the amount of anti semitism in the Labour Party then doesn't it
You really shouldnt be making stuff up"I'm not. You really shouldn't try to downplay the problem | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He is nothing more than a horrible odious, terrorist supporting weasel Glad you are a fan I think yr his only fan on fab Lionel this is the U.K. we like to build em up then knock em down lol He has plenty of fans
Well that just confirms the amount of anti semitism in the Labour Party then doesn't it
You really shouldnt be making stuff up
I'm not. You really shouldn't try to downplay the problem "And you should really provide some evidence of making outlandish claims. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He is nothing more than a horrible odious, terrorist supporting weasel Glad you are a fan I think yr his only fan on fab Lionel this is the U.K. we like to build em up then knock em down lol He has plenty of fans "the important thing for Starmer to do is to implement the report not just leave it in his in tray so far he is all talk & no action . JC is not the problem | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He is nothing more than a horrible odious, terrorist supporting weasel Glad you are a fan I think yr his only fan on fab Lionel this is the U.K. we like to build em up then knock em down lol He has plenty of fans
Well that just confirms the amount of anti semitism in the Labour Party then doesn't it
You really shouldnt be making stuff up"As SKS said, if you don't think there is a problem with antisemitism in the Labour party then frankly you are part of the problem.! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He is nothing more than a horrible odious, terrorist supporting weasel Glad you are a fan I think yr his only fan on fab Lionel this is the U.K. we like to build em up then knock em down lol He has plenty of fans
Well that just confirms the amount of anti semitism in the Labour Party then doesn't it
You really shouldnt be making stuff up
As SKS said, if you don't think there is a problem with antisemitism in the Labour party then frankly you are part of the problem.!"Wanna provide some actual..you know.. evidence? The report found 2 people had been expelled from the party | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He is nothing more than a horrible odious, terrorist supporting weasel Glad you are a fan I think yr his only fan on fab Lionel this is the U.K. we like to build em up then knock em down lol He has plenty of fans
Well that just confirms the amount of anti semitism in the Labour Party then doesn't it
You really shouldnt be making stuff up
As SKS said, if you don't think there is a problem with antisemitism in the Labour party then frankly you are part of the problem.!"Exactly | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He is nothing more than a horrible odious, terrorist supporting weasel Glad you are a fan I think yr his only fan on fab Lionel this is the U.K. we like to build em up then knock em down lol He has plenty of fans
Well that just confirms the amount of anti semitism in the Labour Party then doesn't it
You really shouldnt be making stuff up
As SKS said, if you don't think there is a problem with antisemitism in the Labour party then frankly you are part of the problem.!
Exactly "Waits for evidence.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He is nothing more than a horrible odious, terrorist supporting weasel Glad you are a fan I think yr his only fan on fab Lionel this is the U.K. we like to build em up then knock em down lol He has plenty of fans
Well that just confirms the amount of anti semitism in the Labour Party then doesn't it
You really shouldnt be making stuff up
As SKS said, if you don't think there is a problem with antisemitism in the Labour party then frankly you are part of the problem.!
Exactly
Waits for evidence....
"You've had it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He is nothing more than a horrible odious, terrorist supporting weasel Glad you are a fan I think yr his only fan on fab Lionel this is the U.K. we like to build em up then knock em down lol He has plenty of fans
Well that just confirms the amount of anti semitism in the Labour Party then doesn't it
You really shouldnt be making stuff up
As SKS said, if you don't think there is a problem with antisemitism in the Labour party then frankly you are part of the problem.!
Exactly
Waits for evidence....
You've had it "Ok..you just point me in the direction of the section of the exhaustive report where it said there was widespread semitism in the labour party. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Like jc ya mean lol" He isnt leader. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He is nothing more than a horrible odious, terrorist supporting weasel Glad you are a fan I think yr his only fan on fab Lionel this is the U.K. we like to build em up then knock em down lol He has plenty of fans
Well that just confirms the amount of anti semitism in the Labour Party then doesn't it
You really shouldnt be making stuff up
As SKS said, if you don't think there is a problem with antisemitism in the Labour party then frankly you are part of the problem.!
Exactly
Waits for evidence....
You've had it
Ok..you just point me in the direction of the section of the exhaustive report where it said there was widespread semitism in the labour party."Section? Pretty much all of it. Anyway, he's had the whip removed because legally he is unfit to be an MP apparently | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He is nothing more than a horrible odious, terrorist supporting weasel Glad you are a fan I think yr his only fan on fab Lionel this is the U.K. we like to build em up then knock em down lol He has plenty of fans
Well that just confirms the amount of anti semitism in the Labour Party then doesn't it
You really shouldnt be making stuff up
As SKS said, if you don't think there is a problem with antisemitism in the Labour party then frankly you are part of the problem.!
Exactly
Waits for evidence....
You've had it
Ok..you just point me in the direction of the section of the exhaustive report where it said there was widespread semitism in the labour party.
Section? Pretty much all of it.
Anyway, he's had the whip removed because legally he is unfit to be an MP apparently "Perhaps you should try reading the actual report. Where did you come up with that nonsense? What has he illegally done.? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He is nothing more than a horrible odious, terrorist supporting weasel Glad you are a fan I think yr his only fan on fab Lionel this is the U.K. we like to build em up then knock em down lol He has plenty of fans
Well that just confirms the amount of anti semitism in the Labour Party then doesn't it
You really shouldnt be making stuff up
As SKS said, if you don't think there is a problem with antisemitism in the Labour party then frankly you are part of the problem.!
Exactly
Waits for evidence....
You've had it
Ok..you just point me in the direction of the section of the exhaustive report where it said there was widespread semitism in the labour party.
Section? Pretty much all of it.
Anyway, he's had the whip removed because legally he is unfit to be an MP apparently
Perhaps you should try reading the actual report.
Where did you come up with that nonsense?
What has he illegally done.?"Just telling you what was said on the news | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He is nothing more than a horrible odious, terrorist supporting weasel Glad you are a fan I think yr his only fan on fab Lionel this is the U.K. we like to build em up then knock em down lol He has plenty of fans
Well that just confirms the amount of anti semitism in the Labour Party then doesn't it
You really shouldnt be making stuff up
As SKS said, if you don't think there is a problem with antisemitism in the Labour party then frankly you are part of the problem.!
Exactly
Waits for evidence....
You've had it
Ok..you just point me in the direction of the section of the exhaustive report where it said there was widespread semitism in the labour party.
Section? Pretty much all of it.
Anyway, he's had the whip removed because legally he is unfit to be an MP apparently
Perhaps you should try reading the actual report.
Where did you come up with that nonsense?
What has he illegally done.?
Just telling you what was said on the news "I'm fairly sure if he had done something illegal he would be out the party. They havent havent been hot enough evidence to suspend him. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He is nothing more than a horrible odious, terrorist supporting weasel Glad you are a fan I think yr his only fan on fab Lionel this is the U.K. we like to build em up then knock em down lol He has plenty of fans
Well that just confirms the amount of anti semitism in the Labour Party then doesn't it
You really shouldnt be making stuff up
As SKS said, if you don't think there is a problem with antisemitism in the Labour party then frankly you are part of the problem.!
Exactly
Waits for evidence....
You've had it
Ok..you just point me in the direction of the section of the exhaustive report where it said there was widespread semitism in the labour party.
Section? Pretty much all of it.
Anyway, he's had the whip removed because legally he is unfit to be an MP apparently
Perhaps you should try reading the actual report.
Where did you come up with that nonsense?
What has he illegally done.?
Just telling you what was said on the news "Did it say in the new he had done something illegal? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He is nothing more than a horrible odious, terrorist supporting weasel Glad you are a fan I think yr his only fan on fab Lionel this is the U.K. we like to build em up then knock em down lol He has plenty of fans
Well that just confirms the amount of anti semitism in the Labour Party then doesn't it
You really shouldnt be making stuff up
As SKS said, if you don't think there is a problem with antisemitism in the Labour party then frankly you are part of the problem.!"What SKS said not me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He is nothing more than a horrible odious, terrorist supporting weasel Glad you are a fan I think yr his only fan on fab Lionel this is the U.K. we like to build em up then knock em down lol He has plenty of fans
Well that just confirms the amount of anti semitism in the Labour Party then doesn't it
You really shouldnt be making stuff up
As SKS said, if you don't think there is a problem with antisemitism in the Labour party then frankly you are part of the problem.!
What SKS said not me."So no evidence whatsoever then? Glad that's cleared up | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He is nothing more than a horrible odious, terrorist supporting weasel Glad you are a fan I think yr his only fan on fab Lionel this is the U.K. we like to build em up then knock em down lol He has plenty of fans
Well that just confirms the amount of anti semitism in the Labour Party then doesn't it
You really shouldnt be making stuff up
As SKS said, if you don't think there is a problem with antisemitism in the Labour party then frankly you are part of the problem.!
Exactly
Waits for evidence....
You've had it
Ok..you just point me in the direction of the section of the exhaustive report where it said there was widespread semitism in the labour party.
Section? Pretty much all of it.
Anyway, he's had the whip removed because legally he is unfit to be an MP apparently
Perhaps you should try reading the actual report.
Where did you come up with that nonsense?
What has he illegally done.?
Just telling you what was said on the news
Did it say in the new he had done something illegal?"Is breaching The Equality Act legal? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He is nothing more than a horrible odious, terrorist supporting weasel Glad you are a fan I think yr his only fan on fab Lionel this is the U.K. we like to build em up then knock em down lol He has plenty of fans
Well that just confirms the amount of anti semitism in the Labour Party then doesn't it
You really shouldnt be making stuff up
As SKS said, if you don't think there is a problem with antisemitism in the Labour party then frankly you are part of the problem.!
Exactly
Waits for evidence....
You've had it
Ok..you just point me in the direction of the section of the exhaustive report where it said there was widespread semitism in the labour party.
Section? Pretty much all of it.
Anyway, he's had the whip removed because legally he is unfit to be an MP apparently
Perhaps you should try reading the actual report.
Where did you come up with that nonsense?
What has he illegally done.?
Just telling you what was said on the news
Did it say in the new he had done something illegal?
Is breaching The Equality Act legal? "If he has done something illegal why has been reinstate d? The report found that the equality act had been breached in the past but improvements had been made No where does it say corbyn acted illegally. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He is nothing more than a horrible odious, terrorist supporting weasel Glad you are a fan I think yr his only fan on fab Lionel this is the U.K. we like to build em up then knock em down lol He has plenty of fans
Well that just confirms the amount of anti semitism in the Labour Party then doesn't it
You really shouldnt be making stuff up
As SKS said, if you don't think there is a problem with antisemitism in the Labour party then frankly you are part of the problem.!
What SKS said not me.
So no evidence whatsoever then?
Glad that's cleared up"Head in the sand Lionel. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He is nothing more than a horrible odious, terrorist supporting weasel Glad you are a fan I think yr his only fan on fab Lionel this is the U.K. we like to build em up then knock em down lol He has plenty of fans
Well that just confirms the amount of anti semitism in the Labour Party then doesn't it
You really shouldnt be making stuff up
As SKS said, if you don't think there is a problem with antisemitism in the Labour party then frankly you are part of the problem.!
What SKS said not me.
So no evidence whatsoever then?
Glad that's cleared up
Head in the sand Lionel. "I've asked twice for evidence None has been forthcoming | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He is nothing more than a horrible odious, terrorist supporting weasel Glad you are a fan I think yr his only fan on fab Lionel this is the U.K. we like to build em up then knock em down lol He has plenty of fans
Well that just confirms the amount of anti semitism in the Labour Party then doesn't it
You really shouldnt be making stuff up
As SKS said, if you don't think there is a problem with antisemitism in the Labour party then frankly you are part of the problem.!
What SKS said not me.
So no evidence whatsoever then?
Glad that's cleared up
Head in the sand Lionel.
I've asked twice for evidence
None has been forthcoming "Yep your head seems buried very deep in the sand. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He is nothing more than a horrible odious, terrorist supporting weasel Glad you are a fan I think yr his only fan on fab Lionel this is the U.K. we like to build em up then knock em down lol He has plenty of fans
Well that just confirms the amount of anti semitism in the Labour Party then doesn't it
You really shouldnt be making stuff up
As SKS said, if you don't think there is a problem with antisemitism in the Labour party then frankly you are part of the problem.!
Exactly
Waits for evidence....
You've had it
Ok..you just point me in the direction of the section of the exhaustive report where it said there was widespread semitism in the labour party.
Section? Pretty much all of it.
Anyway, he's had the whip removed because legally he is unfit to be an MP apparently
Perhaps you should try reading the actual report.
Where did you come up with that nonsense?
What has he illegally done.?
Just telling you what was said on the news
Did it say in the new he had done something illegal?
Is breaching The Equality Act legal?
If he has done something illegal why has been reinstate d?
The report found that the equality act had been breached in the past but improvements had been made
No where does it say corbyn acted illegally."Reinstated to what? I used to be a criminal but I'm alright now guv, honest | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Very polarising figure this Jezza chap. Makes you wonder what good he will now do sticking around? " exactly if he is truly labour he would walk away let them move on | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He is nothing more than a horrible odious, terrorist supporting weasel Glad you are a fan I think yr his only fan on fab Lionel this is the U.K. we like to build em up then knock em down lol He has plenty of fans
Well that just confirms the amount of anti semitism in the Labour Party then doesn't it
You really shouldnt be making stuff up
As SKS said, if you don't think there is a problem with antisemitism in the Labour party then frankly you are part of the problem.!
Exactly
Waits for evidence....
You've had it
Ok..you just point me in the direction of the section of the exhaustive report where it said there was widespread semitism in the labour party.
Section? Pretty much all of it.
Anyway, he's had the whip removed because legally he is unfit to be an MP apparently
Perhaps you should try reading the actual report.
Where did you come up with that nonsense?
What has he illegally done.?
Just telling you what was said on the news
Did it say in the new he had done something illegal?
Is breaching The Equality Act legal?
If he has done something illegal why has been reinstate d?
The report found that the equality act had been breached in the past but improvements had been made
No where does it say corbyn acted illegally.
Reinstated to what?
I used to be a criminal but I'm alright now guv, honest "To the party. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Very polarising figure this Jezza chap. Makes you wonder what good he will now do sticking around? exactly if he is truly labour he would walk away let them move on " Quite the opposite | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Very polarising figure this Jezza chap. Makes you wonder what good he will now do sticking around? exactly if he is truly labour he would walk away let them move on Quite the opposite " why ? What good is he doing labour now Lionel ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He is nothing more than a horrible odious, terrorist supporting weasel Glad you are a fan I think yr his only fan on fab Lionel this is the U.K. we like to build em up then knock em down lol He has plenty of fans
Well that just confirms the amount of anti semitism in the Labour Party then doesn't it
You really shouldnt be making stuff up
As SKS said, if you don't think there is a problem with antisemitism in the Labour party then frankly you are part of the problem.!
Exactly
Waits for evidence....
You've had it
Ok..you just point me in the direction of the section of the exhaustive report where it said there was widespread semitism in the labour party.
Section? Pretty much all of it.
Anyway, he's had the whip removed because legally he is unfit to be an MP apparently
Perhaps you should try reading the actual report.
Where did you come up with that nonsense?
What has he illegally done.?
Just telling you what was said on the news
Did it say in the new he had done something illegal?
Is breaching The Equality Act legal?
If he has done something illegal why has been reinstate d?
The report found that the equality act had been breached in the past but improvements had been made
No where does it say corbyn acted illegally.
Reinstated to what?
I used to be a criminal but I'm alright now guv, honest
To the party.
"Big deal. All that tells us is that the hands of the NEC were legally tied or that they are as thick/racist or both as Corbyn | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Very polarising figure this Jezza chap. Makes you wonder what good he will now do sticking around? exactly if he is truly labour he would walk away let them move on Quite the opposite why ? What good is he doing labour now Lionel ?" He has been a labour man all his life He has many supporters Why should he walk away? And even If he does are tgey all going to be 1 happy family? The notion that this is all down to 1 man is ridiculous. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"He is nothing more than a horrible odious, terrorist supporting weasel Glad you are a fan I think yr his only fan on fab Lionel this is the U.K. we like to build em up then knock em down lol He has plenty of fans
Well that just confirms the amount of anti semitism in the Labour Party then doesn't it
You really shouldnt be making stuff up
As SKS said, if you don't think there is a problem with antisemitism in the Labour party then frankly you are part of the problem.!
Exactly
Waits for evidence....
You've had it
Ok..you just point me in the direction of the section of the exhaustive report where it said there was widespread semitism in the labour party.
Section? Pretty much all of it.
Anyway, he's had the whip removed because legally he is unfit to be an MP apparently
Perhaps you should try reading the actual report.
Where did you come up with that nonsense?
What has he illegally done.?
Just telling you what was said on the news
Did it say in the new he had done something illegal?
Is breaching The Equality Act legal?
If he has done something illegal why has been reinstate d?
The report found that the equality act had been breached in the past but improvements had been made
No where does it say corbyn acted illegally.
Reinstated to what?
I used to be a criminal but I'm alright now guv, honest
To the party.
Big deal.
All that tells us is that the hands of the NEC were legally tied or that they are as thick/racist or both as Corbyn "Ha ha So the nec are racist now? It's a stupid question but presumably you have no evidence of this aswell? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Very polarising figure this Jezza chap. Makes you wonder what good he will now do sticking around? exactly if he is truly labour he would walk away let them move on Quite the opposite why ? What good is he doing labour now Lionel ? He has been a labour man all his life He has many supporters Why should he walk away? And even If he does are tgey all going to be 1 happy family? The notion that this is all down to 1 man is ridiculous. " What’s it’s all down to Lionel? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Very polarising figure this Jezza chap. Makes you wonder what good he will now do sticking around? exactly if he is truly labour he would walk away let them move on Quite the opposite why ? What good is he doing labour now Lionel ? He has been a labour man all his life He has many supporters Why should he walk away? And even If he does are tgey all going to be 1 happy family? The notion that this is all down to 1 man is ridiculous. What’s it’s all down to Lionel? " The split between left and right. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If he wants what’s best for labour he would walk away give them a chance for a change his supporters won’t leave labour just because an old man puts his feet up he’s older than water ffs there’s this thing called retirement " He honestly think if Corbyn walks away..everything will be peachy? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If he wants what’s best for labour he would walk away give them a chance for a change his supporters won’t leave labour just because an old man puts his feet up he’s older than water ffs there’s this thing called retirement He honestly think if Corbyn walks away..everything will be peachy?" No but probably better. Let's face it, things got worse when he walked in | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If he wants what’s best for labour he would walk away give them a chance for a change his supporters won’t leave labour just because an old man puts his feet up he’s older than water ffs there’s this thing called retirement He honestly think if Corbyn walks away..everything will be peachy? No but probably better. Let's face it, things got worse when he walked in" In 2017 Corbyn polled better than the last 3 elections so factually incorrect | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If he wants what’s best for labour he would walk away give them a chance for a change his supporters won’t leave labour just because an old man puts his feet up he’s older than water ffs there’s this thing called retirement He honestly think if Corbyn walks away..everything will be peachy? No but probably better. Let's face it, things got worse when he walked in In 2017 Corbyn polled better than the last 3 elections so factually incorrect " And by 2020 up in front of the ECHR and 80 seats down. Brilliant | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If he wants what’s best for labour he would walk away give them a chance for a change his supporters won’t leave labour just because an old man puts his feet up he’s older than water ffs there’s this thing called retirement He honestly think if Corbyn walks away..everything will be peachy?" it can’t be worse Lionel I know yr Stan his biggest fan but surely you know that mate just let go of him | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Lionel do you think you spend to much time on here, talking about your leftie crap? That obviously the majority of the UK don’t want. Ever thought of getting a real job ?" If I gave a flying fuck what you thought,I'd actually be offended | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If he wants what’s best for labour he would walk away give them a chance for a change his supporters won’t leave labour just because an old man puts his feet up he’s older than water ffs there’s this thing called retirement He honestly think if Corbyn walks away..everything will be peachy? No but probably better. Let's face it, things got worse when he walked in In 2017 Corbyn polled better than the last 3 elections so factually incorrect And by 2020 up in front of the ECHR and 80 seats down. Brilliant "So you were wrong again? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Lionel do you think you spend to much time on here, talking about your leftie crap? That obviously the majority of the UK don’t want. Ever thought of getting a real job ?" Its a forum where anyone of any political bent is allowed to express their opinions unless they are defamatory or illegal! If you don't think thats fair perhaps you should raise it with the moderators. I for one would far rather have a broad church in this forum than a bunch of back slapping fellow travellers telling the world that they and only they have the right to be on fab. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Lionel do you think you spend to much time on here, talking about your leftie crap? That obviously the majority of the UK don’t want. Ever thought of getting a real job ? If I gave a flying fuck what you thought,I'd actually be offended " The only thing Lionel can be accused of having is the same unwavering loyalty to JC that he continually suggests those from the right of the forum have for BJ (and I don’t mean blow job ).
Nothing wrong with the principal of “stick to your guns”
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Lionel do you think you spend to much time on here, talking about your leftie crap? That obviously the majority of the UK don’t want. Ever thought of getting a real job ? If I gave a flying fuck what you thought,I'd actually be offended The only thing Lionel can be accused of having is the same unwavering loyalty to JC that he continually suggests those from the right of the forum have for BJ (and I don’t mean blow job ).
Nothing wrong with the principal of “stick to your guns”
"Jezza has plenty of faults but when he is called a pacifist racist terrorist sympathiser (quite how someone becomes that is anyones guess)people should really back up their claims with actual facts. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If he wants what’s best for labour he would walk away give them a chance for a change his supporters won’t leave labour just because an old man puts his feet up he’s older than water ffs there’s this thing called retirement He honestly think if Corbyn walks away..everything will be peachy? No but probably better. Let's face it, things got worse when he walked in " Which "things"? If we take the antisemitism as an example, the report actually states the handling of the issue got better under his leadership. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If he wants what’s best for labour he would walk away give them a chance for a change his supporters won’t leave labour just because an old man puts his feet up he’s older than water ffs there’s this thing called retirement He honestly think if Corbyn walks away..everything will be peachy? No but probably better. Let's face it, things got worse when he walked in Which "things"? If we take the antisemitism as an example, the report actually states the handling of the issue got better under his leadership. " It's always quite amusing to read people views who havent been near the report. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If he wants what’s best for labour he would walk away give them a chance for a change his supporters won’t leave labour just because an old man puts his feet up he’s older than water ffs there’s this thing called retirement He honestly think if Corbyn walks away..everything will be peachy? No but probably better. Let's face it, things got worse when he walked in Which "things"? If we take the antisemitism as an example, the report actually states the handling of the issue got better under his leadership. " Whoa Nick.. You can't mention what's in the actual report, your in danger of entering factual substance into the debate and the mail readers will struggle with that.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"And the racism is swept under the carpet again. Brilliant " There is a huge lump though under the carpet clear for all to see it says it all racism is still live and spreading within the party. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"And the racism is swept under the carpet again. Brilliant There is a huge lump though under the carpet clear for all to see it says it all racism is still live and spreading within the party. " People should start apologising for making up nonsense | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"And the racism is swept under the carpet again. Brilliant There is a huge lump though under the carpet clear for all to see it says it all racism is still live and spreading within the party. People should start apologising for making up nonsense " Facts are there Corbyn had racist tendencies the only people who can't see that or don't want to are fellow racists. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If he wants what’s best for labour he would walk away give them a chance for a change his supporters won’t leave labour just because an old man puts his feet up he’s older than water ffs there’s this thing called retirement He honestly think if Corbyn walks away..everything will be peachy? No but probably better. Let's face it, things got worse when he walked in Which "things"? If we take the antisemitism as an example, the report actually states the handling of the issue got better under his leadership. " But anti semitism got worse under his leadership because his anti semite followers were emboldened and thought they could get away with more because he is one of them. When you say 'handled', what does that mean exactly? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"And the racism is swept under the carpet again. Brilliant There is a huge lump though under the carpet clear for all to see it says it all racism is still live and spreading within the party. People should start apologising for making up nonsense Facts are there Corbyn had racist tendencies the only people who can't see that or don't want to are fellow racists. " The facts are Boris has said many racist and homophobic things , the only people who cant see that or don’t want to are fellow racists and homophobes | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If he wants what’s best for labour he would walk away give them a chance for a change his supporters won’t leave labour just because an old man puts his feet up he’s older than water ffs there’s this thing called retirement He honestly think if Corbyn walks away..everything will be peachy? No but probably better. Let's face it, things got worse when he walked in Which "things"? If we take the antisemitism as an example, the report actually states the handling of the issue got better under his leadership. But anti semitism got worse under his leadership because his anti semite followers were emboldened and thought they could get away with more because he is one of them. When you say 'handled', what does that mean exactly? " Bob on that alas is the sad truth. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If he wants what’s best for labour he would walk away give them a chance for a change his supporters won’t leave labour just because an old man puts his feet up he’s older than water ffs there’s this thing called retirement He honestly think if Corbyn walks away..everything will be peachy? No but probably better. Let's face it, things got worse when he walked in Which "things"? If we take the antisemitism as an example, the report actually states the handling of the issue got better under his leadership. Whoa Nick.. You can't mention what's in the actual report, your in danger of entering factual substance into the debate and the mail readers will struggle with that.. " Funny how people who lean to the left always seem to know what's in the Mail. I read it once and promptly put it in the bin | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"And the racism is swept under the carpet again. Brilliant There is a huge lump though under the carpet clear for all to see it says it all racism is still live and spreading within the party. People should start apologising for making up nonsense Facts are there Corbyn had racist tendencies the only people who can't see that or don't want to are fellow racists. " Provide a link for these 'facts please | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"And the racism is swept under the carpet again. Brilliant There is a huge lump though under the carpet clear for all to see it says it all racism is still live and spreading within the party. People should start apologising for making up nonsense Facts are there Corbyn had racist tendencies the only people who can't see that or don't want to are fellow racists. The facts are Boris has said many racist and homophobic things , the only people who cant see that or don’t want to are fellow racists and homophobes " The thread is not about Boris stick to the subject! I think those are your normal words. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"And the racism is swept under the carpet again. Brilliant There is a huge lump though under the carpet clear for all to see it says it all racism is still live and spreading within the party. People should start apologising for making up nonsense Facts are there Corbyn had racist tendencies the only people who can't see that or don't want to are fellow racists. The facts are Boris has said many racist and homophobic things , the only people who cant see that or don’t want to are fellow racists and homophobes " Why, who can't see that? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"And the racism is swept under the carpet again. Brilliant There is a huge lump though under the carpet clear for all to see it says it all racism is still live and spreading within the party. People should start apologising for making up nonsense Facts are there Corbyn had racist tendencies the only people who can't see that or don't want to are fellow racists. Provide a link for these 'facts please" Facts are there Corbyn had racist tendencies THE ONLY PEOPLE who can't see that or don't want to are fellow racists. "  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If he wants what’s best for labour he would walk away give them a chance for a change his supporters won’t leave labour just because an old man puts his feet up he’s older than water ffs there’s this thing called retirement He honestly think if Corbyn walks away..everything will be peachy? No but probably better. Let's face it, things got worse when he walked in Which "things"? If we take the antisemitism as an example, the report actually states the handling of the issue got better under his leadership. But anti semitism got worse under his leadership because his anti semite followers were emboldened and thought they could get away with more because he is one of them. When you say 'handled', what does that mean exactly? " Why are you commenting on something you clearly no nothing about. When the report began its investigation corbyn played no part in the running of the procedure. There were issues there certainly, but things were improving 2 people where found guilty.That is hardly 'widespread ' | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"And the racism is swept under the carpet again. Brilliant There is a huge lump though under the carpet clear for all to see it says it all racism is still live and spreading within the party. People should start apologising for making up nonsense Facts are there Corbyn had racist tendencies the only people who can't see that or don't want to are fellow racists. Provide a link for these 'facts please Facts are there Corbyn had racist tendencies THE ONLY PEOPLE who can't see that or don't want to are fellow racists. " "Ha ha ha I'm.sorry sunshine..you saying something doesn't make it a fact, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If he wants what’s best for labour he would walk away give them a chance for a change his supporters won’t leave labour just because an old man puts his feet up he’s older than water ffs there’s this thing called retirement He honestly think if Corbyn walks away..everything will be peachy? No but probably better. Let's face it, things got worse when he walked in Which "things"? If we take the antisemitism as an example, the report actually states the handling of the issue got better under his leadership. But anti semitism got worse under his leadership because his anti semite followers were emboldened and thought they could get away with more because he is one of them. When you say 'handled', what does that mean exactly? Why are you commenting on something you clearly no nothing about. When the report began its investigation corbyn played no part in the running of the procedure. There were issues there certainly, but things were improving 2 people where found guilty.That is hardly 'widespread '" Huge compensation payments made says it all some people are so blind they just cant see. But like defends like I guess. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"And the racism is swept under the carpet again. Brilliant There is a huge lump though under the carpet clear for all to see it says it all racism is still live and spreading within the party. People should start apologising for making up nonsense Facts are there Corbyn had racist tendencies the only people who can't see that or don't want to are fellow racists. Provide a link for these 'facts please Facts are there Corbyn had racist tendencies THE ONLY PEOPLE who can't see that or don't want to are fellow racists. "
Ha ha ha
I'm.sorry sunshine..you saying something doesn't make it a fact, "You haven't a clue what a fact is thats sad it really is. The current leader wanted him out as he saw first hand what was going on. you carry on defending a racist. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"And the racism is swept under the carpet again. Brilliant There is a huge lump though under the carpet clear for all to see it says it all racism is still live and spreading within the party. People should start apologising for making up nonsense Facts are there Corbyn had racist tendencies the only people who can't see that or don't want to are fellow racists. The facts are Boris has said many racist and homophobic things , the only people who cant see that or don’t want to are fellow racists and homophobes The thread is not about Boris stick to the subject! I think those are your normal words. "Boris was mentioned earlier, let’s say Corbyn is anti Semitic and let’s say Boris is a racist and a homophobe, who did you vote ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"And the racism is swept under the carpet again. Brilliant There is a huge lump though under the carpet clear for all to see it says it all racism is still live and spreading within the party. People should start apologising for making up nonsense Facts are there Corbyn had racist tendencies the only people who can't see that or don't want to are fellow racists. Provide a link for these 'facts please Facts are there Corbyn had racist tendencies THE ONLY PEOPLE who can't see that or don't want to are fellow racists. "
Ha ha ha
I'm.sorry sunshine..you saying something doesn't make it a fact,
You haven't a clue what a fact is thats sad it really is. The current leader wanted him out as he saw first hand what was going on. you carry on defending a racist. "Did you vote for Boris? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This is like the Monty Python dead parrot sketch "It is now  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"And the racism is swept under the carpet again. Brilliant There is a huge lump though under the carpet clear for all to see it says it all racism is still live and spreading within the party. People should start apologising for making up nonsense Facts are there Corbyn had racist tendencies the only people who can't see that or don't want to are fellow racists. The facts are Boris has said many racist and homophobic things , the only people who cant see that or don’t want to are fellow racists and homophobes The thread is not about Boris stick to the subject! I think those are your normal words.
Boris was mentioned earlier, let’s say Corbyn is anti Semitic and let’s say Boris is a racist and a homophobe, who did you vote ? "The thread is not about Boris stick to the subject! I think those are your normal words. Have you more than two faces?  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"And the racism is swept under the carpet again. Brilliant There is a huge lump though under the carpet clear for all to see it says it all racism is still live and spreading within the party. People should start apologising for making up nonsense Facts are there Corbyn had racist tendencies the only people who can't see that or don't want to are fellow racists. The facts are Boris has said many racist and homophobic things , the only people who cant see that or don’t want to are fellow racists and homophobes The thread is not about Boris stick to the subject! I think those are your normal words.
Boris was mentioned earlier, let’s say Corbyn is anti Semitic and let’s say Boris is a racist and a homophobe, who did you vote ?
The thread is not about Boris stick to the subject! I think those are your normal words.
Have you more than two faces? "Ok, let’s get back on Topic, Corbyn is anti Semitic, but that doesn’t really matter to you ? Does it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"And the racism is swept under the carpet again. Brilliant There is a huge lump though under the carpet clear for all to see it says it all racism is still live and spreading within the party. People should start apologising for making up nonsense Facts are there Corbyn had racist tendencies the only people who can't see that or don't want to are fellow racists. Provide a link for these 'facts please Facts are there Corbyn had racist tendencies THE ONLY PEOPLE who can't see that or don't want to are fellow racists. "
Ha ha ha
I'm.sorry sunshine..you saying something doesn't make it a fact,
You haven't a clue what a fact is thats sad it really is. The current leader wanted him out as he saw first hand what was going on. you carry on defending a racist. "Has he gone? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"And the racism is swept under the carpet again. Brilliant There is a huge lump though under the carpet clear for all to see it says it all racism is still live and spreading within the party. People should start apologising for making up nonsense Facts are there Corbyn had racist tendencies the only people who can't see that or don't want to are fellow racists. The facts are Boris has said many racist and homophobic things , the only people who cant see that or don’t want to are fellow racists and homophobes The thread is not about Boris stick to the subject! I think those are your normal words.
Boris was mentioned earlier, let’s say Corbyn is anti Semitic and let’s say Boris is a racist and a homophobe, who did you vote ?
The thread is not about Boris stick to the subject! I think those are your normal words.
Have you more than two faces? "People will always deflect when they don't like a subject its a "cant think of anything better" thing from a small mind. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"And the racism is swept under the carpet again. Brilliant There is a huge lump though under the carpet clear for all to see it says it all racism is still live and spreading within the party. People should start apologising for making up nonsense Facts are there Corbyn had racist tendencies the only people who can't see that or don't want to are fellow racists. The facts are Boris has said many racist and homophobic things , the only people who cant see that or don’t want to are fellow racists and homophobes The thread is not about Boris stick to the subject! I think those are your normal words.
Boris was mentioned earlier, let’s say Corbyn is anti Semitic and let’s say Boris is a racist and a homophobe, who did you vote ?
The thread is not about Boris stick to the subject! I think those are your normal words.
Have you more than two faces?
People will always deflect when they don't like a subject its a "cant think of anything better" thing from a small mind. "Hello Ponte, I know a few people you have met | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"And the racism is swept under the carpet again. Brilliant There is a huge lump though under the carpet clear for all to see it says it all racism is still live and spreading within the party. People should start apologising for making up nonsense Facts are there Corbyn had racist tendencies the only people who can't see that or don't want to are fellow racists. The facts are Boris has said many racist and homophobic things , the only people who cant see that or don’t want to are fellow racists and homophobes The thread is not about Boris stick to the subject! I think those are your normal words.
Boris was mentioned earlier, let’s say Corbyn is anti Semitic and let’s say Boris is a racist and a homophobe, who did you vote ?
The thread is not about Boris stick to the subject! I think those are your normal words.
Have you more than two faces?
People will always deflect when they don't like a subject its a "cant think of anything better" thing from a small mind.
Hello Ponte, I know a few people you have met "That’s a bit creepy | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"And the racism is swept under the carpet again. Brilliant There is a huge lump though under the carpet clear for all to see it says it all racism is still live and spreading within the party. People should start apologising for making up nonsense Facts are there Corbyn had racist tendencies the only people who can't see that or don't want to are fellow racists. The facts are Boris has said many racist and homophobic things , the only people who cant see that or don’t want to are fellow racists and homophobes The thread is not about Boris stick to the subject! I think those are your normal words.
Boris was mentioned earlier, let’s say Corbyn is anti Semitic and let’s say Boris is a racist and a homophobe, who did you vote ?
The thread is not about Boris stick to the subject! I think those are your normal words.
Have you more than two faces?
People will always deflect when they don't like a subject its a "cant think of anything better" thing from a small mind.
Hello Ponte, I know a few people you have met "Sure you do no wait people I know have class and like the same so no you wouldn't! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"All this knicker twisting over a footnote of failure. This is almost as funny when he won the leadership battle. The amount of salt over that one on here was probably how the politics forum came about. People would have had you believe the shellsuited on was going to sweep all before him. The panic that ensued was glorious. " The shellsuited on? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"All this knicker twisting over a footnote of failure. This is almost as funny when he won the leadership battle. The amount of salt over that one on here was probably how the politics forum came about. People would have had you believe the shellsuited on was going to sweep all before him. The panic that ensued was glorious. " I wasnt on then. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"All this knicker twisting over a footnote of failure. This is almost as funny when he won the leadership battle. The amount of salt over that one on here was probably how the politics forum came about. People would have had you believe the shellsuited on was going to sweep all before him. The panic that ensued was glorious. I wasnt on then." Halcyon days the Corbyn panic. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"All this knicker twisting over a footnote of failure. This is almost as funny when he won the leadership battle. The amount of salt over that one on here was probably how the politics forum came about. People would have had you believe the shellsuited on was going to sweep all before him. The panic that ensued was glorious. The shellsuited on? " Typo shell suited one. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"All this knicker twisting over a footnote of failure. This is almost as funny when he won the leadership battle. The amount of salt over that one on here was probably how the politics forum came about. People would have had you believe the shellsuited on was going to sweep all before him. The panic that ensued was glorious. The shellsuited on? Typo shell suited one. " Who wore a shell suit? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"All this knicker twisting over a footnote of failure. This is almost as funny when he won the leadership battle. The amount of salt over that one on here was probably how the politics forum came about. People would have had you believe the shellsuited on was going to sweep all before him. The panic that ensued was glorious. I wasnt on then. Halcyon days the Corbyn panic. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Should he apologise to the Jewish community especially those in the Labour party for their treatment on his watch?" Nope because the 2 people found guilty were expelled. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Should he apologise to the Jewish community especially those in the Labour party for their treatment on his watch? Nope because the 2 people found guilty were expelled." Sad to hear but not unexpected | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
